Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 04-20-94 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia APRIL 20, 1994 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Meeting Minutes of March 16, 1994 .......................... A 2) Bimonthly Report ...................................... B 3) Committee Reports .................................... C 4) Citizen Comments ..................................... D 5) Presentation by William H. Bushman, Virginia Department of Transportation, regarding alternatives that will attempt to alleviate existing traffic problems in and around the I-81/11 North/Route 37 interchange area. .................................................E 6) Revised Master Development Plan #002-94 of Lake Front Condos (formerly Lake Centre) for 28 condominium units within three structures. This property is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Route 642 (Macedonia Church Road) and Chinkapin Drive, in the Shawnee District. (Mr. Bise) .......... F 7) Discussion regarding a proposed rezoning and master development plan for 91 acres surrounding Star Fort. (Mr. Tierney) ........................................G 2 8) T1;vi-iEcvinn with Mr Friwin F. White rPgarrlino, n request to extend a sewer line to a 78 acre parcel of land which lies outside of the Urban Development Area and the Sewer and Water Service Area. This property is located approximately one half mile east of the Parkins Mill Plant on the south side of Route 644 (West Parkins Mill Road) in the Shawnee District. (Mr. Tierney) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H 9) Discussion with Mr. E. Frank Smith regarding a request to relax the Subdivision Ordinance regulation pertaining to depth and width ratio requirements. (Mr. Miller) ......................................... 10 Other. MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING f``f11Vf_Iti(_V. NZ flN Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on March 16, 1994. PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman; John R. Marker, Vice Chairman/Back Creek District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; Todd D. Shenk, Gainesboro District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Stonewall District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; and Robert M. Sager, Board Liaison; ABSENT: S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison Planning Staff present were: Robert W. Watkins, Director/Secretary; W. Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator; Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II; Lanny C. Bise, II, Planner I; and Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Director. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. BIMONTHLY REPORT Chairman Golladay accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's information. COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CP&PS) - 3/14/94 Mtg Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the CP&PS continued their discussion regarding the sewage problem in the community centers of Round Hill, Clearbrook, and Brucetown. She said that the Subcommittee concluded that further studies were needed and possibly, the best approach would be a land use study of those areas. E Development Review .& Regulations, Subcommittee (DR&RS) 2/22/94 Mtg_ Mr. Thomas reported that the DR&RS finalized the recommended density requirements for the revised RP Zoning District. He said that they also discussed ways to simplify conditional use permits and ways to make them a little less expensive. Mr. Thomas said that the Subcommittee made a recommendation for two citizen members for the DR&RS. Economic Development Commission Mr. Romine reported that the EDC held a retreat on Saturday, March 5, and a wide range of topics were discussed. Battlefield Task Force - 3/9/94 Mtg._ Mr. Light reported that the Task Force discussed the Grim Farm. Mr. Watkins noted that the LFPDC has put together a very good map outlining possible tours for the area. Mr. Watkins also noted that Frederick County -Winchester is in the process of applying for another grant from the National Park Service and this one will be for work regarding battlefield tours. ITIZEN COMMENTS Discussion with Mr_ Thomas G. Brubaker, resident of Cedar Creek Grade, regarding the placement of mobile homes on a 14 -acre parcel owned by Woodbine Farms. Mr. Thomas G. Brubaker, a resident of Cedar Creek Grade, came forward to express his objection to Woodbine Farms installing mobile homes for agricultural workers in his neighborhood. Mr. Brubaker had sent a letter of opposition to John R. Riley, Jr., County Administrator, signed by 21 Cedar Creek Grade residents. (A copy of the letter and attachments are included in the Commission's agenda.) He also presented photographs of the 14 -acre parcel in question, showing an existing house and a mobile home. He felt that the existing house and trailer were an eyesore. Mr. Brubaker cited Section 165-26 of the Frederick County Code and he interpreted the Code to state that agricultural accessory uses were only allowed on the same parcel as the primary use. Mr. Brubaker felt that the mobile homes would have a detrimental affect on property and home values for himself and other adjacent property owners. He felt the area was unsuitable for the number of mobile homes that would be permitted and he was also 3 concerned that the mobile home use would become the principal use of this property. Chairman Golladay explained that in the 19801s, the Planning Commission, after considerable discussion, endorsed an ordinance amendment to allow agricultural housing as an accessory use to the primary farming use. Chairman Golladay said that discussion also centered around whether or not the housing should be located on the actual parcel being farmed or on the