Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-06 Traffic Impact AnalysisITE Code Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total Am: 210 Single Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 230 Townhouse/Condo 199 units 15 74 90 71 35 106 1,731 820 Retail 179,000 SF 135 87 222 441 478 919 9,915 Total Trips 174 231 405 592 560 1,151 12,846 i rip �s I s Patton Harris Rust Associates! pc Eng neers. Surveyors. Planners. Lmdsccpe p cr facts. 2 1 i i I P Ma tins Avenue, Suite 200 —!LL I H Martinsburg burg West Virginia a 255 401 7ryry7�II ppyy�� ry 1 ��yy�� 7304.26427„ rr �JiY Al.11.l'l nclu11Il F 304264.3671 FF FLT' T To: Susan Eddy Organization/Company: Frederick County Planning From: Michael Glickman, PE Date: July 11, 2006 An Addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Project Name/Subject: Woods PHR +A Project file 14076 -1 -0 Number: Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared an addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods, by PHR +A, dated January 18, 2006. The purpose of this document is to present revised traffic impact analyses due to modifications to the proposed development land uses. The revised development is to include 120 single- family detached units, 199 townhouse units and 179,000 square feet of retail (formerly 179,000 square feet of office). Revised analyses are provided for 2010 build -out traffic conditions. All analyses and methodology are consistent with the January 2006 report. TRIP GENERATION PHR +A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 1 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Tasker Woods development. Table 1 Proposed Development: Tasker Woods Trip Generation Summary Page 1 of 11 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 2 of 7 The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Tasker Woods development. PHR +A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 1 to assign the proposed Tasker Woods trips (Table 2) throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 2 shows the respective development- generated ADT and AM /PM peak hour trip assignments. The Tasker Woods assigned trips (Figure 2) were then added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (consistent with the January 2006 report) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 3 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 4 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Trip Distribution Percentages Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 3 of 7 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc _pHRA F Figure 2 Development- Generated Trip Assignments Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 4 of 7 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 5 of 7 4 No Scale AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Average Daily,Tnps P r Figure 3 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects _pHRA r Figure 4 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 6 of 7 1 No Scale Unsignalized Intersection Signalized "Suggested mprovements" Intersection Signalization LOS =C(C) SB Right Turn Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection )41 a Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS =C(C) SS I Left SB -1 Left WB I Right Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS =C(C) Signaliiatlon Unsignalized Intersection e(F)F Signalized "suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS=C(C) Sinalieation Unsignalized Intersection Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) S Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the revised Tasker Woods development are acceptable and manageable. All intersections, except Tasker Road/Mercel Drive intersection, would maintain levels of service consistent with the January 2006 report. The improvements suggested at the intersections of Route 522/Tasker Road, Route 522/Macedonia Church Road and White Oak Road/Tasker Road are consistent with the January 2006 report. The following reiterates the suggested intersection improvements. Route 522 /Tasker Road: Traffic signalization will be required. Route 522/Macedonia Church Road: Traffic signalization will be required. Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 7 of 7 White Oak Road/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound right -turn lane will be required. Mercel Drive /Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound left -turn lane and westbound right -turn lane will be required. Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects A Traffic Impact Analysis of the P RA Tastier Woods Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Morlyn LLC 22A Ricketts Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Prepared by: February 2, 2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Eng neers. Surveyors. Planners. Lcndsccpe Architects. 300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200 Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401 T 304.264.2711 F 304.264.3671 OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Tasker Woods development located along the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Route 522 /Tasker Road in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed development is to be comprised of 120 single family detached units, 199 townhouse units and 179,000 square feet of office. Access will be provided via Route 522, Tasker Road and Macedonia Church Road. Build -out will occur over a single transportation phase by the year 2010. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed Tasker Woods development with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Tasker Woods development were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: Assessment of background traffic including growth rates and other planned projects in the area of impact, Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Tasker Woods development, Distribution and assignment of the Tasker Woods development generated trips onto the completed study area road network, Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of the highway capacity software, HCS -2000, for existing and future conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Route 522/Macedonia Church Road, Route 522 /Clydesdale Drive, White Oak Road/Macedonia Church Road, White Oak Road/Tasker Road, Route 522 /Tasker Road and Mercer Drive /Tasker Road. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using an average "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24 -hour traffic volumes) of 8% as determined from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis. of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 1 i Vicinity Map Tasker Woods, Frederick County, Virginia A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 2 AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Average Dai alit s P Figure 2 P Existing Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis ofTasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 3 No Scale Macedonia Church Rd Unsignalized Intersection Jll Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection exiC Unsignalized Intersection Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) P r Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 4 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS PHR +A increased the existing traffic volumes along Route 522, Tasker Road and White Oak Road using a conservative annual growth rate of four percent (4 per year through Year 2010 based upon published VDOT historical traffic count data. In order to incorporate trips associated with the specific future "other developments" located within the vicinity of the proposed site, PHR +A utilized the following reports: 1) Traffic Impact Analysis for the Home Depot Distribution Center n Eastgate, by Vettra Company, dated October 2002; 2) A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of Crosspointe Center, by PHR +A, dated September 2003; 3) A Traffic Impact Analysis of Freedom Manor, by PHR +A, dated July 2004; 4) A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip, by PHR +A, dated December 2004 and 5) A Traffic Impact Analysis of Cedar Meadows, by PHR +A, dated April 2005: Based upon the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR +A has provided Table 1 to summarize the trip generation for the "other developments" surrounding the site. Figure 4 shows the 2010 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2010 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of. service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 5 Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT Background Development 1 Home Depot Distribution Center Phase 2 150 Warehousing 252,000 SF 65 14 79 21 62 82 927 Background Development 2 The Shenandoah Phase 2 Mixed Land Use 478 336 814 704 773 1,477 17,094 Background Development 3 Development West of Site on Tasker Road 210 Single- Family Detached 300 Units 55 165 219 182 107 288 3,000 Background Development 4 Wakeland Property 820 Retail 80,000 SF 84 53 137 259 281 540 5,874 Background Development 5 #11 Elementary School and Admiral Byrd Middle School 520 Elementary School 640 stud. 110 76 186 2 5 6 826 522 Middle School 850 stud. 223 168 391 66 61 128 1,377 Background Development 6 Freedom Manor 210 Single- Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 Background Development 7 522 Ventures 820 Retail 94,743 SF 92 59 152 290 314 604 6,557 (8.7 acers 0.25 FAR) Background Development 8 Cedar Meadows 251 Elderly Housing Detach 140 units 14 23 37 38 24 63 721 Note 1: The existing Home Depot Distribution Center will be expanded by 252,000 SF Note 2: Trip generation values are taken directly from the report: Home Depot Distribution Center Eastgate Table 1 2010 "Other Developments Tri Generation Summary A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 6 Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total ADT Background Development# 9 Artrip (Phase 2) Land Bay A 210 Single Family Detached 102 units 20 60 81 69 40 109 1,017 230 Townhouse /Condo 438 units 29 140 168 135 67 202 3,811 820 Retail 10,000 SF 24 15 39 66 71 137 1,520 Land Bay B 37 units 9 27 36 28 16 44 373 210 Single- Family Detached Land Bay C 3 field 2 2 4 43 19 62 214 488 Soccer Complex Total Trips 84 244 328 340 214 554 6,935 Total Internal 1 1 2 16 16 31 107 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total "New Trips" 83 243 326 325 198 523 6,828 Background Development 10 Crosspointe Center (Phase 2) 210 Single Family Detached 775 units 138 414 552 435 245 679 7,750 230 Townhouse /Condo 200 units 15 74 89 73 36 109 1,740 253 Elderly Housing Attach 100 units 4 3 7 6 4 10 348 710 Office 90,000 SF 151 21 171 31 150 180 1,224 820 Retail 440,000 SF 236 151 386 801 868 1,669 17,673 Total Tr.s 544 661 1,205 1,346. 1,302 2,648 28,735 Total Internal 80 80 159 330 330 660 6,954 Total Pass -by 29 29 58 125 125 250 2,651 Total "New Trips" 435 553 988 890 847 1,737 19,130 Total Background Trips 1,661 1,761 3,423 2,856 2,718 5,575 63,534 Table 1 (cont4 2010 "Other Developments Trip Generation Summa A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tacker Woods Project Number: 14076 -170 February 2, 2006 Page 7 F H Figure 4 Aa lit Macedo n 4 Church Rd (9)19e# ass+ (6)13 en L I Site Udve Arage Dally Trips. 2010 Background Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 8 1 No Scale Signalized; Stgnahzedp Intersection os etcj Suggested Improvements" Signalization SB- Ri• ht Turn Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection 4\ aSi' "Suggested In�rx o improvements" rovements" p "LO B(B) Signalization 6 *(Iif way Unsignalized Intersection rgn a "Sugges Intersection Improvements" s °z4 Signalization Zl)Sw Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) PH- A 5 2010 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis or Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 9 ITE Code Use Amount In AM Peak flour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total AFT 210 Single- Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 230 Townhouse/Condo 199 units 15 74 90 71 35 106 1,731 710 Office 179,000 SF 263 36 299 47 232 279 2,089 Total Trips 302 180 482 198 313 511 5,020 TRIP GENERATION PER (A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 2 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Tasker Woods development. Table 2 Proposed Development: Tasker Woods Trip Generation Summary TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Tasker Woods development. PHR +A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed Tasker Woods trips (Table 2) throughout the study area. Figure 7 shows the respective development generated ADT and AM/PM peak hour trip assignments. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Tasker Woods assigned trips (Figure 7) were then added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 10 L L Trip Distribution Percentages A Traffic Impact Analysis ofTasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 11 0 0 El 0 PH A Figure 7 P Development- Generated Trip Assignments A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker•Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 12 Figure 8 P H RA 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 13 No Scale "Suggested Signalized Improvements" Intersection Signalization LOS =C(C) SB Right Turn ii ma k e r Ro Bke) (C)C swear Macedonia Church Rd Site -Drive Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection iii Unsignalized Intersection Signalized- Interssection LOS -B(B) "Suggested Improvements" Signalization r. Signalized "Suggested Intel-Tee improvements" IwOS;C(Ci Signalization *(F)? ono Unsignalized Intersection Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) P Figure 9 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service P A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -1 -0 February 2, 2006 Page 14 CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the proposed Tasker Woods development are acceptable and manageable. The intersections of Route 522 /Tasker Road, Route 522/Macedonia Church Road and White Oak Road/Tasker Road will maintain constrained peak hour levels of service "F" during both 2010 background and build -out conditions, suggesting a negligible impact from the proposed development Improvements are suggested for the aforementioned intersections to maintain acceptable levels of service "C" or better, as shown in Figures 5 and '9, during 2010 background and build -out conditions, respectively. The unsignalized intersections of Route 522 /Clydesdale Drive and Tasker Road/Mercer Drive will maintain levels of service "D" or better during build -out conditions. Signalization at these intersections will likely not be warranted. The following reiterates the suggested intersection improvements. Route 522 /Tasker Road: Traffic signalization will be required. Route 522/Macedonia Church Road: Traffic signalization will be required. White Oak Road/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound right -turn lane will be required. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076 -I -0 February 2, 2006 Page 15 SF DET (SMAL r ACEDOW YS�Ie. t1(�� ,REZONE RA`FU B2 ^\e OP�DSED USE CQMM RCIALI IRON FENCE COMMUNITY CENTER POCKET PARK (3 Ac) i CONSOLIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TO SINGLE ACCESS POINT ti NOT CURRENT J FIGURE 2 Revised 8/16/06 TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc �4C '5/ GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FM: (540) 665 -0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SF DET (SMAL r ACEDOW YS�Ie. t1(�� ,REZONE RA`FU B2 ^\e OP�DSED USE CQMM RCIALI IRON FENCE COMMUNITY CENTER POCKET PARK (3 Ac) i CONSOLIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TO SINGLE ACCESS POINT ti NOT CURRENT J FIGURE 2 Patton Harris Rust Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. To: Organization/Company: From: Date: Project Name /Subject: Susan, 1) Revised Proffer Statement dated August 18, 2006. 2) Revised Page 1 of Impact Analysis Statement. 3) Revised Figures 2 and 5 of the Impact Analysis Statement. Thanks, Patrick 1 17 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 Susan Eddy Frederick County Planning Patrick Sowers August 21, 2006 Tasker Woods AUG 2 1 2006 PLC I've attached the following documents pertaining to the Tasker Woods rezoning application: TASKER WOODS REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT August 2006 NOT CURRENT The Tasker Woods site is ideally suited for mixed use residential development. The project, comprised of parcels 76 -A -49 and 76- A -48A, totals 79.178 Acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) and is located along the eastern boundary of the Urban Development Area in the Opequon Magisterial District. By action of the County Board of Supervisors on July 13, 2005 the project area was included in the Urban Development Area and Sewer and Water Service Area (see Figure 1) thereby allowing for this rezoning petition which seeks to rezone 18.897 acres of land to B2 (General Business) with the remaining 60.281 acres of the site becoming RP (Residential Performance) (Figure 2). The rezoning would result in a high quality mixed use development with single family attached and detached uses with a proffered maximum of 319 dwelling units. The site is surrounded by primary and major collector roadways providing for excellent transportation characteristics. The site has a high elevation of 722.10 feet and a low elevation of 690.0 feet with a general cross slope of 2% to 5 Characteristic of most properties within the Martinsburg shale areas of Frederick County, this site was intensively farmed at some point, but no farming has occurred on the site for at least 20 years. This site is overgrown by cedars and scrub brush which is characteristic of land that has been taken out of basic agriculture. Site drainage is afforded by a tributary to Wrights Run which traverses the site from west to east along with a minor drainage shed which leaves the site to the north and east. The principle land use surrounding the site is single family residential with some institutional and church uses. The area to the south is predominantly the Eastgate Industrial Park which is a developing center for economic growth in Frederick County. The site is underlain by Martinsburg shale which has been very suitable for the development of residential communities within the Urban Development Area. Site utilities traverse the site including a major water main loop owned by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Sanitary sewer is available to the south as a part of the Eastgate Industrial Park. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES As mentioned, the principle use surrounding this site is residential. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph from 2001 depicting the typical developed uses in the vicinity of the site. The predominate use to the north of the site is the Macedonia Methodist Church facilities including a new church together with the old chapel facility and community building and graveyard. To the north and west is older established single family homes along Macedonia Church Road and Canter Estates which is a part of the Tasker area land. bays and approaching build out of single family homes. To the south and west are a single family home and a small farm together with lands planned for business and industrial uses including 1 SF DETACHED( (SMALL LOT) R Tb RP, 28). vACRES). SE, ,SF DETACHED SMAL -,LO f SF ATTACHED I 1 ?1 fR EEZONE. R'CTU B2 z '\`)1(I8C847i r lcr7es)) —'PROeQSE D USE' COMMERL'L V COMMUNITY CENTER POCKET PARK (3 Ac) TASKER WOODS GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGIN14 V NOT CURRENT Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FAX: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 2 5' C 46 FC TO EC EV ROW ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATION 80' RIGHT -OF -WAY IrylT 60' RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING PLANNED INTERSECTION TASKER WOODS TRANSPORTATION PLAN FREDERICK COUN7Y, NRCINL4 a i 1 NOT CURR F I L 60' RIGHT OF WAY (40' FC TO FC) ��t�llli Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FAX: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 5 TASKER WOODS REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT April 2006 NOT CURRENT The Tasker Woods site is ideally suited for mixed use residential development. The project, comprised of parcels 76 -A -49 and 76- A -48A, totals 79.18 Acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) and is located along the eastern boundary of the Opequon Urban Development Area. By action of the County Board of Supervisors on July 13, 2005 this project was included in the Urban Development Area and Sewer and Water Service Area (see Figure 1) thereby allowing for this rezoning petition which seeks to rezone 18.89 acres of land to B2 (General Business) with the remaining 58.08 acres of the site becoming RP (Residential Performance) (Figure 2). The rezoning would result in a high quality mixed use development with single family attached and detached uses for a maximum of 319 dwelling units. The site is surrounded by primary and major collector roadways providing for excellent transportation characteristics. The site has a high elevation of 722.10 feet and a low elevation of 690.0 feet with a general cross slope of 2% to 5 Characteristic of most properties within the Martinsburg shale areas of Frederick County, this site was intensively farmed at some point, however in at least the last 20 years, no farming has occurred. This site is overgrown by cedars and scrub brush which is characteristic of land taken out of basic agriculture. Site drainage is afforded by a tributary to Wrights Run which traverses the site from west to east along_ with a minor drainage shed which leaves the site to the north and east. The principle land use surrounding the site is single family residential with some institutional and church uses. The area to the south is predominantly the Eastgate Industrial Park which is a developing center for economic development in Frederick County. The site is underlain by Martinsburg shale which has been very suitable for the development of residential communities within the Urban Development Area. Site utilities traverse the site including a major water main loop owned by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Sanitary sewer is available to the south as a part of the Eastgate Industrial Park. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES As mentioned, the principle use surrounding this site is residential. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph from 2001 depicting the characteristic developed uses in the vicinity of the site. The predominate use to the north of the site is the Macedonia Methodist Church facilities including a new church together with the old chapel facility and community building and graveyard. To the north and west is older established single family homes along Macedonia Church Road and Canter Estates which is a part of the Tasker area land bays and approaching build out of single family homes. To the south and west are a single family home and a small farm together with lands planned for business and industrial uses including 1 rSWSA UDA Roads Primary Roads Secondary Road ^/Nr Streams Lakes Parcels Landuse Residential Business Open Space usbiaf Tasker Woods Land Use Plan NOT CURRE DRAFT June 2005 ISO sz rm or11AF 1 MACEDONIA i� REZ ❑RP 5808 Th PROP(SED' USE' S F DE TA C HED CLk'ISTER, SF /SMAL) LOT I SF ATTACHED ATTACHE /(TOVNHOME r 'REZONE RA' TO 132 "18,89 Acres 'PROPOSED USES COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY CENTER 8. POCKET PARK (3 Ac) dp TASKER WOODS GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FREDERICK COUMY, NRGINI4 NOT cURN co Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picodilly St. %nchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FM: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 2 IASKER WOODS LOCATION MAP FREDERICK COUNTY, NRC /NW Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc NOT CURR E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 661 -2139 FM: (540) 665 -0493 1 FIGURE 3 the Eastgate Industrial Park. To the east are large lot residential uses generally fronting on Route 522. The suggested land use plan was created during the UDA expansion process and shows a hierarchical transition of residential intensities with single family detached uses turning to single family attached prior to the transition to the commercial land bay. This plan provides for a more appropriate transition from the single family uses in the surrounding area to the proposed commercial and existing commercial and industrial areas South of the Property. The site generally drains to a principle tributary of Wrights Run and away from existing residential uses. Design of the project should include special provisions for improvement and mitigation of drainage issues that may arise. Special consideration in design should be given to the existing Macedonia United Methodist Church Road in order to enhance and preserve the church property and function. Also the improvement of White Oak Road as a major collector to create a more appropriate connection with Route 522. ENVIRONMENT TRAFFIC NOT CURRENT Figure 4 is provided to delineate the important environmental features in accordance with County policy and procedures. Of note are wetlands, steep slopes, and other special environmental features. None of the above listed environmental factors presents a particularly difficult planning impact for development of this site. Sensitive use of these areas will produce a meaningful open space plan. The Property is sparsely wooded and includes limited wetlands. The National Wetlands Inventory indicates that wetlands on the site are limited to two ponds on the site, one near the northern property line adjacent to Front Royal Pike as well as a pond situated closer to the Southern boundary of the property near Tasker Road. Any wetlands that may exist along stream channels located on the site will be protected by both riparian buffers as well as an open space plan that provides an additional buffer for these environmental features. There are no special issues regarding previous development on the site that require mitigation. A complete transportation impact analysis has been prepared and is attached as "Appendix A" Of significance is a plan suggested in the Urban Development Area expansion process which includes a weak link minor collector connection between Tasker Road and White Oak Road as shown on attached Figure 5. By locating this minor collector roadway adjacent to the east property line of the project it affords direct access by future development of properties to the east which primarily front on U.S. Route 522 where intersections should be discouraged. Improvement of White Oak Road to a major collector status in accordance with the Eastern Road Plan is provided by proffer for this project. It includes improvement 'of the roadway along the frontage of Macedonia Church Road. The initial part of this improvement has 2 H a 2 WETLANDS <EX POND) TASKER WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1 r G a (�1\ '!fig f /7 2 /7/ ,1', NOT CUNT Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FAX: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 4 ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATION B0' RIGHT -OF -WAY 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY EXISTING PLANNED INTERSECTION G S S 60' RIGHT -OF -WAY (40' FC TO FC) -sue "4-=. 1 r' t 4 r, /I f ,.7 it gi ty 7 1 1 Y'/ rC li TASKER WOODS TRANSPORTATION PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, WRG /NG4 Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FAX: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 5 NOT CURRENT been accomplished in the Canter Estates Master Plan and construction drawings. Special provisions for access to the Macedonia Church need to be planned to allow for full functional use of this facility as a part of entrance planning to this new road. One new connection to this new road is proposed as a part of development planning for Tasker Woods in accordance with Macedonia United Methodist Church. Also a connection is afforded to Macedonia Church Road resulting in a better intersection condition and a connection is provided to Tasker Road at a location already planned and for which an entrance has been installed as a part of regional transportation planning. This connection will be the primary access for business and commercial zoning which is a part of this application and provide access to the residential portion of the project. Details regarding edge treatment for the cemetery, entrance buffers and screens, and onsite church improvements have been agreed upon by the Church and applicant and shall be included as proffered conditions for the project. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) indicates that the proposed rezoning of both residential and commercial portions of the Property would result in a total of 12,846 new vehicle trips per day. Trip distributions indicated that the majority of the traffic (60 will travel North on Front Royal Pike. The remaining trips will head either South on Front Royal Pike (15 or West on Tasker Road (25 towards Interstate 81 and the 37 Bypass. When paired with 2010 background traffic from both existing and planned development projects, the TIA indicates that in order to meet a level of service C or better, signalization will be needed at four intersections: Tasker Road and White Oak Road, Tasker Road and Front Royal Pike, White Oak Road and Front Royal Pike, and Marcel Drive and Tasker Road. The rezoning of the Eastgate Industrial Park and Commerce Center provides for the signalization of Tasker Road and Front Royal Pike when warranted by VDOT. Additionally, a signal at the intersection of White Oak Road and Tasker Road was proffered as part of the Cedar Meadows application, thereby making the proposed development responsible for the signalization of Route 522 and Macedonia Church as well as Tasker Road and Marcel Drive.. In recognition of the importance of the Tasker Road corridor and future transportation improvements needed in the area, the Applicant has proffered $500 dollars per single family, attached unit and $1000 per single family, detached unit for a maximum of $219,500 that could be used in conjunction with the revenue sharing program. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND WATER SUPPLY Presently sewer service is available via an 8" main that travels to the south of this project by a pump station installed adjacent to Tasker Road as a part of the Eastgate project. A new pump station will be needed and is shown on Figure 6. An analysis of run times on the existing pump station and scheduled additions to the pump station would indicate additional capacity is available for this project. Using a standard rate of 200 gallons per day /dwelling unit and 200 gallons per day /1,000 square feet of commercial floor area, it is projected that the proposed development would produce approximately 99,600 gallons per day of sewer flow. Wastewater generated by this project will be transferred to the Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility which is being expanded from 2 to 5 MGD by the FCSA and FWSA at this writing. This project will have a scheduled and minor impact on sewage impact flows and connection fee income as 3 Not 03 NT EX. PUMP STATION TASKER WOODS UTILITY PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRCINI4 Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FAX: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 6 Unit Type Units Waste Generation Total Waste (lbs) Single Family Detached 120 12 lbs /day 1,440 Single Family Attached 199 9 lbs /day 2,388 Office Space 179,000 square feet 25 lbs /1,000 sq.ft. 4,475 Total 8,303 NOT CURRENT a scheduled and minor impact on sewage impact flows and connection fee income as recently increased by the FCSA will provide for capacity expansion as planned for the Urban Development Area. Water supply is provided by way of a 12" water main located along the western boundary of this site which serves as a loop connection along U.S. Route 522 through Albin to a connection with the 20" transmission main located near the Papermill Road intersection with Route 522. Water demand of the project would be equivalent to its sewer production of 99,600 gallons per day. Current water pressures in the area are acceptable to serve the proposed uses. The proposal would have a manageable impact on operating characteristics. The primary water source for this development is the Stephens City quarry system through the James Diehl Water Treatment Facility augmented by both the City of Winchester connection to the transmission main from Middletown and by the Northern Water Plant at Clearbrook in cases where needed. There is adequate capacity to serve this development in those systems and charges for water service connections allow mitigation by the FCSA on facility improvements needed. DRAINAGE Figure 7 shows a preliminary plan for storm water management for this site. Of note is the use of existing ponds for wet storm water management facilities and additional storm water management facilities will be installed in the general location shown. This site will be served by enclosed storm sewer of modern design and will meet the State of Virginia requirements for storm water management. As previously noted, there are no special impacts of drainage on adjacent properties. Of note are the properties to the north and east of the project where a small portion of the drainage shed discharges to adjacent lands. Special precautions will be made in all places where direct discharge leaves the site to first concentrate the discharge back into the site for purposes of management and secondly, to mitigate the effects of impacts that may be created by the increased intensity of land use for this project. There are no special issues which require offsite improvements noted as a part of this analysis. SOLID Waste The following table shows a projection of solid waste generation as a part of this project. Requirement of curbside pick -up will be an improvement to solid waste issues associated with increased dumpster use in the County. 4 4 DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION 7 POSSIBLE STORMPONDS TASKER WOODS FREDERICK COUNTY, l4RGINI4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN •%Ail; (1 t 1. ''f%r 1 l 1 ��J 1/" NOT CURRENT a Patton, Harris, Rust Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667 -2139 FAX: (540) 665 -0493 FIGURE 7 HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify any structures of historic importance on the subject site. Moreover, pursuant to the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, the subject site is not included in any battlefield study area and does not contain any core battlefield resources. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES The mixed use nature of this proposed rezoning will help mitigate the fiscal impacts associated with providing services to the residential component of the project. However, the Applicant has proffered to fully mitigate the projected impacts of the residential development as a definitive phasing schedule for the commercial portion of the project has yet to be determined. Specifically, the Applicant has proffered to contribute $24,290 per single family detached unit and $18,231 per single family attached unit at the time building permit. The total contribution exceeds the County Impact Model by $500 dollars per unit for single family, attached uses and $1,000 per unit for single family, detached uses and is proffered to be allocated as follows: Single Family Detached Fire and Rescue: General Government: Public Safety: Library: Parks and Recreation: School Construction: Transportation: Single Family Attached Fire and Rescue: General Government. Public Safety: Library: Parks and Recreation: School Construction: Transportation: TOTAL: TOTAL: 5 $720.00 per unit $320.00 per unit $658.00 per unit $267.00 per unit $2,136.00 per unit $19,189.00 per unit $1,000.00 per unit $24,290.00 per unit 5528.00 per unit $245.00 per unit $503.00 per unit $204.00 per unit $1,634.00 per unit $14,618.00 per unit $500.00 per unit $18,231.00 per unit NOT CURRENT January 2006 Tasker Woods II. IMPACT ANALYSIS January 2006 I APPENDIX A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Tasker Woods ITE Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 Single Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 230 Townhouse/Condo 199 units 15 74 90 71 35 106 1,731 820 Retail 179,000 SF 135 87 222 441 478 919 9,915 Total Trips 174 231 405 592 560 1,151 12,846 TRIP GENERATION Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. Lmdsccpe Nr chi tects. P l 300 tin Avenue, Suite H i Martinsbursburg, g, West Virginia a 25454 01 T 304.264.2711 F 304.264.3671 To: Susan Eddy Organization/Company: Frederick County Planning From: Michael Glickman, PE PHR +A Project file 14076 -1 -0 Number: Table 1 Proposed Development: Tasker Woods Trip Generation Summary Addendum Date: July 11, 2006 An Addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Project Name/Subject: Woods Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared an addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods, by PHR +A, dated January 18, 2006. The purpose of this document is to present revised traffic impact analyses due to modifications to the proposed development land uses. The revised development is to include 120 single family detached units, 199 townhouse units and 179,000 square feet of retail (formerly 179,000 square feet of office). Revised analyses are provided for 2010 build -out traffic conditions. All analyses and methodology are consistent with the January 2006 report. PHR +A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 1 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Tasker Woods development. Page 1 of 11 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 2 of 7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Tasker Woods development. PHR +A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 1 to assign the proposed Tasker Woods trips (Table 2) throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 2 shows the respective development generated ADT and AM /PM peak hour trip assignments. The Tasker Woods assigned trips (Figure 2) were then added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (consistent with the January 2006 report) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 3 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 4 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Trip Distribution Percentages Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 3 of 7 —P F Figure 2 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Development- Generated Trip Assignments Addendum Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects To: Susan Eddy Page 4 of 7 Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 5 of 7 P r Figure 3 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 6 of 7 :erR dd Site-Driv Unsignalized Intersection 0 X11 K 't v 4 No Scale t Signalized "Sug mprovements Intersect Signalization LOS =C(C) SB Right Turn Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection )4 Signalized "Suggested Intersection lo'provements" LOS =C(C) Rignali e SR L Right W B. I i) M 7t Itt 3 Macedoni Church Rd Unsignalized Intersection SITE Unsignalized Intersection •6 4 t Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS =C(C) Signalization Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS =C(C) signalbalmn 0 Unsignalized Intersection 1♦ Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) r Figure 4 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects CONCLUSION Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 7 of 7 The traffic impacts associated with the revised Tasker Woods development are acceptable and manageable. All intersections, except Tasker Road/Mercel Drive intersection, would maintain levels of service consistent with the January 2006 report. The improvements suggested at the intersections of Route 522/Tasker Road, Route 522/Macedonia Church Road and White Oak Road/Tasker Road are consistent with the January 2006 report. The following reiterates the suggested intersection improvements. Route 522 /Tasker Road: Traffic signalization will be required. Route 522 /Macedonia Church Road: Traffic signalization will be required. White Oak Road /Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound right -turn lane will be required. Mercel Drive/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound left -turn lane and westbound right -turn lane will be required. Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Mercer Drive Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 43 850 10 30 419 26 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 45 894 10 31 441 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 6 0 16 35 0 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 6 0 16 36 0 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach Y Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR v (veh /h) 45 31 22 72 C (m) (veh /h) 1088 748 465 404 v/c 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.18 95% queue length 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.64 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.5 10.0 17.6 19.0 LOS A B C C Approach Delay (s /veh) 17.6 19.0 Approach LOS C C Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:23 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Mercer Drive Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 148 667 23 32 1020 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 155 702 24 33 1073 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 26 0 34 84 0 84 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 27 0 35 88 0 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach Y Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR (veh /h) 155 33 62 176 C (m) (veh/h) 596 872 142 is 0.26 0.04 1.24 95% queue length 1.03 0.12 10.52 Control Delay (s /veh) 13.1 9.3 214.8 LOS B A F Approach Delay (s /veh) 214.8 Approach LOS F Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +T Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:23 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Mercer Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR LT R LTR L TR Volume, V (vph) 43 850 10 30 419 26 6 0 16 35 0 35 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start -up Lost Time, li 2.0 20 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 20 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stapp ng, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 45.0 G= G= G= 8.0 G= 120 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 45 906 473 27 23 37 37 Lane Group Capacity, c 479 1151 892 882 234 385 392 v/c Ratio, X 0.09 0.79 0.53 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.09 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.63 0.63 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.25 0.25 Uniform Delay, d 6.8 11.1 10.9 7.8 29.3 23.0 23.