HomeMy WebLinkAboutTCAgenda2026April271.Adoption of Agenda
2.Welcome and Introductions
3.Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study Phase II Authorization
3.A.EFCTS Phase II Authorization
4.Interstate, Primary, and Secondary Road Plans Update
4.A.Interstate, Primary, and Secondary Road Plans Update
5.County Projects Update
5.A.County Projects Update
6.Other
6.A.Other
AGENDA
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
MONDAY, APRIL 27, 2026
8:30 AM
FIRST-FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
TC04-27-26EFCTS_PhaseIIStudy.pdf
TC04-27-26Interstate_Primary_SecondaryRoadPlansUpdate.pdf
TC04-27-26CountyProjectsUpdate.pdf
TC04-27-26Other.pdf
1
Transportation Committee
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 27, 2026
Agenda Section: Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study Phase II
Authorization
Title: EFCTS Phase II Authorization
Attachments:
TC04-27-26EFCTS_PhaseIIStudy.pdf
2
Item 3:
Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study: Phase II Authorization
Topic Synopsis
Attached is the proposal from the County’s On Call Transportation Consultant McCormick Taylor for
the completion of the EFCTS Phase II Study. Staff is seeking a recommendation of approval to proceed
with the project.
Recommended Action
Approval to the Board of Supervisors.
3
March 6, 2026
Revised March 26, 2026
Mr. John Bishop, AICP
Assistant Planning Director
Frederick County
107 N. Kent Street, Suite 202
Winchester, VA 22601
Re: RFP – Phase II – Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study
Dear Mr. Bishop:
At your request, McCormick Taylor, Inc. is pleased to present this scope and fee proposal to assist
Frederick County with services for Phase II – Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study (EFCTS).
McCormick Taylor has previously assisted Frederick County with EFCTS Phase I and other localities with
similar studies to meet specific criteria of funding sources such as SMART SCALE, TA, RS, BRIC, and RAISE
(now BUILD). We have also assisted the Winchester-Frederick County Metropolitan Planning Organization
(WinFred MPO), in cooperation with Frederick County and VDOT staff, with their Safe Streets for All Action
Plan. We will utilize that experience in preparing EFCTS Phase II to strengthen the County’s submissions.
McCormick Taylor’s efforts will involve updating data and analysis (as needed) provided in EFCTS Phase I
for Route 37 Bypass Phase 1, and Phase 2 as Limited Access Parkway style roadways outlined in EFCTS
Phase I. We will also include up to two Potential Added Recommendations developed in consultation with
the Transportation Committee and Frederick County Project Manager. McCormick Taylor will utilize VDOT
estimating tools (e.g., Project Estimate Summary) to prepare comprehensive cost estimates based on the
intended improvements. We will conduct a site visit to better understand the current conditions and
potential risks associated with each location. In addition, we will coordinate with County and VDOT staff
and provide the engineering support necessary to generate a competitive application. Our work will also
consider any previous application documentation put forth by the County.
The following outlines our proposed work for the RFP Scope of Services Requested, along with a schedule
and fee estimate for the core scope with possible risks or challenges. It will be important to ascertain
potential costs related to those risks/challenges to establish thorough cost estimates.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
EFCTS Phase I was a preliminary re-evaluation of the long-planned completion of the Route 37 Limited
Access Bypass on the east side of I-81. The re-evaluation addressed funding constraints, changes in the
study area since initial planning of the study, and safety concerns. In EFCTS Phase I, McCormick Taylor
recommended five (5) potential improvements in coordination with the stakeholders committee, three
(3) as Partial Limited Access Roadways that were segments along the original Route 37 Bypass alignment,
and two potential improvements to existing roadway segments.
EFCTS Phase II will be an update of EFCTS Phase I to provide new data where available and to better align
with VDOT SMART SCALE criteria for project funding. McCormick Taylor recommends that EFCTS Phase II
follow through on the Frederick County staff spring presentations to the Board of Supervisors and
Planning Commission. In that presentation, staff recommended going forward with the Route 37 Bypass
Phase 1 (EFCTS Phase I, Potential Improvement Project 1: Route 37 Extension from US 11 to Route 7) and
Phase 2 (EFCTS Phase I, Potential Improvement Project 3: from Tasker Road/Route 37 to US 522).
4
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 2 of 9
McCormick Taylor recognizes that potential additional recommendations may need further re-evaluation
in that there may be proposed changes to the roadway network that were not contemplated in EFCTS
Phase I, as well as more recent data and development. Given those considerations, McCormick Taylor
recommends that EFTCS Phase II consider up to two (2) Potential Additional Recommendations in addition
to Route 37 Bypass Phase 1 and Phase 2.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
McCormick Taylor will implement management controls that will be tailored to the needs of the project.
This will include the following efforts:
Project Correspondence
McCormick Taylor will be responsible for the preparation of all correspondence for the project including
agendas, meeting minutes, project memoranda, and transmittals in both hardcopy and electronic
formats. We can also develop a project-specific SharePoint site for project team members to share data,
with deliverables and project information uploaded so all stakeholders can access it. Status meeting
information, such as dates, times, and location (in-person or video/conference call), will be included on
the SharePoint calendar.
Invoicing and Progress Reports
Monthly progress reports and invoices will be submitted according to County requirements. Progress
reports will detail tasks performed and submissions made during the billing period. Upcoming work
efforts, future submissions, and action items required by the County will also be included in the status
report. Invoices will detail the budget for each task, previous and current costs, and the balance remaining
for each task.
Status Meetings
McCormick Taylor will prepare for and attend status meetings for the project throughout the duration of
the study. It is anticipated that these status meetings will include bi-weekly conference calls and
potentially monthly in-person meetings at Frederick County offices. McCormick Taylor will work with the
project team to identify status meeting dates and times that are convenient for all parties. We will prepare
meeting minutes and post them to the SharePoint site for review by the project team.
TASK 1 – INITIAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
McCormick Taylor proposes to revisit the Public Engagement Plan (PEP) that was adopted for Phase I of
the EFCTS project and will review and update the key stakeholders list developed in EFCTS Phase I. The
updated PEP will continue to be consistent with VDOT’s Governance Document Public Involvement
Manual (Revised November 2021). The proposed PEP update will be submitted to the Frederick County
Project Manager prior to finalization and use.
McCormick Taylor proposes to work in coordination with the Frederick County Project Manager on up to:
• Twelve (12) coordination meetings with County staff, consisting of include monthly conference calls
or in-person status meetings with County staff.
• Three (3) meetings with the Transportation Committee or as otherwise directed by the Frederick
County Project Manager.
