Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-13 Impact AnalysisTHE OVERLOOK RE-ZONING Awggregate Area of 55,.46-± acres Jketj Bu-d, Magisterial Frederick County, Virginia. irginia Tax Map Parcels. 55-4-161, 55-A.4-65A—,,55,-A,,.466, 55-A-167, 55-A-1167A, 554,408 55 -A 1`74A, 55- A-!I�74B,,.,5,5-.A-174D:,- 55-A-165 (portibri) 'November,11,20,12, -keyised June ,6,20'113 Curretit, Owners: Tim'othy, &'Mary Stafford. Valley Mill Farm; LC CollitAct Person: Evan A. Wyatt, A1CP Greenway',Enoneermg 151. Windy Hill Lane Winchester,, VA 540-662-4195 Greenway° °Engineering: = General Inforination Location:' 1. Magisterial District: Tax Map Parcel Numbers: i i i i I i i Current Zoning:: 'Current .Use? The Overlook Rezoning South, ide of Berryville Pike (U.S. Route `7 East); North and West side of Valley Mill 'Road (Route' 659) Red Bud`Magsteri'al District. 55- A461, 55 -A 1,65A,55- „A466, 55 -A -167, 55- A =167A, 5'S -A =1.68,.55- A= 1.74A, 55- A -174B, 55- A- 4741, and ,55' -A 165 (portion) R'P, Residential Performance District RA, Rural Areas' District Agricultural and Unimproved Proposed Zoning:. B2, °Busi`ness General District -, 7,.10t acres RP, Residential Performance District: 34,.,18± acres Rural Areas. District: 14.1:8± acres ' Proposed Use: i I' Total Area;: Commercial ,Retail andResidential 55.46 ±; acres �. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN 4 The Frederick County Board, of Supervisors adopted the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban. Area Plan (SEFUAP), on June 13, 20.12: This Comprehensive Policy Plan I ameridment.:,provides future land' uses recommendations and guiding, principles, for land use development within a significant area of eastern Frederick' County; of which the; proposed rezoning application as °a; component The. subject. properties are located' `within the northeastern po iiori of .the, SEFUAP, which recommends new retail service- land.. use adjacent. to the future re.alignirient of Valley Mill Road (Route 659)' and Berryville -Pike: F `7 , and residential land use adjacent to the retail service land use. The: Appl"r`eaiit hq” ,submitted,a rezoning, application request that provides land dedications for the realignment of Valley Mill, Road and, for future improvements along Berryville Pike, and comin'ts to 'the development of 'future retail service and residential land use consistent" with then recommendations of the SEFUAP.. The Applr'cant has proffered a Generalized';'Developrrient Plan (GDP), which identifies the location of these dedication .,areas and land u"se areas, which ensure that the .realignment of Valley Mill Road and improuements on. Berryville Pike are in place consistent. with the first phase of File #5301 S z i Gieenway Engineering= • The.Overlook Rezoning development. Therefore, the Applicant's rezoning application is in conformance with the recommendations of the SEFUAP portion of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE' Existing Conditions The subject properties consist, primarily of woodlands in. the northern and western portions of the project site, open fields in the southern portion of the project site, and floodplain area in the eastern portion of the site. The. -subject, properties have areas of rolling and moderately sloped' 'terrain, as well as"steep terrain and' lowlands within the 100 -year floodplain. The open field, area in the southern portion of the project site is used for agricultural•purposes, while the; remaining land area, is primarily unimproved with the exception "of a" residential structure that is utilized for rental purposes. The existing site conditions limit development .activities to the: open field and woodland areas of the subject properties, which are proposed to occur on the western side of the relocated Valley Mill Road alignment:as depicted on the proffered Generalized Development Plan. Floodplains Thee subject properties are identified on FEMA NFIP Map 51;0063 - 0120 -B. The FEMA NFIP Map indicates that floodplaini areas exist on tax parcels 55-A -161, 55- A- 1.65A, 55- •A -1,66, 55 -A -167, 55= A- 167A, and 55- A -174B, totaling approximately 10.5 acres. These floodplain areas are associated with the Abrams. Creek and Ash Hollow stream channels located along the , Bertyville Pike and Valley Mill Road' :frontages of the subject properties. The proffered Generalized Development Plan directs land bay development away from the floodplain areas; however, some impacts to this environmental feature will be realized, through the, construction of the realigned Valley Mill Road intersection with Berryville Pike that i "s identified in the adopted Senseny /Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan (SEFUAP). The- Generah zed --Development Plan provides for the floodplain acreagei to be consol'idate'd into the Valley Mill' Farm, LC property that is not proposed for development, and provides for this area along the Berryville Pike frontage to be dedicated to VD, OT'.for future road,improvements. Wetlands The National' Wetlands inventory Map does not identify wetland areas within the limits of the subject properties. A manmade pond exists in the central portion of the woodland area of the project; which drains, to the southeast towards Abrams Creek. The manmade pond and drainage channel are located within the portion of the property that is proposed for residential development; therefore, the Applicant will conduct a detailed Wetlands File #5301 S Greenwayl✓ngineering • The Overlook Rezoning Delineation Study`for the proposed development area to delineate any wetland areas prior to development activity on the property. Any wetland areas that are identified, will be provided on the Master Development Plan to determine potential impacts and compliance with all Federal, State, and local requirements.. Steep Slopes The subject properties contain minor areas of steep .slope as defined, which are located primarily along the defined floodplain areas located along the Berryville Pike frontage portion of the site.,: It is anticipated that. there will be minor impacts within the defined steep slope areas primarily due to the construction of the relocated Valley Mill Road. The projected impacted steep slope areas will be provided on the Master Development Plan to ensure compl'iarice with County ordinance requirements. All areas of disturbance associated with the relocated Valley Mill Road of the.Ash Hollow stream, channel will be certified through geotechnical analysis during the site development process and all reports will be furnished to VDOT and the County for verification of this work. Mature Woodlands The subject properties are predominately covered with mature woodlands located within the proposed _commercial and ; residential landbays; as well as the :relocated Valley Mill Road realignment area. The proposed commercial and residential development adjoins an 4 existing mobile home park, which will require buffers and screening to comply with the County Zoning .Ordinance. The Applicant desires to maintain mature. woodland areas where practical 'to meet, :buffer and screening requirements, and :residential landscaping requirements. Therefore, the Applicant will identify the, location of mature tree preservation areas on the Master Development Plan that can be utilized to meet these requirements. Soil Types The Soil Survey of Fredrick County, published by the USDA Soil Conservation Service and the Frederick County GIS ,Database was consulted to determine soil types contained in this tract. The portions of the 56.48± acre properties proposed for development contain the following soil. types: 1C— 'Berks Channery Silt Loam, 7 -1.5% slopes 41C — Weikert -Becks Channery Silt Loams, 7 -1.5% slope 41 D — Weikert -Berks Channery Silt Loams, 15 =25% slope 41E,— Weikert- Berks,Channery Silt Loams, 25 -65% slope Table 5. of the Soil Survey does not identify any of the soil types located on the subject properties as prime farmland'soils. File #5301 S Greenway _1✓ngineering • The Overlook Rezoning Table- ID of the ' Soil Survey identifies all soil types as moderate ,to severe, for the development of roads, residential structures and commercial structures due to slope and' depth :'to rock. Soils testing and compaction testing are standard practice for development projects and road construction; therefore, geotechnical reports verifying soils suitability will be'conducted throughout the development of the subject site. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The zoning and land uses for adjoining parcels are as follows: North: Zoned RA, Rural Area District Use: Residential & Unimproved South: Zoned RA, Rural Area District Use: Residential &Agricultural East: Zoned RA; Rural Areas District Use: Residential &Unimproved. West: Zoned MH -1 District Use: Residential Zoned RA, Rural.Areas District Residential & Agricultural ' The majority of the proposed development area adjoins .the Blue. Ridge Mobile Home Park, and a portion of. the proposed development adjoins the McHale property, which is used for residential purposes. The Applicani desires to maintain mature woodland areas where practical to meet; buffer and. screening requirements, and residential landscaping requirements. The remainder of the surrounding properties that adjoin the proposed development', re owned b the Applicant; therefore; development impacts to adjoining Y PP properties will be mitigated. TRANSPORTATION The 55:46± acre subject site has approximately 1;900 linear 'feet of :frontage along Berryville ;Pike. (U'.S.: Route 7)s and approximately 1,200 linear feet of frontage along Valley, Mill Road (Route. 659). The Senseny /Eastern Frederick- Urban Area ;Plan ( SEFUAP) recommends- :regional transportation improvements, which include the relocation and realignment, of Valley Mill Road that establishes a new intersection and median crgssing; on Berryville Pike approximately 500 feet west of the existing intersection: The. SEFUAR identifies the relocation and realignment of Valley Mill Road. to align with the future Route 37 ramps that are planned for development on the north side of,- Berryville `Pike,, The SEFUAP recommendations will require the relocation and construction of approximately 1/i -mile of Valley Mill Road, the relocation and File-#5301S { Gfeenway Lnginee.ring The.Overlook Rezoning construction of anew median crossing, .new eastbound and. westbound turn lanes, and new ,traffic . signalization on Berryville Pike.. Therefore, the Applicant has met with VDOT and County. representatives to discuss various ..matters including new right -of -way dedication needs; public right-of-way abandonment needs, and' cost sharing options to ensure that the recommendations' of the SEFUAP can be implemented. Additionally, VDOT has provided the Applicant with a letter advising. that the; VDOT Commissioner has the authority to approve the transfer of the abandoned public right -of -way to the property owner once it is no longer needed for transportation • purposes without the need for action by the Commonwealth Transportation Board. A Traffic: Impact Analysis (TIA) has .been prepared for The Overlook project by Volkert, Inc., dated November 19, 2012, and revised. June 5, '2013, which is included as a. component of the. Impact Analysis Statement., The TIA - assumes; the, total build -out of 270 residential dwelling units and 35,300 square feet of commercial retail land use that is developed over a. two -phase study period. Additionally, 'the 'TIA provides for a design year scenario subsequent to build -out of The Overlook- project to provide information that considers the construction of the future. Route 37 ramps. The TIA accounts for the build - out of six residential, projects and one mixed -use residential and commercial project'as background development in, addition to the proposed development within The Overlook. The TIA studies turning movements and capacities All -maj'or `intersections that will be influenced by the relocated Valley Mill Road, including three intersections 'along the Berryville Pike (U.S. Route 7) corridor, three intersection's along the Valley Mill Road corridor, one, intersection �alon'g the Senseny Road corridor; and the .new intersections along Valley Mill Road' that provide access to The Overlook project. The TIA provides for a Level of Service (LOS) analysis for AM and. PM peak hour weekday and 'Saturday traffic volumes, as well as Average Daily Trip "(ADT) volumes for ex "sting,, background, t and build -out conditions for the two -phase study; as well' as for the design year scenario i that ,considers the construction, of the future „Route; 37 ramps. 