HomeMy WebLinkAbout097-26 (OrdAmendmentChapter165Zoning(ResidentialScreeningBufferRequirement) MENIAL ACTION
Action:
PLANNING COMMISSION: May 6, 2026 Recommended Denial
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: June 10, 2026 Amendment Denied
TO AMEND CHAPTER 165
ARTICLE VIII
Community Development Standards
Part 902—Buffer and Landscaping
§1+65-802.08.Buffer and Screening Requirements
WHEREAS, a proposal was presented to amend Chapter 165 — Zoning Ordinance to modify the
residential separation buffer requirements between residential developments contained in §165-
802.08; and
WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Committee(DR-RC) met and discussed the
proposed amendment at their March 26, 2026,regular meeting; and
WHEREAS,the Planning;Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance amendment
on May 6, 2026r, and recommended denial of the ordinance amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this proposed
ordinance amendment June 10,2026;
A MOTION TO DENY THE AMENDMENT carried this 10th day of June 2026, by the following
recorded vote:
John F. Jewell, Chairman Aye Jason C. Aikens Aye
Albert L. Omdorff Aye Robert W. Wells Aye
Michael D. Guevremont Aye Gary R. Oates Aye
Robert T. Liero Aye
A COPY ATTEST
Michael L. BollhoeF
Frederick County JAministrator
No. 097-26
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT
Residential Bnffer Separation Amendment
Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors
Prepared: May 20, 2026
40Staff Contact:Amy Feltner,Planner
Executive S'ummar►°:
Meeting Schedule
Development Review and Regulations Action: None
Committee:
planning Commission:. May 6, 2026 Action: Recommended Denial
Board of Supervisors: June 10, 2026 Action: Pending
Proposal
This is a proposal to amend Chapter 165 -Zoning Ordnance to modify residential separation
buffer relating to certain housing types in the RP(Residential Performance) Zoning District.
The proposal is to amend the minimum buffer requirements for multifamily structures when
placed adjacent to pre-existing residential developments or proposed developments with
different housing types.
Current Standard
t I r . ! . i r
r r • ��n r
1 ? -t
1 Single-fancily detached A B B
Z Single-family zero lot line or small lot .k B B
3 Townhouse A B
4 Garden apartment or multifamily buildings(35' CC 7BJA
or less in her htAge-restricted multifamily C C
Plannina& Zonine Staff Analysis:
This ordinance amendment was requested by a developer. Frederick County ,Zoning Ordinance
defines requirements for Category A, Category B, or Category C residential buffer screening as a
Page 2 of 4
combination of linear distances and the density of landscaping. The denser the landscaping or
screening, the less linear separation distance is required. Frederick County Zoning Ordinance
requires a linear separation distance of 100 feet(Category C full screen), 50 feet(Category B full
screen), and 25 feet (Category A full screen) with the densest planting, known as full screen,
requirements.
The current ordinance requires a category C buffer at the property line where a new multifamily
building or garden apartment development is placed adj acent to an existing single-family detached,
single-family zero lot line, or small lot housing type developments. The ordinance permits a lesser
buffer, category B, when multifamily buildings are erected adjacent to a townhouse development.
Staff would note that multifamily developments are separated into age-restricted multi family and
multi-family/garden apartments.
The proposed ordinance amendment incorporates age-restricted multifamily with multifamily
buildings/garden apartment buildings and provides two categories for multifamily buildings:
multifamily building thirty-five feet (35) or less in height and multifamily buildings greater than
thirty-five feet(35)in height.
The proposed amendment will permit a Category B separation buffer for multifamily buildings
where the multifamily structure is less than thirty-five in height. Multifamily structures greater
than thirty-five feet(35) have retained the current separation buffer requirement.
The ordinance establishes residential separation buffers to adequately buffer different housing
types from dissimilar housing types within adjacent separate developments. A two to three story
multifamily building, regardless of age, can be constructed adjacent to an existing single-family
detached, single-family zero lot line, or small lot housing type developments and share the same
characteristics of that of a townhouse development.
If approved,this amendment would require the residential separation buffer based on the height of
the new multifamily structure and not by development type/housing type.
Staff would note that development of multifamily developments can only occur within the Urban
Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and must meet
additional requirements including road efficiency buffers, open space requirements, density
requirements, and recreational amenity requirements required in the Frederick County Zoning
Ordinance.
Other Jurisdictions:
Staff reviewed other Virginia localities which require separation buffers, also termed transitional
screening, between different housing types. Many jurisdictions require buffer screening between
residential zoning and commercial zoning with no distinction between different housing types.
The comparison with localities used were comparable to the Frederick County RP (Residential
Performance District). Majority of the localities that required residential separation buffers require
a twenty-five (25) feet separation distance between multifamily developments and single-family
units.
