Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-05 CommentsMr. Andy Conlon Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Senseny Village Rezoning Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Conlon: January 12, 2005 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665 -5643 FAX: 540/678 -0682 We have completed our review of the application related to the proposed rezoning of property referred to as Senseny Village. It is our understanding that the proposed project will include the incorporation of an 18.6 acre parcel currently zoned RP and 50 acres currently zoned RA. The 50 acres is currently accessed from Rossum Lane; whereas, access to the 18.6 acre parcel is limited to a dedicated easement off of Glenridge Drive. The 18.6 acre parcel is bisected by an unnamed tributary to the Opequon Creek and is characterized by incised drainage swales and steep slopes. Road construction within this parcel will be difficult especially at the stream crossing and within the steep sloped areas. Also, the 100 year flood plain and existing wetlands will have a significant impact on construction within this parcel. Based on our review of the impact analysis and proffer statement, we offer the following specific comments: 1) The introduction of the impact analysis indicates that the development will consist of 285 residential units with a build -out date of 2008. This date conflicts with the date of 2010 referenced under transportation discussions. This conflict needs to be resolved. 2) Refer to access under site suitability. As previously indicated, access is proposed via a platted inter parcel connection located on Glenridge Drive. Because of the existing topography and associated drainage features, this point of ingress egress will be difficult to construct. 3) Under Flood Plains, the analysis indicates that the subject site is locat 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 JAN 1 3 2005 LB" Senseny Village Rezoning Comments Page 2 January 12, 2005 100 -year flood plain. This statement may be true for the Opequon Creek; however, it is not applicable for the flood plain associated with the unnamed tributary which bisects the 18.6 acre parcel. The discussion of the flood plain issue should be revised to reflect the actual I00 -year flood plains associated with the properties in question. 4) The discussion of impacts on wetlands only identifies one (1) manmade impoundment which will be drained and filled to accommodate development. Our site visit in December, 2004 revealed many more areas which we believe could be classified as wetlands. There was evidence at the time of our site visit that attempts had been made to delineate the wetland areas. If disturbed during development, these areas should be remediated in accordance with the guidelines imposed by the U. S. Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Quality. 5) Under steep slopes, the analysis concluded that there are no steep slopes on the subject site. Based on our review of the topographic surveys furnished with the application, we conclude that there are numerous areas where the steep slope requirement applies. These areas can easily be delineated and will have a significant impact on development especially on that portion of the 18.6 acre parcel located on the south side of the unnamed tributary to the Opequon Creek. 6) Under transportation, the discussion indicates that a traffic impact analysis (T /A) was included as a component of the application package. A copy of the T/A was not included in the application provided for our review. In particular, we are concerned about the impact of the development on Glenridge Drive as well as the other major roads which access the proposed sites. 7) The discussion of sewage conveyance and treatment references the Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility as the destination for the final treatment. This reference is incorrect. To our knowledge, the sewage flows to the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. You will need to coordinate the available capacity with the Sanitation Authority to determine if the existing conditions will accommodate the proposed development. We will not approve a master development plan until we receive confirmation from the Sanitation Authority verifying the available capacity. 8) The impact on solid waste facilities was limited to the availability of disposal capacity at the landfill and the reference to providing dumpsters for the townhouses. There was no mention about refuse collection for the single family dwellings. Our closest solid waste convenience site is located behind the Greenwood Fire Hall. This site has been inundated by the influx of existing Senseny Village Rezoning Comments Page 3 January 12, 2005 development. Any further development would exacerbate the problem unless the applicant or subsequent developer would be willing to upgrade the existing convenience site or provide curbside trash pickup which would negate the need for the upgrade. I can be reached at 665-5643 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. HES /rls The discussion of solid waste has overlooked a very important issue which is the location of the proposed development relative to the existing landfill. The existing landfill is located less than one -fourth of a mile from the southern most boundary of the proposed development. Based on the existing site elevations compared to the future vertical expansion elevations at the landfill, it is apparent that the residential development will have a clear view of the landfill unless all of the existing trees can be saved. Indicate how the applicant or developer plans to inform the prospective home buyers of this future condition prior to purchase. We will insure that this information is provided as part of our building permitting process. 