5
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 3 of 9
• One (1) meeting with VDOT. It is anticipated that VDOT will be represented on the Transportation
Committee, and this is a separate meeting (as necessary) in addition to Transportation Committee
meetings.
• Two (2) Transportation Forum Meetings at the County offices to engage with local officials, other
interested/engaged decision makers, and the public as appropriate or necessary.
McCormick Taylor also proposes to update and collaborate with the Frederick County Project Manager on
content updates for the EFCTS Phase I website developed by McCormick Taylor for the duration of EFCTS
Phase II, including a composite web map.
Additionally, McCormick Taylor anticipates providing collateral materials (as needed) for the project
including PowerPoint presentations, social media content and graphics, and meeting materials such as
sign-in sheets, name badges, and agendas. Most materials will be produced in a draft and final format.
Task 1 Deliverables:
• Updated PEP.
• Updated project website with content and visual graphics, and up to four (4) updates to the website.
• Up to three (3) PowerPoint presentations.
• Six (6) mounted display boards.
• Up to two (2) social media posts including graphics and content generation.
• Content generation for up to two (2) press releases.
TASK 2 – TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
This study will develop required traffic, safety, and planning-level documentation to support a competitive
SMART SCALE application to VDOT for a new roadway on new alignment, in full compliance with the
SMART SCALE Technical Guide (Revised December 2025) criteria. Given the enhanced requirements for
new alignment projects such as Route 37 Bypass Phase 1 (EFCTS Phase I Potential Improvement Project 1
Route 37 extension from US 11 to Route 7) and Phase 2 (EFCTS Phase I Potential Improvement Project 3
from Tasker Road/Route 37 to US 522), the effort will include a comparative analysis evaluating the
proposed roadway with up to two (2) alternative options. Alternatives will be assessed using consistent
criteria such as traffic operations, safety, feasibility, and cost to identify and document a preferred
alternative for application submission.
Geographic location plays a critical role in the SMART SCALE scoring process. Depending on where a
project is located, the relative importance of Safety, Congestion Mitigation, Accessibility, Economic
Development, and Environmental Quality varies substantially, directly influencing how project benefits
are translated into an overall SMART SCALE score. As a result, a technically strong project that is not
aligned with its geographic weighting profile may underperform relative to a project that is strategically
tailored to the priorities of its location.
As the proposed project is in Category C, the scoring framework places comparatively greater emphasis
on Safety (30%) and Economic Development (25%), with moderate weight assigned to Congestion
Mitigation (20%) and Accessibility (15%). This study will be structured to maximize performance under
this weighting profile by focusing on robust safety benefit estimation (including expected crash reduction),
clear demonstration of economic development support (particularly through travel time reliability), and
operational analysis that documents meaningful congestion relief. By aligning the technical analyses with
6
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 4 of 9
the factors that matter most in Category C locations, the study will identify and emphasize a project’s
strongest benefits that will carry the greatest scoring value in the SMART SCALE evaluation process.
VTrans Mid-Term Need Confirmation
Our work will begin with confirmation that the proposed facility addresses an adopted VTrans Mid-Term
Need under the appropriate travel market. The analysis will clearly document how the new alignment
resolves identified capacity, connectivity, or safety deficiencies, ensuring consistency with SMART SCALE
screening requirements and minimizing risk of pre-application rejection. Early coordination with County
and VDOT District representatives will be used to validate need alignment and analytical assumptions.
Planning Study and Alternatives Analysis
Consistent with SMART SCALE readiness requirements for roadway-on-new-alignment projects, the study
will include a formal planning-level evaluation that documents a preferred alternative and evaluates
reasonable non-alignment options.
The alternatives analysis will assess proposed new alignments for Route 37 Bypass Phase 1 and Phase 2
proposed in EFCTS Phase I as Potential Improvement Project 1: Route 37 extension from US 11 to Route 7,
Potential Improvement Project 3: from I-81 interchange/Tasker Road/Route 37 to US 522, and any EFCTS
Phase II-identified Potential Additional Recommendations that are new segments. McCormick Taylor
proposes to address SMART SCALE Technical Guide (Revised December 2025) criteria as follows:
• Update the EFCTS alternatives analysis as needed to consider improvements to the existing roadway
network consistent with SMART SCALE criteria for Roadway on New Alignment.
• Update the crash data and Crash Mitigation Factors (CMF) and calculate a Percent Expected Crash
Reduction for changes in travel patterns from the new roadways.
• Calculate the Percent Expected Crash Reduction and the number of crashes to be added to the
network consistent with 6.1 S.1 EPDO of Fatal and Injury Crashes Methodology identified on Page 59
and 6.2 S.2 EPDO Rate of Fatal and Injury Crashes on Page 60.
The alternatives analysis will also include travel demand modeling as needed. McCormick Taylor proposes
utilizing the current VDOT Transportation and Mobility Planning Division travel demand model for the
WinFred MPO to complete the following:
• Evaluate the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) structure utilized in the EFCTS Phase I analysis compared to
the provided model, including documentation of any adjustments to the model.
• Perform No-Build analysis.
• Perform Build analysis with the recommended improvements.
• Perform Build analysis of all phases of the Route 37 Bypass (if requested by VDOT).
• Identify changes in vehicle travel due to alternative route choices.
• Identify links in the regional network operating below the posted speed limit in a future No-Build
scenario with greater than 10 percent reduction of traffic for the different alternative improvements
as compared to the No-Build scenario (SMART SCALE Section 7.1 C.1 Person
Throughput/Methodology/New/Complex Roadway Facilities).
• Estimate vehicle delay (SMART SCALE Section 7.2 C.2 Person Hours of Delay Methodology for New
Roadway Facilities).
7
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 5 of 9
• Identify any additional segments for further analysis.
Additionally, the alternatives analysis will include improvements based on comparison of the No-Build
and Build analyses to existing parallel facilities including I-81, US 11, Route 7, and Tasker Road. The
analysis will also consist of operational or intersection-based improvements (further described in Traffic
Operations Analysis below) and other feasible strategies addressing the identified need.
Each alternative will be evaluated using consistent performance measures including operational
efficiency, safety performance, constructability, environmental considerations at a planning level, and
relative cost. The preferred alternative will be supported by quantitative findings and documented in a
format suitable for direct inclusion in the SMART SCALE submission.
Traffic Operations Analysis
A comprehensive traffic operations analysis will be conducted using Synchro to support Congestion
Mitigation and Accessibility measures. Existing and future conditions will be evaluated using VDOT-
accepted methodologies appropriate for planning-level analysis.