Page 3 of 4
A cross-comparison of other Virginia localities is included as all attachment to this report.
Proposed Standard
Article VIII. Community Development Standards
Part 802. Buffer and landscaping
Section §165-802.08—Buffer and Screening Requirements.
Table VHI-6.Residential Separation Distance Buffer Type Required.
Proposed
1 Mm4 5
1 Single-family detached A B B
2 Single-family zero lot line or small lot 1 B B
3 Townhouse A B B
4 Garden apartment or multifamily buildings(35' or C-B A
less in height)
5. Garden apartments or multifamily buildings C C
eater than 35' in height)
3
Summary& Requested Action:
The proposal was forwarded to the Development Review and Regulations Committee(DRRC)by
the Board of Supervisors. The committee reviewed the proposal on March 26, 2026. The
committee discussed an additional increase of separation distance based on the height of adjacent
structures. Consideration also included the footprint, or size of the building envelopes. The
committee was not supportive of modifying and examining only one housing type and would
prefer to examine the change as a broader community design. Staff stated that a Phase II Zoning
Ordinance update is proposed pending the adoption of the Phase I Zoning Ordinance
update/reorganization that is scheduled for the May 13, 2026, Board Meeting. If the Phase I is
adopted, a Phase II Zoning Ordinance is planned. The Phase II ordinance update proposal will
include the re-examination of the landing and buffer on the broader scale.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 6,2026. Three(3)members of the
public spoke on the proposed amendment. The speakers were not supportive of the amendment.
Several of the Planning Commission recognized the need to reduce the buffer distance for
housing density purposes but the residential separation distance, as well as the zoning district
buffer,would need to be addressed simultaneously and as a community whole rather than one
housing type. A need for multifamily housing with greater density is needed in the county to
accommodate the growth, especially if preservation of the RA(Rural Area) is to be successful.
The Planning Commission recommended denial. (11-1).
This item is presented to the Board of Supervisors for Public Hearing.
Page 4 of 4
Questions regarding the proposal should be directed to the Planning and Development
Department Staff.
Following a public hearing, staff is seeking a decision from the Board of Supervisors on this
Zoning TextAmendment.
CHAPTER 165 1 FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
Article VIIL Community Development Standards
Part 802. Buffer and Landscaping
Section 165-802.08. Buffer and Screening Requirements.
C. Residential Separation Buffers. When different housing types are adjoining within the same
development,buffers shall be provided in accordance with Table VIII-6 and Table VIII-7.This
shall be in addition to the zoning district buffer types required in F.,below.
(1) General.
i. Buffers shall be placed between the lot line of the proposed housing type and the lot line
of the existing adjoining use or development.When placed on individual lots,the buffer
shall be located within a permanent landscape easement and shall be maintained by the
property owners' association.
ii. When age-restricted multifamily housing adjoins other housing types,the evergreen
element of the residential separation buffer shall be planted at a height of six(6)feet.
iii. When existing mature woodlands are located within the entire buffer area(total distance
if active and inactive buffer),preservation of that woodland will be allowed to substitute
for the required plant material.
iv. Housing types contained within a mixed-use development as outlined in the
Comprehensive Plan,or developments that contain a mixture of housing types but
approved with the same MDP,shall not require residential separation buffers between
housing types contained within the same development.
a. The Zoning Administrator may require residential separation buffers when a MDP is
revised and the housing types are modified after construction has already commenced
within the development.
(2) Waivers,Reductions,and Modifications.The Board of Supervisors may waive,reduce,
and/or modify the residential separation buffer requirements(distance or landscaping)if-
1. The topography of the lot providing the buffer yard and the lot being protected is such that
the required buffer yard would not be effective; or
VIII-7
CHAPTER 165 1 FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
ii. Utility conflicts preclude the installation of the buffer and would
result in unnecessary or otherwise unreasonable hardship to the
developer.
I ■ 1 I 1 1 W-MI i ' ■ " I ' I
1 2 4 5
1 Suigle-fancily detached A B B
2 Single-family zero lot line or small lot A B B
3 Townhouse A A B B
4 Garden apartment or multifamily buildings F B C—B B-A A
35'or less in height)
5.. Garden apartments or multifamily C C B
buildings(greater than 35' in height)
F F
Table VIII-7.
r r I InI!
ScreenInactive Active Total
Type Type1 I
Full screen 15 10 25
A Landscape screen 30 20 50
No screen 75 25 100
Full screen 30 20 50
B Landscape screen 45 30 75
No screen 75 25 100
Full screen 75 25 100
C Landscape screen 100 50 150
No screen 1 150 1 50 1 200
VIII-s