TC 03-24-14 Meeting Minutes
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM (UPWP)
FOR THE
WINCHESTER – FREDERICK COUNTY (WinFred)
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO)
FY 2015
(July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015)
Adopted for Public Comment:
Final Adoption:
Winchester/Frederick County, Virginia
Metropolitan Planning Organization
C/o Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission
400 Kendrick Lane, Suite E
Front Royal, VA 22630
540-636-8800
www.winfredmpo.org
Preparation Statement
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
ii
Prepared on behalf of the WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization by the Northern
Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission staff through a cooperative process involving the City
of Winchester, County of Frederick, Town of Stephens City, Virginia Department of
Transportation, Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration.
The preparation of this program was financially aided through grants from the Federal Highway
Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Virginia Department of Transportation and the
Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation.
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
iii
MPO Policy Board
Officers:
Chair—Richard Shickle, Frederick County
Vice Chair—John Willingham, City of Winchester
Secretary/Treasurer—Martha Shickle, Executive Director NSVRC
Voting Members:
Richard Shickle, Frederick County
Charles DeHaven, Jr., Frederick County
John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County
Michael Kehoe, Town of Stephens City
Dale Iman, City of Winchester
John Hill, City of Winchester
John Willingham, City of Winchester
Randy Kiser, Virginia Department of Transportation
Alternate Voting Members:
Tim Youmans and Perry Eisenach, City of Winchester
Kris Tierney, Frederick County
Tim Stowe, Town of Stephens City
Terry Short, Virginia Department of Transportation
Non-Voting Members:
Mack Frost, Federal Highway Administration
Tony Cho, Federal Transit Administration
Lisa DuMetz-Rosier, Virginia Dept. of Rail & Public Transportation
Rusty Harrington, Dept. of Aviation
MPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Chair—Tim Youmans, City of Winchester
Vice Chair—Eric Lawrence, Frederick County
Members:
Patrick Barker, Frederick County
John Bishop, Frederick County
Eric Lawrence, Frederick County
Kris Tierney, Frederick County
Tim Stowe, Town of Stephens City
Jim Deskins, City of Winchester
Tom Hoy, City of Winchester
Tim Youmans, City of Winchester
Perry Eisenach, City of Winchester
Terry Short, Virginia Department of Transportation
Lisa DuMetz-Rosier, Virginia Dept. of Rail & Public Transportation
Serena ‘Renny’ Manuel, Winchester Airport
Renee Wells, Winchester Transit
MPO Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
Chair—R. William Bayliss, III
Vice Chair—Walt Cunningham
Members:
Joshua Hummer & Walt Cunningham, Frederick County
Kelly Henshaw, Town of Stephens City
R. William Bayliss, III, Dr. John Crandell, City of Winchester
Administrative & Staff Support
Provided by Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
iv
Resolution
By The
WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization
Approving the FY 2015 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
WHEREAS, the FY 2015 Unified Planning Work Program will serve as the basis for all U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) funding participation and will be included in all requests
for DOT planning funds, and
WHEREAS, this UPWP details all transportation and transportation-related planning activities
anticipated within the area during the coming fiscal year, and
WHEREAS, this UPWP has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Technical
Advisory Committee and the Citizens Advisory Committee;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the WinFred Metropolitan Planning
Organization does hereby approve and adopt the FY 2014 Unified Planning Work Program on
DATE.
Signed: _____________________ Signed: ________________________
Richard C. Shickle Martha F. Shickle
Chairman Secretary-Treasurer
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FY 2015 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
WORK TASKS AND BUDGET/FUNDING INFORMATION
Page No.
Preparation Statement ..................................................................................................................... ii
Officers .......................................................................................................................................... iii
Resolution ...................................................................................................................................... iv
Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................v
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………….vi
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................7
WORK TASK 1: Program Management & Administration .........................................................10
WORK TASK 2: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ...................................................11
WORK TASK 3: Federal or State Requested Planning Work Program Items ............................11
WORK TASK 4: Public Mobility & City of Winchester Transit Planning .................................12
WORK TASK 5: Local Technical Assistance ..............................................................................13
WORK TASK 6: Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan Development .........................................................13
WORK TASK 7: System Planning ...............................................................................................14
WORK TASK 8: Long Range Planning, Modeling, GIS &
Data….............................................16
Proposed Revenues & Expenditures by Funding
Source…….…………………………………………………..…………………………….........17
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Page No.
