Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-05 Comments (3)Susan Eddy From: david worthington worthington .david @worldnet.att.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:19 PM To: 'Susan Eddy' Cc: cdehaven@crosslink.net; Bosvanosten @aol.com Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Importance: High Page 1 of 2 Susan, I was hoping to speak at tomorrow's Board of Supervisors meeting but due to pressing work I will be unable to attend. Therefore, I am sending my comments to you and CC Board Members DeHaven and VanOsten for their information. I would appreciate if you could sharing or provide this e-mail to the appropriate parties for their information as well. First, I want to thank the applicant for recognizing that 130 homes on 1/3 acre lots does not match the character of the area. I also want to thank the local citizens for speaking out and having their voice heard. The applicant's decision to reduce the number of houses from the original 130 to what I understand is 30 homes on 2/3 of an acre is, in my opinion, a move in the right direction. The question that I have for you and the Board is while the area in question is certainly within the UDA and is the right place to build is this still too high a density to place adjacent to what amounts to rural and industrial land? What type of density does the Planning staff and Board envision for this area? Certainly some of the rural character of the area will be lost as development pressures continue but in an area that currently has active orchards and houses on five acre lots homes placed on 2/3 of an acre certainly seem out of place. Furthermore, if this rezoning passes I fear that the Board will have established the new density requirements in the area. Land that is currently tied up in five acre plots or more will be subdivided in the future as the currently homeowners sell their homes and new developments on 2/3 of an acre or less will occur. I have seen this trend occur in the counties to our East and it is maddening to the residents who want the character of their community to remain, only to see it lost one piece at a time. Is this what the Planning Staff and Board envision for this area in the future? If not what are their future views? They need to know that their vote tomorrow affects more than this one single rezoning. Please note that other jurisdictions have tried to provide for transition zones from heavily urbanized areas to the less populated rural areas. Is this the policy of Frederick County and if not why? It would seem appropriate as you go farther away from our cities that the land be transitioned from urban to rural. In keeping with this theme if a transition zone overlay was placed over the Glendobbin area what type of density would be appropriate? Perhaps one or two acres per house I think that a compromise can be worked out that allows for the applicant to develop this property but is done so at a density that does not affect the future character of the area. Hopefully you can the Board can be the instruments of such a compromise. In addition to the above issue I noticed in the staff report that the area is wooded. While it appears to be an island of woods in a sea of homes and likely would not qualify as a wildlife corridor (if I am wrong on this please let me know) it is an area that should be carefully developed as to not disturb the wildlife that thrives in the area. Has this applicant proffered tree protection areas that can act as wildlife areas and become buffers between the adjacent property owners? Is there any thought on the impact this project (and others in the UDA) have on our wildlife? Also what is the Planning Staff and Board's opinion on wildlife corridors within the UDA area to allow wildlife to traverse our region without having affecting traffic, safety and reducing the interactions between man and them? Is this being addressed as part of the UDA study I thank you for your time and if you should have any questions or comments on the above, please call me at 540- 665 -3939. I am again sorry that I cannot attend the BOS meeting. Sincerely yours, David Worthington 7/26/2006 Susan Eddy To: Planning Commission Members From: Pam Russell Re: Meeting 5/17/06 906 MAY 1 7 2006 From: Pam Russell [gprussell @hughes.netj Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:21 PM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us; jbishop @co.frederick.va.us; cperkins @co.frederick.va.us; bsuchici @co.frederick.va.us; khenry@co.frederick.va.us Subject: FW: Glendobin proposal Page 1 of From: Pam Russell [mailto:gprussell @hughes.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:49 AM To: 'rthomas @visuallink.com'; 'hpm @visuallink.com'; 'rmorris @shentel.net; 'OatesGR @aol.com'; 'gkriz @visuallink.com.'; 'Iwfarm @shentel.net; 'rours @su.edu'; 'gkerr @hallmechanical.net; 'cmoh n @oakcrestbu ilders.com.' Cc: 'rshickle @shentel.net; 'bosvanosten @aol.com'; 'garydove4 @adelphia.net; 'supervisorewing @yahoo.com'; 'gfisher @visuallink.com'; 'cdehaven @crosslink.net'; 'plemieux @visuallink.com'; 'jriley @co.frederick.va.us'; 'Kris Tierney' Subject: Glendobin proposal I have been going back and forth on whether to write you all regarding the meeting this evening. Then I decided that I really had nothing to lose. After the last meeting, I must say, I am somewhat nervous about the meeting for tonight. You see, I had no idea that there were people who would go to the extent of slandering us and using the volunteer work that I do in order to get their way. I have had a hard time with this. I realize that most of the people against this rezoning are used to getting their way, while we are used to following the rules. With this ground being in the UDA and with water and sewer availability, I don't have to tell you that we could be asking for more. We started off by trying to rezone a piece of ground that is in preservation. At the time of planning for Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision, we did not have the knowledge of it being in the UDA and our engineer at the time failed to point this out. So with trying to change that, we were proposing one acre lots, which is not normally heard of in the UDA and SWSA area. This was voted against so now we are trying our second option. Obviously, this does not make the people happy either. We have invested in a piece of ground that we had much bigger hopes for and now we are asking that you simply vote to approve the 45 Tots that we are proposing. Please remember that this ground was in the UDA and the SWSA area when the residents of Glendobbin purchased their home. Proffers would be paid that would not have to be paid if this is not approved. I am very involved at school and I know that we have an overcrowding issue. We are going to have that regardless of this plan. Our county is growing and that is not a bad thing. Things get done where there is growth, and growth should happen in all areas of the county. I work very hard to raise money for the school that my son attends and I see first hand the needs of our schools. The school system could use that money. The number of students that this would add will not make or break our school system, it would just balance the growth a little bit. We understand that the future Route 37 bypass will be coming through there in some way. This has been in the Manning stage for a very long time and the proposed way it is to go would not interfere with this plan. le would hope that you would not let this stand in the way of voting yes. is piece of ground is located on the end of Glendobbin Road which is near many different sized lots. Most of residents would use Payne Road and Welltown Pike as means to go to work or shop. Wildlife would not be )aged, remember, we have 38 acres right beside it for them to go to. If safety is an issue now, then certainly it 'Id be addressed. The speed limit should not be 55mph on that road, but this proposal does not effect that. It only takes one person to speed to cause a wreck. Page 2 of 2 Since this subdivision would be next to the Industrial Park and the future 37 bypass, we certainly could not expect to build $800,000 homes and be able to sell them. So obviously, it would not be suitable to try for 2 acre lots that would normally sell for $175,000- $200,000 per lot. So we are trying to keep the lot size down so we could build moderate sized homes that would sell to the normal single family that perhaps might have to commute back and forth, yet could still afford a nice home. These homes would in no way bring down the neighborhood. A moderate sized home anymore is around a 2500 square feet. It would be a nice transition from the higher priced homes to the'/ acre homes on Payne Road. We feel like we have tried to compromise and are trying to meet in the middle. We realize that you are faced with a difficult decision, however, if you take in consideration all of the facts in this matter, we feel that you would have no choice but to vote "Yes Thank you for time and consideration, Pam Russell 5R 7/2006 9 0 0 Z 9 0 1 1 .yaleul sirlf to no?luraptsaoo znoA io; noA yut.'ui 'uolsinipgns 101 L17 pasodozd alp of sax„ aloe pInogs noA iura iaa ;.I van agi dim pafeooi si punoxd sigi asneoaq pug Afiiigcdt'o lamas put lateen gam s agf Aq pannbou SUM Afsadoad ;o aaaid stgf asnuaag 'spool egxa asagf aniaaaz o; igauaq s alp 0l aq pinom fi iegl stuaas it os VQn ag33o aplsino 8u?ppnq uagm pantaaaz iou si Aauotu mixa sign Na luaminedap and `sloogos ;o asodmd atp xo; .Cinnoa .mo of o8 I net Aanom sop wqi put panozddt fol goua no siajjozd Agd of and smassn)l aql tegi pamszapan I '90oz `Li Aeyl au plats aq of duitoatn &aruOzaJ mggopuam/llassng atp of aouaza ;az trt dtnIizn+ att `uataajivar9 .ttaU Puo2I uiggopuelej2utuoz11 :ag 10972 VA.