For developing existing conditions, McCormick Taylor will work with the County to obtain existing
intersection and mainline volume and classification traffic count data. Depending on the availability of
these data, additional turning movement counts (TMC) and 24-hour classification/tube counts may be
necessary and can be coordinated with the County once the needs are identified.
Future year traffic volumes will be developed using regional travel demand model outputs, County growth
forecasts, and corridor-level planning data. No-Build and Build conditions will be evaluated to quantify
changes in person hours of delay and person throughput. Documented results will be consistent with
SMART SCALE evaluation methodologies to present defensible scoring inputs.
Economic Development and Travel Time Reliability
To support economic development scoring, this study will evaluate each project’s impact on Travel Time
Reliability, consistent with SMART SCALE economic development measures. For new alignment facilities,
reliability improvements often result from network redundancy, bottleneck relief, improved geometry,
and reduced incident exposure.
The analysis will quantify changes in travel time variability between No-Build and Build conditions and
document how the new facility improves predictability for commuters, freight operators, and regional
traffic movements. Reliability benefits will be framed in terms of improved freight efficiency, workforce
accessibility, and overall corridor resilience.
Regional travel demand model outputs will establish baseline and forecast travel times. Travel time
reliability will be evaluated using simulation-based travel time distributions and percentile travel time
comparisons derived from multiple SimTraffic model runs with varied demand and stochastic seeds.
To improve the credibility of the travel time reliability analysis, SimTraffic models will be calibrated using
travel time data collected from the field at the tie-in roads, major collectors feeding the corridor, and
parallel roadway facilities. TruTraffic 10.0 will be used to collect the travel time data from the field and
travel time runs will be conducted at both AM and PM peaks. For this proposal, it is assumed that travel
time runs will be conducted at up to five (5) arterial facilities.
The results will be used to assess relative improvements in travel time consistency between the No-Build
and Build conditions. Assumptions, model inputs, and performance measures will be documented in a
manner consistent with SMART SCALE validation and review procedures to ensure transparency and
defensibility during scoring.
8
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 6 of 9
Safety Performance Evaluation
A planning-level safety assessment will be prepared to support safety factor scoring. This will include
evaluation of historical crash patterns on parallel and connecting facilities and estimation of anticipated
crash reductions associated with traffic diversion, improved geometry, and reduced conflict exposure.
Where required, documentation will include AADT data, field observations, geometric review, and a
predictive safety analysis with severity weighted projected crash reduction benefits calculated using
Highway Safety Manual methodologies. The resulting analysis will provide defensible inputs for EPDO-
based safety scoring measures.
Project Definition and Readiness Documentation
New alignment projects are subject to elevated readiness expectations. This study will place strong
emphasis on clearly defining scope and preparing documentation necessary to satisfy SMART SCALE
readiness gates.
A conceptual project sketch will be prepared showing alignment limits, termini, cross-section, access
characteristics, and multimodal components. A realistic project development schedule will outline
environmental documentation, right-of-way acquisition, design development, and construction
milestones.
Planning-level cost estimates will be developed consistent with VDOT cost estimating practices and will
include defined costs, appropriate allowances, and risk-based contingencies.
Risk Management and Schedule Control
New alignment projects inherently involve uncertainty related to right-of-way, environmental
considerations, and traffic forecasting. To protect the SMART SCALE schedule, this study will incorporate
early identification of technical risks and data gaps.
Traffic, safety, reliability, alternatives, and cost components will be developed in parallel to maintain
schedule control within SMART SCALE submission timelines. Coordination with VDOT District staff and
OIPI will occur as needed to confirm assumptions and resolve issues prior to final application submission.
Where assumptions are required due to schedule constraints, they will be documented transparently.
Task 2 Deliverables
• Traffic Forecasting Memorandum.
• SMART SCALE Memorandum for Route 37 Bypass Phase 1, Route 37 Bypass Phase 2, and each
Potential Additional Recommendation.
o VTrans mid-term need confirmation memorandum.
o Planning study with alternatives analysis (including non-alignment alternatives).
▪ Traffic operations analysis (No-Build and Build conditions).
▪ Travel time reliability analysis (economic development support).
▪ Safety analysis and planning-level benefit estimation.
▪ Conceptual project sketch for new roadway alignment(s).
▪ Preliminary project development schedule and planning-level cost estimate with
contingencies.
9
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 7 of 9
TASK 3 – POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS
McCormick Taylor will utilize the current VDOT Transportation and Mobility Planning Division travel
demand model to evaluate segments or intersections that may be on the current Potential Safety
Improvement (PSI) list and that were not on the PSI list during EFCTS Phase I. We propose to compare v/c
ratios from the No-Build model output and crash data from 2020 to 2025 to evaluate each Potential
Additional Recommendation in a SMART SCALE Memorandum as described in Task 2.
TASK 4 – FATAL FLAWS ANALYSIS
McCormick Taylor will develop a fatal flaws analysis for Route 37 Bypass Phase 1, Route 37 Bypass
Phase 2, and each Potential Additional Recommendation. For each recommendation, the fatal flaws
analysis will address VDOT standards, safety, constructability, public opposition, and cost. While not
specified in the RFP, McCormick Taylor also recommends addressing environmental considerations. The
fatal flaws analysis will be included in the project report described in Task 6.
TASK 5 – UPDATED COST ESTIMATES
McCormick Taylor will update the cost estimates for Route 37 Bypass Phase 1, Route 37 Bypass Phase 2,
and any Potential Additional Recommendations consistent with the current VDOT Cost Estimating Manual
(Revision March 25, 2025). The cost estimate for each recommendation will be included in the SMART
SCALE Memorandum described in Task 2.
TASK 6 – REPORT
McCormick Taylor proposes submitting a draft report and a final report. Both reports will include an
executive summary, travel demand forecasting procedures, traffic analysis methodologies, SMART SCALE
analysis, justifications, recommendations, and cost estimates.
Task 6 Deliverables
• Draft Executive Summary.
• Draft Final Report.
• Executive Summary.
• Final Report.
TASK 7 – PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PRESENTATION
Meaningful involvement of project stakeholders is essential to fostering acceptance and support of
planned transportation improvements like what will be studied under EFCTS Phase II. Our in-house staff
of GIS specialists, graphic designers, digital technicians, and communications and public involvement
specialists have extensive and relevant experience presenting complex engineering and environmental
information and conceptual designs in manner that is easy for the public to understand.
McCormick Taylor will work closely with County staff to plan and implement a Public Information Meeting
(PIM) to share project details, outcomes, and justifications with local officials and interested citizens.
