Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PC 12-15-04 Meeting Agenda
AGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building Winchester, Virginia December 15, 2004 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) November 3, 2004 and November 17, 2004 Minutes ...................................................... (A) 2) Committee Reports.................................................................................................. (no tab) 3) Citizen Comments.................................................................................................... (no tab) PUBLIC HEARING 4) Conditional Use Permit #24-04 of Shenandoah Mobile Company, for a telecommunications facility. This property is located at 226 Stoney Hill Road (Route 688) and is identified with Property Identification Number 28-A-165 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Mr. Cheran ...................................................................................................................... (B) PUBLIC MEETING 5) Waiver Request for Hilda Maye Meadows, for an exception to the minimum entrance spacing requirements. The property is located on the north side of Apple Valley Road (Route 652), 0.25 miles west of Valley Pike (the Route I 1 and Route 652 intersection), and is identified with Property Identification Number 63 -A -52A, in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Ms. Mills......................................................................................................................... (C) DISCUSSION 5) 2005 — 2006 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Mrs. Eddy........................................................................................................................ (D) 6) Other t • • MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North. Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on November 3, 2004. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Pat Gochenour, Red Bud District; Marie F. Straub, Red Bud District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; John K Light, Stonewall District; Cordell Watt, Back Creek District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Gary Dove, Board of Supervisors' Liaison; Barbara Van Osten, Board of Supervisors' Liaison; and Lawrence R Ambrogi, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: William C. Rosenberry, Shawnee District STAFF PRESENT: Eric R. Lawrence, Planning Director; Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Triplett, the minutes of October 6, 2004 were unanimously approved as presented. COMMITTEE REPORTS Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) — 10/21/04 Mtg. Commissioner Unger reported that the DRRS discussed at great length possible changes to the ordinance regarding flex tech. He said that this discussion was initiated by a request from Mr. John Lewis of Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. Commissioner Unger said that a totally satisfactory solution was not reached and the DRRS will be forwarding that discussion to the Commission for its input. Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1405 Draft Minutes of November 3, 2004 -2 - Comprehensive Plans & Prollrams Subcommittee (CPPS) Commissioner Light reported that the CPPS is conducting the stakeholder and public input meetings for the Rural Areas Study. He reported that the CPPS will meet with the Top of Virginia Building Association on Thursday, November 4, and public comment sessions are scheduled for Tuesday, November 9, at Stonewall Elementary School, Monday, November 15, at Frederick County Middle School, and Tuesday, November 16, at Indian Hollow Elementary School. Commissioner Light added that the CPPS will also meet next week to discuss the Capital Improvements Plan. PUBLIC HEARING Request submitted by Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, Inc. to include approximately 178 acres of land into the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The properties are located on the west side of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522), south of Tasker Road, adjacent to the Eastgate Commerce Center. The subject properties are identified by P.I.N.s 76-A-42, 76-A-53, 76 -A -53G, 87-A-31, 87-A-34, 87 -A -34B, 87 -A - 34A,87 -A -35,87-A-36, 87-A-37, 76 -A -53E, 76 -A -53F,76 -A -53A, and 76 -A -48A in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Action — Recommended Approval Senior Planner, Susan K. Eddy, reported that the application before the Commission is a Comprehensive Policy Plan amendment request to expand the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) by approximately 178 acres. She said the subject parcels are in a number of zoning districts including MI, B3, B2, which are in industrial and business uses, and a few parcels are zoned RA and are in agricultural use. She said that none of the parcels are included in any of the small study area land use plans included in the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. Planner Eddy explained that the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) already serves much of this area and has indicated they would be able to serve the subject parcels with public water and sewer. Planner Eddy commented that the applicant has indicated that he would be seeking a rezoning to business use for the properties east of the Eastgate Commerce Center and west of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522). She advised that entrances to the subject properties east of the Eastgate Commerce Center should not be located on Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522), but access to the subject sites should be from Maranto Manor Drive, which currently accesses the Home Depot site. Planner Eddy continued, recalling that when this application was considered as a discussion item, the applicant had identified a different SWSA boundary than the staff. She said the staff was not able to find a record that the SWSA boundary had been expanded to include the Home Depot site and the entire Eastgate Commerce Center, however, the staff is aware that some of this area is already served by sewer and water. She said the staff is proposing a slightly different boundary line and includes the parcels requested by the applicant to remove any uncertainty of the SWSA boundaries. Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1406 Draft Minutes of November 3, 2004 -3 - In conclusion, Planner Eddy stated that the CPPS (Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee) considered this request at their meeting of September 13, 2004, and was generally supportive of the SWSA request and the staff's suggestion to expand it to other properties to remove the uncertainty of the SWSA line. In addition, she said the Planning Commission considered the request as a discussion item on October 6, 2004, and the Board of Supervisors considered the request as a discussion item on October 12, 2.004. She said that both bodies were in support of the applicant's request as well as the staff's recommendation to expand the request to adjacent properties to remove the uncertainty of the SWSA line. Mr. Charles E. Maddox, Jr., P.E. of Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, P.C. was present to represent the owner and the developers of the Eastgate project for this SWSA expansion request. Mr. Maddox stated that the origin of this project was in the 1980s with the build-up of industrial development in the Warren County area along Rt. 522. Mr. Maddox recalled that Frederick County acknowledged at that time their desire to be in on the potential utilization of the Inland Port facility in Warren County and the Eastgate property was a good location. Mr. Maddox said that later on, Tasker Road was planned through this site and the developers helped with the financial backing to provide the road. Mr. Maddox continued, stating that the road that provides industrial access to the Home Depot Distribution Warehouse Facility goes through the RA -zoned portion of the property and forms an industrial - commercial corner with Rt. 522, which is a major signalized intersection in Frederick County. Mr. Maddox explained that they are seeking action on this SWSA expansion in order to properly file a rezoning request for property on sewer and water. Chairman DeHaven called for citizen comment; however, no one came forward to speak. Commissioner Thomas stated that he was a member of the Commission when the Eastgate commercial area was rezoned and it was certainly the Commission's intent at that time for this entire property to be included within the SWSA; therefore, he made a motion to recommend approval. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kriz and was unanimously passed. BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of the request submitted by Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates to include approximately 178 acres of land, located on the west side of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522), south of Tasker Road, adjacent to the Eastgate Commerce Center, into Frederick County's Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE, SECTION 165-50, TO INCLUDE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES OFFICE USE IN THE RA (RURAL AREAS) ZONING DISTRICT. Action — Recommended Approval Zoning Administrator, Mark R Cheran, stated that the Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) discussed adding local government services office use a permitted use in the RA Zoning District at their meeting of September 23, 2004. Administrator Cheran stated that Section 165-50 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance currently allows schools, post offices, fire and rescue stations, and public utilities. He explained that local government services offices would be owned, leased, or operated by Frederick Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1407 Draft Minutes of November 3, 2004 -4— County for services to the public in general. He added that both the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors discussed this amendment and both bodies were in support of adding the definition of local government services office to the ordinance and including local government services office use within Section 165-50 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. Commission. Chairman DeHaven called for public comment; however; no one came forward to address the No issues were raised by the Commission and they believed the amendment to be appropriate. Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Kriz, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of an ordinance to amend the Frederick County Code, Section 165-50, to include local government services office use in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. OTHER PRESENTATION ON FREDERICK COUNTY'S RURAL AREAS STUDY Senior Planner, Susan K. Eddy, gave the Planning Commission a shortened version of the Rural Areas Study presentation that she normally provides at the public comment sessions for the rural areas study. She said that approximately one year ago the Board of Supervisors requested that the Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) begin a study of the rural areas. She reported a variety of reasons for doing the study, including facts that 30% of all new housing in Frederick County is in the rural area; there has been a decline in agriculture; there has been a loss of open space; there has been pressure from new development on rural roads, and there have been impacts of new residential development on public facilities. Planner Eddy said that ultimately, the end product of the study will be new policies for the rural area in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Planner Eddy next proceeded with her presentation, describing the three separate land development options proposed along with proposed densities. Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1408 Draft Minutes of November 3, 2004 -5 - ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the Planning Commission adjourned by a unanimous vote at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Eric R Lawrence, Secretary Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1409 Draft Minutes of November 3, 2004 MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on November 17, 2004. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Pat Gochenour, Red Bud District; Marie F. Straub, Red Bud District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District;; Cordell Watt, Back Creek District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Gary Dove, Board of Supervisors' Liaison; Barbara Van Osten, Board of Supervisors' Liaison; and Lawrence R Ambrogi, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: William C. Rosenberry, Shawnee District; John H. Light, Stonewall District STAFF PRESENT: Eric R Lawrence, Planning Director; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator; Candice Mills, Planner 11; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Triplett, the minutes of October 20, 2004 were unanimously approved as presented. COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) —11/08/04 Mtg. Chairman DeHaven reported that the CPPS discussed Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) issues and is continuing discussions on the Rural Areas Study. He said the Tuesday morning work group meetings have been well -attended and will be continuing with discussions on the Rural Areas issues. Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1410 Draft Minutes of November 17, 2004 -2 - Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Commissioner Gochenour reported that the HRAB did not meet in November. She said the HRAB will, hopefully, meet next month to discuss plans for reorganization. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mr. Michael Artz with Artz & Associates came forward to state that he appreciated all of the time and effort that everyone is putting into the Rural Areas Study; he believed it was a serious and important issue. Mr. Artz thanked everyone who volunteered their own personal time to attend meetings and for being involved with all the rural areas discussions. ITEMS ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA Chairman DeHaven announced that Item 45 under Tab C, Master Development Plan 412-04 for Easy Living Mobile Home Community, is being postponed at the applicant's request and Item 46 under Tab D, Request for Expansion of the Urban Development Area for the Solenberger/ Bridgeforth properties, is also being postponed because the Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee did not believe it was ready to proceed forward. PUBLIC MEETING Master Dev elopement Plan 4010-04 for Hilda Maye Meadows, submitted by Bowman Consulting, for 20 single-family small lot dwellings on 4.28 acres in the RP (Residential Performance) District. The property is located on the north side of Apple Valley Road (Rt. 652), 0.25 miles west of the Valley Pike (Rt. 11) and Apple Valley Road (Rt. 652) intersection, and is identified with P.I.N. 63 -A -52A in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Action — Recommended Approval Planner Candice Mills reported that this property is located entirely within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). She said the applicant will be providing a community center and parking lot per the zoning ordinance; the applicant is also providing a trail, a picnic shelter, and a tot lot. She said this development will also require a residential separation buffer from all single-family dwellings and this will be provided via a 25 -foot buffer with a full screen. Planner Mills stated that the construction of the new public road will affect three property owners along Apple Valley Road and it will be necessary for two of those property owners to provide easements for the entrance taper. Planner Mills explained that all three property owners will have temporary construction easements through their front yards. She advised that the applicant has not yet obtained the easements necessary Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1411 Draft Minutes of November 17, 2004 for the tapers to the entrance; she said the easements are necessary in order for the staff to administratively approve the master development plan. In addition, Planner Mills pointed out that the public road will create two lots that have non -conforming setbacks for their primary structures. She said that if the Planning Commission believes the layout is sufficient as presented, the applicant will need to ask for a waiver from the subdivision ordinance at the Board of Supervisors' meeting. Commissioner Gochenour asked when the property was rezoned and staffreplied it was rezoned back in 1980. It was remarked that no proffers were involved when the property was rezoned. Mr. John Erickson with Bowman Consulting Group, the design engineers for this project, came forward to answer questions from the Commission. Commissioner Thomas asked Mr. Erickson if he had any reason to believe there might be a problem acquiring the easements from the adjoining property owners. Mr. Erickson replied no; he said they have received verbal agreements and are currently working on the written agreements. Mr. Erickson said the written agreements will be ready in time for the Board of Supervisors' meeting. Commissioner Thomas also inquired whether or not the two lot owners were aware that a waiver was going to be required because of the reduction in setbacks. Mr. Erickson replied that he actually just learned about the waiver requirement today. Mr. Erickson said that hopefully, it will not be an issue; however, he has not yet had an opportunity to speak with those lot owners. Mr. Erickson added that the property owners did see the layout of the master development plan in its current state. Mr. Denny Derflinger, the applicant, said that he spoke with the two affected property owners and he explained the situation to them. He said he advised the property owners that if they had any issues or objections, they should come to the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Derflinger said that neither of the property owners seemed to have a problem and they were not present this evening. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments and the following persons came forward to speak: Mr. Bill McDonnell, adjoining property owner in Plainfield Heights, was concerned about surface run-off water, the size of the proposed lots, and buffering details such as landscaping and the repair and maintenance of the existing fence. Mr. Don Jones, adjoining property owner in Plainfield Heights, inquired if he and his neighbors were going to be given the opportunity to hook into the sewer line that was installed in this area some time ago. He said that if the developer was going to hook into that line, then the existing residents should also be given the opportunity. Mr. Erickson returned to the podium to address the questions from the adjoining property owners. He described the on-site storm water management facility to be constructed per the zoning ordinance and he described the landscaping. Mr. Erickson said the applicant will run a separate sewer line down the proposed street and tie into an existing manhole. Conunissioner Morris asked if the applicant would be willing to add a notation on the master plan stating that the existing fence will be repaired and maintained. Mr. Erickson agreed to providing that notation. Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1412 Draft Minutes of November 17, 2004 -4 - Upon motion made by Commissioner Morris and seconded by Commissioner Kriz, BE IT RESOLVED, That by a majority vote, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Master Development Plan #10-04 of Hilda Maye Meadows, submitted by Bowman Consulting Group, for 20 single-family small lot dwellings with the addition of a statement on the master development plan indicating that the existing fence will be repaired and maintained; the Commission. does also recommend approval of the requested waivers for the two lots that will be created with non -conforming setbacks for their primary structures. The vote was as follows: YES (TO APPROVE): Watt, Unger, Morris, Thomas, Kriz, Triplett, DeHaven NO: Straub, Gochenour (Note: Commissioner Ours was not present for this vote; Commissioners Rosenberry and Light were absent from the meeting.) DISCUSSION DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE, SECTION 165-48.7, FLEX TECH, AND SECTION 165-156, DEFINITION OF FLEX -TECH. Zoning Administrator, Mr. Mark R Cheran, reported that the Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRYS) discussed possible changes to Section 165-48.7, Flex -Tech, and Section 165- 156, Definition of Flex -Tech, at their meeting of October 28, 2004. Mr. Cheran stated the DRRS believed the language of the ordinance adequately addressed the needs of the Flex -Tech use. In addition, the DRRS believed any changes to the Flex -Tech section would allow greater retail activity in the B3 (Industrial Transition) District and the M 1 (Light Industrial) District, which is not the intent of these two districts and may undermine the integrity of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Cheran said the Flex -Tech, as currently written, allows a single user the flexibility to introduce a small retail component of an industrial -manufacturing use. Mr. Cheran continued, stating that the ordinance amendment, which was proposed by Painter - Lewis, PLC for their client, would enable up to 40% of a structure to be used for uses other than those permitted in the underlying zoning district. He said the DRRS does not support this proposed amendment as written and believes the current Flex -Tech ordinance is adequate to meet the user's needs. Mr. John Lewis of Painter -Lewis, PLC, representing the owners of the Airport Business Park, introduced himself and the developers, Mr. Pruitt and Mr. Peter McCabe. Mr. Lewis stated that they would like to see a clarification of the Flex -Tech ordinance and secondly, they would like to see greater flexibility in the uses allowed in the M 1 District. He explained that there is a potential market for large square -footage facilities that do not necessarily have a warehousing component; for example, a gymnastics school with a large area equipped with mats for athletics and a small retail area in front. Commission members pointed out that the original intent of Flex -Tech was to serve as an incubator -type area for small garage -type businesses, which had out -grown cottage and conditional use permits, to move into a flexible business arrangement where they could grow. Mr. Lewis said that those users are not taking advantage of this endeavor and possibly, the time has come to re-examine the vision for flex -tech, if the Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1413 Draft Minutes of November 17, 2004 -5— county wants it to work. During their discussions, Commission members noted that a primary concern was the traffic safety involving large trucks and automobiles trying to maneuver in the same area. It was noted that structure sizing may not need to be the over-riding issue, if there is the ability to separate traffic. They preferred to have retail in the front of the structure and have trucks use the rear of the structure. Commission members believed the issues that would need to be addressed were the parking, the separation of automobile and truck traffic, and the establishment of a pennitteA square -footage range Mr. Pete McCabe, asset manager of the Pruitt -Hazel portfolio, stated that his group speculatively develops in an attempt to provide an environment for the broadest spectrum of businesses to operate in a degree of harmony as broad as possible. Mr. McCabe said that these businesses, for whatever reason, either do not have the capital or do not wish to invest their capital in their own facility or in owning real estate. He identified several segments of the market, such as karate schools, cheer -leading schools, swim schools, etc., who are typically renting armory space or school gyms instead of operating out of their basements. Planning Director Eric R. Lawrence pointed out that the Flex -Tech ordinance applies to the B3 and the M 1 Districts and the scenarios being discussed are M I -based. He said that if the Flex -Tech ordinance is ultimately changed, additional M1 uses could be introduced into the B3 District. Commissioner Thomas suggested a Flex -Tech Overlay District. Mr. Cheran remarked that the uses presented as examples during the discussion this evening are not currently permitted in the M 1 District. He said that an amendment to the ordinance would be necessary for those uses with the amount of square footage mentioned. Commissioners who were also DRRS members noted that the Flex -Tech section seemed to fit the intent of where the committee originally wanted to go; however, if that vision was impractical from a developer's or user's standpoint, then possibly the vision needs to be changed. Commission members believed that before considerably more work is done by the DRRS or the Commission, direction should be received from the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors' liaisons, Ms. Barbara VanOsten and Mr. Gary Dove, believed the ideas raised warranted further study, especially if the Flex -Tech District is not being utilized; they also supported investigating the possibility of an Overlay District. DISCUSSION OF SECTION 165-50Q OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING PUBLIC UTILITY GENERTING FACILITIES IN THE RA (RURAL AREAS) ZONING DISTRICT. Zoning Administrator, Mark R Cheran, stated that the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) discussed public utility generating facilities as a by -right use in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District at their meeting of October 28, 2004. Mr. Cheran reported that the DRRS believed that this use should require a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors more oversight. He said the staff is recommending the removal of Section 165-50Q and adding public utility generating facilities to Section 165-51DD Conditional Uses in the RA Zoning District. He noted that the proposed change would not affect any booster stations or transmission lines. Commission members said the trend they have observed is not necessarily the in-place utilities, but the "for-profit" operations that are occurring under deregulation. It was noted that a "public utility generating facility" could include anything from a water mill to a nuclear power plant. Commissioners believed the County Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1414 Draft Minutes of November 17, 2004 I: should have the ability to make decisions on where these facilities would be located on a case-by-case basis. They agreed that some degree of control was necessary; however, a conditional use permit may not be the appropriate vehicle. The possibility of a "public utility generating facility permit" was raised. Planning Director Eric R Lawrence suggested the possibility of using the CUP, for example, in the case of a farmer who wanted to erect several small wind mills and, subsequently, through the definition, it could be stated that the CUP would not be used for the large-scale generators. He said the large-scale generators would not be allowed in the County unless one of the SIC codes were amended to allow the facility in an industrial district. Commission members strongly supported further discussion on this issue. OTHER 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION ANNUAL RETREAT Planning Director Eric R Lawrence announced that the Planning Commissioners' 2005 Annual Retreat has been scheduled for Saturday, February 5, 2005. Director Lawrence requested that the Commissioners forward their suggestions for topics of discussion to the staff over the next couple weeks, so the staff can incorporate those issues into the agenda. LARGE PARCELS LAND -OWNERS' MEETING Chairman DeHaven announced there will be a meeting for the Large Parcels Land Owners concerning the Rural Areas Study on Thursday evening, November 18, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room. Chairman DeHaven encouraged everyone to attend and to participate. ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the Planning Commission adjourned by a unanimous vote at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Eric R Lawrence, Secretary Fredrick County Planning Commission Page 1415 Draft Minutes of November 17, 2004 �GX ' COCr CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #24-04 s SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY Staff Report for the Planning Commission s Prepared: November 29, 2004 Staff Contact: Mark Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also he useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/15/04 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/12/05 Pending LOCATION: This subject property is located at 226 Stoney I-1111 Road (Route 688). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 28-A-165 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT' USE: RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District Land Use: Residential and Agricultural ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District Land Use: Residential and Agricultural PROPOSED USE: 199 Foot -Commercial Telecommunications facility REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dent. of Transportation: The application for site plan for this property appears to have no measurable impact on Rt. 688, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Present entrance is adequate for proposed improvements. Should business ever expand in the future, entrance may need to be upgraded. CUP #24-04, Shenandoah Mobile Company November 29, 2004 Page 2 Fire Marshal: Emergency vehicle access must be maintained for the maximum width of the roadway and a vertical clearance of 13.5 feet over the entire width. Plan approval recommended. Inspections Department: Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, Use Group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code/2000. Structure plans submitted for permit application shall be sealed by a Va. Licensed Design Professional. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17, Special Inspections, for this type structure, soils, concrete, bolts, etc. Winchester Regional Airport: The Winchester Regional Airport has had your proposed Conditional Use Permit request reviewed by their engineering firm Delta Airport Consultants. Based on the information provided in your site plans, Delta determined that the tower is located 9.95 nautical miles along the extended Runway 32 centerline. The base elevation is approximately 900' MSL with a total tower height of approximately 1.199' MSL. The top of the tower is outside the approach surface and below the Part 77 surfaces of the Winchester Regional Airport and should not have an impact on safe and efficient operations. The tower site does lie about four nautical miles northwest of a private airstrip in Gore but should not impact operations at that airstrip either. We have also reviewed the comments on the Federal Aviation Administration's Aeronautical Study No. 2004 -AEA -2518 -OE which indicates that while the proposed tower does not exceed obstruction standards as a hazard to air navigation, it would be located within or near a military training area and/or route. Given the information provided to us by our engineering firm and based on the information in the study by the FAA, we offer the following comment. 1. Towers over 200 feet AGL are required by the FAA to be lighted, for additional safety and since this tower is at 199 AGL, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority is requesting the proposed structure to be marked, lighted and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460- 1K Change 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting. Planning and Zoning: The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for commercial telecommunication facilities in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance specifies that a commercial telecommunication facility may be permitted provided that residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas, and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. Furthermore, additional performance standards shall apply to the CUP review in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties. This proposed 199 - foot monopole -type commercial telecommunication facility is located outside of the Urban Development Area (UDA), and will not have any significant impacts on the surrounding properties Background: The applicant has provided an inventory of existing telecommunication facilities in the area, and staff would concur that there are no existing facilities or appropriate structures available for collation in this general area. The maps provided within the application, analyzing coverage need in this area, appear to be sufficient to determine the adequacy of the search area, and the existing CUP #24-04, Shenandoah Mobile Company November 29, 2004 Page 3 coverage and capacity of the licensee holder in the vicinity of the proposed facility. As shown on the maps, the coverage needs will be met by a facility at this location. The applicant proposes to build a 199 -foot monopole -type telecommunication facility that is designed to accommodate commercial telecommunication carriers. This proposed commercial telecommunication facility will be in conformance with Section 704 of the Telecommunication Act of 1996. In evaluating this application, it has been demonstrated that there is a need for the infrastructure within this area of the County as identified. Site Plan: The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires a minor site plan for new commercial telecommunication facilities. This site plan will address the location. A certified Virginia engineer shall provide verification that the tower is designed, and will be constructed in a manner that, should the tower collapse for any reason, the collapsed tower will be contained in an area around the tower, with a radius equal to or lesser than the setback, measured from the center line of the base of the tower. All building setbacks will be determined at site plan review. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 12-01-04 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff believes that this application for a commercial telecommunication facility has adequately addressed the requirements of Section 165-48.6 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance in that a need for this facility, based on a lack of coverage and capacity in this part of Frederick County, has been demonstrated. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of this application, the following conditions of approval would be appropriate: 1. All Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requirements and review agency comments shall be addressed and complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for co -locating personal wireless services providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, than the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. The current telecommunications tower must be removed prior to site plan and building permit approval 7. A certified Virginia engineer shall provide verification that the tower is designed, and will be constructed in a manner that, should the tower collapse for any reason, the collapsed tower will be contained in an area around the tower, with a radius equal to or lesser than the setback, measured from the center line of the base of the tower. CUP# 24 - 04 - Shenandoah Mobile Co. (28 - A -165) 0 300 600 1,200 1,800 Feet Frederick County Communication Towers ®ECEaVE J NOY 5 2004 Submittal Deadline [ o �`c� coti P/C Meeting '? - BOS Meeting FREDERICK COUNTY ..M APUMW=C ;:&NCON ITIONAL USE - PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the owner _ X other) NAME: SkC'JANz0"q14 MGb:IE C-ten,4tJ ADDRESS: JLY , D • 'ga x z c, Ec�..v �.z V4- Z 2-6 Z-� TELEPHONE S'YO - i y_ 3 mg 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: WAA.XZ l.,, &tkG k4w1 cT,4 C, rc-11E: fir`, 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) 26 �►hw(y �� � �7u? . V¢ 22 _3 5-72 4206 37 is tc--,-, c4 z� 7 0io �Z�?��.CR�'��f� ���� e.�h� �sC� m��E . Z1 �.� i� � �' t�,rsd� . � c�r� l £fit �A..u✓r � �l'��� fYI'�'� ANS up 7KAXI Rogb '�o <I%. 4. The property has a road frontage of 37Z feet and a depth of 400$--- feet and consists of IZI , 940 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by AlFnvcY � • Ad, 4r k'rw;,r,0 C. 'Rock T,,, as evidenced by deed from &4 �� S°2 recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. 3 e Q on page s 7 9 as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. Tax(Parcel)Identification (I.D.)No. Magisterial District GAiln 1she'.' T Current zoning 7. Adjoining Property: USE ZONING North bC,-F,-,4, East "-9rw4QAL South 4Pu/, I- P, A _ West r -.-,+L-941-1 5. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before Completing)- /00 ompleting) o A- min.e��E G mr;t'[b �n:GE Cr�sys:/2•%�GY�e�aJ p �✓f/IZ)iti.1 Ll 4N� A/�%! tiivJT � S A' ;, G Ail W �! 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: v add 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, ar corporations owning property adjacent t o both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) `Continue he property where beck the requested use will be conducted. if necessary.) TheSe People will be notified by mail of this application: 10273 �c^;aTxrw�S�'C;rz.�•' �:/C� NAME Pr -, Lf (�� � �,�.Ucrra ehn-,u c -s ?eADDRES 5 PROPERTY ID# M)9p 28 - t4 `%6 5/�' � 165q ,� c ,� 1) N,A�tE PoCcc 1C�n,;,;cr C.n� ADDRESS z6, i/•4 X37 - -- PROPERTY ID# lY1�P Z � � � Igo �S`f � /l'c";� F2aorc& NAME / Ams ci,f}2kE ADDRESS 1/,4 z2,1,«3 PRopER.TY ID# 1MfZ6?Z6?-14 i61C %GY cop Nc,27XGu P Prig HAM /a -MU44 , _tS'�?qc �. `� � ����.. ADDRESS &CP -f, V`4 2Z4 3 ,7 PROPERTY ID# 171APZ8 A'L_S" S'T,q3 A4c NAME m2L To n. �1 o ER ✓� ADDRESS 6,:, ze, VA 2.7-G 3 7 - PROPERTY 1D# ,..�.. � Ir5' �►z�1w�a � 6�.1 �rrcE NAME r7u;vi aka, Es�4 ADDRESS _o 2-1- 2z63i _ PROPERTY IDS` NAME' M,�'kCw, �- vel. 4-r' ,4 =, ADDRESS _ wz"Vokfcs r p- , VA ZZ -6 C Z PROPERTY ID#^jp Z8 --,4 - 131 t 13 Z. ,267 so',/5r7- NAME Logf- -cj WAAA ADDRESS PROPERTY IDS` AP z61 - l2 1 Z NAME A�%i r a A.� R ��f� r '� C tsAi%'�' ADDRESS 0 2-26 S PROPERTY ID# Mftf zB . jq ' �`Z� f�r'rv6ylV'+4R�1.4 k`� NAME %�..��l..0-C-R , TIZXT14 P J f�rne5 -r ADDRESS J FsTc-.? V:j- PROPERTY ID# MhPz8-19" %6%✓d i�7'1-CrZ NAME V IC E€, G1�/�21 or°T� ADDRESS q 3 XAb �!�„�c 1ST IM ✓.� zz PROPERTY IDI MV 2S'A -1?c�l NAME �tErS ���zr per`, S+e`- ADDRESS ,G'ef, ,4 2r(0-_6 PROPERTY ID#'�� NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# NAME PROPERTY ID# ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. fill -"-146 r__ R,6FE 12. Additional comments, if any: Sl -/;r 'S �`'�n��e7lLy Gomtav�s�rxo`'�' I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Ii Signature of Applican Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address ��A7& /N Erq wCI, reglo AkZ , 64e1, J// ZZ6 3,2 Owners' Telephone No. � V6 --&)2 %�3t TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: P A /o Frc,-r�� C k s Tsni G G/a/�' .y E,2 To � �" 67`1t2&J 7-�� I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Ii Signature of Applican Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address ��A7& /N Erq wCI, reglo AkZ , 64e1, J// ZZ6 3,2 Owners' Telephone No. � V6 --&)2 %�3t TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: E C E� V E NOV MOM Special Limited Power of Attora County of Frederick, Virgin FREDERICK COUNT PLANNING & DE\rELOPP Planning office, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) T I2_ (Phone) , e© -- f77 -/3o`j (Address) 2/ i 5fl.,au4 Y, // ec,46 , ; V,# 7-z6 --7 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. on Page > and is described as y 1qP 08-,4 Parcel: ZxLot: Block: Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: rf l cf C n_ (Name) S -' r'6 Sc 4a---otu;s L4e�.'7Y��r �o�c Sh�,��(Phone) 5Y0--33 -oc,2o (Address) /� /7 W & t- RCVE2�,/ Sf% c_r. VX 2 YXo r To act as my true and lawful attomey-in-fact or and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: Q Rezoning (Including proffers) 4�� Conditional Use Permits Q Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) 401 Subdivision Q Site Plan My attorney -in fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this day of� � o z- 200 Signature(s) State of Virginia, City/County ofTo-wit: 2, a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument and who is (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has ackn wle ed the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this qday of c 004. -_ ; r. My Commission Expires: 2 -jam .2-ao ,5 Pu c Li N, aV '3l1:i. Special Limited Power of Attor County of Frederick, Virginia FREDERICK COUN Y PLANNING & DEVELOY MENT Planning Office, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) /!'v G' �� (Phone ) -5 (Address) 6Z73 c2,s� � K �-��� A Z z63 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (urs), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No, on Page , and is described as mm 28-A Parcel: 14.5, Lot: Block: Section: Subdivision do hereby make, constitute and e point: (Name) vxTE Jn�c�rr �5. LLC CX;r qlt ecru?