HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-04 Traffic Impact AnalysisA Traffic Impact Analysis of the
Butcher Property
P
Located in:
Frederick County, Virginia
Prepared for:
Dave Holliday
205 North Cameron Street
Winchester, VA
22601
Prepared by:
Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc
Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects.
208 Church Street, S.E.
Leesburg, Virginia 20175
T 703.777.3616
F 703.777.3725
September 8, 2004
(Original Submission: June 14, 2009)
OVERVIEW
Report Summary
Patton tHarris Rustj& Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this document to
present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Butcher Property to be located at
the end of Farmington Boulevard, east of Greenwood Road (Route 656), in Frederick
County, Virginia. The proposed project will include a total of 69 residential units with
sole access provided via Farmington Boulevard. Built -out will occur over a single phase
by the year 2008. PHR +A has provided Figure 1 to illustrate the location of the Butcher
Property with respect to the surrounding roadway network. The study area encompasses
Greenwood Road from Valley Mill Road (Route 659) to Route 657.
Methodology
The traffic impacts accompanying the Butcher Property site were obtained through
a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document:
Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of
impact,
Calculation of the Butcher Property trip generation,
Distribution and assignment of the Butcher Property generated trips onto the completed
road network,
Analysis of capacity and levels of service using the newest version of the highway
capacity software, TICS -2000, for existing and future conditions.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PHR +A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the
intersections of Greenwood Road Valley Mill Road and Greenwood Road/ Route 657. In
order to determine the ADT (Average Daily Traffic) along the study area roadway links, a
"k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24 -hour traffic volumes) of 10%
was assumed. Existing traffic volumes were obtained along Farmington Boulevard
(Briarwood Subdivision Estates) based upon trip generation results for 88 existing single
family detached residential units as calculated using the 7 Edition of the histitute of
Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 1 is provided to show the
existing trip generation results along Farmington Boulevard. All count data are provided
in the appendix section of this report.
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page I
Butcher Property
Vicinity Map
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 2
2008 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
Table 1
Existing Land Uses along Farmington Boulevard
Trip Generation Summary
AM I'eak Hour PiA1 Peak 1lour
Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 88 units 18 53 71 61 34 96 880
Total 18 53 71 61 34 96 880
Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at key
locations throughout the study area. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry
and AM /PM peak hour levels of service. All 1-ICS -2000 levels of service worksheets are
included in the Appendix section of this report.
P1-IR HA increased the existing traffic volumes along Greenwood Road, Route 657
and Valley Mill Road (west of Greenwood Road) using a conservative growth rate of five
percent (5%) per year through Year 2008. Additionally, all trips relating to specific future
"other developments" located along Charming Drive and Valley Mill Road were included.
The following approved, but not yet completed, "other developments" were considered:
Toll Brothers;
Charming Drive Residential;
Giles Farm;
Fieldstone;
Abram's Pointe (Including Coventry Court Subdivision).
Note: Coventry Court trips combined with Abrams Point are consistent with the revised
Master Development Plan.
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 3
-P
Figure 2
Existing Traffic Conditions
1
No Scale
r-
N 00 T
In
J11
(179)75)
(371)731
(49)39
ry
L 48(72)
X192(144)
it 9(37) Scnseny Ron)
P► -1.24
16 (10)
SITE
AM Peak Hour(PM 1'eak Hour)
verage_Daiiy Trips
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 4
1 /4
No Scale
Scnsenv Road
J
(C)C
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(13)
Unsignalized
Intersection
llc Mlp R oad T
Os I Ha
Unsignalized
Intersection
C(C)
Oo%
C(r)
SITE
*Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement
AM Peak HUUr(PM Peak Flom)
-PfriftA
r Figu •e 3
Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 5
Based upon the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' ([TE) Trip
Generation Report, PHR +A has provided Table 2 to summarize the 2008 "other
developments" trip generation.
Table 2
"Other Developments" along Valley Mill Road /Channing Road
n1 Trip Generation Summary
Code
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Landruse Amount' In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 1,164 units 206 618 824 627 353 980 11,640
230 Townhouse/Condo 207 units 15 76 91 75 37 112 1,801
820 Retail 120,000 SF 109 69 178 340 368 708 7,665
Total 330 763 1,093 1,042 758 1,800 21,105
The total 2008 background conditions were determined by summating the existing
traffic volumes, the annual growth through 2008 and the "other developments" (Table 2)
trip assignments. Figure 4 shows the 2008 background ADT and AM /PM peak hour
traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 5 shows the
corresponding 2008 background lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour levels of service.
All I-ICS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this
report.
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 6
No Scale
JI
(228)96.
(474)93
(63)58
3 j(2 4)
ft
61(92)
4.245(184)
t 11(47) se„
a te
.moo
N in
N Oo
J ste% 8
r 1%35)
(!78)6 79(52)
f f,
1 O
N
h `N
4? 005
Fa
en Road
SITE
AM Peak Hour(PM I'eak Hour)
Ave'rage`I)a'ly';Trips
-PH-RA
r Figure 4
P
2008 Background Traffic Conditions
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 7
1
No Seale
Senscnv Road
(VA?,
O Signalized
it R m Intersection
4( C()
(C) r� (D
e f4C.*
Cz
(C)C
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(C)
Unsignalized
Intersection
C(
n
SITE
*Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
r P_ HLIA
Figure 5
2008 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 8
PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION
The total trips produced by and attracted to the Butcher Property were established
using equations and rates provided in the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 3 shows the trip generation results for
the proposed Butcher Property site.
Table 3
Butcher Property
Trip Generation Summary
Code
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT
210 Single Family Detached 69 units 14 43 58 48 28 77 690
Total 14 43 58 48 28 77 690
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the road network
surrounding the proposed site. Figure 6 represents the distribution percentages for trips
produced by and attracted to the Butcher Property development. Figure 7 shows the
respective development generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments at key
locations within the study area.
2008 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The Butcher Property assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2008 background
traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2008 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2008
build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the
study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2008 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak
hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the
Appendix section of this report.
CONCLUSION
The traffic impacts associated with the Butcher Property development are
acceptable and manageable. All study area intersections will maintain acceptable overall
levels of service "D" or better for 2008 build -out conditions. The intersection of
Greenwood Road Valley Mill Road will require traffic signalization, however, this will be
required with or without the proposed development.
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 9
Trip Distribution Percentages
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 10
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
werage Daily Tripsfr
P
r Figure 7
Development- Generated Trip Assignments
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 11
i
No Scale
m627: e
p o
N h O
)7c- TtliR oad ro
3 1(8 )62
]8)98
o
4 (1 3
(236)98.J S
474)93
M
(63)50 <c G
G C J
J
J
F ri
63(97)
4.245(184)
11(47) Sensenv Road
jr
N
O N
q M h
N
43 4 381)
114 (1 3 5
80 (55)
SITE
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Average DailymTnps"
PHI -Zn
r Figure 8
2008 Build -out Traffic Conditions
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 12
t
No Seale
Senseny Road
-P IZtA
(C)C
Signalized
Intersection
LOS C(C)
Valle mi
Unsignalizcd
Intersection
C(C)
ad
S Signalized
co Intersection
4 4 LOS C(D)
b)c V Da))
ilti M a t 938
0
2
(C)+
D
r
SITE
*Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement
AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Flour)
r Figure 9 2008 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
P
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property
September 8, 2004
Page 13