The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-06 Comments (2)r -V r tglia COUNTY of FREDERICK TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: October 13, 2006 Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: RSA/pd L0.13• 00 MEMORANDUM Paramount Development 263 White Oak Dr. Beckley, WV 25801 Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665 -6395 The amount of $50.00 was deposited in line item 43-010-019110-0008 for the company named below had a deposit for one sign for Rezoning #04 -06 for Orrick Cemetery. The company has returned the sign and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 't;ONe 0 aid e n T A X R E C E I P T IDERICK COUNTY ,bO WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR .jes :M. BOX 225 WINCHESTER VA 22604 -0225 SIGN DEPOSITS PLANNING Previous Balance Principal Being Paid Penalty Interest Amount Paid *Balance Due Ticket Date Register: Trans. Dept Acct# Pd by PLANNING Check 79977.87 VARIOUS BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PENALTY /INTEREST THRU THE MONTH 3/2006 00005300001 3/13/2006 BCC /BC 54501 1095 150.00 150.00 .00 .00 150.00 .00 0 2 LL 999p et k p0 31 990001 Da te /13/2 Date tet: 5A 501 Regis N l 545 Tran Dept fwte a5Q1 e t �xdn*rj, u r x S a x/1 ✓`Ck'.i D OLLA O l� a RS S= -f ;:*Y`}:1 R m 2,a -e _`,8"y�'1 \"s +(r�.25t� 1 �Q�� 1 �f.a3" f J ilk REC F.ROM A s f:" 5 112-' 2 off +ir h U `,.M,:x' FOR z3°' vc— T m'�”. ,J 1t3N P,QID, APO 1 1 2006 Jac S Aacr c Ql 11 p r; L /wok_ C i✓ck.cajtoA G(r W O Ir k J0 co.f eAv d. 4 p u b i hear ;'r y on -Hie re 2 0n t7 C1 ±71e, Orr de -r»ef ty pre pQ.v behind Our 171ouse J /fie e2z'er you. Sc,n f 'cS Inerifici 'i nc' Ahoup- 3 c Ilve r "44porc far) f Iipith(1>i4 s rake ;-79 p) a ktci k h ?Ul f", 5o (-diem Lee otKr'UCo 4t //u /``ec/eric% O O(ctv�71.1 1 7 en Stu d;n9 cwt 7p,n Pr P11e. 7.'i5pm h rji w ere -to 1d K) t Co ()Lad hat/ t fo Ida; fire icc/ wit 7 ,$iatrld p o i,' I u r C Gc_s e. c ce ,4nt„ we f ;fed �Fiti QUV ne,c burl l ace_ for rs F;octil -h booty-6( rooim O leavecC avid we- wei�f ivr 6) b Jo( 7tio e J clue -fo IGe hour .-ip fire coo v.(cfr' F e t fo the Orr ick pro re rf S&ie- 1 nhyhf, 1.0 hi h 3 o!he'- portan f 4e6Lr /KJ.5110 /res dot f you �Gr'vrk It 10001 have b ecvii be-4171-6v- fv have hctc( 7Tteat on .rekstole- h is. So fG-a� 71-67ey cae-Q -a{ ve Me (v en he o el a, c ,1 --Hite p c/br i e s ev v e_ b u v h e �e v vr9 Orrr"c,k- properl kvi 11 6 e_ 0124 n 7�,F. �i((L f�Ls_ &onao GtCC.c( 01 fro ;or 7 F/- no f 04(1. A S for 7 3hr a G�[ I. LJI7en �tpu sac(' Ihai` +k i�9r threw f rhovtriy aionc a.5 yeLt k }Ciyr�d 5 0 LA coLC have Moot I t ocerles v 40 coHvrt a Les 'fkcot we wer 7- 49-(4.5 p(4nn/vey c m6r on sour non 70Jan/ iee cfr'ei llA 1 r 6Cevj7 .GC✓r kC irt N 1 George Da mko 2097 Senseny Rd. WIncheste.. VA 22602 C t Cr (-2` Fred et'"? tin* 41 ty 144/.11.C7InAJL/C;e7 aLl. I /eft; Pe-primen Piann and Davefo,orntn 71- /0 0 kJ h K-en 74- Str ee 1,0 in G ig e s fee- t/4 US! 1 881 FROEHLING ROBERTSON, INC GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS ENGINEERS LABORATORIES "OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE" 1734 Seibel Drive NE Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Telephone: 540-344-7939 Fax: 540-344-3657 David Harner Paramount Development Corporation 607 Briarwood Drive Suite 5 Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29572 Subject: Wetland Delineation Perennial Stream Determination 55+/- Acre Site Winchester, Virginia F &R Project Number G62 -393E Dear Mr. Harner: Froehling Robertson, Inc. (F &R) is please to present the enclosed Wetland Delineation' and Jurisdictional Determination reports of the above referenced site located in Winchester, Virginia. We appreciate the opportunity to serve as your Environmental Consultant. If you have questions, comments or additional needs please feel free to contact Greg Whitt at (540) 344 7939. Sincerely, FROEHLING ROBERTSON, INC. Gr.. Whitt E Ironmental Group Manager January 31, 2006 Attachment: Three (3) Wetland Delineation and Jurisdictional Determination reports CC: John Pappas, F &R Crozet 1881 FROEHLING ROBERTSON, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS ENGINEERS LABORATORIES "OVER ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SERVICE" 3015 Dumbarton Road Telephone: (804) 264 -2701 Facsimile: (804) 264-1275 November 23, 2005 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Norfolk District 18139 Triangle Plaza, Suite 213 Dumfries, Virginia 22026 Re: Paramount Development 55 Acres Wetland Delineation Request for Jurisdictional Wetland Determination F &R Project No: G62 -393E To Whom It May Concern: Froehling Robertson, Inc., (F &R) presents herein the results of a Wetland Delineation completed on a parcel of land located in Frederick County, Virginia. The project area includes approximately 55 acres, assigned Tax Map 55 -A -201, and located at 39.1682 N and 78.1197 W. It encompasses (west to east) gently sloping grassed uplands into a mix hardwood and softwood forest on the eastern portion of the property. The project area is hereafter referred to as the Site. On November 20 and 21, 2005 Mr. David Martin of F &R perfonned a wetland delineation on the Site in accordance with methods set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. F &R identified two jurisdictional wetlands; one a low lying wetland swale that enters on the Site's southwestem boundary, exiting shortly thereafter at a property boundary. The second wetland showed surface water movement flowing northeast along the western portion of the Site. This feature apparently is fed by a culvert from an adjacent improvement's storm water detention basin. An isolated circular ditch was observed to be holding water on the top of a hill within the Site's eastern portion. This feature is not considered a part of a natural system, therefore not a jurisdictional Water of the U.S. The Site's features are illustrated on Drawing No.2 in the Attachments. HEADQUARTERS: 3015 DUMBARTON ROAD BOX 27524 RICHMOND, VA 232617524 TELEPHONE (804) 264-2701 FAX (804) 264 -1202 www.FandR.com BRANCHES: ASHEVILLE, NC BALTIMORE, MD CHARLOTTE, NC CHESAPEAKE. VA CROZET, VA FAYETTEVILLE, NC FREDERICKSBURG, VA GREENVILLE, SC HICKORY, NC RALEIGH, NC ROANOKE, VA STERLING, VA PRELIMINARY DATA GATHERING ON -SITE INSPECTION METHODOLOGY Wetland Delineation Paramount Development— 55 Acres Frederick County, Virginia 2 1081 F &R reviewed the USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map of Stephenson, VA for obvious indications of wetlands or other "Waters of the U.S." on the Site. The USGS Map depicts two intermittent channels; one along the western portion of the Site and one along the eastern portion. F &R observed the western feature to be a jurisdictional wetland with surface flow. The eastern channel was not observed during the site reconnaissance. The man trade ditch within the Site's eastem portion was depicted on the USGS Map. F &R reviewed the National Wetlands Inventory (NWT) Map at http /www.nwi.fws.gov /index.html. The Site's western wetland features are depicted as an intermittent stream in the NWI Map. The man made ditch within the Site's eastern portion was depicted on the NWI Map. F &R reviewed the Frederick County Soil Survey for hydric soils or water features located on the Site. The survey maps the Site into approximately two soil series. Clearbrook Charmer) Series soils associated with the Site's uplands are moderately deep, somewhat poorly drained soils comprising areas that are used for pasture and hay, as well as areas used for cultivated crops and as woodland. The slopes range from 2 -7 percent. The Site's western feature is shown as an intermittent channel within the Weikert-Berks Series. This soil is characteristic shallow, strongly sloping, well drained soils in the valley and on the mountains within Frederick County. The slopes range from 7 -15 percent. The soil survey depicts an internittent channel along the eastern portion of the Site within the Weikert-Berks Series. This channel was not observed during the site reconnaissance. The methodology used for conducting the wetland delineation was in general accordance with the 1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual, along with the COE clarification memorandum (dated March 6, 1992). The routine wetland determination, as described in Section D Subsection 3, was employed. F &R walked the Site boundary and made several transects through the property. November 23, 2005 F &R Project No. G62 -393E SITE OBSERVATIONS LIMITATIONS Wetland Delineation Paramount Development— 55 Acres Frederick County, Virginia 3 881 Observations of soil, plants and hydrology were made throughout the project area as necessary to provide the delineation of apparently jurisdictional wetlands. F &R established two Observation Points on the project Site to confirm the location of the wetland boundaries and three Channel Observation Points to define other "Waters of the United States At the Observation Points, a determination of the three criteria for wetlands (hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology and hydric soils) was completed (see Routine Determination Field Data Sheet in Attachments). F &R also noted the presence or absence of an "ordinary high water mark" as a criterion to define "Waters