BZA 05-17-16 Meeting MinutesFrederick County Board of Zoning Appeals Page 1680
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 N. Kent Street,
Winchester, Virginia on May 17, 2016.
PRESENT: Eric Lowman, Chairman, Redbud District; Bruce Carpenter, Vice-Chairman,
Gainesboro District; John Cline, Stonewall District; Reginald Shirley III, Opequon District;
Kevin Scott, Shawnee District; Dudley Rinker, Back Creek; and Ronald Madagan, Member at
Large.
ABSENT:
STAFF
PRESENT: Mark Cheran, Zoning Administrator; David Burke, Zoning Inspector; and Pamala
Deeter, BZA Secretary.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lowman at 3:30 p.m. and he determined there is a
quorum.
Chairman Lowman led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Chairman Lowman asked if there will be a June meeting. Mr. Cheran responded there is one
application at this time. The official cut-off date is Friday, May 20, 2016.
On a motion made by Mr. Shirley and seconded by Mr. Scott, the minutes for the January 19,
2016, meeting was unanimously approved as presented.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Lowman stated we have three variance requests #01-16, #02-16, and #03-16 for one
property owner, Mr. George M. Murphy.
Mr. Cheran came forward and directed the Board to the map showing the three properties. The
properties are all located on Bufflick Road right beside each other.
Mr. Cheran stated the property is in the Shawnee District and zoned RA (Rural Areas), the
adjoining properties are RA and RP with the use of Residential, Vacant, or Open Space. The
Applicant is requesting a 40 foot left side yard variance to a required 50 foot left side setback
resulting in a 10 foot left side setback, and a 40 foot right side yard variance to a required 50 foot
right side setback resulting in a 10 foot right side setback and a 25 foot rear yard variance to a
required 50 foot rear yard setback resulting in a 25 foot rear yard setback.
Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals Page 1681
Mr. Cheran stated the property 64B-A-54A is 0.5165 acres in size and due to the narrowness of
the parcel; a structure cannot be built with the current RA Zoning District setback requirements.
Mr. Cheran gave the history on the property. This property was created in 1937 with the Lela M.
Miller Subdivision and the adjoining properties were created prior to 1937. Frederick County
adopted zoning in 1967. The Frederick County historical zoning map shows this property was
zoned A-2 (Agricultural General) in 1967. The property setback lines at the adoption of the
zoning ordinance were 35 feet for the front and 15 feet for the side yards. Frederick County
amended its ordinance in 1989 to change the A-2 Zoning District to the current RA (Rural Areas)
Zoning District. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors amended the setback for the RA
Zoning District on February 28, 2007, making the current setbacks for this property 60 feet to the
front, 50 feet to the rears, 50 feet on the left side, and 50 feet on the right side.
Mr. Cheran replied this property does not have building restriction lines assigned to it, so it
would need to meet the current RA setbacks for a dwelling. This property also has a wet weather
stream located in the rear of the property.
Mr. Cheran concluded by stating The Code of Virginia 15.2-2309 (2) and Code of Frederick
County 165-1001.2, states that no variance shall be granted unless the application can meet the
following requirements:
1. The property interest for which the variance is being requested was acquired in good
faith.
2. The granting of the variance will not be a substantial detriment to adjoining property or
nearby properties in the proximity of that geographical area.
3. The condition or situation of the property concerned is not of so general or recurring as to
make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an
amendment to the ordinance.
4. The granting of the variance does not result in a use that is otherwise permitted on such
property or a change in the zoning classification of the property.
5. The relief or remedy sought by the variance is not available through a special exception
or the process for modification of a zoning ordinance.
The Applicant does meet The Code of Virginia 15.2309 (2) requirement and the variance may be
justified.
Chairman Lowman asked if there are any questions for Mr. Cheran.
Mr. Rinker asked is there water and sewer access. Mr. Cheran replied yes.
Mr. Artz came forward representing Mr. George Murphy. These particular lots are in a
subdivision that was created back in 1937. Mr. Murphy purchased the lots with the intent one
day to build a dwelling on the individual building lots. The parcels are 75 feet wide and 300 feet
deep. The front setback can be meet on all three parcels and the rear setback and side setbacks on
parcel 64-A-54A we cannot be met because of the pond on the neighboring property that flows to
Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals Page 1682
this parcel and also topography issues. Mr. Artz’s explained he is trying to move the dwelling
back away from the pond. The left and right side setbacks are overlapping the side yard so there
is no building area and we cannot meet the current side yard setbacks. Mr. Artz’s explained, that
parcels 64B-A-54B and 64B-A-55 front and rear setbacks are not a problem but the left and right
side yard cannot meet the current setback requirements.
Mr. Artz’s concluded by saying he would answer any questions the Board might have. Vice-
Chairman Carpenter asked when did Mr. Murphy purchase the lots. Mr. Artz replied 1 lot
purchased in 2007 and the other two lots in 2006.
Chairman Lowman asked is there anyone who wishes to speak in favor of or opposition for the
variance request to come forward.
Mr. George Murphy came forward and he asked the Board to grant the three variances because
of the setback. The first variance #01-16 has rear setback issues and the other two lots cannot
meet the left and right side setbacks.
Ms. Janet Gibson is a neighbor across the road and inquired as to what his plans are for the
property. Ms. Gibson needed clarification as to what would be built. Ms. Gibson was in
agreement with his plan.
