The URL can be used to link to this page

HRABAgenda2025February211.Introductions - New Members 2.HRAB Business - Election of Chair and Vice Chair 2.A.Bylaws 3.Minutes 3.A.Meeting Minutes - October 18, 2024 4.Vaucluse Springs 4.A.Review of Vaucluse Springs Conditional Use Permit Application 5.The 522 Plaza 5.A.Review of The 522 Plaza Rezoning Application 6.Historic Plaque Program Funding 6.A.Update on Historic Plaque Program Funding AGENDA HISTORIC RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2025 10:00 AM FIRST-FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA HRAB02-21-25Bylaws.pdf HRAB02-21-25MeetingMinutesOctober18.pdf HRAB02-21-25CUPVaucluseSprings_Redacted.pdf HRAB02-21-25REZThe522Plaza_Redacted.pdf 1 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 21, 2025 Agenda Section: HRAB Business - Election of Chair and Vice Chair Title: Bylaws Attachments: HRAB02-21-25Bylaws.pdf 2 BYLAWS FREDERICK COUNTY HISTORIC RESOURCE ADVISORY BOARD (HRAB) I. Purpose of the HRAB 1.1 Mission Statement - Provide guidance to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors on issues concerning the County’s historic resources. 1.2 The HRAB was created in 1987 by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to consider the impact of a rezoning or development on historically and architecturally significant sites and structures. 1.3 The HRAB will make recommendations of applications, either approval, approval with conditions, or denial. The recommendation will be based upon the proposed treatment of historic resources as well as the degree of their significance. If conditions are placed on the application, they shall be based on attached document “Formulating Good Recommendations”. II. Membership 2.1 The HRAB consists of nine voting members, one member from each magisterial district and three members at large. In addition to a Planning Commission Liaison, a staff member from the Planning Department, as well as a historic preservation consultant that advises the Board, also attend the meetings. 2.2 Members are appointed by the Board of Supervisors. 2.3 The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall be elected by the HRAB for a term of one year. 2.4 The HRAB may have an annual training or orientation session. 2.5 HRAB members will be encouraged to attend outside training sessions and conferences. 2.6 If a HRAB member has a conflict of interest with an application, it is expected that they refrain from making recommendations. III. Meetings 3.1 Meetings are held the third Friday of the month at 10:00 AM and shall be open to the public. Start time may be amended as deemed necessary by the Chairman. 3.2 Special meetings may be called for by the Chairman and the Planning Staff. 3.3 The staff member for the HRAB may make site inspections for applications. The HRAB members are also encouraged to make site visits. 3.4 Since the HRAB is an advisory Board and only makes recommendations, public hearing and public notices are not required. 3.5 A majority of the members present is required for an approval or denial recommendation; however, all recommendations will be recorded. 3.6 The HRAB will be courteous and respectful to each other and all applicants. 3.7 Regular attendance is expected of all members of the HRAB. If a member is unable to attend, it is expected that he/she notify the staff. Once a member has missed three (3) unexcused HRAB meetings, he/she shall be referred for replacement. 3 IV. Powers & Duties 4.1 The role of the HRAB is to make recommendations for properties that are or may be considered historic or potentially significant when land development applications are submitted to the County. 4.2 Fulfill responsibilities as designated by the HA Historic Overlay Zone Ordinance (Article XVI HA Historic Area Overlay Zone – Frederick County Zoning Ordinance). 4.3 Make recommendations utilizing the “Formulating Good Recommendations” handout. (See attachment) 4.4 Encourage historic preservation in Frederick County by recognizing significant historic resources. V. Application Review Process 5.1 Complete applications (see HRAB submission requirements) must be received by the 1st of the month to be added to that month’s agenda. HRAB members will receive the agenda one (1) week prior to a meeting. Once an application is received, the staff member shall research the project and prepare an agenda for the HRAB Members. At the HRAB meeting, the applicant is expected to be present to answer any questions that the board may have. 5.2 The HRAB shall provide a recommendation to the applicant during the meeting unless the applicant requests to bring the application back to the board at a later time. 5.3 Staff is responsible for notifying the applicant in writing of the HRAB’s action on the application. The notification letter should include all reasons for approval, approval with conditions, or denial. VI. Bylaw Amendment Process 6.1 If a member of the HRAB desires to amend the bylaws, that member would need to bring up the recommendation under the other portion of the meeting. A vote would then be held with the members, and if a majority vote is given a discussion will be held as to how to amend the bylaws. Once the changes have been discussed and agreed upon, staff will provide the HRAB members with a copy of the amended bylaws to adopt at the next scheduled meeting. Adopted: March 15, 2005 Amended: January 17, 2006 Amended: May 15, 2012 Amended: May 17, 2024 4 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 21, 2025 Agenda Section: Minutes Title: Meeting Minutes - October 18, 2024 Attachments: HRAB02-21-25MeetingMinutesOctober18.pdf 5 Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Mee�ng Minutes October 18, 2024 First Floor Conference Room of the County Administra�ve Building 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA Members Present: Lucas Cook, Gary Crawford, Dana Newcomb, Nicholas Powers Members Absent: Jack Owens, Robert Molden, Steve Cantu, and Elijah Filbert Others Present: Maral Kalbian, Kayla Peloquin, Ty Lawson (Thomas Moore Lawson, P.C.), Chris Mohn (Greenway Engineering), Jeremy Smith & Britany Vance (Thunderbird Archeology) Agenda Items: Call to order at 10:00 a.m. Item 1: Minutes Gary Crawford made a mo�on to approve the August 16, 2024 mee�ng minutes. Dana Newcomb seconded the mo�on. The minutes were approved unanimously. Item 2: Review of Winchester East at Opequon Creek Rezoning Applica�on Staff provided informa�on on the proposed rezoning of +/- 91.70 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District to the RP (Residen�al Performance) Zoning District with proffers. The proper�es are located at 2737 and 2474 Senseny Road on the eastern side of the County near the Clarke County line (PINs 65-A- 195 & 65-A-194B). Staff asked if the applicants were going to either try to avoid the area with that was found to have ar�facts that warrant further inves�ga�on or conduct a Phase 2 study. Chris Mohn stated the area will be avoided if possible, and the Phase 2 study would be conducted if it can no longer be avoided. HRAB members discussed the findings of the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Inves�ga�on and the lack of context on the architectural side for the house at 2737 Senseny Road. There was no informa�on in the report on who built the house, who has lived in it since it’s construc�on, and if there are any �es to Millbank, the historic property located roughly 1 mile north of the subject property. Maral Kalbian cau�oned that while the typical American Foursquare dwelling perhaps was more common in the 1990’s, they are more rare now as many have been demolished, so context in the report would be beneficial before this resource is destroyed. Dana Newcomb made a mo�on in support of the proffer as writen to follow the recommenda�ons of the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Inves�ga�on for development of the property. Furthermore, the mo�on recommends approval of the rezoning and that the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Inves�ga�on be updated to include context on the property history, including a chain of �tle, for the house located at 2737 Senseny Road (DHR #034-1155). Gary Crawford seconded the mo�on. The mo�on passed unanimously. 6 Item 3: Historic Plaque Program Staff stated that the roughly $16,800 that is being transferred to the historic plaque line item as part of this upcoming budget cycle would be available beginning July 1, 2025 should the Board of Supervisors approve it. The funds would need to be spent soon a�er they become available to avoid the funds being pulled back for lack of use. HRAB came up with a new idea to u�lize the funds, rather than con�nuing the Historic Plaque Program, to create a map/informa�onal resource with different types of routes (driving/walking) around the County to visit various historic resources, including proper�es that have a plaque and can be seen from the public right of way. The purpose of the ini�al plaque program was to raise awareness, and this would lead to raising public awareness. Other jurisdic�ons have similar resources for people to explore historic resources in different ways. Poten�al partners may include the Winchester-Frederick County Historical Society and the Shenandoah Valley Batlefields Founda�on. Gary Newcomb made a mo�on to direct staff to look into using the funding for this project and, if possible, consider how it may be accomplished. Nick Powers seconded the mo�on. The mo�on passed unanimously. The mee�ng was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. 7 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 21, 2025 Agenda Section: Vaucluse Springs Title: Review of Vaucluse Springs Conditional Use Permit Application Attachments: HRAB02-21-25CUPVaucluseSprings_Redacted.pdf 8 Item # 4A Vaucluse Springs Conditional Use Permit Application The Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for a special event facility, a restaurant, and a campground. The +/-44.25 acre property (Property Identification Number: 84-A-53A) is in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The property is located west of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) and south off Vaucluse Road (Route 638) in the Back Creek Magisterial District. CUP #11-23 was approved by the Board of Supervisors in January 2024 and was initially reviewed by HRAB. That application did not propose any new structures on the property and proposed minor renovations to existing structures, as well as allowed for special events up to 130 guests per event. The new proposal has expanded in scope to include new cabins and buildings, and requires an updated CUP and HRAB comment. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published in 1992 by the National Park Service does not identify the parcel as within the core area or study area of any of the major Civil War Sites. The mapped sites identified within a half mile radius of the property according to the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System (VCRIS) are: • 034-0220/034-0138 – Inn at Vaucluse Spring • 034-0262 – Mildred Kline House • 034-5073 – 263 Vaucluse Road • 034-5074 – 265 Vaucluse Road • 034-5075 – Woodbine Farm Please find the following attachments for your information: • Location Map • HRAB Application & Attachments • Virginia DHR Surveys, Maps, and Photographs • Previous CUP #11-23 HRAB Comment Letter The Applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed CUP. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements possibly impacted by the proposed use. The comments will be included in the CUP application package. **If you have any questions prior to the meeting please forward them to me and I will relay them to the Applicant. 