The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-06 CommentsVDOT Rezoning Comments: Shawnee Drive Property Page 1 of 1 Jill Fries From: Funkhouser, Rhonda Rhonda .Funkhouser @VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd [Lloyd.) ngram@V DOT.Virginia. gov] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:28 AM To: 'Jill Fries' Cc: Ingram, Lloyd Subject: VDOT Rezoning Comments: Shawnee Drive Property The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 652. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Shawnee Drive Property (Parcel ID #63(A)104) Rezoning Application dated March 15, 2006 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right -of -way needs, including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right -of -way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984 -5607 (fax) 5/4/2006 Rezoning Comments Mail to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Attn: Fire Marshal 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665 -6350 ;Ap plicant Please fill out Mar the mformation`as acc urately; 'Frederi County Fore w ith °his review At location nap, proffer statement, impact analysis,,anc Applicant's Name xin'IQJ -1 p 1 s P. L. C Mailing Address: 1 I to S 34 War4- 5.4-. Location ofproperty- R:rn o-Ff o4 R 1i on-lo Shawnre. Pt. bcurd) Irrl?rsec -hnn Pnrrel tS approl&. 25t3 I on e4 .Side, d'rec 4F1 bv,1;cl wtn -pow,+ u o ales, Current zon ing: R.P Frederick County Fire Marshal y�} ,nchether, VA 22401 Zoning requested: 6 '2. Notice to Fire Marshal Please Return This Form to the Applicant 22 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Rescue Dept. Attn: Fire Marshal County Administration Bldg., 1st Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Telephone:5 V (v2 5192 Acreage: 0. q 4 Control number RZ05 -0011 Project Name C.A. Webb Address 116 S. Stewart Sf. Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning RP Automatic Sprinkler System Yes Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehice Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Plan Approval Recommended Yes Date received 10/14/2005 Tax ID Number 63 -A -104 City Winchester Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Yes Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway /Aisleway Width Not Identified Reviewed By D. Limburg Applicant Painter -lewis Fire District 11 State VA Signature Title Date reviewed 10/21/2005 Zip 22601 Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No Rescue District 11 Date Revised Applicant Phone 540 -662 -5792 Election District Shawnee Rezoning Comt•ts Mailing Address: Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Frederick County Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665 -5643 hcant P,leasetfill out the3mf ormatjon as a ccuratel d epartment =o o� ate_ ocation.map,pro Vorks'wi h theirareview Attac r, o fer statement, impact analysis„and; any other pe r Applicants Name: Location of property: jdr Bousti OM Al F fl r OK. ZSO' can tctc oun+ Au-Jo So -te Current zoning: RP I1ln S S pw0.r1- S+- Y4tnChQS'rey VA Z2LDI Department of Public Work's Comments: Zoning requested: g 21 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering County Administration Bldg. 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Telephone: 5010 IDI'Z 311q 2. Acreage: U q Li Notice to Dept. of Public Works Please Return This Form to the Applicant Rezoning Comments Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 868 -1061 Applicant Please fiill'out the information as accurately as possible ih order to 5 anttatton Authority with their review Attach a cop y of your application formri m x t�4Y`ul ap,±proffer statement,; impact analysis, and;any other.pertinent�information Applicant's Namef n#es Lewts 2.> .C. Telephone: 5 Loto2.-519 Z. Mailing Address: Current zoning: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 111.0 S S+rwnr4- 5t-. v‘S che..5-ker vA ZZ too l Location of propert r n o4 R 11 nrr}o 3nci.Jnee. De os+Bou.rri) Ire+ acthlbn -Rse 1 I a �rnY. 6 n R S tde, clIrec4-1 y brhtnrl Irwin /oLrvt- Aw4e Snits tation s Zoning requested: (3 Acreage: p q to Sanitation Authority Please Return This Form to the Applicant 25 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia Rezoning Comment Mail to: Fred -Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 722-3579 �p hcant Please fill out the information a's accurately as possible m or der red -Wmc Serv�ce'Author w it h t revi "Attach copytof your api r ^i: t,'_ w e t S s coffer statement im and othe pinent infor mation to assist =t ilicationa Applicant's Name:�1 awF¢.r- 1 P� s P.t C Telephone: 541p-iota S'1Rz. Mailing Address: Ilto Z.3 #ewas4 S#- Frederick- Winchester Service Authority Win Ys act 71vo1 Hand deliver to: Fred -Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Location of property: i 4-E of 0-.11 on ,Shawna AR o -sl and) irrharstc+ tort. -'mil a.rre.l is agproi 756 nn r-f. side, o- lirec.q -1 behi 1 wi ouri4 ioso Current zoning: R? Zoning requested: (3 2 Acreage: D. 44 Notice to Fred -Winc Service Authority Please Return Form to Applicant 32 Rezoning Comments Frederick County Department of Parks Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Department of Parks Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665 -5678 Applicant's Name�- ��tn}pY PttSt5 P. LC. Mailing Address: Current zoning: fz P 11 In S 3-Eevuo.r 54- Winn JA ZZtoo Zoning requested: b Z 23 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks Recreation County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Telephone: 5'40 (nlo z Location of property: losrl pc x.11 nrrin Shntano 0. De (Eos- 1&urd) trrhuser hon Rrc& t5 o- Pprn1L ZEor 24. ch rcG4-t wrn- o 'tA-4 ICS Acreage: 0. tartment ofParks &R ecreation ,Commen 0/74`/05 Notice to Department of Parks Recreation Please Return This Form to the Applicant Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Ms. Sonya Summers Painter Lewis, P.L. C. 116 S. Stewart Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Ms. Summers: SMK:dkr cc: William C. Dean, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools 540 662 -3889 Ext 112 Frederick County Public Schools Visit us at www.frederick.k12.va.us November 15, 2005 RE: Rezoning Comments for Rezoning Proposal- Parcel ID #63 -A -104 This letter is in response to your request for comments concerning the rezoning for the proposed parcel ID #63 -A -104 project. Based on the information provided that states no residential units will be part of the rezoning, there will be no impact to the school population upon built -out. Sincerely, e -mail: kapocsis@frederick.k12.va.us Step en M. apocsi Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604 -2546 FAX 540 -662 -3890 November 3, 2005 Ms. Sonya Summers Painter- Lewis, PLC 16 South Stewart Street Winclmster, VA 22601 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Jim Webb Proposed Rezoning; PIN# 63 -A -104 Dear Sonya: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact• historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley identifies this property as being located within the core areas of the First and Second Battles of Kernstown and the study area of the Second Battle of Winchester; however, due to the development in this area, it has been deemed to have lost its integrity. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, w e [_.t Candice E. Perkins Planner 11 CEP /bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540 /665 -6395 WILBUR C. HALL (1892 -1972) THOMAS V. MONAHAN (1924 -1999) SAMUEL D. ENGLE 0. LELAND MAHAN ROBERT T. MITCHELL, JR. JAMES A. KLENKAR STEVEN F. JACKSON DENNIS J. MCLOUGHLIN, JR. HAND DELIVERED Dear Mike: HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN MITCHELL A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7 E 307 EAST MARKET STREET 9 EAST BOSOAWEN STREET LEESBURG, VIRGINIA TELEPHONE 703- 777 -1050 April 3, 2006 Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Director Frederick County Department of Planning Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA TELEPHONE 540 662 3200 FAX 540662-4304 E IawyersQQ haIJmonahan con, Re: C. A. Webb Sons Proposed Proffer Statement PLEASE REPLY TO: P. 0. Box 848 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604 -0848 I have reviewed the above referenced Proposed Proffer Statement. It is my opinion that the Proposed Proffer Statement is generally in a foini to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following comments: 1. I would suggest, for uniformity and easy- reference purposes, that the details of the zoning, owners, property, etc., be summarized at the beginning as set forth on the attached fonnat. This format has been used in all recent proffer statements. 2. The heading "INTRODUCTION" should be deleted at the beginning of the proffer statement, as the content of the initial paragraphs are substantive paragraphs of the proffer statement. Michael T. Ruddy, AICP April 3, 2006 Page 2 HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN MITCHELL 3. The last sentences of the first paragraph, beginning with the word "Therefore" should be deleted, as the actual proffers are set forth in the itemized proffers. 4. In the second paragraph, I would recommend that the words "development of this property would require the owner to meet the conditions set forth in this document" be revised to state "development of the subject property shall be done in strict conformity with the conditions set forth below." 5. The words "and the Code of Virginia" should be added at the end of the second paragraph. 6. With respect to Proffer No. 1, as I was not provided with a copy of the Generalized Site Plan, the staff should review the site plan shown on Exhibit 4 of the Impact Statement to determine if it is sufficiently detailed to govern the development of the site. 7. Proffer No. 3 may not, in fact, be a proffer. If this development would require a commercial entrance and require the owner to install improvements required by VDOT, then this proffer is offering nothing beyond what is already required. It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific property, or whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. me. RTM /ks Enclosure HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN MITCHELL Mr. Michael T. Ruddy, AICP April 3, 2006 Page 3 If there are any questions concerning the foregoing comments, please contact my yours, Robert T. Mitchell, Rezoning Comnts Mail to: Winchester City Planning Department Attn: Planning Director 15 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667 -1815 4 Applicant Please f ll out the information as accurate, y as possible in ordento assist the r City of tnchester with their review Attach a copy of your application form location In unfl t X 3 S s A :profferstatement, impact, analysis, and any other pertinent Information Applicant's Name: _(Cho I p u^ I S P Mailing Address: P t- 1 Pit; IS 1 P. i I Lr &FtLOQi+ &f Current zoning: �P City of Winchester l��ryhQ SF� t VA 2 Z10O1 Location of property: it oft n+ PT 11 (3b Sit uineu. 1)1 (Eas- I- bow c 1 C irritr50P len Panel IS 0.PproIL. 25b'en 2 StO ,r 41 b in d u' u, cb :Lle S Hand deliver to: Winchester City Planning Department Attn: Planning Director Rouss City Hall 15 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia Zoning requested: (3 Z Acreage: f? Cj Ll Notice to City of Winchester Plea Return This Form to the Applicant Telephone: OLIO Into2 7 29 05/15/2006 15:39 5406625793 PAINTERLEWIS Jill Fries From: Tim Youmans [tyoumans @ci.winchester.va.us] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:06 PM To: 'Jill Fries' Subject: RE: Rezoning Comment I do not have any objections to the rezoning request. Our assistant City Engineer did not think that the sewer line existed. Tim From: Jill Fries [mallto:jill @painterlewis.