Loading...
BZA 03-18-03 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, Virginia March 18, 2003 3:25 p.m. CALL TO ORDER 1) Determination of a Quorum 2) Minutes of February 25, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING 3) Variance #03-03 of F. Wayne and Linda K. Wright for 40 -foot left and right side yard setback variances to create a buildable lot for the construction of a single-family residence. This property is located on Edwards Lane (Route 1301), and is identified with Property Identification Number 42-A-93 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. 4) Variance #04-03 of Edward and Patricia Mitchler for a 15 -foot front yard setback variance from Wellbourne Lane to create a buildable lot for the construction of a single- family residence. The property is located in Whitham Estates, Lot 18 on Wellbourne Lane, and is identified with Property Identification Number 26-7-3-18 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. 5) Other FILE COPY MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUN i' BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia, on February 25, 2003. (Note: The regular meeting scheduled for February 18, 2003 was rescheduled to February 25, 2003 due to snow.) PRESENT: James Larrick, Jr., Chairman, Gainesboro District; Thomas Malcolm, (representing Shawnee District); Dudley Rinker, Back Creek District; Lennie Mather, Red Bud District; Robert Perry, Stonewall District; Theresa Catlett, Vice Chairman, Opequon District; Wells, Member -At - Patrick T. Davenport, Zoning and Planner I; Carol I. Huff, BZA Sed CALL TO ORDER AMENDMENT TO THE AGENDA: Administrator; Rebecca A. Ragsdale, Chairman Larrick at 3:25 p.m. and seconded by Mr. Perry, the minutes for the January 21, On a request by the representative for Allied Systems Corporation, Mr. Claus Bader of Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., the agenda was amended to hear Appeal 402-03 as the first order of business. PUBLIC HEARING Appeal Application #02-03, submitted by Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., to appeal three violations of the Zoning Ordinance, §165-147; §165-27E(1) and §165-27E(2), pertaining to site plan requirements and surface and parking space demarcation requirements at Allied Systems Corporation. This property is located at 1936 Millwood Pike and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 64 -A -80F and 64 -A -81A in the Shawnee Magisterial District. ACTION - APPEAL DENIED AND DECISION OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Frederick Co. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of February 25, 2003 Minutes Book Page 1 170 AFFIRMED Patrick T. Davenport, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator, gave the background F +; uo tol a the Rnar�i that this ar�riPal u,ac the rP��ilt of ceVPral vinlatinna nn the Allied 11 ilurnla-tIo 1. He told th Boa d rr -nl Systems site and that, to date, neither site plan has been approved. Mr. Davenport stated that three actions needed to occur on the site: 1) removal of illegally parked vehicles; 2) the parking areas need to be paved; and 3) the parking spaces to be demarcated. Mr. Davenport said that there are still outstanding comments from review agencies; therefore, the site plans are not ready to be approved. Chairman Larrick asked if staff is seeking to have the vehicles removed immediately. Mr. Davenport affirmed that conclusion. Mr. Rinker asked if the issues holding up the site plan approvals were minor; Mr. Davenport replied that he believed that to be the case. Mr. Claus Bader of Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. and representative for Allied Systems Corporation, stated that they are asking for a chance to have the site plans approved. He outlined a three-part plan to achieve their goals: 1) ImprV.ing Arbor Court which currently exists behind their site; 2) to create the employee parkin ot; and 3} create the warehouse building which will allow them to empty out the trailers. Additenally thegpn to create an outdoor storage area with landscaping and a berm around it. On a questions by Chairman LaM00, Mr.,.l3ader confirmed that the trailers are currently being used for storage and that the owners areAnxtous to remedy this situation. Mr. Larrick also asked Mr. Bader if he had any idea of a tone frame,for these issues to be resolved. Mr. Bader believed that 30 days would be a reasonable.it S. Mr. Rinker as�ecl lbw ' pig after the site plans were approved would it take to complete the work. Mr. Bader st ted!,that he believed sometime in mid -summer, that they were 01 shooting for a June occupancy dateMr. Bader brought drawings up front for the Board's review. The Boers reviewed the plans and Mr. Rinker asked Mr. Bader when he first started making plans for the work to be done, when did they first receive the notice of violation, and how long the trailers have been there. Mr. Davenport told the Board that staff had checked aerial photographs for 2001 and did not notice the tractor -trailer parking like there is now. No one else was present to speak in favor of the application, nor was anyone present to speak against; therefore, Chairman Larrick closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Mr. Davenport told the Board that staffhad received a letter from an adjoining property owner at 1931 Millwood Pike, Lonnie M. Johns, which stated that he wished for the Zoning Ordinance to be upheld. DISCUSSION: (3: S 0 p. m. Mr. Malcolm came in at this point.) Mrs. Catlett asked if it was within the Board's power to require a time frame for the Frederick Co. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of February 25, 2003 2 Minutes Book Page 1 171 completion of the work. A discussion followed of BZA powers and duties, a review of the state code governing appeals, and the nature (or reasons) for the delay of the approvals. Questions on possible penalties and bonding issues were also addressed. Ms. Mather moved to deny the appeal and affirm the decision of the Zoning Administrator; and, additionally, that the nonconformity be cured on or before September 1, 2003, subject to a penalty bond in the amount of $50,000. Mr. Rinker seconded the motion which passed unanimously. BE IT RESOLVED, THEREFORE, That Appeal Application #02-03, submitted by Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd., to appeal three violations of the Zoning Ordinance, §165- 147; §165-27E(1) and §165-27E(2), pertaining to site plan requirements and surface and parking space demarcation requirements at Allied Systems Corporation, is hereby denied and the decision of the Zoning Administrator affirmed. In addition, the nonconformity shall be cured on or before September 1, 2003, subject to a penalty, bond in the amount of $50,000. Appeal Application #01-03, submitted by P. J 4. Riley, to appeal a violation of the Zoning Ordinance, §165-50, Permitted Uses in the...12A, r`al Areas) Zoning District, concerning "Country Boys Auto Sales." This propertAiis�_. ed at 5058 Front Royal Pike and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 9��A,• 115 7ftirough 94A-1-5-18; 94A-1-6-7 through 94A- 1-6-18; and 94A -1-12A-12 and 94A-1 Al3 ithe Opequon Magisterial District. n ACTION -APPEAL DEN$ AN — I$ION OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AFFIRMED Pursuant to#4§2.2-3" ?