Figure 1: Map of Winchester Frederick County Urbanized Area and MPO Study Area 8
Figure 2: Proposed Revenues and Expenditures by Funding
Source………………………………………..………………………………………… 17
.
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
7
INTRODUCTION
The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for transportation planning identifies all activities
to be undertaken in the WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization study area for Fiscal Year
2015 (July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015). The UPWP provides a mechanism for the coordination of
transportation planning activities in the region, and is required as a basis for and condition of all
federal funding assistance for transportation planning by the joint metropolitan planning
regulations of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA).
The work tasks within this UPWP are reflective of issues and concerns originating from
transportation agencies at the federal, state and local levels. The descriptions of the tasks to be
accomplished and the budgets for these tasks are based on a best estimate of what can be
accomplished within the confines of available federal, state and local resources.
The following are the regulations that inform the MPO Planning Process:
The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) created a number of
planning requirements. In October 1993, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) issued final regulations regarding metropolitan planning.
The Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21), which became law in June 1998,
reaffirmed the structure of the metropolitan planning process. Most of the modifications to the
process were aimed at streamlining and strengthening the provisions included in ISTEA.
On August 10, 2005, the federal legislation known as the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was signed into law.
On July 6, 2012, MAP-21, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act was signed
into law. MAP-21 creates a streamlined and performance-based surface transportation program
and builds on many of the highway, transit, bike, and pedestrian programs and policies
established in 1991.
Metropolitan Planning Area
The WinFred MPO study area consists of the City of Winchester, the Town of Stephens City, the
Urbanized Area of Frederick County, and the area of Frederick County projected to be urbanized
by the year 2020. See Figure 1 for an illustration of the region.
Reported by FHWA for 2010, the WinFred MPO Urbanized Area population was 78,440 and it
encompasses a land area of approximately 103 sq. miles.
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
8
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
9
Responsibilities for Transportation Planning
The WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization is the organization responsible for conducting
the continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated (3-C) planning process for the Winchester-
Frederick County Urbanized Area in accordance with requirements of Section 134 (Title 23
U.S.C.) of the Federal Highway Act of 1962, and Section 5303 of the Federal Transit Act. The
WinFred MPO is the official Metropolitan Planning Organization for the urbanized area,
designated by the Governor of Virginia, under Section 134 of the Federal Aid Highway Act, and
the joint metropolitan planning regulations of FHWA and FTA.
The policy making body of the WinFred MPO is the Policy Board that consists of 8 voting
members. These include 3 representatives from the City of Winchester, 3 representatives from
Frederick County, 1 representative from the Town of Stephens City, and 1 representative from
VDOT. Other agencies with non-voting membership on the WinFred MPO Policy Board
include the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, Virginia Department of
Aviation, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration.
The Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission (NSVRC) provides staff support to the
WinFred MPO. NSVRC staff members, in cooperation with the MPOs member agencies,
collect, analyze and evaluate demographic, land use, and transportation data to gain a better
understanding of the transportation system requirements of the area. Special studies, research,
and other work tasks requested by the MPO are the responsibility of the NSVRC to plan and
coordinate. Consultant assistance may be sought when required to complete work tasks. NSVRC
also prepares materials for use at the Policy Board, Technical Advisory and Citizens Advisory
Committee meetings as well as any sub-committee meetings that are scheduled.
NSVRC staff will participate in all WinFred MPO meetings and provide required staff support
and administration of the transportation planning program. In addition, staff members will
represent the MPO at any meetings with federal, state, and local organizations as necessary.
Total Proposed Funding by Federal Source for FY 2015
The primary funding source for transportation planning activities included in this work program
are the FHWA Section 112 (PL) and FTA Section 5303. The proposed funding amounts
(including state and local matching funds) for completion of tasks described in this UPWP are
shown in Figure 2.
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
10
WORK TASK 1: Program Management & Administration
Objective and Description: This task includes ongoing activities that ensure proper management
and operation of a continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated (3-C) planning process as
described in the Memorandum of Understanding. Products originated from MPO (NSVRC) staff.
