HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 11-17-10 Meeting AgendaAGENDA
FI-IEDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMPAISSION
The Board. Roos i
Frederick County Administration Building
Winchester, Virginia
November 17, 2010
7:00 P.M. CAL;t Y O ORDER TAB
1) Adoption of Agenda: Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission
should adopt the Agenda for the meeting................................................................ (no tab)
2) October 6, 2010 Minutes.................................................................................................. (A)
3) Committee Reports.................................................................................................. (no tab)
4) Citizen Comments.................................................................................................... (no tab)
PUBLIC HEARING
5) Conditional Use Permit #08-10 for Gisella Quevedo, for a Cottage Occupation to
enable an In-home Day Care Facility. The property is located at 110 Marlise Lane in the
Steeplechase Subdivision, and is identified with Property Identification Number 55J-2-1-
44 in the Red Bud Magisterial District.
Mr. Johnston.................................................................................................................... (B)
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
6) 2010 Comprehensive Policy Plan Update
Mr. Ruddy................................................................................................ (``~)
7) Other
FILE COPY
•
•
C7
MEETING MINUTES
Or THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on October 6, 2010.
PRESENT: June M. Wilmot, Chairman/Member at Large; Brian Madagan, Opequon District; Gary
R. Oates, Stonewall District; J. Stanley Crockett, Stonewall District; Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Shawnee
District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; George J. Kriz,
Gainesboro District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Kevin 0. Crosen, Back Creek District; Philip E.
Lemieux, Red Bud District; Christopher M. Mohn, Red Bud District; and Roderick Williams, County
Attorney.
ABSENT: Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon District
STAFF PRESENT: Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning &
Subdivision Administrator; Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk.
CALL TO ORDER & ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Chairman Wilmot called the meeting to order at
Commissioner Kriz to adopt the October 6, 2010, agenda for this
seconded by Commissioner Triplett and unanimously passed.
MINUTES
7:00 p.m. A motion was made by
evening's meeting. This motion was
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Triplett, the
September 1, 2010, minutes of the Frederick County Planning Commission were unanimously approved
as presented.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Triplett, the
September 15, 2010, minutes of the Frederick County Planning Commission were unanimously approved
as presented.
Frederick County Planning Coimnission Page 2686
Minutes of October 6, 2010
-2 -
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Transportation Comm;ttee — 9/27/10 Mtg.
Commissioner Kriz reported that the Transportation Committee discussed the following
agenda items: 1) Amherst Street Improvement Request — The City of Winchester has been in contact
with the Frederick County School Administration regarding improvements at the Frederick County
Middle School and administration buildings along Amherst Street. The proposal is to close the east
entrance, which is an entrance -only, and to shift the west entrance to line up with Fox Drive, as well as
providing a traffic signal, at a cost of $301,500. The school administration was asked to specify exactly
the impacts of the proposed improvements and to bring those back to the Transportation Committee for
assistance in resolving any issues. 2) Comprehensive Plan Update — Discussion took place on two items
in the implementation section entitled, "Ensure Safe Operation of Fire and Rescue Vehicles and School
Buses," and whether or not they should be included. 3) Capital Improvement Update — The Committee
recommended that improvements to the I-81 exits at Exit 310 should be included as Priority #2.
4) Route 522 South Draft Report — Deputy Director, Transportation, John Bishop, was instructed to send
comments on the Tevis Street intersection with I-81. 5) Other — Improvement details are moving along
well for Greystone Drive, Phase 2, Renaissance Drive, and Route 11 North.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Update
Chairman Wilmot announced that the Comprehensive Policy Plan Update is progressing,
She said that both the Rural Areas and the Urban Areas chapters have gone to the Board of Supervisors
for informal review. Chairman Wilmot reported that the Residential Areas chapter, along with the Public
Facilities chapter, will hopefully be ready to send to the Board at their October 13 meeting. She noted
that after that, the business development section will be reviewed and it is anticipated this section will
require considerable work. Chairman Wilmot noted the possibility of the update being presented to the
public around the first of December.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Wilmot called for public comments on any subject not on the Commission's
agenda for this evening. No one came forward to speak.