�t (Phone) (Address)6 To act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting peAsonally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: a, Rezoning (Including praffers) Conditional Use Permits G Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) ¢ Subdivision ¢ Site Plan My attorney in- fart shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorisation shall expire one year from the day it is sigrued, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modifiw& In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this jv:4 day of 200-, Signature(s) Ci of F22�b� 16--r-Tc-1c To -wit: State of Virginia, C a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction eafoozne�sl aforesaid, t��o e person(s) adwho signed to the foregoing instnunent and who is (are) known to me, p pp ac owl the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this �' day of So1200 'f - r' My Commission Expires: �- 3-zc�L c AFFIDAVIT We, Nancy L. Poole and Kenneth C. Poole, do hereby acknowledge that in the event Shenandoah Mobile Company erects a commercial telecommunications facility on real estate owned by us, and the facility is unused or not operated for a continuous period of twelve (12) months, it shall be considered abandoned pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance of Frederick County, Virginia, specifically Subsection 165-48.6 B.(7), and should Shenandoah Mobile Company refuse or be unable to remove the tower from the real estate within ninety (90) days of receipt of notice from the Frederick County Department of Planning and Zoning, we will be held responsible for the removal of the same. This Affidavit is given in accordance with Subsection 165-48.6 A.(4) of the Zoning Ordinance of Frederick County, Virginia. Given under my hand on this c;2- 7 day of September, 2004. (SEAL) Nancy L. Poole Z��Ea C &4 &) (SEAL) Kenneth C. Poole STATE OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE: Subscribed, sworn to and acknowledged before me in Frederick County, Virginia, by Nancy L. Poole and Kenneth C. Poole on this �214-h day of September, 2004. My commission expires: 5 £, 3 o ,, -�-, o t, y (SEPy-) Federal Aviation Administration tooEastern Regional Office - 1 Aviation Plaza -AEA -520 Jamaica, NY 11434 Issued Date: 10/7/2004 Aeronautical Study No. 2004 -AEA -2518 -OE Prior Study No� 2003 -AEA -1098-0E �v V ALAN R PRUSKA SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY �� 124 SOUTH MAIN STREET EDINGBURG, VA 22842 FREDERICK COLINTY� PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure Type: Antenna Tower Location: WINCHESTER, VA Latitude: 39-15-59.93 NAD 83 Longitude: 78-18-4.53 Heights: 199 feet above ground level (AGL) 1097 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s), if any, is(are) met: Based on this evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/or lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, we recommend it be installed and maintained in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 K Change 1. While the structure does not constitute a hazard to air navigation, it would be located within or near a military training area and/or route. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. Page 1 If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (718)553-2560. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2004-AEA-2518-OE. Signature Control No: 395107-315749; (DNE William E Merritt Specialist Attachment(s) Frequency Data Page 2 Frequency Data for ASN 2004 -AEA -2518 -OE LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ,ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 1930 1945 MHz 1640 W 1850 1865 MHz 1640 W 835 890 MHz 500 W 880 894 MHz 500 W 825 835 MHz 500 W 870 880 MHz 500 W 824 825 MHz 500 W 845 846.5 MHz 500 W 869 870 MHz 500 W 890 891.5 MHz 500 W Page 3 WSHENTEL. SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS SITE NAME: BOWLING GREEN RIDGE 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE, VA 22637 NEW EQUIPMENT AND NEW ANTENNAS ON A NEW 195' MONOPOLE (REPLACING EXISTING MONOPOLE) SITE NUMBER: SITE 084 DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM THE INTERSECTIONOF 141 AND ROUTE 37 AT EXIT 310. PROCEED NORTH ON ROUTE 37 APPROXIMATELY 5.3 MILES TO THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 37 AND ROUTE S0. PROCEED WEST ON ROUTE SD APPROXIMATELY 9 MILES TO INTERSECTION OF ROUTE SOAND ROUTE Na. PROCEED RIGHT (EAST) ON ROUTE MIBFOR APPROXIMATELY 1. MILE TO GRAVEL ACCESS ON THE RIGHT. TURN RIGHT AND BEAR LEFT THROUGH GATE AND UP THE HILL TO THE EXISTING COMPOUND. LAT.: 39-1559.93"N LONG.: 78-1804.53-W (NAD 81 PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE INSTALLATION OF PCS EQUIPMENT, SUPPORT FRAMES, ICE BRIDGES, AND ANTENNA FRAMES AND CABLES ON A NEW MONOPOLE BUILDING CODE USE GROUP: U (UTILITY) CONST. TYPE: TOWER - 2C 160 SQUARE FEET SHEETINDEX CDMA081 SITE NAME: SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. INIT. T-1 TITLE SHEET 2 MNT C-1 PROPERTY INFORMATION FLAT 2 MNT A-1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 2 MNT A-2 TOWER ELEVATION 7 ANTENNA DETAILS 2 MNT A-3 SITE DETAILS 2 MNT A-4 SITE DETAILS2 MNT A-5 FENCE DETAILS 2 MNT E -I GROUNDING DETAILS 2 1 MNT E-2 GROUNDING DETAILS 2 MNT E-3 GROUNDING PLAN AND DETAILS 2 MNT GN -1 GENERAL NOTES 2 MNT GN -2 GENERAL NOTES 2 MNT CONTACT: MARK THOMPSON ZONING JURISDICTION: FREDERICK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBER: 28-A-165 DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS N9:: DEED OF GIFT BOOK 934, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. L ANDICAP REQUIREMENTS ILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMANITATION. HANDICAP ACCESS IS NOT REQUIRED. OTHER REQUIREMENTS FACILITY REQUIRES NO PLUMBING OR PARKING. I PROJECT SUMMARY SITE NUMBER: CDMA081 SITE NAME: BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE ADDRESS: 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE, VA 22637 APPLICANT: SHENTEL SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS F. BOX 459 EDINBURG. VIRGINIA 22824-028 PHONE: 540-984.5123 PROPERTY OWNERS: KENNETH C. POOLE 214 ST EY HILL ROAD j GORE. VA 22657 6 NANCY L. POOLE 6273 NORTHWESTER PIKE GORE. VA 22637 ENGINEER: DYNATEK TELECOMM N11CATIONS 435 CRESTVIEW DRIVE TRANSFER, PA 16154 PHONE: 800.838.3224 FAX: 724.646.1384 CONTACT: MARK THOMPSON ZONING JURISDICTION: FREDERICK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBER: 28-A-165 DEED BOOK 6 PAGE N9:: DEED OF GIFT BOOK 934, PAGE 634 AND BOOK 934, PAGE 637 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: GAINESBORO ZONING DISTRICT: RA - RURAL AGRICULTURAL POWER PROVIDER: ALLEGHENY POWER PHONE PROVIDER: VERIZON APPROVAL LIST SITE AC ZONING R.F CONSTR. MANAGER NETWORK -TELCO NETWORK -POWER PROPERTY OWNER/REP FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: DATE: SITE PLAN VALID FOR FIVE (5) YEARS FROM APPROVAL DATE SHENTEL 6HBNAHDDAHM0IRLEOA NDRACARG13 P.D. BOX 659 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 (540) 984-5123 Dynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 475 L_i_ Drive , Tn fer PA 16154 PBwe: MIO -09-3114 Fu: 724N6-1394 —dYnndnelecam.cam NO DYNANO 49N1 PRO/. .. DRAWN BY: M.N.T. CHECKED BY: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS 2 9/13/04 REVISED FINAL 9/9/04 FINAL 0 8/12704 ISAIED TGR REVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN DAVID C. BAUDO BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY H81 Roao GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHLLI NUMBER: T-1 PROJECT e SITE ---\ R 13 2 3 4 t2 5 t. t t QOLT to 9 6 PAY ,amm m No SCJIi 1. Mop 28-A Parcel 1658 Paola, CM1arlas K. Jr. Zoned RA Use: Residential 2. MOP 28-A Parcels 165 and 165A Poole. Nancy L h Kenneth Charles Jr. Zoned: RA Use: Residenlioi Parcel 165 Parcel 165A 3. Map 28-A Parcel 164 Adams, Charl<s F. Zoned RA Use: R,,ida06a1 4. Map 28-A Parcel 161C Adorns, Charles F Zaned: RA Use: Resde06o1 S. Map 28-A-158 Speirs, Kurt Zoned RA Use: Agricultural 6. MOP 28-A Parcel 157 Luttrell• Isaac L. Zoned: RA Use: Agricultural 7. MOP 28-A Parcel 133 Hunt. Cary R. Ona Sheila J. Zed: 82 on Use: 41 8. Map 28-A Parcel 132 M,yheW, Raymond H. and Jean E. Zoned: RA Use: Agricultural 9. MOP 28-A Parcel 131 Mayhew, Raymond H. and Jean E. Zoned RA Use: Agricultural 10. MOP 28-A Parcel 130 Poole. Kenneth Zoned: RA Use: Agricultural 1 t. Map 28-A Parcel 129 Do- Edward W. Zoned: RA Use: A96-Iturat 12. Map 28-A-166 Shug,Or, Antony D. and lis, Lytton Z9nea: RA Use: Residential 13. Map 28-A-170 M,Kes, Cha.l,lte 8. %Stephen SOtler z,aesl: RA Use: Agricultural ft Rq 2s• E69ESS w •+orcss ,3 1 NUMBER gRECTON 01ST LI S 40'38' E .]8' L.2 3 W6Q4J'08' E 299IB9.61'. U S OI'IZ'O6 E I20.J6'! U 5 ]410.18' E ]0.00 LS S 36'1902 W 10.00 t0 N ]Tc0'38 W 70.00' L] N SO'e9'OY' E 70.00 . 1 1 AeES 50. R, OR 0.112 AC, APPROYIWRLT 600' TOW SDBKB INE 23' MONOPOLE (uMR) 'oY' W Rap ren nMutnrw np V w n M �cat�wx�rtc ntU I !anis u� �r+w�.� slror cr r ).)MPoLf N,M ),aiV�r rvgiPss rj'.rV[Kxi-E-OO or Adakgi .e. lef ro. r arses al � sN+f�+vu�rasNlr� r roe naM mn finer .�r:1'ei :09auL�a sb.°see. e BJ uex'4wro 6`"""N. 9°eiiBe:c is rA3EPnrt :"ar E.Ec x r . PraeN�a oar em 4rar BIIw:.v` wrw„°ndaxw mAw.N. a.eaa+ ran i°"'w i a' R 9 N6rTe ; ;r� a s ore wewry a �w �i 4i[ s�inwaas xois 4ri�a b' PNIM r19 _� Na \ \ $ S 31']9'26" W Ra.r i RPRus BaImR vo91E IAf PA9CR 26-A.165 •- 1 I A� a.e 2w Pc. v9 e l�s6n'`u_ oPmts BB6EIH P.. r4 PAesaL 16-A-1 I � sElsbc INE 0 I ' � aun 6MPc I:u 2� ` �E I� Ks 302]9. Ac 'd- (I � r0u4C Eg50N CO4PANy 1 � 3. G9E.,nrpr00R P01vER UNE 1 G� tow sp onu9 ]ea ®xN w POM• NLE 3>z.ss' „I roMR l POel, POLE pal axr Ru Rwp ".. ._. Pw ip roma 5 ]26 W.. ,iW'Re OB. - .. . _ •veusr 02249! N "rC RBB Na NUUBER DELTA CHORD 8RG. TANGENT RADIUS ARC CFWRD CI 2702'08' S aT12'02" E 18.01 ]SAO 15.]9 ]3.06 C2 39'31'00" 5]0'5)']6" E 42.88 ]3.oa PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IrnPV n12 nRlr.FMAl APPRnVPnI RACE AREA ST ,HENANDDAR SHENTEL P.O. BOX 459 EDIN8UFIG. VA 22624-0280 (540) 984-5123 Dynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 413 Cr -k. Drive Transfer, PA 16159 Phone: 800.618-1224 EaB:129606-)]89 —dynareklclecvm <om DYNATFJ( 4841 PRO1. NO.: DRAWN BY: M.N.i. CFBTKEDBY: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS 2 911311, REVISED FINAL 1 alai. FINAL 0 8/12/04 ISSUED FOR REVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OE DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BV NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELA S TO CLIENT NAME IS ST TED. op Q0 DAVID C BAUDO 1187 9 Q�/3/OQ BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: PROPERTY INFORMATION SHEET NUMBER: C-1 SUGGESTED POWER (SHALL BE 12" MIN. INSIDE SUGGESTED TELC (SHALL BE 12" MIN. INS[ EXISTING 12' WIDE CHAIN PROPOSED 195' MONOPOLE (FOUNDATION SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6' FROM EXISTING MONOPOLE FOUNDATION) PROPOSED SHENTEL CPS ANTENNA MOUNTED ON ANTENNA MOUNT _ i i X PROPOSED SHENTEL 10'x16' EOUIPMENT PAD X X X X X X E%ISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN—LINK FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE ON TOP PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN—LINK FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE ON TOP (COMPOUND EXPANSION) r r >;. SHENl'EL ;�HAR�DARM9AR��o�A,M�A,>oHs P.O. BOX 159 EDINBUBG• VA 22021-0280 (51M 981-5123 Dynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES ,05 Cami. Drive T-1 ,PA 1615< Phone BOJ -x11-3224 Fu:T14= ... www.dynalcklelccmm.<am OVNATEK 4.4T P0.0t. NO.: DRAWN BY: M.N T. CHECKED 6Y: C. SUBMITTALS 2 9/13/01 REVISED FINAL 1 9/9/OL FINAL 0 6112101 ISSUED FORREVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN 0 DAVID C. BAUDO . I I" 411 c BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE OB4 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: ARCHITECTURAL SITE LAYOUT �I SHEET NUMBER: A-1 PROPOSED LIGHTING R00 ® EXISTING VERIZON ANTENNAS RELOCATED FROM EXISTING POLE ®SAME RAD CENTER (98') - ANTENNA INSTALLATION NOTES: 1. AZIMUTHS OF ANTENNA SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: OBSTRUCTIONS MUST BE BELOW Is SUBMITTALS CT C2 6' 6• FLC 12 50J 1/2- SECTOR 1-50' SECTOR 2175' SECTOR 3-280' o. CI C2 6' 6' MAIN CABLE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS REQUIRE A }RO C2 2. SHENPARTY 18" 1 5/8" __e�a ERTIOAH PARTY CERTIFICATION FOR THE AZIMUTH k RAD CENTER OF EACH ANTENNA. SHENTEL iy 22" 1 28 MINIMUM OF 75% OR 270' IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION _ CPS MINIMIM SKY VIEWR O IR M SECTOR C - 280' 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE DOWNTILT OF EACH ANTENNA BHBNArmDAx MolrtEcoHMUMCATroNs CABLE CI COLOR CODE C2 YELLOW BROWN WHITE C} WITH A DIGITAL LEVEL. Al P.O. 80X 459 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 YELLOW WHITE WHITE C4 RED WHITE WHITE C6 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PHOTO DOCUMENTATION (540) 984-5123 RV65-19-000P RV65-19-000P THAT ANTENNAS ARE PLUMB. Cl , RADIATION CENTER 195' PROPOSED SHENTEL ANTENNAS 195' MOUNT TYPE LOW PROFILE ANTENNA LOW PROFILE ANTENNA LOW PROFILE ANTENNA PUTfORM MC-PAI?5-4-72 PLATFORM MC-PA12S-9-72 PLATFORM MC-PA12S-9-72 AZIMUTH 50 DEGREE SECTOR A - 50' 280 DEGREE DOWN TILT 0 DEGREE B2 T L\ ynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES SECTOR El - 175' 435 C.mi-D6,, A2 T. -IIA 16134 Phone 100-838-3214 Fu: 724-6441384 Bl www.dYnemNelecom.cam DYNAIEK 4 PrRGJ. NO. 143 ' DRAWNBY: M.N.T. ANTENNA ORIENTATION - I v I oi:ci�� I:�auw rim ntvitw I COAX BEND TABLE 3 GPS ORIENTATION DETAIL 2 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CLIENT NAME IS STRIC ILI PFPHIBITED. PROPOSED SHENTEL GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED ON ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST PROPOSED SHENTEL EQUIPMENT PAD PROPOSED SHENTEL ICE BRIDGE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER 9 XISTING GRADE ® EXISTING VERIZON ANTENNAS RELOCATED FROM EXISTING POLE ®SAME RAD CENTER (98') - COAXIAL CABLE MINIMUM BEND RADIUS CABLE SIZE MINIMUM BEND RADIUS OBSTRUCTIONS MUST BE BELOW Is SUBMITTALS CT C2 6' 6• FLC 12 50J 1/2- CI C2 6• 6' o. CI C2 6' 6' MAIN CABLE 1 5/e' 18" 1 5/8" 225' 225' 1 5/e" 225' 225' iy 22" 1 28 MINIMUM OF 75% OR 270' IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION _ CPS MINIMIM SKY VIEWR O IR M 2 qYI}j04 REVISED FINAL. 1 9/9/01 FINAL - I v I oi:ci�� I:�auw rim ntvitw I COAX BEND TABLE 3 GPS ORIENTATION DETAIL 2 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CLIENT NAME IS STRIC ILI PFPHIBITED. PROPOSED SHENTEL GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED ON ICE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST PROPOSED SHENTEL EQUIPMENT PAD PROPOSED SHENTEL ICE BRIDGE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER 9 XISTING GRADE o+; ,LTH pi D �Ir U DAYB) C. BAUDO N�� IE97 , 4R R BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: TOWER LINK FENCE ELEVATION/ E%ISTING CHAIN WITH STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE ANTENNA DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: --] scut: /� ASG TTIWFR cl F'V ATIt)N q t`Aa3 G B'nn1�In_ crucTiS N c SECTOR I COAX LENGTH (FT) CABLECABLE TYPE/SfZE TR% RX SECTOR 2 COAX LENGTH {Fi) TYPE/SIZE TRX RX SECTOR } COAX LENGTH (TT) CABLE TypE/SIZE TRX RX ANTENNA FLC 12 50J JUMPER I/2" CT C2 6' 6• FLC 12 50J 1/2- CI C2 6• 6' FLCT�2"SOJ CI C2 6' 6' MAIN CABLE 1 5/e' 225' 225' 1 5/8" 225' 225' 1 5/e" 225' 225' EQUIPMENT JUMPER FLC 12 501 1/2 4' q• FLC 12 SOJ 1/2` q• q' FLC 12 SOJ 1/2' q• 4' CABLE CI COLOR CODE C2 YELLOW BROWN WHITE C} RED BROWN WHITE CS CREEN BROWN WHITE YELLOW WHITE WHITE C4 RED WHITE WHITE C6 GREEN WHITE WHITE ANTENNA RV65-19-000P RV65-19-000P RV65-19-OODP RADIATION CENTER 195' 195 195' MOUNT TYPE LOW PROFILE ANTENNA LOW PROFILE ANTENNA LOW PROFILE ANTENNA PUTfORM MC-PAI?5-4-72 PLATFORM MC-PA12S-9-72 PLATFORM MC-PA12S-9-72 AZIMUTH 50 DEGREE 175 DECREE 280 DEGREE DOWN TILT 0 DEGREE O DEGREE O DECREE o+; ,LTH pi D �Ir U DAYB) C. BAUDO N�� IE97 , 4R R BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: TOWER LINK FENCE ELEVATION/ E%ISTING CHAIN WITH STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE ANTENNA DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: --] scut: /� ASG TTIWFR cl F'V ATIt)N q t`Aa3 G B'nn1�In_ crucTiS N c 3/4' CHAMFER 10' CONCRETE 4• TO BE BROOM--------_� FINISHED I r-------� /I4 REBAR 16' O.C. COMPACTED NON ORGANIC II II FILL AS REOVIRED OR II 71 UNDISTURBED SOIL II II 11 IL____—___JI SECTION VIEW PIAN V@W FIELD CUT PIPE TO LENGTH MONOPOLE CAP W/ GALV. METAL CAP FLEX JUMPERS 7 SHENDEL EQUIPMENT 36' MA%. SHENTEL PPC CABINETS, 12 AWG BTCW a a IN 3/4' PVC CONDUIT (ENDS SHOULD RE SEALED WATERTIGHT WITH CAULKING) •1 Zm GROUNDS TO BE BONDED WITH LIKE METAL 62 AWG BTCW IN 3/4' PVC CONDUIT GROUND RING ^ CAOWELD 3 I/2'0 GALV. STD. NOTE: ALl STEEL IS TO BE CAIVaNREO wT. PIPE. ®1111 -ICE BRIDGE III I,�WASM 6' MIN. COMPACTED \ akx? GRAVEL BASE 3E POST DETAIL GALV. STEEL PIPE C, WAVEGUIDE SUPPORT BRACKET 24' WAVEGUIDE IDE BRIDGE CDA% � 3 1/2"0 SCH. 40 GALV. STEEL PIPE GRAVEL HRENANOOAK SHENTEL MOHHPCOMMUMGADON6 P.O. BO% 459 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 (540) 9815123 TRAPEZE e II ALL THREAD WASHER/NUT Dynatek TOP OF PIER BOTH SIDES SNAP—IN FOR CDA% RIDGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD / 415C,a iM Dri GORE, VA 22637 < / Tw fee, PA 16154 SHEET TITLE: Ph-, H00.U1-12s4 FHH:724616 1384 SITE DETAILS www.dynatckulecmm.can WASHER/NUT PROI. NO_ 4847 BOTH SIDES 'YPICAL TRAPEZE DETAIL i DRAWN BY: M.N.T. CHECKEDBY: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS AWG W GROUND 2 9/13/04 REVISEDFINAL LE LEAD FROM WAVEGUIDE TO WAVEGUIDE SUPPORT POST I '9!9/04 FINAL 0 8/12/04 153UED FOR REVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN ' U DAVID C. DO No. 011�! y7 f I" CROWN BOWLING GREE TOP OF PIER RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD / GORE, VA 22637 < / SHEET TITLE: SITE DETAILS I SHEET NUMBER: CANOPY SUPPORT ELEVATION 6 f ANnPY Ci IPPfiRT CF!`TTllnl A-3 1 5/8' UNI STRUT SECURED TO POSTS WITH U -BOLTS 3 DIA. POSTS EMBEDDED IN 12' _/ M222EW DIA. A 3' DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING NOTE: THE METER BACKBOARD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN A SIMILAR FASHION. PPC BACKBOARD DETAIL ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS ADJUSTABLE CO -LOCATION MOUNTING PIPES AS MANUF. BY - -----. _..... �...�-PAI2S-9-72 EQUAL. OR APPROVED 2' POWER CONDUIT TO POWERHOUSE Y POWER CONDUIT FROM METER UNIT 2' TELCO CONDUIT TO BTS UNIT AND Y TELCO CONDUIT FROM TELCO DEMARC O I a I' LIQUID TIGHT FLEXIBLE CONDUIT FOR GROUNDING (TYP.) n PROPOSED 6.. I GPS ANTENNA -7 I N I N WAVEGUIDE ICE BRIDGE I.]2 TELCO CONDUIT FROM PPC TO BTS UNIT 1.-6 ``>Y SHENTEL SNENANCDAR MOBILE NMMUNICATON6 P.O. BOA 459 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0280 (540) 984-5123 2'-1" 1-5' 3—TELECOMMUNICATIONS tD Dynatek SERVICES 455 Crc Mry Drive T f, PA 16154 PM1me: . -S-5211 N. -S -3— Fu 111=1 15 8 4 F-111=15 mvw.tlynMekmlecom.[om DYNATEK 4841 DRAWN BY: M.N.T. CHECKED BY: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS 2 9113104 REVISED FINAL 1 9/9104 fINAI 0 8112104 ISSUED FOR REVIEW THE INFORMATION. CONTAINED IN POWER CONDUIT M PPC TO ' 10' NOTE: GROUNDING LEADS ON EQUIPMENT PAD MUST BE SECURED. 2 EQUIPMENT PAD LAYOUT DETAIL ��o��EpLTFt pF IP, U DAVID C, BAUDO ` J�11187 / BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE, VA 22637 SHEET TITLE SITE DETAILS I SHEET NUMBER: A-4 FINISHED GRADE, AC OR CONC PAVING MATCH SLOPE AND THICKNESS OF EXISTING WARNING TAPE BACKFILL PER ON EARTHWORK CONCRETE ELECTRICAL CONDUIT (MIN. L TELCO CONDUIT (MIN. 3- 3- PVC SCH 40) WHERE PVC SCM 40) WHERE APPLICABLE APPLICABLE ±&TE TO CIQNTRACTOR' INSTALL PULL BOXES ON RUNS EXCEEDING (4) SO' BENDS PER NEC STANDARDS. CONDUIT SEPARATION TO BE VERIFIED WITH LOCAL UTILITY CO. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL D860 NYLON PULL STRING IN POWER AND TELCO CONDUITS. A MINIMUM OF V OF STONE DUST REQUIRED IN BACKFILL. UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL ICE BRIDGE ,-------------------------------------------------------------- / I \\l cu 12 BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE 1 J A ° a • ° ° J ° I .d"'?''SNENlEt (EQUIPMENT GROUND RING) i .d ° ° a , ° d ; ErvANOonNM06¢ECOMMUMCnTgrv6 (TYPICAL FOR 6) 1 ° TOWER BM ° + 1 P.O. BOK 159 OTTO° 1 COOK CABLE GROUND BAR ° ° J2 EOINRURG. VA 22821-0280 ° I GROUND X17 I a s (510) 981-5123 LOCATION OF GROUND ATTACHMENT SPEC. I 16 STRANDED TINNED WIRE TO INSTALLATION • ° d' JJ a , • ° 0 1 I TOWER TOP GROUND BAR 12 BARE TINNED COPP R WIR ° ,, • + ' , J J I , • I D natek /6 STRANDED TINNED WIRE I ° a a ' ° 1 a , J 4 0 S NOEO CAPPER WIRE ° I TELECOMMVNICATIONS SERVICES R TINNED COPPER WIR J (GREEN THWN INSULATION) d ° ` I 915 Gelniew Drive d2 BARE TINNED CAPPER WIRE _ 1 a a ° • ° ° ' , 1 Tianahr•PA 16154 Phone: 800�s1a-J±24 pPRIMARY RADIO ' I Fu 724fi46-Ile4 CABINET LBAR_LTINNEO COPPER WIRE, _ • • BATTERY MOD CELL J9 1 w.vw.dyn.Rlielawn.cwn J /2 BARE TINNED COPPER WIRD I •, ° ° CABINET + ° , a ° J DVNATEIC BARK TINNED COPPER WIRp . ° I PRO]. NO.: 4841 BAR TINNE � ° 1 DRAWN BY: ht N.T. OPPER WIRE \ \ ______ CIfECKED BY: DC.6. METER DISCONNECT GROUNDING ICE PPC _-_-- --_ SWITCH SYSTEM @RIDGE CABINETS 6, _,D- B ,- ,• SUBMITTALS ANTENNA COAX GROUND NIT 2. SECTORS) UNDING DIAGRAM I 2 9/15/01 REVISE. FINAL [PROPOSE DANTENNA(TY,) 0 VOL6/1ISSUED FCR REVIEW THE INFORMATION. CONTAINED IN ICE BRIDGE PROPRIETARY BY NATUREI�ANY 8- DIA.. 24• DEEP USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN INSPECTION WELL P.V.C. THAT ICH CLIENT /2 AWG SOLID TINNED COPPER NAME IS D. SOIL PIPE WITH CAP WIRE TEST LOOP EXTENSION OR EQUIVALENT _ 4 3/4" CRUSHED STONE OR TC EXISTING GRADE :j- EQUAL FILL TEST WELL TO JUZI \ L LoopNW REOF TOP OF GROUND U DAVID C. BAUD. PROPOSED NO. GI IB? PRIMARY' t -FRAME K I I-11 I—I f f—I1 I— 11=111-111—III-1 ( C RADIO BAITER _I'lI1�111�1,II' 1 MOD CELL CABINET 2' TELCO CONDUIT COAX JUMPER _III—I I I_I i—I I I_I I I III=I I I_ I R q� CABINET TO ANTENNAS i ¢ 1 .. GROUND KIT - Oo III,—IIIIIIII $oo 'II�II�I�I,III N #2 SOLID TINNED CGAX GABLE COPPER BOWLING GREEN • GROUND BAR RIDGE I CADWELD J SITE 084 (TMP') 12 AWG SOLID TINNED 226 STONEY HILL ROAD —0 COPPER WIRE CADWELD GORE. VA 22637 5/8" DIA, - 10' LONG CONNECTION (TYPE -GT) TO COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD GROUND R00 2- A.C. CONDUIT CADWELD SHEET TITLE: @ARE TINNED COPPER WIRE GROUNDING 4/0 STRANDED COPPER WIRE DETAILS ETtA1 GROUNDING (GREEN THWN INSULATION) l A TO TOWER BOTTOM GROUND BAR 4/0 STRANDED COPPER WIRE SHEET NUMBER: (GREEN THWN INSULATION) TO TOWER STEEL �� -E BRIDGE LAYOUT 5 ANTENNA GROUNDING DETAIL. A (:R fll rNln rcer u/cT T ncrnrt c , TELCO II POWER 118 CSC CABINET I I PRIMARY MCOABINET RAD I I CABINET $o$$ Y CONDUIT FROM POWER 3' CONDUIT 90' ELBOW AND RISER SHALL BE PVC SCH. 80 (VERIFY MTN LOCAL UTILITY CO.) FINISH GRADE 4' CONDUIT FROM TELCO UTILITY. 90' ELBOW AND RISER SHALL BE PVC SCH. 80 (VERIFY WITH LOCAL UTILITY CO.) 2' PVC TO PPC 2' PVC FROM BTS RADIO CABINET CSC CABINET IGUAZITE 2' PVC FROM-] 500W QUARTZ LIGHT. ORIENT TO SHINE ON SHEET TITLE: POWER UTILITY 2' PVC TO PPC UTILITY RACK GRA E BTS POWER CABINET `CONNECTION ` ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM FE -2 GR� Cit DUPLEX RECEPTACLE FROM ANTENNA 2 4 0 NOTE: NOT INSTALL CABLE GROUND NIT ABEND ANC) ALWAYS DIRECT OUND WIRE DOWN TO CIGBE.7/16' 0 0 JUMPER REQUIRED ONL01/4'0 AND LARGER WEATHERPROOFlNG �y00NITCABLEWAVEAN3 STANDARD CONNECTGROU CABL0CABLEWAVE jWHEN LOGROUND NIT (TYP.) D KIWEATHERPROOFING (SEENOTE) LEGEND ANTENNA CABLE TO CABLE TRAY (TYP.) 1- COPPER GROUND BAR, YX 4'X 20'. HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH NEMADOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION.2- INSULATORS. 3- 5/8' LOCKWAS14 RS. 4- WALL MOUNTING BRACKET. 5-5/8-11 X 1' H.H.C.S.BOLTS. GER BUSS BAR UNTED NEAR/BELOW ANTENNA TANDARD GROUND BAR DETAIL 171 GROUNDMG DETAR. a GROUND ROD DETAIL 2 1 WORK LIGHT DETAIL I #6 AMC FROM ANTENNA CABLE GROUND KIT MECHANICAL TYPE CONNECTION GROUND BAR ON WALL OR ON ANTENNA TOWER DETAIL 5, E-2 OO Oo QOO OO OO ,MECHANICAL TYPE CONNQ O BE USED WITH 04 AW TO BUILDING OR GROUND CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE KOPR-SHIELD (THOMAS & BETTS) ON ALL LUG CONNECTIONS 4 GROUND BAR DETAIL g 4/0 STRANDED COPPER WIRE (GREEN THWN INSULATION) �-3 TO TOWER TOP COLLECTOR GROUND BAR -\ F I BAR SHENTEL SKENANOOAH MOBRE CMMNMCAI)ON6 P.O. 80A 459 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 (5407 984-5123 Dynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 435 C—li— Di Tr f,F PA 16154 Phone: 800.818-1334 Fu: 724d 1&1384 www.dyn�ukt<lecam.w .MAW 1143 PROI NO.. ��II DRAWNOY: MN.T� C.I E08Y: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS 2 9113101 REVISED FINAL 1 9-04 FINAL 0 8/12/04 ISSUED FOR REVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO F_LIENT NAME IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. C RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 500W QUARTZ LIGHT. ORIENT TO SHINE ON SHEET TITLE: EQUIPMENT UTILITY RACK GRA E SUPPORT POST GN/OFF SWITCH `CONNECTION ` MECHANICAL FE -2 GR� Cit DUPLEX RECEPTACLE 112 AWG BCM GROUND ROD �COPPERWELD ,. 5/8'0-10'-0' LONG GROUND ROD DETAIL 2 1 WORK LIGHT DETAIL I #6 AMC FROM ANTENNA CABLE GROUND KIT MECHANICAL TYPE CONNECTION GROUND BAR ON WALL OR ON ANTENNA TOWER DETAIL 5, E-2 OO Oo QOO OO OO ,MECHANICAL TYPE CONNQ O BE USED WITH 04 AW TO BUILDING OR GROUND CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE KOPR-SHIELD (THOMAS & BETTS) ON ALL LUG CONNECTIONS 4 GROUND BAR DETAIL g 4/0 STRANDED COPPER WIRE (GREEN THWN INSULATION) �-3 TO TOWER TOP COLLECTOR GROUND BAR -\ F I BAR SHENTEL SKENANOOAH MOBRE CMMNMCAI)ON6 P.O. 80A 459 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 (5407 984-5123 Dynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 435 C—li— Di Tr f,F PA 16154 Phone: 800.818-1334 Fu: 724d 1&1384 www.dyn�ukt<lecam.w .MAW 1143 PROI NO.. ��II DRAWNOY: MN.T� C.I E08Y: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS 2 9113101 REVISED FINAL 1 9-04 FINAL 0 8/12/04 ISSUED FOR REVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO F_LIENT NAME IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. C RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: g___— TWO HOLE LUG TO BE USED WITH #4 BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE TO GROUND RING GROUNDING DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: FE -2 eTlnTa nc noro 3Nrn Un—rn rnuicn o.�,-,n.. cn... �.m o.., STANDARD EQUIPMENT GROUNDING DETAIL ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS ® GROUND TEST WELL WITH GROUND BAR ® GROUND ROD WITH ACCESS 8 KIT GROUND ROD ® GROUND ROD QI DISCONNECT SWITCH PRIMARY RADIO CABINET METER ON METER/BREAKER UNIT Y CIRCUIT BREAKER GE GENERATOR A MECHANICAL TYPE CONNECTION ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION -- GROUNDING WIRE —'�"— CB INTERLOCKING MECHANISM ABBREVIATIONS AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE BCTW BARE COPPER TINNED WIRE GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM PCS PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PPC POWER PROTECTION CABINET PRC PRIMARY RADIO CABINET RWY RACEWAY TYP. TYPICAL FIGS RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING DWG DRAWING IGR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) ACCA ANTENNA CABLE COVER ASSEMBLY MIGB MASTER ISOLATED GROUND BAR CIBCE COAX ISOLATED GROUND BAR EXTERNAL BTS BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM GEN GENERATOR GR GROWTH SICW STRANDED INSULATED COPPER WIRE KEYED NOTES: lO GROUND RING SHALL CONSIST OF 02 AWG SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE BURIED 36" BELOW FINISHED GRADE OR 6' BELOW FROST LINE, O A2 AWG INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE EQUIPMENT GROUND TO GROUND RING, (FOR LOCATIONS SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A-4) (3) INSPECTION WELL, VERIFY TYPE AND MODEL YATH CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. Q4 5/8" COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD, MAX SPACING: ID'—O' O.C. 05 02 AWG COPPER GROUND WIRE. USE CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION TO ICE BRIDGE POST © p2 AWG SOLID RARE COPPER TINNED WIRE TO SEPARATE GROUND ROD WITH TINNED SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR FOR UTILITY METER (NOT SHOWN) Q7 1/4" X 4' X 20' TINNED COPPER EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR. 08 1/4' X 4' X 20' TINNED COPPER (UPPER) TOWER GROUND BAR. 0 1/4" X 4" X 20" TINNED COPPER (LOWER) TOWER GROUND BAR MOUNTED ON TOWER. CADWELD LEADS TO GROUND RING AT TWO(2) PLACES. QO p2 AWG SOLID BARE COPPER TINNED WIRE TO TOWER GROUND RING (2 TYPICAL) O TEST WELL WITH GROUND BAR (2 TYPICAL) y2 AWG SOLID BARE COPPER TINNED WIRE TO EQUIPMENT GROUND RING WITH TINNED SOLID COPPER CONOUCTOR TO GROUND BAR INSIDE CSC CABINET O M2 AWG SOLID BARE COPPER TINNED WIRE TO SEPARATE GROUND ROD WITH TINNED SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR TO CSC CABINET NOTES: L ALL GROUNDING SYSTEM CONDUCTORS AND CONNECTIONS BELOW GRADE SHALL BE THERMAL WELDS AT GROUND RODS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 30' OR 6' BELOW FROST LINE, WHICHEVER IS DEEPER. 2. ALL INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED. --- ----- 3. ALL GROUND -RE SHALL BE 12 AWG SOLID BARE COPPER TINNED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. ALL GROUND WARES SHALL PROVIDE A STRAIGHT DOWNWARD PATH TO GROUND "IN GRADUAL BEND AS REQUIRED. GROUND WIRES SHALL NOT BE LOOPED OR SHARPLY BENT. T.•6ilu 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF GROUND RODS AND GROUND RING WITH FOUNDATION AND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT. 6. EACH EQUIPMENT CABINET SHALLBE CONNECTEO TO THE GROUND RING WITH [2 AWG INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE. SEE DETAIL 1 ON SHEET A-4 FOR GROUNDING LEAD LOCATIONS, 7. ANTENNA GROUND KITS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY SHENTEL AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. S. KOPR-SHIELD ANTI -OXIDATION COMPOUND SHALL BE USED ON ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 3 9. ALL CADWELD CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED UTILITIZING THE PROPER CONNECTION/TOOL AND MATERIALS FOR THE PARTICULAR APPLICATION. ----_----- 10. ALL BOLTED GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCK WASHER UNDER THE NUT. HARDWARE FOR BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE STEEL. A MINIMUM OF 3/8' DIAMETER AND SHALL BE STAINLESS 11. GROUNDING WIRE SHALL NOT 8E INSTALLED OR ROUTED THROUGH HOLES IN ANY METAL OBJECTS OR SUPPORTS TO PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A 'CHOKE' PONT. • • •—'�—'—'—'—'—'—•—•—•—•—•—•— Il PLASTIC CLIPS OR METAL CLIPS WHICH DO NOT COMPLETELY SURROUND THE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE USED TO FASTEN AND SUPPORT GROUNDING CONDUCTRS. FERROUS METAL CLIPS WHICH COMPLETELY SUO RROUND THE GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL NOT BE USED. 13. STANDARD BUS BARS (CIGBE AND MIGB) SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED. THEY SHALL NOi BE FABRICATED OR MODIFIED IN THE FIELD. 14. THE GROUNDING CONNECTION TO THE POWER AND TELCO SECTIONS OF THE PPC CABINET SMAII BE MAGE BY A CONNECTING A CONDUCTOR FROM THE GROUND RING TO THE FACTORY COMPARTMENT. FURNISHED BUS BAR EACH 15. ALL GROUND LEADS (ABOVE GROUND) WILL BE PLACED IN 3/4" LID 10 TITE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE GROUND LEADS GOING TO BOTTOM TOWER SUSS BAR WHICH WILL BE IN RIGID PVC 16. ALL CONDUITS THAT LAY ON EQUIPMENT PAD SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED DOWN TO CONCRETE PAD. Nlnr rn crn 1 F I .:i'WSNENTEt sx6 Ax MOBBscaw.Iuwunoels P.O. BOX 459 EDINBURG, VA 22624-0260 (540)964-5123 IBJ -- TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 915 C qMm Drive T—ft, PA 16154 FAme: e6U.81b1224 Fu: 7244 6-1184 wwv.dymrcklelecam.c9m DYNATEIC PRO/. NO.: 9841 DRAWN BY: M.N.T. CHECKED SY: O C 8. SUBMITTALS FINAL 1 0 1 8/ 104 11SSUED FOR REVIEW I DAVID C. BAUDD ;�RC7ifl��, BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: GROUNDING PLAN & DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: E-3 95% BASE MATER L. DEPTHS MAY VARY AS DETERMINED BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND GATE LYS' MINIMUM Dw. PIPE. PER ASTM—F1083 (WELDED FRAME CONSTA—In"I E OwCONAI CALV. 2 1/2 DA. SCHEOUL GATE DLA. PIPE LINE POST, PER ASTM—fl EQUALLY SPACED O B'-0' 8'-0' iYP. Ow. SCHEDULE 10 _ GATE POSTS GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINE POST CONCRETE FOUNDATION (3000 psi) TIE WIRE. MIN. 11 GAGE GALV. STEEL AT POSTS AND RAILS WITH HOG RINGS SPACED O 24' a—G TOP RAIL & BRACE RAIL 05^ PIPE. PER ASTM—FIO63 3' DA. SCHEDULE 40 CORNERPOSTS �i —. STRETCHER BAR -` SHENTEL 2HENANDD.W AIOBRE COMMUMCATWNs P.O. BO%459 EDMBURG, VA 228260260 1540) 964-5123 DIA. BRACING BETWEEN ALL Dynatek DJACEAIL ORNER POSTS AND OJACEM LINE POSTS HIGH ALUMINIZED STEEL -NCE FABRIC. 9 CAGE, 2 TELECOMMUNICATIONSSERVICES CN MESH, PER AS7M—A392 435C—iow Drive t 1. CLEARANCE T—Rr PA 16154 NOTES: Phone: 20P236-1224 i.INSTALL FENCING PER ASTM F-567. Fu: 7244 6-1324 2ANSTALL SWING GTES PER ASTM F-900. 3. LOCAL ORDINANCE OF BARBED WIRE PERMIT wwwATnnoNaecom.oam REQUIREMENT SMALL BE COMPLIED IF REQ'D. 4. POST 8 GATE PIPE SIZES ARE INDUSTRY DYNATEIC 4441 PRO1.N0.: STANDARDS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE US' GALY. (HOT DIP, ASTM A120 GRADE 'A' STEEL) ALL FRAMES SHALL BE WELDED. DRAWN BY: M.N.T. ALL WELDING SHALL RE COATED WITH (3) COATS OF COLD GLV. (OR EQUAL). 5. ALL OPEN POSTS SHALL HAVE END—GPS. 6.USE GALVANIZED HIG—RING WIRE TO MOUNT ALL SIGNS. CHECKED BY: QCS. 7.ALL SIGNS MUST BE MOUNTED ON INSIDE OF FENCE. SUBMITTALS 121.9/I3MA IREVBEDFMAL I IN AS E%TENSION ARM WITH 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE TOP RAIL POST OUTSIDE FACE OF FENCING /2 AWG BCW CABLE TO GBEE %2 AwG BCW GDWELD (ttP.) NOTE: RING GROUND12 AWG 8CW (MIN 18' BELOW ROUGH GRADE) 1. THE /2 AWG, BCW, FROM THE RING GROUND SHALL BE CADWELDEG TD THE POST A9GVE GRADE. 2. BOND EACH HORIZONTAL POLE/BRACE TO EACH OTHER ANO TO FACN VERTICAL POLE BONDED TO THE EXTERIOR GROUND MHO 3. GTE JUMPER STALL BE /4/0 AWG WELDING CABLE OR FLEXIBLE COPPER EXOTXEflMX; W BRAID BURNDY TYPE BE 8 WITH SLEEVES ON EACH END DESIGNED FOR 4. GTE JUMPER SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT R WILL NOT BE SUBJECTED TO GAMAGINC STRAIN WHEN GTE IS FULLY OPEN IN OTHER DIRECTION. CABLE TO G-ELD EADWELD RM /2 /2 AWG BLW 5`6yS VERTICAL POST LHIIGL POST CONNECTED NOT CONNECTED TO RING TO RING lIOIE: I. VERTICAL POSTS SHALL BE BONDED TO THE RING AT EACH CORNER AND AT EACH GTE POST. AS A MINIMUM ONE VERTICAL POST S -U. BE BONDED TO THE GROUND RING IN EVERY 300 FOOT STRAIGHT RUN OF FENCE. 2. HORIZONTAL POLES SHALL BE BONDED TO EACH OTHER. 3. BOND EACH NDRIZOMAL POLE /BRACE TO EACH OTHER AND i0 EACH VERTICAL POSE THAT IS BONDED TO THE EXTERIOR GROUND RING DAVID C. BAUDO qR/cxrl� BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 Stoney Hist! Road Gore. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: FENCE & GROUNDING DETAILS SHEEP NUM//�BER: EXTENSION ARM INSTALLATION DETAIL 4 1FENCE GATE GROUNDING lIF AppLt(:A[;LET—'T T Cc2ala Wont R.alTNrtT Yic AnTn rn�nr r:. GENERAL NOTES: I. CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TppLS, EQUIPMENT, SAFETY EQUIPMENT, 7RAN5PORTATION, AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL 114E WORK OUTLINED IN ALL THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFtCATIWS. SCOPES OF WORK, BILL OF MATERIALS, ANO ANY OTHER DOCUMENT ISSUED BY SHENIEL LAWS EORDINANCES,CONTRACTOR REWUTIONS,COMPLY SAFETY REGUALL LATIONS. ALL OSNALREGULATIONS, ALL PUBLIC AND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES. AND ANY U71UTY COMPANIES REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES. 3. ALL MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY THE OWNER. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, AND THE CONTRACTOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND NATIONAL CODES, LAWS. ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS AND PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. ANY CONTRACTOR SUBMITTING BIDS ON ANY OF THE WORK IS REWIRED TO VISIT EACH SITE PRIOR TO THE BID SUBMITTAL AND FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF/ HERSELF WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF WORK INTENDED FOR THE PROJECT. THIS WILL BE PERFORMED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 5. THE DRAWINGAND THE SCOPE OF WORKS EXACT DI E14SJONSSANDELOCAli0N5S MAA GENERALIYECTIVE CHANGE N THE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS AND REPORT ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CCMMENCING THE RELATED WORK. ANY MINOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DOES NOT EXCUSE THE CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLE71NG THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF 714ESE DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL SITES SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE Of DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. ALL TRASH AND MATERIALS NO LONGER BEING USED AT THE SITE MUST BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF ON A DAILY BASIS. ANY EXCESS MATERIALS WILL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND DELIVERED TO THE WAREHOUSING FACILITY PER THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH ANY WORK AT THE SITE PRIOR TO A NOTICE TO PROCEED (NTP) HAS BEEN ISSUED AND A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING AT THE SITE HAS TAKEN PLACE. 8. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A WRITTEN ONE-YEAR WARRANTY STARTING AT THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SITE FROM THE OWNER. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A DESIGNATED MANAGER ON SITE AT ALL TIMES THAT ANY WORK IS BEING PERFORMED. A SUB -CONTRACTOR 15 NOT DEFINED AS A DESIGNATED MANAGER. 10, THE SUCCESSFUL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SCHEDULE UST OF ALL SUB -CONTRACTORS WITH ADDRESSES, CELL PHONE NUMBERS AND HOME PHONE NUMBERS, VERIFICATION OF INSURANCE, ANY AND ALL PERTINENT LICENSES, AND AN ACCURATE SCHEDULE FOR THE PROJECT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN NTP. 11. THE CONTRACTOR TO KEEP A COMPLETE AND UP 70 DATE SET OF THE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS. SCOPE OF WORK, AND BILL OF MATERIAL ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES. THIS IS WILL BE REFERENCED AS THE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS AND MUST BE KEPT CURRENT ON A DAILY BASIS. THIS IS IN ADDITION 70 TME PERMIT SET. 12. A NEW AND CLEAN SET OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WILL BE ISSUED TO THE CONTRACTOR NEAR THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT TO BE USED TO TRANSFER THE INFORMATION FROM THE FIELD COPY OF AS -BUILD DRAWINGS TO THE NEW COPY. THIS NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO TIRE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WITH THE CLOSE OUT DOCUMENTS. 13. ANY ASSIND ALL GNS ARECNOTOTO USE E%6RNCE POWER OR OTAMPER WI114 CONTRACTR AND ANYMANY EQUIPMENT BELONGING TO ANY OTHER CARRIER. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THIS WILL CAUSE IMMEDIATE DISMISSAL OF THE CONTRACTOR FROM THE PROJECT. 14. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SCHEDULING ALL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING REQUIRED FOR EACH PROJECT. A 24-HOUR NOTIFICATION TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IS REWIRED FOR ALL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING. A FIELD COPY OF ALL INSPECTION AND TESTING REPORTS AS WELL AS TRUCK TICKETS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE INSPECTION OR TEST. I5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL MATERIAL ISSUED TO THEM AND REPORT ANY SHORTAGES AND DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TIME OF ISSUANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STORE THESE MATERIALS PROPERLY, ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND IN A MANNEAMAGEDR THAT WILL NUUSALEOT VCUEqD THE WARRANTY ON HANDING ANDANY ITEM. IF ASTORAGE ,ITEM I THE CONTRACTORNWILL BREPLACETI IAMT THEIR EXPENSE. 16. 114E CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FURNISH PROPER FACILITIES FOR THE WORKERS ON EACH PROJECT FOR THE DURATION OF THAT PROJECT. 17. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE PRESENT CONDITION OF ANY EXISTING BUILDINGS. LANDSCAPNC. FENCING, EQUIPMENT. WALKS, DRIVES, AND ATTACHMENTS. IF ANY DAMAGE SHOULD OCCUR. INE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESTORE THE DAMAGE TO A BETTER OR NEW CONDITION. T8. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE PORTABLE TOILET FACIUTIES FOR DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. TOILET IS TORE REMOVED FOM SITE WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SITE WORK I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRUB THE SITE AREA AND ANY ACCESS ROAD CLEARING AND REMOVING A MINIMUM OF 6" TO ACHIEVE A STABLE SUB -BASE TO ACCEPT FILL OR OTHER MATERIAL SPECIFIED FOR IN SITE AND ACCESS ROAD. THE GRUBBING SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND NOT REUSED IN ANY PART OF THIS PROJECT. 