Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-05 Comments (2)Delivery: Fed Ex Other Urgent Founded in 1971 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T AL Project Name: Senseny Village Final Proffer Statement File No: 3924 Date September 14, 2005 To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt Attn: Mike Ruddy GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540- 662 -4185 Copied Fax: 540- 722 -9528 U.S. Mail Courier Pick Up For Your Review As You Requested fl Please Comment Message: Hi Mike, Please find attached the final signed and notarized proffer statement for the Senseny Village Rezoning that provides for the information promised during the Board of Supervisors meeting on August 24, 2005. This should complete the outstanding matters associated with this project and allow you to finalize this application. Please contact our office when the final letter of approval is available and we will make arrangement to pick this up. Thank you for your assistance with this project! Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: August 26, 2005 Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: RSA/pd MEMORANDUM The amount of $50.00 was deposited in line item #3- 010 013030 -0007 for the company named below. The company had a deposit for one sign for Rezoning #04 -05 for Senseny Village. The company has returned the sign and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. Taylor Grace LLC 446 Fromans Rd Winchester, VA 22602 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665 -6395 CD CA O oo o 0 kn I fc� o Q .O N p Q Q 0 o x .4 p. III►m I- o cl) in I no 0 ct O G 7 P PT 2 3 p s RECEIVED-FROMM b l FIL t b ADDRESS s ta t AMT OF ACCOUNT AMT PAID 1 CASH CHECK MONEY ORDER- 1 1 L.BY 00 '00 00 00 *Balance Due .00 Pd by PLANNING Check 10466.00 VARIOUS BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PENALTY /INTEREST THRU THE MONTH 3/2005 1160001 1/2005 /BC 1147 )2 -00 i 1 ler of the 25 a.US .Pets /p.US curs to 5:00 pm pea times, watch TRATION AROP are true, full any oelief. TAX R E C E I P T 'ERICK COUNTY 'es _,WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR 0. BOX 225 WINCHESTER VA 22604 -0225 ZONING APPLICATIONS Previous Balance Principal Being Paid Penalty Interest Amount Paid Balance Due Ticket #:00013310001 Date 3/24/2005 Register: BCC /BC Trans. 40147 Dept ZASP Acct# 10429.00 10429.00 .00 .00 10429.00 Pd by PLANNING BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PE NALTY /INTEREST THRU THE cMONTH0966. /0 VARIOUS 3/2005 .00 Eric Lawrence From: Jeremy Tweedie [jtweedie @greenwayeng.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 3:12 PM To: Eric Lawrence (E -mail) Cc: Mark D. Smith; dave @morlyn.net; Judy Chow Subject: RE: Senseny Village Rossum Lane Eric, This email is to confirm Greenway's attendance for Monday's on -site meeting. Thank you Jeremy Tweedie Original Message From: Eric Lawrence mailto :elawrenc ©co.frederick.va.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:02 PM To: Mark D. Smith Cc: Alexander, Scott; 'Ingram, Lloyd'; 'John Bishop' Subject: Senseny Village Rossum Lane Mark- 9/26/2006 Please confirm your or your representative's attendance at this site meeting. Thanks -Eric Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Director, Department of Planning and Development Frederick County 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 540 665 -5651 540 665 -6395 (fax) Page 1 of 1 As noted in a voice mail left for you earlier today, VDOT and Planning staff will be meeting on site (Rossum Lane) on Monday, October 2 9am to evaluate the most appropriate road improvements to implement the Senseny Village project while recognizing the existing residences. We request that Greenway Engineering and the developer participate in this site meeting in an effort to reach consensus on the improvement. The benefits of the site meeting is that all involved could clearly understand /visualize the impacts the road improvement may have on the adjacent residents. Proximity to homes and existing parking availability will be considered. We would anticipate gaining group consensus on the number and width of lanes necessary to offer safe access for the new project as well as the existing residents. Grecnuay Engineering REZONING: November 22, 2704; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 19, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14,2005 SENSENY VILLAGE PROFFER STATEMENT RZ# Rural Areas (RA) and Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) with Conditions PROPERTIES: 73.79 -acres Tax Parcels 65- ((A)) -49B and 65- ((A)) -55 RECORD OWNERS: Hazel C. Lambert Taylor Grace, LLC APPLICANT: Taylor Grace, LLC PROJECT NAME: Senseny Village ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: November 22, 2004 REVISION DATE: June 14, 2005 Preliminary Matters Senseny Village Reaming Pursuant to Section 15.2 -2296 et. seq. of the Code of Virginia, (1950, as amended), (the "Code