Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-04 Traffic Impact AnalysisA Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property P Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Dave Holliday 205 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust Associates, pc Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 208 Church Street, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 T 703.777.3616 F 703.777.3725 September 8, 2004 (Original Submission: June 14, 2009) OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton tHarris Rustj& Associates, pc (PHR +A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Butcher Property to be located at the end of Farmington Boulevard, east of Greenwood Road (Route 656), in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project will include a total of 69 residential units with sole access provided via Farmington Boulevard. Built -out will occur over a single phase by the year 2008. PHR +A has provided Figure 1 to illustrate the location of the Butcher Property with respect to the surrounding roadway network. The study area encompasses Greenwood Road from Valley Mill Road (Route 659) to Route 657. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Butcher Property site were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of impact, Calculation of the Butcher Property trip generation, Distribution and assignment of the Butcher Property generated trips onto the completed road network, Analysis of capacity and levels of service using the newest version of the highway capacity software, TICS -2000, for existing and future conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR +A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Greenwood Road Valley Mill Road and Greenwood Road/ Route 657. In order to determine the ADT (Average Daily Traffic) along the study area roadway links, a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24 -hour traffic volumes) of 10% was assumed. Existing traffic volumes were obtained along Farmington Boulevard (Briarwood Subdivision Estates) based upon trip generation results for 88 existing single family detached residential units as calculated using the 7 Edition of the histitute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 1 is provided to show the existing trip generation results along Farmington Boulevard. All count data are provided in the appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page I Butcher Property Vicinity Map A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 2 2008 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Table 1 Existing Land Uses along Farmington Boulevard Trip Generation Summary AM I'eak Hour PiA1 Peak 1lour Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT 210 Single Family Detached 88 units 18 53 71 61 34 96 880 Total 18 53 71 61 34 96 880 Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour levels of service. All 1-ICS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. P1-IR HA increased the existing traffic volumes along Greenwood Road, Route 657 and Valley Mill Road (west of Greenwood Road) using a conservative growth rate of five percent (5%) per year through Year 2008. Additionally, all trips relating to specific future "other developments" located along Charming Drive and Valley Mill Road were included. The following approved, but not yet completed, "other developments" were considered: Toll Brothers; Charming Drive Residential; Giles Farm; Fieldstone; Abram's Pointe (Including Coventry Court Subdivision). Note: Coventry Court trips combined with Abrams Point are consistent with the revised Master Development Plan. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 3 -P Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions 1 No Scale r- N 00 T In J11 (179)75) (371)731 (49)39 ry L 48(72) X192(144) it 9(37) Scnseny Ron) P► -1.24 16 (10) SITE AM Peak Hour(PM 1'eak Hour) verage_Daiiy Trips A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 4 1 /4 No Scale Scnsenv Road J (C)C Signalized Intersection LOS C(13) Unsignalized Intersection llc Mlp R oad T Os I Ha Unsignalized Intersection C(C) Oo% C(r) SITE *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement AM Peak HUUr(PM Peak Flom) -PfriftA r Figu •e 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 5 Based upon the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' ([TE) Trip Generation Report, PHR +A has provided Table 2 to summarize the 2008 "other developments" trip generation. Table 2 "Other Developments" along Valley Mill Road /Channing Road n1 Trip Generation Summary Code AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Landruse Amount' In Out Total In Out Total ADT 210 Single Family Detached 1,164 units 206 618 824 627 353 980 11,640 230 Townhouse/Condo 207 units 15 76 91 75 37 112 1,801 820 Retail 120,000 SF 109 69 178 340 368 708 7,665 Total 330 763 1,093 1,042 758 1,800 21,105 The total 2008 background conditions were determined by summating the existing traffic volumes, the annual growth through 2008 and the "other developments" (Table 2) trip assignments. Figure 4 shows the 2008 background ADT and AM /PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2008 background lane geometry and AM /PM peak hour levels of service. All I-ICS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 6 No Scale JI (228)96. (474)93 (63)58 3 j(2 4) ft 61(92) 4.245(184) t 11(47) se„ a te .moo N in N Oo J ste% 8 r 1%35) (!78)6 79(52) f f, 1 O N h `N 4? 005 Fa en Road SITE AM Peak Hour(PM I'eak Hour) Ave'rage`I)a'ly';Trips -PH-RA r Figure 4 P 2008 Background Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 7 1 No Seale Senscnv Road (VA?, O Signalized it R m Intersection 4( C() (C) r� (D e f4C.* Cz (C)C Signalized Intersection LOS C(C) Unsignalized Intersection C( n SITE *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) r P_ HLIA Figure 5 2008 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 8 PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION The total trips produced by and attracted to the Butcher Property were established using equations and rates provided in the 7 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 3 shows the trip generation results for the proposed Butcher Property site. Table 3 Butcher Property Trip Generation Summary Code AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT 210 Single Family Detached 69 units 14 43 58 48 28 77 690 Total 14 43 58 48 28 77 690 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the road network surrounding the proposed site. Figure 6 represents the distribution percentages for trips produced by and attracted to the Butcher Property development. Figure 7 shows the respective development generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments at key locations within the study area. 2008 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Butcher Property assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2008 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2008 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2008 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2008 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS -2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the Butcher Property development are acceptable and manageable. All study area intersections will maintain acceptable overall levels of service "D" or better for 2008 build -out conditions. The intersection of Greenwood Road Valley Mill Road will require traffic signalization, however, this will be required with or without the proposed development. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 9 Trip Distribution Percentages A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 10 AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) werage Daily Tripsfr P r Figure 7 Development- Generated Trip Assignments A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 11 i No Scale m627: e p o N h O )7c- TtliR oad ro 3 1(8 )62 ]8)98 o 4 (1 3 (236)98.J S 474)93 M (63)50 <c G G C J J J F ri 63(97) 4.245(184) 11(47) Sensenv Road jr N O N q M h N 43 4 381) 114 (1 3 5 80 (55) SITE AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) Average DailymTnps" PHI -Zn r Figure 8 2008 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 12 t No Seale Senseny Road -P IZtA (C)C Signalized Intersection LOS C(C) Valle mi Unsignalizcd Intersection C(C) ad S Signalized co Intersection 4 4 LOS C(D) b)c V Da)) ilti M a t 938 0 2 (C)+ D r SITE *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Flour) r Figure 9 2008 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service P A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Butcher Property September 8, 2004 Page 13