Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHumanResourcesAgenda2026September25 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601 County of Frederick Michael J. Marciano Director of Human Resources (540) 665-5668 Fax: (540) 665-5669 Michael.Marciano@fcva.us TO: Human Resources Committee and Board of Supervisors FROM: Michael J. Marciano DATE: September 18, 2026 SUBJECT: HR Committee Agenda The HR Committee will meet in the First Floor Conference Room (Purple Room) at 107 North Kent Street on Friday, September 25, 2026, at 8:45 a.m. The agenda for the meeting is as follows: 1. Request for Specialty Assignment Incentive/Stipends – Presentation by Sheriff Millholland and/or His Representative 2. Turnover Ratio Discussion 1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 Office (540) 662-6168 Fax (540) 504-6400 Sheriff Lenny Millholland Major Steve A. Hawkins Justification for Specialty Assignment Incentive/Stipends Purpose I am requesting consideration of a standardized specialty assignment stipend program for deputies and civilian personnel who serve in designated specialty assignments within the Frederick County Sheriff’s Office. These assignments require employees to assume responsibilities beyond the normal scope of their primary positions and often require additional training, certifications, continuing education, physical or technical readiness, and availability. My goal is to strengthen our ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel for these assignments and ensure the Sheriff’s Office maintains the specialized capabilities needed to respond effectively when those services are required. Operational Need and Staffing Specialty teams are essential to our ability to respond to critical incidents and provide specialized services to Frederick County residents. They allow us to maintain important operational capabilities without creating separate full-time positions for each specialty function. At the same time, several teams are currently staffed below the levels I believe are needed for effective coverage and operational readiness. Specialty Team Current # Desired # Shortfall SWAT 12 18 6 Search and Rescue (SAR) 16 28 12 Dive 8 12 4 Drone (UAS) 5 10 5 Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT) 9 12 3 Honor Guard 5 12 7 Civil Disturbance 13 24 11 I also reviewed our current Special Operations roster to understand better how many employees support these assignments. When we count every roster position, including employees assigned to more than one team, we have 113 total specialty-team assignments. After removing duplicate names, 64 individual deputies fill those assignments. Twenty-seven (27) serve on two or more specialty teams, further illustrating the extent of multiple-team reliance. This demonstrates how heavily some of our personnel are already relied upon across multiple specialty functions. Additional Responsibilities and Expectations Employees who volunteer for specialty assignments accept responsibilities and commitments beyond their regular duties. Depending on the assignment, these expectations may include: • Completing specialized initial training and certification; • Maintaining required certifications and continuing education; • Attending recurring training throughout the year; • Maintaining specialized equipment and operational proficiency; • Meeting enhanced physical, technical, or operational readiness requirements; • Responding during nights, weekends, holidays, and other non-traditional hours; • Remaining available for emergency deployment or call-out; and • Serving as subject-matter experts within the agency. Examples of specialty assignments include Firearms Instructors, Tactical Team, Peer Support Team, Range Officers, Civil Disturbance Team, Dive Team, Honor Guard, Drone (UAS) Team, Defensive Tactics Instructors, Field Training Officers, Crisis Negotiation Team, Tactical Medics, Search and Rescue Personnel, Crime Prevention Specialists, and other Sheriff-approved specialty assignments. Recruitment, Retention, and Operational Readiness I believe a specialty assignment stipend would meaningfully recognize employees who accept these additional responsibilities