'The TIA provides recommended improvements to the regional transportation network that will mitigate the impacts associated with 'the build '-out of The Overlook Project 'and facilitate acceptable LOS= at all studies intersections, `which are the result of ,this project, as weld: as the traffic impacts associated with.the sevenprojects identified in the background analysis. Phase 1 of the TIA accounts for the background projects agreed upon during the project scoping with 'VDOT and` Frederick County, and includes the build -out of 270 residential units and 4;100 square:feet of commercial retail within The Overlook. The TIA modeling demonstrates that the new Valley Mill Road intersection with Berryville ,Pike will be signalized as part Aof this study phase; and accounts for the signalization of" the new Haggerty Connection intersection with Berryville Pike, which was proffered by. the developerI of that project. The regional transportation network improvements suggested during the Phase 1 _development of The Overlook project create, an. acceptable. LOS at all intersections analyzed in the TIA. These improvements-include the relocation of Valley Mill, Road, new traffic- signalization at the intersection ,of Valley Mill Road and Berryville Pike, new right and left. turn, lanes for the eastbound lanes on Berryville `Pike, and a new left turn lane for the. westbound lanes on Berryville Pike. Pile: #5301 S Greenway- Engineering • The Overlook Rezoning Phase 2 of the, TIA accounts for the assumptions utilized in Phase 1 and_, provides for the build -out, of the remaining commercial retail square feet within The Overlook, as well as. annualized traffic growth, throughout the study. area. The Phase 2 'TIA modeling demonstrates that the commercial, land bay intersection with they relocated. Valley Mill Road may'warrant traffic signalization to maintain an acceptable :level of service. The Phase 2 TIA modeling demonstrates that the signalized intersections at Valley Mill Road/Berryville Pike and Greenwood. Road /Berryville Pike experience minor decreases in level of service.-at project build -out; however, these intersections still function at an acceptable level of service. Additionally, the TIA provides for a design year build -out phase that accounts for the. assumptions utilized' in Phase 2, as, well as annualized traffic- growth throughout the study area, and the 'introduction of the new Route 37 on and off ramps at Berryville Pike. The TIA, concludes that; regional .improvements may be required along Berryville Pike to accommodate the introduction of the new Route 37 interchange at this location. The Applicant's proffer statement provides several items that are consistent with the results of the TIA to mitigate transportation 'impacts associated with this project. The Applicant has offered to dedicate right -of -way and easements necessary for the collector road system recommended by the- SEFUAP, as well as' for;future' 'improvements that may be required, along Berryville Pike to accommodate the future Route .37 interchange: The location and right -of -way 'sufficient for the construction of two eastbound travel' lanes; two westbound travel lanes; a center left 'turn lane; right turn lanes at all full access entrances,; left, right, and through stacking lanes for westbound traffic- at the intersection of Berryville Pike; and. two ,receiving lanes for eastbound traffic at the intersection of Berryville Pike ;has been determined based on meetings with VDOT and the County's Director of Transportation Planning. The Applicant has offered to complete the "ultimate section of the relocated Valley Mill Road `between Berryville Pike and the full access entrance to the commercial, land bay and for two lanes of the relocated Valley Mill Road between the commercial land: bay and the existing section of Valley Mill Road in conjunction with the first phase'. of development. This proffered condition will ensure that Valley Mill Road :is, relocated ,to a new intersection at, Berryville Pike. This new i intersection will include signalizati'on, a new .median :crossing;, and appropriate left and right turn lanes. Additionally, the Applicant has offered to limit entrance access into the commercial and, residential 'land bays and provide. signalization to include an access, management exception :request;at, the new commercial entrance should VDOT determine that. warrants are Met. The, Appl'icant's. proffer statement provides information to demonstrate the-public right -of -way area that will need to be abandoned following the: completion of the Valley. Mill Road realignment. The Applicant'is, requesting: support of a revenue, sharing program project and an abandonment request from, the; Board of Supervisors `through a.separate agreement for The Overlook project. File #5301 S 7 1 • Greenway Engineering-. • The Overlook Rezoning 'SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The 55.46± acre subject property is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). A public sewer system 'including an 8" sanitary .sewer gravity fine exists on a portion offthe subject property, which 'drains to an existing 30" sanitary sewer transmission main also located on the subject property. The residential and commercial land uses within The Overlook development will be designed to direct effluent to the, 30" sanitary sewer transmission main, which directs effluent to the Opequon Water .Reclamation Facility (OWRF). Based on comparable discharge patterns, the Frederick County,, Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 235 ,gallons /day per residential connection and 75 gallons /day per 1,000 square feet of commercial development is an appropriate calculation for estimating the sewer:impact for the residential and commercial land uses. Q = 235 gallons /day /acre per residential connection Q = 235 GPD x,270 residential connections Q = 63,450 GPD projected at residential build -out Q = 75 gallons /day /acre per 1,000 square feet commercial Q = 75 GPD x 35.8 (35,800 sq.ft. /1,000 sq.ft.) Q = '2',685 GPD projected at commercial build -out. TOTAL: Q = 66,135 GPD at project build -out The proposed .build -out of The ,Overlook residential and ;commercial project is estimated to add 66;135 gallons. per day to the public sewage .conveyance "system. The development project will direct effluent to the OWRF, which has a design capacity of 12.6 MGD. The Frederick - Winchester Service Authority (FWSA) has advised that Frederick County owns 5:475 MGD of the total design capacity and'is currently using 2.434 MGD, or 44% of this allocated capacity. The Overlook project is estimated to tutil�ize 0.021% of the remaining design capacity .allocated to Frederick. County at build -out; therefore, the OWRF has adequate capacity , to provide treatment of the projected sewer demand of 66,135, :GPD created by The Overlook project. WATER SUPPLY The 55.46± acre subject property is located within the Urban Development, Area (UDA) and. the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The Frederick County ,Sanitation Au "thority(FCSA) owns, and, operates the public water infrastructure near, The Overlook project, and currently has 8 7inch water lines that serve, the Mill Race Estates and Blue Ridge obile Home °Park subdivisions to the west of the proposed development. File #5301S Greeriway Engineering The Overlook, Rezoning Based on comparable consumption .estimates, the Frederick .County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) 'has determined. that that 235 gallons /day per residential connection and 75 gallons /day per 1,000 square feet of commercial :development is an appropriate calculation for estimating the water impact for the residential and commercial land uses. The figures below represent the impact that the total build -out of the proposed land uses will have on "the water supply and treatment systems. Q = 235 gallons /day /acre per residential - connection Q =`235 GPD x 270 residential connections Q = 63,450 GPD projected at, residential build-out Q = 75 gallons /day /acre per 1,000 square feet commercial Q = 75 GPD x 35.8 (35,800 sq.ft11,000 sq.ft.) Q = 2,685 GPD projected at commercial build -out TOTAL: Q= 66,135 GPD at project build -out The Applicant has prepared-a water model report for The Overlook. preject:to evaluate the capacity of the existing wafer near the proposed development, which is included as information with this application. The water model calls for the extension of the 8- inch water lines serving the Mill Race Estates and Blue Ridge Mobile Home Park subdivision that are looped to provide for redundancy within -the water system. The results „of this analysis demonstrates a minimum steady state system pressure of 87.6 psi, which exceeds the minimum 40 psi requirement of 'theFCSA. The analysis demonstrates a minimum system fire flow of 1,528 gpm, with a minimum zone pressure of 40 psi, which exceeds the minimum 1;000 gpm requirement of the FCSA. The FCSA water transmission system provides water .service to this area of - the community via the Stephens City quarry system from. the James H. Diehl Water Filtration Plant and the Clearbrook quarry system from the North Water Filtration Plant. These systems currently provide 6.0 MGD and can be increased to `10 MGD. Additionally, the FCSA purchases water from the -City of'Winchester to further supplement the capacity of potable water required to serve properties within the•UDA and the SWSA,. Therefore, the FCSA has the capacity to provide potable water for The Overlook project based on the, estimated 66,135 GPD needed at project build -out. DRAINGE The 55.46± acre subject property is naturally divided into two distinctive drainage areas., which direct:drainage from ;the northern portion of the site towards Ash Hollow, and from the western, central; `and the portion of the site towards Abrams Creek. The proffered GDP for The Overlook demonstrates that the commercial landbay and the lower portion of the residential land bay will direct drainage towards Ash Hollow, while File #5301 S Greenway Engineering_ The Overlook Rezoning the remaining residential. landbay area will direct drainage towards Abrams Creek. Drainage associated with 'the development of the relocated Valley Mill Road will be designed to meet VDOT requirements. The Applicant will work with the' County Engineer during the Master Development Plan process to determine the most appropriate approach to accommodate stormwater management facilities within The Overlook that meet quality and ,quantity measures at the time of development. Additionally, the Applicant will incorporate- narratives on the Master 'Development Plan that account for needs associated with the 2014 County- Managed Stormwater Program, if applicable, for review and approval prior to land disturbance activities 'associated with The Overlook project. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL The impact on solid waste!, disposal facilities can: be .projected from an average annual business consumption of landfill volume of 5:4 cubic .yards per 1,000 square feet of structural floor area and an average annual residential consumption of 5.4 cubic yards per household (Civil Engineering Reference Manual; 4`h edition). The following figures. show the increase, in average annual volume based on the .35;800 square feet of commercial land use, and 270 residential units that are projected to develop within The Overlook project: AV = 5.4 Cu.. Yd. per 1;000 square feet AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 35.8 (35,800 sq..ft. /1,000 sq,f(.) AV = 193 Cu. Yd. at commercial build- out/yr, or 135 tons /yr at build -out AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd, per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x ,270 residential units AV = 1,458 Cu. Yd. at residential build -out, or 1,020 tons /yr at build -out TOTAL AV = 1,155 tons /yr at;build -out The Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfil . has a current remaining capacity of 1.3,100;000 cubic yards of air space.. The projected build- out.of The Overlook project will generate 1,155 tons of solid waste at build -out annually on average. This represents a 0.57% increase in the annual solid waste received by the Municipal Solid Waste area. of'the, ., Regional, Landfill, which currently, averages 200,000 tons per year. The commercial -,land use portion of the project will utilize commercial waste haulers for trash. pickup service; therefore, 'impacts at the citizen convenience centers will be reduced and _tipping, fees will be generated that will create a continuous revenue source for the Regional Landfill, by a portion of the proposed project. File #5301 S 10 Gree-nway Engineeririg HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Overlook Rezoning The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does `not identify structures on the 55,46+.-,,acre subject property that. are deemed potentially significant. Thel Frederick. County Rural Landmarks Survey identifies Valley Mill Farm ( #34 -108) as a National Register Landmark, which is located on property "immediately adjacent to The Overlook. Additionally, the National Park Service Study :of. Civil War. Sites in the Shenandoah Valley identifies the subject property frontage along. Berryville Pike as a containing a portion of1he 3rd Winchester Core B'attlefie'ld area (Berryville Canyon). The Valley Mill Farm (#34 -108) is owned by Timothy and Mary Stafford, who are the Applicant for The Overlook rezoning application.: The: Stafford's are working with VDOT and Frederick County to relocate Valley Mill .Road to the west of Valley Mill Farm, which will allow'.for the conversion of the public right -of =way between the one- lane low water bridge crossing of Abrams Creek and the frontage of Valley Mild Farm to a private access. drive. The relocation of Valley Mill Road will' allow for Valley Mill Farm to be protected .from existing traffic impacts and from future development. activities such as the reconstruction of the.one -lane low water bridge adjacent to the Valley Mill Farm residence and,outbuildings.. The Berryville. Canyon portion of the 3rd 'Winchester ':Core Battlefield area is located along the Berryville Pike ,frontage of'The Overlook, which is planned for the future. Route -37 interchange area.. The Applicant's proffer statement dedicates the majority of the property that fronts on _ Berryville Pike to the west of the new relocated Valley Mill Road to VDOT for use in the regional improvements associated with the future Route 37 interchange area. The Applicant is.retaining the portion of the' Berryville Canyon that adjoins the existing Valley Mill Road and is consolidating this land' area into the Valley ° Mill Farm ( #34408), which will protect this from future development. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES Fire; and Rescue The development of commercial retail ;and residential land use will create -an impact to fire and.-rescue. services in this area of the community. The Applicant:, has provided a monetary contribution to Frederick County consistent with the community service impact values determined, by the County Development Impact Model to mitigate th s"impact. Additionally, the County, will receive revenues from the commercial development annually; which will further offset impacts to fund community' services. File #53011 I 1 Greenway Engineering Parks and Recreation. The Overlook Rezoning The development "of, residential hand use will i create an impact to parks and recreation, services within the community. The Applicant has provided a monetary,contribution to Frederick ;County consistent with 'the, community.service impact values determined by the County Development Impact Model to mitigate this impact: Additionally, the County will receive revenues from the commercial development annually, which will 'further offset impacts to fund community services. I Educational' Facilities The development of residential. and user will create an impact. to public school services in this area of the community. The Applicant has, provided a, monetary contribution to Frederick County consistent with the.community,service-impact values determined by the County Development Impact.Model to mitigate this, impact. Additionally, the County will receive revenues from the commercial development annually' which, will further offset impacts to fund community services. General Government 1 The development of .residential land use will create an impact to general government services within the commoni'ty. The Applicant.has provided a monetary contribution to Frederick County consistent with the community service impact - values determined by the County Development Impact Model Io: mitigate- this impact. Additionally, the County will •:receive revenues from the commercial development annually, which will further offset.impacts to fund community services. i File #53015 12 TAE OVERLOOK Traffic Impact Study Located ig: Frederick'County., Virginia Prepared For: Tim Stafford 1494 Valley -Mill Road Winchester, VA22602. Prepared By: VOLKERT Volkert Inc. 5400-,Shawnee Road, Suite 301 Alexandria, VA, 22317 Ph: 701642.8100 Fax: 703.642.8106 November 9, 2012 Revised June 5, 2013 • Table of Contents Description Page # Report Summary. and Methodology ....... ............................... 4 Existing Conditions.....,.., ........... ................................... ... 6 Phase 1 Development Description ................ : ...... .....:.:........... 10 2015 Background Conditions.., -.. . ....................... 10 Phase 1. Trip Generation.,,-, .................. ................ ............. .... 13 Phase 1 Trip Distribution And Trip Assignments...,,.. ,::.:. 13 2015 Phase 1 Build -Out Conditions ............... ......... ............ 1 -3 Phase 2. Development: Description .................................... ....,.... 21 2020 Background Conditions., ... ......................... ............. 21. Phase 2 Trip Generation-.. . 24 Phase, 2 Tr -p Distribution And Trip Assignments ........::........... 24 2020 Phase 2 Build -Out Conditions . ...............:............... . 24 "Design Year" Development Description ................................. 31 2026 " "Design Year" Background Conditions.... 3.1 "Design Year" Trip_ Distribution. And. Trip ,Assignments:_ . — ....... 34 2026. "Design Year" Build -:Out Conditions : ..........:..........:......... 31 Conclusions.,.. _ ..,..... -. ......... - Access Management ..... ....................... _ ..._ .. • 43 Pedestrian, and Bicycle Accommodations ....... .. ............. 43 ,Background- 96velopmerits Location ''Map ............................ Appendix Background Developments Trip D' istribution ............................. Appendix VDOT Scoping Document .... .............................................. Appendix Existing Traffic Count Data ............................. . Appendix Generalized, Development Plan .............................. Appendix. The'Overlook- -- Revised Traffic Impact Slit ERT June 5, 2013 LK ® 3 Page I List of Figures Figure :# Deseription Page X 1 Vicinity'Map 5 2 Existing Traffic Volumes 7 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service 8 4 2015 Background - Traffic Volumes 11 5 2015 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service 12 6 -Phase 1 Trip'Distribution Percentages 14 6A Phase 1 Trip Distribution Percentages at Site- Driveways 15 7 Phase 1 The Overlook development Trip Assignments 16 8 2015 Phase .1 Build -out Traffic Volumes 17 9 20'15 .Phase `l Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service 18 10 2020: Background Traffic Volumes 22 11 2020 Background Lane Geometry and Levels. of Service 23 12 Phase .2 Trip .Distribution Percentages 25 13 Phase 2 The Overlook development Trip Assignments 26 14 2020 Phase 2 Build -out Traffic Volumes. 27 15 2010 Phase 2 Build- out.Lane Geometry and Levels of Service 28 16 2026 "Design Year'-' Background Traffic Volumes 32 17 2026 "Design Year" Background Lane Geometry and LOS 33 18 "Design Year "' Trip Distribution Percentages 34 19 "Design Year" The Overlook development Trip Assignments 35 20 2026 "Design Year" Build -out Traffic Volumes 36 21 .2026 "Design Year,'-' Build -out Lane Geometr =y and LOS 37 A Background Developments .Location Map Appendix AI-A7 Background Developments: Trip Distribution, Percentages Appendix The Overlook - Revised TPa_f ic.Impact Siud� VOLKIRT June, 2013 Page 2 • List- of Tables, Table # Description .Page # 1 Existing Levels. of',Service, Delay and Back of Queue Results 9 2 2015 Background Trip. Generation Summary 10 3 Phase 1 Trip Generation Summary 13 4 20`15 Background and Phase 1 Build -out LOS /Delay /Queue 19 -20 5 2020 Background Trip, Generation Summary 2.1 6 Phase 2 Trip Generation Summary 24 7 2020 Background and.Phase 2 Build -out LOS /Delay /Queue 29 -30 8 2026 "Design Year." Background and, Phase 3 Build -out 38 -39. LOS /Delay / Queuue The Overlook ­Revised Traffic Immact.Study V June 5, 2013 Page 3 OVERVIEW Report Summary Volkert, Inc. has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed The Overlook development to be located along the south side of Route 7 (Berryville Pike), west of Valley Mill Road (Route 659), in Frederick County, Virginia. The Study is based upon a projected. development program of 270 single- family,detached units, 21,800 square feet of Retail, a Convenience Mart/ Fast Food (2,000 square feet) with a 16 pump Gas Station, a. 4,100 square foot Drive -in. Bank and a. 7,400 square foot High- Turnover "Sit Down" Restaurant. Access is to be provided :along Route 7 via a relocated Valley Mill Road. Build -out is anticipated to occur over two (2) transportation phases by the Year 2020. Weekday AM peak. hour, weekday PM_peak hour and Saturday peak hour midday analyses are provided for Existing, 2015 Phase. l Background (no-build), 201.5 Phase. 1 build -out, 2020 Phase 2 Background, 2020 Phase 2 Build -out, 2026 "Design Year" Background and 2026 "Design Year" Build -out conditions. The Overlook development Generalized Development Plan (GDP) is included in the Appendix. section of!this Report. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed The Overlook development with respect to the surrounding roadway, network. Methodology All methodology utilized in this Report is based upon an "approved" scoping letter established' between the Applicant; the 'Virginia D"epartmen"t of Transportation (VDOT) and the Frederick County-P.lanning, Department. Documentation, associated with. this scoping letter is provided in the Appendix section of this Report. The traffic impacts :accompanying The Overlook development were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • Collection and evaluation of existing traffic data, • Assessment of background traffic (includes planned projects in the area of impact), • Calculation of trip generation for th ;proposed The :Overlook development, • Distribution and assignment of The Overlook development- generated trips onto the. study Area roadway network, • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of Synchro for existing and future conditions. The Overlook - Revised'Traf�c.Impac! Stirdy VOL. KERT 5,.2013 Page 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS Volkert; Inc. conducted weekday_ AM,,, weekday .PINT and Saturday, midday, peak hour manual turning movement :counts at-the intersections of Route 7 (Berryville Pike) /Valley Mill Road (Route 659), Route 7 /Greenwood. Road (Route 656),. Greenwood' RoadNalley' Mill Road, Valley Mill Road/ Channing Drive and Senseny Road (Route: 657) /Charming Drive in Year 2010. In order to represent the current year (Year 201,2) •traffic condition, the counts . were increased by applying an annual ,compounded- growth rate of 0,25% from Year 2010 to Year 2012. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established .,along each of the. study area roadway links using a "k" factor. (tlie: ratio of P-M peak hour traffic volume's to '24 -hour traffic volumes) of 8% 'based upon the current VDOT'traffic data. Figtirel 2 .shows, the 'existing weekday and .Saturday ADT, as well 'as the weekday AM /PM and Saturday mid= day peak,hour traffic volumes, at key locations within the study area. Figure 3 shows the corresponding.•existing lanegeoinetry and peak;hour levels of service results. All traffic count data and. Synchro, level's of service worksheets, are included in the Appendix section of this Report. Table I is, provided ."to show the existing' levels' of- service, vehicle delay and 95`x' percentile back of queue, by lane group /approach, for each of the ,study area intersections. The Overlook — Revised .Traffic Impact Sludy VOLKERT June 5, 2013 Page 6 < 1 I I 1 I LEGEND gY;? 'WERSECTIONO X (1 R] AN PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)/8'A'7UROAY PEAK HOUR] AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS /AOT] Oy /!7 /3 / - 0 % /J9/ ! 7�J 1i3l )62� s a 91i14� 1 26420 19160. 2 24500 18840 3 3180 1630 4 3180 1630 5 .23900 - 22190' 6 22200 23030 7 5570 4540 8 6650 3750 9 11410 '8400 10 5120 3030 11 4090 2890 12 34701690 r is 3110 2190 2000 2160 7690 5900 9160 7520 O S1g(l2s! R6j1 /1)/ �6b/ kL� O 0 The Overlook FIGURE12 Existing (2012) Traffic Conditions (D- %M 1 26420 19160. 2 24500 18840 3 3180 1630 4 3180 1630 5 .23900 - 22190' 6 22200 23030 7 5570 4540 8 6650 3750 9 11410 '8400 10 5120 3030 11 4090 2890 12 34701690 r is 3110 2190 2000 2160 7690 5900 9160 7520 O S1g(l2s! R6j1 /1)/ �6b/ kL� O 0 The Overlook FIGURE12 Existing (2012) Traffic Conditions O S1g(l2s! R6j1 /1)/ �6b/ kL� O 0 The Overlook FIGURE12 Existing (2012) Traffic Conditions LEGEND 1; INTERSECTION0 LANE CONFIGURAITONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL ® STOP SIGN. X MIZI AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)(SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] * DENOTES UNSIGNALIZEO CRITICAL MOVEMENT ' L �;y N UNSIGNAL&= INTERSECTION O _ SI MAL2ED S/GNALMED UNSIONALIZEU SIUnAL¢EU p<. �2 INTERSECTION ; INTERSECTION .4 INTERSECTION 5. INTERSECTION �I.os= C (8)!81 L08� B (a)B7 LOSS B. (8)(81; n m, 859 A(B)IAI• 859 5 c 859 fej /Bl 856 z The Overlook FIGURE 3 Existing (2012) Lane Geometry& LOS i i I Table 1 The: Overlook Levels of'Service, Delay and Back of Queue (95 %)Results Existing Conditions EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, NB = Northbomid, SB= Soathbound, L: Lelt, 1 :11uu, K: Kichl The Overlook — Revised Traffic N12act Study VOLKERT June 5 age 9 Page. 9 Existin ,,Conditions Intersection _ Al•1;Peak Hour PN1 Peak Hour, Saturday,Peak Hour LOS Delay (in sec) Queue _(in'feet) LOS - Delay (in ice) Queue (infect) LOS Delay (in se "c) Queue (in feet) EB/WB: Route '7 NB: ValleyMill Road Traffic Control:iStop Sign EB/IJ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A EBrr" N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -.N /A N/A N/A N/A E13/R N/A N/A N /A, N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A EB LOS, N/A N/A N/A WWI- "B ;121s., S -ft B� I 10s. 19 11 A 1 10 S. 1 5 Ir WB/'r N/A N/A N/A NIA I N/A j N/A N/A I N/A I N/A WB LOS N /A. N/A N/A NB/LR D 25 s:. 79 11 B 14.s. • 15 ft B 12:s.. 9 ft NB LOS N/A N/A NA OVERALL N/A N/A N/A EB/WB:`Route 7 NB: Grecmwod Road SB:,First Woods Drive Traffic Control:Signalization EB/L, D 45 s. 88 ft D 38.s. 16 i C 33 s. 11 It EB/T' C 31 s. 354 ft . C 23,s. 224'ft B' 19 s: 207 ft EB /R B 12 s. 26 ft A 7 so 29 It A 5 S. 38 ft EB LOS C C B WB/L D 41 s. 4t`,fi C -343. 150 ft C 33 s: 81 ft WB/T C _ 30s. 1 216 ft B I I s. 233 ft _ B 12 s. 20T fl - WB/R' A 7 s. 1 '32`•ft A '4 s., 5 %11 A 6s. 3 ft WB LOS C B B NB/LTR D 50 s. 3777 B 20s. 120 fi B 12s. 67 It NB LOS D: B B SB/LT C 33s. 124.fi C 22 s. 76 ft B 20s, 32 fi SB/R B 12.s., 23 ft B 13 s. 11 ft A 8 s. 25ft' SB;LOS - C. C B 57 ERAFL C. B' B EB/WB: Valley Mill Road NB /SB: Greenoudd Road Traffic Control: Signalizafion EB/L C 31 s: 43 ft C 25!s. 3M C 25:s:: 32 fi EB TR _ C 22 s. 98 fi C 28s. 170 fi C 21 s. 101 11 EB`'LOS - ,C C' C WB /L _ B 20 s. 55 ft B' 19;s. 55 fi B 16 s. 35 fi- WB/TR B 17 s 103 ft B 4 s. 6341 B 12 s. 38 ft WB LOS B B B N B/L A 10s. 81.11 B 14s. 112 11 A 9s. 5111 NBnR A 9 „s. 119 fi B 10. s: 133 ft A 7 s. 50 1i NB LOS A B A SB/L A I 7-s .1611 B” 1't s: '27 It A 9 s 13 fr SB61'R A 8 s. 7411 B, ] 1 s: 160 ft A 8 . 68 ft. SBIOS A B A OVERALL, B B NVB: Valley,Mill Road NB: Charming Dri ve SB:rValleyMillRoad Traffic Contol: Stop Sign _ WB/L _ A 10s. 8:11 B 10s. 12 ft A 9.s. 511 WBR: N/A N /A- N/A N/A N /A N/A N/A N/A N/A WB LOS N/A _ N/A N/A 'NBfr N /A. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N /A, N/A 'NB/R N/A N/A N/A N/A "'N /A N/A N/A N/A I N/A NBIOS N/A N/A N/A SB/L .A 8 s. 7 "11 A 81s. 4' ft A 8.s: 2 ft SBrr N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SB COS N/A N/A 'N/A - OVERALL. -N /A N/A - EB/WB- Sense ny.Road SB: "Charming Dri }'e traffic Control: Signalimtioq. EB/L B 16s. 33 ft B 16 s: 4611 B :19 s. 49 11 .FB/T B 15;s. 74,11 B 20s. 150 (i ". C 23 -s. '136;11. EB.LOS B 'B, - C WB/,T 7721 s. 148'11 B 17 s. 1'19 ft C 20s. 107`ft WB/R A 6s. 10 ft A 6 s: 8 11 A 8 S. 9,fi. WB LOS: C B B SB1L -A 7s. 8'.11 A 7,s 8,11 A 6 s: 81fi SB R A 3 s. 15 ft A 3,9. 161 A 2s. 15 fl Simms A A A OVERALL B B B EB = Eastbound, WB = Westbound, NB = Northbomid, SB= Soathbound, L: Lelt, 1 :11uu, K: Kichl The Overlook — Revised Traffic N12act Study VOLKERT June 5 age 9 Page. 9 • •.. PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ANALYSES (2015) The proposed Phase 1 development is to include 270 single- family detached units and a. 4,100 square foot, Drive -in Bank. Access is to be provided via four (4) site- driveways -located along the relocated. Valley Mill Road (Route 659). Access to the retail,parcel is provided via the northernmost driveway.. Access to the residential parcels is provided via three (3') other driveways. All driveways are stop- controlled; Phase 1 is to be built -out by Year 2015. 2015 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS In order to determine the'20f5 background traffic conditions, Volkert, Inc. increased the existing traffic volumes, shown on Figure 2, usi "nga rate of'0.5% per year through "Year 2015. Per the :September 2012 VD,OT /County approved Scoping Agreement, 20% of the Greenwood Road traffic volumes were then, reassigned. to the new intersection of Route 7 /Valley .Mill Road. Additionally; .all trips, relating. to ,specific future "other developments located within the vicinity of the site were incorporated. Table 2 is provided below to summarize the 2015 "other developments" trip :generation as determined using rates provided by VDOT (Apartment and Townhouse /Condo residential-, uses) as well as those included in the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation, Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Figure A is: provided in the Appendix section of the report; showing the location the background developments. Figures Al through.A7 area also provided in the Appendix showing the trip distribution percentages associated with each of the background developments. Figure 4 shows 'the 20,15 background weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM' /PM and :Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes., at key locations within the study area. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2015 background lane, geornetry and peak hour levels of service. results. All'Synchro levels of service worksheets late included in the Appendix section of the�Report., Table 2 2015 Background "Other Developments" Trip Generation Summary Code, Load tlsc Amount AM Peak Hour PD1 Peak H6ur ADY. Saturday Peak Hour ADT In Out Total.. In Out- 'Total.. In Out Total Rcd -Bud Run " 210 Single - Family Detached '25,units 7 20 27 19' 11 31 290 19 11 31 286.. Total 7 20 27 19 11 31 296 19 It '31 286 Twin Lakes Phases9 and 10 210 Single - Family Detached. 65 units l4 41' 55 46 27 73 760 46 27 73 702 230 Townhouse/Condo* 71 units "Total 10 37. 47 38 21 58, 585, 30 24 54 549 24 78 -102 84 48 131 1,284 1 76 51 .126 L251 Lynnhaven. 210' Single - Family Detached 3 units 3 9 12 3 2 5 - 41 3 2 5 39 .820 Retail 87,120,SF, 88 56 144 274 .297' 572 6,209 412. 380 791 $471 boa twat 'Total 91 65 156 277 299 576 6,250 414 382 :796 8510 Fieldstone. Development .230• Townhouse /Condo* 93' —its 13 47 60 49 27 76 760- 39 .31 69 719 :Total 13 47 60 _ 49. 27 76 x760. `39. 31' 69 719 Sovereign Village 210 Single - Family Detached 42�uni�s 10. 29 39 31 18 49 468 :31. I8. 49 .466 220 Apartment' (A units 9 30 39 32 18 50 503 30 18 48 499 .820 ;Retail 104,544 SF 98. 63 161 309 335 645, . 6,990. 463 428 891 9;562 'Total 18 59 78 63 36 99 971 1 61 37' 97 9(i1 Haggerty Property. 210 .Single ?Family.Detac ied' 180 un its 34 102 135 115 67 182 1,786 115 67 182 1,829 220 Apartment'- 60amits 8� 28 36 30, 17 47 472 28 17' 45 468 :230 Townhouse /Condot. 60,units. 9 31 40 32 IS 50 497 25 20 .46 464 Total. 51 161 211 177 '102 278 2,754 168. 105 273'.. 2 760 Opequon.Crossittg- 210 Single - Fancily' Detached 155 units, 29 88 118 100 :59 159. 1,556 '100 59 159, 1;589 230 ":Townhouse /Condo' 100 units 23 '84. '107 88 48 136 1,364 69 55 124` 1.314 - - •Total. .53 173', 225' 188 107 .295 1 2.920 169 114 '281 2'903 * Dei—onwd using trip . g­.d. rates piovidcd by lqx)T Ttie Overlook.— Revised Traffic Impact Study V"W June 5, 2013 Page 10 'O .LEGEND dEt — RSEC77ONI X (Y)[Z] AIY.PEAK HOUR (- PEAK HOUR)[SATURDA_ Y PEAK HOUR] 1O AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (APT) q6j /�J,y DjJ/ $'w 0 S N a WEEKDAYA&T SATURDAYAD7 1 31745 `24746 2 29558 23991 9 6392 5092. 4 8382 5092 5 29083 27554 5 28715 29973 7 5955 5500 8 7265 4690 9 11100 6010 10 1 7185, 5264 11 _ 4750 3340 12 6672 5152 13 7054 6971 Y4, 7217T 8712 15 9780 8377 18 12606 11805 `0J O i7 J / /5j��34JIS4(� The, Overlook FIGURE 4 2015,Background Traffic Conditions LEGEND' . it INTERSE67TON0 .. LANE CONFIGURATIONS TRAFFlC SIGNAL ® STOPSION X(Y)M AN PEAK HOUR(PAI PEAK HOUR)[SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] * DENOTES UNSIGNAL zED CRITICAL NOYENENT . vas GAY P u 859. O ,j, ,SKiNALQED 3• SKNALEO UN8IBNAUD O S, SIGNAED. INTEREC0 D7RSECTK INERBECTO INTER8ECnON LOS•B(B)IBI LOS- B(B)[B1 LOS- B(B)IB] op : BeI)a/ j7 659 .B(B)IBI 5 i � �`�cle G7 Icltc�c,� < r m P O SW/JALUTI O: ®c •'t'+ y �- 9 sxa�. w � Y 10 BiTER8EC710N '`°1+. Of LOS'�(B)IBl Y' �� ��1FUITURE �[��P�fi�:�e4az �:. I�� 3re� . INTERSECTLON INTERSECTION INTERSECTIONIN)TERSEGTIONF A OR Fik The Overlook FIGURE 5 2015 Background Lane Geometry & LOS i • PHASE 1 TRIP GENEIRATION Volkert, Inc, ;utilized the latest 8h Edition of the - Institute of,, Transportation Engineers' (ITE)'Trip .Generation.Rgport to establish the total trips for Phase .1 of The Overlook: Table 3 is provided to summarize, the total trip generation associated with Phase ;1 of the development: Table 3 Proposed Development: The Overlook Ph'ase.I Trio Generation Summary PHASE 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trip's, was based upon local' travel. patterns for the roadway network surrounding the "proposed site.. Access to the site is provided. Per the VDOT /County approved Scoping Agreement, Volkert, -Inc. "utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed The Overlook Phase 1 development trips ,(Table 3) throughout the study area roadway network. 'Figure 6'A is •provided to show the percentages, of site generated trips entering and exiting each of the :site- driveways. Figure 7 shows`,the development- generated trip assignments `for the weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak `hours. PHASE 1.(2015) BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Phase 1 development assigned, trips (Figure, 7) were added to the 2015 background traffic volumes (Figure 4)V obtain 20.15 build -out conditions. Figure .8-shows the 20.15 Phase 1 build -out weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday' AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes;, at key locations within the ;study area. Figure 9 shows the correspon.ding.build -out lane geometry and peak hour levels of service results. All Synchro levels of,service worksheets are included in the Appendix section ofthis Report. Volkert, Inc. ;has provided Table 4. to show the 2015 background and Phase 1 build -out level's of service, vehicle delay and 95th percentile `back of ,queue, by . ane group /approach, for each of the study area intersections. The Overlook — Revised Traffic - Impact Study, VOLK June 5, 2013 Page 13 'ITE - Code. Land Use - Amount In AM Peak Hour - Out Total In PM PeakHourV Out Total ADT I In Sat Peak Hour Out Total ADT . 210 Single- Farnily.Detached 270 twits .50 149 199 . 162 95 257 2700 132 117 250 2720 912 Drive -in Bank 4,100 SF 28 22 51 53 53 106 607 57 52 109 354 Total Trips 78, 171 249 215 148 363; 31307 189 170 359 3,074 PHASE 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trip's, was based upon local' travel. patterns for the roadway network surrounding the "proposed site.. Access to the site is provided. Per the VDOT /County approved Scoping Agreement, Volkert, -Inc. "utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed The Overlook Phase 1 development trips ,(Table 3) throughout the study area roadway network. 'Figure 6'A is •provided to show the percentages, of site generated trips entering and exiting each of the :site- driveways. Figure 7 shows`,the development- generated trip assignments `for the weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak `hours. PHASE 1.(2015) BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Phase 1 development assigned, trips (Figure, 7) were added to the 2015 background traffic volumes (Figure 4)V obtain 20.15 build -out conditions. Figure .8-shows the 20.15 Phase 1 build -out weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday' AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes;, at key locations within the ;study area. Figure 9 shows the correspon.ding.build -out lane geometry and peak hour levels of service results. All Synchro levels of,service worksheets are included in the Appendix section ofthis Report. Volkert, Inc. ;has provided Table 4. to show the 2015 background and Phase 1 build -out level's of service, vehicle delay and 95th percentile `back of ,queue, by . ane group /approach, for each of the study area intersections. The Overlook — Revised Traffic - Impact Study, VOLK June 5, 2013 Page 13 �Q The Overlook FIGURE 6 Phase 1 Trip Distributioni Percentages N a, ;2A The Overlook FIGURE 6A Trip 'Distribution Percentages;At Site- Driveways LEGEND cO ,INTERSECTION# X(1)[Z] AN PEAK HOUR(PM PEAT( NOUR)(SATURDAY. PEAK HOUR) '\ ' OJAVERAGEDAILY .TRIPS - _. 0 WEEKDAYAOT SATURDAYADT 1 627 769 - 2 1323 1230 34(30) )74) /Z8 /7'11J7Z 3 2150 1868 ' r 4 1158 1078 ' 5 992 922 y, .. o N 6 892 822 WY )p. h, �. 8 0 0 7 3 B .488 461 G ..10 .486 461 10 11 0. 0. 1p 4 9 a 12 1159. 1078 - N 13 '667. 615 14 661. 615 13 ' p. ` 15 331 307 18 331, 307' 0 17 607 354 18 945 962 \\����ha1�1. . 18 1161 1170 859 `b \�4��'` 20 594 588 lq O 'S 7 j14 The Overlook FIGURE 7 Phase 1 Development - Generated Trips r (� �SI(4q) 659 %.26(22)(251 y n /SI �, .. / N1w21j /zS 34(30) )74) /Z8 /7'11J7Z S /I910 118J�� &II)(19/ WY O 9Or, 10 r 51 0\ /19/ (dye 0 CON \1.� \`e,•4•_ \\����ha1�1. . 59 \�C96 \ 859 `b \�4��'` 859 �rt� The Overlook FIGURE 7 Phase 1 Development - Generated Trips LEGEND Ol," INTERSECTION# X (17[ZJ AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK NOUR)(SATURDAY PEAK HOUR], OAVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (AD7)! O SITE a- # WEEKDAYADT SATURDAYADT 1 32572 25516 2 30681 26221 3 8532- 7090 4 6188 5 30075 .28476 6 29707 30898 7 5955 5504 ,8 .7265 4694, 9 11596 6471. 10 7661 5725 11 4750 3340 12 7630 6228 13 7716 7586 14 7878 9327 15 10111 8684 16 12937 12113 17 607 - 354 18 945 952 19 1161 1170 20 1 594. 598 - U Aft '(14o �P. O 113067 e]07(227)[1981111. )117 32(272)f2Ojj The Overlook FIGURE 8 2015 Phase 1 Build -out Traffic Conditions LEGEND, Q9L' INTERSECTIONO V)n LANECONFIGURATONS T Mq SIGNAL E) STOP SIGN X.(Y)M AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)[SATURDAY PEAK HOUR]' * DENOTES UNSk4VU 2ED CRITICAL MOVEMENT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION. LOS- B(S)IB1 v U 7 a m O SIGNALIZED .V • SERSEDED (�\ INTERSECTION O INTERSECTION INTERSECTION lJ INTERSECTION lJ INTERSECTION LOS,. B(B)IBI LOSS 8(81181 LOBS B(B)IeI ` �e /ie} 659 t�:m 6(cmcl• - 5 CrJ BB ,� /iA BIB cue 0(�ic 659 4 4 LI /cRc)B )lA, m F - s UNSIGNALZEO iG UNNZE` TP UNSIGNALDED SGNALZED UNSIGNALI2ED NERSECTION INTERSECTION INTERSECTION . INTERSECTION INTERSECTION; LOS=C(B)IBI c�c\ Ilk „)' y'I_ c``•k n �7 s`i _ 859 °859 859 The Overlook FIGURE 9 _2015'Phase:1 Build -out Lane Goometry & LOS • • Table 4 The Overlook Levels of Service;, Delay and -.Back of Queue (95%)-Results, 2015 Phase 1 Background and'Build- out,Conditioos. The Overlook— Revised Tra;(Tc hnpact Sludv VOILKERT June 5,.2013 Page 19 �o ®mo ®mo ®m ® ®mo ® ® °mm E H/WB Route 7' �o ®m0 ®mo ®mo ®mo ®mo ®m ®mmm ®ma ®m °mmom ®o ®m �o ® ®® ®mommo ®m ® ®mo ®m mao ® ®m ®mm ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®v ®® mi0mmmmmom ®ommo ® ®v ®® �A ®mommo ®mm ®mo ®mo ®m m!o ®mo ®m ® ®mm ® ®o ®mo ®m mio ®mo ®mo ®mo ®m ® ®m ®mm EBAVIEl: �o ®mommommo ®mo ® ®o ®m CIA ® ® ® ®mo ®mm ® ®m ® ®o ®® mao® ®moo ® ®m ® ® ® ® ®m ® ®m ® ® ®m ®m ® ®m ®mm ® ®m ® ® ®emmo ®m �o ®v ®vv m! ® ®momm ® ®m® ®momma ®m ® ®mo ®mo ®mo® om ®v ®® �m ®mommamm0mma ®ma ®m �mmmo ® ® ®mmommo ® ® ° ®® m! ©mmm ®m °mmommommA ®m ® ®mm ® ®m °mm °mme ®ma ®m �lv ®mo ®m °mmo ®m ®mm1 ®�� �mmmmmmm ®mmmmmmmomm� ill R,oui ®mmmmmmmmm ®® ®mmmm ®® m! ®mm °mmo ®m °mmommAmm � ®mmmmm® ®mmmm ®mmm ®m mim ®mo ®mo ®mm ® ®o ®mot® ® ®mmm ®me ®m ®mm ® ® ®o ®m The Overlook— Revised Tra;(Tc hnpact Sludv VOILKERT June 5,.2013 Page 19 r Table, 4 (continnea) The Overlook Levels of Service; Delay and'Backiof Queue•(95 %),Results 2015 Phase 1 Background ,and' Build-put 'Conditions • L' B= Em.W.4WB =W- b- ,LNB.= N.flhb -id, SH= S..ffi bowid; L LeR; TMIh R:; Right The Overlook — .Revised Traffic Impact Study June "5, 2013. Page 20 2015 Back round Conditions 2015 Phase LBufld -out Conditions IMenetli.n Ah1 P-k Hour PM P.iik Hour I S urdny.Peek Hour. 6- AM Peak H- Pfll Peak Hour � Setorday. Peak War. LOS -' I) I_ (cosec) -Qu ue- (i fm LOS 'D lay (in sec) Queue (in feet) LOS D lay (Delay Queue ,(if-) - LOS. DO- (in see) Queue (i. feet) LAS D V (m sec); Queue (M WI) � Los DO- -' (i.-) Q � �w On f4o -.. EBIL MIIIA *y r`! 2 YxYN tN I .ui WIAR 1'y„1 w'�'yt' AMT1 I +I� W' n iu2st f6k4:i -f* B 14 , 1 ':3 fi -. C 17 s. 9 6 C 15, 8 9' EBIR Sr.53` t ..,:yi:'n.:'} g'3f ii% L" x m.': 2?� G�SZ;t.��.: " ' � .A 9'.. 1 1 fi B. 12 s: —3 fi H 2fl ER: Site- Drnenas #1 NB/SR: V.Ucy M01 Road EB L.OS *:4 ('r `"s., }.H.e: .- mfr. •"-4i �U+a..,A..`2u,''. .vNk "i'°.' �%Va4V'."d17.'ru'"1'?'t4,;;::%': .: `. -NIA NIA N/A NB/U W� FIw -x(i`k?dN I0NWP3 Oaeti9';; .uRfk %' VAV. :". -4 § IfiSs* ?k°. '::1 .,L". -.°ti.' _ fi .A :9s. 29 A Rs. 1 f NR? .tiflE7, ' -: ?y3b"3S;s4 -° � `yY ;b/��•.. '.'$"/1 c Ys''t }ate Xti•<<:r ''✓s';y Sfz` '3pa N/A N/A N/A N/A N /A•, N /A. N/A T+affte Contr.l: Stop Sig. NBLOS, .'')kw^'at M/4�`3':A\'NN a`> MSaY# x3si `°i4`?- S.•- M'•AFS`;)! +?i` -e'./. - \/A .NIA. SBIf' f v"de'ii,+%' rl.^ ,' '.*'vast �MeYd. + -')P4 «�'."ES�r:, [ yi4'' '�'^' '�.e,?��Ir/i.S, i'L" 4".: �' G:fii: -atJ�' 'N /A N/A N/A N/A N!A N /A. N/A SB/R v"'I, }.�! ".7'a Y< -',<ka 'a::.cr?-,2�4i- 'r..a3/•r a . #.S '.P.: b' :N /A UNIA SB LOS k`�"'htrF/ 813 ".","u?.'as�l(f rii +><F;+;„�'+q-N %,a -'y'e a .3'k'1 N /A,- N/A OVERALL ,"',Aeks rl;.'T .'1"+�F'a'!14N.' f!.�A' •,:J +v I"r`,'4y ! i' ."�'.3s "..*.^.� 2$':?t' .'44 "I NIA' .N /A EBR, ha"� ?wsr.;:. .SH?� ee✓%,'y },'!ti.i f;�£ ?•0!a..7'. a'3;? i4„q ",.'"+•.'d . 7 fl- C 16 s. 6 R B la s. 6 fl EBIR ;`'t" -rte". srl.4s:•1eu ,S�41k,°?)RY;SS' �sA ':iri; �+iM* 'E�"•�A, Sy,.T -f;n', �idtapa`2'S . 1 fl, EB: Site- Driieuay #2' hB Los +.}SSt .:GtS:.�rL'r,.1°F•yai `.4':"f 8'''n'vd ., ii],;.f."..a4t i'Nt3.*,^rl1x, k'ip; y, 1'FLOW1.:: 2c'�:`:. NIA- N/A NIA NB/SB: \'.U- MiHRoad NBIL `h�+.ljfkw - '??:"✓.n -�'i „t ,,.ykx +�; .E m,5'V=m fttAkwo' A '8s. 0fl A 9s. 1''fl A Rs 11 NH/I' : `-3? -'.' S„C•RT.M1 e s.Sl'dy`rc, : �G S",.�';Svs mss•% k'ttill' Ctd!`,a�:,:e N/A N /A^ N/A .N /A N/A N/A N/A 'N /A N/A- '1'mme Conir.l: Stop Sign NB LOS °. 9`z' .`cl; '1E P5'SL' `;$ .,S4,es✓.1,4x e es?'NIYP' ; :'. O'i4'A"ia, "YBt+.- "r.''i ✓I '.'f i' NIA N/A - 'N /A SR? 3i ,9 u�r3'mSY ?. >- R.� 3?.nn .. kif F`+^xr .z.�:.+.'!1:w '?"+x"71 =ti-.3+ N /A, NIA N/A N/A _ N/A - - N/A N/A' N/A N /A. SB/R' SB LOS '$",'� 7z... €,tr).",:�t'?;�ft a /u'r:;?�+..+#- `+'+b.A4yid ' "�t.''�'4^ Ri»..,: e% "�"6:`ta'�; N/A .NIA NIA OVERALL # /3$`iid'- aN.116 w'Sti': N /A. :N /A N/A EB2- wu1, $ 6 fit#( } y 6 a 4 -1 d v' b 3$ b B 1 " -.13 s.. X 7 0 C 16 s: 6 k H 14 s. 6 fl EBIR P,B:Site Dtiveuny #3 NB/SB. \'a Hey MW Raad EB LOS ONMI"VAMN" `, yi{) d? f,, ,f¢,'e,'""k^H`}'%.^�'}?::';LnS, •N /A N/A N/A NB/L 4 ` f,.; ,Y; ?iS i`f'+,fi. NW>d 1,".Y'�SP;NE; /R�",y GIs �'d<'3W_" :.: 'x'4';33 ):2 A Rs. 1. 10 A RS. 3fl A 'R -z 2fl. NBII .+ i'F3Y - "'x '•�dEint!dP. ?�.£r""t a SsS::'E"Y) Ltb?i ,_ �a$'. N/A -N /A I N/A N/A N/A I N/A N/A I NIA NIA T'nlRe Control: Stop Sign - - - NB LOS 1 �'9> 'c"§ -„,k ",o:°iL x'a' eb`C'� , 1 1,�.a & •fi. &? '.,Ih �'- F,e yrip,,,�8,:),,,d :;•$i"ekkF3tp.� ?"mk' w? i :N /A NIA N /A. SBrI Y3 W'757 Y;�G N/A :N /A' -N /A - N/A N!A -N /A N/A-7-N/A NIA SBR' ? oilm —n4fl -. P...'An ~%: YiSKm rw'K-� :N /A :NIA 'NIA N/A N/A N/A • SH LOS a?e:4'eW ),AW- A,#3v W!4 'eY.4k:' wry"h,?i;0s:'+ "r`S' ;4.LL.`Y,iak t'..'e' :i,.C"k ' .: "?i .:N /A - N/A N /A.. OVERALL °E}:31i #w4"iT, "JP,1,'+` . 141,.::, '`. %'L ..If• Sv` ,.,c`7$ ( + S'k1j• �. °; iS' �� -.t$ N/A N/A .N/A -B-7-147 -r-4 — ERR; Erb- �' s,;.,;5 ••rs a"s`i !f : ax. ??.Y fgl &:�'. )fk.Z .3b`#'..`,. ."ar:�r.: B: 17-r-4 —fl C 15 s. 3 H 19 s. 4 fl EBIR - +a &i"M'7LSktt wti9 tyi, „race s.' f!8 s31i , Vyx .; ar?"d'di 4ii,^if,• 0:, 9x21 aB; A i9 s. . •1 -fl, B :. ]I,. l fl EB: Site- D'n-,-y #4 EB LOS - R.W,01.IV SN r'....�. ..4,i .:. ;a P i,1>~'?d gin' rtit.�n ° ..b'9'S” `: Ac$'"�':,�.t3"##a1".'.�"iF:: -= N/A - N/A N /A —A—T-8-77 NB/SB:%.ky M01 Road NBL . 8s Ofl 8 fi 1 -fl . NB? c•if- inW`ur. kusiP.. ir'tt 199'5, "A'S? S`i'v3lY #fl%s i"^F:'A7t33aad x'','6''%c'L}Rf4 NIA" - N/A .N /A N/A N /A. N/A •.N /A N/A N/A '`. 'I'rnf6 Conlrcl: Stop Sig. NR LOS CN, i�u "i >✓'' .I�.°.°-7fi` -�"G +"':.'. 119 s' ice" 513 ? `.`ih -: id N/A .NIA NIA SB ?:; -X3:. s.- `ate•.. -. "> -a3rX A"+" -hx °_e Cb?ff xA3.vtizf5 +3`'.w;� zFA`a N /A. ".NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N /A; SBR a's,':`.,`"!k30 ,:. y" k: 2-`_ ivRt _!y.�'fd1.'xu•°.nvi'!uK""Y'v'Ta �t".'''.ie:.r'a'tiirs`k` -a"F.: N /A; N/A N/A 'N /A N/A N/A NIA N/A N /A. SR LOS sa+.sT'±? k - i'U"rt'.- s'i.i;''.':';V kti',•tm{��,.'3biP.F::.�H.',Y.` N/A N /A. N/A OVERALL `i.'`»tuktity +, f„yt4➢ .ay(f'1'Iil`i3f�d?},,f`F! ' i ?Tt ?$b.4M++k «,°°t,?3o'i$A';mE:+ -? N/A .N /A. N/A L' B= Em.W.4WB =W- b- ,LNB.= N.flhb -id, SH= S..ffi bowid; L LeR; TMIh R:; Right The Overlook — .Revised Traffic Impact Study June "5, 2013. Page 20 PHASE 2 TRAFFIC ANALYSES (2020) The proposed Phase 2,41evelopmentis to include 270 sing] e- family,detached units, - 21';800 square feet of'Retail, a Convenience Mart/ Fast -Food (2,000 square• feet) with a 16 pump Gas Station, a 4,100 square foot. Drive =in, Bank and _a 7,400 square foot High- Turnover "Sit. Down" Restaurant. Access, is to be provided via four (4) site - driveways located along the relocated Valley Mill Road :(Route 659). Access to the retail parcel is provided via the northernmost, driveway (signalized. control).. Access to the residential. parcels is, provided via three (3) other driveways (stop control). Phase 2 isTto be built -out .by Year 2020. , 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS In order to detenine the 2020 background traffic conditions, Volkert, Inc. increased the existing traffic volumes, shown on Figure. 2, using a rate of 0.5 %o per year through Year 2020. Per the September. 2012 VDOT /County approved Scopin,g Agreement, 20% of the Greenwood Road traffic volumes were 'then'reassigned to the new intersection 'of Route 7 /Valley Mill Road. Additionally, all trips relating to specific future "other developments" located within the vicinity of the site were incorporated. Table 5 is provided below to 'summarize the 2020 "other developments" trip generation as determined using rates provided by VDOT (Apartment and Townhouse /Condo residential uses) as well as those included in the, 71h Edition of the 'Institute of Transportation Engineers' :(ITE)- Trip. Generation Report. Figure 10 shows the 2020 background weekday and :Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes, at key locations within the study .area: Figure 11 shows the ,corresponding '2020 background lane geometry and peak hour levels of service results. All Synchro levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section ofthisReport. Table 5 2020 Background "Other Developments Trip Generation Summary Coale. Use, Amount '�M Peak Hour Peak Hour AD "P Saturday Peak Hour � All'I' .Land In Oii[Totall'PM In Out Total In Out Total Red- BudfRun , 210 Single- 17am_ily:Detached 25 units 7 20 27 19 I:1 31 290 19 11 3.1 286 Total 7 -20 27 19 11' 31 290 19 11 31 286 Twin Lakes Phases 9 and 10 210, Single'Family-Detached, 65`units 14' 41 55 46 21 13 _ 700 46 27 73 702 230 Townhouse/COndo* _ 711unils 10 37 47 38 21 58 585 30 24 54 549 Total -24 X78 102 84 .48 131 1284 1 76 ,51 126. 1 -'251 Lynnhaven 210- Single - Family Detached: 3;unils 3 9 12 3 2 5 41 3 2 5 39 820, ,Retail 97,120 SF 88 56 144 274 297 572 6;2 09 '412 380' 791 !8,471 -total 91 65 156 277 299• 576 6;250 414 382 796 8;510 Fieldstone; Development 230 Townhouse_7Cond_o_ * 93 units 13 47 66 49 27 76 .760 39 31- 69 719 Total 13 47 60 49 27 76 760 39 31 69 719 S(iyerelgn Village 210 Single - family Detached 42 units 10 29 39 31 18 49 468 -.31 18 49 466 220 Aparnneni' . 64 units 9 30 39 32 18 50 503 30 18 48 499 820 Retail •' 104;544'SF 98 63 161 309. 335 645' 6,990 463 428 891 9.502 0" ­m Total 18 59 78 63 36 99. 971 61 37 97 964 Haggerty Property ' 210' Single - Family Detached I80-units 34 102 135 115 67 182 1;786 115 67 182. 1,829 220 Apartment* '60 units 8 28 36 30 17 47 472 28 17 45 468 230. 7'6wnhouselCoud6* 60 units 9 31 40 32 18 50 497 - 25 20 46 464 -Dotal 51 161 211 177 102 278 2,754 -168 105' 273 2,760. Opeyuon'.Crossing 210 Single- Family Detached 155 - -units 29, 88 118 100 59 159 1,556 100 59 159 1,589 230 Townhouse/Condo *- 170 units 23. 84 107 88 48 136 1,364 69 55' 124 1;314 'total 53' '173 225 188 107 295 2,920 169 114, 283 2;903 * Detemrined using trip generation ntes pro%ided by VDOT. The Overlook. — Revised Traffic Impacl Study VOLKERT, June. 5, 2013 Page 21 LEGEND O WMRSECMPJ�_ XMIZI AN PEAK HOUR /PM PEAK HOUR)ISATURGAYPEAK HOUR] AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS =(-17 O 2 SITE W4M89(148)[741 'IWO, 7Z, mAYADT SATURUAYADT 32425 25238 30188 24471 8182 5132 6482 5132 29703 28124 29285 30563 6105 5624 7445 4794 1400 8170 7315 5344 4860 3420 6762 5202 7134 .7agy 7267 8772 9m 8627 12836 11995 'ELPP477ON4 Y FUTURE LOrA47P79 �qog;A17910 S FylIIf�q 'IWO, 7Z, LEGEND i, INTERSECTION 0' m e, LANE CONFIGURATIONS #tyi N TRAFFIC SIGNAL ® STOP SIGN x(Y,)M AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)[SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] *. DENOTES UNSIGNALID =D CRITICAL MOVEMENT :SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS-. a (8)[91 vU 0 wa SIGNALIZED O INTER�DN O UNSIONALIZED. O INTERS CETION ��� INTERSECTION' Lo9� 8(6)(8) m LOS- 8(8)(9) LOS- S(9x81 ,�P �-micr C&7 N(AJ)A/ n tcuBtc �j �� 859. ; t] YJV S F LOS�9(B)(B ���Afe /fie/ n g' The .Overlook FIGURE 11 2020- Background Lane Geometry.& LOS 0 PHASE.2 TRIP GENERATION • Volkert, 'Inc. utilized the latest 81 Edition ,of the: Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip_ Generation Rgport'to establish the total trips for Phase 2 of The Overlook. Table- 6 is provided to summarize the total tripigeneration,associated.with the Phase 2 development. Table•6. Proposed Development: The Overlook Phase2 Trip Generation. Summary ITE Code Land Use 'Amount In A,1TPeak Hour Out Total In PWlaeak Hour Out Total ADT I In Sat Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 Single- Family Detached 270 units 50 149 199 162 95 257 2700 132 117 250 2720 820, Retail 21;800 SF 38 24 63 110 119 229 2,523. 166 X153 318 3,539 853 Convenience Mart w \pumps '16 pwnps 133 133 265 153 153 305 8,682 82 78 160 3,272 912 Drive -in Bank 4,100'SF, 28 22 51 53 53 106 607 57 52 109 354 932 Id;T Restaurant 7,400 SF' 44 41' 85 49 34• 83 941 55 49 104 1172 933 Fasffood w /out DT 2;000 SF 53 35 88 '27 26 52 1432 53 56 109 1392 (located inside Conv. Mart); Sub -Total 346 404 750 553 479 1,032 16,885 545 505 1,050 12,449 Internal Trips: "(to /front Rev. And'Non =Rev.) 30 30 60 39 39 77 810 37 37 75 816 Pass- by'Mps25% (Code820) 8 8 16 29 29 57 631 40 40 80 885 Pass- by'THPsO% (C6de.853 1933) X71 71 .141 71 71 143' 4,045 54 54 108 1,865 Total "New" THpsl Trips 23$ 296 534 1 414, 340 754 . 11,399 414 374 788 1 8,882 PHASE 2 TRIP' DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trip "s was. based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed site. Per the VDOT /County approved Scoping Agreement, Volkert, Inc. utilized. the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 12 to assign the proposed The Overlook development Phase 2 development trips (Table 6) throughout the study area roadway network. Trip distributions at the site - driveways remain consistent with_ Figure 6A. Figure 13 shows the development - generated trip as- signments for the weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday, AM/PM land Saturday mid -day peak hours. PHASE 2 (2020), BUILD -:OUT CONDITIONS The Pliase 2 development assigned trips (Figure 13.) were added to the'2020 background traffic : volumes (Figure 1,0) to obtain 2020 build -out conditions. Figure 14 shows the' 2020 'Phase 2 build -out weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM/PM' and Saturday mid -day' peak. hour traffic Volumes, at key locations within the, study area: Figure 15 shows the corresponding build -out lane :geometry and peak hour levels of service results. All Synchro levels ofservice worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this Repoft: Table- 7 .is. provided below to' show the 2020 background and Phase 2 build -out levels of service,. - vehicle delay and 95th percentile back of queue, by lane group /approach, for each of the study <area'mtersections. The Overlook — Revised Tra jfic Impact Studio V�OLKERT June 5, 2013 Page 24 i j 1 1 1. I I f I i f I f i I i ' 1 I i t r f IF rN. �F P Jq IRRI;V d.EP DcF sag �T SITE •;O J' Rs - 65s ' VALLEV ` ILL �W RD' X25% o� Gp ��'-•1� V Cf �4w-:J The Overlook FIGURE 12 Phase 2' Trip Distribution Percentages I i t I t I I r 1 1 I ] 1 l I j j I LEGEND - '�1� INTERSECTION#. X (Y)Rl AN PEAK FIDUR (Pm PEAK HOUR)tSATURDAY PEAK HOUR) A9 i iQ. AVERAOEDAILYTRIPS /ADT)C..•" -. - X(- 17]d] :D OTES PASS43YfTPJPS 0 WEEMAYADT SATUROAYADT kc�$ 2221 4p.. 2 456D 3553 . d• - 12 3 12085 :8524 • 3990 3108 5 - 3020. ._2865 Y - 8 3420 2885 SITE ° ,q B 0 S I �' �B °q '+ 'TQ•3 B 1710 1332 +9 10 1710 1332 ?° 410 `PQtY� 11 0 0 1 ° 859 4. v 12 3980 3108 fy13 2280 1770 t� '.14 2280 1778 13, ' _ �. v is 1140 888 to 1140 888 - 47 14074 .8814 2•. C 18 850 958 19 1133 1141 +ZD 728' 737 .7q �ft'? S S9(JS7) /ISVO� 4. 859 %044(541561 ..- �,j,Ks (6j /34 59(68)1751 � _ � 5 J/ / _ x/859 _ /Jl/(4J)14J %24(40141/ \ \1a\l \y41�� �I b� z 1 F' V (D 81 9i - 0 /9q /(R - -s174 ' JpaJ ., IJ 7dy� ��i 1 i i i 1 y ti1�► The Overlook FIGURE 13 Phase 2 Development - Generated Trips 1 I ( f I it t I f 4 1 Ir I LEGEND h1 MTERSEC710H 0' X MIZJ! AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)]SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] O AYERAOEDAILY.TRiPS]A 7 y R 2 m N. 4 l z %. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 -16 17 18! Y9 .20- O /28%Q N WEEKDAYADT ,SATURDAYADT 35275 27458 34747 28024 lase 13656 10452 8241 1 33123 30.789 32705 33228 6105 5624 7445• 4794 13110 7502 9024 6877 4860 3420 10752 6317 9414 8808 046 10548 11120 9415 13976 12884 14074 9814 950 956 1133 1141 728 737 !Spq �J 6/43g� /11 71 R133(199)11311 ry1`Q: The Overlook FIGURE 14 2020 Phase 2 Build -out Traffic Conditions. LEGEND INTERSECTION . 3,Y N V LANE CONFIGURATIONS 59 � ;; TRAFFICk(INAL .. O 9 ® 'STOPSIGN .. SIGNALZED O INTERSECTION LOS. B(BI(BI X(YAZI AM PEAK NOUR(PM PEAKNOUR/ISA7URDAYPEAK HOUR] SIGNALIZED O INTERSECTION LOSe S(BIIBI -* DENOTES UNSIGNALMED CRITICAL MOVEMENT _ . 3,Y 59 SIGNAL ZFD INTERSECTION LOS- C(C)[CJ .. O 9 .SIGNALED .INTERSECTION �LOS C(c)[81 .. SIGNALZED O INTERSECTION LOS. B(BI(BI UNSIGNALDED O INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED O INTERSECTION LOSe S(BIIBI �r jjtT Q � B� /e� a � 59 �` � BNltcl' 659 � Q 5 e c o Ic)iaic�, �� 859 b A MONALD'ID INTERSECTION .LOS�B(CI[el O e8lGNALIZED,. si - INTERSECTION �p LOB6BlB1I81 8< s UMUGMALDPD �T INTERSECTION y; :� UNSIGNALRED T.n .INTERSECTION TO UNSwNALDED INTERSECTION r k. g�7 a: 859 859 859 859 The Overlook FIGURE 15 2020 Phase 2 Build -out Lane .Geometry & LOS U Table',7 The Overlook Levels�of Service, Delayand Back of Queue (95 %)Results' .2020. Phase 2 Background and Build -out Conditions EB' =Eaittwund, N'B= Wesibnwid -; tB= Northbowtd, Sit, Somhluuindt,: Left,"- TaTvu, R: Right VolaKThe Overlook - Revised Traf is Imoact Study E. June 5 2013 Page 29 2020 Back round Conditions 2020:Phase'2 BuiWout-Conditions Irn_ersection .. PM Peak [lour Salurdae Peak floor A\1: Peak flour P\1 Peak flour Saturday Peak Your - LOS Delay . :. (m see) Queue LN feel) LOS Delay (in sec) Queue (in feet) .LOS - 'Delay ._ (in sec) Queue _. (in feel) ,LOS - Delay (m sec) Queue Cu• feet) LOS Delay (In sec) Queue (in feel) EBrF IBS, J9s 2153 ff C 21!s. 256'11. B 18 s. - 471 fl B ]Ss. 28411 B ]7s. '250.1 IiBIR fl - A '..3 s. 35 -ft _- A 3 s: 17,R A 3 s. 37 fl A 2 s. 30 ft EBAVB: Route 7 Ell LOS B B B B B WR/E D 42 s. 145.fl :D. 52.s. 181 (i D, _. 43s. fl: 'D 44s. 148 ff-. D 52s. mii it NB: Baggtrty Connection WI3(r B. ,12's. 1352'11 _ "B' 10 s: 190 fl A 6s. 1'0'7 '8 B 12 s. 383 fl A 8 s. 178 fl VVB LOS B - B ,A 'B B Traffic Control: Signaliretion NB/L C 31a. }123.0 C 25 s. 121 It D 36 s. - 193;ft -,C 33 s.. 125 ft C 28 s. 127 ft NBIR A S's. 3911 A 7:s. 3711 A 8s. •49,fl A. 9s. 3911 A :8 s. 39 i1 NB LOS C B C C B OVERALL .B B -'B B _ B EB /UD 48's. 60'fl D 43 s. 57 ft; D <52 s: 62�ft D 51's.. 31'fl D 45 s. 59 fl EB/r C 22 s.. 332.1 _ B 15 s. .251 ft B 20 s. 3840 D 39 s. 384.0 - - C 23 s. 305 0 Ella A 5s. 24fl 'A 3s. =19 0 A 2 s.. 32'0 B 17.s, ;1470 A 3's. 49 it HB•LOS - C B B _ C It WB/L -. D 46 s. 245 1 D 53 s. I86 0 D 54 s. 194 fl D 49 s. 422 fl D 52 s. 329 ft EBAVB: Route 7 WB?_ 'B 13s. 3951. A 9 s. 226 fl A.8 S. 1620. B 12s; 371 it A, IOs. ,207 NB: Valley Mill Road WB. LOS •13 B 'a C C _ N BfL C' 35.1 59 "ft D 36 s. 54 fl _D 51 s. '279 R D 53 s. 258 11 D 48 s. 265 8 Traffic Control: SignaRration NB/R A 9`s.. 53 ".ft .A .9. s. 55!H B :17s: ' 99, it A 9 s. 108 11 A 9 s. 41 1 NB LOS 'B B C C C OVERALL B B C C C EBIL D .43 s. 16 11 .D 42 s. 13.R D 53.s. - 9611 D 40s. ]sit D 41 S. 13 fl EBlr' C' 26 -s. 357;1 B' - IH's: 3611' C 29: s.- 473.R C '25's. 38711 B 20s. 385'R FR/R A, 8s. 54 ft A 6 s. 61 ft B -i I`s. 3311 A 7 -s. 'S0 R A 7 s. 7211 EB2WB: Route 7 Ell LOS -.0 B C C B W B/L -D 45's. 1460 `2 45 s. 83'fl D 46 s. 36 ft D 46s. 139 fl D 40s., 79.11 NBi GreeneuodRoad R'R? 'B `I3 s. 344'11 -B 12s. 329.11 D 36 s.. 421.fl B 35's. :379fl B its. 318 fl SB: MS t. Woods Drive. WB/R A 4 s. 9 ft A 5 s. 411 A 5 s. 37 ft. A 7 s. 4 '3 R '1'ra1Bc Control: Signaltration `_. WB LOS' B _B C _ B l3 - NBILTR C 289. 15911 _ _ C 29s. 151 ft -D - 51,s. 338 R C 35s, 181 ft C 29 s. 154 fl NB LOS C C. D' C C" SB/LT C - 26 s. Slifl C, 27 s. .39 fl' ':D 39.s., l34 ft -C 29 s. 851 _ C' .27 -s: SB/R. B 14 s. ll fl A 9.s. 28 it `B 13 s.. 24 fl B ' 15 s. I l ft A 9 s. 29 R SB LOS C B C C B OVERALL, - '.0 -B C, _ C _ B. 2Ss: 40 fl C 26, 35 ft C 28, 4211 C 28s. 40 fl C- 28 s. '36fl EB/IR- -C 29's. .18911 C 24.5. 115`11 C 'r20 s. 96 "R C 35s. 19311 C' 6 s. 125.8 Ell LOS' C - C C �C - _ C WB/L B 20 s. 74fl If 18 s. 71'11 B '18 s_. 74 ft' C' 30 s. _ 109a B- 2O s. : '77fl EIIAM Valley X101 Road WB?R B I1 -s. 75 fl - A 7s. 47 fl B, 13 s. 97 it B 14s. 75 R A 8 s 51 It NB/SB: Greenmod Road " WB. LOS 'B, B B B- - B NB/C $- 16 s. 12S K B l l's. 60 ft -B "n s. 91 ft 1B 17.3. 435 11 B I l s. 62 ft 'traffic Control: Sigtialintion NB?R Bi I1 s. 136 ft - A 5 s. 57 ft A 9s: 118 0 B 12 s. 1711 fl A S s. 55 R NB LOS B -. ,A B 'B' 'A SB /L B` l4's. 10 fl B 12 s. 69 ft A i0 - 31' 45 ft B 11 s. 71 R ' SB" B 12s 146fl 'A 9, s. 56fl A 9s. 6T0 A 7s: 7611 A 9s. 57 ft. Sit Los W - B A A A OVERALL - B 'B B B ,B _ WB/L, B. 15 s. 60 fl A 9 s. 1011 B 15 s. 44'. R D 28s. 191 8 C 23 s. 126 R NVB/R '.N /A 'N/A. ,N /A N/A N/A 'NIA 'N /A N/A '.N /A N/A ',N /A :N /A N/A N/A N/A WB: Valley.Mill Road NB: Ching Dnve WB LOS N/A N/A N/A _ N/A N/A N13T . 'N /A N /A. N/A N/A N/A N.tA N /A. N/A `N /A 'N /A 'N /A. N/A N/A N/A N/A SB: Valley "Nii6 Road' NB/R- iN /A' rN /A N/A N/A "N /A NIA N/A N/A -N /A N/A iN /A N/A N/A NIA N/A Tragic Control: Stop Sign NB LAS N/A N/A 'N /A -N /A N/A SWL A '8 s. 611 C 23 s 1261 :A 9 s. 14 11 A 9 s. 12 11 A 9 s. ]Oil SBrr N /A. N/A N/A N/A N/A :NIA N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ,N/A Sit LOS N/A N/A N/A -N /A _ OVERALL N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - _ C 35s., 15511. C - -29 s. !200It C '351s 9911 D 42 s: ;19111 C "27 s. 18811 EBfr B 17s. 159 11 B 13 s. .116'11 B. 15 s. -77 11 B 19 s. 154 ft B .12 s. 109 It EB/1V6 Sedseny :Road :EB LOS B _ C C. C C WB/r �B; 15s:- 126:11 B 12. s. 909 :C. 21 s. 155 fl: D I8s: ". 422 ft B 11s. 8Sfl SB: Charing Wile WB/R �A 3 -s.. 22 It A 3 s. 26 "fl A 4 "s. 25 fl . A "2 s. .23 ft A 2 s. 25 fl Will LOS A. A B 'B A TiaBic Contiol:Signafi aMion SWI. B L s. 60'fl B I4s. 109 R A 7 s: 39fl C 2Ls, 117 R B , .a4,.. IOSifl SB/R 'A, 3s: 39 fl A 4 s� 51`ft A 2s. 25 ft. A 7 -s.. 65 It - A 4s: '51 1' ' SB LOS. A A A B- A 'OVERALL. B" B B B B EB' =Eaittwund, N'B= Wesibnwid -; tB= Northbowtd, Sit, Somhluuindt,: Left,"- TaTvu, R: Right VolaKThe Overlook - Revised Traf is Imoact Study E. June 5 2013 Page 29 Table %(Continued) The Overlook Levels of''Service, Delay and Backof 4)ueue•(951/,) Results 2020 Phase .2 Background and,Build =out; Conditions f 2020'Back round Conditions 2020. Phase 2 Bt ild,00t Conditions. ,intersection PN Peak floor Saluiday;Peak Dour AN Peak hour I'M Peak -Iiuur Saturday Peak'llaui 'LOS Delay (in set) Queue :(in feet), .Delay (n see) Queue (in feet)' LOS Delay. (ins fe) Queue; (in feet) IAS Delay (in see),. Queue ;(imfeeQ �S Uelay" (m sec) Queue. (in feet) EB /L: t&7,0rsv k4*� m irk a.a .era i :k �8xt •'1��x'l113s'. 4:' q D 44. 170 it D; 43 s. 223;H D EB/R 4 •.":s ,Y . ' Sk a : ?` ,`3' ?'W9 Q1 %n A 9 s.. 34: ft A 6 s. 39. fl A EB:.Site- Drfire-3y#1 NB /SB: Valley. �7iB Road ER LOS t;14%"s' "ckrk2 ' IMTA e M i z "bM 4N 'C C - C NB/L. _ _I .�S�rw 210��• ;"? ^a:.?_+` 'r ' A `5 s: :36 it A 11 s. 5191 A ..8 s. 62 fl -NB/T ,- "= 5',2ta, iv:,'aai ''_�^?,4ru i; '!':Klr z' A - G s..- I51 ft. A- lOs. IIS�It A 7 s. 118'11 Traffic control, Sigtiaflntion - . .. - NB LOS i,�n" ""', .'roFj,'rs ,1 �i11 db; 1n,i,'2 - t'$yTk'L?:t '.,' Y'y'[�X'w�,�.. A A :A -- SB/1' . t`„ = + e zv is i .y" .?-` ':>x ..& a1;a..; "z'- z _ A 2 s. 26'ft A. 2 s. 3 ft A 3.s: 49 fi _ SB /R :. 't«,r.,�::, q,; '^'"y�"3:* R,'' v, �.�a -,-es n.".ijC,:e'gR?,?teh°M. w ., A 1's: Oft A 1 s. 00 A ;l s. 0'R SR L03 'NW-W rldd. =M.; .""�' 4.0 lY W.N_i f'uv.�Yti`?`e A A A. OVERALL .1" =°='§ "bi4a,;f. *:v",'- :.;,X`4're"»r [x..^....°5 . - B B B - - .EBfL "I m2Dire mwm mss. -'°N Vwm ° AZ .C, .I6�s: !10 fi; C 19 s -.. 8 ft C' 17's 9, fl ;EIVR ,'"'a,,,',,;c$'z'r. c�.Y s :R,)Y `,^ `:cat -. •`" ': .�'a;.l'Sv? -�` ';":? "r: A 10s. I It B 12 -s I It B 41 s: 1 fl EB: Site -D rive..ay 42 NB /SB:Nalley'Mill Road. EB. LOS, °' as .' to �4?: =: �„'. x _ _ N/A _ N/A , \/A NB /C Yiu..°` � 4 e("u+- '�u," v."it u�;' 'B � au+s # "lk'm'.: A - 8 c. 0 f A '9 s. `I'sft: 'A 8 s. O fl NBrI'- �"°'^_�"? 4.•',5:: ::41 ..,r: /d; -.xi' � ?.X¢'oiv:: .' N/A N/A N /A.- N /A._ N/A N/A N/A N!A N/A Traffic Control:. Stop Sign. NB IDS "�_'?�A «'�:''X�• x.a.'>a'ibu'. +I:i= N/A N/A �i N/A - tSBrF Y'w `'11x' s�,i';4j('�y,a :w34':YA 1: ism T'E 'N /A N/A N /A'.. , N/A N /A' NIP: N /A' N /A. N/A SB /R �� 3 �.�" .'n' %sa F"",2. ,` "�. �P y' .' " 4"OW N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N1A N/A N/A N/A TSB LOSbZ�n16:�T1c1�;N /A N/A N/A OVERALL m'v.,i!;A"/r"'°.��:. ` ",,.°",:a.rws�tacT..�.r" - `N /A NUA N/A. EB/l, ;;;f W I'V0101 . t°r`.Yfi "r+ M ,R ,s ` m .w'.; C I S -s. 10 fi C 19 s: 8 fl C 17 s. 9 fl _ EB/Ft. n+.4.3;aiw+ Fs,•'',';,.:Szn'+M"`i„ "..,.� t'; z'�sYxY; m'&M B _ 12 s: 2 f B I l,s.. 3 fl EB: Site- Dii —y#3 NB /SB: Valley Mill Road EB LOS 'i ,;;" {,. r, 4e N`, r'Is$4 >;t=&L c -_a^t� a'D4S t" s 5'',- �,._`. N/A - N /A' N/A /1. kRl` 2 �?'� nom`_ [i' DW u' c �u`ti[z A 87s "1 ft A 9 s. 2 ft A 8 s. 2 ft /I' p;3W x'd^'.'''�t:..F:sr f•"l;x trwss�"... N/A N/A N/A N /A' N/A N /A. N/A N/A _ N/A Traffic Control: Siop Sign OS i " gb;by'S",�• �i�: ,1: 17" N': '0: { y ki'- .?"..ti `s''.?. N,"" N /A. _ � - N/A N/A I' ESSB .,:,at' 4gi^.i' 'r.,. -v; to.Y,.r`?c,`'s�v N/A N/A N/A - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A R, N /A N/A- .N /A N/A N /A, N /A- N/A N/A N /A• OS :' "+it$r5099w j::>;•'!c 0.51 �'+ .s f3�^-t,.n�i..u;• "`.zr: a,�6 N/A - 'N/A N/A ALL zi�AF r fi: +' ±.; '.,. s�...^ .c"s xs '_r". N /A... N/A - N/A - EBIf: k`,.r' A`- ?E'tl?,+�.."3':�185Ea' ' WW'119f. 1 I'm.Vjv S`:4''`)iuZa"+ B. 'C: 11s: 4'11 EB7Lssv`:a. :� ?riEx..:v:. f"„$' "'.it",&�'4v'i r-"'t.„•: .A - - IOs.