Loading...
CPPC 10-14-02 Meeting AgendaTO: FROM: RE: DATE: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 7MEMORA1e1DU1Vd Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee Eric R. Lawrence, Director blw`� October Meeting and Agenda File Copy October 8, 2002 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 The Frederick County Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will be meeting on Monday, October 14, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the first floor conference room of the County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. The CPPS will discuss the following agenda items: AGENDA 1) Review of 2003-2004 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) project requests from various agencies and departments. 2) Request to expand the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to incorporate a 126 acre site, Parcel Number 64-A-116, zoned RA (Rural Areas) District, located on the east side of Front Royal Pike (Route 522 South), south of the intersection of Front Royal Pike and Papermill Road, in the Shawnee Magisterial District. A small portion of the property is currently in the SWSA. The property is slated for a new county middle school. Staff has been directed to advise all committee members that access to the County Administration Building for night meetings that do not occur in the Board room will be limited to the back door of the four-story wing. I would encourage committee members to park in the county parking lot located behind the new addition or in the Joint Judicial Center parking lot and follow the sidewalk to the back door of the four-story wing. Please contact our department if you are unable to attend this meeting. Thank you. u TOMMITTEESTPMAgendas12002 AgendasOctoba 14, 2002 CPPSMeetingAgenda.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22.601-5000 ITEM #1 2003 -2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN PROJECT PRESENTATIONS The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will begin the process necessary to complete the 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The initial step in this process involves the preparation of new capital project requests or modifications to previously endorsed requests by the various county agencies and departments. The purpose of this meeting is to allow representatives from the various agencies and departments to present new project requests and project modification requests to the CPPS for information and discussion. The October meeting will be dedicated to presentations only. The November CPPS meeting will be used to analyze and rate the project requests. Staff will then use this information to develop a project priority list that will be presented to the CPPS in December for 'discussion and recommendation. The recommended project priority list will be submitted to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for discussion in January. Ultimately, the Board of Supervisors will utilize this information for the purpose of developing the FY 2003-2004 budget for Frederick County. Please find included with this agenda item a copy of the Individual Project Description and Justification Forms that have been submitted by the Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department, Handley Regional Library, and the Winchester Regional Airport. Also attached for your reference is the 2002-2003 CIP spreadsheet detailing current proj ect priorities and expenditure estimates and a summary report outlining both new project and project modification requests. Please contact our department if you have any questions regarding this information. SUMMARY OF NEW PROJECT REQUESTS AND PROJECT MODIFICATI®N REQUES'T'S Frederick County Department of Public Works Project Type of 2002 Local 2003 Local Difference in FY Request Expenditure Expenditure Local Request Request Expenditure Request New Animal Shelter Modification $1,095,000 1,254,000 +$159,000 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Project Type of 2002 Local 2003 Local Difference in FY Request Expenditure Expenditure Local Request Request Expenditure Request Lake, Trails, and New N/A $793,000 +$793,000 Parking with Two Irrigated Multi - Purpose Fields - Sherando Park Access Road with New N/A $797,000 +$797,000 Parking and Trails - Sherando Park Parkland in Eastern Modification $2,132,100 $2,196,063 +$63,963 Frederick County Parkland in Western Modification $1,305,099 $1,344,252 +$39,153 Frederick County Softball Complex - Modification $477,307 $491,619 +$14,312 Sherando Park Baseball Complex Modification $978,433 $1,007,788 +$29,355 Renovations - Sherando Park Soccer Complex - Modification $1,112,941 $1,146,199 +$33,258 Sherando Park Request Expenditure Expenditure Open Play Areas - Modification $358,201 $368,699 +$10,498 Clearbrook Park Skateboard/In-Line Modification $454,385 $468,017 +$13,632 Hockey Park School Renovation Tennis/Basketball Modification $372,486 $384,876 +$12,390 Complex - Construction Clearbrook Park Transportation Modification $6,700,000 $6,850,000 Tennis/Picnic Area - Modification $601,664 $619,390 +$17,726 Sherando Park #11 Elementary Modification $10,000,000 $10,800,000 Shelter/Stage - Modification $369,183 $380,245 +$11,062 Clearbrook Park Maintenance Modification $190,481 $196,195 +$5,714 Compound/Office - Sherando Park *Note: The modifications requested by the Department of Parks and Recreation are cost revisions based on an inflation factor of 3.5%. Frederick County Public Schools Project Type of 2002 Local 2003 Local Difference in FY Request Expenditure Expenditure Local Request Request Expenditure Request James Wood Middle Modification $4,005,000 $4,895,000 +$890,000 School Renovation #4 Middle School Modification $15,550,000 $23,300,000 +$7,750,000 Construction Transportation Modification $6,700,000 $6,850,000 +$150,000 Facility #11 Elementary Modification $10,000,000 $10,800,000 +$800,000 School Construction * Note: Cost estimates for Public School projects do not reflect debt service. Winchester Regional Airport Project Type of 2002 Local 2003 Local Difference in FY Request Expenditure Expenditure Local Request Request Expenditure Request Land Acquisition - New N/A $142,475 +$142,475 Preliminary Phase, Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Master Plan Update New N/A 1 $3,000 +$3,000 Handley Regional Library Project Type of 2001 Local 2002 Local Difference in FY Request Expenditure Expenditure Local Request Request Expenditure Request Northern Frederick Modification $48,000 $1,053,000 +$1,005,000 County Library Branch -7- u -RE TT CIS' A = Partial funding from Federal Airport Improvement Program (FAIP) and State Commonwealth Airport Fund (SCAF) grants B =Project includes County Administration annex offices for the Commissioner of the Revenue, C = Projectcosts not identified at time of printing the Treasurer, the Sheriff, and the proposed Fairfax Pike Fire Station. E= Portion of project were funded in previous year D= Partial funding from private donations. N/A' - Project Scope Not Determined At Time Of Printing Department Priority Abbreviations: N/A" -Funding Source Not Determined; Therefore, Debt Service Uncertain At Time Of Printing AP - Winchester Regional Airport N/A- -Feasibility Study To Be Completed Prior To Project Scope Determination CA - County Administration N/A**** - Protect To Be Complete Beyond FY 2006-2007; Therefore No Cost Estimate Projected HL - Handley Library PR - Parks and Recreation 2/13/02 PS - Public Schools 2002CIP. WK4 FREDERICK COUNTY, Vl.