Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-06 CommentsMay 12, 2006 Mr. Mike Artz Artz and Associates 16 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Proposed Rezoning of Alban Center Dear Mike: COUNT 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540 /665 -6395 I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Alban Center. This application seeks to rezone 2.07 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to the B2 (Business General) District. Staff's review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Albin Rural Community Center. The site is in the area generally designated in the Comprehensive Policy Plan as the Albin Rural Community Center. The Comp Plan is not specific on policies for the Albin Community Center. It calls for more commercial uses in the Gore, Gainesboro and Round Hill Centers, but for all other centers, including this one, the plan (6 -74) says to consider proposals for commercial development on an individual basis. The plan further speaks to the need to allow these centers to continue to serve their traditional functions without spoiling their rural character. Therefore, a B2 rezoning could be consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, depending on the details of the proposal. A B1 (Neighborhood Business District) rezoning would be even more supportable, although this clearly allows fewer uses. 2. Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Comprehensive Policy Plan recommends a number of design features for business properties. These include landscaping, screening and controlling the size and number of signs. These design elements should be incorporated into this application. 3. Site Access. The county considers applications for rezonings on Route 522 within the Rural Community Centers, but not elsewhere. For this proposed use to function as part of the Albin Rural Community Center, it must be accessed from the rural community center, not from Route 522. Therefore, access to the site should be limited to one entrance on Bryarly Road. This is consistent with the recent Old Massey Store rezoning (REZ #09 -04) and the conditional use permit Page 2 Mr. Mike Artz RE: Proposed Rezoning of Alban Center May 12, 2006 (CUP #04 -98) for the miniature golf facility in Gainesboro. In addition, Route 522 is a major arterial road where additional accesses onto Route 522 should be avoided. 4. Impact Assessment Statement Proposed Uses. The application states the rezoning is for 20,000 square feet of office space and 3,000 square feet of other space. However, the proffer statement allows up to 40,000 square feet of development. The applicant must, therefore, base the TIA and all analysis on 40,000 square feet of retail development in order to reflect the maximum intensity that is proposed for the site. 5. Impact Assessment Statement Proposed Uses. The application states the rezoning is for one building with 23,000 square feet of commercial floorspace, although, as stated above, the proffer only limits it to 40,000 square feet. The scale and massing of the 23,000 square foot building (let alone a 40,000 square foot building) are out of character with the small- scale, mainly residential buildings in Albin. While the design of the building may be reasonably compatible, the size and scale are not compatible and will overwhelm the neighboring buildings. 6. Impact Assessment Statement Site Suitability. The application is missing a consideration of the natural features on the site (floodplains, wetlands, etc.) as required in the application. Please include this information. 7. Traffic Impact Analysis. Impact Assessment Statement Traffic. A complete traffic impact analysis was not provided with this draft rezoning. Trip generation figures were based on a 23,000 square foot office building. As stated previously, traffic projections will need to be based on 40,000 square feet of retail development (retail is an allowed use on the site and generates the highest possible number of trips), unless a lower floorspace is proffered. The average daily trips for 40,000 square feet of retail is approximately 4,000 trips, not 200- 300 trips as stated in the application. Also, the TIA should be based on one entrance on Bryarly Road and no entrance on Route 522, as stated in paragraph 3 above. 8. Proffer Statement Land Use Restrictions. General retail is an ambiguous term. Please site specific relevant uses allowed in the B2 Zoning District. Precision Instrument Repair and much other instrument repair are not allowed in the B2 Zoning District. Remove instrument repair from the list of allowed uses. Sign painting and lettering shops are allowed in the 132 District. Please precisely Page 3 Mr. Mike Artz RE: Proposed Rezoning of Alban Center May 12, 2006 state that use, so as not to cause confusion with outdoor ad services which are not allowed in the B2 District. 