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:21 PM To: tyoumans @ci.winchester.va.us Subject: Rezoning Comment RE: Shawnee Drive Rezoning Parcel ID# 63 -A -104 Dear Mr. Youmans, Sincerely, Jill Fries PAINTER LEWIS, P.L.C. 5/15/2006 PAGE 02 Page 1 of 1 I am contacting you regarding your comment on the above mentioned Rezoning application. Ms. Candace Perkins, from the Frederick County Planning Department, has asked for documentation of your approval of the rezoning. Per your comments dated 12/09/05, Ms. Perkins is not certain if your response is an approval. Her main concern is the comment regarding the sanitary sewer line annotated as "existing" on the Generalized Site (GSP) plan being actually installed or proposed. As per the GSP labeling, the sanitary sewer line not a proposed line. To that end, could you please respond, via email, if you approve the rezoning application for the above referenced property? I appreciate your time and attention to my request. Please feel free to contact me at 540 -662- 5792 if you have any questions or require additional information. December 9, 2005 Mr. John Lewis Painter- Lewis, P.L.C. 1 16 South Stewart Street Winchester, VA 22601 ,IAN 1 7 RE: Proposed Rezoning of Jim Webb Dear Mr. Lewis: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665 -6395 I have had the opportunity to, review the draft rezoning application for the Jim Webb property. This application seeks to rezone 0.94 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to the B2 (Business General) District. Staff's review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The site is within the limits of the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. This plan appears to show the use of this property as industrial and, therefore, a rezoning to B2 would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, adjacent to the industrial designation is a commercial designation along Route 11. The case for the B2 designation as a transition should be made by the application. 2. Restricted B2. The Impact analysis statement under the traffic portion, as. well as the generalized site plan, state that the property is intended to develop with an office use. This use is not proffered and, therefore, any use could potentially develop on the property. A proffer should be included in the rezoning package that restricts the use of the property to office and limits the square footage of the use to what is shown under the traffic section of the impact analysis. Entrances. The preliminary generalized site plan does not show the property being accessed off of Route 11, and the site suitability section states the property will have an entrance off of Shawnee Drive. Shawnee Drive, being the sole access, has not been proffered and, therefore, in the future the property owner could attempt to use Route 11. A proffer stating that the site will only be accessed off of Shawnee Drive should be included in the rezoning package. Also, interparcel connections to the adjacent properties should be proffered and shown on a GDP. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Page 2 Mr. John Lewis RE: Proposed Rezoning ofJim Webb Property December 9, 2005 Site Layout. A preliminary generalized site plan was provided in the package. This layout has not been proffered and, therefore, the site could develop differently. This layout should be proffered as a generalized development plan (GDP). 5. Parcel Boundaries. The shape of the property that is depicted on the generalized site plan (exhibit 4) does not match the property boundaries shown on the property map (exhibit 1). Clarify if this property touches Route 11 or not. 6. Sidewalks Trails. Eventually a ten foot hike /bike trail will be placed along Route 11; a ten foot pedestrian easement should be proffered along the portion of the property that touches Route 11 so that the land will be available in the future. Also, a sidewalk should be proffered along Shawnee Drive along the frontage of this property. 7. Impact Assessment Statement Traffic. A complete traffic impact analysis was not provided with this draft rezoning. Trip generation figures were based on 9,000 square feet of leasable office space. This site could potentially be developed with a use that has a much higher traffic volume than an office and unless a use and maximum floor space is proffered, the county will have to assume this site could actually develop at a much higher intensity. The County is seeking assurances that the site will not develop with a different use than the intended office. A TIA needs to be provided to the county and if a use is not proffered for the site, the TIA needs to show the traffic conditions should the property develop at the highest B2 use. 8. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Historic Resources Advisory Board, Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation,. Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick Winchester Health Department, the Frederick- Winchester Service Authority and the City of Winchester. Any proposed proffers will need to be forwarded by staff to the Frederick County Attorney. Attorney comments are needed prior to submittal acceptance. 9. Adjacent Parcels. A list of all adjacent properties, their owners and the owners' addresses are required with the application. 10. Fees. The fee for this application includes a $3,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre, and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Thus, a total of $3,144.00 is due upon submission of the official rezoning application. This is based on fees as of January 27, 2005. Please note that these fees may change. Sincerely, n utt L- Candice E. Perkins Planner II CEP /bad Page 3 Mr. John Lewis RE: Proposed Rezoning ofJim Webb Property December 9, 2005 11. Special Limited Power of Attorney. Please have the property owners complete the special limited power of attorney form which authorizes you to represent them during the application process. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. cc: Mr. Jim Webb, C.A. Webb and Sons, 15 First Street, Berryville, VA 22611