HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-05 Impact AnalysisFile #3230 /EAW /ajc
IMPACT STATEMENT
FREE OM MANOR
REZONING
Shawnee Magisterial District
Frederick County, Virginia
TM 64- ((A)) -23
26.87 Acres
April 21, 2004
Revised July 27, 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
Current Owners: Steve A. DuBrueler, et als
Contact Person:
Evan Wyatt, AICP
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
540 -662 -4185
Greenway Engineers rig
INTRODUCTION
April 21.2004
Revised July 27, 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
FREEDOM MANOR REZONING
Freedom Manor Rezoning
This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by
the proffered rezoning of a 26.87 -acre subject property identified as Freedom Manor and
owned by Steve A. DuBnleler, et als. The subject property consists of one parcel, that being:
TM 64- ((A)) -23 containing 26.87- acres. The subject site is located on the east side of
Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet west northwest of the intersection of
Papermill Road and Front Royal Pike (Route 522). The current zoning is RA (Rural Areas)
District. The applicants propose to conditionally rezone the 26.87 -acre parcel from RA to RP
(Residential Performance) District. (Reference Attachment 1. Location and Existing Zoning
Exhibit for Freedom Manor)
Basic information
Location:
Magisterial District:
Property ID Numbers:
Current Zoning:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Proposed Zoning:
Total rezoning area:
Proposed build -out
Fronting on the east side of Papermill Road (Route
644), approximately 2,300 feet west northwest of the
intersection of Papermill Road and Front Royal Pike
(Route 522)
Shawnee
64- ((A)) -23
RA District
Agricultural, Unimproved
Residential, Single family detached
RP District
26.87 acres
70 Single family detached residential Lots
File #3230 /EAW /aje 2
Greenway Engineering
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The development proposal is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, 1999,
Southern Frederick Land Use Plan (SFLUP), map page 6.42.9. The site is within the Urban
Development Area and the Sewer and Water Service Area. The property is located between
two developing corridors (Papermill Road and Front Royal Pike), which includes existing
residential and commercial land uses, and future planned unit development and mixed
commercial land uses.
Urban Development Area
Expansion of the Urban Development Area (UDA) beyond its existing boundary is not
required by this application.
2. Sewer and Water Service Area
Expansion of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) beyond its existing boundary is not
required by this application.
A. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE
Access
April 21.2004
Revised July 27, 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
Freedom Manor Rezoning
The subject site, consisting of tax parcel 64- ((A)) -23, is located within a manmade boundary
created by Papermill Road (Route 644) on the western frontage of the property and Front
Royal Pike (Route 522) near the eastern side of the tract.
The primary access to the subject site will occur through the construction of an entrance on
Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and an entrance on Papermill Road (Route 644), with an
eventual connection to the adjoining tax map parcel 64- ((A)) -19 immediately north of the
site. A Generalized Development Plan (GDP) has been submitted as a proffered exhibit.
The GDP identifies the general road layout, which prohibits access to Westwood Drive
(Route 822). (Reference Attachment 4. Generalized Development Plan Exhibit for Freedom
Manor)
2. Flood Plains
The subject property can be found on FEMA NFIP map #510063- 0200 -B. The entire site is
located outside the 100 -year flood plain in designated "Zone C
File #3230 /EAW /ajc 3
Greenway Engineering
Wetlands
Soil Types
3B Blairton silt loam
9B Clearbrook channery silt loam
41D Weikert -Berks channery silt loam
April 21, 2004
Revised July 27. 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18. 2005
There is approximately 0.35 of an acre of wetlands on this site. Any disturbance of this area
will be in conformance with Army Corps of Engineers and Department of Environmental
Quality permitting procedures. (Reference Attachment 2. Existing Wetlands Exhibit for
Freedom Manor)
The soil types contained in this tract have been obtained from the Frederick County GIS
database. (Reference Attachment 3. Existing Soils Exhibit for Freedom Manor) The subject
site contains the following three soil types:
Table 5 on page 123 of The Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia, identifies the Blairton
Silt loam soils as prime farmland. The remaining soil types on site are not identified within
this table.
B.
