HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 08-18-99 Meeting AgendaAGENDA
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Board Room
Frederick County Administration Building
Winchester, Virginia
AUGUST 18, 1999
7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) July 7, 1999 Minutes ................................................... A
2) Application Action Summary ........................................... B
3) Comrnittee Reports ............................... . . . f., +..1,1
4) Citizen Comments.................................................(no tab)
PUBLIC MEETING
5) Revision to Master Development Plan #001-91 for Shenandoah University, submitted by
G.W. Clifford and Associates, Inc., to provide a 2,500 -seat football stadium and eliminate
a 500 -unit dormitory. The site is located on the east side of Interstate 81, adjacent to the
College Park and Pembridge Heights subdivisions and is identified as Property
Identification Number 64-A-110 in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
(Mr. Wyatt)........................................................ C
6) WaiverRequest, submitted Artz & Associates, from cul-de-sac length requirement, Chapter
144 - Subdivision Ordinance, 144-17 - Streets G.(1) cul-de-sacs for the Buettner Rural
Preservation Subdivision.
(Mr. Ruddy) ....................................................... D
DISCUSSION ITEMS
7) Proposed Amendment to the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District Specific to
Senior Housing.
(Mr. Ruddy)........................................................E
8) Proposed Amendment to Allow Schools with Residential Components in the RA (Rural
Areas) Zoning District as a Conditional Use.
(Mr. Ruddy) ........................................................ F
9) Impact Model Update
(Mr. Wyatt)........................................................ G
10) Other
Other
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North bent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on July 7, 1999.
PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek
District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; W. Wayne Miller, Gainesboro District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee
District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Terry Stone, Gainesboro District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon
District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel.
ABSENT: John R. Marker, Back Creek District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District;
STAFF PRESENT: Kris C. Tierney, Planning Director; Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director; Michael T.
Ruddy, Zoning Administrator; Christopher M. Mohn, Planner II, Amy M. Lohr, Planner I; and Renee' S.
Arlotta, Clerk.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEETING MINUTES - MAY 5, 1999 MAY 19,1 99 & JUNE 2, 1999
Upon motion made by Mrs. Copenhaver and seconded by Mr. Romine, the minutes of the
Planning Commission's May 5, 1999 meeting were unanimously approved as presented.
Upon motion made by Mrs. Copenhaver and seconded by Mr. Romine, the minutes of the
Planning Commission's May 19, 1999 meeting were unanimously approved as presented.
Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mrs. Copenhaver, the minutes of the
Planning Commission's June 2, 1999 meeting were unanimously approved as presented.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 377
-2 -
APPLICATIONS ACTION SUMMARY
Chairman DeHaven accepted the report for the Commission's information.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) - 06/24/99 Mtg.
Mr. Ruddy, Zoning Administrator, reported that members of the DRRS met at the Woodbrook
Village Community Center, at the invitation of Mr. Jim Vickers, to discuss retirement housing and the County's
Residential Performance District design guidelines. Mr. Ruddy explained that the goal is to make the existing
requirements somewhat more flexible in order to accommodate the residential retirement community use.
Sanitation Authority (SA)
Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the minutes of the last SA meeting state that a Vision Mission
Statement and Values for the Sanitation Authority was presented and adopted. In addition, it was reported that
the wells being drilled at the Back Creek Elementary School have the potential of yielding %Z to 1 million
gallons per day and the Bartonsville well field has an availability of about 5 million gallons of water per day.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Note: The following two applications were heard together.
Conditional Use Permit #02-99 of SBA, Inc. (Dr. Raymond Fish Property) to erect a 180' self-supporting
monopole telecommunication facility. This property is located at the end of Hopewell Road (Rt. 672) past
the AA Mobile Market. The site is identified with P.I.N. 33-A-164 in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
(This is a continuation of a public hearing held on 04/07/99 at which this item was tabled.)
Action - Withdrawn at the Applicant's Request
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 378
-3 -
Conditional Use Permit #03-99 of SBA, Inc. (Richard M. Cooley property) to erect a 250' self-supporting
lattice tower telecommunication facility. This property is located at 173 Catlett Lane and is identified
with P.I.N. 1-6A (Warren County parcel number), a portion of which extends into Frederick County
within the Opequon Magisterial District. (This is a continuation of a public hearing held on 04/07/99 at
which this item was tabled.)
Action - Tabled for 30 Days with a Waiver of the Ordinance Time Restraints
Mr. Michael Ruddy, Zoning Administrator, stated that this afternoon, the staff had received
written correspondence from the applicants of both of these conditional use permits for telecommunications
towers requesting the withdrawal of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) #02-99 of SBA, Inc. for the Dr. Raymond
Fish property and requesting a 30 -day extension on their initial tabling request for CUP 403-99 of SBA, Inc.
for the Richard M. Cooley property.
Chairman DeHaven called for public comments concerning either ofthese two conditional use
permits and the following person came forward to speak:
Ms. Michelle A. Rosati, Zoning Attorney with the firm Michael Horwatt & Associates, P.C.,
the Counsel for the applicant, SBA, Inc., stated that within the last two days, Triton PCS has committed to this
site and wants to be joined as a co -applicant. Ms. Rosati said that a deferral of only 30 days will be needed
in order to prepare the paperwork for submission to the Planning Commission.
A member of the Planning Commission inquired if any existing telecommunications facilities
were located in the immediate area of Catlett Lane. Mr. Ruddy replied that there was a 200' CFW lattice tower
approximately 1/4 mile from this site which was constructed in 1995 and has only one provider. Mr. Ruddy
believed that space was available on the tower. Staff recalled that one of the short -comings of the original CUP
application was that sites in the area were not identified, nor the availability of space on those sites.
Ms. Rosati stated that they were fully prepared to discuss the existing tower near the Catlett
Lane site. She said that without getting into too much engineering detail, there was a reason that Triton can
not use that specific tower and it is a technical interference problem.
Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Thomas,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby grant the applicant's
request to table Conditional Use Permit 403-99 of SBA, Inc. (Richard M. Cooley property) for 30 days with
a waiver of ordinance time restraints by unanimous vote.
Conditional Use Permit #10-99 of Glenn and Natalie Miller (GEM Limousine), submitted by Greenway
Engineering, for a Cottage Occupation to operate a limousine service. This property is located at 1100
Front Royal Pike and is identified with P.I.N. 64D -A-17 in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 379
-4 -
Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions
Mr. Christopher Mohn, Planner II, read the background information and review agency
comments. Mr. Mohn stated that the application is a request to permit the addition of one non-resident
employee to an existing home-based limousine service and this is permitted as a cottage occupation. Mr. Mohn
reported, however, that the intensification of the limousine service should not involve a corresponding increase
in the number of limousines parked on the property. He explained that the absence of either natural or man-
made screening around the rear yard currently precludes effective mitigation of the visual impacts associated
with commercial vehicle storage. Mr. Mohn proceeded to read the recommended conditions for the
intensification of the use as a cottage occupation which stipulated the scale of the operation and insurance of
its visual separation from adjacent residential uses.
Mr. Mark Smith of Greenway Engineering, the design engineering firm representing the
applicant, said that both he and the applicant were in agreement with all of the conditions, however, they would
like to modify #5 to give them the flexibility to use either a board fence or landscaping as a means to screen
activities and storage associated with the business. Mr. Smith said that correspondence has been submitted
with the application from the adjacent property owners stating that they have no objections to the operation.
