The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-12 Comments10/02/2012 .11:12 54060970 FREDERICK CO* GOV PAGE 02/0.4 COUNTY of FREDERICK Roderick B. Williams County unty Attorn ey 540/722-8383 ' Fax 54(1/667 =0376 .,r.willia@.c-o:frp-deri.ck.-,vELiis octoberl;2012 VIA FACSIMILE —4540 66S-0403 — AND REGULAR MAIL Ron Mi'sJowski, P.E. Was Patton Hartis'Ru*f Sc Msqd 1117 East Piccadilly S- tre& Winchester; Virp�` Winche nia 22604 Re: 'Rezoning Applitation — Eastgate,-,C6mrriercial Proposed'Revised 15rQff6r.Staternent dated September 1272012 Dear,Roni You have submitted to Frederick Cowftyfor- review. the above - referenced propoted,revised-, revised -,proffer staternerit (the "proffer St6ternenf'), I wave,qow reviewed the P Profftr'Staternenv and ;it IS my op on that the Proffer Statementwoiild'bei in a form 'to mcet-the requirements, of the TtedickrC6unty Zoning iWjnanee;and'tht-Code of ing Virginia,:and would be, legally , �ilifiticiltasaprQffer: smtement-L,Slibi&ctto'the�follo 1x comments: • in the header,,information r the Proffer Statement, references shdu Id be to the, cvvent zonmg�, owner hip; acreage, and parcel status ;of'the Property. The.. proposed zctibri no longer concerns a zoning froth RA/B3 to 132, but instead oncer6s, a zQnIn9,-,.ftom',RZ with ;proffers to B.2 with ,revised ,proffer$. , Likewise; the existing parce num - - - - - for L . ots. 2 through 61j to which the proposed •actjon. would iap y , g e 767Ar5N, 76-A-51K, 76-A753L,'76.-A-5311j and 76-A-53N, - respectiv6ly: Toward this end, absent use ofthe,cuxrent parcel numbers for the five lots, Wal Mart would need,to jbin,mi,the proffier revision, asttheo*ner of a1ot (Lot 1),that was subj,edt'tc'the original 1007,rezonin,g, Also,Ian�-.now attempting to discourage the use oft le',word "Proposed" in the titles of proffer statements. Whai, hap e� 0 happens fterapprov �ofth r67, ningaAd its ,prescnce,,thon,'can, crea -,e confusion asAo whether .a proffer statement is the actual ,proffer ,statement. 'lbe language ,in the :introductory paragraph protects `the owner from a r6ffer statemeni.having :any effect in the event of de'Rial, of the 107 Nbrth Kent Street Winchesteri Virginia.22601 107'02/20'12 11- 1 4AMI 'CGIMT-404,- 00)" 10 "/0'2/2012 1 °1:12 5.4.0570 FREDERICK- COO. GOV: PAGE 03/04 Ron IGlislowski P.E'. Qcboter 2 „2013 Page 2 = .. .. •. The proffer', tateMpT.it;references the'GDP, but'mzght better state that it-4S, attached as,Attachment A. 'Theimaterials I received include a slip shEet iindicating'that the GDP is AttachmentA, • Along similar lines, Proffer l . l a_. refers to 'Ithe concept plan” and,as Attachment ` A, but it appears that "the„concept plaza" should be Attachment'B: As well, the document thatis. "the concept plan" should be. ident fled as such on its, 'face., Fight now; it is; labeled "Maranto Manor Drive. Access $teak ",, P,roffers °Section at may orr act not have already taken lace ase a e��w[nber. of erierall p.. - p of the im rovements th y y Y develo ment�of'the Wa 'Mart site. Staff sbould,review these proffers carefully'to i.on ensure,that`the revisions of the roflers are consrstent,with the currentstatus of p the transportation facilaties. This is psirticularly true of,, but trot necessarily limited to Proffer 1.3.. Also for'clarityin Proffer 1.3,. "fortbe Property" should be..added following "land disturbance permit ".., Proff;,T,.�1.4- --'The TIA eared,to refer to an additional eastbound.right,turn lane . app , on Maranto Manor Drive, from the Lit 3A/3B access to Route 522, yet the, Proffer Statement does riot .necessarily rfiake clear the Applicant's cormiitments with respect to-such lane 1construction.on.Mararito 1vlanor,Drive from..the Lot 3A/3B access to Route 522. • Proffer 2:1 = Thevroffer should commit to a specif c•titi a for compliance •: Proffer-4.1 --Staff will want to consider how this:kAR commitment will interplay N%ith the existiIlg Wa1. Mart 'development that is pant of -tile existing proffer arrangemphts: • `Proffer 4.4 The proffer excludes,gasoline,sales to tractor'trailers. Most'tractor trailers:use dxesel..Stafl"'will want to'conSider thatthe proffer'does.not exclude- ' ' ' .: , diesel sales to tractorArailers. • Proffer 4:5 — The la#guage'of this pr'off'er is 'awkward. Counsel.respectfiilly s ibrit its tha ll.anp ]tee isuch,as "Installation of n6 more,than 12 vehicle fueling stations for gasoline-,,sales.rzaay be perrriitted.:on Lot 3A" would;meet the. same. intent as the current language: Proffer 4,6 : The, proffer does not identify the "other lots "' to which it refers. 