Products:
The primary products of this task are as follows and include those tasks necessary to the timely
and accountable administration of the MPO Planning Process:
Implementation of the FY15 UPWP throughout the fiscal year and provision of all
required administrative functions including accounting, financial reporting, personnel
administration, office management, website management, contract administration, map
production, and necessary highway and transit purchases (e.g., office equipment,
software, etc.);
Maintenance of Title VI, ADA and environmental justice compliance, and in all work
plans and activities for both highway and transit modes including consultation with
appropriate groups, committees and community representatives;
Support of the activities of the WinFred MPO through the preparation of reports,
presentations, agendas, minutes and mailings for all Policy Board, TAC, CAC and other
meetings, as well as attendance at those meetings;
Continue a proactive public participation process that provides complete information,
timely public notice, full public access to key decisions, and supports early and
continuing involvement of the public in developing plans, TIPs and other documents.
Budget: $66,953
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
11
WORK TASK 2: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Objective and Description: As required by federal planning regulations, the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) for the WinFred MPO is a four-year program of highway, transit,
bicycle, pedestrian, safety, and transportation enhancement projects receiving federal funds.
State and locally funded projects are also included in the TIP for coordination purposes.
The TIP is updated every four years must be approved by the MPO Policy Board and the
Governor of Virginia. The TIP is required as a condition for all federal funding assistance for
transportation improvements within the WinFred MPO study area.
The general public and all other interested parties will be given an opportunity to review and
comment on the proposed TIP as described under the WinFred MPOs adopted Public
Participation Plan. To facilitate public review, MPO staff will provide visualization of TIP
projects, post the TIP on the MPO website, and make the TIP accessible at public libraries,
government offices, and upon request.
This task provides for the maintenance of a regional Transportation Improvement Program and
will require active support of the WinFred MPO Policy Board and Committees and coordination
with member agencies. Products originated from MPO (NSVRC) Staff.
Products: Processing of requested amendments and administrative modifications to the adopted
TIP; mapping of TIP projects and Annual Listing of Projects for the next fiscal year.
Estimated Budget: $7,500
WORK TASK 3: Federal or State Requested Planning Work Program Items
Objective and Description: The MPO staff will work with federal and state agencies in support
of projects and programs designed to coordinate transportation planning activities within the
region.
Products: Staff will prepare studies and reports as necessary for the completion of this work
program item and as directed by the appropriate federal and/or state agencies. Staff will
represent the WinFred MPO on the Virginia Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
(VAMPO) by participating in all meetings, events and training programs of the association and
provide information as appropriate to the MPO agencies and partners. Products originated from
MPO (NSVRC) Staff.
Estimated Budget: $7,500
WinFred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP
12
WORK TASK 4: Public Mobility and City of Winchester Transit System Planning
Objective and Description: This work task includes required transportation planning assistance
for Human Services system providers and travel demand management and seeks to advance the
MPO priorities for promoting multi-modal transportation opportunities where appropriate in the
planning area. Products originated from MPO (NSVRC) Staff.
Products:
Incorporate public mobility and travel demand management planning efforts into ongoing
updates to the Long Range Transportation Plan.
Participate in the regional Coordinated Human Services Public Mobility Planning
process.
Promotion of the FTA 5310 funds (Transportation for Elderly Persons with Disabilities)
to the local human service agencies within the MPO.
Annual presentations to the MPO from local human service agencies within the MPO.
Estimated Budget: $5,000
Objective and Description: The Winchester Transit System (WinTran) conducts transit planning
and administration efforts necessary to comply with FTA requirements in order to receive
Section 5307 capital and operating grants. WinTran will coordinate with the MPO on transit
planning activities. Funds will be used to deliver specific, tangible transit planning products.
Products originated from requests by the WinTran program.
Products:
Development of a Winchester Transit System Marketing Plan. This plan will provide a
strategic marketing plan for the Winchester Transit System to promote participation of
choice riders and integration of multi-modal transportation activities with the WinTran
program. The plan may also include identification of key community stakeholders who
represent populations who currently access or are targeted to access WinTran services.
Winchester Transit System Performance Review and Recommendations. This study is
intended to review current City of Winchester WinTran transit service, identify ways to
improve that service within the range of current resources, and recommend changes to the
WinTran system based on an evaluation of the needs of the users. This analysis is not
intended to update the TDP although recommended changes, if adopted, will be reflected in
future TDP revisions.
Estimated Budget: $65,000
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 13
WORK TASK 5: Local Technical Assistance
Objective and Description: This is an annual UPWP task. This task is designed to provide
flexible planning support and services to the WinFred MPO localities. Products will originate
from a requesting locality.
