Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 02-03-99 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building Winchester, Virginia FEBRUARY 3, 1999 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) December 2, 1998 Minutes ..... A 2) Application Action Summary .......................................... B 3) Committee Reports ...................... ......................... (no tab) 4) Citizen Comments .............................................. ..(no tab) PUBLIC HEARING 5) Rezoning #01-99 of K & M Enterprises, submitted by Greenway Engineering, to rezone 0.60 acres from RP (Residential Performance) to B2 (Business General). This property is located on the west side of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North) across from Brooke Road (Route 1328), and is identified with Property Identification Number 54-A-50 in the Stonewall Magisterial District. (Mr. Wyatt) ....................................................... C 6) Proposed Updates to the 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP is a prioritized list of projects requested by numerous County agencies, to be reviewed for potential allocation in the ensuing five-year period. The plan is created as an informational document to assist in the development of the County's annual budget. The CIP is an advisory document; projects are not necessarily funded because oftheir inclusion in the CIP. (Mr. Wyatt) ....................................................... D PUBLIC MEETING 7) Subdivision #01-99 of Scully, LTD, submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., to subdivide a 5.8366 -acre parcel into three lots. This property is located on the south side of Fairfax Pike (Rt. 277), along the east side of Stickley Drive (Rt. 1085), and is identified with Property Identification Number 85-A-148 in the Opequon Magisterial District. (Mr. Lawrence) .................................................... E 8) Other MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on December 2, 1998, PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; W. Wayne Miller, Gainesboro District; Terry Stone, Gainesboro District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; Robert M. Sager, Board Liaison; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: John R. Marker, Vice-Chairman/Back Creek District; and Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison. STAFF PRESENT: Kris C. Tierney, Director; Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director; Eric R. Lawrence, Zoning Administrator; Michael T. Ruddy, Planner II; Christopher M. Mohn, Planner 11; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 21, 1998 and November 4, 1998 Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Romine, the meeting minutes of October 21, 1998 were unanimously approved as presented. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Thomas, the meeting minutes of November 4, 1998 were unanimously approved as presented. APPLICATIONS ACTION SUMMARY Chairman DeHaven accepted the report for the Commission's information. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 275 MR COMMITTEE REPORTS Sanitation Authority (SA) - 11/17/98 Mtg. Mrs. Copenhaver, Planning Commission's liaison to the SA, reported that the minutes from the November 17, 1998 meeting indicate that there was a great deal of discussion about the water storage tank, however, no final decision was made at the meeting. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mr. Robert Pownall of the Shawnee District stated that the description of the property location appearing in the adjoiner notifications and advertisements for Rezoning Application #019-98 of Danford Ridge Properties, L.C., was in error because it states "...south ofthe intersection of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522) and Papermill Road (Rt. 644)..." Mr. Pownall said that this would be the area by the cemetary; however, the area in question is located down where Route 644 is called Parkins Mill Road. He said that there is quite a difference in the two locations. OLD BUSINESS Rezoning #015-98 of Jack K. Wampler, submitted by Greenway Engineering, to rezone 9.30 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B3 (Industrial Transition), and 10.70 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B2 (Business General). This property is located on the west side of Martinsburg Pike (Rt. 11) about 0.5 miles south of the intersection with Hopewell Road (Rt. 672), and is identified with P.I.N. 33 -A -164D in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Proffers Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, stated that the County Attorney has reviewed the revised proffer statement and believes that it is in proper form. Mr. Wyatt recalled for the Commission's information that the revised proffer includes a buffer with evergreen screening on the B3 -zoned area, which adjoins the Stonewall Elementary School site; the provision of a 100' distance buffer with a 6' high berm and evergreen screen along the 132 portion on the northern property boundary to protect the viewshed of the historic L.O. Dick house; the intent of the applicant to conduct an archeological survey of the site prior to development activities at the request of the HRAB; it includes an agreement to provide improvements as required by VDOT, which is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; it provides an increase in the monetary contribution to offset the negative fiscal impacts for capital facilities; and it also limits the 20 -acre site to two commercial entrances along Route 11, which was a concern raised by the Commission Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 276 -3 - at their meeting on November 4, 1998. Mr. Wyatt stated that it was the staff's belief that tiie revised proffer statement addressed the majority of the impacts from the application and the only outstanding issues raised during the Commission's November 4th meeting regard the unknown type and intensity of uses in the B2 as well as the timing of the request, as no public sewer is available to the property. There were no citizen comments. Several Commissioners believed that the Commission and Board needed to give strong consideration to not rezoning any future large tracts of land in this area until the sewer issue was resolved. Commission members stated that sewer in that area was a major concern and they believed it has not yet been addressed properly. Other Commission members noted that the developer of this particular tract will be restricted as to what can be done with the property until public water and sewer is available. Upon motion made by Mr. Light and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Rezoning Application #015-98 of Jack K. Wampler, submitted by Greenway Engineering, to rezone 9.30 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B3 (Industrial Transition), and 10.70 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B2 (Business General) with proffers as submitted by the applicant. (Note: Mr. Marker was absent from the meeting.) Conditional Use Permit Application #008-98 of Meade's Family Day Home, submitted by Ms. Winona M. Clark, for a day care facility. This property is located at 150 Twine Lane, and is identified with P.I.N. 26 -A -34A in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. (This item was tabled from the October 7, 1998 and November 4, 1998 meetings.) Action - Approved with Conditions Mr. Eric R. Lawrence, Zoning Administrator, stated that this item was tabled from the Commission's November 4, 1998 meeting in order to give the applicant the opportunity to address issues raised by the Fire Marshal. Specifically, those concerns were: 1) that the residence had no defined driveway and the closest road is approximately 150' from the dwelling, which would not allow adequate fire and rescue access; and, 2) the remains of a burnt-out dwelling exist on the property which presents a safety hazard for children and this should be secured or razed. Mr. Lawrence said that the Fire Marshal was present to address the issues. Mr. Dennis D. Linaburg, Fire Marshal, stated that the driveway has been installed, however, Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 277 -4 - the partially burnt-out dwelling still remains unsecured on the property. He stated that this situation presents a safety hazard for children attending the day care center. Mr. Linaburg said that he spoke with the applicant again this afternoon and although she is agreeable to installing a fence around the building, it has not yet been accomplished. There were no citizen comments. Mr. Miller moved to approve the conditional use permit with the understanding that there will be no activity at the site until there is compliance with all review agency comments, including those of the Fire Marshal. This motion was seconded by Mr. Wilson. BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Application #008-98 of Meade's Family Day Home, submitted by Ms. Winona M. Clark, for a day care facility, with the following conditions: 1) The applicant must satisfy the licensing requirements of the Virginia Department of Social Services. 2) All review agency comments must be complied with at all times. 3) Any expansion of the existing structure that is to be used for the proposed day care will require a new conditional use permit. 4) No day care activities will occur on the property until the applicant has fully complied with all of the review agency comments, including those of the Fire Marshal. Request to Modify the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District, as submitted by Scot Marsh of Marsh and Legge. The modification will remove 35 acres from and add 67 acres to the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. The district will continue to preserve approximately 14,500 acres of property within the Back Creek and Opequon Magisterial Districts. Action - Recommended Approval Mr. Eric R. Lawrence, Zoning Administrator, stated that the staff has had discussions with Mr. Gary McDonald concerning his request to modify his 200+ acre parcel of land that is currently included in the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. He said that the modifications include a 35 -acre removal from the District and a 67 -acre addition. Mr. Lawrence explained that Mr. McDonald has recently purchased a 190 -acre tract of which he would like to include a 67 -acre portion into the District; and in exchange for putting that acreage in, he would like to remove a 35 -acre portion. Mr. Lawrence continued, stating that Mr. McDonald's goal is to help finance the 190 acres of prime agricultural property and in pursuit of that goal, he would like to subdivide the 35 acres removed from the District, which is not prime agricultural land, and sell it as five -acre residential building lots. Mr. Lawrence said that the Agricultural District Advisory Committee reviewed this request last month and based on Mr. McDonald's willingness to replace almost twice as many acres into the District, Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 278 -5 - in exchange for the 35 he wants to remove, the Advisory Committee believed that the request was appropriate. He said that the Advisory Committee was familiar with the land and agreed that the acreage to be taken out was not prime agricultural property. Mr. Lawrence said that the request will need final approval by the Board of Supervisors, however, it would be appropriate to have a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Members of the Commission asked if removal of acreage from the District at this point in time would be a violation of State Code. Mr. Lawrence replied that the State Code allows for special situations, when the Board of Supervisors votes that it is appropriate, and this is the route that is being pursued. Chairman DeHaven consulted with the Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, Mr. Jay Cook, and Mr. Cook agreed that this course was appropriate. Mr. Scot W. Marsh of Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C., representing Mr. Gary McDonald, replied to a question from the Commission concerning how far outside ofthe Urban Development Area this 35 acres was located. Mr. Marsh said that the property was a short distance west of Westernview Subdivision. Mr. Lawrence clarified that by saying that the property was located well south of the Urban Development Area, west of Middletown. Mr. Marsh said that the portion being removed has frontage on Chapel Road (Rt. 627). He added that the area being removed perks, but it has only been used for grazing cattle, not farming, because of the rock outcroppings. There were no public comments. The Commission believed that the request was appropriate and upon motion made by Mr. Ours and seconded by Mr. Romine, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of the request by Mr. Gary McDonald to modify the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District, as submitted by Scot Marsh of Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. Conditional Use Permit #009-98 of Norris and Kathleen Westover for a Cottage Occupation to operate a certified public accounting business. This property is located at 1721 Wardensville Grade and is identified with P.I.N. 50-A-51 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Action - Approval with Conditions Mr. Christopher M. Mohn, Planner Il, read the background information and review agency comments. Mr. Mohn explained that the various review agency comments revealed no objections to the proposed use, however, the Health Department did include three site-specific conditions with their approval: 1) the occupancy of the house is limited to two full-time residents; 2) there shall be only one employee of the CPA business; 3) since the former country store is served by an unapproved sewage disposal system, no running water is to be allowed in the store—the CPA using the store as an office will be required to use Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 279 a mo the bathroom facilities in the house. Mr. Mohn stated that the property appears physically capable of supporting the operation of a single -employee CPA office without discernable impact on the surrounding property. Chairman DeHaven inquired of the Westovers if they were comfortable with the conditions recommended by the staff and the Health Department restrictions. Mr. and Mrs. Westover replied that they were comfortable with the arrangement. There were no public comments. Members of the Commission had no objections to this particular use because of the minimal traffic associated with it. A member of the Commission pointed out that the road leading to this property includes a "blind" hill that is quite dangerous. It was subsequently noted that the site would not be appropriate for any business involving significant traffic. No other issues of concern were raised and upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Romine, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit 4009-98 of Norris and Kathleen Westover for a Cottage Occupation/ Certified Public Accounting Office at 1721 Wardensville Grade (Rt. 608) with the following conditions: 1) All review agency comments and requirements must be complied with at all times. 2) Any expansion or significant change of use will require approval of a new conditional use permit. 3) Upon approval of this conditional use permit, previously approved Conditional Use Permit #016-96 will become invalid. 4) Signage installed for the approved use may not exceed four (4) square feet in area. Rezoning #018-98 of Carriebrooke, submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., to rezone 72.7 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance). This property is located along the eastern side of Tasker Road (Rt. 642), south of the intersection with Routes 37/I-81/847 and 642, and is identified with P.I.N. 75-A-89 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Action - Tabled for 60 Days Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, read the background information and review agency comments. Mr. Wyatt described the potential impacts of the rezoning, which included increased traffic on Tasker Road; development impacts to two historic resources, Carysbrook House and Carysbrook Redoubt; and negative fiscal impacts to fire and rescue services, as well as parks and recreation. He stated that the Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 280 -7 - applicant has proffered to develop a total of 250 residential units that would be single-family and multi- family uses; they have proffered to preserve the historic Carysbrook Redoubt; they have proffered to undertake improvements to Tasker Road and Carysbrook Drive as recommended by VDOT; and a monetary contribution has been proffered consistent with the capital facilities impact model scenario that account for the existing 20 acres of commercially zoned land. Mr. Wyatt said that the applicant has just recently submitted a revised proffer which includes two additional items, the first is an additional monetary contribution to be paid to the Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company, and the second is to restrict uses on the 20 -acre portion of the site currently zoned commercial. Mr. Wyatt said that it was the opinion of the County Attorney that the restrictions on the 20 -acre portion are not enforceable, since that portion is not a part of this rezoning application. Some discussion followed regarding the applicant's request of staff to apply the capital facilities impact model to this rezoning based on two scenarios—the first accounting for the residential development of 72.7418 acres and the second accounting for the residential development of this acreage plus the development of the 20 acres of the property already zoned for commercial use. The applicant had reasoned that there should be a credit given for the commercial use to offset the money the County would receive in taxes when that portion develops. Staff recalled no precedent of a similar situation in the County's conditional zoning history. Members of the Commission decided that as far as this rezoning was concerned, they would be considering just the 72 acres requested to be rezoned and not the remaining 20 acres of the parcel. Discussion next ensued between the Commissioners and staff about how the Winchester Area Transportation Study (WATS) will impact this site. Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin with G. W. Clifford & Associates, the design engineers for this project, came forward to present the rezoning to the Commission. Mr. Gyurisin stated that this project implements the first phase of relocating Route 642 to Warrior Drive; they are proposing 72 acres of RP development, which will consist of 130 single-family homes with curb, gutter, and sidewalks, and 120 condominium, multi -family units. He said that the Carysbrooke house is not in a condition that can be preserved and the HRAB is in agreement. Mr. Gyurisin said that upon reviewing the proffer statement with the owner, they realized that the model did not project any dollar amount for the school system; therefore, a revised proffer statement was presented that included an additional $562.00 to the amount previously proffered, bringing the total dollar amount to $1,000.00 per unit. Mr. Charles W. Maddox, Jr. also with G. W. Clifford & Associates, the design engineers for the project, came forward and discussed how Carriebrooke Drive will be developed to move commercial traffic through the residential development and he also spoke about other transportation issues. Chairman DeHaven called for public comment, but no one came forward to speak. Several concerns were expressed by the Planning Commission, which included the impacts of new residential development to the County's public school system and regional park system, as well as the inability of Tasker Road (Rt. 642) to manage the additional traffic that would be generated by 250 new residential units. Commission members questioned whether the applicant had adequately addressed the negative fiscal impacts for community facilities and services capital facilities costs, particularly for public schools. Commission members also felt that several of the road improvement projects identified in the Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 281 -8- WATS were necessary to accommodate increased traffic impacts in this area, particularly Route 37 -Phase I and Warrior Drive; however, it was recognized that these projects were outside of the control of this applicant. b r developer had a phasing P11—an that would mitigate the ommiSsl3n iiieii'iverJ Inquired1. the .� speed of the development so that it would match transportation system development. The applicant replied that their revised proffer statement includes a phasing agreement; he said that the owner, Mr. Holliday, has agreed to phase the development so that the higher density development would be constructed initially; followed by the single family development, which is the higher generator oftraffic and school children, after the construction of Route 37 is underway. While some members of the Commission believed that no development should occur prior to the road improvements identified in the WATS, other Commissioners believed that having Warrior Road pointed at the intersection with Route 37 and having development occurring was going to be the driving force that VDOT needed to act on the transportation system in this area. Mr. Light next moved to deny the rezoning. Mr. Light stated that the fact of this 72 acres is there are transportation problems that will not allow for the development of this property and the proffer does not mitigate the problems. This motion was seconded by Mr. Morris, but failed by the following vote: YES (TO DENY): Morris, Light, DeHaven, Ours, Miller NO: Copenhaver, Wilson, Romine, Thomas, Stone Chairman DeHaven pointed out that neither the County's Attorney, nor the Commission and the general public, has had an opportunity to review the revised proffer that was submitted this evening. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Romine, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby table Rezoning Application 4018-98 of Carriebrooke to rezone 72.7418 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) for 60 days to allow the developer to reconsider his proffer and present a complete package for review. The vote on this tabling was as follows: YES (TO TABLE FOR 60 DAYS): Miller, Stone, Ours, Thomas, Romine, Wilson, DeHaven, Copenhaver, Morris NO: Light Rezoning Application #019-98 of Danford Ridge Properties, L.C., submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., to rezone 103.74 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance). This property is located approximately 1,400' south of the intersection of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522) and West Parkins Mill Road (Rt. 644), on the west side of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522 So.), and is identified with P.I.N.s 76-A-22 and 76-A-23 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 282 M Action - Tabled for 30 Days Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, read the background information and the review agency comments. Mr. Wyatt stated that the applicant has proffered to develop a maximum of 250 single-family dwelling units, to provide necessary right-of-way and undertake improvements for Front Royai Pike and for the internal road systems as required by VDOT, to provide an environmental easement that will maintain existing steep slope and woodland areas for the purpose of protecting the Frederick Hall viewshed, and to provide a monetary contribution to offset the negative fiscal impacts for Public Schools, Parks and Recreation, and Fire and Rescue services. Mr. Wyatt said that the proffer statement mitigates the majority ofthe impacts, however, the one issue that still remains is that the general development plan does not include a proposal to continue Warrior Drive from the Wakeland Manor property to the south. He stated that the plan depicts the location of Warrior Drive west of the Danford Ridge track through the Artrip property. He said that this location appears to be superior from a technical engineering design review, as it keeps Warrior Drive out of the stream beds and steep slope areas; unfortunately, the location proposed by the applicant will not allow for a connection with the segment of Warrior Drive through Wakeland Manor unless the approved master development plan (MDP) is revised for that development. Mr. Charles W. Maddox, Jr., with G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., the design engineers representing the owner, presented the rezoning proposal to the Commission. Mr. Maddox said that this development is an implementing phase of the overall Eastern Road Plan in this urban development area. He also spoke specifically about the Warrior Drive road situation, whereby the approved Wakeland Manor MDP shows Warrior Drive at a different location than what is shown on the Comprehensive Plan. In the interest of working together towards a common goal, Mr. Maddox read the following statement by the owner: "The owner is willing to agree that the generalized MDP will be modified to provide for an alternative location of Warrior Drive should the transportation component of the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan be revised to align Warrior Drive from its presently planned location. The owner agrees to consult with adjoining property owners involved with the Warrior Drive location ... in attempt to reach agreement revisions necessary to implement the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. Prior to submission of a MDP for the Danford Ridge Properties, L.C., the location of Warrior Drive will be resolved between property owners that adjoin Danford Ridge Properties." Members of the Commission commented that Route 522 will initially be the primary means of access in and out of the development and once Parkins Mill becomes available, there will be at least two other ways in and out. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments and the following persons came forward to speak: Ms. Connie Graham, adjoining property owner, had concerns about the affects of this development on her and her neighbors' quality of life, on the wildlife in the area, the traffic, and the schools. Mr. Robert Pownall, from Shawnee District, wanted the access to go to Warrior Drive, rather than on Route 522. He commented about the poor visibility on that section of Route 522 and that numerous accidents occur there. Mr. Pownall also requested that the trees be preserved along the viewshed of Route Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 283 -10- 522. Mr. Maddox replied that their plans are to protect the trees around the periphery and the areas along the creeks, and to also protect the historic site to the north. Planning Commission members did not have any outstanding areas of concern with this rezoning. Members of the Commission stated that there were no "unknowns" about what was planned and that it was fairly defined as far as what was going to happen.They did feel that the rezoning needed to be tabled to allow for adequate public review of the revised proffer statement and to correct the legal advertisement for this application, which was in error. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby table for 30 days Rezoning Application 9019-98 of Danford Ridge Properties, L.C., submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., to rezone 103.74 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) in order to allow for public review of the revised proffer statement and to correct the legal advertisement for this application, which was published incorrectly. Master Development Plan #005-98 of Dawson Industrial Park, submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., to develop a 26.4493 -acre site for light industrial and office use. This property is located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Shady Elm Road (Rt. 651) and Route 37, and is identified with P.I.N. 63 -A -59A in the Back Creek District. Action - Recommended Approval with Stipulation Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, read the background information and review agency comments. Mr. Wyatt said that the only issue of concern for staff is that the WATS calls for the widening of Shady Elm Road (Route 65 1) and he pointed out on a map where an interchange would eventually be needed. Mr. Wyatt explained that the Coca-Cola Company designated right-of-way in this area as part of their rezoning; and, in keeping with that, right-of-way will need to be provided for this site also. He explained that the applicant has indicated that right-of-way will be available and it has been designated on the site plan; however, the master development plan will need to clearly identify the location and the acreage and show it as a dedicated issue. Mr. Ronald Mislowsky with G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., the design engineers for the project, said that VDOT has already approved the site plan and subdivision that creates the American Woodmark site; they intend to dedicate the 60' right-of-way and will amend the master development plan to indicate such; and, the Sanitation Authority has approved their plans for the extension of water and sewer to the site. There were no public comments. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 284 ONE No issues of concern were raised by the Planning Commission. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Ours, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of MDP 4005-98 of Dawson Industrial Park with the stipulation that the right-of-way on Shady Elm Road be provided. Master Development Plan 4006-98 of Willow Branch, submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., to develop 51 single family detached residential units. This property is located on the west side of Merriman's Lane (Rt. 621) at the Winchester & Western Railroad crossing and east of Route 37, approximately 1,100' south of Breckenridge Lane, and is identified with P.I.N. 53-A-88 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Stipulation Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, discussed four issues of concern raised by the staff, which included lot access, a road efficiency buffer, a flood plain area within the platted lots, and stormwater management. Regarding the lot access, Mr. Wyatt stated that the development design allows for individual lot access on Merriman's Lane, which is not identified as an arterial or major collector road. He said that it would be more desirable to have all lots access this development via Remington Drive or O'Keefe Lane as the 45 mph speed limit and geometries of Merriman's Lane are not suited for typical higher -density residential lot access. Mr. Wyatt explained that a road efficiency buffer is required within residential properties which adjoin arterial or major collector roads; therefore, the master development plan will need to indicate a road efficiency buffer along Route 37 which includes a location, distance, and typical section for this improvement. Mr. Wyatt continued, stating that the applicant has proposed to incorporate areas of floodplain within building lots on the north side of O'Keefe Lane. He said that a consumer notification statement needs to be provided at the platting stage for these lots which clearly depicts the flood plain area and states that no building activity is permitted to occur within that portion of the building lot. In addition, Mr. Wyatt pointed out that the County Engineer has stated that stormwater management will be required on this site and the location of this feature will need to be provided to ensure that there is not a conflict with the proposed lot limits location. Members of the Commission inquired if there was anything in the WATS plan for Merrimans Lane north of this development going out to Route 50. Mr. Wyatt replied that the only item shown in WATS for this area is the extension of Juba] Early Drive with a new interchange at Route 37. Commission members asked if the City had any comments about the possible impact from Merrimans Lane north. Mr. Wyatt said that the City did not have any comments on the master plan, however, they did comment on the rezoning. Mr. Ron Mislowsky, of G. W. Clifford & Associaties, Inc., the design engineers for the project, said that they have no problems adding the road efficiency buffer and other details requested by the staff. Mr. Mislowsky stated that they are currently re -mapping the floodplain through this area so there is Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 285 -12 - an accurate depiction of where the 100 -year flood is; and, they will certainly add the consumer notification statement to the master development plan. Concerning the stormwater management, Mr. Mislowsky said that they have met with the County Engineer and will soon be meeting with VDOT to make some improvements where Abrams Creek goes under Merrimans Lane. Mr. Mislowsky concluded his presentation by saying that they are providing 12' road widening, curb & gutter; and sidewalk all along Merrimans lane. Mr. Charles W. Maddox, Jr., also with G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., addressed the lot access issue. He stated that rather than back houses up against Merrimans Lane, they have tried to stay in keeping with the design of the existing lots. Mr. Maddox noted that the City has voted to fund and work with VDOT towards the Jubal Early Drive project. He said that the preferred plan by Merrimans Lane residents, and from both the City and VDOT, is to cul-de-sac Merrimans Lane. He added that the access to Jubal Early Drive will be via Handley Avenue and Meadowbranch Avenue. There were no citizen comments. No other areas of concern were raised by the Planning Commission. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Master Development Plan #006-98 of Willow Branch, submitted by G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. to develop 51 single-family detached residential units with the stipulation that all review agency comments are complied with. Review of Site Plan 9067-98 - Opeguon Water Reclamation Facility Mr. Michael Ruddy, Planner II, presented a site plan for the Planning Commission's information for an upgrade to the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. Mr. Ruddy said that the overall cost of the public project is approximately 9.8 million dollars and the site plan indicates a significant increase in the capacity of the plant, from 6 1/4 million gallons per day to 8 1/4 million gallons per day. Cancellation of the Commission's December 16, 1998 Meeting Mr. Kris Tierney, Planning Director, stated that there are no pending applications or items of discussion for the Commission's December 16, 1998 meeting. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Ours, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to cancel their second meeting in December. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 286 -13 - ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. by unanimous vote, Respectfully submitted, Kris C. Tierney, Secretary Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of December 2, 1998 Page 287 APPLICATION ACTION SUMMARY (printed January 25, 1999) - AP Plicatii n newly submi tted. REZONING: %{:.:{.{vnti{:_rnri>.vh s: : •:v.::.; rn:} ' ':n :ii ' i:J: vv...nv:::.:.}=.: •.v :..v. -:: nn::2.hf,:x}: ..{.-. 4.•$:�':: r•.: vi.:?v.. ......... :::.:: r:}:. ..v. .x::•. .i-. t�•r.-.v.{..w. n.>.y.n-v ::: ::. :. {. ... ...... ti ::..i......... :h ...: ..v... ....x: - _ -'.�.},i:'{:-:-S{:::yjJ};.'-r:iyr. i'}::}i:v':. 3rs(:�.v:{ -_ rCvW- .v. :--. :4I.= _ {.. :y. -}.... x::.:2.AY{r n....:. 2:v.. i ::}Y ::::i::. t.;{• ' .��� 103,74 ac. from RA to RP for 250 S.F. homes :2.x2. ...fie.. � � .{ : F•-: � S. -•>}. .. ...:. x•-..�.....:. -:::::vv....v.:-r.-..:.. iv.. . r.$ry :• - $, ;..$Wn ..:.v...- ..::v.:.:x.::{n ::• . Location: West side of Martinsburg Pike, across from Brooke Road 01/27/99 Submitted: 01/06/99 PC Review: 02/03/99 BOS Review: 02/24/99 - tentatively scheduled Danford Ridge Properties, L.C. (REZ 019-98 Shawnee 103,74 ac. from RA to RP for 250 S.F. homes Location: Approx. 1,4001± south of the Rt. 522/ Rt. 644 intersection; on the west side of Rt. 522 South Submitted: 11/06/98 PC Review: 12/02/98 - tabled to 01/06/99; 01/06/99 - rec. approval with proffers BOS Review• 01/27/99 arriebrooke (REZ #018-98) F Shawnee 72.7 ac. from RA to RP for 250 S.F. & M.F. homes Location: Eastern side of Tasker Rd. (Rt. 642); south of intersection of Routes 37/1-81/ 847/ 642 Submitted: 1101/27/99 10/23/98 PC Review: 12/02/98 - tabled to 01/06/99; 01/06/99 - rec. approval with proffers BOS Review: MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Willow Branch (MDP #006-98) Back Creek 51 single family homes on 26.895 ac. Location: W. side of Merriman's Ln. (Rt. 62 1) at W&W Railroad, along Rt. 37 Submitted: 10/21/98 PC Review: 12/02/98 - recommended approval with conditions BOS Review: 01/13/99 - approved with conditions Admin. Approved: pending submittal of final plan by applicant Dawson Industrial Park DP #005-98 Back Creek Office & Industrial Park on 26.4493 ac. 1 Location: NW quadrant of the Shady Elm Rd. (Rt. 65 1) & Rt. 37 intersection Submitted: 09/25/98 PC Review: 12/02/98 - recommended approval with conditions BOS Review: --lipending 01/13/99 - approved with conditions Admin. Approved: submittal of final plan by applicant SUBDIVISIONS: Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 Autumn Glen, Sect. I (SUB 015-98) Location: Submitted: MDP #004-98 (Tasker Rd Land Bays) Subd. Admin. Approved: Opequon I 21 lots - duplex & multiplex (52 dwellings) on 14.8 ac. (RP) South side of Tasker Rd. (Rt. 642), 0.25 mi. East of Rt. 647 06/30/98 MDP approved by BOS 07/08/98; MDP Pending Admin. Approval Phase I approved on 11/04/98 for 21 Briarwood Estates (SUB #014-98)I Stonewall 184 single-family lots on 55.7887 ac (RP) Location: East side of Greenwood Rd. (Rt. 656) midway between Senseny Rd. (Rt. 657) & Valley Mill Rd. (Rt. 659) Submitted: r06/29/98 MDP #003-98 ed by BOS 05/27/98; MDP Admin. Approved Subd. Admin. ADDroved: Mark & Rachelle Repine (SUB #00498) NO MDP Shawnee Subdivision of 1.3719 ac. into 3 s.f. lots (RP) Location: Heritage Hills Subd.; along the eastern portion of Idlewood Drive Submitted: 01/26/98 PC Review: 02/18/98 - recommended approval 11 BOS Review: 03/11/98 -approved ---A:..- Admin Annrnvadi• 11 D Lenoir City Co. Lot 2; Stonewall Indust. Pk. SUB #007-9 Gainesboro Subdivision of a 2.6584 ac. lot (Ml) Location:11 McGhee Rd. (Rt. 861)• approx. 1,000' from Tyson Dr. intersection Submitted: 07/28/97 MDP #006-93 Approved by BOS 07/14/93; Admin. Approved 07/28/93 Subd. Admin. Approved: Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 3 Dominion Knolls (SUB #005-97) Stonewall 75 s.f. zero lot line lots on 20.278 ac. Location: So.west comer of Baker Ln. (Rt. 1200) & Ft. Collier Rd. (Rt. 1322) Submitted: 05/16/97 MDP #001-97 Approved by BOS 04/09/97; Admin. Approved 06/30/97 Subd. Admin. Approved: Section 1 (25 lots) approved 06/02/98; Sections 2 & 3 Pending Winchester -Fred Co. IDC SUB Back Creek 2 MI Lots 0.552 acres & 20.285 acres Location: Southeast side of Development Lane Submitted: 09/08/95 MDP #003-87: 7 Approved by BOS 07/08/87; Admin. Approved 06/08/88 Pending Admin. Approval LAw2ifingsigned plats. RMT Partnership SUB Back Creek 1 Lot - 29.6 Acres 2 cation: ValleyPike (Rt. 11 So.) bmitted: [Pending 05/17/95 DP #003-91 Approved b BOS 07/10/91; Admin. Approved 09/03/91 Admin. ApprovahEllAwaiting submission of signed plat & deed of dedication Abrams Point, Phase I SUB Shawnee 230 SF Cluster & UrbaIplat Location: South side of Rt. 659 Submitted: 05/02/90 PC Review: 06/06/90 - recommended approval BOS Review: 06/13/90 - approved PendingAdmin. Approval: Awaitingdeed of dedication, letter of credit, and si Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 Har Stimpson SUB F�Locafion: -------------- O e uon Two B2 Lots Town Run Lane ed: 09/23/94 PC Review: 10/19/94 - recommended approval BOS Review: 10/26/94 - a roved [Awaitingsigned Pending Admin. Approval: plat. SITE PLANS: ..: :::..: - ::.::::_::::::.:...?...--:-:•'-::C-}.:.........:.......::::J:: .:::.::�:::.::_::::...: :::._::::::::::: -:::..:.._:.:::. ...... is b r..::.:._:-.._:.:._.: �. a. Location 326 McGhee Drive Submitted: 01/15/99 Approved: pending Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 use Assisted Living ) Opequon Assisted living facility/4.6 ac. developed on 73.4749 ac. site (RP) FEApproved: South side of Tasker Rd. (Rt. 642); 1,100 feet east of Aylor Rd. (Rt. 647) 12/07/98 12/02/98 Pending Pending AKI Corp. 8) Stonewall 2,160sf warehouse addition; 0.118 ac. developed on 16.927 ac. site (Ml) UAroved: 188 Brooke Road 441 Park Center Drive 12/07/98 12/03/98 Pending Kraft Foods, Inc. (SP 11071-98) Stonewall 11 1 Parking Lot Expansion; entire one - parcel to be developed (Ml) Location: 441 Park Center Drive Submitted: 12/03/98 Approved: Pending J.R.'s Auto Body (SP 11070-98) Stonewall 1 4,000 s.f. bldg. addition; 2.3986 ac. site (B3) Location: Welltown Pike (Rt. 661) Submitted: 11/23/98 Approved: Pending Crider & Shockey, Inc. of W.V. (SP 11065-98) Stonewall Industrial/Mfg. Use; 9.2467 ac. developed of a 9.2467 ac. site (Ml) Location: West Brooke Road; Ft. Collier Industrial Park Submitted: 10/15/98 Approved: Pending Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 Jones & Frank (SP #06498) --------------- Stonewall Warehouse & office use; 5.0 ac. developed on a 5.0 ac. site (MI) Location: 150 Fort Collier Road, Fort Collier Industrial Park Submitted: 10/19/98 Approved: Pending Raymart, Inc. (SP #063-98) ][Shawnee::: Back Creek �24' X 16' addition for ADA upgrades exterior im rovements Location: 1039 Millwood Pike 11 Submitted: 11 10/14/98 1� God's Glory Land (SP #061-98) II Back Creek Church Retreat; 26.45 ac. to be I develoned of a 85.7 ac. site (RA) Location: Back Creek Road Submitted: 10/01/98 Approved: Pending World Wide Automotive ]Stonewall (SP #062-98) Stonewall 7,504 s.f. warehouse; 4 ac. developed of a 7.74 ac. site (B3) Industrial/Manufacturing; 12.2 ac. to be developed on a 12.203 ac. site (MI) Location: Fort Collier Industrial Park; West Brooke Road Submitted: 10/01/98 Approved: Pending Henry Property - Mini (SP #057-98) Stonewall 7,504 s.f. warehouse; 4 ac. developed of a 7.74 ac. site (B3) FAroved: Intersection of Baker Lane & Fort Collier Road L 08/26/98 Pending Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 Moffett Property (SP #050-98) Stonewall Metal warehse. addition (4,800 g.s.f.); 1.392 ac. site; 0.465 disturbed (B3) Location: 1154 Martinsburg Pike 06/10/98 07/2i/98 ILSubmitted: Approved: Pending T.P. & Susan Goodman (SP #04498) 11 Stonewall Hackwood/ Minor Site Plan (RA) 1 Location: 534 Redbud Road Submitted: 06/10/98 Approved: Pending Cives Steel Company (SP #042-98) Stonewall Addition of paper storage bldg.; 1,200 s.f, of 18.07 -ac. site (Ml) Location: 210 Cives Lane (behind Shade Equipment Co.) Submitted: 06/17/98 Approved: Pending Agape Christian Fellowship Church Sanctua SP #005-9 Shawnee Church Expansion; 2.5 ac. to be developed of a 29.5115 ac. site Location: East side of Rt. 642; a rox. 2,500' so. of the Rt. 37/1-81 Interch . Submitted: 02/12/97 A roved: Pending Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 Shenandoah Bldg. SupplyI� Gainesboro ,Warehouse on 5 acres (Ml) Location: 195 Lenoir Drive (Stonewall Industrial Submitted: 12/16/96 Wheatlands Wastewater Facility SP #047-89 --------------------- Stimpson/Rt. 277 Oil & Lube Service SP #030-9 Opequon & Lube Serv., Car Wash, Drive - FThu on2.97 ac. 2 0.916 acre parcel Location: 3548 North Frederick Pike Location: 152 Fairfax Pk. hind Red Apple CountryStore Pending 04/10/96 Approved: Submitted: 07/03/96 Approved: Pending Wheatlands Wastewater Facility SP #047-89 Opequon AMOCO/House of Gifts Gainesboro Gas Pump Canopy 880 sq. ft. area of a SP #022-96 0.916 acre parcel Location: 3548 North Frederick Pike Submitted: 05/08/96 Approved: Pending Wheatlands Wastewater Facility SP #047-89 Opequon Treatment Facility on 5 Acres (R5) American Legion Post #021 Stonewall Addition to lodge building on 3.4255 SP #018-96 Note: acre site 2 Location: 1730 Berryville Pike Submitted: 04/10/96 Approved: Pendin Wheatlands Wastewater Facility SP #047-89 Opequon Treatment Facility on 5 Acres (R5) Location: o. West of Double Tollgate; ad'. & west of Rt. 522 Submitted: I[Being 9/12/89 Note: held at a licant's re uest. -pp,111catWn3 ttution summary Printed January 25, 1999 Flex Tech SP #057-90 Stonewall Ml Use on 11 Ac. 1 Location: East side of Ft. Collier Rd. Submitted: 10/25/90 Note: Being held at applicant's request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: Norris & Kathleen Westover (CUP #009-98) Back Creek Cottage Occupation for a private (one person) CPA Office (RA) ation: 1721 Wardensville Grade (Rt. 608); approx. 3 mi. So. of Rt. 50 W mitted: [BOS 11/05/98 Review: 12/02/98 - recommended approval with conditions Review: 01/13/99 - approved with conditions Meade's Family Day Home (CUP #1008-98) Gainesboro Day Care Facility Location: 150 Twine Lane, Gore Submitted: 09/11/98 PC Review: 10/07/98 tabled for 30 days; 11/04/98 tabled for 30 days; 12/02/98 - recommended approval with conditions BOS Review: 01/13/99 - approved w/ conditions & pending compliance w/ all review agency comments Applications Action Summary Printed January 25, 1999 10 PC REVIEW DATE: 02/03/99 BOS REVIEW DATE: 02/24/99 REZONING APPLICATION #01-99 K & M ENTERPRISES To rezone 0.60 acres from RP (Residential Performance) to B2 (Business General) LOCATION: This property is located on the west side of Martinsburg Pike (Route 1 I North), across from Brooke Road (Route 1328). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 54-A-50 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) District ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: Zoned RP, Residential Performance District B2, Business General District South: Zoned B2, Highway Commercial District East: Zoned M1, Light Industrial District West: Zoned RP, Residential Performance District LR, Low Density Residential District HR, High Density Residential District PROPOSED USE: Commercial REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Land Use: Residential Use: Residential Weber's Nursery Use: Bank, Strip Mall Use: Ft. Collier Ind. Park Use: Star Fort Estates Single -Family Res. Multi -Family Res. Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objection to rezoning of this property. Before development, REZ #01-99, K & M Enterprises Page 2 January 22, 1999 this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization and off-site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Fire Marshal: Plan approval recommended. Sanitation Authority: No comment. County Engineer: 1) Verify the adequacy of the on-site drop inlet and associated drainage culvert prior to initiating a site plan. 2) Except for the above comment, we have no other objection to the proposed rezoning. City of Winchester: How is impact on future extension of Brooke Road being addressed? County Attorney: Once signed by owners, appears proper. Question `the dedication' of easement for buffer Frederick County. Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History The original Zoning Map for Frederick County depicts this property as R-1, Residential Limited District (U. S. G. S. Winchester Quadrangle). This zoning classification was amended to RP (Residential Performance) District when the RP District replaced the R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-6 Districts on September 28, 1983. 2) Location The 0.60 acres proposed for rezoning is located in the county's Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The property has frontage on Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North) and is situated at a signalized intersection across from the Fort Collier Industrial Park. 3) Site Suitability The site does not contain environmentally sensitive areas, nor does it possess potentially significant historic resources. The most significant historic resource within the proximity of this site is Fort Collier; however, the development of this property would not compromise the REZ #41-99, K & M Enterprises Page 3 January 22, 1999 viewshed from this historic resource. The site has frontage on Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North), which is classified as a major arterial road in the Comprehensive Policy Plan and is capable of being served by public water and sewer from the City of Winchester Public Utilities Department. 4) Potential Impacts and Issues a) Site Access The applicant's traffic impact analysis statement demonstrates an increase in traffic attraction to this site as a result of commercial development. This increase in traffic and change in land use creates the potential for traffic stacking near the signalized intersection for vehicles making left turn movements. Therefore, it would be prudent for the applicant to utilize a shared entrance for this site with the adjoining property immediately south which is the site of the Winchester Animal Hospital. The Winchester Animal Hospital site is owned by the applicant of this rezoning request; therefore, this entrance could be easily accommodated which would allow for access into the site at a signalized intersection. b) Winchester Area Transportation Study The WATS calls for the continuation of a collector road that would extend Brooke Road from Martinsburg Pike (Route 11 North) to North Frederick Pike (Route 522 North). Although the WATS is not property -specific, the plan suggests that this extension should be at a cross intersection with Brooke Road; therefore, this property could be potentially impacted by this future improvement. Meetings with the City of Winchester Planning Director, staff, and the applicant's engineer have resulted in all parties agreeing that this future road extension will impact this property, residential areas along Locust Street in the City of Winchester, and an undeveloped tract of land that is zoned for commercial use in the county. All parties also agree that the applicant should accommodate future right-of-way needs for this road extension, but should not be required to construct the road segment at this time. c) Fire and Rescue Services The Capital Facilities Impact Model was applied to this rezoning proposal. The results of the model run demonstrate a negative fiscal impact to Fire and Rescue Services for capital facilities costs. REZ #01-99, K & M Enterprises Page 4 January 22, 1999 5) Proffer Statement The applicant has submitted a proffer statement which has been signed, notarized, and reviewed by the County Attorney. The applicant has proffered to limit access to this site to one commercial entrance and provide improvements to the road system as warranted by VDOT, to provide a sixty - foot right-of-way for the future extension of Brooke Road on a future site development plan which will require approval by the City of Winchester and Frederick County, and to provide a monetary contribution for Fire and Rescue Service capital facilities costs that slightly exceeds the impact amount demonstrated by the Capital Facilities Impact Model run. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 02/03/99 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The proposal to rezone 0.60 acres from residential to commercial land use conforms with the recommendations of the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The property can be adequately served by the existing infrastructure and will not create a significant negative impact to adjoining properties. The applicant's proffer statement mitigates the majority ofthe impact identified by staff, however, it is unclear if the proffer to limit access to one commercial entrance is intended to utilize a shared entrance with the adjoining property to the south. Staff believes that the applicant should address this issue to the satisfaction of the commission during the consideration of this rezoning proposal. O:\Agendu\REZONE\COMMENTS\K&M Enterprises.REZ .0,. REZ #01-99 K&M Enterprises PIN. 54—A-50 Produced by Frederick County Planning and Development, 1-20-99 REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1 o be co pleted ry 1'lainnrng etc fj ;' Zoning Amendment Number_ Date Receivedt PC Hearing Date,- �(BOS Hearing bate The following information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: 0 Name: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 2. Property Owner (if different than above) Name: K & M Enterprises Telephone: (540) 678-1628 Address: 1207 Cedar Creek Grade Winchester, VA 22602 3. Contact person if other than above Name: Mark D. Smith, P.E.. L.S.. Telephone: (540) 662-4185 4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location map X Agency Continents X Plat X Fees X Deed to property X Impact Analysis Statement X Verification of taxes paid X Proffer Statement X .t � - 5. The Code of Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: K & M Enterprises 6. A) Current Use of the Property: Residential B) Proposed Use of the Property: commercial 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NUMBER Please see attached USE ZONING 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers): Road. 12 Information to be Submitted for Capital Facilities Impact Model , In order for the Planning Staff to use its capital facilities impact model, it is necessary for the applicant to provide information concerning the specifics of the proposed use. Otherwise, the planning staff will use the maximum possible density or intensity scenario for the proposed Zoning District as described on Page 9 of the application package. 9. Parcel Identification/Location: Parcel Identification Number 54-((A))-50 Districts Magisterial: Stonewall Fire Service: Millwood Sta t; on Rescue Service: Millwood Station High School: Middle School: _ Elementary School 10. Zoning Change: List the acreage included in each new zoning category being requested. Acres Current Zoning Zoning Re uested 0.60 RP 0.60 Total acreage to be rezoned 11. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Single Family homes: Non -Residential Lots: Office: Retail: Restaurant: Number of Units Proposed Townhome: Mobile Home: Square Footage of Proposed Uses 13 Multi -Family: Hotel Rooms: Service Station: Manufacturing: Warehouse: Other: 12. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my'(our) knowledge. Applicant(s): = �! _ / '�-� Date: 0 , Date: - n� Owner(s): �,.1/ �� Date:, Date: 14 County City Adjoining Property Owners Rezoning Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 101 -North Kent Street. Name and Property Identification Number I Address Name Michael S. Weber 937 Martinsburg Pike Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: B-2, Use: Retail Property= - '4 -le Mar gree L. Washington 911 Martinsburg Pike Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: RP, Use: Residential Proper = 54-((A))-49 Name Omni 112 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: M-1 Use: Office Procerr # 54 -((A)) -81G Name Mary H. Mills 101 Star Fort Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: RP Use: Residential Property= 54A- 2 -1 Name Earl C. Harsh et ux 100 Star Fort Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: RP, Use: Residential Property= 54A-(-(-2))-16 Name Vivian S. Swisher Prooervv = 114-((l))-157 1003 North Braddock Street Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: LR Use: Residential Name Mary V. Davies et vir 1005 North Braddock Street Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: LR, Use: Residential Prooerry 1 114-((1))-158 Name K & M Enterprises 901 N. Loudon Street Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: B2/HR, Use: Commercial Proerrv= 134-((3))-36 Name Lawton M. Saunders 407 West Monmouth Street Winchester, VA 22601 Zone: HR Use: Multi-Fami1 Pro em = 134-((5))-1 Name Toan & Assoc. 360-2 McGhee Road Winchester, VA 22603 Zone: B-2, Use: Commercial Proem = 134-((5 -6 15 es. City Name and Property Identification Number I Address Name F & M Bunk - Winchester c= P.O. Box 2800 Winchester, VA 22604 Zone: B-2 Use: Commercial Property # 134-((6))-1 Name F & M Bank P. 0. Box 2800 Winchester, VA 22604 Zone: B-2 Use: Commercial Property # 134-((6))-2 Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property # Name Property # Name Property Name # Property # Name Property# Name Property # Name Property Name Property # # 16 REZONING REQUEST PROFFER Property Identification Number 54-((A))-50 K & M ENTERPRISES Pursuant to Section 15.2 - 2296 Et Seq., of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia shall approve rezoning application # 01-99 for the rezoning of approximately 0.60 acres from the Residential Performance (RP) zoning district to the Business General (B2) zoning district, development of the newly rezoned portion of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with said code and zoning ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon the applicant and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The subject property is more particularly described as all of the land conveyed to K & M Enterprises by deed from Tem A. Cochran dated December 29, 1997 of record in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Winchester in Deed Book 285 at Page 1324, and more particularly described by a survey by L. Allen Ebert, L.S., dated April 30, 1992, of record in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Winchester, in Deed Book 253, page 431-432. AREA ZONED B-2 - 0.60 ACRES 1. INGRESS/EGRESS The subject property shall have no more than one entrance on Martinsburg Pike (U.S. Route 11). Signage, turn lanes, and signalization shall be installed as warranted and required by the Virginia Department of Transportation, and the City of Winchester. 2. BROOKE ROAD EXTENSION A sixty foot right-of-way shall be provided for the future extension of Brooke Road from Martinsburg Pike to North Frederick Pike. The location of this sixty foot right-of-way shall be depicted on the site development plan which will require approval by the City of Winchester and Frederick County. 3. MONETARY CONTRIBUTION TO OFFSET IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT The undersigned owners of the above-described property hereby voluntarily proffer that in the event rezoning application # 01-99 is approved, the undersigned will pay to the Treasurer of Frederick County, Virginia, at the time a building permit is issued for said property, the sum of $100.00 for fire and rescue services. The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the applicant and owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grant this rezoning and accept the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfull Submitted: ' J ? By: Kim Walls 'el/z f- , -6 Vt Marietta Walls Commonwealth of Virginia City/County of �\ e. 1 To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �1 day of 1998 by My Commission Expires Commonwealth of Virginia ,)o- '" Notary -Public c City/County of t=�;t.�` _` 1��: To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ;� day of 1998 by Notary Public , r., l; �I �.�••. 1 My Commission Expires i r Z ^ -% y v ONF,%OU I(BUMMIM]ENU PHOPMEM IMUM o CLQ &4-QQQDD-SO donualffy e69 � 0 0 0 Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Greenway Engineering INTRODUCTION Walls Impact Statement The subject property is located on the west side of U.S. Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike), across from Brooke Road. This site consists of a 2.49 acre parcel, and is split by the Winchester -Frederick County line. Out of this total area, 1.38 acres are within Frederick County, and are identified as tax neap no. 54-((A))-50. Within the county's jurisdiction, the owners, Kim and Marietta Walls, propose to rezone 0.60 acres. The newly rezoned area would front on Martinsburg Pike and include the existing residence, (please refer to Appendix 5). The current zoning is "RP", and the proposed zoning is "B-2". This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Frederick County by this rezoning. This impact statement will refer to the entire 2.49 acre parcel as the "subject property", or the "subject site." The area to be rezoned will be referred to as "Parcel A". SITE SUITABILITY Flood Plains The subject site is located on FEMA NFIP maps 9510173 0005 B, and 9510063 0105 B. The site is located within a "ZONE C" area. No portion of the site is in a 100 year flood plain. Wetlands The National Wetlands Inventory Map does not indicate any wetlands on the subject site. Mature Woodlands There is a grove of trees around the existing residence on the subject property. These trees are greater than 12" in diameter and may classify as a mature woodland. During any site plan approval process, care will be taken to insure that the number of mature trees removed are within the limit permitted by ordinance. Soil Types Information for soil types on this site has been obtained from the Soil Survey of Frederick County, by the USDS Soil Conservation Service. There are two different soil types on the subject property. These soils are identified as Frederick-Poplimento loams, 7-15% slopes, and Frederick-Poplimento loams, 7- 15% slopes, very rocky. On Parcel A, the less rocky soil covers approximately two-thirds of the site nearest Martinsburg Pike, with the very rocky soil covering the remainder. Prime Agricultural -Soils Approximately two-thirds of the soils on Parcel A are "moderately well suited" to cultivated crops, and are "well suited" to hay and pasture. The remaining one-third of Parcel A consists of soils that are "not suited" to cultivated crops, and are "poorly suited" to hay and pasture. Greenway Engineering Steep Slopes There are no steep slopes on Parcel A. Con StIMctI o-- CV11Ve. 11J Walls Impact Statement For the above referenced soil types, the Soil Survev lists the following factors as being limitations for community development: rock outcrops, clayey subsoil, high shrink -swell potential, low strength, moderately slow permeability, and slope. All of these factors can be easily dealt with by good site and building design and proper construction techniques. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The following table lists the distanced from the subject property to residences and other structures on surrounding properties: Property Identification No Distance from Building to Subject Pro ft Distance from Building to Parcel A ft Building Type Zone Coun 54-A-48 180' 180' Plant nursery B-2 54-A-49 10' 10' Residence RP 54 -A -81G >250' >250' Office M-1 54A-2-1 60' 265' Residence RP 54A-2-16 70' 250' Residence RP Citv 114-1.157 70' 290' Residence LR 114-1-158 70' 310' Residence LR 134-3-36 70' 145' Vet Clinic B-2 134-5-1 20' 195' Apartments HR 134-5-6 185' 265' Commercial* B-2 134-6-1 --- --- --- B-2 134-6-2 265' 330' Bank B-2 * Northside Station. The enterprise nearest to the subject property is "Jake & Charlies Sports Club." This table shows that an adjoining residence, tax no. 54-A-49 is approximately 10' from Parcel A. A category "B" buffer is required, however, on Parcel A along the boundary with said adjoiner. This will result in the construction of a landscape screen and a 6' high fence along the adjoning boundary. The result is that the minimum distance between this adjoining residence and a structure on Parcel A will be 60'. This screening and distance buffer should be sufficent to reduce to acceptable levels the impact on the adjoining residence by noise or glare associated with business uses on Parcel A. This rezoning is not expected to create a negative impact on any neighboring businesses. Greenway Engineering Walls Impact Statement BASIS FOR DETERMINING XMPACT 10 The subject property is currently zoned "RP". It is expected that Parcel A, with 0.60 acres, could be developed under an RP zone to include 5 dwelling units. WN All impacts for the proposed "B-2" zoning have been calculated using the maximum possible development density, which is 12,820 square feet of "retail space." For trip generation calculations, this has been interpreted to be a shopping center. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Trip Generation The following table is based on trip data taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition: TRIP GENERATION DATA PEAK HOUR TRIPS ADT AM PM (vehicles/day) Existing RP Use Townhouse Density 5 units Entering 1 Exiting 2 Entering 2 Exitin 1 29 B-2 Shopping Center 12,820 sf 8 5 23 25 550 The development of the rezoned site at the maximum density could therefore generate a traffic increase of 521 trips per day. Traffic Impact VDOT has classified U.S. Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike) a major collector. VDOT Office Services Specialist, Vega Ziemer (Edinburg office), supplied existing traffic data from the latest study on this road. 3 Greenway Engineering Walls Impact Statement EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS Road Date of Stud v ADT (vehicles/day) U.S. Route 11 1996 14,000 Approval of this rezoning proposal could therefore generate a 3.8% increase in traffic on U.S. Route 11. It is expected that many of the patrons to businesses on Parcel A will stop in on their way by. Therefore, the actual traffic generated by Parcel A could be much smaller. BROOKE ROAD EXTENSION The Virginia Department of Transportation, in cooperation with several local governments, have produced a report of future road improvements_ This report is known as the Winchester Area Transportion Study, or WATS. Brooke Road, which lies southeast of the subject property, is shown on the WATS study as being extended to U.S. Route 522. Greenway Engineering has met with the Planning Departments of Both Frederick County and the City of Winchester to determine the alignment of this future Brooke Road extension. A consensus has been reached on this alignment, and it has been determined that the road extension will almost completely bypass the subject property (Please refer to the enclosed Brooke Road Extension Plan). The owner is aware that the Brooke Road extension will be built within the next twenty to thirty years, and is prepared to meet the requirements placed on them by the City of Winchester or the Virginia Department of Transportation for future right-of-way dedication. WATER SUPPLY The newly rezoned area will have water service provided by the City of Winchester. The existing building is currently hooked up to the city water system. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The existing building and any new construction on Parcel A will have sewer service provided by the City of Winchester. DRAINAGE There is a knoll on the subject property that diverts water around Parcel A, resulting in less than one tenth of an acre which drains across said parcel. Currently, the runoff from Parcel A drains toward Greenway Engineering Walls Impact Statement Martinsburg Pike. There is a drop inlet near the corner of Parcel A. This drop inlet drains into a ditch on the other side of Martinsburg Pike, and the water then flows into a tributary of Redbud Run. The following calculations estimate the current and proposed storm water runoff for a ten-year flow: Existin C = 0.3 Iio = 6.8 in/hr A = 0.6 acres Qio = 1.2 cfs Proposed C = 0.75 Iio = 6.8 in/hr A = 0.6 acres Qto = 3.1 cfs Development of Parcel A at maximum buildout will therefore result in an increased runoff of 1.9 cfs. This is a relatively small increase and will present no forseeable problems to stormwater management. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Using Fairfax County design requirements, the following calculations were made to estimate the maximum impact of solid waste generated on Parcel A: waste generation rate= 11,440 lbs 1000 sf/yr total solid waste = 12,820 sfx 11,440 lbs 1000 sf/yr = 146,660 lbs/yr compaction = 275 lbs/cy total volume = 146,6601bs/yr 275 lbs/cy = 535 cy/yr Therefore, the maximum amount of solid waste generated by Parcel A will not exceed 535 cubic yards annually. HISTORIC STIES AND STRUCTURES Fort Collier, identified as a historic structure by the Rural Landmarks Survey Report for Frederick County, is approximately 500' from the subject site, and lies across Martinsburg Pike. This home is listed by said survey as being potentially eligible for the state and national register of historic places. The "3rd Battle of Winchester" site is a potential historic district, and also lies across Martinsburg Pike. Greenway End neerinb COMMUNITY FACILITIES Walls Impact Statement The impact on the utilities and infrastructure near the site has been estimated by the Frederick County Capital Facilities Impact Model. Please refer to Appendix 6. OTHER IMPACTS No additional impacts are forseen by the development of Parcel A. 1, \ �= on '. II 739 kit if V C Yt 1 it EAxITEflaOflY(Iq �t-c=<t"—.i ` SPRI G VALLEY" - -- -OR I w000sif E to i II NORTH Church of est Christ WJ II FRE ERICK + of Latter D y aints TERRACE JamesWood i Apple Pie '! 72 Ridge Ridge ! DARVIL �E A, ,IA S %. t Stines Chap 11 a oe j f I , 7 ,-ti - 4 t - �t00ecx `'CMgp ��oe Star Fort Site to gNE4 .?'�a o%V v ST �f 37 MARGARE. ' uA�_- SUNNY,SI /El J '� �• 7/ 522 0i 'FOR Milrnys Fort * \ �c Site -r rederick - County_ MS���l.u° ffROrir� �f ��11/z �� OgTES LQ1 y,1`4GY � . \ STgOrNE9SI N CO, / I Wi MARION �� ` `=�✓�%��at- Th'P STR WryrTrr �i lrl� \ t r SR o`�� �•�� 5W�J JNRT,ty� 7ERI� cIjdTRTISc/—�tl flrESE.��� 9G$etfr- sit: \z� nqr ati AM fi vel o, l n,v, HPRNE S°aTH m Ja tes W ad ST� o`` \f ! 4G ES 17 Jacl}s sNdtj mh rst G ^ � Calvar'1 0 0 1 �' I K. p �� j 'art+Y HS!\ Baptist \ �.� ` Qhial rron' r`o �'k° l \ r 4e Y irsi 01d Towr S ring T SWalrj Sr5'EET om ? n f -- — --—WOO_Tf _ ACA O Yy a A rC'f.�j. 1 y y°,SrWr'��ry" v rf o I lETER � y ° Ct rFO ~ CIt+_ r Wincheste M o ber N flo 'Jahn Kerrt t re ( ¢ M0N oTN aciptt�J�Hrt C h 4 / A S FA T rFr�ro/[n a andley S Atli Al ILi 9NS8U G�(\" \mss ';•, �� aM �i o�tYFacP CESS,-; p��' .rr-,.JJ ti r Fayre hi�1 "OI J'HF� JHc.Y a; Sti L SOOaR SPS r qF ��J SOB O4ry Pq._� Sri '�Lj\9aq C9 STON WALL INDU TRIAL 61 10 MCCHEE A PADI E`Xit 11 2 � I 12 R. 44 — FORT El It I 11� 13 E NDUSTRIAL EST TES - �USJ I i I \�F 1322 FORT OLLIER f j ARCADIA A 11 ` �• INDUSTRIAL ESTATES MHPr �A ort'N811ie.r\ ` rte• \e ORRD�,., \ 5 - TEtRRZIC® nrthwe tern \y,g \;�j- cqE a�,/ I Rg•Edu ati°nal a'� i�e'cko//T��i P784 rogram i` BATTLES VIEW �r SES /� Jir er attglas �\ �_- �� a''• 'r. I�fS✓� HFIE Far \ s7� Qq 7 - I RCLiPF, SHANON HILL ;r v Q at4 Q ir�p ;a,Pa it'se Valley S ST � 3J ♦,O {: as aoo M F i nl x ' a N4 rrONA( C OOt4l 7 Exit tj _ Gospe+ 02; w° m °q mbly aI Cod Mme t Ck Q�+\ a � CHggO 4uE �o r Q br ward a Oq P J 1 c Daniel rwh rgMap IVIS x 1 / t 65 .� UR EP Q- GLEN03E AC E i ar em eRY��oq HERITAG J� a Ing o� C�AA 1t h �P \ �L al O�`' _ Jul r Z? Winc..a IEf Dy E,I ��- �P.; p Recrea ion aE\ 0 0 i M3 mP� w 0 b N n 40 BX 253 ?60432 PAW 2Or5 m--" M LWOUMI a--11" P24 (sm . • WNW SOUWARY NORTH BRADDOCK STREET 150' IMIDE S 45.38' gr' w - 314.5r LOT 2 1- 108,325 SO. FT. w1� � ovat+=fl MOM PtEMA&MM 6-2 AREA DOEa aorr MEET zoa" R£oU=%4�3 MR AW 9z usr- Boundary Survey Appendix 2 � 94 �o,� NS$�F,G (LICENSE) Na 1498 N ��NAL IN IS -45* 38'5r w 'zap 's -z .� N N . 10.0.95• 1.0� 0gl too M Z69 FT. • ' D tQ � p ovat+=fl MOM PtEMA&MM 6-2 AREA DOEa aorr MEET zoa" R£oU=%4�3 MR AW 9z usr- Boundary Survey Appendix 2 � 94 �o,� NS$�F,G (LICENSE) Na 1498 14 4 15 ,�`o. � 6, Q- / �� �� 36H 1 B 15A r �� V . / 13 327-695 36 Q 297--546 , ;TER .� 12-- 304-580 �(�?J / �. 361 �- A � .0 36A A soda 4 pts. 4 747 � X34 6 foo 41 C 11 , I � o `;��� , 3E 81G 36C R A 3 D t 1,322 81 A / 8r B Road 4A 4 $1 F 60 �j 60 58 4§° 73- p / 325-527 olr 65 81 D / / \ , See 72 �`� 73 cr 254-89 361 bq 36F ,' / 2 INSERT 54 AP J,, .+,q 029 ib 6g, 7796 •P 5 1449 A J32 t2 ds 3979 3332 qJ �`n0 c �8 �\ 1450 / 7626 55 �,�`' 4g53�\ 32 J '-' 658 • pry? � \8 / , 1 101 rJl '9` �0�� qh• J � , BO• g'�� 99ob / s 57 599 N%" 1� 41 01 ' ^tis 5994 \\\\ 27 r \ \ S a a6 744 &' 7448 ' r r / Fax map no. 114/134 City of Winchester ; Appendix 4 SflP rF� JJ / z MICHAEL S. UEBER MARf.AREE L. WASHINGTON DB 460/595 1)5 313/461 mh TAX NO.: 54-((A))-48 TAX NO.: 54-C(A))-49 i o ZONE: 5-2 ZONE: RP c o USE: RETAIL USE: RESIDENTIAL Q 'xs Xg S 45'21'05" E 338.41' p ffi 0 1 -A Q� 2 c�7 D EARLC. 821HARSH, at ux m ..• . , . _ _ n TAX NO.: 54A -C(2)) -I6 z - PARCEL A. S ZONE: j 1 (d.6(d ACRES m6 a USE: RESIDENTIAL w .Q ib K t M ENTERPRISES R A, m DB 894/1569 `. o Tax No.: 54-((A))-50 ZONE: RP Z. USE: RESIDENTIAL'��� rev oto MARY DB 501/348 15 TAX NO, 54A-(r2u-1 lu `w� ZONE; RP USE: RESIDENTIAL in m s LIN Z S s 65 g3a„ W `I MARY Y. Dat vIr DB 221/3(521/B15 y W TAX NO.: 114-(1I)-158 K + M ENTERPRISES ZONE: LR DB 285/1324 x USE: RESIDENTIAL TAX NO.: 134-((3))-352O ti � (1 U ' ZONE: 52/HR \ "•�I USE: COMMERCIAL A� +J O C14 i� K! M ENTERPRISES Z w N F' Q DB 253/428 rq c 9 TAX NO_ 134-((3))-36 O W 0 U 3 ZONE: 52/HR � C4 ti t YIVIAN S. SWISHER USE: COMMERCIAL Q to N W� d DB 128314 cl TAX NO.: 114-C(U)-IS( m ���W r R Z ZONE: L _ N USE: RESIDENTIAL�� 4 p N 40'48'2B. w 3g "—,� \mSI�\ 3.86 W O [s, SAUDERS, LAWTCN M., at ab m -A DB 2(9/496 Nil C Tl-�FARMERS AND MERCHANTS TAX NO- 134-((5))-1 Q NATIONAL BANKZONE: HRDB 191/638 USE: RE51D£NT1AL V v m m TAX NO.: 134—^ mZONE: B-2 USE: COMMERCIAL µ DATE: 10/23/98 �m �a Z Proposed Zone SCALE: 1'-50• w Boundaries DESIGNED BY: RCB Appendix 5 roe 22T0 � SHEET Oi OF 01 FIRE AND RESCUE ADDENDUM New Capital Costs Not $93.30 Covered by County Contributions NOTES: Model Run Date 12/09/98 EAW P.I.N. 54-A-50 Rezoning: Assumes 12,817 sq.ft. retail on 0.6 acres zoned B2. 7ue to changing conditions associated with development in the County, the results of this Jutput Module may not be valid beyond a period of 90 days from the model run date. Fiscal Model Appendix 6 OUTPUT MODULE Net Credit Fiscal Taxes LU Capital Impact Capital Net C-osts Credit Costs impa re Department $8 $63 $0 rescue Department $31 Elementary Schools $0 Middle Schools $0 $22,874 $0 High Schools Parks and Recreation $0 rQ $1.360 $Q TOTAL $39 $342,986 $24,296 $0 FIRE AND RESCUE ADDENDUM New Capital Costs Not $93.30 Covered by County Contributions NOTES: Model Run Date 12/09/98 EAW P.I.N. 54-A-50 Rezoning: Assumes 12,817 sq.ft. retail on 0.6 acres zoned B2. 7ue to changing conditions associated with development in the County, the results of this Jutput Module may not be valid beyond a period of 90 days from the model run date. Fiscal Model Appendix 6 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director RE: 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Plan Public Hearing DATE: January 22, 1999 The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) forwarded a recommended draft of the 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors for discussion in January. Following discussion, each body recommended that the 1999- 2000 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) be advertised for public hearing as recommended by the CPPS. Included with this memorandum is a summary ofthe project requests, a summary ofproposed project costs, the evaluation form prepared by the CPPS, project tables comparing projects from the 1998- 1999 CIP and this plan, and a map depicting the general location of the requested capital facilities. Staff asks that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors for final resolution. This will enable the Board of Supervisors to conduct a public hearing for the adoption of the 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Plan on February 24, 1999, which will allow for the use of the adopted plan during the budget process in March 1999. EAW/cc Attachments IJ:\Evan\Common\CIP\ 1999-2000CIPPubhcHeacingPC.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SUMMARY • The proposed draft 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of 26 projects compared to 24 projects recommended last year. All projects are proposed to be developed over a period of five years. • Three new projects are proposed as a part of the 1999-2000 CIP. New capital facility projects have been submitted by the Frederick County School Board, the Winchester Regional Airport, and the Frederick County Public Works Department as follows: Department or Agency New Capital Facilities Project Frederick County School Board James Wood Middle School Renovations Winchester Regional Airport Apron Expansion Frederick County Public Works New Animal Shelter • The total cost of the projects proposed for the 1999-2000 CIP is $102,347,587. This is an increase of $236,341 in the total project cost from the 1998-1999 CII' The total cost does not account for the costs associated with the proposed Public Safety Center, the Transportation Maintenance Facility, the Annex Facilities, the Field House & Indoor Pool Complex, the renovations to James Wood Middle School, or the NREP addition. • The total county cost of the projects proposed for the 1999-2000 CIP is $100,830,997. This reflects a project cost of $65,984,665 and a debt service of $34,846,332. This is an increase of $1,893,923 in the total project cost from the 1998-1999 CIP • The Department of Parks and Recreation is working with Valley Health Systems to conduct a feasibility study to determine the county and city needs that could be accommodated by the field house and indoor pool project. The results of this feasibility study are anticipated to be available in Spring 1999. • The Handley Regional Library has modified the new library facility in the Lakeside area to coincide with the funding cap established by the Board of Supervisors. • A new section will be incorporated into the 1999-2000 CII' which provides a list of capital facility projects that have received funding but are incomplete. This will remove these projects from the funding needs spreadsheet, thus averting confusion for funding needs. FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 1999-2000 County Priority Department Priority Project Descriptions FY 99-00 CQUNTY DNT TI (Tt 23j Lt linty Cona utions Notes terest From Any Debt Service TOTAL COUNTY COSTS Total Project Costs FY 00-01 FY 01-02 FY 02-03 FY 03-04 1{L) I""Ltkxaty 2;053 [?28 2 2 1,125 4,316;253 A U 4, 16,253 $4 3Jb 153 2 1 (CA) Public Safety Center N/A* 0 3 1(P) I*iear33aek Meek kemetmtaty yciovl 1,500>g0ik 8 300 UQt3 5,80034100 N/A** 5785,151 0 35,585]151;: 0 $35'5853151: 4 2 (PS) Transportation/Maintenance/Warehouse N/A* 0 C 1 fi'Yt)ield)fnteilxldot}rPooi 1tt*+* N/A** 0 0 6 2 (CA) New Animal Shelter 670,000 755,000 , 0 755,000 $755,000 7 4(M .Iam85,000 ea Waad:lvTtd- `tcimonl;Rammsrahan t�itA'" 0 G 8 4 (PR) ParkLand Acquisition 1,200,233 1,200,233 . i*itA"* 0 0. z� 0: 3 #Cir} Anncxaftiest fzes -itn ©f RevrS FIR: 1,200 233 $1,200,233 10 1 (AP) .: Airport Apron Expansion 120,000 L2t1;0t10 A 0 1'1 (AP) 4�#re fS45 jCyat(nittm>stnicfw#t 3,tk10 30,1#5(# A 0 120,000 $600,000 12 5 (PS) Third County high School 2,000,000 15 000,000 15,000,000 3210KQW 20,545,151 30000 . 52,545,151 $1,100,1300' 15%545,1-51 13 2 it'i�i tibatt Cotrtpl S)s 438,55] 14 5 (PR) Soccer Complex SP 1,023,516 1,02333'0 0 438 81G $4 .,$ 955 15 6 (PR) irnnistBasketbai3 Complex C B 342 557 342,557 1,023 516 $1,023,516 16 7 (PR) .:. Open Play Area CB 433,410 ..: 4311' 0 #1' 0 34-557 $342,557 1:7 18 3 (P�) �otithfiutr item, ScLtoai Lattd Acquisltttitn .75€1,40(}. '150000 431,2CiG 433,410 t«a1,244& Y�l,2t)If26G 1} 8 (PR) 8 (j'. } Tennis/Picnic Area - SP> 2*3RNP A ttatt 553,325 553,325 0 553,325 $553,325 20 6 (PS) %Uti* Indian Hollow Elem. School Addition 2,100,000 0 2;100X. ,000 C IVA** 1,352 860 Q 3,452,860 $3,452,860 2.1 7 (PS) Newaamesboro E3ecnentgty Selmttut L St10;t3 9;11()41;1)(1€1 19,3f3Q,A.QO & 73 L9E1$ 22 3 (PR) Baseball Field Renovations - SP 688,847 688847 0 23 91m: Sli it...... a eating EB 33 ,51:3 339,51:9 0 688,847 $688,847 24 11 (PR) Maintenance Compound - SP 175,175 175xI5 0 339,51:3; .. 33g 51 25 30 (kxRi atbaard 3markt#rrda Itackey 417;..8.74 417;574 0 175,175 $175,175 26 9 (PS) T. Administration Offices N/A* 0 437874: TOTALS $7,625,261 $30,289,028 $24,463,410 $1,451,073 $2,155,893 $1']5984655 $34,846,332 0 $100,830,997 0 $102,347,587 A = Partial funding from Federal Airport Improvement Program (FAIP) and State Commonwealth Airport Fund (SCAF) giants B = Partial funding from State gnmts and local gills C = Debt Service is unavailable at tune of printing D= Partial funding from private donations N/A* - Project Scope Not Determined At Time Of Printing Department Priority Abbreviations: N/A** - Funding Source Not Determined; Therefore, Debt Service Uncertain At Time Of Printing AP - Winchester Regional Airport N/A*** - Feasibility Study To Be Complete Prior To Project Scope Determination CA - County Administration HL - Handley Regional Library PR - Parks and Recreation PS - Public Schools 1/6/99 CIP99-OO.WK4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS Frederick County Public Schools 99 Rank 98 Rank Project 99 Cost 98 Cost Difference Description 1 1 Back Creek $9,800,000 $8,700,000 +$1,100,000 Elementary 2 2 Transportation Not Not & Maintenance Determined Determined Facility 3 4 Elementary $750,000 $500,000 +$250,000 School Land Acquisition 4 N/A James Wood Not N/A Middle School Determined Renovation 5 3 Third High $32,000,000 $30,000,000 +$2,000,000 School 6 5 Indian Hollow $2,100,000 $2,000,000 +$100,000 Addition 7 6 Gainesboro $10,500,000 $10,000,000 +$500,000 Elementary School 8 N/A NREP Not N/A Addition Deternvned Note: The priority for land acquisition for a new elementary school in southeastern Frederick County has ascended, while the priority for a third high school has descended. The table reflects the difference in capital costs for the various projects only and does not include information on projected debt service that will be realized through loan issues. Frederick. County Parks and Recreation 99 Rank 98 Rank Project Descrintion 99 Cost 98 Cost Difference 1 5 Field House Not Determined Not Determined 2 3 Softball Complex $438,956 $432,042 +$6,914 3 4 Baseball Field Renovations $688,847 $677,998 +$10,849 4 2 Land Acquisition New Parkland $1,200,233 $1,181,332 +$18,901 5 8 Soccer Complex $1,023,516 $1,007,398 +$16,118 6 7 Tennis Courts & Basketball Courts $342,557 $337,163 +$5,394 7 6 Open Play Area $433,410 $426,581 +$6,829 8 9 Tennis Courts & Picnic Area $553,325 $544,611 +$8,714 9 10 Shelter& Stage $339,519 $334,172 +$5,347 10 11 Skateboard Park & In -Line Hockey $417,874 $204,600 +$213,274 11 12 Maintenance Compound $175,175 $200,000 -$24,825 Note: The priorities for a new field house and indoor pool complex and a new soccer complex have ascended, while the priorities for land acquisition for a new regional park in the western portion of the county and an open play area at Clearbrook Park have descended. The 411 priority has been modified in scope to include an In -Line Hockey Rink as a part of the Skateboard Park, while the 412 priority for a maintenance compound and office at Sherando Park has been decreased in scope. Handley Regional Library 99 Rank 98 Rank Project 99 Cost 98 Cost Difference Description 1 1 New Library $4,316,253 $5,257,940 -$941,687 Note: The new library facility is proposed to be developed at 35,000 square feet which maintains the same square footage from last year; however, it is estimated that approximately 1/3 of the interior of the structure will not be finished as a part of this capital project. Frederick County Public Works 99 Rank 98 Rank Project Descri tion 99 Cost 98 Cost Difference 1 1 CDD Landfill $700,000 $800,000 -$100,000 2 N/A Ballast Pond $200,000 N/A $0 3 3 Cell Closure $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $0 4 2 Gas Management Cell $500,000 $500,000 $0 5 4 New Landfill Development $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 6 N/A New Animal Shelter $755,000 N/A Note: The top five projects are funded through the Landfill Enterprise Fund and do not require appropriations from the county's General Fund. Winchester Regional Airport 99 Rank 98 Rank Project Descrition ] 99 Cost 98 Cost I Difference 1 N/A Apron Expansion $600,000 N/A 2 2 Rt. 645 Relocation $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $0 NOTE: 1) Capital Improvement Projects in bold, italic print represent new project requests by department. 2) The New Department Priority category provides a rating for the top four projects submitted by each agency. 1999 - 2000 FREDERICK COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS EVALUATION FORM LISTED BY DEPARTMENT IN ORDER OF DEPARTMENT PRIORITY CRITERION Conform to Health, Legally Distribute Economic Related Public Department and Comp. Plan Safety, Required Services Impact to Other Support Priority TOTAL Welfare Welfare Projects WEIGHT 3 4 4 2 2 3 3 2 LIBRARY New Library 2#'fr 2,"$ A14 A7>84s� 204 0:J'0 3P4 418 43 SCHOOL SYSTEM New Back Creek Elementary SchoolIMF- �r€ F13 Transportation Maintenance Facility 2/ 6 2/ 8 0/ 0 1 J 2 3/ 6 216 1/ 3 ROUN 37 Southern Elem. School Site Acquisition 3:f9 1.14 6# :o 214 1 !2 1 1: 1 y £ i e James Wood MihSchSchool Renovation 2/6 3/12 0/0 1/2 2/4 1/3 1/3 32 Third CountyHi School €h 2f6 ..' v 21:$ ttl_ 2!4 316, F.r3' .. H, Indian Hollow Elementary Addition 2!8 010 1/2 2/4 1 /3 113 010 ; - New Gainesboro Elementary School -2/6 2/{* :; {" 2,t g t�10 1,1'2 214 ' ,•" r 2� NREP Addition 2/6 2/8 0/0 3/6 2/4 0/0 1/3 p/t3 27 Administration Building Renovations PARKS AND RECREATION Field House/Indoor Pool 2!`6 1 i4 Ot 0 21�F 1 t2 A• 2 f6 ' 3 f9 316' Softball Complex - SP 3/9 1/4 0/0 1/2 1/ 2 1/3 2/6 2/4 30 Baseball Field Renovations - SP 2.10 I;1>4 OI Q 112 Park Land Acquisition 3/9 1/4 0/0 418 1/2 1/3 2/6 0/0 32 Soccer Complex - SP P I ilt9 i.14 tJ:l:V it:b 172 yli'. x3 FIcv, Tennis/Basketball Complex - CB 3/9 1/4 0/ 0 3/6 1/2 2/6 1/3 0/0 Open Play Area - CB 349 1. /'407 0 315 u 2f6 30 Tennis/Picnic Area - SP 3/ 9 1/ 4 0/ 0 1/2 0/0 2/6 2/6 0/0 34 27 Shelter, Stage Seating - CB 3>f 9 1.f 4 O f 6 AJ 6 2 f 4 : �J 6 - Skateboard Pazk 1/3 1/4 0! 0 1/2 1/2 1/3 2/6 0/0 20 Maintenance Compound -SP I J3 1.:1'4 Of (t 010 37 6 = ';3 79 I P3 i)jt3 2: AIRPORT Apron Expansion 3116 144A 9 Q U 2, /4 2!6 1 f3 4/8 3I Route 645 Relocation - Construction 2/6 1/4 1/4 0/0 1/2 2/6 1/ 3 3/6 31 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION Public Safety Center 19 3 ( ©1 4J& 4 New Animal Shelter 2/6 2/8 0/0 1/2 1/2 2/6 1/3 3/6 33 Annex Facilities 3 l 218 0=110 112 IJ2 T 113 3':I NOTE: 1) Capital Improvement Projects in bold, italic print represent new project requests by department. 2) The New Department Priority category provides a rating for the top four projects submitted by each agency. FREDERICK COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA U A1Evan\Common%CIP\EVALUATN TOPIC DESCRIPTIO EI JFIT 1 Conformance to Does the project conform to, or contribute to Comprehensive Plan the attainment of goaWobjectives of the 3 Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with establishedpolicies? 2 Public Health, Safety or Does the project improve conditions affecting Welfare health safety or welfare? Does it eliminate a 4 clear health or safety risk? 3 Legal Requirement Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal 4 requirement? 4 Equitable Distribution of Does the project meet a special need of some Services segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the 2 project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under- served relative to other areas of the county? 5 Economic Impact Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the 2 tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? 6 Coordination with other Is the project necessary for the successful Projects completion of other projects? Is the project 3 art of a largerproject? 7 Public Support Are county residents fully informed and 3 supportive of the proposed project? 8 Department Priority Ratings are provided for the top four projects 2 submitted by each agency or department. U A1Evan\Common%CIP\EVALUATN p ro, Clearbrook Park e Pia 15, 16, 23 ` 21 e G°`Q /4b9 20 Z r� 41, Rt. 19 4, 12 7 eery t. RL 7 s Winchester Regional Airport q 10, 11 �p 3° 'R�mdorsrllta A 1 Q aa� doe Shen d andoah Coaaty Scale in Feet Sherando Park ~ 13, 14, 18, 22, 24 0 12000 24000 36000 48000 Frederick County 1999-2000 Capital Improvements Plan Project Locations (In order of prioritization) 1 New Library 2* Public Safety Center 3 New Back Creek Elementary School 4 Transportation/Maintenance Facility 5* Field House/Indoor Pool 6* New Animal Shelter 7 James Wood Middle School Renovation 8* Park Land Acquisition 9* Annex Facilities 10 Airport Apron Expansion 11 Route 645 Relocation — Construction 12 Third County High School 13 Softball Complex — SP 14 Soccer Complex — SP 15 Tennis/Basketball Complex — CB 16 Open Play Area — CB 17* Elementary School Land Acquisition 18 Tennis/Picnic Area — SP 19 NREP Addition 20 Indian Hollow Elementary School Addition 21 New Gainesboro Elementary School 22 Baseball Field Renovations — SP 23 Shelter/Stage Seating — CB 24 Maintenance Compound — SP 25* Skateboard Park/In—Line Hockey 26 Administration Offices * Location to be determined ra VASFrederick County Planning b Development Winchester, Ylrglnln Ar 4W February 1999 P/C REVIEW: 02-03-99 BOS REVIEW: 02-24-99 Subdivision Hppiioation #01-99 SCULLY, LTD. LOCATION: The property is located on the south side of Fairfax Pike (Route 277), along the east side of Stickley Drive (Route 1085). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 85-A-148 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: B2 and B 1 (Business General) District; Land Use: Shopping Plaza and Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: B 1 and B2 (Business General) District; Land Use: Restaurant, Motel SUBDIVISION SPECIFICS: Subdivision of a 5.8366 -acre tract into three lots. REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS: Department of Transportation: All of our previous comments appear to have been addressed; recommend approval of the plat. Public Works/Engineering: No additional comments, as the site is already developed. Sanitation Authority: A water easement exists; no additional comments. Planning and Zoning: Public Meeting Requirement The Subdivision Ordinance requires that land divisions in the B2 (Business General) and the B 1 (Neighborhood Business) Zoning Districts, without an approved master development plan, be presented to the Board of Supervisors for final approval. This project contains split zoning is zoned Subdivision #01-99, Scully, LTD Page 2 January 21, 1999 B2 and B 1, and does not contain an approved MDP; therefore, Board review and action is necessary. Staff Review This parcel presently contains a shopping plaza, self -storage facilities, and restaurants (Roma Restaurant, Golden Corral restaurant, a hardware store). The site is bordered by Kentucky Fried Chicken, Waffle House, Route 277, Stickley Drive and the Comfort Inn. The proposed land division would establish three lots: 2.8172 acres (P.I.N. 85-A- 148E); 2.0192 acres (PIN. 85-A 148); 1.0002 acres (PIN. 85 -A -148F). The 2.8172 -acre parcel will contain the shopping center (Roma Restaurant, hardware store). The 2.0192 -acre parcel will contain the self - storage facility. The Golden Corral restaurant will be located on the 1.0002 -acre parcel. The proposed property lines will follow the existing zoning district boundary lines. The presented plat appears to satisfy the Subdivision Ordinance requirements. STAFF RECONEMENDATION FOR 02/03/99: Staff recommends approval of this subdivision application contingent upon the applicant's satisfying all review agency comments. O:\Agendas\COMMENTS\ScullyLTD-Subdidl.sub Subdivision #01-99 Scully, Ltd. PIN: 85-A-148 This Map was produced by Frederick Co. Planning & Development APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST SUBDIVISION FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA -�: Date: q - . - Application #' — Fee Paid 1/ Application / Agent: Gilbert W. Clifford &Associates Inc. Address: c/o Stephen M. Gvurisin 200 N. Cameron Stregt Winchester VA 22601 Phone: 540 667-2139 s Owners name: Scully,LTD Address: 603 S. Loudoun St. Winchester. VA 22601 Phone: 6674220 Please list names of all owners, principals and / or majority stockholders: Tom Scull Contact Person: Stephen M. risin/ Tom Scully Phone: (540) 667-2131 Name of Subdivision: Scullv. LTD Number of Lots: 3 Total Acreage: 508366 Property Location: South side of Route 277Fairfax Pike along the east side of Rte. 1085, Stickley Dr. Magisterial District: O e uon Property Identification Number (PIN): 85-A-148 L 85-A-148-Eii�-� 85-A-148-F,'�?�5 _ Property zoning and present use: B 1 and B2 zoning, Commercial Use Adjoining property zoning and use: B2 Zoning, Commercial Use Has a Master Development Plan been submitted for this project? Yes No X If yes, has the final MDP been approved by the Board of Supervisors? Yes No What was the MDP title? N/A Does the plat contain any changes from the approved MDP? Yes No If yes, specify what changes: Minimum Lot Size (smallest lot) N/A Number and types of housing units in this development: Number: N/A Types: N/A CURVE TABIC CURVE I ROUS I LENGTH I CHORD BrJ,KING Cl I VLW_ %A& I 94A6 1586'5MIrE , �� `f-'" - EXISTING NGRESS/EGRESJ EASEME �I N � I SPIN 85 -A -148D Im ZONED: B2 ( �- USE: COMM. PIP: 85-A-11 4ii; >, III11 iF _ R BURGER WPB= G27i 8L'SI S III LC 20.- qg2-P D8 874 -PG 275 ED: a1 USE. COPr1�1ERCL;t �\ 56Ti �I + V � � I PIN 85 -A -148E W72 Ar. v� ED. 131 /f IN 85 -A -148F I USE: NCOMM. m i 1.0002 ACRES I I +� �� ZONED: B2 e/, USE COMM. EX UTILI E .T INT ACCESS ESM'T I I F 299AIY REF: DB 797 PG RN 85_• ,�,. f181'2�1 ONING U i. \ A- : V Pi' (w j STEPH NS CIT ' u�'z 0 I= MN 85--148 nm;E- OM ORT INNZOWD.B2 61Da 0 -PG- I 35, USE COMM. I I Da 623 -PG 549 W92AMES -rnuE: B' usF- COMMERCIAL 25' WA E REF: DB 797 GRAPHIC SCALE PG 344 BIZ BIZ I I O 60 100 —.. O N I IN FEET ) 1 inch - 100 ft. %r PIP: 85-A-146 1. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. P: {F 2 EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE u�ppv C C�nupcn►t u NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.pn ° 3. IRON RODS FOUND OR SET AT ALL Da 413 -PG 303 I PROPERTY CORNERS.Z0NEDO: B2 %iE. /,=N'l V tnV/'N1 SHEET 2 OF 2 SCALE: 1" = 100' 1 DATE: DECEMBER 14, 1998 1 DWG. # SCULLY ,Tx OF FINAL PLAT OF SIJIX)I 5ION O� OF THE LAND OF SCULLY, LTD. OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. C� FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA No. 001197 �. MARSH & L EGGE Land Surveyors, P.L.C. ,S URN 560 North Loudoun Street Wlnehe"ter. %Arglnto 22601 (540) 667-"`•58 I= (540) 667-0469