_HA2 and 2.2-315(E) of the Code of Virginia, Mrs. Catlett disqualified herself fro1,icipad; ng in the public hearing and discussion due to a possible conflict of interest. Patrick T. Davenport, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator, gave the background information. Mr. Davenport stated that this appeal resulted from a letter of violation which was issued as a response to a complaint. Investigation of the complaint led to the discovery of an automobile sales business, automobile graveyard and re -builder business, and a roof sign. Associated with these businesses, structures had been recently constructed without proper zoning approval which means that no site plan had been submitted nor building permit acquired. He stated that staff had done extensive research to find out when the Country Boys Auto Sales lousiness was first established, and when the various expansions occurred. Mr. Davenport showed Exhibit "A" on the aerial photographs which depicted various phases of development of the site over the years. Mr. Douglas Harold, the attorney representing Country Boys Auto Sales, told the Board that his client, Mr. Preston James Riley, had been in business since approximately 1968, and that like many other businesses in the area, he started small and has just naturally grown over the years. He Mr. Harold stated that Mr. Riley does not dispute that he should have obtained a building permit for his new building. Frederick Co. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of February 25, 2003 3 Minutes Book Page 1 172 Mr. Riley was present for the meeting and told the Board that he has always been a re - builder. He stated that he has been in business since about 1968 and that he has added more cars as the years have gone by. Mr. Harold referenced the fact that he had sent letters to each of the Board members, dated February 10, 2003. Mr. Harold also referenced what he termed to be "a sprawl" along the Route 522 corridor, with businesses such as Shelly's Truck Caps and Mac's Roller Rink. Once again, Mr. Harold stated that he is not disputing that Mr. Riley's business is in violation of the zoning ordinance but that his business employs people, pays taxes, and maintains a decent, clean facility. Mr. Harold presented a folder of pictures that he had taken of various structures on the site, and of the residential area along Summit Avenue. Mr. Harold concluded by saying that he believed it would be an injustice to deprive Mr. Riley of his livelihood, and that Mr. Riley was prepared to do whatever it takes that is reasonable to come into compliance. He asked the Board to fashion a remedy that would enable Mr. Riley to stay in business and not have to shut down. Mr. Riley explained that he had sl of them. He said he started this business when he also stated that he was willing to do whatever w,- Questions were posed to purpose of various structures was, w know that he was in violation ofEtl compliance. - and is currently rebuilding seven old and that's all he knows. Mr. Riley to stay in business. regarding the number of employees, what the gas electric service to the buildings, when did he and what has he done since then to come into Chairman Lafiick tc ' iffie applicants that although they have asked the BZA to "fashion a remedy," they could no -t- ust ignare the zoning. This was not the type of use that could be resolved with a CUP or that coO14 bro;.,into compliance within a certain time period. Discussion followed on whether there were any solutions available to the applicants. Ms. Genevieve Riley, Mr. Riley's step -mother, spoke in favor of the applicant. The public comments portion of the hearing was closed at 4:40 p.m. DISCUSSION: Chairman Larrick once again stated that the BZA could not "bestow" a new zoning designation on the property. The other BZA members agreed that the only item before them today was whether the Zoning Administrator was correct in his determination; however, Ms. Mather suggested that perhaps they could offer the application more direction. Mr. Davenport said that a rezoning application was one avenue of possibility but reminded everyone that there were no guarantees. Frederick Co. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of February 25, 2003 11 Minutes Book Page 1 173 Mr. Malcolm reminded the Board that they did not do this to Mr. Riley; this situation was brought about by his own actions and suggested that they stick with the issue at hand, as it is not within the Board's power to solve the violations. Mr. Davenport told the Board that the other possibility is that Mr. Riley could appeal to the Circuit Court and that the judge could fashion a remedy. After some further discussion, Mr. Malcolm moved that the Board affirm the decision of the Zoning Administrator, that the appeal be denied, and that if there is any way possible, or favorable hopes for Mr. Riley, that this would be conveyed to whoever takes the next step. Mr. Perry seconded the motion. The motion passed by majority vote, with Mrs. Catlett abstaining. BE IT RESOLVED, THEREFORE, That Appeal Application #01-03, submitted by P. James Riley, to appeal a violation of the Zoning Ordinance, §165-50, Permitted Uses in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District, concerning "Country Boys Autd Sales" is hereby denied and the decision of the Zoning Administrator affirmed. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Davenport reminded theme Beard tlifft" VIr. Mike Chandler is going to be in Leesburg - on March 13 at the Virginia Association of coniOfficials Conference, one portion of which is a BZA training session. Mr. Davenportrtatedhatthe money is available in the budget to get everyone registered, for any member ined. More information will be mailed to all of the members. As there were no OffiRR°items to be discussed, the meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. by unanimous vote. Respectfully submitted, James Larrick, Jr., Chairman Carol I. Huff, Secretary Frederick Co. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes of February 25, 2003 Minutes Book Page 1 174 APPLICATION #03-03 OF F. WAYNE AND LINDA K. WRIGHT Staff Report for the Board of Zoning Appeals Prepared: March 3, 2003 Staff Contact: Patrick T. Davenport This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board of Zoning Appeals to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this Zoning matter. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING DATE: March 18, 2003 - Action: Pending LOCATION: This property is located on Edwards Lane (Route 1301) in Albin. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 42-A-93 PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) District Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) District Land Use: Residential VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicants are requesting 40 -foot left and right side yard variances to enable the construction of a two-story single family residence. REASON FOR VARIANCE: The applicant states that "the lot is too narrow using current zoning." STAFF COMMENTS: Lot 33 of the "Dunbar" Martin S. Glaize lots at Albin were recorded on June 3, 1946 as illustrated on Exhibit "A". Lot 33 contains approximately 0.25 acres or 10,890 square feet. This property is located within the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District which requires the setbacks for Lot 33 to be: 60' for the front and 50' for the sides and rear. This requirement was established as an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance on August 9, 1993. Exhibit `B" is the proposed house location sketch for the lot prepared by Greenway Engineering. As indicated, Lot 33 has 60' of road frontage and the rear length of the lot is 41.70'. The applicant is seeking a 40' variance for the left and right sides of the lot but is able to meet the applicable front and rear setbacks. The applicant has included a proposed house plan which is in the agenda. The applicant would have to meet all requirements of the Frederick County Health Department pertaining to sewage disposal regulations prior to obtaining a building permit for the proposed dwellings. Variance #03-03, F. Wayne and Linda K. Wright Page 2 March 3, 2003 STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE MARCH 18, 2003 MEETING: The Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2309(2) states that no variance shall be authorized by the Board unless it finds that a) strict application of the Ordinance would produce an undue hardship approaching confiscation; b) that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity, and; c) that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. When the existing side setback requirements are applied to Lot 33, no buildable area exists. Other properties throughout the zoning district have the same setback requirements (when the adjoining uses are similar). However, in this instance, strict application of the ordinance produces an undue hardship approaching confiscation. Given the circumstances of the existing regulations and the area of the subject property, the granting of this variance as submitted would be appropriate. O:\Agendas\BZA\Staff Report\2003\Wayne & Linda Wright.doc 4a z }� (n �L I h 5.. cn z'= Co I LLJ J �sl V ca � ID a z N LL Q = z n O IT J E. I N N lf] t I �I I �I I 1 1 11 N I. Z r- �- rn 3: r i li O Q Q�C\1 I r J o I'1 _ UJ r WRIGHT = Q 42 A 93 U ��'�--- 1 J 0O I. LU r SMITH U Q w 00 42 A 94 N I > OQ I O i I I I - I I APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA Sign Deposit MUST BE TYPED OR FILLED OUT IN INK - PLEASE PRINT 1. The applicant is the owner L,_�other . (Check one) 2. APPLICANT: OCCUPANT: (if different) NAME: cj ,� �.z �r� �i 1.�� t NAME: ADDRESS j �� P►;Ke__ - - yA ate& 6, 3 TELEPHONE: �-to t - y & 17 ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 3. The property is located at (give exact directions and include State Route numbers): 0 -V, 3a A). a- u , f t, r, 1 ' r� tt F f- nl\ l_ Rr�t. C, Ae.,1 12cO -- ,:i-fAiAcA-e- F -r ('\:, 1'�ZlAPJ V - X21: J ic f 2 �d of ;�e `tcK�\ f f1-4 Lry 1—:A)LwCI'S L;1. -, �C I ����, 6ft AR i0�'Vf -("'i �l 'See The property has a road frontage of clo 0 feet and a depth of feet and consists of acres (please be exact). Page 5 of 9 5. The property is owned by as evidenced by deed fromif i recorded evious owner) in deed book no. on page of the deed books of the Clerk of the Court for Frederick County. Please attach a copy of the recorded deed. 6. Magisterial District: i-- R j /L 2 be f, O 7. Property Identification No.: ` a-// -- / ; 8. The existing zoning of the property is: ra 9. The existing use of the property is: V t4 C A rtt i o f- 10. Adjoining Property: USE North s fde,L+ i o tI- s� ly East es, cleay South''mac-srde,-,+�� ICm,/y West �_ c� ,L� ►� 1 - ;��p.�r �t.C� ZONING P�. 11. Describe the variance sought in terms of distance and type. (For example: "A 3.5' rear yard variance for an attached two -car garage.") /eft Q,rcl ��'g/tf 1 ;Z �-sfbQ-v kou-sc 12. List specific reason(s) why the variance is being sought in terms of- exceptional f exceptional narrowness, shallowness, size or shape of property, or exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary situation or condition of property, or - the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto b D it F1 rz r'Z c c_j L4 Si %e4 Page 6 of 9 13. Additional comments, if any: ct e(� ktkue 14. The following names and addresses are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to the property for which the variance is being sought, including properties at the sides, rear and in front of (across street from) the subject property. (Use additional pages if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: NAl¢+9[E }( •N (1�,-+2 �- �. C c Address Property ID # 9 p }') %n'e Address q30/ Property ID # _ y ✓� rr� ; f� t �4L Address 1ca�S ��1 - lc �; ,�e1��SiUa .34 0 3 Property ID # _ C -c 2� Address r��� {�C1'; - i��ir%� Uig+G,o Property ID # 9 Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Page 7 of 9 AGREEMENT FEB 6 200? ' VARIANCE # `0 (Number to be assigned by the Planning Dept.) I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application, and petition the Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) to grant a variance to the terms of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance as described herein. I agree to comply with any conditions for the variance required by the BZA. I authorize the members of the BZA and Frederick County officials to go upon the property for site inspection purposes. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the BZA public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road or right-of-way until the hearing. I hereby certify that all of the statements and information contained herein are, to the best of my knowledge, true. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE A 16.3 SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE BZA PUBLIC HEARING OF (if other than applicant) -OFFICE USE ONLY- ACTION: - DATE - APPROVAL SIGNED: BZA CHAIRMAN DENIAL DATE: Page 9 of 9 containing 40 acres. i TO F.AVE AND TO HOLD THE SkfE unto the sa/Rhoe Island Crosen, her heirs and assigns forever. Titness the following signautures and s al s: er MARYE. X PLACE (;LAI,) mar REVEN $0.55UE STAMPS >. :fARGARET U. SHADE ) CANCELLED ;F HOMER SHADE K. M. PLACE State of Virginia LOUISA PLACE County of Frederick, to-wit: I, Char s P. Collins, a Justice of the Peace in and for the County and State aforesaid, o hereby certify that Mary E. Place, Margaret UrsL1s Shade, Homer Shade, Kirk Met el Place and Louisa Place, whose names are signed to the foregoing deed bearing da e the tenth day of March 1914, personally appeared before me in my County and State aforesaid and acknowledged their signatures thereto. Given under my hand this 18 day of Earth 1914. C. P. COLLINS J?• VIRGINIA cREDERIC COMITY, (SCT, This instrument of writing was produced to me on the 3rd d of June 1946 at 12:45 P.M. and with certificate of acknowledgment thereto annexed as admitted to record. Zd), (Z'"CA-t- ,CIEFtK i Exhibit "A" #925 MARTIN S. GLAIZE TO INDENTURE • �#i::IX--Xiu#####iHF;cCrsY#;h:F#;�.Y-Yr;F;F;F;H;-$ ! b ��2 �YG THIS INDENTURE made and dated this 3rd, day of June, 1946, 1� by Martin S. Glaize, a widower. i P.TITNESSETH, that whereas the said party hereto is the owner �o=L'e*tif10 in fee simple and proprietor of a certain tract or parcel of land, lying and being situates,.- D. on the Western side of Virginia -U.S. Highway No. 522, about three (3) miles Northwest of "k Y7 pal Winchester, in Stonewall District, Frederick County, Virginia, which said real estate was conveyed to him by Robert L. Hartman and wife, by deed dated October 19, 1904, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book No. 125, page 150; and of land into lots, streets and alleys, said sub-division being known as "Dunbar" Martin S. Glaize Lots at Albin, a plat of which, showing locations and dimensions of all lots, streets and alleys therein, is attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the uj_ _- signed does hereby state and certify that said sub-division as appears by said plat, with his free consent, and in accordance with his desire, this statement and certifi — ion being made pursuant, and subject to the provisions of Sections 5217, 5218, and 521E of the Code of Virginia. Fitness the following signature and seal. MARTIN S. GLAIZE ( _) State of Virginia County of Frederick, to -wit: I, Virginia Ritter, a notary public in and for the Coun, of !Frederick, in the State of Virginia, do hereby certify that Yartin S. Glaize, whose name is signed to the foregoing writing bearing date of June 3, 1946, has personally appeared before me in my county aforesaid, and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this 4th, day of June, 1946. My commission expires March 243 1948. VIRGINIA RITTER Notary Public I s 7 M 3/LB N � v .688/ O � > -r0 F1 bM O2 '9 N Obi J '00-ZLeN 06 09 S 6 S y 09 'zz m 8/ �k L/ w o °pz •p9 1S 'O9 .Z( pF � •og ,or :�uZ Y 0 y J oe7�z9zs�172o o OD o ooz � x 1S •09 ,pp7 .og M Y,LBN NIlb61(� W .of • ��,p2 ��x 6� o N ZZ, o y So 33' 2 N � 2 h a VIRGINIA FREDERICK COUNTY, (SCT. This instrument of writing was produced to me on the 4th day of June 1946 at 12:30 P.M. and with certificate of acknowledgment thereto annexed was admitted to record. _,CLERK JO 0 r ^ m O Exhibit "B" OTHY M -9p 42_ GRAPHIC 5,..__ (IN FEET ) Iyy' V J I1 PG q j6p _ _� s 737�3h 0 �Qa 2o- I -- �2 DIF ti Z o o EXIST. BLDG o o TO BE 42—A-91 m o REMOVED �J to T. MARTIN MARTIN :J;-- w ' Sp BRL --§. DR 530 PG. 49 w � N - h 11.0 W ill J �-j J m v p N * Z o 0 11.1 42—A-94 60 " BRL co JEFFREY A. SMITH, ET AL � � i 42—A-92 DB 765 PG 903 WAYNE & LINDA WRIGHT * DENOTES PROPOSED VARIANCE FOR SIDE SETBACKS INST. N0. 020010927 N rnQON NJ�O Q Q O 60.00' -4 N 8730 00" W EDWARDS LANE (VA. ROUTE 1301) 30' R/W NOTES THE BOUNDARY INFORMA77ON SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY BY THIS FIRM. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED, EASEMENT OTHER THAN SHOWN MAY EXIST. NO PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE, PER F.LR.M. COMMUNITY—PANEL / 510063 0105 B, DATED JULY 17, 1978. PROPOSED HOUSE LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY OF F. VWAYNE FRIGHT & LINDA K. WRIGHT GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE:JAN. 27, 2003 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Engineers Winchester, Virginia 22602 Surveyors Telephone: (540) 662-4185 FAX. (540) 722-9528 Founded in 1971 www.greenwayeng.com oekw�p,LTH RICHARD A. EDENS a No. 002550 Y4 1/Z-)103 'J"a � 3559 SHEET 1 OF 1 E IS •vzi zf prHER _ 7 7./' 1'16.31a 30 ll all 30 �'� ND Nzi 1 E _ /So' V � ly o � Zi . g• Zb CID O 7. /' S �V � � / 9s• o W F � Qp 0 6� / 7 y J . Dul ye' so 99..s-' 8' MA R T I N so' a 7Y cl y L0TS fR£ofRr�k N N N � � 0 8 9 O V S ca �e I= IOG Wa�kc. 6 `f 2' 6 74' 7 f ' 30' So' So' 30' N w J OR TH TREDER.I Ck GRADE NOTE; Sflk4cS qf' (-4 Cot ry 4 1\ ::- IF. D Q 44 IF _ 3. < TOTAL LIVING AREA: 1)900 SQ. FT VALUE PLAN This two-story traditional home will Traditional Two -Story be worthy of note wherever built. In the front you enter into a foyer with a powder room to your left. k`: � An expansive family room adjoins DINETTE 9'. 10" FAMILY FAMILY the living room, plus a formal dining R 'KIT CHEN ROOM area. The kitchen has an abundance 15 136 lol. 101, 158. 136 0 F� of work space, with a cozy dinette. C �� FDN The second floor features three DR P -T bedrooms, including a sitting room LIVING DINING LIVING I off the master bedroom. The master ROOM ROOM ROOM ROOM bedroom has a full size bath, along 116X 116 14' . 116 x FOYER with a walk-in closet. Another full size bath serves the remaining two bedrooms. 0 3 Bedrooms Cl 0 2 Baths, I Powder Room AT .BATIi 0 Spacious Master Suite/Sitting Room 111 Elegant, Formal Design 21 Large Family Room/ MASTER BELOTWEN . Dinette Combination BEDRM BEDR M I1'. 16' I2_'x 118 Width: 36' SITTING AREA Depth: 26' Slab/crawl option shown WALL OPTIONS: 0 2" x 4" N 2" x 6" FOUNDATION'OPTIONS: 0 Slab 0 Crawl Space 0 Full Basement 7EGORY F. —i-roHINSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 12a S. BRAOOOCK ST. WINCHESTER, VA 22601 4ti,:Y�SEI � •! THIS DEED, made and dated this 160ay of , 2002, by and between DOROTHY V. WILLIAMS ADMINISTRATRIX C.T.A. under the will of STELLA VIRGINIA ARMEL, hereinafter called the Grantor; and F. WAYNE WRIGHT and LINDA K. WRIGHT, husband and wife, hereinafter called the Grantees. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant and convey with Special Warranty of title unto the Grantees, as tenants by the entireties, with common law right of survivorship, the following property: (1) All of that certain lot or parcel of land, together with all improvements and appurtenances thereto belonging, lying and being situate along the Northern side of Martin Street, a short distance West of Virginia State Highway No. 789 (formerly U.S. Highway No. 522) about three miles Northwest of Winchester, in Gainesboro District, formerly Stonewall District, Frederick County, Virginia, fronting on said Martin Street a distance of 60 feet, and extending back Northward a distance of 174.3 feet along its Western side and 167.5 feet along its Eastern side, with a width of 41.7 feet in the rear. (2) All of that certain adjoining lot or parcel of land, together with all improvements and appurtenances thereto belonging, lying and being situate along the Western side of Virginia State Highway No. 789, (formerly U.S. Highway No. 522), about three miles Northwest of Winchester, is Gainesboro District, fonnerly Stonewall District, Frederick County, Virginia, fronting on said highway a distance of 64.2 GREGORY F. HUTCHINSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 124 S. BRAOOOCK ST. WINCHESTER, VA 22601 feet, and extending back Westward a distance of 206.7 feet along its Northern side and 200 feet along its Southern side (being the Northern boundary of Martin Street), with a width of 99.5 feet in the rear. AND BEING the same property conveyed to Stella V. Annel by deed dated May 14, 1984, from Rudolph C. Martin, Executor of the Estate of Hubert C. Martin, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 576, at Page 847; the said Stella Virginia Armel died testate on February 15, 2002; her will gave her executor the power to sell real estate. The executor named in the will declined to serve and in his place Dorothy V. Williams became the administrator with the will annexed, by in appointment of the Deputy Clerk dated March No. 020000050. The said d the aforesaid Clerk's Office in the probate Dorothy V. Williams having taken the prescribed oath as Administrator, C.T.A., and entered into the required bond has authority to sell the testator's real estate pursuant to Virginia Code Section 64.1-147. Reference is hereby made to the aforesaid instruments and the attachments and the references therein contained, for a more particular description of the property hereby conveyed. This conveyance is made subject to all easements, rights of way and restrictions of record, if any, affecting the subject property. v,,i:ig sig��atare and seal: WITNESS the follo rl, , / 1 SEAL) DOROTHY . WILLIAMS, Administratrix, C.T.A., under the will of STELLA VIRGINIA ARMEL STATE OF C+T-Y/COUNTY OF At& to -wit: The foregoing instrument was ackn ,q)yledged before me in my aforesaid jurisdiction this &0day of 2002, by DOROTHY V. WILL"S, Administratrix, C.T.A., under the will of STELLA VIRGINIA Icy Commission Expires: Jja, 4 00 5 OTARY P6BLECC, VIRGINIA-: FREDETIC"KC01-JNT Y. SCT. This instrument of -,vnnng was produa:d to me on r,_­1:11J*,C1, 1'd Cf J- J06.09 Cierk EGORY F. 1,JTCHJNSON ATTORNEY ATLAW 124 S. 6RA000CK ST. WINCHESTER, VA 22601 APPLICATION #04-03 OF EDWARD AND PATRICIA NIITCHLER Staff Report for the Board of Zoning Appeals Prepared: March 3, 2003 Staff Contact: Patrick T. Davenport This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board of Zoning Appeals to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING DATE: March 18, 2003 - Action: Pending LOCATION: This property is located on the corner of Wellbourne Lane and Parrishville Road (Route 610) in Whitham Estates (Lot 18). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 26-7-3-18 PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) District Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) District Land Use: Residential and Vacant VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicants are requesting a 15 -foot front yard setback variance from Wellbourne Lane for the construction of a single family residence. REASON FOR VARIANCE: Exceptional slope of property (please refer to attachments). Variance #03-03, Edward and Patricia Mitchler Page 2 March 3, 2003 STAFF COMMENTS: Lot 18 in Section 3 of Whitham Estates was approved on September 10, 2002 as illustrated on Exhibit "A". Lot 18 contains 2.58 acres and is located within the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. Whitham Estates is being developed as a Rural Preservation Subdivision under the zoning ordinance regulations §165-54 through §165-56. Under these regulations, the front setback for a state -maintained road constructed to serve the subdivision lots is 45 feet. The front setback from an existing state road is 60 feet. This requirement was established as an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance on October 13, 1993. The applicant has indicated that the subject lot contains steep slopes situated in a manner which would cause excessive financial expenditures for grading operations related to the construction of a single family dwelling. Exhibit `B" is a copy of a portion of the subdivision from the approved preliminary sketch plan depicting the subject lot. One of the requirements of the preliminary sketch plan is to depict the existing topography on 10 -foot contour intervals. After conducting a field visit, the topography depicted on the plan does not match the existing topography. The field visit also afforded the opportunity to confirm or refute the applicant's contention of the existence of steep slopes on the subject property. The subject property does contain topography of a "moderately extensive" slope. STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE MARCH 18, 2003 MEETING: The Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2309(2) states that no variance shall be authorized by the Board unless it finds that a) strict application of the Ordinance would produce an undue hardship approaching confiscation; b) that such hardship is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same vicinity, and; c) that the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and that the character of the district will not be changed by the granting of the variance. Section 15.2-2309(2) further provides an "exceptional topographic" allowance for a variance to be granted. The subject property does contain sloping topography. The topography of this particular property does not approach the category of "exceptional topography." "Exceptional topography" is usually reserved for topographic features such as rock outcroppings, cliffs, etc. and not for curable conditions such as filling operations. The expectation and possibility of expending considerable financial resources (as a lone condition) should not qualify the applicant for a variance due to a hardship approaching confiscation. The applicant should have considered this condition prior to purchasing the property. Since the first condition under § 15.2-2309(2) has not been met, denial of this variance would be appropriate. O:\Agendas\BZA\Staff Report\2003\Edward & Patricia Mitchler.doc AL PLAT FOR RURAL PRESERVATION SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE LAND OF WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC. WHITHAM ESTATES - SECTION 3 BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DECEMBER 20. 2000 ro Q � ins BETH 6cntQl CHURCH p VICINITY 0MAP 0' I" = 2000' OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING RURAL PRESERVATION SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE LAND OF WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC., tS APPEARS ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLATS, IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDAfrICE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS, AND TRUSTEES, IF ANY. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA � CITY / LTi' OF l.r ) I r rhe h1J , TO EMIT: ���` � THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATES WAS ACKNOWLEDG BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 2001 BY �J 6�� /� lsrn2 0�. G rfLr LbLA mJ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES `Md—)L -3 / OTARY PUBLIC SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAND CONTAINED IN THIS SUBDIVISION IS A PORTION OF "TRACT 1" CONVEYED TO TIMBER RIDGE ORCHARD, INC. BY DEED DATED MARCH 7, 1956 OF RECORD IN THE FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE IN DEED BOOK 240 AT PAGE 383. TIMBER RIDGE ORCHARD, INC. SUBSEQUENTLY CHANGED THE NAME OF SAID CORPORATION TO WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC., AS EVIDE IMAkENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION DATED APRIL 16, 1,962 OF RECORD IN SAID CLERK'S OFFICE IN DEED BOOK 971 AT PAGE 421. VAR SM FH, L.S. APPROVALS: .4•/•o DATE J -,,y i DATE 09 no U� ATE .� GREE 151 Wosdyl=Lane End Wbxheaw,22602 Ssavegus T'e1ep,Ir�,r�e; 0662-4185 FAX- (540) 722-9528 Fbunded in 1971 u%w4pwe n wyeggxa + PARENT TAX PASSEL IDEe 26—((A))-55 ZONE: RA USE: AGRI. MARK D. SMITH No. 002009 F2561. SHEET 1 OF 6 03 uj1-'`�f, 6 0/0'� 6 40RO 0 G DED,PR�OU•s• 30' CATION STRIP. 08 774 PC 107 z � EXISTING U11LlTy H o FASFMFNT 1 /NF DATA LINE BEARING DISTANCE El S 84'01 11 " E —70—.7-17— F-2 S 4341 23" W 50.00' E3 N 46'18'J7' W 20.00' E4 N 43'41 23 E ---5O. 64 -20' COMMOsyWR7H EREBY DED/CstTED TO HE RD WIDEN/NG CONTA/NNGAO.FOR F(/TURE- 1'ARIS1yVILLE 3737 ACRE. VA- ROUTE 610 ROAD 50' R/iy HEREBY ESTABL/SHED. N 505851' E - J59.81, L2 IRSo �.. tet. �0 PROPOSED h �� WELL SITE o, !� OIRS W� 4LOT 18 m oil 2.5853 ACRES ko cz,g (b N h CN / E4 t 'moo / PROP. I W E2 B / OWNRELD S17E 226 / o IR \�//4`/ n 15e?. L50 sse OT 19 IRS off°^ Q4 `f EC �ChT OFyE� ` �'� - Oo�v p�E� TTj''� RRjEBY � fs� NG'QESS NOTE QCT PRFS"'�74TI N DOT -SHADED AREAS DENOTE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS HEREBY DEDICATED TO FREDERICK COUNTY. F—_ DRAINAGE EASEMENT SEE NOTE BELOW W 000� s`�aQ W 2 g u� Lt- pJ 0 oW ooLAJ PC �2 Q) Q1 z ZE, J Q �UW�mo PRIVATE ENTRANCE SERVING LOT 18 IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED 100 0 100 ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF WELBOURNE LANE ONLY AND IS HEREBY PROHIBITED FROM BEING CONSTRUCTED ALONG GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) THE FRONTAGE OF PAR/SHWLLE ROAD (RTE. 610). SEE SHEET 6 FOR LINE DATA, CURVE DATA, LEGEND, AND NOTES. FINAL PLAT FOR RURAL PRESERVATION SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE LAND OF WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC. WHITHAM ESTATES - SECTION 3 BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINb SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2000 -$ GREENWAY ERGINEER::�:G 151 Windy HUI Lane Engineers W40tenze, VupWa 22602 Surveyors Telephone: (540) 6662-4185 FAX (540) 722-9528 Fowidmd in 1977 www.®r wayewcnvn ARK D. SMITH No. 002009 F2561 SHEET 2 OF 6 EX PA WEL L L25 '?OUT,- 6SIO lfr'IL'L e ITOAD J�Ap Ex .JO , f'REs. '? VE,?-,- EX. L26WELL CAP 0 Boyo 184 ry L85 0 0 P ER R91.2 WL ED L SITE -117 PROPOSED CAr 2.28 ACRES -t WELL SITE F_ -6--- '16 __ � 0 x cr) X/ i I 10 1 10 '* 2.59 ACRESteaL co Lu, I. LU co GRA OW�-�ZA A &L CL .11011/ PROPOSED < DRAINFIELD SITE 'PROPOSED DRAINFIELD 70'\ SITE 226.1 I 2.J7 ACI 2,5_2 b6- PROPOSED160.1 LQ irjI o (::) 607 WELL SITE Q q,;,y PROPOSED LIJ (,r) WELL SITE 41 19 Y)2.20 ACRES -i- 0 Q) 4- J-25 A PROPOSED DRAINFIELD 2176' SITE 12ZJ' o-- �' `_� l I PROP. DRNFLD. 745 SITE 20 2-J7 ACRES i- Iv PROPOSEB'-0 cj DRAINFIELD 19R SfTEto C-) N40* 17 149-7, CC' m a� a� LL C �7 Z CD 3 O APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE IN THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA MUST BE TYPED OR FILLED OUT IN INK - PLEASE PRINT 1. The applicant is the owner x other . (Check one) 2. APPLICANT: OCCUPANT: (if different) NAME: Edward & Patricia Mitchler NAME: ADDRESS 2405 Ross street ADDRESS: Alexandria,VA 22306-1827 TELEPHONE: 703-660-6069 TELEPHONE: 3. The property is located at (give exact directions and include State Route numbers): VA Route 610 Parishville Road - Lot #18 Whitham Estates 9/10 mile from intersection Route 50/Route 610 in new development on left : Wellbourne Lane 4. The property has a road frontage of 2 5 5 feet and a depth of 398.07 feet and consists of 2. 5 8 5 3 acres (please be exact). (irregular shaped lot) 2003 Page 5 of 9..,::..- "a r jl 5. The property is owned by Edward & Patricia Mitch 1 e r as evidenced by deed from Wh i t h a m Estates recorded (previous owner) indeed book no. on page of the deed books of the Clerk of the Court for Frederick County. Please attach a copy of the recorded deed. 6. Magisterial District: Back Creek 7. Property Identification No.: 8. The existing zoning of the property is: RA 9. The existing use of the property is: Re s i d e n t i a l 10. Adjoining Property: North East South West USE Residential Residential Residential Residential - Single Family Home ZONING RA RA RA RA 11. Describe the variance sought in terms of distance and type. (For example: "A 3.5' rear yard variance for an attached two -car garage.") A 15 foot frontage variance on Wellbourne Lane for construction of a new home 12. List specific reason(s) why the variance is being sought in terms of: - exceptional narrowness, shallowness, size or shape of property, or exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary situation or condition of property, or the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto Exceptional slope of property ; please refer to attachments Page 6 of 9 To Frederick County BZA W "iria,nce is being sought because of the exceptional slope of our lot #16 and the excessive _.ope of lot# 23 next to us with the potential of having heavy rain run off. l would like to build our home with the driveway facing Wellbourne Lane and have at least a 2% incline into the garage to prevent any water from entering the garage area. Our 256 feet of frontage on Rt. 610 Parishville Rd slopes over 20 feet in that distance from Wellbourne Lane to Lot # 17 beside gas. Because of this I'm requesting a 15 foot variance toward Wellbourne Lane. Rey major concerns are to have enough depth to sink the basement floor into the ground without the floor being exposed, and/or having to go to the expense of having hundreds of truck loads of fill brought in. If this Variance is granted at the 30 foot BRL then at this point the property is exactly 8 feet below the black top on Wellbourne Lane and by using 9 foot walls will not have a problem obtaining an 2% incline into the garage. Plus I will not have any exposed sub floor. I have had all the above concerns confirmed by Greenway Engineering WeAnesday, Febnaary19, 2003 Anwica Online: CananAWOLT Page: 1 13. Additional comments, if any: Re:Question #14: This is a new development and if other properties have been sold, those owners would be known by John Scully of Colony Realty. 14. The following names and addresses are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to the property for which the variance is being sought, including properties at the sides, rear and in front of (across street from) the subject property. (Use additional pages if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: AJANAW John Scully Colony Realty Addressll2 North Cameron St., Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID # Paulette & Darrin VandenBosch Address 278 Parishville Rd., Gore, VA 22637 Property ID # Pat Mullinson Address 536 Parishville Rd., Gore, VA 22637 Property ID # Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Address Property ID # Page 7 of 9 AGREEMENT VARIANCE # --0-4--.03 (Number to be assigned by the Planning Dept.) I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application, and petition the Frederick County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) to grant a variance to the terms of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance as described herein. I agree to comply with any conditions for the variance required by the BZA. I authorize the members of the BZA and Frederick County officials to go upon the property for site inspection purposes. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) dqys prior to the BZA public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road or right-of-way until the hearing. I hereby certify that all of the statements and information contained herein are, to the best of my knowledge, true. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (f„� a✓�.9 ,►7 /l DATE -21/y�c3 SIGNATURE OF OWNER BZA PUBLIC HEARING OF APPROVAL DENIAL (if other than applicant) -OFFICE USE ONLY - - DATE - SIGNED: DATE: Page 9 of 9 DATE ACTION: BZA CHAIRMAN 110 CD N +3 N �4> 4 -1M - CO U)� 0�o� Lr) ovo C� 0 U) � iz u a� Wa �a -0 od -4 :2� to 1�ix �4 o (a 0 U H GREGORY F. ::HI 1S01V 1 4NEY AT LAW 4 S. RRAODOCK ST JCHESTER, VA 22 601 THIS DEEB, made and dated this lo� - day of September, 2002, by and between'1,XgI1THAM ORCHARDS, INC., a Virginia corporation, hereinafter called the Grantor; and EDWARD R. MITCHLER and PATRICIA ANN MITCHLER, husband and wife, hereinafter called the Grantees. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant and convey with General Warranty and English covenants of title unto the Grantees, as tenants by the entireties, with common law right of survivorship, the following property: All that certain lot or parcel of land, lying and being situate in Back Creek Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, and more particularly described as lots Lot 18 of WIRTHAM ESTATES, SECTION 3, the Deed of Dedication of said subdivision is recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, as Instrument No. C)17 o c., / -and the plats of said subdivision are attached thereto, to which reference is here made and incorporated herein as if set out in full; AND BEING a portion of the property conveyed to Timber Ridge Orchard, Inc. by deed dated iviai elt 7, 1956, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 240, at Page 383. Timber Ridge Orchards, Inc. subsequently changed its name to Whitham Orchards, Inc., as evidenced by the Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated April 16, 1962, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 971, at Page 421. Reference is hereby made to the aforesaid instruments and the attachments and the references therein contained, for a more particular description of the property hereby conveyed. This conveyance is made subject to all easements, rights of way and restrictions of record, if any, affecting the subject property. WITNESS the following signature and seal: WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC. i1 i ,_.._ 4 � �'�£-`.-, (SEAL By: t' , �Hc ) C' : bom T_ THANL President STATE OF VIRGINIA, CITYf� OF }`1C to -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me in my City/County and State this 1 —' _ day of September, 2002, by GORDON T. WHITHAM, President of WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC. My Commission Expires:'Anru-i r oL C)0 - NOTARY PUBLIC VIRGINIA: FREDERICK COUNTY, SCI'. This instrument of writing mas produod to the on o?OOZ at a94 . :ul r��ilh ccnificate of acknowledgement there o annexe'_i as admit.ci to record. Ta imposed by SCC_ 58,.1-gt12 cf .3D• OD and 58.1 -801 have been paid., if assessable �4� , Clerk GREGORY F_ 4U -FGF- 1PJSON 1TTORNEY AT LAW '4 S. BRADI7OCK ST. JCHESTER, VA22SO9 d^, a •_ _. ` = 2 iii••' Taken at 70 feet from center of Wellbourne Lane - height above ladder is 12 feet to see through 4" PVC pipe Aft At At 55 feet from center of Wellbourne Lane - I needed to elevate the camera exactly 8 feet to see through a section of 4" PVC pipe Descending view at 55 feet from center of Wellbourne Lane View from south end of lot 18 (bordering lot 17) View from lot 23 ME��`��-� View from border of lots 17 and 18 Truck was not moved. Invoice ED MITSCI ILER Invoice Number: 2405 ROSS ST. ALEXANDRIA, VA 22306-1827 January 31, 2003 Attention: Project: 2561M WHITHAM ORCHARD, FREDERICK CO. Professional Services for the Period: 12/1/2002 to 1/31/2003 Job Number: 10955 LOT # 18 Professional Services RE-EVALUATE SLOPE OF PROPERTY Date Hours CIVIL ENGINEER 12/19/2002 3.50 RE-EVALUATE SLOPE OF PROPERTY TOTAL: 3.50 Professional Services Totals: Project Totals: *** Total Invoice Amount:*** Rate Charge 75.00 262.50 $262.50 $262.50 $262.50 Aged Receivables: Curren t 31-60 Days 61-90 Days 91-120 Days > 120 Days Total Due $262.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $262.50 Pavment Terms Alet 10 days. A late charge of 1.5% will be added to any unpaid balance after 30 days. 8ngineers Surveyors Telephone 40-662-,1185 FAX 540-722 9528 NAW W.9 fePnwaM W. coin GREEMPRY EGE' 1. 51 Win& Hill 1-ane Wilichester, Virginia 22602 Pounded in 1971 Invoice ED MITSCI ILER Invoice Number: 2405 ROSS ST. ALEXANDRIA, VA 22306-1827 January 31, 2003 Attention: Project: 2561M WHITHAM ORCHARD, FREDERICK CO. Professional Services for the Period: 12/1/2002 to 1/31/2003 Job Number: 10955 LOT # 18 Professional Services RE-EVALUATE SLOPE OF PROPERTY Date Hours CIVIL ENGINEER 12/19/2002 3.50 RE-EVALUATE SLOPE OF PROPERTY TOTAL: 3.50 Professional Services Totals: Project Totals: *** Total Invoice Amount:*** Rate Charge 75.00 262.50 $262.50 $262.50 $262.50 Aged Receivables: Curren t 31-60 Days 61-90 Days 91-120 Days > 120 Days Total Due $262.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $262.50 Pavment Terms Alet 10 days. A late charge of 1.5% will be added to any unpaid balance after 30 days. 8ngineers Surveyors Telephone 40-662-,1185 FAX 540-722 9528 NAW W.9 fePnwaM W. coin FEB -19-03 12:03 FROM-GREENNAY ENGIN«RING P C. 5407229528 T-096 P 001/003 F-059 AN RE AY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 Fvuvled IM1 ]lit Project Name: Whithaw 9states - Lot 18 File No.: 2561 Date: 2/19/03 To: Ed Mitchler Fax. No.: Total pages: Copied - 703 -660-10$7 3 From: Richard A. Edens, LS MUM= CHICINEERING Phone: 540-652-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Email: redens@greenwayeng.com Remarks: 1- Urwo Id-. For Your Review We As You Requested r ResubraWd Moessage: Mr. Mitchler, Please find attached copies of selected portions of the preliminary sketch plan for the above - referenced project for your use, as requested. Yow attention is directed to note 4 on the second page which references the source of the topographic contours shown. As you will notice, the contours are shown at a 20 foot contour interval which shows minimal detail. Lot 18 lies mostly within the 1220-1240 interval, with a small portion along Welboume Lane lying in the 1240-1260 interval_ 1 don't believe we heve any further information as to elevations available, but call me if you have any other questions. Sincerely, Rich Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FAX 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com ... htFTIN'B9 ICada PriirssPevc;SKrvruu e!ad i. ribt:r nut r.i,. .ted „s.,�n•,� � awn nn:�: os. ..„ 7 T4-- Azir.. ti I )j {4 — / � 1 \ PHASE 3 ' - ciN PHAS Aq �/ L7Q2 ti L1Qy 1G��lT OF Y BRL ' L6 ' I rb pHA _ 1 m E xsE 6 ft. En Wo 1:43PM;VDCT Wfncnester 54 V6.151tSnC5 " �+ 0 coqt - ja 6. uj j f fl' op w -29 INLU S G .i lu 0CIE ®: FEB-19-03 12:03 Mki GREENWAY MG10"RIH P c 540T22E520 T-096 P-003/003 F-059 p. Aq i l f 1. CURRENT OWNER OF RECORD. TO WHITHAM ORCHARDS, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TIMBER RIDGE ORCHARD, INC.) SEE DEED BOOK 240, PACE 383 AND DEED BOOK 272, PAGE 555. 2. PARENT TAX PARCEL NO.: 27 A- is 26-A-54, 26A-55, 26-A-58, & 26-A-59. ZONE. RA CURREN;r USE AGRICULTURAL/ORCHARD PROPOSED USE- RESIDENTIAL 3. THE PROPERTY SNOMW HEREON LIES ENTIRELY MTHIN ZONE C. AREAS OF A91NIM4L FLOODING PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE 44APS NO, 510063 0050 B AND 51006) 01001 B, DATED JULY 17, 1978. 4. THE CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON WERE ENLARGED FROM U. S. G. S. 7.5' QUADRANGLE kMP GORE VA-KV' AND 'CAPON BRIDGE, WV VA" AND HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIF/ED. CONTOUR INTERVAL w 20 FEET. LL) C-1 or) C) X Qf 0 1 CE LLI �- L25 -10 R1W IIELL PA-kisHVILLE ROAD PAP cUCL26 [CAP art z 85 s S�7L PROPOSED �" ECL } ! z i _ L SlIF 172.28 ACRES I co i 2.59 ACRS cl) ' •moo b"' 7R! Lu I co PROPOSED e'er �csti � f:►�f7� f ! �o `fr€ �� r saw' f 2.3 7 < r f �g6 je ,r r I I 19-7.0* � of :iia #kr ?LT 114E 'ate- 3�'Q�� PRZ 22C Ri: SffEPROPOSED (b to e wt -u SHE 2.20 ACRES oEkn PROPMED 61 DRAFT' OB SffE 1 21-6' 74-- f2ZJ, f — PROP �, "5�;3cf,2i Inn O 6 CT N W -0 10 O N R ? m C O N O ID < <N =' y 0 p m N (G S(D m T J m 3 7 !L 1' 0 a m(D m 3 'O" 0CL OL m La CD 7 ID V to n zm O N W 7 O _ [D m N O (0 - C ID 3 S t0 O .+ tD 7 f0 W N C 7 .. r - i I a 0 CD a - to o`` s� m m o0 O g i }� o tT t0.N p O O -_ (D C (D wo O 7 fD O O W WID 3 o am 7v .r CD I O N.r p C-0 0 . 0 to m x tT 0 S A O S (3 c=cu<Qtao6,x �- -- n c N a r — m W— ?>' Qs f.� »3�'fD`°°v m r;� CD w, ° spm m 0 tD m m 0 m < a CD o > S - < o > 0 oho m m 0 S tD N d m t0 N CC 0 m 3 m 0 S O S g n. Q' tD �o�. tD MM ID 0<�0 0 tD m — O ID N CCD x N O 'a N c c 3 N 0 m 0 O O) m Q-5 C o O 10 N O N t10� ' m 0 o _� � 0» m 0 0 m RC"J0 O N�W o o p C S_ F m ._. r O O' 0(D x N `< - O n 0 3 N d M CD 3 j = a (D �. - 0 fl '< .. :oilW —N p O' v N j N xo co a a' s s w o v CD M 13 ?M� Qm