CPPC 02-12-07 Meeting AgendaCOUNTY of FREDERICK
i�
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
TO: Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS)
FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Director
RE: February 12, 2007 Meeting and Agenda
DATE: February 5, 2007
The Frederick County Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will be meeting on
Monday, February 12 2007 at 7:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisor's Room of the County
Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. The CPPS will discuss the
following agenda items:
AGENDA
1) Discussion of subcommittee work program priorities for 2007. Staff is seeking input
from the CPPS regarding the work program for 2007. A draft CPPS work program
priority list is attached.
2) Discussion of the update to the Community Facilities and Services and Parks and
Recreation Chapters of the Comprehensive Policy Plan.
3) Discussion of Subdivision Streets. Staff is seeking input from the CPPS regarding the use
of public or private streets within the community. A discussion of this issue is attached for
your information.
4) Other
Access is limited during the evening hours. Therefore, it will be necessary to enter the building
through the back double doors of the Board of Supervisors Room, located in the rear of the new
addition of the County building p would encourage committee members and interested citizens to
park in the County parking lot located in the rear of the building and follow the sidewalk to the
back double doors of the Board Room.
107 North Dent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Item #1: 2007 CPPS Work Program Priorities
Staff is seeking input from the CPPS regarding the 2007 work program. This is an opportunity for
the subcommittee to set work priorities for the year. These priorities will be studied by staff and
forwarded to the subcommittee for action. Below is the list of CPPS related priorities that is made up
of items distributed at the 2006 Planning Commission retreat and items discussed throughout 2006.
Please take the time to fill out this work program list and add others that you believe are important.
This list will be discussed at the February 12th meeting and at the 2007 Planning Commission
Retreat.
CPPS Work Program Priorities
Rank
Project Title
Complete a comprehensive review of the County's Comprehensive Policy Plan.
Develop Neighborhood Village and Urban Community Center Land Use Plans for
specific locations of the County's Urban Areas as part of the ongoing implementation
of the UDA Study.
Develop a coordinated approach to the planning of public services and community
facilities within the County.
Develop Corridor Land Use Plans to enhance the corridors and gateways of the
community.
Conduct an update to existing land use plans to reflect current planning efforts.
Develop Small Area Plans for the Rural Community Centers.
Develop a long range transportation plan which complements the regional effort made
by the Metropolitan Planning Organization and coordinates with recent updates of the
Eastern Road Plan and Bike and Pedestrian Mobility Plan.
Continue efforts to implement the Winchester -Frederick County Battlefield Network
Plan through the development of grant applications and assistance in plan preparation.
Develop an on-line process for the review and completion of various development
applications.
Increase the level of information available through the County's Webpage and promote
interaction on planning issues through this forum.
Itein #2:
Update of the Community Facilities and Services and Parks and Recreation
Chapters of the Comprehensive Policy Plan
The Planning Department will be updating the 2003 Comprehensive Policy Plan in early 2007. In an
effort to update the Community Facilities and Services and Parks and Recreation Chapters of the
Plan, relevant departments were asked to review the description of their facilities and services as
currently found in the plan. They were then requested to draft a new version and forward this to the
Planning Department. The description of services and facilities, and the issues, goals, strategies and
implementation sections are under review.
The CPPS initially reviewed the information provided by the relevant departments at their November
2006 meeting. A subsequent joint meeting was held in December with representatives from the Parks
and Recreation Commission. This meeting sought to advance the discussion and coordination from
the Community Facility providers and also included a representative of the School Board.
It is anticipated that the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will provide a
recommendation on the enclosed text changes that will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for
review prior to adoption by the Board of Supervisors.
Attached you will find the existing chapters in the Comp Plan, and the updated sections that were
submitted from the Parks and Recreation Department and Public Works Department. Proposed new
text changes are shown in red and underlined. Also attached is a new map from the School
Department.
Proposed New Text for: Community Facilities and Services Section
(substantial changes are noted in red underlined text)
Proposed new text for Schools: Also see included map.
Frederick County Public Schools is the 22"d largest of the 134 systems in the state of Virginia.
There are over 2,000 full time employees as of 2007 thus making the Frederick County School
Board the second largest employer in the Winchester -Frederick County Area. The school district
has 11 elementary schools 4 middle schools 3 high schools and 1 alternative education/career
& technical school. The school division also owns and operates two regional special education
facilities: Northwestern Regional Education Program(NREP),housed in NREP Center, and the
Robinson Educational Center. The NREP is a regional pLogram that provides special education
services to students from Frederick and Clarke Counties and the City of Winchester. Other
support facilities include the administration building, the maintenance/warehouse facility, and
the transportation facility. In addition to the 24 schools and administrative support facilities,
there are 32 modular units and two Sprung Instant Structure units maintained as classrooms and
offices. The schools stem also provides building maintenance services for the count
government.
During the past several decades, the student enrollment in the school division has increased
steadily. Historical data shows student membership grew by 1,540 students over the past five
years. This was an increase of 14.5% when comparing FY2006 to FY2001. Student
membership from FY 2006 to FY2007 grew 2.7% with a net increase of 326 students.
In order to meet the need for additional school space, a number of school construction and
renovation projects have occurred over the past decade. Despite the completion of these capital
facilities projects, overcrowding is still a problem in a number of Frederick County's Public
Schools. In order to meet the need for projected membership over the next decade, a number of
new construction and renovation projects have been proposed through the capital improvements
plan (CIP). With the completion of the replacement Gainesboro Elementary School in 2007 the
12th 13th and 14th elementary schools are proiected to open between FY2010 and FY2016. A
renovation to Apple Pie Ride Elementary School and an addition to Bass -Hoover Elementar
School are also projected within this same time period.
As students matriculate from elementary school to middle school and high school levels, the
need to provide additional space for the increase in student population and to meet changing
education requirements will become a necessity. Between FY2011 and FY2013, it is projected
that a 5th middle school a 4th high school a renovation to James Wood High School a
renovation/addition to Robert E. A for Middle School and an addition to Bass -Hoover
Elementary School will also occur within the same time period
In addition to the space need to accommodate student growth, there is also a need for larger
administrative and operation support facilities. The current transportation site can no longer
adequately accommodate work performed at this facility,and the current location is not
sufficient to expand the existing facilfty to safely maintain a bus fleet qpproaching approaching175 school
buses. The central administration building is over 40 years old and the current number of staff
exceeds the building's safe -carrying capacity. This issue will require attention within the next
few years. A plan for the replacement of Frederick County Middle School in the proposed CIP
and the renovation of that facility to house the central administration offices will address this
issue.
As Frederick County looks toward the future it will need to plan for new school facilities that
are strategically located to help mitigate overcrowding for staff and students The rate of
residential growth continues to impact the school system as subdivisions are developed within
the Urban Development Area (UDA). Additionally, it is important to monitor residentialrg owth
outside of the UDA that has historically accounted for a least one-third of the new residences in
Frederick County.
Along with growth in student enrollment, the school division is faced with the responsibility of
providing instruction in order to prepare students to work and live in the 21St century. The use of
technology as a tool in nearly every facet of education has dramatically changed the way in
which instructional services are provided to students. Required technology -related instruction at
all levels will continue to necessitate increased expenditures for computers and computer related
hardware/software. Mandates from the federal and state governments, particularly in special
education services, will require localities to expend additional financial resources to meet
education requirements. The requirements associated with technology -related instruction and the
provision of appropriate special education services to students will create the need for investment
in future capital projects with the school division.
The school division and the Board of Supervisors have made major efforts to consolidate
services in order to serve the residents of Frederick County more effectively which include the
following:
• Cooperative agreements relative to sharing school facilities for recreation use by a wide
range of community organizations
• Maintenance of school grounds, provided by the Department of Parks and Recreation,
which has resulted in greater utilization of space.
• Maintenance of Frederick County's office complex provided by the school division's
Building & Grounds Department
• Warehouse space in the Buildings and Grounds Department's Facility, provided by
Frederick County School Board, for other local government departments
• Fueling services to other local government departments provided by the school division's
transportation department.
Also, whenever possible, the school board has endeavored to support other Frederick County
departments by making school facilities available during non -school hours for community and
recreational use.
Proposed new text for Emergency Services: None.
Proposed new text for Handley Library:
Library service is provided to Frederick County through the Handley Regional Library, which
also serves Clarke County and the City of Winchester. Currently, there are 21,107 active
registered library card holders in Frederick County.
The regional system supports education, preschool through post -secondary, by providing
assistance and research materials for projects and papers, and by being open weeknights,
Saturdays and some Sundays. The library is also open during the summer when schools are
closed. It is also an important resource for adults seeking to improve their skills and for
introducing preschoolers to books and reading. The library also provides the business
community and the general public within information for their research needs as well as
recreations reading.
The Bookmobile service to the residents of southern and western Frederick County was
expanded in July of 1996, as a result of an agreement between the Library and the Trinity
Lutheran Church in Stephens City. This agreement has allowed the library to use the church
parking lot on Wednesdays and Thursdays as a Bookmobile stop. In addition, Trinity has
allowed the library to offer story hours for children in the church hall.
The regional library system continues to be below per capita state standards in the areas of books,
square footage, seating, and periodical holdings; however, important steps have been taken to
remedy this. The predominant project through the County's CIP is the construction of a
Northern Frederick County Branch This project entails the acquisition of 3 to 4 acres and the
construction of a 7,000 square foot library branch with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet
along Route 522 N near Cross Junction. Initial parking would accommodate 35 vehicles There
is no library in this area of the county to serve residents The residents of the Gainesboro District
comprise the largest population group the greatest distance away from a library. The library
would serve members of the population from toddlers to senior citizens Another important
capital project for the Library will be the expansion of the parking lot and sidewalks at the
Bowman Library Branch This proposal would expand the parking lot on the Lakeside Drive
side of the library from 101 to 221ap rking spaces and to provide a sidewalk that will extend
agpproximately 400 to 500 feet beyond the sidewalk that now borders the parking lot to connect to
the sidewalk on Lakeside Drive The parking lot expansion is needed to relieve overcrowding
and to accommodate library patrons The sidewalk is necessary o provide safe access for
pedestrians to the library. Planning consideration for alternative modes of transportation such as
bicycle connectivity should also be considered
Proposed new text for Winchester Regional Airport:
The Winchester Regional Airport is a 376 -acre, all weather, 24-hour general aviation airport with
a 5,500 foot long runway. The Airport is located south east of Interstate 81. The facility
currently has 75 tie down spaces, two 12,000 square foot public clear span hangars, 62 T -hangars,
and three private corporate hangars. Based aircraft total 115, and range in size from single
engine to large cabin craft and business aircraft. Services available include 24-hour U.S.
Customs and Immigrations, 24-hour line service, automated weather observation system,
computerized weather and flight planning equipment, high speed internet service, and full
instrument landing system. In addition to these flight related services rental car and catering
services are also available.
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority (WRAA) was formed by the Virginia General
Assembly on July 1, 1987. The Authority consists of representatives from the City of
Winchester and Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties. Since its formation, the
WRAA has embarked on an extensive airport improvement program. Major capital
improvements have been accomplished in order to comply with Federal safety and design
standards. Completed construction projects include: a 1,100 foot runway extension, pavement
resurfacing of the entire runway, relocation of the taxiway, the creation of safety areas at each
end of the runway, and the remarking of the runway and taxiway. New buildings constructed
under this program include a modern general aviation terminal, a 12,000 square foot clear span
hangar, a maintenance hangar with Fixed Base Operator offices, and 62 T -hangar units. Other
completed projects include the airfield lighting upgrade, installation of a 60,000 gallon above
ground fuel storage facility, a security fence around the Airport's perimeter, and the installation
of a precision instrument approach to provide better all weather access to the Airport.
Collaborating with Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT),
the Authority has also made improvements to primary access roads for the Airport. Also
completed was the relocation of Airport Road to remove a portion of the road which infringed on
controlled airspace. Sewer and Water service is also established for the Airport. To date, more
than $19 million dollars has been invested in the Winchester Regional Airport's capital
improvements, equipment, and promotions through funding received from the Federal Aviation
Administration, Virginia Department of Aviation, and the local jurisdictions.
Remaining capital projects include the acquisition of land along Bufflick Road for noise
abatement, development of the northern side of the runway, renovation of the 17 year old
terminal building and construction of an aircraft wash rack.
Through the support of the member jurisdictions, the Airport will continue to evolve into a
modern, first class air transportation facility which will assist economic development endeavors
in the attraction of new industrial and commercial businesses to the region.
Proposed new text for County Offices:
In addition to the County's main 100,000 square foot administrative office complex in downtown
Winchester, construction began on a 68,000 square foot for Public Safety Building was in the
summer of 2006. The new facility, which is scheduled to open in spring of 2007 is located
south of Route 50, adiacent the regional airportand will house the Fire and Rescue and Sheriffs
departments. This facility is anticipated to accommodate the space needs of these two
departments for 15-20 years The building and site were also designed to allow for future
expansion of an additional 30,000 square feet
Proposed new text for Refuse Collection, Landfill, and Recycling:
Eleven refuse collection stations are located throughout Frederick County. Nine refuse
collection stations consist of hydraulic compactors with separable roll -off containers and
collection facilities for recyclables. Two sites consist of front end dumpsters and collection
containers for recyclables. The County converts dumpster sites to compactor stations when
warranted by tonnage levels. When practical, the consolidation of sites during the conversion
process is also desirable. For residents who prefer curbside refuse collection service is provided
by a number of private haulers.
The Frederick County Landfill is a regional facility which receives refuse from Frederick and
Clarke Counties, as well as the City of Winchester. The landfill is operated by Frederick County
as an enterprise fund and the landfill operation is fee sustaining. The management and planning
of landfill operations are solely the responsibility of Frederick County, with input from an
oversight committee comprised of representatives from Frederick and Clarke Counties and the
City of Winchester.
Closure of the older section of the landfill, which opened in 1976, was completed in 1994. A
new 160 -acre tract of adjacent land, purchased in 1986, was opened for landfilling in 1993.
Approximately 90 acres of this tract have been permitted for landfilling under current Subtitle
"D" Solid Waste Regulations. Both the closure of the old section and the construction of the
section were carried out in accordance with state regulations that require sophisticated
environmental protection measures, including: composite impermeable linersa complete
leachate collection system, leachate treatment facility, groundwater monitoring, and gas
monitoring.
In an effort to extend the useful life of the municipal solid waste landfill, a 109 acre wooded tract
was purchased from Ryland Carper for the future development of a construction debris landfill.
The permitting, design, and construction of this new CDD landfill were completed in 1998.
Through diversion of bulky, construction debris to a separate landfill; an amendment to the state
permit allowing vertical expansion and improved compaction technologies the life of the
landfill has been extended to approximately 40 years. A new program to recirculate leachate or
liquids through the landfill will also increase decomposition and extend the life of the municipal
solid waste landfill. The County should continue to evaluate new methods for waste reduction
and support recycling programs, both of which will extend the life of the landfill.
During the 1990s, the County placed collection boxes for recyclable materials at each of the
citizens' convenience areas located throughout the County. In 2004, containers were also added
at dumpster sites. Through this voluntary collection effort, the County was able to meet the 1995
state recycling mandate of 25 percent. Due to the rapid growth in Frederick County, additional
programs have been implemented to enable the County to exceed the state's 25 percent recycling
goal. These programs include: brush and yard waste mulching, composting, waste oil recycling,
oil filter recycling, cardboard and phone book recycling, tire shredding, household hazardous
waste collection, and electronics recycling.
It is essential that new residential developments are provided with an appropriate means of solid
waste collection. Either private collection or new collection stations, including land, should be
provided by developers.
Proposed new text for Sewer and Water Facilities: See Attached.
Proposed new text for Capital Improvements Plan: None.
Proposed new text for Facility Cost Impacts:
Rezoning requests should be evaluated to determine their potential impacts on the community
facilities. Costs to the County should be estimated in terms of what impact the development,
which could result from the proposed rezoning, would have on facilities and infrastructure.
These costs are estimated in terms of facility use per unit of development. The estimated facility
use is determined through the use of established multipliers which use averages derived from
existing development. These multipliers set out such factors as: expected numbers of vehicle
trips, school children, gallons of sewer and water usage per dwelling unit, square footage of
commercial use, or person. The demand on various facilities resulting from a proposed rezoning
can then be estimated based on the costs of facilities listed in the Capital Improvements Plan.
Initially, costs are estimated in terms of the actual costs of providing facilities to support the
potential development.
In 1991, Frederick County's first impact model was developed. The fiscal impact model was
utilized to project the fiscal impacts of rezonings on public schools, parks and recreation, and fire
and rescue services for capital facilities costs. In 1998, a revised version of the impact model
was adopted by the Board of Supervisors. This new model was designed to project the fiscal
impacts of miscellaneous public facilities, as well as the public agencies that were accounted for
in the previous impact model. The impact model projects the gross potential costs of the
facilities that would be needed to support a new development using the basic formula described
above. In 2005, the Board of Supervisors endorsed for use a new Development Impact Model
(DIM) designed specifically for Frederick County. This model projects the capital fiscal impacts
that would be associated with specific development projects on the budget of Frederick County
Government and the Frederick County School Board The DIM was developed to represent the
budgetary structure of the County and could be used to evaluate future land use planning
scenarios.
No rezoning should be approved unless the net impacts on community facilities are positive, or if
the negative impacts can be adequately addressed through proffers or some other means. A
request for rezoning may be turned down even though all fiscal impacts appear to be addressed.
If there are other impacts which are not addressed by the rezoning application, or if the request
does not conform to this plan, a similar method should be developed for determining the impacts
of proposed developments on transportation systems and other public facilities.
Proposed new text for Issues: None.
Proposed new text for Community Facility and Service Policy: None.
Proposed new text for Implementation Methods:
1. Carefully monitor school enrollments and plan facilities according to enrollment and
development trends. Update the Capital Improvements Plan each year based on trends.
2. Continue to support fire and rescue squads and plan to increase support according to
development in the various service areas.
3. Develop plans for new emergency facilities.
4. Continue to convert dumpster sites to compactor sites. Monitor usage. Plan for new
refuse collection sites according to use and planned development patterns.
5. Monitor landfill use. Plan for additional landfill capacity on adjacent land. Explore
alternative disposal methods and new technologies.
6. Continue to plan for sewer and water main extensions according to the agreements
established with the Sanitation Authority and the City of Winchester. Include planned
extensions in the Capital Improvements Plan.
7. Provide for recycling at collection stations and support a regional recycling center.
Encourage private haulers to offer recycling services to their customers.
8. Carefully monitor sewer and water use and develop a Capital Improvements Plan to
accommodate projected development.
9. Consider means to provide water service to Brueetown.
10. Consider alternative sources of water supply.
11. Minor extensions of sewer and water service to business and industrial uses beyond the
service area may be considered if such uses conform to other County standards. Such
extensions should be reviewed by the Planning Commission for conformance with the
Plan.
12. Require that information be provided with rezoning proposals on the impacts of
development on community facilities. Impacts should be addressed through proffers and
other means. No rezoning should be approved unless all impacts are adequately
addressed.
13. Any sewer or water main six inches in diameter or larger, extended or existing within an
area proposed for inclusion within the County's Sewer and water Service Are or Urban
Development Area, should be dedicated as a public line to be owned and maintained by
the County Sanitation Authority or City of Winchester when appropriate.
14. Plans for new facilities should be based on demand projections as derived from
population projections in the Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed New Text .for: Parks and Recreation Section
(Substantial changes are noted in red underlined text)
PARKS AND RECREATION SECTION
FREDERICK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The purpose of this chapter is to outline the County's recreational policies and identify
implementation methods to accomplish the stated goals for recreational facilities, programs,
studies, and plans. This narrative is a broad overview of parks and recreation goals, needs and
standards, and serves as a guide to decision making. This overview is a part of the County's
continuing planning process.
Facilities
The County currently owns and operates two district parks. Clearbrook Park, located five miles
north of Winchester on Route 11, consisting of approximately 55 acres (44 which are owned by
the County) and Sherando Park, located two miles east of Stephens City on Route 277,
consisting of approximately 334 acres. Both district parks currently serve the County's
population with active and passive recreational programs and facilities.
The four County neighborhood parks are located at: the Reynolds Store Fire Company and
Gainesboro Fire Company in the Gainesboro District, Round Hill Fire Company in the Back
Creek District, and the Frederick Heights subdivision in the Red Bud District. These
neighborhood parks consist primarily of playground equipment for young children.
In 1987, master development plans were adopted for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks.
These master plans established development goals for each park, identified unmet recreational
needs, provided unified facility plans, and proposed a development program for each park. The
Master Plans for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks reflect the recommendations of the County
residents and national standards as outlined in the Virginia Outdoor Plan. These plans
emphasize the development of a swimming pool complex, additional sports venues, picnic areas,
and maintenance support facilities. In 2001, the Sherando Park Master Plan was revised and
adopted.
Since the adoption of the Master Plans, the County has completed the construction of: two
outdoor swimming pool complexes, four irrigated soccer fields, a maintenance building, three
shelters, a gazebo, two playground areas, two sand volleyball courts and two fields of a four field
softball complex. The County has also purchased an area to house the maintenance operation for
Clearbrook Park. Additional recreational facilities currently provided are athletic fields,
playground, and picnic areas with a variety of recreational opportunities such as horseshoes,
fishing, paddleboats, volleyball, open space areas, and support facilities. Clearbrook Park,
Sherando Park, neighborhood parks and all public schools are maintained by the Parks Division
of the County Parks and Recreation Department.
To date, the County has constructed a 2.4 mile bicycle/pedestrian trail to serve several residential
areas east of Stephens City. The County has also committed to the construction of a.6 mile trail
to serve residential areas on the northern perimeter of Sherando Park. These bicycle facilities
will link those residential areas with Sherando Park and Sherando High School. Additional trails
would provide residents the ability to travel safely from their homes to schools, stores, work or
recreation areas without having to share the overcrowded arterial and collector roads with
automobiles.
The majority of recreation programs offered by the Parks and Recreation Department are held
within the 18 public schools in Frederick County and the Parks and Recreation Department's
Community Centers. Consequently, this wide variety of recreation offerings has maximized the
use of county school buildings. The joint efforts of the Frederick County Public Schools and the
Parks and Recreation Department resulted in the inclusion of recreational facilities within
Sherando High School. The Parks and Recreation Department's Community Center, which
adjoins Sherando High School, opened in September of 1993 and contains two racquetball courts,
a weight room and a multipurpose room with kitchen. Building upon the Sherando concept, the
Orchard View Community Center, which is attached to Orchard View Elementary School was
opened in August 2000. This facility features a full-size gymnasium available for recreational
activities during non -school hours. The Evendale Community Center, our third center, opened in
2006 includes two multi-purpose rooms and a full size gymnasium.
Programs
The Recreation Division of the Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department was created
to provide a comprehensive and accessible program of recreational services and activities for the
residents of Frederick County. A diverse range of recreational and enrichment programs is
provided for all age groups. This broad base of activities includes, but is not limited to,
instructional classes, outdoor adventure programs, sports and athletics, lifetime leisure and
fitness programs, cultural and community events, as well as, trips and excursions.
Programming responsibilities are assigned within the Division's four interest sections:
1. Community Events
2. Before & After School Programs
3. Sports & Athletics
4. Lifetime Leisure and Fitness
Staff members work together to identify, develop, and implement those activities which most
closely meet the interests and desires of the community. The Division typically implements
programs within age categories such as preschool, youth, teen, adult and senior adult.
Current Needs and Future Demands
To meet present requests and plan for future leisure service demands the Parks and Recreation
Department has completed Master Plans for the County's two District Parks through community
involvement; studies of national standards provided in the Virginia Outdoor Plan; and surveyed
information relating to the provision of leisure services.
Through utilization of these and any other available resources it is projected that the following
areas must be addressed if we are to meet leisure demands.
1. Land acquisition to meet minimum standards.
2. Facility development to meet minimum standards.
3. Development of recreation centers.
4. Increased programming for special populations.
5. Increased programming for teens.
6. Greater diversity of programming to better meet the needs of the entire community.
7. Expansion of trail systems and bikeways.
To serve our current population and ensure adequate public park land and recreational facilities
are available for future generations of Frederick County residents the Parks and Recreation
_Commission supports an approach which would require developers to set aside open space for
use by the Home Owners Association and encourage a proffer which would enable the county to
accomplish a master planned urban park system With the required open space set aside
provided by the developer, the Home Owners Association would have the option of developing
recreational amenities of their choosing. The developer would also have the opportunity to
include features which may help market their property. The county would then encourage a
proffer, based on the approved urban park master plan of land if determined suitable If land
within a certain development does not conform to the urban park master plana monetary proffer
to _help offset the cost of completing the plan could be considered The Parks and Recreation
Commission would also advocate developers being required to offer easements and construct
pedestrian/bicycle trails through their developments Maintenance and upkeep of these public
trails would then become the responsibility of the Home Owners Associations The acquisition of
these public trail easements would be necessary to provide an array of non vehicular access to
the public parks, schools, libraries and commercial establishments
The Parks and Recreation Commission also recommend the county actively pursue land
acquisition and facility development through appropriations bond referendums donations
partnerships and bequest. Additionally, the Parks and Recreation Commission would support the
monetary proffers for parks and recreation being put into an interest barring account with all
interest earned being added to the proffer intended for parks and recreation capital development.
Area Standard
As suggested by the 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plan, the area standard for local recreation and park
sites in Virginia are ten acres of developed park land per thousand populations. Frederick
County has a population of approximately 70,575 (based on 2006 estimates provided by the
Planning Department) and currently maintains 400 acres of park land. Of the 400 acres assigned
to the parks, about 220 acres would be considered developed.
Using the population projections provided by the Frederick County Planning Department, an
additional 286 acres are needed to meet the current demand; another 37 acres by 2010 and 60
acres by 2015 will be required if we are to keep pace with the recommended standard of the ten
acres per thousand population. It is estimated by the Parks and Recreation Department that by
the year 2020, Frederick County will need approximately 843 acres of developed park land to
adequately serve the County's population.
The following are different park types for development:
MINI PARK
Size
0 — 4 acres
Service Area
%4 Mile
Administrative Responsibility
Local Unit of Government
Pmose
The Mini parks offer close to home open space and limited recreational amenities which are
typically accessible by bicycle/pedestrian trails.
Mini Parks have a service area of approximately 1/4 mile and are less than five acres It is
important for these parks to be accessible by bike/pedestrian trails In most cases it is not
practical to include athletic fields or major facility development in a mini park As a result these
areas offer very little in terms of design elements which create a self policing environment
These areas can become attractive to the occasional/drop—in visitor and supervision is often
necessary to ensure the park remains an asset to the community. Mini parks are the least
desirable type of park for inclusion into a public park system because the are small inefficient
to maintain and difficult to police. Typically, the amenities found in the Mini Park are the same
as found in home owner association open space areas However, if strategically located and
offering a unique value not available as a Home Owners Association recreational unit the Mini
Park may be considered.
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
+ Size
5-24 acres
Plan at 3 acres/1000 Population
gPrvir•P Aran
Approximately 5 — 15 minutes walking distance or % mile to 1 '/2 miles
Administrative Responsibility
Local Unit of Government.
Purpose
The primary function of the neighborhood park is to provide limited types of recreation for the
entire family within easy walking distance. Facilities should be provided for all age groups.
Character
Intensive use and easy access are characteristics of this classification. Ideally, the site would
have areas that are level to gently rolling to accommodate the intensive use facilities, with
shaded areas for passive recreation.
Location
If possible, the neighborhood park should be located near a school and/or the neighborhood
center and away from railroads, major streets and other hazardous barriers.
Potential Facilities
Playground
Badminton Courts
Ball Diamonds
Swimming Pool
Basketball Courts
Volleyball Courts
Tennis Courts
Fishing Pond
Shuffleboard Courts
Recreation Center
Picnic facilities
Trails
Horseshoe Pits
Bikeway
Football/Soccer Field
Play fields usually serve a dual purpose in this type of facility. They provide an area for sports
and running games and also serve as open space. Intensive use areas (the playground area and
hard surfaced courts) are buffered from other activities by passive natural areas and pedestrian
access corridors. Programmed activities such as organized athletics are often suitable in
neighborhood parks. Although limited parking facilities are provided, site design should
encourage pedestrian access to the greatest extent possible.
Rural communities may want to consider deleting neighborhood parks and include their function
in larger community parks which could better serve the needs of widely dispersed local
population. From an economic standpoint, well designed, larger facilities are likely to be less
expensive to maintain than several small sites.
COMMUNITY PARK
Size
25-99 acres
Plan at 3 acres/1000 population
Service Area
Approximately 15 minutes driving time
Administrative Responsibility
Local Unit of Government
PLiMose
Community parks should primarily support active recreation activities and be capable of
withstanding intensive use, while still containing a fair amount of open space.
Character
The site usually varies from relatively flat open space to moderately sloping wooded area. Such
a park should be adaptable to a wide variety of recreational activities. Access is gained by auto,
bicycles, or walking.
T .no.atinn
Locate when possible near the center of the community with good access and serviced by a
public transportation system.
Potential Facilities
Same as Neighborhood Park in addition:
Natural Areas Lake or Stream Boating/Fishing
Parking Areas Golf Beach Area
DISTRICT PARK
Size
100-999 acres
Plan at 4 acres/1000 population
Service Area
15-25 minutes driving time
5-15 miles service radius
Administrative Responsibility
Local Unit of Government
Pum
District Parks should serve the recreational needs of large portions of the local population. They
should contain a wide variety of intensively developed areas for day use recreation, while
providing ample open space with generous buffers between activity areas.
Character
The site could vary from flat open space to moderately to steeply sloping topography. It should
be capable of hosting a diversity of activities, effectively buffering natural areas and open space
from active recreation areas. A site location along a stream or lake is highly desirable. The
regional park needs to be accessible by auto, as well as, pedestrians and bicycles.
Location
Where possible, regional parks should be located near the center of the service area, and on or
close by an arterial or major road providing good access
situations, easy access to mass transit is highly desirable.
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Potential Facilities
Same as Community Park
to the facility. In urban or suburban
The site should also be accessible by
GREENWAY
Size
Any length referable longer than one mile
Typically 75-100 feet or wider
Service area
Dependant upon the location size and significance of the corridor
Administrative Responsibility
Federal, state, local or public/private partnership
Purpose
Greenwa s are established to protect, preserve,and maintain existing natural and cultural
corridors-, to link population centers with recreational educational and business areas and other
population centers,• and to provide recreational and non -motorized transportation opportunities
along these corridors by usin natural features (ridge -lines, steep slopes), utility ri hts-of-wa
and watercourses (streams, rivers, canals etc.).
Character
Depending on the location it can range from rugged terrain with scenic views and extensive
vegetation too en level meadows. The greenway can be a separate entity ora portion of any of
the other park categories.
Potential facilities
Access Points
Camping
Picnic Facilities
Parking Areas
COMMUNITY CENTERS
Canoeing Historic Sites
Fishing Boating
Trails Natural Area
Winter Sports
Community Centers are facilities which provide a multi-purpose room, kitchen area. and a
fitness or gymnasium element. These facilities are usually constructed between 15,000 and
20,000 square feet. These facilities may be reserved for the general public. Community Centers
may be a stand alone facility within a Neighborhood or Communitv Park. or may be co -located
with other County Agency Buildings.
RECREATION CENTERS
Recreation Centers are typically found in District or Regional Parks. These 100,000- 150,000 sq
feet facilities provide an indoor aquatic venue, gymnasium, fitness, multi-purpose rooms, a
kitchen, lobby area, and significant locker room space. In providing Recreation Centers, one
should consider adequate storage. These facilities are open to the general public for drop-in use.
FCPRD Comprehensive Plan Facility Standards
2006
2020
Needs
Needs
Facility
Existing
Gap
Gap
Park Land
400
286
443
'/ Mile Track
1
3
4
Baseball Fields
8
6
9
Basketball Courts
5
9
12
Bike Trails/ Roadways
2
66
82
Greenway
Fishing (bank)
69
84
Amphitheatre
0
2
2
Horseshoes
8
-1
0
Outdoor Swimming
2
1
2
Volleyball
3
11
14
Football
1
6
8
Picnicking
400
286
443
Community Centers
6
1
3
Recreation Center
0
1
1
Skateboard Park
0
1
3
Soccer Fields
4
10
13
Softball Fields
5
9
12
Tennis Courts
6
11
36
Special Use Facility
As needed
As needed
Ice Skating/Hockey
0
1
1
SUMMARY
As the population of the Winchester -Frederick County area continues to increase, there will
undoubtedly be greater emphasis placed on the County's Parks and Recreation Department. As
indicated by the standards provided in the 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plan, referred to in this chapter,
there exists a need to concentrate on developing facilities to meet present minimum standards,
and an even greater need to establish a long range capital improvement program to ensure the
provision of the physical amenities required to meet future leisure demands.
The County has already begun to address long term multi -use trail needs as discussed in this
chapter with a strategy which involves the creation of a complete network of transportation
modes, including non -motorized and pedestrian use In addition the UDA study of April 2005
sets as one of its goals to examine "providing adequate area for district community, and
neighborhood parks and ensure broad access to a variety of recreational opportunities." It is
increasingly important to integrate development of parks and recreation facilities and programs
into the overall County plan to make Frederick County an attractive place to live and work
Since the existing parks and recreation facilities are below the recommended minimum standards
for a locality of our size, priority should be given to bringing our system up to standard. Strong
consideration should also be given to the acquisition of park land to meet future needs while
desirable open space is still available To complement the strategies and standards identified the
Parks and Recreation Department staff is creating a blueprint which will strategically locate
areas for park land acquisition to meet existing and future demands It is anticipated a draft of
this plan will be completed by July 1 2007
In addition to the facilities that are needed to meet current and future demands, the Parks and
Recreation Department will also need additional professional staff to accommodate an already
increasing demand for recreational programs.
Recreation Policy
Goal - Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic
and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through the
implementation of an integrated plan for recreation programs and park facilities.
Strategy 1 - Identify the recreational, parks, and open space needs of the County.
Strategy 2 - Make available a wide range of year-round recreational opportunities.
Strategy 3 - Seek alternative funding methods for the provision of existing and identified
recreational needs.
Strategy 4 - Encourage cooperative efforts with private, semi-public, and public providers of
recreational opportunities.
Implementation Methods:
1. Promote the completion of a County -wide recreation plan which identifies
recreational, park, and open space needs.
2. Continue to solicit public opinion in planning parks and recreation.
3. Continue to encourage the participation and financial support of civic groups
businesses, and other organizations and individuals for recreational needs.
4. Continue to utilize State and Federal grants and loans for financing and
programming County recreational needs and especially for major capital projects.
5. Continue to expand our cooperative relationship with the Frederick County School
Board in jointly meeting identified County recreational needs.
6. Continue to cooperate with the private sector, the semi-public sector and other public
providers of recreation in meeting identified recreational needs.
Goal - Continue to develop the County's regional parks as the major source of recreational
facilities and activities.
Strategy 1 - As finances are available, improvements to the Sherando and Clearbrook Parks
should take place according to the adopted master plans.
Implementation Methods:
1. Use the capital improvements planning process to provide improvements to the
regional parks.
2. Seek alternative sources of funding for park improvements.
Goal - Ensure that appropriate recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas.
Strati — Promote the completion of a County -wide plan to ensure that appropriate open
space and recreational facilities are provided in association with new urban development.
Strategy - Provide for suitable recreational opportunities for all portions of the County.
Strategy 3 — Promote the development of a comprehensive trail system and bikeway plan.
Implementation Methods:
1. Use a County -wide recreation plan to develop standards for open space and
recreational facilities in new urban development.
2. Use a County -wide recreation plan to identify the recreation needs of residents in all
portions of the County.
3. Identify recreation needs associated with the Rural Community Centers.
4. Review land development regulations to ensure that appropriate standards are
provided for open space recreational facilities in new developments.
Goal - Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available
funding.
Straw - Identify recreational program needs.
Strategy 2 - Solicit public opinion on recreational programs to be provided.
Strategy 3 - Coordinate with the Frederick County School Board, the public sector, the semi-
public sector, and private organizations for the provision of recreational program
funds, services, and facilities.
Implementation Methods:
1. Prepare a County -wide recreation plan identifying program needs.
2. Develop and maintain citizen participation in the identification of recreational
program and program facility needs.
3. Actively solicit contributions for the provision of recreational programs and program
facility needs, from all segments of the community, both private and public.
4. Structure the provision of all program facilities, such as indoor community centers,
to recognize land use decisions and policies.
5. Actively utilize public, semi-public, and private facilities for the provision of
recreational programs.
Proposed new text for Sewer and Water Facilities:
(substantial changes are noted in red underlined text)
The location of public sewer and water lines determines where urban development will occur. The
Urban Development Area defines the general area in which more intensive forms of residential
development will occur. Commercial industrial and institutional land uses are also encouraged
within the Urban Development Area The Sewer and Water Service Area is consistent with the
Urban Development Area in many locations However, the Sewer and Water Service Area may
extend beyond the Urban Development Area to promote commercial industrial and institutional
land uses in areas where residential land uses are not desirable
The Frederick County Sanitation Authority has the responsibility for the treatment, transmission, and
distribution of potable water and the collection and transmission of wastewater. Most of the sewer
and water mains and laterals in the County are owned, operated, and maintained by the Sanitation
Authority.
Frederick County and the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) have executed a Facilities
Planning Agreement which sets forth procedures for the planning of sewer and water mains in the
County. The agreement includes provisions for adopting a water and sewer facilities plan as a part of
the Comprehensive Plan, specifying the location of mains over eight inches in size, and includes
provisions for review and update of the plan and for including sewer and water facilities projects in
the Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan.
The City of Winchester owns and maintains sewer and water lines in portions of the County adjacent
to the City corporate limits. Such lines have been extended into the County following a previous
agreement between the City and the County.
The Frederick -Winchester Service Authority (FWSA) has the sole responsibility of providing
wastewater facilities to serve the FCSA and the City of Winchester's treatment needs. The FWSA
currently owns the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. The Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment
Plant and the Crooked Run Wastewater Treatment Plant have operational agreements with the City
and the FCSA for their operation. The City operates and maintains the Opequon Facility while the
Sanitation Authority is responsible for operations of Parkins Mills and Crooked Run Facilities.
Treatment of wastewater generated from within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area
(SWSA) is undertaken at all plants. The Opequon Service Area is comprised of the Abrams Creek
drainage area which includes the City of Winchester and adjacent drainage areas located east, west
and north of the City of Winchester. All wastewater coming from the City of Winchester is
transported to and iriaL .d aL LIR, Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. The Parkins Mills Wastewater
Treatment Plant serves Sanitation Authority customers located in the upper Opequon Creek, Wrights
Run, and Stephens Run drainage areas along with the Town of Stephens City. The Crooked Run
Service Area services the Shenandoah Community in southeastern Frederick County_
The Opequon Water Reclamation Facility presently has a seasonal hydraulic capacity of 8.4 millions
gallons per day during summer months and 16.0 million allonsep r day during the winter months.
The facility has 18,000 pounds per day of biological capacity and also provides for biological
nutrient removal of nitrogen and phosphorus Based on the projections contained in the 1997
Opequon Water Reclamation Facility Capacity Needs Evaluation Report the present treatment
configuration will meet both hydraulic and biological demands through 2007 - 2008
The Frederick Winchester Service Authority has already begun design for an expansion and upgrade
of the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility to meet future growth needs and regulatory
requirements requiring dramatic reductions of nutrient discharges from treatment facilities located in
the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. The initial expansion and upgrade will increase the hydraulic
capacity of the facility to a maximum of 12.6 million gallons per day. Obtaining this capacity will
depend on the final wasteload allocation for nutrients assigned to the Opequon Facility under the
Water Quality Management Plan Regulations adopted by the Commonwealth of Virginia Present
planning would anticipate the expanded facility would be operational by 2010-2011
The Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant which serves the upper Stephens Run, Wrights Run,
and Opequon drainage areas has a present rated capacity of 2.0 million gallons per day. The current
average daily flow of this plant is about 75% of the design capacity. This facility also will be limited
in it ultimate capacity by nutrients Design of an expanded and upgraded facility is complete and
construction of that facility will begin in 2007 When construction is complete in 2009 the Parkins
Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant will have a capacity of 5.0 million gallons per day.
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
0
a)
CL
5.00
c
0
R
0 4.00
C
0
� 3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Opequon Water Reclamation Facility
Sewer Flow Versus Capacity
50vp X91 o o°� ��� �9a a o^ ^a tia h yRP
^99 apo ADO ADO .
Fiscal Years
—.$.—OWRF —A—County —A—City —Capacity
2.5
0 1
0.5
0
Fig 7 - PMTP
Fiscal Year
=Flow- - Limit
0
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
Fiscal Year
=Flow- - Limit
Fig 6 - Annual Connections
Fiscal Year
® Water 22 Sewer
E11
-
{
gld s
si
ig3s=
'e's:mgz
`
3R:3=s3
�: $
: aasa
:s :•:$ `° HOUSE
i3gss sl
ase:
gess = d=sgss:
1 d =! �
•sd•:s
°
`
= 1 1 �. ss �g
•$ ass°E�ad.'s�
sd3
d�
.. d:=•
a
d;
t••g:Rgi
Ilse
"_
gg;::3
!3 ;�
dd:•::d
I. .
I
!!
...s.
Eggs ::
.:d
" sR$
'_•� :g: _ •
gss3
!
•g
d.: g
••
,ggR�gg
d•d :+�g
:. s.13
,.;=EEEg�,/�
:: �
!a: •.fid.=
�g ���
�='s gd :! _
1,00
g:..•
gs3�
d=
igg =s'�
9E$
dE
gE lsdd
IEda !3 $204
a::E•Er
gi:'
g :3$
%°::e31,/
S; E
_• _ _$
6 =�
ly=
�
$:dsE.g
3 ddd • =x
1 � ::s.•::
ddR::.g3�'
i'
s
Rsdd3$d�
3$$d�E
�'
g3g•'s$3
;;g�g�g� gegd's'�
�
s
s•s: !
�.g :051..•g••
$�
3d = !
' s !$
dE� =d
;'OEEd r�3;�s
.g g e
c33g g=
's's ��$''
gg s e�
E§'s :sg
gig
Ig•s=d, �; : =E�
e's�. s
;
3a:=!$,
E•ss b
E
s°=
1 .,�
sem#,
--
,:g::�� ,
�`R•�+i
.
ss3•s
$'sa
R g
�$"R�.R3
,s
�gegg,�' "_ =
="s,
s:�
4
_
_
.:
gam_
:sa
Fiscal Year
® Water 22 Sewer
Item #3:
Discussion of Public and Private Subdivision Street Requirements.
The Board of Supervisors at its meeting on January 10, 2007 provided direction to the
Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee and Planning Commission to study and make a
recommendation to the Board regarding a change to the Frederick County Code to require
subdivision streets not to be maintained by VDOT; however, the streets should be built to State
standards. The Board of Supervisors discussion and motion is provided at the end of this report.
The first step in the process is for the CPPS to study the issue and make a recommendation to the
Planning Commission. It is anticipated that this item will be further discussed by the Commission
and Board at the 2007 Planning Commission Retreat.
Current Polic
The Frederick County Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots abut and have direct access to a
public street or right-of-way dedicated for maintenance by the Virginia Department of
Transportation. The vast majority of new lots created in Frederick County are created consistent with
this policy. Exceptions to this policy include multifamily, single family attached, and single family
small lot housing types which may abut private roads, parking lots, or access easements, and Minor
Rural Subdivisions. In the case of proffered age restricted communities, the Board of Supervisors
may provide a waiver to the public street requirement. However, the private street must meet or
exceed VDOT Standards.
Virginia is a state that manages and maintains the maintenance and operation of local streets.
Therefore, in Frederick County, VDOT maintains the local streets. VDOT's Subdivision Street
Requirements (SSRs) establishes the criteria governing VDOT's acceptance of new roads.
Each locality is responsible for establishing new streets and roads within its jurisdiction, including
those that VDOT will maintain. These new streets are usually built through the efforts of land
developers.
To qualify for VDOT acceptance, new streets must:
- Be available for unrestricted public use,
- Provide public service sufficient to warrant maintenance at public expense,
- Be located on right-of-way that is dedicated to public use; and
- Have been fully and properly constructed to a standard adequate to sustain the
traffic volume anticipated when the land served is fully developed.
Historic Perspective
Prior to the requirement for all lots to have access to state maintained roads, many lots in Frederick
County were provided access via private easements which in many cases were not improved to any
particular standard. Frederick County historically had little involvement in the ongoing maintenance
of the streets or their administration. Most of the lots and access roads were rural in character with
the private property owners and users being responsible for their maintenance. The County's
involvement was limited and consisted of responding to citizen concerns regarding access to their
homes.
Frederick County's most significant involvement with roads occurred in Shawneeland. The
Shawneeland Sanitary District was created in response to a variety of public health, safety, and
welfare issues which were occurring in Shawneeland. As a result, the Shawneeland Sanitary District
has a program for improving and maintaining roads in Shawneeland.
Policy alternatives
In lieu of the current system of constructing and maintaining residential subdivision streets, two
alternatives are available for consideration; l) Public maintenance of subdivision streets by County,
and 2) Private maintenance of subdivision streets by Home/Property Owners Associations. The
Board's discussion sought to transfer this responsibility to Home Owners Associations.
Issues for discussion
In general, public street systems, in particular residential streets, are designed to balance
considerations of safety and efficiency, cost effectiveness, livability, and community attractiveness.
The entire community benefits from street improvements that are functionally adequate, durable, and
cost effective. Current County and State policies seek to achieve this. Any future policies should seek
to ensure this position is maintained or enhanced.
Regardless of the approach taken by the County, a significant increase in the County's transportation
and infrastructure construction and maintenance capabilities would be needed to effectively
administer a road program. Such a change in policy would in essence transfer many of the roles and
responsibilities currently provided by VDOT to the County. Frederick County Public Works
Department has expressed that this would include the adoption of road standards, the addition of
personnel, and potentially the acquisition of equipment. An alternative would be to contract for the
same. Overall, the fiscal responsibility for such programs would also need to be increased.
A significant consideration of the public maintenance of the streets by the County is the current
status of Frederick County's Stormwater Management Permitting. The Frederick County Public
Works Department has advised that the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) recently
ruled that Frederick County does not have to obtain a Phase II stormwater discharge permit. Should
the County assume responsibility for the roads within the County and their associated drainage
infrastructure, Frederick County would be required to participate in this expensive stormwater
program. The application of a Phase II permit to Frederick County would require a major investment
from the County.
The private maintenance of subdivision streets by Home/Property Owners Associations, which the
Board's discussion sought to achieve, would be a major policy change for the County. The function
of Home Owners or Property Owners Associations should be a significant consideration when
evaluating requiring private streets for all development in the County. Such a responsibility would be
beyond the scope of such an organization's customary duty. Recent experiences throughout the
County would indicate that Homeowners Associations do not typically function effectively.
Therefore, to require such associations to be responsible for privately maintaining a public street
system would require a great deal of consideration and, ultimately, oversight.
The transfer of all public streets over to the ownership and control of the Property Owners
Associations of Subdivisions within which the Public Streets are located would appear to have many
important considerations for the County and the Community. Such considerations include but are not
limited to the following:
- Maintaining the Public Health, Safety, and Welfare of the residents of the
Subdivision and the Community.
- Public Access.
- Emergency responsiveness.
- Maintainingproperty values and quality communities.
- Increase the financial responsibility of the residents of the Subdivision and
Community in their on-going maintenance of the public road system.
- Long term life cycle costs of road programs.
- Equitable distribution of taxation revenues.
- Potential source of conflict between the County and residents.
- Additional fiscal impacts to County.
An alternate view of the proposal might suggest that transferring the responsibility for Subdivision
Streets to the County or a Private Home Owners Association may provide additional flexibility in the
design of the streets beyond that which is presently afforded by the State. However, this point is
immaterial if the private streets have to meet VDOT Standards. Such a proposal would appear to
reduce the financial responsibility of the State in their on-going maintenance of the State's road
system.
Virginia State Legislature
Current discussion at the State level related to this issue is in response to a bill that included
provisions for VDOT no longer accepting roads into the State System. This is a transportation issue
with budgetary constraints, the on-going restructuring of VDOT, and the financing of transportation
improvements within the State having a bearing on the bill's consideration. As of February 2, 2007,
the State Legislature defeated the initial consideration of this bill. Final resolution at the State level is
pending. VACO and VAPA's positions were generally opposed to this road reversion legislation
based upon the transfer of this responsibility from the State to the Localities without a revenue
source and the use of general funds for transportation.
As noted previously, the first step in the process is for the CPPS to discuss this issue further and
make a recominendation for the Planning Commission's consideration.
Board of Supervisors discussion and motion (01/10/07)
Supervisor Dove stated that the Board approved resolutions tonight (1/10/07) dedicating
roads to VDOT, which put more burden on the State to maintain subdivision streets. He would like
to make a change in Frederick County that all subdivision streets would be maintained by the
Homeowners' Association. He went on to say that if the Board does not do this then they will be
forced to when the State mandates it. Upon a motion by Supervisor Dove, seconded by Vice -
Chairman Fisher, the Board unanimously directed the Comprehensive Plans and Programs
Subcommittee and the Planning Commission to study and make a recommendation to the Board.
Chairman Shickle stated that this suggestion should go to committee because it needs to be
discussed.
Supervisor DeHaven stated that he did not oppose discussion because there were a lot of
issues associated with this proposal that needed to be discussed.
Supervisor Van Osten stated that it was reasonable to look at this, but she also had interest
in waiting to see what comes out of the State.
Supervisor Ewing stated this proposal was worth studying.
Supervisor Lemieux stated that his only concern was the homeowners' associations trying to
fund this maintenance because they often do not have the cash to pay for these types of expenses.