farm in general. He said that because of the various sized parcels owned by those involved in agricultural production, it was determined that this ruling should apply to the entire acreage and not just the parcel upon which workers were working at the time. Chairman Golladay said that as far as this situation is concerned, this is an allowed use. Mrs. Gloria Brubaker, wife of Mr. Thomas G. Brubaker, also came forward to speak in opposition to permitting mobile homes on the Woodbine Farms parcel. Mrs. Brubaker felt that property values would be affected and she had concerns about security and safety issues. Mr. Ray Evans, a resident of Cedar Creek Grade, said he moved into the neighborhood in November of 1993. Mr. Evans said that had he known there would be four mobile homes possibly housing 22 people on the adjacent property, he would not have built his home at this location. Chairman Golladay said that since this was a permitted use under the Frederick County Code, the only other course of action for Mr. and Mrs. Brubaker and Mr. Evans was to request an ordinance amendment through the Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee or to seek civil restitution. PUBLIC MEETING. Master Development Plan #001-94 of Woodside Estates for single-family detached homes. This property, zoned RP (Residential Performance), is located west and adjacent to Route 641 (Double Church Road), south of the intersection of Route 277, and is identified as PIN 86-A-20 in the Opequon District. Action - Approved Mr. Charles W. Maddox, Jr., Engineer with G. W. Clifford & Associates, presented the master development plan (MDP) to the Commission. Some highlights of Mr. Maddox's presentation were: the development would contain 66 lots at 10,000 square foot each; curb and gutter will be installed; one connection will be provided to Route 641; stormwater management will be provided; the MDP meets all of the minimum environmental requirements of the ordinance; and all of the lots provide 80' frontage. Mr. Maddox said that the development had been specifically designed to minimize 4 the disturbance of woodlands and no more than 25 % of those areas will be disturbed. Mr. Maddox noted that water is available at the site and the developer will fund all of the off-site sewer installation from the existing sewer system on Route 277 to the development. Mr. Bise said that this MDP meets the 25 % open space requirement and the ordinance requirement for allowable disturbance of environmental areas. Mr. Bise stated that the staff would like assurances that no more than 25 % of the woodlands will be disturbed when lots within the wooded area are developed. Mr. Bise also stated that the MDP indicates a 50" road efficiency buffer with a full screen situated on a six-foot high berm north of the subdivision entrance along Route 641. He said that the plan does not indicate the buffer on the south side of the subdivision entrance. Mr. Bise said that the species of plants and density needs to be made clear on the plan. Mr. Bise concluded by saying that the staff was recommending approval, contingent on all staff, review agency, and Planning Commission comments being adequately addressed. There were no public comments. Commissioners were concerned about the adequacy of Double Church Road (Route 641) in light of the number of subdivisions in the area. They felt there was an increasing need for turn lanes on Route 641. It was noted that road design details would be addressed at the subdivision stage. The Commissioners were also concerned that no more than 25 % disturbance of woodlands would take place when lots are developed. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Romine, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Master Development Plan #001-94 of Woodside Estates for 66 single-family detached homes with the stipulation that all staff, review agency, and Planning Commission comments are adequately addressed. This resolution was passed by the following majority vote: YES (TO APPROVE): DeHaven, Shenk, Thomas, Romine, Copenhaver, Marker, Light NO. Golladay, Morris Discussion with Delmer Robinson, C_ L. Robinson Corporation, regarding a possible rezoning of 16 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B-3 (Industrial Transition) for the proposed VDOT headquarters. This property is located on the south side of Route 50 West, at the intersection of Route 803, in the Back Creek District. 5 No Action Mr. Edward Robinson, President of C. L. Robinson, said this site was viewed as a good and logical location for the new district office of the Winchester Division of the Virginia Department of Transportation because it is the approximate geographic center of Frederick County; the site has easy access to Routes 50, 522, 11, 37, and I-81; and the property will be accessible from Route 803 as well as Route 50. Mr. Robinson said that VDOT will provide buffering to protect residential areas. He said that adjacent businesses are conducting similar activities and the site is not currently being used for agricultural purposes. He said that since this property is located next to Perry's quarry, they will have access to a gravel supply and therefore, they will not have to store gravel on their site. Mr. Robinson added that the site will use a well and septic system. The Planning Commission had no major concerns or objections to the proposal. Discussion with Ray Robinson, Jr., regarding the possibility of consolidating two lots (1.13 acres and 12,239 square feet) into one lot and dividing this new lot equally. This lot, zoned RP, is identified by PIN# 63-A-53 and is located along Apple Valley Road (Route 652). No Action Mr. Miller said this lot is nonconforming because it has two dwellings on one 1.13 acre parcel and does not meet the required RP lot size for lots without