Building on our experience conducting public engagement for EFCTS Phase I, the PIM plan will lay out the
logistics for the event, including meeting date, time and location, as well as the meeting room layout
(understanding that this effort may be less if the meeting is held in conjunction with a regularly scheduled
meeting like the Transportation Forum).
10
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 8 of 9
McCormick Taylor will develop draft meeting materials including a PowerPoint presentation,
comprehensive project handout, display boards, a comment form, sign-in sheets and nametags to be
reviewed and approved by the County prior to final production. A dry run will be planned to underscore
the meeting purpose and finalize project team meeting attendance for County approval.
McCormick Taylor will collaborate with the County on a publicity plan that will include the use of the
County’s website, social media channels, a press release and paid advertisement (proof of publication) if
required. Following the PIM, we will provide a meeting summary and compilation and analysis of public
comments received and other meeting documentation as appropriate within two (2) weeks after the
meeting date.
McCormick Taylor also anticipates presenting the study findings to the County Board of Supervisors at a
regularly scheduled meeting, if possible.
POTENTIAL RISKS/CHALLENGES
According to the WinFred MPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, none of the Potential
Improvement Projects are included in Table 9: WinFred 2045 Constrained Long Range Plan, while
Figure 13 shows the Route 37 Bypass as included in the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. The
Route 37 Bypass and some of the potential improvement projects are shown in the Frederick County
Comprehensive Plan recommendations tables and needs maps.
The following are some risks or challenges we have identified worth assessing as part of the EFCTS Phase II
study:
• Given the significant increase in pavement for roadway extensions and widenings, what are the
environmental impacts and potential stormwater management needs? Where would stormwater
facilities be located and how much would the improvements cost, including right-of-way acquisition
and utility impacts? At the planning stage, future roadway cost estimates for construction,
permitting requirements, and right-of-way acquisition, including business damages, all have a
significant amount of uncertainty. As a basis for comparison of potential improvements, McCormick
Taylor will utilize the VDOT Cost Estimating Manual (Revision March 25, 2025).
• The WinFred MPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan was adopted in November 2022 and long-
range transportation plans are typically updated every five (5) years. The population and
employment projections utilized for the travel demand model require periodic adjustment to reflect
new developments and changes in population and employment. While no activity was reflected in
the 2025 MPO meeting minutes, it is possible that the population and employment projections in
the current VDOT Transportation and Mobility Planning Division travel demand model for the
WinFred MPO model may be concurrently evaluated for the next update of the model and/or the
next update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. It is also possible that a subarea model may
have been developed for an area project (I-81 improvements or local land use developments), which
may include adjustments to TAZs, the roadway network, or socioeconomic data. McCormick Taylor
proposes to ascertain the most appropriate travel demand model for use in EFCTS Phase II. Similar
to EFCTS Phase I, we will document the version of travel demand model used and any adjustments
made to that travel demand model as part of the Traffic Forecasting Report.
• As was verified during the EFCTS Phase I public engagement, McCormick Taylor anticipates that
strong support of the Route 37 Bypass will continue.
11
RFP Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study – Phase II
Page 9 of 9
SCHEDULE
McCormick Taylor proposes an 18-month schedule from Notice to Proceed (NTP) to completion. We will
coordinate with the County on an exact deliverable schedule once we receive NTP. Presuming NTP
coincides with the beginning of the Frederick County fiscal year, final deliverables are intended to be
submitted no later than December 31, 2027 so County staff and other stakeholders have adequate time
to process a comprehensive plan amendment and prepare SMART SCALE application(s) in 2028 based on
the EFCTS Phase II Study findings.
The following preliminary schedule is anticipated (this will be refined following project award):
•Task 1 – Initial Public Engagement ....................................... July 2026 – August 2026
•Task 2 – Transportation Analysis .......................................... July 2026 – February 2027
•Task 3 – Potential Additional Recommendations ................. November 2026 – February 2027
•Task 4 – Fatal Flaws Analysis................................................. February 2027
•Task 5 – Updated Cost Estimates .......................................... February 2027
•Task 6 – Draft Report ............................................................ April 2027
– Final Report ............................................................. June 2027
•Task 7 – Public Information Meeting .................................... Spring or Summer 2027
– Board of Supervisors Presentation ......................... Spring or Summer 2027
FEE
This will be a lump sum contract, with a total no to exceed cost of $233,622.04. Our fee breakdown
is attached.
Thank you for providing McCormick Taylor with the opportunity to submit on this task. Please let me
know if you have any questions regarding this proposal.
Sincerely,
McCormick Taylor, Inc.
Brian St. John, PE, PTOE
Vice President, Transportation Services
O 717.540.6040
D 717.775.5807
C 717.215.7893
bstjohn@mccormicktaylor.com
12
Billing Rate Total 209,704.04$ (a)
Direct Costs Other Than Payroll 23,918.00 (b)
Direct Costs of Services and Work Performed by Others:
- (c)
Subtotal (a)+(b)+(c)233,622.04 (d)
Total Cost 233,622.04$ (f)
Total Estimated Man-Hours: McCormick Taylor, Inc.1,258
Total 1,258
Engineer's Name:McCormick Taylor, Inc.