Mr. Smith added that the property owners to the rear are present this evening to speak.
Members ofthe Commission stressed the importance of providing landscaping that was ofthe
appropriate size and density needed to eliminate the noise or visual impacts. Mr. Smith suggested that the
Commission require the submission of screening details to the staff for approval.
Chairman DeHaven called for public comment and the following person came forward to
speak:
Mr. James Layton, adjoining property owner to the rear of Mr. and Mrs. Glenn Miller, stated
that he had no objections to Mr. Miller's operation. Mr. Layton didn't believe that a fence needed to be
installed on the back of the property to separate him from Mr. Miller.
Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Ours, the Planning Commission
unanimously agreed to make the letter from Mr. and Mrs. Franklin Myers, adjoining property owners on the
north side, a part of the official record and, in addition, recognize that the Myers's have a concern over the
parking of limousines in front of their property, which has occurred in the past.
Mr. Morris moved to approve the conditional use permit with a modification of condition #5,
which would permit the staff to approve either landscaping or fencing of the property as a means to screen
activities and storage associated with the business. This motion was seconded by Mr. Romine.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of Conditional Use Permit #10-99 of Glenn and Natalie Miller (GEM Limousine), submitted by
Greenway Engineering, for a Cottage Occupation to operate a limousine service with the following conditions:
All review agency requirements must be complied with at all times.
2. Signage for the proposed use may not exceed four (4) square feet in area.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 380
-5-
3. No more than three (3) limousines shall be parked on the subject property.
4. One (1) employee other than members of the immediate household may be engaged in the operation
of the business on the subject property.
All limousines must be parked in the rear yard of the property and all activities and storage associated
with the business must be screened from adjoining residential properties. Such screening will be
approved by the. Planning Staff and should be accomplished through either the installation of a board -
on -board fence at least six (6) feet in height or landscaping along all property lines adjacent to
residential uses.
6. Any future expansion ofthis business will result in its classification as a commercial limousine service,
which will necessitate its relocation to an appropriate zoning district.
Rezoning #12-99 of Dave and Viola Orndorff, submitted by Greenway Engineering, to rezone 6.0 acres
from RA (Rural Areas) to B2 (Business General). This property is located on the south side of Tasker
Road (Rt. 642) and on both sides of Tadpole Lane, and is identified with P.I.N. 76-A-43 in the Shawnee
Magisterial District.
Action - Recommended Approval with Proffers
Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, read the background information and review
agency comments. Mr. Wyatt said that the property is located in the County's Sewer and Water Service Area
and is situated on Tasker Drive, which is a major collector road. He said that the applicant has proffered to
limit the amount of commercial development on the 6.0 -acre parcel to 48,000 square feet of floor area, as well
as to provide a monetary contribution to mitigate the impacts to Fire and Rescue services.
Mr. Wyatt continued, stating that applicant's traffic impact analysis does not provide level
of service details for Tasker Road and intersections within close proximity to this site and it is, therefore,
difficult to determine if this rezoning proposal will create a need for improvements to the existing road system.
He also stated that the applicant has not indicated how the impacts to the viewshed of the historic Sherman -
Rogers -Sargent House will be mitigated, either as recommended by the Historic Resources Advisory Board
(HRAB) or by other methods.
Mr. Mark Smith of Greenway Engineering, representing the property owners, Dave and Viola
Omdorff, explained that the owners envision a community gas station, which also serves hot lunches, ice
cream, and miscellaneous sundries. Mr. Smith said that the owners plan to build a small 2,000-3,000 square
foot building that would serve this particular community and maybe draw customers from some of the working
plants in the area.
Chairman DeHaven called for public comment and the following person came forward to
speak:
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 381
10.11
Mr. Allen Hudson, a general partner of the adjoining Eastgate Commerce Center, said that his
park contains about 100 acres of industrial and about 100 acres of commercial land. Mr. Hudson stated that
he put considerable effort into creating a quality park with a strong set of covenants and restrictions because
his goal is to have a first-class; quality industrial and commercial center. He explained that when he had the
property sized for sewer, they were conscious of the County's desire not to bring too much capacity to this area
because of the sensitivity concerning residential uses. Mr. Hudson said that no one else in the area was
interested in joining him on the water and sewer acquisition, so his partnership spent close to $600,000.00 of
their own money and built the line themselves, with the understanding that this was their capacity. Mr.
Hudson said that a precedent will be set and his capacity will be at jeopardy from anybody out there who now
decides that they want to be a part of this.
The Planning Commission discussed Mr. Hudson's concern, but believed that any agreements
concerning water and sewer would have to be arranged by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and not
the Commission. They also believed that the County's land developmental standards were more than adequate
to protect adjoining property owners and users.
Mr. Morris, who is the Commission's liaison to the HRAB, said that the tree line separating
this property from the viewshed ofthe historic Sherman -Rogers -Sargent House was discussed at the last HRAB
meeting and members felt confident that if the existing vegetation was left in its present state, it would be quite
sufficient as a buffer.
Mr. Morris next made a motion to approve the rezoning. This was seconded by Mr. Light and
unanimously passed.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of Rezoning # 12-99 of Dave and Viola Omdorff, submitted by Greenway Engineering, to rezone 6.0
acres from RA (Rural Areas) to 132 (Business General) with proffers as submitted by the applicant.
Rezoning Application #13-99 of Lenoir City Company (Stonewall Industrial Park), submitted by G. W.
Clifford & Associates, Inc., to rezone 7.5 acres from MH1 (Mobile Home Community) and 25.7 acres
from RA (Rural Areas) for a total of 33.2 acres to MI (Light Industrial). This property is located on the
west side of Welltown Pike (Rt. 661), approximately 3,100 feet north of the intersection of Welltown Pike
and McGhee Road (Stonewall Industrial Park), and is identified with P.I.N. 43-A-63 in the Gainesboro
Magisterial District.
Action - Recommended Approval with Proffers
Mr. Evan Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, read the background information and review
agency comments. Mr. Wyatt said that the applicant has proffered to provide right-of-way to improve
Welltown Road and to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT which would provide a traffic light at
the intersection of McGhee Road and Welltown Road; the applicant has proffered to prepare a revised master
development plan which conforms to the proffered general development plan to relocate the Tyson Drive
intersection with Welltown Road and to provide an eight -foot earth berm above road grade along the west side
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 382
-7 -
of Welltown Road; and, the applicant has proffered to conduct the Phase II Architectural Study for the historic
Mertz House.
Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin with G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., the design engineers for this
project, presented a copy ofthe 1993 master plan for Stonewall Industrial Park, which they would like to revise
for the expansion of the industrial park, and he proceeded to give the Commission an oven 1ew of the proposed
project.
Chairman DeHaven called for public comment and the following person came forward to
speak:
Mrs. Betty Godlove, resident at 688 Welltown Road, expressed concern about the problems
with the traffic, the dust, and tractor -trailers. Mrs. Godlove spoke about the traffic congestion on Welltown
Road.
Members of the Commission commented that it has always been intended that this additional
portion of the tract be included into the Stonewall Industrial Park. It was also pointed out that Mr. Gilpin and
the Lenoir City Company have a good track record and have followed through in the past to meet the desires
of the County,
Mr. Light stated that he preferred to see the extension of Tyson Drive taken off of Welltown
Pike, because of the additional traffic impacts from this portion of the industrial park.
Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Thomas,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of
Rezoning Application 413-99 of Lenoir City Company (Stonewall Industrial Park), submitted by G. W.
Clifford & Associates, Inc., to rezone 7.5 acres from MH1 (Mobile Home Community) and 25.7 acres from
RA (Rural Areas) for a total of 33.2 acres to M1 (Light Industrial), with the proffers submitted by the
applicant, by the following majority vote:
YES (To Approve): Morris, Copenhaver, DeHaven, Romine, Thomas, Ours, Stone, Miller
NO: Light
PUBLIC MEETING
Master Development Plan #03-99 of the Commonwealth Business Center, submitted by G. W. Clifford
& Associates, Inc., for the development of an industrial park on a 37.2759 -acre site. The site is located
at 3657 Valley Pike and is identified with P.I.N.s 75 -A -91A and 63-A-85 in the Back Creek Magisterial
District.
Action - Recommended Approval with Waiver of Cul-de-sac Length
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 383
-8 -
Mr. Michael Ruddy, Zoning Administrator, read the background information and review
agency comments. Mr. Ruddy stated that the overall concept of the master plan is consistent with the
Comprehensive Policy Plan the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Mr. Ronald Mislowsky with G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., the design engineering firm
representing the owner, stated that a potential user is available for the southwest corner parcel and subdivision
plans have been completed with VDOT, Sanitation Authority, and Public Works approvals. Mr. Mislowsky's
only issue was the length of the cul-de-sac, and he requested a waiver to exceed the 1,000 foot maximum limit
required by the zoning ordinance. He added that the approval of the waiver request would not increase the
number of lots and would improve driveway spacing.
Chairman DeHaven called for public comment and the following persons came forward to
speak:
Mr. Michael Collins, resident at 3670 Valley Pike, expressed concernabout traffic congestion.
Mr. Collins said that too many entrances are being proposed along a section of road where traffic is backed
up on a daily basis. He suggested that a collector road be constructed with a single traffic light. Mr. Collins
also pointed out that this site was a part of the Kemstown Battlefield. He said that hundreds of artifacts have
been found on both this site and the Hood site.
Mr. William E. Broy, resident at 309 Wentworth Drive, had questions about access to the site
and requested additional information about the site.
The Planning Commission discussed the traffic situation here and believed that relief of the
problems would only occur after Route 37 is built and the WATS is implemented. Consideration was also
given to the adjoining Winchester L.L.C. parcel and how access will be provided. The applicant's
representative had noted that improvements to I-81 and Route 37, along with VDOT's entrance spacing
requirements, would potentially landlock this parcel. The applicant, Mr. David Holliday, stated that it was his
intention at this time to reserve sufficient right-of-way through his development to provide an alternative access
to this parcel.
The Commission believed that a waiver of the cul-de-sac distance requirement was appropriate
in this case and upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Ours, they unanimously recommended
approval of the master plan with this waiver.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of Master Development Plan #03-99 of the Commonwealth Business Center, submitted by G. W.
Clifford & Associates, Inc., for the development of an industrial park on a 372759 -acre site with a waiver of
the cul-de-sac distance requirement.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 384
INTRODUCTION OF AMY M. LOHR PLANNER I
Mr. Kris Tierney, Planning Director, introduced Amy M. Lohr, who was hired on June 28,
1999, as a Planner I for the Frederick County Planning Department. Mr. Tierney stated that Ms. Lohr has a
Masters Degree from Virginia Tech.
Chairman DeHaven welcomed Ms. Lohr as a member of the Planning Staff.
CANCELLATION OF THE JULY 21 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Morris, the Planning Commission
unanimously agreed to cancel their July 21, 1999 meeting because of no pending applications or items for
discussion.
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. by
unanimous vote.
Respectfully submitted,
Kris C. Tierney, Secretary
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of July 7, 1999 Page 385
APPLICATION ACTION SUMMARY
(printed August 5, 1999)
_
submitted. n newl
REZONINGS:
Jack K Wampler, Sr., et als
Z #15-98
Stonewall .69 ac. from B3 to RA & modification
of approved proffers
Location:
W. side of Martinsburg Pk. (Rt. 11), about 0.5 mi. so. of the
intersection w/ Hopewell Rd. (Rt. 672)
Submitted:
07/09/99
PC Review:
08/04/99 - tabled
BOS Review:
08/25/99 - tentatively scheduled
Lenoir City Co. of VA
(REZ #13-99
Gainesboro
7.5 ac. from MH1 to Ml; 25.7 ac. from
Ito M1 for industrial develo Tent
Location:
Stonewall Industrial Park; no. of intersection of Welltown Pk. &
McGhee Rd.
Submitted:
06/11/99
PC Review:
07/07/99 - recommended approval w/ proffers
BOS Review:
08/25/99
Dave & Viola OrndorffShawnee
-]
(REZ #14-99)
6.0 ac from RA to B2
Location:
On the south side of Tasker Rd. and on both sides of Tadpole Ln.
Submitted:
06/14/99
PC Review:
07/07/99 - recommended approval w/ proffers
BOS Review:
08/25/99
Manuel C. & Pearl A. DeHaven
& W.D. & Dorothy Orndorff
Z #10-99 "Mr. Fuel"
Stonewall
9.4382 acres from M2 to B3 and .8263
acres from RA to B3;
10.2645 ac. of IA Overlay District
Location: IF500'+
so. of intersection of Rest Church Rd. (Rt. 669) & Martinsburg
Pk. (Rt. 11), betwn Rt. 11 & I-81, & continuing so. to Duncan Run.
Submitted:
04/13/99
PC Review:
05/05/99 - recommended approval with proffers
BOS Review:
05/26/99 - tabled
Lynnehaven (REZ #07-99)
Stonewall
81.4 ac. from RA to RP for 203 s.f. homes;
10.0 ac. from RA to 132 for commercial use
Location:
West of Beans Pond Ln., 400' from the intersection with Senseny Rd.,
& adjacent to the Carlisle Hei is subdivision
Submitted:
02/05/99
PC Review:
03/03/99 - tabled; applicant waived time requirement
BOS Review:
not yet scheduled
Sheppard/ Futral
(REZ #06-99
Stonewall 132.70 ac. from RA to RP for 293
single-family homes
Location:
On Eddy's Ln. (Rt. 820), approx. 0.8 mi. from the intersection with
Valley Mill Road
Submitted:
02/05/99
PC Review:
03/03/99 - tabled; applicant waived time requirement
BOS Review:
not yet scheduled
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Giles Farm (REZ #OS -99)
[Stonewall
140.2 ac. from RA to RP for 350 s.f. homes;
12.0 ac. from RA to B2 for commercial use
Location:
No. side of Senseny Rd., 850' east of Beans Pond Ln., across from the
Burning Knolls & C.M. Lockhart subdivisions, & adj. to the Bedford
Village & Apple Ridge subdivisions.