-,;INIA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 2002-2003 County riori epartment Priori Pro'ects _. ____ 2002 03 . COUNTY CONTRIBUTION _ - -.--- - 1 County Interest From Any TOTAL COUNTY Total Project I I (PS) Millbrook High School g 2003-04 7,950,000 2004-05 2005-06 ' 2006-07 Contributions Notes Debt Service COSTS Costs 7,950,000 E 21,139,875 _ I 59,139,875 $59,139,875 2 2 (PS) James Wood Middle School Renovation 4,005,000 890,000 3 1 CA) Public Safety Center N/A * 4,895,000 E 4,951,181 f 13,851,181 $13,851,181 4 3 (PS) #4 Middle School Construction 12,780,000 2,770,000 � 0 15,550,000 E 0 I 0 0 5 1 (AP) Airport Road Relocation (Construction) 420,000 12,962,081 36,262,081 $36,262,081 6 2 (AP) Airfield Lighting Upgrade g g pg 15,000 ! 420,000 A 0 -- - -- 420,000 $2,1OQ,000 15,000 15,000 __ $75,000 7 3 (PR) Park Land West 1,305,099 A 0 8 I (HL) New Library - Land Acquisition 1,305,099 0 i 1,305,099 $1,305,099 9 2 (HL) Bowman- Parking Lot/Sidewalk Extension 228,468 j 48,000 I 48,000 D 0 48,000 $48,000 10 1 (PR) Field House/Indoor Pool N/A *** 228;468 0 228,468 $228,468 11 2 (PR) _ Park Land East r _ 2,132,100 0 -- - N/A ** ----- ---- --- 0 $0 2,132,100 12 6 (PS) New Gainesboro Elementary School 1 3,280,000 6,720,000 0 000,000 10,, 0 5,563,125 2,132,100 $2,132,100 13 2 (CA) ,New Animal Shelter 110,000 985,000 1,04 00 15,563,125 $15,563,125 14 6 (PR) Soccer Complex - Slay 1,1 12,941 0 1,095,000 $1,095,000 IS 4 (PS) Facility 2 195,000 4,505,000 1,112,941 0 1,112;941 $1,112,941 16 4 (PR) _,Transportation : Softball Complex - SP 477,307 6;900,000 3,727,294 10,427,294 $10,427,294 477,307 10,000,000 477,307 $477,307 $477,375 17 5 (PS) '#1 i Elementary School Construction I 3,280,000 6,720,000 E 0 18 5 (PR) I Baseball Complex Renovation - SP 978,433 6,008,175 16,008,175 $1 19 3 AP ( ) Maintenance Building 210,000 978,433 0 978,433 $978.433 20 7 (PR) 'Airfield Oen Play Areas -CB p 35$,20I 210,000 A 0 210,000 $300,000 21 11 (PR) Shelter/Stage - CB 358,201 0 358,201 $;158,201 364,1$3 ___ _ _ _ 0 I 369;183 $369,183 22 3 (CA) Annex Facilities (Fire;Tres;ComRev; S 369,183 eriff) 215,000 250,000 23 9 (PR) �Tenn islBasketball Complex � 372,486 I 465,000 B , C 0 465;000 $490,000 24 10 (PR) .Tennis/Picnic Areas - SP 372,4$6 0 372,486 $_172,486 25 12 (PR) 'Maintenance Compound P_ 601,664 601;664 0 1 601;664 $601,664 - 26 - 8 PR ( ) !Skateboard Park/In-Line Hockey e I 140,481 - -- 454,385 ( 190,481 _ _ _0 _ _ _ _ _ 190;481 $190,481 454,385 454,385 $454,383 27 7, (PS) :Administration BuildingRenovations 2,000,000 0 28 4 (CA) ;Relocation of Roundhill Fire/Rescue TOTALS N/A* $27,913,468 $16;082;199 $14,818,681 $7;905;072 $1,209;328. 2,009,000 67,9 0 1,112,625 0 $55;464,356 3,112,625 028,748 $3,112,625' $o $165,198;104 $167,753,104 A = Partial funding from Federal Airport Improvement Program (FAIP) and State Commonwealth Airport Fund (SCAF) grants B =Project includes County Administration annex offices for the Commissioner of the Revenue, C = Projectcosts not identified at time of printing the Treasurer, the Sheriff, and the proposed Fairfax Pike Fire Station. E= Portion of project were funded in previous year D= Partial funding from private donations. N/A' - Project Scope Not Determined At Time Of Printing Department Priority Abbreviations: N/A" -Funding Source Not Determined; Therefore, Debt Service Uncertain At Time Of Printing AP - Winchester Regional Airport N/A- -Feasibility Study To Be Completed Prior To Project Scope Determination CA - County Administration N/A**** - Protect To Be Complete Beyond FY 2006-2007; Therefore No Cost Estimate Projected HL - Handley Library PR - Parks and Recreation 2/13/02 PS - Public Schools 2002CIP. WK4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CIP REQUEST 200342004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: New Frederick County Animal Shelter Date Prepared: September 10, 2002 Agency: Public Works Agency Contact Person: Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Phone Number: 665-5643 Location of Project: See Below Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2)paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This project will replace the existing Esther Boyd Animal Shelter which will be displaced by landfill development in the near future (approximately 3 years). The new shelter needs to be enlarged to accommodate an ever increasing population of dogs and cats. For estimate purposes, we have adopted an 9,000 square foot building with appropriate fencing and parking areas. This size of a structure would provide the necessary upgrades to accommodate the growth of the animal population and provide humane, state-of-the-art animal care. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Ideally, the new animal shelter would be constructed on the same property as the new office for the Sheriffs Department. This proximity would maximize interaction with the animal control officers who are supervised by the Sheriffs Department. Based on the projected development of the landfill, we anticipate initiating and completing the design of the new shelter in FY 2003. The construction would follow the design with a completion in FY 2004. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page l Coordinations: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the_" proje_.cts- This project will be constructed on the property of the new Sheriffs Department. This will allow sharing of access and parking. Utilities would also be readily available at this site This combination would result in reduced site development costs. .. ....�, ..�i...l -'� .. �.: .. ... 1..�5;.. F+�:. W..: .': .k:;.w:AL'.C'SYd ..T'..;..Tni W}.'Yy.. i.�M ., }'. }, �.:..Yt d.trY..4 v::.:� ...n .•:w:.%Yf J•. gxil'N.', ,.dam.: ...:•i• f ^�:PA4 f'34Yt v:.k•::S . &'..:I': If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY 200 Planning, 129 129 Surveying, c& Design Land Acquisition Site 85 85 Preparation & Improvements Construction 990 j 990 Furniture and 5050 1 Equipment { Other (opening day collection) ' TOTAL 129 1125 1254 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received X* "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) *Building cost was based on a unit rate of $110 per square foot. Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond t TOTAL 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY 2008 General 129 1125 1254 Fund Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts f Other Fund-raising TOTAL 129 1125 1254 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 .;:.rvx�»�xamw:�c,:�cr��a�as>:epcw:;sr..:+.r�;�.Yaps.s��a;ax:re.,aa�n�„awa+�s.r.r+w�ta-:.:v„t:�s�r..�;�r�:ras�r�'+;�:n+�puw.w+:w:;r:a':;•rsrmt.?��:��.a«st�uasa+rs:�,:r. Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. The animal shelter will serve the citizens of Frederick County ZMEMMU Please describe the need for this project. The project is necessary to replace and upgrade the existing facility to accommodate an ever increasing animal population and more stringent regulations imposed by the state veterinarian. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Refer to previous comments. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 iW-. 4"+Yt1 @iM;TKh: `s� '1 x;R',ETNA:17eK;�zrkcFJY�FtalR4WNA+�+?: ,. 4 '.a:y;y— ... .. .. .;dfbh¢ Ygec s, ^.;,rD��s%S.k iw}, ,+A' 'Jfi..sWtN. "•a r�, #se+ F't<R:Staf!. ':S�k�fsw'Ke+ Conformancef the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Public health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 !t+'/�F+�:'�4t13w1fNry.�.'.:rs%"1W.MHRb4N��'f:9�.:.i.:A'MaRYYh.�$6+OY'wz.••:••.�w,.�;�Yb'+iG#f.... ��%�1s9Y1�.?I.Hyiti'Id'L' +��'9/%'4'RUM"g�Y,tM�#:,fi'.+,$Ia4?4�FY�lH1M' F'fkj,9k��W�l4J?d�iAi3Y'L�'WLegal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 i'i4rtbk'-LAF3GR-Y:�t'i�'4?��'Y$ti*"u'ri4'dM5P71.1h_l f5ii?1a'sCx'+�.'�Kt�k"AN{S'FFFNk1sf�.'�94�SYXfb+i&1G�ME6R1�,id/pAa''i%IE+�:f3.�.'7�'+/a'i'iJC.•ai�9eek4.'�ueKYi9':I-0FrvYRI�iL'aAF'1R.24$�akiT�'..A1�f 84Y"�. •ii+NkS.'. Coordination other'. Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2003-2004 Departmental Request Summary Department: Public' Wart, Approved By: W.'6 t'•dJ4 vE'Y:3"i*F:SY '+'R.+. ,...' re x�`..:9XA�lF9'"aP!�=X<.riyk.:. a. Fl:.c:�b»S:?'�x:f'J.Ia';Y19'S.�Ml3tY...;i...'.f:'C":,?f:dJn Yt'.t.'gsr.,-io3'Je?�"rP�X+frn a.cL.e4 .rlV K.' -�:.y .d �:'..:.. :i � ,. ssKt:M"P+�+£-s'-y-,itn d�Y�`.�1.'at; Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2003 Cost FY 2004 Cost FY 2005 Cost FY 2006 Cost FY 2001 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost I New Animal Shelter 129 1125 1254 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 TOTAL 129 1125 _ 1254 C:4Corel\WordPerfecl\Rhonda\CIP Documents\2003-2004CIP\2003-200ACIPAppbeationFomta.wpd 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 PARIS & RECREATION CIP REQUEST 2003-2004 Departmental Request Summary Department: Parks and Recreation Department Approved by: Dept. Project FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TOTAL Priority Title Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost CIP Cost 1 Field N/A N/A House/ Indoor Pool 2 Park Land 2,196,063 2,196,063 East FC 3 Park Land 1,344,252 1,344,252 West FC 4 Softball 491,619 491,619 Complex Sherando 5 Baseball 1,007,788 1,007,788 Complex Renovation 6 Soccer 1,146,199 1,146,199 Complex 7 Open Play 368,699 368,699 Areas - Clearbrook 8 Skateboard 468,017 468,017 Park/In- line Hockey 9 Tennis/ 384,876 384,876 Basketball Complex 10 Tennis/ 619,390 619,390 Picnic Areas 11 Shelter/ 380,245 380,245 Stage - Clearbrook 12 Mainten- 196,195 196,195 ance Compound Department: narkg anal Recreation Depat me'tlt Approvc By - Dept. Project FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TOTAL =Wait COO 13 Lake/Trails 793,000 793,000 /Parking (663,000) with 2 multi- purpose fields irrigated (130,000) 14 Access 797,000 797,000 Road with Parking and Trails TO'T'AL 3,540,315 2,645,606 1,221,592 2,785,830 10,193,343 2003-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia ' • - PnrkinR .•• Trgil T)eyelnpmenttwo 11 n• - Fields Date Prepared: 1' 1 •-. Pnrlcq ... Rerrflnfinn Agency Contact Person: TamPs11Q_Dnrnn Phone Number: 665-5678 Location of Project: _ Sheranrtn Park Magisterial District: Op -q on Project Descriptiom Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. 1. Development of a 12 acre lake on the north side of Rt. 277 in Sherando Park. 2. 1.5 Mile trail system around the lake. 3. 800 L.F. of access roadway. 4. Parking lot/lighted with 125 spaces. 5. Development of two irrigated 70 x 120 yd. multi-purpose fields. m. � seams Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the master development plan for Sherando Park, which was completed in 2001. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2006-2007 fiscal year. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project. This project is planned as one element of the master development plan for Sherando Park, Project Priority: 13 If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This is a new project not previously prioritized. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PROPOSED EXPENDI'T'URES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY :: 200 Planning, Surveying, & 50,000.00 50,000.00 Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation Improvements Construction 743,000 743,000 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL 10 t 0 0 0 793,000 0 793,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 :NuEh'a,4�^aF.+IA."Sliu.,�.Y?#�R4�8R7+FM{Ffi7+>.r'i'�.ht'a17>iK.:,r+1w3D4dan,'AM'8•A'%:tiM'e�??1ti71 e'R��'rlmiv'�SiFkK As r;..uy.'#w Pit -. ,�";kY,4r+yaALa-r;'tnF 7�;:.`T+�iF:i`�'."a�'A"�'ve+3•er,y:aXd'+.+:�i�a4,.k:. ,+N!'#M'�;i"'r.isy61F'st. s+t�a`4.+GAgyy+.�.. Source of rg: Indicate the projected • •r each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2003 2nd FY 2004 3rd FY 2005 4th FY 2006 5th FY 2007 Beyond FY 2003 TOTAL General Fund 793,000 793,000 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL 0 793,000 0 0 0 0 793,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): We are currently utilizing the TEA -21 grant program for the trail facilities. In addition, recreation access grant monies through the Virginia Department of Transportation may be available for entrance and access roadways. If these grant programs are not funded, this project would need to be funded through the county capital improvements program, by donations, or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 .;y:;•G`X:1!'tiA•:�±'Frw;B�rNNfC'he"+9!W4:"f'+rKz4s:Y�y�frmea?(#.b�F:T??q:•r,&:Y.>s.�:rn+i+sal?�?s�e!s�m+za.m'..sair+weryi�^+N Af+?��ks.^.{d�+:.i•• I.sws$Fks3 a�'1F4..r-:e ..rn.is�:C kasa+eHm1%RtA...s>Fi:aK+ Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. "a -FY.,..., ,.:?w s<nx:.»+; a., .'v""Ury •%4-....* ,+a <.:!.£M xr,•'c¢ xr iY,'v'S:r ?.B11P:'r.:.'n]' Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number needed to meet the minimum standards required for our service area. This project will provide trails with walking and jogging opportunities which ranks as #1 in the 2002 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey. This project will also provide multi -use playfields for adult and youth programs. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the County currently having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been completed. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is necessary to meet the needs of our service area. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 .lNN.'(!'Aii�?X;aiy.11SN,N'�1MM!'i �r'Nk''�.;4i ' i!f�bGvtMii $T:YY.�ii�r ArY�'i :i6`.ed4V4�!4:JlV%i G'; -:Hp !2!Y:if�NfN4.+F3 M'=f^/5tiW,:ifA 1'�94WV�A:'�'.L 9!�$�i1a,Qr•!Y!'[BiYM:.4i�.'eJxx?�:;11��Mi�{'¢6'5�vi(�IYT't�'t �.dk.��'�:i,4+�F(ib'Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? The development of the lake with trails and parking and two multi-purpose fields at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: • Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The development of the lake with trails and parking will provide recreational opportunities in an undeveloped portion of Sherando Park which is adjacent to adjoining housing subdivisions. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 x`fiW�?.�3lNNritye?�4'*s�!,'l;F. tx+�t:.b'9:a:spRv70.`.i?YF;.lnllli�i`..an..=,k1!Y,9.,'!p31.14tR.3B'i'aWyd/�ti�'fi<:witieA'-mkY,'a�UM!fnMYy'Lr Ma'ckty .F'R3.�S4: tE5%i:YtatY.t :.d'Fill'�4.ri:gb+4NWf'M'At,#�In7kw'idM'*. �. .+: ti+�sti9.d"a�W :2i. _ 'd�)f4AAFlN'C�M9z. Requirement:Legal Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project would provide passive recreational services in the County's urban development area and is being developed in accordance with the Sherando Park Master Plan which was completed in 2001. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 bW.4@w+"!k`.+RaaF:.7�t Tw i`r+did!m'!^ +?dK 4::'Ks^.'F'driro an Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The lake with trails and parking and two multi-purpose fields is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted master development plan for Sherando Park. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Yage 8 2003-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUST'IFICAT'ION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: __ Access_Rnard/Parking and Trails0j Date Prepared: ng/d 8/02 AgP.n(-U- Parks anrd Recreation Agency Contact Person: Tames M Doran Phone Number: 665-567R Location of Project: S'hernntln Park Magisterial District: _Onern,nn Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Access Road/Parking and Trails at Sherando Park north side of Rt. 277 and Wrights Run. 1. Entrance and access road (1,500 L.F.) Off of Warrior Drive 2. Parking - 50 spaces 3. Trails - 2.8 Miles 9 R I p Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. This project is reflected in the master development plan for Sherando Park, which was completed in 2001. The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed during the 2006-2007 fiscal year. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 1 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. This project is not dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project. This project is planned as one element of the master development plan for Sherando Park. .�K ..... rrc. ,ti.'1!Y. ;':. ;R�}Y„az ixv,. { v!'_:�,.;;./ '-:i.4:eA�a75s. :, ... �f; ! e".i.!r S .�t.¢�T9:i'I:1t�st�M1: ".:�. 75�.:7'� x. Yt .' ;:Pi:C• '.Yn'+w7li.,+M .n .4'$.4iw�.> 5 M1:>; r.vN.Nk Project , Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: This is a new project not previously prioritized. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 �i:.iaW,Wk1�6!�'ai.:pSN�RilF6�iMY•Y?CdYFfG4nwNi+MlkM1P�:i%+i��N9'ai.7i�.t+11: 'rfW,�SiW�YpYi%YRC aFn!'1+-�.}y.:rl.. �ki:A%. . .it�a: YM{+.Y :iyy.}fr '�ir5!�:'4.Mii .I+:...Y�i �X`NiWs✓.`�I..4'�,^klf.�WY`1yYN`:�h�37941'1'�in. pdVq-i!'/iui�%#�'dY.KV t'+YSb1Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars):PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY 2008 Planning, Surveying, & 50,000.00 50,000.00 Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation Improvements Construction 747,000 747,000 Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) - .:,7, , TOTAL 0 0 0 0 797,000 0 797,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Source ©f Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2003 2nd FY 2004 3rd FY 2005 4th FY 2006 5th FY 2007 Beyond FY 2008 TOTAL General Fund 797,000 797,000 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund- raising TOTAL, 0 0 0 0 1 797,000 0 797,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): We are currently utilizing the TEA -21 grant program for the trail facilities. In addition, recreation access grant monies through the Virginia Department of Transportation may be available for entrance and access roadways. If these grant programs are not funded, this project would need to be funded through the county capital improvements program, by donations, or by funds generated through the collection of proffers. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 .eeNcvivlNi9l+�lp�`�F`ilft�iA11'd%�lkOkk+"��YMXM .: ..'.F.p+844�NSwµeF'Y19�A7-'JI�FYkG.yNN.1'%tk!!M.4%Ar�../.'Wf .Sih4i'.'..7Slo"Ali;�'.Nfl����fr`.iiK3lapv.+Yh:KE'd4ti"-i'�C171'C.k�. _ Y:�M<CrWPs`A6bi5'fRYA.^."�'1Afk`attin5K.12'kFa1�I+�i"P'..�+NMq:1.C'LL :W!$• ProjectJustification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. Please describe the need for this project. To reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number needed to meet the minimum standards required for our service area. This project will provide trails with walking and jogging opportunities which ranks as #1 in the 2002 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor recreational activities. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the County currently having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been completed. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is necessary to meet the needs of our service area. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 .'6n+Mbk...+-.i':wrtYnFC:Wifv;:i>++NYh.+.4FFikkM:M Y.Li.�.H e+t�.i."CfX'�k}1'Yi1.'NYh^Y!lir.YMi+'+h..:9rtY�Mi.:+x:.'.xlr+..Yi..+'>WM-?yW'�/NM.z:I.ZR@(aj}�N@v. �Cs..3r4C A.'.rG.'Y.+VW'sS A4.'d+Silk'J'X.Y%`1M11►iClb%.a:W�i�C.--------Y. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? is the project consistent with established policies? The development of an entrance off of Warrior Drive and an access road with parking and trails at Sherando Park meets the following County comprehensive planning goals: Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete program of parks and recreation. • Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available funding. • Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and rural areas. • Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational facilities and activities. • Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth. • Provide support to travel and tourist related activities. • Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county. Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? The development of an entrance and access road with parking and trails will provide recreational opportunities in an undeveloped portion of Sherando Park which is adjacent to adjoining housing subdivisions. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 ;n>:'v!tib°iTMK"9u'N.°tl+i�^�4x{liYVfw9F::fif;rM4�.wnyri!'6� !i�':.RR�e.•.SVS,rw:ar.rR`a+rm'•ER.Uw.+iG'rv.sh'..SMPr'-,ui.-c:i'�.v!}K..a..Aa'p.r.',k�o:V,.w?rYf.u'+:+�".'.•r'tC2f3t�i'a�alinUli'?r`pfM*ry,'l�Y;�io.'�-+7H'd.ra?.9:(A*a.'�FiG�A.4nM�+'MA`L Legal Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? This project would provide passive recreational services in the County's urban development area and is being developed in accordance with the Sherando Park Master Plan which was completed in 2001. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community. The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and travel industry. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 �Y)W_'u".:vrFnri'n^.'!rt3`KFades&.�sFi.Rkw,�'.SW:;iYW"td.Mf^^f*p�@4':4kf+�Y.mA+�Y:;?titkw.•v«'64'.6 ^p'.'h�+H^+hGF±ser�''i�'sn NtYartY�Nii�itii�:slld;:+,aH'.�i:!eitYJNa;'�'o:.}E.f�t5�.f�'R%p+T?�awsu"psYS'1+k2,-ttPF^E!t4?i+�i'a�aMikK'P..g.Q+.+iKGaMFryd'nAa+:. Coordination other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The entrance and access road with parking and trails is not dependent upon any other planned project. It is one element of the adopted master development plan for Sherando Park. t Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 2001 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of the residents. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CIP REQUEST 2003-2004 Departmental Request Summary Department: Frederick County Public Schools Approved By: Dept. Project Title Borrowed 7/1/03— 7/1/04— 7/1/05— 7/1/06— 7/l/07-- Priority prior to 6/30/04 6/30/05 6/30/06 6/30/07 6/30/08 Project Cost Interest Debt Service 6/30/03 1 James Wood Middle School $9,930,000 $1,820,000 $11,750,000 $6,580,000 $18,330,000 Renovation 2 New Middle School $9,865,000 $13,435,000 Open Fall $23,300,000 $12,962,081 $36,262,081 Construction 2004 "Transportation ' Facility $6,850,000 $6,850,000 $3,836,000 $10,686,000 4 New Elementary $800,000 $3,280,000 $6,720,000 Open Fall School 2006 $10,800,000 $6,008,175 $16,808,165 Construction 5 Admin Bldg. Renovation & $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,112,625 $3,112,625 Addition 6 Replace Gainesboro $3,280,000 $6,720,000 $10,000,000 $5,563,125 $15,563,125 Elementary School 7 1 O 1 AL $20,595,000 $15,255,000 $10,130,000 $8,720,000 $3,280,000 $6,720,000 $64,700,000 $36,062,006 $100,761,996 This is an administrative draft and has not been adopted by the school board! 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Proicct Requests WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT CIP REQUEST 2003-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Land Acquisition — Preliminary Phase Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Date Prepared: September 27, 2002 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Bufflick Road Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Preliminary work to acquire three parcels along Buffiick Road identified on the Airport Property Map as parcels 31, 46, & 53. Property is included in the current Twenty -Year Master Plan to be acquired for noise abatement. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. FY 2004 — 2005 Actual land acquisition costs Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: lfpreviously included in the Cnnitni Improvements Plan. please indicate previous priority and current status of r — project: N/A Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PRtIPnfiFD EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 003 2004 2005 2005 2007 FY 2008 Planning, Surveying, & $ 123,750 $123,750 Design Land Ac uisition $700,000 $700,000 Site Preparation Improvements Construction )Furniture and Equipment Other (opening da collection) TOTAL $123,750 $700,000 $823,750 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 2003-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Land Acquisition — Preliminary Phase Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Date Prepared: September 27, 2002 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Agency Contact Person: Serena R. Manuel Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Location of Project: Bufflick Road Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Preliminary work to acquire three parcels along Bufflick Road identified on the Airport Property Map as parcels 31, 46, & 53. Property is included in the current Twenty -Year Master Plan to be acquired for noise abatement. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. FY 2004 — 2005 Actual land acquisition costs Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PM"P0.CFn FI/NDING SOURCES Element tst FY 003 2nd FY 2004 3rd FY 2005 4th FY 2006 5th FY 2007 Beyond FY 2008 TOTAL General Fund FY 2005 Local Share $4,275 $140,000 State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $560,000 (80%) $142,475 Other Fund Federal Grant .state Grants $111,375 $ 9,900 $560,000 $111,375 $569,900 Bonds and Debts Other Fund -raisin TOTAL $123,750 $700,000 $823,750 Please describe the source of funding (i. e. type of grant): FY 2004 Local Share $2,475 (2%) State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $9,900 (8%) Fed Grant - Federal Aviation Administration $111,375 (90%) FY 2005 Local Share $140,000 (20%) State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation $560,000 (80%) In FY 2006 funding reimbursement from the Federal Aviation Administration is anticipated to be received for expenditures in FY 2005 resulting in the local share being reduced from (20%) to (2%) with due on local share of $126,000 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units ofservice to be provided by the project. N/A Please describe the need for this project. For several years, development requiring land acquisition at Winchester Regional Airport has focused on the Runway 32 (southwest) end. With that land acquisition effort complete, several parcels within the Runway 14 (northeast) end also need to be acquired. The acquisition is necessary because many of these parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the Residential parcels are located inside the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations and encourages airports to resolve the non -compatibility through acquisition. Please describe and juste the proposed location of the project. N/A 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? This project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Development Plan and is within the Airport Support Area on Frederick County's Comprehensive Plan Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? These parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface which is a safety issue. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Leval Requirement: is the projeci required in order to nseet a .State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement Yes under the Federal Aviation Administration's Part 77 Surface Requirements the Airport is required to own fee simple property within the Primary Surface. This requirement is also included in the Code of Virginia 15.2 Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the, project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Safe and efficient approach systems into the airport are essential in attracting business traffic into this region especially during adverse weather conditions which could produce more operating revenue for the airport and the region 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? Project is within the Airport's Twenty Year Master Plan Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Residents living along Bufflick Road that have their property identified for acquisition were immediately notified upon completion of the Master Plan Update in 1993 and have been met with throughout the years to advise them as to an estimated time table for acquisition proceedings to start. Each property owner involved seems to be supportive of the project. Prior to beginning any actual proceedings, each owner involved will be fully advised and met with individually in accordance with Federal Land Acquisition Regulations 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2003-2004 Departmental Request Summary Department: Approved By: Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2003 Cost FY 2004 Cost FY 2005 Cost FY 2006 Cost FY 2007 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 Land Acquisition Bufflick Road $123,750 $700,000 $823,750 2 Master Plan Update $150,000 $150,000 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TOTAL $273,500 $700,000 $973,750 Document] 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 2063-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FC'MM Project Name: Date Prepared Agency Contact Person Location of Project: return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Master Plan Update September 27, 2002 Serena R. Manuel Winchester Airport Agency: Winchester Regional Airport Phone Number: (540) 662-5786 Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. The most recent Master Plan for Winchester Regional Airport was completed in 1993. Since that time, much of the proposed development has been constructed. With the completion of many of the projects identified in the 1993 Master Plan, including a runway extension and full instrument landing system, demand for airport services and development have increased beyond that currently shown on the Master Plan. In addition, the land surrounding the airport has seen a significant growth in business, commercial and industrial growth. With the current master plan maturing and the development around the airport increasing, there is a need to revisit the Master Plan to identify additional areas for future development, including possibly moving some operations to the north side of the airfield, opposite of where existing development has occurred. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. N/A Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): N/A PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Element 3st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond Total 003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY 2008 Planning, $150,000 $150,000 Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition Site Preparation Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $150,000 $150,000 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis far estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Source of Funding- Indicate the projected amount for each funding source_ ni2t)ww -n rmv1)1/V(.' .V0i/Rf F4 Element Ist FY 003 2nd FY J3rd 2004 FY 2005 4th F: 2006 5th FY 2007 Beyond FY 2008 TOTAL General Fund $ 3,000 $3,000 Other Fund State Grants Fed Grant $ 12,000 $135,000 $147,000 Bonds and Debts Other Fu nd-raisin TOTAL $150,000 $150,000 Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant): State Grant — Virginia Department of Aviation Federal Grant — Federal Aviation Administration Local Share — Local Jurisdictions 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests $12,000 (8%) $135,000 (90%) $3,000 (2%) Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to be provided by the project. N/A Please describe the need for this project. Current Twenty Year Master Plan is near completion and does not include development on the northern side of the runway. As air congestion and restrictions increase in the Dulles/Washington area, the Airport is receiving inquiries from businesses looking to relocate their aircraft to the Winchester Airport. Since available space for construction is limited on the existing side, consideration needs to be given to developing a Master Plan to show future development on the opposite side. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. N/A 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? N/A Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? N/A 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? In order to receive State and Federal funding, an airport is required to have a Master Plan for development and once reviewed by those agencies and approved, future developments must be outlined and updated on an Airport Layout Plan. This is a Federal and State requirement. Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? N/A Economic Impact. Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Yes. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? The project would be necessary prior to any development of the northern side of the runway in order to receive Federal and/or State funds for Capital projects. Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. N/A 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2003-2004 Departmental Request Summary Department: Approved By: Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2003 Cost FY 2004 Cost FY 2005 Cost FY 2006 Cost FY 2007 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 Land Acquisition Bufflick Road $I23,750 $700,000 $823,750 2 Master Plan Update $150,000 $150,000 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TOTAL $273,500 $700,000 $973,750 Document2 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 HANDLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY CIP REQUEST 2003-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Parking Lot and Sidewalk addition at Bowman Library Date Prepared: Sept. 25, 2002 Agency: Handley Regional Library Agency Contact Person: Trish Ridgeway Phone Number: 662-9041, ext. 14 Location of Project: Stephens City Magisterial District: Shawnee Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. This project is the Library's top capital improvement priority. To provide a safe means for people to reach Bowman Library, Handley Regional Library proposes that the parking lot be expanded on the Lakeside Drive side of the property (see preliminary drawing that were previously submitted) and that a sidewalk be provided from Lakeside Drive to connect with the existing sidewalk at the library. The parking lot expansion would enlarge the lot from 101 spaces to 221 spaces (approximately 4,000 additional sq. yd.) and would relieve the overcrowding that forces individuals to park on Tasker Road during peak library use times. This work will not require additional storm drainage work but will necessitate moving shrubbery, planting trees and bushes, installing curbs and gutters, and installing parking -lot light fixtures to match the current down -light fixtures. The 4 -foot wide sidewalk will extend approximately 400-500 ft. (approximately 4,000 sq.ft.) beyond the sidewalk that now borders the parking lot. Two options are shown on the drawings. The Library had requested Painter -Lewis to provide two alternatives, thinking the first option would be less expensive. Our estimates show both alternatives cost about the same amount. The Library has chosen Option 2. This option brings the sidewalk to a point on Lakeside Drive most likely to be used by residents, almost all of whom are coming from the east. It would require a culvert system that duplicates the one currently used on the corner of Lakeside and Tasker. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. The project will take approximately 3-5 months. Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Number 9 on the list. The project awaits funding. Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PROPOWD EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5`r' FY Beyond Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY 2008 Planning, Surveying, & $ 11,500 $ 11,500 Design Land Completed Acquisition Site Preparation & 1441157 144,157 Im rovements Construction 72,811 72,811 Furniture and Equipment N/A Other (opening day collection) TOTAL $228,468 $2289468 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment ✓ From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor The Library paid Painter/Lewis to provide the preliminary design. Shockey provided the estimate From bids received "Preliminary" estimate, (e -g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5th FY Beyond FY TOTAL 003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 General Fund $228,468 Other Fund I State Grants Bonds and Debts Other Fund -raisin TOTAL 11$228,468 Please describe the source offunding (i.e. type ofgrant): 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of service to he provided by the project. The Mary .lane and .lames L. Bowman Library opened July 16, 2001. Through August 2002, an average of 12,028 individuals a month have entered the Library. The Library serves all age groups from very young children to senior citizens and provides recreational and education materials for them. The library is a favorite location for families to visit together and serves many children and adults when they are working on school assignments or self-improvement. The library supplies computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. Please describe the need for this project. Parking Lot: One children's program last fall attracted over 400 attendees. At least twelve times since the library opened, library patrons have parked on Tasker Road or in the nearby town -house parking lot because the library lot was full. Opening a car door or helping small children exit a car in the face of Tasker Road traffic is dangerous. The library has public seating space for 153. In addition, the meeting room holds 120 people and is available for area groups to use. Also, since the book processing staff, bookmobile staff, and unit supervisors operate out of Bowman Library, staff takes up 11 to 16 parking spaces during the business day and 7 to g spaces in the evenings. The Library is also a polling place for Frederick County. Library of Virginia standards call for 190 or more parking spaces for a public library building of Bowman's size. Frederick County standards require 100 spaces, and since money was tight for the project, Public Works decided to use the county standard. Sidewalk: The Bowman Library has proved very popular with children and families. Children from the Lakeside Drive side of the Library often bicycle or walk to the library. If they bicycle, they ride on Tasker Road where the traffic often goes faster than the 45 mph speed limit. If they walk, they can walk across the field between the library and Lakeside Drive, and many children jump the drainage ditch, rather than walk to the corner where it is easy to get across. Mothers, who want to walk, complain they have to use Tasker Drive when they have children in strollers. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The parking lot location is the area that was set aside for parking lot expansion. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Yes. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Safety is the primary reason for this request. It is very dangerous for bicyclists and walkers to be on Tasker Drive. More individuals would be comfortable coming on foot or by bicycle if there were a safer route. Likewise parking along the roadside at Tasker also is not safe. The Bowman Library is a polling place for Frederick County and parking was a problem in the last election. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? Public libraries in general serve segments of population who cannot afford to purchase many books for their own libraries as well as those that lack computers and Internet access. Through pooling of funds, public libraries make available to the public at large expensive printed works, books on tape, and computer databases that an individual or most companies could not afford. Economic Impact: Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Realtors, firms relocating, and homebuyers see Public Libraries as a very positive local quality of life factor. Libraries provide information on business start-up, investing, and company management. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project? No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. It is citizen's requests and complaints both to Library staff and to members of the Board of Supervisors who are driving this proposal. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2003-2004 Departmental Bequest Summary Department. Handley Regional Library Approved By: Richard Stephenson, HRL Board Chairman Trish Ridgeway, Director Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2003 Cost FY 2004 Cost FY 2005 Cost FY 2006 Cost FY 2007 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 owman $228,468 $228,468 Parking lot & Sidewalk Additions 2 NW Library $48,000 48,000 Land Acquisition & Site work 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TOTAL $228,468 $48,00 $276,468 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 2003-2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM return to: Department of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia Project Name: Northern Frederick County Library Branch Date Prepared: Sept. 24, 2002 Agency: Handley Regional Library Agency Contact Person: Trish Ridgeway Phone Number: 662-9041, ext.14 Location of Project: Near Cross Junction Magisterial District: Gainesboro Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes. Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc. Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for up to 35 vehicles. The proposed location would be on route 522 in the Gainesboro district, but this could change depending on patterns of library use in the next 3 to 4 years and on whether donated land could be located. The acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres would be in fiscal year 2007/2008. The library itself would be constructed the following fiscal year. Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other planning. Building program complete 2007/2008 Land acquisition 2007/2008 Hire architect 2007/2008 Hire general contractor 2008/2009 Begin construction 2008/2009 Complete construction 2008/2009 Furnish Library 2009/2010 ®pen Library 2009/2010 Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects. N/A Project Priority: If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and current status of project: Number 8 on the list. Estimate Cost (in 2002 dollars): PROMISFn EXPENDITURES Element 1st FY 2nd FY 3rd FY 4th FY 5`f' FY Beyond Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 FY 2008 Planning, Surveying, & Design Land Acquisition 536,000- $36,000- 48,000 48,000 Site Preparation & Improvements Construction Furniture and Equipment Other Total Bldg. Costs945,00t....................9.4.5.,000 .................... Books, etc. 60,000 60,000 TOTAL $1,041,000- 1,053,000 *The Bowman Library at Stephens City with architect's fees and furniture and equipment, but without books, cost approximately $145 per square foot. Since a site has not selected, it is difficult to estimate site costs. Books, books on tape, videos, CDs, and DVDs are calculated with a beginning collection of 30,000 items at a rough estimate of $20 each. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2 Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. Ifyou want to provide more detailed information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided. Cost of comparable facility or equipment From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor From bids received ✓ "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate) On the land cost, we have talked to a landowner who currently had a contract in 2001 for a 5 -acre residential lot on route 522 at $11,980. See information on estimate cost above. Other (please explain) Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source. PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES Element 1st FY 2003 2nd FY 2004 3rd FY 2005 4th FY 2006 5th FF 2007 Beyond FY 2006 TOTAL General Fund $48,000 $48,000 Other Fund State Grants Bonds and Debts $945,OOC $945,000 Other Fund -raisin 60,000 60,000 TOTAL 711 $48,000 $1,005,00 �j,p53�ppo Please describe the source offunding (i.e. type ofgrant): 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 3 Project Justification: Please project the number ofpersons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units ofservice to be provided by the project. This branch would serve most of those who live in the Gainesboro district along with other citizens who travel in the area. In July 2001 the bookmobile began a twice -weekly stop at Redland Church on route 522. Approximately 725 items are checked out each month with the bookmobile there only eight hours per week. Please describe the need for this project. Now that the Bowman Library is completed, the residents of Gainesboro district comprise the largest population group that is the most distance from a library within the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project. The exact location is yet to be determined. Ideally, a public library should be easy to get to, be located on a major road, and be very visible from the road. Location criteria are similar to those for a retail establishment. If a location other than route 522 meets these criteria, it would also be acceptable. Beginning the search for a location now may facilitate the donation of land. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4 Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan: Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies? Yes. Public Health, Safety, or Welfare: Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear health or safety risk? Many senior citizens utilize public libraries; for many of them, the library is their primary social outlet. They volunteer at the library; they visit it each daily or weekly because there is no cost and the staff is friendly. Public libraries also serve an important recreational source for children. Our summer reading program this year registered 2,037 preschoolers and school-age children system wide. We distributed over 700 books (all donated) as reading incentives to program participants. We also work with Valley Health and Senior Navigator to provide health information. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5 Legal Requirement: Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal requirement? No Equitable Distribution of Services: Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is currently under served relative to other areas of the County? ThP Bowman Librarv, the Handley Library, and the Clarke County Library provide services to the residents of Frederick County. Other than the sparsely populated far southwest corner of the County, Gainesboro residents have the farthest drive to reach a library. Economic Impact. Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have a positive effect on the local economy? Realtors, firms relocating, and homebuyers see Public Libraries as a very positive local quality of life factor. Libraries provide information on business start-up, investing, and company management. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6 Coordination with other projects: Is the project necessaryfor the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a larger project No Public Support: Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods used to determine public support. Regular users of the bookmobile and residents of the community have anecdotally indicated strong support. 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 7 2003-2004 Departmental Bequest Summary Department: Handley Regional Library Approved By: Richard Stephenson, HRL Board Chairman Trish Ridgeway, Director Dept. Priority Project Title FY 2003 Cost F a 2004 Cost FY 2005 Cost FY 2006 Cost FY 2007 Cost TOTAL CIP Cost 1 Bowman Parking lot & Sidewalk Additions $228,468 $228,468 2 NW Library Land Acquisition & Site work $48,000 48,000 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TOTAL $228,468 $48,000 $276,468 2003-2004 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8 ITEM #2 URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA (UDA) AND SEWER AND WATER SERVICE AREA (SWSA) EXPANSION REQUEST Included within this agenda item is information that has been prepared by Mark Smith of Greenway Engineering. Mr. Smith has requested the expansion of the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to incorporate approximately 55 acres of the 126 -acre Russell farm; the farm consists of 6 parcels, with 3 owners. Approximately 71 acres of this property is currently within the SWSA. The site is predominantly vacant, but the Frederick County School Board is seeking to acquire a portion of the tract for use as a future middle school site. The subject site is located on Front Royal Pike (US Route 522 South), east of the intersection of Front Royal Pike and Papermill Road. The properties are presently accessed via Laurelwood Drive. The School Board is seeking to purchase a 30 -acre portion of the farm for use as the County's fourth Middle School. In order to utilize the public water and sewer system, the future school site would need to be incorporated into the SWSA. Please refer to the illustration provided by Greenway Engineering, dated September 2002 for the approximate location of the school site. Access to the school site would be via a proposed collector road, which would be constructed through the southern portion of the Shenandoah Mobile Home Park. The owner of the mobile home park has indicated that the road would displace 15 mobile home units. Therefore, it is their intent to relocate the 15 units to an expanded portion of the mobile home park. The UDA expansion is being sought in an effort to accommodate a MH1 rezoning petition that would ultimately be filed with the County. These properties were included in the Southern Frederick Land Use Plan. The properties were generally identified for future industrial use. The Plan identifies a proposed collector road, located south of the subject properties, which would provide access from Route 522. The Plan also identifies a Winchester Area Transportation Study (WATS) proposal for a collector road - extended from Papermill Road- traveling east towards Airport Road. Attached is the information and mapping provided by the applicant and staff. The mapping illustrates the location of the UDA and SWSA, and current zoning in the general vicinity of the subject site. I nnnl"rl III 1971 ,-1 ;T_17;77171ry cya REM 3 i �,1 .�N I')I \vimh 11111 1_a11c \\ im A'iigwi,i _'_1602 September 30, 2002 Frederick County Department of Planning and Zoning 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Eric Lawrence, Director of Planning Re: Russell Farm/Frederick County Middle School Site Dear Mr. Lawrence, On behalf of the Russell Farm and the Shenandoah Mobile Court, we are requesting the following two items: The expansion of the Sewer and Water Service Area to include the remaining lands of the Russell Farm. ■ The expansion of the Urban Development Area, 240' east of its existing location. The two expansion areas are indicated on the enclosed map for graphical purposes. The SWSA is being expanded to accommodate the future Middle School site. The SWSA currently bisects the middle of the Russell Farm property and it is estimated that approximately 126 acies of land would be included in our request. The Urban Development Area expansion is being requested due to the displacement of 15 mobile homes on the Shenandoah Motor Court property. This allows for the new construction of a major collector road from Route 522 to the future Middle School site and the relocation of the 15 mobile homes onto the Russell Farm. Please forward our request to the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee for their consideration. Thank you for your assistance with this project and feel free to call with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Gre .nv,ay Engiir eerirrb �, Mark D. Smith, PT., L., . President Enclosure Ce: Daryl Russell Chris Russell Al Orndorff — Frederick County Public Schools hg4iuccrti Suncvurs SEP 3 0 2002 DEPT. OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT lelchhonc 540-6(,2..41 , 1 XX ' 40-722-95)28 Filc # 2804S/M 0S/dN www.giccnwaycng-i om M Farm Skite UDA / SWSA Expnsion R aequest co \ z oc o m a W CQ CQ mCQ q„ 00 W �A a� W cc F — -1 Laureftwood Dail fir j R sena d MHP �j FE or, w do O W w U) U) a MARK 0. SMITH No, 022837 s DATE: SEPTEMBER 20021 SCALE: 1'=500' DESIGNED BY: MDS JOB NO. SHEET 1 OF 1