PUBLIC HEARING
An ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article IV, Agricultural
and Residential Districts, Part 401, RA (Rural Areas) District, Section 165-401.03 Conditional Uses;
Article VI, Business and Industrial Zoning Districts, Part 603, B2 (Business General) District,
Section 165-603.02 Allowed Uses; Article II, Supplementary Use Regulations, Parking, Buffers and
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2687
Minutes of October 6, 2010
-3 -
Regulations for Specific Uses, Part 204, Additional Regulations for Specific Uses; 165-204.25 Flea
Markets; and Article 1, General Provisions, Amendments and Conditional Use Permits, Part 101,
General Provisions, Section 165-101.02 Definitions and Word Usage. Tht.tse proposed revisions to
the Frederick County Ordinance will allow flea markets in the B2 and RA Districts.
Action — Recommended Approval
Senior Planner, Candice E. Perkins, reported that staff has received a request to draft an
amendment to the zoning ordinance to address the allowance of flea markets. Ms. Perkins explained that
flea markets are currently only permitted in the B2 (Business General) District under SIC 5932, Used
Merchandise Sales. She said staff has prepared a draft amendment to the zoning ordinance to only allow
indoor flea markets as a permitted use in the B2 (Business General) District and indoor/outdoor flea
markets as a conditional use in the RA (Rural Areas) District. Supplementary use regulations have also
been drafted that would correspond with the conditional use in the RA District. She said the
supplemental use regulations address parcel size, access, parking and surface material, allowable days of
operation, buffers and fencing, and a site plan requirement. In addition, a definition for flea markets has
also been drafted.
Ms. Perkins said this proposed amendment was discussed by the Board of Supervisors on
September 8, 2010, and, with a few minor changes, the Board sent the proposed amendment forward for
public hearing. She noted the changes were primarily involving buffers and fencing sections.
Chairman Wilmot called for citizen comments regarding the proposed amendment and
the following persons came forward to speak:
Mr. Robert Light, with the firm of Lawson & Silek, said his office represents the Shen -
Valley Flea Market, located at the corner of Routes 522 and 277 at Double Tollgate, and he was present
to support the proposed text amendment. Mr. Light said his clients support this proposed amendment
because it strikes a good balance between their desire to conduct business in Frederick County and the
County's concerns to make certain that flea markets in Frederick County are operating according to
certain procedures.
Mr. Mark Eshelman, the manager of Shen -Valley Flea Market, provided four benefits he
thought the flea market had to offer Frederick County and the community. First, with the recent trend in
going "green" and recycling, he said flea markets have been doing this for years before it became a
popular move. Second, he said there is a lot of re -useable merchandise which is being put back into use,
rather than filling up our landfills. Third, there was the benefit of a supplemental income for people who
are affected by the poor economy; and fourth, the benefit of sales tax revenue generated for Frederick
County.
Mr. Eddie Hodinger, a resident of Warren County, spoke in favor of the Shen -Valley Flea
Market. Mr. Hodinger said the owners of the flea market operate a good flea market and run it well.
Mr. Earl Collins spoke in support of the Shen -Valley Flea Market. Mr. Collins believed
the flea market has been in operation for 25 -plus years; he spoke highly of the Roystons and Eshehnans
and said they run a fine flea market. Mr. Collins felt the community wanted this flea market, especially in
the current troubled economy.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2688
Minutes of October 6, 2010
-4 -
Mr. Dan Lanning, a resident of Stephens City, said he frequently attends the flea market.
Mr. Lanning said the flea market has been a positive contribution to the community and the State of
Virginia. Mr. Lanning spoke in favor of allowing the Shen -Valley Flea Market to operate in the same
manor in which it has operated for the previous 25 years.
Mr. Thomas Snapp, a resident of the Back Creek District, spoke in favor of the Shen -
Valley Flea Market. Mr. Snapp said there are thousands of people in attendance on Saturdays and
Sundays from not only the surrounding communities, but the surrounding four states. He said people
enjoy attending and he hopes the flea market will continue to operate and be as nice as it has always been.
Mr. Tim Hasselback said he missed going to the flea market most of this year because the
field was not open. Mr. Hasselback said it helps with his income to be able to set up in the field and sell
his wares. He added that the Shen -Valley Flea Market is a very good flea market.
Mr. John Brayne, a resident of Shenandoah County, said he has been attending this flea
market for 20 -plus years and he spoke in support of the flea market. Mr. Brayne said the flea market
brings money to Frederick County. He said people attend from Pittsburgh, New York, and South
Carolina, and they stay at local hotels, and purchase gasoline and food here. He said these are all good
things for our local economy. Mr. Brayne believed the flea market should be put back the way it was.
Mr. John Brennan said he has been attending the flea market for 28 years, ever since his
son was small. He said it is a fun place to go and meet people. Mr. Brennan said it is a good way to
spend the weekends and he asked the Commission to keep it open.
the hearing.
No one else wished to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion of
No issues were raised by the Commission.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Triplett,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
recommend approval of an ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article
IV, Agricultural and Residential Districts, Part 401, RA (Rural Areas) District, Section 165-401.03
Conditional Uses; Article VI, Business and Industrial Zoning Districts, Part 603, B2 (Business General)
District, Section 165-603.02 Allowed Uses; Article II, Supplementary Use Regulations, Parking, Buffers
and Regulations for Specific Uses, Part 204, Additional Regulations for Specific Uses; 165-204.25 Flea
Markets; and Article I, General Provisions, Amendments and Conditional Use Permits, Part 101, General
Provisions, Section 165-101.02 Definitions and Word Usage. These proposed revisions to the Frederick
County Ordinance will allow flea markets in the B2 and RA Districts.
(Note: Commissioner Thomas was absent from the meeting.)
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2689
Minutes of October 6, 2010
-5 -
An ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Z;,ning, Article I, General
Provisions, Amendments and Conditional Use Permits, Part 101, General Provisions, Section 165-
101.02 Definitions and Word Usage; and Section 165-201.06 Signs. This proposed revision to the
Frederick County Code provides clarification as it pertains to off -premise directional signage.
Action — Recommended Approval
Senior Planner, Candice E. Perkins, reported this is a revision to the zoning ordinance to
clarify the language pertaining to off -premise directional signage. Ms. Perkins said the sign ordinance
adopted in 2007 limited the off -premise signs to business signs and multi -tenant complex signs, but did
not address directional signs. She said off -premise directional signs have been permitted with a
conditional use permit in most zoning districts since 1973. Ms. Perkins noted this is a minor revision to
make it clear that off -premise directional signs are permitted with a conditional use permit.
Ms. Perkins said this was discussed by the Board of Supervisors at their September 8,
2010, meeting and the Board forwarded the proposed amendment to public hearing.
Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing to citizen comments at this time. No one
came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion of the hearing.
No issues were raised by members of the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Kriz made a motion to adopt the ordinance amendment as presented. This
motion was seconded by Commissioner Oates and unanimously passed.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval
of an ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article I, General Provisions,
Amendments and Conditional Use Permits, Part 101, General Provisions, Section 165-101.02 Definitions
and Word Usage; and Section 165-201.06 Signs. This revision to the Frederick County Code provides
clarification as it pertains to off -premise directional signage.
(Note: Commissioner Thomas was absent from the meeting.)
An ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article II,
Supplementary Use Regulations; Parking; Buffers; and Regulations for Specific Uses, Part 204,
Additional Regulations for Specific Uses, Section 165-204.19B Telecommunication Facilities,
Commercial. This proposed amendment will provide a revision to the waiver provision for lattice -
style telecommunication facilities.
Action — Recommended Approval
Senior Planner, Candice E. Perkins, reported that staff has been directed to draft an
amendment to the zoning ordinance to revise the waiver provision for lattice -style telecommunication
facilities. Ms. Perkins said the zoning ordinance currently allows the Planning Commission to waive the
monopole requirement when towers are located outside of the Urban Development Area (UDA) and not
located adjacent to historic sites. The proposed amendment would allow the Board of Supervisors to
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2690
Minutes of October 6, 2010
waive the monopole requirement when existing or planned residential areas will not be impacted and
when the site is not adjacent to identified historical resources.
Ms. Perkins said this item was discussed by the Board of Supervisors at their September
22, 2010, meeting and the Board forwarded the proposed amendment to public hearing.
Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing to citizen comments at this time. No one
came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion of the hearing.
Commissioner Oates was not in favor of this proposed ordinance amendment.
Commissioner Oates made a motion to recommend denial of the proposed ordinance amendment. This
motion failed, however, due to a lack of a second to the motion.
Commissioner Crockett next made a motion to recommend approval of the proposed
ordinance amendment. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Triplett and was passed by a
majority vote.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval
of an ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article II, Supplementary
Use Regulations; Parking; Buffers; and Regulations for Specific Uses, Part 204, Additional Regulations
for Specific Uses, Section 165-204.19B Telecommunication Facilities, Commercial. This proposed
amendment will provide a revision to the waiver provision for lattice -style telecommunication facilities.
The vote on this amendment was as follows:
YES (TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL): Unger, Crosen, Ambrogi, Manuel, Crockett, Madagan, Kriz,
Triplett, Lemieux, Mohn
NO: Oates, Wilmot
(Note: Commissioner Thomas was absent from the meeting.)
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN AMENDMENT (CPPA #01-10) FOR TASKER WOODS
Deputy Planning Director, Michael T. Ruddy, reported that this request is for an 8.67 -
acre modification to the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area
(SWSA) to accommodate both residential and commercial land uses in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
Mr. Ruddy stated that at their September 13, 2010, meeting, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs
Committee (CPPC) endorsed an 8.67 -acre adjustment to the UDA with a corresponding 2.41 -acre
adjustment to the SWSA in the northern portion of the study area and a change in the Land Use
Classification from Neighborhood Village and Commercial to Residential. Specifically, the CPPC
recommendation included the following:
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2691
Minutes of October 6, 2010
1) The expansion of the UDA (2.41 acres) in the northern portion, to accommodate additional
residential units, with an accompanying residential land use designation. Access to these
residential uses shall be via the extension of the previously proffered road system. No additional
entrances onto Macedonia Church Road or Route 522 would be permitted.
2) The expansion of the UDA (626 acres) in the southern portion, to accommodate additional
residential units, with an accompanying residential land use designation. The southern area of
environmental features would form the boundary between the residential and commercial land
uses. Protection of the identified environmental features remains an important consideration.
Mr. Ruddy said it was also recommended that the net addition of residential units would
not increase the number of residential units previously proffered for the Tasker Woods project. In
addition, the CPPC encouraged the applicant to consider utilizing the B2 Overlay on the balance of the
commercial zoning in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Tasker Road and the Tasker Woods
access road.
Commissioner Kriz, a CPPC member, commented that the CPPC thoroughly discussed
the north area where the applicant had wanted to place commercial and this use will not fit or work at that
location because of the traffic situation. He said the CPPC believed it was best for it all to be residential.
Chairman Wilmot asked if the land use plan adopted in 2008 was identical to what was
adopted in the Tasker Road Plan or, whether this particular area had not been identified in the Tasker
Road Plan. Mr. Ruddy said the area to the south was a part of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan;
however, the area to the north in this particular location was not quite covered. He recalled there was an
area adjacent to Route 522 which was not covered by a land use plan, but it was taken care of with the
Route 277 Study effort.
Mr. Ruddy said he would forward the Planning Commission's comments on to the Board
of Supervisors for their discussion.
Discussion of a proposed amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article
II, Supplementary Use Regulations, Parking; Buffers; and Regulations for Specific Uses, Part 202,
Off -Street Parking, Loading and Access, Section 165-202.01 Off -Street Parking; Parking Lots.
This proposed amendment will provide revisions to the curb and gutter requirements for parking
areas.
Senior Planner, Candice E. Perkins, reported the staff has been requested to draft an
amendment to the zoning ordinance to revise the curb and gutter requirements for parking areas. Ms.
Perkins said the zoning ordinance currently requires parking lots in all zoning districts, with the exception
of the B3, OM, Ml, and M2, to provide curb and gutter around the perimeter of the entire lot. She said
the amendment received by staff requests the utilization of header curb within parking lots in all zoning
districts when not necessary for the drainage of stormwater.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2692
Minutes of October 6, 2010
Ms. Perkins said this request was sent to the Development Review and Regulations
Committee (DRRC) via email and staff received a number of comments and concerns about the request as
drafted. She said the DRRC had discussions about the durability of using only header curb. Ultimately,
the DRRC believed the only circumstance in which the elimination of the gutter pan would be appropriate
is if parking areas are adjacent to buildings and sidewalks with a turn -down curb are used and the
remainder of the parking lot should have curb and gutter.
Ms. Perkins read the revised language of the amendment for the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Oates said he liked the draft ordinance with the revision; he thought it was
appropriate. He said there is another type of curbing, referred to as CG -7, and instead of the curb having
a flat and vertical face, it goes back at a 45 -degree angle_ He remarked it is a little more labor intensive to
pour, but it makes it easier for lawn mowers to go over it and work around it. Conunissioner Oates said
the County might consider adding the CG -7 as an allowable curb and gutter scenario. He said it also has
a two -foot gutter pan similar to the CG -6.
Ms. Perkins said she would forward the Commission's comments on to the Board of
Supervisors for discussion.
OTHER
CANCELLATION OF THE OCTOBER 20 2010 MEETING OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
Chairman Wilmot announced that the Planning Commission's October 20, 2010, meeting
will be canceled because there were no pending items to be considered.
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and upon motion by Commissioner
Ambrogi and seconded by Commissioner Triplett, the meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. by a unanimous
vote.
Respectfully submitted,
June M. Wilmot, Chairman
Eric R. Lawrence, Secretary
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2693
Minutes of October 6, 2010
r 1
_J
r .
`�
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #08-10
gw4�oK' CO
GISELLA QUEVEDO
Staff Report for the Planning Commission
Prepared: October 26, 2010
Staff Contact: Dana M. Johnston, Zoning Inspector
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on
this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 11/17/10 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 12/08/10 Pending
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request for a Cottage Occupation to enable an In-home Day Care Facility.
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. Hours of operation shall be permitted from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday.
3. The applicant shall satisfy the licensing requirements of the Virginia Department of
Social Services and the County of Frederick.
4. No business sign associated with this Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall be erected on
the property.
S. The number of non-resident children allowed at this daycare facility shall total no more
than twelve (12).
6. Other than those persons residing on the property, there shall be no more than two (2)
employees working at the day care at any time.
7. Any expansion or change of use will require a new Conditional Use permit.
Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors.
Page 2
CUP #08-10, Gisella Quevedo
October 26, 2010
LOCATION: This property is located at 110 Marlise Lane in the Steeplechase Subdivision.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Red Bud
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 55J-2-1-44
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
Zoned: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use: Residential
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE:
North: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use:
Residential
South: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use:
Residential
East: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use:
Residential
West: RP (Residential Performance)
Land Use:
Residential
PROPOSED USE: This application is for a Cottage Occupation to enable an In-home Daycare
Facility.
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a special use permit for this
property appears to have little measurable impact on Marlise Lane within Steeplechase
Subdivision. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand
in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards.
Frederick County Fire Marshall: Plans approved as submitted.
Frederick County Inspections: No change of use permit is required provided the existing
dwelling has a Certificate of Occupancy and oversight is provided by the Virginia Department of
Social Services.
Frederick County Sanitation Authority: There is adequate water and sewer capacity to serve
this site; there is adequate water pressure to serve this site.
Frederick -Winchester Health Department: A food permit is only needed if the facility serves
more than 12 people (staff & students). Please contact the Department of Social Services to
meet any regulations they require which may include a complementary inspection annually by
the Health Department, if 12 or fewer are served. If a food permit is required, please make
Page 3
CUP #08-10, Gisella Quevedo
October 26, 2010
application to the office and a plan review will be done to ensure the facility can meet minimum
requirements.
Planning and Zoning: An in-home daycare facility is a permitted use as a cottage occupation in
the RP (Residential Performance) zoning district with an approved Conditional Use Permit. The
in-home daycare facility is defined by the Zoning Ordinance as a facility in which more than five
children, not including those children related to the people who maintain the facility, are received
for care, protection, and guidance during only part of the 24-hour day.
The proposed in-home daycare facility would be operating within the principal residential
structure on a quarter acre lot in the recently approved Steeplechase single-family subdivision.
The applicant is proposing to have two (2) employees, one now and one later if needed, and
would care for no more than twelve (12) children, ages ranging from eight (8) weeks old to
twelve (12) years old. There were no disapproving agency review comments. The applicant is
in the process of obtaining a license with the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social
Services, but will not be granted until approval of Conditional Use Permit (CUP).
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 11/17/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. Hours of operation shall be permitted from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday.
3. The applicant shall satisfy the licensing requirements of the Virginia Department of Social
Services and the County of Frederick.
4. No business sign associated with this Conditional Use Permit (CUP) shall be erected on the
property.
5_ The number of non-resident children allowed at this daycare facility shall total no more than
twelve (12).
6. Other than those persons residing on the property, there shall be no more than two (2)
employees working at the day care at any time.
7. Any expansion or change of use will require a new Conditional Use permit.
Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors.
qc
cup#08 - 10
- -f Gisella Quevedo
l 4 +
PIN # 55J - 2 - 1 -44
f (Daycarel
* "I s
N
Nk
1%N1 N
Alt
.op 4F 1-10
Q
f'
` /' fir♦ �t;,J _ i
--o-- o 0
o _—
i-
'Application Building Footprints
L.- -A Parcels Address Points
Zoning
B2 (Business, General Distrist)
RP (Residential Performance District)
i I
I
55 31 5J 2 1 32
Note:
CUP # 08- 10 Frederick County Dept of
Planning & Development
Gisella Quevedo 107NKent St
PIN #55J-2- 1- 44 W Winchesnches
ter, VA 22601
(Daycare) 540 - 665 - 5651
Map Created: October 22, 2010
0 75 150 300 Feet
Submittal Deadline D1221 1 C�
P/C Meeting
BOS Meeting
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FREDERICK{ COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1. Applicant
(The
applicant if the
i% owner other)
NAME:
6 1SC Lir'
5.
ADDRESS: t10 Y1AFWS�P— QA WIWC- -AE.`� E -L , VA 22GpO2
TELEPHONE -4Q�-- 349--552(p
2. Please list all owners, occupants (adult individuals as well
as any entities occupying the property), or parties in the
interest of the property:
�UflL-bo I>1AZ- E-t�VE-6AL_ , 6�k 15f--LJ9 S • 00T--NE-h-�C.7
3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and
incl-ade the route number of.ycur road or street)
i10 MtIiZLlci LQ, 22-4�02 �i"�i Ei'L Cit 1SE �t� s�tlfiSiC t.L�
�j�i— C�P_�� l.;�c7� '+Z-Ci�Tj , t��E:�'•i' G� ��1 �-H l �`.1`'Cs�J 'u i.._�D , `�1�1 iC t.. �E�Gii1�
� rE, �T C��O M�i2 L1S� Llai
4. The property has a road frontage of F3 0 feet and a
depth of 15a feet and consists of acres.
(Please be exact)
--5. The property is owned byf,a,�L,Ict3�tias
evidenced by deed from �YWi�is� C P T -14C recorded
(previous owner)
in deed book no. -�Z)-40OGa333 on page (,q3 as recorded in the
records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of
Frederick.
6. Tax (Parc.e, Identification (I. D.) No. t-1�1P�j� , $
j E 'a sEef,ial District goD
Zoic ing RF
OCT 1 8 2010
7. Adjoining Property:
9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed:
10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent
to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested
use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by
mail of this application:
NAME CHIAffUrTA ADDRESS 112 t I�1�L1 f li luii�Gtt .``�
PROPERTY ID# 1-1i��# 553' 2 1 43
NAME E:" z45 tr:�iH ADDRESS 108 W4gtLL15� LI -1. WI
2Zrvo2
PROPERTY 2 l `E5
NAME
PROPERTY ID#
NAME
PROPERTY ID#.
NAME
PROPERTY ID#
NAME
PROPERTY ID#
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
USE
ZONING
North
► 1-
'Fl?
East
P_0fl.�
KP
South
1P
West
\4AC-* --r L -OT"
*:P
-8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Plamling Dept. before completing)
' f) H i L
+AO ME. SLI A E.
9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed:
10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent
to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested
use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by
mail of this application:
NAME CHIAffUrTA ADDRESS 112 t I�1�L1 f li luii�Gtt .``�
PROPERTY ID# 1-1i��# 553' 2 1 43
NAME E:" z45 tr:�iH ADDRESS 108 W4gtLL15� LI -1. WI
2Zrvo2
PROPERTY 2 l `E5
NAME
PROPERTY ID#
NAME
PROPERTY ID#.
NAME
PROPERTY ID#
NAME
PROPERTY ID#
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing
structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines.
LOT 43
0110 pt L
a otiV
05°
665.41
x �
6' I \ 6' WOODEN
in A` ARE4WA,)( q ` FENCE
r8.71���
BASEMENT
�6� `_ � WELL
bI �
50.13' 09.5'j'
2 STORY
iFRAME & SIDING I \I Nul LOT 45
FF=671.47 68&Do 1 Co
Co
GF=669.64 1 I m o
BF=662.39 w 1
POSTED #110
.97
Cd _ i tioa.u•Y.
so"i;6C
_ :X
_ 01 1 i
to
N 31'49'43" E 60.00'
30.0' 669.63 (
IRF s 670.94
669.57 IRF
J
�'t'761
.r6F'r,
669.57 — -LOT 44
= 667.75
NOTE 2)
LP X69- IW
P-
- � 12,000 SP-
�
g— ',X66 25 BRL �, r
6021
666.67
`
67>i9�
X67.01
l
UTILITY
WATER _i666
VALVES
PEDESTAL
\`665 60
-
1667 $�`
F67.93 ja
�
CI
FRWMDC COUNTY. NRNIA
SCALE 1' = 20 DATE: SEPTEMBER 18. 2007
B
Z
a i3a W
Patton Harris Rust A Assaciates
Engineers_ Surveyors. Planners, Landscape Architects.
J_
6971
X 687.84 I
__
,
668.22
k
LOT 43
0110 pt L
a otiV
05°
665.41
x �
6' I \ 6' WOODEN
in A` ARE4WA,)( q ` FENCE
r8.71���
BASEMENT
�6� `_ � WELL
bI �
50.13' 09.5'j'
2 STORY
iFRAME & SIDING I \I Nul LOT 45
FF=671.47 68&Do 1 Co
Co
GF=669.64 1 I m o
BF=662.39 w 1
POSTED #110
.97
Cd _ i tioa.u•Y.
so"i;6C
_ :X
_ 01 1 i
to
30.0' 669.63 (
MiSTELOWR LANE
s89_39 C/o I 1 a
C,DNC a
(54' RIIN,)
S
PORCHSRL
l
NOTE 2)
LP X69- IW
WATER ESMT
ZHOUSE
2 _ s�9Y 667�26/ / GAS VALVES
666.67
H O.P -�
67>i9�
LOT 44
® WIM —'— •
r
UTILITY
WATER _i666
VALVES
PEDESTAL
665 85 IRF
x66t3-i� X6 _
D*" UIL-01W CONC S1W ; `
-
MA ASE
MiSTELOWR LANE
54' RIW)
(54' RIIN,)
(PER SL18DIWS-10N
PLAT—SEE
NOTE 2)
ZHOUSE
LOCATION AND AS -BUILT SURVEY
H O.P -�
LLJ Q
C
LOT 44
C
� -.
S7E�Pt EC HAW
RED BUD MIAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Q
o
�
CI
FRWMDC COUNTY. NRNIA
SCALE 1' = 20 DATE: SEPTEMBER 18. 2007
B
Z
a i3a W
Patton Harris Rust A Assaciates
Engineers_ Surveyors. Planners, Landscape Architects.
117 East Piccudilly SU t
Winehoaker, Virginia 22601
tom,
T+A
12. Additional comments, if any:
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body
of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the
sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at
least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after
the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit
authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or
Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be
conducted.
Signature of Applicant Ll
Signature of Owner
Owners' Mailing Address I t O N A ZLIs—c— W
Owners' Telephone No. -4C32S- 25� -55
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR:
USE CODE:
RENEWAL DATE:
•
C
•
COUNTY of FREDERICK
IJepartn?eni of Planning and Development
54.01665-5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Director �✓�
RE: 2010 Comprehensive Plan Update
Planning Commission Update
"-_)A'1 !+ : November 1, 2010
Staff will take this opportunity to provide the Planning Commission with an Update on the 2010-
2030 Update to the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. This discussion item will also help
publicize a public informational and input meeting that is anticipated to be held on December 7,
2010 at the Frederick County Office Building. The purpose of this meeting will be to present to the
public for their information, the 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan, and to seek additional input from
the public.
In recent months, a small group of volunteers has been working with the chapter updates that were
prepared by the individual Working Groups. The Working Group Chapters have been edited and
compiled and then distributed to the Board of Supervisors for additional input. Feedback on the
Working Group's draft chapters from the Board at this point in the update process will be invaluable.
A feedback form has been used which is aimed at determining several items: if the Chapter met the
Chapter Format, if the Chapter was fluent, did the Chapter carry a positive tone, were there elements
of the Chapter topic that had been missed, have the issues been addressed, and if there was anything
that should be added to the Chapter.
The following draft chapters from the 2010 Update of the Comprehensive Plan have been forwarded
to the Board: Urban, Rural, Residential Development, Public Facilities, and Business Development.
Previously, the Historic Resources and Natural Resource Chapters had been reviewed. The balance
of the 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan Update is being completed by Staff in conjunction with the
working groups.
Please contact either myself or June Wilmot, Chairman of the Frederick County Planning
Commission, if you have any questions.
MTR/bad
107 North _pert Street, ; ni e 202 , Vllnchester, Vir insa 22001-5000