9. Proffer Statement Structural Development. The proffer statement allows 40,000 square feet of structural area. (The term floorspace is preferable.) The application itself proposes 20,000 square feet of office and 3,000 square feet of other. Make sure the proffer reflects what is actually proposed. All analysis must be based on the proffered floorspace. 10. Proffer Statement Structural Development. While the maximum height for an office building in the B2 District is 60 feet, this would be out of scale in a rural community center. The application clearly states the applicant is proposing a two story building. Therefore, it would be more appropriate in the proffer statement to state a height limit (perhaps 25 feet) in keeping with a two -story building, and in keeping with the surrounding buildings. 11. Proffer Statement Structural Development. The renderings prepared by Design Concepts are titled Hicks Office Building II, not Alban Center, and there are two of them. Please reword proffer C(4) to accurately reference these renderings. 12. Proffer Statement Business Signs. Proffering to limit the number and height of the freestanding signs is encouraged. Limiting the face size of the sign should also be considered, particularly given its location in a rural community center. Signs in the RA Zoning District are limited to 50 square feet and 10 feet in height. This is an appropriate scale in a rural community center. 13. Rezoning Exhibit "A This exhibit is not proffered and nothing contained on this drawing is endorsed with the rezoning. The applicant will need to comply with all relevant sections of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 14. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Historic Resources Advisory Board, Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick Winchester Health Department, Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company and the Frederick Winchester Service Authority. The proposed proffers have been forwarded by staff to the Frederick County Attorney. Once attorney comments are received by the Planning Department, they will be forwarded to your office. Attorney comments are required for acceptance of the rezoning application. Page 4 Mr. Mike Artz RE: Proposed Rezoning of Alban Center May 12, 2006 15. Agency Comments. Please verify the relevant Fire and Rescue Company. This area may be served by the Round Hill Fire and Rescue Company. 16. Fees. The fee for this application includes a $3,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre, and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Thus, a total of $3,257.00 is due upon submission of the official rezoning application. This is based on fees as of January 27, 2005. Fees may change. 17. Name. Please note that local maps spell this portion of the county as Albin, not Alban. 18. Applicant. The applicant for this application is listed as Artz Associates. However, the limited power of attorney designates Eddie Yost as the applicant. Please be consistent. One of these two should serve as the applicant and be listed on all documents. 19. Adjacent Parcels. The list of all adjacent properties, their owners and the owners' addresses is missing two parcels, 42 -A -103 and 42 -A -244. Please include these. Also, it is necessary to submit this information in a table form, rather than as individual tax record screens. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, A Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner SKE/bhd cc: David A. and Linda W. Hicks, 2333 N. Frederick Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 August 11, 2006 To: Historic Resources Advisory Board Re: Hicks (Albin Center) 354 Bryarly Road 1. Building Layout 2. Proposed Zoning District Artz Associates, PLC 16 E. Piccadilly St. Winchester, VA 22601 540- 667 -3233 FAX -540- 667 -9188 Summary Response Letter A. We have reduced the Proffered Square Footage to 25,000 square feet, in order to allow for the final architectural design of the building. B. We have provided architectural renderings that we proffer to general conformance. These renderings clearly show a building with residential flavor and style. Although the Building will be 25,000 square feet, it has many break lines and architectural features that will allow it to blend into the community. However, we cannot limit the size to less than that proposed. We have previously looked at multiple buildings and cannot make that work without building at least four stories per building in order to have adequate parking. A. We believe that with the use's we have proffered out, the B -2 zoning is acceptable. 