HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-05 Traffic Impact AnalysisA Phased Traffic impact Analysis of the
Villages at Artrip
Frederick County, Virginia
P
Located in:
Prepared for:
The Tower Companies
11501 Huff Court
North Bethesda, Maryland
20895
Prepared by:
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. Lcndsccpe Aschiiects.
300 Foxcroft Avenue. Suite 200
Martinsburg. West Virginia 25401
T 304.264.271 1
F 304.264.3671
December 15, 2004
OVERVIEW
Report Summary
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this document to
present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Villages at Artrip development
located between Tasker Road and the Opequon Creek (northeast of the Lakeside Drive
dead -end) in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project is to include 820 units of
•residential, 60,000 square feet of office, approximately 150,000 square feet of retail and
two (2) 6,000 square foot restaurants with access to be provided via the planned Warrior
Drive (future roadway). The proposed development will be built -out over three (3) phases
by the year 2012. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the Villages at Artrip
with respect to the surrounding roadway network.
Warrior Drive is proposed as a new arterial that would provide a connection from
Fairfax Pike (Route 277), through Tasker Road (Route 642), to north of the future
Crosspointe Boulevard (extended Route 37). The completion of Warrior Drive, however,
may not occur until the final stages of construction for the Villages at Artrip. Therefore, in
order to address all possible roadway network conditions, PHR +A has prepared build -out
analyses for two (2) interim transportation phases. The following provides a description of
each phase: Phase 1 (2006) assumes 297 residential units along with the completion of
Warrior Drive from south of Tasker Road to the northern property extents of the Villages at
Artrip; Phase 2 (2009) assumes 577 residential units and 10,000 square feet of retail along
with the completion of Warrior Drive from south of Tasker Road to the northern property
extents of the Villages at Artrip; and Phase 3 (2012 Full Build -out) assumes the build
out of the entire Villages at Artrip development along with the completion of Warrior
Drive from south of Tasker Road to north of Crosspointe Boulevard (future roadway within
the planned Crosspointe development).
Methodology
The traffic impacts accompanying the Villages at Artrip development were obtained
through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document:
Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of
impact,
Calculation of trip generation for Villages at Artrip,
Distribution and assignment of Villages at Artrip generated trips onto the study area
road network,
Analysis of capacity and level of service using the newest version of the highway
capacity software, HCS -2000, for existing and future conditions.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 1
Vicinity Map Villages at Artrip
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PHR +A obtained .AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the
intersections of Route 37/1 -81 southbound ramps, Route 37/1 -81 northbound ramps and
Route 37 /Tasker Road from the report titled: A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of
Crosspointe Center, by PHR +A, dated September 10, 2003. Since these counts were
conducted prior to Year 2004, an annual growth rate of 5% was applied. PHR +A then
conducted "new" traffic counts at the intersections of Tasker Road/Lakeside Drive and
Tasker Road/Warrior Drive to complete the study area. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was
established along each of the study area roadway links using an average "k" factor (the
ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24 -hour traffic volumes) of 9
Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry
and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS -2000 levels of
service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report.
P
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 3
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
,�'Aveiage'�Daily�Tgps`„
r Figure 2
Existing ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 4
'ignalized
I nl erseetion
OS =00
J
.a
Unsignalized
Intersection
No Scale
Signalized
I ni a rserlion
LOS 840
L
Lakrsidc Dn
Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
—PHI -fA
Figure 3
Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 5
PHASE 1 ANALYSES (2006)
The 2006 roadway network assumes the completion of Warrior Drive from south of
Tasker Road to the northern property extents of Ole Villages at Artrip site. PHR +A
assumed the partial build -out of Crosspointe Center and Wakeland Manor (background
developments) to coincide with the completion of the proposed Phase 1 Villages at Artrip
development (297 residential units).
2006 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
In order to accurately depict future conditions within the study area, PHR +A
utilized the following traffic studies to determine the trips associated with not yet
completed area developments: 1) A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of Crosspointe Center
by PHR +A, dated September 10, 2003; and 2) A Traffic Impact Analysis for Wakeland
Manor by KELLERCO, dated June 30, 2003. Based upon the 7` Edition of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, Tables la and lb are provided
to summarize the calculated trips associated with each of the 2006 "other developments
Table la
2006 Background Development #1: Crosspointe Center
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 555 units 99 298 398 316 185 501 5.550
230 Townhouse/Condo 140 units 11 56 68 53 26 79 1,218
252 Elderly Housing Attach 100 units 4 4 8 7 4 11 348
710 Office 95,000 SF 158 22 180 31 154 185 1,282
820 Retail 375,000 SF 211 135 346 719 779 1.498 16,035
Total Trips 484 515 999 1,126 1,148 2,274 24,433
Total Internal 74 74 147 304 304 608 6,478
Total Pass -by 26 26 52 112 112 225 2,405
Total "New Trips" 384 416 800 709 732 1,441 15,550
Table lb
2006 Background Development #2: Wakeland Manor
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 199 units 37 111 148 125 74 199 1,985
230 Townhouse/Condo 107 units 9 45 55 43 21 64 931
Total Trips 46 157 203 168 94 262 2,916
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 6
In addition to the trips relating to the specific background developments described
in Tables la and Ib, existing traffic volumes were increased along study area roadways
using an historic growth rate of 5% per year (compounded annually) through Year 2006.
Figure 4 shows the 2006 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 5 shows the corresponding
2006 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. HCS -2000
levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of this report.
PHASE 1 TRIP GENERATION
The total trips produced by and attracted to the Villages at Artrip site were
established using the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip
Generation Report. Table 2 summarizes the trip generation results for the proposed Phase
1 Villages at Artrip development. A detailed description of internal /pass -by trips are
provided in the Appendix section of this report.
PHASE 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Assuming the 2006 roadway network, PHR +A utilized the trip distribution
percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the Phase 1 Villages at Artrip trips (Table 2)
throughout the study area. Figure 7 shows the corresponding development generated
AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments.
2006 PHASE 1 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The Villages at Artrip assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2006 background
traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2006 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2006
Phase 1 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout
the study area roadway network. Figure 9 shows the corresponding 2006 build -out lane
geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service
worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 7
No Scale
ker R
do Dri
d 3
i
SITE
ek
I'
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
X erageDaily.Trips" 3
P
F Figure 4 2006 Background ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 8
Signalized
Intersection
LOS D(F)
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =C(C)
"Suggested
Improvements
B'B Freeno" Right
EB -2 Lefts
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =C(C)
rQ✓
sti
Unsignalized
Intersection
Signalized
Intersection
y LOS B(B)
e)
No Scale
Signalized
Intersection
LOS QC!
L�
Lakeside Dn
SITE
t
1
i
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =B(B)
"Suggested
Improvements"
Signalization
WB I Left
Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
-P
Figure 5
2006 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 9
Code Land Use
Amount
In
AM Peak flour
Out Total
In
PM Peak Hour
Out Total
ADT
Percentage
of Total
Land Bav A
210 Single Family Detached
39 units
9
28
37
29
17
46
390
230 Townhouse /Condo
253 units
19
91
110
88
43
131
2,245
Land Bav C
3 field
2
2
4
43
19
62
214
488 Soccer Complex
Total Trips
30
121
151
159
79
239
2,849
100%
Total Internal
1
1
2
16
16
31
107
7%
Total Pass -by
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
Total "New Trips"
29
120
149
144
64
208
2,742
93%
Table 2
Phase 1: Villages at Artrip
Trip Generation Summary
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 10
Phase 1: Trip Distribution Percentages
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 11
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
.�i.„
Average D a ly Trips
-P
r Figure 7a Phase 1: Development- Generated Trip Assignments
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 12
No Scale
Land Bay B
Land Bay A
SITE
1
'1
dli
et
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
"Average Da ly Ti i iss"
-P RA
I Figure 7b Phase 1: Development- Generated Trip Assignments (Detail)
P
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 13
p H RA
F Figure 8a Phase 1: 2006 Build -out ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 14
No Scale
Land Bay B
I
akeside Dnve
Land Bay C
Land Bay A
SITE
s
sd
N"
Land Bay D
Land Bay E
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Average Da�lyp�Trips
-P I RA
r Figure 8b Phase 1: 2006 Build -out Traffic Conditions (Detail)
P
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 15
No Scale Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(C)
Signalized
Intersection
LOS B(C)0
4
Signalized
Intersection
4" LOS =BIB)
a„ C \O
ar I�
'k
N q
i
z
0
0
2
Signalized
I LO D(F) 4''u�
Signalized "Suggested
Intersection Improvements"
LOS =C(C) EB h NO 2 Lefts
1 Freefon Right
L
SITE
See Figure 9b
Roundabout
LOS A(A)
Signalized 'Suggested
Intersection Improvements"
LOS ?B(B) Added 0111 Leg
SB 1 EB/ -1 LeFI
L1,IThru -Rl
Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
P RA
F Figure 9a Phase 1: 2006 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page I6
No Scale
Land Bay B
Land Bay C
keside Dnve
Land Bay A
SITE
site p•
i
i
is.
ga s 0. 'c
Roundabout
LOS A (A)
c ol
Land Bay D
off.
t1 4,
Land Bay E
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
Figure 9b Phase 1: 2006 Build -out Lane Geometry and LOS (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 17
The 2009 roadway network assumes the completion of Warrior Drive from south of
Tasker Road to the northern property extents of the Villages at Artrip site. PHR +A
assumed the partial build -out of Crosspointe Center and Wakeland Manor (background
developments) to coincide with the completion of the proposed Phase 2 Villages at Artrip
development (577 residential units and 10,000 square feet of retail).
2009 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
In order to accurately depict future conditions within the study area, PHR +A
utilized the following traffic studies to determine the trips associated with not yet
completed area developments: 1) A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of Crosspointe Center,
by PHR +A, dated September 10, 2003; and 2) A Traffic Impact Analysis for Wakeland
Manor by KELLERCO, dated June 30, 2003. Based upon the 7 Edition of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, Tables 3a and 3b are provided
to summarize the calculated trips associated with each of the 2009 "other developments
PHASE 2 ANALYSES (2009)
Table 3a
2009 Background Development #1: Crosspointe Center
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 833 units 148 444 592 455 267 722 8,325
230 Townhouse /Condo 210 units 16 78 93 74 36 110 1,827
252 Elderly Housing Attach 150 units 5 7 12 10 6 17 522
710 Office 142,500 SF 219 30 249 41 198 238 1,752
820 Retail 562,500 SF 269 172 441 940 1,018 1,957 20,870
Total Trips 658 730 1.388 1,519 1,526 3,045 33,296
Total Internal 94 94 189 397 397 795 8,436
Total Pass -by 33 33 66 147 147 294 3,130
Total New Trips" 530 603 1,133 975 982 1,956 21,730
Table 3b
2009 Background Development #2: Wakeland Manor
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 298 units 54 163 218 180 106 286 2,978
230 Townhouse/Condo 161 units 13 63 75 59 29 89 1,396
Total Trips 67 226 293 240 135 375 4,374
A Phased Traffic impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 18
In addition to the nips relating to the specific background developments described
in Tables 3a and 3b, existing traffic volumes were increased along study area roadways
using an historic growth rate of 5% per year (compounded annually) through Year 2009.
Figure 10 shows the 2009 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 11 shows the corresponding
2009 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. HCS -2000
levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of this report.
PHASE 2 TRIP GENERATION
The total trips produced by and attracted to the Villages at Artrip site were
established using the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (IHE) Trip
Generation Report. Table 4 summarizes the trip generation results for the proposed Phase
2 Villages at Artrip development. A detailed description of internal /pass -by trips are
provided in the Appendix section of this report.
PHASE 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Assuming the 2009 roadway network, PHR +A utilized the trip distribution
percentages shown in Figure 12 to assign the Phase 2 Villages at Artrip trips (Table 4)
throughout the study area. Figure 13 shows the corresponding development generated
AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments.
2009 PHASE 2 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The Villages at Artrip assigned trips (Figure 13) were added to the 2009
background traffic volumes (Figure 10) to obtain 2009 build -out conditions. Figure 14
shows the 2009 Phase 2 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 15 shows the corresponding
2009 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000
levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 19
-P
Figure 10 2009 Background ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 20
Unsignalized
Intersection
CS
I
a
Signalized
Intersection
LOS F(F)
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =CIC)
"Suggested
Improvements"
Ell 2 Lefts
\f B Freeness R ignt
NB -2 Lef
Signa ized
Intersection
LOS=C(C) C
CS
.l
Ir) Vd
ide Dn
1 11
No Scale
s
Signalized "Suggested
Intersection Improvement"
LOS =B(C) SB l Len
Remo SUB Left Turn
Signalized
Intersection
LOS D(C)
Cf
L'.
SITE
A
"Suggested
Improvements"
Signalization
N'B -1 Left
Signalized
Intersection
•LOS=B(B)''
Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
-PHRA
Figure 11
2009 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 21
Code Land Use
Amount
In
AM Peak I lour
Out Total
In
PM Peak I lour
Out Total
ADT
Percentage
of Total
Land Bav A
210 Single Family Detached
102 units
20
60
81
69
40
109
1,017
230 Townhouse/Condo
438 units
29
140
168
135
67
202
3.811
820 Retail
10,000 SF
24
15
39
66
71
137
1,520
Land Bav B
37 units
9
27
36
28
16
44
373
210 Single Family Detached
Land Bay C
3 field
2
2
4
43
19
62
214
488 Soccer Complex
Total Trips
84
244
328
340
214
554
6,935
100%
Total Internal
1
1
2
16
16
31
107
3%
Total Pass -by
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
090
Total "New Trips"
83
243
326
325
198
523
6,828
97%
Table 4
Phase 2: Villages at Artrip
Trip Generation Summary
P H RA
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 22
Phase 2: Trip Distribution Percentages
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 23
r -P
Figure 13a
Phase 2: Development- Generated Trip Assignments
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
.r:
Averagetaily Trips
A Phased Traffic Impaci Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 24
No Scale
Land Bay B
keside Dnve
Land Bay C
-r
1
Land Bay A
SITE
e
Land Bay E
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
F Y�
Ay_erage;Daly, Tnps�'
r Figure 13b Phase 2: Development- Generated Trip Assignments (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 25
p H RA
F Figure 14a Phase 2: 2009 Build -out ADT and AM /PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 26
No Scale
Land Bay B
1 0
Land Bay A
SITE
elide Dnve
Land Bay C
o�
SP
-1
�2'i
Land Bay E
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Agerage D aily'�Trips fir.
_PHRA
r Figure 14b
P HRA
Phase 2: 2009 Build -out Traffic Conditions (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 27
Signalized
Intersection
LOS FIF)
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =C(C)
"Suggested
Imprur ements"
the Ft enow Right
Ea 2 Lefts
NB 2 Lefts
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(C)
C.
akeside Dri
Signalized
buersertinn
LOS s
No Scale
Signalized "Suggested
Intersection Improvement"
LOS =C(B) SB 1 Left
Remo.e WB Left Turn
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(D)
✓d
SITE
See Figure 1 Sb
Roundabout
LOS A(A1
Signalized "Suggested
Intersection: Improvements"
LOS =B(C) Added 4th Leg
EB /W B I Left
5B- 1 Lt, 1 Tbru -Rt
Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
—PHRA
Figure 15a
Phase 2: 2009 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 28
No Side
-P :A..
r Figure 15b
Land Bay B
DI
v
"o
Unsignalized
S^I
Intersection t•
Lakeside Dn
Land Bay C
Land Bay A
SITE
e r
a
4--c"
Land Bay E
Land Bay D
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
Phase 2: 2009 Build -out Lane Geometry and LOS (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 29
The 2012 roadway network assumes the completion of Warrior Drive from south of
Tasker Road to north of Crosspointe Boulevard (future roadway with the planned
Crosspointe development). PHR +A assumed the full build -out of Crosspointe Center and
Wakeland Manor (background developments) to coincide with the completion of the
proposed Phase 3 (full build -out) Villages at Artrip development.
2012 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
In order to accurately depict future conditions within the study area, PHR +A
utilized the following traffic studies to determine the trips associated with not yet
completed area developments: 1) A Phased Traffic Impact Analvsis of Crosspointe Center,
by PHR +A, dated September 10, 2003; and 2) A Traffic Impact Analysis for Wakeland
Manor, by KELLERCO, dated June 30, 2003. Based upon the 7 Edition of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers' (11E) Trip Generation Report, Tables 5a and 5b are provided
to summarize the calculated trips associated with each of the 2012 "other developments
PHASE 3 ANALYSES (2012)
Table 5a
2012 Background Development #1: Crosspointe Center
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 1,110 units 197 590 786 589 346 935 11.100
230 Townhouse/Condo 260 units 20 98 118 94 46 140 2,436
252 Elderly Housing Attach 200 units 7 9 16 13 9 22 696
710 Office 190,000 SF 276 38 313 50 242 292 2.187
820 Retail 750,000 SF 320 204 524 1,136 1,231 2,367 25,161
Total Trips 819 938 1,758 1,882 1,874 3,755 41,580
Total Internal 113 113 225 481 481 961 10,174
Total Pass -by 39 39 79 178 178 355 3,774
Total "New Trips" 667 786 1,454 1,224 1,215 2,439 27,632
Table 5b
2012 Background Development #2: Wakeland Manor
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single- Family Detached 397 units 72 215 287 234 137 371 3,970
230 Townhouse/Condo 214 units 16 79 95 75 37 112 1,862
Total Trips 88 294 382 309 174 483 5,832
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 30
In addition to the trips relating to the specific background developments described
in Tables 5a and 5b, existing traffic volumes were increased along study area roadways
using an historic growth rate of 5% per year (compounded annually) through Year 2012.
Figure 16 shows the 2012 background ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 17 shows the corresponding
2012 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. HCS -2000
levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of this report.
PHASE 3 TRIP GENERATION
The total trips produced by and attracted to the Villages at Artrip site were
established using the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip
Generation Report. Table 6 summarizes the trip generation results for the proposed Phase
3 Villages at Artrip development. A detailed description of internal /pass -by trips are
provided in the Appendix section of this report.
PHASE 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Assuming the 2012 roadway network, PHR +A utilized the trip distribution
percentages shown in Figure 18 to assign the Phase 3 Villages at Artrip trips (Table 6)
throughout the study area. Figure 19 shows the corresponding development generated
AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments.
2012 PHASE 3 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The Villages at Artrip assigned trips (Figure 19) were added to the 2012
background traffic volumes (Figure 16) to obtain 2012 build -out conditions. Figure 20
shows the 2012 Phase 3 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 21 shows the corresponding
2012 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000
levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 31
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
aA ye age7D"aily;Ti ips,''. a,'�
PHI -Z±lt
F Figure 16 2012 Background ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
P
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 32
Signalized
Intersection
LOS F(F)
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(D)
✓A
Signalized
Intersection
LOS BIM
k'4
F
‘c, °JC
ad
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =C(C)
"Suggested
Improvements"
ER I Thru. 2 Lefts
NB 2 Lens
o n. Freennn: Right
Unsignalized
Intersection
Signalized
Intersection
LOS B(B) a
No Scale
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =B(C)
"Suggested
Improvements"
WB -1 Thru
SB 1 Len
Remove WB Left Turn
Signalized
Intersection
LOS E(E)
SITE
Sipialized':
Iutersectiou
LOS =C(C),
Suggested
Improvements"
Added Jlh Leg
EB/WB- 1 LI,1 lb
NB 1 Thru
SB I L I Thru I el
R Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
—P
F Figure 17
2012 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15. 2004
Page 33
Code Land Use
Amount
In
AM Peak Hour
Out Total
In
PM Peak Hour
Out Total
ADT
Percentage
of Total
Land Bay A
210 Single Family Detached
139 units
27
SO
107
91
53
144
1.39D
220 Apartment
76 units
3
33
41
39
21
59
456
230 Townhouse /Condo
438 units
29
140
168
135
67
202
3.811
710 Office
60.000 SF
110
15
125
25
121
146
900
820 Retail
103,700 SF
98
62
160
308
333
641
6,953
932 H -T Restaurant
6,000 SF
36
33
69
40
26
66
763
932 H -T Restaurant
6,000 SF
36
33
69
40
26
66
763
Land Bay B
51 units
11
34
45
37
22
58
510
210 Single Family Detached
Land Bay C
3 fields
2
2
4
43
19
62
214
488 Soccer Complex
Land Bav D*
45,738 SF
60
38
98
179
194
374
4,084
820 Retail (4.2- acres 0.25 FAR)
Land Bay E
116 units
12
48
61
53
29
81
696
220 Apartment
Total Trips
428
519
947
989
910
1,899
20,540
100%
Total Internal
47
47
94
165
165
331
3,262
14%
Total Pass -by
19
19
39
76
76
152
1,656
6%
Total "New Trips"
361
452
814
748
669
1,416
15,623
80%
Table 6
Phase 3: Villages at Artrip
Trip Generation Summary
PHR.A performed analysis assuming the worst -case land use. however. Land Bay D may be replaced by 80 apartment units (ITE Code 220) with trip generation
totaling 43 AM peak hour, 62 PM peak hour and 480 daily trips. This would result in a reduction of 55 AM Peak Hour, 312 PM peak hour and 3604 daily nips.
3 The completion of Warrior Drive will create diverted background thin traffic that will utilize the retail components of the Villages at Anrip-
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 34
Phase 3: Trip Distribution Percentages
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 35
_pHRA
Figure 19a
Phase 3: Development- Generated Trip Assignments
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 36
No Scale
-P
Figure 19b
Land Bay B
P
0
c
eside Dnve
Land Bay C
51
Site
Drive D
f
Land Bay A
SITE
9
'h s V3 Land Bav E
S
9
t
tOP
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
er Average DarILIT?FIs
Phase 3: Development Generated Trip Assignments (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 37
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Averag&Dady,Tr'ips
Figure 20a Phase 3: 2012 Build -out ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 38
No Scale
keside Drive
Land Bay C
�q
Land Bay A
SITE
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
n je
Average Daily Tnps
-P
Figure 20b Phase 3: 2012 Build -out Traffic Conditions (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 39
Signalized "Suggested
Intersection Improvements'
LOS =B(C) ER WB- 1 Thru
SB 1 Len
Remo. WB Lefl Turn
C
C
Unsignalired
Intersection
l
it
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(D)Q
A
Signalized
Intersection
LOS BIB)
/T o P
47
Signalized
Intersection
LOS B(C) V'
No Scale
0.
Signalized
Intersection
IDS D(F)
1 61i
f
Signalized
Inlerseclion
LOSF(F)
Signalized "Suggested
Intersection Improvements"
LOS =C(C) ER I rhrn. 2 Lrlls
WR I'fpm
5 1 Freeno•. Right
NB 2 Lefts
P
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =C(C)
See Figure 21b
Suggested
Improvements"
Added 411. Leg
EBM'B 1 Lt, I RI
NB 3 Thru
B. 1 LL I Thru, 1 Rt
Denotes Free -Flow Lane
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
-P
Figure 21a
P
Phase 3: 2012 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 40
i1
No Scale
S v e pa) la ee
Roundabout
LOS A(A)
St,
O
q
z
Unsignalized
Intersection
\I R
q
7
Unsignalized
Intersection
Land Bay B
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =B(B)
Land Bay C
akeside Drive
Signalized
Intersection
LOS AIC)
Land Bay A
SITE
P
SIte lance
Unsignalized
Intersection
Land Bay D
Land Bay E
Unsignalized
Intersection
Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
-P
Figure 21b Phase 3: 2012 Build -out Lane Geometry and LOS (Detail)
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 41
CONCLUSION
The traffic impacts associated with the proposed Villages at Artrip development arc
acceptable and manageable. The following describes the future (Year 2012) operating
conditions at each of the study area intersections.
Route 37 /SB 1 -81 ramps: In order to achieve acceptable overall levels of service of
"C" or better during 2012 background and build -out conditions, the following
intersection improvements were assumed: 1) One lane was added along the
southbound approach; 2) One thru lane in the eastbound and westbound directions,
respectively; and 3) The westbound left -turn movement to southbound 1 -81 was
eliminated. All vehicles would be rerouted to the eastbound I -81 southbound ramp
via the Route 37 /US Route 11 interchange.
Route 37 /NB I -81 ramps: In order to achieve acceptable overall levels of service of
"C" or better during 2012 background and build -out conditions, the following
intersection improvements were assumed: 1) The intersection is to be realigned to
the east at the approximate location of the existing Tasker Road; 2) Two eastbound
left -turn lanes were added; 3) One thru lane in the eastbound and westbound
directions, respectively; 4) One lane was added along the northbound approach; and
5) A designated right tum lane was added in the westbound direction to allow free
flow travel onto northbound I -81.
Crosspointe Boulevard/Tasker Road: For 2012 background and build -out
conditions, this intersection will operate with overall levels of service of "C" during
the AM peak hour and "D" during the PM peak hour assuming the following
improvements: 1) Tasker Road is to be realigned to the east through the proposed
Crosspointe Center site; 2) Route 37 was extended through the Crosspointe Center
site as Crosspointe Boulevard.; 3) The new intersection of Crosspointe
Boulevard/Tasker Road will be signalized and include the following lane geometry:
Eastbound one left -turn lane, two thru lanes and one right -turn lane; Westbound
one left -tum lane, one thru lane and one shared thru /right -turn lane; Northbound
two left -turn lanes, one thru lane and one right-tum lane; Southbound one shared
left- turn /thru lane and one right-tum.
In order to demonstrate the minimal impacts of the project, PHR +A has provided
Table 7 to the show the increase in delay /levels of service between 2012 background
and 2012 build -out conditions, assuming no improvements, for the intersections of
Route 37 /SB I -81 ramps, Route 37 /NB 1 -81 ramps and Crosspointe Boulevard/Tasker
Road.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Village> at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 42
Inlerseclion
Tra Mc (on
Wee dav
13. Peak I lour
I'31 1'rak !lour
Lo rls of Ser rce
Delay
Levels o Service
Delay in seconds)
round
Build -onl
Background
;round
Build -um
Rackgrnund
Build-out
A
EB
132.6
518.2
406.3
-111.9
Rowe 37 1-81
14B Ramps
Signalize,
1413
LL LL
LL. LL
1115 8
1358
139.0
+4.2
11. LI-
344.1
1064
439.0
362.7
+94.9
+256.3
Overall
101.4
2414
+40.0
375.2
409.6
+34.4
013
13.1
11.8
-1.3
30.1
98.0
+67.9
Rowe 37 1 -81
Signalized
15
W
91.4
75.0
-16.4
LL
69.9
164.9
+95.0
SB Ramps
SB
309
55.9
+25.0
131.9
158.3
+26.4
)Overall
59.4
54.5
-4.9
70.2
139.4
+69.2
EB
79.2
25.0
-4.2
w U n 0 0
46 0
56.3
+10.8
Tasker Road
19B
31.7
348
+3.1
233
'_6.0
+2.7
Ctosspoinle
Signalized
NB
U
U
3i
317
+0.0
0
40.7
54.6
+13.9
Boulevard
SB
53.4
3a]
+1.3
U
57.6
+12.8
Overall
31.7
30.6
-1.1
39 3
48.9
+9.6
Table i
Corn ection Delay and Levels (without improvements)
illa es at Arid p 2012 Back2ro Build -out
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 43
Crosspointe Boulevard/Wanior Drive: For 2012 background and build -out
conditions, this intersection will operate with levels of service of "C or Netter
during the AM and PM peak hours. This planned intersection is to he signalized
and will include the following lane geometry: Eastbound one shared left turn /thru
lane and one right -tun lane: Westbound one shared left- turn /thru /right -turn lane:
Northbound one shared left-turn/that lane and one right -turn lane; Southbound
one shared left turn/thru /right -turn lane.
Hillandale Lane /Tasker Road: For 2012 background and build -out conditions, this
intersection will operate with levels of service of "C" or better during the AM and
PM peak hours assuming the following improvements: 1) Tasker Road is to be
realigned to the east through the proposed Crosspointe Center site; 2) Hillandale
Lane was realigned to intersect with Tasker as a T- intersection.; 3) The new
intersection of Hillandale Lane /Tasker Road will maintain the following lane
geometry: Eastbound one shared left- turn /thru lane /right -turn lane; Westbound
one shared left turn/thru /right -turn lane; Northbound one shared left- turn /thru lane
and one right -turn lane; Southbound one shared left- turn/thru/right -turn lane.
Warrior Drive /Tasker Road (north intersection): For 2012 background and build
out conditions, this intersection will operate with levels of service of "C" or better
during the AM and PM peak hours assuming the following improvements: 1)
Tasker Road is to be realigned to the east through the proposed Crosspointe Center
site; 2) The planned intersection of Warrior Drive/Tasker Road (north intersection)
will maintain the following lane geometry: Eastbound one shared thru /right -tum
lane; Westbound one shared left turn /thru lane; Northbound one shared left
turn/ right -turn lane.
Warrior Drive /Parkins Mill Road: For 2012 background and build -out conditions,
this intersection will operate with levels of service "A" during the AM and PM
peak hours assuming the following intersection improvements: 1) Warrior Drive is
to be implemented from south of Tasker Road to north of Crosspointe Boulevard;
and 2) The proposed intersection of Wan Drive /Parkins Mill Road will maintain
traffic control via a single lane roundabout.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 44
Copies:
Date:
Number:
Description:
1
10/5/2006
and Development
CD of Artrip MDP
1
8/17/2005
12819 -2 -0
Artrip MDP TIA Supplement
Winchester, VA 22601
Carbon Copy:
Attention:
Mike Ruddy
Comments:
r.
I; II= II ,I t. nil I
To:
Frederick County Department of Planning
Date:
10/5/2006
Project No:
and Development
Project Name:
The Villages at Artrip
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202
Reference:
Winchester, VA 22601
Carbon Copy:
Attention:
Mike Ruddy
1503 Edwards Ferry Rd., Suite 200 Leesburg, VA 20176
7'
too••
Wool
p
ADP
We Transmit:
Atlanta, GA
Baltimore, MD
Chicago, IL
as per your request
under separate cover
by mail
by messenger
by pick up
by overnight
carrier
P! it
the following:
0
t'
ta
Phone 703- 771 -8004 Metro 703 478 -1335 Fax 703 -771 -4091 Survey Fax 703 771 -2630
prints
specifications
change order
shop drawings
reproducibles
cd
product literature
computations
descriptions
I
1 enclosures ere not av noted, //pllte((ass�ee' notify us a at t once���tt1n^1l�lrr^�t I
11 r i OClpo &ml2'0„ 111 mp3
Dewberry Dads L is an n d, as such, c lies with
Section of E utive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order 11351.
Fairfax, VA
Fredericksburg, VA
Gaithersburg, MD
for:
I'u* your approval
II your review and comment
your file/use
revision and submission
distribution
Transmittal 13184
Transmittal
I] Lanham, MD
2 Leesburg, VA
I] Manassas, VA
Es
as requested by
as approved by
as submitted for approval by
please acknowledge receipt of
enclosures
return enclosures to us
Sent by: David Frank
Warrior Drive /Tasker Road (south intersection): For 2012 background and build
out conditions, this intersection will operate with levels of service "C' or better
during the AM and PM peak hours. This planned intersection is to be signalized
and will include the following lane geometry: Eastbound one left -turn lane, one
thru lane and one right -turn lane; Westbound one left -turn lane, one that lane and
one right -turn lane; Northbound one left -turn lane, one thru lane and one right
tum lane; Southbound one left -turn lane, one thru lane and one right -turn lane.
Lakeside Drive /Tasker Road: For 2012 background and build -out conditions this
intersection will operate with levels of service "C" during the AM and PM peak
hours. No improvements were required.
A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages at Artrip
December 15, 2004
Page 45
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Eng neers. Su rveyors. Planners. Lmdsccpe Architects.
PH
300 Foxcrott Avenue, Suite 200
Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401
Phone: 304.264.2711
Fax: 304.264.3671
To: Charles Segerman
Organization /Company: Tower Companies
From: Michael Glickman, PE
Memorandum
Date: August 17, 2005
An Addendum to: A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villages
Project Name /Subject: atArtnp, dated December 15, 2004.
PHR +A Project file Number: 12819 -2 -0
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this addendum to the report titled: A
Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of the Villager at Artnp, by PHR +A, dated December 15, 2004. The
purpose of this memorandum is to address the possibility that Warrior Drive would be completed
under Phase 3 prior to the completion of Crosspointe Boulevard. Accordingly, a "maximum
threshold" scenario was established to demonstrate the worst -case Artrip development assuming
sole access via the intersection of Tasker Road /Warrior Drive. Based upon HCS -2000 analyses,
PHR +A determined the maximum development that the Tasker Road /Warrior Drive intersection
could potentially accommodate would be 680 residential units and 25,000 square feet of retail.
TRIP GENERATION
PHR +A has provided Table 1 to summarize the revised total trip generation associated with the
proposed Villages at Artrip development.
Table 1
Phase 3: Villages at Artrip (Partial Build -out)
Trip Generation Summary
Code
Land Use
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single- Family Detached
230 Townhouse /Condo
820 Retail
242 units 45 134 179 150 88 237 2,420
438 units 29 140 168 135 67 202 3,811
25,000 SF 42 27 68 120 130 251 2,758
Total Trips 115 300 415 405 285 690 8,989
Page 1 of 5
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS
Memorandum
To:
Page 2 of 5
The assumptions regarding the distribution of Villages at Artrip trips remain consistent with those
determined in the PHR +A December 15, 2004 report. PHR +A utilized these trip distribution
percentages to assign the Villages at Artrip trips (Table 1) throughout the study area roadway
network. Figure 1 shows the development- generated AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes and
Average Daily Trips (ADT) at the intersection of Warrior Drive /Tacker Road.
2012 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The Villages at Artrip assigned trips (Figure 1) were added to the 2012 background traffic volumes
to obtain the 2012 build -out conditions. Figure 2 shows the revised 2012 build -out AM /PM peak
hour traffic volumes and ADT at the intersections of Warrior Drive /Tasker Road. Figure 3 shows
the corresponding 2012 build -out lane geometry and levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of
service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this addendum.
CONCLUSION
The traffic impacts associated with Warrior Drive being completed under Phase 3 prior to the
completion of Crosspointe Boulevard are acceptable and manageable. Assuming 680 residential
units along with 25,000 square feet of retail, the intersection of Warrior Drive /Tasker Road would
maintain acceptable overall levels of service "C" or better.
This planned intersection is to be signalized and will include the following lane
geometry: Eastbound one left turn lane, one thru lane and one right turn lane;
Westbound one left rurn lane, one thru lane and one right turn lane; Northbound
one left turn lane, one thru lane and one right turn lane; Southbound one left turn
lane, one thru lane and one right turn lane.
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
No Scale
SITE
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Average Haiti Trip§
r p H
I Figure 1
Phase 3: Development- Generated Trip Assignments
Memorandum
To:
Page 3 of 5
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Memorandum
To:
Page 4 of 5
Average Daily Trips ?'t
F Figure H 2 Phase 3: 2012 Build -out ADT and AM/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Memorandum
To:
Page 5 of 5
No Scale
Tasker Road
OS
Signalized
Intersection
LOS =B(C)
q r
SITE
T asker
"Suggested
Improvements"
Added 4th Leg
EB/WB 1 Lt, 1 Rt
NB 1 Thru
SB 1 Lt, 1 Thru. 1 R
P R% G
r
l o. J tQ j
a ���Cer
a
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
—PHRA.
Figure 3 Phase 3: 2012 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
1
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT
General Information
Analyst PHR +A
Agency or Co. PHR +A
Date Performed 08/15/05
Time Period AM Peak Hour
Site Information
Warrior Drive Tasker Road
(S)
All other areas
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
Project ID Artrip
2012 Build -out Conditions
Volume and Timing Input
Number of lanes, N
Lane group
Volume, V (vph)
Heavy vehicles, %HV
Peak -hour factor, PHF
Pretimed (P) or actuated (A)
Start-up lost time, I,
Extension of effective green, e
Arrival type, AT
Unit extension, UE
Filtering /metering, I
Initial unmet demand, O
Ped Bike RTOR volumes
Lane width
Parking Grade Parking
Parking maneuvers, N
Buses stopping, N
Min. time for pedestrians, G
Phasing
Timing
EB Only
G 6.0
Y= 0
EB
LT
1
L
72
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0
EW Perm
G 41.0
Y= 5
TH
1
T
546
6
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
12.0
0
0
3.2
RT
1
R
317
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0
03
G=
Y
WB
LT
1
L
114
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0
TH
1
T
506
6
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
12.0
0
0
3.2
G=
Y
RT
1
R
38
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
NB
LT
1
L
238
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0
NB Only
G 17.0
Y= 0
TH
1
T
32
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
12.0
0
0
3.2
RT
1
R
98
2
0.95
A
2.0
NS Perm
2.0
G 16.0
3
Y= 5
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0
LT
1
L
105
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0
07
Cycle Length, C 90.0
SB
G=
TH
1
Y
T
90
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
12.0
0
3.2
RT
1
R
195
2
0.95
A
2.0
2.0
3
3.0
1.000
0.0
0
12.0
N
0 0
08
04
G=
Y
Duration of Analysis, T 0.25
Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay and LOS Determi at
Adjusted flow rate, v
Lane group capacity, c
v/c ratio, X
Total green ratio, g/C
Uniform delay, d
Progression factor, PF
Delay calibration, k
EB
LT
76
314
0.24
0.52
13.3
1.000
0.11
TH
575
936
0.61
0.52
15.1
1.000
0.20
RT
334
1214
0.28
0.77
3.1
1.000
0.11
LT
120
295
0.41
0.46
16.4
1.000
0.11
TH
533
816
0.65
0.46
19.0
1.000
0.23
RT
40
721
0.06
0.46
13.7
1.000
0.11
NB
LT I TH
0.37 10.37
251 1 34
492 1 683
0.51 10.05
21.2 118.4
1.000 11.000
0.12 10.11
0.37 10.18
RT 1 LT
103 1 111
580 1243
0.18 10.46
19.3 133.1
1.000 11.000
0.11 10.11
SB
TH
95
331
0.29
0.18
32.1
1.000
0.11
RT
205
475
0.43
0.30
25.3
1.000
0.11
Incremental delay, d
0.4
1.2
0.1
0.9
1.9
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.1
1.4
0.5
0.6
Initial queue delay, d
13.7
16.3
3.2
17.3
20.9
13.7
22.1
18.4
19.5
34.5
32.5
26.0
Control delay
Lane group LOS
B
B
A
8
C
B
C
8
8
CC
C
11.7
19.8
21.1
29.8
Approach delay
B
B
C
C
Approach LOS
18.4
X 0.64
Intersection LOS
8
Intersection delay
Version 4.1e
HCS2000
opynght ld LWU univers�y w rmum,
EB
WB
NU
LT
TH
RT
LT
TH
RT
LT
TH
RT
LT
TH
RT
Number of lanes, N,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lane group
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
LT
R
Volume, V (vph)
254
502
321
191
789
132
342
112
111
89
74
174
Heavy vehicles, %HV
2
6
2
2
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Pretimed (P) or actuated (A)
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Start-up lost time, I,
20
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Extension of effective green, e
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
20
2.0
2.0
Arrival type, AT
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Unit extension, UE
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Filtering /metering, I
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
Initial unmet demand, 0b
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ped Bike RTOR volumes
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lane width
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
Parking Grade Parking
N
O
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
N
0
N
Parking maneuvers, N
Buses stopping, NB
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Min. time for pedestrians, G
3.2
3 2
3.2
3.2
EB Only
EW
Perm
03
04
NB Only
NS Perm
07
08
Phasing
Timing
G= 8.3
G= 43.7
G=
G=
G= 17.0
G= 11.0
Y= 5
G=
Y=
G=
Y=
Y= 0
Y= 5
Y=
Y=
Y= 0
Cycle Length, C 90.0
HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT
General Information
Analyst PHR +A
Agency or Co. PHR +A
Date Performed 08/15/0
Time Period PM Peak Hour
Site Information
Intersection Warrior Drive Tasker Road
(S)
Area Type All other areas
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year 2012 Build -out Conditions
Project ID Artrip
Input
'Duration of Analysis, i
Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determi at
Adjusted flow rate, v
Lane group capacity, c
v/c ratio, X
Total green ratio, g/C
Uniform delay, d
Progression factor, PF
Delay calibration, k
EB
LT
267
246
1.09
0.58
25.9
1.000
0.50
TH
528
1035
0.51
0.58
11.4
1.000
0.12
RT
338
1302
0.26
0.82
1.8
1.000
0.11
LT
201
399
0.50
0.49
15.8
1.000
0.11
TH
831
870
0.96
0.49
22.2
1.000
0.47
RT
139
769
0.18
0.49
13.1
1.000
0.11
NB
LT
360
422
0.85
0.31
27.0
1.000
0.39
TH
118
580
0.20
0.31
22.8
1.000
0.11
RT
117
492
0.24
0.31
23.1
1.000
0.11
SB
LT
94
155
0.61
0.12
37.4
1.000
0.19
TH
78
228
0.34
0.12
36.2
1.000
0.11
RT
183
427
0.43
0.27
27.1
1.000
0.11
Incremental delay, d
82.0
0.4
0.1
1.0
20.4
0.1
15.5
0.2
0.3
6.7
0.9
0.7
Initial queue delay, d
Control delay
107.9
11.8
1.9
16.8
42.6
13.2
42.5
23.0
23.3
44.1
37.1
27.8
Lane group LOS
F
8
A
B
D
8
D
C
C
D
D
C
Approach delay
31.5
34.7
34.8
34.2
C
C
C
C
Approach LOS
Intersection delay
33.5
X 1.16
Intersection LOS
C
Version 4.1e
HCS2000
Copyright m 2000 Umversny or Flonda,