Loading...
TC 10-07-03 Meeting AgendaCOUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM To: Frederick County Transportation Committee From: Jeremy F. Camp, Planner II Subject: Discussion - Interstate 81 Improvement Projects Date: September 30, 2003 The Frederick County Transportation Committee will be meeting on Tuesday, October 7, 2003 at 7:30 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. The agenda for this meeting is as follows: AGENDA 1) Review of I-81 Projects Proposed by Star Solutions and Fluor Virginia, Inc. 2) Other. Access is limited during the evening hours. Therefore, it will be necessary to enter the building through the back double doors of the Board of Supervisors Room, located in the rear of the new addition of the county building. I would encourage committee members and interested citizens to park in the Count, parking lot located in the rear of the building, or in the joint Judicial Center parking lot and follow the sidewalk to the back double doors of the Board Room. JFC/bah Attachments 107 North Kent Street o Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 File Copy I-81 Improvement Proposals - Star Solutions and Fluor Virginia, Inc. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is currently deliberating with two separate business consortiums about their proposals to improve Interstate 81. These companies are Star Solutions and Fluor Virginia, Inc. Both companies submitted their proposals to VDOT under the authority of the Public Private Transportation Act of 1995 (PPTA), which allows agencies of the Commonwealth of Virginiato procure services of private companies. As required by the PPTA, all local jurisdictions that are affected by such proposals have the opportunity to review and comment on these proposals within a 60 -day period starting when the proposals are received by VDOT. These proposals were received by VDOT on September 5, 2003. Therefore, Frederick County has until November 4, 2003 to provide VDOT with comments. The Star Solutions proposal is along term solution to the transportation problems of I-81. Star Solutions proposes to build 10 lanes from Kernstown to Stephenson, and eight lanes in the remainder of Frederick County. This would consist of at least four lanes in each direction. Two of these lanes would be truck - only lanes and two would be car -only lanes; thus, separating car traffic from trucks. However, trucks would be required to use the same exits as cars, except at I-66, where there would be a separate truck exit. To fund the project and to make a profit, Star Solutions would be establishing a toll system for trucks only. No cars would be tolled so long as the 1.6 billion dollars in public funds is contributed to the project. The Fluor Virginia's proposal is less road, but a practical solution to the I-81 transportation problems. Fluor proposes four lanes from Papermill Road to Stephenson, as well as, in the vicinity of I-66. Three lanes in each direction would be built elsewhere in the area_ At least one of these lanes in each direction would be a car -only lane. Truck tolls are less with the Fluor proposal, but a toll is required on cars. No public funds are required for the Fluor proposal. The Planning Staff has evaluated both detailed proposals, and is ready to facilitate discussion with the Transportation Committee, the Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors so official comments can be submitted to VDOT for their consideration. To