3. Building Schematic A. We believe that the proposed building will fit nicely into the neighborhood and will add a touch of Old World Brick Charm. flicks (Albin Center) 354 Bryarly Road Summary response letter cont 4. Height of Building 5. Archeological Study l ichardson August 1 I, 2006 A. We cannot limit the height of Building to 25 feet due to architectural concerns. A. We Don't believe there is any historical significance associated with this site and therefore do not wish to perform any archeological studies. August 2, 2006 To: Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Hicks' Office II Comments Frederick County, Virginia Summary Response Letter ARTZ ASSOCIATES, PLC 16 East Piccadilly St. Winchester, VA 22601 540- 667 -3233 Fax- 540- 667 -9188 1. The entrance on to Bryarly Road is a normal entrance, with all traffic patterns being utilized. 2. Health Dept. certification letter has been provided with this submission. 3. The Stormwater shall be routed to an underground detention facility capable of providing the required 2 yr. and 10 yr. storage requirements; as well as discharging at equal to, or less than the pre development rates. Also, per a previous meeting with Mr. Wilder, it was determined that an Infiltration Pit would be acceptable of the PERC —rate of the soil can be certifies. We intend to provide this information in writing and with certification at the time of site plan submission. 4. Well location has been shown. 5. We have revised this to 25,000 Sq. Ft. to allow for Architectural concerns. August 11, 2006 To: Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Proposed Rezoning of Albin Center Artz Associates, PLC 16 E. Piccadilly St. Winchester, VA 22601 540- 667 -3233 FAX -540- 667 -9188 Summary Response Letter 1. Duly noted. 2. The landscaping will be per all county ordinances and has been labeled on GDP/ sign location and size is also labeled. 3. We will provide access form Bryarly Road as shown on the GDP. We have also met several times with VDOT regarding access to route 522. Per these meetings with VDOT, it has been determined that VDOT would have no objection to an entrance onto Rte. 522 provided we construct the necessary turn lanes and other improvements. Therefore, we intend to pursue access from Route 522 as well as from Bryarly Road 4. We have revised the Proffer regarding building square footage to 25,000 square feet. 5. We respectfully disagree that the proposed building will overwhelm the neighboring buildings. The reasons we disagree are as follows: A) The existing building to the North, which is currently being utilized as a commercial business will be separated from our site by our proposed required Full Screen Buffer "A." Proposed Rezoning of Alban Center August 11, 2006 Summary Response Letter cont. B) The existing residence to the south is already screened from our site by an existing strip of hardwood trees. We are also providing a full screen buffer "B" along this property line. C) There will be additional landscaping provided along our frontage with Bryarly Road In addition to existing trees to be saved and additional interior planting. D) Therefore, the proposed building will have limited visibility from any of the existing residences. The primary view will be from Rte. 522. 6. We stated that there are no critical areas associated with this site. IE: floodplain, steep topography, wetland etc. 7. We reduced the proffered building square footage to 25,000 Sq. Ft. We are however going to pursue the entrance onto Rte. 522 and stand by our traffic breakdown for the site. 8. General retail is a standard of the zoning ordinance and we cannot see the need to define each and every possibility. 9. Revised terminology to "Floorspace" and reduce proffered area to 25,000 Sq. Ft. Regarding The 3,000 SF, we are requesting a small Deli, Ice cream shop Pizza shop. 10. We understand your concern regarding the 60 foot height. We do however request a height of 52' to the peak of the roof to allow for architectural concerns as well as to provide the proper astetic building appearance. This requires a steeper roof pitch which adds to the peak height of the building. 11. The title on the renderings has been revised as well as the proffer C (4). 12. We request a sign face of one hundred square feet and a height on ten feet as allowed with a B -2 Zoning. 13. The exhibit has been Re- titled to generalize development plan and has been tied to the rezoning application thru the proffiers. A note on the plan states that if rezoning is granted, then all zoning and subdivision ordinances shall be observed during the subsequent Site plan submission. 14. All agency comments are included with this submission as well as summary response letters addressing agency comments. 15. The Fire and Rescue Company is Gainesboro. Proposed Rezoning of Alban Center August 11, 2006 Summary Response Letter 16. A check in the amount of $3,257.00 has been included with this submission. 17. The name "Alban" has been revised to "Albin 18. Revised to Artz Associates for Power of Attorney. 