Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-12 Comment and CorrespondenceIj ,n J November 7, 2012 Mr. Dennie Dunlap, PE Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 FILE (OR- COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 RE: Approval of Site Plan #15 -12; DPG — Project Roscoe Property Identification Number (PIN): 33 -A -110 Dear Dennie: The above - referenced site plan was approved on November 6, 2012. The site plan is approved for the construction of a new warehouse /distribution facility located on Martinsburg Pike in the Stonewall Required site improvements include the following: Phase I: Y Construction of a 450,000 square foot building. 0 Construction of a parking lot with 281 spaces (including seven handicap accessible), including curb and gutter, striping and handicap access. 0 Construction of 48 loading spaces. C Construction of a proffered buffer along Martinsburg Pike. • Construction of a ten foot asphalt trail along Martinsburg Pike. Y Construction of a Zoning District Buffer (berm and landscaping) along the southern property line. • Site lighting as shown on the site plan. Phase I1: • Construction of a 265,800 square foot building. O Construction of a parking lot with 121 spaces (including six handicap accessible), including curb and gutter, striping and handicap access. Y Construction of 108 loading spaces. O Construction of a Zoning District Buffer (berm and landscaping) along the northern property line. • Installation of the proffered buffer along I -81. C Site lighting as shown on the site plan. With the approval of this site plan, it needs to be recognized that the right -of -way dedication plat for Martinsburg Pike needs to be recorded and a copy provided to our office before the County will issue a certificate of occupancy for the structure. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 o Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Mr. Dennie Dunlap, PE Re: Site Plan #15 -12 November 7, 2012 Page 2 All requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance have been met in the approved site plan, including review agency comments from all relevant review agencies. I am providing you with three (3) copies of the approved site plan. Please forward these copies to the appropriate representative(s). Furthermore, advise the owner(s) that a copy should be kept for future reference, and an approved copy must be kept on the construction site throughout the development process. Once site development is complete, the owner(s) should contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, j� Candice E. Perkins, AICP, Senior Planner Attachments C "' IITIJ cc: Jane Anderson, Real Estate Charles DeHaven Jr., Stonewall District Supervisor Gary Oates and Stan Crockett, Stonewall District Planning Commissioners Patrick Barker, EDC Commissioner of Revenue Properties, Ltd., 3000 Centre Square West, 1500 Market Street, Philadelphia PA, 19102 J. m:JJAD � • MDIOH'PAIVAIWV TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. ®® a P a® n a a a► a a a® v a a® a a TRIAD Listens, Designs & Delivers August 24, 2012 Mark Cheran Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Development 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Project Roscoe, Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Cheran: AUG 2 4 2012 FREDERICK COUNTY PL Art {id P, DEVF( OPMENT The following represents Triad Engineering, Inc. responses to your comments provided via letter, dated August 3, 2012, concerning the Project Roscoe site plan review. Review comments are shown in bold italics. We are responding on a point -by -point basis to correlate with your comments. 1. Need to sign the P.E. seal on the plan. The P.E. seal is signed on all site plan sheets (see sheets C -01 to C -49). 2. Need to show crosswalk detail on C -43. A detail for the proposed crosswalks is included (see sheet C -44). 3. Need details on any directional signs. There are no directional signs proposed for the on -site operations of the facility. Please find attached one copy of the revised plan. We are still awaiting formal approvals from a couple reviewing agencies, and those will be forwarded to your attention once received. The right -of -way dedication plat is in the review process, and that info will also be forwarded once approved. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, Dennie flflflVa Dennie D. Dunlap III, P.E. Senior Engineer TRANSMITTALLETTER m:11A TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering • Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Services ' Land Surveying Construction Testing & Monitoring • Drilling Water & Wastewater • Landscape Architecture To: Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Dev. 