Submitted:
02/05/99
PC Review:
03/03/99 - tabled; applicant waived time requirement
11
BOS Review:
not yet scheduled
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
Shenandoah University - Revision
to MDP #001-91
Shawnee
New 2,500 seat football stadium &
eliminate 500 -unit dormitory E
Location:
East side of I-81 adjacent to College Park and Pembridge Heights
subdivisions
Submitted:
07/30/99
PC Review:
08/18/99
BOS Review:
08/25/99
Admin. Approved:
Pending
Fairfax Court (MDP #04-99)10
pequon
26 townhouse units & 3 urban single-
famil lots on 4.8635 ac. (RP)
Location:
airfax Pike (Rt. 277)
Submitted:
7/14/99
PC Review:
ot yet scheduled
[not
BOS Review:
yet scheduled
Admin. A roved:
endin
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Oakdale III, Raven Pointe, Raven
Oaks, Ravenwin DP #02-99
Shawnee 668 residential dwelling units on 247
acres of RP -zoned land
Location:
North side of Rt. 50, East of Winchester
Submitted:
05/11/99
PC Review:
06/02/99 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
07/14/99 - approved
Admin. Approved:
Pending
UBDIVISIONS:
Costello Drive Subdivision
Garber Trust SUB #18-99
Shawnee
Subdivision of 8.88 acres into 8 lots
2
Location:
East side of Rt. 522, approx. 1,500' south of Rt. 50
Submitted:
06/16/99
MDP #005-94
NIDP approved by BOS 09/14/94; NOP admin. approved 10/25/94
Subd. Admin. Approved:
rPending
Commonwealth Business Center
SUB #15-99
Back Creek Subdivision of 5 lots (37.28 ac.) for a
business park 3
Location:
3657 Valley Pike
Submitted:
05/14/99
MDP #03-99
Approved by BOS 07/14/99; Admin. Approved 07/19/99
Subd. Admin. Approved:
Pendin
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Central Coca-Cola Bottling Co.,
Inc. (SUB #17-99
Back Creek
Subdivision of 63.51 ac. into four lots
1
Location:
West of the intersection of Shady Elm Road (Rt. 651) and Apple
Valle Road (Rt. 652)
d:
F
05/27/99
2-98
MDP approved by BOS 05/13/98; MDP approved admin. 05/20/98
min. A roved:
Pending
Merriman's Chase (SUB #13-99)
Back Creek
Subdivision of 26.895 ac. into 48 single-
family residential lots
Location:
W. side of Merrimans Ln. (Rt. 621), along Rt. 37 at Abrams Creek
and Winchester & Western Railroad
Submitted:
04/26/99
MDP #006-98 (formerly known as
Willow Branch)
Approved by BOS 01/13/99; Admin. Approved 02/12/99
Subd. Admin. Approved:
Pending
Oakdale Crossing H
SUB #12-99
Shawnee
7
Subdivision of 24.83 ac into 51 single -
1 family detached lots
Location:
So. of existing
Oakdale Crossing, off of Sensen Rd. (Rt. 656)
Submitted:
03/31/99
1�02/18/99
approved by BOS 07/08/98; MDP approved admin. 09/04/98
MDP #01-99
by BOS 03/10/99; Administrative Approval Pending
11 Subd. Admin. Approved:
LApproved
din
The Camp/Tasker Rd. (JASBO,
Inc. /F. Glaize) (SUB #011-99
Opequon
Subdivision of 50.52 ac. into 170 single -
famil residential lots
Location:
west corner of Tasker Rd. (Rt. 642) & White Oak Rd. (Rt. 636)
Submitted:
MDP #004-98 (Tasker Rd. Land BayP
1�02/18/99
approved by BOS 07/08/98; MDP approved admin. 09/04/98
Subd. Admin. Approved:
din
Applications Action summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Fort Collier -Lot 32Stonewall
Subdivision of 1 lot consisting of 4.7374
SUB #09-99
acres 1
Corner of Century Ln. (Rt. 862) & Lenoir Dr. (F-732)
Submitted:
Location:
Property fronts the northwest corner of the intersection of Brooke Rd.
MDP approved by BOS 07/14/93; MDP admin. approved 07/28/93
(Rt. 1322) & west Brooke Rd. (Rt. 1320)
Submitted:
01/29/99
MDP #004-91
MDP approved by BOS 10/09/91; admin. approved 11/22/91
Subd. Admin. Approved:
Pending
Stonewall Industrial Pk. - Lot 32
SUB #06-99
Gainesboro
Subdivision of 1 lot consisting of 5.4455
ac. 1
Location:
Corner of Century Ln. (Rt. 862) & Lenoir Dr. (F-732)
Submitted:
01/27/99
MDP #006-93
MDP approved by BOS 07/14/93; MDP admin. approved 07/28/93
Subd. Admin. Approved:
Pending
Canter Estates - Section I
(SUB #05-99)
Shawnee Subdivision of 24.5524 ac. into 60 lots
for single-family det. traditional homes
Location:
Northwest comer of intersection of White Oak Rd. (Rt. 636) &
Macedonia Church Rd. (Old Rt. 642)
Submitted:
02/08/99
MDP #004-98 (Tasker Rd. Lana Bays)
MDP approved by BOS 07/08/98; MDP admin. approved 09/04/98
Subd. Admin. Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Tybrooke, L.C. (SUB #03-99)
NO MDP
Gainesboro 2Lots; Tl. Acreage 4.1277 (B2 & RA)
Location:
Front Royal Pk (Rt. 522) at Albin; 1 mile N. of Winch. B (Rt. 37)
I, Submitted:i
PC Review:
01/22/99 II
03/17/99 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/12/99 -approved
Subd. Admin. Approved: j
pending
Autumn Glen, Sect. I
SUB #015-98
Opequon
21 lots - duplex & multiplex (52
dwellings) on 14.8 ac.
Location:
South side of Tasker Rd. (Rt. 642), 0.25 mi. East of Rt. 647
Submitted:
06/30/98
MDP#004-98 (Tasker Rd Land Bays)
MDP approved by BOS 07/08/98; MDP Pending Admin. Approval
Subd. AdminAEproved.
Phase I a roved on 11/04/98 for 21 dwellin s
Mark & Rachelle Repine
SUB #004-98 NO MDP
Shawnee
Subdivision of 1.3719 ac. into 3 s.f. lots
Location:
Heritage Hills Subd.; along the eastern portion of Idlewood Drive
Submitted:
01/26/98
PC Review:
02/18/98 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
03/11/98 - approved
Admin. Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Lenoir City Co. Lot 2; Stonewall
Indust. Pk. SUB #007-9
Gainesboro
Subdivision of a 2.6584 ac. lot (Ml)
Location:
McGhee Rd. (Rt. 861); approx. 1,000' from Tyson Dr. intersection
Submitted:
07/28/97
MDP #006-93
Approved by BOS 07/14/93; Admin. Approved 07/28/93
Subd. Admin. Approve d:
Pendin
Dominion Knolls (SUB #005-97)
Stonewall
75 s.f. zero lot line lots on 20.278 ac.
RP
Location:
So.west corner of Baker Ln. (Rt. 1200) & Ft. Collier Rd. (Rt. 1322)
Submitted:
05/16/97
MDP #001-97
Approved by BOS 04/09/97; Admin. Approved 06/30/97
Subd. Admin. Approved:
Section 1 (25 lots) approved 06/02/98; Sections 2 & 3 Pending
Winchester -Fred Co. IDC (SUB)
FBack Creek 1 2 M1 Lots 0.552 acres & 20.285 acres)
Location:
Southeast side of Development Lane
Submitted:
09/08/95
MDP #003-87:
A roved b BOS 07/08/87; Admin. Approved 06/08/88
PendingAdmin. Approval __�[A!m
.tin signed plats.
Abrams Point, Phase I SUB
Shawnee
230 SF Cluster & Urban Lots
Location:
South side of Rt. 659
Submitted:
05/02/90
PC Review:
06/06/90 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
06/13/90 - approved
Pending Admin. Approval:
Awaiting deed of dedication, letter of credit, and signed plat
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Harry Stimpson SUB
[0:;e��uon T
Location:
Town Run Lane
Submitted:
09/23/94
PC Review:
10/19/94 - recommended approval
lAwaitingsigned
BOS Review:
10/26/94 - approved
Pending Admin. Approval:
plat.
SITE PLANS:
Location: McGhee Road; Stonewall Industrial Park
11 Submitted: 11 07/30/99 11
Omega Drywall, Ltd. (SP #41-99)
-------------------
Gainesboro
34' X 60' 7storag
Location:
Stonewall Industrial Park, Lot 15-A; 1671 T son Drive
Submitted:
07/19/99
Approved:
Pending
Shenandoah Valley Baptist
Church SP #40-99
Opequon
2- 756 s.f. additions to existing church
bidg. for storage use (RA)
Location:
4699 Valley Pike
Submitted:
07/12/99
Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
Route 50 EXXON (SP #39-99)
Shawnee
Addition of 848 s.f. storage area to
existin convenience store bldg. 2)
Location:
992 Millwood Pike
Submitted:
07/12/99
—Approved:
Pending
Fairfax Court (SP #38-99)
Opequon
Single-family & Multi -family
Residential Use
Location:
Fairfax Pike (Rt. 277)
Submitted:
07/14/99
Approved: jr,
Pending
Appleland Sports Center, Inc.
SP #37-99
Back Creek
Expansion of existing commercial
recreation area; )
Location:
4490 Valley Pike
Submitted:
07/14/99
Approved:
Pending
VDO North America, L.L.C.
SP #36-99
Stonewall
Addition of 144 sq.ft. fuel pump testing
building 1
Location:
188 Brooke Road
Submitted:
07/08/99
Approved:
07/30/99
Branch Electric Supply
(SP #35-9
Shawnee
Wholesale distrib. facility; 1.80 ac. of a
2.50 ac. site to be developed 1
Location:
Westview Business Centre, Lot 9; frontage on Victory Lane
Submitted:
06/28/99
Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999 10
Kim &Marietta Walls
SP #34-99
Stonewall
office (B2); 1.58 ac. parcel (1.0 ac. in
Cit of Winc.; 0.58 ac. in Fred. Co.
Location:
909 North Loudoun St.
Submitted:
06/22/99
Approved:
Pendin
Frederick Motor Co. (SP #33-99)
Stonewall
2,600 s.f. warehouse addition to existing
facilit 1
Location:
2 MartinsburgPike
Submitted: q06/24/99
A roved:
din
Winchester Printers (SP #32-99)
Shawnee 25,480 s.fcommer. printing facility;
2.20 ac. developed of 5.0 ac. site 1
Location:
Westview Business Centre; frontage on Independence Drive
Submitted:
06/22/99
Approved:
Pending
H.P. Hood (SP #30-99)
Back Creek
ESL Milk Facility; 74.10 ac. developed
of a 83.21 ac. site (M2
Pruitt Corporation (SP #31-99)
(Airport Bus. Parc, Bldg. A)
Shawnee
Submitted:
150,000 s.f. flex tech facility; 10 ac.
developed of 64.2 ac. parcel (Ml w/ Flex
Approved:
Pending
Tech overla
Location:
of Airport
Rd. & Admiral Byrd Drive
Submitted:
I
FlIntersection
25/99
Approved:
din
H.P. Hood (SP #30-99)
Back Creek
ESL Milk Facility; 74.10 ac. developed
of a 83.21 ac. site (M2
Location •
Rt. 11
Submitted:
06/24/99
Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
11
General Parts, Inc. (SP #29-99)
Back Creek
Location:
9.27 -ac. parcel to be developed for
warehouse/office/wholesale 3)
Location:
East side of VaHey
Ave. (Rt. 11S), approx. 500' north of Rt. 37
II Submitted:
06/ 16/99
Approved:
Pending
Greenwood Volunteer Fire Co.
SP #28-99
Shawnee 11,400 sq.ft. addition to existing bldg.; 2.66
ac. developed of 4.00 ac. parcel (RA)
Location:
1366 Greenwood Road
Submitted:
06/08/99
—Approved: 11
Pending
Special Trades Buildings (Kim
ert SP #27-99
Stonewall
14,400 sq.ft. and 10,000 sq.ft. bldgs;
warehouse w/ accessory office 3
—Henryro
Location:
Fort Collier Road, near Baker Lane
Submitted:
06/11/99
Approved:
07/21/99
VA Employment Commission
SP #26-99
Shawnee
8,783.11 sq.ft. office complex on 1.50
ac. 2
Location:
100 Premier Place
Submitted:
06/08/99
Approved: Ip
Pending
Golden Corral SP #25-99)
FShawnee
9,952 sq.ft. restaurant on 2 acres 2
Location:
120 Costello Drive
Submitted:
06/02/99
Approved: Ip
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999 12
Omps Funeral Home (SP #24-99) I[EOpequon::
Stonewall
7,098 sq.ft. funeral home on 1.3965 ac.
Location:
N.Frederick Pk; a
parcel 2
Location:
W. side of Rt. 5225., a rox. 500' north of Pa ern ill Rd. (Rt. 644)
Submitted:
A roved:
din
Approved:
Pendin
Submitted:
Wine. -Fred. Co. Chptr. of the
American Red Cross SP #23-99
Stonewall
16,160 sq.ft. office facility on 2.0213 ac.
parcel 2
Location:
N.Frederick Pk; a
rox. 1/4 mi. N. of Winc. Co . limits
ubmitted:
fE.ide
13/99
07/15/99
A roved:
din
Location:
Winchester Church of Christ at
Mountain View SP #22-99
Back Creek
Modular classroom addition; 0.10 ac.
develo ed of 29.3924 ac. site fRA
Location:
153 Narrow Lane
Submitted:
06/01/99
[Approved
Approved:
07/15/99
Burning Tree Apts. & Town-
houses SP #19-99
Shawnee
Apartments on 1.3 acres (RP)
Shade Equipment Co., Inc.
Stonewall
Paint shop & parking addition; 1.5 ac.
SP #21-99
Approved:
developed of a 6.136 ac. site 1, M2
Location:
1237 Martinsburg Pike
Submitted:
06/01/99
Approved:
Pending
Burning Tree Apts. & Town-
houses SP #19-99
Shawnee
Apartments on 1.3 acres (RP)
Location:
Williamson Road (Rt. 1213)
Submitted:
05/26/99
Approved:
Pending
Appucations Action summary
Printed August 5, 1999 13
Valley Farm Credit Office
SP #18-99parcel
Back Creek
16,115 sq.ft office facility on a 2.0 ac.
2
—Complex
Location:
Kemstown Business Pk.; Prosperity Dr.; Lot 16; Section I
Submitted:
05/20/99
Approved:
07/20/99
Back Creek Elementary School
SP #16-99
Back Creek
35.89 ac. to be disturbed on a 37.75 ac.
site
Location:
Middle Road (Rt. 628)
Submitted:
04/26/99
—Approved:
Pending
Airport Warehousing at Arbor
Court SP #15-99
Shawnee
7.5 ac. to be developed of a 7.8 ac. site
for a warehouse 1
Location:
321 Arbor Court
Submitted:
04/15/99
Approved:
Pending
Ralph Gregory/Aylor Rd. Site
SP #008-99
Opequon
3,395 s.f. one-story retail/office bldg;
.70 ac. developed on .70 ac. site 2
Location:
Between I-81 & Rt. 647 at the intersection of Rt. 647 & Rt. 641
Submitted:
02/11/99
Approved:
Pending
America House Assisted Living
SP #073-98
Opequon
Assisted living facility/4.6 ac. developed
on 73.4749 ac. site
Location:
South side of Tasker Rd. (Rt. 642); 1,100 feet east of Aylor Rd.(Rt.
647)
Submitted:
12/02/98
Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999 14
Kim Henry Property - Mini
Warehouse (SP #057-98
Stonewall
7,504 s.f. warehouse; 4 ac. developed of
a 7.74 ac. site 3
Location:
Intersection of Baker Lane & Fort Collier Road
Submitted:
08/26/98
Approved:
Pending
Moffett Property (SP #050-98)
Stonewall Metal warehse. addition (4,800 g.s.f.);
1.392 ac. site; 0.465 disturbed 3
Location:
1154 Martinsburg Pike
Submitted:
07/21/98
[Pending
Approved:
Approved:
T.P. & Susan Goodman
SP #044-98
Stonewall
Hackwood/ Minor Site Plan (RA)
Location:
534 Redbud Road
Submitted:
06/10/98
Approved:
Pendin
Southeast Container (SP #001-98)
Stonewall District
Parking Lot; 0.2 ac. Disturbed on a
89.6 ac. Site 1
Location:
Ft. Collier Industrial Park
Submitted:
01/06/98
Approved:
Pendin
Agape Christian Fellowship
Church Sanctus SP #005-9
Shawnee
Church Expansion; 2.5 ac. to be
developed of a 29.5115 ac. site
Location:
East side of Rt. 642; a rox. 2,500' so. of the Rt. 37/1-81 Interch .
Submitted:
02/12/97
Approved:
Pending
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999
15
Shenandoah Bldg. Supply
Gainesboro Warehouse on 5 acres (Ml)
SP #056-96
Location:
152 Fairfax Pk. (behind Red Apple Country Store)
Submitted:
Location:
195 Lenoir Drive (Stonewall Industrial Park)
Submitted:
12/16/96
Approved:
P Pending
Stimpson/Rt. 277 Oil & Lube
Service SP #030-96
Opequon
Oil & Lube Serv., Car Wash, Drive -
Thru on 2.97 ac. 2
Location:
152 Fairfax Pk. (behind Red Apple Country Store)
Submitted:
07/03/96
Approved:
Pending
AMOCO/House of Gifts
SP #022-96
Gainesboro
Gas Pump Canopy 880 sq. ft. area of a
0.916 acre parcel
Location:
3548 North Frederick Pike
Submitted:
05/08/96
Approved: 1P
Pending
American Legion Post #021
SP #018-96
Stonewall
Addition to lodge building on 3.4255
acre site 2
Location:
1730 Berryville Pike
Submitted:
04/10/96
Approved:
Pending
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS:
VA PCS Alliance; CFW Intelos
CUP #12-99
Stonewall
195' monopole for digital telecommun-
ications tower
Location:
3100 Berryville Pike
Submitted:
07/09/99
PC Review:
08/04/99 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
08/25/99
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999 16
W.R. Barney, Jr. (CUP #11-99)
Gainesboro Cottage Occupation - Antique Restor-
ation & some Retail Sales
Location:
341 Gainesboro Road
Submitted:n7in4inn
Submitted:
PC Review:
08/04/99 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
08/25/99
Glen & Natalie Miller
CUP #10-99
Shawnee
Cottage Occupation - Limousine
Service
Location:
t Royal Pk; 415' north of Westwood Dr., on the west side of
Submitted:
LR522ron
PC Review:
- recommended approval
BOS Review:
SBA, Inc. (Richard Miller Cooley
Property) CUP #03-99)
pequon Commercial Telecommun. Facility:
P250' self-supporting lattice tower )
Location:
173 Catlett Lane, Middletown
Submitted:
03/12/99
PC Review:
04/07/99 - tabled at the applicant's request for 90 days to 07/07/99;
07/07/99 - tabled at the applicant's request for 30 days to 08/04/99
08/04/99 - tabled at the applicant's request indefinitely
BOS Review:
not yet scheduled
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999 17
VARIANCES:
Location: S.E. end of Park Center Dr. (Rt. 1323), approx. 0.15 mi. S.E. of
11 intersection w/ W. Brooke Rd. (Rt. 1320), in Ft. Collier Indust. Pk.
Submitted: 11 07/27/99
BZA Review: 11 08/17/99
Location: Corner of Hudson Ave. & Bryarly Rd. (Rt. 789); empty lot between
11 Hudson Ave. and Bethel Lutheran Church
Submitted: 11 07/23/99
BZA Review: 11 08/17/99
Applications Action Summary
Printed August 5, 1999 18
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0632
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director
RE: Shenandoah University Revised Master Development Plan
DATE: August 5, 1999
On July 22, 1991, Frederick County approved a Master Development Plan for an 18.425 -acre site
owned by Shenandoah University. The approved plan calls for the development of this acreage to
provide for an events center, an academic building, and a dormitory. Access to this acreage is
proposed through the extension of a road system from the main campus that will go under Interstate
81, and through the future extension on Tulane Drive.
Shenandoah University has submitted a revised Master Development Plan for this acreage. The
revision involves the provision of a 2,500 seat football stadium and the elimination of the 500 unit
dormitory. A narrative is provided on the revised plan which states that all notes and requirements
that are indicated on the original approved Master Development Plan will still apply if the revised plan
is approved. These notes and requirements include the following:
• The provision of a 20 -foot buffer and full landscape screen along the eastern property line.
• The acknowledgment that access to and from the site on Price Drive (Devon Drive on the
revised plan) will only occur in emergency situations and will be restricted for all other normal
operations.
• The delineation of all environmental features and disturbance calculations.
• Typical sections for the proposed access roads and the buffer and screening.
The revised master Development Plan is scheduled to go to the Board of Supervisors for final
disposition on August 25, 1999. It would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to forward
a recommendation to the Board regarding this issue.
O:\Agendas\COMMENTS\MDP's\ShenandoahUniversityRevisedMDP.wpd
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
APPROVED BY:
DATE
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE
REVISED MJEC3 SCUMMY
TOTAL PROJECT AREA:
18.425 Acres
ZONING: HE
USES
1990 MDP
1999 REV. MDP
EVENTS CENTER
60,000 SF
60,000 SF
ACADEMIC BLDG
24,000 SF
24,000 SF
DORMITORIES
500 APTS
NONE
FOOTBALL STADIUM
I NONE _
2500-5000 SEATS
FIELDHOUSE
I NONE
40,000 SF
(Includes Coaches Offices,
Locker Rooms do Classroom)
a
a W
8%
O
/1 -) I
a
nan
AMENDED MASTER PLAN �
7//E CENTER" of Shenortdooh University ra
Atte. A6'rotes & its of ft
�hsfer Mfl doted &Cwlber 19.9 W,*
&reps as *Wr1�' # modd"w by NMs Pair.
AMENDED WASTER PLAN AREA
� q0.
w i
S[ALB: Tom, t
OaAYB 911, T.Y.P.
loom NO. Y_ A�PLN
SHEET f oP r
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
5401665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0682
MEMOJMNDUM
To: Frederick County Planning Commission,
From: Michael T. Ruddy, Zoning Administrators
Subject: Buettner Cul -De -Sac Length Waiver Request
Date: August 5, 1999
The Planning Commission has received a waiver request from Artz and Associates to allow a cul-de-sac
to extend beyond the maximum length mandated by the Subdivision Ordinance. The request is to allow a
cul-de-sac of 3900' in length as opposed to the required maximum length of 1000'. The cul-de-sac is
located in a proposed Rural Preservation Subdivision, submitted on behalf of Henry Buettner. A copy of
the proposed subdivision is included for your information.
The Subdivision Ordinance provides the Planning Commission with the ability to waive the 1000'
requirement in cases where extreme topography or other factors make it impractical. In no case shall the
street serve more than twenty-five (25) lots. The cul-de-sac in this proposed subdivision will contain twenty
five (25) lots who will be served by the proposed cul-de-sac. In addition, the length of the cul-de-sac would
be 2900' greater than is currently permitted. Recently, the Planning Commission approved a request to
permit an increase of 160' in the length of a cul-de-sac which contained eleven (11) lots. In a manner
similar to this recent request, the applicant has committed to preserving an additional ten percent (10.4
acres) of land to the rural preservation lot. The Planning Commission should determine if they believe
the waiver is appropriate in this case.
Please contact our department if you need additional information.
Enclosure.
UANUe\Common%SUBDIVlS\Waiver requests\bueftnercuidesac.mem
107 North Feast Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Artz * A55oc1ate5, I nc.
35 West Boscawen Street
Winchester, VA 22GO I
540-GG7-3233 540-GG7-9188 (Fax)
Toil free 800-755-7320
mikeartz@shente-1.net
July 27, 1999
Frederick County
Department of Planning and Development
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
Attention: Mike Ruddy, Zoning Administrator
Dear Mr. Ruddy:
This Ietter is on behalf of my client Henry Buettner in regards'to the proposed
subdivision of his land located on Stony Hill Road (Va. Rte. 688). The parcel is
designated as*Map #28-A-161 and is zoned RA. Mr. Buettner is proposing a Rural Lot
Preservation Subdivision.
A waiver as described in the Subdivision Ordinance Section 144-17-G-1 is requested to
allow the proposed cul-de-sac to extend to a length of 3900' rather than the 1000'
existing limit defined in the ordinance.
Due to the lot dimension limitations of the Rural Lot Preservation and the configuration
of the existing boundary and topography of this site, it is my opinion that a waiver is
justified.
In addition, Mr. Buettner is prepared to set aside and additional 10% of land (10.4 Acres
+-) for the Rural Preservation Lot as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Please place this item on the agenda for the next Planning Commission meeting.
Sincerely,
Michael M. A
Artz & Associates
VICINITY SKETCW
AREA TABULATION:
TOTAL AREA = 151.559 AC.
ALLOWED DENSITY = 30 UNITS
PROPOSED DENSITY = 22 UNITS
RURAL PRESERVATION LOT = 75.780 AC (50%)
AREA SUMMARY
AREA IN LOTS 1 THRU 22 = 61.165 AC.
PROPOSED STREET DEDICATION = 4.725 AC.
RURAL PRESERVATION LOT (LOT T) = 75.780 AC
BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT WITH LOT E = 9.8f
TOTAL AREA = 151.559 AC.
MRA. FW-5r12VAnoN [-Or 5LJ
MUMINAZY SKLr--fGI-
CA M51301 O 05 MCf, FM17E121CK COU
SCALE: I" -x}00' 17ATE:.ALY 26, 15
FM5ENT O0A.IEI2:
WNPY C. 6I.0 f17,12, J2., &
YM *28-A-161 17f3 871,
ZONET7 12A
NA 12. 131E I I I F
I'G 1011
IM FARM
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning Commission
From: Michael T. Ruddy, Zoning Administrator —�
Subject: Discussion - Single Family Senior Housing Amendment
Date: August 5, 1999
Over recent months, the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee of the Planning Commission
has been reviewing a request to amend the Residential Performance (RP) Zoning District requirements as
they pertain to Senior Housing. The goal of the request was to fine tune existing regulations in an effort to
meet the unique needs ofretirement communities. Presented for discussion is a proposed Zoning Ordinance
text amendment from the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee that provides an alternative
housing type which addresses the needs of the older person and ensures a high quality development.
While recognizing that the residential performance section of the Zoning Ordinance, in addition to the
buffer and screening sections, should be evaluated as a whole to ensure flexibility in design and the
promotion of quality development, it was the Committee's belief that this current amendment should focus
specifically on the needs of the retirement community. The more thorough evaluation should be addressed
in the future. As a result, Single Family Senior Housing has been added to the list of permitted uses in the
RP (Residential Performance) zoning district and appropriate design guidelines and performance standards
have been developed. The proposed amendment includes revisions to the following sections of the Zoning
Ordinance; 165-37 Buffering and Screening, 165-59 Permitted Uses, 165-63 Open Space Requirements,
165-64 Recreational Facilities, and 165-65 Dimensional Requirements, and section 144-17 of the
Subdivision Ordinance.
This item is for discussion only at this time. The DRRS, at their July 29, 1999 meeting, recommended
approval of the text amendment as proposed. Staff will present this proposed amendment to the Board of
Supervisors for discussion at their August 25 meeting and would anticipate advertising for public hearing
in during the month of September.
U:\Mike\Common\DRRSkebrementhousingpcmem
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Retirement Housing Amendment Single Family Senior Housing
165-59. Permitted Uses.
B. Structures are to be erected or land used for one (1) or more of the following uses:
(1) Any of the following residential structures: Single Family Detached Rural Traditional,
Single Family Detached Traditional, Single Family Detached Urban, Single Family Detached
Cluster, Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line, 5tngie Farnily Beni Ho ng, Patio House,
Duplex, Multiplex, Atrium House, Weak -Link Townhouse, Townhouse, Garden Apartments.
165-65. Dimensional Requirements
A. Single Family Detached Rural Traditional
B. Single Family Detached Traditional
C. Single Family Detached Urban
D. Single Family Detached Cluster
E. Single Family Detached Zero Lot Line
F. (1) ffln a Fanuly Senior Hous1ag
(2) Patio House
G. Duplex
H. Multiplex
I. Atrium House
J. Weak -Link Townhouse
K. Townhouse
L. Garden Apartments
1
Retirement Housing Amendment - Single Family Senior Housing
165-65. F. () Single Fa -mil SeneQr lE ausl g
Single Family Senior Housing shall be a single family detached or semidetached residence with one
dwelling unit from ground to roof, having individual outside access. The intent of this housing type
is to provide an alternative housing type that addresses the unique needs of the older person. This
type of housing is encouraged to be developed in a "village" generally containing less than one
hundred (100) older person homes with site development designs that consider the older population.
This section reflects the Virginia State Code, Section 36-96.7, in defining "housing for older persons"
as housing: i) provided under any state or federal program that is specifically designed and operated
to assist elderly persons, as defined in the state or federal program; or ii) intended for, and solely
occupied by, persons sixty-two years of age or older; or iii) intended for, and solely occupied by at
least one person fifty-five years of age older per unit.
(1) Dimensional requirements shall be as follows:
Minimum lot area: 2,800 square feet
Maximum lot area: 6,000 square feet
(2) Minimum yards shall be as follows:
(A) Setback from public road right-of-way: twenty-five (25) feet.
Setback from private road, driveway, or parking area: twenty (20) feet
(B) Side yards: Zero lot line option may be used with this housing type. If chosen, the
minimum side yard shall be ten feet (10') for that yard opposite the zero lot line side.
To create additional light and space between units, no more than 50 percent of the
zero lot line wall shall be placed on the zero lot line portion of the lot. If the zero lot
line option is not chosen, the minimum side yard shall be five (5) feet.
(C) Rear Yard: Fifteen (15) feet.
(3) Maximum building heights shall not exceed twenty eight (28) feet in height.
(4) All buildings shall be designed and constructed with a low maintenance exterior and all buffers
and open space shall be maintained by a property owners association.
5) Detached accessory buildings shall not be permitted.
6) On-site parking shall be provided for a minimum of two (2) parking spaces.
7) A minimum of twenty (20) landscape trees and/or shrubs shall be provided with each unit.
2
Retirement Housing Amendment - Single Family Senior Housing
165-37. C. (1) Perimeter single family separation buffers.
(a) Wherever possible or practical, single family detached traditional, urban, and cluster, and
single Ealy senior housing, shall not be placed adjacent to other residential lots or structures.
If other types of .residential structures must be placed adjacent to single family detached
traditional, urban and cluster dwellings, the following buffers area required: ... (table)
If single family senior housing residential Arcietures are placed against single family detached
tqd tional, urban, and cluster residential strudms, the fbilowing buffer is required:
165-63. Open Space Requirements.
A. Type of Development Minimum Required Open Space
Single F ly SenI .Housing 3.0 Percent
165-64. Recreational Facilities.
B. (2) (f) CoMMgp#y Center
,( Other Recreational Facilities
C. Single Family Senior Housing developments shall provide three (3') age appropriate.
recreational units for each thirty (34) dwelling units.
C
Retirement Housing Amendment - Single Family Senior Housing
Subdivision Ordinance Amendment.
144-17.
C. Lot Access. All lots shall abut and have direct access to a public street or right-of-way dedicated
for maintenance by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
(2) Multifamily and Single Farny Senior Housing lots.
(a) Lots in subdivisions to be used for the following housing types, as defined by
Chapter 165, Zoning, need not abut public streets.
1) Multiplexes
2) Atrium Houses
3). Townhouses
4) Weak -link townhouses
5) Garden Apartments
6) Single Family Senior Housing
(b) When such lots do not abut public streets, they shall abut parking lots or access
easements. The length and extent of driveways and parking aisles providing access to
lots shall be minimized, and public streets shall be provided in larger subdivisions
where substantial distances are involved. In no case shall such a lot be more than five
hundred (500) feet from a state maintained road, as measured from the public street
along the access route. The distance a lot is located away from a state maintained
road may be increased to eight.hundred (800) feet if additional access and enhanced
cirrculation is provided whh a diiveway loop.
E
COUNTY of FREDERICK
JDepartment of Planning and Development
f 540/665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0682
MEMOR "D UM
To: Planning Commission
From: Michael T. Ruddy, Zoning Administrator '_ l
Subject: Discussion -Schools with a Residential Component in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning
District Amendment
Date: August 5, 1999
The Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee of the Planning Commission, at their July 29,
1999 meeting, recommended approval of the attached text amendment as proposed. This text amendment
pertains to allowing schools with a residential component in the RA (Rural Areas) zoning district as a
Conditional Use and is a result of a recent inquiry received by our department regarding the permissibility
of such a use.
Presently, schools are a permitted use in the RA (Rural Areas) zoning district. However, the addition of
a residential component, which would have the potential to be quite significant, would not be permitted.
It was the belief of the DRRS that the Zoning Ordinance should distinguish between schools without a
residential component and schools with a residential component. Further, that given the appropriate
environment, schools with a residential component would be appropriate as a Conditional Use. Especially,
as the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors would have the opportunity to review such a use
to ensure that there are no adverse impacts on surrounding properties and that the general well being of
the residents of the County is protected. Schools without a residential component would remain as a
permitted use in the RA (Rural Areas) zoning district.
This item is for discussion only at this time. Staff will present this proposed amendment to the Board of
Supervisors for discussion at their August 25 meeting and would anticipate advertising for public hearing
in during the month of September.
U 1M kelCommoriTP RS\schoolspc.mem
t07 North Rent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22.AI-51000
Schools Amendment - RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District.
165-50. Permitted Uses.
E. Schools (without residential component).
165-51. Conditional Uses.
CC. Schools (with residential component),:
165-145. Definitions.
School;
A) Without residential component - Any building used for organized education or
instruction in any branch oftnowledge. This school does not contain rooms where
overnight lodging and meals are vrovided to students..
1, gi
B) With.residential component - Any building used for organized education or instruction
in any branch of knowledge This school does contain room, s where ovgmi& lodging and
meals are provided to students..
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
5401665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director ,
RE: Capital Facilities Impact Model
DATE: August 4, 1999
In 1991, a Capital Facilities Impact Model was developed for Frederick County which has been
utilized to project the fiscal impacts of rezonings on public schools, parks and recreation, and fire and
rescue services for capital facilities costs. In June 1998, a revised Capital Facilities Impact Model was
developed by RER Economic Consultants, and adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The revised
model was designed to incorporate additional modules to project the fiscal impacts of rezonings on
the sheriff s office, the public library system, county administration facilities, and miscellaneous public
facilities, as well as the public agencies that were accounted for in the previous impact model.
The Capital Facilities Impact Model projects the gross potential costs of the facilities that would be
needed to support a new development using various formulas and economic information. Credit is
given for the projected revenues that would be generated by the development. Potential revenues are
subtracted from the projected gross costs resulting in an actual projected net fiscal impact of the
development on the County. Fiscal impacts to facilities and services is currently calculated at 50%
of the total impact for Public Schools and Parks and Recreation, and 100% of the total impact for all
other modules within the model.
The Board of Supervisors conditioned approval of the Capital Facilities Impact Model on an annual
review in July of each year to determine an appropriate increase in the calculated percentage for
Public Schools and Parks and Recreation impacts. Staff will present information for consideration
and adoption by the Board of Supervisors during their August 25, 1999 meeting. This information
will be presented to the Planning Commission for information during the August 18, 1999 meeting.
U:\Evan\Common\PROIECTS1CapitalFacilitieslmpactModelFY1999-2000Update_Plam ingCommissionDiscussionMemompd
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 2-1001-500