HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-13 Comments➢ The Special Limited. Power of Attorney documents for Bowman- Shoemaker
Companies, and Elizabeth Properties have been executed and are submitted -as
information with the Rezoning. Application.
Public Works Comments March 1, 2013
➢ The information in the Site Drainage section of the Impact Analysis Statement has
been revised accordingly.
➢ The first site plan developed on the subject properties will. include an analysis of
the downstream stormwater conveyance system, which will be designed for
review and approval by, the County Engineer.
Fire Marshal Comments — February 25, 2013 .
➢ No comments.;
Winchester Regionat Airport Comments — April 4, 2013
➢ No Comments.
Pl'ann'i'ng Comments — March 22, 2013
➢ Thexequired application.fee has been submitted with the Rezoning Application.
➢ We agree that the proposed commercial land use designation for the subject
properties is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
We agree thatthe subject properties are not able to,support an urban center design
and that there will need to be a greater mix of commercial and residential land use
in the.future to support an urban center concept.
Couni Transportation Comments -March 22, 2013
VDOT has advised, that the anticipated right-of-way needed along the frontage on
'the- subjectproperties ranges from 12.5 . feet to 19 feet. The property owner has
'proffered a right -of =way dedication strip that is 20 feet in width along the frontage
of the subject properties.
➢ The shared right- in/right -out entrance has been approved by VD:OT, which
required the. "review and approval of an Access Management, „ Exception Request.
➢ 'Inter- parcel connectivity has been provided between the subject properties
through 'a, proffered. 'ingress /egress easement. Discussions with the County
Transportation Planning Director indicate that connectivity to the east is not
necessary.
Project 5510 /BAW 2
A VDOT has reviewed a conceptual design for the potential relocation of VDOT
Lane, which aligns with the existing shopping center entrance and has determined
that this will not impact. the proposed full access commercial entrance on VDOT
Lane that will serve the subject properties.
➢ VDOT' reviewed,.a conceptual design for the 'potenti'al . relocation of VDOT .Lane
and did not determine that additional right -of -way would be required for future
'improvements, as this will occur on their property:
'The frontage improvements to the subject properties will include pedestrian
sidewalks. The Zoning Ordinance requires the development. of a full buffer and
screen along 'the Freeton Townhouse Open Space; therefore, pedestrian
connectivity is not permitted by code.
➢ The subject properties will be developed for commercial land use, consist with
other adjoining commercial properties and commercial properties within close
proximity of the site. The proffered Generalized Development Plan provides for
enhanced access management for the subject properties through the restriction of
left turn movements on Fairfax Pike, Which is not the case with other commercial
properties along-. thei corridor..
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this information, or if you need
anything else at this'time.
Sincerely,
Evan Wyatt,,AIC
Greenway Engineering
Cc: Beverley B. Shoemaker
Rachel Shoemaker
]Mike Bryan, P.L.C.
`Project 5510 /EAW 3
Page 1 of l
Evan Wyatt
From: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT) [ Rhonda .Furikh6user @VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of'Smith, MattheW, P.E. (VDOT)
[M_atthew.Smith @vdot.:virginia,gov]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 201.3 9`.0.1 AM
To: Bishop, John. (VDOT) Evan Wyatt
Cc: Ingram, Lloyd :(.VDOT)
Subject: Fairfax- PikeNDOT Lane Commercial Properties - VDOT Comments to Rezoning
We, have revievved the Revised Rezoning Application for the Fairfax Pike /VDOT Lane
Commercial Properties as received -by this office on April 11, 20.13 for impacts to the local
transportation..system.
VD.OT supports 'this < -rezoning in its current format. Thank you for allowing us the
opportuni'ty'to comment. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Matthew B. Smith, PE.
Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Land.Development
Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties
14031 Old, Valley Pike
Edinburg, VA 22824'
Phone # (540) 984 -5615
Fax #' (540). 984 -5607
4/19/20.13
- I .
r` w4 rye
COUNTS' of FREDERICK.
a �` 2013 .
Department of Planning: and Developmeni
G �d EEN WAY
1779 540/665. 5651
- 3
FAX:, 540/665 -6 95
ENGINtERiaVG
101 UV
1 =
TO: -Evan Wyatt
Greenway Engineering
FRONT; Michael, T Ruddy, ,AICP
_ - Deputy ,D'_i_rPct6r
RE': Rezoning.Comments:;, Fairfax Pike /VDOT Lane,-Commercial Rezonim.
DATE: March 22,'2013. ;
- The following comments are offered regarding the Fairfax PikeND,;OT Lane. Comrnerclal.
Rezoning Application. This . is a request 'to. rezone 3.0 acres -from B l (Neighborhood
Business) to B2 (Business General) with.Proffers. The "review is .generally based upon
the: proffer statement dated January 25, 200 and,
,the Impact ;Analysis Statement of the:
same" date.
Prior to formal submission to the. County; please ensure that; these corriments :and -all
review agency .comments are adequatelyaddressed. ' At a. minimum, a. letter. describing
how'each of the agencies and their `comments have been addressed'. should"be:included ' as
part, of the, submission.
_.General. -
`1.., The submisslG' r, G' ;for "this .application.. :YGUM total' � 1%, , ,`i.�iv; iiaseu tipv 3
acreage of`3.61'_acres, plus the appropriate amount for public Hear ingsi`gns:'.
Land Use
1)
The 2030' _Comprehensive Plan and the -Route 277 Triangle and. Urban Center
Land,Use Plan_prouide guidance on, the future developmeni.of-the property. The. -
property is located within the UDA and ;SWSA:_ The `2030 Comprehensive:.Plan
identifies .the general area surrounding this. property with an Urban_ Center land,,'
use designation. In general,>'the proposed commercial .land use designation for
this property is consistent, •with this land. use: designation of the Comprehensive .
-
Plan as the- urban center designation promotes both cormercial and residential
land uses n'a,mixed, use., environment. This ,general :area: contains both uses. -
107 North. Kent, Street, Suite,202 Winchester; Virginia °22601 -5000
Fairfax Pike /VDOT Lane Commercial Rezoning Comments
March 22, 2013;
` Page'2
2) The; ,subject properties, regardless of their- location, size and dimension, are an
integral part of the identified Urban Center. While they individually may not .be
able to support. an entire urban center, .they certainly have the,�ability.to fit into, the
overall Urban 'Center design. A. greater- mix. and integration of the commercial
and, residential land uses ;should occur in the future as this area continues 'to
develop.
Impact Analysis and;Proffer Statements-.
P lease address fhe following items from the= Impact .Analysis and `'Proffer' Statements"
prepared for .this Application: The following comments have been provided in
conjunction with,John Bishop, County Transportation Planner.