9 # # # # # # £¤11 Downes,Al House Kiln, Rt.11 South Conrad House House atVaucluse Vaucluse RIENZIKNOLL LNHITES RDDARTERJO DRVAUCLUSESPRING LNKLINES MILL LNSTROSNIDER LNCOYOTE RIDGE LNVALLEYPIKEVAUCLUSE RD KLINES MILL RD Vaucluse Springs CUP #Historic Rural Landmarks 0.5 Mile B uffer Parcels Map Produced by Frederick C ounty Planning and D evelopment Dept.January 22, 2025 0 0.2 0.40.1 Miles V a u c l u s e S p r i n g s C U P I £¤11 10 11 12 13 Item 12 The purpose of this CUP is to request additional uses and events to the recently approved CUP #11-23, approved January 11, 2024. Applicant requests to add a public restaurant in the Chumley House, gallery and spa, artist studio, event hall, farm stand and cabins. New structures would consist of 12 cabins, an artist studio, a party barn, a pavilion, equipment storage facilities, and additions on 4 existing structures. The applicant would be shifting the existing driving lane to provide access to all locations and providing additional parking at the administrative building, farmstand, main house and cabins. The proposed new car park would consist of 160± new spaces. Applicant request to hold 40 events per year indoor/outdoor, with no more than 160 guest per event. Outdoor events would end by 11PM and music will be cut off no later than 11 PM. Hours of operation will vary by season. The property will be open seven days a week and serve meals to both guests and the public. The applicant proposes there will be 45 employees on the grounds with rotating shifts. Additional septic will be required for the addition of the restaurant and cabins, new drainfields have been located to suffice the additional uses on the property. The plan is consistent with the County’s 2035 Comprehensive Plan. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 10 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Descriptive Inn at Vaucluse Spring Function/Location House, 515 Vaucluse Spring Road Historic/Current Vaucluse Property Addresses Alternate - Route 638 Number change - 231 Vaucluse Spring Lane Alternate - 473 Vaucluse Spring Lane Current - 515 Vaucluse Spring Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):22655 Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:100 Site Description: July 2008: The Inn at Vaucluse Spring is located on Vaucluse Spring Lane, which runs southwest from Vaucluse Spring Road. The main house is sited at the end of the lane and faces south. A gravel parking lot is located directly north of the house. The property is shaded by mature trees and the Vaucluse Spring, which includes a pond, is located east of the house. The Inn at Vaucluse Spring includes six guest houses: "The Gallery", the "Chumley Homeplace", the Mill House Studio", the "Cabin by the Pond", the "Manor House," and the "Cottage on the Hill". These buildings are sited along the north side of Vaucluse Spring Lane. The non-historic "Cottage on the Hill" building is located northwest of the main house near the parking lot. The ruins of an outbuilding, evidenced by a stone chimney, is located west of the cottage. A non-historic shed is located north of the mill house. A pool enclosed by a stone wall is directly in front (south) of the gallery building and a non-historic outbuilding is located along the west side of the pool. November 2008: No changes to the setting have occurred since the previous survey. No changes to the secondary resources have occurred. June 2020: This dwelling is located at the end of Vaucluse Springs Road on a large rural property. The building rests on a slight knoll at the center of an open grassy lawn. There is minimal vegetation around the building, although the clearing is bordered by woods to all sides. The road which becomes a private driveway, approaches the house from the rear and terminates a parking area between it and a modern guesthouse. Spread throughout the large associated property are additional guest cottages, a historic mill, and other outbuildings, several of which were moved to the property to allow it to function as a bed and breakfast. Surveyor Assessment: July 2008: According to the PIF submitted in 1996: "The original owners of the property were Lord Fairfax and Yost Hite. Between 1765 and 1778, it was part of a 775-acre tract owned by Lewis Stephens, founder of the present day Stephens City. Between 1778 and 1782, it was owned by Isaac Zane, Revolutionary War patriot and owner of the Marlboro Iron Works. Between 1782 and 1785, the property was owned by Gabriel Jones, the "Vatley Lawyer," one of the first "King's Attorneys" for Frederick County. According to Garland Quarles in his book “Some Old Homes in Frederick County, Virginia”, Jones was "one of the best-known and most influential citizens of the Valley of Virginia during the Colonial period of its history." Jones served in the House of Burgesses for several years and was a friend and political campaigner for George Washington. He served in the Virginia General Assembly, the Continental Congress and the Virginia Constitutional Convention. Jones apparently never had a home at Vauscluse, but is thought to have had a law office there, possibly in the building of which nothing remains today but a stone fireplace chimney. Jones sold the 775 acres to his son Strother in 1785. Strother had been a captain in the revolutionary army. He built his home and named it after a spring in Vaucluse France which was the country retreat of Petrarch, a 14th Century poet of courtly love. Strother lived at Vaucluse until his death In 1790 and was the first person to be buried in the Jones family cemetery at Vaucluse. The earliest description of Vaucluse that we have is the diary of Rev. Frederick Goodwin, who came to Vaucluse in 1827 as a tutor to the Jones children (the grandchildren of Strother Jones). At that time there was no door on the south side of the house. The entrance was on the north side where a portico was "supported by large round pillars, made rough and white thus presenting the appearance like coarse sand stone." Rev. Goodwin's description of the house, other than the main entrance being on the north rather than the south, seems clearly to fit Vaucluse as it stands today. Descendants of Gabriel and Strother lived at Vaucluse until shortly after the Civil War. The story of the Civil War in the Northern Shenandoah Valley is recounted in the words of the Jones family and their relatives, the 24 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 10 Bartons, in “Defend the Valley” by Margaretta Barton Colt. Vaucluse was occupied from time to time during the war by Union troops and ultimately all of the livelitock and crops were destroyed. “Gabriel Jones (1724-1806) and Some of His Descendants”, by Brown, Chappel and Myers contains a facsimile of a sales brochure for Vaucluse thought to date to the 1870's. At that time the "outbuildings for servants, &c., are also built or brick, and are ample in character." These included two tenant houses equal to ordinary farmhouses, stables, blacksmith's and carpenter's shops, a very large and comparatively new barn, and a grist mill "of capacity sufficient for the farm and neighborhood." From 1898 until 1963, the property was owned by the Rice Family of Winchester, first by John Rice and later by his son Warren. In 1963, the survivors of Warren Rice sold the property to John and Betty Chumley. The Chumleys added the building on the site of the former mill as well as all of the buildings listed above that are not associated with the Vaucluse manor house. Mr. Chum1ey passed away in 1984 and his widow sold 128 acres of the 234 acre parcel to the current owners in 1995. Since October 1995, the Chumley-era buildings have been used as a country inn/bed & breakfast.” In 2008, the entire site, including the large brick manor house, operates as a bed and breakfast. In 1996, VDHR recommended Vaucluse as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C, architecture. Although the manor house underwent a major renovation circa 1997, the house still retains its architectural integrity. All improvements made to the house appear to be in keeping with the character of the original house and follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Since the Chumley-era buildings were extensively remodeled and are not original to the site, the surveyor recommends that these buildings are included non-contributing resources. November 2008: This property historically served as the site of a mill. However, it currently functions as a bed and breakfast. Since the property has lost the integrity of its original function, and since no evidence could be located that supports historic significance, this resource is recommended ineligible for listing under Criterion A. Although the artist John Chumley resided on this property and used it as a studio, it is not the most significant resource associated with his life. As such, the Inn at Vaucluse Spring is not recommended eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion B. The VDHR concluded that this resource is eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C in 1996. The buildings associated with this property have not lost integrity, and continue to convey their architectural significance. In addition, although some of the buildings on the property have been moved from their original locations, under Criteria Consideration B, as long as these buildings are significant solely for their architectural value, they can still be considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. As such, The Inn at Vaucluse Spring is still recommended eligible for listing under Criterion C. The proposed NRHP boundary should encompass the contributing buildings and their immediate surroundings to approximately the extent of the existing tax parcel. June 2020: This property is an excellent example of a late-eighteenth/early-nineteenth century rural manor house in the region. The home is believed to have been built by Strother Jones, who had been a captain in the revolutionary army. He named it after a spring in Vaucluse, France, which was the country retreat of Petrarch, a 14th century poet of courtly love. Also on the property throughout the nineteenth century was a grist mill and a variety of other tenant houses and dependencies. In the 1960s, the owners relocated a number of other nineteenth century buildings to the property to allow it to function as a bed and breakfast. In 1995, many of the buildings, including the main Vaucluse house, were renovated, generally in keeping with their historic character. As such, the home and many of the buildings were determined eligible for listing in the NRHP by the VDHR in 1996. The eligibility was confirmed in 2009, and at this time, the complex continues to represent a good collection of representative architecture from the early-nineteenth century in the region. As such, it continues to be considered eligible for listing in the NRHP for distinctive architecture. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Potentially Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1810 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Federal/Adamesque Form:No Data Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Remodeled Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: 25 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 10 Architecture Summary: Vaucluse is a two-story, three-bay building on a raised stone basement. It is constructed of brick; Flemish bond on the front a a 5-course American bond on the sides and back. It has 2 large interior brick chimneys. There are flat arches over all of the openings. The building has louvered shutters, most of which have been used to board it up. The first floor windows are full length and have jib doors which are paneled. The roof is hipped with a strong overhang. The eaves now have exposed rafters but appear to have originally been concealed. There are vent windows with original wooden bars in the raised basement. To the rear of the house there is a 1-and-a-1/2-story brick wing. This appears to have originally been the summer kitchen. It also appears that there was originally an open breezeway between the main house and the kitchen which has been closed up with brick. July 2008: This house underwent a major rehabilitation circa 1995. The house rises two stories above a uncoursed fieldstone foundation. It is constructed of Flemish-bond brick on the south façade and five-course America-bond brick on the remaining elevations. The house is capped with a hipped roof of standing-seam metal with overhanging eaves. It has two interior brick chimneys with corbelled caps. Windows are twelve- over-twelve double-hung wood-sash with wood-paneled spandrels on first story of the side elevations (replacing what was jib doors) and twelve- over-twelve triple-hung wood-sash windows on the first story of the symmetrically-fenestrated three-bay façade. The second story has twelve- over-eight double-hung wood-sash windows. The centered single-leaf door on the façade features an eight-light transom. All window and door openings have jack-arched brick lintels. A five-bay, one-story porch has been added to the house since the last survey and has an uncoursed fieldstone foundation and wood posts and a simple wood balustrade. A one-and-half-story brick wing is located west of the house and is attached to the main block along its northeast corner. A one-story wood-frame entrance vestibule and porch is attached to the south elevation of the addition and the east elevation of the main block. November 2008: No changes to this dwelling have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood Other Porch 1-story, 5-bay Wood Post, Square Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Coursed Roof Hipped Metal Standing Seam Structural System and Exterior Treatment Masonry Brick Other Chimneys Interior Brick Corbeled Windows Sash, Triple-Hung Wood Other Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Workshop Date of Construction:1960Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Three additional buildings are now on the property: 1) a two-story walnut log structure with additions; 2) a one-and-a- half story Dutch Colonial reproduction house; 3) and a building on the old mill site. July 2008: This building was most likely moved or built on the site circa 1963 by Chumley, who used the building as his first studio. The building appears to incorporate a one-and-a-half-story house and a one-story barn. The barn is connected to the west elevation of the house. Both buildings are clad in weatherboard and have side gable, wood-shingle roofs. The house has a steeply-pitched roof with overhanging, spayed eaves that incorporated a full-width front porch. An exterior-end brick chimney is located on the east elevation. The house has six-over-six wood- sash windows and gabled dormers that hold four-over-four wood-sash windows. The south elevation of the house has an off-set single-leaf door. The barn has a triangular hay hood on its west elevation. The south elevation features a multi-light bay window. November 2008: No changes to The Gallery have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 26 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 10 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Number of Stories:1.5 Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Archaeology Site Resource Type:Archaeological Site NR Resource Type:Site Historic District Status:No Data Not Observed:This resource was not observed during the last survey. Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:Deterioration Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: To the west of the house are the ruins of an outbuilding. All that remains is a large stone chimney with an interior fireplace. This appears to date earlier than the main house. July 2008: The stone chimney is still standing west of the guest house that was constructed circa 2007. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: This site was not investigated as part of this effort. Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:Industry/Processing/Extraction Resource Type:Mill House Date of Construction:1800Ca Date Source:Site Visit/Owner Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: East of the main house, there was originally a mill. July 2008: The “Mill House Studio” is sited on Vaucluse Spring. According to current owners, the building was rebuilt on the foundation of the historic Vaucluse Mill house and used as Chumley’s second art studio. The building has a raised, uncoursed stone foundation. The two-story building is clad in weatherboard and has a gable roof of standing seam metal with and ogee cornice and cornice returns. An interior brick chimney with a corbelled cap rises above the roof. Windows are six-over-six double-hung wood-sash. November 2008: No changes to the Mill House Studio have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Number of Stories:2 27 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 5 of 10 Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Secondary Dwelling Date of Construction:1820Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The Chumley Homeplace was built circa 1820 and was also moved to its current site in 1963 by John Chumley. It is a two- story building that has been clad in weatherboard siding and topped with a side gable roof. Wood shingles comprise the roofing material, and a stone chimney marks the gable end. The fenestration consists of 6/6 double-hung wood sash windows. A one-story screened-in porch with a shed roof has been attached to the east elevation. Multiple one-story additions have been appended to the house on the north, south, and east elevations. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Also recorded separately as 034-0220 Number of Stories:2 Secondary Resource #5 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Secondary Dwelling Date of Construction:2007Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Post Cold War (1992 - Present) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: July 2008: Built circa 2007, the “Cottage on the Hill” is a one-story wood-frame building set on a solid foundation clad in an uncoursed rubble stone veneer. The building is clad in weatherboard and is capped with a side gable standing-seam metal roof with a louvered ridge ventilator. A one-story bay projects from the south elevation. Windows are six-over-six wood-sash. The façade has two single-leaf doors. November 2008: No changes to the Cottage on the Hill have occurred since the previous survey. Due to its construction date and lack of historical significance, the Cottage on the Hill is a non-contributing building. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #6 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1850Ca Date Source:Site Visit/Owner 28 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 6 of 10 Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Three additional buildings are now on the property: 1) a two-story walnut log structure with additions; 2) a one-and-a- half story Dutch Colonial reproduction house; 3) and a building on the old mill site. July 2008: Constructed circa 1850, the one story “Cabin by the Pond” was a former tobacco barn, according to the current owners and was moved to the site. It sits on an uncoursed stone foundation and is constructed of hewn logs. It has a side gable, standing-seam metal roof. A one- story wood-frame bay projects from the west elevation and is clad in weatherboard. Windows are six-over-six wood-sash. A one-story shed porch fronts the building and shelters a single leaf door. The porch has wood posts. November 2008: No changes to the Cabin by the Pond have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #7 Resource Category:Social/Recreational Resource Type:Pool/Swimming Pool Date of Construction:1990Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No discernible style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: July 2008: This inground pool sits south of the studio. Novemer 2008: No changes to the pool have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. Secondary Resource #8 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1990Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known 29 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 7 of 10 Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Two modern storage sheds. July 2008: Only one shed was visible at the time of survey. This shed is located north of the mill. It is a one-story, wood-frame building with a concrete-block foundation. The walls are covered in what appears to be composition siding. It has a gambrel, asphalt shingle roof. A shed overhang is located on its east elevation. November 2008: No changes this shed since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #9 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1990Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Colonial Revival Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Two modern storage sheds. Architectural description: Reproduction of a Williamsburg smokehouse. July 2008: This one-story wood-frame shed is located adjacent to the pool, along its west side. It sits on a rubble stone foundation and its exterior walls are clad in what appears to be composition siding. It has a pyramidal roof of wood shingles. November 2008: No changes to the shed have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: This resource could not be seen at the time of this survey. Number of Stories:1 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0138 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:12/18/2020 30 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 8 of 10 Staff Comment DHR Project No. 2020-0416 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2020-0416 Investigator:Robert Taylor Organization/Company:Dutton + Associates, LLC Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:6/9/2020 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Field survey and reporting prepared by D+A Architectural History staff. Project Bibliographic Information: D+A. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Foxglove Solar Project in Frederick County, Virginia. October 2020. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:6/18/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR records show property recommended eligible under Criterion C in 1996, which appears to be still valid based on data provided for this project; current Phase II data would be needed to confirm and determine whether other NRHP criteria apply, due to the passage of time. The viewshed analysis data indicates no potential for visual effect - no futher work. No additional determination of eligibility made by DHR staff at this time. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/16/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR records show property recommended eligible under Criterion C in 1996, which appears to be still valid based on data provided for this project; current Phase II data would be needed to confirm and determine whether other NRHP criteria apply, due to the passage of time. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 31 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 9 of 10 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/28/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Surveyors: Patti Kuhn Mike Yengling Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0138 Staff Name:DHR Event Date:3/19/1996 Staff Comment Vaucluse, Frederick County, VDHR Number 34-138. The resource was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It was found eligible with a score of 38. Event Type: PIF Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Keeping Company, LLC Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:2/1/1996 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, Maral Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/1/1989 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data 32 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 10 of 10 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Quinn, Michael C. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/16/1973 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: DHR Board: Eligible DHR ID:034-0138 Staff Name:State Review Board Event Date:6/1/1966 Staff Comment No Data Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 33 34 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 5 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Current Mildred Kline House Property Addresses Current - 236 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):STEPHENS CITY Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Not Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:No Data Site Description: August 2008: This dwelling stands on a level grassy lot on the north side of Route 638. A weeping willow tree is located in the side yard north of the house. November 2008: No changes to the setting have occurred since the previous survey. ----------------------------- Secondary resources are outbuildings. August 2008: A gravel driveway leads past the house to a one-bay garage and a gable front shed. The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: In addition to the garage and shed, another wood framed shed is located northwest of the main dwelling, but has begun to deteriorate. Surveyor Assessment: July 2008: It is the opinion of the surveyor that this two-story wood frame dwelling, built ca. 1840, is not eligible for inclusion in the National Register. The house does not possess characteristics of demonstrable significance with respect to design, construction or use of materials (Criterion C). It does not appear to be associated with significant broad patterns, events or persons (Criteria A and B). It has not yielded, nor is it likely to yield, information important to history or prehistory (Criterion D). November 2008: This resource does not possess any significant historical associations with events, trends, themes, or individuals in local or regional history. As such, it is recommended ineligible for NRHP listing under Criteria A or B. The main house stands as a heavily altered example of a common architectural form found throughout the region. Additionally, the outbuildings are unexceptional and deteriorated examples of regularly found types. Therefore, this resource is recommended ineligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C. Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1840 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) 35 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 5 Historic Context(s):Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: August 2008: This two-story side gable house with a standing seam metal roof features an interior brick chimney, an extremely large exterior brick chimney at the north end, vinyl siding, and and 4/4 and 6/6 vinyl windows. The house has a three-bay front porch with a half-hipped roof, and a two-story three-sided addition at the south end. November 2008: No changes to the house have occurred since the previous survey. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double-Hung Vinyl 4/4 Windows Sash, Double-Hung Vinyl 6/6 Roof Gable, Side Metal Standing Seam Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Coursed Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Siding, Vinyl Chimneys Exterior End Brick Cap, Corbeled Chimneys Interior Brick Cap, Corbeled Porch 1-story, 3-bay Wood Post, Chamfered Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Garage Date of Construction:1955Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: timber-frame, horizontal siding, gable roof, shed-roof addition August 2008: The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: The wood framed garage is located north of the hosue and has a concrete block foundation, aluminum siding, a gable roof with V-crimp metal, and an open shed roof addition. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:DSS Legacy 36 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 5 Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1955Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: The shed is timber frame, has vertical-board siding, and is very dilapidated. August 2008: The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: The shed is clad in aluminum siding and is topped with a standing seam metal gable roof. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1910Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Deteriorated Threats to Resource:Deterioration Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: timber frame, shed roof, vertical-board siding August 2008: The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: This building is located northwest of the main dwelling. It is obscured by vegetation, but appears to be in a state of deterioration. Number of Stories:2 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events 37 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 5 Event Type: DHR Staff: Not Eligible DHR ID:034-0262 Staff Name:Kirchen, Roger Event Date:3/16/2009 Staff Comment TrAIL Power Engineers GAI Consultants, Inc. 385 E. Waterfront Dr. Homestead, PA 15120 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 ----------------------------- Record Type: DHR File Data Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/3/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Surveyors: Mike Yengling Patti Kuhn Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 ----------------------------- Record Type: DHR File Data Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, Maral Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/1/1989 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: No Data 38 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 5 of 5 Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 ----------------------------- Record Type: DHR File Data Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 39 40 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5074 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 3 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Function/Location House, 265 Vaucluse Road Property Addresses Current - 265 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Not Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:No Data Site Description: November 2008: This house is located on the south side of the road on a level grassy lot. ----------------------------- November 2008: Access to this property was not granted and, as such, the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. There are no secondary resources associated with this house. Surveyor Assessment: November 2008: No evidence that conclusively ties this resource to any significant events in local history could be identified. As such, this resource is recommended ineligible for listing under Criterion A. This property is not associated with any significant individuals in local or state history and is therefore recommended not NRHP-eligible under Criterion B. This house located along Vaucluse Road has been extensively modified with the application of asbestos shingle siding, new asphalt shingle roofing material, and the construction of two new porches. As such, it no longer maintains architectural integrity and is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C. Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1930 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning, Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Number of Stories:1.5 Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: 41 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5074 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 3 No Data Architectural Description: August 2008: The 1 ½-story, side-gable, wood-frame house, built circa 1930, features weatherboard siding, 2/2 wood windows on the primary façade, a brick end chimney, a newly rebuilt front porch, and a rear porch with a shed roof. Roofing material was not visible. The house is in fair condition at this time. November 2008: Constructed circa 1930, this 1.5 story frame vernacular house stands on a continuous masonry foundation. The exterior walls are clad in both weatherboard and asbestos shingle siding. This house features a side gable roof covered with asphalt shingles and 2/2 double- hung wood sash windows. Decorative shutters flank some of the windows. A one-story, full-width porch has recently been constructed on the facade and is built on a wood pier foundation. Square wood posts and balustrade support the shed roof. A similar shed roof porch has also been appended to the rear. A shouldered brick chimney stack marks the west gable end. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable, Side Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 2/2 Porch 1-story, full-width Wood Posts Foundation Solid/Continuous Unknown Not Visible Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Shingles, Asbestos Chimneys Exterior End Brick Bond, Common Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Weatherboard Secondary Resource Information Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Not Eligible DHR ID:034-5074 Staff Name:Kirchen, Roger Event Date:3/16/2009 Staff Comment GAI recommends that this resource is not NRHP eligible and DHR concurs with this recommendation. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian 42 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5074 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 3 Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 43 44 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 10 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Function/Location Farm, 829 Vaucluse Road Historic Woodbine Farm Current Woodbine Barn Property Addresses Current - 829 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):84 A 50 USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:197 Site Description: November 2008: The Woodbine Farm is situated on the south side of the road and faces north. The house sits close to the road, while a long gravel driveway leads to the barn, shed, and vehicle/equipment shed which are located farther out in an open field. May 2009: A site visit with full property access confirmed that no changes to the secondary resources have occurred since the November 2008 survey. June 2020: This dwelling is located on the south side of Vaucluse Road on a large rural property. The building sits near the road in an overgrown cluster of trees and other vegetation that screens its visibility from the road. A gravel driveway extends past the side of the house to an agricultural complex to the rear. Just across the driveway from the house is a small deteriorated barn. Set on a ridge to the rear of the house are a historic bank barn and a more recent pole barn. Set between the home and barns is orchard on one side of the driveway and open pasture on the other. February 2022: This property is located on the south side of Vaucluse Road and contains 197 acres of rural landscape. The home is set along the road at the front of the property in the center of a grassy, overgrown yard. The driveway extends past the east side of the home and extends towards the agricultural complex set centrally in the property. Just across the driveway from the home is a small outbuilding. A patch of woods borders the homesite along Vaucluse Road to the west. Behind the wooded area, and extending nearly to the western edge of the property and far back as the agricultural complex is a cultivated orchard. On the opposite side of the driveway stretching to the east edge of the property is a fenced cattle pasture. A small, gravel pull off is located roughly four hundred feet to the east of the house. The pull off is likely used for maintenance of the powerline that intersects the property at the northeast corner. Roughly 650 feet to the rear of the house along the driveway is an agricultural complex that consists of a large early-twentieth century bank barn, a mid-twentieth century vehicle shed, a well house, and remains of a former silo. From the complex, the farm lane takes a dogleg turn and then extends through an additional agricultural field and orchard to Hites Road along the west edge of the property. To the rear of the complex is a treeline that separates additional cattle pastures occupying the rear of the property. Surveyor Assessment: November 2008: The main dwelling and agricultural outbuildings do not possess associations with significant events or themes. As a result, Woodbine Farm is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion A. No evidence linking this property to any significant individuals in local history could be identified. As such, this resource is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion B. The buildings that comprise Woodbine Farm do not have sufficient architectural significance or integrity to warrant NRHP listing. The house has undergone various alterations including application of new siding material, construction of a modern porch, and multiple additions. Therefore, this resource is recommended not eligible under Criterion C. May 2009: After full access to the property was granted, an additional site visit was conducted. However, this site visit did not reveal additional information that would qualify the resource for NRHP listing. As such, there are no changes to GAI's November 2008 recommendation of not NRHP-eligible under Criteria A, B, or C. June 2020: This property is an example of a typical late-nineteenth century rural dwelling and farm in the region. The home reflects an I-house form with little architectural distinction. It includes a small collection of typical rural barns and outbuildings, including a contemporary bank barn. Although the home remains a poor condition, overall, the property retains moderate historical integrity and was therefore deemed potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP by the VDHR in 2009. At this time, the home and outbuildings appear to retain similar integrity as at that time and as such, D+A recommends it continue to be considered potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. February 2022: This dwelling is an example of a typical Vernacular farmhouse in the region built in the early-twentieth century. The home was originally constructed in 1906 by Emily and Alexander Jones, descendants of the prominent Jones family of Frederick 45 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 10 County. The property was once part of the larger Vaucluse estate, constructed by William Strother Jones, Sr., circa 1785. The earliest known owner of the property on which the house now stands was Gabriel Jones (1724-1806), who settled in Frederick County during the mid-seventeenth century. The son of Welsh immigrants, Gabriel lived in Williamsburg during the early years of his life. In 1727, the Jones family moved to England due to financial difficulties. While there, Gabriel attended school and served as an indentured apprentice for a lawyer, after which time he began practicing law himself. In 1745, Jones returned to Virginia and eventually settled in Frederick County. In 1751, he purchased a 244-acre tract of land in Frederick and constructed a dwelling there, known as Bogota. During the mid-eighteenth century, he served numerous terms in the House of Burgesses. In his later life, Gabriel Jones worked as a lawyer. By the time of Gabriel Jones’ death in 1806, he owned a total of 1,200 acres of land, which included the present farm. In 1785, he gave a 775-acre tract of land, purchased from Isaac Zane in 1778, to his only son, William Strother Jones, Sr. (1756-1790). During the American Revolution, William served as a captain in the Continental Army. After the war, he served as a colonel in the Virginia Militia. Soon after acquiring land from his father in 1785, William built a house there, known as Vaucluse. The house, which still stands today, is a two-story, Federal-style, brick mansion. It is located roughly one mile southeast of the present house and is currently operated as a bed and breakfast. When William Strother Jones, Sr. died in 1790, he left Vaucluse to his wife. His will stipulated that in the event that their son, William S. Jones, Jr., married, the ownership of the house would pass to him. William Jr.’s mother would remain in the house with him for the remainder of her life. In 1806, William S. Jones, Jr. was married to Anna Marshall, the niece of Chief Justice John Marshall. At this time, he moved into the Vaucluse house. The house appears on an 1809 map of Frederick County. Together, William and Anna had four children. Then in 1823, Anna died at the age of thirty-five. Two years later in 1825, William married Ann Cary Randolph. The couple also had four children. When William Jones, Jr. died in 1845, he willed the Vaucluse estate to his two sons, William S. Jones, III and Francis Jones. In 1849, Francis Jones conveyed his interest in the property to his brother, William. William lived in the house with his stepmother, Ann Cary, his wife, Mary, and their three children, William, Ann, and Beverly, through the Civil War. During the war, Francis Jones served as a member of Confederate General Stonewall Jackson’s staff. In 1862, he was mortally wounded at the Battle of Gaines Mill in Hanover, Virginia. During the war, numerous parties of Union soldiers in the area visited Vaucluse. During these visits, the soldiers stole items from the house and took crops and livestock from the fields. After the war, William Jones, III fell on hard times, as did many farmers in the South following the collapse of the Southern economy and the loss of enslaved labor. Ann Cary Randolph Jones complained of the loss of enslaved workers on the farm, noting that “the abolitionist measures [make] this a large place to cultivate and may compel a change” (quoted in Brown et al.). Unable to maintain the estate and farm, William sold the Vaucluse estate to Guy Richards in 1865 in order to settle a debt of $16,000. The sale included the house and surrounding 430 acres. Guy Richards owned Vaucluse until 1874, at which time the property was sold to John Miller in order to settle Richards’ own debts. During his ownership, Richards had increased by size of the property by 40 acres, bringing its total size to 470 acres. After taking ownership in 1874, John Miller lived at Vaucluse for seven years. He operated a grist mill on the property during that time. By 1881, the property came into joint ownership between John Miller J.M. Long. Then in 1884, Miller and Long agreed to divide and consolidate their ownership of the Vaucluse property so that Miller retained consolidated ownership of the 2/3 share of the property including the “mansion tract” while Long retained ownership of the 1/3 share of property that included 197 acres in the northwest corner. This coincides with the property now identified as 897 Vaucluse Road. Long retained ownership of this property until 1896. While the circumstances of the transaction are unknown, Long’s farm fell to the Shenandoah Valley National Bank in 1896. The Shenandoah Valley National Bank later sold the property to Alexander Tidball Jones and Emily Whittier Jones in 1902. Alexander was the grandson of William S. Jones, Jr. of Vaucluse. His father, Beverly Randolph Jones, was born at Vaucluse. While the Jones family no longer retained ownership of Vaucluse itself, Alexander and Emily Jones had secured a portion of the original farmland. Together, Alexander and Emily owned the property for five years, during which time Alexander likely cultivated the land and built the present house. The Jones couple, along with their daughter, Frances McNeece Whittle Jones, resided in Winchester throughout their ownership of the property and therefore the home was likely rented to a tenant farmer, however, according to the 1910 Census, Alexander himself was identified as a farmer. According to land tax records, the house was valued at $235.50 when it was built in 1906, demonstrating its modest scale as compared to larger estates in the area such as Vaucluse. While not separately noted, it is likely that the large bank barn was built at the same time as the house. The following year, the Jones couple sold the house and 197-acre farm to local farmer, Edgar Stickley. It is likely that the Jones family never lived in the house, but instead constructed it in order to encourage a buyer to purchase the property or to serve as a tenant house. Upon taking ownership of the farm in 1907, Edgar Stickley likely cultivated the farmland surrounding the new house. It is unclear whether he resided in the house during his ownership, as he owned additional land in Frederick County. During the same year that he had purchased the Jones’ farm, Edgar owned three additional tracts of land, two of which included dwellings and other outbuildings. According to the 1900 and 1910 Census, Edgar lived in Frederick County with his wife, Susan, and son, Claude. In 1917, Edgar conveyed the house and farm to his twenty-seven-year-old son, Claude. Claude was known to have lived in the house throughout his ownership of the property. According to the 1920 Census, Claude was designated as head of the household. His parents, who were in their sixties, lived with him. At the time, he worked as a farm manager. Then in 1921, Claude married Pearl Haldeman. By 1930, Edgar and Susan Stickley were living in a separate home. Claude operated his property as a working farm, while Pearl worked as a teacher. The couple lived on the farm until 1933. During their ownership, local records suggest additional outbuildings were constructed, possibly including the shed near the main house and the silo next to the bank barn that no longer remains. Claude and Pearl Stickley sold the farm to Harman Brumback in 1933. Harman was the son of Isaac Brumback, a prominent doctor, landowner, and Confederate veteran in Frederick County. His father owned numerous farms and operated a number of successful fruit orchards in the area. Referenced in the deed of sale were the house, barn, and other outbuildings present on the property at the time. During his ownership of the farm, Harman Brumback lived in the house with his wife, Frances (known as “Fannie”), and their four children, Henry, Franklin, James, and Margaret. According to public records, Harman took on his father’s business of operating multiple farms and running fruit orchards. In 1952, Harman and Fannie gave ownership of the farm to their four children. The couple then moved to Winchester. Together, the 46 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 10 Brumback children retained joint ownership of the property. Then in 1965, Henry Brumback founded Woodbine Farms Inc., an apple orchard and commercial farming business that still operates in Frederick and Shenandoah Counties today. His father, Harman, served as president of the company for many years until his death in 1980. When the company was first established in 1965, all four of the Brumback siblings sold their interest in the property to the company. Throughout the late-twentieth and early-twenty-first centuries, Woodbine Farms cultivated the fields surrounding the house. Woodbine Farms, Inc. is still operated by the Brumback family today. At this time, the property continues to be used agriculturally including an orchard, cattle operation, and cultivation of other crops. The home is no longer occupied, although the bank barn and vehicle shed remain in use. Historically, the property was associated with the prominent Jones family of Frederick County and was part of the grand Vaucluse estate throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, although the present-buildings and configuration are not reflective of that period. The property was separated and developed following a division and consolidation of the Vaucluse property in the late-nineteenth century. By the first years of the twentieth century, this property came back into possession of Alex Jones, a descendant of the original Jones family of Vaucluse. While it does not appear that this Jones resided on the property, he farmed it and was responsible for the construction of the home and bank barn. While the home is not particularly architecturally distinct, the bank barn has been regarded as a good example of timber frame bank barn construction in the region. At this time, the barn remains in use and continues to retain a relatively high degree of historical integrity. As such, it has been determined potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP by the VDHR as part of several compliance projects and continues to be treated as such. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:1906 Date Source:Local Records Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:L-Plan Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Deteriorated Threats to Resource:Neglect, Vacant Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The main house of Woodbine Farm was constructed circa 1880. This frame vernacular dwelling with two-story rear ell stands on a continuous stone foundation and is covered with aluminum siding. The house is topped with a side gable roof that is clad in standing seam metal. 2/2 double-hung wood sash windows comprise the fenestration, and the first floor windows on the facade feature decorative shutters. A modern shed roof porch has been attached to the facade. The porch is built on a pier foundation and features turned wood posts and a wood balustrade. A one-story, shed roof addition has been appended to the east elevation upon which another one-story, gable roofed addition was attached. May 2009: The main dwelling has not undergone any changes since the previous survey. June 2020: This single dwelling was built circa 1880 according to previous study and exhibits a Vernacular design. The two-story building has an I-house front block with an offset two-story rear wing. The wood frame structural system is clad with vinyl siding and rests on a continuous stone foundation. It is topped by a side-gable roof covered with standing seam metal that is pierced by an exterior end chimney at the ridge. The main entrance is set centrally on the front and is sheltered by a full-width one-story porch. All fenestration on the building has been covered with plywood. The building is plain and unornamented. February 2022: This single-family dwelling was built in 1906 according to local land records. The building exhibits a Vernacular form with no discernable style or applied embellishment. It was originally built as a two-story, three-bay residential structure with an offset two-story rear ell. A one-story mass was later to the rear in the corner between the front block and ell and a later one-story addition was subsequently to the rear of that addition, although this rearward-most addition has recently been demolished and all that remains is the concrete slab foundation. The building is currently vacant and remains in poor condition. As such, interior inspection was not permitted. The original core of building is two stories in height and has an I-house form with an offset rear ell. The front block is three bays wide and one bay deep. Along the rear elevation of the front block is a two-story, rear ell, which is situated at the southwest corner of the front block. The rear ell is two bays wide and two bays deep. The front façade of the house is symmetrical, with a central door flanked by two windows on the first 47 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 10 story and three windows on the second story. A nearly full-width one-story porch extends along the front. The porch appears to be nonhistoric, although it could not be determined if it replaced an older porch or portico. The structural system of the house is wood frame, covered with vinyl siding, although it is unclear whether original siding remains beneath the vinyl. The building rests atop a continuous stacked field stone foundation. It is topped by a side-gabled roof with a low pitch and no overhangs that is covered with standing-seam metal. The rear ell is topped by a gable roof that ties into the rear slope just below the ridge over the front block. An exterior-end, concrete block chimney extends up the west side of the front block at the ridge. Fenestration is limited to the front façade, the rear of the main block, and inside wall of the rear ell. There is no fenestration on the sides of the front block, the outside wall of the rear ell, or the rear of the rear ell. All doors and windows on the home are currently boarded over with plywood, although recently conducted previous survey provides details on these features. The primary entrance is set centrally on the front and consists of a paneled wood door, with four lights in the upper half of the door. An aluminum storm door has been inserted into the entrance. The windows on the front façade appear to be original. On each side of the door, a two-over-two, double-hung sash window is evenly spaced between the corner of the wall and the doorframe. Three windows of the same design are found on the second story, directly above the first story openings. The windows on the first story are adorned by faux vinyl shutters, although one shutter has fallen off. A secondary entrance is located on the side of the one-story rear addition adjacent to a hexagonal bay window. The front porch is one-story and stretches nearly the full-width of the front facade. The porch has a wood deck floor supported by plain posts that are wrapped in lattice panels. A set of plain wood stairs lead onto the porch in front of the main entrance. The porch is covered by a shed roof supported by four turned wood posts. A simple wood railing and balustrade extends between the posts. The one-story rear addition remains in deteriorated condition, although its basic form and fenestration remains evident. The mass is topped by a shed roof that slopes down from the side of the original rear ell. The roof has an extended overhang that shelters the secondary entrance and bay window on the outside wall. The second rear addition was previously appended to the rear wall of this mass, however, it no longer remains standing. It was frame with a gable roof. Previous documentation reveals the walls were blank with no doors and windows, and the interior was accessible only from an interior doorway from the adjacent one-story addition. Overall, the building is simple in design and ornamentation. It is void of applied embellishment and does not reflect any discernable stylistic influence. It has been wrapped in nonhistoric materials and additions. Further, it has been vacant for an extended period of time and now remains in a poor condition. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Vinyl Siding Roof Gable, Side Metal Standing Seam Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 2/2 Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Random Porch 1-story, 3-bay Wood Posts, Turned Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Shed,Vehicle/Equipment Date of Construction:1940 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The vehicle/equipment shed stands one-story tall with metal siding and a gable roof. An open shed roof bay has been attached to the north elevation. May 2009: A site visit with property access confirmed that the one-story vehicle-equipment shed is clad with 3 V-crimp metal siding, and the side gable roof is covered with standing seam metal. A total of eight eight open bays are located on the facade, including the shed roofed addition on the northeast elevation. June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. ---------------------- June 2020 48 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 5 of 10 February 2022: Set further to the south of the bank barn, and on the opposite side of the farm lane is a mid-twentieth century one-story, frame vehicle shed. The building consists of a main block that is four bays wide and one bay deep and a side addition along the north elevation that is four bays wide and one bay deep. The main block of the shed has a side-gable roof, while the addition has a flat roof. The exterior walls are clad in metal siding on the west and south elevations, while the north and east elevations are open. Each bay is divided by a wooden post. A total of eight bays are located on the front elevation of the shed. Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Metal Siding Foundation Post-in-ground No Data No Data Roof Side Gable Metal No Data Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1906 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The heavy timber frame barn features a fore bay on the east elevation. It is clad in vertical wood siding and has a gable roof covered with V-crimp metal. May 2009: A site visit with property access revealed that this barn is constructed on a continuous stone foundation. Board and batten siding has been applied to the exterior walls, and the side gable roof is clad in standing seam metal. An earth bank leads to large sliding wood doors on the northwest elevation. June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. February 2022: Set on a knoll roughly 650-feet to the rear of the house is a large bank barn believed to have been built circa 1906 along with the home. The building has a timber frame structural system that rests on a stone foundation. The timbers are roughly 10-inch square and circular mill sawn. Many of the joints are pegged mortise and tenon. The stone foundation is stepped so as to extend the full-height of the lower-level along the earth embedded elevation, but step down along the sides to where the rear of the lower-level is framed. The building is oriented such that the earthen ramp to the upper-level faces west while the lower level opens to the east. The heavy timber frame of the upper-level is clad in vertical wood board siding. The structure is topped by a side-gable roof covered with standing-seam metal. On the west elevation a large just off-center bay provides access to the interior of the upper level from the earthen ramp. The bay is enclosed by a set of sliding vertical wood plank doors suspended from a metal track. At the northernmost end of the west elevation is an open bay that leads into a dogtrot through the lower level. The north end of the building has two small window openings that illuminate storage rooms off the dogtrot passage and a small window set near the peak of the gable. A similar gable window and two large openings with horizontal slats pierce the lower-level of the south end. The east (rear) elevation of the building has a wide bay on the upper-level set directly across from the bay on the front and features similar sliding doors. The upper-level is cantilevered over a recessed area that stretches the width of the lower level. A series of wood posts provides additional support along the sill of the cantilevered area. This shelters a row of animal stalls that open into the lower level. The stalls have wood doors with solid panels in the lower half and horizontal slats in the upper half. The dogtrot from the front elevation extends through and also opens out the sheltered lower-level area on the rear. A fenced corral extends from the rear of the building. The interior of the barn is divided primarily into livestock area on the lower-level and storage above. The lower level space is divided by posts and railings that create a series of stalls and feeding areas, all with dirt floors. It is accessible by a flight of interior stairs from the upper-level as well as a small hatch from the dogtrot. Several storage rooms line the outside (north end) wall of the dogtrot. The interior of the upper-level contains a large open area that occupies much of the space with small enclosed workrooms in the southwest and southeast corners. The timber structural frame divides the space into a series of bays which are open to the roof, although several integral ladders suggest there may have been secondary floors or lofts in the past. The interior stairwell to the lower level is located adjacent to the central bay. Number of Stories:2 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Wood Vertical Board Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Coursed 49 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 6 of 10 Roof Side Gable Metal No Data Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1930 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Neglect Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: Adjacent to the dwelling stands a wood framed shed. This shed is clad in vertical wood siding and topped with a standing seam metal gable front roof. The window apertures remain open. May 2009: After property access was granted, a site visit confirmed that the one-story wood framed shed is clad in both vertical wood and board and batten siding. The standing seam metal clad gable front roof is trimmed with exposed rafter tails. 1/1 double-hung vinyl sash windows comprise the fenestration. June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. ---------------------- June 2020 February 2022: Set across the driveway just to the southeast of the house is a one-story, frame shed. The building has a rectangular form with a post in-ground foundation. It consists of a three-bay, main block with a one-bay ell along the west elevation. The exterior walls are clad in wood weatherboards on the north elevation, except for the portion of the wall above the roof eaves, which is clad in vertical wood boards. The remainder of the building is clad in vertical wood boards. The front-gable roof is covered with standing-seam metal; most of the roofing has fallen off, revealing the framework underneath. A central doorway leads into the shed along the north elevation, although no door fixture remains in place. A broken, one-over-one, double-hung sash window flanks the door to the right. A small window opening is located along the west elevation of the side ell, although there is no window fixture in the opening. The building is vacant and in poor condition. Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Wood Vertical Board Foundation Post-in-ground No Data No Data Roof Front Gable Metal No Data Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Silo Date of Construction:1930 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:No discernible style Form:No Data Condition:Demolished Threats to Resource:Demolition Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: February 2022: Set near the south end of the bank barn is a poured concrete ring that was the foundation of a former silo. 50 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 7 of 10 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:2020-0416 Investigator:Robert Taylor Organization/Company:Dutton + Associates, LLC Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:2/10/2022 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: This intensive-level documentation was prepared in partial fulfillment of the approved mitigation plan for the Foxglove Solar project. As part of the project, this property will be partially developed with solar arrays and therefore result in an adverse impact to the property. Research, survey, and reporting were conducted by D+A architectural history staff. Project Bibliographic Information: D+A. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Foxglove Solar Project, Frederick County, Virginia. October 2020 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID:034-5075 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:12/18/2020 Staff Comment DHR Project No. 2020-0416 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2020-0416 Investigator:Robert Taylor Organization/Company:Dutton + Associates, LLC Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:6/9/2020 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Field survey and reporting prepared by D+A Architectural History staff. Project Bibliographic Information: D+A. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Foxglove Solar Project in Frederick County, Virginia. October 2020. Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible 51 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 8 of 10 DHR ID:034-5075 Staff Name:Kirchen, Roger Event Date:6/18/2009 Staff Comment GAI recommended that this resource is not NRHP eligible but DHR has asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey with full access to the property. GAI's request for property access was approved. The resource appears potentially NRHP/VLR eligible under Criteria A and C and the barn should be considered the primary resource. Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:5/13/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/16/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: GAI recommended that this resource is not NRHP eligible but DHR has asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey with full access to the property. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Otten, Megan L. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 52 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 9 of 10 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: TrAIL Power Engineers GAI Consultants, Inc. 385 E. Waterfront Dr. Homestead, PA 15120 Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Bibliographic Information Bibliography: Alexandria Gazette. “Died.” August 11, 1845, 3. Accessed February 2022. Chronicling America: Historic American Newpsapers. Library of Congress. ______. “Died.” April 6, 1846, 3. Accessed February 2022. Chronicling America: Historic American Newpsapers. Library of Congress. American Historical Society. History of Virginia, Vol VI. 1924. “Anna Maria Marshall Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Ann Cary Randolph Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. Barr, C. Frederick. Alexander Tidball Jones with daughter Frances. Photograph. 1902-1903. Accessed April 2022. Stewart Bell Jr. Archives, Handley Regional Library, Winchester, VA. Brown, Stuart E., Eileen M. Chappel, and Lorraine F. Myers. Gabriel Jones and Some of His Descendants: Notes on Bogota and on Vaucluse. Berryville, VA: Virginia Book, Co., 1990. “Capt. William Strother Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Claude Benjamin Stickley.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. Fetzer. George W. “Bogota.” June 22, 1936. Works Progress Administration. Manuscript on file at the Library of Virginia. “Florinda Taylor Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Gabriel Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Gabriel Jones and Bogota.” Massanutten Musings (blog). October 1, 2014. Massanutten Regional Library. Accessed April 2022. http://mrlreference.blogspot.com/2014/10/gabriel-jones-and-bogota.html. “Harman M. Brumback.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Maj. Francis Buckner Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “The Manor House.” Photograph. Retrieved from The Inn at Vaucluse Spring (website). Accessed April 2022. https://vauclusespring.com/accommodation-type/the-manor-house/. McCabe, Tom. “Many Variables Affecting Crop.” Winchester Evening Star. October 15, 1976. Accessed April 2022. Newspaper Archive (database). “Our Story.” Woodbine Farm Market (website). Accessed April 2022. https://www.woodbinefarmmarket.com/about. Powell, Mickey. “Massive solar power plant targeted for Stephens City area.” The Winchester Star. June 5, 2020. Accessed April 2022. https://www.winchesterstar.com/winchester_star/massive-solar-power-plant-targeted-for-stephens-city-area/article_2eb9d69f-2452-514c-bb7a- 6c62cfb316ae.html. Quarles, Garland R. Some Old Homes in Frederick County, Virginia. Winchester, VA: Winchester-Frederick County Historical Society, 1990. United States Census Bureau. Federal Census, 1850-1940. Accessed March 2022. Family Search (website). Varle, Charles, and Benjamin Jones. Map of Frederick, Berkeley, & Jefferson counties in the state of Virginia. Philadelphia: n.p., 1809. Accessed March 2022. https://www.loc.gov/item/2008621756/. 53 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 10 of 10 Virginia. Frederick County. Land Tax Books, 1904-1926. Accessed April 2022. Library of Virginia. Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). “Died at Vaucluse.” September 28, 1831. Accessed February 2022. Chronicling America: Historic American Newpsapers. Library of Congress. “William Strother Jones, Jr.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “William Strother Jones, III.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Woodbine Cemetery, Harrisonburg.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. Woodbine Farm Market. Photograph of Brumback Family. N.d. Accessed April 2022. https://www.woodbinefarmmarket.com/about. Property Notes: No Data 54 55 Property Photographs from VCRIS & Pictometry DHR #034-0220/034-0138 – Inn at Vaucluse Spring 2020 (VCRIS) – Mill House 56 2020 (VCRIS) – Log Cabin 2008 (VCRIS) – The Manor House 57 2008 (VCRIS) – The Gallery 2008 (VCRIS) – The Cottage on the Hill 58 2008 (VCRIS) – The Chumley Homeplace DHR #034-0262 – Mildred Kline House 2008 (VCRIS) 59 DHR #034-5073 – 263 Vaucluse Road 2023 (Pictometry) DHR #034-5074 – 265 Vaucluse Road - Address point not found on Pictometry DHR #034-5075 – Woodbine Farm 2022 Woodbine Farm Bank Barn (VCRIS) 60 2022 Woodbine Farm Bank Barn (VCRIS) 2022 Front Façade (VCRIS) 61 2022 Rear Addition (VCRIS) 2022 Silo Foundation (VCRIS) 62 63 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 21, 2025 Agenda Section: The 522 Plaza Title: Review of The 522 Plaza Rezoning Application Attachments: HRAB02-21-25REZThe522Plaza_Redacted.pdf 64 Item # 5A The 522 Plaza Rezoning Application The Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a rezoning application of +/- 0.739 acres of a +/- 2.23 acre property (Property Identification Number: 54-A-1E) from the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District to the B2 (General Business) Zoning District with proffers. The remainder of the property is currently zoned B2 and would remain unchanged. The rezoning seeks to enable full use of the property for a 13,600 SF two-story mixed use building containing offices and retail space. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Fortress Drive and North Frederick Pike (Route 522 N) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published in 1992 by the National Park Service identifies the property as within the core area of the Battle of Second Winchester and the Battle of Third Winchester. The mapped sites identified within a half mile radius of the property according to the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System (VCRIS) are: • 034-0322 – Star Fort • 034-0147 – Stine House (Glendale) Please find the following attachments for your information: • Location Map • HRAB Application • Proffer Statement & Impact Analysis Statement • General Development Plan (GDP) • Renderings (for illustration purposes only) • VA DHR Surveys, Maps, and Photographs The Applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed Rezoning. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements possibly impacted by the proposed use. The comments will be included in the rezoning application package. **If you have any questions prior to the meeting please forward them to me and I will relay them to the Applicant. 65 # # # £¤11 £¤522 ¬«37 Winchester Liberty Hall Stine House Star Fort N KENT STBRENDACTLANCEWAY REIGNWAY M ORELAND DR S A L V O C IR EXETERDRMARTINSBURGPIKEMARIONSTWESTMINSTER-CANTERBURYDRE OATESAVE P AWP AW CT CLARK-VILLEDR WESTBURYPL W I L L I A M SCIR C O T T A G EDR CALIBERCT THOMASCTR I VE NDE L L CT WOODSIDELNSENTRYCT TRAVERTI NEWAYCAROLINEST STARFORT DR WINEBERRYDR N BRADDOCK STSENTINELDRSUNN YSI DEPLAZA DRRI CHARDSAVETUDORDROAK SIDE LNRUGBYPLMORNINGSIDEDR SAGECIR TRAFALGARSQN CAMERON STJA C KSO N A VEREDWOODLNLOCUSTAVE LEE AVE N LOUDOUN STAUTUMNVIEW LNHICKORY LNSCARLETMAPLE DRPENNSYLVANIAAVEW OATES AVE E L DE R B E R R YDR DARLINGTONDRBRICK KILN RDFOREMAN LNAMBROSE DRHANDLEY DRSUNNYSIDE DRFAIRMONTAVEPURCELL LNFORTRESS DRCARPERS DRN F R E D E RI C K PIK ELAUCK DRGLENTAWBER RD ST I NE LNThe 522 Plaza Rezon ing #Historic Rural Landmarks 0.5 Mile B uffer Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels Future Rt 37 Bypass Map Produced by Frederick County Planning and Development Dept.February 7, 2025 0 0.15 0.30.075 Miles The 522 Plaza Rezoning I 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0322 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 44FK0732 February 10, 2025 Page: 1 of 4 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Historic Fort Alabama Historic Star Fort Property Addresses Current - Fortress Drive Former - Route 522 County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):22603 Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):WINCHESTER Property Evaluation Status DHR Board: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Suburban Acreage:7 Site Description: 1989: Star Fort is located on the northwest outskirts of Winchester in Frederick County. 