HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_12-21-83_Meeting_MinutesMINUTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board of Supervisors' meeting room on December 21, 1983.
PRESENT: Frank Brumback, Chairman; James Golladay, Vice - Chairman;
Carl M. McDonald; A. Lynn Myers; Manuel C. DeHaven;
W. French Kirk; Kenneth Y. Stiles; Marjorie H. Copenhaver;
John T. P. Horne, advisory; Stephen M. Gyurisin, advisory
ABSENT: George L. Romine
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brumback called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
The first order of business was the consideration of the
minutes of December 7, 1983. Mr. Kirk noted that line two of page two
should read, "...this motion was seconded by Mr. Romine and passed..."
Mr. Kirk then moved to approve the minutes as amended. This motion was
seconded by Mr. Golladay and passed unanimously.*
* Mr. Stiles and Mrs. Copenhaver were not present for this vote.
MONTHLY AND BIMONTHLY REPORTS
The staff discussed pending applications with the Commission.
Mr. Gyurisin stated that the Board of zoning Appeals approved the James
L. Wilson application for a 37' front yard setback variance for a
warehouse.
DISCUSSION WITH ROBERT BROWN ON INDUSTRIAL ZONING REGULATIONS
Mr. Horne said that Mr. Robert Brown is requesting that the
Commission consider an ordinance to transfer truck terminals as a use
in M -2 zones into M -1 zones.
Mr. Robert Brown came forward and stated that he owns property
that someone has inquired about for a truck terminal.
Members of the Commission felt it would be more suitable to
allow truck terminals in M -1 zones rather than rezone the parcel to
1834
-2-
M -2. The Commission was concerned about the many types of heavy
industrial uses that could move onto an M -2 parcel if the truck
terminal did not work out.
Other members of the Commission felt it would be better to
rezone this one parcel for M -2 since the uses surrounding this property
are compatible with an M -2 use.
Chairman Brumback directed the staff to draft a proposal to
allow truck terminals in M -1 zones with restrictions on noise, night
operations, distance to residences, and access traffic.
Preliminary Master Development Plan by Ronnie Ward to develop 71.02
acres with approximately 135 single - family detached cluster units and
20 multiplex units in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
ACTION - Tabled
Chairman Brumback stated that due to a conflict of interest
concerning this Master Development Plan, he was turning the meeting
over to the Vice - Chairman, Mr. James Golladay. Chairman Brumback
stated that he would not participate in any discussion of this case.
Mr. Horne gave the background information. Mr. Horne noted
that a major concern for the staff was the slopes on this development.
He said that virtually all slopes are greater than 8 %, but even the 158
slopes are extremely useable.
Mr. Ronnie Ward, part owner of BGW, Inc. and developer of the
property, came forward and introduced himself to the Commission. With
him was Mr. Bruce Edens, surveyor and engineer, who has done the design
work for the development. Mr. Ward noted that six of the lots in
Section I will front on Senseny Road.
Mr. Stiles asked for the average size of the lots. Mr. Ward
stated that it would be between 8,000- 10,000 square feet.
1835
-3-
Because this was the first Master Development Plan ever
reviewed by the Planning Commission, they felt it would be helpful to
actually walk over the site with a plat in hand to see the layout of
the development. They felt that if they could actually see the
development site, they could more effectively deal with their concerns
on the roads in the development. The Commission scheduled January 4th
at 2:00 p.m. to view the site.
Mr. McDonald moved to table this Master Development Plan until
the meeting of January 4. This motion was seconded by Mr. Kirk and
passed unanimously.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does
hereby table the Master Development Plan of Ronnie Ward until the
meeting of January 4.
Mr. Brumback resumed the chair for the remainder of the
meeting.
DISCUSSION WITH TOM GLASS ON RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE ZONING
REGULATIONS
Mr. Horne stated that Mr. Glass is requesting that the
building separation requirement in the Residential Performance Zoning
Regulations be changed from 25' to 20' and that the standard 40' x 24'
ranch home be allowed to be used on a zero lot line lot.
Mr. Tom Glass, developer and land surveyor, came forward and
introduced himself to the Commission. Mr. Glass felt that in 5 -10
years, 80% of homes will be of the manufactured type. Mr. Glass noted
that these type houses use two foot increments in joist and stud
spacing and therefore, housing width multiples will be in two foot
increments. Mr. Glass also noted that the delivery cost for a
1836
-4-
manufactured ranch home is less than for an "L- shaped" because a ranch
home can be delivered by truck in two units whereas the "L- shaped"
requires shipment in four units.
The Commission felt there would be no problem with amending
the building separation requirements. There was some concern about
allowing a ranch home on a zero lot line lot because this style home
may defeat the purpose of the "L- shaped" home, which is to allow for a
useable and private side yard. Mr. Glass suggested that this could be
accomplished with a ranch home by requiring a fence along the property
line.
The Commission and staff felt that more research needed to be
done on this subject and therefore, no action was taken at this time.
DISCUSSION OF ZONING AMENDMENTS ON RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE ZONING
REGULATIONS
Mr. Gyurisin stated that there are two items under Article 5
of the Residential Zoning Regulations that should be considered for
amendment. Those items are Section 5 -3, Environmental Requirements and
Section 5 -4, Open Space and Recreational Requirements. Mr. Gyurisin
stated that both these items relate to steep slopes and have become
apparent to the staff while reviewing the Master Development Plan
recently submitted. Mr. Gyurisin stated that slopes of 8 -15% are not
unsuitable for housing and do not create critical environmental
problems. He also explained that an inordinate amount of computation
is necessary by the developer to define these areas.
Mr. Stiles moved to direct the staff to draft an amendment for
advertisement. This motion was seconded by Mr. Golladay and passed
unanimously.
W-192I
-5-
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting
adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
rank Brum ack, Chairman
7?
T. P. Horne, Secretary
1838