of the United States During the site reconnaissance, F &R identified two jurisdictional wetlands; one a low lying wetland swale that enters on the Site's southwestem boundary, exiting shortly thereafter at a property boundary. The second wetland showed surface water movement flowing northeast along the western portion of the Site. This feature apparently is fed by a culvert from an adjacent improvement's storm water detention basin. An isolated circular ditch was observed to be holding water on the top of a hill within the Site's eastern portion. This feature is not considered a part of a natural system therefore not a jurisdictional Water of the U.S. This Wetland Delineation has been prepared for the exclusive use of Paramount Development and their authorized agents on this specific project. This report has been performed using generally accepted environmental practices and wetland identification and delineation guidelines established by the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual. Our conclusions are based on field observations made at the time of our site visit and, in part, upon information provided by others. Changing weather conditions and differing interpretation of field observations may influence the characterization and delineation of wetlands on the subject site. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We have not verified the completeness or accuracy of the information provided by others. Froehling Robertson, Inc. by virtue of providing the services described in this report, does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the Site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any local, November 23, 2005 F &R Project No. G62 -393E Respectfully submitted, FROEHLING ROBERTSON. INC. .c41 David M. Martin Environmental Scientist Environmental Services Wetland Delineation Paramount Development— 55 Acres Frederick County, Virginia 4 SINCE 188 state or federal public agencies any conditions at the Site that may present a potential danger to public health. safety or the environment. In areas that require notification of local, state, or federal agencies as required by law, it is the client's responsibility to notify. If you have any questions /comments or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (804) 264 -2701. Ron W. Etter, C.H.M.M Senior Environmental Professional Environmental Services November 23, 2005 F &R Project No. G62 -393E Wetiand Delineation& CBPA Analysis Hunting Run 46 -Acres Spotsylvania County, Virginia 5 ATTACHMENTS August 15, 2005 F &R Project No. G54 -2082 USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle of Stephenson, Virginia topographic map provided by http: /www.topozone.com Approximate Site Location SINCE 1881 Froehling Robertson, Inc. SITE VICINITY MAP Wetland Delineation Paramount Development Tax Map 55 -A -201 Frederick County, Virginia DRAWN: DMM SCALE: NTS PROD NO: G62 -393E CHKD: DMM DATE: 22- Nov -OS DWG NO: 1 GEND: k .9 A9 ��F 9 .2 O 0AA SINGE 1681 1yh ;It" Froehling Robertson, Inc. Jurisdictional Wetland Flag Location DRAWN: DMM CNKD: DMM I o N 6 6 y ak (.S 4 Jurisdictional Channel SA1 Observation Point ®A Channel Observation Point SITE OBSERVATION PLAN Wetland Delineation Paramount Development Tax Map 55 -A -201 Frederick County, Virginia SCALE: NTS DATE: 22- Nov -05 PRO) NO: 362 -393E DWG NO: 2 B 7 Applicant: Paramount Development File Number: 05 -B0126 �3 S .r 1; Date: 25 Jan 2006 Attached is: See Sec below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) An PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B PERMIT DENIAL D X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E A s he following identrfress n d?A� `kg on onalniorrnafion Corps re gulattoilsat 6 i CE; R1' your rights' nd optto Ir ga ding an administrative a pe J o Bov r a c �a pp o he above athttp /usace arm /methfuncttonslcw /ceewo! e�or ¢y Y i g A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.�� ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. I REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record, If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal process you may contact: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk Distr ict Northern Virginia Field Office Attn.: Mr. Ronald H. Stouffer, Jr. 18139 Triangle Plaza, Suite 213 Dumfries, VA 22026 703- 221 -6967 or email ron.h.stouffer @usace.army.mil If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also contact: United States Army Corps of Engineers North Atlantic Division Attn: Mr. James Haggerty, Regulatory Appeals Review Officer Building 301, General Lee Avenue Fort Hamilton Military Community Brooklyn, NY 11252 718- 765 -7150 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 -day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. Signature of appellant or agent. Date: Telephone number: /IRGINIA SHEET NUMBER 36 A.\ Wetlands Data Available Ste*henson PEM1C Virginia NWI/Aerial Map PENDF I l :Jr rr 'PUUHIIi Ma9 cooler. 39' 10' 9' N, 78' 6' 59' Map Legend „4,,I Interstate Major Roads Outer Road "I Interstate State highway U5 highway Roads o CONUS Cities I. :1 CONUS USG5 Quad Index 24K Lower 48 Wetland Polygons Estuarine and Marine Oeepwater a Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater ForestedlShrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine Lower 48 Available Wetland Data No Wetlands Data Available Wetlands Data Available NEED Waterbodies NND Streams ES Canadian Waterbodies CONUS Counties 100K Urban Areas 300K CONUS States 100K in South America Settinc DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Frederick County, 55 Acre parcel Date: 11/20/2005 Applicant/Owner: Paramount Development County: Frederick Investigator: Froehling Robertson, Inc. David Martin State: VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes RI No ri Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypcial Situation)? Yes ri No @i Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ri No pi (If needed, explain on reverse). Community ID: Wetland Transect ID: A Plot ID: 1 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Juncus effusus herb FACW+ Typha latifolia herb OBL Solidago canadensis herb FACU grass spp. herb NI Cephalanthus occidentalis herb OBL Percent of Dominant Species that ar OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC 60% Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: n/a (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water n/a (in.) Water- Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data x FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: n/a (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Al Map Unit Name: (Series and Phase): Clearbrook Channery, 2-7% Drainage Class: Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? somewhat (9B) Taxonomy (Subgroup): poorly drained Yes P No "t Profile Description: Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance /Contrast Structures, etc. Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors finches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) 0 -3 Al 10YR 4/3 10YR 4/4 many /faint clay loam 3 -8 A2 10YR 5/2 2.5YR 3/6 common /distinct clay loam 8 -14 8 10YR 5/2 2.5YR 3/6 many /prominent clay Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Soils Soils List Soils List Histic Epidodon High Organic Content in Organic Streaking in Sandy Listed on Local Hydric Listed on National Hydric Other (Explain in Remarks) Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime x Reducing Conditions x Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes n No'- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No Hydric Soils Present? Yes r Nor Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes E No E Remarks: Low -lying topographic swale DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Frederick County 55 Acre Parcel Date: 11/20/2005 Applicant/Owner: Paramount Development County: Spotsylvania Investigator: Froehlinq Robertson, Inc. David Martin State: VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes WI No n Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypcial Situation)? Yes fl No pi Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes r I No 1'l (If needed, explain on reverse). Community ID: Upland Transect ID: A Plot ID: 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator grass spp. herb NI Solidago canadensis herb FACU Daucus carota herb NI Percent of Dominant Species that ar OBL, FACW or FAG (excluding FAC 0% Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: n/a (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water n/a (in.) Water- Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: n/a (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No wetland hydrology. SOILS A2 Map Unit Name: (Series and Phase): Clearbrook Channery, 2 -7% Drainage Class: Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes somewhat (9B) Taxonomy (Subgroup): poor drained f✓ No =F Profile Description: Mottle Colors (Munsell Moist) Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance /Contrast Structures, etc. Depth Matrix Color (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) 0 -3 A 10YR 4/2 n/a n/a clay loam 3 -6 B 10YR 5/3 10YR 5/6 few /faint clay loam 6 -14 C 2.5Y 6/4 7.5YR 5/8 few /distinct clay Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Histic Epidodon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? E r Yes No Yes r No E' Yes E No E Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes E No Remarks: Upland data point adjacent to wetland swale. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Frederick County, 55 Acre parcel Date: 11/21/2005 Applicant/Owner: Paramount Development County: Frederick Investigator: Froehling Robertson, Inc. David Martin State: VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes ;;I No ri Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypcial Situation)? Yes n No i✓j Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes rj No F9 (If needed, explain on reverse). Community ID: Wetland Transect ID: A Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator grass spp. herb NI Eupatorium maculatum herb FACW Solidago canadensis herb FACU Typha latifolia herb OBL Percent of Dominant Species that ar OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC 50% Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Aerial Photographs Other X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated x Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: n/a (in.) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Depth to Free Water 3 (in.) Water- Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC- Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Al Map Unit Name: (Series and Phase): Weikert -Berks channery Drainage Class: Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes well- drained (41C) Taxonomy (Subgroup): No Profile Description: Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance /Contrast Structures, etc. Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors finches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) 0 -1 Organic Layer 1 -8 A 7.5YR 5/1 7.5YR 5/8 many /distinct Clay 8 -14 B Gley 5/1 7.5YR 5/8 many /distinct Clay Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Histic Epidodon Sulfidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions x Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No tL Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No 0 Hydric Soils Present? Yes E No 0 Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes E No Remarks: Wet drainage swale from a stormwater retention pond culvert. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Frederick County 55 Acre Parcel Date: 11/21/2005 Applicant/Owner: Paramount Development County: Spotsylvania Investigator: Froehling Robertson, Inc. David Martin State: VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes l No r I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypcial Situation)? Yes i No PI Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes r°i No P1 (If needed, explain on reverse). Community ID: Upland Transect ID: A Plot ID: 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator grass spp. herb NI Solidago canadensis herb FACU Daucus carota herb NI Eupatorium maculatum herb FACW Percent of Dominant Species that ar OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC 25% Remarks: HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated 12 Inches in Wetlands more required): Channels in Upper 12 Inches Leaves Data in Remarks) Photographs Saturated in Upper _Aerial Other Water Marks X No Recorded Data Available Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: n/a (in.) Drainage Patterns Secondary Indicators (2 or Oxidized Root Depth to Free Water n/a (in.) Water- Stained Local Soil Survey FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: n/a (in.) Other (Explain Remarks: No wetland hydrology. SOILS A2 Map Unit Name: (Series and Phase): Weikert-Berks channery Drainage Class: Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes well- drained (41C) Taxonomy (Subgroup): No =E Profile Description: Mottle Colors fMunsell Moist) Mottle Texture, Concretions Abundance /Contrast Structures etc. Depth Matrix Color (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) 0 -3 A 10YR 5/3 n/a n/a Clay loam 3 -8 B1 10YR 5/3 7.5YR 5/8 few /faint Loam 8 -10 B2 2.5Y 6/3 7.5YR 5/8 few /faint Loam 10 -14 C 2.5Y 6/3 10YR 6/8 many /distinct Silt loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) Histic Epidodon Suifidic Odor Aquic Moisture Regime Reducing Conditions Gleyed or Low- Chroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? r r. Yes No E Yes No— Yes No E Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No E-- Remarks: Upland data point adjacent to wetland drainage Swale. Norfolk District CORPS OF ENGINEERS FIELD APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Date: January 25, 2006 Applicant: Paramount Development Project Name: Paramount Development Project Number: 05 -B0126 Agent: Froehling Robertson Inc. Project Location: Frederick County This serves as a field approved jurisdictional determination that waters of the United States (including wetlands) are present on this property. Our basis for this determination is the application of the Corps' 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the positive indicators of wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation. The wetland is a waters of the United States and is part of a tributary system to interstate waters (33 CFR 328.3(a)). These waters meet the Corps' definition of waters of the United States and are part of a tributary system to interstate waters (33 CFR 328.3(a)) and have an ordinary high water mark (or high tide line). _x We agree with the wetland delineation as flagged and as described in the letter, report and plans dated November 23, 2005. We agree with the wetland delineation as flagged with the following modifications (a revised map is required): There are jurisdictional waters or wetlands on your property, which are contiguous with We recommend that you have a wetland delineation performed. There are no jurisdictional waters or wetlands on the subject property. All waters /wetlands on the property are isolated and will not require a Depattment of the Army permit. However, a permit may be required from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Any discharge of dredged and/or fill material associated with mechanical land clearing, stumping or grading (such as with an excavator, bulldozer, or root rake), or any filling in jurisdictional areas will require a Department of the Army permit prior to such work occurring. An administrative appeals form is enclosed. This jurisdictional determination is valid for a period of five years from the date of this letter, unless new information warrants revision of the delineation before the expiration date. If you have any questions, please contact the project manager listed below. A condition of this jurisdictional determination is that you maintain the locations of the wetland delineation flags as they are now situated on the site. Once a plan of development is formulated it would be in your best interest to have the actual wetland boundary located by survey and superimposed on any future proposed plan to determine whether jurisdictional wetland would be impacted by the proposed development, and to determine whether a Department of the Army permit would be required. Get Ronald 1-1. Stouffer, r. Corps of Engineers Project Manager 703 221 -6967 Telephone number Paramount Development 05 -B0126 Supplemental Information 1. A search of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources Data Sharing System revealed the following: No known historic properties are located on the property. x _The following known architectural resources are located on/near the property. (see attached map) The following known archaeological resources are located on/near the property. (see attached map) 2. A search of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreations' data revealed the following: No known populations of federally listed threatened or endangered species are located within one minute latitude /longitude of the property. The following species are known to be within one minute latitude /longitude of the property. The property is within a known concentration area for the following species: 3. We suggest the following avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation measures be incorporated into any plans you prepare for the property: Avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the United States, including wetlands, to the maximum extent practicable. Please note this information is being provided to you based on the preliminary data you submitted to the Corps relative to project boundaries and project plans. Consequently, these findings and recommendations are subject to change if the project scope changes or new information becomes available and the accuracy of the data. Lastly, the Corps only consulted the Virginia Department of Conservation Recreation's database. You may want to consult the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries' database at www.dgifva.state.us ralbraWrilikense sgy tire: DWrri c Virginia Department of Historic Resources Data Sharing System, 12/28/2005 kr?' t V V. Paramount Development 1 14:11 .i at:KZfd! p I Y. Virginia Department of Hisoric Resources June 2005 P13 LEGEND Architecture La bets Archa eology Label intestates Architecture (aCtiVarSn) Archa eolegy PolY9 on) D County Boundary 24k TO PO 100k TO PO