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Candice Perkins WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 _ (540) 667 -9300 _ (540) 667 -2260 facsi l � � � � R„ www.triadeng.com ,7T, v l . JUL 2 0 20x1 ����1E:RiCK COUIit� Date: 23 July 2012 Re: Project Roscoe Site Plan review Project No.: 07 -06 -0072 COPIES DATED NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 06 -18 -12 C -1 - C -46 Site Plan for Project Roscoe (Rev. 07- 20 -12) 1 - - Request for site plan comments 1 07 -23 -12 - Comment Response Letter 1 05 -23 -12 Lot Consolidation Plat (approved 06- 05 -12) 1 07 -09 -12 Fire Marshal Approval 1 06 -20 -12 Winchester Airport Approval THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Other ❑ For Your Use ® For Review and Comment REMARKS COPY TO: SIGNED: 1� IV Dennie D. Dunlap III If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. August 3, 2012 Mr. Dennie Dunlap, PE Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 CIS Department ofWanning and Development 540/665 -5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #15 -12; BPG — Project Roscoe Property Identification Number (PIN): 33 -A -110 Dear Dennie: I received your letter dated July 23, 2012, regarding comments from the first review of this site plan. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staff's comments listed below and prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. 1. Need to sign the P.E. seal on the plan. 2. Need to show crosswalk detail on C -43. 3. Need details on any directional signs. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Need R -O -W dedication of Route 11, and comment sheets from the following agencies: the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Engineer, and the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Please contact me at 665 -5651 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark R. Cheran Zoning Administrator MRC/bad Frederick County Investors LLC, 770 Township Line Rd., Ste. 150, Yardley, PA 19067 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 o Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 • • MD 0H PA VA wV TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. July 23, 2012 Candice Perkins, AICP Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Development 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Project Roscoe, Site Plan Review ( #15 -12) Dear Candice: The following represents Triad Engineering, Inc. responses to your comments provided via letter, dated June 25, 2012, concerning the Project Roscoe site plan review. Review comments are shown in bold italics. We are responding on a point -by -point basis to correlate with your comments. Lot Consolidation. The consolidation for PINS 33 -A -109 and 110 needs to be recorded before the site plan can be approved. The consolidation plat for the two /lots have been recorded (see attached). 2. Project Information. On the coversheet provide the revised file number MDP #03 -12. The revised MDP # is provided under Project Information on sheet C -01. 3. Proiect Notes. On the coversheet, revise the following: �, • Under the parking calculation, show the required number of loading space and the actual provided number. Loading space info is now shown (see note #11, sheet C -01). Add a note that states "all utilities shall be underground ". The utility note is included (see note #26, sheet C -01). • Under the setback requirements, state that the side and rear setbacks are 100 feet. The setback requirements are included (see note #7, sheet C -01). Please note that the rear setback was not changed, as the approved MDP indicated a rear setback of 25'. • Provide Phase I and Phase II actual provided setbacks. The actual setbacks are shown (see note #7 & #8, sheet C -01). Indicate if the parking calculations reflect the maximum number of employees for Phase I and Phase IL The parking numbers for both phases are reflected (see note #10, sheet C -01). Parking tabulations factor the maximum /number of employees that could be present at the facility at any one time. Guard Housefs). Indicate if a guard house is proposed at any of the access points into the site; if so, they need to be shown on the site plan. A guard house is not proposed at this time (see note #25, sheet C -01). �- Signage. Indicate if any freestanding (entrance /directional etc) signage is proposed; if so, it needs to be shown on the site plan. There is currently no freestanding sign proposed (see note #23, sheet C -01). 6. Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks over both Route 11 entrances. Crosswalks are now shown across each entrance (see sheets C -05 & C -07). 7. Existing Entrances. On sheet C -03, label the two existing entrances at "TBR ". The two existing entrances are shown to be removed (see sheet C -03). F] 8 Landscavino Notes. On sheet C -13, notes need to be provided that state (1) all planting shall conform with §165-203.01B of the Frederick County Zoning ordinance (Plant selection, planting procedure, and maintenance), and (2) any plant substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick County Planning Department Landscape notes are added (see notes # 3 & #4, sheet C- 13). Plant Tvve. On sheet C -13, the plant schedule calls for Chinese Holly to be used as the 4 foot evergreen screen for the buffer. This plant needs to be 4 feet at the time of planting and typically Holly is utilized as an ornamental or shrub planting. Indicate if this plant is the plant to be used or if a more traditional screening tree should be utilized. Also, remove the 36 inch height for the deciduous tree and only show the 2 inch caliper requirement. The Chinese Holly has been replaced by White Pine for the evergreen screen, but remains as a shrub planting. The height for deciduous trees is also removed (see sheet C -13). 