1818 Market Street
16th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Fed. I. D. No.:23-1683759
Contact Person:Bryan Hanover
Deputy Director
(667) 219-3293
Prepared By:Bryan Hanover
Work Order 1
Job No. 11474
Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study - Phase II
Proposal Summary
13
Name: Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study - Phase II
Work Order 1
Job #:11474 Hours
Date: March 6, 2026
By: Bryan Hanover
256.30 237.77 169.87 153.19 142.59 124.76 227.45 189.14 143.38 108.94
TASK
Total HoursEngineer
VII/SME Engineer V Engineer IV Engineer III Engineer II Engineer I
Technical
Specialist
VI/SME
Technical
Specialist V
Technical
Specialist III
Technical
Specialist II Total Dollars
- -
Task 1 – Initial Public Engagement 16 20 24 75 20 24 60 239 43,752.15
- -
Task 2 – Transportation Analysis 10 60 60 60 125 220 4 16 555 85,419.79
- -
Task 3 – Potential Additional Recommendations 4 16 16 16 24 12 2 18 108 17,953.50
- -
Task 4 – Fatal Flaws Analysis 4 24 2 30 7,186.58
- -
Task 5 – Updated Cost Estimates 4 40 16 2 8 70 10,051.38
- -
Task 6 – Report 16 8 8 24 40 96 15,078.08
- -
Task 7 – Public Information Meeting and Board of Supervisors Presentation 8 16 24 40 88 13,488.32
- -
- -
- -
-
TOTAL 102 136 124 76 189 248 109 36 90 148 1,258 209,704.04$
14
Proposal Summary
Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study - Phase II
1)Travel
a. Client Office
10 trips @ 250 = 1,812.50
10 trips @ 4 tolls per trip = 40.00
b. On Site Travel
100 miles @ 0.725$ per mile = 72.50
Subtotal 1,925.00$
2)Report Reproduction ( For deliverables only, to be billed at cost )
a. Black and White Printing
200 copies @ 0.10$ /pg (8 1/2 x 11) = 20.00$
200 copies @ 0.20$ /pg (11 x 17) = 40.00
b. Color Printing
200 x 0.60$ /copy (8 1/2 x 11) = 120.00
200 x 1.00$ /copy (11 x 17) = 200.00
c. Color Cover
10 Sets @ 2.00$ per set = 20.00
d. Binding and Collating
10 reports @ 2.25$ each = 22.50
Subtotal 422.50$
3)Meeting Expenses ( For deliverables only, to be billed at cost )
a. Black and White Printing
200 copies @ 0.10$ /pg (8 1/2 x 11) = 20.00$
200 copies @ 0.20$ /pg (11 x 17) = 40.00
b. Comment Form or Survey Questionnaire - Single Sided
50 x 0.07$ per copy (Black and White) = 3.50
0 x 0.90$ per copy (Color) = -
c. Comment Form or Survey Questionnaire - Double Sided w/ mailer on back
50 x 0.14$ per copy (Black and White) = 7.00
0 x 1.80$ per copy (Color) = -
d. Graphic Foam Core Displays (6.5' x 8.0')
6 number @ 75.00$ per display = 450.00
e. Display Boards Dry Mounted (3' x 4')
6 x 150.00$ per display = 900.00
Subtotal 1,420.50$
4)Rental Expenses ( For deliverables only, to be billed at cost )
a. Traffic Data Collection (3rd Party) = 20,000.00$
Subtotal 20,000.00$
5)Other Miscellaneous Costs ( For deliverables only, to be billed at cost )
a. Graphic Supplies (Name Tags, Portfolios) = 150.00
Subtotal 150.00$
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS OTHER THAN PAYROLL 23,918.00$
Job No. 11474
Work Order 1
miles r/t x $0.725 per mile
15
Transportation Committee
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 27, 2026
Agenda Section: Interstate, Primary, and Secondary Road Plans Update
Title: Interstate, Primary, and Secondary Road Plans Update
Attachments:
TC04-27-26Interstate_Primary_SecondaryRoadPlansUpdate.pdf
16
17
2025/26-2030/31
INTERSTATE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN
for
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Frederick County Transportation Committee:5/12/25
Frederick County Planning Commission: 6/4/25
Frederick County Board of Supervisors: 6/11/25
18
I-81 Improvements:
Provide additional travel lanes on the main line, evaluate collector-distributor lanes
adjacent to the main line, modifications to existing interchange areas, and develop new
interchange areas and bridge crossings of the main line as recommended by the WinFred
MPO Long Range Plan.
All projects in the vicinity of future I-81 connections for Route 37 should be scoped to
consider that project to prevent conflicting improvements and make sure to accommodate
that future connection.
Moreover, the County of Frederick supports exploration and expansion of the potential for
freight rail transportation as a component of the Interstate 81 Corridor improvements to aid
in removing more trucks from the road.
Interchange Priorities
1.Exit 317 – Interchange Upgrade and Redbud Road realignment to accommodate
interchange upgrade. Improvements to bridges and the north end of the
interchange should work to accommodate the future Route 37 north connection.
2. Exit 307 – Safety and capacity improvements to the existing facility while
continuing to promote the future relocation further south to the South Frederick
Parkway.
3. Exit 313 - Bridge reconstruction, safety improvements, and capacity expansion.
4. Exit 323 – Interchange Upgrade.
5. Exit 310 - Phase 2 of the FHWA approved interchange modifications.
6. Exit 307 – Interchange Relocation.
7. Exit 321 – Upgrade to split interchange between Hopewell Rd and Cedar Hill
Rd.
Interstate Widening Priorities
1.Widen I-81 from Route 50/17 Exit 313 to .5 miles North of Route 11 Exit 317.
Note: This project is funded via the I-81 fund.
2.Widen I-81 from Route 277 Exit 307 to Route 50/17 Exit 313. This should
include the relocation of Exit 307.
3.Widen I-81 in Frederick County from .5 Miles north of Route 11 Exit 317 to
the West Virginia State line.
4.Widen I-81 in Frederick County from Route 277 Exit 307 to the Warren County
Line in the South.
19
Intelligent Transportation Systems and Incident Management
1. Increase of VDOT safety patrols.
2. Implement more variable message signs along the I-81 corridor and approaches.
20
¬«7
¬«277
¬«37
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦66 §¨¦81
£¤11
£¤50
£¤522
£¤11
£¤522£¤11
£¤50
£¤11
£¤522
£¤522
£¤522
£¤50
£¤11
Winchester
StephensCity
Middletown
0 2.5 51.25 Miles
2025 - 2026InterstateRoadImprovementPlan
µ
InterchangeImprovement Priorities
Priority 4
!(Exit 323 Interchange Upgrade
Exit 310 Phase II of theInterchange Upgrade
Priority 5
!(
Exit 321 Upgrade to SplitInterchange
Priority 7
!(
Exit 307 Ramp Relocation
Priority 6
!(
Priority 1
!(Exit 317 Interchange Upgradeand Redbud Rd Realignment toAccomodate InterchangeUpgradePriority 2
!(Exit 307 Safety and CapacityImprovements to Existing Locationand Promote Future Realignment
Exit 313 Bridge Reconstruction,Safety Improvements, andCapacity Expansion
Priority 3
!(
Widening Priorities
Priority 2Widen I-81 fromExit 307 to Exit 313
Widen Remainder of I-81 SouthPriority 4Widen Remainder of I-81 NorthPriority 3
Priority 1Widen I-81 from Exit 313to 0.5 Miles North of Exit 317
21
22
23
2025/26-2030/31
PRIMARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN
for
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Frederick County Transportation Committee: 5/12/25
Frederick County Planning Commission: 6/4/25
Frederick County Board of Supervisors: 6/11/25
24
All upgrades to primary system roadways that are not limited access should include
implementation of access management principles to improve safety and efficiency wherever
possible.