2. RIS THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO CALL THE LOCAL LOCATING MOR, RO XIIES Tp VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR LINES THAT EITEMIST ON T E E ENTIRE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE THESE ITEMS ON THE AS -BUILD DRAWINGS. 3. IF LANDSCAPING IS REWIRED, SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN UNDER NURSERY LETTERHEAD TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. IF A LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE IS INCLUDED, PROVIDE A LIST OF PROPOSED ITEMS AS WELL AS A LANDSCAPE PLAN ON NURSERY LETTERHEAD, 4. ALL ROADWORK AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 5. THE ACCESS ROAD. IF REWIRED, WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FIRST BEFORE ANY OTIiER WORK ON THE SITE IS PERMITTED. BRING THE ROAD TO SUB BASE CWR$E TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC TO USE 714E ROAD FOR 114E PROJECT AND COMPLETE 714E ROAD AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE. 6. ALL SITE AREAS AND ACCESS ROADS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO HAVE A POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOW AWAY FORM THE SITE AND EQUIPMENT. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATION MUST BE BROUGHT 70 THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. 7. ALL ACCESS ROAD AND SITE AREAS WILL HAVE AN UNDERLAYMENT OF MIRAFI-500%, OR EQUAL. B. A SOL STERILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL GRAVEL SURFACES AND BE AN EPA REGISTERED LIQUID COMPOSITION AND OF PRE -EMERGENCE DESIGN. THE PRODUCT LABEL AND INFORMATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 9. GRAVEL FILL SHALL BE WELL GRADED HARD DURABLE. NATURAL. SAND AND GRAVEL, FREE FROM ICE AND SNOW, RO075, SOD, RUBBISH, AND OTHER FOLLOWING OLLLLOOWIWINGNG GG OR ORGANIC MATTER. MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FORADATION REQUIREMENTS - SIEVE SEVE NO. % PASSING BY WEIGHT 4 100 1/2" 50-85 14 40-75 110 30-60 10-30 jT00 5-20 1200 0-B 10. ALL FILL DIRT SHALL BE CLEANAND NATURAL, FREE FROM ANY DELETERIOUS MATERIALS, ROOTS, ICE• SNOW, SOD. AND RUBBISH. A COPY OF ALL DELIVERY TICKETS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN 24 HOURS FROM THE DEUVERY. 11. ALL TRENCHES SHALL HAVE A SIX-INCH BASE OF CLEAN SAND FILL TO ACCEPT THE CONDUITS AND THEN ANOTHER 12' OF CLEAN SAND FILL ON TOP OF THE CONDUITS. THE REMAINDER OF THE TRENCH SHALL HAVE A CLEAN COMPACTABLE FILL PLACED IN MAXIMUM LIFTS OF 8" AND MECHANICALLY COMPACTED TO A DENSITY OF 9$x METALLIC WARNING TAPE SHALL BE PLACED AT 12" BELOW FINISHED GRADE ALONG THE ENTIRE TRENCH. 12. ALL COMPACTION OF S17E AREAS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MECHANICAL MEANS. LARGER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED BY A SHEEP'S FOOT VIBRATORY Ell ROLLER OWER" CAT LEAST 5 TONS. SMALLER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED BY A POWER" HAND HELD TAMPER. ALL COMPACTED AREAS SHALL TE COMPACTED TO WITHIN 9554HE /3. ANY FILL OR STONE WILL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM 8" LIFTS PRIOR TO COMPACTING. 14. FINISH GRADE. INCLUDING TOP SURFACE COURSE. SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 12" BEYOND THE SITE FENCE AND SHALL COVER THE AREA AS INDICATED. 15. USE RIPRAP IN ANY AREAS WITH A SLOPE GREATER THAN 2:1, ENTIRE DITCH FOR 6 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT CULVERT OPENINGS, AND WHEREVER INDICATED ON PLANS, 16. SEED FERTILIZER, AND STRAW COVER $HALL BE APPLIED TO ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS. DITCHES. OR AINAGE• AND SWALES NOT ORIPRATHERWISE WHICH PEDWIL. SEED AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPUED TO SURFACE CONDITIONS, WHICH BILL ENCWRACE ROOTING. PREPARE SURFACE PROPERLY TO ACCEPT THE SEEDS. SOW SEEDS IN TWO OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS IN TWICE THE QUANTITY RECOMMENDED BY THE SEED PRODUCER. 17. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE GROWTH OF THE SEEDED AND LANDSCAPED AREAS BY WATERING, STRAW, MULCH NET MTD ANY OTHER PROPER LANDSCAPING METHOD NECESSARY. ALL AREAS MUST HAVE SUSTAINED GROWTH BY THE TIME OF THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. /8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL AREAS FROM WASHOUTS ANO SOIL EROSION. STRAW BALES$HALL BE PLACED AT THE INLET APPROACH TO ALL NEW OR EXISTING CULVERTS. CONCRETE; 1. ALL MATERIALS, LABOR, AND METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE ASTM AND ACI STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. 1T IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL STANDARDS ARE MET AND BE ABLE TO PRODUCE THE VERIFICATION OF THESE ITEMS UPON REQUEST. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE ALL INSPECTIONS AND THE TESTING LABORATORY AND INFORM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE INSPECTION OR TEST TEM ATURE. AND • THE TEST WILL INCLUDE SLUMP, AIR ENTRAINMENT. AKENRDURNG EACH POUR OR FOR EACHTEST CYLINDERS. TSOAL OFYARDS IIF THE INDE PWRCYLNDERSSHALL IS OVER BE YARDS. THE FIRST CYLINDER WILL BE BROKEN ATS IF T DAYS, A SECOND AT 50 7 DAYS, A THIRD AT 14 DAYS AND A FIRTH AT 28 -DAYS. THE LAST CYUNDER WILL BE KEPT SEPARATELY FOR FUTURE USE IF NECESSARY. 3. ALL CONCRETE FOR THE PROJECT SHALL HAVE A 28 -DAY STRENGTH OF 4.000 PSI AND A SLUMP OF 5" MAXIMUM D ACT WI1TR THE MIXTURE PROPORTIONS MCERMATER ALS USEDNo NG THE TFORNTHE CO CRETE MIXTURE SHALL AADMIL ORES CONFORM TO THE PROPER ASTM REQUIREMENTS, A. TITE CONTRACTOR WILL INSTRUCT THE CONCRETE SUPPLIER TO HAVE AN APPROVED PLASTICIZER ON THE TRUCK TO AID IN THE POURING AND PLACING OF PIERS AND FOUNDATIONS. S. AIR ENTRAINING AGENT SHALL BE USED IN ANY CONCRETE EXPOSED TO FREEZING TEMPERATURES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EMBEDMENT LOCATIONS. SIZES. AND PROPER ANCHORING TO HOLD THE ITEMS IN PUCE ACCURATELY. 7. THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUPPLY AND USE A RELEASING AGENT ON ALL FORMS. ANY ATTACHMENT TO EXISTING CONCRE TE AREAS WILL BE DONE VAIN SMOOTH DOWELS AT 18" O/C WITH A MINIMUM 6" EMBEDMENT IN EACH DIRECTION AND AN APPROVED BONDING AGENT TO BE APPLIED TO THE EXISTING SURFACE. 8. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE WILL HAVE A UNIFORM FINISH AND BE SLOPED FORDRAINAGE OFF THE SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PUNS OR SPECIFICATIONS 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE CONCRETE FROM ANY ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS: PREMATURE INSURE PROPER CURING. DRYING AND MECHANICAL INJURY IN 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE USE AND CONTROL OF ANY MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO INSURE THE PROPER PLACEMENT OF THE CONCRETE TO PREVENT ANY VOIDS OR GAPS. METALS: 1. ALL LABOR. MATERIALS. FABRICATION AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO CODES AND STANDARDS OF ASTM AN AWS. 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE BY A CERTIFIED WELDER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATION TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 3. ALL STEEL USED SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. ANTENNAS AND CABLES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPER STORAGE AND HANDLING OF ALL MATERIALS ONCE THEY HAVE BEEN RELEASED FROM THE WAREHOUSE. 2. INSTALLATION OF ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ADHERENCE TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. TONER TECHNICIANS MUST BE CURRENT CABLEWAVE CERTIFIED FOR CABLE CONNECTOR INSTALLATIONS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE SWEEP TESTING WITH A WILTRON METAL 330 OR EQUAL AND PROVIDE TWO COPIES TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE REQUIREMENTS fOR THE To RESULTS SHALL BE BASED ON SPRINT PCS GUIDELINES AND MUST BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE. AT THEIR EXPENSE. ANY CABLES. CONNECTORS. JUMPERS. PHASERS. AND ANY OTHER ITEMS OR MATERIAL$ THAT THEY DAMAGE. IF A FAULTY PIECE OF MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT IS FOUND, THE DINNER WILL REPLACE IT BUT INE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO REINSTALL IT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. IT IS SIRWCLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR SWEEP ALL ITEMS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 6. THE FOLLOWING TABLE WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE MINIMUM -BENDING RADIUS OF EACH CABLE: ANTENNA TRANSMISSION UNE BENDING RADII DIAM. OF CABLE LOF1 RADIUS 1/2 2 7-1/2- 7/8 5 15" t-5/8 7 30' 2-1/4 12 36' -,�,. SNBAiTEI SNENAM70AN M088P COhaNMCA1tON1 P.O. BOX 459 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 (540) 984-8125 Dyatek TELECOMMUNICATIONSSERVICES 435Crt ie Drive T & PA 16154 Phone: 800-133-1324 Fu: I24d46-1784 ww.dymm41e1«am.com DYNAIEK PROI.NO.: 4841 DRAWN OY: M.N.T. CHECKED BY: D.C.B. SUBMITTALS 2 9/13/04 REVISED FINAL 'i 9/9/04 FINAL 0 1112104 15SUE0 FOR REVIEW DAVID C. BAUDO No. 011187 y�Ja/o4 qR� BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL RoAO GORE, VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: GENERAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER: GN -1 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RUN ALL LINES AND CONDUITS IN A NEAT, ORDERLY AND STRAIT FASHION PROVIDING ANCHORING AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER AND WHEREVER NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE LINESPROPERLY, ELECTRICAL I. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITTING. FILING, AND FEES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROJECT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS VAIN THE PROPER AUTHORITIES AND INFORM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE 24—HOURS IN ADVANCE. ALL TICKETS AND INSPECTION VERIFICATIONS WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN 24—HOURS AFTER THE INSPECTION HAS TAKEN PLACE. 3. ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL CODES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND STANDARDS. 4. ALL EQUIPMENT, WIRING, AND MATERIALS MUST HAVE A UL LABEL. 5. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE BY QUALIFIED AND EXPERIENCED JOURNEYMEN IN AN ORDERLYFORMED MANNER SO AS NOTATO HOLD UPIKEE THEN PROGRESS OFSHALLCTHE PROJECT. 6. THOROUGHLY TEST ALL LINES. FEEDERS, EQUIPMENT. AND DEVICES WITH MAXIMUM LOADS TO ASSURE PROPER OPERATION. 7. CONDUITS AND FITTINGS FOR OUTSIDE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE RIGID OR NON—METALUC UNLESS ONERWISE NOTED. CONDUITS AND FITTINGS FOR INSIDE BUILDING RUNS ABOVE CEILINGS SHALL BE EMT. SUPPORT ALL CONDUITS WITHIN 3 FEET OF ALL JUNCTION BOXES AND AT 8—FOOT INTERVALS OR LESS AS NEEDED WITH APPROVED ANCHORING DEVICES. B. ALL WIRES SHALL BE COPPER; USE OF ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SIZING AND LOCATIONS. USE PROPER SIZE CONNECTORS PER THE LOCAL, STATE, AND NATIONAL CODES. 9. CONDUCTOR LENGTHS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM TERMINATION TO TERMINATION WITHOUT SPLICES. 10. PROVIDE PULL BOXES WHERE SHOWN AND WHERE REQUIRED BY CODES AND UTILITY COMPANIES. 11. ALL CONDUIT ROUGH IN SHALL BE COORDINATED MIN THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 70 AVOID LOCATION CONFLICTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS. 12. ALL WIRES SHALL BE TAGGED AT ALL PULL BOXES, J—BOXES, EQUIPMENT BOXES, AND CABINETS WIN APPROVED PLASTIC TAGS. 13. ALL BREAKERS IN PANEL BOXES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH TYPE WRITTEN LABELS NEATLY PLACED ALONG SIDE OF THE BREAKER. 14. ALL GROUND BUS PLATES SHALL BE M'.4'x20" AND SHALL BE TINNED COPPER AND LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. THE HARDWARE SECURING THE MGB, AND ALL LOWER BUS BARS, SHALL INSULATE THEM FROM ANY STRUCTURE TO WHICH THEY ARE FASTENED. 15. ANY PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALLS. CEILINGS, FLOORS, ROOFS OR ANY OTHER SURFACE SHALL BE CORE DRILLED AND CLOSED WITH UL RATED FIRE SAFING ASSEMBLY. IF A FIRE RATING IS NOT REFERRED TO ON THE DRAWINGS, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME A 2—HOUR RATING. 18. THE MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT INFORMATION ON THESE DRAWINGS IS BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AT THE TIME THAT THE DRAWINGS WERE ISSUED CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL ITEMS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT AND MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS WITHOUT FURTHER COST TO THE OWNER. T7. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUITS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC AND SWEEPS OR BENDS AND ABOVE GROUND CONDUITS SHALL BE RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL. ALL CONDUITS NOT TERMINATING INTO A CLOSED AREA MUST BE SEALED TO PREVENT ENTRY OF ANY MOISTURE OR FOREIGN OBJECTS. GROUNDING: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY NTH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE THAT ALL CONDUIT SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, DES. PANELS. LINES, TRAYS, BRIDGES. PLATFORMS, AND ANY AND ALL ITEMS ARE GROUNDED PROPERLY. 2. THE GROUNDING SYSTEMCONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE MIN HYGROUND COMPRESSION CONNECTORS BELOW GRADE AND MECHANICAL TWO LUG COMPRESSION CONNECTORS ABOVE GRADE. USE ONLY STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS, BOLTS, WASHERS, AND NUTS FOR FASTENING. 3. CLEAN SURFACES THOROUGHLY BEFORE APPLYING GROUND LUGS OR CLAMPS. IF SURFACE 15 COATED, THE COATING MUST BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE BARE METAL. AFTER THE COARNG HAS BEEN REMOVED, APPLY A NON —CORROSIVE APPROVED COMPOUND TO THE CLEANED SURFACE AND INSTALL LUGS OR CLAMPS. WHERE GALVANIZING GALVANIZING FROM METAL, IT SHALL BE PAINTED OR TOUCHED UP NTH COLD GALVANIZING PAINT SUCH AS GLAVMOX OR EQUAL. 4. ALL CLAMPS, SLEEVES, AND SUPPORTS USED TO SUPPORT OR CHANNEL THE GROUNDING SYSTEM CONDUCTORS AND PVC CONDUITS SHALL BE PVC TYPE ON—CONDUCVE_ DO NOT USE METAL RACK TS OR SUPPORTS. WHICHNWOULD FORMRA COMPLETE RING AROUND ANY GROUND IG CONDUCTOR. 5, ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COATED WITH AN ANTI—CORROSIVE AGENT SUCH AS 7&B KOPR SHIELD, NO—OXY, NOALOX, PENETROX OR DUAL VERIFY 714E PRODUCT VAIN THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO USAGE. 6. GC.ROUND INE ANTENNA BASES, FRAMES, CABLE TRAFA YS AND RACKS, AND ANY OTHER METALLIC COMPONENTS WITH /2 GROUNDING OROUNDTBARSAUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDUN CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CONNECTION DETAILS TO BE PERFORMED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. E ANTENNA ES SHALL BE GROUNDED T THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE HVERTICAL RUN FOLR LCHTNING PROTECTION. AINE ANTENNA CABLE SHIELD SHALL BE BONDED TO A COPPER GROUND BUS AT THE LOWERMOST POINT OF A VERTICAL RUN JUST BEFORE IT BEGINS TO BEND TOWARD THE HORIZONTAL PLANE. WIRE RUNS TO GROUND SHALL BE KEPT AS STRAIGHT AND SHORT AS POSSIBLE. THE ANTENNA CABLE SHIELD SHALL BE GROUNDED JUST BEFORE ENTERING THE CELL CABINET. ANY ANTENNA CABLES OVER 200 FEET IN LENGTH SHAH ALSO BE EOUIPPED WITH ADDITIONAL GROUNDING AT MIDPOINT. 8. THE CONTRACTOR, UPON COMPLETION OF THE GROUNDING SYSTEM, SHALL SCHEDULE A TEST OF THE SYSTEM WITH AN INDEPENDENT LABORATORY AS SELECTED BY THE OWNER. THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE INFORMED 24—HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE TEST. 9. STORE REDLINED DRAWINGS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES IN CAPPED PVC CONDUIT 10. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PHOTO'S OF ANTENNA INSTALL (PUNCHUST ITEMS) AT TIME OF PUNCHWALK. 11, FORM PRE AND SHENTEL RTEST OWELL WELLTOTEST WELL. iSHENTEL DI TO PROVIDENG TEST OMOST RECENT OHM TEST. /2. GROUND TEST TO BE PERFORMED AFTER INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT. CONNECTION TO GROUND RING MUST BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 5 OHMS. ANTENNA SWEEP TEST CONTRACTOR WILL PERFORM TESTING ON EACH COAXIAL CABLE TO MEASURE INSERTION LOSS, AND TO ENSURE THAT EACH CABLE 15 INSTALLED AND CONNECTED TO THE APPROPRIATE ANTENNA. THESE MEASUREMENTS MUST BE PERFORMED ON THE COAXIAL CABLE WITH THE ANTENNA JUMPER ATTACHED AND A SEPARATE INSERT ANTENNA SYSTEM, ON LOSS MEASUREMENT ON THE ENTIRE PRELIMINARY_ MSP, TI : PRIOR TO TESTINQ CONTRACTOR WILL pERfORM INSPECTION OF ANTENNA AND COAXIAL SYSTEM AND RECORD FINDINGS ON ANTENNA INSPECTION FORM.' ALL ITEM$ SHOULD BE LISTED A5 COMPLETE ON IRIS FORM PRIOR 70 ANTENNA SYSTEM TESTING. EQUIPMENT-* QUIPMFNT: TEST EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MLTRON 3315 OR SHENTEL APPROVED ALTERNATIVE. PARAMETER: ALL COAXIAL ANTENNA SYSTEMS MUST MEET A MINIMUM 1:3 TO I VS. FREQUENCIESFR OU N 1 , ALL TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR THE FOLLOWING A BLOCK RECEIVE 1860 TO 1895 TRANSMIT 1940 TO 1975 B BLOCK RECEIVE 1885 TO 1920 TRANSMIT 1965 TO 1990 C BLOCK RECEIVE 1855 TO )880 TRANSMIT 1935 TO 1960 D BLOCK RECEIVE 1875 TO 1900 TRANSMIT 1955 TO 1980 E BLOCK RECEIVE 1880 TO 1905 TRANSMIT 1960 TO 1985 NOTIFICATION: CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY INE SHENTEL— DESICNATED REPRESENTATIVE A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANTENNA SYSTEMS TESTING. THAT VERIFICATION: PRIOR TO TESTING, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL A21MU1HS AND DOWNTILTS ARE TRUE. VERIFICATION OF AZIMUTHS AND pOWNTILTS AO THIRD PARTY. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURERE THATT ALLEDONE BY A T INSTALLED TO THE SPECIFIED TORQUE CONNECTORS HAVE BEENVALUES. DOCUMENTATION: ALL TEST RESULTS SHALL BE RECORDED IN SUPPLIED "BASE SI TIO,Y ANTENNA SYSTEM SUMMARY SHEET', ALONG WITH RESULTS OF EACH INDI COUAL TESTS. ONE HARD COPY WILL BE LEFT AT THE SITE ANS 2 HARD COPIES AND 1 SOFT COPY WILL BE SUPPLIED TO SHENTEL AS PART OF THE CLOSEQUT DOCUMENTATION. R IR D T 5TU: CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE FOLLOWING ON EACH COAXIAL LINE AND RECORD EACH READING ON BASE STATION ANIENNA STSTEM SUMMARY SHEET. OPEN VSWR, SYSTEM VSWR, LOAD VSWR, SYSTEM RETURN LOSS, OPEN RETURN LOSS, DISTANCE TO FAULT. AUDIT: CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT AUDIT OF MATERIALS TO INCLUDE: ANTENNA SERIAL NUMBERS AND MODEL NUMBERS PER IDENTIFIED SECTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD FINDINGS IN 'SWEEP AUDIT SHEET. - PHOTOS: CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE DIGITAL PHOTOS OF EACH ANTENNA SYSTEMSDOCUMENTATIONS CONTRSHALLACTOR IBS ITTED AS REOUIR DPTORT OF SUBMIT/OUAUTY PHOTOS, PHOTOS TAKEN WIN INSUFFICIENT LIGHT OR LACKING IN DETAIL WILL TO REJECTED AND WILL BE RE—PHOTOGRAPHED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. BE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY DEVELOPING COSTS OF ALL NON—DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS. PHOTOS REQUIRED OF THE FOLLOWING: ANTENNA A21MUIN5 (3 REQUIRED, 1 PER SECTOR). PICTURE SHOULD INCLUDE THE TOP OF EACH ANTENNA AS A SIOE VIEW AND WILL BE USED TO VERIFY THAT CORRECT GGADLT HAS BEEN APPLIED TO EACH SECTOR. VIEW FROM FACE (3 REQUIRED, 1 PEO SECTOR). PICTURE TO BE MEwF0 FROM BACK Di TRANSMIT ANTENNA TO INCLUDE THE TOP OF THE TRANSMIT ANTENNA AND THE SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE. TOP BUSS BAR (1 PER BUSS BAR). PICTURE SHALL BE USED TO INDICATE GROUNDING KITS HAVE BEEN GROUNOEO APPROPRIATELY. DRIP LOOP (1 REQUIRED). PICTURE WALL BE USED TO VERIFY THAT CONTRACTOR HAS INSTALLED DRIP LOOP I TOWER. N TRANSMISSION LINES EXISTING EXTERIOR BULKHEAD PENETRATION 0 REQUIRED). PICTURE WILL RE USED TO VERIFY GROUNDING STRAPS ARE INSTALLED, NEATLY SWEPT AND BULKHEAD HAS BEEN WEATHERPROOFED. INTERIOR BULKHEAD PENETRATION ( REQUIRED). PICTURE WILL BE USED TO VERIFY INSTALLATION OF SURGE ARRESTOR ARRAY AND DAISY CHAIN. PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF THE ANTENNA AND MOUNT HEIGHTS SHALL BE PRONGED. VERY DESICNAIEO REPRESENTATIVE AFTERISSUE SITEPACKAGE BEENSHENTEL ACCEPTED AND WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS. COLOR—CODING WILL Go AS FOLLOWS: ALPHA: ATX — YELLOW—BROWN—WHITE ARX — YELLOW—WHITE—WHITE BETA: BTX — RED—BROWN—WHITE BRX — RED—WHITE—WHITE GAMMA; CTX — GREEN—BROWN—WHITE CRX — GREEN—WHITE—WHITE SHENTEL 5MN" MOBOICOAANMCATIONS P.O. BOX 459 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0280 (540) 984-5123 Dynatek TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES hamlet, PA 16154 Phone: S 39-3234 Fe.: 7.4 &1384 _dy.wb.Iec ,m , ,PAW 48x3 PRO). NO.: DRAWN BY: M.N.T. CHECKEDBY: DC.