public sewer and water. Mr. Miller said that these dwellings are served by individual septic systems and are both hooked to public water (from the City of Winchester) coming out of Plainfield Heights subdivision. He said that Mr. Robinson also owns a small tract of 12,239 square feet that adjoins this property and he desires to consolidate this tract with the 1.13 acre tract, if it is possible to divide the larger tract. Mr. Miller said that in order for Mr. Robinson to do this, waivers to two ordinance requirements would be necessary: Section 165-65 A of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 144- 24 C of the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Ray Robinson, Jr. stated that this action will recognize the existing situation and place the properties in two separate deeds, which will simplify the handling of his estate by him or his heirs in the future. The Commissioners recognized that approval of this request would remove one nonconforming issue of two dwellings on the same lot, however, it would create another nonconforming use in that the rear lot would not abut a state -maintained street. It was suggested that a condition of approval require that the right-of-way to the rear lot be designated as an exclusive right-of-way for use by this one lot. The Commissioners were in agreement with C. the proposal because it would allow the applicant flexibility in the use of the property and would partially eliminate the nonconforming use. Mr. Miller noted that this request would need Board of Supervisors approval. Discussion regarding the Frederick County244 Primary Road Improvement Plan. Action - Approved Mr. Wyatt presented the 1994 Primary Road Improvement Plan for Frederick County. Mr. Wyatt said this plan was identical to last year's plan --it maintains the same priority for primary road improvements and does not include new projects. He said that the Transportation Committee reviewed the plan during their regular meeting of February 1 and unanimously recommended approval. Mr. Wyatt said that he had received a request from Tom Christoffel of the LFPDC for an addendum to the plan to include park and ride lots. He said that Mr. Christoffel feels that the park and ride lots need to be included as a part of the Primary Road Improvement Plan, rather than the Secondary Road Improvement Plan, before VDOT can proceed with construction. Mr. Wyatt said that a study conducted by LFPDC specified a need for park and ride lots on Route 7, Route 54 East of Winchester, and Route 277. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the 1994 Primary Road Improvement Plan for Frederick County with the addendum including park and ride lots and unanimously recommends approval to the Board of Supervisors. Discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, Article VI, RP (Residential Performance) District, Section 165-58 Intent, and Section 165-62, Gross Density. The proposed amendments pertain to permitted gross density for multi -family housing types and internal residential separation buffers_ Action - Advertise for April 6 Public Hearing Mr. Wyatt said that the Board of Supervisors has expressed concern over the allowable gross density in the RP District, specifically with multi -family housing types. He said that the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) met with representatives of the Top of Virginia Builders Association (TOV) and it was agreed that a new density scale would be created for the RP District and that language would be created for interior residential rI separation buffers. Mr. Wyatt reviewed the changes with the Commission: Section 165-62 Gross Densi1y was amended to reflect the reduction in density which was discussed and agreed upon through worksessions with the TOV. He stated that the existing "sliding scale" provides a gross density for developments that are 25 acres, 50 acres, and 100 acres. He further stated that the proposed amendments establish a density of 5.5 units/acre for developments that are between 10 and 100 acres. Mr. Wyatt explained that language was created under Section 165-62.1 Multi- Amily Housing to establish a maximum percentage of multifamily dwellings that are permitted within any development. He said that this language permits the 100% multifamily housing developments on lots that are less than 25 acres in size, 50% multifamily on 25 acres and less than 50 acres; and 40% multifamily on 50 acres plus. Finally, Mr. Wyatt explained that Section 165-37C was amended and defines the difference between perimeter and interior residential separation buffers and provides requirements for interior residential separation buffers. The Commissioners felt that the proposed language would assist in the reduction of overall gross density for multifamily developments, while still allowing developers the opportunity to create marketable developments and instructed the staff to advertise the amendments for their April 6 public meeting. Discussion of an ISTEA ,Enhancement Pro cp sal,: Civil War Battlefield Tour Network: Phase I Mr. Watkins said that the City of Winchester and Frederick County are developing a proposal to acquire and preserve significant civil war battlefield sites within our area. He said that the purpose of this proposal is to create an interconnected battlefield tour network that can be enjoyed by local citizens and tourists to our area. Mr. Watkins said that a critical component of the tour network involves the capability for various modes of transportation to access these sites. He said that connecting routes will provide the ability for automotive, mass transit, and bicycle travel between sites along historic routes. He stated that appropriate signage, pullovers, and bicycle facility improvements will be part of this process. Mr. Watkins explained that Phase I of this proposal is to request funding to acquire the Grim Farm. He said that this property, located in the City of Winchester and Frederick County, represents a central portion of the First and Second Kernstown Battlefields and is one of six major battlefield sites identified by the National Park Service. Mr. Watkins said that this joint City/County proposal will be submitted as an ISTEA Enhancement Proposal by March 31, 1994. Upon motion made by Mr. Light and seconded by Mr. Marker, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the joint proposal for a Civil War Battlefield Tour Network and the submission of the ISTEA Enhancement Proposal to begin Phase I of the project. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Watkins, Secretary James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report DATE: April 7, 1994 (1) Rezonin s Pending: dates are submittal dates 6/08/90 Shaw Church Flex Tech Twin Lakes 4/04/90 Shaw RA to B2/RP 05/15/91 Negley Construction 2/03/94 Ston B3 to B2 Ston Thomas C. Glass 3/14/94 Shaw B1 to B2 Townhouses C. L. Robinson 3/30/94 BkCk RA to B3 (2) Rezoninas ARProved: (dates are BOS meeting dates) Shenandoah B1dg.Supply 03/01/94 Gain None (3) Rezonin s Denied: dates are BOS meeting dates None (4) Conditional Use Permits Pending: dates are submittal dates Godfs Glory Land 3/08/94 BkCk Church Retreat Boyer Landscaping 3/11/94 Shaw Expansion of Existing Business (5) Conditional Use Permits Approved: dates are aRvroval dates None (6) Site PlansPending: (dates are submittal dates) Wheatlands Wastewater Fac. 9/12/89 Opeq Trmt.facil Grace Brethren Church 6/08/90 Shaw Church Flex Tech 10/25/90 Ston Lgt. Industrial Lake Centre 05/15/91 Shaw Townhouses Red Star Express Lines 05/24/91 Ston Whse. Addition Freeton 04/27/92 Opeq Townhouses 84 Lumber 01/26/94 Ston Storage Addition Corrigated Container 02/22/94 BkCk Light Industrial Shenandoah B1dg.Supply 03/01/94 Gain Warehouse 2 (7) Site Plans Approved: (dates are approval dates) None (8) Subdivisions Pending: dates are submittal dates Briarwood Est. 01/04/94 Stonewall (9) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (PIC or BOS approval dates Abrams Point, Phase I Lake Centre Coventry Courts Freeton Village at Sherando Paul Negley Fredericktowne Est., Sec 8 & 9 Lake Holiday Sec. 1B 06/13/90 Shawnee 06/19/91 Shawnee 12/04/91 Shawnee 05/20/92 Opequon 06/16/93 Opequon 08/11/93 Stonewall 10/06/93 Opequon 12/08/93 Gainesboro (10) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Woodside Estates 02/22/94 Opequon Lake Front Condos 03/28/94 Shawnee (11) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: (dates are BOS approval dates Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back Creek James R. Wilkins III 04/14/93 Shawnee (12) FMDP Administ. Approved (dates are admin. approval dates) None (13) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pendinq:(submit. dates) None (14) BZA Applications Approved: (approval dates) Done (15) BZA Applications Denied: None (16) PLANS RECID. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER None E. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #54 (March 15-31) 1. Transportation Issues Evan Wyatt compiled the 1994 Primary Road Improvement Plan for Frederick County. Evan Wyatt participated in 1994 Preallocation Hearing held in Augusta County on March 31 with Robert Sager and P. Wendel Dick. Evan Wyatt began work to acquire additional funds offered by the VDOT Revenue Sharing Program for the Macedonia Church Road (Route 642) realignment project. 2. Battlefield Preservation and Historic Issues Bob Watkins met with June Wilmot and Anna Thompson of PHW to discuss a grant application to the National Park Service, Battlefield Protection Program. The staff prepared a draft application. Bob Watkins and Evan Wyatt met with Richard Dick, Dick Kerns, June Wilmot, John Riley, Jr., Ed Daley, and Tim Youmans to discuss details of the ISTEA Battlefield Tour Network --Phase I application. Evan Wyatt prepared the application, with assistance from Mark Lemasters, Beverly Warren, Denice Cather, and Susie Keiter. Bob Watkins met with Dr. Hirshberg to discuss the Cedar Creek ISTEA enhancement grant application. Bob Watkins, Kris Tierney, Mark Lemasters, Jim Barnett and Doug Dolan participated in interviews of consultants to assist the Task Force in its efforts to prepare a Battlefield Plan. Lanny Bise finished the land use mapping for the Battlefield Project. 3. G.I.S./Mapping & Graphics The staff is producing a street name list for use in the new Enhanced 911 Service. This street name list combines four street name lists produced by the Planning Department and will be used to update the Street Guide Book. The staff is continuing to work on the conversion of map files from Autocad to Arc/Info. Issue Number 4 of the GIS newsletter, On -Line, has been finalized and will be distributed shortly. 4. Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee - 3/22 Mtg. Considered a request by H.K. Benham to allow maxed retail/wholesale facilities in the B-2 (Business General) District. Began discussion on CUP amendments. Received some of the CUP surveys. 5. Site Development Meetincts Bob Watkins met with Dave Sweeny of the Winchester Medical Center to discuss a possible new urgent care center in the County. On March 24, Kris Tierney and Evan Wyatt met with the designers for a Taco Bell franchise who are interested in locating on Welltown Road near the intersection with Route 11. It is anticipated that an application for rezoning will be submitted. The property is currently zoned M-1 which would permit a restaurant, however, B-2 zoning would more easily accommodate the desired site configuration. On March 29, Kris Tierney and Evan Wyatt met with George Romine and Trish Ridgeway, of the Handley Library, to discuss the necessary procedures for getting an amendment to the RP regulations to allow public libraries as a permitted use in the RP Zone. This item will be going to the next Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee meeting. On March 29, Kris Tierney met with Mr. Ed White to discuss a possible sewer line extension east of the Parkins Mill plant to accommodate an RA cluster development. Mr. White intends to go before the Planning Commission for an informal discussion. Evan Wyatt met with Tom Christoffel, of LFPDC, to discuss needs for park and ride facilities within Frederick County. Evan Wyatt met with Scot Marsh, of G. W. Clifford & Associates, to discuss revisions to the Regency Lakes Mobile Home Park Master Development Plan. Lanny Bise met with Cletus Palmer to discuss site plan requirements for a church addition. Lanny Bise met with Brad McCormick, of the McCormick Company, to discuss M-1 Zoning District regulations. Evan Wyatt met with Charles Robinson of Sheetz, Inc. to discuss site plan requirements for a convenience store. 6. Plans Review and Approval Evan Wyatt approved plans for the Albin Ridge Mini - Warehouse Storage addition (final phase) and the Franklin Mobile Home Park 7. Site Inspections Evan Wyatt conducted site inspections at Aberdeen Acres Kennel and the Huntington Meadows Townhouse section. 8. violations/Zoning Complaints Lanny Bise updated the violation database and investigated several zoning complaints. 9. Planning Staff Personnel The Planning Staff interviewed applicants for the vacant planner position and hired Jean Moore from Richmond. Her first day on the job will be April 11. 10. Professional Development Evan Wyatt conducted a planning seminar pertaining to growth management strategies, techniques, and tools. 11. Other Bob Watkins met with Stan Hough and Jeff Nelson from the Star to discuss housing trends. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner H � \ RE: Proposed Improvements to the 1-81/11 North/Route 37 Interchange Area DATE: April 6, 1994 Mr. William H. Bushman, VDOT Resident Engineer, will present a plan during the April 20, 1994 Planning Commission meeting regarding the above referenced interchange area. This interchange area is currently the second priority on the 1994 Frederick County Primary Road Improvement Plan and has received funding for preliminary engineering. Mr. Bushman addressed the Frederick County Transportation Committee during their April meeting and will make a similar presentation to the Planning Commission. This presentation will demonstrate alternatives that will attempt to alleviate existing traffic problems in and around this interchange area. This item does not require action by the Planning Commission. However, staff encourages the Planning Commission to suggest appropriate alternatives to this plan, and have Mr. Bushman address all comments or concerns. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 P/C Review Date: 4/20/94 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #002-94 LAKE FRONT APARTMENTS LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of State Route 642 (Macedonia Church Road) and Chinkapin Drive (Lakeside Estates) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 75B -A -80C PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance) Land Use - vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance) - land use, residential and vacant PROPOSED USE: 28 apartment units within 3 structures REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objections to this revised master development plan. Before making any final comments this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 4th edition for review. Prior to construction on the State's right-of-way, the developer will need to apply to this office for appropriate permits to cover said work. Fire Marshal: See attached comments from Doug Kiracofe, Fire Marshal. Sanitation Authorityl. 1st review - approved County Engineer: See attached letter to Tom Price, G. W. Clifford & Associates, from Harvey E. Strawsnyder, County Engineer, dated March 25, 1994. E Parks & Recreation: Plan appears to meet open space and recreational unit requirements. For final approval, please provide specifications for playground equipment to be used. Planning & Zoning: The revised master development plan calls for the construction of 28 apartment units on 3.4113 acres. This creates an overall gross density of 8.21 units per acre. The original master development plan was approved for 23 townhouse units, or 6.74 units per acre. This revision increases the density; however, the allowable gross density for this site is 10 units per acre. The revised master development plan depicts two parcels. These parcels will contain the proposed garden apartments and a future day care center. The proposed entrance off of Chinkapin Drive meets the minimum driveway spacing requirements. Care should be taken to ensure that the proposed entrance is aligned with the existing entrance that serves the townhomes on the north side of Chinkapin Drive. The preliminary master development plan indicates that a road efficiency buffer will be created along Macedonia Church Road (Route 642). The proposed road efficiency buffer meets the intent and requirements of the Zoning ordinance. The adjoining property to the south (currently owned by the Frederick County School Board) is vacant; therefore, a residential separation buffer is not required. Staff has suggested that the applicant provide for a future pedestrian walkway to the school property. This will provide future access if a public school is constructed on the adjoining parcel. Staff has also suggested that the recreational amenities be relocated to the southwestern portion of this site. The placement of recreational amenities between and near apartment buildings has created a conflict with residents who occupy the bottom level in other projects. Comments made by the County Engineer and the Fire Marshal should be discussed with the applicant. These comments pertain to fire protection and access for the proposed 12 unit apartment building and storm water management, as both of the 8 unit apartment buildings are located in the existing drainage swale. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 4/20194 PC MTG.: Approval, once the applicant has adequately addressed all review agency comments, and all comments or concerns of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. COUNTY OF FREDERICK VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS r. Control No. 0223941121 Date Received 022394 Date Reviewed 03`1794 Applicant Name G. W. Clifford & Assoc. Address 200 N. Cameron Street- Winchester, Virgtinia treet-Winchester,Virctinia 22601 Project Name Lake Centre Condos Phone No. 703-667-2139 Type of Application Rev. Master Plan Current Zoning RP 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. 11 Election District Shawnee RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System Residential Sprinkler System X Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate Inadequate X Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No Comments Posted fire lanes required at all hydrant locations. Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted; Yes X No Comments The 12 unit condo is too far from traffic lanes for ladder truck access which will he crucial in the event of - Continued - Hydrant Locations; See Notes Adequate Inadequate X Not Identified Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified X Additional Comments: 1 Frederick County Chapter 10 recruires two hydrants within 300' of multi -dwelling structures. The hydrants shown are at 300' from the front of the 12 unit condo. Also, distance from the traffic lane to the rear of the 12 unit condo exceeds the length of nreconnected hose lines. This will slow and hamper firefighting efforts in case of fire 2) Burning of construction debris on site is rohibited in Frederick County. 3) Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times. Recommend denial of this plan due to fire safety concerns on 12 unit condo. ZRe T' e .50 hr Dougl s A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal COUNTY of FREDERICK March 25, 1994 Mr. Tom Price, Project Manager Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Revised Master Development Plan Lake Centre Condos Dear Tom: Based on our review of the proposed revised master development plan, we understand that Mr. Satian plans to construct three (3) multi -family apartment complexes on the site previously approved for townhouses. Development of this approximate four (4) acre site will require the standard erosion and sediment control plan as well as an on site stormwater management facility. These items will be reviewed in detail at the time of site plan submittal if the revised master development plan is approved. Based on the visual impact of the three (3) story condos on the single family dwellings fronting Lakeside Drive, we suggest that strong consideration be given to a dense screening along the south side of the project. HES:smb cc: file Sincerely, 1 Harvey Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works 9 North Loudoun Si. - f.0. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 REVISED PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that -all required information is provided and to -insure that all information is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the master development plan. All required items must be provided on the master development plan. Background Information: 1. Development's name: Lake Front Condos 2. Location of property: Southeast corner at Intersection of State Route 642 & Chinkanin Drive (Lakeside Estates) 3. Total area of property: 4.1613 Acres 4. Property ID #: 75B -A -1F S. Property zoning and present use: RP Vacant 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: RP (Vacant & Townhouses) 7. Proposed Uses: 'Condominiums 8. Magisterial District: Shawnee 9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original Amended—X– `14 •��� Y '-i �� � .�, ..� 1.�� 1. l ;, tr, General Information: 1. Have the following items been included? North arrow Yes—X— % Disturbed No Scale Yes _X_ No Legend Yes_X_ 0 No Boundary Survey Yes 0 No Total Area Yes _X_ _X_ No Topography Yes 0 No Project Title Yes_X_ _X No Preparation and Revision Date, Yes No Applicant Name Yes _X_ X No 2. Number of phases proposed? One (1) 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes No— X- 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes—X— No 5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. Yes—X— No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes—X— No 7. Are environmental features clearly shown? Yes—X— No 8. Describe the following environmental features: Total Area % Disturbed Area in Open Space Floodplains 0 0 0 Lakes and ponds 0 0 0 Natural retention areas 0 0 0 Steep slopes (15% or more) 0 0 0 Woodlands 0 0 0 - .�i.: - Y,•i".yam '.1J t.'..... 9. Are the following shown on the master development plan? Street layout 10 - Yes X— No Entrances YesX _X_ No Parking areas Yes—X— No Utilities (mains) Yes —X— No - o 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Yes X No 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes -No—X Residential Uses If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. What numbers and types of housing are proposed? 28 Condominiums 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes X— No Acreage in each housing type Yes—X_ No Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes—X— No Total acreage Yes X No. Number of dwellings of each type Yes—X— No 3_ What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space? 63% 4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes—X— No 5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed? One (1) Tot Lot 6. Are separation buffers required? Yes No—X- 7. oX 7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes_X_ No; 8. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required? Yes No—X- 9. oX 9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by the plan with profiles or examples? Yes—X— No ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the public hearing. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property isa^y property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a road from the re- quested property. The applicant is required to obtain the follow- ing information on each adjoining property including the 14 digit tax parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. Name: County School Board of Frederick Address:. P.O. Box 3276 Winchester Va 22604 Property I.D.#: 75B -A-1 Name: Winifred W. Hack et als Address: 974 E. Macedonia Church Road Ste hens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: - 75#-A-79 Name: Charles W. Buckley Jr Address: 121 Julee Drive Winchester Va 22602 Property I.D.#: 75-1-2-D Lakeview Townhouses, Inc. P.O. Box 3461 Winchester, VA 22604 75B -1-1A COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Direct jO RE: Pre -Application Conference; Star Fort MDP/Rezoning DATE: April 6, 1994 G.W. Clifford and Associates has requested a pre -application conference to discuss a proposed rezoning and Master Development Plan for 91 acres surrounding Star Fort. The proposed rezoning is for 20 acres of Business General (B-2) and 71 acres of Residential Performance (RP) A sketch depicting the proposed layout of the development is attached. KCT/slk attachment 9 North LOLOOUn Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22004 star Fort 54-A-1 glkbert w. clifford & a55ociate5, Inc.— f PROJECT SUMMARY TOTAL AREA (RP): 71 ACRES I ( r TOTAL AREA (13-2):20 ACRES RP SUMMARY TOTAL LOTS: 163 LOT SIZE:12,000 SF I </ AMENITIES: SIDEWALKS & STREETLIGHTS ROAD TYPE: ROADSIDE DITCH ^! I I I v �- z. /�?\� —` , -fie•. / \ \ STA 'I SPE ElA1� !� nCRES tO COW'"CInL (8'2) FROM RP PCOICATION LD PARK I gilbert w. clifford vt& 955odatc,5, inc. STAR FORT 5cak1"-400' Engineers - Land Planners I reliminary Master 150-C Olde Greenwich Drive 200 N. Carneron St. March, 1994 Frederick5burg,Va 22401 Wlnchester,Va 22601 > rederick Count Virginia (703) 898-2115 (703) 667-2139 y, r�•r.�� IN F//j,- •W �/ /AI ^! I I I v �- z. /�?\� —` , -fie•. / \ \ STA 'I SPE ElA1� !� nCRES tO COW'"CInL (8'2) FROM RP PCOICATION LD PARK I gilbert w. clifford vt& 955odatc,5, inc. STAR FORT 5cak1"-400' Engineers - Land Planners I reliminary Master 150-C Olde Greenwich Drive 200 N. Carneron St. March, 1994 Frederick5burg,Va 22401 Wlnchester,Va 22601 > rederick Count Virginia (703) 898-2115 (703) 667-2139 y, COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Directl�%� RE: Informal Discussion with Edwin E. White DATE: April 6, 1994 Mr. White has requested an informal discussion with the Commission regarding a desired extension of a sewer line to a 78 acre parcel of land which is zoned Rural Areas (RA) and lies beyond the limits of both the Urban Development Area and the Sewer and Water Service Area. The parcel is located approximately one half mile east of the Parkins Mill Plant on the south side of Route 644, West Parkins Mill Road. Mr. White has said that he wishes to develop the property under the Rural Preservation Lot provision within the RA zone. Attached please find a letter from Mr. White discussing his proposal, a copy of the USGS quad sheet showing the general location of the parcel, and a design sketch showing the proposed lot layout. When the rural preservation lot provision was adopted it was seen as preferable to the traditional five acre lot development style. The difficulty in locating drainfields on the smaller lots, in all but the best soils, has been a hinderance to the utilization of the cluster provision. STAFF COMMENTS The Comprehensive Plan states that: "The intention is that additional extensions of sewer and water service will reflect the boundaries of the Urban Development Area. The extension of mains into areas not included in the sewer and water service areas described by the facilities plan will require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. " 9 North Loudoun Strcet P.O. Bax 601 Wincliestcr, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page 2 E. E. White Memo April 6, 1994 Staff feels that this proposal does not fall within the provisions of the Comprehensive Policy Plan, as it is currently written. It is conceivable that the general area of the proposal would be included within the Urban Development Area at some point in the future. At that point, we could anticipate that the land would be developed to a typical urban use and/or density. Some factors to consider with this proposal are whether it would be preferable to have the parcel in question developed at a RA density now, thereby precluding a more intense development at some point in the future, and whether it would be preferable to have the proposed lots developed with connections to a central sewer system or with a series of alternative and conventional treatment systems. There are obviously a number of policy questions and implications to be addressed if this proposal is to be given serious consideration. The immediate question to be addressed is whether the County is willing to consider providing sewer to RA land to accommodate clustered residential development. If so, we may wish to establish a policy specifically for RA cluster developments addressing the areas and conditions in which such extensions would be considered. The staff feels that if the Commission wishes to consider this request, it should be referred to the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee to be considered as part of the annual up- date of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. KCT/slk attachments March 31, 1994 Mr. Kris Tierney Deputy Planning Director County of Frederick Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Tierney: With reference to our discussion of March 30, 1994, I request an opportunity to discuss my proposal with the Planning Commission at the April 20th meeting. To recap; I own 78 acres of land with 1,090 feet of frontage on West Parkins Mill Road, approximately 2,200' east of the Parkins Mill sewage treatment plant. I plan to subdivide this property into 12-15, 2 to 8 acre parcels in accordance with paragraph 165-54 of the zoning code for Frederick County. No zoning change requested nor needed. I presently have approval for 3 alternate facilities, sand filtration or mechanical for 3 0£ the lots, however, the Health Department, as well as, the builder would rather I supply a pumping station and high pressure line to the Parkins Mill Plant. I discussed this with Mr. Wendy Jones, Frederick County Department of Sanitation and he concurrs subject to Planning Commission approval. Additionally I have approval from Mr. Eugene Grove, the owner of the property between the plant and my property. I recognize that this property is outside of the master development plan, however, I am not requesting a zoning change. The high pressure line would follow the Opequon Creek at the back of the property with the required pumping station as noted on the enclosure. The houses will range in price from $250,000.00 to 5350,000.00 with a state approved road, 3 board fencing and entrance decor. If approved, this plan will greatly enhance the area, create additional tax revenue and be environmentally friendly with no septic or alternate treatment systems. Once again, I wish to present and discuss this proposal with the Planning Commission at their scheduled April 20th meeting. Very truly your Edwin E. White copy: Dave Conrad, Apex Builders Eugene Grove STEPHENS CITY QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) r� o e c� 7'30" _39 ° 0 7' 30" 530 000 FEET ME 32 /3• /'�%4/V 7- C. 7,F .9 C, -Cs 0 200 �•• 40® 2p0' 600 Al 36'11"E - L N15'25'23 -W 498.35' y0,* ahyhyg. NOTE THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT HAS BEEN OBTAINED EXCLUSIVELY FROM PUBLIC RECORD. NO SURVEY HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY ME ON THE GROUND, AND NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON, LAND OF EDWIN E. WHITE D.B. 559, P. 673 D.B. 765, P. 691 SHAWNEE DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA JANUARY /994 L ALLEN EBERT PROFESSIONAL LAND S0W 35 N. BOSCOEN ST. w7johe iER M ?%G COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator W-111\ SUBJECT: Request for Subdivision Ordinance Variance DATE: April 7, 1994 Mr. E. Frank Smith previously subdivided a portion of his land located along Marple Road (Route 654) into traditional lots of five acres or more. The lots labeled 169F and 169G on the attached plats were sold by Mr. Smith and the owners of these two lots desire to purchase additional land at the rear of these parcels and attach the additional acreage to their lots through boundary line adjustment. Permitting this would violate our ordinance which requires a maximum 4:1 depth to width ratio. Appeal of this requirement must be acted on by the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Lot 169F: This lot is 300 feet wide and would be allowed to be 1200 feet deep by the ordinance. Adding the proposed 4.774 acres to this parcel would make the lot 1600 feet in depth. Lot 169G: This lot is 250 feet wide and would be allowed to be 1000 feet deep by the ordinance. Adding the proposed 3.968 acres to this parcel would make the lot 1575 feet in depth. Both the proposed additions to these parcels and the original parcels are woodland. Only one residence would be allowed on each parcel in either configuration. Recommendation: Since the proposed addition to these lots is woodland located on a steep slope, staff recommends approval of this request. WWM/slk attachments 9 North Loudoun StreCC P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Greenway, Inc. 1104 Baker Lane • Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 662-4185 • Fax (703) 722-9528 H. Bruce Edens, L.S., President April 6, 1994 Mr. Wayne Miller, Subd. Admin. Frederick County Planning 9 North Loudoun St. Winchester, Va. 22601 RE: Boundary Line Adjustment Plat Dear Wayne: Please find the enclosed proposed sketch plat for a boundary line adjustment. We realize that this does not conform to the subdivision ordinance. However, on behalf of our client, E. Frank Smith, we would appreciate your consideration for a variance. Thank You, i Lary W. Miller Project Co ordinator SURVEYING — DESIGNING — PLANNING RESIDENTIAL - AGRICULTURAL - COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL - CONSTRUCTION G y'a 1120 V JEFFREY M. f HELEN M. W_,7 / D6 643, pG. 586 ZONCD.2a 5 34°IZ'03"W 57. 83 ' 9 ° c AR s s� s(<k J'a S ec' m0 ^ S KA a �y F eIr V s sc, c<` S A y a o it, �6 0 T4 A So.+�' s S s 6. G d o c s o AREA TAB; ULATIOFI PA RC E L I(o°) F 6. 3 1 5 PRop05ED ADDITION 4.77 ADJU4TED AREA 11.08 rAIZCE L 16% G 5.08(0 PROPOSED ADDITION 3.768 ADJUSTED AV -FA %. 0 54 UyE r E 57 / ACRES v� r A\ bi- 0 4 ACIZE5 p p '� ACIZE5 ACRES 0 ACRE5 V p o ACIZE5 ';7 ol PtZ0r05Eb 90uNI7AK'( LINE AVj05TKfENT OF THE LAND OF F. FRA NK -7MI7H GAINE9t30R0 DISTIZICT - FREDERICK COUHTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1"= 700' DATE: APRIL 4, 1��¢ GREENWAY, INC. 970 Baker Lane. Winchester, Virginia 22603 703-662-4185 H. Bruce Edens, L.S. - President SURVEYING - DESIGNING - PLANNING