1) Route 37 Bypass (Phase 1 and 2)
In 2024 the County completed the Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study
(EFTCS) which took an in-depth look at the feasibility, phasing, and best mode of
implementation of Route 37. Results of that analysis were used to update the phasing
priorities and what form initial construction of early phases should take. In Phase 1 and 2
a limited access Parkway style roadway is recommended. Phases 3,4, and 5 do not generate
sufficient additional traffic for implementation prior to 2050 based upon modeling results
at this time so additional detail for initial phasing of those segments is not included at this
time, but interim improvements are noted where applicable.
A.Route 37 – Phase 1
Initiate final engineering and design, acquire right-of-way, and establish a construction
phase schedule for the preferred alternative between existing Route 11 North and Route 7
after completion of VDOT required new road on new location analysis. Per the EFCTS an
initial development of this project would be a limited access parkway concept starting with
2 lanes of the ultimate 4 lanes from Route 11 North to Route 7.
B.Route 37 - Phase 2
Initiate final engineering and design, acquire right-of-way, and establish a construction
phase schedule for the southern segment of the Route 37 Eastern Bypass from Interstate I-
81 to Front Royal Pike (Route 522 South) after completion of VDOT required new road
on new location analysis. Per the Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study (EFCTS)
an initial development of this project would be a limited access parkway concept with 4
lanes from existing 37 at Exit 310 to future Warrior Drive and 2 lanes of the ultimate 4
lanes from future Warrior Drive and Route 522.
2)Route 11 (North and South of Winchester)
A)Upgrade to Six Through Lane System:
From: Northern limits of the City of Winchester
To: Intersection of Cedar Hill Road
B)Upgrade to Four Through Lane System:
From: Southern limits of the City of Winchester
To: Renaissance Drive
C)Upgrade to Four Through Lane System:
From: Intersection of Cedar Hill Road
To: West Virginia line
25
3) Route 277 (East of Stephens City)
Upgrade of the overall corridor to a 4-lane system with improved access management and
bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
A)Establish an Urban Divided Four Lane System:
From: Double Church Road
To: Warrior Drive
B)Upgrade to a Four Through Lane System:
From: Warrior Drive
To: White Oak Road
C)Upgrade to a Four Through Lane System:
From: White Oak Road
To: Route 522
4) Route 7 – Establish a 6 Through Lane Cross Section:
From: Exit 315 Interchange
To: Future Route 37 Interchange
5) Route 50 East and West
A)Upgrade Interchange at Route 50 and Route 37 to a Diverging Diamond
Interchange (DDI)
B)Safety Upgrades to Intersections at Back Mountain Road, Hayfield Road,
Wardensville Grade, Stony Hill Road, and Dicks Hollow Road
C)Establish a 6 Through Lane Cross Section:
From: The Interchange at Exit 313
To: The Future Route 37 Interchange
D) Establish a 6 Through Lane Cross Section:
From: The Interchange with Route 37
To: Poorhouse Road
26
6) Route 37 Phases 3, 4, and 5
In 2024 the County completed the Eastern Frederick County Transportation Study
(EFTCS) which took an in-depth look at the feasibility, phasing, and best mode of
implementation of Route 37. Results of that analysis were used to update the phasing
priorities and what form initial construction of early phases should take. Phases 3, 4, and
5 do not generate sufficient additional traffic for implementation prior to 2050 based upon
modeling results at this time so additional detail for initial phasing of those segments is not
included at this time, but interim improvements are noted where applicable.
A)Route 37 – Phase 3
Initiate final engineering and design, acquire right-of-way, and establish a
construction phase schedule for the preferred alternative between Existing Route
50/17 and Route 522. As noted in the EFTCS study, the Comprehensive Planned
Justes Drive Extension to Airport Road will likely serve as an important interim
improvement prior to this connection.
B)Route 37 - Phase 4
Initiate final engineering and design, acquire right-of-way, and establish a
construction phase schedule for the preferred alternative between Route 7 and
Route 50/17. Extension of Hallowed Crossing Way (formerly Haggerty Blvd) to
Senseny Road would likely serve as an important interim improvement prior to
this connection.
C)Route 37 – Phase 5
Initiate final engineering and design, acquire right-of-way, and establish a
construction phase schedule for the preferred alternative between Existing Route
37 around Stonewall Industrial Park to Route 11 North.
7)South Frederick County Parkway:
From: Relocated Exit 307
To: Intersection with Route 277 approximately 1 mile west of the intersection of
Route 277 and Route 522
This long term planned roadway has limited access points serving a mixture of
predominantly commercial and industrial development.
There is a need to study this project in conjunction with the Exit 307 relocation and
planning for Route 277 improvements noted in item 3.
Phasing of this project is not yet clearly defined; however general phasing would be from
West to East with the clear first phase being from relocated Exit 307 to Warrior Drive.
8) Route 522 and Costello Drive
27
Add additional left turn lane capacity on Route 522 southbound for turns onto Costello
Drive.
9) Gateway Drive Extension and Intersection with Valley Mill Road
This project will establish an intersection on Valley Mill Road and connection to Gateway
Drive approximately 150 to the south of the new intersection with the remainder of the
Gateway Drive extension to be constructed by development via proffer.
10) Route 37 Slip Ramps to Lenoir Drive
Construct ramps to allow traffic to enter and exit the southbound side of Route 37 from
Lenoir Drive.
11)Commuter Park and Ride Lots
Determine appropriate locations for park and ride facilities at other strategic locations
within the County’s Urban Development Area. For Park and Ride locations in Frederick
County, the primary goal should be that they are situated in such a manner that they reduce
traffic in Frederick County in addition to adjacent localities and ideally strengthen
SmartScale applications.
28
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦66
¬«277
¬«277
¬«127
¬«7¬«7
¬«37
£¤50
£¤522
£¤522
£¤50
£¤522
£¤11
£¤50
£¤50
£¤11
£¤11
£¤522
£¤522
£¤11
Winchester
Stephens City
Middletown
2025 - 2026Primary RoadImprovementPlan
0 1 20.5 Miles
Route 37 Bypass (Phase 1 & 2)
Priority 1A - Phase 1
Priority 1B - Phase 2
Route 11 North & South
Priority 2A
Priority 2B
Priority 2C
Route 277 East of Stephens City
Priority 3A
Priority 3B
Priority 3C
Route 7
Priority 4
Route 50
!(Priority 5A
!(Priority 5B
Priority 5C
Priority 5D
Route 37 Bypass (Phases 3, 4, & 5)
Priority 6A - Phase 3
Priority 6B - Phase 4
Priority 6C - Phase 5
South Frederick County Parkway
Priority 7
Route 522 & Costello Dr
!(Priority 8
Gateway Drive Extension
Priority 9
Lenoir Drive/Route 37 Slip Ramps
Priority 10
Commuter - Park & Ride Lots
!(Priority 11µ
2A
2C
2B
3A 3B 3C
4
5C
5D
1A
1B
6A
6B
6C
7
9
10
29
30
2025/26-2030/31
SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN
for
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Frederick County Transportation Committee: 5/12/25
Frederick County Planning Commission: 6/4/25
Frederick County Board of Supervisors: 6/11/25
31
MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
2025/2026 through 2030/2031
Major road improvement projects command the reconstruction of hardsurfaced roads to enhance
public safety. Improvements required for road width, road alignment, road strength, and road
gradient are considered major road improvements projects. ROUTE ROAD NAME FROM TO AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT DISTANCE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ESTIMATED COST ADVERTISEMENT DATE COMMENTS 661 Red Bud Road
.47 Mi
South
Route 11
Int.
Snowden
Bridge
Blvd.
2000 0.5 miles ST $5,573,014 2025
R/S
Funds
32
¬«37
¬«7
¬«7
¬«277
¬«7
¬«37
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
£¤11
£¤50
£¤11
£¤11
£¤50
£¤522
£¤522
Winchester
Stephens City Frederick CountyMajor RoadImprovement Projects2025/2026 thru 2030/2031
0 1 20.5 Milesµ
1
1. Redbud Rd Realignment
33
NON-HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
2025/2026 through 2030/2031
Non-Hardsurface road improvement projects provide impervious resurfacing and reconstruction of
non-hardsurfaced secondary roads. Non-Hardsurface improvement projects are prioritized by an
objective rating system, which considers average daily traffic volumes; occupied structures;
physical road conditions including geometrics, drainage, and accident reports; school bus routing;
and the time that project requests have been on the Secondary Road Improvement Plan. RANK ROUTE ROAD NAME FROM TO AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT DISTANCE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ESTIMATED COST ADVERTISEMENT DATE COMMENTS** 1 612 Fishel Road 600 600 60 1.6 Miles BC $630,000 2025 District Grant Unpaved
Road
2 636 Canterburg Road 640 641 140 1.5 miles OP $590,000 2025 District Grant Unpaved Road
3 638 Clark Road 625 759 140 .8 mile BC $331,000 2026 District Grant Unpaved Road
4 696 S. Timber Ridge Road 522 694 220 1.3 Miles GA $570,000 2027 District Grant
Unpaved
Road
5 607 Heishman Road 600 End of Maint. 60 0.78 BC $350,000 2027
District Grant
Unpaved
Road
6 682 Glaize Orchard Road 608 654 240 1.54 GA $700,000 2028
District Grant
Unpaved
Road
7 670 Ruebuck Lane 669 End of Maint. 160 0.35 ST $192,000 2029
District Grant
Unpaved
Road
8 608 Hunting Ridge Road Phase I 682 End of Paving 90 1.00 GA $485,963 2029
District Grant
Unpaved
Road
9 608 Hunting Ridge Road Phase II
End of
Paving 681 90 1.44 GA $689,000 2030
District Grant
Unpaved
Road
*NOTE: Projects are placed on the scheduled list based upon VDOT revenue projections. Changes to those projections can lead to
projects being delayed or removed from the scheduled list.
**NOTE: Projects primarily funded via District Grant Unpaved Road funds which are distributed to localities on a formula basis by
the state. The formula is based upon miles of unpaved roads in the County compared to miles of unpaved roads in counties across
the state and available funds for use on unpaved roads. Due to the volatility of cost estimates, when projected cost estimates
compared to unpaved roads actual cost lead to a shortfall, this is sometimes addressed using telefee funds allocated to the
County.
34
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦66
¬«55
¬«259
¬«277
¬«127
¬«7
¬«37
£¤50
£¤522
£¤522
£¤522
£¤11
£¤50
£¤50
£¤11
£¤522
£¤11
£¤522
Winchester
Stephens City
Middletown
Frederick CountyNon-Hardsurfaced RoadImprovement Projects2025/2026 thru 2030/2031
µ0 4 82 Miles
1. Fishel Rd
2. Canterburg Rd
3. Clark Rd
4. South Timber Ridge Rd
5. Heishman Ln
6. Glaize Orchard Rd
7. Ruebuck Rd
8. Hunting Ridge Rd Phase I
9. Hunting Ridge Rd Phase II
3
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
35
UNSCHEDULED
NON-HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
2025/2026 through 2030/2031 RANK ROAD NAME ROUTE FROM TO AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT DISTANCE (MILES) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RATING COMMENTS 1 Grace Church Rd 668 667 671 210 1.35 ST 61.20
2 Cougill Rd 634 635 11 120 0.25 BC 61.00
3 Huttle Rd 636 709 735 160 1.1 OP 60.05
4 Light Rd 685 600 681 40 1.3 GA 58.46
5 Cattail Rd 731 608 654 100 1.7 GA 58.24
6 McDonald Rd 616 608 .44 N. of 608 90 0.45 BC 54.33
7 Shockeysville Rd 671 690 .90 miles west of 690 80 0.9 GA 53.67
8 Mount Olive Rd 615 50 Hammack Lane 120 0.37 BC 52.00
9 Gardners Rd 700 127 701 80 1 GA 51.50
10 Mt. Williams Ln 612 608 End of maintenance 60 1.0 BC 44.00
11 Knob Rd 752 Route 50 705 60 2.7 BC 43.40
12 New Hope Rd 699 522 Timber Ridge School 40 2.35 GA 42.44
13 Mount Olive Rd 615 Hammack Lane 600 120 0.4 BC 41.00
14 Passage Ln 648 631 649 192 1.35 BC TBD
15 Germany Rd 625 631 628 136 2.15 BC TBD
Note: Project ratings are updated only when funding is available to promote projects to the scheduled
list.
*Indicated that a roadway doesn’t currently have sufficient traffic count to qualify for state funds. Trips
will have to increase to 50 per day prior to state funds being allocated.