1999 nomination: Star Fort is located on Amblers Hill just north of Winchester, Virginia, in Frederick County between U.S. Route 11, Route 37,,and Interstate 81 in the lower end of the Shenandoah Valley. The Shenandoah Valley runs on a north south-axis formed by the Allegheny Mountains to the west and the Blue Ridge Mountains to the east. The Shenandoah River flows from south to north, and empties into the Potomac River at Harpers Ferry. Boundary Justification: The boundary includes the entire footprint that has been historically associated with Star Fort and that maintains historic integrity. Surveyor Assessment: 1989: Star Fort was one of two forts built by Gen. R.H. Milroy during the Union Occupation of Winchester in 1862. It was built over and around the gun emplacements erected by Gen. "Stonewall" Jackson which Confederate forces called Fort Alabama. It is believed that no more than one or two batteries of artillery and 300-400 men ever occupied it, but it played a very important role in the 2nd and 3rd battles of Winchester. In the 2nd battle of Winchester, Gen. Milroy grossly underestimated the force of Gen. Ewells army and was forced to retreat into Star Fort among others. When Milroy attempted to evacuate, 3826 of his men were captured, wounded,or killed. Milroy barely escaped to Martinsburg, WV. In the 3rd battle of Winchester, Star Fort, now a Confederate holding, withstood attacks by the Union army long enough for 3/4 of Early's Confederate army to escape. 1999 nomination Statement of Significance: Star Fort is the best remaining example of a Civil War-era earthen fort in the Shenandoah Valley. The only earthworks larger than Star Fort that are in similar condition are those constructed during the Siege of Petersburg and Richmond. Both Confederate and Union forces employed earthen fortifications in the defense of Winchester and modified them often between 1861 and 1864. Winchester, which changed hands many times during the course of the war was the strategic key to the Shenandoah Valley, which was known as the "Breadbasket of the Confederacy." Star Fort was initially constructed as a Confederate defensive position. It was later used as a Union fortification during the Second Battle of Winchester on June 12-15, 1863 and again as a Confederate defensive position during the Third Battle of Winchester on September 19, 1864. Star Fort is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A for military defense. History: Star Fort was one of four forts built by Major General Robert H. Milory during the Union occupation of Winchester in 1862 (the others are Fort Collier, Fort Milroy, and West Lunette). It was built over and around gun emplacements erected by order of Major General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson, commander of Confederate forces and referred to as Fort Alabama. See nomination for additional History. 2007: Before Robert E. Lee marched his army north into Pennsylvania in the summer of 1863, he directed his subordinate, Richard S. Ewell, to clear the northern Shenandoah Valley of Union troops. Ewell did just that in what became the Second Battle of Winchester, a feat that required the Southerners’ to push the Federals out of the defensive forts surrounding the city. Remnants of one of these, Star Fort, survive today thanks to the preservation of the site more than 20 years ago by a local reenactor group, the Middlesex Artillery-Fleet’s Battery. On September 5, 2007, the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation and the Middlesex Artillery--joined by representatives of Frederick County and a trio of local developers--announced the transfer of the seven-acre site to the Battlefields Foundation. In addition, 1.6 acres adjacent to the site were donated to the Battlefields Foundation by local developers Richard Hardison, Byron Brill, and Carlin Smith to serve as a buffer between the fort area and the surrounding modern development. 81 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0322 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 44FK0732 February 10, 2025 Page: 2 of 4 Star Fort is one of the many defensive forts constructed around Winchester during the American Civil War. It was built in late 1861 or early 1862 by Confederates under Gen. Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson and was garrisoned by March 1862. The fort—like all of the defensive fortifications around Winchester—was enhanced and occupied by subsequent armies from both sides.Before the Second Battle of Winchester (13-15 June 1863), Union troops occupied the city and its surrounding defenses. Over the course of three days, the highly mobile Confederates managed to push the Northerners out of their fortifications. The battle ended in a complete rout of the Union division stationed at Winchester and elevated Southern hopes for a successful invasion of the North by Lee’s army. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Defense Resource Type:Fortification/Military Base NR Resource Type:Structure Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1861 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Civil War (1861 - 1865) Historic Context(s):Military/Defense Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:No discernible style Form:No Data Number of Stories:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Neglect, Vandalism Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: (From Brandon Beck and Charles S. Grunder, "Three Battles of Winchester," p 22-23) -- Star Fort is the largest untouched Civil War site in Winchester. It is a massive earthwork fortification, well-elevated and with good fields of fire in all directions. Confederates built the fort very early in the war. In years past it has been cleared on occasion, but it is now overgrown and wild. Paths lead up to and over the ramparts, and it is still possible to distinguish a parade area and gun emplacements. 1989: Star Fort was a fortress during the Civil War, and the earthworks are currently in good to fair condition. The 1862 earthworks are threatened by neglect and dirt bike riders. 1999 nomination Summary Description [excerpt]: Star Fort is an earthen military fortification begun in 1861 by Confederate troops under the direction of Major General Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson for the defense of Winchester. It original construction was as a lunette and was significantly smaller than it extant footprint. IN 1862, when Union forces occupied Winchester, it was enlarged under the direction of Major General Robert H. Milroy. Star Fort is oriented to the south, to the defense of the Martinsburg Turnpike, which runs north from Winchester. Located atop a small bluff, the ramparts rise approximately 18 feet from grade and had a clear field of fire to the south and southwest. The saw- tooth design along the east, west and southern walls allowed interlocking artillery and rifle fire in the defense of the fort. The northern wall, running slightly southeast to northwest, was nearly straight at approximately 100 yards in length. A gate located on the south wall between two gun emplacements allowed entry into the fort, while a rectangular earthen gun platform faced the entry to defend against intrusion. A munitions bunker was located midway along the northern wall. See nomination for additional details. 2007 SVBF press release: Today, Star Fort is one of the few intact fortifications remaining around the city. Like Fort Collier, its sister to the east, it contains a system of extant earthworks that will help visitors understand the challenges of defending the northernmost city in the Confederacy. Secondary Resource Information 82 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0322 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 44FK0732 February 10, 2025 Page: 3 of 4 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: NRHP Nomination DHR ID:034-0322 Staff Name:Scott Brooks-Miller Event Date:7/20/1999 Staff Comment Historic Architect, Virginia Dept of Historic Resources [Draft nomination - not submitted for formal consideration] Written with assistance from Chris Mohn, Planner (Frederick County) Event Type: DHR Board: Eligible DHR ID:034-0322 Staff Name:State Review Board Event Date:10/19/1993 Staff Comment The State Review Board determined that the Star Fort appears to meet the criteria for listing on the Virginia Landmarks Register and the National Register of Historic Places. The board concurs with the Department staff that this property appears to be eligible at the national level for significance in the area of military history. Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0322 Staff Name:DHR Evaluation Committee Event Date:8/16/1993 Staff Comment Star Fort, Frederick County (DHR #34-322), was rated at the national level for significance in the area of military history. It was found to be eligible with a score of 42. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Maral S. Kalbian Organization/Company:Maral S. Kalbian, LLC Photographic Media:Film Survey Date:4/1/1989 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: [form was undated and unattributed, but accompanying photographs date from April 1989, and were taken by Maral Kalbian] Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Bibliographic Information Bibliography: The Story of Frederick County, Virginia. Ch. 33, 1989, Sam Lehman, ed. ---------------------- Jones, Annette "$25,000 Grant will Help Star Fort In Its Battle for Preservation" 6/5/1999 The Winchester Star 83 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0322 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 44FK0732 February 10, 2025 Page: 4 of 4 ---------------------- Star Fort Management and Interpretation Plan Oculus, an association with John Milner Associates 2000 FK-135 ---------------------- Igoe, Robert "Board Seeks to Preserve Star Fort" Thursday June 26, 2008 The Winchester Star Property Notes: No Data 84 85 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0147 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data February 10, 2025 Page: 1 of 3 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Historic Glendale Historic Stine, Henry, House Current Stine House Property Addresses Current - Route 522, Off Of County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):WINCHESTER Property Evaluation Status Not Evaluated Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:No Data Acreage:No Data Site Description: No Data Surveyor Assessment: This impressive Greek Revival structure is in extremely oriinal condition. No major alterations or additions have been made, and the lesser changes hardly compromise the historic house's integrity. The building is presently used as an apartment house. (int. 8/90) Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Multiple Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1859 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) Historic Context(s):Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Greek Revival Form:No Data Number of Stories:3.0 Condition:Excellent Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Rear 2-story brick ell. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable Metal Standing Seam 86 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0147 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data February 10, 2025 Page: 2 of 3 Structural System and Exterior Treatment Masonry Brick Other Windows Sash, Double-Hung No Data 6/6 Chimneys Interior End Brick Other Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone No Data Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Garage Date of Construction:1950Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories:No Data Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Smoke/Meat House Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories:No Data Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data 87 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0147 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data February 10, 2025 Page: 3 of 3 CRM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Velt, Tanya M. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/1/1990 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Quinn, Michael C. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/17/1973 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: On an intensive survey form. Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 88 89 Property Photographs from VCRIS & Pictometry DHR #034-0322 – Star Fort 1989 (VCRIS) – Aerial Imagery 1989 (VCRIS) – Star Fort trench west view 90 2023 (Pictometry) DHR #034-0147 – Stine Houe (Glendale) 2023 (VCRIS) 91 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 21, 2025 Agenda Section: Historic Plaque Program Funding Title: Update on Historic Plaque Program Funding Attachments: 92