while also helping us recruit and retain qualified personnel for critical specialty functions. When experienced employees leave a specialty assignment, the Office loses not only the individual but also the time and resources invested in training, certification, equipment familiarization, and operational experience. A standardized incentive would help recognize advanced knowledge and professional expertise, encourage employees to remain active in specialty assignments, reduce avoidable turnover and retraining costs, improve operational readiness, and support adequate specialty-team staffing. Here are brief examples to describe the recruiting and retention challenges facing Frederick County Sheriff’s Office specialty teams: The Frederick County Sheriff’s Office K-9 Unit presents several unique recruiting and retention challenges: • Major personal commitment: Becoming a K-9 handler is more than a normal specialty assignment. The handler assumes responsibility for the dog 24 hours a day, including feeding, housing, exercise, grooming, veterinary needs, and maintaining the dog’s training and readiness. • Extensive initial and continuing training: Handlers must complete specialized training with their canine partner and then participate in regular proficiency and certification training. This additional commitment can discourage otherwise qualified employees from volunteering. • Significant callout demands: K-9 teams may be called upon at any hour for narcotics detection, tracking, searches, apprehensions, missing persons, and assistance to surrounding jurisdictions. These unpredictable callouts can interfere with family and personal responsibilities. • Limited pool of volunteers: Not every deputy has the home environment, family circumstances, interest, experience, or ability to maintain an agency K-9 properly. This significantly reduces the number of potential candidates compared with other specialty assignments. • Recurrent vacancies: Promotions, transfers, retirements, resignations, or staffing shortages can result in experienced handlers leaving the K-9 Unit. Because developing a new handler-and-dog team requires substantial time and training, vacancies cannot always be filled quickly. • Primary staffing needs: When vacancies occur in patrol or other essential assignments, deputies serving as K-9 handlers may face increased regular-duty responsibilities or reassignment, making it more difficult to maintain the specialty program. • Burnout and work-life balance: Combining normal law-enforcement responsibilities with K-9 training, emergency callouts, demonstrations, community events, and daily responsibility for the animal can eventually cause experienced handlers to leave the specialty assignment. Overall: Recruiting and retaining qualified K-9 handlers requires finding employees who are willing to make a long-term professional and personal commitment. Losing an experienced handler creates more than a personnel vacancy—it can mean losing years of specialized training, experience, and the established working relationship between a handler and canine partner. • Tactical Team: Significant training requirements, physical standards, after-hours callouts, and increased risk can make recruiting difficult. Members may leave because of family obligations, workload, promotions, transfers, or burnout. • Search and Rescue Team: Requires volunteers willing to train extensively and respond at unpredictable hours, sometimes in difficult terrain and weather. Maintaining sufficiently trained personnel can be challenging because members must balance specialty responsibilities with their regular assignments. • Crime Prevention Specialist: Recruiting personnel with strong communication, teaching, public-speaking, and community- relations skills can be difficult. Regular staffing shortages may also require qualified personnel to return to patrol or other primary duties. • Dive Team: Specialized certification, continuing training, physical demands, equipment requirements, and potentially hazardous operations limit the number of employees willing or able to participate. Maintaining proficiency requires a substantial time commitment. • Drone Team: Requires specialized technical training, FAA requirements, continuing proficiency, and availability for emergency and investigative callouts. Staffing needs may require transferring trained operators, promoting them, or pulling them back to primary assignments. • Crisis Negotiation Team: Recruiting employees with the appropriate temperament, communication skills, judgment, and willingness to undergo extensive training can be challenging. Negotiators must remain available for lengthy and unpredictable critical incidents while maintaining their regular duties. • Honor Guard: Requires considerable personal commitment for practices, ceremonies, funerals, memorial services, parades, and other events, frequently outside normal working hours. Recruiting and retaining members can be difficult because of the emotional and time demands involved. • Civil Disturbance Team: Members must maintain specialized training and be available for potentially lengthy deployments involving demonstrations, major events, or civil unrest. Employees may be reluctant to volunteer because of the physical demands, risk, and additional training requirements. • Peer Support Team: Requires employees whom their coworkers trust, possess strong interpersonal skills, maintain confidentiality, and are willing to assist personnel during difficult or traumatic circumstances. Emotional demands and additional training can affect retention. Overall challenge: The greatest difficulty with specialty teams is that participation is generally an additional responsibility beyond an employee’s primary assignment. Training, certification, equipment proficiency, meetings, and emergency callouts compete with normal staffing requirements and employees’ family and personal time. When recurrent vacancies occur in patrol, corrections, civil process, or other essential functions, specialty-team members may have to leave or reduce their participation to meet the Sheriff’s Office’s basic operational needs. This creates a continuing cycle of recruiting, training, and replacing experienced specialty personnel, with substantial time and financial costs to the agency. Market and Compensation Context I reviewed available information regarding how other Virginia jurisdictions address specialty assignment compensation. I did not identify a single statewide standard; rather, agencies appear to use different approaches. For example, my initial review identified the City of Portsmouth as providing an annual SWAT allowance and Fairfax County as using an hourly operational hazard stipend for certain specialty activities, including SWAT, Civil Disturbance, and Underwater Search and Recovery. The County’s 2022 Classification and Compensation Study also supports consideration of this issue. The study includes an appendix addressing law-enforcement incentives, recognizes compensation as a tool to attract, reward, and retain qualified employees, and acknowledges that total compensation may include more than base salary. The additional examples reinforce the observation that Virginia jurisdictions use different compensation models for specialty duties. They also show that specialty compensation may be structured as an annual stipend, an hourly premium while performing the assignment, or additional overtime/compensation tied to the duty. Virginia Jurisdiction Specialty Assignment Examples Compensation Approach Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office Training Officer; Canine Handler; Adult Detention Center assignment $4.00/hour while serving as Training Officer; canine handler receives 1 hour of overtime per day; $3,000 annual ADC stipend Fairfax County Police Department SWAT/DSWAT; Civil Disturbance; Underwater Search & Rescue; EOD; Canine; Motors; Tactical Flight $3.00/hour operational hazard stipend when actively assigned/performing qualifying duties Arlington County Police Department Patrol Field Training Officer; Civil Disturbance Unit; SWAT Official County compensation materials document specialty premiums; published rates include $3.00/hour FTO, $0.75/hour Civil Disturbance, and $1.00/hour SWAT Portsmouth Sheriff’s Office SWAT $900 Fauquier County Sheriff’s Office K-9 $456.25 a month for a maintenance fee. Gloucester County Sheriff’s Office SWAT $100 monthly stipend Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office Each Specialty Team $1,000 for the first team and $250 for additional teams Recommended Stipend Structure Based on the additional responsibilities associated with these assignments, the staffing needs identified above, and the compensation practices used by other Virginia jurisdictions, I recommend an annual stipend of $1,500 for an employee’s first qualifying specialty assignment and an additional $500 for each additional qualifying specialty assignment. Number of Qualifying Specialty Assignments Recommended Annual Stipend 1 $1,500 2 $2,000 3 $2,500 4 $3,000 Each additional assignment +$500 This approach recognizes both participation in a qualifying specialty assignment and the greater commitment assumed by employees who serve on multiple teams. Fiscal Impact Using the current Special Operations roster figures submitted with this request, the proposed structure permits an initial estimate. If all 113 listed specialty-team assignments qualify and the 64 individual deputies receive $1,500 for their first assignment, the remaining 46 assignments would receive the additional $500 stipend. Calculation Quantity Estimated Annual Cost First qualifying assignment $1,500 × 64 deputies $96,000 Additional qualifying assignments $500 × 46 assignments $23,000 Estimated current-roster total 113 assignments / 64 deputies $119,000 This $119,000 estimate applies only to 113 assignments and 64 individual deputies identified in the current Special Operations roster and assumes that every listed assignment qualifies under the proposed program. The ultimate cost could change if additional specialty assignments outside that roster are included, if some assignments are excluded, or if the County establishes a maximum stipend per employee. Conclusion I am asking the County to address this issue proactively before staffing shortages affect our ability to maintain specialty teams that may be needed without notice to respond to critical incidents. These assignments require significant training, expertise, availability, and personal commitment, and many of our employees are already supporting more than one specialty function. I believe the proposed stipend structure reasonably recognizes that commitment while strengthening recruitment, retention, and operational readiness. Current staffing levels, the concentration of 113 specialty assignments among 64 individual deputies, the County’s prior compensation study, and the compensation approaches used by other Virginia jurisdictions support considering this request. I recommend establishing the specialty assignment stipend program at $1,500 for the first qualifying assignment and $500 for each additional qualifying assignment, subject to finalizing the administrative parameters and fiscal impact. County Headcount Report HR Committee Meeting September 2026 Page 1 of 2 Full-Time Headcount *2026 figures omit NRADC data 2025 FULL-TIME HEADCOUNT 2026 FULL-TIME HEADCOUNT Month FT Hires + Changes to FT FT Terms + Changes to PT Month-End Headcount Gain/ Loss Month FT Hires + Changes to FT FT Terms + Changes to PT Month-End Headcount Gain/ Loss YE 2024 YE 2025 Jan 11 7 584 4 Jan 9 8 615 1 Feb 8 6 586 2 Feb 1 7 609 -6 Mar 4 2 588 2 Mar 3 3 609 0 Q1 23 15 8 Q1 13 18 -5 Apr 2 7 583 -5 Apr 2 5 606 -3 May 17 6 594 11 May 5 5 606 0 Jun 2 1 595 1 Jun 18 4 620 14 Q2 21 14 7 Q2 25 14 11 Jul 13 10 598 3 Jul 0 0 620 0 Aug 2 10 590 -8 Aug 0 0 620 0 Sep*2 2 590 0 Sep 0 0 620 0 Q3 17 22 -5 Q3 0 0 0 Oct 4 2 592 2 Oct 0 0 620 0 Nov 27 3 616 24 Nov 0 0 620 0 Dec 4 6 614 -2 Dec 0 0 620 0 Q4 35 11 24 Q4 0 0 0 96 62 34 38 32 6 YE 2025 614 YTD 2026 620 * Fire & Rescue new recruits Increase %-24.4%Increase %-1.0% Full-Time Hiring Trends III.Part-Time Hires & Terms 2025 PART TIME 2026 PART TIME Month PT Hires PT Terms Month PT Hires PT Terms Jan 10 4 Jan 15 2 Feb 19 2 Feb 13 0 Mar 11 2 Mar 17 11 Apr 24 10 Apr 0 3 May 18 0 May 1 29 Jun 22 8 June 0 6 Jul 9 1 Jul 0 0 Aug 9 1 Aug 0 0 Sep 7 0 Sep 0 0 Oct 14 2 Oct 0 0 Nov 13 2 Nov 0 0 Dec 10 0 Dec 0 0 Total 166 32 Total YTD 46 51 ** Fire & Rescue new recruits 9 0 3 2 5 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June 2026 Full-Time Hires (Q1-Q2)TOTAL YTD: 37 HR Committee Report County Headcount Report HR Committee Meeting September 2026 Page 2 of 2 Full-Time Turnover IV.Separation Reasons*** 2025 (Q1-Q4)2026 (Q1-Q2) Month Terms Total (includes status changes) Tunover Rate (Start of Year - Terms) Quarterly Turnover Rate Annual Turnover Rate FT Reason Count FT Reason Count YE 2025 Personal Reasons 9 Personal Reasons 8 Jan 7 1.2%Retirement 7 Retirement 4 Feb 6 1.0%Pay 11 Pay 7 Mar 2 0.3%2.6%Different Opportunity 5 Different Opportunity 4 Apr 7 1.2%Performance 3 Performance 3 May 6 1.0%Dissatisfied with Job 3 Dissatisfied with Job 0 Jun 1 0.2%2.4%Career Growth 0 Career Growth 0 Jul 10 1.7%Not Specified 12 Not Specified 0 Aug 10 1.7%All Other 12 All Other 6 Sep 2 0.3%3.8%Total 62 Total 32 Oct 2 0.3% Nov 3 0.5% Dec 6 1.0%1.9%10.7% 62 Month Terms Total (includes status changes) Tunover Rate (Start of Year - Terms) Quarterly Turnover Rate Annual Turnover Rate YE 2025 Jan 8 1.3% Feb 7 1.1% Mar 3 0.5%2.9% 2.9% Apr 5 0.8% May 5 0.8% Jun 4 0.7%2.3%5.2% Jul 0 0.0% Aug 0 0.0% Sep 0 0.0%0.0%0.0% Oct 0 0.0% Nov 0 0.0% Dec 0 0.0%0.0%0.0% 2026 YTD 32 Department # of FT Staff % of FT Terms Number of Terms Sheriff 161 44% 14 Fire & Rescue 193 12% 4 Public Works 66 16% 5 All Other 201 28%9 2026 FT STRAIGHT TURNOVER 2025 FT STRAIGHT TURNOVER *** As reported in exit interviews and/or their departments. Sheriff 44% Fire & Rescue 12% Public Works 16% All Other 28% 2026 Termination Trends by Department Q1-Q2 Sheriff Fire & Rescue Public Works All Other HR Committee Report Department of Social Services Headcount Trends Report HR Committee Meeting September 2026 Page 1 of 2 I. Full-Time Headcount 2026 FULL-TIME HEADCOUNT 2025 FULL-TIME HEADCOUNT Month Hires Total Terms Total Month-End Headcount Gain/ Loss Month Hires Total Terms Total Month-End Headcount Gain/ Loss YE 2025 70 YE 2024 77 Jan 4 0 74 4 Jan 5 2 80 3 Feb 2 3 73 -1 Feb 1 3 78 -2 Mar 1 4 70 -3 Mar 1 3 76 -2 Apr 4 1 73 3 Apr 3 2 77 1 May 2 3 72 -1 May 2 1 78 1 Jun 5 6 71 -1 Jun 1 2 77 -1 Jul 0 0 71 0 Jul 5 9 73 -4 Aug 0 0 71 0 Aug 5 3 75 2 Sep 0 0 71 0 Sep 0 0 75 0 Oct 0 0 71 0 Oct 1 4 72 -3 Nov 0 0 71 0 Nov 4 2 74 2 Dec 0 0 71 0 Dec 0 4 70 -4 18 17 1 28 35 -7 YE 2025 70 YTD 2024 75 % Change 0.0% % Change -2.7% Note: DSS has 2 steady part-time employees; 1 position vacant as of 3/31/26 II. Full-Time Hiring Trends 5 1 1 3 2 1 5 5 0 1 4 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2025 Full-Time Hires (Q1 - Q4) Total YTD 28 4 2 1 4 2 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2026 Full-Time Hires (Q1-Q2)Total YTD 18 HR Committee Report-DSS Department of Social Services Headcount Trends Report HR Committee Meeting September 2026 Page 2 of 2 IV. Termination Trends 2025 Full-Time Turnover 2025 FT STRAIGHT TURNOVER Month Terms Total Tunover Rate (Start of Year minus Terms) Quarterly Turnover Annual Turnover Rate YE 2024 Jan 2 2.6% Feb 3 3.9% Mar 3 3.9%10.4% 10.4% Apr 2 2.6% May 1 1.3% Jun 2 2.6%6.5% 16.9% Jul 9 11.7% Aug 3 3.9% Sep 0 0.0%15.6% 32.5% Oct 4 5.2% Nov 2 2.6% Dec 4 5.2%13.0%45.5% 35 2026 FT STRAIGHT TURNOVER Month Terms Total Tunover Rate (Start of Year minus Terms) Quarterly Turnover Annual Turnover Rate YE 2025 Jan 0 0.0% Feb 3 4.3% Mar 4 5.7%10.0% 10.0% Apr 1 1.4% May 3 4.3% Jun 6 8.6%14.3% 24.3% Jul 0 0.0% Aug 0 0.0% Sep 0 0.0%0.0%24.3% Oct 0 0.0% Nov 0 0.0% Dec 0 0.0% 0.0% 24.3% 17 2026 2025 FT Reason Count FT Reason Count Career Growth 2 Pay 6 Personal Reasons 4 Personal Reasons 6 Agency Term - Performance 1 Agency Term - Performance 5 Different Opportunity 7 Different Opportunity 5 Not Specified 3 Not Specified 11 Career Growth/Relocation 0 Career Growth/Relocation 2 Performance/ allowed to resign 0 Performance/ allowed to resign 0 Retirement 0 Retirement 0 Total 17 Total 35 Benefit Programs 43% Family Services 40% Administration 17% 2025 DSS Turnover by Department Benefit Programs Family Services Administration Benefit Programs 35% Family Services 59% Administration 6% 2026 DSS Turnover by Department Benefit Programs Family Services Administration HR Committee Report-DSS