10. Route 11 Proffered Screen. The plan numbers shown on sheet C -13 don't reflect the proffer.' The calculated plant numbers now reflect the proffered screen. As noted on the site plan, an additional tree and shrub for every 100' of frontage on Rte. 11 were added to meet County code (see sheet C -13). 1. Full Screen. The Category C full screen needs to have a six foot opaque element. The site plan shows a berm that appears to be mostly four feet in height and only six feet in some locations. The entire berm needs to be a minimum of six feet in height. The berm grading is revised to show a 6' height in all locations (see sheets C -11 thru C -13). 12. Photometric Plan (Phase I & 11). The following needs to be provided(revised on the lighting plan: • Light fixtures, including mounting base, shall not be more than twenty -five (25) feet in height above finished grade. Light fixtures are now shown at a height of 25' (see sheets C -14 & C -22). • Building wall mounted or wall pack lighting fixtures shall not be mounted more than twenty -five (25) feet above the finished grade of the building. Wall mounted fixtures are now shown at a height of 25' (see sheets C -14 & C- 22). • Description of all lighting fixtures, which shall include but are not limited to catalog cuts and illustrations by manufacturers that describe the equipment, including, lamp types, wattage and initial lumen outputs, glare control devices, lamps, proposed placement of all fixtures, including engineering detail of fixtures, manufacturer, model and installation of same. - Light fixture details are provided (see sheet C -42). • Lighting levels shall not exceed 0.2 foot candles at any common property line with property zoned, used as or planned for residential or agricultural uses. The lighting plan shows that lighting levels do not exceed 0.2 foot candles at the property line (see sheets C -14 & C -22). • Lighting levels shall not exceed 5.0 foot - candles at any edge of a property line adjacent to a road right -of -way. The lighting plan shows that lighting levels do not exceed 5.0 foot candles at the right -of -way (see sheets C -14 & C- 22). • Lighting intensities need to be shown out to zero. The lighting plan shows the lighting intensities out to zero (see sheets C -14 & C -22). • The lighting requirements are specified under § 165 - 201.07 Outdoor • Lighting. Comment noted. 13. Power Line Easements. On sheet C -15, show the power line easements. The power easements are now shown (see sheet C -15). 14. Phase lI Site Plan. The site and utility plan sheets for Phase 11 should be worn with the same scale as the Phase I sheets (1 " =40% they also need to show the travel land parking dimensions, trailer space dimensions, etc. The Phase II site and utility plan is now shown at 1 " =40' scale with the appropriate dimensions and labeling (see sheets C -16 thru C -19). 5. Phase II Trailer Parking. The trailer parking spaces cannot utilize wheel stops; they need to have curb and gutter. The trailer spaces are revised to show curbing instead of wheel stops (see sheets C -16 thru C -19). Also please note that 25 trailer spaces are now included as part of Phase I, and these spaces are shown with curbing (see sheet C -05). 16. Phase II Landscaping. On sheet C -17 revise/provide the following: • Landscaping notes specified under comment #8. The landscaping notes are added (see notes #3 & #4, sheet C -21). • The 1 -81 Landscaping (proffer 5.2) needs to show 1 tree per 40 feet, not 100 feet. The landscape note is revised (see sheet C -21). • In the plant schedule, remove the 36 inch height for the deciduous trees and only show the 2 inch caliper requirement. The height requirement for deciduous trees is removed (see sheet C -21). • The trailer storage spaces at the rear of the site need to be screened from I- 81 with either a 6 foot fence /berm or with evergreen screening. An evergreen screen is now provided along the trailer spaces (see sheet C -21). 17. Construction Details. A detail for the split rail fence, screening/dumpster fence and the asphalt trail need to be provided. These details are now provided (see sheets C -43 & C -46). • Please find the attached revised plan for your review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, Dennie �flfl� a Dennie D. Dunlap III, P.E. Senior Engineer ® • • MDIOHIPAIVAIWV TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. a p o o D® P P P s o o o o TRIAD Listens, Designs & Delivers July 23, 2012 Candice Perkins, AICP Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Development 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Project Roscoe, Site Plan Review ( #15 -12) Dear Candice: The following represents Triad Engineering, Inc. responses to your comments provided via letter, dated June 25, 2012, concerning the Project Roscoe site plan review. Review comments are shown in bold italics. We are responding on a point -by -point basis to correlate with your comments. 