assist you in reviewing these proposals, staff has prepared a bulleted information sheet which compares the two projects. This information sheet can be found on the following page. On the page after the information sheet, please find comment sheets. These are the comment sheets which VDOT provided to Frederick County for comments. You may either provide staff with your comments on this sheet or in conversation during the upcoming Planning Commission Meeting onOctober 15, 2003. Information relevant to Frederick County for both projects is also attached for your information. The full detailed proposals for each project can be found at the VDOT website (http/!virgiriadot.or-Q/infoservice/is-I-81proposals.asp). All comments received will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Ultimately, the County will be forwarding comments to VDOT for their consideration. Staff is not necessarily seeking to learn a proposal preference, but is seeking to learn the pros and cons of each proposal, Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. General Comparison of Fluor and Star Solutions Proposals Fluor Virginia, Inc. 24 relocations of homes and businesses locally at least 3 lanes each direction 8 total lanes through City & UDA 1 car only lane, 2 multipurpose lanes 12' shoulders rail improvements in Northern Virginia (NS) electronic tolling tolls on cars and trucks completion in 2014 Frederick County constructed in 2009 VDOT to maintain, 20 year maintenance (optional) security bonding fully accommodates 2020 LOS at least 3.3 billion dollar cost no public funds Both Proposals Star Solutions 56 relocations of homes and businesses locally at least 4 lanes in each direction 10 total lanes through City & UDA 2 truck only lanes, 2 car only lanes 10' shoulders rail improvements in Northern Virginia (CSX) electronic tolling tolls on trucks only completion in 2019 Frederick County constructed in 2019 VDOT to maintain security bonding & 20 year pavement warranty fully accommodates 2025 LOS at least 5.7 billion dollar cost (7.75 billion high) at least 1.6 billion dollars in public funds No relocations or significant upgrades to existing interchanges Not consistent with Frederick County's Comprehensive Policy Plan ( ie. Eastern Road Plan and Bicycle Plan) Not consistent with WATS plan No CD lanes through Winchester or Frederick County Il`ffERSTATE 81 PPTA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT' DETAILED PROPOSAL REVIEW COMMENTS FOR PROPOSAL BY FLUOR VIRGINIA, INC. Please evaluate this proposal independently of all other proposals. • Are the proposed improvements compatible with any local comprehensive plans that exist for your locality? YES; NO; Please explain: • Does this proposal, on its own merits, warrant consideration by VDOT's Commissioner for negotiation of a comprehensive agreement? YES; NO; Please explain: • Are there portions of this proposal that create specific advantages and/or benefits for your locality? YES; _NO; Please explain: • Are there portions of this proposal that create specific disadvantages and/or drawbacks for your locality? YES; NO; Please explain: • Are there any other comments you wish VDOT to consider? Please provide all comments by November 4, 2003, to the following address: Malcolm T. Kerley, P.E. Chief Engineer for Program Development Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 E. Broad Street Richmond, Virgina 23219 L"ITERSTATE 81 PPTA IMPROV1'iWENT PROJECT DETAILED PROPOSAL REVIEW COMMENTS FOR PROPOSAL BY STAR SOLUTIONS Please evaluate this proposal independently of all other proposals. • Are the proposed improvements compatible with any local comprehensive plans that exist for your locality? YES; NO; Please explain: Does this proposal, on its own merits, warrant consideration by VDOT's Commissioner for negotiation of a comprehensive agreement? YES; NO; Please explain: • Are there portions of this proposal that create specific advantages and/or benefits for your locality? —.—YES; NO; Please explain: • Are there portions of this proposal that create specific disadvantages and/or drawbacks for your locality? YES; NO; Please explain: • Are there any other comments you wish VDOT to consider? Please provide all comments by November 4, 2003, to the following address: Malcolm T. Kerley, P.E. Chief Engineer for Program Development Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 E. Broad Street Richmond, Virgina 23219 FLUOR VIRGINIA, Inc. vr*ioDeportmentofTra*wtatfon InfairSeacG' 81 Sheet No, NIF1111=0 FLUOR Impr®demenE SEUJY _ • � T-1 PROJECT NUMBER: ROUTE 0081 YDOT METRIC yam PSECo09 q 1.415eIM FROM MP 8.3 TO 324.2 NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL SECTIONS SBL srainen NBL wme n °a snwc� R� A � ].bm �j.1.1.�J,Om—l--iem ].6m - i ].6m--i�—J.6m�—� ).9m Mel.—y�J,6m—I--].6m �islr- Rx1 Pim (lel 6n (lYl (lx7 Uxi i ].6m—•�JAm—i•�i�16m (xe7 6x7 (� lu7 px7 pal Ri �1 UYl rl.em Sigh➢ER H IaemTMV6 W6 I Px1 (zi INSIDE WGT6lTNV Iixm - .I emTM481NE5 —i—Ib (sal Pel WIDENING mAIOU➢Bl —•1 (111 A�NPA� SBL (LNBL eM� � e>�T. -- — — e NET— — GV➢"E-O O — — Dom.. I--xxm �i—Jom—1—]em iem--r—zam I iem 1 1]s]rwl]sm (ui 6]7 Ilii 6Y7 I zbm---•f--zem—i�zem zcm—i—zom--+)i—zem—� (xe7 lxim 6x7 6x7 r ].b mbNelA➢Bl H 14o TMVEL l.N6 i 6x7 (u7 (u1 (u1 cm (u1 6x7 (]61 INSIDE 9mbl].Em Ie.em -PAYEE �6 )xa'row ppi WIDENING •�—(I mAIy.LL81 �I 11Y1 PROP. (i SBL (PAVED MEDIAN W/ MEDIAN BARRIER) PROP. (E NBL IX. fL SBL art Iew RxLoan, '""E ,PA1a�NE IX. fL NBLI �- I 7PA� ssTmll I � t,E>m, O(1t) CI W7 (tY FAaI 1]27 (x>7 Iu7 le,Im1� 1,N0—i Ox7 (al (121 (]-) tui � leem Pe�IA'B INSIDE & OUTSIDE WIDENING O rt SBL (L NBL m]acn PEw Itw � rex nnL OEPm P ].bm 3.emI 3.em b ].em N7 lui 6r) °(u1 627 lv Mul) I lae mtPa9s ws ttY rwx) (sn 11x7 (u1 6T) laamrarvau c a.9m P1 NOTE: I]67 OUTSIDE (]67 WIDENING 1, TRUCK CLIMBING LANES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE OUTSIDE IN LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN. AND OD ARE TYPICAL SECTION DESIGNATIONS. SEE PLANS FOR AREAS WHERE THESE APPLY. 3. TYPICALSECTIO NB DEPICT 3 LANE ROADWAY IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN SHEET FOR 0 LANE LOCATIONS AND TYPICAL SECTION DESIGNATION. vr*ioDeportmentofTra*wtatfon InfairSeacG' 81 Sheet No, NIF1111=0 FLUOR Impr®demenE SEUJY _ • � T-1 PROJECT NUMBER: ROUTE 0081 YDOT METRIC yam PSECo09 q 1.415eIM FROM MP 8.3 TO 324.2 NOT TO SCALE User Note: Click a colored box below to see engineering plan details for that segment. Interstate 81 Improvement &uay reddo DoWtment or Tromwtotion � 1111MM FLUOR SHEET INDEX NOT TO SCALE VDOT METRIC Sheet No. I-3 SHENANDOAH COUm _ WARREN COUNTY SB AQ® N8AO® M N a 2 SB ©® NB ©® O O IL 2 SB ©O3 NB ©® nceu^seafe $1 I>r>r proveme>rnf &u ay mo* PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968-113' SHENANDOAH, WARREN & FREDERICK® COUNTIES, STAUNTON DISTRICT m i fill h g ` 6 x 11 w4do Deportment of Trortwtotlon Proposed Pavement Proposed Widening SWM Basin „1111_ FLUOR —!—m— —R— Proposed Structure Work Proposed -Existing R/W & L!A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section Designation OA © © OD Number of Lanes 3 , 4 SB I- N B NB n SCALE 1 10000 0 200 m 400 m Sheet No. 14-7 >rncerslta�e 81 I>t> p r ovemenif SlEua y A► PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968-113 FREDERICK COUNTY STAUNTON DISTRICT r _ z'taIn ` 7ID _ 'O -- xs .. lie m m cn ...._..._._--- — ._. t 1 A ,, / + 1 } Ca SB ©® NB ©® - YPginta Deporinent of Tronwtation Lo O co IL 2 FLUOR SB ©® NB B003 LEGEND: Proposed Pavement�s ; Proposed m WideningSWM Basin Proposed Structure Work Proposed ------- Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section DesignationAO 0 © OD Number of Lanes Q , N O Q. SB NB M m a 2 SCALE 1 10000 0 200 m 400 m SB @@ N B @ (2 Sheet No. 14-8 I nEersifaEe 131 Im provemelrni SiEu dy PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968113• FREDERICK COUNTY STAUNTON DISTRICT -1,01 t3 m toy -'o' Cn „ m I S �� /j rf } --- E«urvd welch smmnw d� t cn m -, SB 00 NB AZ)G LEGEND: — Proposed Pavement Proposed YryNaOepafe9nTofTransportafbn Widening SWM Basin Sheet No. FLUOR = Proposed Structure -�' ` work Proposed SCALE 1 :10000 --- Existing RNV & L/A Line Retaining Wall 14-9 Proposed RM& L/A Line Typical Section DesignationAO Q © OD 0 200 m 400 m voor rnErr,ic Number of Lanes n n iV j� _ 1 <.:__. 'r Improvemencseudy PROJECT T NUMBER: 0081-968-113 000 j I /j! FREDERICK COUNTY j t� Ili STAUNTON DISTRICT ijn- .... i'i;i�14 L .. - - (~'IF �T— - f-j..:Jt . LI �- . Lr ; �. L l I I - b. r i 1 a l W il.. - 't`r1E= I '-i — I I .J a i { I -1 1 , r_. �/"�'. W C rr - _. _ I i I �. i _ r�!L1.'r� -, I -� i - �` i : r � __ , i \ �� " — - - - xe er L._.. i Uj / f T � lel I -_� - --- 6 i i �. I� �, 71 � 4 f�,11 in 1 i �`- �1' • i 4 z �.� -- m i —T ��?' t � 1 v�i� �`'�� ... .��_-.--.--••---..rte— �-�/ �t � n � 1.f V a rErtT n u'/ .L 1 /T �� TELar IDIXpx FHt ` 1� r F L 6—.._..�._.._ /l .n �''uul%tom-.-.._�. ...�.1--�..e•3�-, t� i t�, 1 i i, is .. L."- _. a;�L,w.� il._1.. j.�/�.�t'�r�_ SB QD NBA003 Yrplydo Department of Transportation \/IIIIm FL UO R M a. SB QO3 NB QB Q3 LEGEND: Proposed Pavement yea^" ==.` Proposed Widening '' SWM Basin Proposed Structure Work Proposed ------- Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section Designation OA O © OD Number of Lanes O _ -t � r~_: / 1: _ � 1, • �.�j��-! b, o m a 2 SCALE 1 : 10000 0 200 M 400 m SB QO3 N BA(2) Sheet No. 15-2 i r �_.__. I /,f ..... 1 - - 1 _-_ Lu = o .- �- t T Z T � U i Int _i 11 E-, Q r Vir¢No Dewtnenf of Trariwtatlon SB O® N B (A)(3) FL UO ]f Eerslfate 1 Improvemene r, ¶ AMMM PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968 113 • FREDERICK COUNTY TSTAUNTON DISTRICT J�J �J hl . !; - _ c - t 1 - _`�='_'_-'-_ r>,flriii 1,i �q U Y l �i r_ �`I ._�•_: l4_. .__ __� �{t 111 r�4r Il, II/1 , Lu uj ��, � �•�i_"_"_.�i � -I r— ba !1 rf/r/J,%i� �� �.a cn _ kygpW 5 / . r_k � .ice .._ 'v`�•�,yL't`Ylt ^ � ...::-t... � .. SB ©O NB ©0 LEGEND: Proposed Pavement Proposed Widening SWM Basin R fax Proposed Structure Work Proposed Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section Designation OA , © © OD Number of Lanes 3 4 A Sheet No. SCALE 1 10000 I= M 15-3 0 200 m 400 M V�OT�METRIC ` �7 Interstate 91, Y Improvement :T; I,� . `-~ -=_ ��(.� iF� t PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-96N8 3 11 • I:I FREDERICK COUNTY Rl,� STAUNTON DISTRICT N: _ t I a;, I17 _ ti ?7 X11 l CSX Mfl eE I, ,. \.....� / i N Lu X: ut A, T - — . it 1 rti'i' , ,. /*' , Lu Z J V/^1 > 3 / _.•r '°`.=�.. R'F r1 4 .s7»�� � • r t!? I .—_ �' r I.71 !_ L fl�l r ^-,: pgp p AIR, OR (A i~`��/y`L ie:-.•`-.:;.,,,,,� ti\, i !il,l' •C q;�lY �f,{r -' i /���--f'a`+a'a ate' ,`;, _._'nr'� '.// •k� \1 �l�—. 1 ,_ t fi\-r'.�'.%;trt'-,i rd=70 w zs 7 Li m a. GRADED MEDIAN M � SB ©O3 SB NB ©Q3 NB LEGEND: AA1k Yrgtdo Deportment of TrmwtotlonProposed _ FLUOR Pavement x° �, Proposed Widening SWM Basin Proposed Structure Work Proposed k SCALE 1 10000 Sheet N0. - Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line ��_� Typical Section Designation O © OD 0 200 m 400 m vopTMemic e aomoom wsa..osoamwaoas:n: vM Number of Lanes 3 , 4 I scuayfoln �f. RV" JECT NUMBERimp:PR 0081 968 11�' FREDERICK COUNTY v STAUNTON DISTRICT O \/ ,, t'o�r1r�_ iclar.I�i :L INN wt., �� �• ] r .,..�s.^iW. �aii§y •_'', ` x 5 t i�il...w.:i �"'�,- - IIT, Rpi 1111 l _ r`✓ r /1' - f�a (—% fZ,�%� d hL1J��L_��jUi�LCL �. Lot�- :'�s�•-_ (� t" '� _.; ,,,..1 ti (/� �/, fi ` 1 1 hh'wlpE �\ '� . y - i \.I T11 _ ( 'tom' R..� \\ (r \ ���\ J 1°t. / ':' ; \\ a !� d ... ....I U I'I 111... Ak W - '� I ` \'�1 � � �y} yl ,r.. -�l � �•kLY"."'" ... -� y� ' 1.:�' L o . +� `i _ _ r / �9 I 774-1 dr L.qi._J _........_ ..._.. -p �"-^-c,•. h�. -�I ' V•,., �8 �`r� �yi W. �jI) --^•r- ; t :{-`.- ..,� I �.._t _-1:x."7 -- - � _ i � � ��.. `T ' r') U ti Q - SB ©® NB ©® —YtrgWpikpQtnentofTrmsyortatbn Proposed Pavement Proposed Widening SWM Basin „"" FLUOR "'J / /O /'1 -- Proposed Structure /!_LU K '�r� Work Proposed -- Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section Designation OA O © OD Number of Lanes 3 4 SCALE 1 10000 0 200 m 400 In Sheet No.l r 15-5 arnCersitafe 81 Improveme>rni SEUJY PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968-113 • FREDERICK COUNTY STAUNTON DISTRICT �,N J �,�—•---' �` I �y a ---orf ✓�„ /� sy ;-�" ,`\tel i� I _.._._._.. 311, _ a f r I r�_ _/ _ y -• - :1..�i-..�.� .'r= -t_- -� ._.1;�_:_.--t_<�_ I� of �-...T...__..� l l r~��� \ { i i `! 1 i i 1 j= •_til._a z_ SB DG - �.i if III SB ©03 NB AOQ3 NB ©� LEGEND: �Yr4rio0%ortmwtoftrw4Wtotlon NET ^/ ( /O� Proposed Pavement Proposed Widening SWM Basin Proposed Structure SCALE 1 Sheet No. I/_L U FLUOR �"j� Work Proposed :10000 '15'7 -T•-^>-g - - Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section Designation OA © © Op 0 200 m 400 m voor Hernia . 5 3001IOoraEavepi5U1.lBn OsmllO]04:51:55 Pta Number of Lanes 3 4 limiteirsitafe 81 i4CL Y __............ _...._... PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968 1 1 3 • - FREDERICK COUNTY STAUNTON DISTRICT i - I :w cli F • r , a SBBQO3 SB 00 NB OB O3 N B A003 LO w w x Lu K J 2 U H Q Sheet No. SCALE 1 10000 15-8 0 200 m 400 m roar wmic LEGEND: AWLProposed YrplNoDeparimentofTrot�artatfon "mm— XIF1111 FLUOR Pavement;^ Widening err Proposed Structure ��•��<>» Work - Existing RNV & L/A Line Proposed SWM Basin Proposed Retaining Wall Proposed R/W & L/A Line Typical Section Designation O © Op Number of Lanes n n LO w w x Lu K J 2 U H Q Sheet No. SCALE 1 10000 15-8 0 200 m 400 m roar wmic u2 F - w LU M: rn Lu z J x U F - Q Improvement SiEudy \ F y PROJECT NUMBER: 0081-968-113 i \\ ,/ FREDERICK COUNTY STAUNTON DISTRICT 14 �" 6 LW' w ------ L--- ------------ iVl SB @ ( N B (A� M AlftyirginloDowtnntofTrorswtatlon FLUOR Proposed Pavement_� Widening Proposed Structure Work ";�? Proposed SWM Basin Proposed -- Existing R/W & L/A Line Retaining Wall Typical Proposed R/W & L/A Line Section Designation OA © © Op ES��o re 9 en09�� 05� evM Number of Lanes 3 4 i PRoiCC�:,r `- EfVp N V N N m m a 0- 2 i SB ©Q NB ©O3 Sheet No.l SCALE 1 10000 15-9 0 200 m 400 m moT mmm Star Solutions Area of Detail Median Truck Rest Area and Toll Registration Plaza rip Key to Features Flyover Interchange to be Improved FD -1 Dual Interchange (Separate Ramps for Cars and Trucks) M New or Replacement Interchange Interchange to be Combined or Replaced 0 Interchange - No Work Anticipated Denotes Half -Flyover at Beginning and End of Project SBL CID Lanes General Truck Purpose Lanes Rumble Strips SBL rGeneral Purpose Lanes 4;4 " Existing SBL General Purpose Truck Lanes Lanes 'ZRumble Strips SBL NBL Truck Lanes Truck Lanes U Ul hi L�j L�l Typical Section Existing Wide Medians (i.e., Mount Jackson Area) NBL NBL General Purpose Lanes gi4 Existing 'M F 277 ......... . End Project State Line 21 ;A /X Typical Section With 3 General Purpose Lanes Winchester and Harrisonburg Areas NBL Truck Lanes, General -C/D Lanes Purpose Lanes ��� k =Rumble"; trips Typical Section With Collector/Distributor (C/D) Lanes Staunton Area Salem District Map Not to Scale 167 Working with VDOT to Make 1-81 Safer for Everyone I Median Truck Rest Area Design Concept Staunton District Am% Am R imp's 0 u r. v- a- -n s Safer Transport And Roadways 2 Figure A - . l� g,�4 ,.v rRz-X iG e0wiTy Virginia Department of Transportation Interstate 81 Improvements Figure A-7: Proposed Number of Lanes and Location of Widening AREA SIEGINMP ENO AAP 1,046 ff I P»b3tiSER- <NOMBER OF , `... S SPLIT NS !k SB ; ° . 1f+NSIDE WIi?ENING<YOt3ENING, WT -SIDE INSIDE& 0lIUWE tRlIM11LYt*",•' rrvci t+F++.x 8 _._$.__._..-240.6_..._. __.. _ 8 237.524_0.6 _._-..__._._.._ 242.1 _. 242.1 _ 243.5 _ _ 3.1_ .� 1 5 _1.5 __.._. 1.4 _8 lanes - 10 lanes__ .__ _____.,.._. 101anes X X..w_._ .__._ __ X 8 _. 242.1 242.8 0.7 10 lanes X 8 m 242.8 247.8 - 5 10 lanes _ X 8243.5 8 _ 8 247.8 250.8 247.8 250.8 251.7 _ 4.3 3 _ 0.9 10 lanes 10 lanes 101anes X X X - 8 251.7 261.6 .._262.6_ 1. 8la_nes 8lanes X _.. .__..._...._._,._ .. .._......_._.....�...._._.. __._ 9263.9 268.1 4.28 lanes _._ 8 9 282.2 286.13.9 � _ _ _ 8 lanes _- 8lanes X� X " _. 290 3... 3.9 __..__.... 8lanes -�X 9 290 _292.4 2.4 _ 8lanesX 9 292.4 292.7 0.3- 8lanes _. X 9m292.7W 293 0.38lanes 9_ _ 293 _....._� _ 298.8_ 5.8._ ._.,__.__- 8lanes r__---- X 9 !4-0.3 298.8 299.7 0.9 _ .__._ _.__ 8lanes _8lanes _ __ _ X X_ 9 _ 300_ 300.1 0.1 - 8 lanesX 9 301.1 302_ 0.9 8lanes 302�� 303 1 8lanes X� 9 9 TOTA 10 10 10 303 304.5 _Al11LEJlf;E 305 306.8 308 304.5 305 FOR ARfi # 306.8 308 309.3 1.5 0.5 8lanes 8lanes X X 4f# 9 1.8 1.2 1.3 8lanes 8lanes 8lanes X X X _....._.,...309.3_._,.._ 10 _._....__. 310.9 311.8 0.9 101anes X mm10311.8 _.. 10.r 10 3.�.6 317 316 3'17 319.6 4.2 M-___.._ 1 2.6 -6.9---X'- 10 lanes ..,..._.....__._�_..... 10 lanes 10 lanes X� _ X X 319.6 320._5 _ lanesX_. 10 324 324.2 TOTAL MILEAGE FOR AREA #10 TOTAL MILEAGE FOR AREA'61 io 0.2 19:3 313.74 8 lanes _ �X- Detailed Proposal September 5, 2003 A-37 p"kfDERlClC CorGvTy Virginia Department of Transportation Interstate 81 Improvements Figure A-5: Existing and Proposed Bridge Structures ✓Mull cU I I.VV00 September 5, 2003 ' Width of bridge demolition for widening or replacement. A-17 .e. .. WAR"' 81 2025 SBL ROUTE 0081 NARROW PASSAGE CREEK 282.4 1966 343 35.0 337.3 85.3 Replace 605 6330 ROUTE 0605 RTE 181 282.5 1966 287 29.0 337.3 47.2 Replace 816 6329 ROUTE 0816 RT 81 284.1 1966 289 32.7 352.7 33.5 Replace 604 6328 ROUTE 0604 RTE 181 284.9 1966 269 33.0 313.3 42.7 Replace 81 2018 NBL ROUTE 0081 PUGHS RUN 287.2 1966 135 44.0 164.0 85.3 Replace 81 2016 NBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 642 & DRY RUN 287.4 1966 148 44.0 180.4 85.3 Replace 81 2019 SBL ROUTE 0081 PUGHS RUN 287.5 1966 135 44.0 164.0 85.3 Replace 81 2017 SBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 642 & DRY RUN 287.6 1966 148 44.0 168.0 85.3 Replace 81 2002 NBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 600 288.4 1965 112 44.0 128.3 85.3 Replace 81 2003 SBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 600 288.7 1965 112 44.01 128.6 85.3 Replace 81 20041 NBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 625 288.9 1965 110 44.01 124.3 85.3 Replace 657 63161 ROUTE 0657 RTE 181 289.0 1965 274 29.0 288.7 33.5 Replace + 81 2005 SBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 625 289.1 1965 110 44.0 138,8 85.3 Replace 655 6317 ROUTE 0655 RTE 181 289.9 1965 260 29.0 275.6 33.5 Replace 653 6318 ROUTE 0653 RTE 181 290.2 1965 259 29.0 280.8 30.8 Replace 651 6319 ROUTE 0651 RTE 181 291.3 1965 242 35.0 285.4 95.8 Replace 646 6320 ROUTE 0646 RTE 181 292.0 1965 289 29.01 304.8 33.5 Replace 81 2006 NBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 601 294.2 1965 106 44.01 135.5 85.3 Replace 81 2007 SBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 601 294.5 1965 106 44.0 131.9 85.3 Re lace 638 6321 ROUTE 0638 RTE 181 295.5 1965 238 29.0 299.5 33.5 Replace 55 1067 ROUTE 0055 RTE 181 296.6 1965 393 35.0 453.41 106.6 Replace 81 2008 NBL ROUTE 0081 B&O RAILROAD 298.2 1965 216 44.0 221.1185.3 Replace 81 2009 SBL ROUTE 0081 B&O RAILROAD 298.5 19651 216 44.0 219.2 85.3 Replace 81 2900 NBL ROUTE 0081 CEDAR CREEK 299.7 19651 385 36.2 386.8 85.3 Replace 81 2901 SBL ROUTE 0081 CEDAR CREEK 300.0 1965 385 36.2 386.8 85.3 Replace 66 2028 WBL ROUTE 0066 RM 3 0 EB RM 2 & NBL 81 300.5 1964 315 36.0 558.7 50.5 Replace 81 2800 NBL ROUTE 0081 ROUTE 840 300.6 1965 128 44.0 141.1 85.3 Replace 66 2029 EBL ROUTE 0066 RMP 2 0 NBL RTE 181 301.4 1964 1701 42.0 413.4 50.5 Replace 627 6167 ROUTE 0627 RTE 181 302.4 1965 257 35.0 260.8 56.4 Replace 735 6168 ROUTE 0735 RTE 181 305.1 1965 257 29.0 No Impact 277 1075 ROUTE 0277 RTE 181 307.0 1963 220 48.2 269.0 98.4 Replace new ROUTE 0642 RTE 181 308.0 393.7 42.7 New 81 2000 NBL ROUTE 0081 OPEQUON CREEK 309.8 1963 139 5.0 138.8 46.3 Widen 37 1115 SBL ROUTE 0037 RTE 181 310.0 1977 250 42.0 354.3 42.7 Replace new SBL CD LANES RTE 181 310.0 354.3 42.7 New 37 1040 NBL ROUTE 0037 RTE 181 310.0 1964 249 35.0 354.3 42.7 Replace new NBL CD LANES RTE 181 310.0 354.3 42.7 New 81 2001 SBL ROUTE 0081 OPEQUON CREEK 310.0 1963 139 5.01 138.8 46.3 Widen new RTE 0037 RTE 11 310.0 180.4 3.7 New new RTE 0037 RTE 11 310.0 180.41 3.7 New 644 6160 ROUTE 0644 RTE 181 312.0 1 19641 288 33.0 315.01 42.7 Replace 11 1064 SBL ROUTE 0011 RTE 181 313.51 19651 292 35.0 No Impact lNot included in stud ✓Mull cU I I.VV00 September 5, 2003 ' Width of bridge demolition for widening or replacement. A-17 1 14 W. Y. LI14,5 > Virginia Department of Transportation Interstate 81 Improvements Figure A•5: Existing and Proposed Bridge Structures Detailed Proposal September 5, 2003 . Width of bridge demolition for widening or replacement. A-18 MAO M 11 1065 NBL ROUTE 0011 RTE 181 313.5 1965 292 35.0 Not included in stud new AIRPORT ROAD RTE 181 313.5 246.1 42.7 17 1078 ROUTE 0017 RTE 181 313.7 1964 279 107.7 210.0 200.181 Tlace 2004 NBL ROUTE 0081 ABRAMS CREEK 314.0 1964 265 10.0 264.8 58.1 81 2005 SBL ROUTE 0081 ABRAMS CREEK 314.0 1964 265 10.01 264.8 58.1 Widen r 657 6163 ROUTE 0657 RTE 181 314.8 1964 249 33.01 275.6 39.4 Replace 744 6162 ROUTE 0744 RTE 181 315.0 1964 327 29.01 354.3 39.4 Replace 7 1080 ROUTE 0007 RTE 181 315.5 1964 307 94.2 213.3 170.6 Replace 81 2006 NBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 11 317.8 1964 213 37.0 212.6 85.3 Replace new NBL CD LANES RTE 0081 RTE 11 317.8 212.6 29.5 New 81 2007 SBL ROUTE 0081 RTE 11 317.8 19641 213 37,0 212.6 85.3 Replace new SBL CD LANES RTE 0081 RTE 11 317.8 1 212.6 29.5 New 81 2008 NBL ROUTE 0081 CONRAIL 318.0 19641 191 5.0 191.0 38.3 Widen new NBL CD LANES RTE 0081 CONRAIL 318.0 1 191.0 46.6 New 81 2009 SBL ROUTE 0081 CONRAIL 318.0 1964 191 5.0 191.0 38.3 Widen new SBL CD LANES RTE 0081 CONRAIL 318.0 191.0 32.8 New 81 2002 NBL ROUTE 0081 980 RAILROAD 318.1 1964 133 5.0 132.9 46.3 Widen 81 2003 SBL ROUTE 0081 B80 RAILROAD 318.2 1964 133 5.0 132.9 46.3 Widen 672 6164 ROUTE 0672 RTE 181 321.5 1964 239 33.0 269.0 54.1 Replace 671 6166 ROUTE 0671 RTE 181 322.0 1964 2581-29,0,'298.6 42.7 Re lace 669 6165 ROUTE 0669 RTE 181 323.8 19641 2631 29.01 285.4 66.3 Replace Detailed Proposal September 5, 2003 . Width of bridge demolition for widening or replacement. A-18 0,--o "M 0,5pc�ick. l c,a� y lks Virginia Department of Transportation Interstate Al Imnrnvmmanfe Figure A-6: Existing and Proposed Interchanges Detailed Proposal September 5, 2003 A-31 _81 Ma'inI&118 NIr &SEI LfJS G&D t YEAR 2025 Interc#lange Type CM Total Ex sung rr4pos"adl COIY1ift@ntS 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 291 Rte. 651 2 2 4 A A Reconstruct Interchange, Rte. 651 Bridge Replacement 2 2 4- 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 296 Rte. 55 2 2 4 A A Reconstruct Interchange, Rte. 55 Bridge Replacement 2 2 4 298 Rte. 11 2 2 4 A A Reconstruct Interchange, Rte. 11 Bridge Replacement 2 2 4 300 1-66E 2 2 4 F F New Dual Truck Only/Car Only Interchange 2 2 4 302 Rte. 627 2 2 4 A A Reconstruct Interchange, Rte. 627 Bridge Replacement 2 2 4 ~ 2 2 4 2 2 4 Northbound Flyover (Milepost 305) 2 E2 2 4 307 Rte. 277 2 2 4 A G SPUI (Proposed as per VDOT design), Rte. 277 Bridge Replacement 2 4 2 2 4 310 Rte. 37S 2 3 5 A D Replace Diamond w/ New Cloverleaf Interchange, New Rte. 37 Bridge over 1-81, Rte. 37 Bridge over CSX, Rte. 37 Bridge over Rte. 11 Detailed Proposal September 5, 2003 A-31 IN V V. Li Virginia Department of Transportation Interstate 81 Improvements 1-81 Maintane NIS # SS LOS G&D i YEAR 2025 Figure A-6; Existing and Proposed Interchanges M � G01138uiiQn I i i%{c14 2 tila4 4....� U 3 I Olaf 5 EXISVI I0.I0-pos-1ji ?.�s�Far�lSLliA4iea'7 2 3 5 313 Rte. 50/37 2 3 5 A G SPUI (Proposed as per VDOT design), Rte. 50 Bridge Replacement Winchester 2 J 3 5 315 Rte. 7 2 3 5 D G Replace partial cloverleaf wl SPUI (Proposed as per VDOT design), 2 3 5 Rte. 7 Bridge Replacement 317 Rte. 11/37N 2 3 5 A A Reconstruct Interchange, 1-81 Bridge Widening 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 4 321 Rte. 672 2 2 4 A A Reconstruct Interchange, Rte. 672 Bridge Replacement 2 2 4 323 Rte. 669 2 2 4 A A Reconstruct Interchange, Rte. 669 Bridge Replacement 2 2 4 WV 2 2 4 Detailed Proposal September 5, 2003 B - Diamond, One Loop C - Diamond, Three Loops D - Cloverleaf E - Truck, Three Leg F - Dual Truck Only/Car Only G - Single Point Urban H - Trumpet I - Diamond, 2 Loops A-32