9) Under the proffer statement (B.4), the applicant proffers to design the internal street system to provide two (2) means of access to Senseny Road. Indicate if this statement also implies the construction of any improvements required to upgrade Twinbrook Circle and Glenridge Drive. cc: Planning and Development file C: \Corel \Nord Perfect\ Rhonda \sensenraillreznnnmpd Sincerely, N (l,J "t?1(.ht Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works ILE C0P1 February 28, 2005 Mr. Andy Conlan Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665 -6395 Re: Preliminary Comments Senseny Village Rezoning Application. Dear Andy: Thank you for forwarding to this office the Senseny Village rezoning application materials for our continued review. The TIA for this project was received on February 15, 2005 and the latest version of the proffer statement which recognizes the recent change in ownership of the property and updated transportation commitments was received via e- mail on February 24, 2005. The following letter is offered to assist you as you continue to address the issues associated with this rezoning application. As customary, it is anticipated that these issues will be fully addressed through revisions to the application prior to its consideration by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. 1) Preliminary Matters a) The Code of Virginia, Section 15.2- 2204.C. requires that the CEO of the adjacent locality is notified if the property is within 1/2 mile of the boundary of the adjoining locality. Please demonstrate if this provision of the State Code is applicable with this application. 2) Impact Analysis and Proffer Statement a) The introduction to the project in the impact statement identifies a specific mix of housing types (145 single family detached and 140 townhouse units). Such a mix has not been proffered by the applicant and should be removed from the discussion. Alternately, the applicant could specify the mix of housing types in the proffer statement. 107 North Kent Street. Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Page 2 Mr. Andy Conlan Re: Preliminary Comments Senseny Village Rezoning Application February 28, 2005 b) It is more appropriate, and indeed necessary, to identify and address the environmental features that exist on this site as part of the rezoning exercise. Areas with environmental constraints may exist on the property that warrant particular attention and should be a consideration of the rezoning application. In particular, there appears to areas with critical slope and drainage issues on the property. c) The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Plan should be considered when discussing this application. A preliminary review of this element of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that Route 37 is a consideration with this 5( e 1 tit f the ,application. vicinity ofhhis project for your the useast Corridor Study Plans in d) Access to this property is described to be via Rossum Lane and Twinbrook Circle and Glenridge Drive. Detail should be provided with the rezoning application regarding the existing conditions and cross section of these existing neighborhood streets. It should be demonstrated that sufficient right -of -way exists to accommodate the additional traffic volumes and any improvements necessary to achieve an appropriate typical section. The impacts to the property owners who reside along Rossum Lane, Twinbrook Circle, and Glenridge Drive should also be addressed in this application. e) The Senseny Village application is adjacent to several developed subdivisions and other undeveloped properties. Opportunities for additional inter parcel connectivity should be evaluated and pursued with this application. In particular, to the property to the southwest. Residential development of this intensity requires pedestrian accommodations Interparcel pedestrian connectivity should also be a consideration of this application. f) The TIA indicates that the Senseny Road /Twinbrook Circle intersection will not maintain an acceptable level of service during build out conditions. Please ensure that a solution is provided to achieve an acceptable level of service at this location. It should be demonstrated that sufficient right -of -way is available to implement this solution. g) The application identifies a fiscal contribution to offset identified road improvements associated with this project. It is important to recognize in the application that based upon the open mix (not proffered) of residential uses proposed in the application, 285 single family attached units would be permitted. This would generate $855,000 as opposed to the $1,145,000 identified in the impact statement and proffer statement. j) Sincerely, MTRJbad Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Planning Director Page 3 Mr. Andy Conlan Re: Preliminary Comments Senseny Village Rezoning Application February 28, 2005 h) The applicant has proffered to fund or implement several transportation improvements. It would be appropriate to further detail the scope of the specific improvements, both immediate and future, to provide certainty in the desirability and function of the improvements. It would appear as though a coordinated and committed approach would be most beneficial and eliminate any future confusion regarding the implementation of the transportation program i) Consistent with County policy, it would be appropriate to insure that any proffered transportation improvements associated with the application are provided at the beginning of the project. Any monetary contribution should be provided prior to the onset of the project and not at the time of individual building permit issuance. Water and wastewater evaluations provided in the impact statement should be viewed in relationship to other previously approved projects within the County. A combined and updated figure for water resources and wastewater capacity would be beneficial when determining the adequacy of the capacity and resources. k) Recent rezoning applications have proffered that a private refuse collection service will be used to collect the solid waste generated by their particular project. It would be desirable for this application to consider such an approach. This is beneficial as it potentially reduces the individual usage of the County' s convenience sites. Reference to the number of single family attached units in the Solid Waste Disposal section should be removed unless the applicant is willing to proffer a specific mix of residential uses. 1) The impacts to community facilities were evaluated using the County' s fiscal impact model and were based upon a specific mix of residential uses requested by the applicant. The County will provide an updated output based upon a worst case scenario should the mix of uses not be secured within the proffer statement. It would also be desirable to have the application provide a break down of the proffered amount based on the public entities receiving the funds. Please feel free to contact me at any time regarding the above comments or the application in general. I look forward to continuing our participation in the review of this application. Virginia Department of Transportation Comments: See attached letter from VDOT to Greenway Engineering dated February 5, LUUS. P VDOT Signature Date: l r J f R o s' aT— P i t< s RE:"t rn 'kn]r 11): Rezoning Comments Applicant's Name: Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: VirginiaDepartment of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (540) 984-5600 Applicant: Please fill outthe information as accurately as possible inorder to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review Attach three copies ;of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File #3924) Greenwav Engineering Attn.: Andy Conlon, AICP Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill lane Winchester, VA 22602 Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). Current zoning: RA RP Zoning requested: RP Hand deliver to: VirginiaDepartment of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 1550 Commerce Street Winchester, Virginia Telephone: (540) 662 -4185 Acreage: 68.6 Philip A. Shucet COMMISSIONER February 8, 2005 Andy Conlon, AICP C/O Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Mr. Conlon: LAI/rf Enclosure Comment Sheet COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Ref: Senseny Village Route 657 Frederick County DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE EDINBURG, VA 22824 The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 657. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Senseny Village Rezoning Application dated November 22, 2004 with proffers revised December 29, 2004 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right -of -way needs, including right -of -way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right -of -way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Sincer &ly, e i si Lloyd A. Ingrain, Transportation Engineer VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TEL (540)984 -5600 FAX (540)984 -5607 Fire Marshal's Comments: AP Is I• a 4, AL t.... l, Fire Marshal' s Signature Date: ...,:a-sa \IC'' 4.,t Notice to Fire Marshal Please Return This Form to the Applicant Rezoning Comments Mail to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Fire Rescue Dept. 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia22601 (540) 665-6350 Frederick County Fire Marshal Hand deliver to: Frederick County Attn: Fire Marshal County Administration Bldg., 1st Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: lPlease fihl outthe iriformation as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Fire Marshal with his review Attach a copy of yonr applieation form, loeation map, proffer statement, irnpact analysis, and any other pertinent information. SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File#3924) Applicatt's Name: Greenwav Engineering Attn.: Andy Conlon. AICP Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Current zoning: RA RP Zoning requested: RP Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Acreage: 68.6 Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). ?:yVIRGINIA�?� Control number RZ04 -0018 Project Name Senseny Village Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning RA RP Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Adequate Siamese Location Not Identified Access Comments Additional Comments Plan Approval Recommended Yes Emergency Vehicle Access Comments There should be two site access points during tan Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office'of the Fire Marshal. Plan Review and Comments Date received 11/30/2004 Tax ID Number 65 -A -49B 55 City Winchester Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System No Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway /Aisleway Width Adequate clearing and burning of land clearin Reviewed By Timothy L. Welsh Applicant Greenway Engineering Fire District 18 State VA Signature Title Date reviewed 12/8/2004 Zip 22602 Rescue District 18 Fire Lane Required No Special Hazards Yes Election District Redbud Yes .brls will nd, pe rn tted. Date Revised Applicant Phone 540 6624185 -liPLAN 1.-.Y-F1at f9RIE MARSHAL-FREDERICK-COUNTY Rezonintr Comments Name of Fire Rescue Company: Company 18 Greenwood Station Volunteer F &R Co. Winchester, Virginia Eddie Keeler Chief Applicant's Name: Greenwav Engineering Mtn.: Andy Conlon, AICP Mailing Address: 151 Win Hdy ill Lane Winchester. VA 22602 Current zoning: RA RP Td WdT4:TO 4002 ZZ Fire and Rescue Company Address Phone P.O. Box 3023 Winchester, VA 22604 phppe: (540) 667 -9411 Fax: �pplteaut. Pleaseftll Outth infanuatiafl as accurately asposst a to s ttd to assist the ire and LescuoSquad wttlr therr rernew Attac a 4fep of your atio appihcnrform,,locatio iroffetstatemeilt and any other pertrtient informatton SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File #3924) Fire and Rescue Company's Comments: 4. YA.nl rr. ticr�i 4 °tit 7 .5LU 1 •-GILd/✓a� Telephone: (549) 662 -4185 Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrggk Circle (Route 867). Zoning requested: RP Acreage 68.6 in -t 5 (2_I S A AAA rep iai Fire &Rescue Company's a �L J Signature Date: w /r z- 61 Pioiirc t:1 Fire Rescue Comp:anv Please Return This Form is tlzc s,eniicant LT46L9904S ON XHd 1N5W1Nbd30 2dld COOMN2389 WOdA Sanitation Authority Comments: $A1//// 4 5 7 C 0 •4/ U7 9 Sanitation Authority Signature Date: trfi7E-4 c M: 4;-' 1 Lo-/ ./-*ce Notice to Sanitation Anthority Please Return This Form to the Ap 1) a `V.IAT Rezonin2 Comments Mailing Address: Applicant's Name: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 868-1061 Applicant: Please fill outthe information as accurately as possible in order to assist the ganitatiOn!EAUthotity your application form,Iocation map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File#3924) Greenway Engineering Attn 'Andy Conlin AICP 151 Windy Hill lane Winchester. VA 22602 Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). Current zoning: RA RP Zoning requested: RP Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Acreage: 68.6 By DEC 0 1 2004 Fred-Winc Service Authority Comments: mesa 0,41 ached Fred-Winc Service Authority Signature Date: AA... tAAAA Ili tke4 Notice to Fred-Winc Service Authority Pease Return This Form to the Applicant in r- Rezoning Comments Frederick-Winchester Service Authority Mail to: Frederick-Winchester Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22W4 (540) 722-3579 Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill lane Winchester, VA 22602 Current zoning: RA RP Hand deliver to: Fred-Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fihl outthe information as accurately as possible in order to as ist the Fred-Winc Service Authority wth their review Attaeh a copy ofyour application form, HH statement, impact analysiS;;Eandinnyi:othcrEpertitienT information, SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File#3924) Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Attn.: Andy Conlon, AICP Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). Zoning requested: RP Acreage: 68.6 117, L DEC 0 2 7004 B 692 L i Y7,,,,.. To: Andy Conlon, AICP Greenway Engi a ring From: Jesse W. Moffett Executive Director Date: December 1, 2004 Re: Senseny Village Rezoning In my review of the rezoning application, the narrative for conveyance and treatment of wastewater indicates that this property will be serviced by the Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant. I believe that this is in error and treatment would occur at the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. Page 1 tie tftW 7%) eden WInchester e br;k,,�v,�i�Ac�eAutho n Rezoning Comments Applicant's Name: Mailing Address: Frederick County Department of Parks Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Department of Parks Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia, 22601 (540) 665-5678 Applicant Please fill' out the information: as accurately as possible inorder to assist the DiepartmentiofParks Recreation withtheir review, Attach, a copy of Your application {form l ocat i on map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING Greenway File #3924) Greenway Engineering Telephone: (540) 662 -4185 Attn.: Andy Conlon, AICP 151 Windy Hill lane Winchester VA 22602 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks Recreation County Administration Bldg., 2 Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). Current zoning: RA RP Zoning requested RP Acreage: 68.6 Department of Parks Recreation Comments: Snn Attarhnll Pks. Rec. Signature Date Notice to Department of Park s& Recreation Please Return This Form to the Applicant LJ DEC 032004 !Y SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING COMMENTS: Department of Parks Recreation Comments: Required recreational units and open space to be reviewed upon submittal of that information. Staff recommends bicycle trails, providing circulation within the development and connections to Senseny Road and adjacent developments, be included in the plan. The proposed monetary proffer of $1,166 for Parks and Recreation appears to be appropriate to help offset the impact this development will have on these county services. Parks Recreation Signature and Date: AP W...) Pr) `nl' Winchester Regional Airport's Comments: 1e 6-ee 0, eikfc& e r Winchester Regional Airport's C I �I g I CLf Signature Date: U" Y O Notice to Winchester Re_ional Air ort Please Return Form to A Ili r'q v. L Rezoning Comments Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662-2422 Applicant's Name: Mailing Address: Location of Property: Current Zoning: Winchester Regional Airport Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) Winchester, Virginia 3 accu �pphcant lease fill out the xmfo m atron as rately tble m or to assist the sT Winchester Regional Airport with their review Attaeh a copy of your: der ppliCatio form, s {E 'x 9 s" i �..a n z3_ ,k..v su� o �1` za i ii .E rFsE�� ocation map; proffer: statement, impact analysts, and any other pertin ent rnformatton CiF 4'sw 7 1=ft .fir,w za —ax ...^s. �x r xS^t n t... v +'kJ� �.r w.. Eu r a.. 4 SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File #3924) Greenwav Engineering Telephone: 540- 662 -4185 Attn.: Andy Conlon, AICP 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 south of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). RA RP Zoning Requested: RP Acreage: 68.6 By DEC 1 0 2004 December 8, 2004 Andy Conlon, ACIP Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Rezoning Comments Senseny Village Redbud Magisterial District Dear Mr. Conlon: The above referenced proposal was reviewed. While the proposed development lies within the airport's Part 77 surfaces and airspace, it appears that the proposed site plan should not impede operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT Serena R. Manuel Executive Director 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662 -2422 Administrative Assistant to Frederick County Public Schools e -mail: Visit us at www.frederick.kl2vans the Superintendent kapocsis ©frederick.kl2va.us Mr. Andy Conlon, AICP Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Mr. Conlon: RE: Senseny Village Rezoning SMK: dkr 1 9�1� DEC 2 2 7004 By December 20, 2004 This letter is in response to your request for comments regarding the rezoning application for the proposed Senseny Village Rezoning project. Based on the information provided, it is anticipated that the proposed 145 single family homes and 140 townhouses will yield 40 high school students, 37 middle school students, and 100 elementary school students for a total of 177 new students upon build -out. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools serving this area having student enrollments nearing or exceeding the practical capacity for a school. The cumulative impact of this project and others of similar nature, coupled with the number of approved, undeveloped residential lots in the area, will necessitate the future construction of new schools facilities to accommodate increased student enrollments. The impact of this rezoning on current and future school needs should be considered during the approval process. Respectfully yours, cc: William C. Dean, PhD Superintendent of Schools n Stephen M. Kapocsi Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent 540 -662 -3889 Ext 112 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604 -2546 FAX 540- 662 -3890 Planning Department Comments: Superintendent's Signature Date: Notice to Pf?rtt?ing,32tpntneo, Please Return This Form to the,Apttlicant I Rezoning Comments Planning Department Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665 -5651 Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Current zoning: RA RP FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent Street Fourth Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665 -5651 Applicant: Please fill out the mformatron as accurately as posse le in order to assist the Planning Department. with this review. Attach a copy of your application form, locatio map, proffer statemen impact analysis and an other pertinen information. SENSENY VILLAGE REZONING (Greenway File #3924) Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Telephone: (540) 662 -4185 Ann.: Evan Wyatt AICP Location of property: South of Rossum Lane (Route 736) and Twinbrook Circle (Route 867). Zoning requested: RP Acreage: 68.6 oa File #3924/EAW Review Agency Comments Is