Products:
Activities may include, but are not limited to:
- Development and submission of transportation-related grants for WinFred MPO localities
for both highway and transit projects; and
- Management of the on-call consultant list for the MPO and its member localities with
contract administration and project management services.
Estimated Budget: $15,000
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 14
WORK TASK 6: Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Development
Objective and Description: An update to the MPO’s bicycle and pedestrian plan was completed
in FY 14. This update prioritized facility improvement needs identified in the 2007 plan using
objective criteria. This task will allow the MPO to advance the plan recommendations. Products
originated from MPO (NSVRC) Staff in anticipation of completion and adoption of the 2014
Bicycle and Pedestrian Study and Recommendations.
Products: Specific tasks and deliverables associated with this work item may include
1. Plan Development, Implementation and Funding
1.1. Track MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan implementation.
1.2. Participate in the development of the Shenandoah Valley Bicycle Plan on behalf of the
MPO.
1.3. Incorporate the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update and subsequent planning efforts into
ongoing updates of the LRTP.
1.4. Conduct feasibility studies to advance priority projects identified in the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan Update.
1.5. Assist localities in the preparation of Transportation Alternatives Program funding
applications.
1.6. Maintain and update the bicycle and pedestrian facility GIS database.
2. Education and Encouragement
2.1. Print the bicycle and pedestrian user map, produced in FY 14 as part of the bicycle and
pedestrian plan update, for public distribution.
2.2. Develop, maintain and update the MPO bicycle and pedestrian information web page
including education/safety, encouragement, route planning, and event information.
2.3. Coordinate and market events to encourage bicycling and walking which may include
Walk to School Day and Bike to Work Day events, and a “bicycle rodeo” for elementary
school-aged children.
2.4. Promote bicycle tourism to, through and within the MPO area through existing tourism
marketing channels including the Winchester-Frederick County Convention & Visitors
Bureau, Virginia Tourism Corporation and the “Bike the Valley” website.
3. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Planning
3.1. Promote the initiation of SRTS programs at area schools. Identify and convene
interested stakeholders to identify opportunities and barriers.
3.2. Assist elementary and middle schools in the preparation of School Travel Plans and
grant applications.
Estimated Budget: $20,000
Insert Bike Plan Image
WORK TASK 7A: System Planning
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 15
Objective & Description: Projects included in this work task bridge the gap between project
readiness required for construction/ implementation and the conceptualized phase of a project
prioritized in the CLRP. Activities will include site specific evaluation and validation of
appropriate alternatives and will further refine understanding of the necessary project scope to
accomplish a goal in the LRTP.
1. South Winchester Area Transportation Plan – Carryover from FY14
Objective and Description: This study will focus on the immediate impacts of the
realignment of Shawnee Drive at the intersection with Valley Avenue to connect
with Opequon Church Lane and the long term impacts of the widening of
Monticello Avenue. The Study may be scoped in segments or as a whole. Staff
would anticipate use of a consultant in partnership with local staff, VDOT, DRPT
and FHWA officials.
The operation of the Shawnee Drive/Valley Pike intersection fails during peak, and
is expected to worsen as population growth places greater demands on the road
system. Consultants will conduct a traffic study of the intersection projected to a
20-yr horizon, and recommend alternatives to bring intersection to acceptable LOS
for the horizon year, considering capacity expansion, land use planning, access
management and network development. The activity was initiated at the request of
the City of Winchester.
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 16
Products: Report describing alternatives for bringing the intersection to an
acceptable level of service in the horizon year. Thirty percent design plans.
Estimated Budget: $82,500
2. Area Plan for Exit 317 at I-81
Objective and Description: The purpose of this consultant-led study is to identify and evaluate
feasible interchange modifications to accommodate existing and projected future traffic volumes
and growth at and within the vicinity of Exit 317 along Interstate 81. It is anticipated that the
proposed improvements may include, but are not limited to the construction of new
roadways/ramps and/or modifications to existing roadways and ramps. Improvements may also
include the replacement of existing bridges, as well as new signalized intersections.
The consultant will provide project management, quality control, traffic analysis
and the development of a report and conceptual alternatives for improvements to
the existing interchange, including preliminary interchange concepts. The general
study area is expected to encompass the area shown below. The project was
initiated by VDOT.
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 17
Deliverables:
• Report: A complete study will be developed in accordance with IIM-LD-200.6 and applicable
FHWA guidelines.