& SUBMITTALS 2 9/13/04 REVISED FINAL 1 919/04 FINAL 0 8/12/04 ISSUED FOR REVIEW THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN DAVID C. BAUDO No. OmS7 q,.s%�o gR6m51_1, BOWLING GREEN RIDGE SITE 084 226 STONEY HILL ROAD GORE. VA 22637 SHEET TITLE: GENERAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER: GN -2 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 Ii�IEM®iANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Candice E. Mills, Planner II u' ,F - RE: Public Meeting - Request of Exception — Hilda Maye Meadows DATE: November 29, 2004 On November 17, 2004 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Master Development for Hilda Maye Meadows; however, staff has noticed that this project does not meet the minimum entrance spacing for Apple Valley Road. Staff has received a waiver request from Bowman Consulting to allow for the reduction in the entrance spacing for new driveways on minor collector roads. The request is to allow a new public road to be placed less than 70 feet from an existing residential driveway. A copy of the new road and the existing driveway has been included for your information; the circled area denotes the areas that will be affected by this waiver. The zoning ordinance §165-29A(6) specifies that: "The minimum spacing for access on minor collector roads shall be 70 feet between driveways and between driveways and intersections. " In accordance with Section 165-29B(1), the Planning Commission may allow other means of motor vehicle access which do not meet the requirements set forth in 165-29. The single family small lot development in Hilda Maye Meadows is situated on the northern side of Apple Valley Road in Winchester. The approval of this waiver will allow this development to be built in conformance with the Master Development Plan submitted to the Planning Commission on November 17, 2004. The Planning Commission should determine if they believe the waiver is appropriate in this case. Please contact our department if you need additional information. Enclosure CEM/bad 107 North Kent Street, Sr:lte 292 0 Winch. ester, Virginia 22601-5000 o I� >z iN I 1 '"'IASS BLY a 35.0' SHELTE h H CONCRET gAB AT REAR bF LOT 17 18 1� 1C3 CD ► SEWER I ►TION TT L OO 65-64— 1 r ROPOSED TRAFcji `" �� L1�70 � H 0 'PL p RET9 fila E R �pt`l u5�• 1 0' G6 E MENT 1 ASPHALT 5' TENORR`Y 21VEWAY� 1 CONSTR - CT6!4� 0 EASEMENT R.O.W. TO B� 1 =DEDICATED G --�-EI-RANCE D•BLITY POLE- . TO BE TO B 6c TED DEDICATED X r c i \40 ,5-01 CG -6 1' T. UTILITY PC TO BE REI M• GR1,-- 1. NIF PG 5p pGPN o tiaN�o• EN a� ��1G1� •gyp pSE' 1 �-- "' 6.0' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT R5O.O' a 35.0' SHELTE h H CONCRET gAB AT REAR bF LOT 17 18 1� 1C3 CD ► SEWER I ►TION TT L OO 65-64— 1 r ROPOSED TRAFcji `" �� L1�70 � H 0 'PL p RET9 fila E R �pt`l u5�• 1 0' G6 E MENT 1 ASPHALT 5' TENORR`Y 21VEWAY� 1 CONSTR - CT6!4� 0 EASEMENT R.O.W. TO B� 1 =DEDICATED G --�-EI-RANCE D•BLITY POLE- . TO BE TO B 6c TED DEDICATED X r c i \40 ,5-01 CG -6 1' T. UTILITY PC TO BE REI MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner � K DATE: December 1, 2004 COUNTY of FREDERICK it of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 RE: Discussion: 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) On November 8, 2004, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) met with county department and agency representatives to discuss new project requests and project modification requests associated with the 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The role of the CPPS in the CIP process is to ensure that the various departmental project requests are in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, rather than to engage in the evaluation and prioritization of departmental projects. Projected expenditures are included in the proposed CIP as these are required by the Code of Virginia. Following discussion, the CPPS agreed that the CIP requests were in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and forwarded the draft document out of committee for Planning Commission discussion. Subsequent to the CPPS meeting, minor revisions to the regional jail and school board projects were made. It is requested that the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors consider the proposed 2005-2006 CIP as a discussion item prior to the document's advertisement for public hearing. Such discussion will provide a valuable opportunity for collective review of proposed capital projects while also allowing members to determine if additional information or analysis is needed in advance of final CIP consideration. Please find attached with this agenda item a summary of the proposed 2005-2006 CIP; information pertaining to new or modified departmental project requests; and a draft copy of the proposed 2004-2005 CIP, which includes a map illustrating the known locations of the CIP requests. The map, if ultimately adopted by the Board of Supervisors as an element of the Comprehensive Policy Plan, would satisfy the review requirement of Sec. 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a "feature shown" within a jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. 107 Nerth AKent Street, Suite 202 • Winebester, Virginia 22601-5000 Discussion: Capital Improvements Plan December 1, 2004 Page 2 During the CPPS discussion, it was acknowledged that there are areas in the existing Comprehensive Policy Plan language that are outdated and in need of amendment to support the various departmental needs. The committee recommended that planning department staff and the agencies work jointly in an effort to update the policy language and associated mapping to achieve clear consistency between the CIP and Comprehensive Policy Plan. This update will be submitted by staff as an amendment to the Public Facilities chapter of the Comprehensive Plan prior to next years' CIP cycle. Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this information. SKE/bad Attachments SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED 2005-2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The proposed CIP consists of 43 capital projects, an increase over the 33 projects included in the 2004-20050P. County contributions toward capital projects (excluding debt service) are estimated to be $74.3' million over the upcoming five-year period, a slight increase from the $73.7' million in expenditures projected in the 2004-2005 CIP. With debt service included, the proposed CTP estimates total County costs for capital projects to be $83.6 million. The proposed CIP includes twelve (12) new capital projects, which are as follows: Five (5) new projects from the Frederick County Public Schools: • Renovations to James Wood High School that would update the facility and provide adequate infrastructure for new technology. • A fourth high school. • A fifth middle school. • Renovations to Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School. • Renovations to Bass Hoover Elementary School. Four (4) new projects from the Department of Parks and Recreation: • An indoor swimming pool to provide space for recreation and space to house programs provided by the Parks and Recreation Department.2 • A new playground in Sherando Park. • Renovations of the swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks by adding water slides and spray grounds. • A Field House to later accompany the new indoor pool that would provide space for indoor recreation activities and special 2 events. Two (2) new projects from the Department of Public Works (County Administration): • Expansion of the Greenwood Road convenience site to deal with new residential growth in the area. • Relocation of the Gainesboro convenience site to accommodate fencing and control illegal dumping. One (1) new Winchester Regional airport Authority project: Terminal building renovations to repair several areas of wear including the exterior surface, a leaking roof, and an aging HVAC system. All of the capital projects included with the previous CIP will be carried over to the proposed 2004-2005 CIP with the exception of construction of the new middle school, which is nearly completed. 1- Please note that these figures do not include County contributions toward the County Annex Facilities and new fire and rescue, the relocation of the Round Hill Fire Station, the fourth high school, the fifth middle school, and renovations to the school administration building, James Wood High School, Apple Pie Ridge Elementary, and Bass Hoover Elementary. 2 - The indoor swimming pool and field house were considered a single project in the 2004-2005 CIP. PROPOSED 2005-2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY OF NEW PROJECT REQUESTS AND PROJECT MODIFICATION REQUESTS Frederick County Public Schools Project Type of Request 2004-2005 Local 2005-2006 Local Indoor Pool New Expenditure Request Expenditure Request #11 Elementary. School Modification $10,500,000 $5,900,000 Replace Uainesboro Modification $15,700,000 $1700,000 Elementary School James Wood HS New N/A N/A Renovation Fourth High School New N/A N/A Fifth Middle School New N/A N/A Apple Pie Ridge Elem. New N/A N/A Renovations Bass Hoover Elem. New N/A N/A Renovations Frederick County Parks and Recreation Project Type of Request 2004-2005 Local Expenditure Request 2005-2006 Local Expenditure Request Indoor Pool New N/A $9,000,000 Playground - Sherando Park New N/A $125,000 Water Slide/Spray Ground New N/A $1,000,000 - Clearbrook & Sherando Park Parkland in Eastern Modification $2,250,965 $2,302,737 Frederick County Parkland in Western Modification $1,377,858 $1,409,549 Frederick County Open Play Areas - Modification $377,921 $386,591 Clearbrook Park Skateboard/In-Line Modification $479,718 $490,752 Hockey Park - Sherando Park Lake, Trails, and Parking Modification $838,925 $858,001 with Two Irrigated Multi- Purpose Fields - Sherando Park Softball Complex - Modification $503,345 $514,922 Sherando Park Baseball Complex Modification $1,032,982 $1,056,741 Renovations - Sherando Park Soccer Complex - Modification $1,151,611 $1,178,435 Sherando Park Tennis/Basketball Modification $394,734 $403,887 Complex - Clearbrook Park Tennis/Picnic Area - Modification $635,211 $649,882 Sherando Park Shelter/Stage - Clearbrook Modification $390,833 $401,254 Park Maintenance Compound - Modification $201,100 $205,725 Sherando Park Access Road with Parking Modification $811,125 $829,789 and Trails - Sherando Park Field House New N/A $7,040,000 Frederick County Administration Project Type of Request 2004-2005 Local 2005-2006 Local Expenditure Request Expenditure Request Public Safety Center Modification N/A $13,000,000 New Animal Shelter Modification $1,540,000 $2,501,000 Greenwood Citizens' New N/A $200,000 Convenience Site Expansion Gainesboro Citizens' New N/A $2203000 Convenience Site Winchester Regional Airport Project Type of Request 2004-2005 Local 2005-2006 Local Expenditure Request Expenditure Request Land Acquisition - Modification $141,000 $17,300 Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Terminal Building New N/A $110,000 Renovation Handley Regional Library Project Type of Request 2004-2005 Local 2005-2006 Local Expenditure Request Expenditure Request Bowman Library - Modification $237,500 $228,468 Parking Lot & Sidewalk Extension Clarke-Fauquier-Frederick-Winchester Community Corrections Center (CCC) Project Type of Request 2004-2005 Local 2005-2006 Local Expenditure Request Expenditure Request CFFW Community Modification $1,165,320 $2,264,000 Corrections Center Secure Detention Modification N/A N/A Expansion Note: 2005-2006 Requests that are identical to those included in the 2004-2005 C.I.P. are not included. FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......,.._................................................I.......I...•........•--•--- ._._ _.........._......_1 PROJECTRECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................................2 Frederick County Public Schools............................•.....•..................................................2 Frederick County Public Schools.....................................................................................9 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department.......................................................2 411 Elementary School........................................................................................9 CountyAdministration.....................................................................................................3 Administration Building Renovation...................................................................10 Winchester Regional Airport ...........................................................................................4 HandleyRegional Library................................................................................................4 CFFWRegional Jail.........................................................................................................4 2005-2006 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP.....................................................................................5 2005-2006 PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE...............................................................................6 CIPTABLE EXPLANATIONS..................................................................................................7 PROJECTFUNDING..................................................................................................................7 PROJECTDESCRIPTIONS.......................................................................................................9 Frederick County Public Schools.....................................................................................9 411 Elementary School........................................................................................9 Transportation Facility.........................................................................................9 Administration Building Renovation...................................................................10 New Gainesboro Elementary School...................................................................10 Robert E. Aylor Middle School Renovation........................................................10 James Wood High School Renovation................................................................11 FourthHigh School..............................................................................................I I FifthMiddle School.............................................................................................I 1 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Renovation............................................................12 Bass Hoover Elementary Renovation..................................................................12 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department.......................................................13 IndoorSwimming Pool........................................................................................13 Playground — Sherando Park................................................................................13 Swimming Pool Improvements — Sherando/Clearbrook Park .............................13 Parkland in Eastern Frederick County.................................................................14 Parkland in Western Frederick County................................................................14 Open Play Areas — Clearbrook Park....................................................................14 Skateboard Complex — Sherando Park................................................................15 Lake, Trail, and Parking with Multi -Purpose Fields — Sherando Park ................15 Softball Complex — Sherando Park......................................................................15 Baseball Complex Renovation — Sherando Park.................................................16 Soccer Complex — Sherando Park........................................................................16 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Tennis/Basketball Complex — Clearbrook Park...................................................17 Tennis/Picnic Area — Sherando Park...................................................................17 Shelter/Stage Seating — Clearbrook Park.............................................................17 Maintenance Compound and Office — Sherando Park.........................................18 Access Road with Parking and Trails — Sherando Park.......................................18 FieldHouse..........................................................................................................18 CountyAdministration.....................................................................................................19 PublicSafety Center............................................................................................19 New Frederick County Animal Shelter................................................................19 Annex Facilities/New Fairfax Pike Fire and Rescue Station...............................20 Relocation of Round Hill Fire/Rescue Station.....................................................20 Greenwood Road Convenience Site Expansion..................................................21 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation and Expansion...................................21 WinchesterRegional Airport ...........................................................................................22 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road, parcels 31, 46, and 53 ..................................22 Terminal Building Renovations...........................................................................22 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road, parcels 47, 47A, and 48 ...............................22 Airfield Lighting Upgrade...................................................................................23 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road, parcels 50, 51, and 52 ..................................23 Airfield Maintenance Building............................................................................24 HandleyRegional Library................................................................................................24 Bowman Library Improvements..........................................................................24 North Frederick County Library Branch.............................................................24 CFFWRegional Jail.........................................................................................................25 Community Corrections Center...........................................................................25 Secure Detention Expansion................................................................................25 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY INTRODUCTION 2005-2006 Section 15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plan as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not, for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is projected. 1 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Frederick County Public Schools 2. Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department In an effort to maintain educational facilities that will handle the growing student population, the construction of two new elementary schools is recommended with one replacing the current Gainesboro Elementary building. Additionally, renovations to James Wood High School, Robert E. Aylor Middle, Apple Pie Ridge Elementary, and Bass Hoover Elementary have been added to this year's plan which are intended to extend the life of the facility. Lastly, a new high school and a new middle school have been requested to meet the future demand of a growing student population. Funding is also being requested for the development of a new central transportation maintenance facility which will house all of the school system's buses and provide service to county vehicles from other departments. Renovations to the Administration Building would update the facility, increase office space, and expand public record storage. The majority of the recommended projects are planned for the county's two regional parks. Nine projects are planned for Sherando Park: a new playground, a skate/in-line hockey park, a lake with associated trails and parking and multipurpose fields, a softball complex, renovations to the existing baseball fields, a soccer complex, tennis and picnic areas, a maintenance compound, and an access road with parking and trails. Three projects are planned for Clearbrook Park including a new open play area, new shelter and stage, as well as a tennis/basketball complex. In addition, the swimming pools at both parks will be updated with water slides and a spray ground. Also planned is an indoor pool with an accompanying field house to be completed in the following years. Various options for the development of this project are being explored, including a public-private partnership. 