The URL can be used to link to this page

February 10 2021 Board_Agenda_Packet 7 f AGENDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2021 7:00 PM BOARD MEETING ROOM 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Adoption of Agenda 5. Citizen Comments — For agenda items that are not the subject of a Public Hearing 6. Consent Agenda Roll Call Vote Required 6.A. Minutes of Closed Session and Regular Meeting of January 27, 2021 BOS02-10-21 Minutes27January2021.pdf 6.B. Minutes of Budget Work Session of January 27, 2021 BOS02-10-21 MinutesWorkSession27January2021.pdf 6.C. Joint Finance Committee Report of January 6, 2021 BOS02-10-21 JointFinanceCommReport6January2021.pdf 6.D. Proposed Amendments to the Winchester-Frederick County Convention and Visitors Bureau Memorandum of Understanding and Membership BOS02-10-21 ProposedAmendCVB-MOU.pdf 6.E. Resolution for Addition to the Secondary System of State Highways: Christo Rey Estates - Comforter Lane, State Route 1633 BOS02-10-21 Road ResChristoReyEstates.pdf 1 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 2 February 10, 2021 Consent Agenda, continued 6.F. Resolution Requesting Reconsideration of Ruebuck Road Access by Maine Drilling and Blasting for an Explosives Storage Facility in Berkeley County, West Virginia BOS02-10-21 ResMaineDrilling.pdf 7. Board of Supervisors Comments 8. County Officials 8.A. Committee Appointments Planning Commission Four-year term of Gainesboro rep. Charles Triplett expiries 2/22/21 (Mr. Triplett is eligible and willing to serve another term.) Winchester Regional Airport Authority Unexpired four-year term ending 08/12/24 (See attached application of Thomas Leone.) Social Services Board Unexpired four-year term of Shawnee District Rep. ending 06/30/22 (Karen Kimble has resigned effective 3-30-21. See attached application of Kermit Gaither.) Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board Joint Appointment with the City of Winchester The City of Winchester approved the three-year appointment of Laura K. Wiley as Non-Profit Sector Representative at their meeting of January 26, 2021, to fill an existing vacancy. Endorsement by the Board of Supervisors is requested. (See attached application of Laura K. Wiley.) BOS02-10-21 Comm itteeAppts.pdf 2 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 3 February 10, 2021 County Officials, continued 8.B. Supervisor Stegmaier's Proposal re: A Resolution Calling for the Rescission of Actions taken by the Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors and the Leesburg Town Council against Virginia State Delegate David LaRock BOS02-10-21 ResRecissionOfActionsAgainstLaRock.pdf 8.C. Supervisor Dunn's Proposal re: Radio System Acquisition BOS02-10-21 DunnRadioSystemProposal_Redacted.pdf 8.D. Frederick County School Board Request for the Board of Supervisors to Hold Public Hearings Regarding: 1. Supplemental Appropriation for James Wood High School Renovation: $72,844,000 2. Participation in the 2021 Spring VPSA Bond Sale for the James Wood High School Renovation Project BOS02-10-21 RegPublicHearingsJamesWoodHS_Reno_Redacted.pdf 8.E. Frederick County School Board Request for the Board of Supervisors to Hold Public Hearings Regarding: 1 . Supplemental Appropriation for Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation: $12,020,000 2. Participation in the 2021 Spring VPSA Bond Sale for the Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation Project BOS02-10-21 RegPublicHearingslndianHollowReno_Redacted.pdf 9. Committee Business - None 3 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 4 February 10, 2021 10. Public Hearings (Non Planning Issues) 10.A. An Ordinance to Amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155 Taxation, Article XI Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security, §155-46 Fee Imposed; Collection; Use. Legislation Passed in 2020 Increases the Courthouse Security Fee that Localities May Impose as Part of Court Costs in Each Criminal Case in Which a Defendant is Convicted of a Violation of Any Statute or Ordinance. The Proposed Ordinance Would Increase the Current $10 Fee to $20. BOS02-10-21 CodeAndOrd inanceItem 1.pdf 10.B. An Ordinance to Amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155, Taxation, Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-85 Proration of Tax. Legislation Passed in 2020 Permits a Local Governing Body to Authorize the Locality's Treasurer to Issue Any Refund up to $5,000 as a Result of an Erroneous Tax Assessment. Any Refund Above $5,000, the Governing Body Must Approve the Refund. The Proposed Amendment Would Confirm that the Authority for Such Refunds Extends to Refunds of Business License Taxes. BOS02-10-21 CodeAndOrd inanceItem 2.pdf 10.C. An Ordinance to Amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155, Taxation, Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-110 Violations and Penalties. Legislation Passed in 2012 Permits a Locality to Require that No Business License Shall be Issued to an Applicant Until that Person has Produced Satisfactory Evidence that all Delinquent Business License, Real Estate, Personal Property, Meals, Transient Occupancy, Severance, and Admissions Taxes Owed by the Business to the Locality have Been Paid Which Have Been Properly Assessed Against the Applicant by the Locality. The Proposed Amendment Would Add Real Estate Tax to the List of Taxes Required to be Paid before Issuance of a Business License. BOS02-10-21 CodeAndOrd inanceItem 3.pdf 11 . Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings 11.A. Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District - To Consider Adding Additional Parcels into the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. These Properties are Located at 475 Green Spring Road, Winchester, Virginia and are Identified with Property Identification Numbers 21-3-20, 21-3-21 , 21-3-22, 21-3-23, 22-A-45, 22-A- 46, 22-A-47 and 22-A-49 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. BOS02-10-21 GreenSpring_Redacted.pdf 4 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 5 February 10, 2021 Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings, continued 11.13. South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District - To Consider Adding Additional Parcel into the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. The Property is Located at 229 West Oaks Lane, Winchester, Virginia and is Identified by Property Identification Number 74-A-3 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. BOS02-10-21 South Frederick_Redacted.pdf 11.C. 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP is a Prioritized List of Capital Projects Requested by Various County Departments and Agencies. The Plan is Created as an Informational Component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. BOS02-10-21 CIP2021-2026.pdf 12. Planning Commission Business - Other Planning Business 12.A. SP #18-20 Senseny Place - Information and Waiver Request The Applicant previously received a waiver of the Master Development Plan (MDP) requirement on December 11, 2019 and has chosen to process a site plan in lieu of the MDP. When processing a site plan in lieu of the MDP, the application must be presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as an informational item. With this Site Plan, the Applicant is requesting approval of a waiver from the Board of Supervisors for a residential separation buffer modification pursuant to §165- 203.02(C)(7) of the Zoning Ordinance, due to the location of existing utilities on the site. BOS02-10-21 SitePlan 18-20SensenyPlace_Redacted.pdf 13. Board Liaison Reports 14. Citizen Comments 15. Board of Supervisors Comments 16. Adjourn 5 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Title: Minutes of Closed Session and Regular Meeting of January 27, 2021 Attachments: BOS02-10-21 Minutes27January2021.pdf 6 MINUTES CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2021 5:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ATTENDEES Board of Supervisors: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman; Robert W. Wells, Vice Chairman; Blaine P. Dunn; Shawn L. Graber;Judith McCann-Slaughter; J. Douglas McCarthy; and David D. Stegmaier were present. Staff present: Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator; Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney; Scott Varner, Director of Information Technology; Candice Perkins, Assistant Director of Planning; John Bishop, Assistant Director of Planning-Transportation; Seth Thatcher, Commissioner of the Revenue; Steve Majchrzak, Fire Chief; Lenny Millholland, Sheriff; Patrick Barker, EDA Director; Cheryl Shiffler, Finance Director; Sharon Kibler, Assistant Director of Finance; Jennifer Place, Risk Manager/Budget Analyst; and Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION Vice Chairman Wells moved that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County enter a closed session pursuant to Virginia Code Sec. 2.2-3711(A)(5) for discussion concerning a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business' or industry's interest in locating facilities in the community. Supervisor McCarthy seconded the motion which carried on a voice vote. Supervisor Slaughter recused herself from the closed session because she has a property interest that is subject to one or more than one agreement that could potentially be impacted by the subject matter of the closed session. At 5:23 p.m., the Board members being assembled within the designated meeting place in Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 1 7 the presence of members of the public and the media desiring to attend, the meeting was reconvened on motion of Vice Chairman Wells, seconded by Supervisor McCarthy and carrying on a voice vote. Vice Chairman Wells moved that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County certify that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting to which this certification applies, and (ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered by the Board. Supervisor Graber seconded the motion which carried as follows on a recorded vote: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Abstain RECESS At 5:25 p.m., Chairman DeHaven recessed the meeting. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Supervisor McCarthy delivered the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chairman Wells led the Pledge of Allegiance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA—APPROVED Upon motion of Supervisor Slaughter, seconded by Supervisor Graber, the agenda was adopted on a voice vote with the postponement of REZ#06-19 at the request of the Applicant. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 2 8 CITIZENS COMMENTS Alex Wang of Fairfax County spoke in favor of the resolution raising awareness of the persecution, including forced organ harvesting, in China of Falun Gong practitioners. He thanked the Board for placing the resolution on the agenda. Kery Nunez of Fairfax County thanked the Board for addressing the issue of forced organ harvesting and the persecution of residents in China who opposed the Chinese Communist Party. She spoke in favor of the resolution. Tiny Tang of Fairfax County thanked the Board for considering the proposed resolution saying that it will help prevent County residents from becoming unwitting accomplices to forced organ harvesting. Jason Croasdale, Back Creek District, spoke in favor of the reappointment of James Smith to the Shawneeland Sanitary District Advisory Committee. He said it was typical for committee members to be allowed to serve additional terms if they chose to and questioned why the Board was considering replacing Mr. Smith. He praised Mr. Smith's service, leadership, and open communication with the residents and asked the Board to allow Mr. smith to continue serving. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA—APPROVED Supervisor Slaughter moved for adoption of the consent agenda as presented. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McCarthy and carried on a voice vote. - Minutes of Closed Session and Regular Meeting of January 13, 2021 - CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL - Minutes of Joint Meeting of the Board of Supervisors and the Economic Development Authority of January 13, 2021 -CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL - Parks and Recreation Commission Report of January 12, 2021 - CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL, Appendix 1 - Finance Committee Report of January 20, 2021 —CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL,Appendix 2 - Acknowledgment of Update on the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES)Act of 2020 for the direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic through the establishment of the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF)—CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 3 9 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS Supervisor McCarthy noted his statement at the previous meeting in opposition to permanent standard protocols regarding Covid-19. He said he plans to continue working on opposition using approaches to the both the state legislature and the executive branch. Supervisor McCarthy referenced the public radio system procurement effort saying Chief Majchrzak has updated him. He said the Communications Committee has made good progress toward providing answers to questions from the Board members and he thanked the Chief and the Purchasing Manager for their work on the project. Supervisor Dunn referenced the recent national election saying the rhetoric has become negative. He reminded everyone that we are all Americans and need to work together. Supervisor Dunn said the recent requests for Delegate Dave LaRock to resign because of his choice to exercise his right to assembly and free speech is inappropriate. Supervisor Wells noted a request from the Parks and Recreation Commission concerning $55,000 in proffer funds for an amphitheater at the Bowman Library. He said the request was not acted on by the Finance Committee. By consensus, the Board agreed the matter be returned to the Finance Committee for further review. COUNTY OFFICIALS RESOLUTION TO EDUCATE FREDERICK COUNTY'S RESIDENTS AND MEDICAL COMMUNITY ON THE RISKS OF TRAVELING TO CHINA FOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT IN LIGHT OF RECENT REPORTS OF STATE-SPONSORED ORGAN HARVESTING FROM PRISONERS OF CONSCIENCE -APPROVED Supervisor Graber moved for approval of the resolution titled To Educate Frederick County's Residents and Medical Community on the Risks of Traveling to China for Organ Transplant in Light of Recent Reports of State-Sponsored Organ Harvesting from Prisoners of Conscience. Supervisor Stegmaier seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 4 10 Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye RESOLUTION TO EDUCATE FREDERICK COUNTY'S S RESIDENTS AND MEDICAL COMMUNITY ON THE RISKS OF TRAVELING TO CHINA FOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT IN LIGHT OF RECENT REPORTS OF STATE-SPONSORED ORGAN HARVESTING FROM PRISONERS OF CONSCIENCE. WHEREAS, extensive and credible reports have revealed mass killing of prisoners of conscience in the People's Republic of China from religious and ethnic minority groups, in order to obtain organs for transplants;and WHEREAS,The China Tribunal,an independent tribunal sitting in London chaired by Sir Geoffrey Nice QC,who was a prosecutor at the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, concluded on June 18,2019,in a unanimous determination at the end of its yearlong hearings,that the killing of detainees in China for organ transplants is continuing and ongoing: and, WHEREAS,an investigative report published in June 2016 by human rights attorney David Matas,former Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific,David Kilgour,and journalist Ethan Gutmann,estimated that China is performing transplants on "an industrial-scale, state-directed organ transplantation system, controlled through national policies and funding,and implicating both the military and civilian healthcare systems,",as Kilgour described these practices in his speech to the European Parliament in 2016;and, WHEREAS, in June 2016, the United States House of Representatives unanimously passed House Resolution 343,condemning the systemic,state-sanctioned organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience; and WHEREAS,there has been little media coverage of this problem,yet dozens of Frederick County residents expressed concern to the Frederick County Board of Supervisors;and WHEREAS,Frederick County residents should be fully informed of the organ source in China before they make the decision to engage in organ tourism in China; and,WHEREAS,the Frederick County Board of Supervisors desires to assist in raising awareness in this regard; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY the Frederick County Board of Supervisors,that we strongly condemn the illegal and immoral organ harvesting being conducted at the direction of and under the protection of the Government of the communist Peoples Republic of China;and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the residents of and medical community serving Frederick County and the immediate region,be informed of the inherent injustices of the organ tourism in China,and that travel to China for organ transplants may cause our local citizens to unwittingly become accomplices in state- sponsored forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors shall provide copies of this resolution to the Frederick County delegation to the Virginia General Assembly and the Virginia delegation to the United States Congress. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27,2021 5 11 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS GEORGE BISHOP APPOINTED TO SHAWNEELAND SANITARY DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE—APPROVED Supervisor Graber moved to appoint George Bishop to a two-year term ending February 27, 2023, on the Shawneeland Sanitary District Advisory Committee. Supervisor McCarthy seconded the motion. Supervisor Dunn said the residents of the District should be able to elect their representatives, but since that was not allowed with the current rules, he would support Mr. Bishop's appointment. Vice Chairman Wells said he had received 15 emails and nine phone calls supporting the reappointment of Mr. James Smith. Supervisor McCarthy said he had heard good things about Mr. Smith but that turnover is a good thing. Supervisor Graber agreed that allowing the residents to vote on the Committee members would be a better option. He said he would like to give Mr. Bishop the opportunity to serve on the Committee. Mr. Bishop was appointed on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier No Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells No J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye ROBERT R. BODEN, JR. APPOINTED TO BOARD OF EQUALIZATION —APPROVED Supervisor Slaughter moved to appoint Robert R. Boden, Jr., to fill an unexpired a three- year term ending December 31, 2022 on the Board of Equalization. Supervisor McCarthy seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn No David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 6 12 BRADLEY COMSTOCK APPOINTED TO BOARD OF EQUALIZATION—APPROVED Supervisor McCarthy moved to appoint Bradley Comstock to fill an unexpired a three-year term ending December 31, 2022 on the Board of Equalization. Vice Chairman Wells seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter No + + + + + + + + + + + + + + COMMITTEE BUSINESS —FINANCE COMMITEEE Supervisor Slaughter moved for approval of the following: The Parks& Recreation Director requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $30,000. This amount represents a donation for the installation of two (2) sand volleyball courts at Clearbrook Park; The Sheriff requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $9,989.76. This amount represents two (2) insurance reimbursements for auto claims; The Sheriff requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of$1,100. This amount represents two (2) donations to the department.; The Public Safety Communications Director requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $32,120. This amount represents additional funds from VDEM for the NG911 system migration; and The Finance Director requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $16,065.30. This amount represents unspent VJCCCA funds in FY 2020 that must be returned to the State. Vice Chairman Wells seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Supervisor Slaughter noted the Parks & Recreation Director request for a General Fund Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 7 13 supplemental appropriation in the amount of $55,000 saying it amount represents a request for proffer funds for the construction of an amphitheater behind the Bowman Library. By consensus, the Board referred the request back to the Finance Committee for further review. Supervisor Slaughter moved for approval of the following: The NRADC Superintendent requests an NRADC Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $161,852. This amount represents additional grant funds from DCJS to expand pretrial services. This expansion does require the addition of four(4)grant funded Probation Officer positions as caseloads increase. Vice Chairman Wells seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Supervisor Slaughter moved for approval of the following: The NRADC Superintendent requests an NRADC Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $16,305. This amount represents an expansion of PAPIS pre-release services.Vice Chairman Wells seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Supervisor Slaughter moved for approval of the following: The Director of Elections requests authorization to convert a part-time Assistant Registrar position to a full-time position. Supervisor Stegmaier seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber No Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Supervisor Slaughter moved for approval of the following: The Finance Director requests a General Fund and a County Capital Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $3,204,306. This amount represents prior year audit adjustments to account for the debt write-off for the Sanitation Authority and FY 2020 CARES funds for budgeted public safety salaries. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 8 14 Supervisor McCarthy seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Supervisor Slaughter commended the Finance Department noting the following: the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) has awarded the County the Award for Outstanding Achievement for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Annual Financial Reporting for the June 30, 2019 Popular Annual Financial Report (PAFR). This is the 14th consecutive year that Frederick County has received this achievement; the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) has awarded the County the Award for Outstanding Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the June 30, 2019 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). This is the 34th consecutive year that Frederick County has received this achievement; and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) has awarded the County the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020. This is the 34th consecutive year that Frederick County has received this award. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + REZ #06-19 - WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER — DEFERRED INDEFINITELY AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT + + + + + + + + + + + + + + CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN—FORWARDED TO PUBLIC HEARING Ms. Perkins reviewed the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) saying it is a document that consists of a schedule of major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five-year period, as well as a category for long term projects (6 + years out) and is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. She said in addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. She noted that the inclusion of projects on the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. She concluded saying the CIP is strictly advisory Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 9 15 and is intended for use as capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Ms. Perkins said staff is seeking authorization from the Board of Supervisors to schedule the CIP for public hearing. Vice Chairman Wells moved that the Capital Improvement Plan be forwarded to public hearing and Supervisor Slaughter seconded the motion. Supervisor Graber stated his concern that many of the items listed in the CIP are not essential functions of government adding that those items should be trimmed before the public hearing. Supervisor Dunn said he approves of some items in the CIP adding that a revolving fund for use by Fire and Rescue is a good idea. He noted concern about the priorities listed by the schools for their CIP. The motion carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye David D. Stegmaier Aye Shawn L. Graber No Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye 2021-2026 CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN(CII') WHEREAS, the Frederick County Planning Commission discussed the 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)at their regular meeting on January 20,2021. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CIP and affirmed that the projects contained within the CIP are in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors discussed the CIP at their regular meeting on January 27,2021; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors supports the priorities shown in the 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)and has affirmed the determination of the Planning Commission that the projects contained in the CIP conform with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT REQUESTED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that the 2021- 2026 Capital Improvements Plan be scheduled for public hearing at the Board of Supervisors meeting on February 10,2021. BOARD LIAISON REPORTS—None CITIZEN COMMENTS— None Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session&Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 10 16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS Supervisor McCarthy noted the earlier recognition of the awards received by the Finance Department saying he has always found the staff very accommodating to both the Board and the citizens of the County. ADJOURN On motion of Vice Chairman Wells, seconded by Supervisor McCarthy, the meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Closed Session &Regular Meeting Minutes *January 27, 2021 11 17 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Title: Minutes of Budget Work Session of January 27, 2021 Attachments: BOS02-10-21 MinutesWorkSession27January2021.pdf 18 MINUTES BUDGET WORK SESSION FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2021 5:30 P.M. BOARD ROOM, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ATTENDEES Board of Supervisors: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman; Blaine P. Dunn; Judith McCann-Slaughter; J. Douglas McCarthy; David D. Stegmaier; Shawn L. Graber; and Robert W. Wells were present. Finance Committee Citizen Members: Jeffrey S. Boppe; and Gary R. Oates Angela L. Rudolph-Wiseman was absent. Staff present: Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator; Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney; Scott Varner, Director of Information Technology; Cheryl Shiffler, Director of Finance; Jennifer Place, Risk Manager/Budget Analyst; Sharon Kibler,Assistant Director of Finance; Bill Orndoff, Treasurer; Seth Thatcher, Commissioner of the Revenue; Steve Majchrzak, Fire and Rescue Chief; Sheriff; and Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PRESENTATION BY THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR County Administrator Kris Tierney presented an overview of the upcoming budget process, general fund revenue, capital requests, and new position requests. By consensus, the Board requested that staff provide budget scenarios using the natural revenue growth occurring from the reassessment. The Board and staff discussed funding a proposed salary survey. The Board discussed the need for a transfer tax to offset expenses of new residential growth. 19 DISCUSSION OF THE BUDGET CALENDAR By consensus, the Board agreed to use the proposed budget calendar with the elimination of the February 3 meeting meaning the next work session will be February 10 before the regular Board meeting. ADJOURN At 6:27 p.m., Chairman DeHaven adjourned the meeting. 20 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Title: Joint Finance Committee Report of January 6, 2021 Attachments: BOS02-10-21 JointFinanceCommReport6January2021.pdf 21 JOINT FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday,January G,2021 10:00 a.m. 107 NORTH KENT STREET,WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA ATTENDEES: Committee Members Present Charles S.DeHaven,Jr.and Judith McCann-Slaughter, Frederick County representatives;and David Smith and Kim Herbstritt,City of Winchester representatives Staff Present:Kris C.Tierney,County Administrator,Roderick B.Williams,County Attorney;Jay E.Tibbs,Deputy County Administrator;Cheryl B.Shiffler,Finance Director, Dan Huffman,City Manager;Mary Blowe,City of Winchester Finance Director,Kerri Mellott,Deputy Clerk of Council;Evan Clark,City Council Member;and Justin Kerns, Executive Director of the Winchester-Frederick County Convention and Visitors Bureau. ...Action Item... PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE WINCHESTER-FREDERICK COUNTY CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND MEMBERSHIP Mr.Tibbs and Mr.Kerns reviewed the proposed revisions to the Memorandum of Understanding,which was a joint product of City,County,and Tourism staff. The proposed revisions pertain to the apportionment of members. Currently all 9 members are jointly appointed by the City and County. The proposed MOU allocates the membership between the two localities with Frederick County having 5 members and the City of Winchester 4 members. Members will be recommended by the Tourism Board and voted on by the respective locality. In addition to the membership breakdown,changes are made to the funding allocation to more accurately reflects current practice. The remainder of the MOU is left unchanged. The Joint Finance Committee reviewed the proposed amendments and recommended approval of the updated MO U. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 10:29 a.m. 22 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FREDERICK COUNTY AND CITY OF WINCHESTER JOINT AGREEMENT RE: WINCHESTER-FREDERICK COUNTY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU L PURPOSE The County of Frederick and the City of Winchester are entering into this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)to reflect the allocation of membership Aghe Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board (Tourism Board) and to establish the° un ng contribution for the Winchester-Frederick County Convention and Visitors' Bureau (CVB). This MOU shall supersede all existing agreemen4APOINTMENT, ve upon date of adoption. II. MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITIO AND TERM The Tourism Board shall consist of 9 voting me Yige ese members shall be appointed by Frederick County. Four member all be appoiity of Winchester. The Tourism Board shall follow the 'ss`or new �and members as dictated in Article VII of the Tourism Board bylaws. The ylaws detail the voting"and non-voting member composition, membershi uirements, limits and internal evaluation and recommendation process. -- ,� Aor Henceforth, the Tourism Board shall�recommend voting memb rs for appointment to either the City or the County based upon which locality is°being represented. The current board members and their assign4edpsitions as detailed below are attached in Addendum A. Publi -profit pos on 1 — County Public -profit position 2— City Public/No -profit position 3 - County Public/Non-profit position 4- City Private sector lodging position 1 — County Private sector lodging position 2 — City Private sector position Wcounty Private sector position 2 City Private sector position 3 — &unty As detailed in the Tourism Board's bylaws, candidates shall first be evaluated by the Tourism Board, and then recommended to the appropriate governing body for final appointment. III. FUNDING 23 The County's annual contribution to the CVB shall be a function of the County's transient occupancy tax assessment as dictated by the Virginia General Assembly. All County transient occupancy tax receipts received in excess of the base 2%, up to the maximum 5%, transient occupancy tax rate shall constitute the County's contribution to the CVB. At the time of this MOU, the County's transient occupancy tax rate is 3.5%, thus those receipts collected from the additional 1.5% comprise the County's contribution to the CVB. The City's annual contribution to the CVB shall increase or decrease annually based on a formula which compares the City's transient occupancy tax revenue totals from the previous two fiscal years. Beginning with FY23, a percentage change in trag&pt occupancy tax receipts between the previous two fiscal years shall be calculated and applied to the previous year's contribution. For the first year, FY23, the percent change shall be applied to the previously established base contribution to the CVB, which is $1 ,5.0'0.00.