36
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦66
¬«55
¬«259
¬«277
¬«127
¬«7
¬«37
£¤50
£¤522
£¤522
£¤522
£¤11
£¤50
£¤50
£¤522
£¤11
£¤522
Winchester
Stephens City
Frederick CountyUnscheduledNon-Hardsurfaced RoadImprovement Projects2025/2026 thru 2030/2031
µ0 4 82 Miles
1. Grace Church Rd
2. Cougill Rd
3. Huttle Rd
4. Light Rd
5. Cattail Rd
6. McDonald Rd
7. Shockeysville Rd
8. Mount Olive Rd
9. Gardners Rd
10. Mount Williams Ln
11. Knob Rd
12. New Hope Rd
13. Mount Olive Rd
14. Passage Ln
15. Germany Rd
15 14
1
2 3
5
6
7
8
9
11
13
10
12
4
Middletown
37
38
39
Secondary System
Frederick County
Fund FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 Total
CTB Formula - Unpaved State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Formula Secondary State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TeleFee $233,243 $233,243 $233,243 $233,243 $233,243 $233,243 $1,399,458
STP Converted from IM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Federal STP - Bond Match $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Formula STP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MG Formula $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BR Formula $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
State Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Federal STP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
District Grant - Unpaved $573,032 $573,032 $573,032 $568,931 $568,931 $538,739 $3,395,697
Total $806,275 $806,275 $806,275 $802,174 $802,174 $771,982 $4,795,155
Construction Program
Estimated Allocations
Board Approval Date:
Residency Administrator
County Administrator
Date
Date
40
Budget Detail Report SSYP FY27 (working draft) : FY27 WORKING
Frederick County
Frederick County (034)
UPC Description
59259 RTE 655 - RECONSTRUCTION
0001.00 Project 0655034274 0.691 Mi. W. Rte 656 0.288 Mi. E. Rte 656
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$0
ProjectedPrevious
$6,343,821 $0 $6,343,821
$5,473,750
-$870,071
06/04/07 09/11/12 11/06/18
$1,243,898 $789,997 $3,439,855
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030601 .Formula - Secondary
:Federal/State - Frederick
(CNS601)
$324 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$535 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030626 Secondary Formula - IM to STP :
Frederick (CNF626)
$167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030653 Federal Formula - Secondary
Bond Match : Frederick (CNB653)
$660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030667 Secondary Formula - STP :
Frederick (CNF667)
$128 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030668 Secondary Formula - EB(MG) :
Frederick (CNF668)
$239 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030669 Secondary Formula - Bridge :
Frederick (CNF669)
$300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030670 Secondary Formula - Match :
Frederick (CNB670)
$437 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030675 Federal Formula STP - Secondary
: Frederick (CNF675)
$3,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
101435 Relocate Rt.661 Red Bud Road
0002.01 Project 0661034801 0.600 Miles West of Snowden
Bridge Blvd.
0.214 Miles West of Snowden Bridge
Blvd.
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$153,364
ProjectedPrevious
$5,834,782 $0 $5,988,146
$6,497,399
$509,253
01/07/15 06/10/25 03/10/26
$1,264,275 $255,198 $4,977,926
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
3001500 CTB Formula: Unpaved -
Frederick
$83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030201 Revenue Sharing Funds :Local
Match
$1,787 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030202 Revenue Sharing Funds :State
Match (CNS202)
$1,787 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$1,329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6030672 Secondary Formula - State :
Frederick (CNS672)
$435 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $0 $153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
9030622 Accounts Receivable - Secondary $415 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Staunton
3/27/2026 10:26:13 AM
1 of 3
41
Budget Detail Report SSYP FY27 (working draft) : FY27 WORKING
Frederick County
Frederick County (034)
UPC Description
115231 Fishel Road - Rural Rustic - Frederick County
0003.16 Project 0612034923 Rt. 600 - Back Mountain Road Rt. 600 - Back Mountain Road
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$0
ProjectedPrevious
$630,000 $0 $630,000
$630,000
$0
03/31/25
$0 $0 $630,000
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $630 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
115232 Canterburg Road - Rural Rustic - Frederick County
0003.17 Project 0636034924 Rt. 640 - Refuge Church Road Rt. 641 - Double Church Road
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$0
ProjectedPrevious
$408,586 $0 $408,586
$408,586
$0
12/05/25
$0 $0 $408,586
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $346 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
124889 Rte. 638 Clark Road - Rural Rustic
0003.18 Project 0638034938 Various Various
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$124,586
ProjectedPrevious
$206,414 $0 $331,000
$331,000
$0
12/01/25
$0 $0 $331,000
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $181 $125 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
121193 FY27 & FY28 Frederick County Rural Rustic Roads Projects
0003.19 Project 9999034953 various various
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$295,082
ProjectedPrevious
$0 $624,918 $920,000
$920,000
$0
09/23/26
$0 $0 $920,000
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$0 $0 $128 $0 $0 $0 $0
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $0 $295 $497 $0 $0 $0 $0
3/27/2026 10:26:13 AM
2 of 3
42
Budget Detail Report SSYP FY27 (working draft) : FY27 WORKING
Frederick County
Frederick County (034)
UPC Description
124890 FY29 & FY30 FREDERICK COUNTY RURAL RUSTIC ROADS PROJECTS
0003.20 Project 9999034960 Various Various
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$0
ProjectedPrevious
$0 $1,377,963 $1,377,963
$1,377,963
$0
03/27/28
$0 $0 $1,377,963
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$0 $0 $0 $136 $24 $0 $0
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $0 $0 $76 $573 $569 $0 $0
127181 FY31 FREDERICK COUNTY RURAL RUSTIC ROADS PROJECTS
0003.21 Project 9999034977 Various Various
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$0
ProjectedPrevious
$0 $689,000 $689,000
$689,000
$0
02/25/30
$0 $0 $689,000
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$0 $0 $0 $0 $50 $140 $0
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $499 $0
-31667 FY32 FREDERICK COUNTY RURAL RUSTIC ROADS PROJECTS
0003.22 Project 9999034992 Various Various
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$0
ProjectedPrevious
$0 $650,000 $650,000
$650,000
$0
$0 $0 $650,000
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8 $33
6071700 HB2 DG: Unpaved - Frederick $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70 $539
122228 COUNTYWIDE - TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
0004.01 Project 9999034
Total Estimate:
Balance:
Budget
$233,243
ProjectedPrevious
$1,061,295 $646,999 $1,941,537
$1,440,823
-$500,714
07/01/22 06/30/23 07/01/24
$50,000 $50,000 $1,340,823
Schedule:
Total
Estimate:
PE RW CN
Funding Detail (in $1000s)Previous FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032
6030606 Secondary Formula -
Telecommunications : Frederick
$1,061 $233 $105 $97 $160 $85 $200
3/27/2026 10:26:13 AM
3 of 3
43
Transportation Committee
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 27, 2026
Agenda Section: County Projects Update
Title: County Projects Update
Attachments:
TC04-27-26CountyProjectsUpdate.pdf
44
45
Transportation Committee
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 27, 2026
Agenda Section: Other
Title: Other
Attachments:
TC04-27-26Other.pdf
46
47