and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned applicants hereby proffer that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application for the rezoning of 49.70- acrest from the Rural Areas (RA) District to Residential Performance (RP) District, and for the rezoning of 24.09 acres± currently zoned Residential Performance (RP) District to proffered Residential Performance (RP) District, development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and have no binding effect whatsoever. Upon approval of such rezoning, these proffers shall be binding upon the applicants and their successors and assigns. The subject property. identified as Senseny Village, and more particularly described as the lands owned by Hazel C. Lambert, (the "Owner of the first parcel being all of Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A)) -55 and further described by Will Book 115 at page 1563. and the lands owned by Taylor Grace. LLC, (the "Owner of the second parcel being all of Tax Map Parcel 65 -((A)) -498 and further described by Instrument #050002909. Ftic W3924IEA W Grcenway Engineering A.) Residential Land Use November 22,20444; December 29, 2004 January 17, 200S,, February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005, April 14, 2005 lune 14, 2005 Senseny Village Reaming The Applicants hereby proffer to limit the total number of residential units to 285 dwelling units on the combined subject properties of Tax Map Parcels 65- ((A)) -49B and 65- ((A)) -55. 2. The Applicants hereby proffer to prohibit the development of garden apartments, as defined in Section 165 -65L of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Applicants hereby proffer to develop the residential dwelling units in accordance with the following annualized phasing plan. All dwelling units not developed within the specified calendar year shall be carried forward to the ensuing calendar years: .7 CALENDAR YEAR TOTAL BUILDING PERMITS 2005 70 2006 70 2007 70 2008 75 TOTAL 285 B.) Generalized Development Plan and Master Development Plan 1. The Applicants hereby proffer to submit a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of street systems, residential land use areas and open space areas within the Senseny Village Community. The final engineering documents for Senseny Village will be in substantial conformance with the proffered GDP; however, it is recognized that modifications to the final road alignment may occur due to site development constraints such as wetlands or steep slopes. The final engineering documents will ensure that the Senseny Village Community provides for a street extension/connection to Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Glenridge Drive (Route 865), an internal street system that connects to both of the extended streets, and an inter -parcel connection to Tax Map Parcel 65 -((A))-72.. The Generalized Development Plan (GDP) has been designed to provide for single family' detached residential lots to adjoin the Glenmont Village Subdivision and the existing residential lots along Rossum Lane, Mason Street and Broad Avenue on Tax Map Parcel 65- File k3924/EA W 2 Grcenway Engineering C.) Transportation November 22,2004; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2035; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005 S enseny Village Reaming ((A)) -55. Furthermore, the GDP has been designed to provide for open space adjacent to Glenmont Village Section 6 on Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A)) -49B. A no disturbance easement that is 10 -feet in width shall be provided along the rear property line of all single- family detached residential lots that abut Glenmont Village and the existing residential lots along Rossum Lane, Mason Street and Broad Avenue for the purpose of preserving existing woodlands on Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A)) -55. The open space adjacent to Glenmont Village Section 6 shall remain undisturbed between the state street serving the townhouse lots and the existing residential lots within Glenmont Village Section 6 on Tax Map Parcel 65 -((A)) -49B. 4. A no disturbance easement shall be established within the open space areas that are associated with the natural drainageways to protect the integrity of the waterways and the upland slope areas. The only activity that may occur within this no disturbance easement will include utility installation and a single road crossing to provide access to the southern portion of Tax Map Parcel 65 -((A)) -49B. 5. A Preliminary Master Development Plan will be submitted for the portion of the subject property that is located on Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A)) -49B to demonstrate how this portion of the subject property would be developed. Board of Supervisor approval of this Preliminary Master Development Plan concept does not bind the Board of Supervisors to any action on this rezoning application. Additionally, Board