19. Information on parcels #42 -A -103 and #42 -A -244 for adjoining owners has been provided with this submission. August 11, 2006 To: Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Department& Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Alban Center (Hicks) Proposed Proffer Statement ARTZ ASSOCIATES, PLC 16. Piccadilly St Winchester, VA 22601 540- 667 -3233 Fax 667 -9188 Summary Response Letter 1. We have revise the Proffer Statement to the format Requested 2. Duly Noted. 3. 60' is allowed in a B -2 Zone for office buildings. 4. We have referenced the rendering as being attached with the proffer. 5. Revised Proffer "D" to read "To Two (2)." 6. Revised Proffer "F" to state that the cash payment will be made at time of the issuance of First Building Permit. 7. We have referenced the GDP in the Proffers and stated general conformance. Respectfully, Crai Richardson David Linda! icks Hicks Office 11 1 oft Subject: David Linda Hicks Hicks Office II From: "Ingram, Lloyd" L1oyd.Ingram @VDOT.Virginia.gov> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:18:45 -0400 To: Mike Artz' <mikeartz @adelphia.net> CC: 'Eric Lawrence' <elawrenc @co.frederick.va.us Mike Ruddy' <mruddy @co.frederick.va.us "Ingram, Lloyd" L1oyd.Ingram @VDOT.Virginia.gov> The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a measurable impact on Route 789. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is conditionally satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Hicks Office II Rezoning Application dated April 10, 2006 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. VDOT is satisfied with the proposed entrance to the subject site from Route 789 VDOT will consider the right out only access point to Route 522 South. After careful consideration of the use of U -turns along a high speed primary route such as Route 522, with the major goal of moving traffic rapidly, VDOT has determined it would not be appropriate to encourage a situation where vehicles are making a U -turn on the high speed roadway. There is an acceptable crossover already at Route 789. With some improvements to the decel and storage lanes at the crossover at the intersection of Route 789, VDOT has determined this is the safest and therefore preferred method for the traveling public to access this proposed project. If the developer chooses to accept the primary access to this site to be from Route 789 and the possible right out only onto Route 522, VDOT will support the rezoning. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right -of -way needs, including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and off-site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right -of -way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. «SCN_20060615141428001. pdf» Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike 6/15/2006 3:43 PM GREGORY A. WHIRLEY ACTING COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER October 24, 2005 Mr. Craig Richardson Richardson Development Consultants, LLC C/O Hicks Consultants 2333 North Frederick Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Craig: This is in response to your request for information in regards to your Route 522 project. I offer the following comments: Crossover spacing is determined by the posted speed limit as noted in the VDOT Road Design Manual. With the current crossover spacing a new relocation would not be authorized. Your new entrance on Route 522 would be acceptable as you described in your letter. You will however be required to construct a taper and deceleration lane on north bound Route 522 at the crossover you had proposed to relocate. This will allow traffic, making a U -tum to enter your Route 522 entrance, to move out of the north bound thni traffic lane and provide storage for the vehicle until it can make a safe U -turn maneuver. Your request for an entrance on Route 789 appears acceptable. There are no current VDOT plans for widening Route 522 in this area. If any work is performed on the State's right -of -way, a land use permit will need to be applied for and issued to cover said work. The permit is issued by this office and requires a fee and surety bond coverage. If you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Loyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer LAI/rf COM ONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE EDINBURG, VA 22824 VirginiaDOT..org Control number RZ06 -0007 Project Name Hicks Office II Address 16 E. Piccadilly St. Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning RA Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Siamese Location Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Flan approved as submitted. Plan Approval Recommended Yes Date received 4/12/2006 Tax ID Number 42 -A -249 City Winchester Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Hydrant Location Roadway /Aisleway Width Reviewed By J. Neal Applicant Artz Associates Fire District 15 Signature Title Date reviewed 4/25/2006 State Zip VA 22601 Fire Lcne Required No Special Hazards No Rescue District 15 Date Revised Applicant Phone 540 -667 -3233 Election District Gainesboro Residential Sprinkler System No FtlHE MARSHAL, FF EDERiCK COUNTY Mr. Mike Artz, L.S.B. Artz and Associates, PLC 16 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 April 26, 2006 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665 -5643 FAX: 540 /678 -0682 RE: Rezoning Request for Hicks' Office II Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mike: We have completed our review of the proposed rezoning request for the I- ticks' Office 11 project and offer the following comments: Refer to Traffic Impacts on Page I: Explain or clarify the intent of the right in/right out entrance on Bryarly Road. Indicate if this requirement is intended to prohibit left turns from the site onto Bryarly Road and left turns from Bryarly Road into the site. 2. Refer to Sewage Conveyance on Page 2: Provide a copy of the Virginia Department of Health approval letter for our records to verify the adequacy of the soils /drainfield to support the intended use. 3. Refer to Drainage, Page 2: Stormwater drainage will be an important issue in developing this site. Offsite drainage improvements may be required depending on the impacts created by the proposed development. It appears that the existing topography serves as a very large detention/retention basin significantly minimizing the downstream impacts. Changing the routing and time of concentrations may adversely impact the downstream areas. The discussion indicates the use of an underground detention /infiltration facility. Frederick County prohibits the use of infiltration galleries especially in karst areas. The discussion of the drainage needs to be expanded to address the above issues. 4. Refer to Water Supply, Page 2: Indicate the proposed location of the well referenced in the discussion. 5. Refer to the Proffer Statements Under Structural Development.C.1: Under statement number 1 the applicant proffers to limit development on the parcel to a maximum of 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Hicks' Office I1 Rezoning Comments Page 2 April 26, 2006 HES /rls cc: Planning and Development file Sincerely, 40,000 square feet. This conflicts with the 23,000 square feet of development referenced under Traffic Impacts, page 1 of the impact analysis. Resolve this conflict. I can be reached at 722 -8214 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. C: \Program Files \WordPerfect Office 11\ Rhonda\ TEMPCOMMENTS \IIICKSOFCEIIREZCOM.wpd Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works a (JO J Rezoning Comments Frederick Winchester Service Authority Mail to: Fred -Wine Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 722 -3579 'Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Fred -Wine Service Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, locatior map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: _t 2c a Telephone: Mailing Address: (6 Focr f?, g nrrrFa Up 1 V .C.0 I Location of property: #f RSA vapt.c./ Current zoning: Re- Zoning requested: -2 34 Hand deliver to: Fred -Wine Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Tr Acreage: 2,,C) Fred -Wine Service A uthoritryy's Comments: not ctruk� by ?mitotic uk.lr;hes Fred -Wine Service Author ty Signature Date: tea. citllep Notice to Fred -Wine Service Authority Please Return Form to Applicant 1 Sanitation Authority Comments: W 40 'tor 5'"RVS 7 48 4 .2:44' a, Sanitation Authority Signature Date: Snare L i 12 0( Ra Notice to. Sanitation.Authority Please Return This Form to the Applicant y �P Rezoning Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 868 -1061 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Sanitation Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Q rz a Mailing Address: TM La .R 7ict Current zoning: R A S s r -rrcornr l.y St- WTrar itcsDpR ILL ZC I Location of property: 14 ;Sc-i 13fzdn-Rt_y A-t .1 Zoning requested: 1?- 2 24 FCSA Sal? I1B APR 12 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia Telephone: 590 (;A Acreage: a .c 7 Rezonine Comments Mailing Address: Frederick Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick- Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722 -3480 Current zoning: g,A 25 c.c,4,.pww -L- f J�'r C,E/ESTea72, ✓A 7:-/Z-e•20 Zoning requested: Z_ Hand deliver to: Frederick- Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick Winchester Health Department with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: Te__ E Axsoc,ATC> 5 Telephone:.`gt' —(?O7- 3233 Location of property: -14 ,rte/ (-7 73,4,Ai Acreage: Z r 0 7 JA Frederick-Winchester Health Department's Comments: I 0. 