HRAB 04-17-07 Meeting AgendaCOUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
MEMORANDL-IM
TO: Historic Resources Advisory Board
FROM: Lauren E. Krempa, Zoning Inspector'
RE: April Meeting Agenda
DATE: April 9, 2007
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) will be meeting on
Tuesday, April 17'h, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Executive
Session Room* in the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street,
Winchester, Virginia. The HRAB will discuss the following items:
AGENDA
1. February Minutes
2. Member Roster
3. Ervin Development Rezoning Proposal (Painter -Lewis)
4. Shady Elm Rezoning Proposal (PHR&A)
5. Willa Cather property preservation plan
6. Other
Please contact this office if you will not be able to attend the meeting. Thank you.
*PLEASE NOTE MEETING LOCATION
Access to this building is limited during the evening hours. Therefore, it will be
necessary to enter the building through the rear door of the Board Room. I would
encourage committee members to park in the county parking lot located behind the
new addition (accessible off of Cameron Street).
LEK/bad
Attachments
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 a Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB)
February 20, 2007, 6:30pm
Held in the Board of Supervisors Executive Session Room of the County
Administrative Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winrhester, VA,
Members Present: Rhoda Kriz (Chairman), Elizabeth Fravel (Vice -Chairman), Martin
Killingbeck, Virginia McClure, Mary Turner, Maral Kalbian (Consultant), Gary Oates
(Planning Commission Liaison).
Members Absent: None.
Staff. Kevin Henry, Planning Technician, Lauren Krempa, Zoning Inspector
Agenda Items: Vice -Chairman Election, January 2007 Minutes, Ervin Development
Rezoning proposal (Painter -Lewis), Willa Cather birthplace grant, meeting date change
discussion.
Other: N/A
The meeting began at 6:30 P.M. The first item of the agenda was the election of Vice
Chairman. Ms. Fravel was the only member nominated for the position. After
nominations closed, Ms. Fravel was unanimously appointed the Vice Chairman of the
HRAB.
The January 2007 minutes were unanimously approved.
The third item on the agenda for the meeting was for the HRAB to evaluate the Ervin
Development (Jeff Butler) rezoning proposal (1932 Senseny Rd.). The application was
represented by Painter -Lewis who didn't present anything, but were available for
questions. After staff gave a brief synopsis of what is proposed in the application, Ms.
Kalbian asked the applicant if they would be adverse to relocating the Greenwood School
to another portion of the parcel that isn't going to be developed. Ms. Kalbian also
suggested, that if the structure had the ability to be relocated, it could be used as an office
on the same parcel. The applicant informed the HRAB that any relocation of the school
would require a multitude of work, for something that is not guaranteed to be structurally
sound after its relocated.
Chairman Kriz asked the applicant to incorporate building material from the Greenwood
School, and use similar materials on the pharmacy structure. Chairman Kriz, Ms.
Kalbian, and Commissioner Oates suggested particulars such as: utilizing concrete block,
similar colors, and locating the school bell on the outside of the building. Ms. Fravel also
suggested that a historical marker be placed on the building, which would provide an
interpretative sign and rendering of the school.
Mr. Killingbeck reaffirmed the HRAB's decision to reuse building material from
Greenwood School, and incorporate this onto the new structure for the pharmacy, but
suggested that the applicant not relocate the school. Mr. Butler stated that Ervin
Development would not be adverse to using similar building material. Ms. Kalbian felt
that if the school were to be relocated, it should be near the Senseny/Greenwood
intersection. Ms. Kalbian also felt that it would be inappropriate to include building
materials from Greenwood School inside the pharmacy, as this was discussed
sporadically throughout the meeting.
The HRAB recommended that the historical marker that be placed on the site, be held to
standards determined appropriate by staff and Planning Commission. The HRAB had no
further comments for the applicant. Staff informed the applicants of a letter stating the
HRAB's recommendations would be prepared post -meeting and mailed to them.
The fourth item of the agenda was the Willa Cather birthplace grant opportunity. Staff
presented the work that is currently being done. Staff had invited Linda Cather
(Chairman) of the Willa Cather Foundation to support the HRAB in this effort. The
HRAB made recommendations for the different methods staff could use to persuade the
property to sell to the county. As far as land preservation funds, the HRAB gave several
options such as: ISETEA (Transportation) grants, conservation easement, and national
park grants. Ms. Linda Cather had previously proposed a sale of property as well as
conservation easement. The property owner has rejected both ideas to date. Staff
mentioned that they are currently communicating through Mr. Adrian O'Connor of the
Winchester Star, to the property owazer.
Ms. Linda Cather stated that many people had strong interests in protecting this property.
And with so many interested, staff had decided that it would be appropriate for the
HRAB to endorse this effort.
In closing notes on the fourth item, Commissioner Oates made a suggestion that rezoning
requests such as the one that was before the HRAB on the evening, should provide a
proffered amount of money to be set aside in an account that was to be used for purchase
of properties like the Willa Cather birthplace. Staff acknowledged the comment, and said
they would research the possibilities.
The final item was briefly detailed by staff. The possibility of a date change for the
meetings could not occur due to the Board of Supervisors decision to hold the meetings
on a specified date.
There being no other business the HRAB adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
HISTORIC RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD (HRAB)
Contact Information- Planning Department 540-665-5651
Rhoda Kriz (Chairman) (H)667-1663 Member -At -Large
547 Apple Pie Ridge Rd. (F)540-450-0340 Term: 01/10/2005 -
Winchester, VA 22603 (E)rkriz@visuallink.com 01/10/2009 (4 year)
Elizabeth B. Fravel (Vice) (H)869-4378 Opequon District
5211 Main St., P.O. Box 190 (W)869-4494 Term: 04/26/2005 -
Stephens City, VA 22655 (E)fravel@adelphia.net 04/26/2009 (4 year)
Martin Killingbeck (H)888-3471 Gainesboro District
678 Winding Ridge Ln.(E)mkillingbeck@therichardscorp.com Term: 04/12/2005 -
Winchester, VA 22603 04/12/2009 (4 year)
Virginia B. McClure (H)662-0452 . Shawnee District
134 McClure Way (E)redI l@adelphia.net Term: Expired on
Winchester, VA 22602 05\22\2006 (4 year)
Mary Turner Back Creek District
2344 Jones Rd. Term: 10/17/2006 -
Winchester, VA 22602 (E)Homespun1790@aol.com 10/17/2010 (4 year)
Stacey Yost (H)662-8418 Stonewall District
1031 Payne Rd. (W)662-2289 Term: 02/28/2007 -
Winchester, VA 22603 (E)theyosts@shentel.net 02/28/2011 (4 year)
Claus Bader (H)722-6578 Red Bud District
102 Whipp Dr. (W)664-1971 Term: 02/28/2007
Winchester, VA 22602 (E)csbader@adelphia.net 02/22/2010
Member -At -Large
----Vacant---- Term: Expired on
05/10/2006
Member -At -Large
----Vacant---- Term: Expired on
05/25/2006
Maral Kalbian (H)837-2081 Architectural Historian
2026 Old Chapel Rd. (E)mkalbian@verizon.net (Contract Basis)
Boyce, VA 22620
Gary Oates (H)545-7823 PC Liaison
1073 Redbud Rd. (W)667-2001
Winchester, VA 22603 (E)OatesGR@aol.com
0
0
0
Item # 3
Ervin Development Rezoning rroposai
Painter -Lewis has requested to return to the HRAB for comments on the proposed
historical sign commemorating the Greenwood School building, as discussed at the
February 2007 meeting. Included is a copy of the proposed monument to the school
house.
Representatives of the applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide
additional information on the proposed rezoning. Staff will be seeking comments from
the HRAB on the historical marker. The comments will be included in the rezoning
application package for the Ervin Development rezoning proposal when it is submitted.
PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
116 South Stewart Street
Winchester, VA 22601
March 9, 2007
Mrs. Rhoda Kriz, Chairman
Historic Resources Advisory Board
547 Apple Pie Ridge Road
Winchester, VA 22603
RE: 1932 Senseny Road Rezoning
Ervin Development
Greenwood School Monument
Dear Mrs. Kriz,
tel.:
(540)662-5792
fax:
(540)662-5793
email:
office@painterlewis.com
As a result of the February 20, 2007 meeting, the HRAB suggested various mitigations
to consider maintaining the historical resource listed above. One of the suggestions was
a historical marker placed on the site. To that end, we are enclosing a sketch of the pro-
posed monument and would like to invite your feedback.
PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. will be hosting a meeting, March 21St at 4:30pm at their offices
to review the proposed monument. Please confirm your attendance by calling 662-5792
or emailing your comments to rachel@painterlewiscom.
We look forward to hearing from you. Please feel free to contact this office if you have
any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely;
Ji I Fries
Engineering Admin. Assistant
PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C.
Enclosures
CC' Historic Resource Advisory Board Members
Kevin Henry
Frederick Co. Planning Dept.
Jeff Butler
Ervin Development
File: 0611002
PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C.
V:
Item ## 4
Shady Elm Rezoning Proposal
The Historic Resources Advisory Board has been requested to review and provide
comment on the Shady Elm rezoning proposal (office/warehouse use), which has been
submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates. The proposal seeks to rezone 58.74 acres
from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District to the B3 (Industrial Transition) Zoning
District. The property is located south of Winchester. More specifically, on the east side
of Shady Elm Road approximately 1,500 feet south of Route 37 (see location map).
The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah VallgL published by the National Park
Service, shows that a portion of the subject site is included in the battlefield study area of
the First Battle of Kernstown with portions of the site being identified as core area. The
Rural Landmarks Survey Report for Frederick County Virginia does not identify any
potentially significant structures on the property associated with this rezoning; however
the following structure is located on an adjoining property:
• Henry Carbaugh House (934-1040) — located northwest of Stephens City, the
Carbaugh House represents a typical vernacular Queen Anne -style dwelling
constructed in the early twentieth century. It still retains elements typical of the
Victorian era, including a central -front gable, decorated verge board, wooden
shingles in the gable ends, corbelled chimneys, and a Folk Victorian -style front
porch with turned spindles and brackets. The cut -away bay window on the west
end gives it a distinctive Queen Anne flavor (description from Frederick County,
Virginia: History Through Architecture).
Please find attached for your information: a map of the site; the impact analysis; and, the
proffer statement provided by the applicant. Representatives of the applicant will be
available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed
rezoning. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements
possibly impacted by the proposed development. The comments will be included in the
rezoning application package for the Shady Elm rezoning proposal when it is submitted.
Frederick County, Virginia
REZONING APPLICATION MATERIALS
FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL
OF THE
SHADY ELM
PROPERTY
Back Creek Magisterial District
November 2006
Prepared by.
Patton Harris Rust & Associates
117 E. Piccadilly Street
Suite 200
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Phone: 540-667-2139 Fax: 540-665-0493
PH
RI�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Application
II. Impact Analysis
III. Proffer Statement
IV. Agency Comments
V. Survey Plat and Deed
VI. Tax Ticket
I.
APPLICATION
REZONING APPLICATION FORM
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
To be completed by Planning Staff low
Fee Amount Paid $
Zoning Amendment Number i _ Date Received
PC Hearing Date BOS Hearing Date
The following information shall be provided by the applicant:
All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of
the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester.
1. Applicants:
Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Telephone: .(540) 667.2139
Address: 117 East Piccadilly Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
2. Property Owner (if different than above)
Name: Venture I of Winchester, LLC Telephone:
Address: 827 Armistead Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
3. Contact person(s) if other than above
Name: Patrick Sowers Telephone: (540) 667.2139
4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application.
Location Map X Agency Comments X
Plat X Fees X
Deed of property X Impact Analysis Statement X
Verification of taxes paid X Proffer Statement X
5. The Code of Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to
rezoning applications.
Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned:
Paige Manuel Mark Lynch
James Lynch
6. A) Current Use of the Property: Residential/Agriculture
B) Proposed Use of the Property: Commercial/Industrial
7. Adjoining Property: SEE ATTACHED.
8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance
from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers).
The Property is located East and adjacent to Shady Elm Road approximately
1,500 feet South of Route 37.
In order for the Planning Staff to use its capital facilities impact model, it is necessary for the
applicant to provide information concerning the specifics of the proposed use. Otherwise, the
planning staff will use the maximum possible density of intensity scenario for the proposed Zoning
District as described on page 9 of the application package.
9. Parcel Identification/Location: Parcel Identification Number: 75-A-1
Magisterial:
Fire Service:
Rescue Service:
Back Creek
Stephens City
Stephens City
Districts
High School:
Middle School:
Elementary School:
Sherando
James Wood
Orchard View
10. Zoning Change: List the acreage included in each new zoning category being requested.
Acres
Current Zoning Zoning Re uested
58.74
RA B3
58.74
Total acreage to be rezoned
2
t?. The following information should he provided according to the type of rezoning proposed:
Number of Units Proposed
Single Family Home Townhome Multi -Family
Non -Residential Lots Mobile Home Hotel Rooms
Office
Retail
Restaurant
12. Signature:
327.000
Square Footage of Proposed Uses
Service Station
Manufacturing
Flex - Warehouse
Other
327,000
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County
Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick
County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site
inspection purposes.
I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front
property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of
Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the
hearing.
I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to
the best of my (our) knowledge.
Applicant(s) V l%4INA,4` Date
Special Limited Power of Attorney
County of Frederick, Virginia
Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us
Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia,
107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601
Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395
Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We)
(Name) Venture I of Winchester, LLC (Phone) 540.667.9794
(Address) 827 Armistead St, Winchester, Virginia 22601
the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by
Instrument Number: 24270 and is described as
Tax Map Parcel 75-A-1 Subdivision:
do hereby make, constitute and appoint:
(Name) Patton Harris Rust & Associates (Phone) 540.667.2139
(Address) 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200, Winchester, Virginia 22601
To act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead with full power and
authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described
Property, including
X Rezoning (including proffers)
_ Conditional Use Permits
X Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final)
_ Subdivision
Site Plan
My attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered
conditions except as follows:
This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or
modified.
In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this day of , 200_,
Signature(s)yL. ,`'^ J ktt JL 4 G� � 4 C (4c� � , L, L C_
State of Virginia, C' /Countyof
�
Li ��l � � F9 .a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction
aforesaid, certify that he person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument personably appeared before me
and has acknowledged the same b fore me 'Vi the jurisdiction aforesaid this day ofl r—ck , 200 7 .
Jlla_�J"C . My Comurr ssion Expires:
!Votary Public
II.
IMPACT ANALYSIS
December 2006 Shady Elm Rezoning
INTRODUCTION
The 60.0 acre Shady Elm Property is comprised of a single tax map parcel identified as 75-A-1. The
Property is located adjacent to Shady Elm Road just South of Route 37 with access provided to
Route 11 by Apple Valley Road to the North and Springdale Road to the South (See Figure 1).
Currently, the subject acreage is zoned RA (Rural Areas) but bounded to the North and West by
property zoned M1 (Light Industrial) with property zoned B3 (Industrial Transition) bounding the
project site to the East (See Figure �.
The Property is located wholly within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). Recently,
Frederick County approved revised boundaries for the Urban Development Area (UDA).
Originally, the subject property was located within the UDA. With the adoption of the revised
UDA boundary, however, the Property is now located outside of the UDA boundary. The
Comprehensive Policy Plan identifies that areas located outside of the UDA but within the SWSA
boundary are intended for commercial and industrial uses.
This application seeks to rezone the Property from RA (Rural Areas) to the B3 (Industrial
Transition) zoning district. in an effort to integrate the site with the surrounding area. Rezoning the
Property from its current residential/agricultural designation to the industrial transition zoning
classification will provide for an increasingly viable commercial/industrial node that accommodates
the County's future land use goals while bolstering the County's tax base.
COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN
The Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan (EFCLRLUP) identifies industrial as the
intended land use designation for the Property and the surrounding area to the North. The site is
also located within the boundary of the Route 11 South Land Use Plan. This small a -tea land use
plan does not identify an intended land use for the Property but instead simply indicates its current
RA zoning designation. As such, the EFCLRLUP can be considered the guiding document
regarding the intended land use for the Property. A B3 (Industrial Transition) zoning designation
would be in keeping with the intended land use identified by the Comprehensive Plan.
1 of 4
FIGURE 1
ar
Q
1
,l
®
I /F%A
I '
Patton, 1
i Asso 1 1
`117
E. Picadilly•
•1
•
1 1 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
December 2006 Shady Elm Rezoning
ACCESS AND TRANSPORTATION
Currently, access to Route 11 is provided by Shady Elm Road's connection to Apple Valley Road to
the North and Springdale Road connecting Shady Elm Road with Route 11 to the South. The
majority of project generated trips will travel north through the existing industrial area of Shady
Elm.
The adopted Eastern Road Plan includes a collector road located just South of the subject property
that will connect Shady Elm Road with Route 11. This future connection would allow commercial
and industrial traffic to avoid using Apple Valley and Springdale Roads as a means of access to
Route 11 from Shady Elm Road. The Applicant has proffered a 50 foot right of way dedication
along the southern property line and to construct a minimum of 800 feet of a two lane collector
road to help implement the Eastern Road Plan. The Eastern Road Plan also calls for Shady Elm
Road to be a major collector. The Applicant has proffered sufficient right of way to along the
Property's frontage with Shady Elm Road to provide for this improvement.
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for this application using composite data collected from
other studies in the area as well as actual traffic counts. Using traffic generation figures from the
I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition, the TIA projects that the proposed development will
produce 3,562 vehicle trips per day (VPD). The TIA uses two scenarios to analyze the impact of the
proposed rezoning on the subject area street system. Both scenarios indicate that background traffic
alone necessitates the same improvements as the combination of background traffic and project
build out.
Scenario A assumes access is provided by the existing road network with Apple Valley Road
providing access to the North and Springdale Road providing access to the South. Using this
scenario, 80 percent of the trips would utilize the northern connection where Shady Elm Road
meets Apple Valley Road with the remaining 20 percent of the trips utilizing the Springdale Road —
Route 11 intersection. The identified improvements needed to keep the transportation system
operating at a Level of Service (LOS) C or better include the following:
- Additional northbound and southbound through lanes for Route 11 at Apple Valley Road.
- Signalization of Springdale Road — Route 11 Intersection.
2 of 4
December 2006 Shady Elm Rezoning
Scenario B assumes access provided by the future connection of Shady Elm Road directly to Route
11 as intended by the Easter Road Plan. While this may be the ultimate transportation system
utilized for access to the site, it is very likely that such a connection will not a occur for some time
until issues regarding additional right of way and a rail road crossing south of the Property are
addressed. Under Scenario B, the same improvements found under Scenario A would be needed
where Route 11 intersects Apple Valley Road and Springdale Road. In addition, a signal would be
needed at the intersection of the new collector road and Route 11.
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES
The site does not contain conditions that would preclude or substantially hinder development
activities. The Property does not contain any areas of steep slopes, stream channels, flood plain, or
wetlands. Verification of wetland data would be provided through a wetland delineation which
would be required and completed during the master plan phase of the development process
The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County Virginia indicates that the soils
comprising the subject parcels fall under the Frederick-Poplimento-Oaklet soil association. Such
geology is prevalent on land located West of Interstate 81 and accommodates commercial and
industrial development as evidenced by development on surrounding parcels.
Drainage leaves the site to the East where it meets a drainage divide which directs drainage
approximately 3,000 feet South into Opequon Creek. A lack of steep slopes on the 60.0 acre site
result in little to no issues associated with drainage (See Figure 3).
SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND WATER SUPPLY
Water service can be provided to the Property by two different scenarios. The first option is to
connect to the existing 8" water main on Prosperity Drive, east of the site. The second option is to
connect to the existing 12" water main in the Dawson Industrial Park. Assuming a water
consumption rate of 500 gpd/acre, water demand for the site would be 30,000 gallons per day.
3 of 4
FIGURE 3
December 2006 Shady Elm Rezoning
Sewer service would be provided to the site by connection via force main to tap into the existing 6"
force main at the Dawson Industrial Park. Sewer flows would be roughly equivalent to the
projected water consumprion of 30,000 gallons per day.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
The following table shows a projection of solid waste generation as a part of this project.
Development T e
Area (Square ft
Waste Generation
Total Waste lbs
Office Park
327,000
.051bs/s .ft.
16,350
Warehouse
327,000
.01 lbs/sq ft.
3,270
TOTAL 19,620
Solid waste would be transferred by private carrier and deposited at the County landfill.
HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES
The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify any structures of historic
importance on the subject site. Moreover, pursuant to the National Park Service Study of Civil War
Sites in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, the subject site is not included in any battlefield study
area and" does not contain any core battlefield resources.
IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES
The commercial and industrial nature of the proposed rezoning results in a net positive fiscal
impact.
4 of 4
'"-I - .-7k'M%rlqw
e �
.a*fir � `�•�''"� �.{�yL't` w �'� r � ..�• ��� � �.� �.
i'. .rte ;; *R y. ..... ,..,,. ��. �sr � i e �iy �� • rr +!y A�•A w r
-, Vf
lorp
Wag -2 n•'. kih � � M" rte.+ IM, �„
J
Ax
, Nv
-16
.01
� , �� , ;��' .� � � - � •�+ ,?+ _ � �+��• ►- ,a�r9� ,�4 a . �'� `:�s.#!d •r • d �: j '"r :rim-'
MY,w
- is ..r= ,� • .
5L ..d
mtwe
11
• L �
4 ar . � s
Y
04-06-2007
•
J
Item # 5
Willa Cather Property Preservation
The following is an update on the Willa Cather birthplace proceedings that have taken
place since the last HRAB meeting when this item was merely in the preliminary stages.
Since this time, Chairman Kriz, Mr. Adrian O'Connor of the Winchester Star, and
Planning Staff (Mr. Henry & Ms. Krempa) met with property owner Mr. Charles Brill.
Mr. Brill's intentions of selling the property were made clear in the meeting and he has
given the County the option to continue trying to find monetary support through Federal
grants to purchase the property.
Staff has been in contact with the Federal government. The grants that are available for
this property are all in the form of matching grants. Since the County is not going to
provide any match, it will be incumbent upon the HRAB to find private funding sources.
To aid the HRAB in identifying funding sources, Planning Staff is continuing efforts with
the federal and state government to help organize the grant proposal. At this point staff is
asking the HRAB to provide comments or suggestions for funding the purchase of the
property.