of Supervisor approval of this Preliminary Master Development Plan concept does not eliminate the requirement for a Master Development Plan for the entire 73.79 acres +1- subject site. The applicants hereby proffer monetary' contributions that are to be utilized for improvements to the Senseny Road (Route 657) corridor and/or a proposed north -south connector between Senseny Road and Berryville Pike (U.S. Route 7). The contributions, in the amount of $5 per single family detached unit and $3,000 per townhouse unit, total a potential maximum of $1.145 million dollars. The applicants authorize the use of these contributions as matching funds by Frederick County for transportation improvements to these roadways. This monetary contribution shall be provided to Frederick County at the time of building permit issuance for each dwelling unit. File 53924/EAW 3 Greenway Engineering November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005: April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005 Senseny Village Reaming 2. The applicants hereby proffer to design and construct right turn lanes (and tapers) of eleven -foot width, and to include curb /gutter, on Senseny Road at the Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867) intersections, within the existing Senseny Road right -of- way. The construction of these improvements shall occur prior to the issuance of the first building permit, but will not restrict site grading and infrastructure installation on the subject properties. 3. The applicants hereby proffer to design and construct improvements to Rossum Lane (Route 736), to consist of a VDOT standard pavement section of thirty -six feet from face -of -curb, and to include curb /gutter, street lights and storm sewer, within the existing Rossum Lane right of -way. Furthermore, traffic calming measures will be considered during the design of the Rossum Lane improvement project. The construction of these improvements shall occur prior to the issuance of the first building permit, but will not restrict site grading and infrastructure installation on the subject properties. 4. The applicants hereby proffer to design the internal street system to provide two means of access to Senseny Road via both Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867) for all residential lots. Traffic calming measures will be considered during the design of the internal street system connections to Rossum Lane, Glenridge Drive, and Tax Map Parcel 65- ((A)) -72 if desired by VDOT. 5. The applicants hereby proffer to provide for a right -of -way dedication for the future Route 37 Eastern Bypass as identified on the proffered GDP. This right -of -way dedication shall be provided to Frederick County at no cost within 90 days after receiving written request from Frederick County that the right -of -way is needed. D.) Monetary Contributions The applicants hereby proffer monetary contributions in the amount of $10,000.00 for each detached single- family dwelling unit, and $8.000.00 for each townhouse dwelling unit, to mitigate impacts to capital facilities as identified in the Frederick County Capital Facilities Fiscal Impact Model Output Module prepared by the Frederick County Planning Department on November 19, 2004. This monetary contribution shall be provided to Frederick County at the time of building permit issuance for each dwelling unit. File 03924/EAW 4 Grecnway F,nginccring E.) Community Trash Collection November 22,2004; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14, 2005 Scnseny Village Rezming The Applicants hereby proffer to provide commercial trash pickup and waste removal service to all residential land uses within the Senseny Village community. The commercial trash pickup and waste removal service shall be established by deed covenant and shall be assigned to the Senseny Village Homeowners Association "HOA or sub association at such time as identified in the legal documents setting forth the guidelines for the Senseny Village HOA or sub association. The commercial trash pickup and waste removal service shall remain in effect and be the responsibility of the Senseny Village HOA or sub association until such a time that this service is provided by Frederick County or other municipal providers. File 93924IEA W 5 Grcenway Engineering F.) Signatures The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the assigns and successors in the interest of the Applicants who constitute the owners of the Property. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered foregoing conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: 20(25 by File b3924JEA W November 22, 2004; December 29, 2004 January 17, 2005; February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14,2005 Hazel Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of ;In/Mirk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11 it day of My Commission Expires 1 l /ig 3/ O To Wit: Date Senseny Village Rezoning t Grcenway Engineering F.) Signatures The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the assigns and successors in the interest of the Applicants who constitute the owners of the Property. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered foregoing conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully S. •mined: 20DS by November 22,2004, December 29,2004 January 17, 2025: February 24, 2005 March 17, 2005; April 14, 2005 June 14,2005 By: �t1t1/ t� 16 Tay or- Grace, LLC Date Denver Quinnelly, Man e tember Commonwealth of Virginia, I City /County of '1— r& (I C .K To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ILLday of 1 l z IL-_ e rwy2_2_ C ul nr\e I I� My Commission Expires 9 —.30-bLe Senseny Village Reaming File 03924/EA W 6 February 28, 2005 Mr. Andy Conlan Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Re: Preliminary Comments Senseny Village Rezoning Application. Dear Andy: Thank you for forwarding to this office the Senseny Village rezoning application materials for our continued review. The TIA for this project was received on February 15, 2005 and the latest version of the proffer statement which recognizes the recent change in ownership of the property and updated transportation commitments was received via e- mail on February 24, 2005. The following letter is offered to assist you as you continue to address the issues associated with this rezoning application. As customary, it is anticipated that these issues will be fully addressed through revisions to the application prior to its consideration by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. 1) Preliminary Matters a) The Code of Virginia, Section 15.2- 2204.C. requires that the CEO of the adjacent locality is notified if the property is within 1/2 mile of the boundary of the adjoining locality. Please demonstrate if this provision of the State Code is applicable with this application. 2) Impact Analysis and Proffer Statement a) The introduction to the project in the impact statement identifies a specific mix of housing types (145 single family detached and 140 townhouse units). Such a mix has not been proffered by the applicant and should be removed from the discussion. Alternately, the applicant could specify the mix of housing types in the proffer statement. Page 2 Mr. Andy Conlan Re: Preliminary Comments Senseny Village Rezoning Application February 28, 2005 b) It is more appropriate, and indeed necessary, to identify and address the environmental features that exist on this site as part of the rezoning exercise. Areas with environmental constraints may exist on the property that warrant particular attention and should be a consideration of the rezoning application. In particular, there appears to areas with critical slope and drainage issues on the property. c) The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Plan should be considered when discussing this application. A preliminary review of this element of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that Route 37 is a consideration with this application. I have included a copy of the Route 37 East Corridor Study Plans in the vicinity of this project for your information and use. d) Access to this property is described to be via Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle and Glenridge Drive. Detail should be provided with the rezoning application regarding the existing conditions and cross section of these existing neighborhood streets. It should be demonstrated that sufficient right -of -way exists to accommodate the additional traffic volumes and any improvements necessary to achieve an appropriate typical section. The impacts to the property owners who reside along Rossum Lane, Twinbrook Circle, and Glenridge Drive should also be addressed in this application. e) The Senseny Village application is adjacent to several developed subdivisions and other undeveloped properties. Opportunities for additional inter parcel connectivity should be evaluated and pursued with this application. In particular, to the property to the southwest. Residential development of this intensity requires pedestrian accommodations. Interparcel pedestrian connectivity should also be a consideration of this application. I) The TIA indicates that the Senseny Road/Twinbrook Circle intersection will not maintain an acceptable level of service during build out conditions. Please ensure that a solution is provided to achieve an acceptable level of service at this location. It should be demonstrated that sufficient right -of -way is available to implement this solution. g) The application identifies a fiscal contribution to offset identified road improvements associated with this project. It is important to recognize in the application that based upon the open mix (not proffered) of residential uses proposed in the application, 285 single family attached units would be permitted. This would generate $855,000 as opposed to the $1,145,000 identified in the impact statement and proffer statement. Page 3 Mr. Andy Conlan Re: Preliminary Comments Senseny Village Rezoning Application February 28, 2005 h) The applicant has proffered to fund or implement several transportation improvements. It would be appropriate to further detail the scope of the specific improvements, both immediate and future, to provide certainty in the desirability and function of the improvements. It would appear as though a coordinated and committed approach would be most beneficial and eliminate any future confusion regarding the implementation of the transportation program. i) Consistent with County policy, it would be appropriate to insure that any proffered transportation improvements associated with the application are provided at the beginning of the project. Any monetary contribution should be provided prior to the onset of the project and not at the time of individual building permit issuance. J) k) Recent rezoning applications have proffered that a private refuse collection service will be used to collect the solid waste generated by their particular project. It would be desirable for this application to consider such an approach. This is beneficial as it potentially reduces the individual usage of the County's convenience sites. Reference to the number of single family attached units in the Solid Waste Disposal section should be removed unless the applicant is willing to proffer a specific mix of residential uses. 1) The impacts to community facilities were evaluated using the County's fiscal impact model and were based upon a specific mix of residential uses requested by the applicant. The County will provide an updated output based upon a worst case scenario should the mix of uses not be secured within the proffer statement. It would also be desirable to have the application provide a break down of the proffered amount based on the public entities receiving the funds. Please feel free to contact me at any time regarding the above comments or the application in general. I look forward to continuing our participation in the review of this application. Sincerely, Water and wastewater evaluations provided in the impact statement should be viewed in relationship to other previously approved projects within the County. A combined and updated figure for water resources and wastewater capacity would be beneficial when determining the adequacy of the capacity and resources. Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Planning Director MTR/bad Forded in 1971 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T AL Project Name: Senseny Village- Master Development Plan File No: 3924 Date June 3, 2005 To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt/dim Attn: Mike Ruddy GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540- 662 -4185 Copied Fax: 540- 722 -9528 Delivery: Fed Ex U.S. Mail Courier Pick Up Other n Urgent N For Your Review As You Requested Please Comment Message: Mike, Attached are 2 copies of the Master Development Plan Exhibit. Call with any questions or need for additional copies. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received By: Date: Jr I l J JUN 32005 F,-.1. .,r,:; COU.JTY PL L MEiNT rounded in 1971 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T AL Project Name: Senseny Village Rezoning Revised Proffer Statement File No: 3924 Date June 16, 2005 To: FC Planning Attn: Mike Ruddy Copied Urgent For Your Review From: Evan Wyatt GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540 -662 -4185 Fax: 540- 722 -9528 n As You Requested Please Comment Message: Hi Mike, Please find attached a copy of the revised proffer statement for the Senseny Village Rezoning that reflects the issues we discussed. I have also provided a copy that shows the new language in bold /italic text to make your review easier. We have forwarded the revised proffers to the property owners for signature and will submit them to you once they are received. Thank you, Evan Greenway Engineering Telephone 540- 662 -4185 FAX 540- 722 -9528 www.greenwayeng.com Founded in 1971 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny Village Rezoning File No: 3924 Date June 17, 2005 Attn: Mike Ruddy Copied To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540- 662 -4185 Fax: 540- 722 -9528 rl Urgent n For Your Review fl As You Requested Please Comment Message: Hi Mike, Please find attached the revised proffer statement for the Seseny Village Rezoning with original owner and notary signatures. This revised proffer provides for all items that we discussed during our meeting yesterday. 1 will provide you with 69 color copies of the new GDP and any revisions to the Impact Statement when 1 return after next week. Thanks again for your assistance with this project. Please contact me if you any additional information regarding this matter. Thanks! Evan 1 JUN 2 0 2005 Greenway Engineering Telephone 540 -662 -4185 FAX 540- 722 -9528 www.greenwayeng.com Mr. Andy Conlon Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Senseny Village Rezoning Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Conlon: January 12, 2005 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665 -5643 FAX: 540/678 -0682 We have completed our review of the application related to the proposed rezoning of property referred to as Senseny Village. It is our understanding that the proposed project will include the incorporation of an 18.6 acre parcel currently zoned RP and 50 acres currently zoned RA. The 50 acres is currently accessed from Rossum Lane; whereas, access to the 18.6 acre parcel is limited .to a dedicated easement off of Glenridge Drive. The 18.6 acre parcel is bisected by an unnamed tributary to the Opequon Creek and is characterized by incised drainage swales and steep slopes. Road construction within this parcel will be difficult especially at the stream crossing and within the steep sloped areas. Also, the 100 year flood plain and existing wetlands will have a significant impact on construction within this parcel. Based on our review of the impact analysis and proffer statement, we offer the following specific comments: 1) The introduction of the impact analysis indicates that the development will consist of285 residential units with a build -out date of2008. This date conflicts with the date of 2010 referenced under transportation discussions. This conflict needs to be resolved. 2) Refer to access under site suitability. As previously indicated, access is proposed via a platted inter parcel connection located on Glenridge Drive. Because of the existing topography and associated drainage features, this point of ingress- egress will be difficult to construct. 3) Under Flood Plains, the analysis indicates that the subject site is located outside the 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Senseny Village Rezoning Comments Page 2 January 12, 2005 100 2 year flood plain. This statement may be true for the Opequon Creek; however, it.is not applicable for the flood plain associated with the unnamed tributary which bisects the 18.6 acre parcel. The discussion of the flood plain issue should be revised to reflect the actual 100 -year flood plains associated with the properties in question, 4) The discussion of impacts on wetlands only identifies one (I) manmade impoundment which will be drained and filled to accommodate development. Our site visit in December, 2004 revealed many more areas which we believe could be classified as wetlands. There was evidence at the time of our site visit that attempts had been made to delineate the wetland areas. If disturbed during development, these areas should be remediated in accordance with the guidelines imposed by the U. S. Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Quality. 5) Under steep slopes, the analysis concluded that there are no steep slopes on the subject site. Based on our review of the topographic surveys furnished with the application, we conclude that there are numerous areas where the steep slope requirement applies. These areas can easily be delineated and will have a significant impact on development especially on that portion of the 18.6 acre parcel located on the south side of the unnamed tributary to the Opequon Creek. 6) Under transportation, the discussion indicates that a traffic impact analysis (T /A) was included as a component of the application Package. A copy of the T/A was not included in the application provided for our review. In particular, we are concerned about -the impact of the development on Glenridge Drive as well as the other major roads which access the proposed sites. 7) The discussion of sewage conveyance and treatment references the Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility as the destination for the final treatment. This reference is incorrect. To our knowledge, the sewage flows to the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. You will need to coordinate the available capacity with the Sanitation Authority to determine if the existing conditions will accommodate the proposed development. We will not approve a master development plan until we receive confirmation from the Sanitation Authority verifying the available capacity. 8) The impact on solid waste facilities was limited to the availability of disposal capacity at the landfill and the reference to providing dumpsters for the townhouses. There was no, mention about refuse collection for the single family dwellings. Our closest solid waste convenience site is located behind the Greenwood Fire Hall. This site has been inundated by the influx of existing Senseny Village Rezoning Comments Page 3 January 12, 2005 I IES /rls cc: Planning and Development file C:: \Cb rel \Word Perfrrl \Khuutl el +enccillrriti ''1 'pd Sincerely, development. Any further development would exacerbate the problem unless the applicant or subsequent developer would be willing to upgrade the existing convenience site or provide curbside trash pickup which would negate the need for the upgrade. The discussion of solid waste has overlooked a very important issue which is the location of the proposed development relative to the existing landfill. The existing landfill is located less than one fourth of a mile from the southern most boundary of the proposed development. Based on the existing site elevations compared to the future vertical expansion elevations at the landfill, it is apparent that the residential development will have a clear view of the landfill unless all of the existing trees can be saved. Indicate how the applicant or developer plans to inform the prospective home buyers of this future condition prior to purchase. We will insure that this information is provided as part of our building permitting process. 9) Under the proffer statement (B.4), the applicant proffers to design the internal street system to provide itwo (2) means of access to Senseny Road. Indicate if this statement also implies the construction of any improvements required to upgrade Twinbrook Circle and Glenridge Drive. 1 can be reached at 665-5643 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works L DU JAN 1 3 2005 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Fvunded in 79:1 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny VillageRezoning File No: 3924 Date 11/29/04 Attn: Mike Ruddy Copied Urgent 1 1 For Your Review To: FC Planning From: Andy Conlon/ad GREENWAY ENGINEE RING Phone: 540- 662 -4185 Fax: 540- 722 -9528 As You Requested V Please Comment Message: Mike Please find attached one copy of the following_ Rezoning Application Impact Statement Exhibits Traffic Impact Analysis Request for Comments Thank you for your assistance, please call with any questions or need for additional information. Greenway Engineering Telephone 540- 662 -4185 FAX 540- 722 -9528 www.greenwayeng.com FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Planning Department Comments: Superintendent's Signature Date: Notice to Fianninp Department Please Return This Form to the pnlicant Rezoning Comments Planning Department Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Applicant's Name: Greenwav Engineering Attn.: Andy Conlon, AICP Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Current zoning: RA RP p[ C[ NINC NOV 3 0 2004 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665 -5651 'Th Applicant: Please fill outthe information as accurately aspossible in order to assist th PlanningDepartment with this review{ Attach a'copy of your application form, locatiolt map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent' information SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File #3924) Telephone: (540) 662 -4185 Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). Zoning requested: RP Acreage: 68.6 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 T R A N S M I T T A L Project Name: Senseny Village Rezoning File No: 3924 Date 2/15/05 Attn: Mike Ruddy Copied To: FC Planning Urgent n For Your Review From: Andy Conlon GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540- 662 -4185 Fax: 540- 722 -9528 0) FEB15 2005 Lo FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT n As You Requested Please Comment Message: MME Please find attached one copy of the following: Traffic Impact Analysis Thank you for your assistance, please call with any questions or need for additional information. Greenway Engineering Telephone 540- 662 -4185 FAX 540- 722 -9528 www.greenwayeng.com GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Project Name: Senseny Village Rezoning File No: 3924 Date March 23, 2005 To: FC Planning Attn: Milce Ruddy Copied Urgent For Your Review TRANSMITTAL From: Evan Wyatt/dim GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540- 662 -4185 Fax: 540- 722 -9528 Greenway Engineering Telephone 540- 662 -4185 FAX 540- 722 -9528 www.greenwayeng.com E MAR 232005 ['ERICK COUNTY P V I,OPMENT As You Requested Please Comment Message: Milce, Attached is the following for the above rezoning project: Signed Rezoning application Application fee check for $10,429.00 Zoning and Location Map (69 copies) Future Rt 37 Location Map Review Aaency Comments Signed /notarized Special Limited Power of Attorney forms Signed /notarized Proffer Statement Impact Analysis Statement -Deed to property Verification of taxes paid -Hazel Lambert Boundary Survey Plat (69 copies) Traffic Impact Analysis (1 spiral bound copy and 1 unbound copy) FC Planning comment sheet Thank you for your assistance. Call with any questions or need for additional copies or information FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HA VE COMPLETED. Candice David Mark Susan Eric 0 Document Approval Form Received by Clerical Staff (Date Time)::.S -P 1, INITIALS DATE TIME 51( Q5 2.5 M COMMENTS: 9/b o2. n V AR 3 D 2 20(5