Loading...
CPPC 11-13-06 Meeting AgendaCOUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development -- 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) FROM: Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner � Ke - RE: November Meeting and Agenda DATE: November 6, 2006 The Frederick County Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will be meeting on Monday, November 13, 2006_ at 7:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisor's Room in the County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. The CPPS will discuss the following agenda items: AGENDA 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) 2. Update of the Community Facilities and Services and Parks and Recreation Chapters of the Comprehensive Policy Plan 3. Other Please contact our department if you are unable to attend this meeting. SKE/bad Access is limited during the evening hours. Therefore, it will be necessary to enter the building through the back double doors of the Board of Supervisors Room, located in the rear of the new addition of the County building. I would encourage committee members and interested citizens to park in the County parking lot located in the rear of the building and follow the sidewalk to the back double doors of the Board Room. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 .. u ITEM #1 2007-2003 Capital Improvements Plan The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will be reviewing and discussing the 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). New capital project requests or modifications to previously endorsed requests have been prepared by the various county agencies and departments. Representatives from the various agencies and departments will be attending the meeting to discuss their requests with the CPPS. The role of the CPPS in this meeting will be to review the project requests in the context of the current Comprehensive Policy Plan to ensure that the requests are consistent with the adopted Plan. Attached to this memo is a short summary of this year's CIP and table outlining new and modified project requests. Also attached for your reference are the 2007-2008 CIP draft spreadsheets detailing expenditure estimates and a summary report outlining both new project and project modification requests. Also included with this agenda item are copies of the Individual Project Description and Justification Forms that have been submitted by the Fredrick County Department of Public Works, Parks and Recreation Department, Handley Regional Library, Frederick County School Board, Frederick County Fire and Rescue, Winchester Regional Airport, and the newly created Frederick County Transportation Committee. Staff has prepared maps of the planned public facility locations. Only those facilities for which there is a specific or generalized location are mapped. The map element, if endorsed by the CPPS and ultimately adopted by the Board of Supervisors, would satisfy the Code of Virginia requirement for the 15.2-2232 Review. In essence, the code states that no public facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a "feature shown" within the comprehensive plan. Of course, proposed facilities that are not mapped would not satisfy the code requirement. The Transportation Committee has included capital project requests within this year's CIP. The Code of Virginia allows for transportation projects to be included within a CIP. The need to clearly identify transportation needs has become more apparent as growth continues in Frederick County. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this information. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED 2007-2008- CAPITA -1, IMPROVEMENTS .a The nrnnosed C�`IP consists of 54 capital nrojectc an increase oxrpr flip dF r-�r r. , projects included in the previous CIP. ® Of the 54 capital projects proposed, seventeen are new. The Public Schools account for four, Handley Regional Library has two, and all of the eleven Transportation Committee's requests are new, since this is the first year they have provided capital projects. o The following is a listing of the new project requests (besides transportation): o Four (4) projects from the County public schools: o Apple Pie Ridge Elementary includes several renovations that pertain to updating electrical, plumbing, and other mechanical features. o Bass Hoover Elementary proposes the addition of classrooms to cope with growth in student membership. o The relocation of Frederick County Middle School has been included to provide a better environment for students than the current facility. o Frederick County Middle School renovations include a change of use to administrative offices. • Two (2) projects from the Handley Regional Library: o Branch libraries located within the UDA have been requested, which include specific areas: Senseny/Greenwood Route 522 South Public Schools, Parks & Recreation, County Administration, and Winchester Regional Airport have either reduced their number of priorities or have submitted the same number of requests as Iast year, while the Regional Library was the only agency to increase the amount of project requests from last year. SFO osed 20-41-)7-2 j Cap aipp_Ko vements Flan Comparison of New Project Requests and Modification Requests Frederick County Public Schools Project Type of 2006-2007 2007-2008 Difjerence Request Local Local (�) Expenditure Expenditi:re Request ($) Re uest ($) Transportation Facility Modification 12,500,000 13,186,200 686,200 Elementary School 912 Modification 20,451,700 19,389,000 -1,062,700 Apple Pie Ridge New N/A 3,500,000 N/A Elementary School Renovation Bass Hoover Elementary New N/A 1,500,000 N/A School Addition Replacement of Frederick New N/A 33,592,000 N/A County Middle School Frederick County Middle New N/A N/A N/A School Renovation/Administrative Offices Robert E. Aylor Middle Modification 18,000,000 18,000,000 0 School Renovation Fifth Middle School Modification 26,000,000 34,642,000 8,642,000 James Wood High School Modification 18,000,000 N/A N/A Renovation Fourth High School Modification 55,000,000 52,000,000 -3,000,000 ]Elementary School #13 Modification 20,451,700 19,389,000 -1,062,700 Elementary School #14 Modification 20,451,700 19,389,000 -1,062,700 Total 190, 855,100 214, 587, 200 18,732,100 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Project Type Of 2006-2007 2007-2008 Difference Request Local Local ($) 1,075,304 1,123,693 Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) Aquatic Facility Modification 13,500,000 14,107,500 607,500 Park Land in Modification 3,000,000 3,135,000 135,000 Western Frederick County Park Land in Modification 4,000,000 4,180,000 180,000 Eastern Frederick County Swimming Pool Modification 1,114,560 1,164,715 50,155 Improvements Maintenance Modification 336,960 352,123 15,163 Compound- Sherando Park Open Play Areas- Modification 444,990 465,015 20,025 Clearbrook Park Access Road with Modification 1,075,304 1,123,693 48,389 Parking and Trails- Sherando Park Lake, Trails, and Modification 1,054,199 1,101,638 47,439 Parking with 2 -MP Fields Skateboard Park- Modification 454,594 475,051 20,457 Sherando Park Softball Complex- Modification 593,674 620,389 26,715 Sherando Park Baseball Complex Modification 1,177,802 1,230,803 53,001 Renovations- Sherando Park Soccer Complex- Modification 1,790,665 1,871,245 80,580 Sherando Park TennisBasketbali Modification 449,772 470,012 20,240 Complex - Clearbrook Park Picnic Area- Modification 697,280 728,658 31,378 Sherando Park Shelter/Stage Modification 443,412 463,366 19,954 Seating- Clearbrook Park Multi -Generational Modification 7,840,800 8,193,636 352,836 Community Center Total 37, 974, 012 39, 682, 844 1,708,832 County Administration Project Type of 2006-2007 2007-20018 D�ffierence Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) Fire & Rescue Modification 3,100,000 3,100,000 0 Station #22 Round Dill Fire Modification N/A N/A N/A Station Relocation Gainesboro Modification 250,000 400,000 150,000 Convenience Site Relocation New N/A 47,800,000 Core Refuse Site Modification 250,000 400,000 150,000 Expansion New N/A 3,000,000 Clearbrook Fire Modification 1,530,000 1,530,000 0 Station- Relocation Total New -5,130,000 5, 430, 000 300,000 Transportation Committee Project Type of 2006-2007 2007-2008 Difference Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) Planning & New N/A 3,000,000 Engineering Rt. 37 Warrior Drive New N/A 23,200,000 Extension Channing Drive New N/A 20,600,000 Extensiou Widening of Route New N/A 47,800,000 11 North Brucetown Rd. & New N/A 3,000,000 Hopewell Rd. Realignment Senseny Road New N/A 22,800,000 Widening East Tevis Street New N/A 2,600,000 Extension Inverlee Way New N/A 10,200,000 Fox Drive New N/A 250,000 Blossom Drive New N/A 250,000 Revenue Sharing New N/A 3,000,000 Total 136, 700,000 N/A Winchester Regional Airport Project Type of 2006-2007 2007-2008 Di_f_ference Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request $) Land Acquisition- Modification 17,300 17,300 0 Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Terminal Building Modification 110,000 11000 0 Renovation Modification 1,053,000 1,053,000 0 Land Acquisition- Modification 17,300 17,300 0 Parcels 47, 47A, & 48 Upgrade Airfield Modification 4,000 4,000 0 Lights i,and Acquisition- Modification 7,000 7,000 0 Parcels 50, 51, & 52 Airfield Maintenance Modification 210,000 210,000 0 Building Total 1 365,600 365,600 1 0 Handley Regional Library Project Type of 2006-2007 Local 2007-2008 Difference Request Expenditure Local ($) Request (S) Expenditure Request (S) Bowman Library- Modification 228,468 228,468 0 Parking Lot & Sidewalk Extension Library facility in Modification 1,053,000 1,053,000 0 Northwestern Frederick County Library Branch- New N/A N/A N/A Sensen /Greenwood Library Branch- New N/A N/A N/A Route 522 South Total 1,281,468 1,281,468 0 Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year County Contributions Notes Total Project Costs Projects 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Public Schools Transportation Facility 8,000,000 5,186,200 Elementary School #12 $13,166,200 $13,186,200 9,125,000 13,901,700 3,562,300 $19,389,000 $19,389,000 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary 400,000 2,400,000 700,000 Bass Hoover Elementary 250,000 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 800,000 450,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Replacement Frederick Middle 2,200,000 5,500,000 21,500,000 4,392,000 $33,592,000 $33,592,000 Fred Co. Middle School Renov. Robert E. Aylor Renovation 500,000 7,575,000 7,650,000 2,275,000 N/A $16,000,000 N/A $18,000,000 Fifth Middle School 2,250,000 1,000,000 3,892,000 22,500,000 5,000,000 $34,642,000 $34,642,000 James Wood High School Renov. N/A N/A Fourth High School 3,750,000 1,500,000 5,000,000 13,000,000 19,000,000 $52,000,000 D $52,000,000 Elementary School #13 700,000 1,125,000 14,001,700 $19,389,000 D $19,389,000 Elementary School #14 Parks 8 Recreation $19,389,000 D $19,389,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility 14,107,500 $14,107,500 $14,107,500 Park Land Western Fred. Co. 3,135,000 $3,135,000 $3,135,000 Park Land Eastern Fred. Co. 4,180,000 Clearbrook & Sherando Water Slide/Spray Ground $4,150,000 $4,180,000 Sherando Maintenance Compound 1,164,715 $1,164,715 $1,164,715 Clearbrook Open Play Areas 352,123 $352,123 $352,123 Sherando Access Road w/Parking/Trails 465,015 $465,015 $465,015 Sherando Lake/Trails/Parking- 2 Fields 1,123,693 $1,123,693 $1,123,693 Sherando Skateboard Park 1,101,638 $1,101,638 $1,101,638 Sherando Softball Complex 475,051 $475,051 $475,051 Sherando Baseball Complex 620,389 $620,389 $620,389 Sherando Soccer Complex 1,230,803 $1,230,803 $1,230,803 Clearbrook Tennis/Basketball Complex 1,671,245 $1,671,245 $1,871,245 Sherando Picnic Areas 470,012 $470,012 $470,012 Clearbrook Shelter Stage 728,658 $728,658 $728,658 Multi -Generational Center 463,366 $463,366 $463,366 County Administration 8,193,636 $8,193,636 $8,193,636 Fire & Rescue Station #22 400,000 1,100,000 1,600,000 Station #15 Relocation $3,100,000 $3,100,000 Relocation of Gai.nesboro Site 50,000 350,000 N/A N/A Relocation/Expansion Gore Site $400,000 $400,000 50,000 350,000 $350,000 $350,007 A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation N/A= Not Available B= Partial funding from FAA C= Partial funding from private donations D= Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years Station #13 Relocation 80,000 90,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 $510,000 Transportation 869,500 Route 37 Engineering 1,500,000 1,500,000 Warrior Drive Extension $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Channing Drive Extension $23,200,000 $23,200,000 Widening of Route 11 North $20,600,000 $20,600,000$47,aoo,000 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign. $47,800,000 Senseny.Road Widening $3,000,000 $3,000,000 East Tevis Street Extension $22,000,000 $z2,000,000 Inverlee Way $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Fox Drive $10,200,000 $10,200,000 Blossom Drive $250,000 $250,000 Revenue Sharing 500,000 $250,000 $250,000 Winchester Airport 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Land Acquisition, Lots 31,46,53 14,000 3,300 Terminal Building Renovation 100,000 $17,300 A,B $865,000 Land Acquisition, Lots 47,47A,48 13,000 4,300 $100,000 A $500,000 Upgrade Airfield Lights 1,000 3,000 $17,300 A $865,000 Land Acquisition, Lots 50,51,52 $4,000 A,B $200,000 Airfield Maintenance Building 7,000 $7,000 A $350,000 Regional Library 210,000 $210,000 A $300,000 Bowman Parking Lot/Sidewalk 228,468 Library Branch North Frederick $228,468 $228,468 Senseny/Greenwood Branch 48,000 1,005,000 $1,053,000 C $1,053,000 Route 522 Branch N/A N/A NIA N/A A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation N/A= Not Available B= Partial funding from FAA C= Partial funding from private donations D= Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years 2007-,2008 Capital Improvements Specific or Approximate Locations oift Parks and Recreation 1 Sherand0 Park 2 Clearbrook Park 3 Future Western Parkland 4 Future Eastern Parkland County Administration 1 Annex Facility 2 Round Hill Fire Station Relocation 3 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation 4 Gore Convenience Site Expansion 5 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation Airport Library 1 Bowman Library - Parking Lot and Sidewalk Addition 2 Northern Frederick County Library Branch 3 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood 4 Library Branch - Rt 522 South /\, Primary Roads Net. Created by Frederick County Department of Planning & Development November 02, 2006 Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests submitted by various county departments. 20,07-2008 ,�'�` ederhp,A o.,unt I 0 12,500 25,000 50,000 75,000 0 2 4 Feet $ 12 Miles - ®RAFT - Existing Elementary Schools Existing Middle Schools Existing High Schools New School Location Alternatives O'N_r Rt 37 Bypass Urban Development Area t S WSA City/ Town Bounday Streets Primary r Secondary Winchester Rds 2007-2008 New School Locations dif 38 f ii �A ' Replacement FCMS < ! �/i ��'X✓.b"-. ;ei y< Idly . p. Elementary - r: School " #13 Elem S h I s Map Created by Frederick County Dept of Planning & Development 11/02/06 N W*E S 0 1 2 4 Miles t�i ! 1 1 i ti M� �'-�#12 Elem School #5 Middle School #4 High School School Locations Are Most Appropriate Within the UDA FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS �5 GE-E 2 2'', Frederick County Public Schools 2007-2008 FREDERICK COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Departmental Requests Individual Description and Justification Forms For New and Carry Over Project Requests Department of Planning and Development Approved October 17, 2006 by the Frederick County School Board Frederick County School Facilities 1 Admiral Richard E. Byrd Middle School 2 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School 3 Armel Elementary School 4 Bass -Hoover Elementary School 5 Gainesboro Elementary School 6 Indian Hollow Elementary School 7 Middletown Elementary School 8 Millbrook High School 9 Orchard View Elementary School 10 Redbud Run Elementary School 11 Senseny Road Elementary School 12 Stonewall Elementary School 13 Frederick County Middle School 14 James Wood Middle School 15 Robert E. Aylor Middle School 16 James Wood High School 17 Sherando High School 18 Dowell J. Howard Center 19 Northwester Regional Education Programs 20 Evendale Elementary School Future Site Locations A Transportation Facility B Reelacement Gainesboro Elementary School G 12t Elementary School D 41" High School E 5"' Middle School F Future Elementary Schools G Replacement Frederick County Middle School H Mufti -use Campus Frederick County Public Schools .4;), e ds $ �YY YY.l� Cross' 5 b ra a �ewbrup z �6 � r3 .• �q � g to . Hifi t C i rl�r r me. Approve Frederick County School Board on October 17, 2006 Frederick C ty t-ublic Schools CIP 2007-2012 Dept. 7/1(2006- Year 1I Year 2 Year 3 Year Year 5 Year 6 Years Estimated Project Priority Project Title 7!1/2007- 7/1/2008- 6/30/2007 7!1!2009- 7/1/2010- 7/1/2011- 7/112012- BeyondCIP Cost 6/30/2008 6/30/2009 6130/2010 6(30/2011 6/30!2012 6(3012013 Land` Acquisition„ Transportation 12th Elementary School _15 acres::: - Replacement FCMS :.:30aares:.♦. 5th Middle School " ...30 Sema:.. " 4th High School ...50 acras:r: 13th Elementary School 14th Elementary School , ,, . „ , , , : c.:76'acres..: ....... , Land Acquisition Begin $13, 200,00.00 Approval & *� Transportation Facility Construction July Open July 2008 Includes Land Acquisition Appropriation 2007 LandAGqursttloA; $19,400,000.00 Without Alternate; Includes – — - — *2a ---.-------- 12th Elementary School – Begin-- Construction- --r— — — ---I Open July 2009 Approval & +�+ Land Acquisition Appropriation March 2008 1 Apple Pie Ridge Approval & Begin Open July 2009 $3,500,000.00 2b Elementary School Appropriation Construction July Renovation July 2007 2008 2c Bass -Hoover Elementary ppprovat & AAppropriation Begin Construction July Open July 2008' $ 1,500,000.00 School Addition J– 2007 2008 ---- – ----- r — – — - _--- — Land Acquisrt%n $ 33,600,000 ��� � Replace Frederick � � � Begin i *3a County Middle School Construction July Open July 2010 includes Land Acquisition Approval & Appropriation FCMS) 2008 ; November 2006 Begin 3b Renovate FCMS to Approval Engineering Appropriation Bid Project Construction July Open Jan 2012 1 TBD Administration Office 111112006 Design Proposal _ – _ _ 2010 ' $18,000,000.00 I Robert E. Aylor Middle' I �!' ' I Approval & Begin addition Nov. Open July 2011 4 School Addition andRenovation Appropriation alio Renovation Sept. 2007 June 2009 Land Acquisition Approval &Appropriation Begin $34,600,000.00 *5 5th Middle School Construction July Open July 2011 November 2007 2009 – ----- - — - — - — - ----- Includes Land Acquisition TBD sa James Wood High --. .—�—�— . I —'—I — –RpPr— & Appropriation -Begin Construction July Open July 2011 i School Upgrades July 2008 2009 Approval & Appropriation Begin Construction July t Open July 2012 r $52,000,000.00 Without Alternate; Land Acquisition 6b 4th High School July 2007 2009 Includes Land Acquisition - — - — _----------- -,.�y�.+:. Approval & Begin $19,000,000.00 Land Acquisition *7 13th Elementary School A ro riation pp p Construction Open July 2013 [::: Without Alternate; Includes July 2010 March 2012 Land Acquisition Approval & Begin $19,000,000.00 Land Acquisition *8 14th Elementary School Appropriation Construction March 2014 Without Alternate; Includes July 2012 Oen Jul 2015 Land Acquisition * � Land Acquisition O Construction Cost per square foot based on $162 /sq.ft. (Gainesboro Elem. School replacement). � Approval and appropriation Q Out of CIP range Estimate will change over time of CIP. up to awarding bid �7 • 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Transportation Facility Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: TSD Agency: Frederick County Public School Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: TBD Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. A Transportation Facility on approximately 25 acres that would house administration, driver training areas, driver and staff meeting area, mechanical service and repair bays, inspection bay, wash bay, and fueling bays. The location of the facility should be close to major transportation arteries and as close to the largest number of schools as possible. The facility will also need secure parking for the bus and vehicle fleet, as well as adequate parking for visitors, staff and drivers. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, planning, design, property assessment, and construction should take approximately 38 months. ■ Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 r� Project Priority: 1 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The Transportation facility would be listed as number one under project priority. ®mated Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES FY 1st 2nd 3rd 4tn 5th Beyond Element FY FY FY FY FY 2006/07 FY 2007/08 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 /09 /10 /11 112 /13 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Ac uiq siMOI Site Preparation & pn rovenaent Construction Furniture and 1,000,000 1,000,000 L,186,200 2,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,500,000 E ui anent 500,000 Other (opening 500,000 da collection) *13,186,2 TOTAL 3,500,000 4,500,000 5,186,200 —. *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility "costs. Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds i Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The transportation department provides a student transportation system to support a division membership of over 12,000 students and over 2,000 full and part-time employees. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 FY 1St FY 2nd FY 3`d FY 4" FY 5th FY Beyond Element 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY TOTAL 2012/13 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and 3,500,000 4,500,000 5,186,200 13,186,200 Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 3,500,000 4,500,000 5,186,200 13,186,200* *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds i Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The transportation department provides a student transportation system to support a division membership of over 12,000 students and over 2,000 full and part-time employees. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Mm�■M ��■ ter®��M _ Please describe the need for this project. The current transportation site has outgrown the current facilities and there is not sufficient area to expand those facilities. The increase in student membership, coupled with the stringent laws and regulations that govern the operation and maintenance of school transportation vehicles, requires a much larger and upgraded transportation facility. Additional space is needed to provide a safe and adequate work place for employees. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location of this facility has not yet been determined. ■ Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. w� ■ Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk This proposed project will directly impact the transportation department's ability to operate and maintain the school division's school bus fleet, and vehicle fleet. The project will also address ADA inadequacies, relieve overcrowding, and plan for future expansion. ■ Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? This proposed project will assist the transportation department as well as the administration staff in its ability to maintain compliance with Federal and State laws and regulations that govern the transportation of students and also assist in maintaining compliance with building code and fire regulations. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 o Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Student transportation is provided to all eligible residents of Frederick County. Students that have a verified special need for special services transportation are provided those services. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools facilities assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. It takes adequate facilities and well-managed programs to maintain quality public schools. ■�■ Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Elementary School #12 Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: TSD Agency: Frederick County Public School Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: TBD project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This is a single story elementary school with a floor area of approximately 94,000 to 97,000 square feet without the alternate which includes Parks & Recreational facilities located on 15 acres. The facility will be designed to accommodate a student membership of 750. The outdoor facilities will include three pods of -grade -level appropriate playground equipment, one asphalt play area, one softball field, and one physical education field. This facility will meet or exceed all Virginia Department of Education new construction requirements for K-5 Elementary Schools. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, planning, design, property assessment, and construction should take approximately 36 months. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other pro)ect(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project 2a, 2b, and 2c are dependent and planned in conjunction with each other due to increases in enrollment and changes in the instructional program. Project Priority: 2a� If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The Elementary School #12 would be listed as number 2a on the project list. Estimated Cost (in 2006 dollars): 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES FY 1st 2nd 3rd 4"' 5th Beyo Total Element 2006/07 FY FY FY FY FY nd 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010 2011 FY /11 /12 2012/ 13 700,000 700,000 Planning, Surveying, & Design 1,125,000 Land 1,125,000 Acquisition 100,000 Site Preparation 100 000 Improvements 12,901,700 15,714,000 Construction 1,000,000 1,500,000 Furniture and Equipment P250,000 250,000 Other (opening day collection) 800,000 13,901,700 3,562,300 19,389,000* Nw— TOTAL 1,125,000 *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) l - . Source of Funding: hidicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 1 � � 2005-2006 Capital hnpmvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 4th 5th Beyo Element FY 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY FY FY ndTOTAL 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/ 2011 2012 11 /12 /13 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds 1,125,000 800,000 13,901,700 3,562,300 19,389,000 and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 1,125,000 800,000 13,901,700 3,562,300 19,389,000* *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 1 � � 2005-2006 Capital hnpmvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The facility will serve 750 students. Please describe the need for this project. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools having student enrollments exceeding their program capacity. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. This school will be located in an area to relieve current overcrowding and to accommodate the projected new housing development in the areas served by these elementary school attendance zones. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map for the east side of Frederick County. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk This school will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and elementary students of Frederick County. Page 4 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? _C,Q_mpletion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student - ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodating students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does. -the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been. identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age population of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed -project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open'—public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, `JA Project Name: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Renovation Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapoesi Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: Gainesboro Location of Project: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School 349 Apple Pie Ridge Road Winchester, VA ®■1 -0 Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Schools is located at 349 Apple Pie Ridge Road Winchester, VA and opened for students in 1974 and has served as an elementary school since that time. The school contains 65,120 square feet and has a program capacity of 563 students. Currently the building serve grades K - 5. The building is in good condition however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Several of the major areas to be included in this renovation project are additional classroom space; roof replacement, security, and upgrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. An architectural/engineering study will need to be conducted to determine the full scope of work to be undertaken and provide cost estimates for the project. The study is estimated to begin during the FY06/07 with construction scheduled to begin FY08/09 with completion summer 2009. Approval, planning, design, property assessment, and construction is estimated to take approximately 24 months. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the pro=jects Project 2a, 2b, and 2c are dependent and planned in conjunction -with each other -- due to increases in enrollment and changes in the instructional program.'" Project Priority: 2b If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The renovation of Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Schools is number 2b on the project priority list. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 15' FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th 5th FY Beyond Totab- 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 FY 20011/ FY _ 2010 12 2012 /11 400,000 Planning, 400,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 2,700,000 Construction 2,000,000 700,000 400,000 Furniture and 400,000 Equipment Other (opening day collection) 400,000 2,400,000 700,000 3,500,000* TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "Iacihty "costs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rn�c Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility -or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011112 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants 400,000 2,400,000 700,000 3,500,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising 400,000 2,400,000 1 700,000 3,500,000 TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above " tactttty " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 2005-2006 Capital Lrnprovements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please. project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. ple Pie Ridge Elementary School will be Program capacity for the renovated Ap determined by the architecture study, but the number of students served in grades K-5 should be increased due to the additional space being added to the building. ■ Please describe the need for this project. Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is soon to be 32 years of age and renovation is needed to .a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for the years to come. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: - Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project inconsistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and elementary school students in the Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School attendance zones. 2005-2006 Capita( Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining= -recommended teacher -to - student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special -needs, populations, and assist in accommodation students and staff with disabilities. ■ Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age populations of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project esseiitial to, or would it encourage some form of econornen-; development? Would the project improve' the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 :� C • 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Bass Hoover Elementary School Addition Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapoesi Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: Opequon Location of Project: Bass Hoover Elementary School 471 Aylor Road Stephens City, VA Project: Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Bass Hoover Elementary School is located at 471 Aylor Road Stephens City, VA and opened for students in 1975 and has served as an elementary school since that time. The school contains 64,630 square feethas a program capacity of 662 u -dents `:drrently the buildings serve grades K - 5. The building is in good condition however, additional classroom space is needed. ■ Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, planning, assessment, and construction should take approximately 24 months. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project 2a, 2b, and 2c are dependent and planned in conjunction with each other due to increases in enrollment and changes in the instructional program. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page I Project Priority: 2c If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous'piiority and current status of project: The renovation of Bass Hoover Elementary Schools is number 2c on the project priority list. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): rnr%ni-%oir" L Yb1G 1�TTliTiTRF.0 Element 15t FY 1 1 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY - 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/1 20011/12 FY 1 2012 Planning, 250,000 250,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition _ — ""— Site Preparation & huprovements 1,100,000 - Construction 800,000 300,000 .Furniture and 150,000 150,000 Equipment Other (opening day collection) 250,000 800,000 450,000 1,500,000* TOTAL t -1..-...v 6°forility L° r -"&Q *Partnerships witli other county (ir,PM LttioliL�) CU V, llvL V-.. .--a v-- .-' --__ __ _ . _ 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the -space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate providd&by"an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants 250,000 800,000 450,000 - - 1,500,000 Bonds and I Debts Other Fund- raising 250,000 800,000 450,000 *1,500,000 TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. _ The. program capacity of Bass Hoover Elementary School grades K-5 will be recalculated after the addition is complete. Please describe the need for this project. Bass Hoover Elementary School is soon to be 31 years of age and built using the _ open classroom concept and with increasing membership the need to add additional classroom space will insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for the years to come. _Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. NIA Conformance to the Cdrnprehensive Plan: - Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and elementary school students in the Bass Hoover Elementary School attendance zone. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or--som6-other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to - student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special-ueeds�o-Ulations, and assist in accommodation students and staff with disabilities. ■ Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school-age populations of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some forin of economic development? Would the project improve the tm ,-base, reduce. operating expenses, produce revenue, of F+1--rwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business-aud industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Replacement Frederick County Middle School Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: TBD Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: Gainesboro Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The replacement Frederick County Middle School (FCMS) project will have a program capacity of 850 students and serve grades 6 -8. This projects location has been requested as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map and would be located in the western part of Frederick County between Route 50 West and Route 522 North in the area of Hayfield Road. It will have a floor area of approximately 166,000 square feet and be located on approximately 30 acres of land. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, purchase of property, property assessment, planning, design and construction should take approximately 44 months. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 nm�� Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planneen d in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate n unction with eache relationship eotheredue to the needed Project 3a and 3b are planned in co renovation of FCMS and the need for renovation and space needs at the Frederick County Administrative Building Project Priority: 3a If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The replacement FCMS is listed as number 3a on the priority list. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES. 5th Be and 2nd T3rd 4th y Element 1st FY FY FY FY FYFy 2012/13 2006/07 2007/08 2008/099/10 2010/11 2011 02 1 `Tanning, arveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TO p 1 *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility "costs. 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 4,500,000 19,000,000 1 3,392,000 2,500,000 1 500,000 500,000 1200,000 1,000,000 5,500,000 21,500,000 14,392,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,00 00 00 26,8926,g9 02, 0000 3,000,000 00 500,000 00 *33,592,000 Page 2 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. TTTXmTXT1-4 Cl1TT1D V C Element FY 2006/07 A A�V1 vvi�Y 1st FY 2007/08 ivx.y��. 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 — 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 201 1/12 7Beyond TOTAL - — General Fund Other Fund State Grants 1,200,000 1,000,000 5,500,000 21,500,000 4,392,000 33,592,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 1,200,000 1,000,000 5,500,000 21,500,000 _:-3---- 4,392,000 7 :_. +I,- ,b,...>e'Fn ilitcr" rnctc 7592,000* *Partnerships with otner county ucpauw,Qu- uu il�� ��ll�lu�., ,. --� •--� ��� . - ---- Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The replacement FCMS would have a program capacity of 850 students in Grades 6-8. A I Please describe the need for this project. With the need for renovations at the current FCMS to the major mechanical systems, items dealing with ADA compliance, increasing membership, location of the facility, concern for the best building configuration for the delivery of instruction, and the connectivity to other department projects the replacement of FCMS is listed as a priority department project. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location of this project has been requested as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map t he area of Hayfield in the western part of Frederick County between the Route 50 West and Route 522 Nord would be th in Road. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This school will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and high school students in Frederick County. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodating students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age population of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of -,t,-zonomic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. 9 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 C • r-� 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, V4 Project Name: Frederick County Middle School Renovation to Administrative Offices Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: 441 Linden Drive Winchester, VA Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: Winchester City Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Frederick County Middle School is located at 441 Linden Drive Winchester, VA and opened for students in 1965 and has served as a junior and middle school since that time. The school contains 99,293 square feet and has a program capacity of 730 students. Currently the building serves grades 6, 7, and 8. The building is in good condition however, several major areas meed to be addressed in a renovation to an administration_ office building. Several of the major areas to be included in this renovation project are security, a replacement of fire alarm system, and roof; up -grades to the heating, electrical and plumbing systems, as well as conversion of current instructional space to office space. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. An architectural/engineering study will need to be conducted to determine the scope of work to be undertaken and provide preliminary cost estimates for the project. The study is beginning during the FY06/07 with construction scheduled to begin FYI 0/11 with completion January 2012, Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project 3a and 3b are planned in conjunction with each other due to the needed renovation of FCMS and the need for renovation and space needs at the Frederick County Administrative Building 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page I i Project Priority: 3b Ifpreviou ly included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The renovation of Frederick County Middle School is number 3b on the project priority list. a Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 151 2nd I 3rd FY I 4th FY FY FY 2009/10 2010/11 2007 2008 /08 /09 Planning, Surveying, & Design LaEAcquisition Sion&nts Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) 5th FY Beyond Total 20011/12 1 FY 2012 11 TBD* TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility" costs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED VVNVIINU OVUM -En Element 1st 2nd 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL FY FY 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 FY 2012 2006 2007 /07 /08 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising , TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above iaciuty —S -- Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): M Page 3 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests i■ Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The renovation of Frederick County Middle County Public1strative Scho Is offices will serve 110 current staff housed in the present Frederick Administration Building. a Please describe the need for this project. Frederick County Middle School is soon to be 41 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the facility for the years to come. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainmentebli of t policies als and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project will assist the school division and -county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and middle school students in the Frederick County Middle School attendance zone. Page 4 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? This proposed project will assist the Frederick County administrative staff in its ability to maintain compliance with Federal and State laws and regulations that govern the school division. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age populations of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. e Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger pro] ect? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 r � u 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and DevOopment Frederick County, VA Project Name: Robert E. Aylor Middle School Renovation and Addition Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: 901 Aylor Road Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: Opequou Stephens City, VA Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Robert E. Aylor Middle School is located at 901 Aylor Road Stephens City VA and opened for students in 1969 and has served as a middle school since that time. The school contains 113,643 square feet and has a program capacity of 850 students. Currently the building serves grades 6, i, and 8. The building is in good condition however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major areas to be included in this renovation project are additional classroom and storage space; a complete replacement of fire alarm and, communication systems, plus roof replacement; upgrade of electrical and plumbing; and complete replacement of mechanical systems. Others areas to be addressed would include: security, repaving of asphalted areas, and the installation of an emergency power system. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. An architectural/engineering study will need to be conducted to determine the scope of work to be undertaken and provide preliminary cost estimates for the project. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 v Project Priority: 4 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The renovation of Robert E. Aylor is number 4 on the project priority list. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 15f FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 FY 011 2012 I12 500,000 Planning, 500,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 16,025,000 Construction 7,000,000 7,000,000 2,025,000 Furniture and 5751000 600,000 200,000 1,375,000 Equipment 100,000 Other (opening 50,000 50,000 day collection) TOTAL h5 0-0500,000 7,575,000 7,650,000 2,275,000118,000,000* *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility "costs. Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. nnnnnc1un U'FTNnrN('_ cnrTR( YS Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The renovation of Robert E. Aylor Middle School will serve 850 students in grades 6, 7, & 8. Please describe the need for this project. Robert E. Aylor Middle School is soon to be 37 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for the years to come. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 1st FY 2007/08 r c%,"A %-LP021" 2nd FY 2008/09 1' 11 -- 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/ Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL Element 12 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and 500,000 7,575,000 7,650,000 2,275,000 18,000,000 Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 500,000 T7—,575,000 7,650,000 2,275,000 18,000,000* Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The renovation of Robert E. Aylor Middle School will serve 850 students in grades 6, 7, & 8. Please describe the need for this project. Robert E. Aylor Middle School is soon to be 37 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for the years to come. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. ■ Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and middle school students in the Robert E. Aylor Middle School attendance zone. Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher-to� student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodation students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age populations of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger proj ect? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Reiurn to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: New Fifth Middle School Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: TBD Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: TBD Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The new fifth middle school project will have a program capacity of 850 students and serve grades 6 -8. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map. The facility will have a floor area of approximately 166,000 square feet and be located on approximately 30 acres of land. ■ Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, purchase of property, property assessment, planning, design and construction should take approximately 44 months. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. No 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 ■ Project Priority: 5 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The new fifth middle school is listed as number 5 on the priority list. ■ Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 1st 2nd 3`d 4th 5th Beyo Total Element FY FY FY FY FY nd 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 2 12 Planning, 1,000,000 1,000,000 Surveying, & Design 2,250,000 Land Acquisition 2,250,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Site Preparation & Improvements 2,892,000 20,000,000 4,000,000 26,892,000 Construction Furniture and 2,500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Equipment 500,000 500,000 Other (opening day collection) 2,250,000 1,000,000 3,892,000 22,500,000 5,000,000 34,642,000 TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility" costs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) i Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and 2,250,000 1,000,000 3,892,000 22,500,000 5,000,000 34,642,000 Debts Other Fund-raising 2,250,000 1,000,000 3,892,000 22,500,000 5,000,000 1 1 34,642,000* TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The fifth middle school would have a program capacity of o50 students in Grades 6-8. Please describe the need for this project. This project will address continued growth in student enrollment in the school division over the next five years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase at all levels. A rolling migration projects the following student enrollment in the middle schools by FYI to be 3,322. Based on this projection population it will be necessary to construct the fifth middle school in Frederick County. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This school will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and high school students in Frederick County. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodating students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age population of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: James Wood High School Renovation Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency: Frederick County Public School Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Phone Number: (540)-662-3889 Location of Project: 161 Apple Pie Ridge Rd Magisterial District: Gainesboro Winchester, VA 0 Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. James Wood High School is located at 161 Apple Pie Ridge Rd Winchester, VA opened for students in 1980 school year and has served as a high school since that time. The school contains 234,095 square feet and has a program capacity of 1400 students. Currently the building serves grades 9 —12. The building is in good condition however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major areas to be included in this renovation project include increased electrical service and distribution to support technology; technology cabling, hardware, and its installation; upgrade of plumbing and mechanical systems; and modification of instructional areas to support instructional delivery. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. An architectural/engineering study will need to be conducted to determine the scope of work to be undertaken and provide preliminary cost estimates for the project. The study is estimated to begin during the FY07/08 with construction scheduled to begin FY09/10 with completion Summer 2011. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 ■ Coordination: if the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project Priority: 6a If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The renovation of James Wood High School is number 6a on the project priority list. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered i"facility "costs. n the above 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each'funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1St FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/ 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 20011/12 FY 2012 08 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TBD* TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): .Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of - _ w service to be provided by the project. The renovation of James Wood High School will serve 1,400 students in grades 9 —12. Please describe the need for this project. James Wood High School is soon to be 27 years of age and renovations the school for the years to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation to come. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attaimnent of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County Sr-hool Board. public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and high school students in the James Wood High School attendance zone - 2005 -2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodation students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age populations of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an op en public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: New Fourth High School Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency: Frederick County Public Schools Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Location of Project: TBD Magisterial District: TBD Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The fourth high school project will have a program capacity of 1,250 students and serve grades 9 -12. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map for the east side of Frederick County. The facility will have a floor area of approximately 242,000 square feet and be located on approximately 50 acres of land. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, purchase of property, property assessment, planning, design and construction should take approximately 60 months. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. No 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan. Project Requests Page l ■ Project Priority: 6b If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The new Fourth High School is listed as number 6b on the priority list. ■s■w�s ■ Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 PROPOSED EXPENDITURE t Beyond Total Element 1st FY 2 „a 3rd 4 FY FY FY FY FY 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012 Planning, 1,500,000 1,500,000 Surveying, & Design 3,750,000 Land Acquisition 3,750,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 Site Preparation & Improvements 2,000,000 13,000,000 16,000,000 8;750,000 39,750,000 Construction 3,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collectio►r)52,000,000* TOTAL 3,750,000 1,500,000 5,000,000 13,000,000 19,000,000 9,750,000 *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architec.t, -- vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPORRI) FTTNDTNG SOURCES Element lst FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants 3,750,000 1,500,000 5,000,000 13,000,000 19,000,000 9,750,000 52,000,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising 3,750,0"01 1,500,000 5,000,000 13,000,000 19,000,000 9,750,000 52,000,000* TOTAL *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above ""acuity -- costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The fourth high school would have a program capacity of 1,250 students in grades 9-12. Please describe the need for this project. This project will address continued growth in student enrollment in the school division over the next five years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase at all levels. A three year rolling migration projects the following student enrollment in the high schools by the fall of 2012 to be 4,359. Based on this projection along with Weldon Cooper population projections it will be necessary to construct the fourth high school in Frederick County. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive plan's capital project map. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This school will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and high school students in Frederick County. 2005-2006 Capital. Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 ■ Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodating students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age population of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. A M Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger proj ect? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 • :7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: New Elementary School #13 Date Prepared: 10118/06 Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapocsi Location of Project: TBD Agency: Frederick County Public School Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: TBD Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This is a single story elementary school with a floor area of approximately 94,000 to 97,000 square feet located on 15 acres. The facility will be designed to accommodate a student membership of 750. The outdoor facilities will 'include three pods of grade -level appropriate playground equipment, one asphalt play area, one softball field, and one physical education field. This facility will meet or exceed all Virginia Department of Education new construction requirements for K-5 Elementary Schools. ■ Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, planning, design, property assessment, and construction should take approximately 36 months. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page I ®tMMw 0 Project Priority: 7 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: The New Elementary School #13 would be listed as number 7 on the project list. Estimated Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1St 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Beyond Total FY FY FY FY FY FY 2007 2008 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012 /08 /09 Planning, 700,000 700,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition 1,125,000 1,125,000 Site Preparation 100,000 100,000 & Improvements Construction 12,901,700 2,812,300 15,714,000 Furniture and 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000 Equipment Other (opening 250,000 250,000 day collection) TOTAL 700,000 1,125,000 14,001,700 3,562,300 19,389,000* *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2005-2006 Capital Iinprovernents Plan Project Requests rage 2- r� Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. vi2npns;F.il FUNDING SOURCES *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above racuiLy cuSts. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds ■ Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The facility will serve 750 students. Please describe the need for this project. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools having student enrollments exceeding their program capacity. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 1st 2nd FY FY 3`d FY 4t'` FY 5t'' FY Beyond FY TOTAL Element 2007 2008/ 2009/10 2010/10 2011/12 2012 /08 09 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and 700,000 1,125,000 14,001,700 3,562,300 19,389,000 Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 700,000 1,125,000 14,001,700 3,562,300 ecr 19,389,000 •1•. _CC *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above racuiLy cuSts. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds ■ Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The facility will serve 750 students. Please describe the need for this project. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools having student enrollments exceeding their program capacity. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. This school will be located in an area to relieve current overcrowding and to accommodate the projected new housing development in the areas served by this elementary school attendance zones. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive Pan's Capital Project Map. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk This school will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and elementary students of Frederick County. Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodating students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age population of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage 4 i Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax uasc, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: New Elementary School #14 Date Prepared: 10/18/06 Agency Contact Person: Steve Kapoesi Location of Project: TBD Agency: Frederick County Public School Phone Number: (540) 662-3889 Magisterial District: TBD Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This is a single story elementary school with a floor area of approximately 94,000 to 97,000 square feet located on 15 acres. The facility will be designed to accommodate a student membership of 750. The outdoor facilities will include three pods of grade -level appropriate playground equipment, one asphalt play area, one softball field, and one physical education field. This facility will meet or exceed all Virginia Department of Education new construction requirements for K-5 Elementary Schools. w Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Approval, planning, design, property assessment, and construction should take approximately 36 months. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Project Priority: 8 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Tlue New Elementary School #14 would be listed as number o on the project last. Estimated Cost (in 2006 dollars): *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 PROPOSED =2008/2009/10 EXPENDITURES 4tn - FY 2010/112011/12 5th FY Beyond FY 2012 Total Element 1st FY 2007 /08 700,000 700,000 Planning, Surveying, & Design 1,125,000 1,125,000 Land Acquisition 100,000 100,000 Site Preparation & Improvements Constriction 15,714,000 15,714,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Furniture and Equipment 250,000 250,000 Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 19,389,000 19,389,000* r *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The facility will serve 750 students. Please describe the need for this project. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools having student enrollments exceeding their program capacity. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 1" FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4tn FY 5`n FY Beyond FY Element 2007/ 2008 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012 TOTAL 08 /09 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and 19,389,000 19,389,000 Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 19,389,000 119,389,000* *Partnerships with other county departments are not considered in the above "facility " costs. Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Virginia Public School Authority Bonds Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The facility will serve 750 students. Please describe the need for this project. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools having student enrollments exceeding their program capacity. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. This school will be located in an area to relieve overcrowding and to accommodate the projected new housing development in the areas served by this elementary school attendance zones. The location of this project has been projected on the Comprehensive Plan's Capital Project Map. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project contributes to improving educational services to Frederick County students. This project is consistent with established policies and procedures of the Frederick County School Board. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk This school will assist the school division and county government in meeting the community needs for the citizens and elementary students of Frederick County. Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Completion of this project will assist in maintaining recommended teacher -to -student ratios, assist in providing necessary services to special needs populations, and assist in accommodating students and staff with disabilities. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Frederick County Public Schools serves all segments of the school age population of Frederick County in meeting their individual educational needs. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or other -wise have a positive effect on the local economy? Quality public schools assist in attracting favorable types of business and industries into Frederick County. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Business of the school board is conducted in an open public forum with an open invitation for the public to address the board with citizen comment. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 FEDERICK COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2007-2008 Departmental Request Prioritization Summary FC Department: Parks and Recreation Department Approved by: 1,164,715 Dept. Project Title FY FY FY FY Clearbrook & Priority2007/08 2008/09 FY07-08 2009/10 2010/11 2011/1 FY TO Cost TAL IP Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost ance 1 Indoor Aquatic 14,107,500 Compound Facility 14,107,500 2 Park Land West 3,135,000 Areas - FC 3,135,000 3 Park Land East 4,180,000 FC 4 Water Slide/ 1,164,715 Spray Ground Clearbrook & Sherando Parks 5 Mainten- 352,123 ance Compound Sherando 6 Open Play 465,015 Areas - Clearbrook 7 Access Road 1,123,693 with Parking and Trails 8 Lake/Trails/Park Ing with 2 multi- purpose fields irrigated 1,101,638 4,180,000 1,164,715 352,123 465,015 1,123,693 1,101,638 Skateboard 475,051 475,051 Softball 620,389 Complex 620,389 Sherando 2007-2008 Departmental Request Prioritization Summary Department: Parks and Recreation Department Approved bv: Dept. Project Title FY FY FY FY FY TOTAL Priority 2007108 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 CIP Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost 1,230,803 11 Baseball 1,230,803 Complex Renovation Sherando 1,871,245 12 Soccer 1,871,245 Complex 470,012 13 Tennis/ 470,012 Basketball Complex Clearbrook 14 Picnic Areas 728,658 728,658 Sherando 15 Shelter/ 463,366 463,366 Stage - Clearbrook 16 Multi- 8,193,63 8,193,636 Generational Community Center 39,682,844 TOTAL 17,242,500 7,285,546 3,427,881 2,341,257 9,385,66 • 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Indoor Aquatic Center - Competitive/Training/Leisure Pool Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Location to be determined Magisterial District: Project Description: Give a brief1-2paragraph ■ MM Provide basic information, such as he to ation, size, ac eage, floor area, c project includes. apacity, etc. This facility would house a leisure pool along with a teaching and competitivlap swimming pool with an office, storage and locker rooms. This facility should be located on property owned e or donated to the County and would utilize approximately 8-12 acres with parking. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2007-08 fiscal year. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon oris being planned in conjunction with anyME other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent on another project. MEHIM 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 1 Project Priority: 1 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous prio,;t,� and current status of project: Previously listed as 41. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PRf1PCiQVi1 1WV1DVXTY%'VriTn1r r 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests page 2 Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 14,107,500 14,107,500 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 14,107,500 0 0 0 0 0 14,107,500 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary' estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General 14,107,500 Fund 14,107,500 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 14,107,500 0 0 0 0 0 14,107,500 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Presently, there are no federal or state grant monies available for this project. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, through donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. It is estimated that the center will see over 120,000 guests each year. The pool concept that this project is offering will meet the needs of all levels of swimmers in the area. The leisure pool will provide family entertainment while the teaching and competitive pools will offer ample space for swim team practices, swim lessons, water exercise, and a variety of other aquatic programming. The Departments' swim team participation has increased over 29% in the last three years and over 1500 swim lessons were taught during the summer of 2006. Estimated drop in attendance is 168 visitors per day; this figure does not include programmed classes or events. This facility would be available for use by all area residents. Please describe the need for this project. In keeping with the vision of the Department; to build community through people, parks, and recreational opportunities, the need for an indoor aquatic facility has been realized. Frederick County residents are currently forced to use the indoor pool in the City of Winchester, a facility that meets the needs of City residents first. The construction of this project will provide a facility the Department can offer year round programming opportunities for all residents to as well as provide ample practice space for the Frederick County High School swim teams along with Department swim team programs. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The Indoor Pool facility should be located in an area convenient to the major transportation corridors of the county on an existing county or donated site. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan:-� Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Indoor Pool project meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Continues to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Supports a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, and programs, as well as supporting economic development in the County through the support of businesses and the travel and tourism industry. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The Indoor Aquatic Center project addresses the need for an indoor recreational facility in Frederick County. The construction of this facility will provide the community with a public facility that could be used for not only recreational pursuits, but rehabilitation and wellness programs. In addition, the needs of the competitive swimming community would be met. The development of this project would assist in providing a year round lifeguarding program that would enhance the safety of the County's existing outdoor pools. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? In initial stages of planning, the Indoor Pool project is projected to potentially serve over 150 community organizations and groups. There is currently no other similar facility located within the County. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. Coordination with other projects: 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 6 Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger proj ect? The Indoor Aquatic Facility project is not dependent upon another project. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The Indoor Aquatic Facility project has been identified by the Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. A Parks and Recreation Commission sub -committee has been formed to determine the final size and content of the facility. zuu i-zuuu Uapital improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Parkland in Western Frederick County Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Western Frederick County Magisterial District: West. Fred. Co. Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. w Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Acquisition of Parkland; 150-200 acres ®u Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The Parks and Recreation Commissions is requesting that this project be funded and completed in FY 2007-08. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. Project Priority: 2 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #4. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land 3,135,000 3,135,000 Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 3,135,000 0 0 0 0 0 113,135,000 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or eK,.:ipaient From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 2007/08 2008/09 General Fund 3,135,000 Other Fund State Grants Bondsand Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 11 3,135,000 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY 2009/10 1 2010/11 2011/12 01 01 0 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): BeyondII TOTAL FY 2012 3,135,000 0 1 0 11 3,135,000 There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This project would be used by the entire Frederick County area. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the western portion of Frederick County. The location of this project would provide parkland which could be developed to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents of western Frederick County. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Parkland acquisition in Western Frederick County project meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Identify and protect important natural resources. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, insuring that adequate and appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The acquisition of Parkland in Western Frederick County ensures the adequate provision of open space, and will provide the citizens of the county with an area that will contribute to their physical and mental well being, as well as improving the quality of life in Frederick County. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The acquisition of parkland in western Frederick County would service the needs of the citizens of the entire county, but directly the Back Creek and Gainesboro Districts, who currently have to drive to either Clearbrook or Sherando Parks. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The acquisition of Parkland in Western Frederick County is not dependent upon another project. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The acquisition of Parkland in Western Frederick County has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, in 1996 public hearings were held to discuss the project and the acquisition of property. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Parkland in Eastern Frederick County Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Eastern Frederick County Magisterial District: Eastern Fred. Co.. Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Acquisition of Parkland; 150-200 acres Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed in FY 2008-09. 2001-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. Project Priority: 3 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: ]Previously listed as #3. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURE& Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2011 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land 4,180,000 4,180,000 Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 4,180,000 0 0 0 0.14,180,000 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipmentFrom cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund 4,180,000 4,180,000 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 L4,180,000 0 0 0 0 4,180,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 r Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This project would be located in the primary growth center of Frederick County, within the existing urban development area and the approved Southern Frederick Land Use Plan, which consists of 1,200 acres of new residences. The project could be used by the entire Frederick County area, but the principal users would be from the eastern Frederick County area. The location of this project in eastern Frederick County will also serve to reduce the traffic burden in other areas by providing facilities and services in closer proximity to the residents. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the eastern portion of Frederick County. The location of this project would provide parkland which could be developed to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents of eastern Frederick County. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests r age -, Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Parkland acquisition in eastern Frederick County meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. C Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Identify and protect important natural resources. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, insuring that adequate and appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: EM Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The acquisition of Parkland in eastern Frederick County ensures the adequate provision of open space, and will provide the citizens of the county with an area that will contribute to their physical and mental well being, as well as improving the quality of life in Frederick County. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The acquisition of parkland in eastern Frederick County would service the needs of the citizens of the entire county, but the residents in the urban development area would be provided services that only exist at Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Yage 0 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The acquisition of Parkland in eastern Frederick County is not dependent upon another project. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The acquisition of Parkland in eastern Frederick County has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 c: • 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Water Slide/Spray Ground for Clearbrook and Sherando Parks Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Clearbrook/Sherando Parks Magisterial District: Stonewall/Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of the diving boards and the installation of one 50' water slide and one 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also include the addition of a spray ground with 10- 12 features at each pool. ........... . Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project will take approximately 8 months to complete. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2008-09 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project. Project Priority: 4 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #2. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, 86,275 86,275 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 1,078,440 1,078,440 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 1,164,715 0 0 0 01. 1,164,715 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 2 Basis of Cosi Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) ■�®M Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 1,164,715 1,164,715 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 1,164,715 0 0 0 0 1,164,715 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Presently, there are no federal or state grant monies available for this project. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, through donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park service area. Please describe the need for this project. Currently, we have two outdoor swimming pools at the County's regional parks. These facilities are 15 years old and were constructed with two diving boards as the main feature for each pool. Over the past 5 years, swimming pool attendance has been flat and users are requesting that we add different water features. The addition of two water slides and a spray ground to each pool facility will increase pool attendance by an estimated 30%. With the increase in fees to comparable facilities, the County could realize an additional $65,000 in revenue annually. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Clearbrook and Sherando Parks, currently owned by Frederick County offers the best site and location for the development of this facility. With the upgrade to the existing swimming pool facilities, the County would not have to incur costs for property acquisition or infrastructure development. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 4 r Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The upgrading of the swimming pool facilities meets the County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the County. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The upgrading of the swimming pool facilities will mean more active participation options for all swimming pool users, especially school aged participants. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The project would upgrade the existing swimming pool facilities and would be available to all citizens of Frederick County. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests rdgr V Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project, at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks is not dependent upon any other planned project. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvement Plan. The swimming pool facilities have been identified as part of the Master Development Plan for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 7 • :7 :� 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Maintenance Compound and Office - Sherando Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Office —1,200 SF. Storage Sheds — 4,000 SF. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Sherando Park which was completed in 1987. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during fiscal year 2008-09. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. This project was planned as one element of the Master Development Plan for Sherando Park to satisfy existing recreational needs. Project Priority: 5 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #5. ■ Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total 26,083 26,083 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 326,040 326,040 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 352,123 0 0 0 0 352,123 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURUEN Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 352,123 352,123 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 352,123 0 0 0 352,123 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility will enable the county to maintain its equipment and facilities in a more responsible and effective manner. ■ Please describe the need for this project. To provide an adequate maintenance facility to maintain county equipment and facilities in a responsible and effective manner. Also, with the additional responsibility of maintaining all outdoor facilities at Sherando High School, Robinson Learning Center, Armel Elementary School, Orchard View Elementary School, Bass -Hoover Elementary School, Middletown Elementary School, R. E. Aylor Middle School, Admiral Byrd Middle School and Evendale Elementary School, there is a need for more storage, maintenance and office space. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, will provide the best location for the development of this maintenance facility. Since the maintenance equipment, staff and facility is needed to serve as a maintenance function for Sherando Park's grounds and facilities, this project should be located at Sherando Park. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Maintenance Compound and Office development at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. ■ Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The project will provide the park with a facility to enable the County to maintain its equipment and facilities in a safe, efficient and responsible manner. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project will permit the park to continually comply to OSHA requirements for the provision of a safe work environment. In addition, lit's in compliance ndlth the complet adopted one element of the Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide ithe County?ervices to a population group that is currently under served relative to other ars The project would provide support facilities b by Sherar not onlyndo Park maintenance staff. e maintenance of do Park, but also the nine school sites currently cared fory Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic deuelop ent?otheriseouldve the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, pe revena positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests ` "bv �■ Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The project is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project is part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 0 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Open Play Area - Clearbrook Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Clearbrook Park Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Open Play Areas on South side of Lake: Parking — Sixty-four spaces; asphalt paved with curbed islands and concrete wheel stops; line markings and four security lights. Existing Shelters (Five) - Repair, cleaning, painting, and restroom rehab. Refurbish signage, five picnic shelters, one restroom. Landscaping - Eleven shade trees; Eight evergreens. Peripheral Work - General turf (Two acres): miscellaneous signage. (Cont'd) Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2008-2009 fiscal year. Open Play Area - Clearbrook (cont'd) Open play at water tower: 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Parking — Seventy-three spaces; asphalt paved with curbed islands and concrete wheel stops; line markings and six security lights. Picnic shelter - 30'x 55'; 18 tables, wood deck floor; wood frame and asphalt shingles. Horseshoe pits (Six) - sand base; 12 steel bars; 8" x 8" timber edge. Croquet - turf surface Shuffleboard - concrete base, regulation court, tournament style. Volleyball court - 50'x 80' sand court. Existing concession - cleaning, repair, refurbish, rehab., paint. Landscaping - 14 shade trees Peripheral work - general turf (Two acres); miscellaneous signage. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. This project was planned as one element of the Master Development Plan for Clearbrook Park to satisfy existing recreational needs. Project Priority: 6 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #6. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): f PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design 34,446 34,446 Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 430,569 430,569 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 1 465,015 0 0 0 oil 465,015 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOUKUhN Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 465,015 465,015 Other Fund LEI State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising P70 TOTAL Oil 465,015 0 0 0 465,015 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park service area. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number which is needed to meet the minimum standards for our service area. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Clearbrook Park, currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the county already having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been completed. This project, being located at Clearbrook Park, is necessary to meet the needs of our service area. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goalsandobjectives of the ed Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with estab�is��;u YV.11 =. � The development of the Open Play Area at Clearbrook Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • al, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and Contribute to the physical, ment social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • ties based on identified needs and available Provide recreational programs and activi funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. Supporta business climate Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Development of the Open Play Area at Clearbrook Park will provide the facility with additional parking, provide paved pathways and renovate existing structures to improve the accessibility and appearance of the park. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Project Requests I usv v Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. .m Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The project would relieve some of the existing pressure on the facility, as well as provide additional outlets for recreational opportunities. The project is being developed in accordance to the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The Open Play Area project at Clearbrook Park is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted Master Plan for Clearbrook Park. i Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park since 1987 to satisfy existing recreational needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 • • J 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Access Road/Parking and Trails Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Access Road/Parking and Trails at Sherando Park north side of Rt. 277 and Wrights Run. 1. Entrance and access road (1,800 L.F.) off of Warrior Drive 2. Parking - 100 spaces 3. Trails - 2.8 Miles Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the master development plan for Sherando Park, which was completed in 2001. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2008-2009 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project. This project is planned as one element of the master development plan for Sherando Park. Project Priority: 7 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #15. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PRnPnCED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, 83,236 83,236 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 1,0409457 1,040,457 Furniture and Equipment y L :L 0 1,123,693 0 0 0 1,123,693 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING �iUUKUE6 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL Element 1,123,693 1,123,693 General Fund Other Fund rantsand t Other Fund- raising [TOTAL 0J 1,123,693 0 I 0 0 J 0L1,123,693 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): We are currently utilizing the TEA -21 grant program for the trail facilities. In addition, recreation access grant monies through the Virginia Department of Transportation may be available for entrance and access roadways. If these grant programs are not funded, this project would need to be funded through the county capital improvements program, by donations, or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number needed to meet the minimum standards required for our service area. This project will provide trails with walking and jogging opportunities which ranks as #1 in the 2002 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor recreational activities. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the County currently having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been completed. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is necessary to meet the needs of our service area. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The development of an entrance off of Warrior Drive and an access road with parking and trails at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The development of an entrance and access road with parking and trails will provide recreational opportunities in an undeveloped portion of Sherando Park which is adjacent to housing subdivisions. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project would provide passive recreational services in the County's urban development area and is being developed in accordance with the Sherando Park Master Plan which was completed in 2001. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services of the citizens, provide for a more productive contribute to the physical and mental well being work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page ■ ■® Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The entrance and access road with parking and trails is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted master development plan for Sherando Park. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 • • J 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Lake, Parking, and Trail Development with two Multi-purpose Fields Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. 1. Development of a 12 acre lake on the north side of Rt. 277 in Sherando Park. 2. 1.5 Mile trail system around the lake. 3. 800 L.F. of access roadway. 4. Parking lot/lighted with 125 spaces. 5. Development of two irrigated 70 x 120 yd. multi-purpose fields. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the master development plan for Sherando Park, which was completed in 2001. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2009-2010 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project. This project is planned as one element of the master development plan for Sherando Park. Project Priority: 8 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #8. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): TiTT[� 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 PROPOSED 2nd FY 2008/09 EXPr 3rd FY 2009/10 IN111 i unfr 4th FY 2010/11 o 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Element 1st FY 2007/08 81,602 81,602 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 1,020,036 1,020,036 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 0 1,101,638 0 0 0ll 1,101,638 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. P12n1PnC1F.n FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 1,101,638 1,101,638 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 1,101,638 0 0 0 1,101,638 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): We are currently utilizing the TEA -21 grant program for the trail facilities. In addition, recreation access grant monies through the Virginia Department of Transportation may be available for entrance and access roadways. If these grant programs are not funded, this project would need to be funded through the county capital improvements program, by donations, or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number needed to meet the minimum standards required for our service area. This project will provide trails with walking and jogging opportunities which ranks as #1 in the 2002 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey. This project will also provide multi -use playfields for adult and youth programs. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the County currently having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been completed. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is necessary to meet the needs of our service area. D oil Improvements Plan Project Requests Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The development of the lake with trails and parking and two multi-purpose fields at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. ■ Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The development of the lake with trails and parking will provide recreational opportunities in an undeveloped portion of Sherando Park which is adjacent to housing subdivisions. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project would provide passive recreational services in the County's urban development area and is being developed in accordance with the Sherando Park Master Plan which was completed in 2001. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The lake with trails and parking and two multi-purpose fields is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted master development plan for Sherando Park. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 0 0 C7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Skateboard Park Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon _® Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. One Bowl, One half pipe and open skate area Parking - 30 spaces; asphalt paved with curb islands, wheel stops; line markings and security lights Access road Fencing Landscaping/access paths Signage Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2009-10 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other planned project. This project was identified in the Master Development Plan for the County's regional parks completed in 2001. The project has been included at the request of the citizenry of Frederick County. Project Priority: 9 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #7. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY EFY2012]1_ Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Planning, 35,190 35,190 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 439,861 439,861 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 0 475,051 0 0 0 475,051 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 475,051 475,051 Other Fund State Grants Bondsand Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 475,051 0 0 475,051 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. To provide recreational opportunities to the citizens of Frederick County. Please describe the need for this project. Requested by the community to provide additional recreational facilities for the youth of Frederick County at Sherando Park. This project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but it is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the 2001 Master Development Plan for Sherando Park. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location of this project would be at Sherando Park in the open field area at the intersection of Lake View Drive and Splash Ave. This location has been identified in the 2001 Master Development Plan for Sherando Park. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 N� Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehenproject sive Plan? Is the consistent with established policies? The Skateboard Park project meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and ivic pride and social responsibility through a complete social well-being, and its sense of c program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The Skateboard Park will provide a facility dedicated to the safety of the participants. It will provide participants with a facility where they can pursue this recreational avenue, without interfering with vehicular or pedestrian traffic on public and private properties. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Currently, there are no facilities within Frederick County to accommodate skateboarding. This project is needed to provide a safe facility to meet the recreational demands of the community. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is not dependent upon any other planned project. This project has been included on the 2001 Master Plan Development for Sherando Park. The project has been included at the request of the citizens of Frederick County. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Requested by the community to provide a dedicated public recreational facility, this project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Softball Complex - Sherando Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Softball fields (Two) - 300' radius, fully fenced, backstop, four 50 person bleachers per field, lighted concrete poles 30/20 FC, concrete deck. Access Road - 500 LF. Parking - 153 spaces, asphalt paved with curbed islands and drop off, line markings and 6 security lights. Landscaping - 100 shade trees; pine screen. Peripheral Work - General seeding - One acre; miscellaneous signage. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Sherando Park and a site development plan has also been completed for these facilities. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2009-10 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Once this project has been completed, we will be able to retrofit the existing baseball/softball complex at Sherando Park for youth baseball use. Project Priority: 10 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #9. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 2 Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Planning, 45,955 45,955 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 574,434 574,434 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 0 620,389 0 0 0 620,389 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 620,389 620,389 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 71 0 0 620,389 0 0 0 620,389 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. Please describe the need for this project. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields within the county's regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth and adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate the existing demand of youth baseball and adult softball programs. ■ Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best site for softball field development. The fact that the County will not have to acquire property for this facility means that the most costly aspect of this development has already been completed. Sherando Park also provides a location that is situated in the fastest growing area of the county and is adjacent to Sherando High School. Joint use of facilities between the park and school system has been approved, and , as a result, these fields will facilitate school activities as well as recreation programs. 8 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests "r'" T Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The completed development of the Softball Complex at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The Softball Complex at Sherando Park will provide a safe facility to meet the needs of the county's growing softball program for both adults and youth. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The project would relieve some of the existing pressure on the Sherando Park with the continual demand for field space in southern Frederick County. The facility could also be used by the Frederick County school system. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of, economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The Softball Complex at Sherando Park project is not dependent upon any other planned project, however, once completed it will allow the existing baseball/softball complex at Sherando Park to be retrofitted for youth baseball use. The project is one element of the adopted Master Plan for Sherando Park. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Baseball Complex Renovation - Sherando Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Renovate existing ball fields (Four) - Grading, seeding, infield renovation; partial fencing and new backstops; new lighting 50/30 FC (required by Little League, Inc.); drainage control and upgrade support facilities. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Sherando Park which was completed in 1987. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2009-10 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Renovation of this facility cannot be completed until the softball complex on the north side of Rt. 277 has been completed. Project Priority: 11 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #10. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 91,171 91,171 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 1,139,632 1,139,632 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) 0 0 1,230,803 0 0 0 1,230,803MM�wl TOTAL 7-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 1,230,803 1,230,803 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 1,230,803 0 0 0 1,230,803 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility, presently serving as both youth baseball and adult softball fields, would be used by the "Little League" programs within the Sherando Park service area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, the athletic complex will also be used by the Frederick County school system. Please describe the need for this project. In its present design, the four field complex does not provide adequate diamond configuration or grading scheme to facilitate youth baseball programs. The renovation of this complex would correct these problems and bring those fields up to the recommended standards. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The project location would be at Sherando Park which is currently owned by Frederick County. Presently, Sherando Park has six basebalUsoftball fields. This project would involve the renovation of the existing ball field complex. With the site of the new county high school being adjacent to Sherando Park, there will be a joint use of these facilities and with the renovation of the fields, athletic programs can be more effectively facilitated. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The renovation of the Baseball Complex at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: ' Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The renovation of the Baseball Complex at Sherando Park will provide a safe facility to meet the demands of the county's growing baseball program. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The project would correct original design problems for the facility and provide a facility to meet the demands of the growing youth baseball program in the County. Additionally, the renovation of the facility will permit more efficient use of the site. The facility would also be used by the school system. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The renovation of the Baseball Complex at Sherando Park cannot be completed until the softball complex on the north side of Route 277 has been completed. The project is part of the adopted Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. �m N■� Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Soccer Complex - Sherando Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Soccer field (Two) - 450'x 450' artificial grass surface with goals pads. Access paths - 1500 LF; 10' wide; asphalt paved. Restroom/concession - 820 SF; masonry with concrete roof deck; full concession hookup Plaza - 22,000 SF; 50% paved/50% planted; kiosk. Picnic shelters (One) - 24'x 24': 6 picnic tables each; concrete pad; wood frame structure; asphalt shingles. 12 sets of bleachers. Landscaping - 90 shade trees. Lighting - One field (450'x 450') Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Sherando Park which was completed in 1987. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2010-11 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. ed as one This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. This project was or Sherando Park to satisfy existing recreational needs. element of the Master Development Plan f Project Priority: 12 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #11 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 1st FY nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total Element 2007/0 8 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 138,610 138,610 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 1,732,635 1,732,635 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) 0 0 0 1,871,245 0 0 1,871,245 TOTAL Page 2 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SUUKUV N 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL Element 1,871,245 1,871,245 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 , 0 1,871,245 0 0 1,871,245 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would be used by the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, the soccer complex will also be used by the Frederick County school system. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the gap between the number of existing soccer fields and the number of fields which are needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best location for soccer field development. The fact that the county will not have to acquire property for this facility means that the most costly aspect of this development has already been completed. Sherando Park also provides a location that is situated in the fastest growing area of the county and is adjacent to the new county high school. With joint use of facilities between the park and school system, the construction of additional soccer fields will benefit both agencies. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Soccer Complex at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The Soccer Complex at Sherando Park will provide a safe facility to meet the demands of the county's growing youth and adult soccer programs. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The project would be used by the entire Frederick County area to meet the demands for additional soccer fields for the growing youth and adult soccer programs within the County. The fields will not only serve the recreational needs of the community, but will also be used by the Frederick County school system. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The Soccer Complex at Sherando Park is not dependent upon any other planned project. The project is one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Tennis/Basketball Complex - Clearbrook Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Clearbrook Park Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Tennis courts (Four) - Two sets of Two courts each; fully fenced, chain link vinyl clad, lighted, 30 FC. Basketball courts (Two) - 85' x 65' asphalt with color coating; two backboards each court; player benches, lighted, concrete poles, 30 FC. Shelter deck (One) - 30'x 30' octagonal shelter concrete pad, wood frame, cedar shingles, six picnic tables. Parking - 25 spaces; asphalt paved with curbed islands and concrete wheel stops; line markings and two security lights. Landscaping - 39 shade trees. Peripheral work - general turf (eight acres); miscellaneous signage. Access paths - 1000 LF; 10' wide, asphalt paved. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2010-11 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 k-001 UlUalluu. a -- 1 .. J. __ ._r _ other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon lan for Clearbrook to satisfyThis existmg recreationalplanned needse element of the Master Development Project Priority: 13 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #12. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): �T,, r, vn�rTil7TiTi2FC PRO"" Element 1st FY 2nd FV 2007/08 20080 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 470,012 470,012 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 0 470,012 0 Oil 470,012 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 ■ Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. Because Clearbrook Park is a regional facility, these facilities will be available to all county residents. Currently, there are no tennis or basketball courts in the Clearbrook Park area and, with over 180,000 park visitors annually, these facilities are needed. Please describe the need for this project. Presently, there are no tennis or basketball courts located in the Clearbrook Park area and, with park visitation over 180,000 annually, these facilities are needed. This project will reduce the gap between the number of existing tennis and basketball courts and the number of courts needed to meet the minimum standards for our service area. Development of this project will also provide this department with facilities for recreational programs. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Clearbrook Park, currently owned by Frederick County, provides the very best location for tennis and basketball court development. Since the county will not have to acquire property for this facility, the most costly aspect of this development has already been completed. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 ■ Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The development of the Tennis/Basketball Complex at Clearbrook Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. e Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. O Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The development of the Tennis/Basketball Complex at Clearbrook Park will provide the citizens with a facility to improve their physical and mental well being. Additionally, the project will provide Clearbrook Park with additional parking, provide paved pathways and renovate existing structures to improve the accessibility and appearance of the park. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? There are currently no tennis, basketball or racquetball courts in the Clearbrook area. The development of the Tennis/Basketball Complex at Clearbrook Park will provide the residents of northern Frederick County with facilities similar to those found at Sherando Park. The project is being developed in accordance to the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The Tennis/Basketball Complex project at Clearbrook Park is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted Master Plan for Clearbrook Park completed in 1987. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park since 1987 to satisfy existing recreational needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 0 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Project Name: Date Prepared: return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Picnic Area - Sherando 09/01/06 Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Location of Project: Sherando Park Agency: Parks and Recreation Phone Number: 665-5678 Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Restroom/concession - 625 SF masonry and wood with asphalt shingles; limited concession hookup; 1500 SF plaza. Picnic shelter (Four) with plaza - 24'x 24; six picnic tables each; concrete pad, wood frame structure; cedar shingles, skylights, stain, electric and water outlets. Playground area. Access paths - 1000 LF; 10' wide; asphalt paved. Access road - 50 LF; 24' wide Parking - 94 spaces; asphalt paved with curbed islands and concrete wheel stops; line markings and four security lights. Landscaping - 15 shade trees. Peripheral work - general turf (three acres); miscellaneous signage. r � Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Sherando Park which was completed in 1987. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2011-12 fiscal year. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. This project was planned as one element of the Master Development Plan for Sherando Park to satisfy existing recreational needs. Project Priority: 14 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #13. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 PROPOSED EXPENll1'1'UREN 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Element 53,974 53,974 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 674,684 674,684 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 0 0 0 0 728,658 0 728,658 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 728,658 728,658 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 0 0 728,658 0 728,658 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. These facilities would be used by the Sherando Park service area and the southwestern part of Frederick County. With the growth in this area of the county and being deficient in passive recreational opportunities at Sherando Park, the Commission is recommending this project be included. Please describe the need for this project. Presently, there are only five picnic areas (shelters) within Sherando Park. This development is needed to reduce the gap between the number of Frederickfacilitiesand tWiththe lnimum over 300t000ards for the Sherando Park service area and southeastern visitors annually, five picnic shelters do not accommodate the demand. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. ll not Since Sherando Park is owned by FrederickCounty property Sherando1Park al o necessary, the most costly aspect of this development has been completed. provides a site which is situated in a growing area of the county. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: ' Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Picnic Area project at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. ■ Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The development of the Picnic Area project will provide the citizens with a facility to improve their physical and mental well being. Additionally, the project will provide Sherando Park with additional parking, provide paved pathways and additional facilities to improve the accessibility and availability of recreational opportunities within the park. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? ble for These facilities will provide Sherando h needed facility development within he park to meet the eneral use. In addition, the project will provide recreational demands of the citizens of Sherando Park service area. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of econorevs revenue, or development? Woulise d e the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. Coordination with other projects: 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The project is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project is part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 C 0 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Shelter/Stage Seating - Clearbrook Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Clearbrook Park Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Existing restrooms - clean, repair, paint and refurbish, signage. Access paths - 1000 LF; 10' wide; asphalt paved. Shelter/Stage - sound stage; sound system; lighting; 6300 SF; wood decking, stairs and miscellaneous site development. Peripheral work - general turf (one acre); miscellaneous signage. Lake Renovation Schedule: if the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during fiscal year 2011-12. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. This project was planned as one element of the Master Development Plan for Clearbrook Park to satisfy existing recreational needs. Project Priority: 15 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #14. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 2007/08 2008/09 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) 0 TOTAL 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 34,323 34,323 429,043 429,043 0 0 0 1 463,366 0 463,366 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PRnPn4F11 FINDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL General Fund 463,366 463,366 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 0 07 0 463,366 0 463,366 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would be used by the entire Winchester -Frederick County area. Please describe the need for this project. Presently, there are no facilities to accommodate cultural programs within the county's park system. This project is needed to provide a facility for cultural activities. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Clearbrook Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best location for facilitating cultural events. The fact that the county will not have to acquire property for this project means that a significant cost has already been completed. Clearbrook Park, with its existing park characteristics and cultural features also provides the best location for our service area. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 i Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Shelter/Stage Seating project at Clearbrook Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. ecreational facilities are provided in urban and • Ensure that appropriate open space and r rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The project provides facilities to enhance the physical and mental well being of the citizens of Frederick County. In addition, the project renovates existing facilities and improves the accessibility and appearance of the park. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 i Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. In addition, the project is part of the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Currently, there are no facilities to accommodate cultural programming within the county's park system. This project is needed to provide a facility for development of cultural arts programming to meet the recreational demands of the community. In addition, the project is being developed in accordance to the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park which was completed in 1987. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted Master Plan for Clearbrook Park. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Clearbrook Park since 1987 to satisfy existing recreational needs of the residents. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM 01--ninn .nr,rl r)jawninnmntreturn to: Vnepal c + of r iai a u11y a11u��swve Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Multi -Generational Community Center Date Prepared: 09/01/06 Agency: Parks and Recreation Agency Contact Person: James M. Doran Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: Sherando Park Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The Multi -Generational Community Center project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a 1/16 mile meter track and a minimum of two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton with the installation of in -floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden and home, outdoor, craft, antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities to take place at one time. The facility would also house a fitness center, multipurpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2011-12 fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon any other project planned. Project Priority: 16 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previously listed as #16 and has been separated from the Indoor Swimming Pool Project. Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 606,936 606,936 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements 7,586,700 7,586,700 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) 0 0 0 8,193,636 011 8,193,636 LTOTAL 0 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. vunnncFn FriNnING ROURCES Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Presently, there are no federal or state grant monies available for this project. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, through donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2006-2007 Capital hnprovements Plan Projects Requests Page 3 1st FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 TOTAL Element General Fund 8,193,636 8,193,636 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL0 0 0 0 8,193,636 0 8,193,636 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Presently, there are no federal or state grant monies available for this project. As a result, this project would need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, through donations or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become available, they will be actively pursued by this department. 2006-2007 Capital hnprovements Plan Projects Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied solely on the use of the county public schools to house our programs. This arrangement was adequate when the department first started out, but now the department offers over 750 programs annually and at this same time, space within the schools is more difficult to secure. This has created a situation where the department can no longer meet the programming and facility needs of the county residents. By constructing the Multi -Generational Community Center facility, it would permit the department to meet citizen programming demands, provide an instructional facility, as well as provide the area with a facility that would attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. Please describe the need for this project. As stated above the Department and the community have outgrown the use of school facilities for programming. In the past four years, the Department has experienced a signaficiant increase in demand in program offerings. The construction undrecreationalprogramect lll ming toahe residents of e a facility the Department will be able to offer year Frederick County. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The Multi -Generational Community Center facility should be located in an area convenient to the major transportation corridors of the county on a donated site or at one of the two county regional parks. Locating the facility on property already owned by the county would reduce development costs. 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The Multi -Generational Community Center project meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Continues to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. a Supports a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. O Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, and programs, as well as supporting economic development in the County through the support of businesses and the travel and tourism industry. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The Multi -Generational Community Center project addresses the need for an indoor recreational facility in Frederick County. The construction of this facility will provide the community with a public facility that could be used for not only recreational pursuits, but wellness programs as well. In addition, the development of this project would assist in reducing overcrowding in the school facilities and provide a new outlet to expand the existing scholastic activities programs within the schools. 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent the County? services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other e In initial stages of planning, the Multi -Generational Community Center project is projected to potentially serve over 150 community organizations and groups. This assistance would be provided in either facility or programming provisions within the facility. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 6 The Multi -Generational Community Center project is not dependent upon another project. However, when this facility is constructed adjoining the indoor pool facility, development and construction costs would be reduced. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The Multi -Generational Community Center project has been identified by the Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. A Parks and Recreation Commission sub -committee has been formed to determine the final size and content of the facility. In addition, the Commission has prepared a user survey to solicit input from community organizations who would benefit from the facility. 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Projects Requests Page 7 FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Frederick County Fire & Rescue Station 22 Date Prepared: September 28, 2006 Agency: Fire and Rescue Department Agency Contact Person: Gary A. DuBrueler Phone Number: 540-665-5618 Location of Project: Fairfax Pike East Magisterial District: Opequon .® Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construct a two bay Fire and Rescue Station with satellite Sheriff s office and County office space for treasure, commissioner of the revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. The station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike east of White Oak Road to provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three -acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be approximately a 10,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite offices. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. N/A 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Satellite office space for Sheriff's office, Treasure, Commissioner of the Revenue, and BOS office. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Listed #3 under County Administration. No progress on project at this point. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Estimate Cost (in 2005 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element V FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, 50,000 50,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition 300,000 300,000 Site Preparation 50,000 50,000 & Improvements Construction 1,100,000 1,100,000 Furniture and 600,000 600,000 Equipment Other (opening 1,000,000 1,000,000 day collection) TOTAL 400,000 1,100,000 1,600,000 3,100,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 i Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General 100,000 1,100,000 1,600,000 2,800,000 Fund Other Fund 300,000 300,000 State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 400,000 1,100,000 1,600,000 3,100,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There is a possibility of proffers in the form of cash and/or property. State EMS Grant funds Federal Fire Grant funds 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated community with age restrictions on 80% of the homes above 55 and the other 20% above 45. The developer's master plan will allow for 2130 individual dwelling units using a mix of housing types. Please describe the need for this project. This project would serve the rapidly growing southeastern Frederick County. One of the main requirements for this facility is the development of the Shenandoah project at Lake Frederick. The site work for this development was started in the early part of 2005. With the Stephens City fire and rescue service area population the largest in the County the increase in population and demographics brought about by the development will far exceed the resources available to provide adequate protection in this area of the County. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The project would be located in the eastern area of Fairfax Pike east of White Oak Road. This location would allow the necessary response to all entrances of the Shenandoah project as well as to other locations of high growth from Stephens City to Front Royal Pike. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is incorporated into the County's Comprehensive Plan to meet the goals and objectives of emergency services to the residents and visitors of Frederick County. This will be the first facility project of this type to be constructed in the County by the Fire and Rescue Department. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project would greatly improve fire and emergency medical responses to the southeastern area of Frederick County and provide assistance to surrounding response areas. This has a positive effect on the health, safety, and welfare of our citizen's and visitors 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The jurisdiction having authority is responsible for providing the necessary fire and emergency medical service to its citizens. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The project would provide for a decreased response time to the citizens in the immediate area thus increasing service to that segment of the population. ■ Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? A cost effect could be realized by home and business owners in the area in a decrease in insurance premiums. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is not necessary for the completion of other projects but is part of a proposed County satellite office project. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. No official information has been disseminated to the general public to support or not support the project. It was the intention of the Shenandoah development to have a fire and rescue station in or near its project due to the age restrictions within the community. Further discussions have taken place in planning commission meetings about a fire station being needed east of 181 during development talks because of the traffic situation at Fairfax Pike and 18 1. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests -Page 8 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Round Hill Co. 15 Fire Station Relocation Date Prepared: October 6, 2006 Agency: Fire and Rescue Department Agency Contact Person: Gary A. DuBrueler Phone Number: 540-665-5618 Location of Project: Round Hill Community Magisterial District: Back Creek Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Project includes the relocation and building of an approximately 22,000 sq. ft. facility to accommodate ten or more pieces of emergency equipment. This facility will also be able to accommodate living and sleeping quarters. A community center is also planned with this project and will be approximately 10,000 sq. ft. accommodating 400 persons for holding fundraising events. The entire project will be relocated to an area of 3 to 5 acres. This information is submitted on behalf of the Round Hill Community Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Currently in planning phase. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. No Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Number 4 under County Administration No progress on project. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage 2 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL IM 1� Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) No Cost estimates done 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSV11 FT]NDTNG SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Yage 4 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. First due population for the 2000 censes was 8,089. The continued growth in the area has brought additional commercial development (Walmart, hotels, and planned development by the hospital, shopping and restaurants). The area includes a high school and elementary school. ®i . I Please describe the need for this project. There is a dire need to replace the existing 50+ -year-old facility that does not meet the needs of the department and is not structurally sound. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The facility will be located in the Round Hill community to serve their citizens. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Con;pTehensiVe Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Project is a Round Hill Volunteer Fire and Rescue Project. ■ Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? As an established fire and rescue company within Frederick County, our mission is continued and improved service to the citizens and visitors of the County. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Jurisdiction having authority is responsible to provide fire and EMS service to its citizens. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Will provide services that may effect insurance rates for the home owners and businesses of the community. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? IM Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Not determined 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Relocation of Gainesboro Refuse Site Date Prepared.- 8-28-06 Agency: Public Works Agency Contact Person: H. Strawsnyder, Jr. Phone Number: 665-5643 Location of Project: North Frederick Pike Magisterial District: Back Creek Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The relocation of the Gainesboro site will take place following the closing of the current Gainesboro School. A fenced two -acre site will be constructed behind the buildings located on the property. This project will require several months to complete and include fencing, earthwork, retaining walls, electric and paving. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Design work will take place during FY 07/08 for the relocation of the Gainesboro site. Construction is anticipated for FY 08/09. 2007-2008 Capital hnprovements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. The actual construction of a new Gainesboro site will begin only after the closing of the elementary school at Gainesboro. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previous priority: 4/Administration List Current status: no funds have been allocated 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1St FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY nth FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & 50 50 Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation 350 & Improvements 350 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 50 350 400 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. nunnncFn FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General 400 Fund 50 350 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 50 350 400 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rabc + Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. Approximately 2,500 residents are served by the Gainesboro facility. The refuse site serves a large geographic area from Gainesboro, westward to the Cross Junction, Whitacre and Reynolds Store communities. Please describe the need for this project. The project is necessary to provide adequate trash disposal service for citizens living in the western end of the county (Gainesboro, Cross Junction, Whitacre, Reynolds Store). The existing site is completely inadequate and cannot be expanded to provide safe ingress and egress and fencing to mitigate illegal dumping. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Acquiring property on which to locate a convenience site is difficult at best. By far the most feasible option for the county is to locate sites on county -owned property whenever possible. The proposed site is less than a mile from the existing one. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the r^'Pct consistent vvitl Pstal,l;ched policies? p,o� r The proposal conforms to the department's and county's goal of improving services to citizens. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The current site is a health hazzard for those utilizing the facility. It is overrun by rodents and snakes due to its proximity to Back Creek. It is also dangerous for vehicles entering and leaving the site since it is much too small to properly accommodate traffic. It is the department's desire to provide an expanded and improved facility to meet future refuse disposal needs and improve worker conditions and safety. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? IM Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Iwo Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? The project would reduce refuse collection operating costs. More than at any other refuse site, staff time is consumed policing the site to head off illegal dumpers and cleaning up refuse that is left on the ground after hours. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 ®-■ I ■® Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Wil Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. A fenced, expanded site would not only better serve Gainesboro area residents, but also reduce, if not completely eliminate, illegal dumping. The current site is rather remote and unsecured. Therefore, illegal dumping has been an on-going problem. The department believes residents living in the immediate area would welcome an end to this situation. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage 6 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to Derartment of Planninn and De elo ent Frederick County, VA Project Name: Relocation/Expansion of Gore Refuse Site Date Prepared: 8-28-06 Agency: Public Works Agency Contact Person: H.Strawsnyder, Jr. phone Number: 665-5643 Location of Project: Sand Mine Road Magisterial District:Back Creek Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The project will expand refuse collection capacity at Gore by installing a trash compactor now in use at another site. With the relocation of the landfill site and purchase of new equipment, there will be surplus compactors. Installation of a compactor at Gore will drive down collection costs at the site where trash is now collected in 10 8 -yard boxes. In order to accomplish this, and account for traffic flow, the site will be relocated to a nearby parcel and expanded to two acres. This is contingent on a successful lease or purchase agreement. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Design work is anticipated for FY 08/09 with actual construction during the following fiscal year. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. A surplus compactor will become available during January of 2007. ■■ Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Previous priority: 5/Administrative List Current status: no funds allocated 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element ls` FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY nth FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & 50 50 Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation 350 350 & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 50 350 400 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. X Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. vu nP"Q V l FUNDING Cs01 TRCF.S Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General 50 350 400 Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 50 350 400 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage + Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. Population in the Gore community is 2,025, according to the planning district commission (767 dwellings). Please describe the need for this project. This project would pay for itself in lower refuse collection costs. It would also provide much- needed capacity during heavy flow times such as weekends and holidays. An upgraded site would meet the future refuse disposal demands of this growing community. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Proposed location is within a few hundred yards of existing site. Intent is to make the best use of existing equipment while lowering operational costs in the Gore service area. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 s Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attaimnent of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The proposal conforms to the department's and county's goal of reducing operational costs whenever possible. This project has the added benefits of improving service and providing for future needs. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The project would improve conditions at the Gore refuse collection site in that all trash would be compacted and contained in a single enclosed container, reducing the potential for odor and blowing litter. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? IM Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? No. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? The project will significantly reduce collection costs by compacting trash before it is hauled away to the landfill. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 ®M i M® Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The department believes that the public is supportive anytime better use can be made of tax dollars. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 C� • • 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Fire Station 13 Relocation Date Prepared: August 31, 2006 Agency Contact Person: Lloyd C. Winters Location of Project: Clear Brook, VA Agency: Clear Brook Vol. Fire and Rescue Phone Number: 540-667-9300 Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. At the present time the Clear Brook Vol. Fire & Rescue has outgrown the existing building with the equipment on hand, the call volume, the staffing of 24 hour personnel and the traffic at the existing location. We are proposing a new facility to be located on Rt. 11 either North or South of Brucetown Road. The building is to be six (6) drive through bays, administration, eating and sleeping facilities along with a dining hall. The estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 28,000 square feet. This upgrade of the facility will help to provide the needed space for Fire and EMS services for the community of Clear Brook. Administration, Day Kitchen, 6 Drive Through Bays Social/Dining Hall Day Room, A Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. N/A 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Ma Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: N/A 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element is` FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, 60,000 60,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation 50,000 50,000 & Improvements Construction 1,400,000 1,400,000 Furniture and 20,000 20,000 Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 1,530,000 1,530,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General County 80,000 85,000 85,000 90,000 90,000 510,000 Fund 80,000 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other 52,000 55,000 57,500 60,000 65,000 70,000 359,500 Fund- raising TOTAL 132,000 135,000 142,500 145,000 155,000 160,000 869,500 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant)_ The company has an annual yard party, fund drive letter and monthly pancake breakfast that yields approximately $52,000 (yard parry - $20,000, pancake breakfast - $12,000, fund drive letter - $30,000). The County EMS and Fire contribution is approximately $80,000.00. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. At present time the Clear Brook Vol. Fire and Rescue serves the northern Frederick County area, 66 square miles. We have two (2) industrial parks, four (4) trailer parks, two (2) large truck stops, one (1) school, eight (8) churches and a number of small businesses. We also at this time house the County ladder truck. 6,789 2000 Census Please describe the need for this project. To enlarge, update the building we would be able to better fill the needs of our community, have a larger site for emergency relief to shelter during emergencies, upgrade our equipment as the need arises for the community growth, i.e., additional subdivisions: Stephenson Village, Green Spring Acres, Gordon Dale — east side, Apple Glenn, Glenn Dobbin, Semples Development, and additional homes along routes that are single family; increased traffic on I-81, industrial at 1-81 and Exit 323. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The Route 11 location would allow for better access and quicker response, better geographic location during emergencies and allow for possible growth, if required. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? In accordance to the comprehensive plan, will not change but to update existing services to be provided. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? It provides a greater margin of safety and removes the risk of accidents at the intersection of Rt. 11 and Brucetown Road. The new station is necessary to provide and enhanced service to the community and the industrial areas. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? 1w Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Yes, this would meet all of the needs of the population and growth of the Community. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Value increases of the services would possibly decrease the insurance premiums based on the ISO rating system. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The Clear Brook community, through viable contact, has indicated that the station needs to be larger and located to better serve the community. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 FREDERICK COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Planning and Engineering Work for Route 37 Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: Location of Project: Planned Eastern Route 37 Magisterial District: Multiple Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension. More specifically; to update the Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new Record of Decision and to updated the 1992 design plans to address the current alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvements. no.e� Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. It is anticipated that this work could be completed within a 2 year timeframe beginning with the environmental work and finishing with the updated plans. Coordination: If theproject is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project would be completed within the scope of the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Not previously included. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): vunnncFn F.XPF.NT)TTTIRES Element 1s` FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Planning, $1.5 M $1.5 M $ 3.0 M Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $1.5 M $1.5 M $3.0 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General $1.5 M $1.5 M $3.0 M Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $1.5 M $1.5 M $3.0 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): There is a possibility that revenue sharing funds could be pursued for this project which would reduce the burden on the General Fund. Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This project moves the county closer to completion of a transportation improvement that would benefit the entire county and surrounding localities. Please describe the need for this project. As stated above. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location of the corridor is as adopted by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is in conformance with the Eastern Road plan as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The completed Route 37 improves the safety and quality of life for the traveling public in the entire region. Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Equitable Distribution of Services: • LoeS the project liiect a special need ^vf SCme -5-- * of the r�n>>lation td,at has been identified 5..�... r r -- as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? No. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Enhancement of the transportation system does encourage economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This proposed expenditure is a small part of the ultimate completion of route 37, but places the county in a better strategic position to take advantage of state and federal dollars as they become available. ■ Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept informed of adopted transportation projects via meeting advertisements and public meetings. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Warrior Drive Extension Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Route 277 to relocated Exit 307 Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construct a 4 Lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with 1-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. ■ Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the planning for the location of the new Exit 307 Interchange for purposes of future access at that point. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 ■ Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element I -s FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY Sth FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL n 523.2 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Using unit costs from the Winfred MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/i2 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $23.2 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $23.2 M is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that much or all of this cost would be absorbed by the coming development which makes the roadway's implementation necessary. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the county and address coming development to the surrounding area. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the county, town, city, and VDOT. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and offering additional travel alternatives. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? II Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Transportation projects such as this one, by their very nature attract additional economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is an important link to the future relocated Exit 307 Interchange and the Stephens City bypass. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearings. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Channing Drive Extension Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Future Channing from Senseny to Route 50 Magisterial District: Redbud Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construct a 4 Lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where Channing Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south to intersect with Route 50 at Independence Dr. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. ■ Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the planning for Greenwood Rd and Sulphur Springs improvements. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. -2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $20.6 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Using unit costs from the Winfred MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Yage 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $20.6 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $20.6 M is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that much or all of this cost would be absorbed by the coming development which makes the roadway's implementation necessary. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the county and address coming development to the surrounding area. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the County and VDOT. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and offering additional travel alternatives. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. Economic Impact: X Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Transportation projects such as this one, by their very nature attract additional economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is an link in the transportation network serving eastern Frederick county by improving north south movement between Senseny Road and Route 50. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearings. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Widening of Route 11 North to the WV State Line Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Route 11 North of Winchester Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6 lane facility as detailed in the Eastern Road Plan. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. There are a number of development associated improvements in the area that this project is not dependent upon, but which will be taken into consideration when planning the improvements. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): punpn4 Fzyn F.XPFNDITIJRES Element ls` FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th NY 2011/12 lseyond FY 2012 Total Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $47.8 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Costs from the Winfred MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $47.8 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $47.8 M is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that much or all of this cost would be absorbed by the coming development which makes the roadway's implementation necessary. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion over a large area of the county and address coming development to the surrounding area. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location would be along the existing corridor. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and improving the flow of traffic. 2007-2009—Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. �s Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Transportation projects such as this one, by their very nature attract additional economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No, but it is necessary to accommodate the comprehensive planned land uses for this area. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and 'hearings. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 e 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Gciurr +-.7 Department of Planning and Devebpment Frederick County, VA Project Name: Brucetown Rd\Hopewell Rd Alignment and Intersection Improvements Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Agency: Planning Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Brucetown\Hopewell at Rt II Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Realign Brucetown Rd to meet Hopewell Rd at Route 11. Improvements to intersection to address comp. planned development's traffic generation in the area. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other prof ect(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the planning for the overall widening of Route 11. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1St FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond IF Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $3.0 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g, no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $3.0 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $3.0 M is the projected cost, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that all of this cost would be absorbed by the coming development which makes the roadway's implementation necessary. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on the Route 11 corridor. M-- ■ M�� M Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the county and VDOT. ■ Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and offering additional travel alternatives. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. ■ Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is an important component to addressing growth along the Route 11 north corridor. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearings. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 0 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Senseny Road Widening Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Senseny Road from Winchester to Clark County Magisterial District: Red Bud and Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Widen to a 4 lane divided roadway. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the implementation of Route 37, Channing Drive, and development in the area. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PRnPncF.n EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $22.8 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Using unit costs from the MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising FTOTAL $22.8 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $22.8 M is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that some of this cost will come via the revenue sharing program, and a significant amount would be absorbed by the coming development which makes the roadway's implementation necessary. These sources will still leave a significant amount that will need to come from Federal, State, or local funds. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of Service tv be pry J� �e by tl�e "rn' J Y J This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location along the existing corridor. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and offering additional travel alternatives. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? M Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? ®M Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is being developed using coordinated planning for Route 37, Channing Drive, and surrounding development. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearings. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 • C: 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: vcNal u l Icl n of Planning al lU Development Icl n Frederick County, VA Project Name: East Tevis Street Extension Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Agency: Planning Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: From Route 522 to the Russell 150 Development Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construct a 4 Lane divided roadway beginning at Route 522 and going west approximately .2 miles to connect to the road network being constructed by the Russell 150 development. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is dependent upon the Russell 150 road system being put into place. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): P-P0PngF,D F.XPF.NDITURES Element lst FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $2.6 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Using costs from the Winfred MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $2.6 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $2.6 M is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that much of this cost will be addressed via the revenue sharing program and proffer dollars, though some local funds will likely be required. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the county and address coming development to the surrounding area. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the county, VDOT, and the developer. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: ■ Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and offering 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 additional travel alternatives. Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Transportation projects such as this one, by their very nature attract additional economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project is an important link to the Tevis Street extension and I-81 overpass. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearing. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 • C� 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Inverlee Way Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: From Senseny Road to Route 50 Magisterial District: Red Bud and Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construct a 4 Lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south to Route 50. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is being planned in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and surrounding development. Project ,Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 �■® Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Using unit costs from the Winfred MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Element 15` FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th r x' 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond'�ot� FY 2012 al � Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $10.2 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Using unit costs from the Winfred MPO Long Range Plan. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 ■ l� Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSE; r U \Lll�l ky SC V nV-110 Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bands and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $10.2 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $10.2 M is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that much of this cost will be addressed via new development and the revenue sharing program. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion and provide and additional needed link between Senseny Road and Route 50. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the county and VDOT. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and offering additional travel alternatives. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a region wide benefit. wm� ■ Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Transportation projects such as this one, by their very nature attract additional economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Public Support: .Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 public meetings and hearing. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 • C: J 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Fox Drive Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Fox Drive where it intersects with Route 522 Magisterial District: Stonewall Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Add additional turning lane(s) to Fox Drive where it intersects with Route 522. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): nr�nuncT,'n T'YPFNiITTTTRF,� Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 IL 1%A-fX Element 1St FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $250,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $250,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $250,000 is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that this cost will be addressed the revenue sharing program. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at this intersection. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is at the existing intersection point. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: ■ Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? IM] Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a congestion benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? M i Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearing. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planninq_ and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Blossom Drive Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency: Planning Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Location of Project: Blossom Drive at Route 7 Magisterial District: Red Bud ���■■iiiA�■ Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Add additional turning lane(s) at Blossom and Route 7. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Funding and planning for this project is not currently advanced to the point where an accurate schedule can be projected. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): nnnpnc�n F.YpF.NnTTTTRFS Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 lst FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 5th FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Element Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $250,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $250,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): While $250,000 is the projected cost based upon the above referenced plan, the actual allocation by funding source would be premature at this time. It is anticipated that this cost will be addressed the revenue sharing program. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at this intersection. Please describe the need for this project. As noted above. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The location is at the existing intersection point. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This project improves the safety for the traveling public. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project does not highlight any specific group, but is a congestion benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearing. -2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Revenue Sharing Date Prepared: 10/27/2006 Agency Contact Person: John Bishop Location of Project: County Wide Magisterial District: All Agency: Planning Phone Number: 540-665-5651 Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Plan to address changes in the revenue sharing program. Current state code, while allowing localities to apply for up to $1 M under the program only allow for %2 of those dollars to come from proffers. This creates a requirement for a minimum of $500,000 annually from County funds to apply for the maximum in revenue sharing on an annual basis. i Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Annual application process. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project has not previously been included in the CIP. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Estimate Cost (in 2006 dollars): vnnvncr'il FXPF.NT)TTTTRF,S Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Annual expectation of revenue sharing match required from local funds based upon State Code. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 A L�VX Element V FY 2007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 2010/11 Sth FY 2011/12 Beyond FY 2012 Total Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3.0 M Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) X Other (please explain) Annual expectation of revenue sharing match required from local funds based upon State Code. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. vn"WAQV , �rrNnrivr_ cnFrurEc 11\Vl V"-- 1 111�L11\V Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 FY 2012 General $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3.0 M Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 $500,000$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3.0 M Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. These funds are used to address projects as determined by the Board of Supervisors on an annual basis. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Please describe the need for this project. Based upon State Code, if the county wishes to apply for the fall $1 M in revenue sharing, we must be prepared to pay 50% of the match or $500,000 from local funds. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. County Wide r Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? NA Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? These projects improves the safety for the traveling public. Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? These projects do not highlight any specific group, but are a congestion and safety benefit. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Many transportation projects, by their very nature offer opportunities for additional economic development. Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger proj ect? No. -�■oma Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The public is kept abreast of planned transportation improvements via a number of advertised public meetings and hearing. 2007-2008 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 ."HESTElt', REGION A1, A] RPORT 2006-2007 FREDERICK COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Departmental Requests Individual Description and Justification Forms For New and Carry Over Project Requests July 12, 2005 Department of Planning and Development 2UU6-2UU / Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Winchester Regional Airport Through coordinated efforts between the Counties of Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah and Warren, and the City of Winchester, it was determined major capital improvements would be needed in order to develop Winchester Municipal Airport into a modern first class airport. The Winchester Regional Airport Authority was formed on July 1, 1987 by the Virginia General Assembly and consists of representatives from the Counties of Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah and Warren and the City of Winchester Since its formation, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority embarked on an extensive airport capital improvement program in order to comply with Federal Aviation Administration safety and design standards to accommodate business/corporate aircraft. The Winchester Regional Airport is now a 376 -acre, all weather, 24-hour general aviation airport with a 5,500 foot asphalt runway. It is conveniently located southeast of Interstate 81, Exit 313 and lies between State Routes 50 east and 522 south. Completed construction projects include a 1,100 -foot runway extension, pavement resurfacing of the entire runway, relocation of the taxiway and the creation of safety areas at each end of the runway. New buildings constructed under this program include a modern general aviation terminal, a 12,000 square foot clear span hangar, a 9,000 square foot aviation maintenance hangar office complex, and 61 T -hangar units. Other improvements include airfield lighting upgrade, installation of a 41,000 gallon above ground fuel storage facility, security fencing of the Airport perimeter, the installation of a precision instrument approach system that provides all weather access to the Airport, and the relocation of Airport Road State Route 645 to meet FAA standards which will also allow room for future expansion to accommodate additional corporate hangars. Private and business aircraft based at Winchester total over 100, and range in size from small single engine aircraft to large cabin class business aircraft and business jets. Numerous aviation business located at the airport provide airframe and engine maintenance, flight schools, aircraft rentals, parts brokering, aircraft rides, air ambulance service, and aircraft charter services. Collaborating with Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Authority has also made improvements to primary access roads to the airport. Water and sewer service was also established within the Route 522 South area affording the opportunity to many Frederick County residents to access this needed utility. To date, more than $19 million ab rs have been invested in Airport capital improvements, equipment, and rom 'ons through funding received from the Federal Aviation Administration, Virginia Department of Aviation, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the supporting local jurisdictions. ,. �._�i 'i:.... I...J. r1A I 1 -..r�r..v�r. .�r��l D�r.rdl r Drn�en�inn /fnrmgmrl!�y impolLal t amenities include 2 -4 -hour V.S. UustV1 1s all o uci IvL vuV1I kiv v 7 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 46 U.S. Customs and Immigrations), 24-hour on call line service, air cargo handling, automated weather observation system (AWOS III), computerized weather and flight planning equipment, full instrument landing system and rental car/limousine services. In December 1993, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority updated its 1987 Twenty - Year Master Plan which is near completion with only a few projects remaining. They include the relocation of Airport Road to remove a section of the road that infringes on regulated airspace, land acquisition along the northern side of Bufflick Road for noise abatement and a modified master development plan for the north side of the runway. Land to accommodate the road relocation project was acquired by the Airport over two years ago and the design phase is complete. In working with the Virginia Department of Aviation and the Federal Aviation Administration, approximately three parcels a year along Bufflick Road will be processed for acquisition in accordance with the current Master Plan. Due to the limitations on space on the south side, the Airport Authority is in the process of creating a development plan for the north side of the runway. With continuing increased air space restrictions within the Dulles/Washington area, the Winchester Airport has experienced a steady increase in business traffic. In addition to increased operations, the sizes of aircraft used for business travel have become larger and with the growing demand in air cargo service the airport has seen the introduction of DC -9 air freight service. Requests by owners of larger aircraft to lease land to build hangars currently cannot be met due to limited available building space. This is a loss of potential revenue by the Airport in lease fees along with the loss of tax revenue by Frederick County. A modified master plan for development on the north side will be completed in the fiscal year 2005. While details are not yet completed it is known that a parallel taxiway with a minimum 400 foot separation from the centerline of the runway will have to be constructed. This setoff distance will safely accommodate the larger aircraft and will also provide a means to access ramps and hangars on the north side. Members of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Virginia Department of Aviation often use the Winchester Regional Airport as a role model airport for planning and development. This recognition was achieved through the solidarity of the Winchester Regional Airport Authority. Through the continued support and dedication of its member jurisdictions, the Winchester Regional Airport will enhance its role as a vital economic development asset in the attraction of new commercial and industrial businesses to this region while serving the needs of existing businesses. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 47 2006-2007 Departmental Re nest Prioritization Summar New and Carry Over (Modified and Unmodified) Project Requests Department: Winchester Airport Approved By: Dept. Project FY FY FY FY FY TOTAL Priority Title 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 CIP Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost 1 Land Parcel 31, $700,000 $165,000 $865,000 46,53 2 Terminal Bldg $500,000 $500,000 Renovation 3 Land Parcel 47, $65,000 $800,000 $865,000 47A, 48 4 Upgrade $200,000 Airfield $50,000 $150,000 Lights 5 Land $50,000 $300,000 $350,000 Parcel 50, 51,52 6 Airfield $300,000 $300,000 Maint Bldg 7 8 9 10 11 TOTAL $1,315,000 $1,115,000 $350,000 1 $300,000 $3,080,000 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 r � :� 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Land Acquisition — Preliminary Phase Parcels 31, 46 & 53 Date Prepared: September 26, 2005 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Bufflick Road Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Preliminary work to acquire three parcels along Bufflick Road identified on the Airport Property Map as parcels 31, 46 & 53 was completed in FY 2005 and funding for fee simple acquisition is budgeted in FY 2006. Actual acquisition of properties will carry over into FY 2006. Property is included in the current Twenty -Year Master Plan and is to be acquired for noise abatement. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. FY 2003 — 2004 Preliminary Costs (Surveys, appraisals, EDDA, etc.) Completed FY 2005 FY 2004 — 2006 Actual land acquisition costs may carry over with an increase into FY 2006 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 17 Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Phase I of this project is in included in the CIP and is rated as four under the County Priority system. Funding grant through the Virginia Department of Aviation was awarded August 2004. Estimate Cost (in 2005 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 15` FY 2006/2007 2nd FY 2007/2008 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/2010 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 Total Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition $700,000 $165,000 $865,000 Site Preparation & Improvements - Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $700,000 $165,000 $865,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 18 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1" FY 2006/2007 2nd FY 2007/2008 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/2010 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 TOTAL General Fund $14,000 $3.300 $17,300 Other Fund Federal Grant State Grants $665,000 $21,000 $156,750 $4,950 $821,750 $25,950 Bonds and Debts Other Fund-raising TOTAL $700,000 $165,000 $865,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant). FY 2004 Local Share State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation Federal Grant — Federal Aviation Administration FY 2005 Local Share State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation Federal Grant — Federal Aviation Administration FY 2006 Local Share State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation Federal Grant — Federal Aviation Administration $1,000(2%) $4,000(8%) $45,000 (90%) $14,000 (2%) $21,000 (3%) $665,000 (95%) $3,300(2%) $4,950(3%) $156,750 (95%) In FY 2006, funding reimbursement from the Federal Aviation Administration is anticipated to be received for expenditures in FY 2005 and FY 2006 resulting in refunds to the County for monies advanced on this project. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 19 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. N/A Please describe the need for this project. For several years, development requiring land acquisition at the Winchester Regional Airport has focused on the Runway 32 (southwest) end. With that land acquisition project complete, several parcels within the Runway 14 (northeast) end also need to be acquired. Acquisition is necessary because many of the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located in side the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations and encourages airport to resolve the non - compatibility through acquisition fee simple where feasible. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2U Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the FNJJj CL ..nsistent established policies? This project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Development Plan and is within the Airport Support Area identified on Frederick County's Comprehensive Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Parcels 31 and 46 are located adjacent to Runway 14-32. Parcel 31 is located within the FAR Part 77 primary surface. In addition, terrain and other features on both parcels are obstructions the to FAR Part 77 transitional surface. Parcel 53 is located under the western corner of the Runway 14 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). It is the recommendation of the FAA and the Airport's desire to own in fee simple all land within their RPZ's. These acquisitions will help to clear the approach surfaces for Runway 14 and structures, trees, etc. will be removed as part of this project. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 21 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Yes, under the federal Aviation Administration's Part 77 Surface Requirements, the Airport is required to own fee simple property within the Primary Surface. This requirement is also include in the Code of Virginia 15.2. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Safe and efficient approach systems into the airport are essential in attracting business traffic into this region especially during adverse weather conditions that could produce more revenue for the regional and additional operating revenue for the airport to help the airport be more self- sustaining. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 22 ®its■����®� ■ Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Plan. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Residents living along the northern side of Bufflick Road that have property identified for acquisition were immediately notified upon completion of the Master Plan Update in 1993. They were each provided a copy of an estimated timetable outlining when acquisition proceedings would proceed. Each property owner involved seems to e supportive of the project. Prior to beginning any actual proceedings, each owner involved will be fully advised and met with individually in accordance with Federal Land Acquisition Regulations. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 23 C� 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Terminal Building Renovations, Phase H Date Prepared: September 26, 2005 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Winchester Regional Airport Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The General Aviation Terminal building was constructed in 1992. Over the past 12 years, new and existing companies, State, Federal and local agencies, and the public have used the terminal building extensively. The building is beginning to show several areas of wear that need to be addressed including the delaminating of the exterior surface and leaking of the roof. In addition, the existing HVAC system is approaching the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced. There are places within the public lobby of the terminal building that leak rather badly and several areas of the ceiling have actually fallen down after becoming soaked with rainwater. Ceiling tiles are constantly being replaced within the office areas. The roof replacement is scheduled and budgeted for FY 2006. ■ Schedule:. If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. An evaluation of the facility is being conducted in FY 2006. A qualified architect will determine the condition of all components of the building and a priority schedule for addressing renovations along with cost estimates and recommendations on what renovation efforts would be most beneficial. Realizing that such renovations are relatively expensive, the project will likely have to be completed over time once the evaluation and recommendations are completed. FY 2006 — Evaluation of Facility FY 2007 — Renovation of Facility (May carry over to FY 2008) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 38 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. An evaluation of the terminal building and its components, is funded in FY 2006 budget and a State grant has been received for $40,000 Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rag° -" Estimate Cost (in 2005 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1St FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 FY 2011 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction 5500,000 $500,000 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 40 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. Element 1" FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 FY 2011 General $100,000 $100,000 Fund Other Fund State Grants $400,000 $400,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 11 $500,000 $500,000 PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): FY 2007 Local Share — Local Jurisdictions State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $100,000 (20%) $400,000 (80%) 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 41 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. N/A Please describe the need for this project. The terminal building is over twelve years old and is in need of renovation in order to prevent further deterioration and to protect the local jurisdictions and the State's investment. The flat roof needs to be repaired in order to prevent the interior of this building from further damage. Funds to construct the terminal building were received by the State Department of Aviation in 1989 and it is the responsibility to maintain and preserve this facility under conditions of the original grant. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 42 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? N/A ■ .. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? There are several areas within the building that sections of tile or drywall from the ceiling have fallen when wet. Leaks are repeatedly fixed however, it has been determined that there are also structural improvements that must be made in order to prevent further damage and deterioration. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests 1 as' — Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? As a condition to receiving funding from a State Grant, there is an obligation to maintain the facility constructed with State funds. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? The terminal building serves as the front door to this community with a positive impression made on businesses and travelers arriving at the Winchester Regional Airport. It is a valuable asset used to promote this region to enhance economic development and tourism. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 44 �r Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Phase I for an evaluation to determine the scope of the renovation is in the FY 2006 budget. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. N/A 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage '+D 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Land Acquisition — Preliminary Phase Parcels 47, 47A & 48 Date Prepared: September 26, 2005 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Bufflick Road Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Preliminary work to acquire three parcels along Bufflick Road identified on the Airport Property Map as parcels 47, 47A & 48. Property is included in the current Twenty -Year Master Plan and must be acquired to meet noise abatement requirements. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. FY 2005 — 2006 Preliminary Costs (Surveys, appraisals, EDDA, etc.) (May carry over to FY 2007) FY 2006 — 2007 Actual land acquisition costs Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 24 ■ Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project was rated as number 6 in the County CIP. Estimate Cost (in 2004 dollars): Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 25 1" FY 2006/2007 PROPOSED 2nd FY 2007/2008 EXPENDITURES 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/201.0 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 Total Element $65,000 $65,000 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land $800,000 $800,000 Acquisition Site Preparation Improvements - Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $65,000 $800,000 t 5865,000 ■��■ ■■■■ter Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 25 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 15` FY 2006/2007 2nd FY 2007/2008 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/2010 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 TOTAL General Fund $13,000 $160,000 ($155,700) $17,300 Other Fund Federal Grant State Grants $52,000 $640,000 $821,750 ($666,050) $821,750 $25,950 Bonds and Debts Other Fund-raising TOTAL $65,000 $800,000 $-0- $865,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): FY 2006 Local Share $52,000 (20%) State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $13,000 (80%) FY 2007 Local Share $160,000 (20%) State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $640,000 (80%) In FY 2008 funding reimbursement from the Federal Aviation Administration is anticipated to be received for expenditures in FY 2006 & FY 2007 resulting in the local share being reduced from (20%) to (2%) with a refund due to the County on the local share in the amount of $155,700 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 26 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided 'by the project. MM Please describe the need for this project. For several years, development requiring land acquisition at the Winchester Regional Airport has focused on the Runway 32 (southwest) end. With that land acquisition project complete, several parcels within the Runway 14 (northeast) end also need to be acquired. Acquisition is necessary because many of the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located in side the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations and encourages airport to resolve the non - compatibility through acquisition fee simple where feasible. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests ' a8. ■MMM■.■■ Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Pian? is the project consistent with established policies? This project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Development Plan and is within the Airport Support Area identified on Frederick County's Comprehensive Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Parcels 47, 47A and 48 are located adjacent to Runway 14-32 within the FAR Part 77 primary surface. In addition, terrain and other features on both parcels are obstructions to the FAR Part 77 transitional surface. It is the recommendation of the FAA and the Airport's desire to own in fee simple all land within their RPZ's and primary surfaces. These acquisitions will help to clear the approach surfaces for Runway 14 and structures, trees, etc. will be removed as part of this project. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 28 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Yes, under the federal Aviation Administration's Part 77 Surface Requirements, the Airport is required to own fee simple property within the Primary Surface. This requirement is also include in the Code of Virginia 15.2. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Safe and efficient approach systems into the airport are essential in attracting business traffic into this region especially during adverse weather conditions that could produce more revenue for the regional and additional operating revenue for the airport to help the airport be more self- sustaining. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage /-y Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Plan. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Residents living along the northern side of Bufflick Road that have property identified for acquisition were immediately notified upon completion of the Master Plan Update in 1993. They were each provided a copy of an estimated timetable outlining when acquisition proceedings would proceed. Each property owner involved seems to e supportive of the project. Prior to beginning any actual proceedings, each owner involved will be fully advised and met with individually in accordance with Federal Land Acquisition Regulations. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 30 • • C: 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Upgrade Airfield Lighting Date Prepared: September 26, 2005 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Winchester Regional Airport Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Upgrade Medium Intensity Runway Lighting (MIRL) to High Intensity Runway Lighting (HIRL) and upgrade 2 -Box Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) to 4 -Box PAPI. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The design phase is scheduled for FY 2007 with the construction phase scheduled for FY 2008 depending upon available State/Federal funding. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project is included in the current CIP rated as number 3 under the County Priority System. This project will be delayed until Federal funding becomes available. Estimate Cost (in 2005 dollars): PROPOSED EXP ENDI I URES Element 1st FY 2006/2007 2nd FY 2007/2008 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/2010 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 Total Planning, $50,000 $50,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements Construction $150,000 $150,000 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $50,000 $150,000 $200,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2006/2007 2nd FY 2007/2008 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/2010 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 TOTAL General Fund $1,000 $3,000 $4,000 Other Fund Federal Grants State Grants $45,000 $4,000 $135,000 $12,000 $180,000 $16,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fund-raising TOTAL $50,000 $150,000 $200,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): Local Share — Local Jurisdictions State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation Federal Grant — Federal Aviation Administration $4,000(2%) $16,000 (8%) $180,000 (90%) 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the pr ect• N/A Please describe the need for this project. Recent improvements at the airport have enhanced all-weather and nighttime operations capability. Included in these improvements was the recent installation and commissioning of the airport's precision instrument landing system that has increased use of the airport by jet aircraft. FAA in Advisory Circular No. 150/5340-24 recommends that runways with precision approaches have high intensity runway edge lights (HIRLs) installed and that a 4 -Box visual approach aid be installed on runways with jet operations. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage o Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the CoMnrr-e- lhe- n�ci.ye PI Tg the project c_n�;-Ient VI�L —I VtII I3LAiV1r. Jlli GUa policies? This project is within the Airport's Twenty -Year Master Development Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Upgrade of the airfield lighting system will enhance the approach system into the Winchester Regional Airport providing pilots with faster traveling aircraft the ability to see the airport from a further distance out. 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Although not mandated, this project will meet the FAA's design standards and recommendation for airport with the type of precision instrument landing system in place at Winchester Regional Airport. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Approach systems at an airport that are safe and efficient could attract more business traffic to this region especially during adverse weather.or nighttime operations. An increase in traffic could also produce more operating revenue for the airport. 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 ■ Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? This project will complete the entire precision instrument land system already installed. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 9 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Land Acquisition — Preliminary Phase Parcels 50, 51 & 52 Date Prepared: September 26, 2005 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone. Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Bufflick Road Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Preliminary work to acquire three parcels along Bufflick Road identified on the Airport Property Map as parcels 50, 51 & 52. Property is included in the current Twenty -Year Master Plan and is to be acquired to meet noise abatement requirements. �M Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. FY 2007 — 2008 Preliminary Costs (Surveys, appraisals, EDDA, etc.) FY 2009 — 2010 Actual land acquisition costs Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 31 Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project was rated as number 7 in the County's CIP. Estimate Cost (in 2005 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 FY 2011 Planning, 550,000 $50,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition $300,000 $300,000 Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $50,000 $300,000 $350,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 32 Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 FY 2011 General Fund $10,000 $60,000 ($63,000) $7,000 Other Fund Federal Grant $332,500 $332,500 State Grants $40,000 $240,000 ($269,500) $10,500 Bonds and Debts Other Fund-raising TOTAL $50,000 $300,000 $-0- $350,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): FY 2009 Local Share $10,000 (20%) State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $40,000 (80%) FY 2010 Local Share $60,000 (20%) State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $240,000 (80%) In FY 2011 funding reimbursement from the Federal Aviation Administration is anticipated to be received for expenditures in FY 2009 & FY 2010 resulting in the local share being reduced from (20%) to (2%) with a refund due on the local share of $63,000 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 33 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by +he project. N/A Please describe the need for this project. For several years, development requiring land acquisition at the Winchester Regional Airport has focused on the Runway 32 (southwest) end. With that land acquisition project complete, several parcels within the Runway 14 (northeast) end also need to be acquired. Acquisition is necessary because many of the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located in side the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations and encourages airport to resolve the non - compatibility through acquisition fee simple where feasible. ®■ Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. IIV 1 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 34 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Development Plan and is within the Airport Support Area identified on Frederick County's Comprehensive Plan. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Parcels 50, 51 and 52 are located adjacent to Runway 14-32 and are located within the FAR Part 77 primary surface. In addition, terrain and other features on both parcels are obstructions the to FAR Part 77 transitional surface. These parcels are located under the western corner of the Runway 14 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). It is the recommendation of the FAA and the Airport's desire to own in fee simple all land within their RPZ's. These acquisitions will help to clear the approach surfaces for Runway 14 and structures, trees, etc. will be removed as part of this project. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 35 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Yes, under the federal Aviation Administration's Part 77 Surface Requirements, the Airport is required to own fee simple property within the Primary Surface. This requirement is also include in the Code of Virginia 15.2. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Safe and efficient approach systems into the airport are essential in attracting business traffic into this region especially during adverse weather conditions could produce more revenue for the regional and additional operating revenue for the airport to help the airport be more self- sustaining. P 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests age 36 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Plan. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Residents living along the northern side of Bufflick Road that have property identified for acquisition were immediately notified upon completion of the Master Plan Update in 1993. They were each provided a copy of an estimated timetable outlining when acquisition proceedings would proceed. Each property owner involved seems to e supportive of the project. Prior to beginning any actual proceedings, each owner involved will be fully advised and met with individually in accordance with Federal Land Acquisition Regulations. 2005-2006 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 37 • :-7 • 2006-2007 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM Return to. Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, VA Project Name: Airfield Maintenance Building — Design & Construction Date Prepared: September 26, 2005 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Winchester Regional Airport Magisterial District: Shawnee ■ Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This project includes demolition of an old and undersized wooden structure formerly used to house maintenance equipment and the design and construction of a new facility. It will be large enough to accommodate the airport's maintenance equipment and designed to allow staff to perform preventive maintenance work. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project should be started and completed within the same fiscal year provided that State funding is available. ■ Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 10 Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project was rated as number 5 on the County Priority system. Estimate Cost (in 2005 dollars): Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 11 Is' FY 2006/2007 PROPOSED EXPENDI'I UxLN 2nd FY 2007/2008 3rd FY 2008/2009 4th FY 2009/2010 5th FY 2010/2011 Beyond FY 2011 Total Element $50,000 $50,000 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation & Improvements $250,000 $250,000 Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $300,000 $300,000 e� Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 11 PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element V' FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond TOTAL 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 FY 2011 General $210,000 $210,000 Fund Other Fund State Grants $90,000 $90,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL $300,000 $300,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation — Design Only $40,000 (80%) Local Share — Local Jurisdictions $10,000 (20%) State Grant — VDOA construction (at this time only 1,250sf is eligible for reimbursement based on an estimated $50sf) $50,000 Local Share — Local Jurisdictions $200,000 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 12 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of se. Vice to be provided bythe project. WE Please describe the need for this project. Continuing expansion and improvements to the airport increased the demand to provide larger and more reliable maintenance equipment in order to properly maintain the airport. The airport owns various pieces of equipment and vehicles to handle aircraft towing, deicing equipment, cutting grass, snow removal operations, airfield and building maintenance. Room to store and maintain vehicles and equipment is inadequate resulting in the airport having to use two aircraft t -hangars that could be generating over $6,000 annually in revenue. In an effort to streamline operations and reduce operating costs, two staff position were created to perform light to medium maintenance on all airport owned buildings and equipment. One hangar is used as a temporary shop and does not provide adequate electrical service, heat and water/sewer facilities. The wooden structure previously used as a storage facility is undersized and was not constructed for the purpose of maintaining the types of equipment used by the airport nor does it have any utilities. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is within the Airport's Twenty-year Master Development Plan. 4 Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? This facility will provide a safe, appropriate and efficient working environment for airport maintenance technicians to service and maintain airport equipment. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 14 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Ma Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? An airfield maintenance/storage facility will allow the airport to generate additional revenue by leasing the hangar space to aircraft owners. The facility will allow for airport owned equipment to be properly and securely stored out of the weather which should help reduce maintenance costs and extend the life of the equipment that is maintained and purchased from operating revenues. 2004-2005 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests rage i D Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? N/A Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Wn zvuq-/-uv3 uapitai trriprovements Flan Froject Requests Page 16 HANDLEY REGI-ONAL LIBRARY 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Parking Lot and Sidewalk addition at Bowman Library Date Prepared: October 16,2006 Agency: Handley Regional Library Agency Contact Person: Trish Ridgeway Phone Number: 662-9041, ext.14 Location of Project: Stephens City Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This project is the Library's top capital improvement priority. It is a safety issue for Bowman Library users. To provide a safe means for people to reach Bowman Library, Handley Regional Library proposes that a sidewalk be constructed to connect with existing sidewalks at the library. (See preliminary drawings that were previously submitted.) Additionally, more parking is needed to prevent individuals from parking on Tasker Road when the existing lot is full, a situation that is happening more and more frequently. The 4 -foot wide sidewalk will extend approximately 400-500 ft. (approximately 4,000 sq.ft.) beyond the sidewalk that now borders the parking lot. Two options are shown on the drawings. The Library had requested Painter -Lewis provide two alternatives, and both options are estimated to cost about the same. The Library has chosen Option 2. This option brings the sidewalk to a point on Lakeside Drive most likely to be used by residents, almost all of whom are coming from the east. It would require a culvert system that duplicates the one currently used on the corner of Lakeside and Tasker. The parking lot expansion would enlarge the lot from 101 spaces to 221 spaces (approximately 4,000 additional sq. yd.) and would relieve the overcrowding that forces individuals to park on Tasker Road during peak library use times. This work will not require additional storm drainage work but will necessitate moving shrubbery, planting trees and bushes, installing curbs and gutters, and installing parking -lot tight fixtures to match the current down -light fixtures. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The project will take approximately 3-5 months. 9/1/05 1 or 8 Handley Regional Library CIP Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: if previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This is the Number 1 on Handley Regional Library's list. The project awaits funding. Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PROPOSED EXPEINDII U1cEno Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5"' FY Beyond Total 007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/11 FY 2011 Planning, $ 11,500 Surveying, & $ 11,500 Design__ Land Completed Acquisition Site Preparation & 144,157 144,157 Improvements Construction 72,811 72,811 Furniture and Equipment N/A Other (opening day collection) TOTAL L $228,468 $228,468 Oct- 16, 2006 2 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP Basis of Cost Estimates. Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment ✓ From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor The Library paid Painter/Lewis to provide the preliminary design. Shockey provided the estimate From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding. Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5"' FY Beyond FY TOTAL 007108 2008/09 2009110 20010/11 2011/11 2011 General Fund 228,468 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund-raising I TOTAL 11$228,468 Please describe the source offunding (i.e. type ofgrant): Oct. 16, 2006 3 of S Handley Regional Library CIP Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. Each month, �"-10,500 individuals a month enter the Bowman Library with a system- wide annual total of 305,377. Using the percent of checkouts as a rough determination of annual door count, Frederick County residents enter the libraries in the system approximately 240,000 times per year. The Library serves all age groups from very young children to senior citizens and provides recreational and education materials for them. The library is a favorite location for families to visit together and serves many children and adults when they are working on school assignments or self-improvement. The library supplies computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. Please describe the need for this project. Parking Lot: One children's program last summer attracted over 500 attendees. Library users park on Tasker Road or in the nearby town -house parking lot because the library lot is full. This usually occurs during elections, children's programs and the library's twice - annual book sales. Opening a car door or helping small children exit a car in the face of Tasker Road traffic is dangerous. The library has public seating space for 183. In addition, the meeting room holds 120 people and is available for area groups to use. Also, since the book processing staff and unit supervisors operate out of Bowman Library, staff takes up 11 to 16 parking spaces during the business day and 7 to 8 spaces in the evenings. The Library is also a polling place for Frederick County. At the November 2004 election the deputies from the Frederick County Sheriffs office were needed to direct traffic. Library of Virginia standards call for 190 or more parking spaces for a public library building of Bowman's size. Frederick County standards require 100 spaces, and since money was tight for the project, Public Works decided to use the county standard. Sidewalk: The Bowman Library has proved very popular with children and families. Children from the Lakeside Drive side of the Library often bicycle or walk to the library. If they bicycle, they ride on Tasker Road where the traffic often goes faster than the 45 mph speed limit. If they walk, they can walk across the field between the library and tch, rather than walk to the Lakeside Drive, and many children jump the Mothers,lrainage who wantito walk, complain they have to use corner where it is easy to get across. Tasker Road when they have children in strollers. OcL 16, 2006 4 of 8 Handley Regional library CIP Please describe and juste the proposed location of the project. The parking lot location is the area that was set aside for parking lot expansion. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Yes. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Safety is the primary reason for this request. It is very dangerous for bicyclists and walkers to be on Tasker Drive. More individuals would be comfortable coming on foot or by bicycle if there were a safer route. Likewise parking along the roadside at Tasker also is not safe. The Bowman Library is a polling place for Frederick County and parking is a problem during elections. Oct. 16, 2006 5 of 8 Handley Regional Library CEP Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Public libraries in general serve segments of population who cannot afford to purchase many books for their own libraries as well as those that lack computers and Internet access. Through pooling of funds, public libraries make available to the public at large expensive printed works, books on tape, and computer databases that an individual or most companies could not afford. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Realtors, firms relocating, and homebuyers see Public Libraries as a very positive local quality of life factor. Libraries provide information on business start-up, investing, and company management. Oct. 16, 2006 6 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. It is citizen's requests and complaints, both to Library staff and to members of the Board of Supervisors, that continue to push this proposal. Oct. 16, 2006 7 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP 2006-2007 Departmental Request Summary Department: Handley Regional Library Approved By: George Ludwig HRL Board Chairman Trish Ridgeway, Director Dept Priority Project Title FY 2007/08 Cost FY 2008/09 Cost FY 2009/10 Cost FY2010111 Cost FY 2011/12 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 Bowman Parking lot & Sidewalk Additions $228,468 $228,468 2 NW Library Land Acquisition & Site work $48,000 $48,000 Construction $945,000 $945,000 Donations for Books 60,000 60,000 3 Senseny/ Greenwood Branch Under development 4 522 Branch Library Under development TOTAL $228,468 $48,000 $1,005,000 $1,281,468 Oct. 16, 2006 8 of 8 Handley Regional Library CUP 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Northern Frederick County Library Branch Date Prepared: October 16, 2006 Agency: Handley Regional Library Agency Contact Person: Trish Ridgeway Phone Number: 662-9041, ext. 14 Location of Project: Near Cross Junction Magisterial District: Gainesboro Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for up to 35 vehicles. The proposed location would be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro district, but this could change depending on patterns of library use in the next 3 to 4 years and on whether donated land could be located. The acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres would be in fiscal year 2007/2008. The library itself would be constructed the following fiscal year. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Building program complete 2007/2008 Land acquisition 2007/2008 Hire architect 2007/2008 Hire general contractor 2008/2009 Begin construction 2008/2009 Complete construction 2008/2009 Furnish Library 2009/2010 Open Library 2009/2010 OCT5 ^00 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 8 Ilandley Regional Library CIP Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project continues to rank 2,d on Handley Regional Library's capital requests. Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5`h FY Beyond IFY Total 007/08 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 2011/11 2011 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition $36,000- $36,000- 48,000 48,000 Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other 945,000 9455000 Books, etc. *60,000 60,000 TOTAL $36,000- 1,005,000 $190419000- 48,000 11053,000 *The Bowman Library at Stephens City with architect's fees and furniture and equipment, but without books, cost approximately $145 per square foot. Since a site has not been selected, it is difficult to estimate site costs. Books, books on tape, videos, CDs, and DVDs are calculated with a beginning collection of 30,000 items at a rough estimate of $20 each. 10/23/2006 Page 2 of 8 Handley Regional Library CEP Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received ✓ 'Preliminary" estimate, (e.g no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) On the land cost, we have talked to a landowner who had a contract in 2001 for a 5 - acre residential lot on route 522 at $11,980. See information on estimate cost above. Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 007/08 2nd FY 2008/09 3rd FY 2009/10 4th FY 20010/11 5th FY 2011/11 Beyond FY 2011 1st FY 007/08 General Fund $48,000 $48,000 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts $945,000 Other Fund -raisin 60,000 TOTAL $48,000 $1,005,000 $190539000 Please describe the source offunding (i -e- type ofgrant): 10/16/2006 Page 3 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP Project Justification: Please project the number ofpersons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This branch would serve most of those who live in the Gainesboro district along with other citizens who travel in the area. An average of 25,807 individuals enter the library of the system each month in 2005-2006. Using the percent of checkouts as a rough determination of annual door count, in the last fiscal year Frederick County residents entered the libraries in the system over 200,000 times and had 51,778 questions answered, and 24,636 hour of Internet usage. Please describe the need for this project. Now that the Bowman Library is completed, the residents of Gainesboro district comprise the largest population group that is the most distance from a library within the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The exact location is yet to be determined. Ideally, a public library should be easy to get to, be located on a major road, and be very visible from the road. Location criteria are similar to those for a retail establishment. If a location other than route 522 meets these criteria, it would also be acceptable. Beginning the search for a location now may facilitate the donation of land. 10/23/2006 Page 4 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Yes. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? In 2005-2006 Frederick County Citizens of all ages checked out 393,312 items; over 190,00 items of this total were borrowed from Handley Library and 175,00 items were borrowed from the Bowman Library. Many senior citizens utilize public libraries; for many of them, the library is their primary social outlet. They volunteer at the library; they visit daily or weekly because there is no cost and the staff is friendly. Our introductory computer classes that are offered twice yearly attract many senior citizens. Public libraries also serve an important recreational and educational source for children. Our summer reading program this year registered 2,105 preschoolers and school-age children system wide. We distributed over 1,504 books (all donated) as reading incentives for each six hours of reading by program participants. 10/23/2006 Page 5 of 8 Handley Regional Library CEP Legal Requirement. Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The Bowman Library, the Handley Library, and the Clarke County Library provide services to the residents of Frederick County. Other than the sparsely populated far southwest corner of the County, Gainesboro residents have the farthest drive to reach a library. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Realtors, firms relocating, and homebuyers see Public Libraries as a very positive local quality of life factor. Libraries provide information on business start-up, investing, and company management. 10/16/2006 Page 6 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? We have discussed with Frederick County School Superintendent William Dean the possibility of collaboration when a new Gainesboro School is constructed. Dr. Dean communicated to the library in August 2005 that the site lacked room for a library. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Users of the Library's deposit collection at Redlands United Methodist Church in Gainesboro and other residents of the community have anecdotally indicated strong support. 10/16/2006 Page 7 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP 2006-2007 Departmental Request Summary Department: Handley Regional Library Approved By: George Ludwig HRL Board Chairman Trish Ridgeway, Director Dept, Priority Project Title FY 2007/08 Cost FY 2008/09 Cost FY 2009/10 Cost FY 2010/11 Cost FY 2011112 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 Bowman Parking lot & Sidewalk Additions $228,468 $228,468 2 NW Library Land Acquisition & Site work $48,000 $48,000 Construction $945,000 $945,000 Donations for Books 60,000 60,000 3 Senseny/ Greenwood ranch Under development 4 522 Branch ibrary Under develo ment TOTAL 1 $228,468 $48,000 $1,005,000 $1,281,468 10/20/2006 Page 8 of 8 Handley Regional Library CIP 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Frederick County Library Branch - Senseny/Greenwood Date Prepared: October 16, 2006 Agency: Handley Regional Library Agency Contact Person: Trish Ridgeway Phone Number: 662-9041, ext.14 Location of Project: Senseny & Greenwood roads Magisterial District: Redbud/Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for up to 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Yet to be determined. ; 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 7 Handley Regional Library CEP-Senseny Greenwood Branch Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project ranks 3rd on Handley Regional Library's capital requests. Estimate Cost PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Unknown Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. N/A Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. N/A Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): N/A 10/23/2006 Page 2 of Handley Regional lAbrary CIP Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This branch would serve citizens living in this rapidly growing area. An average of 25,807 individually enter the library of the system each month in 2005-2006. Using the percent of checkouts as a rough determination of annual door count, in the last fiscal year Frederick County residents entered the libraries in the system over 200,000 times and had 51,778 questions answered, and 24,636 hour of Internet usage. Please describe the need for this project. A library in this area would meet the needs of Frederick County citizens by reducing traffic into Winchester. Parents and other library users will use the library more often if they do not have to come downtown to Handley Library. This area also lacks a community center; a library with ameeting room could help fill this need. The Library will provide materials and programming for patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The exact location is yet to be determined. Ideally, a public library should be easy to get to, be located on a major road, and be very visible from the road. Location criteria are similar to those for a retail establishment. 10/23/2006 Page 3 of 7 Handley Regional Library CII' Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Yes. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? In 2005-2006 Frederick County Citizens of all ages checked out 393,312 items; over 190,00 items of this total were borrowed from Handley Library and 175,00 items were borrowed from the Bowman Library. Many senior citizens utilize public libraries; for many of them, the library is their primary social outlet. They volunteer at the library; they visit it each daily or weekly because there is no cost and the staff is friendly. Our introductory computer classes that are offered twice yearly attract many senior citizens. Senior citizens are strong users of public libraries for both recreational and informational materials. Our introduction to computer resources classes have more seniors attending than any other group. Public libraries also serve an important recreational and educational source for children. Our summer reading program this year registered 2,105 preschoolers and school-age children system wide. We distributed over 1,504 books (all donated) as reading incentives for each six hours of reading by program participants. 10/23/2006 Page 4 of 7 Handley Regional Library CEP Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a .special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The Bowman Library, the Handley Library, and the Clarke County Library provide services to the residents of Frederick County. Economic Impact. Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Realtors, firms relocating, and homebuyers see Public Libraries as a very positive local quality of life factor. Libraries provide information on business start-up, investing, and company management. 10/23/2006 Page 5 of 7 Handley Regional Library UP Coordination with other projects: Is theproject necessary for the successful completion of otherprojects? Is theprojectpart of a largerproject? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Anecdotally, we hear from residents that they would like a library closer to their homes. 10/23/2006 Page 6 of 7 Handley Regional Library CIP 2006-2007 Departmental Request Summary Department: Handley Regional Library Approved By: George Ludwig HRL Board Chairman Trish Ridgeway, Director Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2007/08 Cost FY 2008/09 Cost FY 2009/10 Cost FY 2010111 Cost FY 2011112 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 Bowman Parking lot & Sidewalk Additions $228,468 $228,468 2 NW Library Land Acquisition & Site work $48,000 $48,000 Construction $945,000 $945,000 Donations for Books 60,000 60,000 3 Sensony/ Greenwood Branch Under development 4 522 Branch Library Under development TOTAL $228,468 $481000 $1,005,000r---1 11 $1,281,468 10/23/2006 Page 7 of 7 Handley Regional Library CEP Frederick County ? a 7 2 Mmes I 9 0 0 2007-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 0'CT L 5 22000 - INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Frederick County Library Branch - 522 South Date Prepared: October 16, 2006 Agency: Handley Regional Library Agency Contact Person: Trish Ridgeway Phone Number: 662-9041, ext.14 Location of Project: Where 522 meets Justice Drive (school cluster) Magisterial District: Opequon Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for up to 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Yet to be determined. 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 7 Handley Regional Library CIP Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This project ranks 4th on Handley Regional Library's capital requests. Estimate Cost PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Unknown Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. Ifyou want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. N/A Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. I -OM Please describe the source offunding (i.e. type ofgrant): N/A 10/23/2006 Page 2 of 7 Handley Regional Library CEP- Rt. 522 Branch Project Justification: Please project the number ofpersons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This branch would serve citizens living in this rapidly growing area. An average of 25,807 individually enter the library of the system each month in 2005-2006. Using the percent of checkouts as a rough determination of annual door count, in the last fiscal year Frederick County residents entered the libraries in the system over 200,000 times and had 51,778 questions answered, and 24,636 hour of Internet usage. Please describe the need for this project. This population group is not close to a library in the regional system. This area also lacks a community center that a library with meeting room could help fill this need. The Library will provide materials and programming for patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Please describe and juste the proposed location of the project. The exact location is yet to be determined. Ideally, a public library should be easy to get to, be located on a major road, and be very visible from the road. Location criteria are similar to those for a retail establishment. 10/23/2006 Page 3 of 7 Handley Regional Library CEP- Rt. 522 Branch Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Yes. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? In 2005-2006 Frederick County Citizens of all ages checked out 393,312 items; over 190,00 items of this total were borrowed from Handley Library and 175,00 items were borrowed from the Bowman Library. Many senior citizens utilize public libraries; for many of them, the library is their primary social outlet. They volunteer at the library; they visit it each daily or weekly because there is no cost and the staff is friendly. Our introductory computer classes that are offered twice yearly attract many senior citizens. Public libraries also serve an important recreational and educational source for children. Our summer reading program this year registered 2,105 preschoolers and school-age children system wide. We distributed over 1,504 books (all donated) as reading incentives for each six hours of reading by program participants. Senior citizens are strong users of public libraries for both recreational and informational materials. Our introduction to computer resources classes have more seniors attending than any other group. 10/23/2006 Page 4 of 7 Handley Regional Library CIP- Rt. 522 Branch Legal Requirement. Is the project required in order to meet a ,State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? The Bowman Library, the Handley Library, and the Clarke County Library provide services to the residents of Frederick County. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Realtors, firms relocating, and homebuyers see Public Libraries as a very positive local quality of life factor. Libraries provide information on business start-up, investing, and company management. 10/23/2006 Page 5 of 7 Handley Regional Library CIP- Rt. 522 Branch Coordination with otherprojects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of otherprojects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Anecdotally, we hear from residents that they would like a library closer to their homes. 10/23/2006 Page 6 of 7 Handley Regional Library CIP- Rt. 522 Branch 2006-2007 Departmental Request Summary Department: Handley Regional Library Approved By: George Ludwig HRL Board Chairman Trish Ridgeway, Director Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2007/08 Cost FY 2008/09 Cost FY 2009110 Cost FY 2010111 Cost FY 2011172 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost I Bowman Parking lot & Sidewalk Additions $228,468 $228,468 2 NW Library Land Acquisition & Site work $48,000 $48,000 Construction $945,000 $945,000 Donations for Books 60,000 60,000 3 Sensenyl Greenwood Branch Under development 4 522 Branch ibrar Under develo went TOTAL $228,468 $48,000 $1,005,000 $1,281,468 10/23/2006 Page 7 of 7 Handley Regional Library CIP- Rt. 522 Branch 0 0 n-; Frederick County 1 4 'i 2 Files • :7 • ITEM #2 Update of the Community Facilities aad Services and Parks and Recreation Chapters of the Comprehensive Policy Plan The Planning Department will be updating the 2003 Comprehensive Policy Plan in early 2007. in an effort to update the Community Facilities and Services and Parks and Recreation Chapters of the Plan, relevant departments were asked to review the description of their facilities and services as currently found in the plan. They were then requested to draft a new version and forward this to the Planning Department. Both the description of services and facilities, and the issues, goals, strategies and implementation sections are under review. Ultimately, any text changes will need to be reviewed by the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) and the Planning Cormnission, before adoption by the Board of Supervisors. Attached you will find the existing chapters in the Comp Plan, and the updated sections that were submitted from the Parks and Recreation Department and Public Works Department. Proposed new text changes are shown in red and underlined. Also attached is a new map from the School Department. Community Facilities and Services As development continues in Frederick County, there is a need to carefully plan for the facilities and services that will be required. Planned development will effect the expenditures and facilities that will be needed. It will also effect the location and types of facilities that must be provided. There is a need to carefully monitor growth and to plan land use and facilities in a coordinated fashion. This can be accomplished through annual comprehensive planning and capital improvements planning. Schools The Frederick County Public School system is composed of ten elementary schools serving students in grades kindergarten through fifth grade; three middle schools serving grades six through eight; and, two high schools serving grades nine through twelve. The Northwest Regional Education Programs (NREP) is a regional program that provides special education services to students from Frederick and Clarke Counties and the City of Winchester. Approximately 57% of the students attending NREP who receive services are from Frederick County. The Dowell J. Howard Center provides vocational education services for high school students and adults, and is also the location of The Learning Center, a high school alternative program. In addition to the seventeen school facilities, twenty-two modular classrooms are used at six school sites to reduce overcrowding due to increased enrollment and to address the need for additional space due to changes in educational programs. During the past several decades, student enrollment in the school division has increased steadily. The most significant increase has occurred throughout the 1990's with school enrollment growing by 2,318 students. This increase, from 8,223 students in 1990 to 10,408 students in 1999, represents a 28% growth in student enrollment in the school division. Student enrollment in Frederick County has notably exceeded the state average, which was 11.3% for the same period of time. In order to meet the need for additional school space, a number of school construction and renovation projects have occurred throughout the 1990's. Despite the completion of these capital facilities projects, four of the ten elementary schools will exceed 90% of their capacity at the opening of school in the fall of 2000. These schools are Bass -Hoover (96%), Indian Hollow (91 %), Senseny Road (105%) and Stonewall (95%). Construction of classroom additions to Armel and Middletown Elementary Schools, which were completed in the fall of 1998, resulted in an increase in student capacity and a reduction in the percent of practical capacity utilized at each of these sites. Orchard View Elementary School in the Back Creek Magisterial District will open for students in the fall of 2000 and Robinson Elementary will be closed. As students matriculate from elementary school to the middle school and high school levels, the need to provide additional space for the increase in student population and to meet changing educational requirements will necessitate the development of new facilities and the renovation of existing Frederick County 8 - 1 Comprehensive Plan Comm unity Facilities and Services facilities. The Capital Improvements Plan reflects the need to address space requirements for middle and high school enrollment that has exceeded 90% of capacity in three of the five schools despite the use of nineteen modular classrooms at five different locations, and the increased use of the Dowell J Howard Center for secondary programs. A major renovation project at James Wood Middle School and the construction of a third county high school on Berryville Pike are two projects planned to address the increase in middle and high school student population. During the 1990's, the need to renovate or replace older facilities and provide facilities to accommodate residential growth in the county has resulted in significant allocations for capital facilities costs in the school division. The rate of residential growth continues to impact the school system, particularly in southern and eastern Frederick County as subdivisions are developed in the Urban Development Area (UDA). In addition, careful monitoring of residential growth outside of the UDA, which has accounted for approximately one-third of new residential building permits issued throughout the 1990's, is necessary to accurately predict enrollment trends. Along with growth in student enrollment, the school division is faced with the responsibility of providing instruction in order to prepare students to work and live in the 21' century. The use of technology as a tool in nearly every facet of education has dramatically changed the way in which instructional services are provided to students. Required technology -related instruction at all levels will continue to necessitate increased expenditures for computer and computer-related hardware and software. Mandates from the federal and state governments, particularly in special education services, will require localities to expend additional financial resources to meet educational requirements. The requirements associated with technology -related instruction and the provision of appropriate special education services to students will create the need for investment in future capital projects within the school division. Major efforts have been made by the school division and the Board of Supervisors to consolidate services in order to serve the residents of Frederick County more effectively and efficiently. Cooperative agreements have been developed relative to sharing school facilities forrecreational use by a wide variety of community organizations; maintenance of school grounds provided by the Department of Parks and Recreation, resulting in a greater utilization of space; and maintenance of the County Office Complex provided by the school division's Building and Grounds Department. Frederick County 8 - 2 Comprehensive Plan ID School Name Type 1 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary ES Z Armel Elementary ES 3 Bass -Hoover Elementary ES 4 Gainesboro Elementary ES 5 Indian Hollow Elementary ES 6 Middletown Elementary ES 7 Orchard View Elementary ES 8 Redbud Run Elementary ES 9 Senseny Road Elementary ES MS 13 10 Stonewall Elementary 11 Frederick County Middle ES MS Rey ds 4_1 or James Wood High HS 15 Sherando High HS 16 Dowell J. Howard Voc. VOC 17 Northwestern Reg. Ed. Program VOC L l� �l �l q Ga, o. Cross Junction a' a bor ore learbroo Hayfield l cj Rou_ d I y Win s e �1 S 5t ensu' ne "-� School Types t Elementary School �t N Middle School U W (q E idl' diet Ctr `, High School � Vo School -Tech S o Hamlets Roads red N Major Roads mre Co_ Minor Roads Frederick C;0-urttw -! -a Schools R Frederick county Department of Planr.u�g a and Development Winchester, VA y December 20W � 000 2000 ��tMi oo' Year 12 James Wood Middle MS 13 RE. Aylor Middle MS 14 James Wood High HS 15 Sherando High HS 16 Dowell J. Howard Voc. VOC 17 Northwestern Reg. Ed. Program VOC Community Facilities and Services Emergency Services The Frcder,'ck CoA: t<, Fire and Rescue Department was established in 1990 to provide support and guidance for the eleven volunteer fire and rescue companies that provide fire suppression and emergency medical services to the citizens of Frederick County. Each volunteer fire and rescue company provides fire suppression service, eight provide advanced life support emergency medical service, one provides basic life support emergency medical service, and two provide first responder level medical care. The County Fire and Rescue Companies are as follows: Company 11 - Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 12 - Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company - Company 13 - Clearbrook Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 14 - Gore Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 15 - Round Hill Community Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 16 - Gainesboro Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 17 - Star Tannery Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 18 - Greenwood Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 19 - North Mountain Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 20 - Reynolds Store Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Company 21 - Millwood Station Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Staffing of the fire and rescue stations is accomplished by volunteers from each of the communities and is supplemented by twenty-four career fire and rescue personnel employed by Frederick County. The volunteers provide 24 hour a day, seven day a week coverage in all of the fire and rescue stations. The career fire and rescue personnel staff nine of the eleven stations, ten hours a day, five days a week as well as providing 24 hour coverage on two advanced life support response vehicles. These vehicles operate from Company 16 and 18. The Fire and Rescue Department office is divided into three Divisions. These Divisions are Operations, Training, and Life Safety. The office is headed by a full-time Director who is employed by the County. The Director is responsible for supervision of all of the Departments operations. This includes the supervision of all career personnel, coordinating the service delivery of the volunteer companies, overseeing emergency services planning, providing volunteer and career training programs, disaster and hazardous material coordination, and managing Department resources. The office also has two full-time support staff personnel, an administrative assistant and a secretary. The Operations Division is divided into three Battalions, having a Fire/Rescue Lieutenant - Field Supervisor to oversee the career fire and rescue personnel. These Field Supervisors also work with the volunteer chiefs to coordinate daily activities within each company. The Life Safety Division is responsible for fire prevention, life safety education programs, fire code enforcement, and fire investigations. The Life Safety Division is headed by a full-time Fire/Rescue r;. Frederick County 8 - 4 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and Services Battalion Chief - Fire Marshal employed by the County. The division is supported by a full-time Fire/Rescue Lieutenant - Assistant Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshals are on call on a 24-hour basis to provide fire investigations, technical support to volunteer companies, and to respond to emergencies. The Training Division is responsible for developing, providing and overseeing training programs for the volunteer and career fire and rescue personnel. This Division is headed by a full-time Fire/Rescue Battalion Chief - Training Officer employed by the County. The Training Officer is also the Career Development Advisor, responsible for overseeing the administration of the Career Development Program. Future challenges for the Fire and Rescue Department include meeting fire and rescue equipment needs, maintenance and expansion of current fire and rescue stations, developing water systems for fire protection, meeting training and certification requirements, increasing emergency medical service, improving radio communications, providing service for the regional airport as required by the Federal Aviation Authority regulations, and developing additional fire and rescue stations to meet future growth within the County. The County of Frederick, had a population of 34,150 in 1980 and an estimated population of 57,000 in 1999 according to the University of Virginia Center for Public Services. This was a population increase of 22,850 with no development of new fire and rescue stations. This growth has increased the response time for existing fire and rescue stations and will undoubtedly lead to the need for additional fire and rescue services. Planning for future fire station locations and equipment needs has been accomplished by developing a five-year strategic plan. This plan identifies future station sites and equipment needs based on projected service demands and response times. The plan encourages the dedication of sites for new fire and rescue stations within the identified areas during the rezoning process. A recent response study was conducted and concluded the need for five additional fire and rescue stations in the next five years. These stations are to cover the areas of: Green Springs/White Hall Rt. 522 South/Rt. 277 East Middle Road/Cedar Creek Grade Apple Pie Ridge/Route 522 Route 7/Redbud Road The response study justifies the need for new fire and rescue stations. The study indicates that in many areas a ten minute total response time is not being met. Increased calls to each fire station create a situation where the 2nd due station has to cover additional areas while the V due station is still out. Non-residential areas such as retail, office, and industrial require increased fire protection because specialized equipment is necessary to insure safety for these land uses. Other land uses Frederick County 8 - 5 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and Services identified as target hazards continue to grow. These include land uses such as schools, nursing homes, daycare centers, and industrial facilities. These land uses have a higher risk of injury due to the specific demographics of persons utilizing these facilities. Existing road conditions; primarily those with gravel or dirt surfaces and horizontal and vertical curvatures, located outside of the county's Urban Development Area (UDA) create longer response times. The greatest factor contributing to the need for new fire and rescue stations is the rapid population growth and increases in dwelling units within and outside of the UDA. The development of new fire and rescue stations could provide an opportunity to extend satellite services provided by other county departments and agencies. Allocation of space could be created within new fire and rescue stations for community services provided by the Sheriff's Office, the Treasurer's Office, the Voter Registrar's Office, and the Commissioner of the Revenue's Office; as well as office space for members of the Board of Supervisors. Airport The Winchester Regional Airport is a 376 -acre, all weather, 24-hour general aviation airport with a 5,500 foot runway located southeast of Interstate 81, Exit 313A. The facility currently has 75 tie down spaces, two 12,000 square foot public clear span hangars, 52 T -hangars and three private corporate hangars. Based aircraft total 80, and range in size from single engine to large cabin class business aircraft. Services available include 24-hour U.S. Customs and Immigrations, 24-hour on call line service, automated weather observation system, computerized weather and flight planning equipment, full instrument landing system, and rental car service. The Winchester Regional Airport Authority was formed by the Virginia General Assembly on July 1, 1987. The Authority consists of representatives from the City of Winchester, Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren counties. Since its formation, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority has embarked on an extensive airport improvement program. Major capital improvements have been accomplished in order to comply with Federal safety and design standards. Completed construction projects include a 1,100 -foot runway extension, pavement resurfacing of the entire runway, relocation of the taxi way and the creation of safety areas at each end of the runway. New buildings constructed under this program include a modern general aviation terminal, a 12,000 square foot clear span hangar, a maintenance hanger with Fixed Base Operator offices, and 42 T -hangar units. Other completed projects include airfield lighting upgrade, installation of a 40,000 gallon above ground fuel storage facility, security fencing of the Airport perimeter, and the installation of a precision instrument approach that provides better all weather access to the Airport. Collaborating with Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Authority has also made improvements to primary access roads to the airport. Sewer and water service has also been established. To date, more than $14 million dollars has been invested in Airport capital Frederick County 8 - 6 Comprehensive Plan 1-UMmur'lity Facilities and Services improvements, equipment, and promotions through funding received from the Federal Aviation Administration, Virginia Department of Aviation and the local jurisdictions. Remaining capital projects include the relocation of Airport Road to remove a portion of the road that infringes on controlled airspace and land acquisition along Bufflick Road for noise abatement. Land to accommodate the road relocation project has been acquired by the Airport over the past year in order to provide the Virginia Department of Transportation a one hundred foot right of way. Through the support of the member jurisdictions, the Winchester Regional Airport will continue to evolve into a modern first class air transportation facility which will assist economic development endeavors in the attraction of new industrial and commercial businesses to the region. Handley Library Library service is provided to Frederick County through the Handley Regional Library, which also serves Clarke County and the City of Winchester. Currently, there are 21,107 active registered library card holders in Frederick County. During the 1998 fiscal year, Frederick County residents borrowed 208,988 items from the Handley Library, the Clarke County Library, and the Bookmobile. The regional system supports education, preschool through post -secondary, by providing assistance and research materials for projects and papers, and by being open nights, Saturdays, some Sundays, and during the summer when schools are closed. It is also an important resource for adults seeking to improve their skills and for introducing preschoolers to books and reading. The library also provides the business community and the public with information for their research needs as well as recreational reading. Bookmobile service to the residents of southern and western Frederick County was expanded in July 1996, as the result of an agreement between the library and Trinity Lutheran Church in Stephens City. This agreement has allowed the library to use the church parking lot on Wednesdays and Thursdays as a Bookmobile stop. In addition, Trinity has allowed the library to offer story hours for children in the church social hall. During fiscal year 1998, nearly 1,000 children and adults have attended the story hours. The regional library system continues to be below per capita state standards in the areas of books, square footage, seating, and periodical holdings; however, important steps have been taken to remedy this. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors hired Lukmire Partnership of Arlington, Virginia, to design a 35,000 square foot library for a site at the corner of Tasker Road and Lakeside Drive, just east of Stephens City. Construction of this new facility is anticipated to begin in the fall of 1999 and be open for public use ir-I the fall of 2001. Other capital improvements are proceeding simultaneously, including a complete renovation ofthe historic Handley Library which involves roof repairs and replacement, and interior renovations. In addition, a volunteer -directed campaign to raise Frederick County 8 - 7 Comprehensive Plan SCommunitv Facilities and Services three million dollars for books for the regional system, which began in November 1997, is more than one-half of the way towards its goal. County Offices In 1996, the County completed construction of a 68,000 square foot building adjacent to the Frederick County Administration Building. Funding for this new building was obtained through the issuance of a bond. The construction incorporated the existing 32,000 square foot Frederick County Administration Building, and provide a county government complex totaling 100,000 square feet. Most of the County's departments and agencies are now housed in this new county government complex in downtown Winchester. In 1998, the County modified the Capital Improvements Plan to provide for a Public Safety Facility for the Sheriff's Department and the Fire and Rescue Department; as well as for Annex Facilities that would situate satellite offices throughout the County for representatives of the Treasurer's Office, the Commissioner of Revenue's Office, and the Sheriff s Department. The provision of these facilities is intended to improve emergency response time, enhance public safety, and provide more efficient service to County residents. The location of these facilities are envisioned to occur within areas of dense population, as well as along arterial and major collector road corridors. Refuse Collection, Landfill, and Recycling Twelve refuse collection stations are located throughout Frederick County. Nine refuse collection stations consist of hydraulic compactors with separable roll -off containers and collection facilities for recyclables, and three sites consist of front-end dumpsters only. The County converts dumpster sites to compactor stations when warranted by tonnage levels. Consolidation of sites during the conversion process is also desirable, when practical. Based on research by the Government 12 Student Learning project and staff, the concept of curbside pickup in the densely populated areas of Frederick County that are currently served by public water and sewer was endorsed by a resolution of the Board of Supervisors in August, 1998. The Board may elect to offer curbside refuse and recycling collection anytime after August, 2003. The Frederick County Landfill is a regional facility that receives refuse from Frederick and Clarke Counties and the City of Winchester. The landfill is operated by Frederick County as an enterprise fund and the landfill operation is fee sustaining. The management and planning of landfill operations are solely the responsibility of Frederick County, with input from an oversight committee comprised of representatives from Frederick and Clarke counties and the City of Winchester. Closure of the older section of the landfill, which opened in 1976, was completed in 1994. A new 160 -acre tract of adjacent land, purchased in 1986, was opened for landfilling during 1993. Frederick County 8 - 8 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and Services Approximately 90 acres of this tract has been permitted for landfilling under the newly adopted Subtitle "D" Solid Waste Regulations. Both the closure of the old section and the construction of the new section have been carried out in accordance with new state regulations that require much more sophisticated environmental protection measures, including composite impermeable liners, a complete leachate collection system, leachate treatment facility, groundwater monitoring and gas monitoring. The current landfill was originally estimated to have adequate capacity for 25 years commencing in October of 1993. The development of a construction debris landfill should extend the life of the current sanitary landfill approximately eight years, resulting in a life of 33 years. A tract of land consisting of 109 wooded acres was purchased from Ryland Carper for the future development of a construction debris landfill. The permitting, design and construction of this new construction/debris landfill was completed in 1998. The County should reevaluate tonnage, revenue, and expenditure trends each year and set fees accordingly. The County should also continue to evaluate new technologies for waste reduction and recycling that would extend the life of the landfill. During the 1990's, the Countyplaced collection boxes for recyclable materials at each of the citizens' convenience areas located throughout the County. Through this effort, the County was able to meet the 1995 recycling mandate of 25 percent mandated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Due to the rapid growth in the County, additional programs have been implemented to enable the County to maintain the 1995 recycling mandate of 25 percent. These programs include brush and yard waste mulching, composting, waste oil recycling, tire shredding, and household hazardous waste collections. New residential developments need to be provided with appropriate means of solid waste collection. Either private collection or new collection stations should be provided by developers. Sewer and Water Facilities The location of public sewer and water lines determines where urban development will occur. The Urban Development Area described by the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan is roughly the same as the service areas for public sewer and water. Because sewer and water facility location determines the location of urban development, great care is needed in planning where such facilities will be provided. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority has the responsibility for the treatment, transmission, and distribution of potable water and the collection and transmission of wastewater. Most of the sewer and water mains and laterals in the County are owned, operated, and maintained by the Sanitation Authority. Frederick County 8 - 9 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and Services Frederick County and the Sanitation Authority have executed a Facilities Planning Agreement which sets forth procedures for the planning of sewer and water mains in the County. The agreement includes provisions for adopting a water and sewer facilities pian as a pari of the Comprehensive Plan, specifying the location of mains over eight inches in size, and includes provisions for review and update of the plan and for including sewer and water facilities projects in the Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan. The City of Winchester owns and maintains sewer and water lines in portions of the County adjacent to the City corporate limits. Such lines have been extended into the County following a previous agreement between the City and the County. The Frederick -Winchester Service Authorityhas the responsibility of providing wastewater treatment for the Sanitation Authority and the City of Winchester. The Service Authority currently owns the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility and the Parkins Mills Plant and contracts for their operation. The City operates the Opequon Facility and the Sanitation Authority operates Parkins Mills. Treatment of wastewater generated in the County is provided by two sewage treatment plants: the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility and the Parkins Mills Plant. The Opequon Plant serves the Abrams Creek drainage area and surrounding drainage areas east and north of Winchester, and provides sewage treatment for Winchester. The Parkins Mills plant serves the upper Opequon Creek, Wrights Run, and Stephens Run drainage areas. The Opequon Water Reclamation Facility has a hydraulic capacity of 8.4 millions gallons per day with a biological capacity of 18,000 pounds per day. The O_peguon Water Reclamation Facility Capacity Needs Evaluation Report projects this capacity will meet demands through 2008. The Parkins Mills Plant serves the upper Stephens Run, Wrights Run, and Opequon drainage areas. The rated capacity of this plant is 2.0 million gallons per day. The current average daily flow of this plant is about 1.1 million gallons per day. Frederick County 8-10 Comprehensive Plan Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. Winchester, VA 46-7s November 2000 F. ACILIT PLAN Community Facilities and Services Frederick County 8-12 Comprehensive Plan C©m muniV Facilities and Services Figure 17 Total New Water and Sewer Connections 1100 ; 0 water loon Sewer 900 800- 700 CO) C 600 y U N C C 500 U 400 30D 200-- 001000 100-- 0 �i n '00 I 91 92 93 94 95 Fiscal Year 96 97 98 99 Frederick County 8- 13 Comprehensive Plan Com m un iFacilities and Services Figure 18: ®pequon Treatment Plant; Sewer Flows Versus Capacity 8 ❑ city ❑ FCSA ftaw�-�e ft 7 6 3 Wj Limit 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 96 99 100 Fiscal Year Certain portions of the Urban Development Area, such as the Apple Pie Ridge area, may not be intended to be sewer and water service areas. Rural Community Centers that are outside of the Urban Development Area may be provided with some form of service, depending on the policies established for each particular center. The intention is that additional extensions of sewer and water service will reflect the boundaries of the Urban Development Area. The extension of mains into areas not included in sewer and water service areas described by the facilities plan will require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. In this way, the County will maintain an orderly process of development. All sewer and water mains extended should be publicly owned mains. Frederick County 8-14 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and Services Figure 19: Parkins Mill Treatment Plant; Flow Versus Capacity 0.6 0.4 0.2 91 92 N 94 95 96 97 96 99 '00 Fiscal Year Capital Improvements Plan The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is the community's plan for public facilities. It provides a list of projects planned for five years and is updated each year as projects are completed and new projects added. In general, projects on the Capital Improvements Plan are relatively expensive, fixed assets that require expenditures that do not recur annually and last for a relatively long time. Frederick County 8- 15 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and Services The first year in the Capital Improvements Plan should provide a capital budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The scheduling ofprojects needs to be coordinated with plans for development contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan should be used as a tool to aid in determining priorities among projects, for estimating required funding, and for scheduling projects. The Capital Improvements Plan helps to guide development, to achieve the most efficient use of funds, and to maintain a stable financial program. The County's procedures for reviewing and adopting the CIP need to be improved. The CIP needs to have a direct link to available or projected funds. Projects need to be systematically reviewed against established standards in order to determine priorities. These standards need to be developed and reviewed on a regular basis. The County Finance Department should play an active role in the CIP development process. Facility Cost Impacts Rezoning requests should be evaluated to determine their potential impacts on community facilities. Costs to the County should be estimated in terms of what impact the development, which could result from the proposed rezoning, would have on facilities and infrastructure. These costs are estimated in terms of facility use per unit of development. The estimated facility use is determined through the use of established multipliers which use averages derived from existing development. These multipliers set out such factors as: expected numbers of vehicle trips, school children, gallons of sewer and water usage per dwelling unit, square footage of commercial use, or person. The demand on various facilities resulting from a proposed rezoning can then be estimated based on the projected number of units which could result. Actual cost estimates are then calculated using the costs of facilities listed in the Capital Improvements Plan. Initially, costs are estimated in terms of the actual costs of providing facilities to support the potential development. In 1991, an impact model was developed for Frederick County -which has been utilized to project the fiscal impacts of rezonings on public schools, parks and recreation, and fire and rescue services for capital facilities costs. In 1998, a revised impact model was adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The revised model was designed to incorporate additional modules to project the fiscal impacts of rezonings on the sheriffs office, the public library system, county administration facilities, and miscellaneous public facilities, as well as the public agencies that were accounted for in the previous impact model. The impact model projects the gross potential costs of the facilities that would be needed to support a new development using the basic formula described above. Credit is given for the projected revenues that would be generated by the development. Potential revenues are subtracted from the projected gross costs resulting in an actual projected net fiscal impact of the development on the County. The impact model will need to be updated annually by county staff to ensure that the information used in the model is accurate. In general, negative fiscal impacts for capital facilities costs are realized from residential rezonings, while positive fiscal impacts are realized from commercial and industrial rezonings. Frederick County 8-16 Comprehensive Plan Community .Facilities and Services No rezoning should be approved unless the net impacts on community facilities are positive, or if the negative impacts can be adequately addressed through proffers or some other means. A request for rezoning may be turned down even though all fiscal impacts appear to be addressed. If there are other impacts which are not addressed or if the request does not conform to this plan, a similar method should be developed for determining the impacts of proposed developments on transportation systems and other public facilities. Issues: • There is a need to carefully monitor school enrollments and to plan for school capacity to deal with overcrowding, replacement of outdated facilities, and population growth in the County. o There is a need to continue supporting fire and rescue squads and to develop policies to deal with growing emergency service demands. o House number efforts should continue in association with improved emergency telephone systems. ► The County should support improvements at the Winchester Regional Airport as a Part of the overall economic development efforts. ► The County should continue to monitor refuse collection sites and should make improvements or add sites as needed. The Countyshould continue to monitor landfill recycling efforts should be supported. The County should maintain a process of careful Capital Improvements Planning coordinated with Comprehensive Planning. • Frederick County and the Frederick County Sanitation Authority need to continue coordinated planning of sewer and water facilities following the procedures described by the Facilities Planning Agreement. ► Additional information is needed on the impacts of new development on community facilities. Frederick County and the City of Winchester need to maintain coordinated planning of sewer and water facilities in the County through the Sewer Agreements. Frederick County 8-17 Comprehensive Plan Comrnanices o Together with the County and the City, the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority should carefully plan needed sewage treatment capacity based on trends in usage. The Service Authority needs to develop a capital improvements plan that is coordinated with City and County plans. • Water and sewer service should be provided to service areas in the urban development areas through an orderly process following the Facilities Planning Agreement and using the Capital Improvements Plan. Community Facility and Service Policy Strate1 - Plan sufficient school capacity to meet projected enrollment trends and to meet appropriate facility standards. Strate 2 -Recognize the changes occurring in demand for emergency services and develop policies for dealing with those changes. Strate 3 - Support expansion plans for the Winchester Regional Airport. Strate 4 - Monitor refuse collection and landfill use and continue to develop plans for future improvements. Pursue recycling methods and other methods to extend the life of the landfill. Strate 5 - Carefully monitor sewer and water use and develop up-to-date improvement plans for sewer and water facilities. Strate 6 - Develop and maintain formal and regular relationships and procedures between the County and providers of facilities and services, including the Sanitation Authority, the City of Winchester, the Service Authority, the School Board, the Regional Airport Authority, and the Fire and Rescue Squads. Strate 7 - Use the Capital Improvements Plan to carefully plan community facilities and to coordinate facilities planning with land use plans. Frederick County 8-18 Comprehensive Plan Community Facilities and .services Strategy 8 - Require that the impacts of new developments on facilities be described and require that the impacts are addressed through proffers and other means. Implementation Methods: 1. Carefully monitor school enrollments and plan facilities according to enrollment and development trends. Update the Capital Improvements Plan each year based on trends. 2. Continue to support fire and rescue squads and plan to increase support according to development in the various service areas.. 3. Develop plans for new emergency service facilities. 4. Continue to convert dumpster sites to compactor sites. Monitor usage. Plan for new refuse collection sites according to use and planned development patterns. 5. Monitor landfill use. Plan for additional landfill capacity on adjacent land. Explore alternative disposal methods. 6. Continue to plan for sewer and water main extensions according to the agreements established with the Sanitation Authority and the City of Winchester. Include planned extensions in the Capital Improvements Plan. 7. Provide for recycling at collection stations and support a regional materials recovery center. 8. Carefully monitor sewer and water use and develop a capital improvements plan to accommodate projected development. 9. Consider means to provide water service to Brucetown. 10. Consider alternative sources of water supply. 11. Minor extensions of sewer and water service to business and industrial uses beyond the service area may be considered if such uses conform with other County standards. Such extensions should be reviewed by the Planning Commission for conformance with the Plan. 12. Require that information be provided with rezoning proposals on the impacts of development on community facilities. Impacts should be addressed through proffers and other means. No rezoning should be approved unless all impacts are adequately addressed. Frederick County 8-19 Comprehensive Plan Commurain Facilities and Services 13. Any sewer or water main six inches in diameter or larger, extended or existing within an area proposed for inclusion within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area or Urban Development Area, should be dedicated as a public line to be owned and maintained by the County Sanitation Authority or City of Winchester when appropriate. 14. Plans for new facilities should be based on demand projections as derived from population projections in the Comprehensive Plan. Frederick County 8-20 Comprehensive Plan t of FrederickanDevelopmeepartmeaesler, A �'®1�.:i�Y�.nity � acilties and Services and Development Wmchesker, VA �''�� December 2000 Parks and Recreation The purpose of this chapter is to outline the County's recreational policies and to identify implementation methods for accomplishing recreational facilities, programs, studies, and plans. It is not meant to be a detailed recreation plan, but rather it is a part of the County's continuing planning process and a guide to decision making. Facilities The County currently owns and operates two regional parks. Clearbrook Park, located five miles north of Winchester on Route 11, consists of approximately 55 acres and Sherando Park, located two miles east of Stephens City on Route 277, consists of approximately 330 acres. Both regional parks currently serve the County's population with both active and passive recreational programs and facilities. In addition to these regional parks, five neighborhood parks have been developed which serve a more specific group with more limited facilities than those in the regional parks. The neighborhood parks are located at: Reynolds Store Fire Company and Gainesboro Fire Company in the Gainesboro District, and Round Hill Fire Company in the Back Creek District, and at Frederick Heights subdivision in the Shawnee District. These neighborhood parks consist primarily of playground equipment for young children. The Parks and Recreation Department also maintains two tennis courts at Senseny Road Elementary School for community use. In 1987, master development plans were adopted for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. These master plans establish development goals for each park, identify unmet recreational needs, provide unified facility plans, and propose a development program for each park. The master plan for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks reflect the recommendations of the County residents and national standards as outlined in the Virginia Outdoor Plan. These plans emphasize the development of a swimming pool complex and additional sports, picnic, maintenance, and other support facilities. Funding has been provided to update the Sherando Park Master Plan. The revisions are scheduled to be completed by June 30, 2001. Since the adoption of the master plans, the County has completed the construction of two outdoor swimming pool complexes, four soccer fields, a maintenance building, one shelter, two playground areas, two sand volleyball courts, and two fields of a four field softball complex. The County has also purchased an area to house the maintenance operation for Clearbrook Park. Additional recreational facilities currently provided are athletic fields, playground, and picnic areas with a variety of recreational opportunities such as horseshoes, fishing, paddleboats, and volleyball, open space areas and support facilities. Clearbrook Park, Sherando Park, neighborhood parks and all public school athletic fields and grounds are maintained by the Parks Division of the County Parks and Recreation Department. As a result of a joint operating agreement with the County School Board, the Parks and Recreation Department has use of the following Sherando High School facilities when they are not in use by the high school: lighted football field and track, baseball field, eight outdoor lighted tennis Frederick County 9- 1 Comprehensive Plan 10arks and -Recreation courts, and four outdoor lighted basketball courts. The Parks and Recreation Department's Community Center, which was built adjoined to Sherando High School, opened in September of 1993 and contains two racquetball courts, a weight room and a multipurpose room. The Residential Performance Zoning regulations require that open space be provided in most types of suburban development. In addition, recreational facilities are required in any residential development which contains lot sizes of less than 5,000 square feet. It is required that such open space and facilities be dedicated to homeowners associations. There is a need to examine recreational and park needs in suburban and urban areas, specifically, the development of a bikeway and trail system. One need that has been identified is the development of a bikeway and trail system. To date, the County has constructed a 2.40 mile bicycle facility to serve several residential areas east of Stephens City. The County has also committed to the construction of a.60 (3,200 l.£) bicycle facility to serve residential areas on the northern perimeter of Sherando Park. These bicycle facilities will link those residential areas with Sherando Park and Sherando High School. Additional trails would provide residents the ability to travel safely from their homes to schools, stores, work or recreational areas without having to share the overcrowded arterial and collector roads with automobiles. Also, there is a need to examine Residential Performance Zoning regulations to determine whether the recreational needs of the single family homeowner are being met. Programs The Recreation Division of the Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department was created to provide a comprehensive and accessible program of recreational services and activities for the residents of Frederick County. A diverse range of recreational and enrichment programs are provided for all age groups. This broad base of activities includes, but is not limited to, instructional classes, outdoor recreation programs, sports and athletics, health and fitness programs, cultural and special events, and trips and excursions. Programming responsibilities are assigned within the Division's four interest sections --Community Recreation (Children's Programs, Cultural Arts, etc.); Senior Citizens; Aquatics; and Sports and Athletics. Staff members work together to identify, develop and implement those activities which most closely meet the interests and desires of the community. The Division typically implements programs along age group stratifications such as preschool, youth, teen, adult and senior adult; however, a shift in programming emphasis has resulted in the development of broader activities to appeal to family units. In particular, holiday events are planned to include parent and child in a variety of leisure opportunities. The majority of recreation programs offered by the Parks and Recreation Department are held within the 15 public schools in Frederick County and the Parks and Recreation Department's Community Center. Consequently, a wide variety of recreation offerings has maximized use of the county school Frederick County 9 - 2 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Recreation buildings. The joint efforts of the Frederick County School Board and the Parks and Recreation Commisslon.�Department resulted in the inclusion of recreational laciiities within Sherando High School. The Department's Community Center, which was built adjoined to Sherando High School, opened in September of 1993. On August 28, 2000, the Orchard View Community Center is scheduled to open. This facility, which is attached to the Orchard View Elementary School, will have a full-size gymnasium that will be programmed during non -school hours. Citizen Participation Citizen participation and input regarding recreation programs and park development have been actively solicited since the creation of the department in 1971. The Parks and Recreation -Commission consists of seven members, including one from each magisterial district, appointed by the Board of Supervisors for four year terms and two at -large members recommended by the Commission and appointed by the Board to serve staggered four year terms. Future Demands To help plan for the future leisure service demands, the Parks and Recreation Department has completed master plans for the County's two regional parks, studied national standards provided in the Virginia Outdoor Plan, and gathered survey information relating to the provision of leisure services. Through the utilization of these and any other available resources, it is projected that the following areas must be addressed if we are to meet future leisure demands: 1. Land acquisition to meet minimum standards 2. Facility development to meet minimum standards 3. Development of recreational centers 4. Increased programming for special populations 5. Increased programming for teens 6. Great diversity of programming so as to better meet the needs of the entire community. 7. Establishment of trail systems and bikeways Frederick County 9 - 3 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Recreation Area Standards As suggested by the 1996 Virginia Outdoor Plan, the area standard for local recreation and park sites in Virginia is ten acres of developed park land per thousand population. Frederick County has a population of approximately 57,000 (based on 1999 provisional estimate data provided by the University of Virginia Center for Public Services) and currently maintains 404 acres of park land. Of the 404 acres assigned to the parks, about 240 acres would be considered developed. By the year 2001, using the population projections provided by the Frederick County Planning Department, an additional 166 acres will be needed and by the year 2010, another 130 will be required if we are to keep pace with the recommended standard of the ten acres per thousand. It is estimated by the Department of Parks and Recreation that by the year 2020, Frederick County will need approximately 833 acres of developed park land to adequately serve the County's population. In meeting the ten -acre per thousand minimum standard for park land, it is recommended by the Virginia Outdoor Plan to consider the following types of park development: Frederick County 9 - 4 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Recreation NEIGHBORHOOD DARK Size: 5 - 20 acres Plan at 3 acres/ 1000 Population Service Area: Approximately 5 - 15 minutes walking distance or''/2 mile to 1 '/z miles Administrative Responsibility: Local Unit of Government or Homeowners Association Purpose: The primary function of the neighborhood park is to provide limited types of recreation for the entire family within easy walking distance. Facilities should be provided for all age groups. Character: Intensive use and easy access are characteristics of this classification. Ideally, the site would have areas that are level to gently rolling to accommodate the intensive use facilities, with shaded areas for passive recreation. Location: If possible, the neighborhood park should be located near a school and /or the neighborhood center and away from railroads, major streets and other hazardous barriers. Potential Facilities: *playground *badminton courts *ball diamond *swimming pool *basketball courts *volleyball courts *tennis courts *fishing pond *shuffleboard courts *recreation center *picnic facilities *walking trails *horseshoe courts *bikeway *football/soccer field Play fields usually serve a dual purpose is this type of facility. They provide an area for sports and running games and also serve as open space. Intensive use areas (the playground area and hard surfaced courts) are buffered from other activities by passive natural areas and pedestrian access corridors. Programmed activities such as organized athletics are often suitable in neighborhood parks. Although limited parking facilities are provided, site design should encourage pedestrian access to the greatest extent possible. Rural communities may want to consider deleting neighborhood parks and include their function in larger community parks which could better serve the needs of widely dispersed local population. From an economic standpoint, it would be more beneficial for a rural locality to have a few strategically located, well designed, larger facilities than to invest in several small sites and not have the funds to properly develop and maintain them. Frederick County 9 - 5 Comprehensive Plan Parks and .recreation '"OMIVIUNI 7 PA Size: 20 -50 acres Plan at 3 acres/ 1000 Population Service Area: Approximately 15 minutes driving time Administrative Responsibility: Local Unit of Government Purpose: Community parks should primarily support active recreation activities and be capable of withstanding intensive use, while still containing a fair amount of open space. Character: The site usually varies from relatively flat open space to moderately sloping wooded area. Such a park should be adaptable to a wide variety of recreational activities. Access is gained by auto, bicycles, or walking. Location: Locate when possible near the center of the community with good access and serviced by a public transportation system. Potential Facilities: * playgrounds * tennis courts * horseshoe courts * ball diamonds * volleyball courts * beachlswimming area * picnic facilities * swimming pool * shuffleboard courts * basketball courts * parking area * footballlsoccer fields * trails: walking , hiking, biking, fitness * natural area * fishing lake or stream access * recreation center A multitude of activities must be provided by this intensive -use recreational facility. The recreation center is often the focal point of the park. Organized activities are grouped in the surrounding area. Their location is dependent upon the natural terrain, need for control, and vehicular access. Any existing natural qualities, such as topography, water features, and trees, should be preserved and utilized as natural buffers between activity areas as well as to protect the recreation environment from surrounding, incompatible influences. These natural elements should also be used to provide a space for more passive forms of recreation such as nature walks, picnicking, and fishing. In the rural setting, this park category may take the place of the neighborhood park. It can better serve a widely dispersed population than two or three smaller sites. Community parks, along with neighborhood parks (where applicable), usually meet most of the close -to -home recreation needs of most localities. Frederick County 9 - 6 Comprehensive Plan Warks and Recreation iD V S"T A1VT A f 1M A "i7 XXL%XX"l'7riL I tiI\Ii Size: 50- 150 acres Plan at 4 acres/1000 Population Service Area: 15 - 25 minutes driving time 5 - 15 miles service radius Administrative Responsibility: Local Unit of Government Purpose: Regional Parks should serve the recreational needs of large portions of the local population. They should' contain a wide variety of intensively developed areas for day use recreation while providing ample open space with generous buffers between activity areas. Character: The site could vary from flat open space to moderately to steeply sloping topography, It should be capable of supporting a wide variety of activities with ample buffer and natural areas. Sitting on a stream or lake is highly desirable. The regional park needs to be accessible by auto as well as pedestrians and bicycles. Location: When possible, locate the regional park so that it is near the center of the service area. It should be on or near an arterial or major collector road providing good access to the facility. In urban or suburban situations, easy access to mass transit is highly desirable. The site should also be accessible by pedestrians and bicyclists. Potential Facilities: *playgrounds *trails *lake or stream *natural area *tennis courts *horseshoe courts *ball diamonds *fishing/boating *volleyball courts *parking areas *basketball courts *football/soccer fields *recreation centers *shuffleboard courts *swimming pool and/or *golf beach with swimming area *picnic facilities Frederick County 9 - 7 Comprehensive Plan Paris and Recreation iZE'y..01E AL 1 .10 JLNTC Ed i a:.IR LS The recreation center may be found at the neighborhood, community, district, and regional parks. At the neighborhood level, the recreation center is usually constructed between 15, 000 and 20,000 square feet. It generally will include multipurpose rooms, an arts and crafts area, game room, kitchen, lounge and lobby, restrooms, and office. If a gymnasium is not available in a neighborhood school, the recreation center may also include a gymnasium and locker room facilities. The recreation center in a large park that serves a community will be considerably larger, from 50,000 -100,000 square feet, and will include several multipurpose rooms, gymnasium, indoor pool, shower and locker rooms, game room, arts and crafts area, an auditorium or areas for performing arts, class or club rooms, kitchen, large meeting room, restrooms, office, lounge or lobby, and some specialized areas such as a ceramics workshop or weight room. An important consideration in all recreation facilities is to provide adequate storage space. Frederick County 9 - 8 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Recreation EMSTING REGIONAL PARK FACILITIES Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for operating and maintaining the following facilities: Clearbrook Park Clearbrook Park, covering 55 acres, is located approximately five miles north of Winchester, on Route 11. Clearbrook Park is open 365 days a year, from 8:00 a.m. to dark and includes: *four lighted athletic fields with concessions *paddleboats *playgrounds *outdoor swimming pool *maintenance complex Sherando Park *three -acre lake *horseshoe pits *vintage red caboose *passive areas *fishing *volleyball *tables & grills *picnic shelter Sherando Park is located on Route 277, approximately two miles east of 1-81, near Stephens City. The park consists of 330 acres, approximately one-half of which is undeveloped. Sherando Park is open 365 days a year, from 8:00 a.m, to dark and includes: *five -acre lake *outdoor swimming pool *paddleboats *model radio airplane *fishing *passive areas facility *four soccer fields *volleyball *seven lighted athletic *horseshoe pits *playgrounds fields with concessions *eight lighted tennis courts *picnic shelters *four outdoor lighted *hiking trails *tables & grills basketball courts *community center *eighteen -hole disc golf facilities course Based on the demand standards established by the 1996 Virginia Outdoor Plan, Frederick County should use the following recommendations as a guide for future park development. Frederick County 9 - 9 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Recreation Table 1S: Facility Deeds Based on Minimum Standards Established in the 1996 Virginia Outdoor Plan )Facility i n><ts1100 'o Ma io E�istrttg Tent#res . 1'�eeds Gap Based on Population :. of40,090 . _ Needs .Gap Based an P pplafion of 00,000 Need` Ga. p Based on Popu7atron: ;C . 80;400. Archery Range 1/50,000 0 0 1 1 Baseball Diamond 1/6,000 *7 2 3 6 Basketball Court 1/5,000 5 5 7 11 Bicycle Trails 1 mile/1,000 2.4 miles 37.6 5T6 77.6 Soccer Fields 1/5,000 4 6 8 12 Horseshoes 1/10,000 8 -4 -2 0 Softball 1/3,000 **5 12 15 21 Swimming Pools * * * 1/10,000 2 3 4 6 Tennis Courts 1/2,000 23 3 7 17 Park Land 10ac./1,000 404 -4 196 396 Ice Skating 1/30,000 0 1 2 2 Picnicking 10/1,000 400 0 200 400 Skateboard Park 1/80,000 0 0 0 1 In -Line Hockey 1/30,000 0 1 2 2 Amphitheater 1/40,000 0 1 1 2 Source: Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation Because these facilities share time with softball, this figure has been adjusted according to percent of use. ** Because these facilities share time with baseball, this figure has been adjusted according to percent of use. *** Jr. Olympic Pool Frederick County 9- 10 Comprehensive Plan Parks and lRecreation Conclusions As the population of the Winchester -Frederick County area continues to increase, there will undoubtedly be greater emphasis placed on the County's Parks and Recreation Department. As indicated by the standards provided in the 1996 Virginia Outdoor Plan, (referred to in this chapter), there currently exists a need to concentrate on further facility development just to meet present minimum standards, and a greater need to establish a long range capital improvement program to insure the provision of the physical amenities required to meet future leisure demands. At this time, priority should be given to bring our park system up to the recommended minimum standard, but strong consideration should also be given to the acquisition of park land to meet future needs while desirable open space is still available at a reasonable cost. In addition to the facilities that are needed to meet current and future demands, in eastern Frederick County and :western Frederick County, the Parks and Recreation Department will also need additional professional staff if the County is to accommodate an already increasing demand for recreational programs. Recreation Policy GO,, -9L - Contribute to the physical, mental,, and cultural needs of the community, it8: economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program ofparks and recreation. Strategy 1 - Insure that appropriate open space and facilities are provided with new development. Strategy 2 - Identify the recreational, parks, and open space needs of the County. Strategy 3 - Make available a wide range of year-round recreational opportunities. Strategy 4 - Seek alternative funding methods for the provision of existing and identified recreational needs. Strategy 5 - Encourage cooperative efforts with private, semi-public, and public providers of recreational opportunities. Frederick County 9 - 11 Comprehensive Plan Parrs and Recreation Implementation Methods: 1. Prepare a County -wide recreation plan which identifies recreational, park, and open space needs. 2. Continue to solicit public opinion in planning parks and recreation. 3. Continue to encourage the participation and financial support of civic groups, businesses, and other organizations and individuals for recreational needs. 4. Continue to utilize State and Federal grants and loans for financing and programming County recreational needs and especially for major capital projects. 5. Continue to expand our cooperative relationship with the Frederick County School Board jointly meeting identified County recreational needs. 6. Continue to cooperate with the private sector, the semi-public sector, and other public providers of recreation in meeting identified recreational needs. GOAL - Continue to develop the County's regional park as a PW sor rce of recreational gcilities and activities. Strategy 1 - As finances are available, improvements to the Sherando and Clearbrook Parks should take place according to the adopted master plans. Implementation Methods: 1. Use the capital improvements planning process to provide improvements to the regional parks. 2. Seek alternative sources of funding for park improvements. Frederick County 9-12 Comprehensive Plan Park,- and Recreatioin GOAT -Insure that appropriate ripen space and recreational facilities are provided h? urban and rural areas: Strate 1 - Insure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in association with new urban development. Strategy 2 - Provide for suitable recreational opportunities for all portions of the County. Strate 3 - Provide for a trail system and bikeway plan. Implementation Methods: l . Use a County -wide recreation plan to develop standards for open space and recreational facilities in new urban developments. 2. Use a County -wide recreation plan to identify the recreational needs of residents in all portions of the County. 3. Identify recreational needs associated with the Rural Community Centers. 4. Review land development regulations ito insure that appropriate standards are provided for open space and recreational facilities in new developments. COAL - Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available ,funding. Strategy I - Identify recreational program needs. Strateay 2 - Solicit public opinion on recreational programs to be provided. Strateyy 3 - Coordinate with Frederick County School Board, the public sector, the semi-public sector, and private organizations for the provision of recreational program funds, services, and facilities. Frederick County 9- 13 Comprehensive Plan Parks and Recreation Implementation Methods: 1. Prepare a County -wide recreation plan identifying program needs. 2. Develop and maintain citizen participation in the identification of recreational program and facility needs. 3. Actively solicit contributions for the provision of recreational programs and program facilities, from all segments of the community, both public and private. 4. Structure the provision of all program facilities, such as indoor community centers, to recognize land use decisions and policies. 5. Actively utilize public, semi-public, and private facilities for the provision of recreational programs. Frederick County i 9-14 Comprehensive Plan Raovjej o cA C\-� m ee4 i A 01r\ 11 1 13 ( o C, Proposed new text for Sewer and Water Facilities: The location of public sewer and water lines determines where urban development will occur. The Urban Development Area defines the general area in which more intensive forms of residential development will occur. Commercial industrial and institutional land uses are also encouraged within the Urban Development Area The Sewer and Water Service Area is consistent with the Urban Development Area in many locations However, the Sewer and Water Service Area may extend bevond the Urban Development Area to promote commercial industrial and institutional land uses in areas where residential land uses are not desirable. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority has the responsibility for the treatment, transmission, and distribution of potable water and the collection and transmission of wastewater. Most of the sewer and water mains and laterals in the County are owned, operated, and maintained by the Sanitation Authority. Frederick County and the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) have executed a Facilities Planning Agreement which sets forth procedures for the planning of sewer and water mains in the County. The agreement includes provisions for adopting a water and sewer facilities plan as a part of the Comprehensive Plan, specifying the location of mains over eight inches in size, and includes provisions for review and update of the plan and for including sewer and water facilities projects in the Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan. The City of Winchester owns and maintains sewer and water lines in portions of the County adjacent to the City corporate limits. Such lines have been extended into the County following a previous agreement between the City and the County. The Frederick -Winchester Service Authority (FWSA) has the sole responsibility of providing wastewater facilities to serve the FCSA and the City of Winchester's treatment needs. The FWSA currently owns the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. The Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant and the Crooked Run Wastewater Treatment Plant have operational agreements with the City and the FCSA for their operation. The City operates and maintains the Opequon Facility while the Sanitation Authority is responsible for operations of Parkins Mills and Crooked Run Facilities. Treatment of wastewater generated from within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area SWSA) is undertaken all plants. The Opequon Service Area is comprised of the Abrams Creek drainage area which includes the City of Winchester and adjacent drainage areas located east, west and north of the City of Winchester. All wastewater coming from the City of Winchester is transported to and treated at the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility. The Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant serves Sanitation Authority customers located in the upper Opequon Creek, Wrights Run, and Stephens Run drainage areas along with the Town of Stephens City. The Crooked Run Service Area services the Shenandoah Community in southeastern Frederick County. The Opequon Water Reclamation Facility presently has a seasonal hydraulic capacity of 8.4 millions gallons per day during summer months and 16.0 million gallons per day during the winter months. The facility has 18,000 pounds per day of biological capacity and also provides for biological nutrient removal of nitrogen and phosphorus Based on the projections contained in the 1997 Opequon Water Reclamation FacilitCapacity Needs Evaluation Report the present treatment configuration will meet both hydraulic and biological demands through 2007 2008 The Frederick Winchester Service Authority has already begun design for an expansion and upgrade of the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility to meet future Growth needs and regulatory requirements requiring dramatic reductions of nutrient discharges from treatment facilities located in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed The initial expansion and upgrade will increase the hydraulic capacity of the facility to a maximum of 12.6 million gallons per day. Obtaining this capacity depend on the final wasteload allocation for nutrients assigned to the Opequon Facility under the Water Quality Management Plan Regulations adopted by the Commonwealth of Virginia Present planning would anticipate the expanded facility would be operational by 2010-2011. The Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant which serves the upper Stephens Run, Wrights Run, and Opequon drainage areas has a present rated capacity of 2.0 million gallons per day. The current average daily flow of this plant is currently approaching design capacity. This facility also will be limited in it ultimate capacity by nutrient limits Design of an expanded and upgraded facili . is complete and construction of that facility will begin in 2007 When construction is complete in 2009 the Parkins Mills Wastewater Treatment Plant will have a capacity of 5.0 million gallons per day. 9.0( 8.00 7.00 m 6.00 0 0 N 5.00 c O (7 4.00 0 a 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Opequon Water Reclamation Facility Sewer Flow Versus Capacity .:P o 9P 96 91 9� 99 �p �� 9� �g �p Oh 06 100 .0"0�9^ o�°�� 99� 90� 99y 9orO 991 �9� 90�°� 000 00� OOl OOS' OSA Ooh Fiscal Years ' eOWRF —W—County —City —Capacity 09 Ode .:P o 9P 96 91 9� 99 �p �� 9� �g �p Oh 06 100 .0"0�9^ o�°�� 99� 90� 99y 9orO 991 �9� 90�°� 000 00� OOl OOS' OSA Ooh Fiscal Years ' eOWRF —W—County —City —Capacity Fig 7 - PMTP 2.5 a ® 1.5 a c 0 ns C9 0 1 0.5 0 a . I I -r- - . I __L . - I . i-il 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 Fiscal Year D Flow —Limit Fig 6 - Annual Connections Fiscal Year EB Water E2 Sewer l5�.. j y :ss:l 1 1 � = S3 SS : S.•� � SSS = � ,��. 3a s°�o� � a Nos s?.3�, �_�� = i3 =•s.:t s:: A333g3� :s . : � :.% 3g3 s 3� s .:• �IMP .ges=? : ss• s 33s3g33 °:s=3$e � s : !3 � 3�sz as = � 3a g : 3sa= 'iz�:l s 1 1 :s 3g E s ; s3 =g=s : • • : 3: s • g33=� 13:3s ���z3s3�,p,/� � zg3� �3 3 • 3= •=s a.s:,� 3 � E� s !s z3�.,.. c: s�°3e� •=s� s.se'ss`� �s i�o� �I :3s :?, i �s� a�l� �•. 33 �� E33�g3� ` .s:i� �°s;'3� %�3: � "��3'��is•zs ;_°� .3:=� ��; : ::� :333 �i�3 s.�: :r3� i. :: s 9 ��� :; : 3� :z 3z3 3; s s�:s z3 3� :� 3.3: ° �� :� i:::s. g��s:3 !s'�•z=� •� ; 1 � i s: s3 ••�i � ;.3;3� . as• ° :e' ss 3 _ ;s.3== � •sg 3:=3 � �•_ � � =,s3 � �•a :, �s z • �S: :3 : ` i�3• .i :: SS. ss : 3�,� 3:az:$ 36A.02 ss : g � : r 3 sz ; ea.: 3• .3E: : s • 6ss.s•! z: z s:,z: � � lss�s� :.g; S.SS = :'i CS'S sii S� 3 zs3� .: 3 It! 3/ •�3:::• zpgg.s t3C�iis � =:3 : •3;S •� °i3zz:. ii =� S� SS•=S" !.:3 . Ari; °•z sQ3�'; :3 .s.;3 A = �'y' sg .3 lsz;sa ° Ssia =ss 3..� oil E: sig :e 3z3@ 3== zi °sg , : r aa=�a .iii °•3szg3 3sieT•z �s= .: ii " jv Fiscal Year EB Water E2 Sewer Proposed New Text for: Community Facilities and Services Section (changes are noted in red underlined text) Proposed new text for Schools: See included map. Proposed new text for Emergency Services: None. Proposed new text for Handley Library: None.. Proposed new text for County Offices: None. Proposed new text for Refuse Collection, Landfill, and Recycling: Eleven refuse collection stations are located throughout Frederick County. Nine refuse collection stations consist of hydraulic compactors with separable roll -off containers and collection facilities for recyclables. Two sites consist of front end dumpsters and collection containers for recyclables. The County converts dumpster sites to compactor stations when warranted by tonnage levels. When practical, the consolidation of sites during the conversion process is also desirable. For residents who prefer curbside refuse collection service is provided by a number of private haulers. The Frederick County Landfill is a regional facility which receives refuse from Frederick and Clarke Counties, as well as the City of Winchester. The landfill is operated by Frederick County as an enterprise fund and the landfill operation is fee sustaining. The management and planning of landfill operations are solely the responsibility of Frederick County, with input from an oversight committee comprised of representatives from Frederick and Clarke Counties and the City of Winchester. Closure of the older section of the landfill, which opened in 1976, was completed in 1994. A new 160 -acre tract of adjacent land, purchased in 1986, was opened for landfilling in 1993. Approximately 90 acres of this tract have been permitted for landfilling under current Subtitle "D" Solid Waste Regulations. Both the closure of the old section and the construction of the section were carried out in accordance with state regulations that require sophisticated environmental protection measures, including: composite impermeable liners, a complete leachate collection system, leachate treatment facility, groundwater monitoring, and gas monitoring. In an effort to extend the useful life of the municipal solid waste landfill, a 109 acre wooded tract was purchased from Ryland Carper for the future development of a construction debris landfill. The permitting, design, and construction of this new CDD landfill were completed in 1998. Through diversion of bulky, construction debris to a separate landfill; an amendment to the state permit allowing vertical expansion. and improved compaction technologies the life of the landfill has been extended to approximately 40 years. A new program to recirculate leachate or liquids through the landfill will also increase decomposition and extend the life of the municipal solid waste landfill. The County should continue to evaluate new methods for waste reduction and support recycling programs, both of which will extend the life of the landfill. During the 1990s, the County placed collection boxes for recyclable materials at each of the citizens' convenience areas located throughout the County. In 2004, containers were also added at dumpster sites. Through this voluntary collection effort, the County was able to meet the 1995 state recycling mandate of 25 percent. Due to the rapid growth in Frederick County, additional programs have been implemented to enable the County to exceed the state's 25 percent recycling goal. These programs include: brush and yard waste mulching, composting, waste oil recycling, oil filter recycling, cardboard and phone book rec cling, tire shredding, household hazardous waste collection, and electronics rec cling, It is essential that new residential developments are provided with an appropriate means of solid waste collection. Either private collection or new collection stations, including land, should be provided by developers. Proposed new text for Sewer and Water Facilities: None. Proposed new text for Capital Improvements Plan: None. Proposed new text for Facility Cost Impacts: None. Proposed new text for Issues: None. Proposed new text for Community Facility and Service Policy: None. Proposed new text for Implementation Methods: 1. Carefully monitor school enrollments and plan facilities according to enrollment and development trends. Update the Capital Improvements Plan each year based on trends. 2. Continue to support fire and rescue squads and plan to increase support according to development in the various service areas. 3. Develop plans for new emergency facilities. 4. Continue to convert dumpster sites to compactor sites. Monitor usage. Plan for new refuse collection sites according to use and planned development patterns. 5. Monitor landfill use. Plan for additional landfill capacity on adjacent land. Explore alternative disposal methods and new technologies. 6. Continue to plan for sewer and water main extensions according to the agreements established with the Sanitation Authority and the City of Winchester. Include planned extensions in the Capital Improvements Plan. 7. Provide for recycling at collection stations and support a regional recycling cling center. Encourage private haulers to offer recycling services to their customers. 8. Carefully monitor sewer and water use and develop a Capital Improvements Plan to accommodate projected development. 9. Consider means to provide water service to Brucetown. 10. Consider alternative sources of water supply. 11. Minor extensions of sewer and water service to business and industrial uses beyond the service area may be considered if such uses conform to other County standards. Such extensions should be reviewed by the Planning Commission for conformance with the Plan 12. Require that information be provided with rezoning proposals on the impacts of development on community facilities. Impacts should be addressed through proffers and other means. No rezoning should be approved unless all impacts are adequately addressed. 13. Any sewer or water main six inches in diameter or larger, extended or existing within an area proposed for inclusion within the County's Sewer and water Service Are or Urban Development Area, should be dedicated as a public line to be owned and maintained by the County Sanitation Authority or City of Winchester when appropriate. 14. Plans for new facilities should be based on demand projections as derived from population projections in the Comprehensive Plan. NewSchoof Lo cations " Nle•, S h nl _o atr)r A te(­,ahvas ` �i .r.sir Fc.'et rftirhu;s / '�,+fit a •--� '•:. � ��," r ick A,{ 33�� t SeC,'I'la N RCahb I JmarCavrf;)p- rtA-ea CityrTawn Boundary West Jubal Early i _• ~ �� ti Land Use Pian Replacement ✓� w•, FCMS f Elementary - l r _ ElSchoolry Multi-Use #12 Elementary • Campus ` (�`•�, jj j( � School �M.ddl. mentary Elementary School r -# 4 High School J�� / ^fir \. �• ji 1 II -.f I Revised 10-09-06 School Locations Proposed New 'Text for: Parks and Recreation Section (Changes are noted in red underlined text) Proposed new text for Intent: The purpose of this chapter is to outline the County's recreational policies and to identify implementation methods to accomplish the stated goals for recreational facilities, programs, studies, and plans. This narrative is a broad overview of parks and recreation goals needs and standards, and serves as a guide to decision making_ This overview is a part of the County's continuing planning process. Proposed new text for Facilities: The County currently owns and operates two regional parks. Clearbrook Park, located five miles north of Winchester on Route 11, consists of approximately 55 acres and Sherando Park, located two miles east of Stephens City on Route 277, consists of approximately 334 acres. Both regional parks currently serve the County's population with active and passive recreational programs and facilities. In addition to these regional parks, five neighborhood parks have been developed which serve a more specific group with more limited facilities than those in the regional parks. The neighborhood parks are located at: Reynolds Store Fire Company and Gainesboro Fire Company in the Gainesboro District, and Round Hill Fire Company in the Back Creek District, and at Frederick Heights Subdivision in the Red Bud District. These neighborhood parks consist primarily of playground equipment for young children. In 1987, master development plans were adopted for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. These master plans establish development goals for each park, identify unmet recreational needs, provide unified facility plans, and propose a development program for each park. The master plans for both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks reflect the recommendations of the County residents and national standards as outlined in the 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plan. These plans emphasize the development of a swimming pool complex and additional sports, picnic, maintenance, and other support facilities. In 2001, the Sherando Park Master Plan was revised and adopted. Since the adoption of the Master Plans, the County has completed the construction of: two outdoor swimming pool complexes, four soccer fields, a maintenance building, three shelters, a g_azebo, two playground areas, two sand volleyball courts, and two fields of a four field softball complex. The County has also purchased an area to house the maintenance operations for Clearbrook Park. Additional recreation facilities currently provided are athletic fields, playground., and picnic areas with a variety of recreational opportunities such as horseshoes, fishing, paddle boats, volleyball, open space areas, and support facilities. Clearbrook Park, Sherando Park, neighborhood parks, and all public school athletic fields are maintained by the Parks Division of the Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department. As the result of a cooperative use agreement with Frederick County Public Schools, the Parks and Recreation Department has use of the following: Frederick County High School Facilities when they are not in use by the high school; lighted football fields and track, baseball fields, 24 outdoor lighted tennis courts, and four outdoor lighted basketball courts. The Parks and Recreation Department's Community Center, which adjoins Sherando High School, opened in September of 1993 and contains wo racquetball courts, a weight room, and a multipurpose room with a kitchen. In addition to the use of the three Frederick County High School facilities the Parks and Recreation Department utilizes indoor classrooms and gymnasiums and outdoor athletic and play fields at the four middle schools and eleven elementary schools in the Frederick County Public Schools System. The Residential Performance Zoning District regulations require that open space be provided in most types of suburban development. In addition, recreation facilities are required in any residential development which contains lot sizes of less than 5,000 square feet. It is required that such open space facilities be dedicated to homeowners associations. There is a need to examine recreation and park needs in suburban and urban areas, specifically, the development of a bikeway and trail system. To date, the County has constructed a 2.4 mile bicycle facility to serve several areas east of Stephens City. The County has also committed to the construction of a .6 mile (3,200 linear feet) bicycle facility to serve residential areas on the northern perimeter of Sherando Park. These bicycle facilities will link those residential areas with Sherando Park and Sherando High School. Additional trails would provide residents the ability to travel safely from their homes to schools, stores, work, or recreation areas without having to share the overcrowded arterial and collector roads with automobiles. Also, there is a need to examine Residential Performance Zoning District regulations to determine whether the recreation needs of a single family homeowner are being met. Proposed new text for Programs: The Recreation Division of the Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department was created to provide a comprehensive and accessible program of recreational services and activities for the residents of Frederick County. A diverse range of recreational and enrichment programs is provided for all age groups. This broad base of activities includes, but is not limited to: instructional classes, outdoor adventure programs, sports and athletics, lifetime leisure and fitness programs, cultural and community events, as well as, trips and excursions. Programming responsibilities are assigned within the Division's four interest sections: 1. Community Events 2. Before & After school Programs I Sports & Athletics 4. Lifetime Leisure & Fitness Staff members work together to identify, develop, and implement those activities which most closely meet the interests and desires of the community. The Division typically implements programs within age categories such as preschool, youth, teen, adult, and senior adult. The majority of recreation programs offered by the Parks and Recreation Department are held within 18 public schools in Frederick County and the Parks and Recreation Department's Community Center. Consequently, this wide variety of recreation offerings has maximized use of county school buildings. The joint efforts of the Frederick County Public Schools, the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Parks and Recreation Department resulting in the inclusion of recreational facilities within Sherando High School. Building upon the Sherando Concept, the Orchard View Community Center, which is attached to Orchard View Elementary School, was opened in August of 2000. It has a full size gymnasium available for recreation activities during non -school hours. The Evendale Community Center, our third center, will open in 2006 and will feature two multi-purpose rooms with a full size gymnasium. Proposed new text for Citizen Participation: Citizen participation and input regarding recreation programs and park development have been actively solicited since the creation of the department in 1971. The Parks and Recreation Commission consists of 8 voting members, including one from each magisterial district, appointed by the Board of Supervisors for four year terms and two at -large members recommended by the Commission and appointed by the Board to serve staggered four year terms. Proposed new text for Future Demands: To help plan for future leisure service demands, the Parks and Recreation Department has completed Master Plans for the County's two Regional Parks; studies of the national standards provided in the Virginia Outdoor Plan; and surveyed information relating to the provision of leisure services. Through the utilization of these and any other available resources, it is projected that the following areas must be addressed if we are to meet future leisure demands: 1. Land acquisition to meet minimum standards. 2. Facility development to meet minimum standards. 3. Development of recreation centers 4. Increased programming for special populations 5. Increased programming for teens 6. Greater diversity of programming to better meet the needs of the entire community 7. Expansion of trail systems and bikeways. Proposed new text for Area Standard: As suggested by the 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plan, the area standard for local recreation and park sites in Virginia is ten acres of developed park land per thousand population. Frederick County has a population of approximately 68,634 (based on estimates provided by the Department of Planning and Development) Hent) and currently maintains 396 acres of park land. Of the 396 acres assigned to the parks, about 220 acres would be considered developed. Using population projections provided by the Frederick County Planning Department, an additional 290 acres are needed to meet the current demand; another 37 acres by 2010 and another 60 acres by 2015 will be required if the County is to keep pace with the recommended standard of ten acres per thousand people. It is estimated by the Parks and Recreation Department that by the year 2020 Frederick County will need approximately 843 acres of developed park land to adequately serve the County's population. In meeting the ten acre per thousand minimum standards for park land, it is recommended by the Virginia Outdoor Plan to consider the following types of park development: Proposed new text Neighborhood Parks: none. Proposed new text Community Parks: none. Proposed new text Regioaal Parks: none. GREENWAY Size: Any length, preferably longer than one mile, typically 75-100 feet or wider Service Area: Deendant upon the location size and significance of the corridor Administrative Res onsbili : Federal state, local, or public/rivate partnerLhi2 Purpose: Greenways are established to protect, preserve and maintain existing natural and cultural corridors; to link population centers with recreational education and business areas and other population centers; and to provide recreational and non -motorized transportation opportunities along these corridors by using natural features (ridge -lines steep slopes), utility rights-of-way, and watercourses (streams, rivers canals, etc). _Character: Depending on the location, it can range from rugged terrain with scenic views and extensive vegetation too en level meadows. The greenway can be a sel2axate entity ora portion of any of the other park categories. Potential Facilities: *Camping `Picnic Facilities `Access Points *Trails (all types *Canoeing *Natural Area *Fishier *Parking Area *Winter Sports *Boating and Facilities *Historic Sites Facility Needs Based on Minimum Standards Established in the 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plan: Facility Units/1000 Population 1 Existing # of Facilities Needs Gap based on current population 68,634 Needs Gap based on 2010 population 72,300 Needs gap based on 2015 population 78,300 Needs gap based on 2020 population 84,300 Amphitheatre 1/40,000 0 1 1 1 2 Baseball (youth) 1/5,000 15 -3 -1 0 1 Basketball 1/5,000 5 8 9 10 11 Bicycle Trails 1 mi/1000 3.0 miles 6Tmiles iles Horseshoes 1/10,000 8 - Ice Skating 1/30,000 0 2 In-line Hockey 1/30,000 0 2Park T451 Land 10 acr/1000 396 2Picnicing 10/1,000 400 2Recreation Center — indoor pool 1/60,000 0 1 Skateboard Park 1/60,000 0 1 1 1 1 Soccer Fields 1/5,000 8 4 6 7 8 Softball (Adult) 1/5,000 5 7 9 10 11 Outdoor Swimming Pool 1/12,000 2 3 4 4 5 Tennis Courts 1/2,000 14 17 20 23 26 Volleyball 1/5,000 3 10 11 12 13 * Baseball (youth) 3 fields are shared with softball ** Softball (adult) 3 fields are shared with baseball Based on the demand standards established by the 1996 and 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plans, Frederick County should use the above recommendations as a guide for future park development. * Facilities shared with softball, figure adjusted according to percentage of use and includes 4 public little league fields on Passage Road in Stephens City ** Facilities shared with baseball, figure adjusted according to percentage of use. Proposed new text for Recreation Centers: none. Proposed new text for Existing Regional Park Facilities: Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for operating and maintaining the following facilities: Clearbrook Park: Clearbrook Park, covering 55 acres, is located approximately 5 miles north of Winchester on Route 11. Clearbrook Park is open 365 days a year, from 8:00 am to dark and includes: o Four lighted baseball/softball fields a Vintage Red Caboose with concessions and restrooms * Volleyball a Three acre fishing lake ® Swimming Pool with Concessions o Fishing ® Passive Areas SO Paddle boats o Maintenance Complex • Picnic Shelters, Tables, and Grills O Comfort Stations Horseshoe Pits Playgrounds Sherando Park: Sherando Park is located on Route 277, 1.8 miles east of I-81, near Stephens City. The Park consists of 334 acres, approximately one half of which is undeveloped. Sherando Park is open 365 days a year, from 8:00 am to dark and includes: • 4.5 Acre lake • Paddle Boats Q Fishing o Six Lighted Baseball/Softball Fields with Concessions Picnic Shelters, tables, and grills ® Eighteen -hole Disc Golf Course ® Hiking Trails o Horseshoe Pits o Playgrounds • Volleyball Swimming Pool with Concession o Remote Control Airplane Facility Passive Areas • Maintenance Complex • Comfort Stations • Bike Trails Proposed New 'Text for Conclusion: As the population of the Winchester -Frederick County Area continues to increase, there will undoubtedly be greater emphasis placed on the County's Parks and Recreation Department. As indicated by standards provided in the 2002 Virginia Outdoor Plan (referred to in this chapter), there currently exists a need to concentrate on developing future facilities to meet present minimum standards, and an even greater need to establish a long range capital improvement program to ensure the provision of the physical amenities required to meet future leisure demands. The County has already begun to address lona term needs as discussed in this chapter with a mobility strategy which involves the creation of a complete network of transportation modes, including non -motorized and pedestrian uses. In addition the UDA study of April 2005 sets as one of its goals to examine "providing dequate area for regional community, and neighborhood parks and ensure broad access to a variety of recreational opportunities." It is increasingly important to integrate development of parks and recreational facilities and programs into the overall County plan to make Frederick County an attractive place to live and work. Since the existing parks and recreation facilities are below the recommended minimum standards for a locality of our size priority should be given to bringing our system up to standard Strong. consideration should also be given to the acquisition of park land to meet future needs while desirable men space is still available. In addition to the facilities that are needed to meet current and future demands, in eastern Frederick County and Western Frederick County, the Parks and Recreation Department will also need additional professional staff, if the county is to accommodate an already increasing demand for recreational programs. Proposed new text for Recreation Policy: None. Ira FREDERICK COUNTY' PARKS Frederick County Schools a Elementary Schools 0 Middle Schools 0 High Schools . . . . . . . . . . . Fire Stations Reynolds Store Fire Coj-, ____ , Urban Development Area 12 Roads Primary Secondary Tertiary 5 q, F Parks Parcels -9 City Town Gainesbaro Fire Co. 52 R,K L -J CLEARBROOK PARK -.Fc A. w N xf jA, :A 59 W E Ali 'itP. couff7r CHOO LE219 Bu �R M' r Co. Round Hill Flre FREDERICK HEIGHTS aF U ART 6R,", tl -7� i. k 4 A 41 5t2p CI ,r FZ y4e E 0 ;Im 27 Y Or SHERANDO PARK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mi 4 8 12 15 Miles