1+i5 O n the CPav ii i n (vP5')" 03 4 kJ Health Dept. Signature Date: 6/6 1106 Form to the Applicant Notice to Health Department Please Return This Rezonine Comments Mailing Address: Frederick Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick- Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722 -3480 Current zoning: g,A 25 c.c,4,.pww -L- f J�'r C,E/ESTea72, ✓A 7:-/Z-e•20 Zoning requested: Z_ Hand deliver to: Frederick- Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick Winchester Health Department with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: Te__ E Axsoc,ATC> 5 Telephone:.`gt' —(?O7- 3233 Location of property: -14 ,rte/ (-7 73,4,Ai Acreage: Z r 0 7 JA Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Mr. Mike Artz Artz Associates 16 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Artz: SMK/dkr 540- 662 -3889 Ext 112 So l e ors .A/) 4 00, Frederick County Public Schools Visit us at www.frederick.k12.va.us April 25, 2006 RE: Rezoning Comments for David A. and Linda W. Hicks Rezoning Proposal This letter is in response to your request for comments concerning the rezoning application for the Hicks's property. Based on the information provided that states no residential units will be part of the rezoning, there will be no impact to the school population upon build out. Respectfully yours, cc: William C. Dean, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools Al Orndorff, Assistant Superintendent for Administration Charles Puglisi, Director of Transportation Stephen Kapocsi Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604-2546 e -mail: kapocsis@frederick.k12.va.us FAX 540 662 -3890 Rezonin Comments Frederick Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722 -3480 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick Winchester Health Department with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: All rt I 5 CYA Telephone: p 32,33 Mailing Address: E4 r 0,00/4 Location ofproperty: Health Dept. Signature Date: Hand deliver to: Frederick Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia Current zoning: EA Zoning requested: Acreage: Z_ ©'7 Frederick Winchester Health Department's Comments: 25 Notice to Health Department Please Return This Form to the Applicant SERVING THE `OF VIRGINIA April 17, 2006 Mike Artz Artz Associates 16 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Comment RA to B -2 David A. Linda W. Hicks Alban Center Gainesboro Magisterial District Dear Mr, Artz: The proposed rezoning request has been reviewed and it appears that it will not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Thank you for the opportunity to review this request. Sincerely, S. R. Manuel Executive Director WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 Rezoning Comments s- awit.«£' "au aria hxt` :Ss's`�,wr Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662 -2422 Current zoning: /Z/\ Winchester Regional Airport Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order t to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: I,e" f oc,/4T Mailing Address: 6, s t4CCA Z> �✓J j Location of property: -rn3! S, �i, u� r 4 /l L g Zoning requested: 29 Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) Winchester, Virginia Telephone: 1;4 CPC/7 -3Z33 Acreage: 2.- 0 7 Winchester Regional Airport's Comments: Winchester Regional Airport's c Signature Date: y e 1Q \1.3 L i'l (116 L Notice to Winchester Regional Airport Please Return Form to Applicant Rezoning Comments s- awit.«£' "au aria hxt` :Ss's`�,wr Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662 -2422 Current zoning: /Z/\ Winchester Regional Airport Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order t to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: I,e" f oc,/4T Mailing Address: 6, s t4CCA Z> �✓J j Location of property: -rn3! S, �i, u� r 4 /l L g Zoning requested: 29 Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) Winchester, Virginia Telephone: 1;4 CPC/7 -3Z33 Acreage: 2.- 0 7 Rezoning Comments LVORERWMAREEMSTIMIEVIMaat Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662 -2422 Mailing Address: Current zoning: EA muziart i, t ta tS", M tati".3"w TPr atla u'.'.+,'9 Winchester Regional Airport Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: 4 A5 9 re3 Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) Winchester, Virginia /c' t 6 T 7 cc_A„a /cry err cNcsr CTL 01 Z zz c' Location ofproperty: ..3_ 73e>7 r 4/ ALA q-Z 2 99 Zoning requested: Z 29 Telephone: Sqo Cite 1 3233 Acreage: "Z.-107 Winchester Regional Airport's Comments: d asp, Ar Winchester Regional Airport's 1r Signature Date: (2 0 L Notice to Winchester Regional' Airport Please Return Form to Applicant Rezoning Comments LVORERWMAREEMSTIMIEVIMaat Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662 -2422 Mailing Address: Current zoning: EA muziart i, t ta tS", M tati".3"w TPr atla u'.'.+,'9 Winchester Regional Airport Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: 4 A5 9 re3 Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) Winchester, Virginia /c' t 6 T 7 cc_A„a /cry err cNcsr CTL 01 Z zz c' Location ofproperty: ..3_ 73e>7 r 4/ ALA q-Z 2 99 Zoning requested: Z 29 Telephone: Sqo Cite 1 3233 Acreage: "Z.-107