`SafsagatnA‘ PUS inax 'N LOI noissntrUIO3 8utuuem Afano3.3louapazd 900Z `8 ArYsl May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote "Yes" to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available. I feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, /2 4/ L rvs e O incileshr, 22-6°°3 I ii �I MAY 172006 P�_c May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sinc ely,. MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, o zAAA-0-- MAY 1 6 2006 l May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ef sod ye ;4 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: ReioningWGlendobbin Road MAY 1 6 2006 Dear Gentlemen, 1 am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006.1 understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra fiends Because this piece of. )ropey because acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability th ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, May 3, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. lent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Reioning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell!Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that. this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the U'DA. so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. 'Thank you for your consideration in this matter. MAY 1 6 2006. May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, 1 am exiting in reference to the RusselIiGlendnbbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006.1 understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra fiords. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the 1)DA,1 feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying Shut the door behind mein Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, l e 43e )s u MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2O0G Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as It is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from thls plan. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbln Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. tt is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as It is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time.. Sincerely, ('),Cofitt 4.4t_ MAY 1 6 2006 M; May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, 'A n b)eft h n MAY 1 6 2006 L In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration.. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 MAY 1 6 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re:.Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, c rro Slob/ex MAY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, bum er MAY 1 6 2006 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re:.Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Jo `c Le_ fv7 t r 67/ t,J 0 3 1 6 2006 i May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, MAY 1 6 2006 I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 71/4 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: O MAY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, l je% A. eL AcT/L-C-- May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, crr' S✓rL MAY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. May 7, 2006 1 x '3 1 6 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, r In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, D ennul (4 MM 1 6 ')(106 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, c 2 .5 4- plc pie R4C- MAY 1 6 2 006 I L May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: MAY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ake lifaxipL e May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 16 par litk May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re:.Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russeil/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, MAY 162006 L May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 L May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers en each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, MA` ti 6 200 1 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: l MAY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ;fit& ,30yc May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 09 MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: I MAY 1 6 2006 !"..9 L In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, (RAN01 L,'NAI3uRG 1ST, m ARpLE ed U) IN( UP .9.6,03 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that. manner. Thank you for your consideration. A May s, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester; VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, rJ` MAY 1 5 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Coininission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Giendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it wouid be to the county's benefit to receive these extra. funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the RusseliIGlendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, -PGA 10Lie1.0si May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, kix,1 &Act MAY 1 5 2006 r May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Olendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glend e bi the belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote proposal of 47 lots_ This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely. i_ 1 Lea >e.l MAY 1 5 2006 L_ May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision MAY 1 5 2006 L Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Gslendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, era 'T May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Olendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. MAY 1 5 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, C. qe-- \cik Z0 39tid 113SSilJ WVd UNV N339 b0SSZ990DS 0E:ZZ 9003/L0/90 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street- Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 iot. subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. MM 1 5 2006 'I May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 5 2006 :1 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on C,lendebbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Y May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 PI Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is Currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families- 1 believe that we have aN heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, C /EIK IR? vi zz 56/kJ-au/if /5// l i MAY 12 2006 May 8, 2006 Fredericic County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road 9 II ,j MAY 1 2 2006 L Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the RusseltfGlendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. 'Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Sincerely, Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote u Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that. manner. Thank you for your consideration. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 P4 Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as It is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from thls plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 2 2006 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra fiends. Because this piece of property was acquired by.the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this rnatter. Sincerely, MAY 1 2 2006 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Sincerely, Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell /Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 141M 1 2 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendebbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots_ This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glen dobbin Road the to the Russell's, we ask that you vote proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,. 