• Conceptual Interchange Options: Conceptual options will be developed and submitted in roll
plot format for up to three (3) interchange options. A planning level cost estimate will also be
developed, with phased improvement scenarios.
• Conceptual Interchange Options will be developed as roll plots. In addition to the plan views,
it is anticipated that two (mounted) color displays will be developed using aerial photography to
depict said options. Large scale conceptual typical sections will also be developed.
Updated planning level cost estimates and other supporting planning level data will be developed
as appropriate.
Timeframe: 24 months
Estimated Budget: $165,000 ($275,000 over two fiscal years)
3. Exit 310/Valley Pike/Tasker Road Origin and Destination Survey
Objective and Description: This study will quantify trips through the survey intersections by
their origins and destinations during a period of typical traffic flow. The survey may be
conducted using cell phone traces, license plate capture, tube counts, or a combination thereof.
The objective of the study is to estimate the likely effectiveness of a proposed connecting road
between Tasker Road and Valley Pike (Route 11) over I-81 north of Exit 310 in diverting trips
from and preserving capacity of the survey intersections. The Product was initiated by Frederick
County.
Product: A report of the compiled results of an origin/destination survey of trips through the
study area.
Estimated Cost: $27,500
4. Area Plan for Future Exit 311 (Battaile Drive/Papermill Road)
Objective and Description: This study will identify capacity needs for Battaile
Drive, Papermill Road and Shawnee Drive as well as a broader program of capital
projects including a new I-81 interchange and land use modifications to improve
traffic circulation and land access and to accommodate future growth in the
southern part of the City of Winchester and adjoining portion of eastern Frederick
County in the vicinity of Papermill Road and the proposed interchange. The
product was initiated by the City of Winchester.
The program as described as Project #4 in the Vision Plan of the 2035 Long Range
Transportation Plan, includes:
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 18
1. An extension of Battaile Drive eastward to Papermill Road and westward to
Monticello Street, creating an east-west arterial across the southern part of the
City;
2. A new interchange on I-81 (future Exit 311) with the Battaile Drive extension;
3. The closure and removal of the I-81 Papermill Road overpass;
4. Widening the existing Battaile Drive to a four-lane urban section; and
5. Extending and widening Pleasant Valley Road to a four-lane urban section
from Cedarmeade to Battaile Drive.
Product: An area plan to include
1. Determination of preferred sections for Battaile Drive, Papermill Road and
Shawnee Drive;
2. delineation of potential roadway realignments for Shawnee Drive and
Papermill Road and approximate rights-of-way;
3. planning-level cost estimates;
4. recommended timing/phasing of roadway modifications; and
5. recommended modifications to the land use and development codes necessary
to serve the plan objectives.
Estimated Budget: $82,500
WORK TASK 7B: Freight Planning
Objective & Description: I-81 is one of the most significant corridors for goods
movement in the eastern U.S., and its importance to the region’s economic growth
and impacts on the region’s transportation system and land use cannot be
underestimated. Many projects in the LRTP, and particularly those involving I-81,
its interchanges and connecting arterials, affect and are affected by goods
movement.
This work task will identify goods movement considerations in projects to be
undertaken in Task 7, System Planning. Staff will identify and convene public and
private sector freight stakeholders in a forum to discuss goods movement in the
context of planned I-81 projects. Issues to be addressed will include economic
development, land use and access, safety, traffic impacts, potential diversion of
truck haulage to rail, and growth associated with the Virginia Inland Port. The
Product was initiated by Frederick County
Products: A white paper of the forum proceedings including next steps. A
database of WinFred MPO freight stakeholders.
Estimated Budget: $20,000
Win-Fred MPO
FY 2015 UPWP 19
WORK TASK 8: Long Range Planning, Modeling, GIS & Data
Objective and Description: Many of the federally-required Long Range
Transportation Plan activities have been identified in the UPWP as stand alone
tasks. Work Task 8 is meant to be the recurring umbrella long range planning task
to include updates to the Long Range Plan, as well as support for travel modeling,
GIS and database management. VDOT will continue to provide technical
assistance for model development, updates and statewide data collection activities,
and fund software maintenance, upgrades and training. PE / NEPA study modeling
for SYIP projects will be completed by VDOT, not by the MPO. This task provides
staff and/or consultant technical assistance in modeling scenarios, model
enhancements, network and land use updates and completion of studies necessary
for maintenance of the model. Model maintenance provides support for required
long range planning activities, funding applications and support of any future air
quality analysis in support of regional early action air quality conformity compacts.