1. Lot Consolidation. The consolidation for PINS 33 -A -109 and 110 needs to be recorded before the site plan can be approved. The consolidation plat for the two lots have been recorded (see attached). - 2. Proiect Information. On the coversheet provide the revised file number MDP #03 -12. The revised MDP # is provided under Project Information on sheet C -01. 3. Proiect Notes. On the coversheet, revise the following: • Under the parking calculation, show the required number of loading space and the actual provided number. Loading space info is now shown (see note #11, sheet C -01). • Add a note that states "all utilities shall be underground ". The utility note is included (see note #26, sheet C -01). • Under the setback requirements, state that the side and rear setbacks are 100 feet. The setback requirements are included (see note #7, sheet C -01). Please note that the rear setback was not changed, as the approved MDP indicated a rear setback of 25'. • Provide Phase 1 and Phase 11 actual provided setbacks. The actual setbacks are shown (see note #7 & #8, sheet C -01). • Indicate if the parking calculations reflect the maximum number of employees for Phase I and Phase IL The parking numbers for both phases are reflected (see note #10, sheet C -01). Parking tabulations factor the maximum number of employees that could be present at the facility at any one time. 4. Guard Housels). Indicate if a guard house is proposed at any of the access points into the site; if so, they need to be shown on the site plan. A guard house is not proposed at this time (see note #25, sheet C -01). 5. SkinaQe. Indicate if any freestanding (entrance /directional etc) signage is proposed; if so, it needs to be shown on the site plan. There is currently no freestanding sign proposed (see note #23, sheet C -01). 6. Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks over both Route 11 entrances. Crosswalks are now shown across each entrance (see sheets C -05 & C -07). 7. Existing Entrances. On sheet C -03, label the two existing entrances at "TBR ". The two existing entrances are shown to be removed (see sheet C -03). 8. Landscaping Notes. On sheet C -13, notes need to be provided that state (1) all planting shall conform with § 165 - 203.01 B of the Frederick County Zoning ordinance (Plant selection, planting procedure, and maintenance), and (2) any plant substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick County Planning Department. Landscape notes are added (see notes # 3 & #4, sheet C- 13). 9. Plant Type. On sheet C -13, the plant schedule calls for Chinese Holly to be used as the 4 foot evergreen screen for the buffer. This plant needs to be 4 feet at the time of planting and typically Holly is utilized as an ornamental or shrub planting. Indicate if this plant is the plant to be used or if a more traditional screening tree should be utilized. Also, remove the 36 inch height for the deciduous tree and only show the 2 inch caliper requirement. The Chinese Holly has been replaced by White Pine for the evergreen screen, but remains as a shrub planting. The height for deciduous trees is also removed (see sheet C -13). 10. Route 11 Proffered Screen. The plan numbers shown on sheet C -13 don't reflect the proffer. The calculated plant numbers now reflect the proffered screen. As noted on the site plan, an additional tree and shrub for every 100' of frontage on Rte. 11 were added to meet County code (see sheet C -13). 11. Full Screen. The Category C full screen needs to have a six foot opaque element. The site plan shows a berm that appears to be mostly four feet in height and only six feet in some locations. The entire berm needs to be a minimum of six feet in height The berm grading is revised to show a 6' height in all locations (see sheets C -11 thru C -13). 12. Photometric Plan (Phase I & ll). The following needs to be provided /revised on the lighting plan: • Light fixtures, including mounting base, shall not be more than twenty -five (25) feet in height above finished grade. Light fixtures are now shown at a height of 25' (see sheets C -14 & C -22). • Building wall mounted or wall pack lighting fixtures shall not be mounted more than twenty -five (25) feet above the finished grade of the building. Wall mounted fixtures are now shown at a height of 25' (see sheets C -14 & C- 22). • Description of all lighting fixtures, which shall include but are not limited to catalog cuts and illustrations by manufacturers that describe the equipment, including, lamp types, wattage and initial lumen outputs, glare control devices, lamps, proposed placement of all fixtures, including engineering detail of fixtures, manufacturer, model and installation of same. Light fixture details are provided (see sheet C -42). • Lighting levels shall not exceed 0.2 foot candles at any common property line with property zoned, used as or planned for residential or agricultural uses. The lighting plan shows that lighting levels do not exceed 0.2 foot candles at the property line (see sheets C -14 & C -22). • Lighting levels shall not exceed 5.0 foot- candles at any edge of a property line adjacent to a road right -of -way. The lighting plan shows that lighting levels do not exceed 5.0 foot candles at the right -of -way (see sheets C -14 & C- 22). • Lighting intensities need to be shown out to zero. The lighting plan shows the lighting intensities out to zero (see sheets C -14 & C -22). • The lighting requirements are specified under § 165 - 201.07 Outdoor Lighting. Comment noted. 