2✓ --�-u H1L111 irll,i MAY 1 1 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, (A4 u-t tb waLb �I n c May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision 1 MAY 1 0 2006 t,E Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 442,4,4 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 PI Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 4 021 i44 wto 3 3 I Sfr 1-4-3 oat iDAAK I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. R is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re; Russell Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbln Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006.1t Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families.1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mer Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. MAY 1 6 2006 Z0 39Vd 713ssna WVd QNV N319 170STZ990VS 6C:ST 900Z/SI /S0 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbln Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re; Russeil /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbln Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am suiting to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With thls ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return- benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't aUow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 6 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that Is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 0 J e 44 33,,,„), May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families.1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as It is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, A/1 L jft /9/P N 6 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, t U-e Gw n A May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Ophicly p MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 6 MAY 1 6 2006 7 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, e >41()2/ L. MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, PAP 1 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 IV Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbi Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help withithe schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, r rn. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, go 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MPS 1 6 �pp6 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 j May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, �p� 16'lp May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. rA o 11._m6 Sincerely, MM 1 6 2006 i L. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 6, 4 w /watt MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, cyn j o 1 Z MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 L May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 9 MM 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, /5; 1 I G AC IC MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. M AY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbi Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. cerely Si y MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, e 0.2. MM 1 6 2.006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. !believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MPV 1 6 X006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Mph 1 6 1pp6 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MPV �62�p6 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobb Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this o happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, r May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. MPS 1 6 L6p6 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that Is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbi Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with !the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, C May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 PI Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbi Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with:the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which •would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. l believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, aest May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 PI Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobbi Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help withthe schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families.1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice. to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, /AS,- M 1 6 26 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell /Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbi Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help withtthe schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this o happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 01 1 6 2006 THIS GROUP OF LETTERS WERE HAND DELIVERED ON APRIL 4, 2006 BY MR. RONALD W. STROSNIDER OF APPLE MANOR PROPERTIES. DIANE WALSH APR 4 2006 V) March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Pi.` March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, t APR 4 2006 I March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, I i APR 4 2006 L_ March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. l would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the ODA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a tot less than he could ask for. t would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 L_ March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as i can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one tot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, ct/t APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. !believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sirwerely, 5 APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Giendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for.1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that_ With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, tvo 1 APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Gtendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the DOA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2000 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, T IJA1 wack AP R 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Giendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 20D6 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please o t' right thing and vote yes. Sincerely Say a APR March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as !can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. !believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please dorthe right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, I L_155f1 fty eu 'e $h DS APR 4 203E March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2003 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Lc6- t o4 T g APR 4 o March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the eight thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 L005 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. l would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, c Adds,_ c /Lee APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the eight thing and vote yes. Sincerely, ?..69 APR March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the IIDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that- With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the eight thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 %I March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the eight thing and vote yes. Sincerely, O pp APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the tiDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. /eoL APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Gtendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Gtendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 Pf Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Gtendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes_ APR 4 2033 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as t can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. t believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. l would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area As far as 1 can telt that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one tot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one tot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2933 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can telt that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. !believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 10714 Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Litt APR March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of G(endobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the ODA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Gtendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Gtendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also self their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, r ytAb ik/ APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, a /140 APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, it APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availabil it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, go4 APO 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5a', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize,that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may Mso sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? 7 Please do the eight thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5u', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as l can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote y Sincerely, APR 4 2006 0 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5 you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the eight thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that_ With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thin vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5u', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote y Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several Tots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 Tots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. APP, 4 2208 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. l believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot Tess than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, APR 4 2003 Hello Susan, I wish to weigh in on the Russell Glendobin request for rezoning (albeit a bit late). I for one am not against growth. I am against uncontrolled and unrestricted growth. Having grown up in Maryland in several areas of growth (Darnestown, Germantown Middletown) I have seen good and bad approaches. Based on this the reduction in lot size, I feel, causes nothing more than a formula to overburden existing services and utilities. I do not think half acre to acre sized lots ensure good septic or water usage. I don't think tax revenues vs. the number of residents will support road, school or police and fire needs. I vote for keeping the existing 2- 5 acre zoning requirements. On a side note I really think the area planning should take a realistic look at impact fees. I think present levels are woefully inadequate. Ten to twenty thousand would not have stopped me or anyone I know from buying a house in Frederick County. Especially when it is rolled into the price of a new house mortgage. The 60 to 120 extra cars on the road from this request alone, plus construction equipment who would pay for the road wear and tear? 60 multi bedroom houses at least 80% would have at least 1 child in school...more How about doing some real planning here. I think it is time to do some realistic evaluation of the cost of these endeavors and who is really benefiting. Thank You, Tom Shiben To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. "'i 1 1 2006 "no, 1 1 9(Y It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Salata 132 Wilton Drive Winchester, VA 22603 \U'' \I 11 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 IA/ Pro IP crsi To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. APR 1 0 2006 It%would puta high density: subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R ergo rots, G) KOC30—. t B 1' i III j l ib M c (Ru., k H Qo cz: L.) s\ --r V Pr- n-G c53 G 01 ?bv•.,S u l Cu_,. It tt. ill 1111.1 1',, ttt,kU ,1,,,1,1,1,,,,,,,, TECO SEOS•:$:t' 1:1?? Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 1 „I,1 „1,1,11 „11 11,1, 1 11 ,,,,,11,1,1 „11,,,1 „,1,1,1,1 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Rea a rds, ,a* CarilJFiELA be ✓r 0 *5� 17 22603 (s APO 1 0 2006 lc, 1;4* cos r wwa Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 4 Ottilii Sty APR 1 0 2006 n' Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 10,7 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick Countyand!.ive in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision inclose proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. fi9;24,, 39 P-69 APR 7 2006 0 0 C Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 1 111. 111 1 111111 1111 11 11111 it 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 —2006 Olympic Winter Gomes March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the belonging to the Russells, we ask ground is located in the UDA and that the Russells should have the manner. Thank you for your cons Sincerely, P c. parcel on Glendobbin Road that you vote Yes This the SWAB area and we feel right to develop it in that ideration. APR 10 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the belonging to the Russells, we ask ground is located in the UDA and that the Russells should have the manner. Thank you for your cons Sincerely, parcel on Glendobbin Road that you vote Yes This the SWAB area and we feel right to develop it in that ideration. APR 1 0 2006 7 Susan Eddy From: Dave Toth [dmtothl @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:47 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us; cdehaven @crosslink.net Cc: dmtothl @yahoo.com Subject: RE: Glendobbin Rezoning Application #17 -05 DO NOT APPROVE!!! TO: Ms. Susan Eddy and Mr. Chuck DeHaven FROM: Dave Toth, resident of Frederick County Apple Pie Ridge RE: DO NOT APPROVE THE GLENDOBBIN REZONING APPLICATION I am a resident of Frederick County I live near the subdivision that the Russells are proposing on Glendobbin road. I just want you to know that I am strongly against this rezoning application. Page 1 of 2 This application is not consistent with the surrounding community. This type of development is not conducive to building strong communities. I lived in a community that had a mix of densities within a small radius and can tell from experience that there was no sense of community built between the different densities. It had nothing to do with economic class as their were people in my neighborhood who were much less well off than some of the people in the smaller homes and townhomes nearby. There was a significant difference in priorities and a sense of care and responsibility for the surrounding land and environment. On an envioronmental impact level, when property is developed below about 2 acres, a completely different environmental dynamic occurs the ground must be scraped clean and compacted, completely removing the vast majority of wildlife and native trees that live there. I moved here because Frederick County was different in a great way. If we continue to develop in an intelligent, controlled, planned manner, we will continue the excellent quallity of life and environmental friendlieness Frederick County has to offer. Putting high density housing right smack in the middle of of Glendobbin road will seriously damage this. I noticed that the vast majority of the people at the April 5th hearing who were in support of the rezoning were doing so for monetary reasons they wanted the business. Of course Mr. Russell is going to be a wonderful community figure to them he signs their paychecks. Approving this rezoning application means giving in to greed and loopholes in the law /code that Mr. Russell's attorney is attempting to exploit to their fullest extent namely the UDA boundary and waiver of the 10 -year restriction on rezoning of preservation lots. Why was a preservation lot allowed to be created knowing that it can be removed without any restrictions? The preservation lot was a factor in several people dropping $700,000 for their home paying a premium for what seemd to be a guarantee on controlled development. This was very deceiving. Please make the right decision for the future of Frederick County and deny this application. Thank you, Dave Toth 4/18/2006 dmtothl@yahoo.com 540 -336 -1211 Yahoo! Messen er with Voice. PC -to -Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. 4/18/2006 Page 2 of 2 March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner /manager, T would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the UDA area, so it is an obvious area for growth. Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, APR 5 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, w ask sk that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and)the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should- have right-to it in that manner Thank you for your consideration. APR 5 2006 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: Sincerely, 2 APR 3 I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub- contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 Tots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 Tots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: r APR 3 2006 I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 Tots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 Tots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes Sincerely, C��. lepkr March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, 0 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner Thank you for your consideration. March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub- contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 Tots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes 4 Sincerely, /s C t4.4%� -eco 3 0O6 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs. In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes a. This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, APB 3 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. 2it APR 3 2006 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 Tots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of alI the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and Tabor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes A `'9 2 006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, doe,40/ 0 f'i 3 <900( March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: &lendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 Tots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 Tots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: Sincerely, 2 11 1 :IP i A, APR 0 Lj In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. v.n �1 t il l 71 7 I March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: Sincerely, APR I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: A PR I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 Tots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes Sincerely, /7 e, A Ye. March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: APR 3 I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am o Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zerol Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 APB 3 2000 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned cttlzen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA_ And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. 1 can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something?! have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAD 2 9 2006 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub- contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this.. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes Sincerely, MAR 2 9 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAR 2 9 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, MAR 2 9 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5 you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground 1s in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell Is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, r APR ^006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, APR C 7 6 2006 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub- contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 Tots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this, Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with arty number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 Tots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes Sincerely, 4p8 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom R May Concern, 1 am just a concerted citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. l can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since it isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? if the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. MBAR 2 9 2006 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 Tots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this, Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3 -4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 Tots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, 55 9Yl G✓ti��-C�' MAP, 2 9 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Z 9 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner Thank you for your consideration. MAR 2 9 2006 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote Yes This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, kAAA 2 9 200;. March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 MAR 2 0 ?r16 Re: Gledobbln Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, 1 am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. 1 may not know every fact there Is about this, but what 1 do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What 1 don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, K AccA MAR 2 9 2006 me m Me m s 04/05/2006 10:48 5405366464 APR 5 2006 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. f j Attn: Susan Eddy r 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, PAIN MANAGEMENT PAGE 01 I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of hornes already built in the area.. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Records, AAt To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzeg rds, (9 Mr. James R. Russell 595 Glendobbin Rd. Winchester, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 h !Hi ti l!Hal(!!!a! it: hh if! u! hh! lh hntot!t! 1'. !Mt To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. 'if object-to-the Russell- Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. -This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial_park.and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.ergGirds, APR 5 2006 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 nNt VN. rjl. vi t i,t1Ii I h To: Frederick Co. Planning. Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing s -s neighborhoods already in this area. 1,; Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. .Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Regard BILL JANET OWEN 360 GLENDOBBIN RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 11 t hi ialunii Mil lin ;1 li it lid( MIN 1 ti To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, APR I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because 73'W4. ri 11;9 It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing s 88 ,lj r CA ,i, neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 7 s covitricuc-r- 5 2006 BILL JANET OWEN 360 GLENDOBBIN RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 1111W:111111H I III! IN 1 1 i i It ;Jim mikk k 1,9,1 1m Ittvoll‘ To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. leg a yak, 3 66 Pc Pc. 7aQ- ;7Yo APR 5 2006 The Lilly Family 860 Apple Pie Ridge Rd Winchester, VA 22603 Rd. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 11 hit dill IL 111111111i! II h 11111111 lilt II II To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Rego vats, A ypt? TO kt'( MAST 15 Ce\l itO ,\b4xCIL b UMJE it(41,Nb1 PiN v ate NWOr4 -t lt4(a O pt SUM 1 [11 IS 5 2006 Mr. Carl X Re!tcnbarger t 116 Windy Pine Lit 41 Wineb ste], VA 22603 -3271 pc) Z"& Nc/N S NrANtM aNt» A LS 114 Lot kba In gtIN ))1N0,9 "K) nan 191 031-A- N► 'TG) Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I object to the Russel; Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. tzes a lids, /f1 r fr Mrs S7-e cam. &rat edict) l% Li m(, lin- 0 2 O. APR I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 5 2006 Steven 8 Daphne Bageant 511 Golds Hill Rd. Winchester, VA 22303-3138 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 :1 iiii rii rir I l lar ir :l i f in brill:ills rir i r ill Susan Eddy From: Diane Kearns [didi @shentel.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:22 PM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: Russell- Glendobbin Hey Susan Just formally noting Fruit Hill's opposition to this rezoning: RP next to orchard w doesn't fit in with neighboring property, technically able but shouldn't be requesting things we spoke of last night Thanks.... since everyone seemed to think it would go absolutely no where I didn' Diane 4/4/2006 Page 1 of 1 ith no setback, (shouldn't be an option), rezoning on set aside so soon. All the t bother Gary with it. Susan Eddy From: Cindy Lee [gsslee @ntelos.net] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:28 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Date Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43 -A -16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would 4/3/2006 Page 1 of 3 make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Michael Cynthia Lee 121 Quaker Lane Winchester, VA 22603 4/3/2006 Page 2 of 3 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, 3 -ze-r, SD S G/endoz4, Rod I am a resident of Frederick County and live in- the area -areu fie Pie 4 I object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because A.s yen-- c i t your- !'P�D y i� It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. y m yr r ✓-i et ,0 o r L y ,p roe o.r ;t /1 e OD7-e� Co it e701 /�.Q_ �p re ref /J are T conS/S Sec f W 7 71A2- _Col c;ar%a/.r tz /f eg l O Zia-1ire GCoinrst4 s bn. C— y fv- 77,--ernAra S r G /ena'oa; Pe n ley t44 2-16 03 6 476 9/ APR 3 2006 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Susan Eddy From: Kimberly [kimsalata @myway.com] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 9:12 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Cc: cdehaven @crosslink.net Subject: Glendobbin rezoning Importance: High Greetings Page 1 of 1 I am writing to record my opposition to the proposed rezoning in any form of the Russell property off Glendobbin. My family and I will be at the hearing next week but 1 wanted all of you to know the depth of my concerns. 1 spoke with Ms.Eddy at the last meeting and spoke with Mr. DeHaven at my home about this issue while he was campaigning for election. We moved to our home on Wilton Drive because the area retained a rural, limited development feel. We were told that all future housing in the area would be on 5 acre lots. We looked at property in Oakdale Crossing and Meadow Branch and did not want a high density housing environment, no matter how costly the homes. This remains our view. Currently the roads are not designed to handle increased traffic. Glendobbin is dangerous in the mornings and evenings with work and school traffic. The fences along the road are hit by speeding cars AT LEAST once or twice per year. We cannot allow our children to walk or bike to friends homes and this situation would only worsen with new high density construction. The schools in the area are at capacity now. Resources are limited and cannot handle the rapid expansion that a dense neighborhood would bring. I volunteer every week just to help meet the minimal needs of the students, and fear that any additional stress to the system would negatively impact the quality of the education provided. As it is, the students are already sharing computers and headphones and don't always have the essentials. Finally, I must also express my displeasure at the system which allows the Russell's to constantly "change" and "amend" their proposal with words but not really the essence of what they want to do. A rose is a rose is a rose. The latest ploy to request only "half' the land to be developed is so transparent. We know that the plan is to wait till things quiet down and then push the remaining land to be densely developed as well. We are not stupid. A final ruling needs to be made so that this issue is settled once and for all. We have a tight community, all the neighbors talk. I have not heard a single resident of the area support this proposed development. 100% are opposed. Please respect the intentions of the original development plan to keep a rural feel to our area. Sincerely Kimberly H. Salata, MD Winchester Musculoskeletal Medicine, PLC No banners. No pop -ups. No kidding. Make My Way your home on the Web http: /dell.myway.com 3/30/2006 Susan Eddy From: Jon Miles Umileswinchester @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:11 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, 1417-05 of Russell Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and 3/29/2006 Page 1 of 2 just way to late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high- density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Jon M. Miles 3/29/2006 Page 2 of 2 Susan Eddy From: Toth, David M [david.m.toth @intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:41 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Cc: Toth, David M Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. This type of zoning is counterproductive to building strong communities. I lived in such an area of mixed zoning and have experienced poor community development and high crime first -hand. One of the reasons I moved my family here is because zoning was more consistent and, as a result, the feeling of community has been excellent. I am not against urban and high- density development it is necessary to provide afforable housing and infrastructure to the masses. However, placing high densitiy housing in the middle of rural- suburban development is poor zoning. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43 -A -16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. If this area is set aside to be a preserve, then why is it even an option to rezone this? Developing on preservation parcels sets a bad precedent that this can be a regular practice essentially making "preservation" meaningless. I would like the county to look carefully at the reasons this and other preservation parcels are established in the first place. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high- density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would 3/29/2006 Page 1 of 3 result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. Regardless, the VDOT estimated impact needs to be recalculated based upon the new zoning request approving this request without that updated impact from VDOT would be making a decision without accurate data. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high- density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Dave Toth and The Toth Family 3/29/2006 Page 2 of 3 New Page 0 Page l of 2 Susan Eddy From: iona benoit [iona_benoit @yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 9:19 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: glendobbin rezoning Date Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43 -A -16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high- density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What 3/28/2006 New Page 0 Page 2 of 2 1 mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like its just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, David Benoit The Benoit Family 3/28/2006 Susan Eddy From: robert bower [rlbower00 @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 2:22 PM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russel Glendobbin Date Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, 1 write to you to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell Glendobbin. I have been a resident of WellTown Acres II since 1990. The rural aspect of the area surrounding Glendobbin was the factor which attracted me to build a home and live in this area. Therefore this request for rezoning concerns me greatly. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites (including WellTown Acres II) or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43 -A -16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. There are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not 3/28/2006 Page 1 of 2 necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Robert L. Bower The Bower Family 3/28/2006 Page 2 of 2 Susan Eddy From: Katz [mail2katz @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:22 PM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner Ms. Eddy, We write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin and to respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. We have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre homesites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A- 16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high- density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What we mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to us is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and just way too late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based cn that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will sqaush all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the 1 land, putting up a new on what was supposed to be a vate drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high density build out, we would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Bradley and Rama Katz The Katz's 304 Union View Lane Winchester, VA 22603 cell: 443-801-4953 email: mail2katz @yahoo.com Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 2 Susan Eddy From: Walkd @aol.com Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 1:12 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning March 24, 2006 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2 -acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43 -A -16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high- density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non proffered a not guaranteed sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it could be worse than what is in the "non- proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier 3/24/2006 Page 1 of 2 this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Daniel L. Walker The Walker Family 311 Union View Lane (home under construction) 3/24/2006 Page 2 of 2 Frederick County Zoning Board Dear Members, April 2, 2006 We understand that you are soon to decide upon a zoning issue which will have wide ranging effects upon the future of Frederick County. As new residents here, we admittedly do not fully appreciate the history of building development and planned growth here. Obviously there will be growth, as this county remains an attractive place to live. There are jobs here and jobs which can be accessed by 1 to 2 hours drive. There is a fine Medical Center here, and so on... In the case of the proposed high- density development on Glendobbin, we are very concerned. The huge stresses which would be placed on the current infrastructure (roads, schools, emergency facilities) make a vote for liberal re- zoning an unwise thing to do. Keep the current zoning ordinances and do not relax the rules on lot size. Keep the schools, roads and infrastructure ahead of the population growth. Do not allow our neighborhood to become over -run. 7 it r APR 42006 Sincerely/ Dwight and Sherry/Kemp .2a6 iIAAtlrf Difi%v_ ft; 0,4 ;2:203\ Harley and Roxie Ostlund 328 Union View Lane Winchester, VA 22603 L Frederick County Department of Planning Development Attn: Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner 107 North Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Russell Glendobbin Rezoning Application #17 -05 The applicant wants us to all to believe it is. Here are the reasons listed: MAR 2 g 2006 3/28/2006 Page 1 The purpose of this letter is to express our opposition to the application to rezone 67.7242 acres in the Glendobbin/Apple Pie Ridge area from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) Please refer to the Russell Glendobbin Property Rezoning Impact Analysis Statement dated March 2006. Once we have completed outlining our objections to this statement, we will address our additional concerns. Page 1: Introduction Paragraph 1: The applicant states that the existing Glendobbin Ridge development consists of 2 acre parcels when in fact, the size of the 16 lots range from 2 to 4 acres. The statement made by the applicant that the proposed development will provide a "transition from the more intensive land uses within the Stonewall Industrial Park to the low density residential pattern" surrounding this area is at best, inaccurate. A better term may be ludicrous. The vast majority of the surrounding area is orchard, farm land and open tracts of land. The Industrial Park is unobtrusive to this area. As residents, let us reassure you we have never considered high density housing an appropriate buffer between low density single family dwellings and apple orchards. We find this statement offensive to the intelligence of the citizens in this community. Page 1: Introduction Paragraphs 2 3, Page 2: Comprehensive Policy Plan Paragraphs 1 -5 We are now aware of the exception that preservation parcels within the UDA can apply for rezoning prior to the 10 year division restriction. Please note that homeowners within this community were specifically told the preservation lot could NOT be subdivided for 10 years, and even then it would be an exception. The builder who purchased the land from the Russells either didn't know of the exception, or lied to us all by omission. Many, if not all of us chose to purchase here specifically for the rural nature of the area. Indeed, the requirement for rezoning consideration of a preservation lot is that the proposed development is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in effect. Therefore, a major factor in this matter is just that: "Is the proposed development consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in effect 1. The CPP expressly calls for suburban residential uses to predominate within the UDA. 2. In the absence of a designated use as set forth in the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan, determination of land usage should be left to each individual property owner to decide what is best for him alone. 3. The area in question is "transitional." 4. High density homes will compliment the area. 3/28/2006 Page 2 5. High density homes will foster a dynamic housing market. 6. Glendobbin should not be considered the "Apple Pie Ridge Road area" solely because it partially falls within the SWSA. In response to this, we say, "No, the proposed development is not consistent with the goals of the current Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons:" 1. There is currently discussion regarding moving the UDA line. It is our understanding that the area in question is included in the research and evaluation currently underway and there is the possibility that it may, in fact, be taken out of the UDA. It seems prudent to wait until a final revision of the UDA is in place before considering this request. 2. Large growth in Frederick County seems likely over the next several years. It is wonderful to know that the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors are taking seriously their responsibility for managing growth in a well thought out, organized, researched and defined manner. That is why we argue that in the absence of a designation, danger lies in allowing individuals to interpret the CPP and to determine what is best. The applicant aside, when millions of dollars are at stake, individuals tend to choose what is best for them, regardless of the best interests of the community. In this particular case, we hope that you will agree that the proposed development is not in the overall best interest of this community. 3. As previously discussed, this is not a transitional area. The apple orchards are the most appropriate transition away from the industrial park. 4. Talk to your friends and family, co- workers and out -of- towners and ask them what makes Winchester unique? What is their favorite area in Winchester? If they could live anywhere here, where would it be? Hands down, they'll say "the Apple Pie Ridge area." Apple Pie Ridge represents "the Sunday drive, the Virginia country, the American dream." It is precisely the beauty of the area, the attractiveness of the large homes on acreage, and the trees and rolling hills that makes this community unique. What makes this area so special is arguably the lack of high density, look at your eight neighbors out your kitchen window, suburban developments found in every town and city that this request is for. 5. Are we currently in need of a more `dynamic housing market How will this application foster one? Not convinced. 6. The SWSA does not determine the community's definition of a neighborhood. That is just silly. Glendobbin Road is as much a part of the Apple Pie Ridge Road area as Butler Estates, Green Springs, and other developments adjacent to Apple Pie Ridge Road are. The argument could be made however, that the creation of high density homes in this area will result in Glendobbin being known as the "downfall of, indeed the sell -out, of Apple Pie Ridge." Page 3 Suitability of the Site: 13. Location and Access Paragraph 2 "A secondary point of access will be established for emergency vehicles through the existing Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision." As the 3'" iteration of this proposal, within the past year the Russell's have attempted to pave and dedicate this easement to the County, they have attempted to use it as a secondary entry into their proposed development, and are now stating its new use as emergency access. That's a lot. Be advised that they are not the owners of the easement land. If you have not yet received a letter from our attorney on this matter, one will be forthcoming shortly. There is no further need to comment on this issue here. Page 4 Suitability of the Site: D. Traffic Paragraph 1 Traffic patterns in this area are already at bottleneck proportions during certain times of the day. First, Apple Pie Ridge Road is heavily congested before and after school hours and Glendobbin Road is used as a major thoroughfare for high school students commuting to and from school. Second, the traffic exiting Interstate 81 onto Rt. 11 has become so congested between the hours of 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. that cars are at times stuck stopped on the freeway, attempting to exit. In addition, Apple Pie Ridge Road and Glendobbin Road are 55 mph zones. Traffic often exceeds the limit on these narrow, windy rural roadways. To make matters worse, the entrance to Union View Lane is located such that the sight line for intersecting traffic is only 150 ft! The line of sight for the proposed new entrance off of Glendobbin Road is equally as short. This limited distance requires extreme caution when turning onto Glendobbin Road. More traffic will exacerbate the problem. Having stated these current concerns, this application indicates the proposed development will increase the average daily car trips by 1300! What exactly does that mean to existing homeowners living in and around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Payne, and Welltown Roads? Well, given that most car trips occur between 6 am, and 9 pm, that averages out to 86 more cars per hour or an additional 1.5 car trips a minute. In other words, if this proposal goes through, there will be no more days of peaceful, country living for these neighborhoods. Instead, the existing homeowners will spend their time at stop signs trying to catch a break in traffic remembering the `good old days' when a car didn't pass every 40 seconds: Yes indeed, every 40 seconds. Additional comments While we have now fully outlined our objections to the March 2006 proffer statement and request for rezoning, there are additional concerns and comments we would like you to consider as follows: 1. School system: It is over capacity as it is. The instant addition of a whole neighborhood of students will overburden the teachers and the school administration. This type of growth results in a lower quality of education for existing students as well as the newcomers. 2. Neighborhood impact: This subdivision of 60 homes will immediately almost double the number of homes currently built in this area. 3/28/2006 Page 3 3. Lot layout: The applicant has not provided a proffered proposal, nor accounted for the total 67.7242 acres. As you are aware previous requests were made but withdrawn, attempting to put 130 homes on 15000 sq ft lots. The current request is for 60 homes on 20,000 sq ft lots. Given there is a total of 67.72 acres, 58 homes on 20,000 sq ft lots, plus 2 homes each on 3.6 acres (see Impact Analysis Statement, page 4, E. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply Paragraph 2), plus an estimation of 7 acres allotted for roads (see note) accounts for 40.83 acres. With all roads in place, 26.89 acres is left unaccounted for. That's a lot of undeveloped property. Hmm, that's even enough to get about 58 more homes on 20,000 sq ft lots at a later date. The non proffered layout submitted with this application means exactly nothing. It cannot even be considered for discussion or comment. Furthermore, the Russell's have not allotted for setbacks, screenings, buffers or fences for adjacent property owners. They have not indicated how new homes backed into orchards impacts the integrity of the existing environment and working farms. They have not demonstrated how new homes built on the hill adjacent to and directly below Glendobbin Ridge lots 3 -7, 9, 10, 13, 16 will affect the current homeowners who have view property. How will clear cutting the hill and putting up new homes affect drainage issues and runoff waters from these steep lots? What size and kind of homes are they intending to 3/28/2006 build Smaller tract housing Large $500K homes that in effect really won't offer consumers the alternative they proposed? *Note: 7 acres for roads estimated by using the 2.8876 acres dedicated for the existing Union View Lane, then multiplying by 2.5.) Page 4 4. The Russell's have not yet been able to prove their ability to supply 2 separate means of access to the proposed development. 5. It is our stance that this development will not help but in effect, harm existing property values in this area. From all accounts, it appears the new development will place homes next to industrial facilities and backed into the Route 37 connection resulting in an undesirable neighborhood location. 6. Applicant Behavioral History This applicant has made a lot of assumptions along the way. From the beginning, the applicant has acted as if this process has already been completed. It began in October 2005 when one day he came and bulldozed a 50 ft swath of old growth trees, pushed through a substantial sized road, laid crushed gravel and prepared to pave. He didn't talk to the adjacent homeowners who actually own the land rights; he just did it. While the road in place was not 50 ft wide, it was at the time adequate for his large farming machinery. It is now a mess and looks terrible. Due to construction debris left by G &M Homes, there was a period this past winter where the road was difficult to traverse. The applicant repeatedly drove on our property to get through, and most recently ran a bulldozer on top of our drain field. The numerous proposals, along with withdrawls and postponements, as well as inaccuracies and errors in the proposals have frustrated and angered the surrounding community. Furthermore, despite the Planning Commissions strong advisement to hold a community meeting before the April 5 meeting, no such attempt was made. This past week there was once again a flurry of activity on the part of the applicant. As if you had already approved the proposal, the applicant punched the road back through and added his access gate. With the new gate in place, cars and trucks without gate access now turn around on our property. Again, we've witnessed them backing onto our drain field in order to turn around. Given this history, we have concluded that unfortunately the applicant is not interested in anything but a hostile resolution. As fellow community members and adjacent property owners, we have felt completely dismissed, disregarded, and disrespected and therefore have surmised that the Russell's have no intention of compromise, no intention of relationship and no intention of considering anyone other than themselves. Given these strong objections, we respectfully ask you to deny this rezoning application. Harley Roxie Ostlund cc: Planning Commission To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. 1 object to the Russell Glendobbin rezoning request because It is NOT %onsistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.ec0 9'arriA c JtL, 41114.24A bitei Vw� 113 L.d; t +lam (n Li- 2f2Af 03 APR 4 2006 _1 I Li (a Archie Patty Houser 173 Wilton DI. Winchester, VA 2 2603 -3 31 9 11 1 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 ll1 1 j` iuit{,;i,Tit; ttrt i; it Susan Eddy From: frank scheder [psche @visuallink.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 6:42 AM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Page 1 of 1 Dear Susan: This proposal cannot be ok'd because of several issues: 1st and foremost the water issue which at this moment is affecting Frederick county. The second is the traffic issue which will really affect us and the third is the acreage on which houses are to be built would set a precident which would effect everyone in the future. This has to be defectedullu 4/5/2006 Susan Eddy From: KATHY EUBANK [keubank @msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:19 PM To: seddy @co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Ms. Eddy, Page 1 of 1 I am a resident of Spring Valley Estates which adjoins the Russell Glendobbin parcel being considered for rezoning. I object to the Russel Glendobbin rezoning because of several reasons. One, it is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Second, part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Third, depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. Fourth, it will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more children to a school that is already full. Because of the reasons above and the fact that this type of development is not appropriate for this area I urge you to deny this request for rezoning. Sincerely, Andy Eubank 4/5/2006 March 30, 2006 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning Development 107 N. Kent St., 2" Floor, Winchester, VA 22601 Ms. Eddy, My name is J.P. Darlington and I am writing to you to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17 -05 of Russell Glendobbin. I own land adjoining two sides of the Russell property in question. I have three hundred acres which consists of 51 5- acre lots and a 45- acre parcel on which I live. All of this land is part of Spring Valley Estates. My land extends from Rt. 37 to large lots along Glendobbin Rd. I have a number of concerns and objections to this request for rezoning. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to land owned by me and the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43 -A -16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently purchased their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It is my opinion that even though the current UDA would double the value of my property I feel that the UDA is inappropriate for this area and should be lifted.