GIS activities support the regional travel demand model maintenance and all other
UPWP work tasks. The Products are initiated by the MPO (NSVRC) Staff.
Products
1. Scope, tasks and schedule for WinFred 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
development
2. Ongoing Updates to Long Range Transportation Plan
3. Ongoing Maintenance of Regional Travel Demand Model
4. Update of regional Origin & Destination Studies and incorporation into base and future
year model scenarios
5. GIS mapping, data collection, and database management in support of all MPO UPWP
work tasks (including GIS software maintenance for 2 users at 50% of total cost)
6. Perform a study of motor vehicle crashes for the five most recent years that data is
available; identify appropriate countermeasures
Estimated Budget: $25,000
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
FH
W
A
St
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
FT
A
St
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
Total
FY
1
5
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
t
c
h
M
a
t
c
h
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
5
3
0
3
M
a
t
c
h
M
a
t
c
h
Subtotal MPO
80
%
1
0
%
1
0
%
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
80
%
1
0
%
1
0
%
Transit
F
Y
1
3
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
FY
2
0
1
5
N
e
w
P
L
1
1
2
F
u
n
d
s
(
1
)
$1
2
1
,
9
7
0
$
1
5
,
2
4
6
$
1
5
,
2
4
6
$1
5
2
,
4
6
2
$152,462
FY
2
0
1
3
C
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
P
L
1
1
2
F
u
n
d
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
i
n
F
Y
2
0
1
5
(
2
)
$2
6
4
,
6
4
5
$
3
3
,
0
8
1
$
3
3
,
0
8
1
$3
3
0
,
8
0
7
$330,807
FY
2
0
1
4
5
3
0
3
F
u
n
d
s
(
3
)
$7
2
,
5
3
2
$
9
,
0
6
7
$
9
,
0
6
7
$90,665 $90,665
FY
2
0
1
5
5
3
0
3
F
u
n
d
s
$7
6
,
4
7
4
$
9
,
5
5
9
$
9
,
5
5
9
$95,593 $95,593
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
F
Y
1
5
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$3
8
6
,
6
1
5
$
4
8
,
3
2
7
$
4
8
,
3
2
7
$
4
8
3
,
2
6
9
$
1
4
9
,
0
0
6
$
1
8
,
6
2
6
$
1
8
,
6
2
6
$
1
8
6
,
2
5
8
$
6
6
9
,
5
2
7
To
t
a
l
F
Y
1
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$669,527
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
FH
W
A
St
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
F
T
A
St
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
Subtotal Total
VD
O
T
/
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
t
c
h
M
a
t
c
h
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
53
0
3
M
a
t
c
h
M
a
t
c
h
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
M
P
O
DR
P
T
80
%
1
0
%
1
0
%
80
%
1
0
%
1
0
%
Expenditures
Ta
s
k
1
:
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
70
/
3
0
$3
7
,
4
9
4
$
4
,
6
8
7
$
4
,
6
8
7
$4
6
,
8
6
7
$1
6
,
0
6
9
$
2
,
0
0
9
$
2
,
0
0
9
$20,086 $66,953
Ta
s
k
2
:
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
T
I
P
)
70
/
3
0
$4
,
2
0
0
$
5
2
5
$
5
2
5
$5
,
2
5
0
$1
,
8
0
0
$
2
2
5
$
2
2
5
$2,250 $7,500
Ta
s
k
3
:
S
t
a
t
e
/
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
W
o
r
k
T
a
s
k
s
50
/
5
0
$3
,
0
0
0
$
3
7
5
$
3
7
5
$3
,
7
5
0
$3
,
0
0
0
$
3
7
5
$
3
7
5
$3,750 $7,500
Ta
s
k
4
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
&
C
i
t
y
o
f
W
i
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
0/
1
0
0
$5
6
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
$70,000 $70,000
Ta
s
k
5
:
L
o
c
a
l
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
50
/
5
0
$6
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
$
7
5
0
$7
,
5
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
$
7
5
0
$7,500 $15,000
Ta
s
k
6
:
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
&
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
20
/
8
0
$3
,
2
0
0
$
4
0
0
$
4
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
$1
2
,
8
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
$
1
,
6
0
0
$16,000 $20,000
Ta
s
k
7
:
S
y
s
t
e
m
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
75
/
2
5
$2
2
6
,
5
0
0
$
2
8
,
3
1
3
$
2
8
,
3
1
3
$2
8
3
,
1
2
5
$7
5
,
5
0
0
$
9
,
4
3
8
$
9
,
4
3
8
$94,375 $377,500
Ta
s
k
8
:
L
o
n
g
R
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
,
G
I
S
a
n
d
D
a
t
a
60
/
4
0
$1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$8
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
$10,000 $25,000
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
F
Y
1
5
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
$2
9
2
,
3
9
4
$
3
6
,
5
4
9
$
3
6
,
5
4
9
$
3
6
5
,
4
9
2
$
1
7
9
,
1
6
9
$
2
2
,
3
9
6
$
2
2
,
3
9
6
$
2
2
3
,
9
6
1
$
5
8
9
,
4
5
3
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
/
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
F
u
n
d
s
f
o
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
$80,074
To
t
a
l
F
Y
1
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
$669,527
(1
)
F
Y
1
4
P
L
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
f
r
o
m
V
D
O
T
f
o
r
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
(2
)
F
Y
1
3
P
L
C
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
F
u
n
d
s
:
n
o
t
E
x
p
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
F
Y
1
3
(3
)
F
Y
1
4
C
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
F
T
A
5
3
0
3
F
u
n
d
s
:
n
o
t
e
x
p
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
F
Y
1
4
Pa
g
e
1
7
Fi
g
u
r
e
2
:
W
i
n
-
F
r
e
d
M
P
O
F
Y
2
0
1
5
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
b
y
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
WORKING WORKING
$4
,
2
0
0
$
5
2
5
$
5
2
5
WORKING
$4
,
2
0
0
$
5
2
5
$
5
2
5
$3
,
0
0
0
$
3
7
5
$
3
7
5
WORKING
$3
,
0
0
0
$
3
7
5
$
3
7
5
WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING
50
/
5
0
WORKING
50
/
5
0
$6
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
$
7
5
0
WORKING
$6
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
$
7
5
0
WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING
20
/
8
0
WORKING
20
/
8
0
$3
,
2
0
0
$
4
0
0
$
4
0
0
WORKING
$3
,
2
0
0
$
4
0
0
$
4
0
0
75
/
2
5
WORKING
75
/
2
5
Ta
s
k
8
:
L
o
n
g
R
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
,
G
I
S
a
n
d
D
a
t
a
WORKING
Ta
s
k
8
:
L
o
n
g
R
a
n
g
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
,
G
I
S
a
n
d
D
a
t
a
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
F
Y
1
5
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
WORKING
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
F
Y
1
5
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING WORKING
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
$7
6
,
4
7
4
$
9
,
5
5
9
$
9
,
5
5
9
DRAFT
$7
6
,
4
7
4
$
9
,
5
5
9
$
9
,
5
5
9
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
F
Y
1
5
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$3
8
6
,
6
1
5
$
4
8
,
3
2
7
$
4
8
,
3
2
7
$
4
8
3
,
2
6
9
$
1
4
9
,
0
0
6
$
1
8
,
6
2
6
$
1
8
,
6
2
6
$
1
8
6
,
2
5
8
$
6
6
9
,
5
2
7
DRAFT
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
F
Y
1
5
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$3
8
6
,
6
1
5
$
4
8
,
3
2
7
$
4
8
,
3
2
7
$
4
8
3
,
2
6
9
$
1
4
9
,
0
0
6
$
1
8
,
6
2
6
$
1
8
,
6
2
6
$
1
8
6
,
2
5
8
$
6
6
9
,
5
2
7
St
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
F
T
DRAFT
St
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
l
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
F
T
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
t
c
h
M
a
t
c
h
H
i
g
h
w
a
DRAFT
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
t
c
h
M
a
t
c
h
H
i
g
h
w
a
80
%
1
0
%
1
0
%
DRAFT
80
%
1
0
%
1
0
%
$3
7
,
4
9
4
$
4
,
6
8
7
$
4
,
6
8
7
DRAFT
$3
7
,
4
9
4
$
4
,
6
8
7
$
4
,
6
8
7
$4
,
2
0
0
$
5
2
5
$
5
2
5
DRAFT
$4
,
2
0
0
$
5
2
5
$
5
2
5
DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT