PC 01-06-16 Meeting Agenda AGENDA
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Board Room
Frederick County Administration Building
Winchester, Virginia
January 6, 2016
7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) Adoption of Agenda: Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission
should adopt the Agenda for the meeting ................................................................ (no tab)
2) Election of Officers, Meeting Schedule, Adoption of Bylaws and Roles &
Responsibilities 2016 ....................................................................................................... (A)
3) Committee Reports .................................................................................................. (no tab)
4) Citizen Comments .................................................................................................... (no tab)
PUBLIC HEARING
5) Rezoning #12-15 CROSSPOINTE CENTER submitted by Pennoni Associates, to
rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General
Business) District and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP
(Residential Performance) District within the Crosspointe Center development, Rezoning
#13-03, and to amend the proffers associated with Rezoning #13-03. The properties are
located east and adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and adjacent to Tasker Road and
Hillandale Lane. The properties are identified with Property Identification Numbers 75-
A-89, 75-A-89A, 75-A-91, 75-A-92, 75-A-95, 75-A-96 and a portion of 75-A-90 and 75-
A-94 in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
Mr. Ruddy ....................................................................................................................... (B)
INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
6) 2016 – 2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP is a prioritized list of capital
projects requested by various County Departments and Agencies. The Plan is created as
an informational component of the 2030 comprehensive Plan
Mr. Ruddy ......................................................................................................................... (C)
7) Other
Adjourn
Commonly Used Planning Agenda Terms
Meeting format
Citizen Comments – The portion of the meeting agenda offering an opportunity for the public to provide
comment to the Planning Commission on any items not scheduled as public hearing items.
Public Hearing– A specific type of agenda item, required by State law, which incorporates public comment as
a part of that item prior to Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors action. Public hearings are held for
items such as: Comprehensive Plan policies and amendments; Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance amendments;
and Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit applications. Following the Public Hearing, the Planning
Commission will take action on the item (see below).
Action Item–There are both public hearing and non-public hearing items on which the Planning Commission
takes action. Depending on the actual item, the Planning Commission may approve, deny, table, or forward a
recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding the agenda item. No public comment is accepted during
the Action Item portion of the agenda.
Information/Discussion Item– The portion of the meeting agenda where items are presented to the Planning
Commission for information and discussion. The Planning Commission may offer comments and suggestions,
but does not take action on the agenda item. No public comment is accepted during the Information/Discussion
Item portion of the agenda.
Planning Terminology
Urban Development Area or UDA – The UDA is the county’s urban growth boundary identified in the
Comprehensive Plan in which more intensive forms of residential development will occur. The UDA is an area
of the county where community facilities and public services are more readily available and are provided more
economically.
Sewer and Water Service Area or SWSA – The SWSA is the boundary identified in the Comprehensive Plan
in which public water and sewer is or can be provided. The SWSA is consistent with the UDA in many
locations; however the SWSA may extend beyond the UDA to promote commercial, industrial, and institutional
land uses in area where residential land uses are not desirable.
Land Use – Land Use is the nomenclature which refers to the type of activity which may occur on an area of
land. Common land use categories include: agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial.
Zoning District - Zoning district refers to a specific geographic area that is subject to land use standards.
Frederick County designates these areas, and establishes policies and ordinances over types of land uses,
density, and lot requirements in each zone. Zoning is the main planning tool of local government to manage the
future development of a community, protect neighborhoods, concentrate retail business and industry, and
channel traffic.
Rezoning – Rezoning is the process by which a property owner seeks to implement or modify the permitted
land use activities on their land. A rezoning changes the permitted land use activities within the categories
listed above under Land Use.
Conditional Use Permit or CUP - A CUP allows special land uses which may be desirable, but are not always
appropriate based on a location and surrounding land uses. The CUP requested use, which is not allowed as a
matter of right within a zoning district, is considered through a public hearing process and usually contains
conditions to minimize any impacts on surrounding properties.
Ordinance Amendment – The process by which the County Code is revised. Often the revisions are the result
of a citizen request with substantial justification supporting the change. Amendments ultimately proceed
through a public hearing prior to the PC forwarding a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
County Bodies Involved
Board of Supervisors or BOS - Frederick County is governed by an elected Board of Supervisors composed of
seven members, one from each magisterial district, and one chairman-at-large. The Board of Supervisors is the
policy-making body of the county. Functions of the Board of Supervisors related to planning include making
land use decisions, and establishing growth and development policies.
Planning Commission or PC - The PC is composed of 13 members, two from each magisterial districts and one
at-large, appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the
Board of Supervisors which then takes final action on all planning, zoning, and land use matters.
Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee or CPPC – The CPPC is a major committee of the PC whose
primary responsibility is to formulate land use policies that shape the location and timing of development
throughout the County. Included in the work are studies of specific areas to develop guidelines for future land
use within those areas. The CPPC also considers requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Decisions by CPPC are then forwarded to the PC for consideration.
Development Review and Regulations Committee or DRRC – The DRRC is the second major committee of the
PC whose primary responsibilities involve the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan in the form of
Zoning and Subdivision ordinance requirements. Requests to amend the ordinances to the DRRC are made by
the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, local citizens, businesses, or organizations. DRRC decisions
are also forwarded to the PC for consideration.
A
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Election of Officers, Meeting Schedule, Committee Assignments, Bylaws
DATE: December 16, 2015
________________________________________________________________________
ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 2016
At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission elects a Chairman, Vice-
Chairman and Secretary. These three Planning Commission officers assume office
immediately, and hold such office for the duration of the calendar year.
For each office, the Commission will: open the nominations; accept nominations; close
nominations; and, vote to fill the officer position.
ADOPTION OF MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2016
At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission adopts their meeting
schedule for the ensuing year.
Historically, the Commission has held meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of
each month at 7:00 p.m., to be held in the Board of Supervisors meeting room; the
Comprehensive Plans & Programs Committee meets on the second Monday of each
month at 7:00 p.m. in the first floor conference room and the Development Review &
Regulations Committee meets on the fourth Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the
first floor conference room. The Planning Commission meeting has an inclement
weather schedule, where in if weather causes the cancelation of a Wednesday evening
meeting, the meeting will be held on the following Thursday evening.
Memorandum: Elections, Meeting Schedule, Appointments, Bylaws
December 16, 2015
Page 2 of 2
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2016
At the first meeting of each year, the Chairman appoints the membership for the
Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) and the Development Review &
Regulations Committee (DRRC). The Chairman also appoints a Planning Commission
liaison to the: Transportation Committee (TC); Historic Resources Advisory Board
(HRAB); Conservation Easement Authority (CEA); Frederick County Sanitation Authority
(FCSA); and, the Winchester Planning Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS FOR 2016
At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission adopts their Bylaws, and
Roles and Responsibilities for the ensuing year. These documents are attached.
Please contact staff should you have questions.
Attachments: Proposed 2016 Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed 2016 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities
CEP/pd
PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS
County of Frederick, Virginia
Proposed
January 6, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting
ARTICLE I - AUTHORIZATION
1-1 The Frederick County Planning Commission is established by and in conformance with
Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County, and in accord with the provisions of Section
15.2-2210 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended.
1-2 The official title of this body shall be the Frederick County Planning Commission,
hereinafter referred to as the "Commission".
ARTICLE II - PURPOSE
2-1 The primary purpose of the Commission is to advise the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors and to carry out all duties and functions described by the Code of Virginia, as
amended.
ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP
3-1 The membership of the Commission shall be determined by the Frederick County Board
of Supervisors as specified in Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County. Methods of
appointment and terms of office shall be determined by Chapter 21 of the Code of
Frederick County.
3-2 Within the first month of initial appointment, new Commissioner appointees shall: 1)
participate in an orientation to familiarize themselves with the operations of the
Department and the Commission, and 2) meet with planning staff representatives in an
effort to review and better understand specific agenda items by no later than their second
Planning Commission meeting.
Page 2
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS
4-1 Officers of the Commission shall consist of a chairman, vice-chairman and secretary.
The chairman and vice-chairman must be voting members of the Commission. The
secretary shall be a member of the Commission or a county employee.
4-2 Selection
4-2-1 The officers shall be elected by the voting members of the Commission at
the first meeting of the calendar year.
4-2-2 Nomination of officers shall be made from the floor. Elections of officers
shall follow immediately. A candidate receiving a majority vote of the
entire voting membership shall be declared elected.
4-3 Duties
4-3-1 The Chairman shall:
4-3-1-1 Preside at meetings.
4-3-1-2 Appoint committees.
4-3-1-3 Rule on procedural questions. A ruling on a procedural question by the
chairman shall be subject to reversal by a two-thirds majority vote of the
members present.
4-3-1-4 Report official communications.
4-3-1-5 Certify official documents involving the authority of the Commission.
4-3-1-6 Certify minutes as true and correct copies.
4-3-1-7 Carry out other duties as assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the
Commission.
4-3-2 The Vice-Chairman shall:
4-3-2-1 Assume the full powers of the chairman in the absence or inability of the
chairman to act.
4-3-2-2 When acting as chair, the vice-chairman shall carry out other duties as
assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the Commission Chairman.
Page 3
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
4-3-3 The Secretary shall:
4-3-3-1 Ensure that attendance is recorded at all meetings.
4-3-3-2 Ensure that the minutes of all Commission meetings are recorded.
4-3-3-3 Notify members of all meetings.
4-3-3-4 Prepare agendas for all meetings.
4-3-3-5 Maintain files of all official Commission records and reports. Official
records and reports may be purged in accordance with applicable state
codes.
4-3-3-6 Give notice of all Commission meetings, public hearings and public
meetings.
4-3-3-7 Provide to the Board of Supervisors reports and recommendations of the
Commission.
4-3-3-8 Attend to the correspondence necessary for the execution of the duties and
functions of the Commission.
4-4 Term of Office
4-4-1 Officers shall be elected for a one-year term or until a successor takes office.
Vacancies shall be filled for an unexpired term by a majority vote of the
Commission. In such cases, the newly elected officer shall serve only until the
end of the calendar year or until a successor takes office.
4-5 Temporary Chairman
4-5-1 In the event of the absence of both the chairman and the vice-chairman from any
meeting, the Commission shall designate from among its members a temporary
chairman who shall act for that meeting in the absence of the chairman or vice-
chairman.
Page 4
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES
5-1 The Commission shall establish committees necessary to accomplish its purpose.
5-2 In establishing committees, the Commission shall describe the purpose for each
committee.
5-3 Members of the committees shall be appointed by the chairman and will serve for a term
of one year. The chairman may request recommendations from the Commission or
committee members on committee appointments.
5-4 Commission members, employees of the County, and citizen volunteers may be members
of the committee.
5-5 The chairman and vice-chairman of the Planning Commission shall be ex-officio
members of every committee.
5-6 The committees will elect a chairman and vice-chairman annually. These officers shall
be current Commission members and should represent different Magisterial Districts, if
possible.
5-7 The committees may operate as a committee of the whole or by executive committee,
with current and past Commission members serving as members of the executive
committee.
5-8 The committees may establish standing subcommittees whose activities will be a specific
responsibility of the parent committee. One executive committee member will serve as
liaison to the standing subcommittee and will assist staff in managing its activities.
Membership will be comprised of past Commission members and citizens. Membership
will be appointed by the chairman of the Committee with concurrence by the
Commission Chairman.
5-9 The committees may establish working groups to assist in specific, carefully-defined tasks
for a limited period of time. Important considerations for membership on the working
group are skills and experience necessary to assist in providing acceptable solutions.
Membership will be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee with concurrence by
the Commission Chairman.
Page 5
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
ARTICLE VI – COMMISSION MEETINGS
6-1 At the first meeting of each calendar year, the Commission shall fix the date, time, and
place of all its regular meetings for the ensuing calendar year, and shall fix the day on
which a regular meeting shall be continued should the Chairman declare that weather or
other conditions make it hazardous for members to attend.
6-2 Special meetings may be called by the chairman or by the secretary after due notice and
publication by the secretary.
6-3 Notice of all meetings shall be sent by the secretary with an agenda at least five days
before the meeting.
6-4 All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public except for Closed Sessions
held in accordance with the provision specified under Section 2.2-3711(A) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
6-5 Work sessions shall be held at the adjournment of regular meetings or at the time and
place set by the Commission and/or the Board of Supervisors.
ARTICLE VII - VOTING
7-1 A majority of voting members shall constitute a quorum. No action shall be taken or
motion made unless a quorum is present.
7-2 No action of the Commission shall be valid unless authorized by a majority vote of those
present and voting.
ARTICLE VIII - OPERATING RULES
8-1 Order of Business for a regular meeting
8-1-1 Call to Order.
8-1-2 Adoption of the Agenda.
8-1-3 Consideration of Minutes.
8-1-4 Committee Reports.
Page 6
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
8-1-5 Citizen Comments on Items not on the Agenda.
8-1-6 Public Hearings.
8-1-7 Action Items.
8-1-8 Information/Discussion Items
8-1-9 Other.
8-1-10 Adjournment.
8-2 Minutes
8-2-1 The Commission shall keep minutes of each meeting. The chairman and
secretary shall sign all minutes following approval by the Commission certifying
that the minutes are true and correct. Minutes made available to the public prior
to formal approval by the Commission shall be clearly identified as a draft version
of the meeting.
8-3 Procedures
8-3-1 Parliamentary procedure in the Commission meetings shall be governed by
Robert's Rules of Order, except where otherwise specified in these procedures.
8-3-2 Whenever an agenda item involves a recommendation to the Board of
Supervisors, the Commission shall continue to consider the item until a definite
recommendation is made. If a motion has been made and defeated, additional,
different motions may be made concerning the item under consideration.
8-3-3 The initial motion on an agenda item shall be made by a member representing the
application’s Magisterial District. If both District representatives are absent or
decline to make the initial motion, then any other Commissioner may act.
8-3-4 Business items on the agenda shall be considered using the following procedures:
8-3-4-1 Report by County Staff.
8-3-4-2 Presentation by Applicant.
8-3-4-3 Citizen Comment.
Page 7
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
8-3-4-4 Applicant Response.
8-3-4-5 Staff Summary.
8-3-4-6 Discussion by Commission.
8-3-4-7 Motion and Action by Commission.
8-3-5 Public comment shall be allowed in all cases required by the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, or the Code of Frederick County. In other cases, the chairman
may allow public comment.
8-3-6 The Commission members may ask questions of clarification and information
after the staff report, applicant presentation, and/or citizen comment.
8-3-7 Petitions, displays, documents or correspondence presented at a meeting may be
made part of the official record of the meeting by motion of the Commission and
are to be kept on file by the secretary. Such items need not be made part of the
published minutes.
8-3-8 Public Hearings
8-3-8-1 The Commission shall hold public hearings on all items for which
hearings are required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or by the
Code of Frederick County. Such public hearing shall be advertised and
notifications provided as required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
8-3-8-2 The Chairman may establish special rules for any public hearing at the
beginning of said hearing. These rules may include limitations on the time
of staff report, applicant presentation and citizen comment.
8-3-8-3 In addition to those required by law, the Commission may hold public
hearings on any matter, under the purview of the Commission, which it
deems to be in the public interest. In such cases, the public hearings shall
follow all procedures described for public hearing in these bylaws.
8-3-8-4 The 90-day period (Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick County Zoning
Ordinance) for the Planning Commission to make a rezoning
recommendation to the Board will start after the first Commission
meeting following the referral of the amendment to the Commission.
8-3-9 Tabling
Page 8
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
8-3-9-1 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to table agenda items
45-days (less if reaching the limits of Section 165-102.03) for any one of
the following:
A) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
B) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of
Frederick County.
C) Insufficient information has been provided for the agenda item.
D) Revised proffers have been received from the applicant less than
twenty-one (21) fourteen (14) days of the advertised Planning
Commission meeting.
E) Issues or concerns that arise during formal discussion of the
agenda item warrant additional information or study.
F) The applicant provides the Frederick County Planning Department
with a written request to table the agenda item.
G) The Frederick County Planning Department is advised of an
emergency situation that prevents attendance by the applicant.
H) The applicant fails to appear at the meeting in which the
application has been advertised to appear.
8-3-9-2 The applicant shall be permitted to request that an agenda item be tabled
from a scheduled Planning Commission meeting one time. The Planning
Commission shall table the application for a specific period of time to
ensure that the requirements of Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick
County Zoning Ordinance are not exceeded unless the applicant requests a
waiver from this requirement. In no case shall an application be tabled for
more than 12 months from the time the complete application was received
by the Zoning Administrator or applicable staff.
8-3-9-3 An application that has been tabled for an unspecified period of time shall
be re-advertised for consideration by the Planning Commission once the
following steps have been completed:
A) The applicant has requested in writing that the agenda item be
Page 9
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
considered by the Planning Commission.
B) The applicant has provided all required information to the
Frederick County Planning Department which addresses all
concerns of the Planning Commission.
8-3-10 Work sessions
8-3-10-1 The Commission may hold work sessions at which the procedural rules of
these bylaws shall not apply.
8-3-10-2 Work sessions shall be held after the adjournment of regular meetings or
at the time and place set by the Commission and/or the Board of
Supervisors.
8-3-10-3 Notice of work sessions shall be sent to the Planning Commissioners at
least five days before the session.
8-3-10-4 The chairman shall lead the session and require orderly behavior and
discussion.
8-3-10-5 No actions shall be taken or motions made at a work session.
8-3-10-6 Work sessions shall be open to the public. Public comment is not required
at a work session.
8-3-10-7 The secretary shall keep a general record of all work sessions and the
items discussed.
8-3-11 Adjournment
8-3-11-1 In no case shall the Commission consider any new items
after 10:30 P.M. and the meeting shall be adjourned by
11:00 P.M. In the instance that an item begun before
10:30P.M. has not been acted on by the 11:00 P.M. hour,
the Commission may, by majority vote, lift the
adjournment time until a recommendation has been made,
or such time, after 11:00 P.M., as the Commission may fix.
ARTICLE IX - AMENDMENTS
9-1 These bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the entire voting
Page 10
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed on January 6, 2016
membership after thirty days prior notice at any time during the calendar year.
9-2 The Planning Commission shall conduct an annual review of these bylaws each
calendar year to ensure their accuracy.
9-3 At the first meeting of the calendar year, the By-Laws will be adopted.
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Proposed for Adoption at the
January 6, 2016 Meeting
This document has been prepared to assist Frederick County Planning Commissioners in
understanding what their role and responsibilities are in the myriad of activities that they
accept as a member of the Planning Commission. This compilation is a companion
document to the Commission’s By-Laws.
APPLICATION COMMUNICATIONS
There are three primary sources of information gathered by and weighed by the Planning
Commission in order to make quality planning recommendations to the Board of
Supervisors. They are ex-parte communications, staff reports and public input.
Ex-Parte Communications:
Individual meetings between Commissioners and an applicant/developer regarding a
specific application shall follow the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. During this
discussion or at any other time prior to action taken by the Commission on the
application, a Planning Commissioner should make no commitments or endorsements.
Any new written materials provided by the applicant to any one Commissioner shall be
made available to all commissioners and staff by the applicant prior to the application
appearing on the agenda. To not do so may result in the application being tabled at the
Planning Commission public hearing.
Staff Application Briefings/Work Sessions:
Prior to the first public hearing being held, staff will hold a briefing for the Planning
Commissioners, with an invitation extended to the Board of Supervisors to participate,
regarding any application deemed sufficiently complicated / controversial to warrant
detailed explanation. The purpose is to apprise the Commissioners regarding the details
of the application, both those items that meet the ordinance and those that do not. This
provides the opportunity for the Commissioners to have a common understanding of the
application prior to the public hearing. The decision to hold a briefing on a specific
application will be made jointly by the Director of Planning and the Chairman of the
Planning Commission. In addition to complexity, the application shall be basically
complete prior to scheduling the briefing.
Page 2
Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities
Proposed for Adoption at the January 6, 2016 Meeting
The Planning Commission may request a work session for an application which, after the
first public hearing is concluded, is subsequently tabled. The purpose of the work session
is to discuss amongst each other and with staff details of the application, any revised
proffers provided or anticipated by the applicant, and other improvements which could be
made to the application.
For either a briefing or a work session:
-The applicant should attend, but will not have an active role.
-The format of a Planning Commission work session as identified in paragraph 8-
3-10 of the Commission’s By-Laws will be used.
-In no case will the legal timeline for consideration before the Planning
Commission be changed.
Public Hearing/Meeting:
Efficient and effective public hearings are an essential part of enabling the Commission
to make reasoned recommendations to the Board of Supervisors.
Every attempt will be made to obtain focused and broad representation of opinion or
information from the public. When possible, specific time limitations will not be used.
However, both rules of order as well as time constraints most appropriate for the specific
application will be implemented when there is either large interest in or controversy
regarding an application.
One constant during this process on both the part of the public, the applicant and the
Commission itself is civility and respect for information offered or a differing opinion.
Deviation from this behavior is unacceptable.
COMMISSIONER DEVELOPMENT:
Each Commissioner shall be committed to preparing for and keeping knowledge current
in order to do the most effective job for the community.
New initial appointees should strive to obtain Planning Commissioner certification from
an acceptable training program within the first year of appointment. This training is
supported by the Planning Department budget.
Further continuing education through many offerings should be pursued and will be
supported by the Planning budget as possible. These opportunities should be shared
Page 3
Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities
Proposed for Adoption at the January 6, 2016 Meeting
amongst the number of Commissioners who are serving. Examples include PlanVirginia
annual meeting, other special offerings as well as the American Planning Association’s
readings and meetings. A library is maintained by the Planning office.
COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE
Commissioners are expected to participate in 80% of the regularly scheduled meetings
per year. Members who cannot attend a meeting due to illness, business, and other
governmental or family reasons should notify the Commission Chairman and/or staff
Administrative Assistant prior to the scheduled meeting in order for the absence to be
noted. It may affect quorum considerations.
Especially essential is preparation and readiness for each of the Commission’s meetings
in order to use not only the Commission’s but the staff’s and public’s time wisely.
COMMISSION COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS:
Appointments to a Commission committee or liaison assignments are made by the
chairman and shared by the membership. Generally, they involve a once per month
meeting.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Each Commissioner needs to be familiar with Commonwealth of Virginia information on
conflict of interest. If a Commissioner is unsure if there is conflict, the County Attorney
is the correct resource.
Upon determination that there is or might be perceived to be a conflict, the Commissioner
should state immediately after the agenda item is read that recusal action is necessary
(with, preferably, stating the reason) then step down from the dais until the item is
concluded.
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION:
Commissioners are citizens, too. If there is a public item that is of interest, the
Commissioner should participate, but not identify themselves as members of the
Frederick County Planning Commission unless acting in an official capacity and directed
to do so. Implied endorsements by the Commission should be avoided.
B
REZONING APPLICATION #12-15
CROSSPOINTE CENTER
Staff Report for the Planning Commission
Prepared: December 28, 2015
Staff Contacts: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Director
John Bishop, AICP, Deputy Director - Transportation
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 01/06/16 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 01/27/16 Pending
PROPOSAL: To rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General
Business) District and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP (Residential
Performance) District within the Crosspointe Center development, Rezoning #13-03, and to amend the
proffers associated with Rezoning #13-03.
Please see the enclosed plat of rezoning which identifies the location of the modified zoning areas
within the property.
LOCATION: The property is located east and adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and adjacent to
Tasker Road and Hillandale Lane.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 01/06/16 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING:
The commercial and residential zoning proposed for this property with the rezoning and proffer
amendment is consistent with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The original
rezoning for Crosspointe Center, Rezoning #13-03, was consistent with the County’s long range land
use plan. This current request, Rezoning #12-15, remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a
land use perspective.
With regards to the impacts associated with this request, it has been demonstrated that transportation
improvements will be in place to support this additional development. VDOT has expressed their
approval of the revised proffers that ensure the improvements will be secured.
While the reorganization of the land uses within the development could lead to additional tr affic
generation compared to what is currently approved, the resulting difference is not enough to trigger a
Chapter 527 evaluation. This application retains a three phase development and associated
transportation improvement program similar to the current proffers. However, the new proposal moves
much more of the transportation impacts into Phase One. That is offset by an agreement to complete a
traffic impact analysis (TIA) upon the completion of 370,000 square feet of commercial and accelerate
transportation improvements or make modifications if needed. Ultimately, the project will be
responsible for extending Tasker Road, construction of a portion of Warrior Drive, Future Route 37,
Bridges over Tasker Road, and demolition of the temporary ramps to Tasker being constructed by
VDOT.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 2
Staff has pointed out in the report that the original proffer which provided for the dedication of area for
Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation of area for government services.
The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
Following the required public hearing, a recommendation regarding this rezoning application to
the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately
address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 3
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this
application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues
concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 01/06/16 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 01/27/16 Pending
PROPOSAL: To rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General
Business) District and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP (Residential
Performance) District within the Crosspointe Center development, Rezoning #13-03, and to amend the
proffers associated with Rezoning #13-03.
Please see the enclosed plat of rezoning which identifies the location of the modified zoning areas
within the property.
LOCATION: The property is located east and adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and adjacent to
Tasker Road and Hillandale Lane.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee
PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 75-A-89, 75-A-89A, 75-A-91, 75-A-92, 75-A-95, 75-A-96, and a
portion 75-A-90 and 75-A-94.
PROPERTY ZONING: B2 (General Business) District and RP (Residential Performance) District
PRESENT USE: Vacant
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant
M1 (Light Industrial) Washington Gas
South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential (Lakeside/Village at Artrip)
B2 (General Business) Private School/FCSA
East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant/Agricultural
West: B2 (General Business) Use: Commercial
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 4
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation: Please see attached email from Jeff Lineberry dated December 11,
2015 and most recently from Matthew Smith dated December 21, 2015.
Frederick County Fire Marshal: Plans approved.
Public Works Department: Please see attached letter from Harvey Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E., Director
of Public Works dated August 17, 2015.
Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Please see attached letter from Uwe E. Weindel, PE,
Engineer-Director dated August 14, 2015.
Frederick County Parks & Recreation: The proposed proffer does not appear to meet the monetary
contributions necessary to satisfy the Parks and Recreation impacts of this development. Parks and
Recreation recommends adjusting the monetary contributions proffer to meet the current impact model
standards.
Winchester Regional Airport: The proposed Proffer Amendment for Crosspointe Center review has
been completed. While the site is within the airspace of the Winchester Regional Airport the proposed
proffer amendment will not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport.
Frederick County Public School: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Crosspointe
Center proffer amendment application submitted to us on August 12, 2015. We offer the following
comment:
1. The change from 200 age-restricted units to 200 possibly age restricted units is noted. This
could have an impact on FCPS of as many as 80 additional students. Eighty students would
increase our costs $927,000 annually and necessitate a one-time capital cost of $3,306,000.
Frederick County Attorney: Please see attached letter from Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney,
dated September 24, 2015. Final legal review of the most recent proffer statement dated December
15, 2015 is anticipated prior to the 1/6/16 Planning Commission meeting.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 5
Planning & Zoning:
1) Site History
Rezoning #13-03, Crosspointe Center, was approved by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors on February 11, 2004. This application was to rezone 574 acres from RA (Rural
Areas) and B2 (General Business) to RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business).
More specifically, the rezoning approved 175.62 acres from RA to B2, 381.8 acres from RA to
RP, and 16.95 acres from B2 without proffers to B2 with proffers. The proffers that were
approved with this rezoning request are unique to the properties contained in the Crosspointe
Center rezoning application (Rezoning #13-03).
The current rezoning request (Rezoning #12-15) seeks to modify the proffers associated
with the original rezoning and adjust the general locations of the RP and B2 areas of
zoning.
2) Comprehensive Policy Plan
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County.
Land Use.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan provides guidance
on the future development of the property. The property is located within the UDA and SWSA.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property with an Urban Center land use
designation. This land use designation supports commercial and residential development. The
Urban Center designation is envisioned to be a more intensive, walkable urban area with a
larger commercial core, higher densities, and designed around some form of public space or
focal point, located in close proximity to major transportation infrastructure.
In general, the proposed commercial and residential zoning for this property is consistent
with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. It is recognized that the
future land use would support a greater mixing and intensity of land uses, supported by a robust
transportation network as is identified in the County’s Road Plan, and as supported in the
current zoning and approved proffers for the property. The original rezoning, Crosspointe,
Rezoning #13-03, was consistent with the County’s long range land use plan. This current
request remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a land use perspective.
Transportation.
This property is impacted by key components of the County’s Eastern Road plan. Most
important is the Route 37 extension, followed by Warrior Drive and Tasker Road. Each of
these roads are critical to the County’s planned transportation network. Implementation of these
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 6
major roads is essential to accommodating local and regional traffic at acceptable level of
service (LOS) conditions throughout the study area.
The original rezoning addressed these key transportation components through the approved
proffer statement. It is important to evaluate this current request in light of agreements that have
been made since the approval of the original rezoning (Three-Party Agreement with VDOT and
Frederick County), and the need to ensure the transportation commitments made to address the
needs of the local and regional traffic are maintained and improved upon.
Currently, VDOT is constructing improvements to the Interstate 81, Exit 310 Interchange.
Referred to as Phase One improvements, construction includes the relocation of Tasker and
Hillandale Roads to accommodate exit ramp improvements for the interchange. These
improvements will enable the future extension of Route 37 east of its current terminus through
the Crosspointe property as a limited access, grade separated, roadway, pursuant to the Three-
Party Agreement.
With regards to transportation, the rezoning and proffer amendment seeks to clarify the
remaining road improvements within the property required for the completion of the project.
The rezoning and proffer amendment continues to promote a three phased approach to
implementing the transportation network that is generally consistent with the original rezoning.
However, the request increases the amount of commercial land use that may be developed and
increases the amount of development that may be included in the first phase. To offset this
increase in the first phase, the Applicant’s proffers commit to additional TIA’s for land use
above 370,000 square feet (the original parameters of Phase One) and the completion or
advancement of improvements identified by the TIA and the proffers.
In addition to adjusting the transportation commitments required for the completion of the
project, the rezoning and proffer amendment modifies the locations of the commercial and
residential land bays and increases the maximum commercial floor area from 960,000 square
feet to 1,088,000 square feet.
3) Potential Impacts
The Impact Analysis prepared for this rezoning application addresses the impacts associated
with, among other things, the increased intensity of the project, the relocation of the various
commercial and residential land bays, and the proposed modification of the developer obligated
transportation improvements.
The amount of commercial land use that may be developed on the property has increased by
128,000 square feet, from 960,000 to 1,088,000 square feet. In addition, the location of the
commercial land uses has been adjusted to predominately the western portion of the property.
This provides greater visibility from the Interstate 81 right-of-way.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 7
An additional 240,000 square feet and an additional 322 residential units are proposed in Phase
One. This represents a larger amount of development in Phase One than the current zoning.
Consequently, Phase Two and Phase Three have been reduced in scope.
The revised land use proffer addressing residential development would enable an additional 200
non-age restricted housing units to be developed on the property. This has the potential of
introducing additional impacts on the County should the age restricted units not be constructed
in favor of non-age restricted units.
The value of the proffers aimed at mitigating the impacts associated with the development of
this property are the same as the original proffer statement for this project which was approved
in 2004. It should be recognized that the Development Impact Model projects a much higher
amount in 2015. As proposed, the residential land use changes may allow an additional 200
residential units that are not age restricted, thus potentially creating additional impacts on
schools. The Applicant’s position that the additional commercial area planned for the project
will offset the impacts to capital facilities caused by the residential development. It is
recognized that the Applicant may still utilize age restricted units within the project.
It has been demonstrated that transportation improvements will be in place to support
this additional development. Coordination with VDOT and the County in achieving
agreement on the transportation approach has been very important. It has ensured that
the proposed land uses and land use phasing, with the improvements made by VDOT in
fulfillment of the Three-Party Agreement, are coordinated and acceptable. The cap of
370,000 square feet of commercial land uses triggering additional TIA and improvements, if
warranted, is consistent with the current rezoning and provides a mechanism for addressing the
impacts to the satisfaction of VDOT.
Site Access and Transportation.
The current proffer statement directly ties the amount of development, the phasing of the land
uses, to road improvements. Previously, the Applicant demonstrated that the transportation
improvements would be completed with the appropriate amount of development. The proposed
proffer statement continues to tie the land use to the needed transportation improvements. The
addition of a proffer tying the increased development in the first phase to a TIA, with the
guarantee that additional transportation improvements would be provided to support this
development, maintains a level of consistency with the original proffers and ensures the
development remains tied to the road improvements. This addresses t he question of what is
stopping the next phase of development from not touching or necessitating the necessary
transportation improvements. The application therefore links the land use to the transportation
improvements to a greater extent.
Environment.
The application continues to provide for a comprehensive trail network linking the development
land bays with historic park areas and stream corridors within the site and adjacent
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 8
developments. The Stream Preservation Buffer Areas have been identified as in the approved
rezoning and GDP. Particular attention has been paid to the stream buffer area and potential
trail connectivity along the Opequon Creek. This linear feature is supported in the
Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan.
Historical.
The area identified as Historic Park in the western part of the property, north of future Route 37
has been modified and is smaller than in the original five acres identified in the original GDP.
This historic preservation parcel immediately surrounds the Hillandale House. The change was
necessitated by the additional right-of-way VDOT required for the completion of the Interstate
81, 310 Interchange. The proffer has been further modified to allow for the adaptive reuse of the
structure which may include a commercial type use.
The other commitments made in the original rezoning from a historical perspective, the
preservation of Camp Russell and the Carysbrook Redoubt, remain consistent.
Community Facilities.
The application addresses the potential impact to community facilities by maintaining the
proffer values of the original rezoning for Fire and Rescue, Schools, Parks, Libraries, Sheriff,
and Administration.
It is important for Staff to point out that the original proffer which provided for the
dedication of area for Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation
of area for government services. The difference between dedication and reservation is
significant. The area for government services is nine acres in size and would be located within
the Phase 1 commercial area. The reservation is for a period of five years. No value has been
attributed to the acreage and the cost to the County has not been determined. Previously, the
dedication was at no cost to the County, it was for three years with an additional two year
extension. Further, in lieu of the dedication, the Applicant would pay to the County $200,000.
The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
It is also important to recognize that the County’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has
consistently recognized the need for a new fire and rescue station (#22) in the immediate
vicinity of the Crosspointe Center project.
4) Proffer Statement Original Date of Proffers August 27, 2003 (Revised and Approved January
23, 2004). Revised proffers dated August 7, 2015, and most recently, December 15, 2015.
Final legal review of the most recent proffer statement dated December 15, 2015 is
anticipated prior to the 1/6/16 Planning Commission meeting. The County Attorney will
forward those comments to the Applicant and the Planning Commission.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
December 28, 2015
Page 9
In general, the proffer statement;
provides for the phased development of land use and transportation with provisions that the
project shall be developed in three phases;
includes a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) that illustrates the phased development;
provides for development related items such as architecture, signage, and landscapi ng, a
pedestrian trail system and recreation areas, environmental and cultural resource preservation;
provides for community facility impacts by continuing to proffer amounts consistent with the
original rezoning; and
proposes an area of reservation for government services. As pointed out in the report, it should
be determined if the change from dedication to reservation of this area is acceptable.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 01/06/16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
The commercial and residential zoning proposed for this property with the rezoning and proffer
amendment is consistent with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The original
rezoning for Crosspointe Center, Rezoning #13-03, was consistent with the County’s long range land
use plan. This current request, Rezoning #12-15, remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a
land use perspective.
With regards to the impacts associated with this request, it has been demonstrated that transportation
improvements will be in place to support this additional development. VDOT has expressed their
approval of the revised proffers that ensure the improvements will be secured.
While the reorganization of the land uses within the development could lead to additional traffic
generation compared to what is currently approved, the resulting difference is not enough to trigger a
Chapter 527 evaluation. This application retains a three phase development and associated
transportation improvement program similar to the current proffers. However, the new proposal moves
much more of the transportation impacts into Phase One. That is offset by an agreement to complete a
traffic impact analysis (TIA) upon the completion of 370,000 square feet of commercial and accelerate
transportation improvements or make modifications if needed. Ultimately, the project will be
responsible for extending Tasker Road, construction of a portion of Warrior Drive, Future Route 37,
Bridges over Tasker Road, and demolition of the temporary ramps to Tasker being construc ted by
VDOT.
Staff has pointed out in the report that the original proffer which provided for the dedication of area for
Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation of area for government services.
The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
Following the required public hearing, a recommendation regarding this rezoning application to
the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately
address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission.
VILLAGESAT ARTRIPSubdivision
THE TOWNESAT TASKERSubdivision
CROSSPOINTECENTERSubdivision
COMMONWEALTHBUSINESS CENTERSubdivision
COPP TRACTSSubdivision
§¨¦81
Winchester
75 A 96
75 A 89
75 A 95
75 A 90
75 A 94
75 A 94
75 A 89A
75 A 92
75 A 91
126CALEDON CT
126CALEDON CT
106NATURE DR 143EQUESTRIAN DR
217SURREYCLUB LN
108CLEARWATER CT 104LAKEVIEW CT
1285MACEDONIACH RD101JASMINE CT106JASMINE CT 102CANAAN CT 119LIPIZZANER CT
102MYSTIC CT 105CANAAN CT 115LIPIZZANER CT
102LEGACY CT
107LAKERIDGE DR
114TIMBERLAKETER104CASCADE CIR
122WOODRIDGE CT 303CHINKAPIN DR
330CHINKAPIN DR
101MYSTIC CT
103JADE CT 127BELL HAVENCIR
102LIPIZZANER CT
127PARADISE CT
131PARADISE CT
133PARADISE CT
345TASKER RD
227SOMERSET DR
218SOMERSET DR 315CHINKAPIN DR
106SUGARCREEK CT
208FALABELLA DR
163RUTHERFORD LN 106LAKERIDGE CT 323CHINKAPIN DR
1726FRONTROYAL PIKE
214LAKERIDGE DR
220LAKERIDGE DR
369TASKER RD
244PICKET LN
216PICKET LN
358TASKER RD 176PICKET LN 266PICKET LN
315TASKER RD
130CARRIEBROOKE DR
3951VALLEYPIKE
221KERNSTOWNCOMMONS 187KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
121KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
251COMMONWEALTH CT
332CALDWELL LN
332CALDWELL LN
3790PAPERMILL RD
3790PAPERMILL RD
204FROGALE CT
3661VALLEYPIKE
190COMMONWEALTH CT
221COMMONWEALTH CT 350HILLANDALE LN104KING LN107KING LN
3632VALLEYPIKE
180HOODWAY
201COMMONWEALTH CT
104FAY ST106FAY ST
161COMMONWEALTH CT
404HILLANDALE LN3583VALLEYPIKE
296PASTURE LN
296PASTURE LN3578VALLEYPIKE
285CALDWELL LN
125APPLEVALLEY RD
3540VALLEYPIKE
3463VALLEYPIKE 148PASTURE LN 200PASTURE LN
3500VALLEYPIKE
329CALDWELL LN
221PASTURE LN
170HARRISON LN
3464VALLEYPIKE
237CALDWELL LN
165HARRISON LN
123HARRISON LN
3425VALLEYPIKE
245CAPITOL LN 324CALDWELL LN332CALDWELL LN
322CALDWELL LN 225CALDWELL LN 130HARRISON LN
LAKERIDGE CT
PAPERMILL RD
LAKEVIEW CT
BLACKWATER CT
COMMONW
E
A
L
T
H
C
T
H
O
N
E
Y
C
R
E
E
K
C
I
R CAMELL
I
A CT
C
A
P
O
N
W
A
Y
HACKB
E
R
R
Y
DRNAT
U
R
E
D
R
CRYSTAL
LAKE CT
SU
M
M
E
R
LA
K
E
D
R
CAR
Y
S
B
R
O
O
K
DR
EQUESTRIAN DR
FAY ST
C
A
L
E
D
O
N
C
T
TIM
B
E
R
L
A
K
E
TE
R
CASC
A
D
E
CIR WOODRIDGE CT
FAIRLAWN CT
BELL
HAV
E
N CIR
HOO
DWAY
GOLDE
N
POND
CIR
HARRISO
N
L
N
LIP
I
Z
Z
A
N
E
R
C
T
LA
K
E
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
CHINKAPIN DR
SOMERSE
T
D
R
PARA
D
I
S
E
C
T
KER
N
S
T
O
W
N
COM
M
O
N
S
BLV
D
A
G
A
P
E
W
A
Y
VA
L
L
E
Y
PIK
E
TASK
E
R
R
D
PICKET L
N
PA
S
T
U
R
E
L
N
EVEND
A
L
E
L
N
HIL
L
A
N
D
A
L
E
L
N
Applications
Parcels
Sewer and Water Service Area
Building Footprints
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 16, 2015Staff: mruddy
Winchester
VAL
L
E
Y
P
I
K
E
TAS
K
E
R
R
D
SHAD
Y
E
L
M
R
D
CHINKAPIN
D
R
HILL
A
N
D
A
L
E
L
N
FAY ST
FALAB
E
L
L
A
D
R
§¨¦81
0111
REZ # 12 - 15Crosspointe CenterPINs:75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96, portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2, 72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer Amendment
0 1,300 2,600650 Feet
REZ 12-15
REZ # 12 - 15Crosspointe CenterPINs:75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and ProfferAmendment
REZ 12-15
0137
01522
0137
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
0111
VILLAGESAT ARTRIPSubdivision
THE TOWNESAT TASKERSubdivision
CROSSPOINTECENTERSubdivision
COMMONWEALTHBUSINESS CENTERSubdivision
COPP TRACTSSubdivision
§¨¦81
Winchester
75 A 96
75 A 89
75 A 95
75 A 90
75 A 94
75 A 94
75 A 89A
75 A 92
75 A 91
126CALEDON CT
126CALEDON CT
106NATURE DR 143EQUESTRIAN DR
217SURREYCLUB LN
108CLEARWATER CT 104LAKEVIEW CT
1285MACEDONIACH RD101JASMINE CT106JASMINE CT 102CANAAN CT 119LIPIZZANER CT
102MYSTIC CT 105CANAAN CT 115LIPIZZANER CT
102LEGACY CT
107LAKERIDGE DR
114TIMBERLAKETER104CASCADE CIR
122WOODRIDGE CT 303CHINKAPIN DR
330CHINKAPIN DR
101MYSTIC CT
103JADE CT 127BELL HAVENCIR
102LIPIZZANER CT
127PARADISE CT
131PARADISE CT
133PARADISE CT
345TASKER RD
227SOMERSET DR
218SOMERSET DR 315CHINKAPIN DR
106SUGARCREEK CT
208FALABELLA DR
163RUTHERFORD LN 106LAKERIDGE CT 323CHINKAPIN DR
1726FRONTROYAL PIKE
214LAKERIDGE DR
220LAKERIDGE DR
369TASKER RD
244PICKET LN
216PICKET LN
358TASKER RD 176PICKET LN 266PICKET LN
315TASKER RD
130CARRIEBROOKE DR
3951VALLEYPIKE
221KERNSTOWNCOMMONS 187KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
121KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
251COMMONWEALTH CT
332CALDWELL LN
332CALDWELL LN
3790PAPERMILL RD
3790PAPERMILL RD
204FROGALE CT
3661VALLEYPIKE
190COMMONWEALTH CT
221COMMONWEALTH CT 350HILLANDALE LN104KING LN107KING LN
3632VALLEYPIKE
180HOODWAY
201COMMONWEALTH CT
104FAY ST106FAY ST
161COMMONWEALTH CT
404HILLANDALE LN3583VALLEYPIKE
296PASTURE LN
296PASTURE LN3578VALLEYPIKE
285CALDWELL LN
125APPLEVALLEY RD
3540VALLEYPIKE
3463VALLEYPIKE 148PASTURE LN 200PASTURE LN
3500VALLEYPIKE
329CALDWELL LN
221PASTURE LN
170HARRISON LN
3464VALLEYPIKE
237CALDWELL LN
165HARRISON LN
123HARRISON LN
3425VALLEYPIKE
245CAPITOL LN 324CALDWELL LN332CALDWELL LN
322CALDWELL LN 225CALDWELL LN 130HARRISON LN
LAKERIDGE CT
PAPERMILL RD
LAKEVIEW CT
BLACKWATER CT
COMMONW
E
A
L
T
H
C
T
H
O
N
E
Y
C
R
E
E
K
C
I
R CAMELL
I
A CT
C
A
P
O
N
W
A
Y
HACKB
E
R
R
Y
DRNAT
U
R
E
D
R
CRYSTAL
LAKE CT
SU
M
M
E
R
LA
K
E
D
R
CAR
Y
S
B
R
O
O
K
DR
EQUESTRIAN DR
FAY ST
C
A
L
E
D
O
N
C
T
TIM
B
E
R
L
A
K
E
TE
R
CASC
A
D
E
CIR WOODRIDGE CT
FAIRLAWN CT
BELL
HAV
E
N CIR
HOO
DWAY
GOLDE
N
POND
CIR
HARRISO
N
L
N
LIP
I
Z
Z
A
N
E
R
C
T
LA
K
E
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
CHINKAPIN DR
SOMERSE
T
D
R
PARA
D
I
S
E
C
T
KER
N
S
T
O
W
N
COM
M
O
N
S
BLV
D
A
G
A
P
E
W
A
Y
VA
L
L
E
Y
PIK
E
TASK
E
R
R
D
PICKET L
N
PA
S
T
U
R
E
L
N
EVEND
A
L
E
L
N
HIL
L
A
N
D
A
L
E
L
N
Applications
Parcels
Sewer and Water Service Area
Building Footprints
B1 (Business, Neighborhood District)
B2 (Business, General Distrist)
B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District)
EM (Extractive Manufacturing District)
HE (Higher Education District)
M1 (Industrial, Light District)
M2 (Industrial, General District)
MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)
MS (Medical Support District)
OM (Office - Manufacturing Park)
R4 (Residential Planned Community District)
R5 (Residential Recreational Community District)
RA (Rural Area District)
RP (Residential Performance District)
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 16, 2015Staff: mruddy
Winchester
VAL
L
E
Y
P
I
K
E
TAS
K
E
R
R
D
SHAD
Y
E
L
M
R
D
CHINKAPIN
D
R
HILL
A
N
D
A
L
E
L
N
FAY ST
FALAB
E
L
L
A
D
R
§¨¦81
0111
REZ # 12 - 15Crosspointe CenterPINs:75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96, portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2, 72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer Amendment
0 1,300 2,600650 Feet
REZ 12-15
REZ # 12 - 15Crosspointe CenterPINs:75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and ProfferAmendment
REZ 12-15
0137
01522
0137
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
0111
0111
0137
§¨¦81
75 A 96
75 A 89
75 A 95
75 A 94
75 A 9475 A 90
75 A 89A
75 A 92
75 A 91
103WARBLER DR105WARBLER DR104WARBLER DR 212RAVEN RD215RAVEN RD 223KILLDEER RD211BLUEBIRD DR 208BLUEBIRD DR
100MOUNTAINASH CT
1187MACEDONIACH RD
302LAURELHILL DR 106CHELTENHAM DR101KEVERNE CT 111CARNOUSTIE LN103BERWICK LN 306TALAMORE DR 101WYNCOTE CT 124CASPIAN DR126CASPIAN DR105WYNCOTE CT
212NIGHTINGALEAVE 112ROBINAVE
213KILLDEER RD 974TASKER RD
1075TASKER RD 213LAURELHILL DR 107DORNACH CT 405CRAIG DR
201QUINTONOAKS CIR
108BOWLINGGREEN CIR
412TALAMORE DR
101KILLDEER RD 115KILLDEER RD
307RAVEN RD 226BLUEBIRD DR
871TASKER RD
100LAURELHILL DR
104LAURELHILL DR
103HICKORYHILL DR 201LAURELHILL DR
108LANE ST
102CRAIG DR
109BRANDYLION DR
208BRANDYLION DR
303CHELTENHAM DR
113WORTHINGTON CT
104BRISTOWMANOR LN 419TALAMORE DR
227NIGHTINGALEAVE
213WARBLER DR209ROBINAVE
302BLUEBIRD DR
108LAKESIDE DR
116MIMOSA DR 110HICKORYHILL DR
106MULBERRYCIR
117LANE ST 208WAKELAND DR 113AYRSHIRE CT
112VINCENT DR 103RICHWOOD CT 414KINTYRE LN
100BRIGATINE DR431TALAMORE DR429TALAMORE DR
241NIGHTINGALEAVE
245NIGHTINGALEAVE
247NIGHTINGALEAVE 312BLUEBIRD DR
101BUTTERNUT DR 118HICKORYHILL DR 124LANE ST
216WAKELAND DR 329CHELTENHAM DR
102VINCENT DR 127VINCENT DR 105IVYHILL CT
126POCONO PL
106BUTTERNUT DR 110WHITEPINE CIR
227LAKESIDE DR
237LAKESIDE DR 219WAKELAND DR
1285MACEDONIACH RD
1285MACEDONIACH RD
107TATTERSALL CT 100ALDIEBURN CT
103AUBURNHILL CT
112SOMERTON CT108SOMERTON CT
92CHINKAPINDR
124HACKBERRY DR 111POCONO PL
112BUTTERNUT DR 102WILLOWOAK CIR 107LAKEWOOD DR
243BRANDYLION DR 113ALDIEBURN CT
113AUBURNHILL CT 123PENDERBROOK CT
128AUBURNHILL CT
117CHINKAPIN DR 386SURREYCLUB LN
212SURREYCLUB LN 230HACKBERRY DR 107ROSEDALE DR 134FAIRLAWN CT
119CAMARUGE CT
126CALEDON CT 100TIMBERLAKETER
106TIMBERLAKETER 183EQUESTRIAN DR 111CLEARWATER CT
109HONEYCREEK CIR 111SOMERSET DR
107LAKEVIEW CT 204CAMELLIA CT
114FAIRLAWN CT
114LIPIZZANER CT119LIPIZZANER CT
4273VALLEYPIKE
110PARADISE CT
107LAKERIDGE DR
112TIMBERLAKETER
118WOODRIDGE CT 103GOLDENPOND CIR
319HACKBERRY DR 115BELLHAVEN CIR
103FAIRLAWN CT
106LIPIZZANER CT
203FALABELLA DR104CAMARUGE CT
127PARADISE CT
345TASKER RD
133PARADISE CT 126NATURE DR 119CASCADECIR
223SOMERSET DR 120GOLDENPOND CIR
324CHINKAPIN DR 330CHINKAPIN DR 208FALABELLA DR202FALABELLA DR
521TASKER RD
163RUTHERFORD LN 232SOMERSET DR 107SUMMERLAKE DR
1726FRONTROYAL PIKE
4227VALLEYPIKE
136MUSKET DR
142MUSKET DR
239SCHRAMMLOOP
216PICKET LN 244PICKET LN
220LAKERIDGE DR225LAKERIDGE DR
120SUMMERLAKE DR
4184VALLEYPIKE
369TASKER RD143SCHRAMMLOOP
4118VALLEYPIKE
4118VALLEYPIKE
111MUSKET DR
211SULKYDRIVE
358TASKER RD 176PICKET LN 266PICKET LN
4110VALLEYPIKE
200SULKY DR 315TASKER RD
4046VALLEYPIKE 4050VALLEYPIKE
4017VALLEYPIKE 130CARRIEBROOKE DR
3951VALLEY PIKE
3951VALLEYPIKE
251PROSPERITY DR
125PROSPERITY DR
187KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
553SHADYELM RD
220PROSPERITY DR240PROSPERITY DR
161PROSPERITY DR
210PROSPERITY DR
180PROSPERITY DR
3862VALLEYPIKE170PROSPERITY DR
3880VALLEYPIKE
222KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
141KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
100DEVELOPMENT LN
121KERNSTOWNCOMMONS
251COMMONWEALTH CT
332CALDWELL LN
121DEVELOPMENT LN
103FAY ST
190COMMONWEALTH CT
221COMMONWEALTH CT
350HILLANDALE LN
3790PAPERMILL RD
3790PAPERMILL RD
204FROGALE CT
128FAY ST
104FAY ST
106KING LN
124FAY ST
3632VALLEYPIKE3688VALLEYPIKE
180HOODWAY
185COMMONWEALTH CT
130FROGALE CT
139COMMONWEALTH CT175COMMONWEALTH CT
404HILLANDALE LN
3578VALLEYPIKE 3583VALLEYPIKE3595VALLEYPIKE
296PASTURE LN
296PASTURE LN
131DAWSON DR
125APPLEVALLEY RD
3463VALLEYPIKE
148PASTURE LN200PASTURE LN
285CALDWELL LN
285CALDWELL LN
100DAWSON DR 131FROGALE CT 3526VALLEYPIKE
3488VALLEYPIKE
329CALDWELL LN 221PASTURE LN
170HARRISON LN
157HARRISON LN
Applications
Parcels
Sewer and Water Service Area
Building Footprints
Long Range Land Use
Residential
Neighborhood Village
Urban Center
Mobile Home Community
Business
Highway Commercial
Mixed-Use
Mixed Use Commercial/Office
Mixed Use Industrial/Office
Industrial
Warehouse
Heavy Industrial
Extractive Mining
Commercial Rec
Rural Community Center
Fire & Rescue
Historic
Institutional
Planned Unit Development
Park
Recreation
School
Employment
Airport Support Area
B2 / B3
Residential, 4 u/a
High-Density Residential, 6 u/a
High-Density Residential, 12-16 u/a
Rural Area
Interstate Buffer
Landfill Support Area
Natural Resources & Recreation
Environmental & Recreational Resources
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: December 16, 2015Staff: mruddy
Winchester
VAL
L
E
Y
P
I
K
E
TAS
K
E
R
R
D
SHAD
Y
E
L
M
R
D
CHINKAPIN
D
R
HILL
A
N
D
A
L
E
L
N
FAY ST
FALAB
E
L
L
A
D
R
§¨¦81
0111
REZ # 12 - 15Crosspointe CenterPINs:75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96, portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and ProfferAmendment
0 1,700 3,400850 Feet
REZ 12-15
REZ # 12 - 15Crosspointe CenterPINs:75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and ProfferAmendment
REZ 12-15
0137
01522
0137
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
C
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP
Deputy Director
DATE: December 28, 2015
RE: Discussion: 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
On December 14, 2015, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) met
with County Department and Agency representatives to discuss their individual capital
improvement project requests, including new projects and modifications to previous
requests, associated with the 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP).
The role of the CPPC in the CIP process was to ensure that the various departmental
project requests are in conformance with the County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan. The
evaluation and prioritization of departmental projects was presented by Frederick County
Public Schools, Parks and Recreation, and staff. Also provided was a projected cost for
each project as required by the Code of Virginia. The CPPC discussion was typically
thorough. The CPPC recommended the following additional notation which was added
to the draft CIP - Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional
school sites located throughout the County.
This year’s CIP seeks to make a stronger link to the County’s budget process. To that
end, the first column is highlighted to emphasize projects for which funding would be
requested in the upcoming budget would be located in this column. In addition, those
projects that are long range comprehensive plan projects have been placed at the end of
the CIP table, outside of the 5 –year window of a traditional CIP.
Particular focus was once again placed on enhancing the connection between the CIP and
the policies of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This effort continues to be exemplified
with the collaboration between Frederick County Public Schools and the Parks and
Recreation Department with their identification of joint community facility opportunities.
Planning Commission
Discussion: 2016-2017 CIP
December 28, 2015
Page 2
The CIP includes a total of eighty-nine projects, including several new projects. Projects
have also moved off the CIP based on their initiation or completion indicating progress
on the provision of new or improved community facilities. This year’s CIP continues to
include the individual Fire and Rescue Company requests as a subcomponent of the CIP.
Other components include Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional Library,
Transportation, Winchester Regional Airport, County Administration (including the
Voter Registrar), and Fire and Rescue.
Following the CPPC discussion, the CPPC endorsed the 2016-2017 CIP and endorsed its
conformance with the County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan. The CPPC forwarded the
2016-2017 CIP to the Planning Commission for discussion.
It is requested that the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors consider the
proposed 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan as a discussion item prior to the CIP’s
advertisement for public hearing. This discussion will provide a valuable opportunity for
the collective review of proposed capital projects while also allowing the Planning
Commission and the Board of Supervisors the ability to determine if additional
information or analysis is needed in advance of final consideration of the CIP. It is the
role of the Planning Commission to affirm that the 2016-2017 CIP is in conformance
with the Comprehensive Policy Plan.
Please find attached with this agenda item the Draft 2016-2017 CIP which includes: a
summary of the proposed 2016-2017 CIP in table form, and a draft copy of the proposed
2016-2017 CIP maps illustrating the known locations of the CIP requests incorporated
into the draft of the CIP. More detailed information regarding the individual department
requests is available digitally and may be forwarded to you directly if requested. The
information provided by the individual departments is also located on the County’s
website via the following link: www.fcva.us/plans.
If adopted, the CIP and included maps will ultimately become a component of the
Comprehensive Policy Plan, which would satisfy the review requirement of Section 15.2-
2232 of the Code of Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed
unless said facility is a “feature shown” within a jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan.
Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this
information.
Attachments
MTR/pd
FREDERICK COUNTY
VIRGINIA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
2016-2017
Fiscal Year
Adopted by the
Frederick County
Board of Supervisors
TBD, 2016
Recommended by the
Frederick County
Planning Commission
TBD, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………. 1
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………………………. 2
Frederick County Public Schools…………………………………………...2
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department………………………. 2
Handley Regional Library ……………………………………………….. 3
Transportation Committee…………………………………………………. 4
Winchester Regional Airport………………………………………………. 4
County Administration ……………………………………………………..5
Fire & Rescue……….. ……………………………………………………..5
2016-2017 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP………………………………………….. 7
2016-2017 COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP……….. 9
2016-2017 COUNTY PARKS AND REC. CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP…………11
2016-2017 TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS MAP………………..……………. 13
2016-2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLE……………………15
CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS…………………………………………………… 21
PROJECT FUNDING……………………………………………………………… 21
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS………………………………………………………. 23
Frederick County Public Schools…………………………………………...23
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department………………………. 27
Handley Regional Library…………………………………………………..37
Transportation Committee…………………………………………………..39
Winchester Regional Airport………………………………………………. 44
County Administration…………………………………………………….. 51
Fire and Rescue……………..……………………………………………….55
Individual Fire & Rescue Company Requests……………………….58
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
FREDERICK COUNTY
2016-2017
INTRODUCTION
Section 15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of
plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements
Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the
ensuing five years.
The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed
or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in
preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital
expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform
to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with
considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component
of the Comprehensive Plan. Frederick County approved the 2030 Comprehensive Plan on
July 14, 2011.
The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning
document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities may
change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that
particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The
status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is
projected.
Transportation projects are included in the CIP. The inclusion of transportation projects
to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently
undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of
state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing.
The 2016-2017 CIP continues to emphasize the connection between the CIP,
Comprehensive Plan, and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning
projects. This effort continues to be exemplified with the collaboration between Frederick
County Public Schools and the Parks and Recreation Department with their identification
of joint community facility opportunities.
1
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
Frederick County Public Schools
Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects
that have been priorities from previous years. The replacement Frederick County Middle
School has recently been initiated and therefore no longer a part of the CIP.
Previously removed projects include the James Wood Middle School parking lot safety
enhancement project, the new transportation facility located adjacent to Armel
Elementary School, and the school renovations proposed to prepare school facilities for
an all-day Kindergarten program. It should be recognized that the all-day kindergarten
program had been delayed for several years in light of the recent fiscal climate so it was
very positive to see the all-day kindergarten program be introduced through the joint
efforts of Frederick County Public Schools and the Board of Supervisors.
The joint top capital improvement priority for the Schools is the 12th Elementary School
and the addition to, and renovation of, Armel Elementary School. This is in recognition
of the anticipated community growth in these two general locations.
The construction of the County's fourth High School is the second priority. The new high
school has been requested to relieve overcapacity issues at the high school level and in
anticipation of projected student population growth.
Improvements to Robert E. Aylor Middle School is the third highest priority.
Other schools included for renovation projects include Apple Pie Ridge Elementary
School, Bass Hoover Elementary School, and James Wood High School. This year’s CIP
continues to include requests to improve the parking lot and construct a softball field at
Sherando High School and to renovate and expand the current administration building on
Amherst Street.
Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located
throughout the County.
Parks & Recreation
Swimming improvements continue to be a focus for Parks and Recreation. The upgrade
of pool amenities at the swimming pools at both parks will include the addition of water
slides and a spray ground. Added to the scope of this project is an overall pool complex
renovation. This project is expected to increase pool attendance by 30 percent while
providing recreational opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service
areas.
2
The indoor aquatic facility continues to be proposed as a high priority of the Parks and
Recreation Department. This project has been moved up to the Department’s #3 priority
in recognition of Frederick County Public Schools 4th High School land opportunity.
This year’s CIP continues to be reflective of the previous effort to seek community input
into the parks and recreation programs and facilities. The recently completed survey has
been taken into consideration when prioritizing parks and recreation capital projects.
The majority of the recommended projects are planned for the county’s two regional
parks (Sherando & Clearbrook). However, a new project, the Snowden Bridge Park
Development has been identified in recognition of an endorsed site plan on the proffered
park and school site. This project has been separated from the Community Park Group
where it was previously considered.
The effort of the Parks and Recreation Department and their identification of their
comprehensively planned parks including community, neighborhood, and district parks,
further emphasize the connection between the CIP, Comprehensive Plan, and potential
proffered contributions made with rezoning projects.
Projects planned for Sherando Park include: upgrade of baseball lighting, upgrade pool
amenities, a softball complex, a soccer complex, maintenance compound and office,
skateboard park, parking and multi-purpose fields with trail development, picnic area
with a shelter, and an access road with parking and trails. The projects planned for the
Clearbrook Park include, upgrade of baseball lighting, upgrading pool amenities, a new
open play area, a tennis/basketball complex, and shelter with an area for stage seating.
The Sherando Park Softball Complex has been moved up in recognition of scheduling
pressure at existing facility and the number of Community Parks has been reduced to
three in recognition of work underway at Rose Hill and separation of the identified
Snowden Bridge site.
A project that continues to be a high priority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams
Creek Greenway Trail. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for
residents of this corridor along with the surrounding communities and was emphasized in
the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan completed during 2012. This project
will provide trails with bicycle, walking and jogging opportunities, which ranks #1 in the
2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor recreational activities.
Handley Regional Library
The Handley Regional Library continues to recommend three projects. As noted last year,
this marks a change from their 2014-2015 request of four. The library’s top priority is a
new library branch in the Gainesboro area.
The two remaining projects request that funding be provided for new library branches
throughout the county which include the areas of Senseny/Greenwood Road and Route
3
522 South, both of which are anticipated to be located within the UDA (Urban
Development Area) in locations consistent with recently approved area plans; The
Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the Southern Frederick Area Plan.
The parking lot sidewalk extension project, designed to promote sidewalk access at the
Bowman Library as phase 2 of the parking lot expansion project by extending the
sidewalks to serve residents traveling from the east to Lakeside Drive, is the project that
was most recently removed from their submission.
Transportation Committee
The Transportation Committee continues to provide project requests for the CIP.
Virginia State Code allows for transportation projects to be included within a locality's
CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from developers and
revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does not take away funding
for generalized road improvements.
The Transportation Committee continues their requested funding for sixteen projects.
The sixteen requests include projects that entail widening of major roads; key extensions
of roads that help provide better networks, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and the
addition of turn lanes at current unsafe intersections. The inclusion of the Eastern Road
Plan Improvements item once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and
potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects which are aimed at
mitigating potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
The major change to the transportation project list in recent years CIP s is the
classification of the projects into funded and unfunded priorities. In this year’s CIP, the
funding contributions have been further adjusted by the Transportation Committee to
reflect the amount allocated to each funded project. Unfunded priorities have been placed
in the Long Range Comprehensive Plan Project column.
Winchester Regional Airport
Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and
state governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the
other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding.
The Airport has recently completed a major improvement of their runway. With this
project moving from the CIP, The Airport Authority is now focusing their CIP efforts on
taxiway improvements and property acquisition in support of airport development to
meet Federal Aviation requirements for general aviation facilities. The vast majority of
the funding for these improvements came from the FAA and VDA.
The construction of a new general aviation terminal to support future airport operations
and associated parking improvements is a project that has been elevated to number one in
4
this year’s CIP. The previous number one priority for the Airport was the acquisition of
property to support airport operations. The authority continues to be successful in their
pursuit of this priority. A relatively new project for the airport is the Fuel Storage
Facility. This project has moved up to the Airport’s third priority in this year’s CIP.
The number of projects that are included in this CIP has been consolidated in recent years
as the Airport Authority is further aligning the County’s CIP with the one provided to the
Virginia Department of Aviation.
County Administration
With the potential necessary relocation of the Clearbrook citizen convenience center in
the future, the number one priority is the facility proposed as a replacement for the
current convenience site at another location in the immediate vicinity to the existing
convenience site. The other requests from Public Works are for the expansion/relocation
of both the Albin and the Gore Refuse Sites to allow for a trash compactor, which will
reduce operational costs, by compacting trash before it reaches the landfill.
The joint County Administration and School Administration Building that was included
in last year’s amended CIP remains in this year’s project list. A new project for County
Administration this year is the Joint Judicial Center renovation and replacement project.
This new project consists of an expansion to the existing Joint Judicial Center Building as
the first phase of the project, and the potential further renovation or relocation as a second
phase. The project is to be located generally in the City of Winchester or in the County’s
Urban Development Area. The need for this project has been established through ongoing
communication with the court system and the City of Winchester. With Phase one of this
project underway, the value of this project has been reduced accordingly.
Previously, an item was added to enhance the connection between the CIP and proffered
contributions made to mitigate the impacts of development projects. This item, General
Government Capital Expenditures, is an item that addresses those general government
capital expenditures that may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold.
This is similar to the approach previously taken for Fire and Rescue Capital Equipment.
Fire and Rescue has its own section.
Fire and Rescue
The top project for the Fire and Rescue component remains the creation of Fire & Rescue
Station #22 in the vicinity of Route 277, with the ability to provide an annex facility for
other County-related offices. The collaboration of this project with other community
users and a land use planning effort was a key element of the Route 277 Land Use Plan.
Fire and Rescue has also included a project which provides for the capital apparatus
needs of this facility.
5
Fire & Rescue has once again requested the relocation of a current fire station in order to
operate more efficiently; Clearbrook. The Round Hill replacement project has moved off
of the CIP based on the successful initiation of this project. Three newer projects for Fire
and Rescue are the creation of Station #23, a new facility located in the vicinity of
Crosspointe, the creation of Station #24 in the vicinity of Cross Junction/Lake Holiday,
and a Fire & Rescue Regional Training Center. Such a Regional Public Safety Training
Center potentially consisting of an administrative building, multi-story burn building,
multi-story training tower, vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other
training props. This project will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous
materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions located within
the region.
Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests
Previously, a project consisting of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the
benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established. It is the intention of this capital
expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital
equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment that may fall below the guidelines
established by the Finance Committee. It was determined that the inclusion of such a
project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in
the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the
benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
The individual Fire and Rescue Companies have identified their own capital requests
which have been added to the CIP in no particular order. Most of the capital requests
meet the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee. However, three
projects do meet this guideline. Therefore, these equipment requests have been noted in
the table under the Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment project category. All of the requests
are from the Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company.
6
§¨¦81
§¨¦66
§¨¦81
0137
01259
01277
0155
0150
0111
01127
01522
017017
0150
0111
0150
01522
01522
0111
0137
0150
0 11,000 22,0005,500
Feet
0 3 61.5
Miles
2016 - 2017Frederick CountyCapital Improvements Plan
V
2016 - 2017Capital ImprovementsSpecific or Approximate Locations
3
3
6
4
1
1
4
2
3
5
7
2
1
1 Clearbrook Convenience Site
2 Albin Convenience Site Expansion
3 Gore Convenience Site Expansion
4 Fire & Rescue Station 22
5 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation
6 Fire & Rescue Station 23
7 Fire & Rescue Station 24
Airport
1 Library Branch - Gainesboro
2 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood
3 Library Branch - Rt 522 South
Library
County Administration
1
7
8
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Elementary School
12th Elementary School,
at Snowden Bridge
Middle School
The Willows
Fourth High School
Elementary School
Elementary School
Elementary School
Multi-Use Campus
Villages at Artrip
SHS
MHS
JWHS
FCMS
JWMS
REAMS
ABMS
GBES
SWES
RRES
APRES
EES
AES
BHES
MTES
OVES
IHES
GMES
Buildings & Grounds
Old Transportation Facility
Administration
Senseny Road
Dowell J. Howard
New Transportation Facility
StephensCityVirginia
0155
0111
01259
01522
0111
0137
0111
01277
01522
01127
01522
0150
01522
01522
0150
017
01522
0150
01522
0111
01522
0137
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
WinchesterVirginia
Middletown Virginia
!High Schools
!Middle Schools
!Elementary Schools
!Support Facilities
Potential School Facility Locations
Potential School Locations
Purchased Land
Proffered Land
Potential Proffer
Urban Development Area
SWSA
V
0 2 41 Miles
Note:
Created by Frederick County Department of
Planning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests
submitted by Frederick County School Board
12/1/15
School Locations
Are Most
Appropriate
Within the UDA
2016 - 2017Frederick CountyCapital Improvements Plan
Existing and Potential School Locations
9
10
§¨¦81
£¤55
£¤50£¤259
£¤522
£¤522
£¤277
£¤522
£¤50
£¤11
£¤37
£¤11
£¤37
§¨¦81
Clearbrook
Park
Sherando
Park
Rose Hill
Park
Snowden Bridge
Park
EAST
NE
SW
NW
V
0 2 41 Miles
Note:Created by Frederick County Department ofPlanning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests submitted by The Dept of Parks & Recreation12/1/2015
Existing County Parks
District Park
l Community Park
[k Neighborhood ParkProposed Parks
District
Community
Neighborhood
Abrams Creek Trail
UDA
2016 - 2017Frederick CountyCapital Improvements Plan
New Parks/Rec Locations
11
12
01522
0137
0111
01277
01522
01522
0150
017
01522
0150
0111
0137
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
Winchester
StephensCity
12
11
3
11
8
15
7
6
13 9
2
4
4
4
4
0 0.75 1.50.375 Miles
Frederick County Dept of
Planning & Development
107 N Kent St
Winchester, VA 22601
www.CO.FREDERICK.VA.US
12/1/15
V
2016 - 2017Frederick CountyCapital Improvement Plan
Transportation Projects
2016 - 2017Capital Improvement PlanTransportation Projects
$+
$+
Funded Priorities
Unfunded Priorities
16, EASTERN ROAD PLAN
IMPROVEMENTS16
2, ROUTE 277 WIDENING &
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 1)
3, EAST TEVIS EXTENSION
& BRIDGE OVER I81
4, CONTINUE RT37 PLANNING
& ENGINEERING WORK
6, ROUTE 277 WIDENING &
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 2)
7, REDBUD ROAD REALIGNMENT
8, WARRIOR DR EXTENSION
TO NEW EXIT 307
9, CHANNING DR EXTENSION
TO RT50
11, RT11 N OF WINC
WIDENING TO WV LINE
12, SENSENY RD WIDENING
13, INVERLEE WAY; CONNECTION
FROM RT50 TO SENSENY RD
15, RENAISSANCE DR
10, BRUCETOWN RD/
HOPEWELL RD; ALIGNMENT
AND INTERSECTION
10
14
ðñò""310 1, I-81 EXIT 310 IMPROVEMENTS
ðñò""310
1
5, I-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATIONðñò""307
ðñò""307
5
14, FOX DR; INSTALL RT TURN
LANE ONTO RT522$+14
$+10
13
14
Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Projects 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+
Public Schools Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located throughout the County.
Elementary School #12 $17,600,000 $12,800,000 $2,000,000 $32,400,000 $32,400,000
Armel Elementary School (Prior to FY2016-2017 Cost)
Addition and Renovation
Fourth High School $13,700,000 $27,400,000 $27,400,000 $15,000,000 $6,000,000 $89,500,000 $89,500,000
(Prior to FY2016-2017 Cost)
Robert E. Aylor Middle School TBD TBD TBD
Addition and Renovation
James Wood High School Upgrades TBD TBD TBD
Sherando High School Parking Lot TBD
& Softball Field Improvements TBD TBD
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary TBD TBD TBD
Phase 2 Renovation
Bass Hoover Elementary TBD TBD TBD
Phase 2 Renovation
Administration Office TBD (Prior to FY2016-2017 Cost)TBD TBD
$31,300,000 $40,200,000 $27,400,000 $15,000,000 $0 $8,000,000 $121,900,000 $121,900,000
Parks & Recreation
Sherando North West Sherando Park $1,107,210 $1,107,210 $1,107,210
Indoor Aquatic Facility $480,000 $10,820,000 $11,300,000 $11,300,000
Clearbrook & Sherando Water Slide/Spray Ground/$175,000 $1,180,000 $1,355,000 $1,355,000
Building Renovation
Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $121,000 $228,000 $2,849,000 $3,198,000 $3,198,000
Sherando Softball Complex $50,000 $622,000 $672,000 $672,000
Snowden Bridge Park Development $145,000 $1,816,000 $1,961,000 $1,961,000
Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000
Community Parks (3)$101,000 $6,204,000 $6,305,000 $6,305,000
Neighborhood Parks (3)$9,000 $2,398,000 $2,407,000 $2,407,000
District Parks (4)$15,530,000 $15,530,000 $15,530,000
Sherando Maintenance Compound $386,000 $386,000 $386,000
Community Center $9,067,000 $9,067,000 $9,067,000
Soccer/Multi Use Fields $1,153,000 $1,153,000 $1,153,000
Sherando Skateboard Park $529,000 $529,000 $529,000
Fleet Trip Vehicles $307,000 $307,000 $307,000
Indoor Ice Rink $6,180,000 $6,180,000 $6,180,000
Sherando Access Road w/Parking/Trails $1,618,000 $1,618,000 $1,618,000
Sherando Lake/Trails/Fields/Parking $1,387,000 $1,387,000 $1,387,000
Sherando Picnic Areas $828,000 $828,000 $828,000
Clearbrook Open Play Areas $493,000 $493,000 $493,000
Clearbrook Tennis/Basketball Complex $542,000 $542,000 $542,000
Clearbrook Shelter Stage $524,000 $524,000 $524,000
$1,883,210 $13,833,000 $13,889,000 $24,983,000 $1,682,000 $307,000 $11,572,000 $68,149,210 $68,149,2101
5
16
Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Projects 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
Regional Library
Gainesboro Library $155,023 $1,465,736 $128,275 $1,749,034 $1,749,034
Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD
Route 522 South Library TBD TBD
$0 $155,023 $1,465,736 $128,275 $0 $0 $1,749,034 $1,749,034
Transportation
Funded Priorities
I-81 Exit 310 Improvements $49,121,000 $49,121,000 E $49,121,000
Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening
and Safety Improvements (ph 1)$14,000,000 $24,000,000 $38,000,000 E $38,000,000
East Tevis Street Extension and
Bridge over 81 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 E $15,000,000
Unfunded Priorities
Route 37 Engineering & Construction $300,000,000 $300,000,000 E $300,000,000
I-81 Exit 307 Relocation $60,000,000 $60,000,000 E $60,000,000
Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening
and Safety Improvements (ph 2)$15,000,000 $15,000,000 E $15,000,000
Redbud Road Realignment $2,500,000 $2,500,000 E $2,500,000
Warrior Drive Extension $23,200,000 $23,200,000 E $23,200,000
Channing Drive Extension $20,600,000 $20,600,000 E $20,600,000
Brucetown/Hopewell Realign.$3,000,000 $3,000,000 E $3,000,000
Widening of Route 11 North $47,800,000 $47,800,000 E $47,800,000
Senseny Road Widening $22,800,000 $22,800,000 E $22,800,000
Inverlee Way $10,200,000 $10,200,000 E $10,200,000
Fox Drive $250,000 $250,000 E $250,000
Rennaisance Drive $2,000,000 $2,000,000 E $2,000,000
Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD TBD
$78,121,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $324,000,000 $207,350,000 $609,471,000 $609,471,000
Winchester Airport
New General Avaiation Terminal $380,000 $3,280,000 A,B $3,660,000
Northside Connector $1,250,000 A,B $1,250,000
Fuel Storage Facility $1,000,000 A,B $1,000,000
Land Parcel 64-A-69 $212,000 A,B $212,000
Land Parcel 64B-A-33A $175,000 A,B $175,000
Land Parcel 64B-A-40 $175,000 A,B $175,000
Land Parcel 64B-A-51 $235,000 A,B $235,000
Land Parcel 64-A-67 $275,000 A,B $275,000
Land Parcel 64-A-64 $275,000 A,B $275,000
Land Parcel 64-A-60 $275,000 A,B $275,000
Land Parcel 64-A-59 $300,000 A,B $300,000
Land Parcel 64B-A-47 $300,000 A,B $300,000
Land Parcel 64-A-49 $300,000 A,B $300,000
Land Parcel 64-A-50 $300,000 A,B $300,000
Land Parcel 64B-A-52 $300,000 A,B $300,000
North Side Svc Road $400,000 A,B $400,000
Taxiway "A" Relocation Design/Construction $200,000 $4,650,000 $1,250,000 $3,550,000 A,B $9,650,000
$3,702,000 $3,830,000 $2,100,000 $4,650,000 $1,250,000 $3,550,000 $0 $19,082,000
1
7
18
Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Projects 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County Administration
Clearbrook Convenience Site $540,650 $540,650 E $540,650
Albin Convenience Site $30,000 $540,650 $570,650 $570,650
Relocation/Expansion Gore Site $30,000 $358,105 $388,105 $388,105
General Government Capital Expen $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000
Voting Equipment - Registrar $297,332 $297,332 $297,332
County/School Board
Administration Building TBD TBD E TBD
Joint Judicial Center
Renovation / New Facility $20,000,000 $24,065,500 E $20,000,000
$1,067,982 $740,650 $230,000 $558,105 $200,000 $20,000,000 $26,862,237 $22,796,737
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue Station #22 (277)$400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000
F&R Station #22 (277) Apparatus $100,000 $805,000 $905,000 $905,000
Fire & Rescue Station #23 $550,000 $2,150,000 $1,000,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000
Regional Training Center $75,000 $100,000 $1,250,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 $31,175,000 $31,175,000
Fire & Rescue Station #24 (Gainesboro)$250,000 $3,500,000 $3,750,000 C $3,750,000
Station #13 (Clearbrook) Relocation $33,000 $88,000 $4,575,000 $4,696,000 E $4,696,000
$1,158,000 $4,893,000 $11,825,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 47,626,000 $47,626,000
Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests
Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000
* See Fire & Rescue Company Requests (<$100K)
$550,000 Apparatus Ventilation System for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$550,000 C $550,000
$550,000 Office and Living Quarters for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$550,000 C $550,000
$700,000 Rescue Engine Replacement for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$700,000 C $700,000
$200,000 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$200,000 C $200,000
$1,000,000 Building Renovation for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$1,000,000 C $1,000,000
$450,000 North Mountain Fire & Rescue Co.Building Expansion $450,000 C $450,000
$3,650,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $4,450,000 $4,450,000
Total $120,882,192 $63,851,673 $57,109,736 $55,519,380 $12,832,000 $366,107,000 $880,207,481 $895,223,981
* Fire & Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests (<$100K)
$39,600 Turn out Gear for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue $39,600 C $39,600
$16,000 Hose Replacement for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$16,000 C $16,000
$67,000 Life Pack x2 for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co.$67,000 C $67,000
$122,600
A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation N/A= Not Available
B= Partial funding from FAA TBD= To be Determined
C= Partial funding from private donations
D= Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years
E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources
F= Funding initiated prior to displayed 5 years
1
9
20
THE CIP TABLE
CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS
The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital
improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the
information in this table is explained below.
Department Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for
their requested projects.
Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects.
County Contribution- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each
project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the
five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year
columns, does not include debt service projections.
Notes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular
projects.
Total Project Costs- The cost for each project, including county allocations and other
funding sources.
PROJECT FUNDING
The projects included in the 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project
cost to the county of $895,223,981. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five
years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years.
• School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the
Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund.
• Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the
unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation
Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for
projects not funded by the county.
• Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state,
and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from
Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of
Winchester.
• The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an
indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these
projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of
state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing.
21
22
Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List
Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located
throughout the County.
PRIORITY 1
Elementary School #12 / Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation
Description: The 12th ES will have a floor area of approximately 100,000 square feet
and will be located in Snowden Bridge. The facility will be designed to accommodate a
student membership of 742.
Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since
that time. The school contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 590
students. As of October 31, 2015, the school has 579 students. Ten classrooms will be
added to Armel ES for the school to accommodate the additional growth at Lake
Frederick. The existing facility will be updated as needed and core areas partially
renovated to serve the additional students.
Capital Cost: $32,400,000
Justification: The 12th ES project will address anticipated growth in student enrollment
in the school division in general and in the Stonewall, Redbud Run, and Apple Pie Ridge
elementary school attendance zones in specific over the next several years.
Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, unexpected growth in the
attendance zone will need to be addressed through the addition of classrooms to the
facility. An attendance rezoning was completed last year as part of the implementation of
full-day kindergarten. Addressing the growth issue at Armel was studied as a part of this
rezoning. Four areas were identified to be rezoned to another school to offset the
additional growth at Lake Frederick. None of the four options provided a complete and
satisfactory solution. One option would have put Armel outside of its own attendance
zone. A second would have split a neighborhood and sent some of the neighborhood to a
school further away. A third would have simply relocated the growth issue to another
school. The fourth option was adopted, but only moved ~50 students, a temporary
reprieve from growth pressures.
Construction Schedule: For both schools, planning, design, permit approval,
appropriation, and construction should take 30 Months
PRIORITY 2
Fourth High School
Description: The fourth high school project will serve students grades 9-12, have a
program capacity of 1,725 students, and will address anticipated growth in high school
student enrollment in the school division. The site is located at the end of Justes Drive
23
behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school is designed for collaborative education, similar to
the new Frederick County MS and the renovated Aylor MS, with a variety of learning
spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in
today’s working world.
Capital Cost: $89,500,000
Justification: This project will address expected growth in high school student
enrollment in the school division over the next several years. We project that enrollment
in the high schools by the fall of 2020 will be 4,253 students. High school program
capacity is currently 4,050 students. To avoid overcrowding in the high schools, we need
to construct the fourth high school in Frederick County to open in that time frame.
Construction Schedule: Construction will take 48 months
PRIORITY 3
Robert E. Aylor Middle School Addition & Renovation
Description: Robert E. Aylor Middle School opened in 1969 as a junior high and has
served those grades since that time. The school contains 113,643 square feet and has a
program capacity of 850 students serving grades 6-8. The building is in acceptable
condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major
areas of this renovation project include the following: reorganization and addition of
classroom and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborative
education, complete replacement of fire alarm and communication systems, upgrade of
electrical and plumbing, and complete replacement of mechanical systems. Other areas to
be addressed are security, modernization of asphalted areas, and the installation of an
emergency system.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: Robert E. Aylor Middle School is 46 years old and renovations are needed
to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operation of the school for
years to come. The school was constructed as a junior high, where the school was
arranged by department. Modern instruction requires that the school be arranged by grade
and that a variety of learning spaces be provided (classroom, low intensity labs, high
intensity labs, small collaborative spaces, large collaborative spaces, etc.) to meet the
needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working
world.
Construction Schedule: 48 Months
PRIORITY 4
James Wood High School Renovation
Description: James Wood High School opened in 1980 and has served as a high school
since that time. The school contains 234,095 square feet and has a program capacity of
1,400 students. Currently, the building serves grades 9-12. The building is in good
condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major
24
areas to be included in this renovation project are increased electrical service and
distribution to support technology, technology cabling, hardware and its installation,
upgrade of plumbing and mechanical systems, and modification of instructional areas to
support modern instructional delivery.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: James Wood High School is 35 years old. Renovations and technological
upgrades are needed to a number of areas to ensure effective, economical, and efficient
operation of the school for years to come. This school will be renovated to be more like
the 4th HS, the new Frederick County MS, and the renovated Aylor MS, with a variety of
learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills
necessary in today’s working world.
Construction Schedule: 36 Months
PRIORITY 5
Sherando High School Parking Lot and Softball Field Improvements
Description: This project is being undertaken to address several traffic safety concerns
identified over the years at Sherando High School and to address equity issues (there is
no softball field at SHS). Two studies of the site have been conducted, and a master plan
created. Concerns exist for pedestrians, school buses, student drivers, parents, and staff.
Rearrangement of the site and the flow of traffic on the site are necessary to address these
needs.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: This is a two-part project. For transportation safety, concerns exist on the
school site at Sherando High School during arrival and dismissal. The students, many of
their parents, and the staff necessary to serve them are exposed to these safety concerns
on a daily basis. The flow of traffic at arrival is so slow that at times vehicles on Route
277 back up past Double Church Road.
For the softball field, SHS does not have a softball field on site, instead using a softball
field in neighboring Sherando Park. This represents an equity issue between boys and
girls sports and is contrary to FCPS’ standpoint of equity between boys and girls sports.
Construction Schedule: 30 Months
PRIORITY 6
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovations
Description: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School opened in 1974 and has served
continuously as an elementary school since that time. The school contains 65,120 square
feet and has a program capacity of 528 students.
Currently, the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however,
several major areas need to be addressed, including open classroom space, ADA
compliance, energy conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarm, electrical,
plumbing, and mechanical systems.
25
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is 41 years old and renovation is
needed to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operations of the
school for years to come.
Construction Schedule: 36 Months
PRIORITY 7
Bass Hoover Elementary School Phase 2 Renovations
Description: Bass-Hoover Elementary School opened in 1975. The school contains
70,569 square feet and has a program capacity of 656 students.
Currently, the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however,
several major areas need to be addressed. Renovations will address several major issues,
including open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy conservation, security, and
upgrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. A building
addition, Phase 1, has been done to maintain program capacity and prepare the building
for full-day kindergarten.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: Bass-Hoover Elementary School is 40 years old and renovation is needed
to a number of areas to ensure the effective, economical, and efficient operations of the
school for years to come.
Construction Schedule: 36 Months
PRIORITY 8
School Board Administration Building
Description: Frederick County Public Schools’ administration has been located at the
old Kline Elementary School building since 1983. Before the building was converted to
offices, it had served as Kline Elementary School since 1961. The facility contains
27,992 square feet, including the 5,000 square foot Annex and the 2,400 square foot
Finance Addition, but not including the four modular classroom units that are used for
offices, work space, and a conference room.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The 54 year old Administrative Offices building does not have enough
office and meeting space, needs technology upgrades, and improvements to the
mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems to meet modern code. Meeting space is at a
premium, as we have only 2 sizeable meeting rooms. There are also building security and
asbestos issues. Existing issues will become more pressing and new issues will appear as
the district (and therefore the staff) grows.
Construction Schedule: 30 months
26
Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
North West Sherando Park
Description: This project involves the development of an Access Road, Parking,
Shelter, Restroom, Playground, and Open Play Field in the North West area of Sherando
Park, off Warrior Drive. Improvements to include; Entrance and access road (400 lf) off
Warrior Drive, Parking – 46 paved & lighted, 50 overflow spaces, Restroom Building,
Shelter Building, Playground, 400’x200’ open play field, and Electric, Sewer and Water
infrastructure
Capital Cost: $1,107,210
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando
Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. This project will provide
access to new recreation amenities trails with walking and jogging opportunities.
Walking and jogging rank #1 in the 20011 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey and 2012 Parks
and Recreation Community Survey for all outdoor recreational activities. The standard
for bike/pedestrian trails, based upon the Virginia Outdoor Plan, is 1 mile/1,000
population. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in
the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Sherando Park,
currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With
the County currently having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this
project has already been completed. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is
necessary to meet the needs of our service area.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 2
Indoor Aquatic Facility – Competitive/Training Pool
Description: The Parks and Recreation Commission has engaged in conversation with
FCPS to site the facility at the 4th High School campus. Land on the site has been set
aside for this purpose. The approximately 35,000 square foot building will likely house a
10 lane competitive pool, 6 lane warm water teaching pool, meeting rooms, shower and
changing rooms, and facilities support areas. The above facility would meet the
swimming needs of the community, including HS level swim teams.
Capital Cost: $11,300,000
Justification: There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By
constructing the indoor pool, it would permit the department to meet competition needs,
instructional needs, citizen programming provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to
the community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified
in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. This facility
would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a
27
facility to offer competitive scholastic programs and year round recreational
programming for the residents of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 3
Water Slide/Spray Ground Swimming Pool Improvements – Sherando/Clearbrook
Description: Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando
Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of the diving boards and the installation of
one 50' water slide and one 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also include
the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool.
Capital Cost: $1,355,000
Justification: This project is expected to increase pool attendance by 30 percent while
providing recreational opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service
areas.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 4
Abrams Creek Greenway Trail
Description: 10’ wide asphalt multi-use bicycle/pedestrian trail along Abrams Creek
from Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is estimated that the trail will have (3) three
bridges (stream crossings) and will be approximately 2.6 miles in length.
Capital Cost: $3,198,000
Justification: This project will provide trails with bicycle, walking and jogging
opportunities, which ranks #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor
recreational activities. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as
identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 5
Softball Complex- Sherando Park
Description: Softball fields (2) - 300' radius, fully fenced, backstop, four 50 person
bleachers per field, lighted concrete poles 30/20 FC, concrete deck. Access Road - 500
LF. Parking - 153 spaces, asphalt paved with curbed islands and drop off; line markings
and 6 security lights. Landscaping - 100 shade trees; pine screen. Peripheral Work -
General seeding - 1 acre; miscellaneous signage.
Capital Cost: $672,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire
Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by
28
the Frederick County school system. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields
within the county’s regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual
purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth and adult softball programs. With
the increased usage of these fields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these
programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to
accommodate the existing demand of youth baseball and adult softball programs. This
project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick
County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 6
Snowden Bridge Park Development
Description: Snowden Bridge Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge
development utilizes park and school land for the provision of an active recreation park.
The above park is to include four (4) regulation size soccer fields and three (3) baseball
fields suitable for little league play. Lighting, restroom and parking are part of the park
concept.
Capital Cost: $1,961,000
Justification: The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (formerly
Stephenson Village) rezoning proffer of 2003. The proffer indicates the provided land to
be used for baseball and soccer field development in anticipation of the population
increase generated by the development. The Parks and Recreation Commission adopted a
site plan for the property in 2015 showing parking and three (3) baseball fields.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 7
Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade
Description: Upgrade the ball field lighting at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks
Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the 30/20 FC (footcandle)
level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and replace with 50/30 FC (footcandle) level
fixtures, lamps and steel poles on (4) four fields at Clearbrook Park and (4) four fields at
Sherando Park. This upgrade is required by Little League International on all little
league fields.
Capital Cost: $1,300,000
Justification: The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfield light
system be upgraded to achieve the recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the
playing surface. This will facilitate the provision of recreational opportunities at
Sherando and Clearbrook parks for the service areas which include all Frederick County
residents. The field light fixtures are over twenty-five years old and are affixed to poles,
the majority being over thirty-five years old.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
29
PRIORITY 8
Community Parks (3)
Description: The Community Park project includes the acquisition of three sites of
approximately thirty-five acres and the subsequent development of four sites (Rose Hill
Park land currently under lease). Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by
the specific site; however typical development would be as described by Parks and
Recreation.
Capital Cost: $6,305,000
Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the
amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as
recommended by the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located throughout
Frederick County. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to
create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents Frederick
County.
Construction Schedule: FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 9
Neighborhood Parks (3)
Description: The Neighborhood project includes the acquisition of three sites of
approximately ten acres and the subsequent development of these sites. Developed
amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site; however typical development
would be as described by Parks and Recreation:
Capital Cost: $2,407,000
Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the
amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as
recommended by the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the Urban
Development Area. The location of this project would provide parkland developed to
create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents of
Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 10
District Parks (4)
Description: Acquisition of Parkland; 200 acres
30
Capital Cost: $15,530,000
Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the
amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as
recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the needs
of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in all parts of
Frederick County. The location of this project would provide parkland which could be
developed to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the
residents of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 11
Maintenance Compound and Office – Sherando Park
Description: This project involves the construction of a 1,200 square-foot office and a
3,200 square-foot storage shed for operation at Sherando Park.
Capital Cost: $386,000
Justification: This facility will enable the county to maintain its equipment and facilities
in a more responsible and effective manner. There is a need for more storage,
maintenance and office space with the additional responsibility of maintaining all outdoor
facilities at Sherando High School, Armel Elementary School, Orchard View Elementary
School, Bass-Hoover Elementary School, Middletown Elementary School, R. E. Aylor
Middle School, Admiral Byrd Middle School, Evendale Elementary School, and the
Public Safety Facility. This project should be located at Sherando Park to best serve the
target maintenance area.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 12
Multi-Generational Community Center
Description: The Field House project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and
include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a 1/16 mile track and a minimum of
two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by indoor
soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton with the installation
of in-floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for
special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden and home, outdoor, craft,
antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities
to take place at one time. The facility would also house a fitness center, multi-purpose
rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms.
Capital Cost: $9,067,000
Justification: Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied
significantly on the use of the county public schools to house recreation programs. This
arrangement was adequate when the department first started out, however the department
31
currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating a situation where the department
can no longer meet the programming and facility needs of the county residents. A
Community Center facility will facilitate the department to meet citizen programming
demands and provide the area with a facility to attract new businesses to the community.
This facility would be available to all area residents and is intended to meet the needs of
the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 13
Soccer Complex - Sherando Park
Description: Soccer field - 210' x 360' artificial grass surface with goals. Access paths -
1500 LF; 10' wide; asphalt paved. Restroom/concession - 820 SF; masonry with concrete
roof deck; full concession hookup. Plaza - 22,000 SF; 50% paved/50% planted; kiosk.
Picnic shelters (1) - 24' x 24': 6 picnic tables each; concrete pad; wood frame structure;
asphalt shingles. 12 sets of bleachers. Landscaping - 90 shade trees. Lighting - 1 field
(210' x 360')
Capital Cost: $1,153,000
Justification: This facility would be used by the entire Frederick County area. In
addition to its use as a recreational facility, the soccer complex will also be used by the
Frederick County school system. To reduce the gap between the number of existing
soccer fields and the number of fields which are needed to meet the minimum standard
for our service area. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as
identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best location
for soccer field development. The fact that the county will not have to acquire property
for this facility means that the most costly aspect of this development has already been
completed. Sherando Park also provides a location that is situated in the fastest growing
area of the county and is adjacent to the high school. With joint use of facilities between
the park and school system, the construction of additional soccer fields will benefit both
agencies.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21.
PRIORITY 14
Skateboard Park - Sherando Park
Description: This project recommends the development of a skateboard bowl; a half
pipe; an open skate area; vehicle parking; an access road; fencing; and landscaping.
Capital Cost: $529,000
Justification: Requested by the community to provide additional recreational facilities
for the youth of Frederick County at Sherando Park. This project is not mandated by state
or federal requirements, but it is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive
32
Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master
Development Plan for Sherando Park. This project is intended to meet the needs of the
community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community
Survey.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21.
PRIORITY 15
Fleet Trip Vehicles
Description: The Parks and Recreation Department needs to upgrade the current vehicle
fleet to offer a comprehensive package of trips for Frederick County citizen’s recreation
needs. These are necessary to adequately offer trip packages and provide reliable
transportation for program participants. Bus #1 – 40-50 Passenger Bus, Bus #2 – 30-40
Passenger Bus, Van #1 – 12 Passenger Van
Capital Cost: $307,000
Justification: To offer a comprehensive package of trips where the population of
Frederick County could begin to rely on the Parks and Recreation Department to meet
their trip needs.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21+.
PRIORITY 16
Indoor Ice Rink
Description: The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and
include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a single 200’ x 85’ ice rink, locker
rooms, party/meeting rooms, and concession area and would need approximately 10 acres
to construct. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the
County. The ice rink may be co-located with other compatible uses should opportunities
arise, reducing the acreage demand.
Capital Cost: $6,180,000
Justification: There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and county
residents currently must travel over one hour to use an indoor ice facility. By
constructing the indoor ice rink, it would permit the department to meet competition
needs, instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as well as provide a
nucleus to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to
all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer year
round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. This project is
intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County
Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
33
PRIORITY 17
Access Road with Parking and Trails - Sherando Park
Description: This project involves the development of an entrance and 1,800 linear feet
of access roadway from Warrior Drive; a 100 space parking area; and 2.8 miles of trails.
Capital Cost: $1,618,000
Justification: This project will provide trails with walking and jogging opportunities.
Walking and jogging rank #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor
recreational activities. The standard for bike/pedestrian trails, based upon the Virginia
Outdoor Plan, is 1 mile/1,000 of population. This project is intended to meet the needs of
the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 18
Lake, Parking, and Trail Development with two multi-purpose fields
Description: This project involves the development of a 12 acre lake; 1.5 mile trail
system around the lake; 800 linear feet of access roadway; lighted parking lot with 125
spaces; and development of two irrigated 70x120 yard multi-purpose fields.
Capital Cost: $1,384,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando
Park service area and the entire Frederick County community by reducing the needs gap
between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number needed to meet
the minimum standards required for our service area. This project will provide trails with
walking and jogging opportunities which ranks as #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan
survey. This project will also provide multi-use playfields for adult and youth programs.
This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 19
Picnic Area- Sherando Park
Description: This project includes a restroom/concession area; four picnic shelters;
playground area; access paths; parking; and landscaping.
Capital Cost: $828,000
Justification: These facilities would be used by the Sherando Park service area. The
Commission is recommending this project be included to address deficiencies in passive
recreation opportunities at Sherando Park. This project is identified in the 2002 Sherando
Park Master Plan and is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the
2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
34
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 20
Open Play Area – Clearbrook
Description: This project includes development of a picnic shelter; six horseshoe pits; a
volleyball court; croquet turf; shuffleboard; parking; refurbishing the existing concession
stand; landscaping; peripheral work; and renovations to existing shelters, restrooms,
access paths, and parking areas on the south side of the lake.
Capital Cost: $493,000
Justification: To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park service area.
To reduce the gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the
number which is needed to meet the minimum standards for our service area. This
project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick
County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Clearbrook Park, currently owned by
Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the county already
having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been
completed. This project, being located at Clearbrook Park, is necessary to meet the needs
of our service area.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 21
Tennis/Basketball Complex - Clearbrook Park
Description: This project includes the development of four tennis courts; two basketball
courts; a shelter; access paths; parking; and landscaping.
Capital Cost: $542,000
Justification: Because Clearbrook Park is a regional facility, these facilities will be
available to all county residents. Currently, there are no tennis or basketball courts in the
Clearbrook Park area. This project will reduce the gap between the number of existing
tennis and basketball courts and the number of courts needed to meet the minimum
standards for our service area. Development of this project will also provide this
department with facilities for recreational programs. This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Clearbrook Park, currently owned by Frederick County, provides the
very best location for tennis and basketball court development. Since the county will not
have to acquire property for this facility, the most costly aspect of this development has
already been completed.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
35
PRIORITY 22
Shelter/Stage Seating - Clearbrook Park
Description: This project includes the development of a shelter with a performance
stage; refurbishing existing restrooms and access paths; and renovations to the lake.
Capital Cost: $524,000
Justification: This facility would be used by the entire county population. Presently,
there are no facilities to accommodate cultural arts programs within the county’s park
system. This project is needed to provide a facility for cultural activities. Clearbrook
Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best location for
facilitating cultural events. The County will not have to acquire property for this project
means that a significant cost has already been completed. Clearbrook Park, with its
existing park characteristics and cultural features also provides the best location for our
service area.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
36
Handley Regional Library Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
Northern Frederick County – Gainesboro Library Branch
Description: Construction of a 4,000 to 5,000 sq.ft. branch library, either as a stand
alone facility or co-located with a planned Frederick County facility (e.g. the new middle
school). Initial parking should be for at least 50 vehicles. The proposed location would
be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro District, but this could change depending on patterns of
library use and on whether donated land could be located or if co-located with a
Frederick County project already in the early planning stage. This projected branch
would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing property and was outlined in a document
prepared by FCPS students just over a year ago.
Capital Cost: $1,749,034
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. In 2014-
2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 462,299 items. 42,034 Frederick
County residents have library cards and averaged 63.64% of all materials checked out of
the regional system. 3,147 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for
library cards for the first time in 2013-2014. Of Frederick County residents over five
years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 47.6 % of the total have
library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the
national average level of 58%. This population group is not close to a library in the
regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from
toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will
be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when
school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi and via
desktop/laptop computers for word processing, other office applications and for Internet
usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 2
Frederick County Library Branch – Senseny/Greenwood
Description: Construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to
15,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 65 vehicles. The
proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The
first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: In 2014-2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 462,299
items. 42,034 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 63.64% of all
materials checked out of the regional system. 3,147 Frederick County residents, adults
and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2013-2014. Of Frederick
County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately
37
48% of the total have library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library
usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. This population group is not close
to a library in the regional system. This library will provide materials and programming
for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational
materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and
on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply internet, Wi-Fi,
and desktop/laptop access for word processing and other office applications for job
searching, business, entertainment, etc. usage. There will be a meeting room of 425
square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 3
Frederick County Library Branch - Route 522 South
Description: Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to
10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 35 vehicles. The
proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The
first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres acre or co-
located with the new High School projected to be built in the same area.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. In 2014-
2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 462,299 items. 42,034 Frederick
County residents have library cards and averaged 63.64% of all materials checked out of
the regional system. 3,147 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for
library cards for the first time in 2013-2014. Of Frederick County residents over five
years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 48% of the total have
library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the
national average level of 58%. This population group is not close to a library in the
regional system. This area also lacks a community center that a library with meeting
room could help fill this need. The Library will provide materials and programming for
patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational
materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and
on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access
via Wi-Fi and via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, other office
applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in
which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: TBD
38
Transportation Committee Project Priority List
Funded Priorities
PRIORITY 1
Interstate 81, Exit 310 Improvements
Description: Construct improvements to Exit 310 interchange.
Capital Cost: $49,121,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in many areas of the County and address coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 2
Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1)
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to
Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley
Drive.
Capital Cost: $38,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 3
East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over I-81
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 522 and going west
approximately 0.2 miles to connect to the road network being constructed by the Russell
150 development. Project includes bridge over Interstate 81.
Capital Cost: $15,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in many areas of the County and address development to the surrounding area. The
location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the county, VDOT, and the
developer.
Construction Schedule: TBD
39
Unfunded Priorities
PRIORITY 4
Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37
Description: This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension.
More specifically, to update the Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new
Record of Decision and to update the 1992 design plans to address the current alignment,
engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvements. In addition, this allows
for advanced engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction.
Capital Cost: $300,000,000 +
Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation
improvement that would benefit the entire county and surrounding localities.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 5
Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation
Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost: $60,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in many areas of the County and address coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 6
Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2)
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to
Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley
Drive.
Capital Cost: $15,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 7
Redbud Road Realignment
Description: Realign Redbud Road from its current location through development land
in the vicinity of Route 11 north and Snowden Bridge Boulevard.
40
Capital Cost: $2,500,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on
Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 8
Warrior Drive Extension
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior
Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south and west to intersect
with I-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost: $23,200,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 9
Channing Drive Extension
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where
Channing Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south to intersect
with Route 50 East at Independence Drive.
Capital Cost: $20,600,000
Justification: This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan, and will address
congestion in Eastern Frederick County and address development to the surrounding
areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 10
Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements
Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11.
Improvements to this intersection will address comprehensive planned development’s
traffic generation in the area.
Capital Cost: $3,000,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on
the Route 11 corridor. The location is identified by joint planning efforts between the
County and VDOT.
Construction Schedule: TBD
41
PRIORITY 11
Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line
Description: Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the
Eastern Road Plan.
Capital Cost: $47,800,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
over a large area of the County and address development to the surrounding area. This
project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and improving
the flow of traffic.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 12
Senseny Road Widening
Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not
dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the implementation of Route 37, Channing
Drive, and development in the area.
Capital Cost: $22,800,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on
Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 13
Inverlee Way
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going
south to Route 50 East. This project is being planned in conjunction with improvements
to Senseny Road and surrounding development.
Capital Cost: $10,200,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
and provide an additional needed link between Senseny Road and Route 50 East.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 14
Fox Drive
Description: Add additional turning lane(s) to Fox Drive where it intersects with Route
522 North.
Capital Cost: $250,000
42
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at this
intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 15
Renaissance Drive, Phase 2
Description: Construct a connector road between Route 11 and Shady Elm Drive.
Capital Cost: $2,000,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at key
points along Route 11 and Apple Valley Dr. This project is identified in Secondary Road
Improvements Plan.
Construction Schedule: Phase I construction was recently completed.
PRIORITY 16
Frederick County Eastern Road Plan
Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation
improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan, Eastern Road Plan that are not noted
individually above.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: This project prepares the County for future development by addressing the
projects needed to support that development in a manner consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Construction Schedule: N/A
43
Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
New General Aviation Terminal Construction
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport proposes to construct a new general
aviation terminal building. The new facility will be constructed in a new location slightly
south of the existing terminal building.
Capital Cost: $3,660,000
Justification: Since its opening in the early 1990s, the general aviation terminal building
for the Winchester Regional Airport has had only limited interior work completed.
Interior repairs are necessary due to extensive usage and some damage from water
leaking from the roof prior to its replacement in the spring of 2006 by necessity. The
heating and cooling systems are approaching 25 years in age and are nearing the end of
their useful life. The exterior of the terminal building is made from Drivet that has failed
in many areas and is generally in fair to poor condition. In addition, the windows are not
energy efficient and several of the window seals have failed. In 2008, a study was
completed to examine needs and costs to renovate the existing terminal building. After
review of the study, the WRAA determined it would be more economical to build a new
energy efficient building slightly east of the existing terminal. The proposed location of
the project will allow enough room to build out a new transient apron during the taxiway
relocation project.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 2
Northside Connector
Description: This project proposed to construct a new taxiway connector and a short
partial parallel taxiway on the northwest side of the airfield. The connector would access
the runway at the end of Runway 14 and the parallel taxiway would connect to the
proposed apron and hangar development area on the northside of the airfield.
Capital Cost: $1,250,000
Justification: The Winchester Regional Airport has and continues to experience a
growth in business usage. Over the past several years, businesses have been operating
increasingly larger aircraft. The based aircraft accommodations on the south side of the
airport were developed over 20 years ago, before these larger aircraft were even available
to businesses. Therefore the south side was not developed to accommodate these larger
aircraft. In addition, the airport has effectively "built-out" the available space for any
aircraft hangars on the southside, requiring opening up land on the northside. These
taxiways are the first step in opening up the area for future development of large
corporate hangars.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
44
PRIORITY 3
Fuel Storage Facility
Description: Construct new fuel storage facility for expansion and to meet DEQ and
EPA requirements.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: When the taxiway midfield section is relocated it will cause an
encroachment into the current fuel farm area. In addition relocation of a fuel storage
facility will allow room to add additional storage tanks in the future.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 4
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-69
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-69 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $212,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 5
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64B-A-33A
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel
64B-A-33A on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a
portion is located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $175,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
45
PRIORITY 6
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64B-A-40
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel
64B-A-40 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a
portion is located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $175,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 7
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64B-A-51
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-51 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $235,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 8
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-67
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-67 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $275,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
46
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 9
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-64
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-64 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $275,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 10
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-60
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-60 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $275,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 11
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64 A 59
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64
A 59 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $300,000
47
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 12
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-47
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-47 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $300,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 13
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A- 49
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-49 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $300,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 14
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-50
48
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-50 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $300,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 15
Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-52
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64-
A-52 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $300,000
Justification: Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 16
Northside Service Road
Description: This project proposes to construct a two lane service road around the end of
Runway 14. The road will be approximately 1/2 to 3/4 miles in length so that vehicles
stay clear of navigational aid critical areas. It is proposed that the road will be 2 lanes.
Capital Cost: $400,000
Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development occurring on the
northside of the runway. By having aircraft ground operations and storage on both sides
of the airfield (north and south), ground vehicle traffic requiring access to both sides of
the airfield will be generated. The traffic will include fueling truck operations and
personnel activities for general maintenance. The FAA encourages the construction of
service roads around aircraft activity areas, especially the runways, to prevent
unauthorized ground vehicle access to aircraft movement areas and to promote a safer
operating environment. The service road, located on the west side of the airport (Runway
14 end) will accomplish these goals.
49
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 17
Taxiway (A) Relocation
Description: The relocation of Taxiway "A" is part of the overall Airport upgrade to
meet safety design standards for a Group III airport. This relocation will improve the
serviceability and safety of the airport in regards to ground operations for larger jet
aircraft. Due to the complex task of relocating the entire 5,500' taxiway, the project has
been broken down into two phases - Phase I will begin at the 32 approach end of the
runway and continue to the terminal building located midfield. Phase II will continue
from the terminal building to the approach end of runway 14. The project will be broken
down into sections within the phases based on pavement conditions, demand and
availability of funding from the Federal Aviation Administration.
Capital Cost: $9,650,000
Justification: The relocation of Taxiway A is necessary to increase the Airport’s ability
to accommodate larger aircraft. This project also will improve the serviceability of the
Airport for larger aircraft wishing to use the airport.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19+
50
County Administration Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
Clearbrook Convenience Site Relocation
Description: The relocation of the Clearbrook citizens’ convenience site to property
located within the Clearbrook community is planned for the FY 16/17. The current two
acre facility is now situated on quarry land and is the beneficiary of a no-cost lease which
ends December 31, 2015. The Quarry has asked that the County vacate this property by
the end of 2016. Although the original lease agreement and options were extended by the
previous owner, O-N Minerals which planned to long wall mine below the surface. Due
to Carmeuse’s intention to use an open pit approach during its quarry expansion, the
convenience site will be forced to relocate to another site in the Clear Brook/Stephenson
community, likely within the next two years.
Capital Cost: $377,850
Justification: Planned quarry expansion will mandate that current facility be relocated,
preferably on county-owned land in the Clear Brook/Stephenson community.
Construction Schedule: Start in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 2
Albin Convenience Site Relocation
Description: The relocation of the Albin citizens’ convenience site to property located
within the Sunnyside/Albin community is projected for FY 17/18. A fenced two-acre site
will be constructed between North Frederick Pike and Indian Hollow Road on county-
owned property in close proximity to the existing site, ideally on a portion of the former
FCPS bus garage property. The project will require several months to complete including
fencing, earthwork, retaining walls, electric, equipment, lighting, paving and landscaping.
Capital Cost: $442,850
Justification: During August of 2015, 160,096 vehicles visited the Albin facility,
making it the single most utilized solid waste facility outside of the landfill. The site
serves a geographic area extending from Sunnyside to Cedar Creek Grade westward to
Gainesboro. It is easily accessible from Route 37 and North Frederick Pike. The total
number of vehicles using the facility, an average of 596 a day, represents an increase of
eight percent over 2014 figures. On Fridays and weekends this number can reach close to
700. As trash disposal and the resulting traffic continue to increase, the present
infrastructure will be unable to safely service the public. During the holidays, the site
requires two attendants in order to efficiently move traffic. However, lines still back out
onto Indian Hollow Road, creating a hazard noted several times by the Sheriff’s Office.
For residents living between Cedar Creek Grade and Apple Pie Ridge Road, curbside
pickup is costly, prompting heavy utilization of the convenience site which attracts a mix
of users from the suburbs and rural community. A number of users are those from the
more western end disposing of their trash when traveling into Winchester. Avid recyclers
51
from Westminster-Canterbury, Shenandoah University’s Pharmacy School and SU
students living in nearby townhouses also frequent the facility.
Construction Schedule: Start in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 3
Gore Refuse Site Relocation/Expansion
Description: The project will expand refuse capacity in the Gore community by
installing a surplus trash compactor. Installation of a compactor at Gore will drive down
collection costs at the site where trash is now collected in 10 8-yard boxes. In order to
accomplish this, and account for improved traffic flow and the construction of compactor
and recycling staging areas, the site will be expanded onto an adjoining parcel owned by
the county.
Capital Cost: $349,550
Justification: A total of 3,213 vehicles utilized the facility during the month of August,
2015. On a typical Saturday, usage peaks to 146 vehicles. The project will pay for itself
in lower refuse collection costs through compaction of solid waste before transport. Also,
with a compactor in place, refuse will be contained in an enclosed receiver can, reducing
blowing litter and odor and vectors, all of which can be a problem when using open
collection cans. The project will also provide much-needed capacity during heavy flow
times such as weekends and holidays. All 10 containers now fill to capacity during
Saturdays and Sundays. Numerous times, the site has closed early on Sundays when
capacity is reached. A 40-yard roll-off is used during the holidays to contain excess trash,
another additional expense. An upgraded site will meet the current and future solid waste
management needs of the Gore community.
Construction Schedule: Start in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 4
General Government Capital Expenditures
Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for
the benefit of General Governmental Capital Expenditures. It is the intention of this
capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for
governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities.
Such expenditures may be less than the established $100,000 departmental threshold. It
was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that
this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget
process. This project is for the benefit of the County Governmental Entities participating
in the CIP but does not include individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of
purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements
to general governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the
52
Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers
accepted on behalf of the governmental entities.
Construction Schedule: N/A
PRIORITY 5
County/School Board Administration Building
Description: This project consists of a County/School Board Administration Building,
to be located generally in the County’s Urban Development Area. The Joint
Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150,000 square foot office building
that may be shared with the County Schools Administration. The Schools’ portion may
be 50,000 square feet.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to
general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick
County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and
government services in an accessible location.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 6
Joint Judicial Center Renovation/New Facility
Description: This project consists of an expansion to the existing Joint Judicial Center,
to be located generally in the City of W inchester or in the County’s Urban Development
Area. This is a two-phased project; phase one includes the $4,065,000 renovation to the
existing Joint Judicial Center (in-progress, therefore $ value removed from CIP), Phase
two is the further renovation and/or reconstruction of facilities.
Capital Cost: $20,000,000
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to
general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick
County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and
government services in an accessible location. The need for this project has been
established through ongoing communication with the court system and the City of
Winchester.
Construction Schedule: FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 7
New Voting Equipment/Optical Scan
Description: This new project consists of a replacement of the current voting machines
(Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Machines). In 2015, the General Assembly
53
introduced a bill to prohibit the use of DRE Machines and require the use of optical use
ballot scanning systems in future elections. This project is in anticipation of future
legislation.
Capital Cost: $297,332
Justification: The Registrar has provided replacement plans for the voting machines by
precinct in anticipation of the replacement of the voting systems.
Construction Schedule: Start in FY 16-17
54
Fire & Rescue Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
Fire & Rescue Station #22 / Annex Facilities (Route 277)
Description: Construct a two bay Fire and Rescue Station with satellite Sheriff’s office
and the potential for office and meeting room space for the County and community. The
station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike, White Oak Road, and Tasker Road to
provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three-
acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be
approximately a 10,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who
would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite office and meeting room
space. This facility is specifically identified in the Route 277 Triangle and Urban Center
Land Use Plan approved in 2008.
Capital Cost: $3,400,000
Justification: This development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated
community with age restrictions on 80% of the homes above 55 and the other 20% above
45. The developer‘s master plan will allow for 2,130 individual dwelling units using a
mix of housing types.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 2
Fire & Rescue Station #22 / Apparatus (Route 277)
Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I
Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and
Rescue Station 22.
Capital Cost: $905,000
Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station
22 located on Fairfax Pike East in the Stephens City area of Frederick County. The
pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of the required
and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built
to the Federal KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped with all of the required and
necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance. This fire and
rescue apparatus is needed due to the fact that the Fire and Rescue Department currently
owns one (1) pumper and one (1) ladder truck that are twenty (20) plus years of age and
already assigned to other functions. The currently owned fire and rescue apparatus
would not endure the demands placed on it while being assigned to a high call volume.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
55
PRIORITY 3
Fire & Rescue Station #23 / New Facility (Crosspointe)
Description: This project consists of a 10,000 square foot fire station to accommodate 4
pieces of emergency equipment, and to house living and sleeping areas for staff. This
project also has the potential for office and meeting room space for the County and
community with an additional 2,000 square feet of building area. A two and ½ acre parcel
should be sufficient for building, parking and amenities for approximately 20 to 30
persons. The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end of current Rt. 37 South,
an area of proposed high density residential development, and commercial development.
Capital Cost: $3,700,000
Justification: The proposed location at the South end of Route 37 provides for quick and
easy access to Interstate 81 North and South at the 310 Exit. Access and response on Rt.
37 will be greatly enhanced from I81 to Route 50 West in the Northbound Lane.
Currently Stephens City and Round Hill Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies serve the
area. This location also provides easy access to Rt.11 and the Kernstown area along with
access to Middle Road and Subdivisions of Brookneil, Stonebrook, and Jacksons Woods.
These subdivisions have large single family homes in an area of Frederick County
outside of the UDA. Water supplies are scarce in these areas and a rapid response from
this proposed facility will likely reduce property damage from fire and response times for
Medical Emergencies. Major collector roads such as Tasker Road and Warrior Drive
along with the proposed extension of Rt. 37 and new roadways in the development will
provide quick access to additional homes and businesses in areas including Front Royal
Pike, Papermill Road. These roadway construction efforts will provide for an increased
level of quality emergency service to the citizens in this entire area.
Construction Schedule: To be determined.
PRIORITY 4
Fire & Rescue Regional Training Center
Description: Construct a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially consisting
of an administrative building, multi-story burn building, multi-story training tower,
vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other training props. This project
will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law
enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions located in Clarke County, Frederick
County, Shenandoah County, Warren County, Winchester City, State Agencies, Federal
Agencies, and potentially jurisdictions within the State of West Virginia.
Capital Cost: $31,175,000
Justification: This project will facilitate realistic training in today’s modern environment
for emergency services and industrial personnel located throughout the Northern
Shenandoah Valley and expanding into the State of West Virginia. This project will
reinforce existing training programs in those respective agencies and jurisdictions as well
as facilitate training that is currently not available within the Northern Shenandoah
Valley which causes students and instructors to travel into the Washington Metropolitan
56
region. The number of potential personnel being trained at this Training Center is
potentially in the thousands based upon training statistics provided in July 2007 by the
participating agencies.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21
PRIORITY 5
Fire and Rescue Station (#24) Relocation
Description: Construct a three (3) bay fire and rescue station with satellite County
Offices. This station is intended to be located on or near Redland Road in the area of
Lake Holiday either at a site provided by Lake Holiday or other tract in the vicinity. An
approximate three to four acre site is necessary for a 10,000 square foot facility, to house
a fire engine, and ambulance and rescue boat.
Capital Cost: $3,750,000
Justification: The Lake Holiday Development is scheduled to have a final build-out of
2,800 single family homes.
Construction Schedule: To be determined
PRIORITY 6
Clear Brook Fire and Rescue Station (#13) Relocation
Description: A new facility is proposed to be built on property located on Route 11
either north or south of Brucetown Road. The building is to be four (4) drive-through
bays, administration, eating and sleeping facilities along with a dining hall. The
estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 28,000 square feet.
Capital Cost: $4,396,000
Justification: With the current facility and need for upgrade in living quarters to
accommodate the career personnel24 hours, this is of the utmost priority. The new
location on Route 11 would give better access and additional space for additional use on
the property. At the current time we have outgrown our facility and with the equipment
that we have to provide the service to our community for property and health protection
and with the staffing needs and fund raising operations our current facility is in need of
upgrading/updating. We have an option to swap land with the Quarry and propose to
build a new facility on that property or remain at the current location and build on our
own property to the east and remove the current building and extend the parking to the
west.
Construction Schedule: To be determined
57
Fire & Rescue Company Capital Project Requests
Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue – Vehicles & Equipment
Description: This new project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000
for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services. It is the intention of this capital expenditure
fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment
fire and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was determined that the inclusion of such a
project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in
the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the
benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of
purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and
equipment will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with
regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire
and rescue companies.
Construction Schedule: N/A
The following requests have been added to the CIP in no particular order:
Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests.
Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Office and Living Quarters Project
Project Cost: $550,000
Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Apparatus ventilation system project
Project Cost: $550,000
Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Rescue Engine Replacement
Project Cost: $700,000
Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Self-contained Breathing Apparatus
Project Cost: $200,000
Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Building Renovation
Project Cost: $1,000,000
58
North Mountain Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Building Expansion
Project Cost: $450,000
Individual Equipment Requests less than $100,000.
Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Turn out gear
Project Cost: $396,000
Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Hose Replacement
Project Cost: $16,000
Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Life Pack x 2
Project Cost: $67,000
59