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.33 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d 0.1 3.7 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 6.9 14.8 11.5 7.8 29.5 23.1 23.1 Lane Group LOS A B B A C C C Approach Delay 14.4 11.3 29.5 23.1 B B C C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates Approach LOS Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +T Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Intersection Delay 14.1 I X 0.65 Intersection LOS I B Generated: 7/11/2006 5:20 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Mercer Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR L T R LTR L TR Volume, V (vph) 148 667 23 32 1020 89 26 0 34 84 0 84 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start -up Lost Time, Ii 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 20 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 51.0 G= G= G= 5.0 G= 9.0 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 156 726 1108 94 63 88 88 Lane Group Capacity, c 202 1285 1137 1000 157 236 274 v/c Ratio, X 0.77 0.56 0.97 0.09 0.40 0.37 0.32 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.70 0.70 0.64 0.64 0.11 0.17 0.17 Uniform Delay, d 20.0 6.0 13.9 5.6 33.0 31.7 28.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d 16.7 0.6 20.7 0.0 1.7 1.0 0.7 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 36.8 6.5 34.6 5.6 34.7 327 29.5 Lane Group LOS D A C A C C C Approach Delay 11 9 32.3 34.7 31.1 B C C C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates Approach LOS Intersection Delay Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 24.5 X 1.04 Intersection LOS I C HCS Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11 /2006 5:20 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 12 1095 769 137 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 12 1152 0 0 809 144 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 300 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 315 0 16 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh /h) 12 331 C (m) (veh /h) 711 265 lc 0.02 1.25 9 5% queue length 0.05 16.01 C ontrol Delay (s /veh) 10.2 178.4 L OS B F Approach Delay (s /veh) 178.4 Approach LOS F Copyright 2005 University of Fl rida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7 /11/2006 5:24 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 38 1243 1112 478 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 40 1308 0 0 1170 503 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 541 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 569 0 17 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh /h) 40 586 C (m) (veh/h) 375 167 is 0.11 3.51 95% queue length 0.36 56.28 Control Delay (s /veh) 15.7 1185 LOS C F Approach Delay (s /veh) 1185 i sproach LOS F Copyright ©2005 university of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 523 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS DETAILED REPORT General Information Site information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Int Macedonia Church Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input ES WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 2 2 1 Lane Group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 300 16 12 1095 769 137 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopp ng, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 36.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 34.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 333 13 1153 809 144 Lane Group Capacity, c 700 314 1551 1199 1307 v/c Ratio, X 0.48 0.04 0.74 0.67 all Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.38 0.83 Uniform Delay, d 20.0 13.5 18.5 23.4 1.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.30 a25 0.11 Incremental Delay, d 0.5 0.1 2.0 1.5 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 20.5 13.6 20.4 24.9 1.4 Lane Group LOS C B C C A Approach Delay 20 5 20 4 21.4 C C C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates Approach LOS Copyright 2005 University of Florida, A I Rights Reserved 7/11/2006 Intersection Delay 20.8 I X 0.62 I Intersection LOS I C HCS +TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:21 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 2 2 1 Lane Group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 541 17 38 1243 1112 478 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopp ng, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Op 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 36.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 34.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 587 40 1308 1171 503 Lane Group Capacity, c 701 277 1551 1199 1307 v/c Ratio, X 0.84 0.14 0.84 0.98 0.38 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.38 0.83 Uniform Delay, d 24.4 16.9 20.0 27.6 1.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.37 0.11 0.38 0.48 a ll Incremental Delay, d 8.8 0.2 4.4 20.5 0.2 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 33.2 17.1 24.4 48.1 2.0 Lane Group LOS C B C D A Approach Delay 332 242 34.3 C C C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates Approach LOS I Intersection Delay 30.3 Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved X 0.84 HCS +TM Version 5.2 l intersection LOS G nerated C 7/11/2006 7/11/2006 5:21 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 289 802 904 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 304 844 0 0 951 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 169 705 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 177 0 742 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh /h) 304 177 742 C (m) (veh /h) 656 111 532 vic 0.46 1.59 1.39 95% queue length Z45 13.26 34.35 Control Delay (s /veh) 15.1 374.1 210.7 LOS C F F Approach Delay (s /veh) 242.2 Approach LOS F Copyright 2005 University of Fl ride, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:24 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 880 1299 1065 209 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 926 1367 0 0 1121 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 121 614 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 127 0 646 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh /h) 926 127 646 C (m) (veh /h) 505 469 is 1.83 1.38 95% queue length 58.56 30.16 Control Delay (s /veh) 402.4 207.0 LOS F F Approach Delay (s /veh) pproach LOS Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:25 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCSC DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 2 2 1 Lane Group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 169 705 289 802 904 89 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 20 20 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 35.0 G= 31.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 178 742 304 844 952 41 Lane Group Capacity, c 273 941 763 2327 1093 871 v/c Ratio, X 0.65 0.79 0.40 0.36 0.87 0.05 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.16 0.60 0.73 0.73 0.34 0.56 Uniform Delay, d 35.7 13.7 10.3 4.4 27.6 9.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.23 0.34 0.11 0.11 0.40 0.11 Incremental Delay, d 5.5 4.6 0.3 0.1 7.8 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 41.2 18.2 10.7 4.5 35.5 9.2 Lane Group LOS D B B A D A Approach Delay 22 7 6.1 34.4 Approach LOS C A C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/11/2006 I Intersection Delay I 20.2 I X 0.82 `Intersection LOS I C Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:20 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 2 2 1 Lane Group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 121 614 880 1299 1065 209 to Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 120 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 5.9 G= G= G= G= 35.2 G= 30.9 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 820 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 127 646 926 1367 1121 167 Lane Group Capacity, c 126 882 842 2558 1196 799 v/c Ratio, X 1.0/ 0.73 1.10 0.53 0.94 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.07 0.56 0.81 0.81 0.38 0.51 Uniform Delay, d 38.0 13.4 19.5 27 24.6 11.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.50 0.29 0.50 0.14 0.45 0.11 Incremental Delay, d 82.3 3.2 62.0 0.2 13.7 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 120.4 16.5 81.5 2.9 38.3 11.2 Lane Group LOS F B F A D B Approach Delay 33.6 34 6 34.8 Approach LOS C C C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/11/2006 I Intersection Delay I 34.5 I X 1.40 I Intersection LOS I C Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 G nerated: 7/11/2006 5:19 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church R Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods EastAVest Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 4 324 31 1 233 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 4 341 32 1 245 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 19 3 13 42 2 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 20 3 13 44 2 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 L anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 C onfiguration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L ane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh /h) 4 1 48 36 C (m) (veh /h) 1313 1180 396 485 Ic 0.00 0.00 0.12 a 07 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.41 0.24 C ontrol Delay (s /veh) 7.8 8.1 15.3 13.0 L OS A A C B Approach Delay (s /veh) 15.3 13.0 Approach LOS C B Copyright CD 2005 University of Fl ride, All Rights Reserved HCS +T Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:26 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church A Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 10 202 42 4 313 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 10 212 44 4 329 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 9 5 6 74 6 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 9 5 6 77 6 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 L anes 0 1 0 0 I 0 C onfiguration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 10 4 84 20 C (m) (veh /h) 1213 1303 401 460 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.78 0.14 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.0 7.8 16.3 132 LOS A A C B Approach Delay (s /veh) 16.3 13.2 Approach LOS C B Copyright 2005 University of Fl rids, All Rights Reserved HCS +T Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:26 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 243 835 60 18 427 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 255 878 63 18 449 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 39 98 40 29 114 152 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 41 103 42 30 120 160 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Pared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR (veh /h) 255 18 186 310 C (m) (veh/h) 1092 724 0 0 is 0.23 0.02 95% queue length 0.91 0.08 Control Delay (s /veh) 9.3 10.1 LOS A B F F Approach Delay (s /veh) Approach LOS Copyright 2005 University of Florida, AU Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:26 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 127 770 42 26 1031 33 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 133 810 44 27 1085 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vehlh) 40 69 13 15 154 230 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 42 72 13 15 162 242 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Decay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR v (veh/h) 133 27 127 419 C (m) (veh /h) 620 781 0 0 vic 0.21 0.03 95% queue length 0.81 0.11 Control Delay (s /veh) 12A 9.8 LOS B A F F Approach Delay (s /veh) Approach LOS Copyright 2005 University of Fl ride, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:27 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour I Tasker Road White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 I Lane Group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 243 835 60 18 427 15 39 98 40 29 114 152 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Op 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 55.0 G= G= G= G= 25.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 270 995 494 17 196 159 169 Lane Group Capacity, c 463 1116 866 958 446 467 436 v/c Ratio, X 0.58 0.89 0.57 0.02 0.44 0.34 0.39 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 0.28 Uniform Delay, d 10.6 15.0 10.4 6.9 26.7 25.9 26.3 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.17 0.42 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d 1.9 9.3 0.9 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.6 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 12.5 24.2 11.4 6.9 27.4 26.4 26.9 Lane Group LOS B C B A C C C Approach Delay 21 7 11.2 27.4 26.6 C B C C 7/11/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates Approach LOS Intersection Delay 1 20.6 Copyright 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 1 X 0.75 HCS +TM l Intersection LOS Version 5.2 1 Generated C 7/11/2006 7/11/2006 5:19 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates HCS DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane Group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 127 770 42 26 1031 33 40 69 13 15 154 230 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 20 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Lane Width 120 120 120 120 120 120 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Op 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 4.0 G= 50.7 G= G= G= 15.3 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length C 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 134 855 1112 35 126 178 242 Lane Group Capacity, c 181 1251 1136 994 206 341 476 v/c Ratio, X 0.74 0.68 0.98 0.04 0.61 0.52 0.51 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.68 0.68 0.63 0.63 0.19 0.19 0.30 Uniform Delay, d 18.1 7.5 14.1 5.5 29.6 29.1 229 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.30 0.25 0.48 0.11 0.20 0.13 0.12 Incremental Delay, d 15.0 1.6 21.7 0.0 5.3 1.5 0.9 Initial Queue Delay, d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 33.1 9.1 35.8 5.5 34.9 30.5 23.8 Lane Group LOS C A 0 A C C C Approach Delay 123 34.9 34.9 26.7 B C C C 7/1 1/2006 Patton Harris Rust Associates Approach LOS Intersection Delay I 25.3 Copyright 2005 University of Florida, A I Rights Reserved