10/02/2,01;2 11 :146M (GMT-041-._.00) • Mislowsky,. Ronald - From: Funkhouse.r'Rhorida (VDOT), < Rho rid a. Funkhouser @.VDOT.;Virgihia.gov> on behalf of Smith' 'Matthew, P.E. (VDOT) <. Matthew .Smith @:vdot.virginia.gdv> Sent :. Friday, November °02, 2012 8:.30 AM To: Mislowsky, Ronald Cc:_ Bishop, John. (VDOT). Short, Terry (VDOTj; Ingram; Lloyd (VDOT); Smith, Matthew; P.E. (V DOT) Subject: Winch South Median Crossover -TIA & Proffer Review- Revised VDOT Comments 1112112 VDOT staff.has completed the technical review of the revised TIA fdr the Minchester South Median .Crossover for Lots 3A. &3B and also the revised proffers dated October 2,120-12-. Wq.concur with the analytical findings of the TIA and have no additional. comments on the, revised proffers. Therefore, VDOT would allow the installation of°the crossover; if the County`approves the proffer °amendment. Even though the'TIA shows the crossover working and there are no regulations that would prevent its installation, VDOT still. has concerns with the short weave and how this °crossover location, will actually function under real traffic conditions. Please be aware, in the future, should safety issues arise and the. crossover becomes problematic, VDOT could remove the crossover. - Please let me know if you have any questions. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. I Area Lane! Use Engineer VDOT - Land Development Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg; VA 22824 Phone # (540) 984 -5615 Fax # (540) 984 -5607 a , n* Pa, tfidn H;arrls: Ru3st & Assocl'ates Engineers Surveyors Planners:_ Landscape Architects. 1 17 East Piccadilly Street° , P Winchester Virginia 22601 T 540`667,2139 'F 540:665:0493 -� Transmittal, u 4s NOV 1 5 2012 j � n Ff =rC r ,CK, CGU'NTY i To: john Bishop Or'g 'iationlCompany: Frederick County Planning; Address-."' 1,0,7 N. 'Kent Street •.: Winchester VA 22601 ! Telephone Number: i Date: November 15 ,2012, ' From: Ron M sl vsky,, PE' ' Proleet':NamelSut)lect; Winchester,`Soutl ,Proffer�.Mo&fication Via:' InternaFOfidject File #: .j, QdaMity File # ,Date- Description Transmitted Proffer Statement (Revised 11,/1,/12) ❑ Herewith+ ' 1 is -§w igned By _ Winchester South _ Ell ',Underseparate cover w _ •Material..: - :.. ❑A Originals ❑ Photocopies 1 ❑ Diskette ❑ ;Shop Drawings, Mylar El, Prints „ M1 ❑, Invoice d ❑. Sepia Putpose _ m Your Use Patft*'Harris- Rust & A S S 0 c i a f.&s EEngineers. �urvbWs Pl'anhers. Lanos�cape' Arch6fecfs. r Nov - 2 2012 November 2, 2012 1, COUNTY E N T ,Mr., John.'Bishop Frederick- County Planning 107 N. Kent. Street Winchester, Virgiriia,22601 RE,': Winchester 'South'P'roffer-.Modification Dear, John, Please` find enclosed materials, irelated to our request for Proffer" Modification, pertaining to the Eastgate Commercial Rez . 6hifig. In addition to the revised proffer statement dated November ,2012, , we have attached the ,Power of Attorney, applicatiori fee and comment letters from the County, Attorney and VDOT. As you know the, associated revised TIA is quite voluminous. If,'' you need copies of 'that document please let me: know-. The cop d y provided to you previously has., 'been approved by VDOT and unchanged. The proffer ni6dificatibn would' provide that L. Commercial entrances as allowed by, the VD`0T- Access Management' may be installed. This hi's ihcludes, a4eft in to Lot 3A/3B oil the ;south, side of Marant6,Mano-r Drive,w 2;, Use's on the E.astaate: lots would, be restricted. as required by the revised. Traffic lmgA4, Study,. The, 'current proffer addresses' comments received from VDOT and the County,, Attorney,., We hope we can proceed to Planning "'commission consideration. Please -let me know if you haveipy. questions or comments: 'Sinocrelyl, PATTON HARRIS ,,RUST & ASSOCIATES Akennold. Gollipi1hy