13. Power Line Easements. On sheet C -15, show the power line easements. The power easements are now shown (see sheet C -15). 14. Phase 11 Site Plan. The site and utility plan sheets for Phase 11 should be worn with the same scale as the Phase I sheets (17=40), they also need to show the travel land parking dimensions, trailer space dimensions, etc. The Phase I I site and utility plan is now shown at 1 " =40' scale with the appropriate dimensions and labeling (see sheets C -16 thru C -19). 15. Phase 11 Trailer Parking. The trailer parking spaces cannot utilize wheel stops; they need to have curb and gutter. The trailer spaces are revised to show curbing instead of wheel stops (see sheets C -16 thru C -19). Also please note that 25 trailer spaces are now included as part of Phase I, and these spaces are shown with curbing (see sheet C -05). 16. Phase II Landscaping. On sheet C -17 revise/provide the following: • Landscaping notes specified under comment #8. The landscaping notes are added (see notes #3 & #4, sheet C -21). • The I -81 Landscaping (proffer 5.2) needs to show 1 tree per 40 feet, not 100 feet. The landscape note is revised (see sheet C -21). • In the plant schedule, remove the 36 inch height for the deciduous trees and only show the 2 inch caliper requirement The height requirement for deciduous trees is removed (see sheet C -21). • The trailer storage spaces at the rear of the site need to be screened from P 81 with either a 6 foot fence /berm or with evergreen screening. An evergreen screen is now provided along the trailer spaces (see sheet C -21). 17. Construction Details. A detail for the split rail fence, screening/dumpster fence and the asphalt trail need to be provided. These details are now provided (see sheets C -43 & C -46). Please find the attached revised plan for your review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, Dennie Z?flfl,2Tc Dennie D. Dunlap III, P.E. Senior Engineer June 25, 2012 •_ ?-71140Ptof FREDERICK Mr. Dennie Dunlap, PE Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #15 -12; BPG — Project Roscoe Property Identification Number (PIN): 33 -A -109 and 33 -A -110 Dear Dennie: Planning Staff has reviewed the above - referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies, have been adequately addressed. Please review Staff's comments listed below and prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1) Lot Consolidation. The lot consolidation for PINS 33 -A -109 and 110 needs to be recorded before the site plan can be approved. 2) Proiect Information. On the coversheet, provide the revised file number MDP #03 -12. 3) Proiect Notes. On the coversheet, revise the following: • Under the parking calculations, show the required number of loading spaces and the actual provided number. • Add a note that states "all utilities shall be underground ". • Under the setback requirements, state that the side and rear setbacks are 100 feet. • Provide Phase I and Phase II actual provided setbacks. • Indicate if the parking calculations reflect the maximum number of employees for Phase I and Phase II. 4) Guard House(s). Indicate if a guard house is proposed at any of the access points into the site; if so, they need to be shown on the site plan. 5) Signage. Indicate if any freestanding (entrance /directional etc) signage is proposed; if so, it needs to be shown on the site plan. 6) Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks over both Route 11 entrances. 7) Existing Entrances. On sheet C -03, label the two existing entrances as "TBR ". 8) Landscaping Notes. On sheet C -13, notes need to be provided that state (1) all planting shall conform with §165-203.0113 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (Plant selection, planting procedure, and maintenance), and (2) any plant substitutions must be approved in writing by the Frederick County Planning Department. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 a Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5000 Mr. Dennie Dunlap, PE Triad Engineering, Inc. Re: Site Plan #15 -12 June 25, 2012 9) Plant Type. On sheet C -13, the plant schedule calls for Chinese Holly to be used as the 4 foot evergreen screen for the buffer. This plant needs to be 4 feet at time of planting and typically Holly is utilized as an ornamental or shrub planting. Indicate if this plant is the plant to be used or if a more traditional screening tree should be utilized. Also, remove the 36 inch height for the deciduous tree and only show the 2 inch caliper requirement. 10) Route 11 Proffered Screen. The plant numbers shown on sheet C -13 don't reflect the proffer. 11) Full Screen. The Category C full screen needs to have a six foot opaque element. The site plan shows a berm that appears to be mostly four feet in height and only six feet in some locations. The entire berm needs to be a minimum of six feet in height. 12) Photometric Plan (Phase I & II). The following needs to be provided /revised on the lighting plan: • Light fixtures, including mounting base, shall not be more than twenty -five (25) feet in height above finished grade. • Building mounted or wall pack lighting fixtures shall not be mounted more than twenty -five (25) feet above the finished grade of the building. • Description of all lighting fixtures, which shall include but are not limited to catalog cuts and illustrations by manufacturers that describe the equipment, including, lamp types, wattage and initial lumen outputs, glare control devices, lamps, proposed placement of all fixtures, including engineering detail of fixtures, manufacturer, model and installation of same. • Lighting levels shall not exceed 0.2 foot - candles at any common property line with property zoned, used as or planned for residential or agricultural uses. • Lighting levels shall not exceed 5.0 foot - candles at any edge of a property line adjacent to a road right -of -way. • Lighting intensities need to be shown out to zero. • The lighting requirements are specified under § 165- 201.07 Outdoor Lighting. 13) Power Line Easements. On sheet C -15, show the power line easements. 14) Phase II Site Plan. The site and utility plan sheets for Phase II should be shown with the same scale as the Phase I sheets (1" =40'), they also need to show the travel lane and parking dimensions, trailer space dimensions, etc. 15) Phase II Trailer Parking. The trailer parking spaces cannot utilize wheelstops; they need to have curb and gutter. 16) Phase II Landscaping. On sheet C -17 revise /provide the following: • Landscaping notes specified under comment #8. • The I -81 landscaping (proffer 5.2) needs to show 1 tree per 40 feet, not 100 feet. • In the plant schedule, remove the 36 inch height for the deciduous trees and only show the 2 inch caliper requirement. • The trailer storage spaces at the rear of the site need to be screened from I -81 with either a 6 foot fence/berm or with evergreen screening. Mr. Dennie Dunlap, PE Triad Engineering, Inc. Re: Site Plan #15 -12 June 25, 2012 17) Construction Details. A detail for the split rail fence, screening /dumpster fence and the asphalt trail need to be provided. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit one copy so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Inspections Department, the Frederick County Engineer, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, and the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP /bad cc: Properties, Ltd., 3000 Centre Square West, 1500 Market Street, Philadelphia PA, 19102 Patrick Barker, EDC Attachment lip'll' TRANSMITTALOETTER m:VlAi) L TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering - Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Services • Land Surveying Construction Testing & Monitoring • Drilling Water & Wastewater - Landscape Architecture To: Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Dev. 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Mark Cheran WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: i 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VAPt C (540) 667 -9300 , r ---- -- V (540) 667 -2260 fa�Cc iinile www.triadeng.co 2 4 2012 FREUER!G COUNTY 8 9EVF!_QPNIENT 1 Date: 24 August 2012 Re: Proiect Roscoe Site Plan review Project No.: 07 -06 -0072 COPIES DATED NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 06 -18 -12 C -1 C -49 Site Plari for Project Roscoe (Rev. 08- 23 -12) 1 - - Request for site plan comments 1 08 -24 -12 Comment Response Letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Other ❑ For Your Use ® For Review and Comment REMARKS COPY TO: SIGNED: .0 (-! -LI) = IF Dennie D. Dunlap III If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. TRANSMITTAL LETTER m:JJAi) L TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering ' Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Services - Land Surveying Construction Testing & Monitoring - Drilling Water & Wastewater • Landscape Architecture To: Frederick County Dept. of Planning & Dev. 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Mark Cheran WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 667 -9300 (540) 667 -2260 facsimile www.triadeng.com Date: 19 October 2012 Re: Project Roscoe Site Plan review Project No.: 07 -06 -0072 COPIES DATED NUMBER DESCRIPTION 6 06 -18 -12 C -1 - C -49 Site Plan for Project Roscoe (Rev. 10- 15 -12) County Agency approvals THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ® For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Other Q [ E _W_E� �I J OCT 1 9 2012 FH- DER!CK COUNTY F, DFVFi_0r "nEN1 - -- ❑ For Your Use ❑ For Review and Comment REMARKS SIGNED: Dennie D. Dunlap III If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. i E. C-E- Document Approval F6rmf 19 2012 PLEAEREVEW,TM AjTACED DOCUNENT. IF TM DOCi%� &MM YOM APPROVAL Ny,&M paTLAL AM PROVIDE Tm DATE Am TM OF YOM APPROVAL. j7l=MVJMff DOWJVOTJfiMT yoVIAMMIrAL PLEAMPROPME CO AS 1.0 puff T017 WOVZD 1= 70 JU FE DATE & IN [TAU— A M=* DMM FAC John (Dube Received by Ck6cd StOff U:1PamlCammonlDoc Approval Fa=vpd