2 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan 3. County Administration The Parks and Recreation Department has proposed to acquire land in both the eastern and western portions of the county for the development of future regional park system. This proposal calls for the acquisition of 150-200 acres of land for each regional park system to accommodate the recreational needs of the growing population. In an effort to improve service to the citizens throughout the county and meet current and future space needs, the Frederick County Sheriff's Office is looking to development of new Public Safety Center. The development of a 9,500 -square -foot animal shelter is proposed to replace the existing Esther Boyd Animal Shelter. The existing shelter is expected to be displaced in approximately three years due to continued development of the Municipal Solid Waste landfill. The animal shelter would serve Frederick County and accommodate growth of the animal population. This shelter will be located on property adjacent to the existing regional jail. Long-range service enhancements are recommended to provide annex satellite facilities in strategic locations throughout the county that will house representatives of the Frederick County Sheriff's Office, the Frederick County Treasurer's Office, and the Commissioner of Revenue's Office. The Department of Fire & Rescue has recommended a new fire/rescue station along Fairfax Pike (Route 277) that would potentially house such satellite offices. The fire/rescue facility would serve areas in southeast Frederick County between Route 522 and Route 277. Relocation of the existing Round Hill Fire Station is also requested. This would involve the relocation and building of a 22,000 square foot facility for fire and rescue activities along with the building of a 10,000 square foot community center for fund-raising and other activities. Modifications to two of the County's convenience sites have been requested. One request is for the expansion of the convenience site on Greenwood Road while the other is for the relocation of the Gainesboro convenience site. 3 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan 4. Winchester Regional An updated master plan for the Winchester Regional Airport Airport was adopted in December 1993. Since that time, much of the proposed development has been completed, yet the demand for airport services and development have increased beyond that currently shown on the Master Plan. The Airport Authority has one new project request, renovations of the terminal building. There are three carried over requests to acquire additional parcels along Bufflick Road which are required to meet noise abatement requirements. Also carried over are the request to construct a new airfield maintenance building, and a request to upgrade the airfield lighting system to enhance safety for aircraft use of the facility. Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and state governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdicitons providing the remaining funding. 5. Handley Regional The Handley Regional Library has recommended two Library projects. The library proposes to acquire three to four acres of land in the Gainesboro Magisterial District for a future branch library. A project request for improvements at the existing Bowman Library is also proposed. More parking at the Bowman Library is needed to accommodate the growing number of users of the library. A sidewalk extension is needed for safer access from adjoining neighborhoods to the library. 6. CFFW Regional Jail The Clarke-Fauquier-Frederick-Winchester Regional Jail Board proposes to construct and operate, in accordance with the Public -Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002, a 44,000 square foot, 200 -bed Community Corrections Center on an 11.4 acre site adjacent to the eastern boundary of its property located at 141 Fort Collier Road. Additionally, the CFFW is planning for a Secure Detention expansion which will be connected to the existing Secure Detention Center. The purpose of this project is to accommodate projected growth in inmate population. Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan N 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Specific or Approximate Locations 4W School System 1 #11 Elementary School 2 Administration Building Renovations 2005-2006 Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan 3 Replacement of Gainesboro Elementary (ti 4 R.E. Aylor Middle School Renovations `\ 5 James Wood High School Renovations 5 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Renovations 7 Bass Hoover Elementary Renovations 40 Parks and Recreation 1 Sherandc Park fJ 2 Clearbrook Park f 3 Future Eastern Parkland 4 Future Western Parkland County Administration ~ , 1 New Animal Shelter 2 Greenwood Road Convenience Site Expansion 3 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation 4W Airport y 4W Library / 1 Bowman Library - Parking Lot and Sidewalk Addition f 2 2 Northern Frederick County Library Branch 4W Jail System 1 CFFW Community Corrections Center ; 2 Secure Detention 3 Parcels Primary Roads Secondary Roads f y �4 Terciary Roads /� N / .0s .t _M2 Note: Created by Frederick County Department of Planning & Development November 2004 Map re prosents the Capital Improvment Requests submitted by various county departments. DRAFT N 1 S _ Department COUNTY CONTRIBUTION PER FISCAI Z Priority Projects 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-t., 2009-10 I(PS) #I1 Elementary School 5,900,000 2(PS) Transportation Facility 1,000,000 3(PS) Administration Building Renovations N/A* 4(PS) Replace Gainesboro Elem. School 1,000,000 5(PS) R.E. Aylor Middle School Renovations N/A* 6(PS) James Wood HS Renovation N/A* 7(PS) New Fourth High School N/A* 8(PS) New Fifth Middle School N/A* 9(PS) Apple Pie Ridge Elem. Renovations N/A* 10(PS) Bass Hoover Elem. Renovations N/A* I (PR) Indoor Swimming Pool 9,000,000 2 (PR) Playground - SP 125,000 3 (PR) Water Slide/Spray Ground (CB, SP) 1,000,000 4 (PR) Park Land East FC N/A* 5 (PR) Park Land West FC D 6 (PR) Open Play Areas -CB $0 7 (PR) Skateboard Park/In-Line Hockey - SP 9,000,000 8 (PR) Lake/Trails/Parking/MP Fields - SP 0 9 (PR) Softball Complex - SP 10 (PR) Baseball Complex Renovation - SP $1,000,000. I 1 (PR) Soccer Complex - SP 2,302,737 12 (PR) Tennis/Basketball Complex - CP 0 13 (PR) Tennis/Picnic Areas - SP 14 (PR) Shelter/Stage - CB $386,591 15 (PR) Maintenance Compound -SP 490,752 16 (PR) Access Road with Parking & Trails -SP 0 17 (PR) Field House I (CA) Public Safety Center $514,922 2 (CA) New Animal Shelter 171,000 3 (CA) Annex Facilities/New Fire & Rescue 0 4 (CA) Relocation of Roundhill Fire/Rescue 5 (CA) Greenwood Citizens Conv. Site Exp. $403,887 6 (CA) Gainesboro Citizens Conv, Site 649,882 I(RA) Land Acquistion - Parcels 31, 46, 53 14,000 2 (RA) Terminal Building Renovation 10,000 3 (RA) Land Acquisition - Parcels 47, 47A, 48 13,000 4 (RA) Upgrade Airfield Lights 1,000 5 (RA) Land Acquisition - Parcels 50, 51, 52 0 6 (RA) Airfield Maintenance Building I (HL) Bowman- Parking Lot/Sidewalk Ext. 228,468 2 (HL) New Library 2,501,000 I (RJ) CFFW Community Corrections Center NIA - PPEA 2 (RJ) Secure Detention Expansion N/A** N/A ** TOTALS $18,462,468 A = Partial funding from Virginia Department of Aviation (VDOA) grants B = Partial funding from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants C =Satellite facility for Treasurer, the Sheriff, and the proposed Fairfax Pike Fire Station. N/A* - Project Scope Not Determined 220,000 NIA** - Funding Source Not Determined; Therefore, Debt Service Uncertain 4,500,000 N/A* 5,500,000 N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* 2,302,737 1,409,549 386,591 490,752 858,001 2,900,000 N/A* 5,900,000 N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* 514,922 1,056,741 1,178,435 N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* N/A* 403,887 649,882 401,254 205,725 829,781 7,040,000 N/A - PPEA N/A - PPEA N/A - PPEA 2,330,000 993,000 20,000 180,000 40,000 180,000 3,300 $74,325,325 100,000 N/A 4,300 $5;900,000 3,000 4,100,000 12,500,000 7,000 D 210,000 County Contributions 5,900,000 8,400,000 0 12,400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0' 9,000,000 125,000 1,000,000 2,302,737 1,409,549 386,591 490;752 858;001 514,922 1,056,741 1,178,435 403,887 649,882 401,254 205;725 829,781 7,040,000 13,000,000 2,501,000 _0 0 200,000 220,000 17,300 110,000 17,300 4,000 7,000 210,000 228,468 48,000 945,000 993,000 N/A - PPEA N/A - PPEA N/A - PPEA N/A - PPEA 2,264,000 N/A** N/A** N/A** N/A** N/A** $17,948,230 $12,127,098 $2,538,529 $7,985,000 $74,325,325 D = Project costs not identified at time of printing N/A E = Partial funding from private donations. $5;900,000 F= This assumes the state will be reimbursing 50% of the construction costs. N/A -Not Available Interest From Any TOTAL COUNTY 'reject Notes Debt Service COSTS -osts N/A 51900,000 $5;900,000 4,100,000 12,500,000 $12,500,000 D N/A* 0 $0 5,200,000 17,600,000 $17;600,000 D N/A* 0 $0 D N/A* 0 $0 D N/A* 0 $0 D N/A* 0 $0 D N/A* 0 $0 D N/A * 0 $0 0 9,000,000 $0 0 125,000 $125,000 0 1,000,000 $1,000,000. 0 2,302,737 $2,302,737 0 1;409,549 $1,4091549 0 386,591 $386,591 0 490,752 $490,752: 0 858;001 $858,001 0 514,922 $514,922 0 1,056,741 $1,056,741 0 1;178,435 $1,178,435 0 403,887 $403,887 0 649,882 $649,882 0 401;254 $401,254' 0 205,725 $205,725 0 829,781 $829,781 0 7,040,000 $7,040,000 N/A - PPEA 13,000,000 $13,000,000. 0 2,501,000 $2,501,000 C N/A * 0 $0 D N/A ** 0 $0 0 200,000 $200,000 0 220,000 $220,000 A,B 0 17,300 $865,000 A 0 110,000 $550,000 A 0 17,300 $865,000 A, B 0 4,000 $200,000 A 0 7;000 $350,000 A 0 210,000 $360,000 0 228,468 $228,468 E 0 993,000 $1,053,000 F N/A ** 2,264,000 $10,776,200 F N/A ** N/A ** $10,300,000 $9,300,000 $83,625,325 $96,261,925 Department Priority Abbreviations: CA - County Administration RJ - Regional Jail PR - Parks and Recreation HL - Handley Library PS - Public Schools RA - Regional Airport THE CIP TABLE CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS PROJECT FUNDING The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous page, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Department Priority - The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description - The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contribution - The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes - Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects. Interest From Any Debt Service - The projected interest that will be incurred for a particular project. Debt service projections are provided by individual departments and are based on the most accurate interest rate information available at the time the CIP is assembled. Total County Costs - The total estimated expenditures that the county will incur for a particular project. This column includes both fiscal year allocations and debt service expenses associated with each project. Essentially, this column represents the total county contributions for each particular project. Total Project Costs - The cost for each project, including county allocations and other funding sources. The projects included in the 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project cost of $96,261,925. If all projects are undertaken, the county will contribute $74,325,325 over the ensuing five years, excluding the interest from any debt service. By adding the projected 7 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan debt service of $9,300,000 the total county contribution of the projects comes to $83,625,325. Costs associated with the new County Administration Annex facilities (Treasurer, Commission of Revenue, Sheriff, and the Fairfax Pike Fire Station), the relocation of the Round Hill Fire Station, the fourth high school, the fifth middle school, and renovations to the school administration building, James Wood High School, Apple Pie Ridge Elementary, and Bass Hoover Elementary are not included in these figures. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the county. The Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the county. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. Regional jail projects will be requesting 50% reimbursement by the State of Virginia. Reimbursement may be "lump sum" or over a period of time specified by contract. The local share is based on the percentage of jurisdictional use averaged for the most recent 3 years for Frederick County. 8 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 Elementary School # 11 Description: This project involves the construction of a new elementary school to accommodate 644 students. This project has moved up to the number 1 priority for the Frederick County School Board. Capital Cost: $5,900,000 Debt Service: Not included Justification: This project is needed to accommodate growth patterns in the County's Urban Development Area. Construction Schedule: Open in Fall 2006. Transportation Facility Description: This project involves the site acquisition and development of a new transportation facility for the public school system. The facility would also provide support services to other county agencies such as the Sheriff's Department and Parks and Recreation. Capital Cost: $8,400,000 Debt Service: $4,100,000 Justification: The land will be used for the construction of a facility that will accommodate administrative offices, support staff offices, driver training areas, driver and staff meeting area, and will be utilized for the repair, inspection, and service of schools buses, and cars and trucks within the public school system. Construction Schedule: Land acquisition and planning in FY 05-06. 9 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 3 1 Administration Building Renovation Description: This project involves remodeling the existing administration building to address energy conservation; to provide adequate restroom and storage facilities; and to upgrade the fire, electrical, and security systems. The project would also include additional space for information technology needs and the space needs of other departments. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined Justification: The carrying capacity of the building for staff office space and records space has been exceeded. The building also lacks adequate facilities to meet the needs of the school division. Construction Schedule: The project is estimated to take one year to complete and scheduling is yet to be determined. PRIORITY 4 New Gainesboro Elementary School Description: This project involves the construction of an elementary school (grades K-5) of approximately 81,000 square feet to serve 644 students. The school is located on a 20 acre site. Capital Cost: $12,400,000 Debt Service: $5,200,000 Justification: The current site is too limited to justify renovating. The building lacks many facilities and there are health and safety concerns. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. PRIORITY 5 Robert E. Aylor Middle School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations of the current facility. Major areas to be included in the project are additional classroom space; a complete replacement of fire alarm and communication systems; upgrade of electrical and plumbing; and complete replacement of mechanical systems. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined Justification: Robert E. Aylor Middle School is soon to be 36 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of different areas to insure the economic and efficient operation of the school for the years to come. Construction Schedule: To be determined 10 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 6 I James Wood High School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations of the existing facility. Major areas to be included in the project include increased electrical service and distribution to support technology; technology cabling, hardware, and its installation; upgrade of plumbing and mechanical systems; and modification of instructional areas to support instructional delivery. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined Justification: Updating the facility will assist the school division in meeting the community needs for the citizens and high school students in the James Wood High School attendance zone. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 7 Fourth High School Description: This project consists of the development of a fourth high school serving grades 9-12 with a program capacity of 1,250 students. The project location has yet to be determined but will have a floor area of approximately 242,000 square -feet and be located on approximately 60 acres of land. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined Justification: This project will address continued growth in student enrollment in the school division over the next five years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase at all levels. Student enrollment in the high schools by the fall of 2010 is projected to be 4,115. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 8 Fifth Middle School Description: This project consists of the development of a new middle school serving grades 6-8 with a capacity of 850 students. The project location has yet to be determined but will have a floor area of approximately 165,000 square feet and be located on approximately 30 acres of land. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined 11 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 9 PRIORITY 10 Justification: This project will address continued growth in student enrollment over the next five years. Middle school enrollment in 2010 is projected to be 3,359. Construction Schedule: To be determined Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations to Apple Pie Ridge Elementary including upgrading of electrical service and distribution to support technology; technology cabling; upgrading plumbing and mechanical systems; and modification of instructional areas to support instructional delivery. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined Justification: The school is over 30 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for years to come. Construction Schedule: To be determined Bass Hoover Elementary School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations to Apple Pie Ridge Elementary including upgrading of electrical service and distribution to support technology; technology cabling; upgrading plumbing and mechanical systems; and modification of instructional areas to support instructional delivery. Capital Cost: To be determined Debt Service: To be determined Justification: The school is 30 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for years to come. Construction Schedule: To be determined 12 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Frederick County Parks and Recreation Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 I Indoor Swimming Pool Description: This facility would house a leisure and competitive lap swimmin4 pool with an office, storage and locker rooms. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the county and would utilize approximately 10-12 acres with parking. The facility will be designed to accommodate the addition of Field House amenities (priority 17). Capital Cost: $9,000,000 Justification: Parks and Recreation has relied heavily in the past on the public schools to house Parks and Recreation programs. This project would permit the Parks and Recreation department to meet citizen programming demands, provide an instructional facility, as well as provide the area with a facility that would attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 2 Playground — Sherando Park Description: This project consists of a multi-component accessible play structure for age groups from 5-12 years of age. Capital Cost: $125,000 Justification: The project will provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 05-06. PRIORITY 3 Swimming Pool Improvements — Sherando/Clearbrook Description: This project consists of removing the diving boards and installing two water slides at both Sherando and Clearbrook Park. The upgrade would also include the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: This project is expected to increase pool attendance by 30 percent while providing recreational Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan 13 opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service areas. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 05-06. PRIORITY 4 Park Land - Eastern Frederick County Description: Parkland acquisition in the eastern portion of the county. Capital Cost: $2,302,737 Justification: A new 150-200 acre regional park would be utilized by the entire county population. The park would be located in the primary growth center of Frederick County. This project would reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for the Frederick County service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. Construction Schedule: Acquisition in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 5 Park Land — Western Frederick County Description: Parkland acquisition in the western portion of the county. Capital Cost: $1,409,549 Justification: A new 150-200 acre regional park would be utilized by the entire county population. This project would reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for the Frederick County service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. The location of this project would provide parkland to create more accessible recreational facilities to residents in western Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Acquisition in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 6 Open Play Area — Clearbrook Description: This project includes development of a picnic shelter; six horseshoe pits; a volleyball court; croquet turf; shuffleboard; parking; refurbishing the existing concession stand; and renovations to existing shelters, access paths, and parking areas on the south side of the lake. Capital Cost: $386,591 14 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Justification: These facilities will provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park Service Area which will lessen the disparity between the number of passive recreational areas needed to meet the minimum standards for this service area. Clearbrook Park offers the best location for this development. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 7 Skateboard Park/In-Line Hockey — Sherando Park Description: This project recommends the development of a skateboard bowl; a half pipe; an open skate area; two in-line hockey rinks; vehicle parking; an access road; fencing; and landscaping. Sherando Park is the proposed location of this facility. Capital Cost: $490,752 Justification: This facility will enable the county to provide a recreational facility that has been requested for the community's youth. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 8 Lake, Parking, and Trail Development with Two Mulit- Purpose Fields — Sherando Park Description: This project involves the development of a 12 acre lake; 1.5 mile trail system around the lake; 800 linear feet of access roadway; lighted parking lot with 125 spaces; and development of two irrigated 70 x 120 yard multi- purpose fields. Capital Cost: $858,001 Justification: This facility will provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. The development of this facility will reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number required to meet the minimum standards established for the service area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 9 Softball Complex — Sherando Park Description: This project includes two softball fields; an access road; parking spaces; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $514,922 15 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 10 PRIORITY 11 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire county population, as well as the Frederick County School System. Presently, there are ten softball and baseball fields within the county's regional park system. Eight of the existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball, as well as adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become increasingly difficult to facilitate these programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate the existing demand for youth baseball and adult softball programs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. Baseball Complex Renovation — Sherando Park Description: This project includes an upgrade to the lighting system; renovation of four existing baseball fields; and renovations of existing restrooms, access roads, and walkways. Capital Cost: $1,056,741 Justification: This facility, presently serving as both youth baseball and adult softball fields, would be used by the Little League Programs within the Sherando Park service area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, the athletic complex will also be used by the Frederick County School System. This project cannot be completed until the Sherando Softball Complex is completed. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. Soccer Complex — Sherando Park Description: This project includes the development of two soccer fields; access paths; restrooms; concession; one picnic shelter; a plaza; landscaping; and lighting. Capital Cost: $1,178,435 Justification: This facility will serve the entire county population and will be utilized by the Frederick County School System. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 16 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 12 I Tennis/Basketball Complex — Clearbrook Park Description: This project includes the development of four tennis courts; two basketball courts; a shelter; parking; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $403,887 Justification: These facilities will be available to all county residents. Currently, there are no tennis courts or basketball courts in the Clearbrook Park Service Area. Clearbrook Park is utilized by over 150,000 visitors annually; therefore, these facilities are needed. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09. PRIORITY 13 Tennis/Picnic Area — Sherando Park Description: This project includes the development of three tennis courts; a playground area; four picnic shelters; restrooms; a concession area; access road; access paths; parking; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $649,882 Justification: These facilities would be used by the residents of southern Frederick County. Although tennis courts have been included at Sherando High School, the department feels that it is important to include three tennis courts on park property for general use while the school courts are being used for school activities. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09. PRIORITY 14 Shelter/Stage Seating — Clearbrook Park Description: This project includes the development of a shelter with a performance stage; refurbishing existing restrooms and access paths; and renovations to the lake. Capital Cost: $401,254 Justification: This facility would be used by the entire county population. Presently, there are no facilities to accommodate cultural programs within the county's park system. This project is needed to provide a facility for cultural activities. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09. 17 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 15 1 Maintenance Compound and Office — Sherando Park Description: This project involves the construction of a 1,200 square -foot office and a 4,000 square -foot storage shed for operation at Sherando Park. Capital Cost: $205,725 Justification: This facility will enable the county to maintain equipment and facilities in a more responsible and effective manner. The additional responsibility to maintain the outdoor facilities at Sherando High School increases the need for more storage, maintenance, and office space. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09. Access Road with Parking and Trails — Sherando Park PRIORITY 16 Description: This project involves the development of an entrance and 1,800 linear feet of access roadway from Warrior Drive; a 100 space parking area; and 2.8 miles of trails. Capital Cost: $829,781 Justification: This facility will provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. The development of this facility will reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number required to meet the minimum standards established for the service area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09. PRIORITY 17 Field House Description: This facility would be attached to the Indoor Swimming Pool (Priority 1). The project involves building a 44,000 square foot facility that would contain and indoor track and at least two basketball courts. The court area would be designed to be used by indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton. The area could also be used for special events. Additionally, the project would house a fitness center, multipurpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Capital Cost: $7,040,000 Justification: This facility would give the Parks and Recreation Department the ability to offer year round recreational programming to the residents of Frederick County. It would also allow the Parks and Recreation 18 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Department to meet the increasing demand for recreational programming in Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 09-10. County Administration Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Public Safety Center Description: This project recommends the development of a 35,000 square -foot facility for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office and Fire and Rescue Services. This will allow the Frederick County Sheriff's Office to vacate the Winchester - Frederick County Joint Judicial Center. Capital Cost: $13,000,000 Justification: The Frederick County Sheriff's Office currently has 80 employees that occupy space in the Winchester -Frederick County Joint Judicial Center (JJC). When this space was first occupied, there were 36 employees in the office. Representatives of the JJC have indicated that additional space is required for court officers and other arms of the judicial branch. Development of a new facility in the county will enhance the response time for emergency service in the safest possible manner. The current location of the Sheriff's Office in the JJC increases emergency response time due to congested streets and heavily populated areas, thus compromising safety to persons and property. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 2 New Frederick County Animal Shelter Description: This project involves the development of a 12,000 square -foot building with parking and fencing. This project would be built adjacent to the existing regional jail. Capital Cost: $2,501,000 Justification: This project will replace the existing Esther Boyd Animal Shelter which will be displaced by development of the MSW Landfill in approximately 3 years. Construction Schedule: Design in FY 05-06 with construction completion in FY 06-07. M Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 3 1 Annex Facilities Description: This project will consist of several facilities located at strategic locations throughout the county to house employees of the Sheriff's Office, the Treasurer's Office, and the Commissioner of Revenue's Office. A fire station would be included with offices located in the Fairfax Pike area. Capital Cost: $465,000 for Treasurer's Office Satellite Office; other estimates not available. Justification: The development of satellite facilities along major transportation networks and in areas of dense population will provide ease of access for citizens and will improve services to the county. The county continues to experience a significant rate of growth; therefore, it is important to provide services within these areas instead of requiring citizens to confront congestion, limited parking, and accessibility in the City of Winchester. Construction Schedule: Phase 1 — Site acquisition and construction FY 07-08; construction completion FY 08-09. New Fairfax Pike Fire/Rescue Station (coordinated with Annex Facilities request) Description: This project involves the construction of a new fire/rescue facility in southeast Frederick County between Stephen's City and Route 522, along the Route 277 (Fairfax Pike) corridor, which would also house satellite facilities for the Sheriff, Treasurer, and Board of Supervisors District Office. The fire and rescue component of the facility would involve an engine and rescue company. A five to seven acre tract of land would be needed for this project. Capital Cost: To be determined Justification: The need for a new station is in response to present and anticipated future growth ("Shenandoah" development of Lake Frederick) in this area of Frederick County. The new station would reduce fire and EMS response time to the population of southeastern Frederick County. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 4 Relocation of Round Hill Fire/Rescue Station Description: This project includes the relocation and building of a 22,000 square -foot facility to accommodate ten or more pieces of emergency equipment and to house living 20 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan PRIORITY 5 PRIORITY 6 and sleeping areas for staff. A community center of approximately 10,000 square feet, with a capacity of 400 people, is also planned; it would be used for fund raising events and other activities. The project would need a parcel of three to five acres. Capital Cost: To be determined Justification: The existing facility serving the Round Hill area is 50 years old and not large enough to accommodate the equipment needed to serve the Round Hill community. This community includes approximately 9,000 households, three schools, and the Winchester Medical Center. Construction Schedule: To be determined Greenwood Road Convenience Site Expansion Description: This project will expand the existing trash drop-off on Greenwood Road. The expansion would add another compactor; a separate entrance and exit to the facility; fencing; paving; and a buffer of trees. Capital Cost: $200,000 Justification: The facility is necessary to provide adequate, safe trash disposal service for citizens living in the Greenwood Road area of Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation and Expansion Description: This project involves the relocation and expansion of the Gainesboro convenience site. The project would include fencing; earthwork; retaining walls; electric; paving; and a buffer of trees. Capital Cost: $220,000 Justification: The project is necessary to provide adequate trash disposal service for citizens living in the Gainesboro area of Frederick County. The existing site is inadequate and cannot be expanded to provide for safe ingress/egress or fencing to prevent illegal dumping. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. 21 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Description: Acquisition of three parcels along Bufflick Road. Capital Cost: $865,000 State/Federal Grant - $847,700 Local Share: $17,300 Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within both the Airport's FAR Part 77 Primary Surface and/or approach surface and the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential land use within the noise contour to be incompatible with airport operations and encourages airports to resolve such incompatibility through land acquisition. Moreover, under the FAA's Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia, the Airport is required to assume fee simple ownership of property located within the Primary Surface. Construction Schedule: Completion by FY 06-07 PRIORITY 2 Terminal Building Renovations Description: This project involves repairs and upgrades to the existing terminal building including fixing the exterior surface; stopping leaks in the roof; and replacing the HVAC system. Capital Cost: $550,000 State/Federal Grant - $440,000 Local Share: $110,000 Justification: The building was constructed in 1992 and is beginning to show several areas of wear including delaminating of the exterior surface and a leaking roof. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 3 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 47, 47A, & 48 Description: Acquisition of three parcels located along Bufflick Road. Property is included in the 20 Year Master Plan. Capital Cost: $865,000 State/Federal Grant - $847,700 Local Share: $17,300 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan W PRIORITY 4 PRIORITY 5 Frederick County Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located inside the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. Airfield Lighting Upgrade Description: This project involves the upgrade of the existing medium intensity runway lighting to high intensity runway lighting and the upgrade of the two -box precision approach path indicator (PAPI) to a four -box PAPI. Capital Cost: $200,000 State/Federal Grant - $196,000 Local Share: $4,000 Justification: This project is necessary to accommodate the increase in aircraft that utilize the Winchester Regional Airport. Construction Schedule: Design in FY 05-06 with construction in FY 06-07. Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 50, 51, & 52 Description: Acquisition of three parcels located along Bufflick Road. Property is included in the 20 Year Master Plan. Capital Cost: $350,000 State/Federal Grant - $343,000 Local Share: $7,000 Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located inside the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan 23 PRIORITY 6 Airfield Maintenance Building Description: Demolition of undersized wooden structure and construction of a new facility to accommodate the airport's maintenance equipment and maintenance work activities. Capital Cost: $300,000 State Grant - $90,000 Local Cost: $210,000 Justification: This project is necessary to accommodate maintenance activities at the airport. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 Handley Regional Library Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Bowman Library Parking Lot and Sidewalk Extension Description: This proposal is to expand the parking lot on the Lakeside Drive side of the library from 101 to 221 parking spaces, and to provide a sidewalk that will extend approximately 400 to 500 feet beyond the sidewalk that now borders the parking lot to connect to the sidewalk on Lakeside Drive. Capital Cost: $228,468 Justification: The parking lot expansion is needed to relieve overcrowding and to accommodate library patrons. The sidewalk is necessary to provide safe access for pedestrians to the library. Planning consideration for alternative modes of transportation such as bicycle connectivity should also be considered. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 05-06. PRIORITY 2 Northern Frederick County Library Branch Description: This project involves the acquisition of 3 to 4 acres and the construction of a 7,000 square -foot library branch with expansion possible to 10,000 square -feet along 522 North near Cross Junction. Initial parking would accommodate 35 vehicles. Capital Cost: $1,053,000 Fund Raising - $60,000 24 Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan W Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Local Cost: $993,000 Justification: There is no library in this area of the county to serve residents. The residents of the Gainesboro District comprise the largest population group the greatest distance away from a library. The library would serve members of the population from toddlers to senior citizens. Construction Schedule: Land acquisition FY 07-08; Construction complete FY 08-09; Open library FY 09-10. CFFW Regional Jail Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Community Corrections Center (CCC) Description: The Clarke-Fauquier-Frederick-Winchester Regional Jail Board proposes to construct and operate in accordance with the Public -Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002, a 44,000 square -foot, 204 bed Community Corrections Center on an 11.4 acre parcel of land adjacent to the eastern boundary of its property located at 141 Fort Collier Road. Capital Cost: $10,776,200 Local Share: $2,264,000* Justification: The Regional Adult Detention Center has a capacity of 265 inmates while current population exceeds 470 during the week and reaches nearly 500 on weekends. Construction Schedule: Construction in FY 05-06 * This figure assumes a 50% state reimbursement of construction costs. PRIORITY 2 Secure Detention Expansion Description: A 32,990 square -foot 96 bed facility that will be connected to the existing secure detention center to accommodate growth in inmate population. The expansion will be partially designed for direct supervision housing. It will also include a segregation unit, classification, and negative air flow facilities. Capital Cost: $10,300,000 Justification: The core facilities were designed to support the expansion and land was acquired during the initial construction. Construction Schedule: To be determined W Frederick County 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan