The URL can be used to link to this page

TC 09-20-93 Meeting AgendaCOUNTY of REDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Transportation Committee FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner H RE: September Meeting and Agenda DATE: September 9, 1993 There will be a meeting of the Transportation Committee at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, September 20, 1993, in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House, 9 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia. The Transportation Committee will discuss the following items: AGENDA 1. Review of the 1994-1995 Frederick County Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan. 2. Discussion regarding a proposed road connection between Valley Mill Road (Route 659) and Berryville Pike (Route 7). 3. Other. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 ITEM #1 Frederick County Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan Each fall, the Frederick County Transportation Committee reviews and updates the existing Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan. The purpose of this review and update is to remove projects that have been completely funded by VDOT, add projects that have been requested, and prioritize all road improvements. Enclosed in your agenda is the July 1, 1993 - June 30, 1994 Secondary Road Construction Budget for Frederick County. Based on the funding under this budget, the following projects may be removed from the new Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan: MAJOR PROJECT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Route 661 from Route 672 to Route 663 HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Route 734 from Route 522 N to 1.5 miles south Route 699 from 0.5 to 0.7 miles south of Route 694 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION Route 659 - bridge over Red Bud Run Route 622 - 150 lbs cold mix from Route 37 to Route 620 Route 681 - overflow pipes at Brush Creek Route 648 - spot widen Route 681 - spot widen and tree removal from Route 685 to Route 690 Route 604 - relocate curve and intersection Other projects have begun to receive funding under the current Secondary Construction Budget. These projects need to remain on the plan until they are completely funded. Staff recommends that the priority of these items remain in their present order, and that they are renumbered accordingly. ITEM ##1 CONTINUED The Transportation Committee will consider requests for additions to the Six Year Road Plan during this meeting. Over the last few years, the Transportation Committee has held public meetings to encourage citizens to address their concerns. Staff has compiled the requests that have been received since the last update of this plan. Requests that have not been received but are made at this meeting should be considered by the committee. The following requests have been received by staff. 1) Request of Robert F. Bossick to spot widen and remove trees for improved visibility along Route 689. 2) Request of James L. Bowman to consider short term safety improvements along Route 636 from Route 640 to Route 735 until it qualifies for future improvements. 3) Request of Patricia Shell and Della Dunlap to repair five bridges along Route 608 between Route 50 W and Route 55, and to install guardrail on Route 616 along the hill that leads to the intersection with Route 608. 4) Request of Mark D. Anderson to have Route 836 considered as a hard surface improvement project. 5) Request of John M. Gregory to have Route 671 widened and hard surfaced from Route 692 south into the Shockeysville community. 6) Request of Mr. & Mrs. Roger DeHaven to improve Route 682 by widening and straightening out curves and eventually hardsurfacing the entire road segment. Included with this agenda item is a location map for these requests, as well as the actual letters and petitions that were provided to staff. Staff asks that consideration be given to each request and that the Transportation Committee recommends action for each item. 'x691 \P T 696 O G r� 41 T 1 ® } fi95 692 / 696 694 697 69, • 691 U `T31 ^ \ , t g% 692 661 671 6% 577 �+r e /' 87e 710 6➢a 887,` S+w 6B/p 9 own.rr.� 8 ; 127 `661 P Tal �„� 9n J � �� _/•_- -;;a s7 tf �1 .9 1ma9] 689 � sooV- �7,, 10214- ' lm ✓' ° ,' !` {� �\ ,srl ,,�, 661 C.761 a 1 514 v ��,-� sl��.s -� � . X600 9 �� •m.•.... , � i � o ' 739 Q ikT- L �os �661��_ ) ) es, , / •�7 ( ___ol- _ 7e ` n3 /� �tl�..� a � 1as "..� � "�l wn (, � . ( ui) '�', 97 t i 1 '.• /w,w w.1w91 i 1 ° — 1i.69j 7d ! yJ yr � I W I Imo.•. � 1 `1 WJ b�, \ II� - r � I /Ox 4 J � `I '.� t•I F r � i 0 !. / pl J °L °a lll. 1 :\ i / �•, �....1 •,wior„ia��."` _T`GB! J ( �r-1 1-\ f..T6iF ,� I671 _ _.l �IY r, I�` l•� �a ,9� L C 752 89, 6� 661r �� /_.i; u.w•*.--.--C� ��i!� 81 Jr �� 688 276 66J F' 791 767 \SCI _�/ � 68, 'r �•+A -�,Y� �� 1 611 � ��q_�' "° ''• el 701, J 7s, ems¢ ~� � r sxz 1 910 u.. 1 I s (' y�U ]0 1.6 L763 \ / , e1z 661°• Is7z �' \ �' `\ 769\\ 7W , __--�O. f"i � L 9 1, � • -------' ' 0 0 ►. 1665 ------- =--1 � �' ti � j _ \ y 7 O 1375 �1- `\ 608 668 F\ 70, o Yg9n l,1'bP+Gq� lI w.. g501yTy�,J T 16675W+w..n' •�A^I', `7b nhrr 7 11 611 F fil5 !\M[Oun '�r 199 729 9v. r .` \\ e M1 ' 619 811608 •6sA ,11•� ` ',� �.r 661f .. „1�6_0 JEO 1 3` / r � 0� � � ` 626 / 7 -_ �'; 3� ',� +`• t jj >f ��821 37 / 1730: 701 ` \ .v ( 1j a.�° Gdl^ 6nu y' • .. ♦ \ • _� fi00 ))) /J 618 ' p tllnl.n 1� � � e5()OTQ_ �. WWC11ESiFA _. ` Lx I� � a79 y_\ 1 1 YY M9 p LIS f0 5[, 657 - ' MMY 800 fi116 \.c 951 file /!/ 819 620 • 0�1nn �'•` 1 !.? 656-- �, i? 4 811 r I x i+F 800 ' ` ��\ 616 ! •' 77 1 / F \�. \ Sri CL r l 1 51 / 679 3 / 628 1 ✓ 1 ! G+e a1 732 1 ,+1 127 1I A 608 4 651 - /_ 790 °• 622 1fi 8 T ` D1 j✓l // � � �� 675 1-"---•F.g79 ._� 61l -----17�y9--•--� ..._ - f Fr9 , 679 876 07F., � w, 'J s1. 7 60e _ xx 9 yrs• 11� ,., ,.s,� ,,h , , -�_-� 661 Sv a 877 GK // q 671 0, o , 631'9 fe ".LIT::•. t 617 1 1 v ` ' r60 1- to xi m •,l iw�1'� •� g8 eq 67a disc. —J eat i0 67M801,110 ppeQuo g38 • 7„ �-"'Si L - - - ----- '��••7 4 - b 6°� ' v '1 /7zs 62 T759 �- .� -- ` - _ C• 1 SC x� 677 , �✓ 475 �� 9]], \1 j ° 1 135 636 r •4 OI /ItTll 1638 7��wpjj((/��Vr.-� T . FREDERICK COUNTY SIX YEAR SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAJOR PROJECTS/NEW HARDSURFACE/INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION 1993 - 1994 Frederick County Transportation Committee (Recommendation for approval on September 14, 1992) Frederick County Planning Commission (Recommendation for approval on October 21, 1992) Adoptee! on November 12, 1992 by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Major road improvement projects command the reconstruction of hardsurfaced roads to enhance public safety. Improvements required for road width, road alignment, road strength, and road gradient are considered major road improvement projects. 1993 - 1994 SIX YEAR MAJOR PROJECT ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN RANK ROUTE FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD.DAT 1 661 Rt. 672 Rt. 663 1053 1.92 miles ST/GA 07/93 2 656* Rt. 657 to Rt. 659 intersec 3916 1.01 miles SH/ST 07195 3 628 Rt. 631 Rt. 732 1482 2.41 miles BC 12/95 4 621** I Rt. 622 Rt. 1109 1808 1.38 miles BC 12/96 5 647 widen between Rts. 277 & 642 6723 2.08 miles OP UN/SH 6 608 Back Creek bridee 0.7E of 681 117 0.2 miles GA UN/SH 7 608 Rt. 50W Rt. 616 1201 2.83 miles BC UN/SH 8 E9 659 widen from bridge to Rt. 7E 272 0.2 miles ST UN/SH 656 widen between Rts. 655 & 657 2188 1.39 miles SH/ST UN/SH 10 Towns curb and gutter improvements for the Town of Stephens City UN/SH 11 Towns curb and gutter improvements for the Town of Middletown UN/SH 12 642 Rt. 1031 Rt. 522S 2150 1.87 miles SH/OP UN/SH 13 664 Rt. 761 Rt. 660 1178 1.1 miles ST UN/SH 14 660 Rt. 664 Rt. 7E 1653 2.13 miles ST UN/SH 15 622 City of Winchester to Rt. 37 9299 1.03 miles BC UN/SH 16 600 1.07 miles N Rt. 600 to Rt. 684 608 1.93 miles GA UN/SH 17 659 Rt. 656 bridge 224 1.8 miles ST UN/SH 18 657 City of Winchester to Rt. 656 8141 1.6 miles SH UN/SH 19 739 Rt. 673 Rt. 522N 2490 1.66 miles GA UN/SH 20 636 Rt. 277 Rt. 642 429 1.6 miles OP/SH UN/SH 21 644 City of Winchester to Rt. 522S 4600 1.36 miles SH UN/SH 22 661 Rt. I IN Rt. 660 355 3.24 miles ST UN/SH 1993 - 1994 Road Improvement Plan Page -2- 1993 - 1994 SIX YEAR MAJOR PROJECT ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Continued) RANK ROUTE7 FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD, DAT 23 622 Rt. 629 Rt. 37 4076 5.86 miles BC UN/SH 24;657 Rt. 656 to Clarke County 4383 2.07 miles ST UN/SH 25 41 Rt. 647 Rt. 277 1931 0.68 miles OP UN/SH 26 761 Rt. 11N Rt. 664 2778 1.13 miles ST UN/SH 27 659 Rt. 716 Rt. 656 5894 1.09 miles SH/ST UN/SH 28 636 Rt. 277 to 1.5 miles south (277) 481 1.5 miles OP UN/SH 29 621 Rt. 1109 Rt. 628 1398 0.57 miles BC UN/SH 30 600 Rt. 753 Rt. 614 919 1.8 miles BC UN/SH 31 655 Rt. 50E Rt. 656 2547 0.79 miles SH UN/SH 32 642 0.2 miles west Rt.1070 to Rt. 1031 6355 0.9 miles OP/SH UN/SH 33 661 Rt. 663 Rt. 11 N 7097 1.21 miles ST/GA UN/SH 34 621 to City of Winchester 3008 1.25 miles BC UN/SH 35 36 627#nstate 7032 81 to Route IIS Rt. 683 I 4580 215 J 0.49 miles 4.11 miles OP BC UN/SH UN/SH ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS: ADT - 1991 Average Daily Secondary Traffic Tabulation Counts. DIST - Distance of total improvement length in miles. MAGIS - Magisterial District in which road improvement will occur. AD.DAT - Scheduled Advertisement Date for road improvement project to begin. 656* - Improvements to Route 656 will include the intersection of Route 656 and Route 659, as well as the "S" curve leg of Route 656. 621 ** - Improvements to Route 621 will include drainage improvements south of Route 622 and the realignment of the "S" turn on Route 621. 1993 - 1994 Road Improvement Plan HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Page -3- Hardsurface road improvement projects provide impervious resurfacing and reconstruction of non-hardsurfaced secondary roads. Hardsurface improvements are considered primarily by the average daily traffic count for these secondary roads. 1993 - 1994 SIX YEAR NEW HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN [RANK ROUTE FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD. DAT 1 734 Rt.522N to 1.5 miles south (522) 85 1.55 miles GA 07/93 2 649 Rt. 648 Rt, 625 58 1.8 miles BC 07/94 3 636 Rt. 735 Rt. 640 83 1.1 miles OP 05/96 4 706 Rt. IIS to end of Rt. 706 59 0.35 miles BC 08/96 5 699 0.5 to 0.7 miles south Rt. 694 142 0.2 GA 08/96 6 702 Rt. 703 to West Vir,-Yinia line 124 0.8 miles GA 08/97 7 701 Rt. 703 to West Virginia Iine 133 1.01 miles GA 04/98 8 695 1.09 to 2.3 miles north Rt. 522 89 1.21 miles GA UN/SH 9 695 2.3 miles north Rt. 522 to WVA 89 0.9 miles GA UN/SH 10 692 Rt. 600 Rt. 671 143 2.6 miles GA UN/SH 11 625 Rt. 624 Rt. 635 102 0.5 miles BC UN/SH 12 692 Rt. 671 to West Virginia line 58 0.7 miles GA UN/SH 13 633 Rt. 625 Rt. l IS 106 1.4 miles OP/BC UN/SH 14 696 Rt. 522N Rt. 694 84 1.3 miles GA UN/SH 15 638 Rt. 625 Rt. 759 84 T0.8 miles BC UN/SH 16 629 Rt.608 to 1.15 miles east Rt.622 139 3.05 miles BC UN/SH 17 636 Rt. 709 Rt. 735 49 0.6 miles OP UN/SH 18 811 Rt -671 to 0.45 miles north (671) 128 0.25 miles OP UN/SH 19 679 0.3 miles west Rt. 608 to 0.5 miles east Rt. 600 98 2.5 miles GA UN/SH 1993 - 1994 Road Improvement Plan Page -4- 1993 - 1994 SIX YEAR NEW HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Continued) RANK ROUTE FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD.DAT 20 734 addition of 1 mile 85 1 mile GA UN/SH 21 704 Rt. 683 to West Virginia line 126 3.3 miles BC UN/SH 22 676 0.83 mile south Rt.671 to Rt.677 86 0.87 miles GA UN/SH 23 644 Rt. 50E to Clarke County line 152 0.81 miles SH UN/SH 24 634 Rt. 635 Rt. I IS 135 0.25 miles OP UN/SH 25 733 Rt. 50W Rt. 707 80 1.3 miles BC UN/SH NOTE: Route 777 is proposed to be hardsurfaced during the construction of Route 522 South if funds are available. If funds are not available, Route 777 will be included as a new hardsurface road improvement project. ABBREVIATIONS: ADT - 1991 Average Daily Secondary Traffic Tabulation Counts. DIST - Distance of total improvement length in miles. MAGIS - Magisterial District in which hardsurfacing will occur. AD.DAT - Scheduled Advertisement Date for hardsurface road improvement project to begin. 1993 - 1994 Road Improvement Plan INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION Page -5- 1993 - 1994 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN RANK ROUTE FROM TO DESCRIPTION MAGIS I P/Y 1 659 At 0.3 miles SW of Rt7 (N side) bridle over Red Bud Run ST 93/94 2 627 Rt. 37 Rt. 620 150 lbs. cold mix BC 93/94 3 681 0.82 to 1.1 miles N of Rt. 685 overflow pipe (Brush Cr.) GA 93/94 4 648 Rt.631 to 0.1 miles N of Rt.631 spot widen BC 93/94 5 681 Rt. 685 Rt. 690 spot widen & tree removal GA 93/94 6 604 0.1 mule N to 0.05 mile S Rt.714 relocate curve & intersee. BC 93/94 7 709 Rt.735 to 0.92 miles W Rt.735 widen surface OP U/S F8 627 West of Town of Middletown improve curve sight dist. OP/BC U/S 9 631 Rt. 277 Rt. 628 165 lbs. S-5 OP/BC U/S 10 608 spot widen and tree removal along unpaved sections of Rt. 608 GA U/S 11 608 At 2.57 miles north of Rt. 600 - bride over Furnace Run BC U/S 12 701 Rt. 700 T- Rt.703 widen/improve shoulders GA U/S 13 603 Rt. 55 to 0.3 miles south (Rt. 55) relocate intersection BC U/S 14 739 Rt. 672 to West Virginia line 165 lbs. cold mix GA U/S 15 707 Rt. 50W Rt. 733 spot widening BC U/S 16 733 Rt. 50W Rt, 707 spot widening BC U/S ABBREVIATIONS: MAGIS - Magisterial District in which incidental construction project will occur. FI Y - Fiscal year in which incidental construction project will occur. L r 1993 - 1994 ;OR ROAD - = w ,}. 7 Vit• J- . ter` ;/• -�^'_ _ a•� \=:�' /� -� ` ,ter ;-l'��• - v-^.:�.� [i - JJ zn i7w Z, -�-a, C ��L.J//��\ "�` / - � .�'' " 1 ('-`-' •- � � -�.J' �.•-'' V e`er i�� _ '� \'�'\. `�� l •1`� ♦ I �.�,. : ; gip, I .F � . .// ?/1 " { � r. T \ ✓sem. � �� — 11_ .�/+ � ^ �'1�' ,7 4f" off �V` 44�alM�Y _' - ." ;+ ice..- , � �i "�.�. • �. C + : .v/� .... � [C.� ... J `\- � S 199-1-1994 HARJ 1. DSURFACE •'f 7 .�' `�.�1, ,� E I Ii R OV ES 1 ENT S ,^1 Aro 777, MA � ; � • � 7 / � �y r :`•.�� a �. ,� s - _ V. �T r. ' m •, , � - �..._ �, � ' •.may, y/' ^� ��'�-^ -"� � � \ •�.1 SVT N / ��d u• _-• _ (/ / �y �G•. �',_• \�L••�� ,� 'C ,,-•'�•� l `��,,, _ � ,\ti�•� l .. y ! m � �.--• � 1 `t / .yyri�• �''..� 1 y __ ]� �-,' / 'Z' �:.� /.%' =J/ �1►:3.' •.goo• .i•• .. -1�_ on /flO�.L Msyrnm�M-•e-�� •r: `-„ I 1 � �� ,�,�C�ca ., • /`� iv,�ST �1" _ v .....�. �' n + �� - I `h� % ,�-.� is .. V; `, -:- - , q I SR -2(n 4 - 89) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION BUDGET REGULAR CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATION UNPAVED ROAD ALLOCATION (33.1-23.1:1) NET FUNDS FOR DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION INCIDENTAL IMPROVEMENTS NUMBERED PROJECTS: REGULAR IMPROVEMENTS UNPAVED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL ALLOCATION Date of Board of Supervisors Approval of Annual Priority Program: July 14, 1993 Date Printed: 07 -Jun -93 JULY 1, 1993 - JUNE 30, 1994 FREDERICK (34) COUNTY STAUNTON (68) DISTRICT PROJECTED FY 93-94 S 2,084,784 379,341 S 2,464,125 S 560,000 1,524,784 379,341 $ 2,464,125 SR -2A (Revised 4 - 89) SHEET 1 OF 4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JULY 1, 1993 -JUNE 30, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Frederick (34) COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM Staunton (68) DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION BUDGET DATE June 7, 1993 ------------------------------ ROUTE --------------------- I PROJECT OR I LENGTH I ITEM ----------------------------- ---------------------------- DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------- '"'""""'"""""."'"""-""'-""" I ALLOCATION I State Forces REMARKS 8003 ------------------------------- 5601 -- I Traffic and Safety ServicesI ---------------------------- Hired Equip. S 80,000 State Forces & Contract 8000 5603 I --------------------------------------------------------------- I - � - --------------------------- Rural Addition TO: 0.05 MS Rt 714 ------- I 5,000 --------------------------- 1 State Forces/Hired Equipment 8005 - 5604 I -- -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- I -- I Pipe Installation TC: 3203 --------------------------------------------- 15,000 1 State Forces 8012 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5605 I Survey and Preliminary Engineering I 45,000 State Forces 8014 5606 1 I -- I Fertilization and Seeding --- --------------I----------------- 20,0001 State ------------- Forces ------------------------ -------------------------------------------I------------ - 1 I 8015 I 5607 I -- I District Design Support I 55,000 I State Forces ----------------------------------------------------- 0604 Gravel Spgs Rd 5300 0.15 Mi. Relocate Int. 35 000 Hired Equip. FR: 0.10 MN Rt 714 TC: 365 TO: 0.05 MS Rt 714 0622 Cedar Ck Grd 5301 ---------------pp-y------------.--------------------------- 1.54 Mi. A l Plant Mix? ------------------------•-----.._.._...._._.. 80,000 Contract TC: 3203 e 6 FR: Rte 621 TO: Rte 620 ----------------------------------------- 8 Rabbit Road 5302 ----------------------------------------------- 0.10 Improve Interseciton - ----------------------------- 30,000 Hired Equip. TC: 66 FR: Rte 631 TO: 0.10 MN Rte 631 SR -2A (Revised 4 _�) SHu 2 OF 4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JULY 1, 1993 -JUNE 30, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Frederick (34) COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM Staunton (68) DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION BUDGET DATE June 7, 1993 -------------------------------- ROUTE I -------------------------------- PROJECT OR I ITEM LENGTH I DESCRIPTION ----- --"---""-"'""" I ALLOCATION " " " '"'" " " " " - "'-- REMARKS 0659 Valley Mill Rd 6029 -- ---------------------------------------- Replace One Lane Concrete Bridge AT: 0.30 ------------'------- 110 000 __ --------------------------- State Forces & Hired Equip. TC: 451 MSW Rte 7 ---------------------------- 0681 Ch'nut Gry Rd 5303 ------------------------------------------------- 0.28 Install 3 Pipe Overflows ---------------------------------------------- 70 000 Hired Equip./State Forces TC: 62 FR: 0.82 MN Rt 685 TO: 1.10 MN Rte 685 ----------------------------- 81 Ch'nut Gry Rd 5304 2.70 Mi Spot Widen Various Locations ----..D 15 000 State Forces-------------------------------------- TC: 62 FR: Rte 685 TO: Rte 690 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL INCIDENTAL IMPROVEMENTS S 560,000 SR -2A (Revised 89) _T3OF4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JULY 1, 1993 '-JUNE 30, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Frederick (34) COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM Staunton (68) DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION BUDGET DATE June 7, 1993 ---------------------------- ROUTEI PROJECT OR ITE M - - I LENGTH DESCRIPTION I ____________ I ALLOCATION REMARKS I------------- ------------------- 0661 --- 034-140, ----------------- 2.20 Mi ------------------------------------------------------ FR: 0.11 MN - Rte - 663 --"------------ '--`"-"----"- FAS C502 TO: 0.05 MN Rte 686Additional Financing Welttown Pike Reconstruct Existing Road 954,143 Contract TC: #1 808 PRIORITY Estimated Cost = 2,300,014 Federal Aid PPMS #2734 Previous Allocation = 1,345,871 - -- -------- --- " ---------------- Future Funds = 0 0656 034-118, 1.04 Mi ------- -------:-------------------------------------- FR: Rte 657 --------------------- " ""-" " '""""- FAS C502 Rte 659 Additional Financing Greenwood Rd Reconstruct Existing Road 535 641 Contract TC: 1380 PRIORITY #2 Estimated Cost = 1,603,235 Federal Aid Previous Allocation = 71,894 ------------------------------ PPMS #3890 ------------------------------------ Future Funds = 995,700 0600 FAS 034-214, C501 1.72 Mi ------------------- FR: 0.01 MNE Rte 50 -"" Additional Financing Hayfield Rd TO. 1.07 MNE Rte 679 Reconstruct Existing Road 35 000 Contract TC: 516 Estimated Cost = 1,421,982 Federal Aid Previous Allocation = 1,386,982 PPMS #8684 ------------------------------- Future Funds = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Completed - TOTAL REGULAR NUMBER PROJECTS S 1,524,784 SR -2A (Revised , 89) Sr,tET 4 OF 4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JULY 1, 1993 -JUNE 30, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Frederick (34) COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM Staunton (68) DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION BUDGET DATE June 7, 1993 - ----- - I ROUTE - ------ --- ------------ -------------------------- PROJECT OR LENGTH ITEM - I- - ---------------------------------- I DESCRIPTION """"'""'""" I ALLOCATION " "" " '- " "" -"--------- REMARKS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I------------------------------ 0734 Non FAS 034 P83 1.55 Mi. FR: Rte. 522 --- ---------------------------- Sleepy Crk*Rd N501 T0: 1.55 MS Rt. 522 Grade, drain, surface treat 155,607 Contract TC: 85 Priority #1 (UNPAVED) Estimated Cost = Previous Allocation = 387,322 State Funds PPMS #:3418 Future Funds = 231,715 Unpaved Road Funds -------- ------- -- -- ------- - -------- 0 0649 034-P22, 1.80 Mi ---1 FR: Rtee 64 648 --------------------------------- Non FAS Springdale Rd N501 TO: Rte 625 223,734 Contract TC: Grade, drain, surface treat Priorityy #2 (UNPAVED) Estimated Cost = Previous Allocation = 700' 000 State Funds PPMS #11239 --------------------------------- Future Funds = 0 476,266 Unpaved Road Funds TOTAL UNPAVED NUMBERED PROJECTS 379,341 CONSTRUCTION GRAND TOTAL S 2,074,029 l August 25, 1993 Mr. Evan Wyatt Planning and Development 9 North Loundon St. Winchester, Va. 22601 Dear Mr. Wyatt, v ;l and Mrs. Roger DeHav e n '`4506-1 N. Frederick Pike Winchester, Va. 22603 703 888 1462 I appreciated talking with you August 20, 1993. I am glad Mrs. Sherwood referred me to you. A am writing about Rt. 682. We have 75 acres of land on Rt. 682. We are waiting for the deeds to .to completed by our lawyer, giving our three children each a lot. Anita D. Bartell, Robin D. Malone , and Jonathan B. DeHaven will each have 4.117 acres. We bought this property in Oct. of 1986. At the time we bought it we were told that the people in the Country Squire Estates were told that the road was to be widen and black topped. We built there in 1990. W6 love it there. The only problem is the narrow road with the sharp turns. Last summer our daughter in law had just dropped our 8 month old granddaughter, and was on her way home. She had an accident on the turn just before the creek. Thank God she or the other man was not hurt. They both were over to far as they rounded the turn. It is almost impossible to not be over in the other persons lane on the narrow -road. One day last summer I was coming home and saw a women leading a horse up the middle of 682. Her truck could not pull the hill with the horse on behind. It keptspinning on the rough road. At the foot of the hill was her truck, sitting right in the road. When I got to the bottom of the hill, a man had stopped to help. Thank goodness, because I would have to have went around on the wrong side of the truck. This summer I was going down the hill, car in low gear, going about 10 miles per hour. YOU CAN"T GO ANY FASTER. The road was so rough that I started sliding as I Got to the bottom. There was no one coming or I could not have stopped. The road gets like a wash board. Going'up , the tires dig all the way up. A few weeks ago, I was starting down the hill, before I got to the bottom, I met a man. He was coming around the turn so fast +-hat he slide. He would have hit me if I had met him on the turn. We can watch for lights at night, but that doesn't help during the day. Page 2. Last year I was coming down the road and met my neighbor, Mary Ellen DeHaven, I pulled off in a wide spot to let her pass. She was on her side as for as she could get and slide off in a ditch. we tried to get her out. I took her and her baby home. She had to have her car towed out of the ditch. Please understand that I am not complaining about the road crew at Cross Junction. They do the best they can. Money is being th-rowed away, because each month thet have to come over and work on the hili. Theis another really bad turn on past the sub division. It is really a blind turn. I do not know how the school bus gets around those blind turns. We would love to have the road paved, but please take care of the narrow road and dangerous curves. I know that my husband and I will gladly give the land to improve the road. Thank you for you attention to this matter. Better S. DeHaven Roger DeHaven The address on Rt. 682 is currently; 566 Glaize Orchard Rd We are now living back on 522 N. until our house there sells and then we are coming back to 682. Our address is 4506-1 N. Frederick Pike, Winchester, Va. 22603 WE ARE RESIDENTS ON T. 682. WE HAVE READ AND A EE WITH THE LETTER WRITTEN BY BhiYY AND ROGER DeHAVEN. WE ALoO WANT TO SEE THE ROAD IMPROVED. PLEASE WIDEN THE ROAD AND TAKE OUT THE DANGEROUS CURVES. n i.J NAME: r ADDRESS: ca A -Q_ Au ol JJOw o7 U,aNc 3$ C - 5 i U -e- Z Z v Ae J �� GU V� 0 u7<4 Cc 2 L-r5of--- C)K- 226c 3 '7S- iZt�z:h, WE ARE RESIDEN`_ ON RT. 682. WE HAVE READ J AGREE WITH THE LETTER WRITTEN BY BETYY AND ROGER DeHAVEN. WE ALSO WANT TO SEE THE ROAD IMPROVED. PLEASE WIDEN THE ROAD AND TAKE OUT THE DANGEROUS CURVES. NAME: ADDRESS: q �d fj�,d /4- 50��t,,O 3 /U :3/0 �l �z� prcGiarCi cI Grimm.. (/ i9 Z V � r August 4, 1993 RD6EN ACRWWs AKC ROTTWEILERS BOARDING KENNELS AND STABLES Mr. Evan Wyatt Frederick County Planning Department 9 North Loudoun Street Post Office Box 601 Winchester, Va 22604 Dear Mr. Wyatt: This correspondence is to confirm our telephone conversation on 3/4/93 at 3=4S PM regarding State Route 836 in Frederick County. mz I discussed with you, I have been dealing with Mr. William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer with the Department of Transportation in Edinburg, Va. Mr. Bushman has instructed me that the next step in the process of facilitating reconstruction and improvements to State Route 836 to a hard surfaced facility rests with the approval of the Transportation Committee. Based on the response received from Mr. Bushman and our telephone conversation of 8/4/93 I would respectfully request that you bring before the Transportation Committee in Frederick County a request to add State Route 836 to the Frederick County Road Plan for a hard surfaced addition. This request is made in behalf of all the residents and business owners on and along this route and the justification for the addition is based on the following. Traffic on State Route 836 is steadily increasing. There are now seven families which use this road daily to gain access to their homes. At the end of this month there will be ten businesses located on this Route. The families include The Roberts, Williams, Pooles, Braggs, Andersons, Hollers, Rudolphs. The Kellys are additional property owners who plan to move to the area in the near future making a total of eight families who will have homes on this Route= MARK & CHERYL ANDERSON Located on Route 836 o P.O. Box 220 • Stephenson, Virginia 22656 0 (703) 667-7809 The businesses located on and at the end of this Route include Max's TV, Fryes Quarry, Burleson Cattle Farm, Aberdeen Acres Inc., Justice Inc., North and South Real Estace Company, T and T Vending Company Inc., Williams Construction Company. At the end of August 1993 a Doctor of Veterinarian Medicine will have a new practice located at Aberdeen Acres Pet Care Center and Invisible Fencing of Apple Country is in the process of negotiating for office space at Aberdeen Acres. This will bring the total to ten businesses located on this Route. Even though the State does its best to maintain this road it stays in poor condition. It is now coming to the point that clients and customers are complaining about its condition_ As a last note I am concerned about the safety of the motoring public on this route. As I explained in my correspondence to Mr. Bushman on April 13, 1993, with the increase of horse trailers in and out of Aberdeen Acres the road in its -present condition is simply not suitable for this traffic without extreme caution having to be used at all times to prevent an accident. F along with all the other parties concerned would respectfully request to address the board or the committee should any additional information be needed or if approval is going to be questionable. Since you were not a recipient of copies of the correspondence from Mr. Bushman to me I have enclosed a copy for your review and your files. We would certainly appreciate your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Mark D. Anderson Vice President AKC ROTTWEILERS 'klll� )ACRJVPQ BOARDING KENNELS AND STABLES April 13, 1993 ,William H. Bushman, P,E. Resident Engineer Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation F.O. Lox 278 Edinburg, V.q 22824 gear Mr. Bushman; This letter is predicated on the condition of State Foute 836 in Freaer�._k County Virginia. This secondary road is one that gets a terrific amour;' of traffic on a daily basis from not only the families that resice at �_.-e %f the road but also from business patrons of Aberdeen Acre= Tnc., gin,- stice Inc. As my wife Cheryl Anderson has corresponded with you _efo this road sees sometimes 60 or 70 cars daily depending, on the time -f r It now however is increasing at a steady pace due to the growth of nth businesses. -,ue to the wet conditions we have experienced over th.e last f, ---w mon*_ _s e road is in serious need of repair. 1 receive complaints on a Bail- o _ from our clients regarding the way it is maintained. These c.ient: rin_: increasingly difficult to bring their- automobiles back Route t-36 fc•r r—, of damage from all the deep pot holes, and the lack cf gravei whic�: 3_i_: the mud to pull vehicles off the side of the road when two vehicle:: me - The road anyway is just barely wide enough for two vehicles to pas an - with the shape it is in now it becomes almost impossi:31e to pass �_ne ve=hicle having t- ;o in a ditch. There are now seven families which use this road to gain access to te:: homes. There are six businesses now located on this road. They the Burleson Cattle Farm, Freys Quarry, Max's TV, Aberdeen Acres Inc., Justice Inc., and North and South Real Estate Company. There are additional property owners in excess of the seven which now have horl� located on or at the end of the road. There are plans to increase the L and for an additional business development off chis road thi_ xe_i:. MARK & CHERYL ANDERSON Located on Route 836 0 P.O. Box 220 • Stephenson, Virginia 22656 ® (703) 667-7809 I would first respectfully request that the road be repaired as soon a-17- possible �possible and that it be brought to a. standard which will accommodate tie amount of traffic the road now sees without going into the need for ,ecai. a week or two after the repairs are made. This has been the case for the past few years now. I realize that you must operate within the guidelines of certain budget limitations and that there must be a cert<in amount of money allotted for secondary road repair but I would think i`. would be more cost effective to bring this road to a standard whi•.;h wo.,ld not allow it to become to a state of repair condition so often. Anoth--r problem with this road when it is repaired is that it is simply nut wi, enough for two large vehicles to pass without diffic.,ulty. With the increase of horse trailers in and out of Aberdeen Acres the road is si,,pl�- not suitable for this traffic without extreme caution having to b use--, a, - ail times to prevent an accident. Recently a horse trailer nearly upset while trying.to pass another trailer which would have caused several valued at over $100,000.00 to have been placed in a very dangerous-jos_tir_.Z. had the trailer turned on its side. Secondly I would request that you provide me with information with w-i•_h the families and businesses on this route would need to comply with and complete in order to request and have the State come in and widen, pave, and extend this 1 mile stretch of road. It is my understanding that al c time the State maintained an additional 300 feet east of where it now, stops. The property owners and businesses would like to know what_ need to be taken to have this again extended to that location where road forks to two private roads. I sincerely thank you for your efforts in the past with attempting to :,eep this route suitable for all who live and do business on it. I really thin now is the time to consider taking steps to alleviate the maintenance problem the road will undoubtedly need routinely due to the increase in volume of business now conducted on it and the additional families_ using it. Sincerely, Mark D. Anderson Vice President ;may, COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER Mr. Mark D. Anderson, C/O Aberdeen Acres P. O. Box 220 Stephenson, VA 22656 Dear Mr. Anderson: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O'BOX 278 EDINBURG,22824 Vice President April 20, 1993 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(703)984-4133 FAX(703)984-9761 Ref.: Route 836 Frederick County Thank you for your letter of April 13, 1993 concerning the condition of Route 836 and the possibility of future improvements to it. Regarding the first questions, we too are aware of the serious problems on the stabilized road system in Frederick County as a result of the extreme weather conditions experienced this past winter. The amount of moisture which we have received has severely affected roads such as Route 836. Recognizing these extraordinary conditions, we have taken what we feel are special efforts to restore these roads to more serviceable conditions. Our graders are working six (6) days a week and most of the crews are working five (5) ten hour days in an effort to get the road system back to a more reasonable maintenance state. The second item you requested in your letter was relative to what was needed to have this road be considered for improvement, reconstruction, and hardsurfacing. We need to have an indication. from the property owners on this section of road that they are in agreement to donate the rigt-of-way necessary to reconstruct Route 836 as a hardsurfaced facility. This would generally entail a 50' wide right-of-way with a roadway pavement of approximately 20' with 4' to 6' width for shoulders on each side and appropriate ditches for drainage. This information which must be unanimous of all the property owners involved should be forwarded to the Frederick County Planning Department, Attention: Mr. Evan Wyatt. It can then be brought to the attention of the Transportation Committee at the appropriate time. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Mr. Mark D. Anderson, Vice President April 20, 1993 Page Two The issue of extending this road further to the point where it forks into two (2) private roads, involves as best I can recollect a subdivision of properties. I am not clear on that and I do not remember when Route 836 was shortened as you indicate in your letter. There are circumstances which would allow the road to be extended, but they would have to looked at carefully. By the time you have received this letter the road condition of Route 836 should have been addressed. We regret the inconvenience experienced by the users of roads such as Route 836 in Frederick County. The inordinate amount of precipitation we received from mid-December through mid-March took its toll. We appreciate your patience in dealing with those conditions. If you have additional questions about these matters or others, please do not hesitate to let me know. Since 1 , William H. Bushman, P.E. Transportation Resident Engineer WHB/sg xc: Mr. R. D. Hawkins, Jr. July 20, 1993 AKC ROTTWEILERS W1 'ItIlk I �� BOARDING KENNELS AND STABLES William H. Bushman, P.E. Resident Engineer Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Va 22824 Dear Mr. Bushman: Thank you for your prompt attention to my last letter dated April i-, _ in relation to questions regarding the upgrading of State Route rrederick County, Virginia. Since my last letter there have been additional businesses locateorf road. First of all I inadvertently left off my last list william Construction and Braggs vending service when I drafted my last correspondence to you. A Doctor of Veterinarian medicine is now in th-- process of opening for business at Aberdeen Acres. Invisible fencing c.r Apple Country is also in the process of negotiating for office space at Aberdeen Acres. This will bring the total to ten businesses located ort: this highway. After receiving your response dated April 20, 1993 I along with otters this roadway mounted a campaign and have approached everyone we think wci r be involved in this project. There is a strong desire of all concerne(I request this project be undertaken. At this point there is no oppositior: by any of the property owners which we think would be involved in donacir-!j right-of-way for the improvement. Based on the last paragraph of your letter to me, there is one question which we would like addressed prior to going to the Frederick County Planning Commission. How much right-of-way does the State currents; have from Route 11 traveling east on State Route 836, to where the first sprin_ crosses under the roadway just east of Long Last Farm, the Robertson property. MARK & CHERYL ANDERSON Located on Route 836 0 P.O. Box 220 0 Stephenson, Virginia 22656 • (703) 667-7809 We would respectfully request that at your earliest convenience- yoi. authorize the right-of-way staked between these two poinrs to show ,n: the boundaries would have to be if this project is approved ror construction. We have done some research but are not ausc•lutely st, = the location of the current boundaries. We would ask this be <ompl 'I,- show the property owners on both sides of the current read as it nr,w __ between these two points, just how much of their propf_rty would be LnV(D_ i:( if this project is approved. As far as we know there may be no need f ; any further conveyance of property, if adequate right-of-way cur-rer; i� exists. Again I thank you for your sincere efforts in assistif-IC is with th matter_ Sincerely, Mark D. Anderson Vice President ` COUNTY of FREDERICK Board of Supervisors Richard G. Dick - Chairman 703/665-5666 W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Vice Chairman Shawnee District James. L. Longerbeam Back Creek District Patricia Shell 151 Milhon Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Ms. --Shell: August 3, 1993 Robert M. Sager Opequon District Beverly J. Sherwood Gainesboro District Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. Stonewall District I am in receipt of your letter to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting bridge and road repairs. Please be advised that this correspondence has been forwarded to Evan Wyatt, Planner II, in the Office of Planning and Development, to be forwarded to the Frederick County Transportation Committee for discussion. Once this has been presented to the Transportation Committee, staff from the Planning Office will contact you as to the results of the meeting. Sincerely, Beverly J. Sherwood Supervisor, Gainesboro District BJS/tjp cc: Evan Wyatt, Planner II 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester. VA 22601 Winchester. VA 22604 I COUNTY of FREDERICK tsoara or supervisors Richard G. Dick - Chairman 703/665-5666 W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Vice Chairman Shawnee District James. L. Longerbeam Back Creek District August 3, 1993 Della Dunlap 1352 Wardensville Grade Winchester, VA 22602 Dear Ms.. -Dunlap: Robert M. Sager Opequon District Beverly J. Sherwood Gainesboro District Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. Stonewall District I am in receipt of your letter to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting bridge and road repairs. Please be advised that this correspondence has been forwarded to Evan Wyatt, Planner II, in the Office of Planning and Development, to be forwarded to the Frederick County Transportation Committee for discussion. Once this has been presented to the Transportation Committee, staff from the Planning Office will contact you as to the results of the meeting. Sincerely, Beverly J. Sherwood Supervisor, Gainesboro District BJS/tjp cc: Evan Wyatt, Planner II 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 July , 1993 Winchester, Virginia Dept. of Transportation Highway Safety Commission Richmond, VA 23219 To Whom it May Concern: I'm writing this on our behalf along with the following residents who reside within the same locality as we do. This letter is written to advise your office of several safety hazards that exist now and have been for some time. There are 5 bridges, 2 of which is deteriorated to a point where I'm sure is a safety hazard, and 3 are in a desperate need of repairs. There has been no work 4done on these bridges or highway approximately within the last 5 years. Also the roads are very narrow and several bad curves with no center lines for traffic and the shoulders of the road are very high and all broken off, very dangerous. There has been several accidents within the last couple of years where several people have been killed. This highway is heavily traveled by residents and school buses, etc. The location of this area is located on Route 50 west to Route 608 to Route 55 in Winchester, VA. Attention: 616 which was called Armels Hill now new address is McDonald Road needs a guard rail coming down the hill to 608, very bad curve and high bank. I hope you or your office will give this matter some attention. Thanking you Sincerely, Patricia Shell 151 Milhon Lane Winchester, (Frederick Co.) Virginia 22602 Della Dunlap 1352 Wardensville Grade Winchester, VA. 22602 1Vnly)L S-t-V�-,O ,cc �G A nl�r�c-�ss ,�— ��v 3;y S 36� 3�3 30� 3�s 1?7 i7 /mak i S77 d4) 1�- c`cA-(��eS7`cf �i 7-2 / LGK,C�LJj / %j GCJa-e-�.6,2� SCJhQ 4� boy q�� 11 1 tl r 0070 // r < < It Q - - '-- .G7 a (4- so—z-, ze, L5 -�� rG &,wes7e% 3sF--- pis W -10A coca h�( GU � ke- 6L7-tj� X 4Lj. - - Ajaxgs� _ q.o 3a 3, A 31, a Rox-7/e)-7 �,/(�.iL •C4/(,Z.�j. SUS. 64-f /I�f -L�� ntJ c►��Q LfJfvl2c'ft2��.CZ ez— 3 s -c -,L9 %� . � moo• �c�� t:3 �,�� : �liK JG �J Xg -�'7 lee Ile ti fdv v 7� YA ,�1/�.c,-441--J i 3 4c, w 13 L-2 r� 98 a� aL��/. I1 z C Css ew y 02C t J kd Qct 1 ~� +tom P-, e � � t • � f� Si f1 �l S _ ITEM #2 Proposed Road Connection Between Valley Mill Road and Berryville Pike The Frederick County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have reviewed proposals for residential development along the Valley Mill Road area over the last several months. As you know, the Valley Mill Road area contains several residential neighborhoods at this time. This road is experiencing a decreased level of service, and its intersection with Route 7, east of Winchester is not designed well. Master Development Plans have been submitted for to new multifamily developments between Dowell J. Howard Vocational Center and the Brookland Heights townhouse subdivision. This property has been zoned for this type of development for several years; therefore, the availability of proffers or the option of plan denial does not exist. The Board of Supervisors have directed the developers to propose a solution to this problem. The Board has also asked that the Transportation Committee consider this proposal and provide a recommendation to the Board. Mr. Charles E. Maddox of Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates will address the committee during this meeting. Enclosed is a plan that proposes a connection from Valley Mill Road to Berryville Pike. This plan generally conforms with the Eastern Road Plan that is part of the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. Staff asks that the committee consider Mr. Maddox's proposal and provide a recommendation regarding this matter. 8 J ' • 1 u: _ �= EY G a ." \ �., .,,_: Qom/ - _ _ `� 04 , -o 1 « • �:. .,Y m..w + C L L 6 - 1 i / __ lam' ! i I 00 • • • • • _fir 1 � -. A • E - ` \Ra .� .tea:,.--...-< .... f \ L F T, .� - 1 (/ p• • • •• • , // •� - b. �i��; I ./ - '\ tom- _ -_�SOIV • 1 �� - \. �/? it `1 r� / _ �� _ -L! �`` .rAd� •~ '(iii' `\� ! O^ Il\ / •- j • d � •1 irr r1 �✓,—fin_ 0 /; ; `, _. ;.'i � �i , /�l ' '� � ! 1< ii/f,/`=e='I \ 1 � � . -v • •\';DEVELOPMENT CO • lwIET . LJ •• � • V--��.f> �. r �':a _. _ `• _ ,�4 'L } { -a_ �� q� - 'iF'® �f �7 r Yr.7. _�~ / L / / / / • • may` /' �� - _ •• _ �:-. �, a-_ s - � � .e,�'>i "/+._ I �� - ra '^ 1�, // ®_ --� • �� ,GESTATES _ ..�� .�> . ��; - � � � � „ -� ; i;� � � �� • REGENCY LAKES ESTATES /•_.I 690. > _ �li''I �� ~�� / • II' 1`\Q ,ice p I:i -.. - �4i �/ •_3�; �l /� i �- �' . IFf � �� '� CALEB HEIGHTS �� _ t r �' I - • ��' A" -f , _f.. -,- � � f \\ q l j\\t)\ • • u .;r,%T �` I ` f`" r � 11��.: 1 ``'�' `�. r'� ,. •• •• •• • =>." ',. '1? • BROOKLAND- �i, • • • • _ ` TOWNHOUSESALL 3 �ai�.-U+ FREDERICK HEIGHTS w f;'y'`— —�� I� `1,T^� / r► ,4� ,ems • �-. ``• it �/ .10 i • • •- r ;%� O Z _ _ _ _ _ • - i,�,Y---'s :moi_; I , - • a it I v ♦••• • !�� i •J•• • •• • • / i ._,' ' / • r l! • � I • �. - Q �T'��/ � �i � A O _ -_ • O � �% I II ♦ • • 1 • +Y� ► •- ASA - •'- � � • • � a �� i ' f - ' PO an- \ V - • •• �` ♦, O , �i' �. • . lel• 'j — •. rl - • • • • • - U' , '� • a r ' - ;,� _ -- —� -ter _, r� 1 • �ti� F i} � � —� . _\ ._ % ;i: :� • • i �•, °pro z:E«sloxs JOB NO. VALLEY MILL AREA Scale dote deecrtytion by ckd. Gilbert �' I1,�• cord and associates, Iite. TRANSPORTATION PLAN tsHSoo' .- - - - - -- - ---- - DESIGNED BY: C.E.M. DRAWN BY, Engineers Land Planners Surveyors Frederick County, Virginia OF .PPROVED BY:C.E.M. 150-C ❑la'e Gree'�,C:;-' Dr, 200 North Car-.erom St, � j FrederiC�sburg, `;'sry;�;� _�-C.. Winchester, Vlrgn;a :22601 0 LEGEND EXISTING ROAD IMPROVED MAJOR ARTERIAL IMPROVED MINOR ARTERIAL IMPROVED MAJOR COLLECTOR IMPROVED MINOR COLLECTOR NEW MAJOR ARTERIAL NEW MINOR ARTERIAL NDN NEW MAJOR COLLECTOR NEW MINOR COLLECTOR No;�J z 67 3 r 0 ro ro 6;,g 6?9 p1b;r` co Co 4 0 617 \ �� 2l 43 °0n6 N 11 w6 cr1, 9°� �`N°NE51Ea Cc a �O fa ' O N d � ( 627 OPeQ�O" 672 � �R0 � CO) 'Ov 810 6 C� fo Co i i 4b arr0^� � � 732 649 66 4� m. ^ m/ 9 2g 629 ' 1 I 629 i SSEYNENS 2l N 631 FREEvEERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT EASTERN' ROAD PLAN UCer of � C s \ 836 61 C'earbrook Run 666 e,5Or 66q � j6\ 7 I. 16\ 660 661 ® Lick 0048*#A-66/ Red Bud___, 6q E,6\6� Run p I1 DIST ? �� NEE: DIST• cc os h Greek �0 F n %J/ f Al� m a� 924 �Co It �®w ®%82 Co 78i 0 �S S. 655 Rury�i �- �iph SPr�rO D?2_ 64S w\nch05ket A/2\-71 • + ?/ W -i85 / Buf/o%yj 2un �p Lick cgs y 645 � 6144 mt �7 OTHER Mrs. Glenda Madigan addressed the Transportation Committee during the August meeting to discuss safety concerns at the intersection of Route 641, Route 640, and Sherando Lane. As a follow-up to this discussion, staff has provided the committee with correspondence from VDOT and Frederick County. Included under this agenda item is a letter from William H. Bushman, dated August 10, 1993, and a letter from our department dated September 8, 1993. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development September 8, 1993 Mrs. Glenda Madigan 1049 Double Church Road Stephens City, Virginia 22655 RE: Virginia Department of Transportation Letter Dated August 10 1993 Dear Mrs. Madigan: 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 This letter is in response to our conversation regarding safety concerns at the intersection of Double Church Road and Sherando Lane. As you know, the Frederick County Transportation Committee discussed this situation in August. Since that meeting, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has studied this area and responded to the Transportation Committee. Enclosed is a copy of the letter addressed to Mr. Don Taylor from Mr. William Bushman for your records. Mr. Bushman has stated that the best solution for this situation is to relocate the entrance of Sherando Lane so that it aligns with Grim Road (Route 640). Mr. Bushman believes that this will improve visibility for all vehicle patterns in this area. The relocation of the entrance of Sherando Lane can not be included on the Frederick County Six Year Secondary Road Plan because it is a private lane. However, VDOT has offered to pay for the cost associated with utility relocations if this entrance is relocated by others. During our conversation, you stated that you did not believe that the property owner would be willing to allow for Sherando Lane to be relocated. I will be willing to meet with the property owners on behalf of the Transportation Committee to discuss possible solutions to this situation. I will provide all committee members with a copy of this letter. Please contact me to let me know if I may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II enclosure cc: Frederick County Transportation Committee 9 forth Loudoun Strcct P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 C'0 AMONWEALTH of ` 1RQ1NIA ' y7 �, J ' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER August 10, 1993 RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(703)984-4133 FAX(703)984-9761 Mr. Don Taylor, Chairman Ref.: Routes 640 & 641 Frederick County Transportation Committee Frederick County Route 1, Box 267 Clearbrook, VA 22624 Dear Don: I am writing you in response to the discussion at the Committee's meeting of August 2, 1993, regarding the intersection of Routes 640 and 641. To briefly summarize the situation, the citizens' complaints center on the entrance of the private subdivision on Route 641. There was unanimity of opinion, the Route 640 intersection leg posed no safety problem. We have reviewed the area. This is an area which has been the source of many complaints stretching back nearly 15 years. The entrance to the subdivision was not built under VDOT permit and is not to our minimum standards. The subdivision side of Route 641 is the source of the sight distance problems. There is an embankment which restricts visibility to the south and the vertical curve on Route 641 restricts sight distance for people traveling southbound on Route 641 in turning into the subdivision. Complicating matters further is the fact there are several utilities buried including a very large capacity telephone cable. Due to the circumstances of this very complicated area, we proposed the following: ® If some entity will reconstruct the entrance to the subdivision 50'+ to the east (to a point which is the highest point on Route 641 (directly across from Route 640) and will give users of the subdivision safe sight distance in both directions), under a VDOT permit, on right-of-way recorded for such an entrance road, then: • VDOT proposes to pay for the adjustment of all utilities necessary to allow the construction of the relocated entrance. A further condition is the right-of-way obtained for the relocated entrance should also encompass the area needed for the relocated utilities. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURt Mr. Don Taylor August 10, 1993 Page Two We do not feel we can expend public money to enhance or construct a private entrance. We do feel justified in participating in the relocation of the utilities, however, to reduce a potential accident location. We will be glad to discuss this with you and whoever else might be involved. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, William H. Bushman, P.E. ,; 1 Transportation Resident Engineer WHB/sg xc: Mr. J. A. Copp Mr. K. D. Walker Mr. K. A. Steele van �ya Iwo