- I:ft - - B .I l: s. I It B II s. I fi EB: Site -Drive Nay p4 NB /SB:;VaOey'Mill Road Ell LOS 1 �'� ��F; '�i'F;hs% �,"; fl'arW'•k �', L7,Iw's N/A - N /A- N/A NB/L 4{i .c %i 4',i fyipr -" ,r"''i. M1'.,' 'k „t d i.°? `f'w`d: A 1 8,. 1 07 A 9s 1 fl. A - 8 -s i ft NBrI' y -u`'„; '. 'tYtiai .N /A - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N /A. 'Traffic Contml: Stop Sign NB LOS ,'4w_ :'A, ?, x ": ^aa'1 ' F '. W -:'^ AM—NE M'M` 1 N/A - N /A. -N /A . ISB /f: ,�.1' "ia w'S 'i -c i'.. 1' n' sk`�% 3#a • C 4' P,WW ii N/A -N /A - N /A, - - N/A N/A N/A N/A 'N /A :�N /A SB /R ;yam .- fir',? -✓ .�', u` sue;!;a ssdm N/A N/A NIA N!A . N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SR IDS tRXI — 1 1''.. . st...w. I'll :ui.?';&'::% . \!A N/A ,N/A OVERALI 31k. ''�''?"F`- �s"a3f'�%.'z`';��iC44 Y. -.'':? ! ..N /A N/A :N/A BB = Ba obola n, N'H = N'CSilnlaNl, ,`!tl = ..�lnnlNal ➢IQ NH - -Uta nlalq L: LCn::I ,I Ml, K: Klgnl The Overlook — Revised Ti q is Impact Studv VOLKERT Jiine 5, 2013 Page 30 I I ,1 i • "DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSES .(2026) As, per VDOT Chapter 527 requirements, Volkert, Inc. has provided traffic analyses ,,assuming, a "Design Year" of 2026 (6 -years after build -out). This, condition assumes the completion of the interchange of Route -7 /Route, 37 with 500 vehicles per hour assigned to each ramp (as per the September 2012 scoping agreement). All other methodology remains consistent with the Phase 2 Background and.Build -out conditions, respectively. 2026 "DESIGN YEAR" BACKGROUND CONDITIONS In order to determine the. 2026 background traffic conditions; Volkert, Inc, increased the existing traffic: volumes,; shown on Figure 2, using a: rate of 0.:5,% per year through Year .2026:. Per, the September 2012 VDOT /County :approved Scoping Agreement, 20% of the Greenwood Road traffic volumes were: then reassigned'.to the new`intersection of Route Walley ;Mill Road. :Additionally, all. trips relating to specific, future "other developments" located within the vicinity of the site were incorporated (See Table 5). Figure ,16 shows the 2026 background .weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM /PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour "traffic volumes, at key locations within the study area. Figure 47 shows the corresponding 2026 background' lane geometry and peak hour levels of service results .All. S' hro levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this Report. THE OVERLOOK TRIP,DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution, of trips' was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network. surrounding the, proposed site. ;Per the VDOT /County approved Scoping Agreement, Volkert, Inc. utilized °the trip distribution. percentages shown' in 'Figure 18 to assign the proposed,'The Overlook ,development Phase 2, development trips (Table 6). ,throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 19 shows the development- .generated assignments for the weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as the weekday AM/PM and Saturday rriid -day peak hours. 2026 "DESIGN YEAR" BUILD =OUT CONDITIONS Thee Phase, 2 development assigned trips (Figure 1:8) were :added to the 2026 background traffic 7volumes (Figure, 1,6) to obtain 2026 "Design Year" build -out conditions. Figure 20 shows'the :2026 "`Design Year " - build -out weekday and Saturday ADT, as well as..the weekday AM/PM and.. Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes; at key locations, within the study area. Figure 21 shows the corresponding build -out lane geometry and peak hour levels :of service results. Ali Synch :levels . of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this Report. , , Volkert, Inca -,has provided. Table 8 to show the ,2026 "Design Year" background and build -out levels of` service, vehicle delay and 95t' percentile back of queue;, by lane group /approach,, for each of the •study area. intersections: TTr nm The =Overlook -. Revised Ti aMle:Impact Study oLi \ELtl June 5, 2013 Page.31 1 i 1 i i t 1 r 1 i LEGEND 0 WERSECTIOHa. ' X (Y)[Z) AN PEAK HOUR (PH PEAK HOUR)[SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] InAVERAGE DALLY TR/PS(ADT) -O. L SITE ,1Po938)l85/ The ,Overlook FIGURE 16 2026 "Design Year" Background Traffic Conditions WEEKDAYADT SATURDAYAOT' 47396 37631 36510 31655 10242' 10062 10242' 10062 36026 35608 35556 38077 6275 5764 7655 4814 11760 8380 7485 5444 4986 3510 10552 10152 10914 12001 11017 13742 12060. 11157 The ,Overlook FIGURE 16 2026 "Design Year" Background Traffic Conditions C� J LEGEND ��1 INTERSECTION# (� +LANE CONFIGURATIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL e, STOPSION X(Y)[Z] AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)[SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] * DENOTES UNSIGNALRED CR "ICALWOVENIENT 1cKc)c �f 8 S m O SIGNALIZED 1110""D INTERSECTION ..O' INTERSECTION LOS- SIS)ISI 'LOS- SM)IBI m 559 � a(A)lal e L m 2 fL iC al INTERSECTION LOS- D(D)[D] 8('LIIA) The Overlook FIGURE 17 20026 "Design, Year" Background Lane Geometry & LOS I � O WY O-' o �A Q Jn(U! lckx I ¢o a , a SIGNALIZELG_ L INTERSECTION LOS- C(D)(CI9 1cKc)c �f 8 S m O SIGNALIZED 1110""D INTERSECTION ..O' INTERSECTION LOS- SIS)ISI 'LOS- SM)IBI m 559 � a(A)lal e L m 2 fL iC al INTERSECTION LOS- D(D)[D] 8('LIIA) The Overlook FIGURE 17 20026 "Design, Year" Background Lane Geometry & LOS Fo The Overlook FIGURE 18 "Design Year" Trip Distribution Percentages LEGEND GINTERSECTION? X QNZ] AM PEAT( HOUR /PM PEAK HOUR][SATURDAY PEAK HOUR] AVERAGE DAILY-TRIPS (AD 7]0 - X( -Y)[-Z] DENOTES PASS-BY TRIPS K 11,1!\x,00 SITE r NJ �io��6�aJ i gas,_ 1>� 0 WEEKDAYADT SATUROAYADT 1 .2850 ,2221 2 4500 3553 3 12005 8524 4 3080 3100 5 -3420 2805 0 3420 2865 7 0 0 5 0 0 9 1710 1332 10 1710 1332 !1 0 0 12 3900 3108 13 2280 1770 14 2280 1778 15 1140 888 15 1140 888 17 14074 9.014 18 950 958 19 '1133 1141 20 728 737 O E ILai /(at)za� - �Sal4ill4l/ The Overlook FIGURE 19 "Design Year" Development-Generated Trips LEGEND: O#NTERSEC77ON0 (Y)(Z]. ; AM PEAK HOUR (PU PEAK HOUR)(8ATURDAY PEAK HOUR) I 1 JAVEPAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADT) 0 n SITE ..fix 0 WEEIIiAYADT SATIIRDAYADT' - 1 49337 38095 2 38940 34520 3. 22326 18606' 4 14232 13191. 5 1 39445 .38273 6 36977 '40742 1y 7 6275 5764. 8 7655 4814 '9 13470 7712 .6 '^ 10 8184 6777 11 4960 3510 12 '14542 13261 13 13194 13778 f4 13296 15518 15 :13200 ,12045 18 16106 15574 17 14074 9614 18 950: 956 18 .1139 1141 20 728 -737 J 10 . /lam a5Q4 Qom\ q yJ �t'�' �`b5 / J•3 d� bti� _ .!.4 �`�\ .o,� t l ���` ;,-/Q ?291 -JI6 (Jp9 The Overlook FIGURE 20 2026 "Design Year" Build -out Tragic Conditions I f LEGEND. "1! INTERSECTION# �Qnf LANE CONFIGURATIONS TRAFFICSIGNAL E. STOP SIGN xcnrn AM PEAK HOUR (PM PEAK HOUR)ISATURDAY PEAK HOUR] *- DENOTES UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL MOVEMENT Cpl /C/ I O E SKLNAL�D INTERSECTION LOS-B(C O SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS-SPIN ! - MONALIZED O LVTERSEC710N LOS- 8(p)[81 SIONALQED O INTERSECTION LOS- S(D)fflI p� C' ^ )ISI (�V s /s� /s ' A(A)JAI e` 10(c) 659 m 559 m y O y V' �.D t'' .SIGNALgM r; INTERSECTION .. COS. 0(S)(S1 8, UNSIGNALIZED'. S,ITELSECTION 9, T,i,.. UNStGNALIZED INTERSECTION 10 UNSIGNA ar. INTERSECTION, G V •�� r✓ G, R(Ol(Cl; /0 Ta Z /Oroz, /� /' g ,0?4, . 9 a� C , � C• �w�o scJ; INTERSECTIONY Los=crol[C] , 559 859 859. „ 859 The Overlook FIGURE 21 2026 "Design Year" Build -out Lane Geometry & LOS Table :8 The Overlook Levelsof Service, Delay and'Back of Queue (95 %) Results ,20.26, ",Design Year" Background and Build- out - Conditions The 'Overiook— Revised Traffic Impact Siti VO4KERT June 5, 2013 Page -38 SB:,R.61e 37 ©moo ® ® ®® Nfl: Valley Mill Read ®v® ®® ®moo �000v ®o IEHAVBiva ®AO ®vv MM W."Im® ®moo ©® -o�AOo The 'Overiook— Revised Traffic Impact Siti VO4KERT June 5, 2013 Page -38 Tables (C..U—d) The Overlook Levels of Service, Delay and Back of.Queue (95%) Results 2026 "Design Year" Background,and Build-,out Conditions - The - Overlook — Revised Traffic Impact Sludv June 5, 2013 VOW Page 39 2026 Back round Condid ns 2026 "Desi gn Year" Build-out Conditions . lwrtt.j.. A I Ptik flon, PM PCak How S.1"y. Peak H.- XM Peak flo- FAI Peak How S—Wm�, N.k H.- LOS D, 1. ­ y (In —) 9-eue (i. imi S I �[oy - (.—) Q.. (i.f—) k,?S DO.y (i.'set) �Q.. (6� rie'; 'LO DO.', Q.. (i. f-D LOS, (m sec) Q ocu�! "(W (M) IOs �D D,I,y, (i—c) Queue (i.r-D EWL Vmwa� ffeo-vqimn� — OW I'-- ta-11— D D 53 271 0 D 52, 271 d —44 EBIR �agll;.m 1 Al 10, A 7 42 ft A ft EB LOS 1�11��-WWI�It� F 9�9i-W MOIVPNd 1-14 D D D NRISB: Valley MN Road NBIL 47 A 1 5, 1 ig i A 1. 7Fft A 2 '. 75.n NBrI m �4,, w--rj upm- VS MI-V A. 6 i. 2219 A 8s:` 1-205 ft A 2100 9 Tmffic Control: SignaLLmlion NO LOS A A A swr '*U;Iwvl A 3 t: 13 fl A 6,. 1 96H — SBIR %,w4rmp- 91 6 M�A 'SH LOS A A OVERALL j-IPPqi,` B H EBIL "ru M D 32 7-15fi D 33,- p EBfR M., 2 B 13s. 2 fl EB: Sitt-]M—y #2 EB LOS NIA NIA NB/SB;. V.11e , �Mifl,R..d N B/L A bs. Ufl —A-71-0 A 19, 1 it NBfr W�� N/.4 N/A NIA NIA NIA I*mffic Con"]: St,psi., NB LOS NIA N/A NIA SB/I' N77 NA NA NA A NIA NIA NIA N/A SBIR. i V4b, V",Mj7 , IM�ip WA I WA 'NIA N/A NIA N/A SB DOS • 441WFIfflInPFIIR�^RW-i&e* ItIlmq §15;WN-MMIN NIA NIA N/A OVERALL NIA N/A EBIL U;�m �W� am;40, '0 " Rf- MOW, C 1 20 _ la H 11� 1 YT �-D 32, 199 --------- -1 -, --r�— — EHfR 5.-� I W.' wo katw� vw-m 01— ! = i —B—T-- -I -7 7 1-1 - t— It ED: She !Dni—nty #1 NBISB: Valley M W R..d ER LOS TqA5IWRNW, NIA NIA --A--71-0 NA --A—T-9 —s-T —2ft NB/L A47m- 1 IM6091-11 1 1W WIKk Z�I j9e4 lxltJ m A ft �—F-3 It— NHrF . ,�e W�k4'" 1 rmffic Control: Stop Sign — NB LOS -.4 N/A N/A N/A -F—N/A s8n, NIA NIA N/A N /A.-T N/A SB/RI RX-!M NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA SB LOS - NIA OVERALL r _•NIA NIA NIA N/A FBJL —6. D 70 MISM i ;IXIW711t *Vmq tVftWll 1 10'. 1 IAI EB: Sil,.Di,,-y 94 NBISB: Valley Mill Road ED LOS N/A N/A NRrL A 8 : 0 fi A 9, Ifl A 9, Ifl NBT w'**,--, '-N-W'W �ne NIA NIA NIA 1 mfric Con(ml: Stop Sig, NB LOS `oM '�C,6-Wa W- I NIA NIA NIA SBIr wwl,�; i VA110"MA 4WWIv "Oft eWA.14a NIA I N/A NIA N,/AA � NIA NIA NIA SWR VrNM MOM, �M;O N/A I NIA NIA: !�NIA, N NIA NIA I NIA 'A NIA NIA SB LOS Q F NIA NIA VA: OVERALL NIA NIA MA The - Overlook — Revised Traffic Impact Sludv June 5, 2013 VOW Page 39 CONCLUSION" Each of the study area intersecfions were evaluated using .Synchro 7.0 capacity analysis software. The following. describes then results for the future Phase 1 Phase• 2 and. "Design Year" build- out,traf_ fie conditions analyzed in this Study: PHASE-1 (201'5):• 2. 3. Route 7 c& .Haggerty Connection Road:; Signalized capacity analyses revealed. overall :level s of'service of "C" or better during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak hours. All' lane groups; maintain levels of service o f "D or better. This; intersection would, be. implemented ;in conjunction w11th the build -out the Haggerty Development Tle ,' Sttudy assumes an eastbound'r`ight =turn lane;, as westbound left -turn lane; a:norihbound left, -:turn lane and a northbound right -tum lane. Route •7 &, Realigned Valley Mill Road. Signalized capacity, analyses "revealed .overall levels;, of'service; of" B" or better during.. the weekday A1VI/PIVI and Saturday midday peak'. hours. A111ane groups _maintain levels of'service of "D" or better This intersection would relocate to the west from its currenf, locafion along Route 7. The .Study assumes an, eastbound right -turn lane a westbound left -.turn lane, a northbound left -turn `lane, and- a.northbound right turn lane. US Route 7 & Greenwood.' Road: Signalized capacity ;analyses revealed overall levels of service of, "B or, better during the weekday'AM /PM sand. Saturday midday peak hours,. All;,th6 approaches maintain; levels of, service of or `better. Volkert, Inc, does not recommend improvements for'this intersection.. Greenwood,Road & V 'lley.Mill,Road: Signalized,capacityanalyses revealed.overal'l levels of service'of "B" or .better' during the weekday, AM /PM and Saturday midday peak, hours'; All,,the app "roaches maintain. levels of service of " "C" or better; Volker(;. Inc. does not recommend improvements for this intersection'. Kidley, Mill, Road & rhanning Drive: Unsignalized analyses revealed lane group I'evels of service of "G" 'or better. during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak.hours. Volkert,, Inc. does not recommend improvements for'this intersection. Senseny, Road & Charming .Drive Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels ;of service of "B" or better during th_e weekday, AM /PM and Saturday, midday peak ,hours. - All 'lane� groups maintain levels of service ;of "C or' better: Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this intersection: Malley -Mill Road, &. Site - driveway #1: Unsignghzed capacity analyses revealed lane group levels of "service of "C' or better during the weekday AM/P -M and :Saturday midday. peak - Hours. Volkert,, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this 'intersection. Valley Mill Road' <& Site - driveway, #2: Unsignafized capacity analyses, revealed lane: group levels, of service,,of* "-:C" or better during7 the weekday AIVUPM and 'Saturday midday peak hours. Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this ;intersection., Valley Mill Road & Site4riveway #3: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group Ieuels of service, of "C" or better duri.rig the weekday AM /.Mand Saturday ®f The Overlook - Revised Trade lmUacl SIudy LKLiAL1T June 5;.2013 "T Page40 4, i 5. 6. '7. Route 7 c& .Haggerty Connection Road:; Signalized capacity analyses revealed. overall :level s of'service of "C" or better during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak hours. All' lane groups; maintain levels of service o f "D or better. This; intersection would, be. implemented ;in conjunction w11th the build -out the Haggerty Development Tle ,' Sttudy assumes an eastbound'r`ight =turn lane;, as westbound left -turn lane; a:norihbound left, -:turn lane and a northbound right -tum lane. Route •7 &, Realigned Valley Mill Road. Signalized capacity, analyses "revealed .overall levels;, of'service; of" B" or better during.. the weekday A1VI/PIVI and Saturday midday peak'. hours. A111ane groups _maintain levels of'service of "D" or better This intersection would relocate to the west from its currenf, locafion along Route 7. The .Study assumes an, eastbound right -turn lane a westbound left -.turn lane, a northbound left -turn `lane, and- a.northbound right turn lane. US Route 7 & Greenwood.' Road: Signalized capacity ;analyses revealed overall levels of service of, "B or, better during the weekday'AM /PM sand. Saturday midday peak hours,. All;,th6 approaches maintain; levels of, service of or `better. Volkert, Inc, does not recommend improvements for'this intersection.. Greenwood,Road & V 'lley.Mill,Road: Signalized,capacityanalyses revealed.overal'l levels of service'of "B" or .better' during the weekday, AM /PM and Saturday midday peak, hours'; All,,the app "roaches maintain. levels of service of " "C" or better; Volker(;. Inc. does not recommend improvements for this intersection'. Kidley, Mill, Road & rhanning Drive: Unsignalized analyses revealed lane group I'evels of service of "G" 'or better. during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak.hours. Volkert,, Inc. does not recommend improvements for'this intersection. Senseny, Road & Charming .Drive Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels ;of service of "B" or better during th_e weekday, AM /PM and Saturday, midday peak ,hours. - All 'lane� groups maintain levels of service ;of "C or' better: Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this intersection: Malley -Mill Road, &. Site - driveway #1: Unsignghzed capacity analyses revealed lane group levels of "service of "C' or better during the weekday AM/P -M and :Saturday midday. peak - Hours. Volkert,, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this 'intersection. Valley Mill Road' <& Site - driveway, #2: Unsignafized capacity analyses, revealed lane: group levels, of service,,of* "-:C" or better during7 the weekday AIVUPM and 'Saturday midday peak hours. Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this ;intersection., Valley Mill Road & Site4riveway #3: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group Ieuels of service, of "C" or better duri.rig the weekday AM /.Mand Saturday ®f The Overlook - Revised Trade lmUacl SIudy LKLiAL1T June 5;.2013 "T Page40 midday peak hours: Volkert, Inc: does riot ° recommend improvements for this intersection: 10 valley Mill Road &;- Site - driveway #4: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed.lane group, levels of service, of.' "C "' or better during weekday .AMM.M and ;Saturday midday peak hours'. Volkert, ,Inc.. does not recommend, improvements for this intersection: ➢' .PHASE,2 OWN): 1,. Route 7 A Haggerty ;Connection Road: Signalized' capacity analyses revealed overall levels of "seruico of "B "',or better during; the weekday AMTM and Saturday midday peak hours. AlI approaches maintain levels of service of "C" or. better. This: intersection would be, ' inpleinented 'in conjunct'ion.with. the; build -out' the Haggerty' Development, The, Studydssumes an eastbound`righ"t -turn lane; a westbound left -tum lane; a northbound left-turn .lane and a northbound _right -turn lane: 2: Route 7 & Realigned Valley. Mill Road., Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels of service of "C' or better during the weekday.AM/PM and Saturday midday peak hours. All, approaches mainta. in levels of ,service. of C °' or better:. Tlis intersection would xelocate to the west from its current location along Route 7. The; Study assumes an eastbound right -turn lane, a wesibound.left -.turn lane, a northbound left -turn lane 'and.a northbound right -turn,la-ne; 3. US Route & Greenwood :Road: Signalized capacity analyses revealed' overall levels of service .of "C" or better during° the, weekday AM/PM and .Saturday midday peak Hours. All approaches iaintain levels' of 'service °.of "D"' or better. Volkert, .Inc. does not _recommend improvements for this intersection. . 4: Greenwood Road &. Valley Mill Road: Sikiidlized .capacity analyses revealed overall levels, of,service:of"B" or'better during the weekday AMV.M., and Saturday midday peak hours. All approaches maintain levels of service of "C" or better. Volkert , Inc. does�,riot recommend improvements -for, this intersection: i 5. Valley Mill Road, & Channing.Drive: Unsignalized :analyses revealed lade group levels of service: of "D" or better .during the weekday ;AM %PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Volkert, Inc. does .not „recommend improvements for this intersection. 6. Senseny Road .& Charming. Drive: Signalized capacity analyses 'revealed overall levels of service, of "B” or better during the weekday AM /.PM and Saturday midday peak hours. All approaches .maintain levels. of service of "C" or better.,- Volkert; Inc. does not recommendamprovements Tb this'intersection. 7; Valley Mill Road &Site - driveway #1: Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall. levels of° service of 'W' or better during the weekday AM /PM and Saturday midday peak hours. All "approaches maintainlevels of service of "C" or better. Volkert„ Inc. does hOt- ,reconlnlend,iii prOvements for this intersection. 8. valley Mill Road: & Site- driveway #2: Unsignalized.capacity analyses revealed, lane group 'levels of service of "C" or, better /P during the weekday` AM/PM and Saturday midday, peak `hours. Volkert; I"nc.. does' not ;recommend 'improvements for this intersection. The Overlook - Revised Ti dJM Impact: Study �%OLKERT .rune 5;,2013, Page 4.1 9., `Valley Mill Road &- Site - driveway #3: ' Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group levels of service of "C" or better.during the weekday.-AM/PM and.Saturday midday peak hours. Volkert; Inc. does not recommend improvements for this intersection. 10. Valley Mill Road & Site - driveway #4: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group level. s of service of ".C' or better during, the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak. hours. Volkert, Inc, does not recommend improvements for this intersection. ➢ " Design Year" (2026): 1. Route 7 & Haggerty =Connection Road/Route 37 NB Ramps: Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall ;levels of service of "D or better during the weekday AM/PM and :Saturday midday peak hours. All approaches; except the north and south approaches in PM peak hour, maintain levels of;service of "D" or better., The aforementioned two approaches maintain 'LOS "E ". This intersection would be impleniented'in oconjuiiction with the build -out the Haggerty Development as well as the completion of Route 37 through- to Route 7. The Study assumes dual eastbound left -turn ' lanes, an . .eastbound right -turn, lane, dual - westbound left -turn lanes, a westbound right -turn lane,, a northbound left -turn lane, a northbound thru lane, a northbound -right -turn lane, dual southbound left-turn lanes,'a southbound thru lane and a� southbound right -turn lane. 2. Route 7 & Realigned Valley Mill Road/Route 37 SB Ramps: Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels of service of "D" or better during the weekday AM/PM, and Saturday midday peak hours. All approaches also maintain levels of service of "D" or better: 'This intersection woul&relocate to the west from its current location ialong Route 7. Asp a,result; of the completibn>of Route 37 through to Route. 7, the Study assumes dual eastbound left =turn lanes, ;an eastbound right -turn lane, dual westbound left =turn lanes, a westbound right-turn lane, a northbound left -turn lanes; 'a :northbound ,thru .lame, a northbound right-turn lane, dual. southbound left- turn lanes, a -. southbound thru lane and a southbound right -turn lane. 3. US Route 7 &; Greenwood Road Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels of service of "C or better during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak hours. All ap.proache"s maintain levels of service of "D" or better. Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for. this;intersee.tiom 4. Greenwood ,Road A Valley Mill Road: Signalized ,capacity analyses revealed overall levels of service of "B or better during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak hours;° All approaches maintain, levels of 'service of "C" or better. Uolkert;, Inc., does; not recommend improvements, for this intersection. 5. Valley Mill Road & Charming Drive: Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels of service of or better during the weekday AM,/PM ; and, Saturday midday peak hours. All approaches�riiaintain' level 's of- service Of or better. Volkert, Inc. rpcommends,traffc.signalization during;2026 "Design Year" conditions.. 6. Senseny Road & Channing Drive .-I Signalized capacity analyses revealed overall levels of service. of "B" or better during the weekday O M/PM and Saturday midday :The`Overlook — Revlsed Traffic Impaci Study �%OLKERT June 5, 2013 Page 42 peak hours. All approaches maintain levels of service of "D" or better. Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this :intersection. 7. _ Valley ltlill Road & Site- driveway #1: Signalized capacity, analyses revealed overall levels of service of "B" or better during the weekday AM/PM and Saturday midday peak .hours. All approaches maintain levels of service of "D" or better. Volkert, Inc. does not--recommend improvements for this intersection. 8. Valley Mill Road & Site-driveway #2: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group levels of. service of "D" or better during the weekday AM/PM & Saturday midday' peak hours. Volkert, Inc. does not recommend improvements for this intersection., 9. Valley Mill Road & Site - driveway #3: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group levels of service of "D" or better during the weekday.AM/PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Volkert, lnc. does not recommend improvements for this .intersection. 10. Valley Mill:Road.& Site - driveway #4: Unsignalized capacity analyses revealed lane group levels of service of "D" or better during the weekday AM /PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Volkert, Inc. does not recommmend improvements for this intersection. SITE. ACCESS AND.ACCESS MANAGEMENT To minimize the traffic .impacts associated with the proposed development and to maintain satisfactory traffic flow, four (4), site = driveways, are, proposed, to "the west of Relocated Valley Mil Road. The northernmost driveway ( #,1) will provide sole access to the retail development. The remaining three driveways will provide access to -residential development only. All the driveways are stop controlled during Phase 1 traffic condition.. Driveway #1 is proposed to be signalized to coincide with the build -out of Phase 2. Based on'Table2 -2 of.VDOT Road,'Design Manual — .Appendix. F, all the,,proposed site- driveways maintain satisfactory spacing as described below. ➢ Site- driveway #4 maintain. approximately 66.0 feet from the signalized intersection of Route 7 & Valley Mill Road which satisfies the minimum spacing requirement of 660 feet between signalized intersections for Collector with speed at or below 45 mph, ➢ Distance between .each of. the, site-,,driveways range from 6,60 feet to 775 feet, which satisfy the minimum- spacing requirement of 440 feet between unsignalized intersections for Collector with speed limit gat or below 45 mph. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCOMODATIONS Th`e Overlook Proffer Statement'provides for,the development of a 1'046ot hard. surfaced bicycle and pedestrian facility for this. project. The proffered Generalized Development, Plan identifies the location of this `facility along the northwestern side of the relocated Valley Mill Road between the lower residential land bay and the commercial land bay,,, then through the commercial `land bay to .connect to the adjoining mobile home park. Therefore, this project accommodates pedestrian and bicycle needs "through the limits of the project. The Overlook— Revised Traffic Impact Study VOLKERT June 5, 2013 Page 41