X 0.97 HCS +TM Version 5.2 Intersection LOS C 7/11/2006 G neraled: 7/11/2006 5:18 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 11 1381 856 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 11 1453 0 0 901 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 54 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 56 0 43 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Pared Approach Y N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 L anes 0 0 0 0 0 0 C onfiguration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh /h) 11 99 C (m) (veh /h) 717 530 vic 0.02 0.19 95% queue length 0.05 0.68 Control Delay (s /veh) 10.1 16.4 LOS B C Approach Delay (s /veh) 16.4 Approach LOS C Copyright 2005 University of Fl rida, All Rights Reserved HCS Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:17 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 1 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 26 1753 1553 139 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 27 1845 0 0 1634 146 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 42 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh /h) 44 0 31 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach Y N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh /h) 27 75 C (m) (veh /h) 345 228 vic 0.08 0.33 95% queue length 0.25 1.37 Control Delay (s /veh) 16.3 33.3 LOS C D Approach Delay (s /veh) 33.3 Approach LOS D Ccpyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS +TM Version 5.2 7/11/2006 Generated: 7/11/2006 517 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates APPENDIX HCS-2000 Worksheets N TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 78 425 0 0 493 57 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 82 447 0 0 518 60 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 75 0 272 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 a 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 78 0 286 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 82 78 286 C (m) (vph) 985 379 737 v/c 0.08 0.21 0.39 95% queue length 0.27 0.76 1.84 Control Delay 9.0 16.9 12.9 LOS A C B approach Delay 13.8 pproach LOS B t. Q B 0 B Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 2/2/2006 Version 4.Id a Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 283 629 0 0 544 94 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 297 662 0 0 572 98 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 •61 0 164 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 64 0 172 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 297 64 172 C (m) (vph) 909 175 708 v/c 0.33 0.37 0.24 95% queue length 1.43 1.56 0.95 Control Delay 10.9 37.0 11.7 LOS B E B pproach Delay 18.6 pproach LOS C 9 H N Rights Reserved HCS1000TM 2/2/2006 Version 4.Id a Copyright 2003 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 601 0 0 365 38 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 632 0 0 384 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 127 0 13 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 133 0 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 10 146 C (m) (vph) 1125 487 v/c 0.01 0.30 95% queue length 0.03 1.25 Control Delay 8.2 15.5 LOS A C Approach Delay 15.5 Approach LOS C Rights Reserved XCS2000TM 7/7/700A Version 4.1 d a Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 31 545 0 0 505 140 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 573 0 0 531 147 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 163 0 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 171 0 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 32 185 C (m) (vph) 903 411 v/c 0.04 0.45 95% queue length 0.11 2.27 Control Delay 9.1 20.7 LOS A C Approach Delay 20.7 Approach LOS C El Rights Reserved HCS2000rM 2/7 /inns Version 4.Id Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 11 717 0 0 362 33 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 754 0 0 381 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 54 0 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 56 0 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 11 99 C (m) (vph) 1133 969 v/c 0.01 0.10 95% queue length 0.03 0.34 Control Delay 8.2 11.2 LOS A B Approach Delay 11.2 Approach LOS B n B Rights Reserved riCS2000TM 7/7/7nn( Version 4.1d a Copyright 2003 University of Florida, AU Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROLSUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 26 682 0 0 615 80 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 717 0 0 647 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 42 0 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 44 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 27 75 C (m) (vph) 863 736 v/c 0.03 0.10 95% queue length 0.10 0.34 Control Delay 9.3 12.8 LOS A B Approach Delay 12.8 Approach LOS B H B El 9 Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 7/7/71)(16 Version 4.Id Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East /West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 4 261 22 1 188 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 274 23 1 197 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 19 2 2 19 3 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 2 2 20 3 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 4 1 24 36 C (m) (vph) 1367 1259 483 566 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.20 Control Delay 7.6 7.9 12.8 11.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 12.8 11.8 Approach LOS B B P Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 2/2/2006 Version 4.1d a Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROLSUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 160 12 4 248 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 168 12 4 261 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 18 6 1 9 5 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 6 1 9 5 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(vph) 10 4 25 20 C (m)(vph) 1284 1389 494 547 vie 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.11 Control Delay 7.8 7.6 12.7 11.8 LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay 12.7 11.8 Approach LOS 8 8 m m Rights Reserved NCS2000TM 7/9/7(1(16 version 4.Id Copyright 0 2003 University of Flodda, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 200 259 46 14 140 12 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 210 272 48 14 147 12 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 26 75 31 24 90 106 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 27 78 32 25 94 111 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 210 14 137 230 Capacity, c (vph) 1414 1234 225 328 v/c ratio 0.15 0.01 0.61 0.70 Queue length (95 0.52 0.03 3.53 5.00 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.0 8.0 43.1 38.1 LOS A A E E Approach delay (s /veh) 43.1 38.1 Approach LOS E E El p El N 2/2/2006 a Impr TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection M4 Road Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+4 Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7%2005 Analysis Year 2005Ex/^Vn0Cond/0ono Anaiy�ivTirnoP*hod p�JPeak/fou/ Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 104 130 25 10 228 27 Peak factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 109 145 26 10 240 28 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P xv 3 3 Median type Undivided RTChanoo|ized! 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 27 51 9 12 117 143 Poak'hnurfactor.PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 28 53 9 12 123 150 Proportion of heavy vehicles, 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR olume, v (vph) 109 18 90 285 Capacity, c (vph) 1290 1400 265 484 v/c ratio 0.08 0.01 0.34 0.59 Queue length (95%) 0.28 0.04 1.45 3.74 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 7.6 25.4 22.5 LOS A A D C approach delay (y/veh) 25.4 22.5 Approach LOS D C E TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Analyst Agency /Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 12/7/2005 AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Mercer Drive Tasker Road 2005 Existing Conditions North /South Street: Mercer Drive Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement Volume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Median type RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Eastbound 1 L 0 0.95 0 3 0 2 T 305 0.95 321 1 T 0 3 R 8 0.95 8 0 1 R Westbound 4 L 25 0.95 26 3 0 LT 5 T 160 0.95 168 1 0 6 R 0 0.95 0 Raised curb 0 0 Minor Street Movement Volume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, P Percent grade C/o) Flared approach Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Northbound 7 L 6 0.95 6 3 0 8 T 0 0.95 0 3 N 0 0 LR 9 R 16 0.95 16 3 0 0 0 Southbound 10 L 0 0.95 0 3 0 11 T 0 0.95 0 3 N 0 0 12 R 0 0.95 0 3 0 0 0 Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Configuration Volume, v (vph) Capacity, c (vph) v/c ratio Queue length (95%) Control Delay (s /veh) LOS Approach delay (slveh) Approach LOS EB 1 WB 4 LT 26 1225 0.02 0.07 8.0 A Northbound 7 8 LR 22 671 0.03 0.10 10.5 8 9 10.5 B Southbound 10 11 12 HCS2000 7/2/2nn6 Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d w TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Mercer Drive Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 0 173 19 26 285 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 182 20 27 300 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 3 3 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 26 0 34 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 27 0 35 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PEA/ 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 27 62 Capacity, c (vph) 1364 701 v /c'ratio 0.02 0.09 Queue length (95 0.06 0.29 Control Delay (s /veh) 7.7 10.6 LOS A B Approach delay (s /veh) 10.6 Approach LOS B U HCS2000 7/7/2(116 Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 '3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 263 802 0 0 904 89 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 276 844 0 0 951 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 169 0 670 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 177 0 705 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(vph) 276 177 705 C (m) (vph) 656 124 532 v/c 0.42 1.43 1.33 95% queue length 2.09 12.11 30.34 Control Delay 14.4 297.2 181.8 LOS B F F Approach Delay 205.0 Approach LOS F In N El Fl g H Rights Reserved HC52000TM 2/2/2006 Version 4.1d Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 5 L T R L T R olume 791 1299 0 0 1065 209 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 832 1367 0 0 1121 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 121 0 530 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 127 0 557 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 832 127 557 C (m) (vph) 505 469 v/c 1.65 1.19 95% queue length 47.45 20.96 Control Delay 320.6 131.6 LOS F F Approach Delay Approach LOS In Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.Id Copyright ID 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 169 670 263 802 904 89 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 30.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 35.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 178 705 277 844 952 94 Lane group capacity, c 618 830 309 1680 1307 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.29 0.85 0.90 0.50 0.73 0.07 Total green ratio, g/C 0.35 0.53 a 53 0.53 0.41 0.82 Uniform delay, d 19.8 17.1 17.4 12.8 21.0 1.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.38 0.42 0.11 0.29 0.11 H H N ii 2/2/21111A a Incremental delay, d 0.3 8.3 26.8 0.2 2.1 0.0 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 20.1 25.4 44.2 13.1 23.1 1.4 Lane group LOS C C D B C A Approach delay 24 4 20.8 21.2 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 21.9 X 0.80 Intersection LOS C Ui El 9 B F. U iiCS2000 /7/211AK Copyright 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e HCS2000`" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 121 530 791 1299 1065 209 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 9.0 G= G= G= G= 33.0 G= 33.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 127 558 833 1367 1121 220 Lane group capacity, c 186 867 767 2464 1232 867 v/c ratio, X 0.68 0.64 1.09 0.55 0.91 0.25 Total green ratio, g/C 0.11 a 55 0.78 0.78 0.39 0.55 Uniform delay, d 36.6 13.2 21.5 3.7 24.6 9.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.25 0.22 0.50 0.15 0.43 0.11 N 9 n E 11 0 13 ci G 1nr)nnA a Incremental delay, d 9.8 1.6 58.4 0.3 10.1 0.2 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 46.5 14.8 79.9 4.0 34.7 10.0 Lane group LOS p B E A C B Approach delay 20 7 32.7 30.7 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 30.1 X 1.30 Intersection LOS C B HCS2000 711 /21111( Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 12 1095 0 0 769 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 1152 0 0 809 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 161 0 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 169 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 12 185 C (m) (vph) 770 271 v/c 0.02 0.68 95% queue length 0.05 4.54 Control Delay 9.7 42.7 LOS A E Approach Delay 42.7 Approach LOS E M Rights Reserved 1 /CS2000TM 7/7/7(10A Version 4.1d a Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d w TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 38 1243 0 0 1112 182 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 1308 0 0 1170 191 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 206 0 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 216 0 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 40 233 C (m) (vph) 496 174 v/c 0.08 1.34 95% queue length 0.26 13.74 Control Delay 12.9 237.2 LOS B F Approach Delay 237.2 Approach LOS F Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.I d Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d HCS2000`" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 161 16 12 1095 769 50 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 186 13 1153 809 53 Lane group capacity, c 513 402 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.36 0.03 0.62 0.54 0.04 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, d 237 8.4 11.3 16.0 1.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 13 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.20 0.14 0.11 Incremental delay, d a4 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 24.1 8.5 11.9 16.4 1.4 Lane group LOS C A B B A Approach delay 24.1 11.9 15.5 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 14.3 X 0.53 c Intersection LOS B Li E3 Ii A p n 9 HCS2000TM i2 i2 nn S Copyright m 2000 University o£Flodda, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 206 17 38 1243 1112 182 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, l 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 235 40 1308 1171 192 Lane group capacity, c 513 294 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.46 0.14 0.70 0.78 0.15 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, d 24.5 10.9 12.3 18.9 1.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 U t# 212 P7nm Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.27 0.33 0.11 Incremental delay, d 0.7 0.2 1.2 2.8 0.1 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 25.1 11.1 13.5 21.7 1.6 Lane group LOS C g B C A Approach delay 25.1 13.4 18.9 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 16.9 X 0.62 c Intersection LOS B 11 11 11 11 11 11 S HCS2000TM Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rig is Reserved Version 4.1e w TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 1243 0 0 769 33 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 1308 0 0 809 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 54 0 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 56 0 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 11 99 C (m) (vph) 782 589 v/c 0.01 0.17 95% queue length 0.04 0.60 Control Delay 9.7 15.2 LOS A C Approach Delay 15.2 Approach LOS C B N 11 11 U Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d 2/7/7006 Copyright 2003 University of Florida, AU Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 26 1417 0 0 1257 80 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1491 0 0 1323 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 42 0 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 44 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0. 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 27 75 C (m) (vph) 476 329 v/c 0.06 0.23 95% queue length 0.18 0.86 Control Delay 13.0 23.1 LOS B C Approach Delay 23.1 Approach LOS C 0 PA Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d 2/7/7006 Copyright m 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A •gency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 nalysis Time Period AM Peak Hour I ntersection White Oak Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 4 324 22 1 233 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 341 23 1 245 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 19 2 2 19 3 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 2 2 20 3 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 4 1 24 36 C (m)(vph) 1313 1189 407 488 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.07 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.24 Control Delay 7.8 8.0 14.4 13.0 LOS A A B B •pproach Delay 14.4 13.0 •pproach LOS B B B B 9 El E U Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 2/7/7 M(, Version 4.Id a Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church P Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods EasUWest Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 10 202 12 4 313 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 212 12 4 329 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 18 6 1 9 5 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 6 1 9 5 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 10 4 25 20 C (m)(vph) 1213 1339 418 471 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.13 Control Delay 8.0 7.7 14.2 13.0 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 14.2 13.0 Approach LOS B B II U 11 I Rights Reserved HCS2000Tm oinnnnA Version 4.1d Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id a n El 9 p D General Information Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road Intersection Orientation: East -Wes 2 /2 /2 nn< TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information North /South Street: White Oak Road Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement Volume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Median type RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Eastbound 1 L 243 0.95 255 3 1 L 2 T 792 0.95 833 1 0 3 R 60 0.95 63 0 0 TR Westbound 4 L 18 0.95 18 3 0 LT 5 T 393 0.95 413 1 0 6 R 15 0.95 15 Undivided 0 1 R Minor Street Movement olume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, P Percent grade Flared approach Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration pproach Movement Lane Configuration olume, v (vph) Capacity, c (vph) v/c ratio Queue length (95 Control Delay (s /veh) LOS pproach delay (s /veh) Northbound 7 L 39 0.95 41 3 0 0 Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service EB 1 L 255 1126 0.23 0.87 9.1 A 8 T 98 0.95 103 3 N 0 1 LTR WB 4 LT 18 753 0.02 0.07 9.9 A 9 R 40 0.95 42 3 0 0 Northbound 7 8 LTR 186 0 F Southbound 10 L 29 0.95 30 3 0 0 9 11 T 114 0.95 120 3 N 0 1 LTR 10 12 R 129 0.95 135 3 0 0 Southbound 11 LTR 285 0 F 12 ntersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour a n El 9 p D General Information Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road Intersection Orientation: East -Wes 2 /2 /2 nn< TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information North /South Street: White Oak Road Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement Volume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Median type RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Eastbound 1 L 243 0.95 255 3 1 L 2 T 792 0.95 833 1 0 3 R 60 0.95 63 0 0 TR Westbound 4 L 18 0.95 18 3 0 LT 5 T 393 0.95 413 1 0 6 R 15 0.95 15 Undivided 0 1 R Minor Street Movement olume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, P Percent grade Flared approach Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration pproach Movement Lane Configuration olume, v (vph) Capacity, c (vph) v/c ratio Queue length (95 Control Delay (s /veh) LOS pproach delay (s /veh) Northbound 7 L 39 0.95 41 3 0 0 Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service EB 1 L 255 1126 0.23 0.87 9.1 A 8 T 98 0.95 103 3 N 0 1 LTR WB 4 LT 18 753 0.02 0.07 9.9 A 9 R 40 0.95 42 3 0 0 Northbound 7 8 LTR 186 0 F Southbound 10 L 29 0.95 30 3 0 0 9 11 T 114 0.95 120 3 N 0 1 LTR 10 12 R 129 0.95 135 3 0 0 Southbound 11 LTR 285 0 F 12 'Approach LOS HCS'000 /7 /7 nnF Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Intersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Q TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Analyst Agency /Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR +A PHR +A 12/7/2005 PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Site Information North /South Street: White Oak Road Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement Volume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Median type RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Eastbound L 127 0.95 133 3 1 L 2 T 622 0.95 654 1 0 3 R 42 0.95 44 0 0 TR Westbound 4 L 26 0.95 27 3 0 LT 5 T 947 0.95 996 1 0 6 R 33 0.95 34 Undivided 0 1 R Minor Street Movement Volume (veh /h) Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Percent grade Flared approach Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Northbound 7 L 40 0.95 42 3 0 8 T 69 0.95 72 N 0 1 LTR 9 R 13 0.95 13 3 0 0 0 Southbound 10 L 15 0.95 15 3 0 11 T 154 0.95 162 3 N 0 1 LTR 12 R 174 0.95 183 3 0 0 0 Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Configuration Volume, v (vph) Capacity, c (vph) v/c ratio Queue length (95 Control Delay (s /veh) LOS Approach delay (s /veh) EB 1 L 133 671 0.20 0.73 11.7 B WB 4 LT 27 894 0.03 0.09 9.2 A Northbound 7 8 LTR 127 0 F 9 Southbound 10 11 LTR 360 0 F 12 n io n nn 7 (Approach LOS HC52000TM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.td HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 243 792 60 18 393 15 39 98 40 29 114 129 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A AA AA A A Start -up lost time, l 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G a2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 35.0 G= G= G= 5.0 G= 25.0 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 256 897 433 16 186 287 Lane group capacity, c 418 966 555 830 462 586 v/c ratio, X 0.61 0.93 0.78 0.02 0.40 0.49 Total green ratio, g/C 0.53 0.53 0.41 0.53 0.29 0.35 Uniform delay, d 13.0 .18.5 21.7 9.5 24.0 21.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 H El 9 El p S fl/fl r)nn< Delay calibration, k yor 0.20 0.44 0.33 Now 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d 2.7 14.8 7.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 15.7 33.3 28.7 9.5 24.6 22.2 Lane group LOS B C C A C C Approach delay 29 4 28.0 24.6 22.2 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 27.7 X c 0.81 Intersection LOS C Mi B El HCS2000TM 7 /7 /71111A Copyright 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4 I HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction 2010 Background Analysis Year Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 127 622 42 26 947 33 40 69 13 15 154 174 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A AA A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 67.0 G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 134 699 1024 35 129 178 183 Lane group capacity, c 147 1196 1093 955 348 456 542 v/c ratio, X 0.91 0.58 0.94 0.04 0.37 0.39 0.34 Total green ratio, g/C 0.65 0.65 0.61 0.61 0.25 0.25 0.35 Uniform delay, d 29.5 10.6 19.6 8.6 33.7 33.9 26.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 12 U m s 2 /2 /9(111A S Delay calibration, k 0.43 0.18 0.45 0.11 N OW 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d 48.8 0.7 14.6 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.4 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 78.3 11.4 34.1 8.6 34.4 34.5 27.0 Lane group LOS E 8 C A C C C Approach delay 22 1 33.3 34.4 30.7 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 29.1 X c 0.83 Intersection LOS C El 11 I1 I I HCS2000TM 2/7nnn Copyright 2000 University of Florida, All Right Reserved Version 4.1e le TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Mercer Drive 8TaokerRoad Analyst PHR+A Jurisdiction Agency/Co. PHR+A Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Date Performed 12/7%2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 850 10 30 410 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 895 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 894 10 31 441 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 3 3 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 6 0 10 0 0 0 Peok'hnurfoctor.PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 8 Q5 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 6 0 10 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P xv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR o|urno 31 22 Capacity, c (vph) 748 337 v/c ratio 0.04 0.07 Queue length (95%) 0.13 0.21 Cvnt/o|Delay(s/veh) 180 16.4 LOS B C pproaoh delay (s/voh) 16.4 ppnoaohLOS C 2/7/2006 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection Mercer Drive Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Jurisdiction Agency /Co. PHR +A Analysis Year 2 B 2010 Back ground Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 0 667 23 32 1020 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 0 702 24 33 1073 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 26 0 34 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 27 0 35 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 33 62 Capacity, c (vph) 872 318 v/c ratio 0.04 0.19 Queue length (95 0.12 0.71 Control Delay (s /veh) 9.3 19.0 LOS A C Approach delay (s /veh) 19.0 Approach LOS C U a U El 7nnnnK TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs), 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 308 802 0 0 904 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 324 844 0 0 951 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 169 0 698 Peak -Hour Factor. PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 177 0 734 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 324 177 734 C (m) (vph) 656 102 532 v/c 0.49 1.74 1.38 95% queue length 2.75 14.09 33.47 Control Delay 15.7 440.1 204.4 LOS C F F Approach Delay 250.2 Approach LOS F B Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d /7 ifnnA S Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 •'ustments Ma'or Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 821 1299 0 0 1065 209 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 864 1367 0 0 1121 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Si•nal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 121 0 577 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 127 0 607 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Dela Queue Len•th, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 864 127 607 C (m) (vph) 505 469 lc 1.71 1.29 95% queue length 51.20 26.00 173.0 Control Delay 348.4 LOS F F pproach Delay pproach LOS I) II 11 Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 2 /2 now, Version 4.10 a Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PNR +q Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 169 698 308 802 904 89 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G a2 a2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 27.0 G= G= G= G= 13.0 G= 35.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 178 735 324 844 952 94 Lane group capacity, c 557 830 371 1792 1307 1236 v/c ratio, X 0.32 0.89 0.87 0.47 0.73 0.08 Total green ratio, g/C 0.32 a 53 0.56 0.56 0.41 0.79 Uniform delay, d 22.0 17.7 18.9 11.0 21.0 2.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.41 0.40 0.11 0.29 0.11 U 0 El Q "1/n /nnnc Incremental delay, d 0.3 11.3 19.9 0.2 2.1 0.0 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 22.4 29.0 38.8 11.2 23.1 2.1 Lane group LOS C C D 8 C A Approach delay 27 7 18.8 21.2 Approach LOS C B C Intersection delay 22 X c a82 Intersection LOS C U N B ij HCS2000 Copyright 2000 University of Flodda, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 121 577 821 1299 1065 209 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0. 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 8.0 G= G= G= G= 340 G= 33.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 127 607 864 1367 1121 220 Lane group capacity, c 165 867 788 2501 1232 849 v/c ratio, X 0.77 0.70 1.10 0.55 0.91 0.26 Total green ratio, g/C 0.09 a55 0.79 0.79 0.39 a 54 Uniform delay, d 37.6 13.9 21.2 3.3 24.6 10.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.32 0.27 0.50 0.15 0.43 0.11 a e U '11 Innn< Incremental delay, d 19.6 2.5 61.7 0.3 10.1 0.2 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 57.2 16.4 82.9 3.6 34.7 10.6 Lane group LOS E B F A C B Approach delay 23 5 34.3 30.8 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 31.4 X 1.36 Intersection LOS C N e HCS2000 lIn 1 ACV( Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalyst PHR +A gency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 nalysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods EasUWest Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 12 1095 0 0 769 201 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 a 95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 1152 0 0 809 211 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 252 0 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 265 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 12 281 C (m) (vph) 670 267 v/c 0.02 1.05 95% queue length 0.05 11.18 Control Delay 10.5 111.1 LOS B F Approach Delay 111.1 Approach LOS F El 1 D 13 Ri ghts Reserved HCS2000TM 7 /7 /211r1 Version 4.1d Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.l d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 38 1243 0 0 1112 281 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 1308 0 0 1170 295 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 362 0 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 381 0 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 40 398 C (m) (vph) 452 170 v/c 0.09 2.34 95% queue length 0.29 33.02 Control Delay 13.7 664.6 LOS B F Approach Delay 664.6 Approach LOS F f I" Rights Reserved ncs2000TM 117 /21)(1A Version 4.Id Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d lor HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church& Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 252 16 12 1095 769 201 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak hour factor, PHF a 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 282 13 1153 809 212 Lane group capacity, c 514 402 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.55 0.03 0.62 0.54 0.16 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, d 25.3 8.4 11.3 16.0 1.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.15 0.11 0.20 0.14 0.11 Li N m Fl /7 /7nn Incremental delay, d 1.3 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.1 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 26.5 8.5 11.9 16.4 1.6 Lane group LOS C A B B A Approach delay 26.5 11.9 13.3 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 14.2 X 0.59 c Intersection LOS B a HCS2000 7/2/7(1(16 Copyright 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 362 17 38 1243 1112 281 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start -up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 Min time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 399 40 1308 1171 296 Lane group capacity, c 515 294 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.77 0.14 0.70 0.78 0.23 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, d 27.4 10.9 12.3 18.9 1.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.32 0.11 0.27 0.33 0.11 /n in nn< Incremental delay, d 7.3 0.2 1.2 2.8 0.1 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 34.7 11.1 13.5 21.7 1.7 Lane group LOS C B B C A Approach delay 34.7 13.4 17.7 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 18.0 X 0.73 Intersection LOS B D HCS2000Tn a Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e -w TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build-out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 11 1333 0 0 920 63 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 1403 0 0 968 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 0 0 0 72 0 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 75 0 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 11 118 C (m) (vph) 662 447 v/c 0.02 0.26 95% queue length 0.05 1.05 Control Delay 10.5 18.6 LOS B C Approach Delay 18.6 Approach LOS C H Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 11111(1n1; Version 4.1d Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North /South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 26 1574 0 0 1356 100 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 a 95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1656 0 0 1427 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 73 0 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 76 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 27 107 C (m) (vph) 426 239 vlc 0.06 0.45 95% queue length 0.20 2.15 Control Delay 14.0 34.5 LOS B D Approach Delay 34.5 Approach LOS D Br 9 Rights Reserved HCS3000TM 9 7I7I9nnF Version 4.1d a Copyright ID 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 324 52 1 233 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 341 54 1 245 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume 37 2 2 19 3 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 2 2 20 3 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 4 1 42 36 C (m)(vph) 1313 1158 391 477 vlc 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.08 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.36 0.24 Control Delay 7.8 8.1 15.3 13.2 LOS A A C B pproach Delay 15.3 13.2 pproach LOS C B II B I 11 Rights Reserved HCS2000TM 7n171 Version 4.Id S Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection White Oak Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 202 32 4 313 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF a 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 212 33 4 329 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 49 6 1 9 5 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 51 6 1 9 5 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 10 4 58 20 C(m)(vph) 1213 1315 406 465 vlc 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.49 0.13 Control Delay 8.0 7.7 15.3 13.1 LOS A A C B Approach Delay 15.3 13.1 Approach LOS C B Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4 I Copyright 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. I d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 273 837 60 18 420 15 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 287 881 63 18 442 15 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P 3 3 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh /h) 39 98 40 29 114 147 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 41 103 42 30 120 154 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR olume, v (vph) 287 18 186 304 Capacity, c (vph) 1099 723 0 0 v/c ratio 0.26 0.02 Queue length (95 1.05 0.08 Control Delay (s /veh) 9.4 10.1 LOS A B F F pproach delay (s /veh) pproach LOS B H N H a TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Intersection White Oak Road Tasker Road Analyst PHR +A Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 146 652 42 26 994 33 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 153 686 44 27 1046 34 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh /h) 40 69 13 15 154 205 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 42 72 13 15 162 215 Proportion of heavy ehicles, PHV 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR olume, v (vph) 153 27 127 392 Capacity, c (vph) 642 869 0 0 v/c ratio 0.24 0.03 Queue length (95 0.92 0.10 Control Delay (s /veh) 12.4 9.3 LOS B A F F A pproach delay (siveh) A pproach LOS LI B a D B H 9 ')111')1111C HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 273 837 60 18 420 15 39 98 40 29 114 147 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A AA A A A A Start up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control De ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 287 944 461 16 186 151 155 Lane group capacity, c 471 1074 742 922 379 484 738 v/c ratio, X 0.61 0.88 0.62 0.02 0.49 0.31 0.21 Total green ratio, g/C 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.59 0.24 0.29 0.47 Uniform delay, d 10.7 14.9 16.8 7.3 28.1 23.3 13.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.20 0.41 0.20 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Li flnnnnc Incremental delay, d 2.3 8.5 1.6 0.0 w 1.0 0.4 0.1 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 13.0 23.5 18.4 7.3 29.1 23.7 13.4 Lane group LOS B C B A C C B Approach delay 21 0 18.1 29.1 18.5 Approach LOS C B C B Intersection delay 20.7 X 0.84 Intersection LOS C FICS2000 n In /nnnL Copyright 02000 University of Florida, All Right Reserved Version 4.1 HCS2000`" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Agency or Co. PHR +A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 146 652 42 26 994 33 40 69 13 15 154 205 Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 a95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (MA A A A A A AA A A A A Start up lost time, I 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering /metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped Bike RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking Grade Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N Buses stopping, N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 62.5 G= G= G= 22.5 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T 0.25 Cycle Length, C 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control be ay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 154 730 1073 35 129 178 174 Lane group capacity, c 162 1234 1122 980 283 402 510 v/c ratio, X 0.95 0.59 0.96 0.04 0.46 0.44 0.34 Total green ratio, g/C 0.68 0.68 0.63 0.63 0.22 0.22 0.32 Uniform delay, d 28.9 8.8 17.5 7.2 33.5 33.4 25.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.46 0.18 0.47 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 k;i 7 /2/7nn( Incremental delay, d 56.0 0.8 17.4 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.4 Initial queue delay, d Control delay 85.0 9.6 34.9 7.2 34.6 34.1 26.0 Lane group LOS F A C A C C C Approach delay 22 7 34.0 34.6 30.1 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 29.4 X c 0.88 Intersection LOS C 9 H HCS2000' Copyright 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 7/7/7MF Version 4.1e TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Mercer Drive Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 45 850 10 30 419 45 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 47 894 10 31 441 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 6 0 16 27 0 27 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 6 0 16 28 0 28 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach Y Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 47 31 22 56 Capacity, c (vph) 1070 748 465 400 v/c ratio 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.14 Queue length (95 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.48 Control Delay (s /veh) 8.5 10.0 17.6 18.6 LOS A B C C Approach delay (slveh) 17.6 18.6 Approach LOS C C HCSd000 7 /n /7nnr. Copyright 2003 Unive sity of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR +A Intersection Mercer Drive Tasker Road Agency /Co. PHR +A Jurisdiction Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North /South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East -West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 30 667 23 32 1020 30 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 31 702 24 33 1073 31 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P PEN 3 3 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh /h) 26 0 34 47 0 47 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh /h) 27 0 35 49 0 49 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade 0 0 Flared approach Y Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 31 33 62 98 Capacity, c (vph) 629 872 280 330 v/c ratio 0.05 0.04 0.22 0.30 Queue length (95 0.16 0.12 0.83 1.22 Control Delay (s /veh) 11.0 9.3 26.5 28.9 LOS B A D D Approach delay (s /veh) 26.5 28.9 Approach LOS D D HCS2000 of7/2nn Copyright 2003 Unive siry of Florida, MI Rights Reserved Version 4. Id Traffic Counts Intersection: E -W: CLYDESDALE DR Weather dry File Name N -S: ROUTE 522 Count By 3W Input By HP Location WINCHESTER,VA Count Date 12/1/2005 15 Minute Period Begining EB: CLYDESDALE DR Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thai Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total N,S, E W 15 Min. Period Begining 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 5 0 6 I I 8 0 II 19 12 0 10 22 16 0 14 30 14 0 12 26 11 0 8 19 12 0 II 23 17 0 10 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 118 0 120 1 132 0 133 3 144 0 147 4 156 0 160 3 174 0 177 3 166 0 169 2 159 0 161 3 167 0 170 0 54 6 60 0 60 4 64 0 72 8 80 0 84 6 90 0 90 II 101 0 86 7 93 0 89 8 97 0 97 7 104 191 216 249 280 304 281 281 301 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 A.M. Total 95 0 82 177 0 0 0 0 21 1216 0 1237 0 632 57 689 2103 A.M. Total 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 87:15 17:30 17:45 10 0 5 15 14 0 7 21 11 0 4 15 14 0 5 19 10 0 II 21 7 0 8 15 II 0 6 17 8 0 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 144 0 149 6 148 0 154 8 155 0 163 5 166 0 171 1 184 0 185 8 172 0 180 12 160 0 172 8 137 0 145 0 134 12 146 0 140 12 152 0 135 19 154 0 139 21 160 0 156 19 175 0 144 24 168 0 140 16 156 0 133 13 146 310 327 332 350 381 363 345 303 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 P.M.Total 85 0 50 135 0 0 0 0 53 1266 0 1319 0 1121 136 1257 2711 P.M.Total I Hour Period Begining EB: CLYDESDALE DR Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thru Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thai Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left That Right Total N,S, E W 1 Hour Period Begining 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 41 0 41 82 50 0 47 97 53 0 44 97 53 0 45 98 54 0 41 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 550 0 560 11 606 0 617 13 640 0 653 12 655 0 667 11 666 0 677 0 270 24 294 0 306 29 335 0 332 32 364 0 349 32 381 0 362 33 395 936 1049 1114 1146 1167 7 :00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 16:00 16:15 -�3 16:30 16:45 17:00 49 0 21 70 49 0 27 76 42 0 28 70 42 0 30 72 36 0 29 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 613 0 637 20 653 0 673 22 677 0 699 26 682 0 708 29 653 0 682 0 548 64 612 0 570 71 641 0 574 83 657 0 579 80 659 0 573 72 645 1319 1390 1426 1439 1392 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 1 Hour Period Begining ER: CLYDESDALE DR Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thru Right Total NB: ROUTE522 Left Thai Right Total SB: ROUTE522 Left Thru Right Total N,S, E W 1 Hour Period Begining 8:00 F A.M. Peak 54 0 41 95 PHF 0.88 0 0 0 0 PHF 11 666 0 677 PHF 0.96 0 362 33 395 PHF 0.95 1167 0.96 8:00 A.M. Peak 16:45 P.M. Peak 42 0 30 72 PHF 0.86 0 0 0 0 PHF 26 682 0 708 PEP 0.96 0 579 80 659 PHF 0.94 1439 0.94 16 :45 P.M. Peak 11 Intersection: E -W: MACEDONIA CHURCH Weather dry File Name N -S: ROUTE 522 Count By HP Input By ]3P Location WINCHESTERVA Count Date 12/5/2005 15 Minute Period Bea ning ER: MACEDONIA CHURCH Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thru Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thm Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total N,S, E W 15 Min. Period Begining El 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 12 0 3 15 16 0 3 19 24 0 6 30 27 0 2 29 34 0 5 39 29 0 4 33 34 0 2 36 30 0 2 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 116 0 118 1 129 0 130 4 140 0 144 3 149 0 152 2 150 0 152 3 146 0 149 3 155 0 158 2 150 0 152 0 48 3 51 0 59 3 62 0 74 6 80 0 80 8 88 0 77 12 89 0 79 10 89 0 83 8 91 0 86 8 94 184 211 254 269 280 271 285 278 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 A.M. Total 206 0 27 233 0 0 0 0 20 1135 0 1155 0 586 58 644 2032 A.M. Total 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 N 17:15 17:30 17:45 31 0 3 34 33 0 4 37 31 0 4 35 35 0 5 40 42 0 4 46 45 0 3 48 41 0 2 43 32 0 2 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 108 0 115 6 115 0 121 8 119 0 127 11 123 0 134 8 129 0 137 6 130 0 136 6 122 0 128 4 109 0 113 0 106 16 122 0 116 21 137 0 112 29 141 0 126 36 162 0 130 45 175 0 128 33 161 0 121 26 147 0 116 19 135 271 295 303 336 358 345 318 282 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 P.M. Total P.M. Total 1 Hour Period Begining EB: MACEDONIA CHURCH Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thm Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thm Right Total N,S, E W 1 Hour Period Begining 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 lf $�B 8:00 79 0 14 93 101 0 16 117 114 0 17 131 124 0 13 137 127 0 13 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 534 0 544 10 568 0 578 12 585 0 597 11 600 0 611 10 601 0 611 0 261 20 281 0 290 29 319 0 310 36 346 0 319 38 357 0 325 38 363 918 1014 1074 1105 1114 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 130 0 16 146 141 0 17 158 153 0 16 169 163 0 14 177 160 0 II 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 465 0 497 33 486 0 519 33 501 0 534 31 504 0 535 24 490 0 514 0 460 102 562 0 484 131 615 0 496 143 639 0 505 140 645 0 495 123 618 1205 1292 1342 1357 1303 16 :00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 I Hour Period Begining EB: MACEDONIA CHURCH Left Thm Right Total WB: Left Thm Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thm Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thm Right Total N,S, E W I Hour Period Begining 8:00 A.M. Peak 127 0 13 140 PHF 0.90 0 0 0 0 PHE 10 601 0 611 PFIF D.97 0 325 38 363 PHF 0.97 1114 0.98 8:00 A.M. Peak 16:45 P.M. Peak 163 0 14 177 PHF 0.92 0 0 0 0 PHF 31 504 0 535 PHF 0.98 0 505 140 645 PHF 0.92 1357 0.95 16:45 P.M. Peak N Intersection: E E-W: T TASKER RD W Weather D Dry F File N Name N -S: M MARCEL DR C Count By L LP I By 1 11P Location W WINCHESTER,VA C Count Date 1 11/30/2005 1 15 Minute E EB: T TASKERRD W WB: T TASKERRD N NB: M MARCEL DR S SB: 1 15 Min. Period N,S, P Period Begining L Left T Thru Right T Total L Left T Thru Right T Total L Left T Thru Right T Total L Left T Thru R Right T Total H H W B Begining 7:00 0 0 6 60 2 6 62 3 3 2 26 0 2 29 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 9 92 7 7:00 7:15 0 0 7 77 I 7 78 5 5 3 30 0 3 35 1 1 0 0 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 114 7 7:15 7:30 0 0 8 82 3 8 85 8 8 3 34 0 4 42 0 0 D D 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 129 7 7:30 7:45 0 0 8 84 0 8 84 4 4 3 37 0 4 41 2 2 0 0 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 131 7 7:45 8:00 0 0 7 76 2 7 78 7 7 4 44 0 5 51 3 3 0 0 3 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 135 8 8:00 8:15 0 0 6 63 3 6 66 6 6 4 45 0 5 51 1 1 0 0 7 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 125 8 8:15 8:30 0 0 5 55 4 5 59 4 4 4 40 0 4 44 2 2 0 0 6 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I III 8 8:30 8:45 0 0 4 41 3 4 44 5 5 3 38 0 4 43 3 3 0 0 6 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 96 8 8:45 0 A.M. Total 0 0 5 538 18 5 556 4 42 2 294 0 3 336 1 12 0 0 29 4 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9 933 I A A.M. Total 16:00 0 0 3 33 3 3 36 3 3 6 60 0 6 63 4 4 0 0 3 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 1 16:00 16:15 0 0 3 39 6 4 45 7 7 6 66 0 7 73 6 6 0 0 6 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 130 1 16:15 1 6:30 0 0 4 42 5 4 47 6 6 7 75 0 8 81 5 5 0 0 10 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 143 1 16:30 16:45 0 0 5 50 4 5 54 9 7 78 0 8 87 7 7 0 0 9 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 157 1 16:45 17:00 0 0 4 42 4 4 46 4 4 6 66 0 7 70 8 8 0 0 9 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 133 1 17:00 17:15 0 0 3 37 3 4 40 7 7 5 59 0 6 66 6 6 0 0 6 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 118 1 17:15 17:30 0 0 3 34 2 3 36 3 3 5 58 0 6 61 2 2 0 0 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 103 1 17:30 1745 0 0 2 27 2 2 29 4 4 5 54 0 5 58 3 3 0 0 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 92 1 17:45 P.M. Total 0 0 3 304 29 3 333 4 43 5 516 0 5 559 4 41 0 0 49 9 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 982 P P.M. Total I Hour E EB: T TASKER RD W WB: T TASKER RD N NB: M MARCEL DR S SB: 1 1 Hour Period N.S, P Period Begining L Left T Tim Right T Total L Left T Thru Right T Total L Left T Thm Right T Total L Left T Thru R Right T Total E E W B Begining 7:00 0 0 3 303 6 3 309 2 20 1 127 0 1 147 3 3 0 0 7 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 466 7 7:00 7:15 0 0 3 319 6 3 325 2 24 1 145 0 1 169 6 6 0 0 9 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 509 7 7:15 7:30 0 0 3 305 8 3 313 2 25 1 160 0 1 185 6 6 0 0 16 2 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 520 7 7:30 7:45 0 0 2 278 9 2 287 2 21 1 166 0 1 187 8 8 0 0 20 2 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 502 7 7 :45 Intersection: E -W: TASKER RD Weather Dry File Name N -S: ROUTE 522 Count By 11P Input By 1JP Location WINCHESTER,VA Count Date 5 /12/2005 15 Minute Period Begining EB: TASKER RD Left Thru Right Total WB Left Thru Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total N,S, F W 15 Min. Period Begining 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 8 0 70 78 5 0 79 84 II 0 83 94 8 0 67 75 7 0 66 73 9 0 59 68 12 0 47 59 7 0 42 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 68 0 79 14 67 0 81 17 82 0 99 15 89 0 104 17 90 0 107 21 101 0 122 15 112 0 127 16 122 0 138 0 90 6 96 0 98 8 106 0 107 8 115 0 121 11 132 0 117 13 130 0 123 13 136 0 126 17 143 0 127 14 141 253 271 308 311 310 326 329 328 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 C A.M. Total I 67 0 513 580 0 0 0 0 126 731 0 857 0 909 90 999 2436 A.M. Total 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 14 0 28 42 17 0 30 47 16 0 36 52 17 0 30 47 18 0 37 55 14 0 40 54 12 0 36 48 9 0 31 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 138 0 187 51 147 0 198 64 161 0 225 70 157 0 227 77 164 0 241 69 148 0 217 63 160 0 223 50 152 0 202 0 114 17 131 0 I11 15 126 0 119 19 138 0 137 22 159 0 142 31 173 0 136 22 158 0 129 19 148 0 123 15 138 360 371 415 433 469 429 419 380 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 P.M. Total 117 0 268 385 0 0 0 0 493 1227 0 1720 0 1011 160 1171 3276 P.M. Total I Hour Period Begining EB: TASKER RD Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thru Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total N,S, E W 1 Hour Period Begining 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 32 0 299 331 31 0 295 326 35 0 275 310 36 0 239 275 35 0 214 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 306 0 363 63 328 0 391 70 362 0 432 68 392 0 460 69 425 0 494 0 416 33 449 0 443 40 483 0 468 45 513 0 487 54 541 0 493 57 550 1143 1200 1255 1276 1293 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 64 0 124 188 68 0 133 201 65 0 143 208 61 0 143 204 53 0 144 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 603 0 837 262 629 0 891 280 630 0 910 279 629 0 908 259 624 0 883 0 481 73 554 0 509 87 596 0 534 94 628 0 544 94 638 0 530 87 617 1579 1688 1746 1750 1697 16:00 16:15 16:30 16 :45 17:00 I Hour Period Begining EB: TASKER RD Left Thru Right Total WB: Left Thru Right Total NB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total SB: ROUTE 522 Left Thru Right Total N,S, E W 1 Hour Period Begining 8:00 A.M. Peak 35 0 214 249 PHF 0.85 0 0 0 0 PHF 69 425 0 494 PHF 0.89 0 493 57 550 PHF 0.96 1293 0.98 8:00 A.M. Peak 16:45 fl P.M. Peak 61 0 143 204 PHF 0.93 0 0 0 0 PHF 279 629 0 908 PHF 0.94 0 544 94 638 PHF 0.92 1750 0.93 16:45 P.M. Peak Intersection: E -W: 'FASKER RD Weather Dry File Input Name N -S: WHITE OAK RD Count By HP By LIP Location WEICHESTER,VA Count Date 11/10/2005 15 Minute ER: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E W Begining 700 37 66 4 107 1 23 1 25 5 7 5 17 3 12 19 34 183 7:00 7:15 44 67 9 120 3 27 3 33 4 II 8 23 6 18 21 45 221 7:15 7:30 55 74 15 144 5 31 5 41 7 14 8 29 6 22 24 52 266 7:30 7:45 53 71 13 137 5 34 2 41 8 16 II 35 8 27 33 68 281 7:45 8:00 50 60 11 121 I 37 2 40 6 22 6 34 6 21 27 54 249 8:00 8:15 42 54 7 103 3 38 3 44 5 23 6 34 4 20 22 46 227 8:15 8:30 35 45 4 84 0 33 3 36 3 16 8 27 5 18 20 43 190 8:30 8:45 25 41 5 71 2 26 4 32 4 17 7 28 5 12 16 33 164 8:45 A.M. Total 341 478 68 887 20 249 23 292 42 126 59 227 43 150 182 375 1781 A.M. Total 16:00 23 27 5 55 3 49 4 56 5 11 0 16 0 9 26 35 162 16:00 16:15 24 34 3 61 2 54 4 60 5 12 2 19 3 9 33 45 185 16:15 16:30 27 35 6 68 5 60 9 74 7 9 2 18 2 14 35 51 211 16:30 16:45 29 37 6 72 6 61 8 75 9 14 I 24 4 17 39 60 231 16:45 17:00 27 35 8 70 2 58 4 64 5 13 4 22 4 14 36 54 210 17 :00 17:15 21 31 5 57 5 49 6 60 6 15 2 23 2 12 33 47 187 17 :15 17:30 19 27 6 52 5 44 11 60 3 12. 1 16 4 13 26 43 171 17:30 17:45 20 21 5 46 3 46 7 56 3 9 0 12 1 8 23 32 146 17:45 P.M. Total 190 247 44 481 31 421 53 505 43 95 12 150 20 96 251 367 1503 P.M. Total I Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: WHITE OAK RD SR: VIII lE OAK RD I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thm Right Total E W Begining 7:00 189 278 41 508 14 115 11 140 24 48 32 104 23 79 97 199 951 7:00 7:15 202 272 48 522 14 129 12 155 25 63 33 121 26 88 105 219 1017 7:15 7:30 200 259 46 505 14 140 12 166 26 75 31 132 24 90 106 220 1023 7:30 7:45 180 230 35 445 9 142 10 161 22 77 31 130 23 86 102 211 947 7:45 8:00 152 200 27 379 6 134 12 152 18 78 27 123 20 71 85 176 830 8:00 16:00 103 133 20 256 16 224 25 265 26 46 5 77 9 49 133 191 789 16:00 16:15 107 141 23 271 15 233 25 273 26 48 9 83 13 54 143 210 837 16:15 16:30 104 138 25 267 18 228 27 273 27 51 9 87 12 57 143 212 839 16:30 16:45 96 130 25 251 18 212 29 259 23 54 8 85 14 56 134 204 799 16:45 17:00 87 114 24 225 15 197 28 240 17 49 7 73 II 47 113 176 714 17:00 I Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thm Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E W Begining 200 259 46 505 14 140 12 166 26 75 31 132 24 90 106 220 1023 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF 0.88 PHF 0.94 PHF 0.94 PHF 0.81 0.91 A.M. Peak 16:30 104 138 25 267 18 228 27 273 27 51 9 87 12 57 143 212 839 16:30 P.M. Peak PHI 0.93 PHF 0.91 PHF 0.91 PRE 0.88 0.91 P.M. Peak H 12 gj i Intersection: E -W: Macedonia church rd Weather Dry File Input Name N -S: WHITE OAK RD Count By JJP By HP Location WINCHESTER,VA Count Date 11/15/2005 IS Minute EB: Macedonia church rd WB: Macedonia church rd NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E W Begining 7:00 3 1 3 7 3 0 0 3 1 49 2 52 0 37 0 37 99 7:00 7:15 4 0 2 6 4 0 0 4 1 54 3 58 0 42 0 42 110 7:15 7:30 6 0 5 It 4 1 I 6 0 55 7 62 0 44 1 45 124 7:30 7:45 5 1 4 10 5 0 0 5 1 58 5 64 1 46 0 47 126 7:45 8 00 4 2 2 8 6 I I 8 2 53 7 62 0 48 I 49 127 8:00 8:15 3 I 4 8 3 2 0 5 3 46 4 53 1 42 0 43 109 8:15 8:30 6 0 3 9 4 1 1 6 1 38 6 45 0 34 0 34 94 8:30 3 8:45 4 I 1 6 3 0 0 3 0 34 3 37 0 29 0 29 75 8:45 1 AM. Total 35 6 24 65 32 5 3 40 9 387 37 433 2 322 2 326 864 A.M. Total 16:00 I I I 3 2 1 2 5 1 26 I 28 1 55 I 57 93 16:00 16:15 0 2 0 2 I 2 1 4 2 29 2 33 0 54 3 57 96 16:15 16:30 2 1 2 5 3 0 0 3 I 33 I 35 1 60 I 62 105 16:30 16:45 4 3 1 8 5 1 0 6 3 36 4 43 61 4 67 124 16:45 17 :00 2 0 0 2 4 3 1 8 4 34 4 42 0 67 4 71 123 17:00 I 17:15 I I 3 5 6 2 0 8 2 35 3 40 1 60 3 64 117 17:15 17:30 0 2 1 3 3 2 1 6 3 29 2 34 0 51 I 52 95 17:30 17:45 I 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 24 0 25 0 39 0 39 67 17:45 P.M. Total 11 10 S 29 26 11 5 42 17 246 17 280 5 447 17 469 820 P.M. Total I Hour EB: Macedonia church rd WB: Macedonia church rd NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left 7 r Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Tim Right Total Left Thru Right Total E W Begining 7:00 18 2 14 34 16 I 1 18 3 216 17 236 I 169 I 171 459 7 :00 7:15 19 3 13 35 19 2 2 23 4 220 22 246 t 180 2 183 487 7:15 7:30 18 4 15 37 18 4 2 24 6 212 23 241 2 180 2 184 486 7:30 7:45 18 4 13 35 18 4 2 24 7 195 22 224 2 170 1 173 456 7:45 8:00 17 4 10 31 16 4 2 22 6 171 20 197 I 153 1 155 405 8:00 16:00 7 7 4 18 I1 4 3 18 7 124 8 139 4 230 9 243 418 16 :00 16:15 8 6 3 17 13 6 2 21 10 132 II 153 3 242 12 257 448 16:15 16:30 9 5 6 20 18 6 I 25 10 138 12 160 4 248 12 264 469 16:30 16:45 7 6 5 18 18 8 2 28 12 134 13 159 3 239 12 254 459 16:45 17:00 4 3 4 II 15 7 2 24 10 122 9 141 1 217 8 226 402 17:00 F'. 1 Hour EB: Macedonia church rd WB: Macedonia church rd NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 1 Hour Period 10,S, Period Begining Left mm Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E W Begining 7:15 19 3 13 35 19 2 2 23 4 220 22 246 I 180 2 183 487 7:15 A.M. Peak PHF 0.80 PHF 0.72 PHF 0.96 PHF 0.93 0.96 A.M. Peak 16:30 9 5 6 20 l8 6 1 25 10 138 12 160 4 248 12 264 469 16:30 P.M. Peak PHF 0.63 PHF 0.78 PIIF 0.93 PHF 0.93 0.95 P.M. Peak