1) ° Transportation improvements to Route 277; Fairfax -Pike, . are 'planned on the
VDOT . Six -Year: ' Improvement 'Plan. 'Therefore, it -is not anticipated that. -this
project constructs improvements to Route 277, rather, dedicates appropriate right
of- -way, designs: access to this site that, is -consistent with, those improvements'
anticipated with the VDOT" " Six =Year Plan Project, and provides. some
contribution to transportation improvements resulting. from 'the impacts of this
- new development, further; 'that' the value" of .any contribution hds ,a nexus to the
project and "'its:impacts.
2) The :provision of a shared right- in/right- °out °entrance may work given the
anticipated - separated °median design. for Route 277. In . general; additional
entrances on Route 277 are to be avoided.
.3) Potential interparcel connectivity :could be ;provided to,the commercial property to
the east.
4) Please ensure'that' the proposed relocation of VDOT Lane to the west to align
With the existing entrance to the shopping, center-will not have an impact to the
entrances proposed on VDOT Lane,
51 Please ev4 irate cif' any'- additional right -of way dedication is necessary along
VOOT Lane for future improvements.
6) Pleaset ensure that pedestrian acces-sibilit y and circulation, ,is ,provided to the
adjacent properties where appropriate to ensure ,this, project ; is well integrated into
the. - surrounding community,.. .
.7) The commercial and residential land uses of the Route 277 Urban Center, ate-
expected `to. have a strong treet presence and relate to existing -Fairfax Pike.
e
Pleas explain what site planning t and ,design elements will be implemented to
achieve this goal of the Route, 2`77 Triangle and Urban Center Plan'.
In conclusion, please ensure that the above comments, ;and those offered by the reviewing
agency are addressed.
MTR/bad
q COUNTYY of ",FREDERICK
- w
Roderick .B': Williams
GiN� - - County Attorney... -
1778 - -
540%722 =8383
Fax, 540/667 --0370
E -mail:
rwitlia @ccJrederick:va us `
March 12, 2013
VIA E -MAIL- AND:REGULAR:MAIL
'Mr. ;Evan Wyatt;
Green'way Engineering'
`15.1`W..indy Hi111ane
Winchester VA, 22602,
_ Re :' Rezoning Application - Fairfak'PikeVDOT Lane Commercial'Properties
Proffer Statement, dated January.25', 2013
-Dear Evan:
You: have, submitted to Frederick County for review the above-referenced proffer"
statement (the "Proffer., Statement" ). for tk proposed rezoning, of Tax Parcel Numbers. 86-
A -14 and 86 -A -15 (collectively, the "Property "), in -the Opequon Magisterial_District,
from the BI Neighborhood Business District to ih-IW General Business, District,, with
proffers. I have now "reviewed the Proffer.. Statement and'it is my opinion that the Proffer
Statement would be in arform to meet the requirements of the .Frederick ,County Zoning'
b Ordinance and the, Code of Virginia, ,and would be legally sufficient as a, proffer
' statement; subject to the following. comments::
•' -lri: the third ne under "Prelim nary Matters" ° "fipp icant'' should 'uet ea to
"Owner?, consistent with. the view that the• obligations are ultimately. those .of the
owners) (and any successors -in- interest) and not of any applicant(s).
•' . Prior -to final submission ofthe� rezoning application, as I assume that. you. will be
acting for the owner(s) %applicant(s)," you will of course *need to submit executed
powers of attorney for Bowman- Shoemaker Companies and Elizabeth Properties,
L C. y .. 1
A If
"Ed""ENED
'• v _ Y _ - _ MAR C 6..`M "ii3" 4
,GREENWAY. .
Winchester; Vir inia 22 Q:l_ ENC N° F-,,' � 1, N
107 North. Kent Street g " 1.
Page t of l
Evan Wyatt
From_: :Funkhouser, Rhonda (VD`OT),[ Rhonda. Funkhouser @VOOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Smith, ;Matthew, P.E. (VDOT)
[ Matthew :Smith @'vdotvirginia.'gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19-12013 11:33 AM
To: Bishop, John. (VDOT); Evan Wyatt
Cc Ingram, Lloyd (VDOT) , Smith, 'Matthew, P.E. (VD.OT)
Subject: Fairfax Pike /VDOT Lane Commercial Properties VDOT'Commentsto Rezoning
We have reviewed the Rezoning"Application, for the Fairfax Pike /VDOT Lane Commercial
Properties as received by thi's office on, February 25, 20.13 forimpacts to the local
transportation system. Our comments foryour consideration are as follows:
. Remove all dimensions associated with'the entrances on the Generalized.
Development Plan, as final design and location will be determined at time.of site
plan review in accordance -with current. regulations and standards.
. At this time, VDOT does, not support °two full- access entrances off of MOT Lane. The
50' ingress/egress, easement, should provide access to both parcels.
Access locations to these properties =will be determined at the time of site plan
review. This office will require a:complete set. of construction plan's detailing
entrance designs, drainage features and traffic flow data from the T.T.E. Trip
Generation Manual, Eighth Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment
on all right-of-way `needs, including turn lanes, right -of -way dedications, traffic
signalization, and drainage.
VDOT supports this rezoning after satisfactorily addressing the .above comments. Thank
you for allowing us the opportunity to comrhent.
Matthew B. Smith; P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Land Development
Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren: Counties
14,031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg; VA 22824
.Phone ` #' (540) 984 - 5815
Fax # (540),984-5607
3!22/2013
Untitled Stationery Page 'l of 3
Evan Wyatt
'From: Colson, Chris, P E. "(VDOT) [Chris :Colson @vdot.virginia.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 25,2013 11;:57 AM
To: Evan Wyatt
cc-., Bishop, John. (VDOT) `Thomason °,'Kirk,(VDOT)
Subject; RE: Fairfax Pike Preliminary'Design
Hi Evan, that sounds, reasonable toa,us at'this point in time based on the current design. I just want to
reiterate the design is still;.preliminary and is,subject -to change, but as, design continues we will keep,the
future development of the parcels in mind. If you can share site plan design files we would appreciate it.
Chris Colson, P.E.
VDOT - Staunton District
Location &.Design
'540 =332 -7746 (tel)
'From:, Evan Wyatt [mailto:ewyatt @greenwayeng.com]
Sent: Friday,; January 25, 2013 9:05 AM
To! Colson, Chris, P.E. (VDOT)
Cc: Bishop, John. (VDOT)
Subject: RE: Fairfax. Pike Preliminary Design,
Hi Chris,
I appreciate the return call -and the:fo(low.up message below. I have had a chance to discuss
this information with John Bishop and thel property owner. In order to accommodate the
preliminary design at this point in time, we will plan to provide a 20' right-of-,way dedication
along the property4ro.ntage of Elizabeth Properties and Bowman- Shoermaker'Properties-, as well
as a, 10' temporary construction easement. The County's parking lot setback requirements are
10' from the right -of -way; therefore, we will also identify the ability to extend, the dedicated
right -of -way into the 10' temporary construction easement if.necessary to accommodate the
final design. I do not -see this being.an issue except in the area of the western property line.of
the Elizabeth Property and would not anticipate the additional encroachment to be more than
a couple of feet;, therefore, there will not be an impact to the parking lot that will most likely be
developed, in advance of -the Route 277 widening improvements; We. will identify the right-of-
way &eclication area on the site plan for the project and will plan to provide the dedication plat.
to VDOT`at the ti'me.it is requested by VDOT, which would most likely occur after the final
design of the Route 277 widening,
1 would. ask that both John and you `review this suggestion and, advise me if -this makes sense or
if there are other ideas.
Thanks, Evan
From: Colson, Chris, P.E. (VDOT) [maiItoi;Chris .Colson @vdot.virginia.gov]
:Sent: Thursday; January 17, 201'3 1 :50 PM
To: Evan Wyatt
4/19/201.3
Untitled Stationery Page 2 of 3
'Cc; Bishop, John. (VDOT)
Subject: RE': Fairfax Pike Preliminary Design
Hi Evan, I wanted to makesure I got.back to,you today regarding your questions on:Route 2,77., W.e are currently still in the
preliminary engineering. stage; while I feel confident with the horizontal.layout.through this section, we are still developing
the,vertical, so I' am hesitant1a'provide CAD files at this stage;' and we have not began to set the right -of -way. With that
caveat, the following are approximate back of`walk offsets from the existing right of °way lines at the property corners:
Offset Location
15 -ft north Western property line of-Elizabeth Properties
13 -ft north Eastern property line ofElizabeth Properties
Western; property line of Bowman- Shoemaker
12.5 -ft north Eastern property line of Bowman- Shoemaker
'The right-of-way will at a minimum be a foot behind the back of walk,or greater depending,upon-the grading; this does,not
account for any easements (utility, etc.;) that may be needed.
Let me know °if you need additional information..
Chris Colson, P.E.
VDOT - Staunton District
Location &• Design
811 Commerce Road
Staunton, VA
,540 -332 7.7746 (tel)
From: Evan .Wyatt [mailto:ewyatt @greenwayeng:comI
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013,2:26 PM.
To: Colson, Chris, P.E. (VD.-OT)
Cc; Bishop, John. (VDOT)
Subject: Fairfax Pike Preliminary Design
Hi. Chris;
met =with John Bishop yesterday to discuss one of our projects located at.the, intersection of Fairfax. Pike and VDOT Lane.
John advised me of the information discussed between VDOT and Feederick_ County to establish the typical section in this part
of the corridor, which we will be following in our project. l obtained a copy of the. preliminary design layout on'the aerial base'
(see attached), which was not to scale; .therefore, I need to know what the proposed right -of -way width so we can plan
accordingly. It Would be great if I could obtain the digital file for the attached document or dimensional information from the
road_ centerline, to the north.at,your earliest possible convenience. I am available should you need to contact me regarding
this.matter.
Thank you, Evan
GREEN AY ENGINEERING
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
Phone: 540- 662 -4185
Fax: 540 - 722 -9528
Visit us on the web at www.greenwayeng com to learn about exciting new services offered by Greenway
Engineering: Laboratory Services, Water _Sewer, Maintenance / Monitoring,.ESA'Phase I, Wetlands and more..
4/19/2013
�Virglnia DepArtment
of Transportation August,2012
OVA,
ACCESS MANAGEMENT EXCEPTION REQUEST: AM -2
MINOR ARTERIAL, COLLECTOR, & LOCAL STWT REGULATIONS124 VAC 30-73
SECTION 120
stibmitteO,,by::Gtt!p-n'-w"-ay, Engineering
Date' February 22, 2013
°Email Address: ew.yatt@gre_enWa-Yeng;com
Phone: 540 -622-4185
Address:. 1 51 Nih-dy Hill Lane Winchester,, .VA' 22602
Project Name: VDOT Lane, Route 277
Ri0277
Locality: Frederick County
Description of 'Project:
Rezoning of two commercial properties on the -comer bf'VDOT Lane and Route 277,
Vb6T District: y
Stauritbn/E.dinburg Residency
Area Land Use Engineer: -Matthew
B. Smith, P.E.
(1),., Su.bmit-thisifb-rm:and.anylattathrhehts-to:one-ofthe,District's.AeeaLand.Use7Engineets.
(2). Se'eSectioin 120 of Regulations fordetalit on-the*requirements, exceptions, and exception request review, process
c6,'additi6ral1616rma"t'lo'nasn..ecelssay.,t o Jysii'fiiie' exception -rqq uest( Q.
.(4);.lf'ii,trtfhc�ohgineering!s�udyis,.r6q4i.rL!O,-thO.diecisionon' ere 0 twill barb aeonVDOTeng Ineerin Judgment.
�hq ,, 9 b-44b (5h Usofie besi4 --Excep�ion�or�the,LD;.448�De*!gn Waiver-for ,fo ms ginoeriii4,telated standards, e.g. tight
distance; See 1M-L1)427L for a Itibnal1rittriu6tio'ns:
Se.,lectihe 6ception(s) Being Requested
EB�&c,.eoel,.,oila.o:th-e,shared,entr;incL- requirement. (Access M. Regulations Section 1,20C.2)
Reasonfor exceptloh*
"k An,agreement to share the entrance;could not be.reached'with adjoining-property owner.
IRS Attached: Written ,evidence that adjoining property owner will not share the entrance:
�P;Physical, coconstraints: topography, adjace nt haiirdous land use, stream, wetiand, other.
aSpecifyconstraint:
O.Attached: Documentation of constraint such as aerial, photo or topographic map.
doto-stie,vehicuilae connection'to adjoining undevelooed proo'iertyrequirelm6rit. (Section 120 C4)
.:11eascifi4orexceptl6n:
W,.-A,--. Aysical.ponstraints: topography, adjacent'hazardousliand'.use, stream; wetia nd,,.dtheri
R'110&V, constraint:
,Attached: Documentation of Constraint such asaerialuphoto-ortopographic map-.
�Bi. Other reason:
M'Exception to therequirement that an entrance'shall not be located within tWur►ctidnal area of An
intersection or roundabout. (See Re gu iation Section 110 C. i, Appendix Ni* 0�qsigp_Mftn al)
'Attaiibd: 'A traffic engineering stud y documenting that the operatibn.of the intersection and
pubilc safety will not be,aiciversely,impacted.
AM-2
0
August; 2012
: "EXCEPTION'`TO'THE SPACING STANDARDS FOR:
• Entrances, intersections, crossovers {(Table 2 =2);
Entrances,,intersections:near interchange ramps (Tables 23, 2=4);:,or
•> :Comer'clearance (Fgure 4- 4);..; Appendix F. Road DesignWanual
Provide the foflowtngInformgtion on th'eUception Request
❑� ON A iVIINOR'ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR
NEAR,ANANTERCHANGE',RAMP (SUbmitta.b;of a traffic engineeringfstudy:required)'_
0 CORNER CLEARANCE %'(Submittal of<a .traffic:engineeri(tg study "required)
Type of.entrance /intersection /crossover Signalized.[] Unsignahied %FUll Access (] .Partial Access=[]
-
Postedspeed limit :. 35` 'mph Minor•Arterial []■ Collector: [] Iocalt ❑.
Regiuired`spacing =distance, 250. ft
Proposed spacing dlstancl2 +/-
Requested';exception: Reduction in `required spacing38:4
/-ft
REASON; FOR fXCEPTION--
?A., To;be;located on `an 61, der, established:tiusmess section of a'liu way`corridor where existing
,spacing ld�not meet.the §pacing standards prior to October,l4, 266k: (Regulation Section 120 C.3.e)
n Attadied: Dated- aerial photo of" corridor =identifying propos - entrance /intersection�location._
B, Not enou
gh prope'ty frontage, to meet spacIrj &standard, but the applicant does not wall a
partial access right -in /right -ouL entrance. (si.ction 120rC.I ),
rAttaohed:; A traffic engineenngstudV °documenting that,.left turn movements at the entrance will not
`have'a - negativetii npact`,on highway operationor!safety.
C. Tq be located,within +a neWIjO,banism mixed' use:type•deveiopment..(Section 120Ct3.d)
Attached: The; designbf tlie::development:and compliance with �intersection,sight'distance:.
s
D � The�proposed.entrance meets the;signal.vuarrants but does not rheeftheisignalized
Intersection spacing standard. The.applicant.requests,an `exception,to the.spacihtttandard.
Attached: A 'trafficengineeringstudythat(I) evaluates; WdlocatbW,s�suitability.foran�u ndibodfand(li)'
contains specific /documented reasons showing that the +proximity , 0 t64 proposed signal to;anadjaoent
signal will;not adversely impact.a safe and;effident flow. (Of traffcon the highway. (Section 12O;C5)
'E. The development's 2°° (or' °additional) entrance does not rneetthe,spacing standatds but is
necessary'%Or the`streets`to be accepted Into the secondary ^system. (Section 120 CIe)
Attached;!. Information on the development that;identifies1he location of:entrances.
F. , To be located within' -the limhs'of{a VDOT and locahty,approved access hianagementcorridor plan.;
Attache -
d. Aerial:photo:of corridor identlfyingproposed entrance /intersectionlocatlon;'(Sect 120:0 3b)'
2, AM -2.
August., 2012
[FOR VDOT USE -ON
Recommendation on Exception Request: Approve 0 Di e ' !y T� On 111, 2013
Area Land Use Engineer or Name Matthew B. Smith, P.E., Area Land Use Engineer,
kei'imar6--The Edinburg Rpsidepc e exception rpque
Residency. supports the request, as this is within an older
established business'section of an Urban HidhWaytorridor. The. proposal is providing
a shared right in /right out t access, with the adjacent lot. In, addition, proposed roadway
improvements on Route 277'will shift VDOT Lane further west once•completed and will
then meet spacing requirements to thewest-.
Exception. Requist-Actloh: Approy Denied E] Date: f I -,'13
Disiiict',AAnil-'niit'r'iitiDr,or _g
nee >, A.
Nate (and ;position if Desipee) V5
TeX e6ert-.y e 0_1_�
ery A iq "Ok e- ire
:r-
Concur
vq;rl-$
r +ke PrV1,006ed
rec-vrAAkeAAtOI�:rO4§ "0'
a-gcep+ivjr�
rie:VIAes4-
1'5
cyp roVej-CO
f re S � m+ c4 ill�
I
DistrIct Staff: Please'emall copya,6 Paul.Gra-seWrzft-VDOT.ViLginia Gov
3 ' ' AM-2,
•
August 2012
MWORARTERIAL & COLLECTOR REGULATIONS -Section.120.-Commerdal:entranceaccess:manauement
A., As commercial. entrance locations and designs am prepared and appropriate' access :management
regulations and standards shall beutilized to ensure the safety,. integrity and operational characteristics of the
transportation system are maintained: . The proposed commercial enirance,'shall meet the, access management I
standards contained, in Appendix F of the Road -'D-'cslgn Manual and the reguld ' "tions in this chapter to provide the
users of such entrance with a safe means of ingress and egress vhile minimizing the impact of such ingress and
egress -on the operation-of the highway.
B. A proposed development's. compliance with.,the access management requirements specified below �sbould be
considered during the local government;and VDOT's- review of any rezoning, site plan, or -subdivision •plat -for the
development. VDOT's review bf- 6, rezoning traffic impact statement and 6 site Plan/subdivision plat supplemental
traffic analysis submitted for a development in;accordance with the Trifffic:ltnpadv p mental
Analysis-R6giil&idris shall include
comments on the development's cbmpliahce • with the access mAndgemenf,'re0ifem6nt§ specified -below.
C. Access management,requirdments, in,additidn to other. regulations in this chapter, include but-are not limited to:
1. Restricting commercial'entrance;,Iociiti'o-ns. To prevent undue "interference with free traffic movement.
and to preserve safety, entrances to the highways shall :not be- permitted within the functional areas of
intersections, roundabouts, railroad grade. crossingsi interchanges or similar areas with sensitive traffic
operations.. A requestfor .6h exception to this requirement. submitted - according to:24V.AC30-73-120. D shall
.include aAraffic'= engineering- investigation report 1hat -contains: specific'anAdocumented reasons showing that
highWay,opdration-and safetywillmbt%b& adversely impacted.
I Entrances shared with, adjoining :properties on minor arteries and collectors: To reduce the number, of
entrances to; state highways, :a condition of entrance permit issuance'shAll vbe that entrances serve two or more
Parcels. A street thit meets the Secofi4ary Street Acceptance Requirernents will be prublicly maintained and
shalt be. ihe'lDreferred method,t&r sliared entrances as such entrances will allow for 'the Ifiture development of a
network . of publicly maintained.streets. Otherwise a shared commercial entrance shall:be created and designed'
to serve adjoining�prqpertjes_. A.copy of the property owners, recorded agreement to share use of and maintain
the entrance shall be included with the entrance permit application submitted to the district administrator's
designee. The shb*d entrance shall be -identified on any :site. plan or subdivision plat of the property. The
districtadmihistratdr's designee, is adthbriized to a'' an exception to this requirement upon submittal -of a
approve
requesfAccordibg to 24VAC3043420 Uthat.includes the fbllQW'mg:
a. Written evidence, that a reasonable agreement to share� an entrance cannot be reached with adjoining
propertyowners, or
b. Documentation. - that. there are pliysipal, .constraints; including but not limited to topography,
environmentally sensitive,areas, and hazardous,uses, to"creating a shared entrance.
3. Spaichig of enb-iuicis and intersections. The spacing of pro -po sed. entrances and intersections shall
complyvith the spacing, standards f6r'enthftices and intersections in Appendix .F except as specified below.
a. Where a
plan of development or a condition ofdevelopmmt. that identifies the spebific location of an
entrance, or entrances -was :proffered pursuant to ; §15:24197, 151-2108, or 1S.2-2303, of'the Code of
V*ginia.as-part of a rezo mg.apprpVqd
byAhe locality prior to, October 14,2009,:such.entrances shall' be
exerf3pt.from the appliqqble sp acing standards for, entrances and I intersections, provided the requirements of
§,1'562-'2307'of-the Code of Virgiiniwhave been met. Entrances shall be exemptIroin the applicable s;Pa6ing
standards for entrances and-intersections when thellocation of 'such entrances are showwon a: subdivision
plat, site. plan li - ari rements, conceptual
pre minary subdivision plat, or a Secondary Street Accept ce Requi
sketch that was submitt6&by the,l6calfty-. to VDOT for review and received by VDOT prior to October 14,
2009-o.ris,valid"p uanfto §§16.2-2260 and 15.2.461 and ,was .approved in accordance with §§15'.2 -2286
and 15.2-2241 thipygh 15;22245 prior to October. 14, 2009; The district administrator's designee is
authorized to,exernpt, such entrances from the spacing standards upon submittal of a request according to
24VAC30-73.120 Dtliat includes documentation.of the,above criteria.
4 AM-2
0 0
August 2012
b. VDOT may =work with a locality or localities. on access, management corridor, - plans. Such plans
may allow for spacing° standards that differ, from and supersede the applicable: spacing standards for
entrances; and intersections, subject: to approval by the :district •administrator. : Such plans may also
identify, the locations: of-any, physical constraints to creating .shared .entrances, or vehicular /pedestrian
connections between adjoining properties. If the permit. applicant submits a request according to
24VAC30 -73 =120 D for an exception to the spacing, standards and provides documentation that the
location of the proposed commercial entrance is within the limits of an access management plan
approved by the local government 'and by VDOT, the plan sfiould guide the district administrator's
designee m approving,the exceptiowi- equestand in determining the appropriate location of 'the entrance.
c. On older, established business corridors of a locality an urban area where existing entrances
and intersections did not meet the spacing standards prior to October 14, 2009, spacing for new entrances
and intersections may be hallowed by `the district administrator's :designee that is consistent with the
established spacing along, the;highway, provided that the permit applicant•fsubmits4 request according; to
24VAC30- 73 -120'D for amexceptionwto the spacing standards. that.includes,,evidence:that -reasonable efforts
were made: to comply with the other access management:requirements of-this section including restricting
entrances within the functional areas ,of intersections, sharing entrances with and .providing vehicular and
.pedestrian coimechoris between adjoining properties, and physically restricting entrances to right =in or
right -out or both movements.
d. Where a developer proposes a development within a designated urban development area:as: defined in
§15.2- 2223.1 of the- Code of Virginia or an area .designated in, the local comprehensive, plan for higher
density development that incorporate§ principles of new urbanism and traditional 'neighborhood
development, :which may include but 'need not be limited 'to '(i) pedestrian- friendly road .design, (ii)
.interconnection of new. local streetss`with, existing local Streets' and roads;, (iii) connectivity' of road and
pedestrian networks, (iv) preservation of natural areas, (v) satisfaction of rr6quiremdfits for stormwater
management, (vi) mixed =use neighborhoods, including mixed Housing .types, (vii) reduction of front and
side y_ building setbacks, and (viii) reduction -of subdivision.street widths and turning radii at subdivision.
�
street intersections, the district administrator's designee may: approve. ;spacing standards for :public street .
intersections internal to the deb =elopment that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing standards,
provided that the developer submits _a request according to 24.VAC30- 73=120 D for an exception, to the
spacing standards, that includes ;information- on the design of the ,development and on the conformance of
such entrances:and intersections with the: -intersectionsighvdistance .standards specified in Appendix:F.
e Where-a development's second or additional commercial. entrances are necessary for the streets in
l
the developmepVto be eligible for acceptance into,t e`secondary system of state ^highways in accordance
with the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements and 'such commercial entrances cannot meet the
spacing standards for' highways the developer, may submita.request according to 24VAC30 -73 -120 D
for an exception to the spacing, standards t}iat includes information on the design of the development:
The following shall apply.to the exception request:
1) For highways, with. a ,functional. classification as .a collector or. local street; the district
administrator's designee may approve spacing standards that differ from the otherwise applicable.
spacing standards to allow the approval of the entrance-:or entrances. Such commercial entrances
f
shall be required' to meet the intersecti on sight distance. standards specified in Appendix F of the
Road Design Manual.
2) For `highways WiW a functional classification as a minor arterial, the district administrator's
designee shall ,'in consultation with the developer and the locality within which the development, is
proposed, eitl ce, approve - spacing :standards that differ from the, otherwise applicable spacing.
standards :to -allow the approval of :the; entrance or entrances, or waive such -state requirements that
necessitate second or additional commercial entrances. If approved,,su&commercial entrances,shall
be; required to;meet.the intersection sight,distance standards specified in- Appendix,F:
AM -2
August 2012
f. Where a parcel of record has InsOfficient- frontage, on, 4 highway to meet the spacing; standards:
because, of the, dimensions of the -parcel or -a physical constraint such as topography or An environmentally
sensitive area, they entrance shall ,be physically restricted to right-4n or ,right-,out movements or both or
similairrestrictions such'that the public interests in a.safe and,efficient flow of traffic on the' systems of state
'highways are,protec*d-and.preservedA requpst,fouan exception.to this requirement submitted according
to-,24VAC-30413-1120 Dlhall include a traffic engineering investigation report that contains spoci& and
documented reasons showing that high*ayoperatibn and safety will not -be adverselyimpacted.
4. Vehicular /pedestrian circulation between. en. adj6ininj ropiitiis. ToIkilftdte traffic, circulation between
adjacent properties, reduce 'the number of entrances to the highway, anal. maximize use of .new signalized
intersecti 'di ni applicant shall. be re with a &nctional classification as a minor
highway, and-may be rpquir'ed by the district adrainistratbr's=designee..,cin a highway with .a ftinctional
classification, as a collector-, as acondition of permit- issuance to record access: easements and to construct
vehicular connections :to. the 'botmdaries of the property, `(which may inchide frontage roads or' reverse
frontage -road s ),in such ajnanner that affords safeiand efficient future access between the permit applicant's
property and adjoining undeveloped properties., Where appropriate, the permit. applicant also shall construct
pedestrian connections to the boundary lines of adjoining adj 0" 11 ng
,&velop e
d
pf6pemieisi with sidewalks that abut ffe property. At such iinaithitt a, commercial, entrance permit. a li application
pp ca.
is submitted for the #djdiiiin propert . y, a conditio of pemut issuance shall be to extend such
_9 TI permit . "; issuance - 1. . .1. . extend .. .
vehicular/pedestrian connections into the proposed development. Dev�qlopment sites under, the same
ownership or consolidated 'fbi the purposes of development and comprised of more than. one building site
shall -provide :a unified -vehiciilartand'-pedesbrilan access- connection and circulatibn system beiween.the.,Mtes.
a. Such., connections �shall not. be required if the permit, applicant submits a request for ,an exception
according to 24VAC30-73-120. D and provides documentation that 'there are physical constraints to
maldng such connections b.etw6en Oroperties, including: but not limited to topography, environmentally
sensitive arm, and hazard ous uses.
,b-. If arrmit applicant does not wish to,comply with this requirement, thi; c- tcap
pli.cant's entrance shall
bephygically restricted to right-iii OT right -out mpyements or both or §iniilar.restiictions such that the public
interests.,in a safe and ,efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
5. Traffic signal spacing., To promote the efficient progessionof traffic on hi
ghways, commercial entrances
that .are .expected. to serve. sufficient ;traffic volumes
and movements to require,4signalization shall not .be
permitted if the spacing between 'the entrance and at least, one adjacent -signalized intersection is below
signalized intersection spacing standards, in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual. if suffi6drit spacing
between adjacent traffic signals is'novavailable, the ejittanc&.shAll be physically-riestricted to right-in or right-
out movements or both or. similar restrictions such that the Oublic interests in a safe, and efficient -flow of
'traffic on. the systebris of state ',highways are protected and preserved. A request fbir an exceptim to this
requirement submitted ac6oidihg to '24VAOOmU-1.20 Ei,sball 'include a traffic engineering investigation
report. that (i) evaluates the suitability of the entrance location for design as a roundabout; (ii) contains
specific and documented reasons showing, that highway operation.and-safety wiUtnot.-be adversely-impact6d.
6. Limiting, vntrancv. movenifekti. To preserye the safety and function of certain highways, the district
administratoes designee,-- may require an 'entrance to be designed, and constructed`' in such a : manner as to
ph3sicdlly-,.prQhibit,tdrtiiini.traffic:movements.
D. A -request for an exception from the 'access' management requirements in 24VAC30=73-120 C shall be
submitted lil ntiih -fo the ik c t administrator's d6ignee.'The request shallideritify the-type -of excep6on, describe
the reasons for, thd request; and "include :all documentation specified in 24VAC304 type o f 3-429 C for the ty I
' exception.
After considering- 411 pertinent information lhclualng any improvements be :needed to the entrance or
that wi
:intersection to protect the, operational characteristics of the highway, the districtadmWstatori s des . ignee will advise
the applicant in writing regarding the, decision on. the exception request within 30, calendar days of receipt of the
written exception request, with a copy to the district administrator. The .applicant may,appeal. the, decision of the
district, administrator's designee4o,,the district.,administrator, in, accordance with'thVvrocedures'fbr.an appeal.
AM-2
Virginia Dapattmentof T*Vortat oa
Attn: MaUhew B 'Smith, Pia
14Q31 Qld VdicyPilo
Eftbw& Virginia 22,824
Dear Matt:
Graenway Bring :is , a rezoning- pmcesaing .. application for two saaaU comtneidel
0"erdes to_c MP the zoning designation froth the Ell District to the, B2 District:
Theses ProPa'des .are dedpaftd as tax parcels- 96"A -I4 and 8&A -15, and aze located on
.00 north, side of F nfax. Pike be"Wean VDOT-Lane -and Double C,`humb.Road. Parcel 15
.1183P frontage on Fairfax.Pikc and VDOT.Lane and Parcel:14 bas frontw solely'oa
Fairfax Piloe. 1U ombined:fiontag�e for muse parcels is appi+oacimably 365 feet alleical
14 has epprooaimately 17S %et of
660tew and:Paul 13 has appm* dp rely 190.feet,of
frontage): The comn�ciat
property immediately east of dtese. Owcale, -is developed:
there .i$ alppro mately 425 fea between VDOT+ LAW, and. die adjoining
eommezdel ptvpeaty e�tiaace..l 6,i s. classified as: a noinot arterial road with a
posted speed Iimitof 35 aalph;, theret�Or+e, VDOT cauretltiy <regai 410 feet for ffitl access
commercial :e bi.this type;of road systam.
Clreenway Ong ?bas° had dikuWons' with VDOT and five Frederick County
Director of 1Yaaspottation the;planned widening'of tkFeirfaa Pike and'aoaess
desiP ,properdeL 'Speci$c e.tbe; Couaty`has requested that lull'.
aoc esis tom�+ciaLent�es =be avoided ow PnM four blase Pat+cels; that access-
anto .Fairft Nq_ a is'- limited to a 'shaded rift4p/rigbt m- ;enir=M that full access
cornmes+cfai ;are located on VDOT.Laae; aad that Lot 14;is provided with an
access ea ,,across Lot 1S to avoid arIandio - situation d at would dictaoe; a `foil
access commearr — entrance on-Fairfax Me. These disctissions lba0eliovided ,gutdanee.
as to an approods :access
management plea for the two ,pat!ceb; which is, ;being
proffered by`the'p .petty owner:,
In :artlea to ,accomplish this access management Plan. VDt7i' will need to: pmvide the.
allowance 'for locating a shared &461rigtif*out access tbat` . & less. than 250 iia,
.
Greenway Bngiineening, has prepared an exhibu .that is proffered with the-. rezoning
application -a w Iodates ;ttie access tippa+ox#matety 212 feetfrom
rngineers. Surnyon Planners CnvttonmentafSctemim
Telephone 540.6624185 FAX 540 722 -9528
Peqxti www.gre
w
wmdiee6a,Vitueia 226M
Awed rn 7971
y22. 2013
Virginia Dapattmentof T*Vortat oa
Attn: MaUhew B 'Smith, Pia
14Q31 Qld VdicyPilo
Eftbw& Virginia 22,824
Dear Matt:
Graenway Bring :is , a rezoning- pmcesaing .. application for two saaaU comtneidel
0"erdes to_c MP the zoning designation froth the Ell District to the, B2 District:
Theses ProPa'des .are dedpaftd as tax parcels- 96"A -I4 and 8&A -15, and aze located on
.00 north, side of F nfax. Pike be"Wean VDOT-Lane -and Double C,`humb.Road. Parcel 15
.1183P frontage on Fairfax.Pikc and VDOT.Lane and Parcel:14 bas frontw solely'oa
Fairfax Piloe. 1U ombined:fiontag�e for muse parcels is appi+oacimably 365 feet alleical
14 has epprooaimately 17S %et of
660tew and:Paul 13 has appm* dp rely 190.feet,of
frontage): The comn�ciat
property immediately east of dtese. Owcale, -is developed:
there .i$ alppro mately 425 fea between VDOT+ LAW, and. die adjoining
eommezdel ptvpeaty e�tiaace..l 6,i s. classified as: a noinot arterial road with a
posted speed Iimitof 35 aalph;, theret�Or+e, VDOT cauretltiy <regai 410 feet for ffitl access
commercial :e bi.this type;of road systam.
Clreenway Ong ?bas° had dikuWons' with VDOT and five Frederick County
Director of 1Yaaspottation the;planned widening'of tkFeirfaa Pike and'aoaess
desiP ,properdeL 'Speci$c e.tbe; Couaty`has requested that lull'.
aoc esis tom�+ciaLent�es =be avoided ow PnM four blase Pat+cels; that access-
anto .Fairft Nq_ a is'- limited to a 'shaded rift4p/rigbt m- ;enir=M that full access
cornmes+cfai ;are located on VDOT.Laae; aad that Lot 14;is provided with an
access ea ,,across Lot 1S to avoid arIandio - situation d at would dictaoe; a `foil
access commearr — entrance on-Fairfax Me. These disctissions lba0eliovided ,gutdanee.
as to an approods :access
management plea for the two ,pat!ceb; which is, ;being
proffered by`the'p .petty owner:,
In :artlea to ,accomplish this access management Plan. VDt7i' will need to: pmvide the.
allowance 'for locating a shared &461rigtif*out access tbat` . & less. than 250 iia,
.
Greenway Bngiineening, has prepared an exhibu .that is proffered with the-. rezoning
application -a w Iodates ;ttie access tippa+ox#matety 212 feetfrom
rngineers. Surnyon Planners CnvttonmentafSctemim
Telephone 540.6624185 FAX 540 722 -9528
Peqxti www.gre
the -egg eatrapces on Fairfax Pilae. Ttiis location « n be m6 coustractod sad has
aPPa'oP sight di Umce fbnr vHestbound tinffic on Falrfaa -pUm
ads included the VDOT .paws
t -R AM -2 Farm the
Wendfles the ;avlicabJa- ego Vdpti t aim, with the 'per Gmemlized
Devalop *g Pies` it.dded`JanuM 259 2013 for our isview:. It is leque .that
VDO'T.ptovide a fav6a'able_r on for ibis °nequest which will W,:ifi6opdrjted
-
as°a ooiiiii eaf of'th VDOT review =Meats during the rezoidbg,app proem.
.Please cont�t'me if you lave any gnestioris re8s�+diaB this infanmation, or if you'need
anything else at this time.
Evan
rAMWy " "&&eedng
CM John A. Bishop, Jr., Frederick County Director of Transportation
Phdm #M AW
z
IN 11
jig
\ \f \ \b
m7l
5
I-V I
Fax- from' 548 678,+ 4739
_ , t7� —z5 -13 11 .4! r.y
Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Fire. Marshal
Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept.
8.00 Coverstone Drive
Attn: Fir Marshal
E Winchester, Virginia 22602
Public. Safety Building
IY
(540)'665 -6350
3
Se 3
V
Rezon,7ng. Comments;
p
NO
r Frederick County Fire'Mki7sh
Y !,
Mail, to
Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Fire. Marshal
Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept.
8.00 Coverstone Drive
Attn: Fir Marshal
E Winchester, Virginia 22602
Public. Safety Building
V
(540)'665 -6350
1'800 Coverstone Drive
k ,.n
Applicants Name: Greenway Engine6ring Telephone:
540- 662 -4185
Mailing Address: 15,1 windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
Location of property: North, side of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) adopapt to VDOT'Lane (Route 1018);,
approximately " / -mile east of interstate 81 Exit 307
Current zoning: B-1, District Zoning, requested: S`2 District Acreage: 3.61 t/- Ac.
ti
Fire Marshal's Comments:
, Fire Marshal's Signature &Date:
Notice to Fire Marshal - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
v
t
�,x e
22
i � t rtti.
11
02 -25 —n 1-1:47 Pg., i
h a
Control number Date received. Date reviewed Date Revised
„ RZ1�2 -Og04 2/22/2013 2/25!20 "13
'..., Project Name s- Applicant
f .Fairfax Pike. / VDOT Lane,Commercaal;Rezoning Greenway Engineering.
Address city State Zip e
Applicant Phone
Winchester VA '22602 540 662 -4185
1'51 Windy HilhLane .
Type Application Tax ID Number.: Fire District :Rescue District
i' Rezoning` 8-&A -14 8 86yA -1 1 11
e',""� Current Zoning .
Election District
„
BI, 0 equon
Residential Sprinkler S
Automatic Sprinkled System Automatic Fire AEarm System p System
P �� Not
' ' , ` 4 ` Y,es Yes
•other recommendation
Requirements .
Emergepcy'Vehicle Access hydrant Locatiory Fire Lane Required
r =. .. No
Note Identified Not ,ldentifed'
E s Siamese Location Roadway /Aisleway Width
Special Hazards
NUddentified Adequate
No,
t
Emergency Vehicle Access,.Commerits >
R.8 •
p
Access�Comments .7 } ;
aP n"h3 '-
+' s Suf' "fir r '.
•a 1- any °..,r>' 4• 3,k ,cam �.,?} §; re. y. .3
r 4 p r { �' •i+npq s ,� Y J M,t �r�3, �,rg` Fynksrc �i.P �+s`+�
aR
"'m T,-
• n ,�`kf xti '_ `,�£ yet
> ' �+Y�,nu� -• °tJ"v '�'a�p'' �,~i
t D -
" ",a �Add1110nal Comments ` i"� �� "�f''�sacr'�# -'r
IN lo
a•} { �v4ri Fr1'YS' nits d- x,—
Oil
'"•'L r k "` �. t `sJ Vii' S r s - 4." Y •'� ..
$' 0,
lr ,"r& '•c„rJt.r,� x• fr°>a s ttr etY a ?01
1
EGG 5 i�,4i ar`a . °cp*�''S•q q a �,a • / '!';°Fa ''`3 a� F .` d ?1„ i r r� r. '
Pfan Approval Recommended 7� Reviewed By' Signature, $ p
sw�"�a5•i ,�4�,�+ a% f px' i ` _ "Y' ''r3 a. , Fah a> v
a�"'a`Yes" fir —n Ken
neth Scott
'T�tle s
-40
i i`1x c�y ' J "� ' " C S •`. ' .
r -g c s A s. <x
VN
Y?
'F ,• ', �''Fj `' {t'}" r. ,a: w Yx� -b d, �`a ro9 �'r r '••';r p 'fi .,t: 3f i�Y y �'`
y tk —1 t 9 r41 4
�{,�• �. t +Fi' fr� �„ �.•`.` 1 v "., k � � ,� 3 'K °�, �.n �`' � -, ;�,,.,�„ �. viz
ply w .h�
',ae ti § �iq���_�a,......"�% �'. ... ._._ •�'. ..
Mr. Evan Wyatt, AICP
Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, Virginia 22602
March 1, 2013
C®IJNT Y of FRE6EItYCK.
,;Department of Public Works:
.540/'665 =5643 '
FA X. .540478-0682
RE: Rezoning Request for Proposed Commercial Properties at Intersection of Fairfax Pike
and VDOT Lane
Frederick County, Virginia
Dear Evan:
We have completed our review ofthe rezoning application for the proposed commercial
development at the intersection of Fairfax Pike and VDOT Lane. Based on this review, we offer
the following minor comments:
1 Refer to Site Drainage on Page 8. Change east to west of the Food Lion Plaza
development.
2. At the site plan design phase, include an analysis of the downstream stormwater
conveyance system until the runoff reaches the drainage channel on_ the south side of
Fairfax Pike. Alternative-stormwater management systems should be considered in
future site�plan designs.
I can be reached at 722 -8214 if.you should have any questions regarding the above
comments.
Sincerely,
BnbE per•
r 4" i w
ff
q
Harvey Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E.
Director of Public Works
HES /rls
cc: Planning and Development
file
t:UthondaUEMPCOMMENTSUNT FAIRFAX PI{ & VDOT LN REZ COM.doc
Rezoning Comments
Frederick County Sanitation Authority
Mail to: Hand deliver to
Frederick County Sanitation Authority Frederick County Sanitation Authority
Attn: Engineer Attn: Engineer
P.O. Box 1877 315 Tasker Road
Winchester, Virginia 22604 Stephens City, Virginia
(540) 868 -1061
Applicant - Please fill -out the- mfortnation as accurately,�as;possible in.order;toiassist the Sanitation Authority
�^vP�',..�4.��4`sf�`d, Y"�'�t F,}d�t:�b� �„� ; . 1' 4"'.: �a�# a� '�%`''M1aL''d�.£1.'��"'�^r.,`� �t s;:!15R�,.aif }•�3ri't`ak'4�'re'�- i^'"au;.'.
with their- reui'ew Attac11�aicopy�?of youi apphcatiton, form= .location�map proffer statemenir,- impact":
analysis,. and any other pertlment�mformahon. ' � n� � � " -
Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering Telephone: 540- 662 -4185
Mailing Address: 151 windy Hjp Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
Location of property. North side of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) adjacent to VDOT.'Lane (Route 1'018);
approxim ate ly'' %2 -mile east of Interstate 8,1 Exit 307
Currentzoning: B -1 District
Zoning requested: B -2 District
Acreage: 3.61+/-.Ac.
Sanitation Authority Comments:
morose Ste Mckcneca CLCLJ-rnnegl .-
Sanitation Authority Signature &• Date:
Notice. to Sanitation Authority - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
FEB 2 7 201
GREENWAY
ENGINEERING
25
i
Post Office Box 1877
Winchester Virginia 22604 -8377
February 26, 2013
Mr. Evan Wyatt
Greenway Engineering.
15`1 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester;; V irginia 22602
i
FREDERICK COUNTY
SANITATION AUTHORITY
PH. — {540)868 -1061
Fax — (540)868 -1429
wwwAsa- water.com
Ref.: Rezoning Comments
Fairfax.PikeNDOT Lane Properties Rezoning
Tax Map # 86-A4 4 &' 86 =A -1,5 `
Dear Mr. Wyatt:
Uwe E. Weindel, P.E.
Engineer - Director
Per your request .aseview of the - proposed rezoning has been performed. The'Frederick County Sanitation
Authority offers comments lirnited to ihe,anticipated:impact/effect upon the Authority's public water and sanitary
sewer system and the,.demands thereon.
The parcel is in the* Water and sanitary sewer area served by the Authority. Based on the anticipated .usage, water
capacity 'is presently available. Sanitary sewer treatment capacity at the waste water treatment plant is also
presently available. Conveyance .capacity and layout-will be contingent, on the .applicant performing a technical
analysis of the existing, sanitary ewer system within the area to be served aiid the, existing collection main. Both
water and sanitary sewer facilities.are located within a reasonable. distance from this site.
Please be aware that the Authority does not rev_ iew or comment upon proffers and/or conditions proposed or
submitted by the applicant in support of or 'in conjunction with this ;application for rezoning; nor does the
Authority, assume or undertake' any responsibility to review or comment upon any amended proffers and/or
conditions which the Applicant may'hereafter provide to Frederick County.
.T_llank you;
Uwe E. Weindel, PE
Engineer- Director
FEB 2 7 '2013
GREENWAY
ENGINEERING
A'
WATER'S WORTH IT
/
1
1• �� '
b 1
z
egional Airport
Hand delii►er
" Wfikhester is
Attn Eii
491 A#§bat' R
(P 7• . APPn.
Rt 6F . o %
W I" hencs' ��
n
matiozi,as accuratelyras�ptojl �bl
r4
l
X45
h)
ssfst'the Winchester
location map; proffer
�FEN'
y�IIy+�ati ?33�$� a1sTlhpp� an eepone
°
H— Address '� 151,Wfndyat itl Lane_ a ` ki
1", # 1,14 Y a'i!ari 7i�'N"2J nvz ,�
u 2 Winchester VA 22662:.
rr SZE�( b1 S ,��xrw ryJ M r
yk,
' l rI;OCSt10II Oftproyperty ataenofjF4 ypprowmately aGtax Pike (Route 277) adjacent to VDOT Lana (Route LOI 3); i
s s a,
r ; 'F tl ,/ '4" h R q� t e r4 -mile east of lriterstate 81 Exit 307
�i)R�Y.ry(tr;ifeF #{`T"y r t.,
i i i t�t�Lt �ilt(i'lIS "f 1f hi'id i 1 # {< 7 q4 �4`.
Zoning requested: s- 2'uistnct Acreage 3,614
30,
S
!
Xf �""�r}�, •4i"�aJ�+,�•fRr "� #. In Y if3 " .� j -t' i, a
Wfac� ter #RcOoj& k0ipdrt & Comments:
r I 4 r z#
� pia +a� t 1r d s o- im n,
?t �4{r� •a rAM. it
x Jy "t +t F 1r.0 -
p �.t• tF S 9 r J,MI #1 C,r( t ## r + ,.
<K Propos d re`zatung shbU' k lint have an impact•on operations at the Vlrnchester Regional Airport.
5 ct
yl ,t33Y FL fir. 7p uY n . ,
4�
FA
MORU
4 rI'�3W1 nchester egional Auport's 'April 4 2013
Signature & Date
: sus, �Y ` ;.
o a to WncheS�er Regional Atrpor.L - Please Return F,orrn:to App'Icant
'
�t�. J 4
''i�'�'�[`"'L 'rt `#+ F YtdJ7 {a =' � � �n .••J'9Y�`i` t t � ,+ -
._'�.�.
b5
ur. 30
,r
R.
„t