Public Hearing Closed
No Discussion
Mr. Scott made a motion to approve Variance Request #01-16 for George M. Murphy as
requested and was seconded by Mr. Carpenter and passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING
Mr. Cheran came forward again and presented Variance Request #02-16 for George M. Murphy
and directed the Board to the map showing the property again. The property is located on
Bufflick Road.
Mr. Cheran stated the property is in the Shawnee District and zoned RA (Rural Areas)
theadjoining properties are RA and RP with the use of Residential, Vacant, or Open Space. The
Applicant is requesting a 40 foot left side yard variance to a required 50 foot left side setback
resulting in a 10 foot left side setback, and a 40 foot right side yard variance to a required 50 foot
right side setback resulting in a 10 foot right side setback.
Mr. Cheran stated the property 64B-A-54B is 0.5165 acres in size and due to the narrowness of
the parcel; a structure cannot be built with the current RA Zoning District setback requirements.
Mr. Cheran gave the history on the property. This property was created in 1937 with the Lela M.
Miller Subdivision and the adjoining properties were created prior to 1937. Frederick County
adopted zoning in 1967. The Frederick County historical zoning map shows this property was
zoned A-2 (Agricultural General) in 1967. The property setback lines at the adoption of the
Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals Page 1683
zoning ordinance were 35 feet for the front and 15 feet for the side yards. Frederick County
amended its ordinance in 1989 to change the A-2 Zoning District to the current RA (Rural Areas)
Zoning District. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors amended the setback for the RA
Zoning District on February 28, 2007, making the current setbacks for this property 60 feet to the
front, 50 feet to the rears, 50 feet on the left side, and 50 feet on the right side.
Mr. Cheran concluded again by stating The Code of Virginia 15.2-2309 (2) and Code of
Frederick County 165-1001.2, states that no variance shall be granted unless the application can
meet the following requirements:
1. The property interest for which the variance is being requested was acquired in good
faith.
2. The granting of the variance will not be a substantial detriment to adjoining property or
nearby properties in the proximity of that geographical area.
3. The condition or situation of the property concerned is not of so general or recurring as to
make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an
amendment to the ordinance.
4. The granting of the variance does not result in a use that is otherwise permitted on such
property or a change in the zoning classification of the property.
5. The relief or remedy sought by the variance is not available through a special exception
or the process for modification of a zoning ordinance.
The proposed setback of 60 feet front, 10 feet left and right side and 50 feet rear would be
consistent with the character of the district; and meets the intent of The Code of Virginia 15.2309
(2) and the Code of Frederick County. This request from the current setback of the RA Zoning
District may be justified.
Chairman Lowman called for anyone who wished to speak for or against this Public Hearing to
come forward.
Mr. Artz’s came forward, in favor of the Variance Request #02-16. Mr. Artz gave his
presentation for all three variances at the first item of business.
Public Hearing Closed
No Discussion
Mr. Scott made a motion to approve Variance Request #02-16 for George M. Murphy as
requested and was seconded by Mr. Carpenter and passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING
Mr. Cheran presented Variance Request #03-16 for George M. Murphy directed the Board to the
map showing the property again. The property is located on Bufflick Road.
Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals Page 1684
Mr. Cheran stated the property is in the Shawnee District and zoned RA (Rural Areas) adjoining
properties are RA and RP with the use of Residential, Vacant, or Open Space. The Applicant is
requesting a 40 foot left side yard variance to a required 50 foot left side setback resulting in a 10
foot left side setback, and a 40 foot right side yard variance to a required 50 foot right side
setback resulting in a 10 foot right side setback.
Mr. Cheran stated the property 64B-A-55 is 0.5165 acres in size and due to the narrowness of the
parcel; a structure cannot be built with the current RA Zoning District setback requirements.
Mr. Cheran gave the history on the property. This property was created in 1937 with the Lela M.
Miller Subdivision and the adjoining properties were created prior to 1937. Frederick County
adopted zoning in 1967. The Frederick County historical zoning map shows this property was
zoned A-2 (Agricultural General) in 1967. The property setback lines at the adoption of the
zoning ordinance were 35 feet for the front and 15 feet for the side yards. Frederick County
amended its ordinance in 1989 to change the A-2 Zoning District to the current RA (Rural Areas)
Zoning District. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors amended the setback for the RA
Zoning District on February 28, 2007, making the current setbacks for this property 60 feet to the
front, 50 feet to the rears, 50 feet on the left side, and 50 feet on the right side.
Mr. Cheran concluded again by stating The Code of Virginia 15.2-2309 (2) and Code of
Frederick County 165-1001.2, states that no variance shall be granted unless the application can
meet the following requirements:
1. The property interest for which the variance is being requested was acquired in good
faith.
2. The granting of the variance will not be a substantial detriment to adjoining property or
nearby properties in the proximity of that geographical area.
3. The condition or situation of the property concerned is not of so general or recurring as to
make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation to be adopted as an
amendment to the ordinance.
4. The granting of the variance does not result in a use that is otherwise permitted on such
property or a change in the zoning classification of the property.
5. The relief or remedy sought by the variance is not available through a special exception
or the process for modification of a zoning ordinance.
The Applicant meets the intent of The Code of Virginia 15.2309 (2) and the Code of Frederick
County. This request from the current setback of the RA Zoning District may be justified.
Chairman Lowman called for anyone who wished to speak for or against this Public Hearing to
come forward.
Public Hearing Closed
No Discussion
Mr. Scott made a motion to approve Variance Request #03-16 for George M. Murphy as
requested and was seconded by Mr. Carpenter and passed unanimously.
Mr. Rinker made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 3:55 p.m. and Mr. Carpenter seconded the
motion.