Other Environmental Features
The site does not contain areas of steep slope or woodlands as defined by the Frederick
County Zoning Ordinance.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Adjoining property zoning and present use:
North: RP (Residential Performance) District
RA (Rural Areas) District
South:
East:
West:
B2 (Business General) District
RA (Rural Areas) District
RP (Residential Performance) District
RA (Rural Area) District
RA (Rural Areas) District
2 -7 slope
2 -7 slope
15 -25" slope
Freedom Manor Rezoning
covers approximately le of site
covers approximately 80 of site
covers approximately 2.0 of site
Use: Residential
Use: Unimproved
Use: Funeral home
Use: Commercial cemetery
Use: Residential
Use: Residential /Commercial
Use: Unimproved
File #3230 /EAW /ajc 4
Greenwaa Engineering
C. TRANSPORTATION
April 21. 2004
Revised July 27. 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
Freedom Manor Rezoning
Access to the site will occur through the construction of a primary entrance on Papermill
Road (Route 644) and a secondary entrance on Front Royal Pike (Route 522). A temporary
cul -de -sac will he provided at the northern property boundary to allow for a future inter
parcel connection. Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644) meet at a
signalized intersection just to the south of the subject property. The configuration of internal
streets in this subdivision is designed to discourage cut through traffic between Front Royal
Pike and Papermill Road. Plans for future access have been provided through a planned
connection to the adjoining tax map parcel 64- ((A)) -19 located to the north. A deed
restriction will he recorded which will prohibits access between the subject property, via the
existing platted right -of -way, and Westwood Drive (Route 822).
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared for the subject site by Patton Harris Rust
and Associates, PC, dated July 22, 2004. At the time of the preparation of the TIA 120 lots
were planned for the Freedom Manor project. Since that time the proposal has been reduced
to 70 lots. The reduction in the number of lots reduces the overall impact, but the relative
values reflected in the TIA remain generally the same.
The TIA provides actual traffic counts for Papermill Road and Front Royal Pike, as well as
AM and PM peak hour counts for the intersection of these two road systems. The TIA
assumes ten VPD per household for the 120 lots projected at that time, resulting in an
average daily traffic volume of 1,200 VPD for the project. The TIA includes background
traffic volumes and also projects an average traffic growth rate of 5% on Front Royal Pike
and Papermill Road. The additional traffic, coupled with the then 1,200 VPD from the
Freedom Manor project result in a level of service (LOS) "B" for the impacted intersection at
build -out. Furthermore, the link analysis for impacts to Front Royal Pike maintains a level of
service "A" during both AM and PM peak hour, while the link analysis for impacts to
Papermill Road result in a LOS "B" during both AM and PM peak hour. The results of the
TIA demonstrate that the traffic impacts associated with Freedom Manor are acceptable and
manageable.
The applicants have incorporated a transportation proffer section as a component of the
overall proffer statement. These proffers are provided to ensure that Frederick County and
VDOT are provided with adequate guarantees for full intersection improvement design,
construction and bonding and to address traffic calming measures internal to the project.
These proffered measures coupled with the results of the TIA will adequately mitigate the
transportation impacts associated with the Freedom Manor Subdivision.
D. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT
The 26.87 -acre property is located in the southeastern portion of the Sewer and Water
Service Area (SWSA). There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main on the west side of Front
Royal Pike adjoining the subject site. The principle collector line for the development's
File #3230 /EA W /ajc 5
Greenwav Engineering
April 21, 2004
Revised July 27, 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
The figures below represent the impact that this project would have to the sewage
conveyance system and treatment system at full build -out of 70 dwelling units:
Freedom Manor Rezoning
sanitary sewer system will follow the northern boundary of TM 64- ((A)) -23 in a west to east
direction of flow to the existing main. It will be connected to the main in accordance with
Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) regulations. Impacts of the proposed
rezoning on the sewage conveyance and treatment system are based on the proffered land use
of 70 single- family detached dwelling units. Design figure estimates are based on 225
gallons per day (GPD) per single- family detached unit.
Q 225 GPD per dwelling unit
Q 225 GPD x 70 dwelling units
Q 15,750 GPD
The proposed zoning is estimated to add 15,750 gallons per day to the public sewage
conveyance system and the Opequon Wastewater Treatment Plant. The design capacity of
the treatment plant is 8.4 million gallons per day, of which approximately 6.4 is currently
being utilized. The total build -out of the proposed subdivision would require approximately
0.7 percent of the available capacity at the Opequon Waste Water Treatment Plant; therefore,
adequate capacity. source, and infrastructure are available for this development.
L. WATER SUPPLY
The 26.87 -acre properly is located in the southeastern portion of the Sewer and Water
Service Area (SWSA). There is an existing 8 -inch water line along Westwood Drive
adjoining TM 64- ((A)) -19. A 20 -inch main, located on the east side of Front Royal Pike, is a
major transmission line from the James Diehl Water Treatment Plant.
Impacts of the proposed rezoning on the water supply system are based on the proffered land
use of 70 single family detached dwelling units. Design figure estimates are based on 275
gallons per day (GPD) per single family detached unit. The figures below represent the
impact that this project would have to the water supply system at full build -out of 70
dwelling units:
Q 275 GPD per dwelling unit
Q 275 GPD x 70 dwelling units
Q 19,250 GPD
The proposed development would utilize an estimated 19,250 gallons per day. The James
Diehl Water Treatment Plant serves the subject area. The treatment plant provides
approximately four million gallons per day of potable water. The projected water usage at
build -out would account for less than one percent of the current source; therefore, adequate
capacity, source, and infrastructure are available for this development.
File #3230/EA W /ajc 6
Grcenway Engineering
F. SITE DRAINAGE
April 21, 2004
Revised July 27, 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
The 26.87 -acre site has a topographic high spot approximately half way between Papermill
Road (Route 644) and Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Approximately 6 acres of the site
drains west towards Papermill Road (Route 644) and approximately 20.87 acres flows east
towards Front Royal Pike (Route 522). An onsite storm water management pond is proposed
to control the increased run -off. Detailed stormwater management design will be conducted
during the subdivision design plan process, which will include impacts to the downstream
channels and drainage structures, as well as as -built conditions of the existing on -site ponds
for stormwater retention. These design criteria will be developed to the satisfaction of the
County Engineer.
G. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
The impact on solid waste disposal facilities can be projected based upon each household
having an annual average volume (AAV) of 5.4 cubic yards of landfill volume (Civil
Engineering Reference Manual, 4 edition). The following figures show the increase in daily
volume based on the proffered density of 70 dwellings.
It is estimated that the proposed development will provide an approximately .7% increase in
solid waste generation annually. The Municipal Solid Waste portion of the Regional Landfill
has the capacity to accommodate this increase in solid waste generation.
H. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES
1. Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks
AAV 5.4 cu. yd. per dwelling
AAV 5.4 cu. yd. x 70 dwellings
AAV 378 cu. yd.
2. Winchester Regional Preservation Office Department of Historic Resources
There were no archeological artifacts found on the site.
Freedom Manor Rezoning
The only historic landmark in the immediate vicinity inventoried by the Virginia Division
of Historic Landmarks is the Evandale School, file #34 -433. The former schoolhouse has
been converted to a private residence.
The Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) reviewed the previous rezoning proposal
for much of the subject property, then known as the Doris Casey rezoning. The HRAB
provided a letter dated February 6, 2002, stating that development of the Doris Casey
File #3230/EAW/ajc 7
Greenway Engineering
I. OTHER IMPACTS
Attachments:
April 21, 2004 Freedom Manor Rezoning
Revised July 27, 2004
Revised October 7, 2004
Revised April 18, 2005
property would not significantly impact any historic sites. The Frederick County
Department of Planning and Development has determined that further HRAB review is not
necessary at this time.
The Frederick County Capital Facilities Fiscal Impact Model has been applied to the
proffered to the proffered development of 70 single family detached dwelling units. The
results of this model run indicate that the development of the subject site will result in a net
fiscal impact of $9,845 per dwelling unit. The applicants have proffered a monetary
contribution consistent with the results of the fiscal model run to adequately address this
matter.
1. Location and Existing Zoning Exhibit for Freedom Manor
2. Existing Wetlands Exhibit for Freedom Manor
3. Existing Soils Exhibit for Freedom Manor
4. Generalized Development Plan Exhibit for Freedom Manor
5. Conditional Zoning Proffer Statement for Freedom Manor
File #3230/EAW /ajc 8
P,J 208 bu Son S.E.
i �1 l Leesburg, Virginia 20175
Phone: 701777.3616
Fax: 703.777.3725
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Engineers. SL rveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects.
To: Evan Wyatt
Organization /Company: Greenway Engineering
From: Michael Glickman, PE
Date: July 9, 2004
Project NamelSubject: Freedom Manor
PHR +A Project file Number: 13083 -1 -0
Memorandum
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this document to present the traffic
impacts associated with the proposed Freedom Manor site to be located northwest of the Papermill
Road /Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) intersection in Frederick County, Virginia. The project is to
include a total of 120 single family detached residential units with primary site- access to be provided
along Route 522 and secondary site access to be provided along Papermill Road. The development
will be built -out in a single transportation phase by the year 2006. PHR +A has provided Figure 1
to illustrate the location of the Freedom Manor site with respect to the surrounding roadway
network.
Methodology
The traffic impacts accompanying the Freedom Manor site were obtained through a sequence of
activities as the narratives that follow document:
Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of impact,
Calculation of the Freedom Manor trip generation,
Distribution and assignment of the Freedom Manor generated trips onto the completed roadway
network,
Analysis of capacity and levels of service using the newest version of the highway capacity
software, HCS -2000, for existing and future conditions.
Page 1 of 11
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Figure 1
Freedom Manor
Vicinity Map
0
Memorandum
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 2 of 11
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Memorandum
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 3 of 11
Existing Conditions
PHR +A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersection of
Papermill Road /Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) in Frederick County, Virginia. In order to determine
the ADT (Average Daily Traffic) along the study area roadway links, a "k" factor (the ratio of PM
peak hour traffic volumes to 24 -hour traffic volumes) of 9.2% was calculated based upon existing
traffic volumes (design hour and 24 -hour) published by the Virginia Department of Transportation
(VDOT).
Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of
Papermill Road /Route 522. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and AM /PM
peak hour HCS -2000 levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS -2000 levels of service
worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this memorandum.
2006 Background Conditions
PHR +A increased the existing traffic volumes along Papermill Road and Route 522 using a
conservative growth rate of five percent (5 per year through Year 2006. Figure 4 shows the 2006
background ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of Papermill
Road /Route 522. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2006 background lane geometry and AM /PM
peak hour HCS -2000 levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in
the Appendix section of this memorandum.
Trip Generation
The total trips produced by and attracted to the Freedom Manor site were established using
equations and rates provided in the 7` Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' GTE)
Tnp Generation Report. Table 1 shows the trip generation results for the proposed Freedom Manor
development.
Table 1
Freedom Manor
Trip Generation Summary
Code
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single- Family Detached 420 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200
Total 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
4
No Scale
PuRA
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
"A vcraj�eiDaily:Trips o -;t
Figure 2
Existing Traffic Conditions
Memorandum
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 4 of 11
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
No Scale
Links Analysis
LOS A(B)
Links Analysis
LOS A(A)
SITE
)11
11i
Signalized
Intersection
LOS B(B)
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
r A
Figure 3
Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
Memorandum
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 5of11
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
1
No Scale
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
;a` Avc�axc�Daily�Trips;�e�?
r P
Figure 4
2006 Background Traffic Conditions
Memorandum
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 6 of 11
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Memorandum
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 7 of 11
1
No Scale
Links Analysis
LOS A(B)
ts
Links Analysis
LOS A(A)
0
SITE
i11
(IOC
Signalized
Intersection
LOS B(B)
111
m
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
P
r
Figure 5 2006 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
CONCLUSION
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
2006 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
Memorandum
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 8 of 11
The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding
the proposed site. Figure 6 represents the distribution percentages for trips produced by and
attracted to Freedom Manor.
The Freedom Manor assigned trips (Table I) were added to the 2006 background traffic volumes
(Figure 4) to obtain the 2006 build -out conditions. Figure 7 shows the 2006 build -out ADT and
AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of Papermill Road /Route 522. Figure 8
shows the corresponding 2006 build -out lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour HCS -2000 levels of
service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this
memorandum.
The traffic impacts associated with the build -out of Freedom Manor are acceptable and manageable.
The following details the HCS -2000 levels of service results:
HCS -2000 "Signals" Intersection Analyses: The intersection of Papermill Road /Route 522 will
operate with levels of service "B" or better during existing, 2006 background and 2006 build -out
conditions.
HCS -2000 "Multi- lane" Link Analyses: Route 522, north of the intersection of Papermill
Road /Route 522, will operate with levels of service "A" during existing, 2006 background and 2006
build -out conditions.
HCS -2000 "Two- lane" Link Analyses: Papermill Road, west of the intersection of Papermill
Road /Route 522, will operate with levels of service "B" or better during existing, 2006 background
and 2006 build -out conditions.
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Memorandum
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 9 of 11
Trip Distribution Percentages
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
1
No Scale
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Avcrac,D3ily
r P
Figure 7
2006 Build -out Traffic Conditions
Memorandum
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 10 of 11
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Memorandum
To: Evan Wyatt
Page 11 of 11
1
No Scale
Links Analysis
LOS B(B)
SITE
J11
m
Links Analysis
LOS A(A)
Signalized
Intersection
LOS= B(B)
AM Peak Elour(PM Peak Hour)
P
r Figure 8
2006 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects
066/17 eF ,rederrck CountpComp,e /teysi Plansa &ProgramsSubcoimuttee
Mike Ruddy„ AICP uty Director
Over the past several months the UDA Working Group has been working to establish an
approach to the study of the County's Urban Development Area. The efforts of the group have
focused around two key areas. Firstly, the development of goals for the UDA Study that portray
the guiding principles or philosophies envisioned for the study. Secondly, the solicitation and
involvement of key stakeholder groups in the initial stages of the study. The group engaged
several key stakeholder groups in an effort to fully understand the concerns of these groups, what
impact development patterns within the UDA would have on these groups, and potential
approaches that could be incorporated into the UDA Study to address the needs of these groups.
This report is provided in summary of the efforts of the UDA Working Group and an
identification of important issues to be addressed in the study. This report also serves as a basis
for future direction.
Goals for the UDA Studv.
Promote a balance of housing opportunities to address lifestyle, size, cost, and
availability.
Adopt a philosophy of development that concentrates on creating neighborhoods which
incorporate residential, retail, educational, and public uses, commercial services,
opportunity for employment, and institutional and recreational resources.
Provide for a comprehensive transportation system that enhances local and regional
connectivity and incorporates all types and modes of transportation.
Achieve a business development strategy that seeks to provide appropriate locations for
commercial and industrial opportunities and seeks to achieve a balanced ratio between
the residential and commercial /industrial growth of 60 percent residential to 40 percent
commercial/industrial (60/40) within the UDA /SWSA.
Provide adequate areas for regional, community, and neighborhood parks and ensure
broad access to a variety of recreational opportunities.
Identify criteria and principles to guide future modifications of the UDA /SWSA.
Develop principles that address the future land needs of the school system, guide the
location of school facilities, and promote collaboration.
Develop a water and sewer facilities plan that is designed to facilitate the County's
UDA /SWSA land use planning efforts.
Identify and sustain green infrastructure and protect the County's environmental systems
and resources by preserving green space and open space linkages and connectivity.
Establish a creative system of rewarding innovative residential and commercial
development practices in the UDA that further the vision of the UDA and the goals of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Endorsed by the CPPS on April 11, 2005 (modified UDA Working Group 06/07/05)
Stakeholder Group Summaries.
Frederick County Sanitation Authority.
The FCSA is currently embarking on a study of the long range wastewater facility needs of the
community and an update to the water and sewer facilities plan.
A significant impact from evolving nutrient reduction regulations is anticipated. Nutrient Cap
allocations and TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) regulations promulgated by the State will
have an impact on development within the UDA.
Planning efforts should be cognizant of State regulations and cap limits proposed for the Parkins
Mill and Opequon wastewater facilities, and the future Crooked Run facility.
The opportunity exists to coordinate the planning efforts of the FCSA/FWSA and the UDA Study
to ensure a valid land use plan that respects the limitations and opportunities of the water and
sewer resources available to Frederick County.
Frederick County Parks and Recreation.
Update of community parks and recreation needs assessment based upon recognized recreational
standards should be performed.
Evaluation of current park policies pertaining to the type and location of new facilities is
warranted.
Community should place a greater emphasis on joint use of facilities for a variety of entities and
uses.
Increased focus on community scale parks approximately 30 50 acres in size.
Clearbrook Park has a limited existence as presently used. The County should anticipate the need
for an additional regional park within the UDA.
Greater emphasis should be placed on the provision of pocket and neighborhood parks by the
development community in conjunction with new development projects.
Connectivity The importance of providing linkages between trails, parks, opens spaces and
community uses should be a prominent element of future planning efforts.
Industrial Parks Association.
The IPA expressed immediate and long-term concerns regarding the lack of an available labor
force and a lack of affordable housing to accommodate the labor force.
The inventory of available and planned industrial sites should be evaluated and enhanced.
The community, Winchester and Frederick County, should seek to improve its coordination of
utility facility planning efforts.
Frederick County Public Schools.
Based upon anticipated number of units (UDA Report), the following school facility needs can be
anticipated to be needed within the next 7 10 years to address current growth within the UDA.
Number of RP units (UDA chart): 9,491
Number of Students: 6,644 (9,491 *0.7)
Elementary *0.39) 3,701 FCPS Goal enrollment 550 Students
(6.73 Elementary Schools)
Middle *0.14) 1,329 FCPS Goal enrollment 850 Students
(1.56 Middle Schools)
High *0.17) 1,613 FCPS Goal enrollment 1350 Students
(1.19 High Schools)
All Elementary School Facilities within the UDA are presently at or above programmed capacity.
The next two elementary schools to be constructed will relieve capacity issues at existing
facilities. It is anticipated that they will immediately meet their programmed capacities.
Capital Improvement Planning is of primary importance. Efforts to address the capital needs of
the school system, and potentially other public agencies, within the Comprehensive Plan and CIP
should be a priority effort in conjunction with the study of the UDA.
Land acquisition policies for public and school use should be addressed. Inventory, location,
development proffer guidelines, and the joint use of community facilities are components of the
Comprehensive Plan to be further developed.
Development of an enhanced relationship between the schools, planning, and parks and recreation
departments and boards should be fostered to enhance collaboration and facilitation of future
planning and operational needs of the County.
A joint Capital Facility Planning Group could be established as a result of the UDA Study that
would provide facilitation and direction in the County's future Comprehensive Planning and
Capital Improvement Planning efforts.
Stakeholder Participation Continued.
The UDA Working Group has identified additional stakeholder groups who should be engaged
during the following stages of the UDA Study. These groups include the Design Engineering
Community, the Top of Virginia Building Association, the Economic Development Commission,
the City of Winchester, the Chamber of Commerce, Real Estate Association, Home Owner
Association Groups, the Winchester Wheelmen, and large landowners from within the UDA.
Other Public Agencies with community facility needs will also be engaged during the UDA
Study. These agencies would include the Frederick Winchester Service Authority, the MPO,
Winchester Regional Airport Authority, Frederick County Departments of Emergency Services,
the Handley Regional Library, and Frederick County Department of Public Works.
Statement of intent.
The UDA Working Group believed it was important to develop an all encompassing sentence or
statement that effectively summarized the purpose of the UDA Study.
To that end:
Summary.
The UDA Study will address the 21' century needs of the urbanizing areas of Frederick
County. The study shall identify planning and development principles to affect a land use
plan that is proactive and creative, that will meet growth demands, assure a sustainable
community, and maintain a high quality of life for its citizens.
As previously noted, this report is provided in summary of the efforts of the UDA Working
Group to date and an identification of important issues to be addressed in the study. Please
consider the information contained in this report as you evaluate future land use decisions. This
report also serves as a basis for future direction for the UDA Study. Any input offered by the
Board at this point in the UDA Study process would be greatly appreciated. The UDA working
Group will continue to meet with additional stakeholders and further define a strategic scope to
the UDA Study based on input received. Please feel free to contact myself, Mike Ruddy, or Mr.
George Kriz, Chairman of the UDA Working Group Study effort with any input you would like
to offer.
Mike Ruddy, AICP
Deputy Director,
Department of Planning and Development
(540) 665 -5651
mruddy@co.frederick.va.us
George Kriz
Chairman,
UDA Study Working Group
(540) 667-1663
gkriz(Wvisuallink.com