` The change in the City's annual contribution to B shall be % of the amount calculated using the above noted formula until the City' overall transient occ ncy tax revenues exceed $1,000,000.00. IV. FISCAL AGENT The City of Winchester shall serve as t - isc nt for the rtaking(s) covered by this MOU. The Convention and Visitors' Bureau Board may opt to me its own fiscal agent or use another entity with approv I f the Fre - ck C rd o ervisors and the Common Council of the City Winchest V. TERM The term o t is shall be u throug une 3 each fiscal year. Unless otherwise termin&lVas herein provided, this agreement sha*automatically renew and continue in full force a ect from year to year unless terminated by either parry in such manner and at such time as he ter provided for terminal*. VI. TE ATION This MOU may be to ted by either parry only upon written notice to the other party by certified or registered in return receipt requested, at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial term or any renewal ; otherwise this MOU shall renew and continue as provided. Upon termination of this MOU, the parties shall mutually agree as to the disposition of the personal property of the operation and of any jointly owned real property of the operation. VII. EVIDENCE OF AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE In accordance with the provision of the attached Resolutions (incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein) duly adopted by parties to this Memorandum of Understanding, the undersigned individuals are hereby authorized and directed to execute this Memorandum of 24 Understanding on behalf of the respective governing bodies, and do hereby acknowledge and agreed to abide its terms. Given under my hand this day of , 2020 on behalf of the City of Winchester, Virginia. City Manager Approved as to Form City Attorney Given under my hand this day o 7202 ehalf of the County of Frederick, Virginia. Coun dministrator Approv County Atto 25 Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board Voting Members and Associated Appointment Bodies ADDENDUM A WFCTB Voting Members Current 11/1/2020 First Last Sector/Position Appointment Body 1st Term Begin 1st Term Exp 2nd Term Begin 2nd Term Exp Company/Organization Location of Business/Organization VACANT VACANT Non-Profit 1 County Gwen Borders-Walker Non-Profit 2 City 12/1/2019 6/30/22 Winchester-Frederick-Clarke NAACP City&County Kristin Laise Non-Profit 3 County 7/1/2015 6/30/18 7/1/2018 6/30/21 Belle Grove Plantation County Karen Helm Non-Profit4 City 7/1/2014 6/30/17 7/1/2017 6/30/20 Celebrating Patsy Cline,Inc. City Lani Pendleton Private(hotel)1 County 7/1/2018 6/30/21 La Quinta Inn&Suites County Priya Patel Private(hotel)2 City 7/1/2015 6/30/18 7/1/2018 6/30/21 Wingate by Wyndham City Arthur Kearns Private County 3/1/2020 6/30/22 Winchester Ciderworks County Josh Huff Private 2 City 7/1/2020 6/30/23 The Bright Box Theatre City Julie Shaffer Private 3 County 7/1/2020 6/30/23 Shaffer's BBQ County 26 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Title: Proposed Amendments to the Winchester-Frederick County Convention and Visitors Bureau Memorandum of Understanding and Membership Attachments: BOS02-10-21 ProposedAmendCVB-MOU.pdf 27 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FREDERICK COUNTY AND CITY OF WINCHESTER JOINT AGREEMENT RE: WINCHESTER-FREDERICK COUNTY CONVENTION AND VISITORS' BUREAU L PURPOSE The County of Frederick and the City of Winchester are entering into this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)to reflect the allocation of membership Aghe Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board (Tourism Board) and to establish the° un ng contribution for the Winchester-Frederick County Convention and Visitors' Bureau (CVB). This MOU shall supersede all existing agreemen4APOINTMENT, ve upon date of adoption. II. MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITIO AND TERM The Tourism Board shall consist of 9 voting me Yige ese members shall be appointed by Frederick County. Four member all be appoiity of Winchester. The Tourism Board shall follow the 'ss`or new �and members as dictated in Article VII of the Tourism Board bylaws. The ylaws detail the voting"and non-voting member composition, membershi uirements, limits and internal evaluation and recommendation process. -- ,� Aor Henceforth, the Tourism Board shall�recommend voting memb rs for appointment to either the City or the County based upon which locality is°being represented. The current board members and their assign4edpsitions as detailed below are attached in Addendum A. Publi -profit pos on 1 — County Public -profit position 2— City Public/No -profit position 3 - County Public/Non-profit position 4- City Private sector lodging position 1 — County Private sector lodging position 2 — City Private sector position Wcounty Private sector position 2 City Private sector position 3 — &unty As detailed in the Tourism Board's bylaws, candidates shall first be evaluated by the Tourism Board, and then recommended to the appropriate governing body for final appointment. III. FUNDING 28 The County's annual contribution to the CVB shall be a function of the County's transient occupancy tax assessment as dictated by the Virginia General Assembly. All County transient occupancy tax receipts received in excess of the base 2%, up to the maximum 5%, transient occupancy tax rate shall constitute the County's contribution to the CVB. At the time of this MOU, the County's transient occupancy tax rate is 3.5%, thus those receipts collected from the additional 1.5% comprise the County's contribution to the CVB. The City's annual contribution to the CVB shall increase or decrease annually based on a formula which compares the City's transient occupancy tax revenue totals from the previous two fiscal years. Beginning with FY23, a percentage change in trag&pt occupancy tax receipts between the previous two fiscal years shall be calculated and applied to the previous year's contribution. For the first year, FY23, the percent change shall be applied to the previously established base contribution to the CVB, which is $1 ,5.0'0.00.` The change in the City's annual contribution to B shall be % of the amount calculated using the above noted formula until the City' overall transient occ ncy tax revenues exceed $1,000,000.00. IV. FISCAL AGENT The City of Winchester shall serve as t - isc nt for the rtaking(s) covered by this MOU. The Convention and Visitors' Bureau Board may opt to me its own fiscal agent or use another entity with approv I f the Fre - ck C rd o ervisors and the Common Council of the City Winchest V. TERM The term o t is shall be u throug une 3 each fiscal year. Unless otherwise termin&lVas herein provided, this agreement sha*automatically renew and continue in full force a ect from year to year unless terminated by either parry in such manner and at such time as he ter provided for terminal*. VI. TE ATION This MOU may be to ted by either parry only upon written notice to the other party by certified or registered in return receipt requested, at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial term or any renewal ; otherwise this MOU shall renew and continue as provided. Upon termination of this MOU, the parties shall mutually agree as to the disposition of the personal property of the operation and of any jointly owned real property of the operation. VII. EVIDENCE OF AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE In accordance with the provision of the attached Resolutions (incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein) duly adopted by parties to this Memorandum of Understanding, the undersigned individuals are hereby authorized and directed to execute this Memorandum of 29 Understanding on behalf of the respective governing bodies, and do hereby acknowledge and agreed to abide its terms. Given under my hand this day of , 2020 on behalf of the City of Winchester, Virginia. City Manager Approved as to Form City Attorney Given under my hand this day o 7202 ehalf of the County of Frederick, Virginia. Coun dministrator Approv County Atto 30 Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board Voting Members and Associated Appointment Bodies ADDENDUM A WFCTB Voting Members Current 11/1/2020 First Last Sector/Position Appointment Body 1st Term Begin 1st Term Exp 2nd Term Begin 2nd Term Exp Company/Organization Location of Business/Organization VACANT VACANT Non-Profit 1 County Gwen Borders-Walker Non-Profit 2 City 12/1/2019 6/30/22 Winchester-Frederick-Clarke NAACP City&County Kristin Laise Non-Profit 3 County 7/1/2015 6/30/18 7/1/2018 6/30/21 Belle Grove Plantation County Karen Helm Non-Profit4 City 7/1/2014 6/30/17 7/1/2017 6/30/20 Celebrating Patsy Cline,Inc. City Lani Pendleton Private(hotel)1 County 7/1/2018 6/30/21 La Quinta Inn&Suites County Priya Patel Private(hotel)2 City 7/1/2015 6/30/18 7/1/2018 6/30/21 Wingate by Wyndham City Arthur Kearns Private County 3/1/2020 6/30/22 Winchester Ciderworks County Josh Huff Private 2 City 7/1/2020 6/30/23 The Bright Box Theatre City Julie Shaffer Private 3 County 7/1/2020 6/30/23 Shaffer's BBQ County 31 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Title: Resolution for Addition to the Secondary System of State Highways: Christo Rey Estates - Comforter Lane, State Route 1633 Attachments: BOS02-10-21 Road ResChristoReyEstates.pdf 32 f ` COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 Fax: 540/665-6395 Memorandum To: Frederick County Board of Supervisors From: Mark R.Cheran,Zoning and Subdivision Administrator Date: February 2,2021 RE: Christo Rey Estates The following additions to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to the statutory provision or provisions cited, are hereby requested; the right of way for which, including additional easements for cuts, fills and drainage, as required,is hereby guaranteed: Comforter Lane, State Route 1633 (east) 0.07 miles Comforter Lane, State Route 1633 (west) 0.03 miles Staff is available to answer any questions. MRC/slc 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 33 4�GK C01 RESOLUTION w BY THE ,{1739 FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, in regular meeting on the 10th day of February, adopted the following: WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3, fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on June 9, 1993, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described in the attached Form AM-4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.2-705, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of- way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts,fills and drainage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Blaine P. Dunn David D. Stegmaier Judith McCann-Slaughter A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator PDRes. #05-21 34 In Fredericks County 37336685 by Rpsolution of the governing body adopted February i0,2021 The following WDOT Farnt AM-4.3 is hereby attached and incorporated as part a'Fthe governing body's resolution for changes to the secondary system of state highways. A Copy Testee Signed(County Official): Report of Changes in the Secondary System of State Highways Proiect/Subdivision: Christo Rey Estates-Comforter Lane Addition- New subdivision street§33.2-705 .. . ... ...... .. ............................ .......... Rte #of Rlw (Number Lanes Recordation Width Street Name From Termini To Termini Length Reference Intersection of Route 1633, Instrument Comforter Loretto drive 070014478 1634 Lane (east) cul-de-sac 0.07 2 Page 0391 50' Intersection of Route 1633, Instrument Comforter Loretto Drive 070014479 1634 Lane (west) cul-de-sac 0.03 2 Page 0391 50, Page: 111 35 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Title: Resolution Requesting Reconsideration of Ruebuck Road Access by Maine Drilling and Blasting for an Explosives Storage Facility in Berkeley County, West Virginia Attachments: BOS02-10-21 ResMaineDrilling.pdf 36 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION RESOLUTION REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION OF RUEBUCK ROAD ACCESS BY MAINE DRILLING AND BLASTING FOR AN EXPLOSIVES STORAGE FACILITY IN BERKELEY COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Maine Drilling and Blasting is planning an 8.5-acre explosives storage facility to be located in Berkeley County, West Virginia, and WHEREAS, Maine Drilling and Blasting is planning to access their site using one point of access on Ruebuck Road, in Frederick County Virginia, and WHEREAS, Maine Drilling and Blasting is expected to generate approximately io trips per day by pickup and medium duty straight trucks along with two to three tractor trailer vehicle trips per week; and WHEREAS, Ruebuck Road is a minor secondary roadway with 65 residential addresses in Virginia and several more in West Virginia which is not conducive to the type and amount of traffic proposed; and WHEREAS, The proposed traffic and type of materials involved create a safety concern for the citizens of this residential area; and WHEREAS, The access via Ruebuck Road creates a situation whereby in the event of an emergency, services will likely be provided by Frederick County; and WHEREAS, The property on which Maine Drilling and Blasting is to be located has available access to the West Virginia road system via Sam Mason Road; 37 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors requests that Berkeley County, West Virginia, and Maine Drilling and Blasting reconsider access to Ruebuck Road and use Sam Mason Road for access to the Maine Drilling and Blasting Explosives Storage Facility. ADOPTED this loth day of February 2021. Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Blaine P. Dunn David D. Stegmaier Judith McCann-Slaughter Kris C. Tierney Clerk, Board of Supervisors County of Frederick,Virginia 38 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Committee Appointments Attachments: BOS02-10-21 CommitteeAppts.pdf 39 .r COUNTY of FREDERICK Office of the County Administrator tigGl\'f 173_ Tel: 540.665.6382 Fax: 540.667.0370 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk DATE: February 4, 2021 RE: Committee Appointments Listed below are the vacancies/appointments due through March 2021. As a reminder, in order that everyone have ample time to review applications, and so they can be included in the agenda, please remember to submit applications prior to Friday agenda preparation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. FEBRUARY 2021 Planning Commission Charles E. Triplett — Gainesboro District Representative 150 Lone Willow Lane Gore, VA 22637 Phone: (540)877-1380 Term Expires: 02/22/21 Four-year term (Mr. Triplett is willing to continue serving.) MARCH 2021 Conservation Easement Authority Bryan J. Green — Frederick County Representative 504 Heishman Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: (540)877-1844 Term Expires: 03/14/21 40 Memorandum — Board of Supervisors February 4, 2021 Page 2 Three-year term (The Conservation Easement Authority was established in August 2005. The Authority consists of seven citizen members, one member from the Board of Supervisors and one member from the Planning Commission. Members should be knowledgeable in one or more of the following fields: conservation, biology, real estate and/or rural land appraisal, accounting, farming, or forestry. Members serve a three-year term and are eligible for reappointment.) VACANCIES/OTHER Winchester Regional Airport Authority Elizabeth D. Kozel — Frederick County Representative 300 Covey Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Term Expires: 08/12/24 (See Attached Application of Thomas Leone.) (Staff has been advised that Ms. Kozel has resigned.) Historic Resources Advisory Board David O'Neil — Gainesboro District Representative 161 Harrelson Place Winchester, VA 22603 Phone: (540)722-8955 Term Expires: 06/12/21 Four-year term (Staff has been advised of vacancy from Gainesboro District.) Social Services Board Ryan C. Shaw — Red Bud District Representative 110 Foxglove Drive Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: 877-4978 Term Expires: 06/30/20 Four-year term (Mr. Shaw has moved from Red Bud District.) Karen L. Kimble — Shawnee District Representative 41 Memorandum — Board of Supervisors February 4, 2021 Page 3 118 Keswick Court Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: (540)665-2023 Term Expires: 06/30/22 (See Attached Application of J. Kermit Gaither). (Ms. Kimble advised she will be stepping down effective March 30, 2021.) (The Social Services Board is comprised of seven members, one member from each magisterial district and one member at large. Members serve a four-year term and are limited to two consecutive terms.) Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board Joint Appointment with the City of Winchester Laura K. Wiley— Non-Profit Sector Representative 27 '/2 N. Braddock Street Winchester, VA 22601 Three-year term (See Attached Application of Laura K. Wiley. After the interview process, the City of Winchester approved the three-year appointment of Ms. Wiley at their meeting of January 26, 2021 to fill a vacancy that existed and endorsement by the Board of Supervisors is requested.) AWP/tjp Attachments U:\TJP\committeeappointments\MmosLettrs\Board CommitteeAppts(02102021 BdMtg).docx 42 M INFORMATIONAL DATA SHEET FOR FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Please provide the following information for review by the Board of Supervisors regarding your interest in serving on Winchester Regional Airport Authority . Please print clearly if filling out by hand. Thank You. Name: Thomas Leone Home Phone: Address: 201 Clayhill Drive Office Phone: Winchester,VA 22602 Cell/Mobile: - Fax: Employer: United Airlines Email: Occupation: Airline Pilot Civic/Community Activities: Will You Be Able To Attend This Committee's Regularly Scheduled Meeting On: Yes: x No: Do You Foresee Any Possible Conflicts Of Interest Which Might Arise By Your Serving On This Committee? Yes: No: X Explain: Additional Information Or Comments You Would Like To Provide(If you need more space,please use the reverse side or include additional sheets): Applicant's Signatur Date: 1-29 -2021 Nominating Supervisor's Comments: Please submit form to: Frederick County Administrator's Office 107 North hent Street Winchester,VA 22601 or email to: tprice Gt fcva,us or itibbs ii fcva us (08/0611-020) THOMAS LEONE 201 Clayhill Drive • Winchester, VA 22602 Objective To join the team at Winchester Reginal Airport Authority expertly serving important customers. Flight Time Total Time 15,272 Multiengine Turbojet 11,771 Instrument. 1,641 Pilot In Command 3,559 Instructor 242 Flight Engineer 241 Professional Experience United Airlines Pilot Apr 2017-Present Washington Dulles International -First officer on B-787, B-737,A-320 Aircraft. Airport Parc Aviation Pilot Air Japan Airlines Nov 2008-Apr 2017 Narita International Airport -Captain on B-767 passenger&Cargo Aircraft United Airlines Pilot Feb 2006-Nov 2008 Washington Dulles International -First officer on B-767, B-757, B-737 Aircraft Airport Mesa Airlines Pilot Sept 2003-Feb 2006 Phoenix International Airport -First officer on CRJ-200, CRJ-700, CRJ-900 Aircraft United Airlines Pilot Sept 1999-Sept 2003 Washington Dulles International -First officer on B-767, B-757, Engineer B-727 Aircraft Airport Atlantic Coast Airlines Pilot Sept 1997-Sept 1999 Washington Dulles International -First officer on CRJ-200, J-41 Aircraft Airport Gulfstream International Airlines Pilot Nov 1995—Sept 1997-Captain on Miami International Airport BE-1900 Aircraft Education Bachelor of Science IN Aviation Management Southern Illinois University May 1994 Associate of App Sci Aviation Technology Northern Virginia Community College Aug 1993 Career pilot Northern Virginia Community College May 1993 Licenses and Certificates Awards and Honors FAA Airline Transport Pilot Rating, Multiengine Land, Instrument Rating SIU Capstone program FAA Certified Flight Instructor, Single/Multiengine Land, Instrument Rating SIU United Internship FAA Airframe and Powerplant Certificate FAA First Class Medical FCC Restricted Radiotelephone Operator's License Type Rated in B-787, B-767, B-757, B-737,A320, BE-1900 44 INFORMATIONAL DATA SHEET FOR FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Please provide the following information for review by the Board of Supervisors regarding your interest in serving on Sochi Services board _ . Please print clearly if filling out by hand. Thank.You. Name: J Kermit Gaither Home Phone: Address: 117 Brenton Court Office Phone: Stephen Va 22655 Cell/Mobile: Fax: Employer: Winchester Sheriff Office Email: Occupation: deputy Civic/Community Activities: republican Party;Volunteer Firefighter/EMT.FOP Lodge 12,NAACP Will You Be Able To Attend This Committee's Regularly Scheduled Meeting On: Yes: X No: Do You Foresee Any Possible Conflicts Of Interest Which Might Arise By Your Serving On This Committee? Yes: X No: Explain: Additional Information Or Comments You Would Like To Provide(If you need more space,please use the reverse side or include additional sheets): Applicant's Signature: Date: j. L C) Nominating Supervisor's Comments: Please submit form to: Frederick County Administrator's Office 107 North Kent Street Winchester,VA 22601 or email to: tprice(u�fcva.us or jtibbsnfcva.us 108:06/2020) Laura Kerr Wiley 27.5 N. Braddock St. I Winchester,VA 22601 Summary A passionate museum professional and proven fundraiser with over ten years of museum experience who is dedicated to helping people connect with their history and culture in a meaningful way. Highlighted Experience Museum of the Shenandoah Valley,Winchester,Virginia Director of Community Engagement, January 2018 to Present • Manages the museum's community engagement efforts through its membership programs, annual fund campaigns, community programs, special event rentals programs, and other special campaigns such as the Trailblazer Campaign for the Trails at the MSV • Increased the museum's membership by 25% from 1,900 memberships to 2,450 members between January 2018 and January 2020 • Developed, managed, and executed the public phase of the Trailblazer Campaign for the Trails at the MSV park project, including creating marketing materials, direct mail, and social media for the campaign • Brought the public phase of the Trailblazer Campaign to a successful $7.2 million conclusion in one year in 2019 • Established Yappy Hour at the MSV, an annual outdoor fundraiser for the MSV • Created and implemented a comprehensive themed campaign for the MSV annual fund each year and grew the number of donors to that program each year • Assisted with the MSV's accreditation process with the American Alliance of Museums. AAM Accreditation achieved in November 2019 The Filson Historical Society,Louisville,Kentucky Director of Development, January 2017 to December 2017 Director of Membership and Annual Giving, August 2016 to January 2017 Capital Campaign Manager/Development Coordinator, June 2013 to August 2016 • Joined The Filson team to help conclude a major $12.5 million capital campaign to renovate and expand The Filson's campus • Responsible for all fundraising activities including grants, corporate giving, membership, annual fund,planned giving, and major gifts • Working closely with the board, the president, and the former director of development, brought the campaign to a successful completion in 2016 46 • Took responsibility for The Filson Annual Fund in 2015. Created and implemented a comprehensive themed campaign for each year and grew Annual Fund revenue from $68,000 to $200,000 over three years • Promoted to Director of Membership and Annual Giving in 2016 • Promoted to Director of Development in January 2017, taking the lead in The Filson's fundraising efforts • Created The Filson's Planned Giving program and honorary society "Thruston Legacy Circle" or"TLC" - over $300,000 in planned gifts have been received in 2017 alone. • Created and implemented a system for recruiting corporate sponsors • Increased 2016 membership revenue by 12% (From $208,000 to $232,900) over the previous year through increased community outreach, implementation of an auto-renewal option, and improving the online enrollment process • In January 2017 conducted a data overhaul of the Donor Perfect software improving data entry and establishing best practices Historic Crab Orchard Museum and Pioneer Park, Tazewell,Virginia Membership and Development Assistant, September 2008 to August 2009 Guest Services and Education Assistant, 2004 to September 2008 • Managed the museum membership program and provided member services • Managed volunteers and the youth interns • Developed and conducted tours based on Virginia Standards of Learning Other Experience Indiana Wesleyan University,Louisville,Kentucky Adjunct Instructor of History, January 2013 to December 2014 Sterling College Online, Sterling, Kansas Adjunct Online Instructor of History, March 2012 to December 2012 Huntington Learning Center, Crestwood,Kentucky Assistant Director, August 2010 to June 2013 • Prepared and supervised all educational programs • Hired, trained, and managed all teachers Labor:Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas] Assistant Reviews Editor, August 2009 to May 2010. Bluestone Review, Literary Magazine of Bluefield College. Editor for the 2009 edition Education 47 The College of William and Mary,Williamsburg,Virginia Master of Arts in Early American and U.S. History, 2011 • Thesis: "Bondage on the Border: Slavery in Tazewell County, Virginia" • Graduated Cum Laude Bluefield College,Bluefield,Virginia Bachelor of Arts in History, 2009 • Honors Research Thesis: "The African-American Experience in Tazewell County from Emancipation to 1900" • Graduated Summa Cum Laude Continuing Education and Relevant Volunteer Experience Top of Virginia Regional Chamber Young Professionals Board,Member 2019 to present "Top of Virginia Regional Chamber Community Leadership Program" a nine-month leadership class., 2019 Attended the Virginia Fund Raising Institute Conference, Richmond,Virginia, 2019 Attended the Virginia Fund Raising Institute Conference, Richmond,Virginia, 2018 "Destination: Excellence" Center for Nonprofit Excellence, Louisville, Kentucky A six-month leadership development course for nonprofit executives, 2017 "NeXt: Inspiring Arts Ambassadors for Life" Fund for the Arts, Louisville, Kentucky A two-year leadership development program given by the Fund for the Arts, 2016 Young Professional Opera Patrons (YPOP) Board of Directors,Kentucky Opera Treasurer, 2015 to 2017 Attended the Donor Perfect Training Conference, Philadelphia,Pennsylvania, 2015 "Fiscally Sound: What Non-Accountants Need to Know About Nonprofit Financial Statements," Center for Nonprofit Excellence,Louisville,Kentucky, 2013 Constant Contact Email and Social Media Marketing Bootcamp,Louisville, Kentucky 2013 48 A MSV MUSEUM OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY February 26, 2020 Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board 1400 S Pleasant Valley Rd. Winchester,VA 226o1 Dear Members of the Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board: I am honored to be considered to join the Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board. Since moving to Winchester in 2018, I have been impressed with all that this wonderful community has to offer its residents and visitors alike. It would be a joy to help represent this community to the larger world. Although trained as a historian, I have spent my career working at museums and historical societies,both frequent drivers of local cultural tourism. I am a firm believer in the power of arts and culture to transform a community,to bring it together,to give it a pride of place, and to attract visitors and new residents.Arts and culture can also be an important driver of economic development.This is achieved by encouraging local pride and investment and attracting outside tourism dollars as well.Winchester and Frederick County has a lot to offer in the form of cultural tourism,from battlefields and museums to wineries and festivals. I think that the tourism of Winchester and Frederick County has the potential to grow the economic development of this region. I would be honored to help this area reach its potential. I believe I could bring an interesting perspective to the tourism board. My museum experience and community programs experience could be especially valuable.Although I do not have marketing experience,through my work in fundraising, I am constantly promoting this area's history and culture to encourage local investment in the arts.This experience could also be valuable for the board. I have served on several other non-profit boards, including the Young Professionals Board of the Kentucky Opera in Louisville, Kentucky and the Young Professionals Board of the Top of Virginia Chamber of Commerce.Thank you again for this opportunity. I do hope you will allow me to serve my new community in this way. �1_ U CHARITY got Amherst Street•Winchester,Virginia 226o1 NAVIGATOR 540-662-1473 * *** www.theMSV.org rear star charity 49 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Supervisor Stegmaier's Proposal re: Resolution Calling for the Rescission of Actions taken by the Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors and the Leesburg Town Council against Virginia State Delegate David LaRock Attachments: BOS02-10-21 ResRecissionOfActionsAgainstLaRock.pdf 50 A � BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE RESCISSION OF ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE SPEAKER OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, THE LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND THE LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL AGAINST VIRGINIA STATE DELEGATE DAVID LAROCK Whereas, in 2005, the nonpartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and former Secretary of State James Baker, a Republican, raised concerns that, without adequate safeguards, vote-by-mail "remains the largest source of potential voter fraud" in the nation, since it occurs outside the close scrutiny that is available at local polling places; and Whereas, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, 46% of the approximately 150 million votes cast in the 2020 presidential election were done by mail; and Whereas, opinion polls of Americans since the election indicate that a sizable percentage from both major political parties have suspicions that voting irregularities and significant voter fraud took place in the 2020 presidential election in several states; and Whereas, the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of Virginia protect the right of all Americans to peaceably assemble and protest; and Whereas, Delegate David LaRock, who represents constituents living in precincts of the Red Bud and Stonewall Magisterial Districts of Frederick County in the Virginia General Assembly, joined more than 100,000 other Americans at a rally in Washington, D.C. on January 6, protesting voting irregularities that occurred in various states across the nation in the time leading up to and on November 3rd; and Whereas, there is no evidence that Delegate LaRock encouraged any of those attending the rally to violate any laws, including illegally entering the Capitol Building after the rally; and Whereas, the letter that Delegate LaRock co-signed with two other members of the Virginia House of Delegates requesting Vice President Pence to pause the counting of electors until an audit of votes was completed, did not encourage or condone any acts of violence or law- breaking; and Whereas, on the evening of May 30, 2020, Virginia Delegate Lee Carter participated in a protest demonstration on Sudley Road in Prince William County that turned violent, by angrily 51 confronting law enforcement officers who were attempting to maintain order and by inappropriately using his position as an elected official; and Whereas, Virginia House Speaker Eileen Filler-Corn has stripped Delegate LaRock of his assignment on the House Transportation Committee, despite taking no disciplinary action against Delegate Carter whose parry affiliation is the same as the Speaker; and Whereas, such action against Delegate LaRock is also an injustice against the people of Frederick County since we no longer have Delegate LaRock officially engaged in transportation issues that are very important to our growing community; and Whereas, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors and Leesburg Town Council have passed resolutions calling for Delegate LaRock to resign; Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors hereby requests Virginia House Speaker Eileen Filler-Corn, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors and the Leesburg Town Council to rescind the politically motivated actions that they have taken against Delegate David LaRock who was simply exercising his constitutionally protected right to peaceably protest the results of the 2020 presidential election; and Be It Further Resolved that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors strongly supports Delegate LaRock's exercise of his rights to free speech and assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, that are guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 12 of the Constitution of Virginia. ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2021. Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Blaine P. Dunn David D. Stegmaier Judith McCann-Slaughter Kris C. Tierney Clerk, Board of Supervisors County of Frederick, Virginia 52 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Supervisor Dunn's Proposal re: Radio System Acquisition Attachments: BOS02-10-21 DunnRadioSystemProposal_Redacted.pdf 53 February 3, 2021 Radio System RFP Feb 10 Proposal Dear Board members: As a follow up to my email to you on January 21, 2021 outlining my concerns on the RFP, I would like to make a detailed suggestion on a solution that will best serve Frederick county. The current RFP is for a 15 year time frame. However, the initial public presentation and discussion was for a 20 year time frame which is inconsistent with the current RFP time frame. Also, the current RFP called for one refresh although we have heard that some vendors have offered as many as 3 refreshes. Motorola and EF Johnson offered initial prices in the $20 million range to construct their proposals yet during the negotiation process, the price tag has risen to more than $30 million, a 50 percent increase, not including the cost of financing! Rod Williams told me that the Board can request a new RFP without a reason. He also said that extending the time frame from 15 year to 20 years (a 33% increase) and a new refresh schedule likely would be a significant change. Frederick County hired Mission Critical Partners because the county did not have the technical expertise for this radio system. However, I would expect that a well written concise RFP would have laid out the specific criteria that Frederick county needed. Vendors then could have proposed a price for implementing their proposal. A 50% price increase — not decrease - leads me to believe that the initial criteria was too loosely written or that the committee led by MCP did not fully vet the technical and financial criteria needed to meet our needs. The procurement office has said they have been negotiating with vendors since September which seems exceedingly long if the RFP were concise and well written. Therefore, I would like to propose that we discard the current RFP and initiate a new RFP similar to the existing RFP but with tighter criteria, a longer time frame, and enough refreshes to keep the system functioning well for the stated time frame. This can be done on an accelerated timetable. Reasons. 1. A new RFP with the exact criteria that Frederick County needs would enable the vendors to make a proposal based on our new specifications. Each vendor should submit a proposal to meet our specifications. However, if a vendor had an alternative solution which differed from the specific criteria, the vendor could submit an alternative and the Communications Committee should hear and consider the reasons. If those reasons made sense, then they could modify their 54 request and accept the proposal if they so desired. Otherwise, the new RFP would establish the guidelines for which the vendors would compete. 2. A new RFP also would eliminate the potential lawsuit by EF Johnson and likely other vendors as well. That would eliminate both a cost to the county potentially of more than $100,000 and time spent on the issue. What to Include in new RFP. • A new RFP should clearly state that the Board of Supervisors is the final decision maker. The Board has the authority to accept, reject, or modify any staff recommendation. • Each vendor needs to submit a proposal to meet the specified criteria laid out in the RFP including initial costs and total costs over the life of the system. • Each vendor should state what hardware, software, time frame, and any other items that are or are not included in each refresh. • Any vendor can also provide an additional alternative to the specifications laid out in the RFP and the reasons for the differences in the alternative. The committee should consider the alternative and decide if the alternative meets our radio needs and is or is not a better alternative than the other proposals. • Board of Supervisors will be able to attend the oral presentations and ask questions if they desire. If proprietary information is being discussed, then the meetings can be closed to the public. Members of the Communications Committee at a meeting I attended seemed to concur that software becomes outdated in a 5-8 year time frame. Therefore, I would suggest that a refresh occur every 5-7 years which would allow 2 - 4 refreshes in a 20 year time frame. Doing so would give the county a time frame to have a good working system in year 15-18 to prepare for the 4 year time frame to work and build a new radio system when the current radio system has reached its life expectancy. Proposed accelerated time table for RFP and vote to approve • February 10, 2020. Board votes to table the current RFP and create a new RFP with a 20 year time frame, 2-4 refreshes, and tightening of any existing criteria that the committee feels is pertinent to a new system. • February 11-16. Committee writes a new RFP based on the existing RFP but with changes for the time frame, number of refreshes, and any other pertinent information of importance to the committee. • February 17. RFP goes to the public and is advertised for 3 weeks. Final bids must be received by March 10. • March 11 — 17. Bids are received and all vendors are given the opportunity to make oral arguments on their presentation(s) after they have submitted their proposals. 55 • March 11 —April 7. Committee negotiates with the vendors on quality of proposal, quality of hardware, software, support, and any other items on the proposal. • Committee makes a decision on whom to recommend to the Board by April 7 and then wraps un any loose ends regarding financing, execution, or anything else pertaining to the project. • April 14. Board votes on committee recommendation. Additional modifications. Frederick County hired Mission Critical Partners to provide technical expertise. Organizations which develop proposals often want to get a second opinion or have a Team A and Team B analyze the same data to see what areas are consistent or what areas have disagreements to develop a better solution. Therefore, I would like to suggest that the county also hire a second consultant to vet the new RFP and answer any technical question that might arise. Their role would be to review the RFP, listen to oral arguments, and be available to answer any questions by staff and Board members. The cost should not exceed $20,000 (0.1%) and possibly as low as $5,000 - $7000. (0.03%). That is a small amount to get a second opinion on a $20,000,000 project which has now risen to $30,000,000 without the cost of financing. If we can have all vendors explain their positions, we can eliminate a known pending lawsuit by one company and likely lawsuits by other companies. The cost of a lawsuit likely will be more than $100,000 in legal fees. By letting all vendors make an oral presentation, we, as Board members who must vote on the proposal, can ask questions and hear the proposals. I also would like to have the other vendors technically critique each vendors proposals (not including price which would be proprietary at that time) so we can hear the different analytical views from competitors. By having 3 or 4 vendors compete, we can potentially lower our cost significantly. We should examine to determine if the quality of would meet our needs and then see if other vendors will reduce their prices. Thank you in advance for your consideration. I will be glad to discuss in more depth with any of you if you wish. Blaine Dunn 56 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Frederick County School Board Request for the Board of Supervisors to Hold a Public Hearing Regarding: 1. Supplemental Appropriation for James Wood High School Renovation: $72,844,000 2. Participation in the 2021 Spring VPSA Bond Sale for the James Wood High School Renovation Project Attachments: BOS02-10-21 RegPublicHearingsJamesWoodHS_Reno_Redacted.pdf 57 11 . • Frederick County Public Schools Executive Director of Finance Patty Camery cameryp@fcpsk12.net DATE: February 3, 2021 TO: Jay Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator Ann Phillips, Deputy Clerk FROM: Patty D. Camery, Executive Director of Finance _ SUBJECT: 1) Supplemental Appropriation for James Wood High School Renovation 2) Participation in the 2021 Spring VPSA Bond Sale for the James Wood High School Renovation Project The Frederick County School Board requests, by way of the two attached resolutions, action by the Board of Supervisors concerning the renovation of James Wood High School: 1) a supplemental appropriation to the school construction fund for $72,844,000 for the renovation of James Wood High School and 2) participation and application in the 2021 Spring Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bond sale program for the renovation of James Wood High School. The resolution for $72,844,000 will cover participation in the Spring 2021 VPSA bond sale and future VPSA bond sales up to the amount approved. A public hearing is required and is requested after which both approving resolutions can be considered by the Board of Supervisors. The public hearing should be set for March 10th. The ad for publication is attached. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Thank you. Attachments (3) cc: David T. Sovine, Ed.D., Superintendent Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator Cheryl Shiffler, Frederick County Finance Director Bond Counsel 1415 Amherst Street www.frederick.02.va.us 540-662-3889,ext.88105 P.O.Box 3508 58 Winchester,Virginia 22604-2546 RESOLUTION (Renovation and Additions James Wood High School) s Of the County School Board of Frederick County, Virginia, declaring its intention to request a supplemental appropriation to the FY2021 School Construction Fund subject to the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' approval. WHEREAS, Frederick County Public Schools (the "Division") is a political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County School Board of Frederick County, Virginia, (the "Board") is charged by law to manage and control the property of the school division and provide for the erecting, furnishing, and equipping of necessary school buildings (§22.1-79); and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Virginia, (the Supervisors") approved the James Wood High School Addition and Renovation through annual adoptions of the Capital Improvements Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted an extensive condition study and evaluation of major building systems, building finishes, and site amenities in July of 2017, amended December 2020 in preparation for preliminary design detail; and WHEREAS, the major building systems have exceeded their normal life expectancy; and WHEREAS, the configuration of the building inhibits the efficient and effective operation of a high school, particularly the location of Guidance Offices, and the cafeteria without a loading dock; and WHEREAS, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is inadequate and fails to meet American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) standards for indoor air quality. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE BOARD as follows: The Board requests a supplemental appropriation to the FY2021 Construction Fund in the amount of$72,844,000.00 for the renovation, and construction of James Wood High School; t = Section I—The Board shall perform major renovation,and construct additions to the James Wood High School in compliance with the regulations of the Board of Education and the Uniform Statewide Building Code (§22.1-140); 59 Section II - The school design shall be approved in writing by the Division's Superintendent s in accordance with State Law (§22.1-140); Section III —The school plans shall be reviewed and approved according to Frederick County Ordinance by the Chief Building Official and appropriate State or Federal Agencies with jurisdiction such as the Virginia Department of Transportation; Section IV—The school shall be sized to accommodate an approximate program capacity of 1,500 students in accordance with the Virginia Board of Education Regulations and Virginia Department of Education Guidelines for School Facilities. Section V- Should the appropriation be reduced from the amount requested, the scope of the work shall be reduced in size and program capacity accordingly without affecting the instructional space/layout and integrity of the school to accommodate current instructional pedagogy and integration of technology. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. t Frederick County School Board Clerk,Frederick County School Board (Name) Executive Director of Finane�and Deputy Clerk(Title) Recorded Vote Moved By: .e Lasers Seconded By: Yeas: 7 Nays: 62 60 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES AND CONSENTING TO THE ISSUANCE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The School Board of the County of Frederick (the "School Board") hereby (i) requests,pursuant to Section 15.2-2640 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the "Code"), that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick (the "County") cause the County to issue one or more of its general obligation school bonds (the 'Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $76,486,200.00, but with the objective of providing up to $72,844,000.00 in net proceeds, to finance the renovation of James Wood High School which constitutes a capital project for public school purposes and (ii) consents, pursuant to Section 15.2-2638.B(iii) of the Code and Article VII, Section 10(b) of the Constitution of Virginia, to the issuance of the Bonds. 2. Further, the School Board consents to and authorizes an application to the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the purchase of the Bonds by the VPSA as part of its 2021 Spring Pooled Bond Sale and such future pools as may be necessary to finance the above- referenced project. The Chairman of the School Board, the Superintendent of the schools of Frederick County School Division (the "Schools"), and such other officer or officers of the School Board or the Schools as either may designate (the "Authorized Officers") are hereby authorized to decrease the amount of proceeds requested to the extent the County and such Authorized Officers deem it necessary to issue the Bonds in an amount less than provided in paragraph 1 above. 3. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver on behalf of the School Board a Use of Proceeds Certificate and Tax Compliance Agreement (the 61 "Tax Compliance Agreement") setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary for the bonds issued by VPSA in the Spring of 2021 or in the future (the "VPSA Bonds")to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended(the "Tax Code"), and the applicable regulations. The School Board covenants on behalf of itself and the Schools under its governance that the School Board and the Schools shall comply with the provisions of the Tax Compliance Agreement and the Tax Code so that the interest on the VPSA Bonds is excludable from gross income under the Tax Code. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. ADOPTED BY THE FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY,2021 Member Vote Member Vote Jay W. Foreman X- Frank Wright Shontyd C. Washington Michael A.Lake Bradley A. ComstockBrandon H.Monk Brian J.Hester y Frederick County School Board Clerk Frederick County School Board 62 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail . Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��GrN Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Frederick County School Board Request for the Board of Supervisors to Hold a Public Hearing Regarding: 1. Supplemental Appropriation for Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation: $12,020,000 2. Participation in the 2021 Spring VPSA Bond Sale for the Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation Project Attachments: BOS02-10-21 RegPublicHearingslndianHollowReno_Redacted.pdf 63 11 . • Frederick County Public Schools Executive Director of Finance Patty Camery cameryp@fcpsk12.net DATE: February 3, 2021 TO: Jay Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator Ann Phillips, Deputy Clerk FROM: Patty D. Camery, Executive Director of Finance _ SUBJECT: 1) Supplemental Appropriation for Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation 2) Participation in the 2021 Spring VPSA Bond Sale for the Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation Project The Frederick County School Board requests, by way of the two attached resolutions, action by the Board of Supervisors concerning the renovation of Indian Hollow Elementary School: 1) A supplemental appropriation to the school construction fund for $12,020,000 for the renovation of Indian Hollow Elementary School and 2) Participation and application in the 2021 Spring Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bond sale program for the renovation of Indian Hollow Elementary School. The resolution for $12,020,000 will cover participation in the Spring 2021 VPSA bond sale and future VPSA bond sales up to the amount approved. A public hearing is required and is requested after which both approving resolutions can be considered by the Board of Supervisors. The public hearing should be set for March 10th. The ad for publication is attached. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Thank you. Attachments (3) cc: David T. Sovine, Ed.D., Superintendent Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator Cheryl Shiffler, Frederick County Finance Director Bond Counsel 1415 Amherst Street www.frederick.02.va.us 540-662-3889,ext.88105 P.O.Box 3508 64 Winchester,Virginia 22604-2546 RESOLUTION (Renovation Indian Hollow Elementary School) Of the County School Board of Frederick County, Virginia, declaring its intention to request a supplemental appropriation to the FY2021 School Construction Fund subject to the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' approval. WHEREAS, Frederick County Public Schools (the "Division") is a political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County School Board of Frederick County, Virginia, (the "Board") is charged by law to manage and control the property of the school division and provide for the erecting, furnishing, and equipping of necessary school buildings (§22.1-79); and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Virginia, (the Supervisors") approved the Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation through annual adoptions of the Capital Improvements Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted an extensive condition study and evaluation of major building systems, building finishes, and site amenities beginning in 1996 and amended in December 2020, in preparation for preliminary design detail; and WHEREAS, the major building systems have exceeded their normal life expectancy; and WHEREAS, the construction of Indian Hollow Elementary School was based upon the use of porous decorative CMU (concrete masonry unit)with a block filler and paint as the exterior veneer due to cost cutting measures at that time; and WHEREAS, the building is experiencing indoor air quality and structural concerns as a result of the porous absorption characteristic of this masonry exterior veneer and continuous moisture infiltration; and WHEREAS, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) is inadequate and fails to meet current American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) standards for indoor air quality. 65 -- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD as follows: The Board requests a supplemental appropriation to the FY2021 Construction Fund in the amount of$12,020,000.00 for the renovation of Indian Hollow Elementary School; Section I —The Board shall renovate the Indian Hollow Elementary School in compliance with the regulations of the Board of Education and the Uniform Statewide Building Code (§22.1-140); Section II - The school design shall be approved in writing by the Division's Superintendent in accordance with State Law (§22.1-140); Section III —The school plans shall be reviewed and approved according to Frederick County Ordinance by the Chief Building Official and appropriate State or Federal Agencies with jurisdiction such as the Virginia Department of Transportation; Section IV - Should the appropriation be reduced from the amount requested, the scope of work shall be reduced accordingly without affecting the instructional space/layout and integrity of the school to accommodate current instructional pedagogy and integration of technology. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PaiJ, Frederick County School Board Clerk,Frederick County School Board game) Executive Director of Finance and Deputy Jerk(Title) Recorded Vote Moved By: /hR. ova g.4414- Seconded 414-Seconded By: le. �. �� Yeas: �p Nays: 66 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES AND CONSENTING TO THE ISSUANCE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The School Board of the County of Frederick (the "School Board") hereby (i) requests,pursuant to Section 15.2-2640 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the "Code"), that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick (the "County") cause the County to issue one or more of its general obligation school bonds (the 'Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount not in excess of $12,621,000.00, but with the objective of providing up to $12,020,000.00 in net proceeds, to finance the renovation of Indian Hollow Elementary School which constitutes a capital project for public school purposes and (ii) consents, pursuant to Section 15.2-2638.B(iii) of the Code and Article VII, Section 10(b) of the Constitution of Virginia,to the issuance of the Bonds. 2. Further, the School Board consents to and authorizes an application to the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") for the purchase of the Bonds by the VPSA as part of its 2021 Spring Pooled Bond Sale and such future pools as may be necessary to finance the above- referenced project. The Chairman of the School Board, the Superintendent of the schools of Frederick County School Division (the "Schools"), and such other officer or officers of the School Board or the Schools as either may designate (the "Authorized Officers") are hereby authorized to decrease the amount of proceeds requested to the extent the County and such Authorized Officers deem it necessary to issue the Bonds in an amount less than provided in paragraph 1 above. 3. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver on behalf of the School Board a Use of Proceeds Certificate and Tax Compliance Agreement (the 67 "Tax Compliance Agreement") setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary for the bonds issued by VPSA in the Spring of 2021 or in the future (the "VPSA Bonds")to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Tax Code"), and the applicable regulations. The School Board covenants on behalf of itself and the Schools under its governance that the School Board and the Schools shall comply with the provisions of the Tax Compliance Agreement and the Tax Code so that the interest on the VPSA Bonds is excludable from gross income under the Tax Code. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately. ADOPTED BY THE FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY,2021 Member Vote Member Vote Jay W. Foreman y Frank Wright Shontya C. Washington y Michael A. Lake Bradley A. Comstock Y Brandon H.Monk Brian J. Hester C; r�1.ar Frederick County School Board Clerk Frederick County School Board 68 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Public Hearings (Non Planning Issues) Title: An Ordinance to Amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155 Taxation, Article XI Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security, §155-46 Fee Imposed; Collection; Use. Legislation Passed in 2020 Increases the Courthouse Security Fee that Localities May Impose as Part of Court Costs in Each Criminal Case in Which a Defendant is Convicted of a Violation of Any Statute or Ordinance. The Proposed Ordinance Would Increase the Current $10 Fee to $20. Attachments: BOS02-10-21 CodeAndOrdinanceItem 1.pdf 69 CODE& ORDINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT to the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Tuesday, December 8, 2020 3:00 p.m. 107 NORTH KENT STREET,WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA ATTENDEES: Committee Members Present: J. Douglas McCarthy, Chair;Blaine P. Dunn; Stephen Butler, and Derek Aston Committee Members Absent: James Drown Staff Present: Roderick B.Williams, County Attorney;Jay E. Tibbs,Deputy County Administrator; Kathryn Corbit, Chief Admin for the Business Division, Commissioner of the Revenue's Office. ITEMS FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: 1. Proposed Revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155 Taxation,Article IX Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security, §155-46 Fee Imposed; collection; use. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision. The General Assembly during its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation increasing the courthouse security fee that localities may impose as part of the court costs in each criminal case in which a defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. The proposed ordinance would increase the current$10 fee to $20. The Clerk of the Circuit Court requested consideration of this fee increase. Upon a motion by Mr.Aston, seconded by Mr. Butler, the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. 2. Proposed revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155,Taxation,Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-85 Proration of tax. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision to Chapter 155,Taxation. The General Assembly during its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a local governing body to authorize the locality's treasurer to issue any refund up to $5,000 as a result of an erroneous tax assessment. The legislation increased the amount from$2,500 to $5,000. For any refund above $5,000,the governing body must approve the refund. The proposed amendment would confirm that the authority for such refunds extends to refunds of business license taxes. Upon a motion by Mr. Butler, seconded by Mr. Dunn,the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. 70 3. Proposed revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155,Taxation,Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-110 Violations and penalties. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision to Chapter 155,Taxation. The General Assembly during its 2012 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a locality to required that no business license shall be issued to an applicant therefor until that person has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license,real estate,personal property,meals, transient occupancy, severance, and admissions taxes owed by the business to the locality have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the locality. Upon a motion by Mr. Dunn, seconded by Mr. Butler,the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:25 p.m. 71 COUNTY OF FREDERICK r Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 1,8 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail rwillia@fcva.us MEMORANDUM TO: Code & Ordinance Committee FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney DATE: December 1, 2020 RE: Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security—Legislation Authorizing Increase in Fee The General Assembly at its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation increasing the courthouse security fee that localities may impose as part of the court costs in each criminal case in which a defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. A copy of the legislation is attached. The County currently imposes a $10 fee for this purpose. The new legislation permits the County to increase the fee to $20. The Clerk of the Circuit Court has requested consideration of the increase. The Treasurer's Office reports that, in Fiscal Year 2020, the County received approximately $91,500 in courthouse security fee assessments. Therefore, were the County to increase the courthouse security fee assessment, the County could expect that the amount of collections of the fee in future fiscal years would be roughly double the FY2020 amount and therefore be approximately $183,000. The authorizing legislation restricts use of the funds to the funding of courthouse security personnel, and, if requested by the sheriff, equipment and other personal property used in connection with courthouse security. At present, the Sheriff s Office has over 20 deputies assigned to its Civil Services Division, the responsibilities of which include courthouse security. While not as many as 20 deputies are performing courthouse security functions at any given time, the potential $183,000 in revenue from the courthouse security fee would cover the costs of approximately three FTEs and the demands of courthouse security functions certainly exceed three FTEs. Toward this end, it may be appropriate for the Sheriff s Office regular annual budget to show this revenue and then provide for use of the courthouse security fee funds for personnel costs, in lieu of having the funds accumulate. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 72 A draft proposed revision to the relevant section of the County Code, Section 155-46, is attached. This memorandum serves as a request for a recommendation from the Code& Ordinance Committee as to whether to forward this item to the Board of Supervisors for further consideration. Attachments cc: Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator 73 VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2020 SESSION CHAPTER 602 An Act to amend and reenact § 53.1-120 of the Code of Virginia, relating to courthouse and courtroom security; assessment. [S 149] Approved April 2,2020 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That § 53.1-120 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows: § 53.1-120. Sheriff to provide for courthouse and courtroom security; designation of deputies for such purpose; assessment. A. Each sheriff shall ensure that the courthouses and courtrooms within his jurisdiction are secure from violence and disruption and shall designate deputies for this purpose. A list of such designations shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Criminal Justice Services. B. The chief circuit court judge, the chief general district court judge and the chief juvenile and domestic relations district court judge shall be responsible by agreement with the sheriff of the jurisdiction for the designation of courtroom security deputies for their respective courts. If the respective chief judges and sheriff are unable to agree on the number, type and working schedules of courtroom security deputies for the court, the matter shall be referred to the Compensation Board for resolution in accordance with existing budgeted funds and personnel. C. The sheriff shall have the sole responsibility for the identity of the deputies designated for courtroom security. D. Any county or city, through its governing body, may assess a sum not in excess of " $20 as part of the costs in each criminal or traffic case in its district or circuit court in which the defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. If a town provides court facilities for a county, the governing body of the county shall return to the town a portion of the assessments collected based on the number of criminal and traffic cases originating and heard in the town. The imposition of such assessment shall be by ordinance of the governing body that may provide for different sums in the circuit courts and district courts. The assessment shall be collected by the clerk of the court in which the case is heard, remitted to the treasurer of the appropriate county or city and held by such treasurer to be appropriated by the governing body to the sheriffs office. The assessment shall be used solely for the funding of courthouse security personnel, and, if requested by the sheriff, equipment and other personal property used in connection with courthouse security. 74 f W eras ORDINANCE __' 2021 The Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia hereby ordains that Section 155-46 (Fee imposed; collection; use) of Article XI (Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security) of Chapter 155 (Taxation) of the Code of Frederick County, Virginia be, and the same hereby is, amended by enacting an amended Section 155-46 (Fee imposed; collection; use) of Article XI (Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security) of Chapter 155 (Taxation) of the Code of Frederick County, Virginia, as follows and to take effect April 1, 2021 (deletion shown in strikethre G ; addition shown in bold underline): CHAPTER 155 Taxation ARTICLE XI Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security § 155-46 Fee imposed; collection; use. Pursuant to § 53.1-120D of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, there is hereby assessed a fee of$a 9 20 as part of the costs in each criminal or traffic case which is tried in either one of the district courts of the County of Frederick or in the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick and which results in conviction of any statute or ordinance. This fee shall be collected by the Clerk of the circuit court in which the case is heard, remitted to the Treasurer of Frederick County, and held by the Treasurer subject to appropriation by the Board of Supervisors to the Sheriff of Frederick County for the funding of courthouse security personnel. Enacted this day of , 2021. Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Blaine P. Dunn David D. Stegmaier Judith McCann-Slaughter 75 A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator 2 76 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Public Hearings (Non Planning Issues) Title: An Ordinance to Amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155, Taxation, Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-85 Proration of Tax. Legislation Passed in 2020 Permits a Local Governing Body to Authorize the Locality's Treasurer to Issue Any Refund up to $5,000 as a Result of an Erroneous Tax Assessment. Any Refund Above $5,000, the Governing Body Must Approve the Refund. The Proposed Amendment Would Confirm that the Authority for Such Refunds Extends to Refunds of Business License Taxes. Attachments: BOS02-10-21 CodeAndOrdinanceltem2.pdf 77 CODE& ORDINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT to the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Tuesday, December 8, 2020 3:00 p.m. 107 NORTH KENT STREET,WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA ATTENDEES: Committee Members Present: J. Douglas McCarthy, Chair;Blaine P. Dunn; Stephen Butler, and Derek Aston Committee Members Absent: James Drown Staff Present: Roderick B.Williams, County Attorney;Jay E. Tibbs,Deputy County Administrator; Kathryn Corbit, Chief Admin for the Business Division, Commissioner of the Revenue's Office. ITEMS FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: 1. Proposed Revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155 Taxation,Article IX Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security, §155-46 Fee Imposed; collection; use. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision. The General Assembly during its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation increasing the courthouse security fee that localities may impose as part of the court costs in each criminal case in which a defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. The proposed ordinance would increase the current$10 fee to $20. The Clerk of the Circuit Court requested consideration of this fee increase. Upon a motion by Mr.Aston, seconded by Mr. Butler, the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. 2. Proposed revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155,Taxation,Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-85 Proration of tax. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision to Chapter 155,Taxation. The General Assembly during its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a local governing body to authorize the locality's treasurer to issue any refund up to $5,000 as a result of an erroneous tax assessment. The legislation increased the amount from$2,500 to $5,000. For any refund above $5,000,the governing body must approve the refund. The proposed amendment would confirm that the authority for such refunds extends to refunds of business license taxes. Upon a motion by Mr. Butler, seconded by Mr. Dunn,the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. 78 3. Proposed revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155,Taxation,Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-110 Violations and penalties. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision to Chapter 155,Taxation. The General Assembly during its 2012 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a locality to required that no business license shall be issued to an applicant therefor until that person has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license,real estate,personal property,meals, transient occupancy, severance, and admissions taxes owed by the business to the locality have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the locality. Upon a motion by Mr. Dunn, seconded by Mr. Butler,the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:25 p.m. 79 COUNTY OF FREDERICK r Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 1,8 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail rwillia@fcva.us MEMORANDUM TO: Code & Ordinance Committee FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney DATE: December 1, 2020 RE: Ordinance Regarding Refunds of Erroneously Assessed Business License Taxes The General Assembly at its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a local governing body to authorize the locality's treasurer to issue any refund of up to $5,000 as a result of an erroneous tax assessment. The legislation increased the amount from $2,500 to $5,000. For any refund above $5,000, the governing body must approve the refund. A copy of the legislation, which amended Va. Code § 58.1-3981, is attached. County Code § 155-136 (copy attached)permits the County's Treasurer to make such refunds as to property taxes and County Code § 155-85 permits the County's Treasurer to make such refunds as to business license taxes, but § 155-85 does so only in instances in which the business has ceased to do business. Frequently, however, instances arise with the business license tax,just as with the personal property tax, where taxpayers remain in business, frequently as successful enterprises, and file amended returns, for any number of legitimate reasons, which result in refunds due for portions of the tax paid (the Commissioner of the Revenue still must determine whether an assessment was erroneous). So that the Treasurer may proceed with these refunds, if not more than $5,000, without the need to have the matter go on the Board agenda, an amendment to § 155-85 would be needed. A draft proposed revision to §155-85, adding language to allow the Treasurer to issue business license refunds in instances of erroneous business license assessments, is attached. The draft also adds the word"occupation" to the term "business, trade, profession, or calling", for consistency with other provisions in the County Code regarding business license taxes. This memorandum serves as a request for a recommendation from the Code& Ordinance Committee as to whether to forward this item to the Board of Supervisors for further consideration. Attachments cc: Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 80 VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2020 SESSION CHAPTER 240 An Act to amend and reenact § 58.1-3981 of the Code of Virginia, relating to refunds of local taxes,- authority axes;authority of treasurer. [H 316] Approved March 10,2020 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That § 58.1-3981 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows: § 58.1-3981. Correction by commissioner or other official performing his duties. A. If the commissioner of the revenue, or other official performing the duties imposed on commissioners of the revenue under this title, is satisfied that he has erroneously assessed such applicant with any such tax, he shall correct such assessment. If the assessment exceeds the proper amount, he shall exonerate the applicant from the payment of so much as is erroneously charged if not paid into the treasury of the county or city. If the assessment has been paid, the governing body of the county or city shall, upon the certificate of the commissioner with the consent of the town, city or county attorney, or if none, the attorney for the Commonwealth, that such assessment was erroneous, direct the treasurer of the county, city or town to refund the excess to the taxpayer, with interest if authorized pursuant to § 58.1-3918 or in the ordinance authorized by § 58.1-3916, or as otherwise authorized in that section. However, the governing body of the county, city or town may authorize the treasurer to approve and issue any refund up to $2,500 $5,000 as a result of an erroneous assessment. B. If the assessment is less than the proper amount, the commissioner shall assess such applicant with the proper amount. If any assessment is erroneous because of a mere clerical error or calculation, the same may be corrected as herein provided and with or without petition from the taxpayer. If such error or calculation was made in work performed by others in connection with conducting general assessments, such mistake may be corrected by the commissioner of the revenue. C. If the commissioner of the revenue, or other official performing the duties imposed on commissioners of the revenue under this title, is satisfied that any assessment is erroneous because of a factual error made in work performed by others in connection with conducting general reassessments, he shall correct such assessment as herein provided and with or without petition from the taxpayer. D. An error in the valuation of property subject to the rollback tax imposed under § 58.1-3237 for those years to which such tax is applicable may be corrected within three years of the assessment of the rollback tax. E. A copy of any correction made under this section shall be certified by the commissioner or such other official to the treasurer of his county, city or town. When an unpaid erroneous assessment of real estate is corrected under this section and such real estate has been sold at a delinquent land sale, the commissioner or such other official making such correction shall certify a copy of such correction to the clerk of the circuit court of his county or city; and such clerk shall note such correction in the delinquent land book opposite the entry of the tract or lot for the year or years for which such correction is made. F. In any action on application for correction under § 58.1-3980, if so requested by the applicant, the commissioner or other such official shall state in writing the facts and law supporting the action on such application and mail a copy of such writing to the applicant at his last known address. 81 10/30/2020 Frederick County,VA Ecode360 Frederick County, VA Friday, October 30, 2020 Chapter 155. Taxation Article XXI. Refund of Local Taxes § 155-136. Refunds. Pursuant to the authority granted by § 58.1-3990 of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, the Commissioner of the Revenue may authorize a refund on erroneously assessed property designated for local taxation. No refund shall be made in any case when application therefor was made more than three years after the last day of the tax year for which such taxes were assessed. https://www.ecode360.com/print/FR1364?guid=8707468 1/82 f W eras ORDINANCE __' 2021 The Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia hereby ordains that Sections 155-85 (Proration of tax) of Article XVI (Business License Provisions) of Chapter 155 (Taxation) of the Code of Frederick County, Virginia be, and the same hereby is, amended by enacting an amended Sections 155-85 (Proration of tax) of Article XVI (Business License Provisions) of Chapter 155 (Taxation) of the Code of Frederick County, Virginia, as follows (deletions shown in stFikethF9 ,nh; additions shown in bold underline): CHAPTER 155 Taxation ARTICLE XVI Business License Provisions § 155-85 Proration of tax. A. In the event that a person, firm,, or corporation ceases to engage in a business, trade, profession, occupation, or calling within the County during a year for which the person, firm, or corporation a 'iGense t has already been paid a license tax, or, to the extent that the Commissioner of the Revenue determines that a person, firm, or corporation has incorrectly paid license tax in an amount greater than determined to be actually due, the taxpayer shall be entitled upon application to a refund for that portion of a license tax already paid that corresponds to the excess payment by the person, firm, or corporation, or, in the instance of a person, firm, or corporation that ceases to engage in a business, trade, profession, occupation, or calling within the County, prorated on a monthly basis so as to ensure that the licensed privilege is taxed only for that fraction of the year during which it is exercised within the County. Frederick County may elect to remit any refunds in the ensuing fiscal year and may offset against such refund any amount of past due taxes owed by the same taxpayer. In no event shall the County be required to refund any part of a minimum flat tax or the flat portion of the fee which is not based upon the gross receipts of the taxpayer. B. Licenses issued on a basis other than gross receipts or gross purchases, that is, those assessed a flat license fee, shall not be prorated for any period less than 83 one calendar year, except as provided by the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, and except as otherwise provided in this article. Enacted this day of , 2021. Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Blaine P. Dunn David D. Stegmaier Judith McCann-Slaughter A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator 2 84 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Public Hearings (Non Planning Issues) Title: An Ordinance to Amend the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155, Taxation, Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-110 Violations and Penalties. Legislation Passed in 2012 Permits a Locality to Require that No Business License Shall be Issued to an Applicant Until that Person has Produced Satisfactory Evidence that all Delinquent Business License, Real Estate, Personal Property, Meals, Transient Occupancy, Severance, and Admissions Taxes Owed by the Business to the Locality have Been Paid Which Have Been Properly Assessed Against the Applicant by the Locality. The Proposed Amendment Would Add Real Estate Tax to the List of Taxes Required to be Paid before Issuance of a Business License. Attachments: BOS02-10-21 CodeAndOrdinanceltem3.pdf 85 CODE& ORDINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT to the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Tuesday, December 8, 2020 3:00 p.m. 107 NORTH KENT STREET,WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA ATTENDEES: Committee Members Present: J. Douglas McCarthy, Chair;Blaine P. Dunn; Stephen Butler,and Derek Aston Committee Members Absent: James Drown Staff Present: Roderick B.Williams, County Attorney;Jay E. Tibbs,Deputy County Administrator; Kathryn Corbit, Chief Admin for the Business Division, Commissioner of the Revenue's Office. ITEMS FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: 1. Proposed Revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155 Taxation,Article IX Assessment of Court Costs for Courthouse Security, §155-46 Fee Imposed; collection; use. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision. The General Assembly during its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation increasing the courthouse security fee that localities may impose as part of the court costs in each criminal case in which a defendant is convicted of a violation of any statute or ordinance. The proposed ordinance would increase the current$10 fee to $20. The Clerk of the Circuit Court requested consideration of this fee increase. Upon a motion by Mr.Aston, seconded by Mr. Butler, the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. 2. Proposed revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155,Taxation,Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-85 Proration of tax. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision to Chapter 155,Taxation. The General Assembly during its 2020 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a local governing body to authorize the locality's treasurer to issue any refund up to $5,000 as a result of an erroneous tax assessment. The legislation increased the amount from$2,500 to $5,000. For any refund above $5,000,the governing body must approve the refund. The proposed amendment would confirm that the authority for such refunds extends to refunds of business license taxes. Upon a motion by Mr. Butler, seconded by Mr. Dunn,the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. 86 3. Proposed revision to Frederick County Code, Chapter 155,Taxation,Article XVI Business License Provisions, §155-110 Violations and penalties. Mr.Williams reviewed the proposed revision to Chapter 155,Taxation. The General Assembly during its 2012 Regular Session passed legislation permitting a locality to required that no business license shall be issued to an applicant therefor until that person has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license,real estate,personal property,meals, transient occupancy, severance, and admissions taxes owed by the business to the locality have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the locality. Upon a motion by Mr. Dunn, seconded by Mr. Butler,the Code and Ordinance Committee forwarded the proposed ordinance amendment to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing with a recommendation of approval. The motion was unanimously approved. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:25 p.m. 87 COUNTY OF FREDERICK r Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 1,8 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail rwillia@fcva.us MEMORANDUM TO: Code & Ordinance Committee FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney DATE: December 1, 2020 RE: Ordinance to Require Payment of Real Estate Taxes prior to Issuance of Business License The General Assembly at its 2012 Session passed legislation permitting a locality to require that no business license shall be issued to an applicant therefor until that person has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license, real estate, personal property, meals, transient occupancy, severance and admissions taxes owed by the business to the locality have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the locality. See Va. Code § 58.1-3700 (2012 Acts of Assembly cc.304 and 318) (copy attached). The County Code does not presently impose this requirement. See County Code § 155-110. This legislation is similar to the legislation that permits a locality to withhold building permits and other land use approvals until all real estate taxes and other charges constituting a lien on the subject property have been paid. See Va. Code § 15.2-2286(B). In 2018, the Board amended the County Code to impose that requirement. See County Code §§ 52-5 and 143- 195(A). The Treasurer has requested consideration of an amendment to the County Code to include the requirement of payment of delinquent real estate taxes before issuance of a business license to a person who is delinquent in the payment of real estate taxes (copy of request attached). A draft proposed revision to County Code Section 155-110, to add the term "real estate", is attached (the draft also adds the word"business" before"license" for clarity and conformance with the state code). This memorandum serves as a request for a recommendation from the Code& Ordinance Committee as to whether to forward this item to the Board of Supervisors for further consideration. Attachments cc: Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 88 Code of Virginia Title 58.1. Taxation Chapter 37. License Taxes § 58.1-3700. License requirement; requiring evidence of payment of business license, business personal property, meals and admissions taxes Whenever a license is required by ordinance adopted pursuant to this chapter and whenever the local governing body shall impose a license fee or levy a license tax on any business, employment or profession, it shall be unlawful to engage in such business, employment or profession without first obtaining the required license. The governing body of any county, city or town may require that no business license under this chapter shall be issued until the applicant has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license, real estate, personal property, meals, transient occupancy, severance and admissions taxes owed by the business to the county, city or town have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the county, city or town. Any person who engages in a business without obtaining a required local license, or after being refused a license, shall not be relieved of the tax imposed by the ordinance. Code 1950, § 58-239; 1984, c. 675; 1991, c. 267; 1993, cc. 93, 934; 1996, cc. 715, 720;2012, cc. 304 , 318. The chapters of the acts of assembly referenced in the historical citation at the end of this section may not constitute a comprehensive list of such chapters and may exclude chapters whose provisions have expired. 1 10/30/2020 89 lC� CO COUNTY of FREDERICK Office of Treasurer P.O.Box 225 Winchester,Virginia 22604-0225 540/665-5607 + FAX 540/662-5838 R.Wayne Corbett,MGDT www.fredtax.com Deputy,Treasurer Operations C. William Orndoff,Jr.,MGT Angela Fritts Whitacre,MGDT County Treasurer Deputy Treasurer DATE: May 22, 2020 TO: Roderick Williams. Frederick County Attorney FROM: C.William OrnIaff,Jr r r, Frederick County RE: Code and Ordinanc The Frederick County Treasurer would like to have the Frederick County Code 155-110 amended to conform with the state code of VA 58.1-3700 B. The County states: B. No such license shall be issued until the applicant has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent license, personal property,meals, transient occupancy, severance and admissions taxes owed by the applicant to the County have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the County The state Code states: § 58.1-3700. License requirement; requiring evidence of payment of business license, business personal property, meals and admissions taxes. Whenever a license is required by ordinance adopted pursuant to this chapter and whenever the local governing body shall impose a license fee or levy a license tax on any business, employment or profession, it shall be unlawful to engage in such business, employment or profession without first obtaining the required license. The governing body of any county, city or town may require that no business license under this chapter shall be issued until the applicant has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license, real estate,personal 107 NORTH KENT STREET • WINCHESTER,VIRGINIA 22601 90 property,meals, transient occupancy, severance and admissions taxes owed by the business to the county, city or town have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the county, city or town. Any person who engages in a business without obtaining a required local license, or after being refused a license, shall not be relieved of the tax imposed by the ordinance. Code 1950, § 58-239; 1984, c. 675; 1991, c. 267; 1993, cc. 93, 934; 1996, cc. 715, 720; 2012, cc. 304, 318. The addition to the County Code would be the words real estate as highlighted above in the state code. This would allow the Treasurer to withhold a businesss license for the non payment of real estate in that entity's name 91 f W eras ORDINANCE __' 2021 The Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia hereby ordains that Section 155-110 (Violations and penalties) of Article XVI (Business License Provisions) of Chapter 155 (Taxation) of the Code of Frederick County, Virginia be, and the same hereby is, amended by enacting an amended Section 155-110 (Violations and penalties) of Article XVI (Business License Provisions) of Chapter 155 (Taxation) of the Code of Frederick County, Virginia, as follows (addition shown in bold underline): CHAPTER 155 Taxation ARTICLE XVI Business License Provisions § 155-110 Violations and penalties. A. It shall be unlawful to engage in any business, employment or profession for which a license is required by any of the provisions of this article without first having obtained such license, which shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $2,500 or by a jail sentence of not more than 12 months, or by both such fine and jail sentence. B. No such license shall be issued until the applicant has produced satisfactory evidence that all delinquent business license, real estate, personal property, meals, transient occupancy, severance and admissions taxes owed by the applicant to the County have been paid which have been properly assessed against the applicant by the County. C. Anyone who engages in a business, employment or profession without obtaining a required license, or after being refused the same, shall not be relieved of the tax imposed by the provisions of this article. D. Whenever any person is required by any of the provisions of this article to file a return for tax purposes, it shall be unlawful for such person to willfully fail or refuse to file such return at the time or times required or to make a false statement in such return with intent to defraud, and any violation hereof shall be punishable as provided in § 58.1-3916.1, Code of Virginia. 92 Enacted this day of , 2021. Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Blaine P. Dunn David D. Stegmaier Judith McCann-Slaughter A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator 2 93 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings Title: Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District - To Consider Adding Additional Parcels into the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. These Properties are Located at 475 Green Spring Road, Winchester, Virginia and are Identified with Property Identification Numbers 21-3-20, 21-3-21, 21-3-22, 21-3-23, 22-A-45, 22-A-46, 22-A-47 and 22-A-49 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Attachments: BOS02-10-21 GreenSpring_Redacted.pdf 94 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 11 ,�,,, 540/ 665-5651 15 Fax: 540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Board of Supervisors FROM: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator - RE: 2020-2025 Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District Request to Add Property Identification Numbers (PINs): 22-A-49, 22-A-47, 22- A-46, 22-A-45, 21-3-23, 21-3-22, 21-3-21, and 21-3-20 Martha Wolfe DATE: January 25, 2021 Please find attached an application from Martha Wolfe, dated November 5, 2020, seeking to add eight parcels, totaling 90.86+/- acres to the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. The Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District was established in 2014 and was renewed for a period of five years on September 9, 2020. Currently, the district contains 385.63+/- acres. If approved, this addition would increase the District to 476.49+/- acres. Section 15.2-4314 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, provides property owners with the ability to request to add land to the Agricultural and Forestal District through a public process via the local governing body. The Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) considered this request at their meeting on December 15, 2020. The ADAC unanimously recommended approval of the additions to the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the additions at their meeting on January 20, 2021. This request is presented to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing. Staff is seeking a decision from the Board of Supervisors on this request to add eight parcels totaling 90.86+/- acres to the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. Please find attached to this memo: 1. Staff Report 2. Maps delineating the location of this addition and its proximity to other properties within the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District 3. Applicant Request letter Please contact staff if you have any questions or need additional information. MRC/pd 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 95 CO� 2020-2025 AGRICULTURAL & FORESTAL DISTRICT Aw ` GREEN SPRING DISTRICT ADDITION b Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors w Prepared: January 29,2021 tiA4f,1 118 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to other interested in this matter. Reviewed Action Agricultural District Advisory Committee: 12/15/20 Recommended Approval Planning Commission: 01/20/21 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 02/10/21 Pending PROPOSAL: A request to add eight parcels totaling 90.86+/-to the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. LOCATION AND SIZE: This District is located within the Gainesboro Magisterial District and currently contains 385.63+/- acres within two (2) parcels managed by two (2) property owners. It is generally located along Glaize Orchard Road (Route 682) to the south and Green Spring Road (Route 67 1) to the east. This request for the addition of 90.86+/- acres would increase the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District to 476.49+/-acres. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 02/10/21 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is a request to the Board of Supervisors to increase the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District. Chapter 43, Section 15.2-4300 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, requires that these Districts be reviewed by the local government every five years after establishment. The Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District during the last renewal consisted of 385.63+/- acres. This proposed District request meets the intent of Chapter 43, Section 15.2-433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and has been evaluated in conjunction with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. This addition provides an opportunity for the agribusiness community to conduct long range planning efforts for the management of their operations, while providing a reserve of agricultural land through the year 2025. The 2020-2025 Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District currently consist of 385.63+/- acres. This request of 90.86+/- acres would increase the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District to 476.49+/- acres. The Agricultural District Advisory Committee(ADAC) unanimously recommended approval of the 90.863+/-acres to the 2020-2025 Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District at their meeting on December 15, 2020. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the 90.863+/-acres to the 2020-2025 Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District at their meeting on January 20,2021. Following a public hearing, Board of Supervisors action on this application would be appropriate. 96 Page 2 Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District Addition January 29, 2021 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: LOCATION AND SIZE: This District is located within the Gainesboro Magisterial District and currently contains 385.63+/- acres within two (2) parcels managed by two (2) property owners. It is generally located along Glaize Orchard Road (Route 682) to the south and Green Spring Road (Route 671)to the east. This request for the addition of90.86+1- acres would increase the Green Spring Agricultural and Forestal District to 476.49+/-acres. AGRICULTURAL & FORESTAL SIGNIFICANCE: The agricultural operation in the District is 40 percent agriculture (livestock, and crop harvesting) and 60 percent open space/woodlands. The area within the District is rural in nature. LAND USE: All parcels within the District are agricultural,vacant, and woodland. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2035 Comprehensive Plan of Frederick County provides guidance when considering land use actions. The location of this proposed District lies outside the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area(SWSA) and is not part of any land use plan or study by the County. The land use within this District of 385.63+/- acres is vacant. This current land use should remain in its present land use of pristine condition with land use of vacant and woodland. The intent of the Rural Areas is to maintain agriculture as a significant portion of the County's economy and to maintain the rural character of areas outside of the Urban Development Area. The Comprehensive Plan can accomplish this by promoting the inclusion of additional land in Agricultural and Forestal Districts. The Comprehensive Plan Supports the renewal of the District for it provides an opportunity for the agribusiness community to conduct long range planning efforts for the management of their operations, while providing a reserve of agricultural land through the year 2025. LAKES/PONDS/STREAMS: The District lies within the Green Springs and Babbs Run drainage areas. These two bodies of water are tributaries to Back Creek. This District will further assist with managing the quality of County's water resources. TOPOGRAPHY: The District generally varies from rolling hills to ridges to the south, west, and north. Flat and gentle rolling hills are to the east. This District lies within the Green Springs and Babbs Run drainage area and water is available from ponds, wells and springs. PRIME AGRICULTURE SOIL: The largest amount of prime agricultural soils located within District is Weikert-Gainesboro-Berks. 97 2020-2025 Green Spring Addition Agricultural & Forestal District OJ - ^� At 4 X, ' +fi 90s CV-1 r mss y r Mee vy�y g OAddition Parcels PIN Owner Acres 21 3 20 SHABB, WILLIAM 5.53 21 3 21 SHABB, WILLIAM 5.12 21 3 22 SHABB, WILLIAM 6.00 21 3 23 SHABB, WILLIAM 6.55 22 A 45 SHABB, WILLIAM A&MARTHA WOLFE 2.75 22 A 46 SHABB, WILLIAM A&MARTHA WOLFE 22.88 22 A 47 SHABB, WILLIAM 39.60 22 A 49 SHABB, WILLIAM A&MARTHA WOLFE 1 2.43 Note: Frederick County Dept of Planning&Development 107 N Kent St.Suite 202,Winchester,VA 22601 540-665-5651 0 0.045 0.09 0.18 M'.9$ Map Created:November 19,2020 • �A 111 ► . � 21A A ®� �213 22 22 ® X29 323 22�A X49 • 90.66 Acre Addir WON WMA ►III "-• _ �;� �� -.�� lam► •.. .'�►•♦� � C) 0 kk. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of planning and Development 5401665-5651 ``-- Fax: 5401665-6395 APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL,ADDITION OR REMOVAL FROM THE GREEN SPRING AGRICULTURAL &FORESTAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY,VIRGINIA Name; Address: Phone: Em ail: As indicated in the attached letter, you currently have parcels in the Green Searing Agricultural and Forestal District. Please indicate in the table below which parcels you would like to keep in the District or remove from the District. If you wish to add new parcels to the District,please list those below as well. Tax Map# Acreage Deep in or Add to Remove from District District Z- tlf Xdd 2, - RFs" Z.s 0-c:- _ js^•sd L Z Z / lgn re Date 'rfT / � S Date PLEASE RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RFM4RCH 31,2020 107 North Kent Street 9 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 4�GK CO w t ADDITION w 3`4GIA, 1739 Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 20, 2021 Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: February 10, 2021 ADDITION TO THE GREEN SPRING AGRICULTURAL & FORESTAL DISTRICT WHEREAS,Frederick County received a request to include eight parcels of land totaling 90.86± acres into the Green Spring Agricultural &Forestal District; these parcels are identified by Property Identification Numbers(PINS)22-A-49,22-A-47,22-A-46,22-A-45,21-3-23,21-3-22,21- 3-21, 2-A-49,22-A-47,22-A-46,22-A-45,21-3-23,21-3-22,21- 3-21, and 21-3-20. This District is located in the Gainesboro Magisterial District along Glaize Orchard Road (Route 682)to the south and Green Spring Road (Route 671)to the east; and WHEREAS,The Agricultural District Advisory Committee(ADAC)discussed this request at their meeting on December 15, 2020 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public hearing for this request at their meeting on January 20, 2021 and recommended approval; WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing for this request at their regularly schedule meeting on February 10, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the addition of Property Identification Numbers(PINS)22-A-49,22-A-47,22-A-46,22-A-45,21-3-23,21-3-22,21-3-2 1,and 21-3-20,totaling 90.86±acres into the Green Spring Agricultural&Forestal District contributes to the conservation and preservation of agricultural and forestal land in Frederick County; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as follows: The Frederick County Board of Supervisors hereby includes Property Identification Numbers(PINS) 22-A-49,22-A-47,22-A-46,22-A-45,21-3-23,21-3-22,21-3-21,and 21-3-20,totaling 90.86±acres into the Green Spring Agricultural & Forestal District, with an expiration and renewal date of September 9, 2025. This addition increases the size of the Green Spring Agricultural & Forestal District to 476.49+/- acres. This Agricultural & Forestal District is as described on the attached map. This ordinance shall be in effect on the day of adoption. PDRES901-21 101 Passed this 10th day of February 2021 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Blaine P. Dunn Shawn L. Graber David D. Stegmaier J. Douglas McCarthy Judith McCann-Slaughter Robert W. Wells A COPY ATTEST Kric C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator PDRES401-21 102 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings Title: South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District - To Consider Adding Additional Parcel into the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. The Property is Located at 229 West Oaks Lane, Winchester, Virginia and is Identified by Property Identification Number 74- A-3 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Attachments: BOS02-10-21 South Frederick—Redacted.pdf 103 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 11 ,�,,, 540/665-5651 15 Fax: 540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Board of Supervisors FROM: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator RE: 2020-2025 South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District Request to Add Property Identification Number(PIN)74-A-3 for West Oaks Farm Market,LLC DATE: January 25, 2021 Please find attached an application from West Oaks Farm Market, LLC, dated October 30, 2020, seeking to add one parcel totaling 200.00+/- acres to the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. The South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District was established in 1980 and was renewed for a period of five years on September 9, 2020. Currently, the district contains 6,694.42+/- acres. If approved, this addition would increase the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District to 6,894.42+/- acres. Section 15.2-4314 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, provides property owners with the ability to request to add land to the Agricultural and Forestal District through a public process via the local governing body. The Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) considered this request at their meeting on December 15, 2020. The ADAC unanimously recommended approval of the addition to the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the addition at their meeting on January 20, 2021. This request is presented to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing. Staff is seeking a decision from the Board of Supervisors on this request to add 200.00+/- acres to the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. Please find attached to this memo: 1. Staff Report 2. Maps delineating the location of this addition and its proximity to other properties within the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District 3. Applicant Request letter Please contact staff if you have any questions or need additional information. MRC/pd 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 104 COQ 2020-2025 AGRICULTURAL& FORESTAL DISTRICT w SOUTH FREDERICK DISTRICT ADDITION w Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: January 29,2021 138 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran,Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Agricultural District Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to other interested in this matter. Reviewed Action Agricultural District Advisory Committee: 12/15/20 Recommended Approval Planning Commission: 01/20/21 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 02/10/21 Pending PROPOSAL: A request to add one parcel totaling 200.00+/- to the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. LOCATION AND SIZE: This District is located within the Back Creek Magisterial District and currently contains 6,694.42+/- acres. It is generally located along Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622), Middle Road (Route 628), Marlboro Road (Route 63 1) and Hites Road (Route 625). This request for the addition of 200.00 +/- acres would increase the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District to 6,894.42+1-acres. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 02/10/21 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is a request to the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to increase the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. Chapter 43, Section 15.2-4300 of the Code of Vir ig nia, 1950, as amended, requires that these Districts be reviewed by the local government every five years after establishment. The South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District during the last renewal consisted of 6,694.42+/- acres. This proposed District request meets the intent of Chapter 43, Section 15.2-433 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and has been evaluated in conjunction with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. This addition provides an opportunity for the agribusiness community to conduct long range planning efforts for the management of their operations, while providing a reserve of agricultural land through the year 2025. With this addition the acreage will be increase by 200.00-acres. The total acreage of the District after considering addition would increase from 6,694.42+/- acres to 6,894.42+/- acres. The Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) unanimously recommended approval of the 200.00+/-acre to the 2020- 2025 South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District at their meeting on December 15, 2020. The Planning Commission (PC) unanimously recommended approval of the 200.00+/-acres to the 2020-2025 South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District at their meeting on January 20,2021. Following a public hearing,Board of Supervisors action on this application would be appropriate. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: 105 Page 2 South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District Renewal January 29, 2021 LOCATION AND SIZE: This District is located within the Back Creek Magisterial District and currently contains 6,694.42+/- acres. It is generally located along Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622), Middle Road (Route 628), Marlboro Road (Route 63 1) and Hites Road (Route 625). This request for the addition of 200.00 +/- acres would increase the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District to 6,894.42+1-acres. AGRICULTURAL & FORESTAL SIGNIFICANCE: The agricultural operation in the District is 90 percent agriculture (orchard, and crop harvesting) and 10 percent open space/woodlands. The area within the District is rural in nature. LAND USE: All parcels within the District contain agricultural or residential land uses. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2035 Comprehensive Plan of Frederick County provides guidance when considering land use actions. The District is outside the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and is not part of any land use plan or study by the County. The current land use should remain in its present land use with orchards, agricultural, and residential. The intent of the Rural Areas is to maintain agriculture as a significant portion of the County's economy and to maintain the rural character of areas outside of the Urban Development Area. The Comprehensive Plan can accomplish this by promoting the inclusion of additional land in Agricultural and Forestal Districts. The Comprehensive Plan Supports the renewal of the District for it provides an opportunity for the agribusiness community to conduct long range planning efforts for the management of their operations, while providing a reserve of agricultural land through the year 2025. LAKES/PONDS/STREAMS: The District lies primarily within the Opequon Creek and Stephens Run drainage area. The District will further assist with managing the quality of the County's water resources. TOPOGRAPHY: The District generally varies from rolling hills to ridges to the north, west, south and east. This District lies within Opequon Creek watershed and water is available from ponds,wells and springs. PRIME AGRICULTURE SOIL: The largest amount of prime agricultural soils located within the District is Frederick-Poplimento. 106 2020-2025 South Frederick Addition Agricultural & Forestal District LUw A-4y. ' " MIDD WU " yfl1 Y 1e €tia 'E A. g Bq,p � s ¢�� MW r k x a s Addition Parcels PIN Owner Acres 74 A 3 1 WEST OAKS FARM MARKET LLC 200.00 Note: Frederick County Dept of Planning&Development 107 N Kent St.Suite 202,Winchester,VA 22601 540-665-5651 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Miles 107 Map Created:November 19,2020 '�I -�- a r ti � � � �II�� .7/��I� 1 -. �piJ��•�_"•�Vli�1�1Q ■.�„ ---- t - _ OVA r4t WE OR fJ ♦ �� iii ♦ • ,.,,11•. _ .. ��,� � ', �`�' I•� • ♦ � � , n:�i�i��:•��.�``/iii u�,1h:,`�,i,.o•.,�o♦ I ��ii �, t '_ 111111 ♦ (i ', .A .• ♦fir` ,,`` ' ��♦.�`'►.��' fit' /� %♦�� i1�Q�� 74 A�131; �1 200 AcreAilalition QJ op I MON,) OAR •s MA 1 � - 1 .1 • .1 1 1 C) COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5403 665-5651 Fax,: 5401665-6395 APPLTCATION FOR RENEWAL OR ADDI71CO TO THE SOUTH FREDERICK AGRICULTURAL& FORESTAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNT t Y,V1RG11�,-1A Ne-nae• West Oakcs Farm Market, LLC fl 229 t yr� n 0 {� �" Vh , 226 Address: Phone Email: You presently have or have requested to have the folie ing bracts in the Sheath figFrederick adiculteeral and Forestal District. Please Yt�.tarn� (with n :tee each parcel [Cauca■a,r d`,�l 1 that you wish to keep in or add to the eDistrict and mark each parcel you wish to remove from the District. Please enter in any additional properties you wish to add to the district. T'az h1ap# Acreage i eep in or Add to Ren.tove from DisV•iet District 74-A-3 200.0 Ac. Add f Bg a a MA Date �agn: re Date PLEASE,RE Td1RIV W MIE PLAMWNG DE AR�MENT B Y hmRCH 31, 020 107 North Kent Street• Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 4�GK CO w ADDITION w 3`4Gf1/ 1738 Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 20, 2021 Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: February 10, 2021 ADDITION TO THE SOUTH FREDERICK AGRICULTURAL & FORESTAL DISTRICT WHEREAS,Frederick County received a request to include one parcel totaling 200.00+/- acres into the South Frederick Agricultural&Forestal District;this parcel is identified by Property Identification Number 74-A-3. This District is located within the Back Creek Magisterial District and currently contains 6,694.42+/- acres. It is generally located along Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622),Middle Road (Route 628),Marlboro Road (Route 63 1) and Hites Road (Route 625); and WHEREAS,The Agricultural District Advisory Committee(ADAC)discussed this request at their meeting on December 15, 2020 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public hearing for this request at their meeting on January 20, 2021 and recommended approval; WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing for this request at their regularly schedule meeting on February 10, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the addition of Property Identification Number 74-A-3 totaling 200.00+/- acres into the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District contributes to the conservation and preservation of agricultural and forestal land in Frederick County; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as follows: The Frederick County Board of Supervisors hereby includes Property Identification Number 74-A-3 totaling 200.00+/-acres into the South Frederick Agricultural&Forestal District,with an expiration and renewal date of September 9, 2025. This addition increases the size of the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District to 6,894.00.42+/-acres. This Agricultural&Forestal District is as described on the attached map. This ordinance shall be in effect on the day of adoption. Passed this 10th day of February 2021 by the following recorded vote: PDRES902-21 110 Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Blaine P. Dunn Shawn L. Graber David D. Stegmaier J. Douglas McCarthy Judith McCann-Slaughter Robert W. Wells A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator PDRes. 414-14 PDRES402-21 111 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings Title: 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP is a Prioritized List of Capital Projects Requested by Various County Departments and Agencies. The Plan is Created as an Informational Component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: BOS02-10-21 CI P2021-2026.pdf 112 f ` COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 Fax: 540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Board of Supervisors FROM: Candice E. Perkins,AICP, CZA,Assistant Director DATE: January 28, 2021 RE: Public Hearing- 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is a document that consists of a schedule of major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five-year period, as well as a category for long term projects (6 + years out). The CIP is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan. The inclusion of projects on the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities and cost estimates may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that projects may not be funded during the year indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further out the project date is identified. The CIP is also updated annually, and projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. CIP Components The CIP provides project priorities that are submitted by various County Agencies and tables that outline the projects and cost estimates. Within the tables, columns for each year show the funding needs that would be requested in the corresponding budget cycle. In addition, those projects that are long range projects have been placed at the end of the CIP table, outside of the five-year window. The CIP includes three separate tables; the first table shows County funded projects and the second and third tables cover Transportation projects and Airport projects which are primarily funded through other sources. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 113 2021-2026 CIP—Public Hearing January 28, 2021 Page 2 The CIP includes a total of 54 projects from the following: Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional Library, County Administration, Fire and Rescue, Sheriff's Office, Public Safety Communications, Transportation and the Winchester Regional Airport. Background—Discussions On January 11, 2021, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPQ discussed the 2021-2026 CIP capital improvement project requests. The role of the CPPC in the CIP process was to ensure that the various departmental project requests are in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Following the CPPC discussion, the Committee endorsed the CIP and its conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and forwarded the CIP to the Planning Commission for discussion. The Planning Commission discussed the CIP at their meeting on January 20, 2021; the Planning Commission recommended approval of the 2021-2026 CIP and affirmed that the CIP is in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. The Board of Supervisors discussed the CIP on January 27, 2021 and authorized the CIP to be sent forward for public hearing. Conclusion The 2021-2026 CIP is presented to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing. Staff is seeking a decision from the Board on the adoption of the 2021-2026 CIP. If adopted, the CIP will become a component of the Comprehensive Plan, which would satisfy the review requirement of Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a"feature shown"within a jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this information. CEP/pd Attachment-Draft 2021-2026 CIP with applicable text, tables, and maps 114 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 2021- 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Adopted by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors TBD Recommended by the Frederick County Planning Commission ' January 20, 2021 1738 115 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX- PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................... 1 Frederick County Public Schools................................... 15 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................2 Frederick County Parks and Recreation .......................18 Frederick County Public Schools.................................. 2 Frederick County Parks and Recreation ..................... 2 Handley Regional Library............................................... 27 Handley Regional Library ..............................................2 County Administration ..................................................2 County Administration.....................................................29 Fire & Rescue...................................................................3 Sheriff's Office................................................................ 3 Fire and Rescue.................................................................32 Public Safety Communications......................................3 Transportation Committee........................................... 4 Volunteer Fire Company Requests ................................34 Winchester Regional Airport.........................................4 Sheriff's Office .................................................................38 2021-2026 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAPS Public Safety Communications.......................................40 2021-2026 Capital Projects.............................................5 2021-2026 Frederick County Public Schools................6 Transportation Committee .............................................41 2021-2026 Parks and Recreation ..................................7 2021-2026 Transportation Projects...............................8 Winchester Regional Airport........................................ 47 CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS............................................................9 PROJECT FUNDING.........................................................................9 2021-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLES....10-13 116 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY FY 2021-2026 INTRODUCTION Section §15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five years. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Once the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and provides a link between the documents and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning projects. The inclusion of projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use, as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is projected. 1 117 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS Frederick County Public Schools Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects that have been priorities from previous years. The top capital improvement priority for the Schools is the Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation. The James Wood High School additions and renovations is the second highest priority, followed by the Armel Elementary School renovation and expansion. Parks & Recreation The top capital improvement priority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams Creek Greenway Trail. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents of this corridor along with the surrounding communities and was emphasized in the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan. Other top priorities include a recreation center, Old Charlestown Road Park development, and the Indoor Aquatic Center. Handley Regional Library The Handley Regional Library recommends three projects. The library's top priority is a new library branch in the Gainesboro area. The second and third priorities are for new library branches throughout the County which include the areas of Senseny/Greenwood Road and Route 522 South; both of which are anticipated to be located within the UDA (Urban Development Area) in locations consistent with the approved area plans -the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the Southern Frederick Area Plan. County Administration There are two requests from Public Works—the Gore Convenience site expansion and the Double Toll Gate Convivence Site. County Administration projects continue to be the County Office Annex (Former Sunnyside Plaza Shopping Center), the joint County Administration and School Administration Building and the future replacement of the Joint Judicial Center. General Government Capital Expenditures is also included in the CIP — this item enhances the connection between the CIP and proffered contributions made to mitigate the impacts of development projects. This item addresses those general government capital expenditures that may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold. 2 118 Fire and Rescue The top project for Fire and Rescue is the construction Fire & Rescue Station #22, a new facility located in the vicinity of Route 277 that would also provide the ability for an annex facility for other County-related offices. Also identified as priority 1A is the apparatus needed for this facility. Project two includes the construction of Station #23, a new facility located in the vicinity of Crosspointe that would also provide the ability for an annex facility for other County-related offices. Also identified as priority 2A is the apparatus needed for this facility. Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests The revolving fund in the amount of$1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established remains a component of the CIP. This capital expenditure fund is for purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment that may fall below the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee. It was determined that the inclusion of such a priority would be beneficial in ensuring that significant capital expenses are identified in the County's capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Greenwood Fire Station has included requests for the expansion/upgrade of the living quarters and the replacement of two ambulances. Middletown Fire Station is seeking to demolish their original building and first addition and rebuild and connect to the third addition. Clearbrook Fire Station is seeking to demolish their existing structure and build a new station. Stephens City Fire Station is seeking to replace tower 11, and the replacement of two medic units. Sheriff's Office The Sheriff's Office has included five projects in their CIP. The top project is the construction of an eight-bay steel building for housing of large, specialized vehicles that require coverage. Other projects include replacement law enforcement vehicles, mobile and portable radios, and a firearms training simulator. Public Safety Communications The Project 25 Public Safety Radio Network is top public safety—communications priority. This project includes the purchase, construction, and deployment of Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Project 25 (P25) radio 3 119 communications system to support mission-critical public safety communications within the County. This system will provide radio and paging communications for the Frederick County Sheriff's Department, Frederick County Fire & Rescue, volunteer fire & rescue companies, and the Department of Public Safety Communications. Transportation Committee The Transportation Committee continues to provide project requests for the CIP. Virginia State Code allows for transportation projects to be included within a locality's CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from developers and revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does not take away funding for generalized road improvements. The Transportation Committee has included 20 priority projects. The top three priorities include Route 277 widening and safety improvements (Phase 1), Exit 313 Bridge Replacement and Capacity Improvements, and Renaissance Drive (Phase 2). The inclusion of the Eastern Road Plan Improvements item once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects which are aimed at mitigating potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Winchester Regional Airport Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and state governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding. The construction of a new general aviation terminal to support future airport operations continues to be number one in the CIP, followed by the Taxiway "A" Relocation (design/construction). Other projects focus on land and easement acquisition in support of airport development to meet Federal Aviation requirements. The vast majority of the funding for these improvements comes from the FAA and VDA. 4 120 2021 -2026 i Capital Improvements 1 Specific or Approximate Locations County Administration 1Gore Convenience Site Expansion 2 Double Toll Gate Convenience Site Expansion 3 Sunnyside County Office Annex - Airport 127 - Library 1 Library Branch -Gainesboro 22 2 Library Branch-Rt 522 South 3 Library Branch-Sansany&Greenwootl i Fire&Rescue t 1 Fire&Rescue Station 22 2 Fire&Rescue Station 22 Apparatus 3 Fire&Rescue Station 23 4 Fire&Rescue Station 23 Apparatus Fire&Rescue-Volunteer Stations 1Greenwootl Station Renovation 11 - 2 Middletown Station Building Addition 50 3 New Clearbrook Fire Station - Sheriffs Office 1 Steel Building 1 22 259 37 a � 3 s 7 r 37 11 22 50 w. 55 r. Z277 0 5,000 10,000 20,000 /� - 22 Feet 0 1.25 2.5 5 Miles 2 121 High Schools 22 Middle Schools Elementary Schools Support Facilities Potential School Facility Locations OPotential School Locations OPurchased Land Urban Development Area 0 SWSA 127 22 / 1 Facilities Services 50 FCMS 11 / *GES 22 AES SES �✓ JSES 259 Support Facilities. est JW'HSI • APRES 50 Middle School JWMS. MHS RRES School Board Offide=. -111: / esteDJHC Winchr NREP/SRS <�t GMES, J" Multi-Use Campus 2 •� �" j % %&% Elementary School •• f37 i � ;•� �• • C / OVES ABMS �} 22 EES 50 Fourth High School ES Transportation Facility 11 55 Stephens`' BH ES City. ./•�� REAMS • Elementary School SHS 277 © i School Locations Note 71 Created by Frederick County Department of 0 1 2 4 Miles MES Elementary School Are Most Planning&Development iddletown. Appropriate M Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests 11 22 Within the U DA submitted by Frederick County School Board 12/22/20 122 Proposed Parks District Community , Neighborhood :-Abrams Creek Trail Existing County Parks \ Reynolds District Park Community Park > (S,,ore i 0 Neighborhood Park Publically Accessible Land Federal 1z� State Battlefield 22 Cross ,� \ Non-Profit / Junction Local Park t Tuscarora Trail j School Public Boat Launch esbor`oY` Urban Development Area / Gainin ' Clear Brook j Gore 22 I N` ®� Clearbrook \ Park r' S ♦' Stephenson l WEST Albin 259 ♦ Old Charlestown Road` i - Park i Round HII�'� Shawneeland o 7 NE V l�wm�nesie. Frederick Heights Park 1 / Rose Hill Park I EAST; / 37 •% •. i L ,i �, 22 50 Star Tannery --A� t : / mel i�l j •r Sherando 277 / J Park Note: Created by Frederick County Department of �, Planning&Development 'e,\ 0 0.75 1.5 3 Miles f, Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests mramero� submitted by the Department of Parks&Recreation > 11 11/9/2020 ? '. -J�_ 22 i_ ---------------- 123 1 - 2021 -2026 i Capital Improvement Plan 1 1 s Transportation Projects Funded Priorities 1. ROUTE 277 WIDENING& P%O SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS(PH 1) 0% 2. EXIT 313 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 0&CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS 3. RENAISSANCE DR, PHASE 2 4 4. ROUTE 277; RT TURN LANE EXTENSION AT WARRIOR DR 11 Unfunded Priorities 22 a 5. CONTINUE ROUTE 37 PLANNING &ENGINEERING WORK i ti6. ROUTE 277 WIDENING& SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS(PH 2) 0% 7. REDBUD RD& EXIT 317 00INTERCHANGEIMPROVEMENTS 8. ROUTE 11 N WIDENING FROM •.�� SNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD TO so OLD CHARLESTOWN RD tt Q 9. BRUCETOWN RD/HOPEWELL RD; 1 ALIGNMENTAND INTERSECTION 10. ROUTE 7 CORRIDOR 37 IMPROVEMENTS FROM EXIT 315 Winchester TO GREENWOOD RD L � 11. ROUTE 11 S WIDENING& O% INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS OFROM CITY LIMITS TO OPEQUON CHURCH LN �12. ROUTE 11 N OF WINCHESTER WIDENING TO WV LINE 13.SENSENY RD WIDENING 22 14.SENSENY RD;TURN LANES so` AT CRESTLEIGH DR 1® 15. 1-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATION 16.WARRIOR DR EXTENSION P%O TO NEW EXIT 307 �17.CHANNING DR EXTENSION �., •� 11 TO ROUTE 50 !•'�• r'" © �18. INVERLEE WAY; CONNECTION j Stephens 0 0.5 1 2 Miles FROM SENSENY RD TO ROUTE 50 city 19.WARRIOR DR EXTENSION • Frederick County Dept of FROM ROUTE 37 Planning&Development 107 N Kent St o 20. EASTERN ROAD PLAN Winchester,VA 22601 IMPROVEMENTS www.fcva.us 22 12/21/20 124 THE CIP TABLES- CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan tables, on the following four pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Projects Ranked by Department-The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. County Contribution - The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes - Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs-The cost for each project, including the County allocations and other funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in Table 1 have a total projected cost to the County of $339,062,907, this figure excludes Airport requests and transportation projects as these are primarily funded through other sources. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission actively seeks grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. • The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. 9 125 Long Range Comprehensive County Total Project Projects-Ranked by Department 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026+ Plan Projects Contributions Notes Costs Ensuing Beyond Departmert Fiscal Year Year2 Year Year Years Year 6+ Public Schools Please frto,%,prdenhryhgj�w.re school sitrsf radditionalschool st'eslomter7mroughoutae County. Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation $5,800,000 $3,800,000 $2,400,000 $12,000,000 $12,000,000 James Wood High School Additions/Renovations $3,600,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $73,600,000 $73,600,000 Amnel Elementary School Renovation/Expansion $8,100,000 $5,400,000 $2,600,000 $16,100,000 $16,100,000 School Board Office IT Addition $4,800,000 $1,600,000 $6,400,000 $6,400,000 Fourth High School $35,300,000 $23,500,000 $23,500,000 $11,700,000 $94,400,000 $94,000,000 Sherando High School Renovation/Expansion TBD Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation TBD Total $17,500,000 $44,000,000 $61,900,000 $43,500,000 $23,500,000 $11,700,000 $202,500,000 $202,100,000 Parks&Recreation Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $479,985 $508,915 $1,210,000 $1,630,000 $3,828,900 $3,828,900 Recreation Center $650,000 $9,250,000 $9,900,000 $9,900,000 Old Charlestown Road Park $3,400,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility $835,000 $12,000,000 $12,835,000 $12,835,000 Jordan Springs Elementary Gym Addition $75,000 $1,325,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 Water Slide/Sprayground $1,030,000 $1,030,000 $1,030,000 Sherando Sherando Park Area l Rec Access Phase 2 $100,000 $1,315,000 $1,415,000 $1,415,000 Clearbrook Clearbrook Park Development $220,000 $200,000 $420,000 $420,000 Sherando Sherando Park Softball Complex $115,000 $1,625,000 $1,740,000 $1,740,000 Sherando Sherando Park Area 3 Development $110,000 $2,350,000 $2,460,000 $2,460,000 Playground Replacement $350,000 $300,000 $150,000 $250,000 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 Sherando Sherando Ballfeld Light Replacement $945,000 $945,000 $945,000 Community Parks $1,040,000 $1,154,000 $2,194,000 $2,194,000 Neighborhood Parks $293,000 $600,000 $4,131,000 $5,024,000 $5,024,000 Regional Parks $5,400,000 $4,110,000 $6,320,000 $15,830,000 $15,830,000 Sherando South Sherando Park Development $2,465,000 $2,465,000 $2,465,000 National Guard Armory Gym Addition $630,000 $630,000 $630,000 Fleet Trip Vehicles $340,000 $340,000 $340,000 Sherando SH Park Areal and 2 Development $3,450,000 $3,450,000 $3,450,000 Indoor Ice Rink $6,930,000 $6,930,000 $6,930,000 $5,224,985 $20,058,915 $14,443,000 $5,984,000 $5,650,000 $6,575,000 $17,721,000 $77,286,900 $77,286,900 Regional Library Gainesboro Library $155,023 $1,340,000 $225,736 $128,275 $1,849,034 $1,849,034 Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD 522 South Library TBD TBD IM $155,023 $1,340,000 $225,736 $128,275 $0 $0 $1,849,034 $1,849,034 County Administration Gore Convenience Site Expansion $750,000 $750,000 E $750,000 Double Toll Gate Convenience Site $35,000 $550,000 $585,000 $585,000 County Office Annex(Sunnyside) TBD TBD TBD General Government Capital Expenditures $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 County/School Board Administration Building TBD TBD E TBD Joint Judicial Center New Facility TBD TBD TBD Total $950,000 $235,000 $750,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $2,335,000 $2,335,000 126 Long Range Comprehensive County Total Project Projects-Ranked by Department 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026+ Plan Projects Contributions Notes I Costs Public Safety-Fire and Rescue,Sheriffs Office and Comn-hiCatione� Fire&Rescue Frederick County Fire&Rescue Station 22 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 Station 22 Apparatus $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Fire and Rescue Station 23/Annex Facilities $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Station 23 Apparatus $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Kill _ $0 $0 $8,600,000 $0 $0 $8,100,000 $0 16,700,000 $16,700,000 Fire&Rescue Company Capital Requests Fire&Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 1 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 Fire&Rescue Company Capital Requests Greenwood Fire Station Upgrade/Expand Living Quarters $1,500,000 $1,500,000 including capdal equipment requests Greenwood Fire Station Ambulance Replacement Program $310,000 $385,000 $695,000 Middletown Station Building Renovation/Addition TBD Clearbrook-New Fire Station $50,000 $205,000 $4,575,000 $4,830,000 StephensCity Station-Tower 11 Replacement $130,000 $1,170,000 $1,300,000 Stephens City Station-Medic Unit Replacement(11-2) $240,000 $240,000 Stephens City Station-Medic Unit Replacement(11-3) $280,000 $280,000 $1,700,000 $510,000 $200,000 $0 $200,000 $280,000 $0 1,000,000 $9,845,000 Sheriffs Office Eight Bay Steel Building for Large Vehicles $320,000 $320,000 $320,000 Replacement Law Enforcement Vehicles $870,000 $870,000 $870,000 $870,000 $870,000 $870,000 continuous $5,220,000 $5,220,000 Apex 8500 Mobile Radios $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 continuous $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Apex 8000 Portable Radios $187,500 $187,500 $187,500 $187,500 $187,500 $187,500 continuous $1,125,000 $1,125,000 Firearms Training Simulator $100,000 $100,000 Total = _ $1,677,500 $1,257,500 $1,257,500 $1,257,500 $1,257,500 $1,257,500 $0 7,865,000 $7,965,000 Communications Project 25 Pubic Safety Radio Network $4,196,395 $6,294,592 $6,294,592 $2,098,197 $2,098,197 $20,981,973 Total $20,981,973 Total of All Categories $27,207,5081 $67,401,415 $87,376,236 $51,069,775 $30,807,500 $27,912,500 $17,721,000 $309,535,934 $339,062,907 Other Funding Sources: E=Partial funding anticipated through development&revenue sources TBD=To be Determined 127 Long Range oun y Comprehensive rivate Total Project Projects-Ranked by Agency 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026+ Plan Projects Contributions Notes Costs Ensuing Beyond Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6+ Funded Priorities Route 277,Fairfax Pike,Widening and Safety Improvements(ph 1) $37,012,924 $37,012,924 E $37,012,924 Exit 313 Bridge Replacement and Capacity Improvements $35,123,000 $35,123,000 E $35,123,000 Rennaisance Drive,Phase 2 $4,223,000 $4,223,000 E $4,223,000 Route 277 right turn extension Warrior Drive $490,943 $490,943 E $490,943 Unfunded Priorities Route 37 Engineering&Construction $772,500,000 $772,500,000 E $772,500,000 Route 277,Fairfax Pike,Widening $0 and Safety Improvements(ph 2) $26,191,407 $26,191,407 E $26,191,407 Redbud Road Realignment and $0 $0 Exit 317 Interchange Improvements $11,576,306 $11,576,306 E $11,576,306 Widening of Route 11 North(ph 1) $29,196,504 $29,196,504 E $29,196,504 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign. $8,240,000 $8,240,000 E $8,240,000 Route 7 Corridor Improvements Exit 315 to Greenwood $5,150,000 $5,150,000 $5,150,000 Route 11 S Widening and Intersection Improvements from Winchester City Limits to Opequon Church Lane $3,399,000 $3,399,000 E $3,399,000 Widening of Route 11 North(ph2) $197,760,000 $197,760,000 E $197,760,000 Senseny Road Widening $69,010,000 $69,010,000 E $69,010,000 Senseny Road turn lanes/improvements Crestleigh Drive $2,625,036 $2,625,036 E $2,625,036 I-81 Exit 307 Relocation with 4 In connection to Double Church and Stephens City Bypass $241,283,133 $241,283,133 E $241,283,133 Warrior Drive Extension(south) $48,410,000 $48,410,000 E $48,410,000 Channing Drive Extension $46,350,000 $46,350,000 E $46,350,000 Inverlee Way $28,119,000 $28,119,000 E $28,119,000 Warrior Drive Extension(Crosspointe south) $34,505,000 $34,505,000 E $34,505,000 Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD E TBD TO1 $76,849,868 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,524,315,386 $1,601,165,253 $1,601,165,253 Other Funding Sources: E=Partial funding anticipated through development&revenue sources The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects.Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds,developer contributions,and revenue sharing 128 III F-I PI TO • • • Long Range Comprehensive County Total Project Projects-Ranked by Agency 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026+ Plan Projects Contributions Notes Costs Ensuing Beyond Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6+ New Aviation Terminal $1,724,000 $4,580,000 $85,000 A,B,C $6,389,000 Taxiway"A"Relocation $4,130,000 $4,150,000 $4,444,444 $4,444,444 $4,444,444 A,B,C $17,168,888 Land Parcel 64-A-60(Cooper) $200,000 A,B,C $200,000 Runway Protection Zone(RPZ)Land Services $150,000 A,B,C $150,000 Acquire Easements $100,000 A,B,C $100,000 Northside Site Prep 500000 A,B,C $500,000 Northside Access Road $700,000 A,B,C $700,000 Fuel Storage Facility $600,000 A,B,C $600,000 $1,724,000 $4,130,000 $4,580,000 $4,935,000 $5,394,4441 $4.444.44411 $25,807,888 A=Partial funding from VA Dept.of Aviation B=Partial funding from FAA C=Partial local funding(%split between Frederick County and Winchester based on Weldon Cooper figures) *Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal,state,and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick,Clarke, Shenandoah,and Warren Counties,and the City of Winchester. 129 APPENDIX PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List PRIORITY 1—Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation Description: Indian Hollow Elementary School opened in 1988 and has served continuously as an elementary school since that time. The school and auxiliary buildings contain 59,065 square feet. The school has a program capacity of 442 students. Currently the building serves grades K-5. This renovation needs to address the exterior wall, windows, & doors, and the HVAC. Repairing the exterior walls is a pressing need. Capital Cost: $12,000,000 Justification: Indian Hollow Elementary School is 32 years old and renovation is needed to these few areas to empower FCPS staff to operate the building economically and efficiently until a full renovation can be accomplished. Construction Schedule: FY 23-24 PRIORITY 2—James Wood High School Renovations and Additions Description: James Wood High School opened in 1980 and has served as a high school since that time. The school and all auxiliary buildings total 229,187 square feet and has a program capacity of 1,283 students. The building serves grades 9-12. The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Foci of the renovation will include modification of instructional areas to support modern, student-centered instructional delivery, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, technology, finishes, and site. Capital Cost: $73,600,000 Justification: James Wood High School is 40 years old. Renovations and additions are needed to a number of areas to support effective, economical, and efficient operation of the school for years to come. This school will be renovated to be more like the 4th HS, the new Frederick County MS, and the Aylor MS replacement, with a variety of learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today's working world. Construction Schedule: FY 24-25 PRIORITY 3 -Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation Description: Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since that time. The school contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 580 students. As of September 15, 2020, the school has 607 students. Eight classrooms will be added to Armel ES, to accommodate the additional growth at Lake Frederick. The existing 15 131 facility will be updated as needed and core areas partially renovated to serve the additional students. Capital Cost: $16,10,000 Justification: Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, growth in the attendance zone will need to be addressed through the addition of classrooms to the facility. Construction Schedule: FY 23-24 PRIORITY 4—School Board Office IT Addition Description: This project would put the entire department together in one purpose-built facility. It would be a separate building located near the Administrative Offices on James Wood Middle School property. The new facility would be a 15,000 square foot building with storage areas, work areas, offices, cubicles, conference rooms, a customer service area, customer parking, a loading dock, and parking for IT work vehicles. Capital Cost: $6,400,000 Justification: Frederick County Public Schools IT Department is currently located in three areas inside the Administrative Offices and four trailers behind the offices. Being situated in multiple locations that are not purpose built for the administration of the school division's technology systems creates significant time-consuming inefficiencies. Construction Schedule: FY 23-24 PRIORITY 5—Fourth High School Description: The new high school project is proposed to serve students grades 9-12 with a program capacity of 1,250 students and will address anticipated growth in high school student enrollment in the school division. The site is located at the end of Justes Drive behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school will be designed for collaborative education, similar to Frederick County MS, with a variety of learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today's working world. Capital Cost: $94,000,000 Justification: This project will address expected growth in high school student enrollment in the school division over the next several years. We propose to open the new high school in the fall of 2027. Construction Schedule: Beyond 2026 16 132 PRIORITY 6—Sherando High School Renovations and Addition Description: Sherando High School opened in 1993. The facility contains 239,517 square feet and has a program capacity of 1,323 students serving grades 9-12. Several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation, including reorganization and addition of classroom and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborative education. Because we want the facility to last another 30 years, facility infrastructure will be renewed and updated, and finishes will be refreshed. Other areas to be addressed are security, traffic safety, and gender equity in athletic facilities. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: Sherando is 27 years old and will be at least 32 years old by the time we start to renovate it. Renovations are needed to ensure the economical, efficient, and effective operation of the school for years to come. Modern instruction requires that a variety of learning spaces be provided, including collaborative spaces of varying sizes and project labs (similar to maker spaces). Transportation safety concerns exist on and around the school site at Sherando during arrival and dismissal. Sherando does not have a softball field on site, instead using a softball field in Sherando Park. This represents an equity issue between boys' and girls' sports and is contrary to FCPS' policy of equity between boys and girls sports. Construction Schedule:TBD PRIORITY 7 —Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation Description: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School opened in 1974 and has served continuously as an elementary school since that time. The school and auxiliary building contain 65,120 square feet. The school has a program capacity of 509 students. Currently the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed, including open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarms, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is 46 years old and renovation is needed to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operations of the school for years to come. Construction Schedule:TBD 17 133 Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List PRIORITY 1—Abrams Creek Trail Description: 10' wide, asphalt, shared-use trail along Abrams Creek. From Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is estimated the trail will have six bridge stream crossings and will be approximately 3 miles in length. As outlined below, the project is envisioned in three phases of approximately 1 mile each. Each phase will have logical beginning and ending points and be usable trail sections in themselves. Phase 1 from Senseny Road to Woodstock Lane. Phase 2 from Woodstock Lane to Woody's Place, and Phase 3 from Woody's Place to Channing Drive. VDOT Transportation Alternatives (TA) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds are allocated for the project in the schedule above. Funds for Phases II and III are not yet secured. Grant funding will be pursued for these phases. Capital Cost: $3,828,900 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents and provide an alternate means of entering and exiting the City of Winchester from Eastern Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey, and the 2012 Virginia Outdoors Plan Survey. Construction Schedule: Phase I — FY 22-23, Phase II and III — Beyond FY 26 The construction schedule will follow VDOT funding. Phase I is funded through VDOT with design scheduled for FY 21, construction FY 22, and 23. Phase 1-3 Beyond FY 26 PRIORITY 2—Recreation Center Description: The Recreation Center project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a minimum of two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis, and badminton with the installation of in-floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden, and home, outdoor, craft, antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities to take place at one time. The facility would also house a fitness center, multi-purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Capital Cost: $9,900,000 Justification: Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied significantly on the use of the county public schools to house recreation programs. This arrangement adequately addressed Recreation Center needs for a time, however the 18 134 department currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating a situation where the department is limited in its ability to meet the programming and facility needs of the county residents. A Recreation Center facility will facilitate the department to meet citizen programming demands and provide the area with a facility to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24 PRIORITY 3—Old Charlestown Road Park Development Description: Old Charlestown Road Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge development provides land for the provision of an active recreation park. The above park is to include athletic fields suitable for league play. Fields, restroom, and parking are part of the park concept. Capital Cost: $3,400,000 Justification: The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (formerly Stephenson Village) rezoning proffer of 2003 and public input sessions in 2020. Plans are to provide rectangular fields and hard surface courts at this location. There are no public rectangular fields in the north of Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 4— Indoor Aquatic Facility Description: The approximately 35,000sf building will likely house a 10-lane competitive pool, 6 lane warm water teaching pool, meeting rooms, shower and changing rooms, and facilities support areas. The above facility would meet the swimming needs of the community, including HS level swim teams. Capital Cost: $12,835,000 Justification: There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By constructing the indoor pool, it would permit the department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citizen programming provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer competitive swim and year-round recreational programming. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 19 135 PRIORITY 5—Gym Addition—Jordan Springs Elementary School Description: This project brings the Jordan Springs Elementary School into the Cooperative Use framework for shared school and community uses. Expanding the gymnasium from elementary size to full size (comparable to Orchard View, Greenwood MITI, Evendale, and Gainesboro Elementary School Gyms), and adding community multi-purpose room space to the proposed school site. Capital Cost: $1,400,000 Justification: The model in place since Orchard View Elementary was built in 2000 added gymnasium and multipurpose space to subsequent elementary schools, as these schools are located where population growth is present. Growth in community programming, camps, and indoor sport leagues continues to create demand for more gymnasium and multi-purpose space. Adding pressure for this location is that there are no community center spaces in the Stonewall District, while population continues to increase. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 6 -Water Slide/ Spray ground/ Building Renovation Description: Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of the diving boards and the installation of one 50' water slide and one 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also include the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool. Capital Cost: $970,000 Justification: To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park service area. Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department operates two outdoor swimming pools at the regional parks. These facilities are over 20 years old and were constructed with two diving boards as the main feature for each pool. Swimming pool attendance has trended decline in recent years and users are requesting different water features. The addition of two water slides and a spray ground to each pool facility will appeal to families and increase interest in visiting the outdoor pool facilities. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 7—Sherando Park Area 1 Recreation Access Phase 2 Description: This project continues the development vision for the NW area of Sherando Park located north of Rt. 277 as shown in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Continuing the newly installed Line Drive from Warrior Drive to Landgrant Lane, parking, restroom building, and dog park are elements of this phase. 20 136 Capital Cost: $1,415,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 8—Clearbrook Park Description: This project implements the development vision for the NE area of Clearbrook Park. This vision is consistent with the Clearbrook Park Master Plan. Included are basketball, pickleball courts, and an access trail from the existing pool parking lot. Capital Cost: $420,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreation opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. It would provide amenities not readily available in northeastern Frederick County and provide a public pickleball complex for county residents. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 9 - Sherando Park North - Softball Complex Description: This project completes the development vision for the SE area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are softball fields to complete the complex, a shared use trail segment, roadway, and parking. Capital Cost: $1,740,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields within the county's regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth and adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these programs. This project is needed to meet the growing need for diamond field space and tournament opportunities. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 21 137 PRIORITY 10 - Sherando Park Area 3 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the SW area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are rectangular play fields, a shared use trail segment, roadway and parking, playground, restroom, and maintenance building. Capital Cost: $2,460,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. With the development of N Sherando Softball Complex (CIP item #9) two rectangular play fields will be displaced. The development of area 3 not only addresses this direct result, but also addresses additional identified needs of the community. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24 PRIORITY 11 - Playground Replacement Description: This project schedules replacement for playgrounds at County Parks. Capital Cost: $1,050,000 Justification: County park playgrounds are popular amenities at County-owned parks. The playgrounds will need to be replaced to meet user expectations. Construction Schedule: This project is anticipated to be ongoing; a four-year schedule is proposed. Year 1: CB main playground, Frederick Heights. Year 2: CB 2nd playground, SH 2nd playground. Year 3: SH 3rd playground. Year 4: SH Main playground. FY22- 26 PRIORITY 12 —Sherando Ballfield Lighting Replacement Description: Upgrade the ballfield lighting at Sherando Parks Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the 30/20 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and replace with 50/30 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps and steel poles on (4) four fields at Sherando Park. This standard is required by Little League International on all little league fields. LED light fixtures are specified, as HID fixtures are facing obsolescence. Acquisition of Parkland (35 acres) Capital Cost: $945,000 22 138 Justification: The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfield light system be upgraded to achieve the recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the playing surface. This will facilitate the provision of recreational opportunities at Sherando Park for the service areas which include all Frederick County residents. The field light fixtures are over twenty-five years old and are affixed to poles. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 13—Community Parks Description: The Community Park needs include continued development of existing parks, and the acquisition of approximately thirty-five acres for an additional park located in eastern Frederick County. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical development would include: Acquisition of Parkland; 35 acres • Paved & Gravel Paths • Playground • Tot lot • Shelters • Lighted Basketball &Tennis courts Capital Cost: $2,194,000 Justification: Potential acreage for parkland would be located close to population density, east of Winchester, Redbud / Shawnee district area. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 PRIORITY 14—Neighborhood Parks Description: The Neighborhood project includes the continued development of existing and acquisition of six new sites of approximately ten acres and the subsequent development of these sites. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical development would include: Acquisition of Parkland, 10 acres per site • Paved Path • Playground 23 139 • Shelter • Hard Surface Courts • Open Play Fields Capital Cost: $5,024,000 Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the 2013 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the Urban Development Area or Rural Community Centers. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY26 PRIORITY 15—Regional Park Description: Acquisition of Parkland: • Northeastern Frederick County 150-200 acres • Western Frederick County 150-200 acres • Eastern Frederick County 150-200 acres Capital Cost: $15,830,000 Justification: This project would meet the recreation needs of the Frederick County population. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY26 PRIORITY 16- S. Sherando Park Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the area of Sherando Park located south of Rt 277. This vision is expressed in the 2002 Sherando Park Master Plan update as well as other identified improvements. Included are rectangular play fields, skate park, roadway and parking, lake trail, and restroom. Capital Cost: $2,465,000 Justification: These improvements would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26 24 140 PRIORITY 17 - National Guard Armory Gym Addition Description: Through an agreement with the National Guard, Frederick County would convert the existing buildings assembly space to a gymnasium. The project includes flooring and air conditioning. Capital Cost: $630,000 Justification: The model in place since Orchard View Elementary was built in 2000 added gymnasium and multipurpose space to elementary schools, as these schools are located where population growth is present. Growth in community programming, camps, and indoor sport leagues continues to create demand for more gymnasium and multi-purpose space. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 PRIORITY 18—Fleet Trip Vehicles Description: Bus #1 —40-50 Passenger Bus Bus #2— 30-40 Passenger Bus Van #1 - 12 Passenger Van Capital Cost: $325,000 Justification: To offer a comprehensive package of trips where the population of Frederick County could begin to rely on the Parks and Recreation Department to meet their trip needs. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 26 PRIORITY 19— N Sherando Park Area 1 & 2 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277 and Wrights Run. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are multi-use trail, mountain bike trails, restrooms, pavilions, roadway, and parking. Capital Cost: $3,450,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 25 141 PRIORITY 20—Indoor Ice Rink Description: The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a single 200' x 85' ice rink, locker rooms, party/meeting rooms, and concession area and would need approximately 10 acres to construct. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the County. The above ice rink may be collocated with other compatible uses should opportunities arise, reducing the acreage demand. Capital Cost: $6,930,000 Justification: There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and county residents currently must travel over one hour to use an indoor ice facility. By constructing the indoor ice rink, it would permit the department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as well as provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer year- round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 FCPRD Community Survey. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 26 26 142 Handley Regional Library Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Frederick County Library Branch - Gainesboro Description: Construction of a 4,000-5,OOOsf branch library, either as a stand-alone facility or co-located with a planned Frederick County facility (e.g., the new middle school). Initial parking should be for at least 50 vehicles. The proposed location would be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro district, but this could change depending on patterns of library use and on whether donated land could be located or if co-located with a Frederick County project already in the early planning stage. This projected branch would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing property and was outlined in a document prepared by FCPS students six years ago. Capital Cost: $1,849,034 Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area: In 2018-2019 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 460,355 (traditional) + 96,928 (electronic) = 557,283 items. 32,570 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 64.7% of all materials checked out of the regional system. (inactive users were purged 11/18 per state requirements) As of June 2019, 2850 new cards were registered. Frederick County residents, adults, and children registered for library cards for the first time in 2018-2019. (Note: Due to CV19 shutdown the data above is from the previous FY which is representative of a normal year.) This population group in the Gainesboro district is not close to a library in the regional system. This new library would serve a sizeable population of Frederick County that is not being served. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets, and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 180 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Library Branch - Senseny/Greenwood Description: Construction of a 10,OOsf branch library with expansion possible to 15,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 65 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area: In 2018-2019 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 460,355 (traditional) + 96,928 (electronic) = 557,283 items. 32,570 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 27 143 64.7 % of all materials checked out of the regional system. (inactive users were purged 11/18 per state requirements) As of June 2019, 2850 new registrations Frederick County residents, adults, and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2018- 2019. (Note: Due to CV19 outbreak and shut down the previous year's data is being utilized which is representative of a normal year.) As noted above the population group in the Redbud/Shawnee district is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets, and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 800 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective — beyond FY26 PRIORITY 3—522 South Library Description: Construction of a 7,OOOsf branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acre or collocated with the new High School projected to be built in the same area. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area: In 2018-2019 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 460,355 (traditional) + 96,928 (electronic) = 557,283 items. 32,570 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 64.7 % of all materials checked out of the regional system. (Inactive users were purged 11/18 per state requirements) As of June 2019, 2850 new registrations (these are end of FY numbers for each year.) Frederick County residents, adults, and children registered for library cards for the first time in 2018-2019. (Note: Due to CV19 shutdown, previous year data is utilized here as representative of a normal year) This population group in the Opequon district is not close to a library in the regional system. This new Library will serve an area of Frederick County largely unserved by our current branches. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets, and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective — beyond FY26 28 144 County Administration and Public Works Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 -Gore Citizens Convenience Site Description: The project will expand refuse capacity and improve efficiency of collection in the Gore community by installing a surplus trash compactor. Converting the Gore facility from one which utilizes 10 8-yard boxes for refuse collection to one that uses a trash compactor will drive down collection costs dramatically. In order to accomplish this, and account for improved trash flow and the construction of a compactor and recycling staging area, the site will be expanded onto an adjoining parcel already owned by the county.This construction will take place over a period of months. Capital Cost: $750,000 Justification: A total of 3,785 vehicle trips were made to the facility during August 2020, an increase of 7 percent in usage. 2019 showed a growth of 10 percent. On a typical Sunday, up to 183 vehicles drop of trash, filling the site's refuse collection cans to capacity. The project will pay for itself in lower refuse collection costs through compaction of solid waste prior to transport. Also, with a compactor in place, refuse will be contained in an enclosed receiver can, reducing odor, vectors and blowing litter, all of which are challenges of using open collection cans. Project will provide much-need capacity during heavy trash flow times such as holidays and weekends. At times, the site is forced to close early. The Public Works Committee supports this project. Basic design work has already taken place in the current fiscal year. Construction is planned for FY 21/22. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 2 - Double Toll Gate Citizens' Convenience Site - Expansion Description: The project will expand refuse capacity in the growing Double Toll Gate, Lake Frederick, Stephens City and Armel communities by adding a second trash compactor and poured concrete wall. The current site is situated in Clarke County and is leased from the state at no cost. The facility also serves Clarke residents. Clarke shares in collection and disposal costs (21 percent) while Frederick maintains the site and provides labor. This construction will take place over a period of months. Capital Cost: $585,000 Justification: A total of 8,654 vehicle trips were made to the facility during August 2020, an increase of 11 percent in usage. 2019 also showed a hike of 11 percent over 2018. An average of 321 vehicle trips are made to the facility each day, making it one of the county's busiest refuse and recycling sites. With a second compactor in place, capacity and traffic flow would be enhanced and the need to close early on holidays and weekends eliminated. This location has served the area well since the late 1970's. A recycling pad and new pavement were added in 2009. Additional upgrades are now necessary in order to meet the growing demands of solid 29 145 waste management. The Public Works Committee supports this project. Design work would take place in FY 22/23. Construction is planned for FY 23/24. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 3—County Office Annex (Former Sunnyside Plaza Shopping Center) Description: This project consists of the renovation of an existing shopping center containing approximately 64,000 square feet located at the Intersection of Fox Drive and Route 522 in the County's Urban Development Area. This project will accommodate the relocation of certain departments (TDB) from the 107 N. Kent Street complex to this County office annex in order to address existing and future space needs of County departments. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government services in an accessible location. Construction Schedule:TBD PRIORITY 4-General Government Capital Expenditures Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of$1,000,000 for the benefit of General Governmental Capital Expenditures. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities. Such expenditures may be less than the established $100,000 departmental threshold. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County's capital planning and budget process. This project is for the benefit of the County Governmental Entities participating in the CIP but does not include individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the governmental entities. Construction Schedule: N/A 30 146 PRIORITY 5 -County/School Board Administration Building Description: This project consists of a County/School Board Administration Building, to be located generally in the County's Urban Development Area. The Joint Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150,000 square foot office building shared with the County Schools Administration. The Schools' portion would be 50,000 square feet. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government services in an accessible location. Construction Schedule:TBD PRIORITY 6-Joint Judicial Center New Facility Description: This new project consists of a new future Joint Judicial Center Facility to be located generally in the City of Winchester or in the County's Urban Development Area. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government services in an accessible location. The need for this project has been established through ongoing communication with the court system and the City of Winchester. Construction Schedule:TBD 31 147 Fire & Rescue Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Frederick County Fire & Rescue Station 22 Description: Construct a three-bay Fire and Rescue Station with availability for satellite Sheriff's office and County office space for Treasurer's, Commissioner of the Revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. The station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike, White Oak Road and Tasker Road to provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three-acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be approximately a 15,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite offices. Capital Cost: $7,500,000 Justification: Development near this area will necessitate the development of this station. The Lake Frederick development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated community with age restrictions on 80% of the homes above 55 and the other 20% above 45. The developer's master plan will allow for 2130 individual dwelling units using a mix of housing types. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 PRIORITY 1A- Frederick County Fire and Rescue Station 22 Apparatus Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22. Capital Cost: $1,100,000 Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East area of Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all required and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped with all required and necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 PRIORITY 2 - Fire and Rescue Station 23/Annex Facilities Description: Construct three-bay fire station with availability for satellite offices for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office, Treasurer's Office, and Commissioner of Revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. square feet of building area. An approximately three-acre site will be needed to accommodate the facility. The fire station will be approximately a 15,000 sq ft facility to house an 32 148 engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite offices. The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end of current Rt. 37 South, an area of proposed high-density residential and commercial development. Capital Cost: $7,500,000 Justification: As commercial and residential developments continue to expand in this area of Frederick County, and with the increased traffic on Rt. 37 and 1-81, the calls for emergency services increases as well. To address the needs of the growing community and to maintain efficient response times, the addition of a new fire and rescue station is needed. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27 PRIORITY 2A- Frederick County Fire and Rescue Station 23 Apparatus Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 23. Capital Cost: $1,100,000 Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East area of Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all required and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27. PRIORITY 3- Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue—Vehicles & Equipment Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County's capital planning and budget process. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment AND fire and rescue vehicles and equipment, will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire and rescue companies. Construction Schedule: N/A 33 149 Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital and Capital Equipment Requests. Greenwood Fire Station— Upgrade/ Expand Living Quarters Description: Living Quarters Upgrade / Expansion project. This will include remodeling the upstairs (2nd floor) portion of the building, approximately 4,638 sq. ft. of living space. The project will convert the existing open space to add six (6) bunk rooms with four (4) beads in each room; upgrade the existing kitchen; add bathroom facilities for male and female, with each containing lockers and shower facilities. The upgrade will add a training room and a fitness area to the 2nd floor. The project will also include a renovation of the 1st floor to add office/meeting space and personnel recovery area. Capital Cost: $650,000 Justification: Greenwood will be remodeling the day room, bunk rooms, and work areas to accommodate the additional Staff and Volunteers that are providing fire and rescue service. The existing space is outdated and will not accommodate the potential additional staff that will be assigned to our Station. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 Greenwood Fire Station—Ambulance Replacement Program Description: Ambulance Replacement program (Two Ambulances). Capital Cost: $695,000 Justification: Greenwood is one of the busiest stations in the county responding to approximately 2,600 (estimated) EMS calls per year. Replacement is needed due to the wear and tear on the existing fleet of ambulances. Construction Schedule: Multi-year objective (FY 22-23 and FY 24-25) Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company—Building Renovation and Addition Description: Demolish original building and 1st addition to the station. Build back in that location tied back into the 3rd addition. This addition would be designed to provide additional sleeping, bathroom, and office areas for future growth in our system. Currently we are almost at max capacity in the bunk rooms for volunteers and staff. And taller apparatus bay and entry doors. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: It is essential for Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Inc. to maintain our capabilities in emergency response and the facilities to house the apparatus, tools and equipment and provide suitable living quarters for our system 34 150 members. Currently we are maxed on room for sleeping and office space. Our one apparatus bay area has small doors and short ceiling that restricts what can be parked in that section. Construction Schedule: TBD Clearbrook Fire Station— New Fire Station Description: At the present time the Clear Brook Vol. Fire & Rescue has outgrown the existing building with the equipment on hand, the call volume, the staffing of 24-hour personnel and the traffic at the existing location. We are proposing a new building to be located within the Clear Brooks first due area. The building needs to be approximately a 100x100 Administration and living with a 100x60/4 - Truck Bay all single level. The building will be used for day-to-day operations, administration, eating and sleeping facility of the current career staffing, volunteers, and future staffing. The estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 16,000 square feet. This upgrade of the facility will help to provide the needed space for Fire and EMS services for the community of Clear Brook. Capital Cost: $4,830,000 Justification: With the current facility and needed for upgrade in living quarters to accommodate the overnight personnel 24 hours and volunteers, this is of the utmost priority. At the current time we have outgrown our facility and with the equipment that we have to provide the service to our community for the health and property protection and with the current staffing needs and fund- raising operations our current facility is in need of upgrading/updating. Construction Schedule: FY 23-24 Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company—Tower 11 Replacement Description: Replacement of a 1986 custom chassis ladder tower truck with a new year custom chassis ladder tower truck. The apparatus will be built to N. F.P. A. 1901 specifications and equipped with the required tools and appliances to meet ISO standards at the time of build. The apparatus will meet NFP A standards and ISO requirements at the time of design. A steering/ design committee is currently in place and meeting regarding the design process. Capital Cost: $1,300,000 Justification: 1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing fire apparatus. 35 151 2. Condition of Major Components - An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive train, transmission, engine, ladder, platform, hydraulic systems, pump, chassis, and body. These components are approaching the expected service life or have already been replaced. 3. Availability of Replacement Parts - As apparatus get older, replacement parts may become more difficult to obtain, leading to longer periods of"down time." Construction Schedule: FY 22-23 Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company— Medic Unit Replacement (type 1) UNIT 11-2 Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all required and necessary equipment to function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for medicines required for EMS. Capital Cost: $240,000 Justification: 1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS apparatus. 2. Condition of Major Components -An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life. 3. Changes in National Standards and Federal Mandates - Compliance with present Federal KKK-A-1822E, NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Service Occupational Safety and Health Program and NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances. Construction Schedule: FY 21-22 Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company—Ambulance/Medic Unit Replacement (Type 1) Existing 11-3 Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for medicines required for EMS. 36 152 Capital Cost: $280,000 Justification: 1. Personnel Safety- Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS apparatus. 2. Condition of Major Components -An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life. 3. Changes in National Standards and Federal Mandates - Compliance with present Federal KKK-A-1822E, NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Service Occupational Safety and Health Program and NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 26 37 153 Sheriff's Office Project Priority List PRIORITY 1—8 Bay Steel Building for Large Vehicles Description: Construct an 8-bay steel building for housing of large, specialized vehicles that require coverage due to the large amount of equipment and specialized tools. This project does not require the purchase of land as it will be constructed on the property of the Frederick County Public Safety Building. The building will allow for the maintenance, storage, security of all the large, specialized vehicles that are required for the special operations teams. This building size will be 4,256 square feet and will require 13,500 square feet to build.This will be an 8 bay 4 garage door equipment storage building with a 35x76 front concrete pad. Capital Cost: $320,000 Justification: This project will facilitate the required housing of vehicles that are used for the special purpose teams. These vehicles are required to be protected from the weather to ensure quick responses to emergencies. Protecting the vehicles will allow the longevity of the vehicle by reducing engine wear and exposure to fluctuating weather conditions. Due to these vehicles belonging to specialty teams, the vehicles house important and expensive equipment. This equipment allows personnel of each specialty team to conduct the mission at hand. Much of the equipment must be maintained at certain temperatures to function at a moment's notice. This project will ensure the equipment is ready at all times. Due to the simplicity of the building style and materials and the readily availability of the land, this building can be competed in a years' time. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 2—Replacement Law Enforcement Vehicles Description: This project is to indicate projected cost of replacement vehicles to the fleet of the Frederick County Sheriff's Office over the next five years. This will ensure the replacement of end of service life vehicles to the Sheriff's Office fleet as well as cost effectiveness for repairs to failing vehicles. Capital Cost: $5,220,000 Justification: This project is needed to meet the basic requirements for Law Enforcement Officers when responding to calls, patrolling of the county, community safety and safety of the Officers. This will offset the cost of purchasing vehicles that were not replaced during the 2010-2012 budget years due to budget restraints. This schedule would drop the cost of purchasing 46 vehicles per year to approximately 25 per year on a rotating basis. Construction Schedule: Multi-year objective 38 154 PRIORITY 3—Apex 8500 Mobile Radios Description: This project is in conjunction with the implemented vehicle replacement timeline. This project will update the mobile radio system for each replaced vehicle. The Sheriff's Office has been recycling all the old radio systems from previous vehicles for so long that the current equipment is obsolete. This equipment will be inter-operable with any band radio system that the County decides to go with after the radio study. Capital Cost: $1,200,000 Justification: This project is needed for equipping all timeline replaced vehicles with current and up to date radio systems to communicate with the Emergency Communication Center. This project will also be P-25 and narrow band compliant as outlined by FCC regulations. Construction Schedule: Multi-year objective PRIORITY 4—Apex 8000 Portable Radios Description: This project is in conjunction with the implemented mobile radio replacement timeline. This project will update the portable radio system for each replaced vehicle. The Sheriff's Office has been recycling all the old portable radio systems for so long that the current equipment is obsolete. Capital Cost: $1,125,000 Justification: This project is needed for equipping all timeline replaced portables with current and up to date radio systems to communicate with the Emergency Communication Center. This project will also be P-25 and narrow band compliant as outlined by FCC regulations. This project is need for all the specialty teams that operate outside of their vehicle while on call outs and rescue missions. Construction Schedule: Multi-year objective PRIORITY 5—Firearms Simulated Training System Description: This project will be used to do use of force training for the entire Sheriff's Office and selected members of the public. The simulated trainer does firearms training, ASP training, pepper spray training, taser training and less lethal training. The trainer is used to simulate real life situations so that deputies use the appropriate amount of force, hopefully lowering the Sheriff's Office's civil liability in use of force situations. The simulator can also be used to demonstrate the complexity of use of force situations to the public. 39 155 Capital Cost: $100,000 Justification: Provide real life training to all deputies and reduce the civil liability the Sheriff's Office could face in excessive use of force cases. Construction Schedule: FY 21-22 Public Safety and Communications PRIORITY 1—Project 25 Public Safety Radio Network Description: Purchase, construction, and deployment of Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Project 25 (P25) radio communications system to support mission-critical public safety communications within the county. This system will provide radio and paging communications for the Frederick County Sheriff's Department, Frederick County Fire & Rescue, volunteer fire & rescue companies, and the Department of Public Safety Communications. Capital Cost: $20,981,973 Justification: This Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Project 25 (P25) radio communications system is needed to support mission-critical public safety communications within the County. Construction Schedule: FY 23 40 156 Transportation Committee Project Priority List Funded Priorities PRIORITY 1 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1) Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at 1-81 and continuing to Double Church Road. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive. Capital Cost: $37,012,924 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 2— Exit 313 Bridge Replacement and Capacity Improvements Description: Replace the structurally deficient bridge at Exit 313 and add limited capacity improvements. Capital Cost: $35,123,000 Justification: The bridge on Route 17/50/522 (Millwood Pike) Bridge over Interstate 81 at Exit 313 is reaching the end of its service life and needs to be replaced. The new bridge will feature design elements that will accommodate future improvements to the Route 17/50/522 corridor and future improvements to 1-81. The interchange configuration will not change with this project. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 3 - Renaissance Drive, Phase 2 Description: Construct a connector road and Railroad Crossing between Route 11 and Shady Elm Drive. Capital Cost: $4,223,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at key points along Route 11 and Apple Valley Drive. This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD 41 157 PRIORITY 4 - Route 277 right turn lane extension at Warrior Drive Description: Extend right-turn lane for eastbound 277 at the intersection of Rt. 277 and Warrior Drive. Installation of sidewalk for pedestrian safety and installation of pedestrian pedestal. Capital Cost: $490,943 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD Unfunded Priorities PRIORITY 5 - Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37 Description: This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension. More specifically, to update the Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new Record of Decision and to update the 1992 design plans to address the current alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvements. In addition, this allows for advanced engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction. Capital Cost: $772,500,000 Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation improvement that would benefit the entire County and surrounding localities. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 6 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2) Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at 1-81 and continuing to Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive. Capital Cost: $26,191,407 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD 42 158 PRIORITY 7- Redbud Road Realignment and Exit 317 Interchange Improvements Description: Realign Redbud Road from its current location through development land in the vicinity of Route 11 north and Snowden Bridge Boulevard and interchange upgrades to improve traffic flow and safety. Capital Cost: $11,576,306 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 8 - Route 11 North Widening to 6 Lanes from Snowden Bridge Boulevard to Old Charlestown Road Description: Route 11 North of Snowden Bridge Boulevard is currently primarily a two-lane roadway. This project would widen that facility to a 6-lane divided roadway with turn lanes where appropriate. Capital Cost: $29,196,504 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will provide a significant capacity upgrade to address congestion on the Route 11 Corridor. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 9 - Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11. Improvements to this intersection will address comprehensive planned development's traffic generation in the area. Capital Cost: $8,240,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on the Route 11 corridor. The location is identified by joint planning efforts between the County and VDOT. Construction Schedule:TBD PRIORITY 10—Route 7 Corridor Improvements from Exit 315 to Greenwood Road Description: Spot improvements throughout the corridor to be determined through ongoing study in coordination with VDOT. Capital Cost: $5,150,000 43 159 Justification: The County is engaged in a STARS study with VDOT through the MPO. This study will be used to identify key spot improvements to be addressed under this item. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 11— Route 11 S Widening & Intersection Improvements from Winchester City Limits to Opecluon Church Lane Description: Route 11 S, NB side widening and improvements to the intersection of Shawnee Drive at Route 11 and Opequon Church Lane at Route 11 Capital Cost: $3,399,000 Justification: Transportation study conducted in conjunction with the MPO and VDOT determined that these improvements would significantly improve congestion and safety in the area. In addition, this improvement would promote the Comprehensive Plan vision for this area. Construction Schedule:TBD PRIORITY 12-Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line Description: Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the Eastern Road Plan. Capital Cost: $197,760,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion over a large area of the County and address development to the surrounding area. This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and improving the flow of traffic. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 13 - Senseny Road Widening Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the implementation of Route 37, Channing Drive, and development in the area. Capital Cost: $69,010,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD 44 160 PRIORITY 14 - Senseny Road Turn lanes at the intersection of Senseny Road and Crestleigh Drive Description: Improvements to the intersection of Senseny Road (657) and Crestleigh Drive to include turn lanes and potential signalization. This project would add left and right turn lanes to Senseny Road at the intersection of Crestleigh and potentially a full signalization of the intersection. Capital Cost: $2,625,036 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 15- Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $241,283,133 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address coming development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 16-Warrior Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with 1-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $48,410,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 17 - Channing Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where Channing Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south to intersect with Route 50 East at Independence Drive. Capital Cost: $46,350,000 45 161 Justification: This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan and will address congestion in Eastern Frederick County and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule:TBD PRIORITY 18 - Inverlee Way Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south to Route 50 East. This project is being planned in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and surrounding development. Capital Cost: $28,119,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion and provide an additional needed link between Senseny Road and Route 50 East. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 19 -Warrior Drive Extension from Route 37 Crosspointe south to existing terminus Description: 4-lane roadway from the Route 37 extension in the Crosspointe Development south to the existing terminus of Warrior Drive. Capital Cost: $34,505,000 Justification: This improvement would be concurrent with a Route 37 extension and would provide significant congestion relief at Exit 307 as well as Tasker Road at Exit 310 Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 20 - Frederick County Eastern Road Plan Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan, Eastern Road Plan that are not noted individually above. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This project prepares the County for future development by addressing the projects needed to support that development in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Construction Schedule: N/A 46 162 Winchester Regional Airport Proiect Priority List PRIORITY 1 - New Airport Terminal Description: The Airport proposes design, bid, and construction of a new terminal building. The new facility will be constructed south of the existing building. Capital Cost: $6,389,000 Justification: The project will construct a new terminal building to accommodate a relocated taxiway and aircraft parking apron and address numerous building systems in need of rehabilitation/replacement. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 PRIORITY 2—Taxiway"A" Relocation Description: The relocation of Taxiway A is part of the overall goal to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport standards to maintain CAT I Instrument Landing System (ILS) weather minimums and meet airport design criteria for Group III aircraft. Capital Cost: $17,168,888 Justification: This project improves the safety of airport operations and enhances our ability to accommodate large business aircraft. Due to the complexity of relocating the entire 5,500' taxiway, the project will be completed in phases. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 26 PRIORITY 3— Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 60: Cooper off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design standards for the taxiway object free area (TOFA) for Taxiway "A". Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $200,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 47 163 PRIORITY 4— Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Land Services Description: Surveys, appraisals, review appraisals, and acquisition of 4 avigation easements identified on the airport property map; PE2, PE3, PE4, and PES. Capital Cost: $150,000 Justification: The parcels underlie the approach path to Runway 14. Certain land uses have the potential to cause negative impacts to airport operations. Avigation easements will help protect the airport from consequences that may result from obstructions or incompatible land uses in these areas. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26 PRIORITY 5—Acquire Easements Description: The airport seeks to acquire easements scoped for purchase in the "RPZ Land Services" project; identified as PE2, PE3, PE4, and PE5 on the airport property map. Capital Cost: $100,000 Justification: The parcels underlie the approach path to Runway 14. Certain land uses have the potential to cause negative impacts to airport operations. Avigation easements protect the airport from consequences that may result from obstructions or incompatible land uses in these areas. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26 PRIORITY 6— North Side Site Prep Description: Site preparation (e.g., grading, utilities) for future aeronautical development and commercial entrance onto airport property off Coverstone Drive extended. Capital Cost: $500,000 Justification: The area on the north side of the airport has been through the NEPA environmental approval process. It is the most attractive area on the airport for build-to-suit facilities. The project will make it more attractive to private investment and is in keeping with the airport's business and marketing plans. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25 48 164 PRIORITY 7—North Side Access Road Description: This project proposes to construct a two-lane service road around the end of Runway 14. The road will be an appropriate length so that vehicles remain clear of navigation aid critical areas. Capital Cost: $700,000 Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development on the north side of the runway. With operations on both sides of the runway, ground vehicles will require access to both sides for fuel delivery, inspections, maintenance, and transportation of personnel. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) encourages the construction of service roads around aircraft activity areas to prevent unauthorized access to runways and taxiways. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26 PRIORITY 8—Fuel Storage Facility Description: The current facility is in need of renovation to continue to meet DEQ and/or EPA requirements. Capital Cost: $600,000 Justification: The fuel storage facility has not undergone major maintenance since it was installed. This project is to renovate the facility to ensure it continues to meet DEQ and EPA requirements. Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 26 49 165 tiC'K ' CO RESOLUTION w yaGfAi 1739 Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 20, 2021 Recommend Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 27, 2021 Sent to Public Hearing BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: February 10, 2021 Pending 2021 -2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN(CIP) WHEREAS the Frederick County Planning Commission discussed the 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) at their regular meeting on January 20, 2021. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CIP and affirmed that the projects contained within the CIP are in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors discussed the CIP at their regular meeting on January 27, 2021 and forwarded the CIP for public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on the CIP at their regular meeting on February 10, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors supports the priorities shown in the 2021- 2026 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) and has affirmed the determination of the Planning Commission that the projects contained in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) conform to the 2035 Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as follows: The Frederick County Board of Supervisors hereby approves the 2021-2026 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for Frederick County,Virginia as an element of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Passed this 10th day of February 2021 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Judith McCann-Slaughter David D. Stegmaier Blaine P. Dunn Robert W. Wells A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney, Frederick County Administrator PDRes 904-21 166 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: February 10, 2021 ��Gt• Agenda Section: Planning Commission Business - Other Planning Business Title: SP #18-20 Senseny Place - Information and Waiver Request Attachments: BOS02-10-21 SitePlan18-20SensenyPlace_Redacted.pdf 167 4�CK CSG SITE PLAN#18-20 Senseny Place Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: January 21, 2021 138 Staff Contact: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 01/20/21 Reviewed Board of Supervisors: 02/10/21 Pending PROPOSAL: The Applicant seeks to develop 63 multi-family housing units (senior residential development) and a church on 4.971-acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance)Zoning District. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Red Bud PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 54-A-128 LOCATION: The subject property is located on the northside of Senseny Road (Route 657), generally west of Williams Road and generally east of Boundary Avenue. PROPERTY ZONING& PRESENT USE: Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Church ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Multi-family Residential South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Single-Family Detached East: B 1 (Neighborhood Business) Use: Vacant RP (Residential Performance) Use: Single-Family Attached(Townhomes) West: RP (Residential Performance) Use: School STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 02/10/21 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The Applicant previously received a waiver of the Master Development Plan (MDP) requirement on December 11,2019 and has chosen to process a site plan in lieu of the MDP. When processing a site plan in lieu of the MDP, the application must be presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as an informational item. With this Site Plan, the Applicant is requesting approval of a waiver from the Board ofSupervisors for a residential separation buffer modification pursuant to&165- 203.02(C)(7) of the Zoning Ordinance, due to the location of existing-utilities on the site. The Site Plan for Senseny Place is consistent with the approved proffers for Rezoning #02-18 for St. Paul's on the Hill, and with the requirements of Article VIII, Development Plans and Approvals, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and is in a form that is administratively approvable, subject to approval of the requested waiver. Following presentation of the application to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, and the incorporation of your comments, staff is prepared to approve the site plan. 168 SP #18-20, Senseny Place January 21, 2021 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: A VDOT review has been conducted for the Senseny Place Site Plan, signature dated December 3,2020. Based off of the review of the Drawings,all of the previous VDOT comments have been addressed and the Site Plan is approved by our office. Please ensure that all applicable agencies have the most recent set of approved Drawings. We offer the following general comments: • Our review and comments are general in nature. Should details be overlooked during plan review or conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the department. • Materials used and methods of construction shall adhere to the current observed VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, Road and Bridge Standards, Manual on Uniform Trak Control Devices, and Land Use Permit Special Provisions. • A preconstruction conference shall be held by the engineer and/or the developer with the attendance of the contractor, various County agencies, utility companies, and VDOT prior to initiation of work. • All drainage is to be carried within the right-of-way in ditch lines or gutters along the street to a pipe or drainage easement. • Any construction related changes to the approved plan must come through the design engineer to VDOT for approval. Please allow a minimum of 5 business days for VDOT review. • A Land Use Permit shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of- way. The permit is issued by this office and may require application fees,the salary & expenses of a State assigned inspector, and surety bond coverage. Please see attached email dated December 12, 2020. Frederick County Fire Marshal: Approved as drawn. Please see attached letter dated April 29, 2020. Frederick County Inspections: Proposed Residential apartments and religious worship structures shall comply with the 2015 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, 2015 Virginia Building Code (VBC); Section 305 Assembly Use Group, Section 310, Residential Use Group. Other code that applies is ICC A117.1-09 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities and the Virginia Energy Code 2015. Demolition permit is required.An asbestos permit is required. If asbestos is found, an asbestos abatement permit will be required. Retaining walls require a permit and inspections. Proposed structure shall comply with height and area as specified in Table 506 with applicable increases. Building is provided with NFPA 13 sprinkler system as required. FDC located on the plans. 169 SP #18-20, Senseny Place January 21, 2021 Page 3 Location of the structure from adjacent property lines shall comply with T601/602 of the Virginia Building Code. All required egress shall be handicap accessible. Handicap parking shall be provided per Section 1106.06 (Where multiple accessible entrances are provided; parking shall disperse). Signage shall comply with VBC 1106.8. Special inspection requirements of Chapter 17 of VBC shall apply to this type of structure.(soils,concrete, steel, etc.) Please see attached letter dated May 5, 2020. Frederick County Public Works: Upon review of the revised site plan April 20, 2020,we recommend approval of the subject plan. Please see attached email dated December 4, 2020. Frederick Water: Please see attached letter dated November 19, 2020. Frederick County Park&Recreation: Please see attached email November 23, 2020. City of Winchester: See comment letter dated December 4, 2020. Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A Master Development Plan is required prior to development of this property. The Applicant previously received a waiver of the Master Development Plan (MDP)requirement on December 11, 2019 and has chosen to process a site plan in lieu of the MDP. When processing a site plan in lieu of the MDP,the application must be presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as an informational item. B) Site History The subject properties comprising this site plan were approved with proffers through Rezoning (REZ) application#02-18 (at that time known as St. Paul's on the Hill). C) Site Suitability& Project Scope Comprehensive Plan: The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the Community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this Plan is to protect and improve the living 170 SP 418-20, Senseny Place January 21, 2021 Page 4 environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. Land Use Compatibility: The subject parcels comprising this site plan, Senseny Place, are located within the County's Urban Development Area(UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area(SWSA). The UDA defines the general area in which more intensive forms of development will occur. In addition, the property is located within the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan envisions the subject properties to develop as residential. The site plan, as proposed,generally meets the 2035 Comprehensive Plan vision for this area of the County. Site Access and Transportation: Access to the site is provided directly from Senseny Road (Route 657) via a private driveway. The site plan also depicts right-of-way dedication (approximately 44-feet wide) including new pavement and curb and gutter, and a 10-foot (FT) wide hiker/biker trail along Senseny Road, which is a planned "improved major collector" roadway identified in the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Ordinance: The site is in general conformance with the applicable Zoning Ordinance standards for the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning Districts. The site plan also addresses the required setbacks (i.e. building restriction lines), residential development standards (density, parking, open space, recreation units) and buffers and screening required by the Code. The Applicant received a parking waiver from the Zoning Administrator on January 24, 2019 to reduce the number of required parking spaces for the proposed multi-family residential building and church from 184 parking spaces (as required by the Zoning Ordinance) to 94 parking spaces (as noted on Sheet 2 of the site plan dated December 3,2020).A covenant guaranteeing future parking (if needed)was reviewed by staff and will be recorded prior to site plan approval. The Applicant/Owner has also requested a Category B Type Buffer modification from the Board of Supervisors per the exemption contained in the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance §165- 203.02(C)(7)where an existing utility (sanitary sewer)conflicts(crosses)the buffer area near the adjoining townhome development. A 6-foot (FT)tall fence is being provided along the boundary adjacent to the townhomes expect in locations where the utility conflicts. No plantings will be provided within the utility easements. Details and notes regarding this modification are on Sheet 43 of the site plan (see graphic below highlighting buffer modification location and note). The Board of Supervisors would need to grant the residential separation buffer modification, as described above, as part of their consideration of the site plan. 171 SP 418-20, Senseny Place January 21, 2021 Page 5 Figure 1: Senseny Place buffer modification details from Site Plan- Sheet 43. 1 01 `x.10 ZS 2 Ar. Ms. -7 Ls _92 Ion r' .f . Hr 34 T Mae1 J2A! /,/ nee 8'NI.[Pralsde c7earald, - NOFmiwinxar:lar- from prwnd too Am=off to flow 1 5AvareaSenSarY u,xlcr ferxai} LANDSCAPING UN NF ENANCE NOTES A.Pd Iandsraped area shatl be manla,ted in good oonditlOn hyorrnw. S P*Wnabie prftvBion5 shah"made 15 protect lanr$tapng frrfn wahioos.padeatdans and ehoppng Caft 1.Tree and 8hrlub size shown en plan Aaw are Vustfatt+o.$iF a1 planting aro as shown in plant icheoule C.Dead or dying vggqlydnn ahatl ha rgplar�7 of Me direction of the,aiee a,lminiplra[nr 2,Tha plec�nenl of Imas Mown nn The.plan may 6hange at the him at inaaA The---n the righ tors ate 1r6es.1[u aesthesc purposes,with paw approval from Fredenck Cawny Flaming Depadmem. '3.PJI plants SfiJ9 Wnfomr mar Ft6dt*0 County's appinowC landscape list S bsbtuhws ntusl be approved m --ting by the(Frederick d. Cow1y planning Deprtment. ilia hop�. eMmR5r &rferpar M%mpbm atalFed in Frvdarick Cwnty zoning dldl Samany RT d to the n ane b.wnlgs.37eel txaes am being paastdW alorp7 the grapey Sernany Cblfaad as part of hIs modFca bn. , the ewner hes ray...a Category TV"8(idler rrwdIA.1—per the exemptica cante..d in fredend. County zoning aMinancP§165-203.021Glf&1 as an e.istng ub ty[wnftary sewefl conflicts{posses}the area near the existing advamntto vnhames.A6'screenng fence is Owing prprldfad along the 1—nda ad-nml hr the lnwnhnnn a vera tat MNt udliry r sict STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 01/20/21 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Applicant previously received a waiver of the Master Development Plan (MDP) requirement on December 11,2019 and has chosen to process a site plan in lieu of the MDP. When processing a site plan in lieu of the MDP, the application must be presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as an informational item. With this Site Plan, the Applicant is reguestim approval of a waiver from the Board of Supervisors for a residential separation buffer modification pursuant to X165-203.02(C)(7) of the Zonin,- Ordinance, due to the location of existin-utilities on the site. The Site Plan for Senseny Place is consistent with the approved proffers for Rezoning 902-18 for St. Paul's on the Hill, and with the requirements of Article VIII, Development Plans and Approvals, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and is in a form that is administratively approvable, subject to approval of the requested waiver. SUMMARY OF THE 01/20/21 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Planning Commission received a presentation for information on the site plan for Senseny Place on January 20th. The Planning Commission asked staff to confirm which entity would provide water/sanitary sewer and to confirm the transportation improvements along Senseny Road were acceptable to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). Staff confirmed that water/sanitary sewer would be provided to the site from Frederick Water, as the owner did not receive permission to utilize City of Winchester utilities. Staff also confirmed that the future right-of-way (ROW) dedication and planned improvements including new pavement width and curb and gutter were acceptable to VDOT (as part of their review of the site plan) for the future condition of Senseny Road as an improved major collector roadway. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 02/10/21 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The Applicant previously received a waiver of the Master Development Plan (MDP) requirement on December 11,2019 and has chosen to process a site plan in lieu of the MDP. When processing a site plan in lieu of the MDP, the application must be presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as an informational item. With this Site Plan, the Applicant is requesting approval of a 172 SP #18-20, Senseny Place January 21, 2021 Page 6 waiver from the Board ofSupervisors fora residential separation buffer modification pursuant to$165- 203.02(C)(7) of the Zoning-Ordinance, due to the location of existing-utilities on the site. The Site Plan for Senseny Place is consistent with the approved proffers for Rezoning #02-18 for St. Paul's on the Hill, and with the requirements of Article VIII, Development Plans and Approvals, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and is in a form that is administratively approvable, subject to approval of the requested waiver. Following presentation of the application to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, and the incorporation of your comments, staff is prepared to approve the site plan. 173 ti SITE PLAN APPLICATION Office Use Only- Date Application Received: t)112,11ZD Application#: Fees Received: )b Receipt#: Initials: I Project Title: Senseny Place 2. Project Description: The project development will consist of the construction of senior residential building and future church, with related utilities, parking and roadways. 3. Location of Property: 1527 Senseny Road, Winchester, VA 22602 (Street address)_ 4. Applicant/Designer: Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Telephone: 540-662-4185 Primary Point of Contact: Kevin Seward, P.E. email: kseward@greenwayeng.com Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 5. Property Owner(if different than above): Name: Williams F. M. Trustee ETALS-SPOTH Telephone: 540-667-8110 Address: 1577 Senseny Road, Winchester, VA 22602 6. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number: 54 A 128 b. Total acreage of the parcel to be developed: 4.97 Acres c. Total disturbed area of the parcel: 5.30 Acres (4.25 onsite& 1.05 offsite) d. Present Use: Institutional (Church) e. Proposed Use: Senior Residential & Institutional (Church) f Magisterial District(s) Red Bud 8 LO ti 7. Site Plan Type: a. Is this an original or new site plan? Yes tri No b. Is this a revised site plan? Yes F� No If yes provide all previous site plan numbers: c. Is this a minor site plan? Yes No L1 If yes provide all previous site plan numbers: 8. Zoning Information: a. Current Zoning: RP b. Was this property Rezoned? Yes F71 No c. If yes provide the rezoning number for this property: Rz#02-18 d. Are there any proffers for this property? YesV" No e. Has a MDP been approved for this property? Yes No f. If yes provide the MDP number for this property: 9. Adjoining property zoning and use: USE ZONING North Residential RP East Commercial g1 South Residential RP West Educational RP I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: Name(Printed): Kevin A. Seward Date: 7 �4; 9 I CID r- Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: wwwAvams Department of Planning& Development,County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Trustees of St.Paul's on-the-Hill Episcopal Church Name or Properly Owner/Applicant please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owns will be needed_ 1527Senseny Road',Winchester,Virginia 22602 540-667-8110 Mailing Address of Properly Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: Instrument No.17 0008658 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: Greenway Engineering,Inc. Name of Attorney-In-fact 151 Windy Hill Lane,Winchester,VA 22602 (540)662-4185 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name, place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to rile and act on my behalf with respect to applic t ion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit HVSite Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Ej Variance or Zoning Appeal further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner tim. otherwise rescind or modify it. Signator I REG.NU 76 7 RSS 10-31-2020 EPEP�/We�z� of an enti Title(if sig on behal of an ent State of County/City of Y) Gr-- To i I, cbl(- c.lomi-sy, a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that Rollo I personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the s_ day of 'Cm 20 My Commission Expires: Registration Number: Ll p~ p~ n— Bettie Lamberson From: Kevin Seward Sent Yhursday, December 10, 2O201O:49AK4 To: 8M1ieLamb*raon Cc: Randy Kepler Subject: FW: 5ensenyPlace Site Plan Approval Bettie, Hooray vvegot approval from VDOT. Please print this approval and attach with the other agency approval letters for Tyler. Please have the Senseny Place plans (5 hard copies), PDF plan (CD)and approval letters sent to Frederick County Planning today. Also file this digitally and update tracker. Thanks, Kevin Seward, PE i PnojeutW1onager Winchester,VA | Ashburn,VA | Martinsburg,WV Office:540.662.4185 Qel|:nun�sox,5157 Web: Email: Af �� rw N �-'N��0�� 0��0�WA YN £NC IN EERIN 0 7,/'x.r.c./m�`,c..'s,` n'mu,.��/a/�n,'»,`./�`��.o`cn ,.u,' '.,z'*v�eo' 1o." �. �u From:Timothy Rhodes^timothv rhodes@vdot.vrginia.gnv> Sent:Thursday, December 1O, 202O1D:12AK4 To: Randy Kepler<rkep/er@greenvvayeng.conn> Cc: Kevin Seward<kseward@greenwayeng.com>; Gregory Hoffman <gregory.hoffman@vdot.virginia.gov>; Rhonda Funkhou»er<Rhonda.Fun khouse r@vdo1.virQinia.8ov»; Ri0g|ennan, Bradley«bradley.riOD|ennan@vdot.viqJinia.gov>;Tyler Klein <tk|ein@fcva.us>;/ohn Bishop^jbishop@fcva.uy> Subject:SensenyPlace Site Plan Approval DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staumoo/edinbu,gLand Development 14O31Old Valley Pike Edinburg,YA228Z4 1 00 I- Randy, A VDOT review has been conducted for the Senseny Place Site Plan, signature dated December 3, 2020. Based off of the review of the Drawings, all of the previous VDOT comments have been addressed and the Site Plan is approved by our office. Please ensure that all applicable agencies have the most recent set of approved Drawings. We offer the following general comments: • Our review and comments are general in nature. Should details be overlooked during plan review or conditions in the field exist such that additional measures are warranted, such measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the department. • Materials used and methods of construction shall adhere to the current observed VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, Road and Bridge Standards, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and Land Use Permit Special Provisions. • A preconstruction conference shall be held by the engineer and/or the developer with the attendance of the contractor, various County agencies, utility companies, and VDOT prior to initiation of work. • All drainage is to be carried within the right-of-way in ditch lines or gutters along the street to a pipe or drainage easement. • Any construction related changes to the approved plan must come through the design engineer to VDOT for approval. Please allow a minimum of 5 business days for VDOT review. • A Land Use Permit shall be obtained before any work is performed on the State's right-of- way. The permit is issued by this office and may require application fees, the salary & expenses of a State assigned inspector, and surety bond coverage. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Timothy Rhodes VDOT—Land Development Engineer Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah& Warren Counties 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA. 22824 (540)-984-5630 2 ti REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Fire Marshal Comment Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Public Safety Building Attn: Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstone Drive 1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester,Virginia 22602 Winchester, Virginia 22602 Phone: (540) 665-6350 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two t2)coo ies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering,Inc. Telephone: 540-662-4185 Email Address: kseward@greenwayeng.com Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester,VA 22602 Name of development and description of the request: Senseny Piece-The project development will consist of the construction of senior residential building&future church,with related utilities,parking and roadways. Location of Property: 1527 Senseny Road Winchester,VA 22602 Fire Marshal Comments: -FREDERICK COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL USE ONLY- Date Received Review Number 1 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed Revision Required Date Approved Signature&Date: Please Return Form to Applicant** 25 RECEIVE,_.) APR 2 4 2020 C) Go Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department 0 - - Office of the Fire Marshal 1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester,VA 22602 rd Phone: 540-665-6350 Fax:540-6784739 fmo@fcva.us Plan Review Site Status: Approved Business blilme Senseny Place 1527 Senseny Rd Winchester,Virginia 22602 Engineering Firm : Printed Date:04/29/2020 Greenway Engineering '.General Information Received Date: 04/24/2020 Occupancy Type: Review Begin Date: 04/29/2020 Property Use: Review End Date: 04/29/2020 Activity Number: 104BJ044 Hours: 2,0000 Review Cause: New Construction Activity Details Project Name Senior Residential Building Comments: Approved as drawn. Adam Hounshell Lieutenant/Assistant Fire Marshal Page 1 of 1 oo REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County lwoeciions Department Comment Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Department Frederick County Inspections Dept. Attn: Building Official 107 North Kent Street. 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Winchester, Virginia 212601 Phone: (540)665-5650 Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two(2)copies of the Site Plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering,Inc. Telephone: 540-662-4185 Email Address: kseward@greenwayeng,com Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester,VA 22602 Name of development and description of the request: Senseny Place-The project development will consist of the construction of senior residential building&future church,with related utilities,parking and roadways. Location of Property: -1527 Senseny Road Winchester,VA 22602 Inspect ns Department Comments: cL 't a �-t�c ill -FREDERICK COUNTY INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT USE ONLY- Date Date Received -2 D2 c) Review Numbeij 2 3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed 51 Revision Required pproved _Cd Signature&Date: Please Return Form to Applicant- 18 N 00 Proposed Residential apartments and religious worship structure shall comply with the 2015 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, 2015 Virginia Building Code(VBC): Section 305 Assembly Use Group, Sections 310, Residential Use Group. Other Code that applies is ICC A] 17.1-09 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities and the Virginia Energy Code 2015 Demolition pen-nit is required. An asbestos permit is required. If asbestos is found, an asbestos abatement permit will be required. Retaining walls require a permit and inspections Proposed structure shall comply with height and area as specified in Table 506 with applicable increases. Building is provided with a NFPA 13 sprinkler system as required. FDC located on the plans Location of the structure from adjacent property lines shall comply with T601/602 of the Virginia Building Code All required egress shall be handicap accessible. Handicap parking shall be provided per Section 1106.6 (Where multiple accessible entrances are provided; parking shall be dispersed). Signage shall comply with VBC 1106.8. Special inspection requirements of Chapter 17 of VBC shall apply to this type of structure. (soils, concrete, steel etc.) s:\site plan comments\2015!rcsldcntial senseny place senior.doc M 00 C COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 December 4, 2020 Mr. Kevin Seward Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Revised Site Plan Comments—Senseny Place Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Seward: Upon review of the revised site plan April 20, 2020, we recommend approval of the subject plan. Sincerely, Joseph W. Johnson, P.E. Joe C. Wilder Civil Engineer Director of Public Works JCW/kco cc: Planning and Development file 107 North Kent Street, Second Floor,Suite 200 • Winchester,Virginia 22601-5000 le 00 FREDERICK WATER f-:'R-E D E-R I C K A* w ATER . SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PO Box 1877,Winchester,VA 22604-8377 540.868.1061 voice 315 Tasker Road,Stephens City,VA 22655 540.868.1429 fax Project St. Paul's On The Hill Applicant Greenway REVIEW STATUS attention Mr. Kevin Seward review number F-1correct&resubmit ®approved as noted number of items to be corrected 4 1-1 approved DRAWINGS send me by December 10, 2020 1.print of sheets All-two sets 2.two CDs:each disc shall contain the following plan sheets All a) One CD (containing all of the above noted sheets) shall be in PDT format. Each sheet shall be in its own file and be in landscape orientation.Each file shall be titled with the project name and appropriate sheet number. b) One CD shall be in DWG format;(1)in Model Space,(2)in state plane coordinate system NAD 83,(3) compatible with AutoCAD 2006. c) Each of the two CDs shall be labeled with its format and project name,and placed in its own paper CD envelope. EASEMENTS IAMIYUN A copy of the recorded onsite FW easement(s)is/are required. k7—) OY(j)N A copy of the recorded offsite FW easement(s)is/are required. o The easement document shall contain a plat and both shall be signed by the Frederick Water. o The Frederick Water requires specific language in its deed of easement. o Visit our website www.frederickwater.coin to obtain a copy of the fon-n. o A copy of the recorded deed(s)of easement shall be received before service will be authorized. OTHER 0 Y�N This project also requires DEQ-Valley Region Office approval. Y� N This project also requires VDH—Lexington Field Office approval. Yo N This project also requires VDH—Lexington Field Office—Project Summary Report. BY DATE FOR DRAWINGS ABOVE,see VDH website for form 0 Y(�j)N This project has a sewer pump station that FW will own.Title to the pump station site shall be granted to the Frederick Water in fee simple absolute.Also,(1)a copy of DEQ's Certificate to Construct,(2)a copy of DEQs Certificate to Operate, and (3) two copies of the FW approved 0 & M manual are required. These documents must be received before service will be authorized. (4) Work cannot commence that would connect to F . . . spections until the contract is returned to this office. Date: November 19, 2020 Earl W. Wiley—Engin ring Assist—ant MIR Reset In mw n— Bettie-Lamberson From: Jonathan Turkel <jturke|@fcvaus> Sent: Monday, November 2]' 2020232PK4 To: Kevin Seward Cc: Tyler Klein Subject RE: '[ExLerna|]'RE: SensenyP|oce - SiteP|anRevimwConmments - PorksandRecreadon Kevin, Yes,these responses are acceptable. Thanks, Jon From: Kevin Seward <ksevvard@greenvvayeng.conn> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2O2O1:54PM To:Jonathan Turkel^jturke)@fcva.us> Cc:Tyler Klein<tk|ein@fcva.us> Subject: '[External]'RE:Senseny Place-Site Plan Review Comments- Parks and Recreation Jon, Comment#2—we did not continue the sidewalk along the main entrance because the proposed entrance is a steep climb into the site (about 7' elevation change from trail tVchuroh>. This would also push out the fill slope towards the existing stream and wetlands. We are trying to minimize impacts tothe stream and wetlands. The route we have shown is a flatter route for pedestrians to the trail (about 1' elevation change). Comment#3—Sheet 14 note 14 references the community room and fitness room. VVewould like toadd ontothe note that the rooms identified shall remain recreation spaces in perpetuity. Let nneknow ifthis acceptable. Thanks, Kevin Seward, pE | Project Manager Winchester,VA | Ashburn,VA | Martinsburg,WV Office:540.662.4185 Cell:540.532.5157 Web: mail:kseward@areenwayeng.com ,mn%�� ,' GREEN WAY EN G2N E ERINC w,o'r.p",xxeu.*' �.�.`�*.�`v,p",� ^* u,u.u..uvnu`*z/a�^*�. .�, m( 7K From:Jonathan Turkel Sent: Friday, November 2[\ 2OIO2:24PK8 ` w0 00 Cr Tyler Klein<LkIem@fc faus> n~ Subject:Senmeny Place-Sbe Plan Review Comments-Parks and Recreation Dear Kevin Seward , | appreciate your response tothe previous comments in a letter dated 10/10/2020. In response to the original three comments provided, please find the Parks and Recreation follow-up responses below: Comment 1: Recreation Unit table onPage 2provides the required information Comment 2: While an internal sidewalk connection to the 10'trail along Senseny Road has been provided and this does technically satisfy the comment, Parks and Recreation would recommend consideration of providing this connection as a continuation ofthe existing sidewalk along the main entrance road as a preferrable alternative. VVerecognize there may be other design considerations that make this route prohibitive, however itwould be more intuitive for residents and not require crossing through the parking lot to the location currently proposed. Comment 3: The recreation unit amenities proposed appear to meet Parks and Recreation requirements. The department would like awritten assurance that the rooms identified asrecreation amenities,for the purpose of satisfying the recreation unit requirements, remain recreation spaces in perpetuity. Please let meknow ifyou have any questions. Thank you, Jon Turkel Assistant Director Frederick County Parks and Recreation 1O7N. Kent St. Winchester,VA 22601 ti 00 R—V GUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS City of Winchester Comment � Mall to: 1Ei(a*td deliver 14 Winchester Planning Department Rouss City Hall Attn: Planning Director 15 North Cameron Street 15 North Cameron Street Winchester,Virginia 22601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone: (540)667-1815 Applicant: it is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as passible in order to assist the agency with their review. P ase�tlach one f 1)cmyf thSLt�eyith this sheet Applicant's Name: c+reanway Enowedng inc. Telephone: _540-U2-4185 _,......__ Email Address: tweragretlrnrayertgcern Mailing Address: 151 Wrndy Hill Lane iMncftaster.VA Name of development and description of the request: Smseny Place-The project davatopment w8i cwsist of the cermuction or senior residential aw"and ham church,wm related uduues,parking and roadways. This project is located in Ute county but water a SAMMY service will be with the Gky of Winchester. Location of Property: 1527 Senseny Road 1Mincheste,VA 22602 City of Winchester's Co ents: -CITY OF WINCHESTER USE ONLY- . t Date Received Review Number 12@3 4 5 (circle one) Date Reviewed l2/trot#f Revision Required Date Approved " u Signature&Date* , **Please Retum Fornito Appllcant** 42 Plan Revisions No. Rev DSENSENY PLACE ev aae commeln Sheet Index R 012app ttOF WINCHES GNeet Number SN—Till, ReN on RD.. m��3 02 t2 pp »� 03 + Cwer9Met 09 2-0}p20 °" $ 1-1i COINTI 11-1 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3G�rfN+ee� 65 uaa26p 3v 3r 0a a 0p " FREDERICK-TER— RED BUD MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT cPel�er-Le e 03 - CITY OF WINCHE— 6 05 6o FREDERICK COUNTY,VA P SP#18-20 a &sP l&611F eR o5 o�app Q sa Eas Pl�ee l&Il orc'�re e�&sewer o5 oaaap2o 2� E&S PM1es 5 p}3app = /a . +0 E&SNerreA 03 Oatapp ' Zw E.Demils 03 -IF— Lu E&S—li o3 oa+app SWIo +3 E&S O-li 14 sl.Ple, ofi +a2san2o ('�w 06 Regia—w Ple umin Ple oe oeeuewere ofi p me—V Pb len uxi� � Llf - - t Mep&JVIRIRefMem � 9WM D�as Me /11hp - - •`io l $`2./\ $ 3 ` Sewer P ete Pump steeon 093a2ap _ hmm 2M �rYSrorm Sewer Pmfles 033apm kTWh re# rue �� 98v. a8� ' r p Sro et n're P.1 OY +a-t2 pm S � � �+ a� �� p smm,sewercempomaem os +o-wpe6 p e /"°w=e"°'"d gc �� '� a&n smm,sewermecpmpumae� 06 °"•^^ B s� I �-^' _ p —ing wellPmnle o6 �� F-41'� � V vooT cemlls oo - Il.l r um 6�s SITE erOOlryce�eus W s o o z Sig meq' $ '�� °qay 35 OT tt-+2-p20 > wC7 U 8 \ O Q0 w,s 1 $i l�rl L m- W`^ oLL 7qi er $�.� $,7 � CALL"MISS UTILITY" fx<a\ \yb VIRG 11 oaooTo ocn-' 'NKuormaencwT�1;"T" asss uaiicu REsroNSI6LE FOR COMaIA uIREMEMs,vIRGINIAcoo moa j`� �� ANIE3PRI"TTo Ho"aeca�"s.REo N UTILITY NOTICE REQUIRED 't5. IN 'h ma w ty re e �`O uv m merIssue n mn L R-�� w'mTa I Isa°I6ei+'e+A nm+ 9 Oat-2Pte Y Pae OWNER DEVELOPER »»; � +a < TRUSTEE'S OF ST.PAUL'S ON WESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION : oa2app THE HILL EPISCOPAL CHURCH 5515 CHEROKEE AVENUE SUITE 200 aaTE Pm�`�w. 1527 SENSENY ROAD ALEXANDRIA,VA 22312 APPROVAL sco.LE: , s+alee"ama 2reoa WINCHESTER,VA 22602 (AN ALEXANDRIA, �nYeWj"° sR''I`�''Re Po ea.+�aoa (540)667-8110 ESIGNEDSYRL—S re Iwa15°aasa2— Im+I s.sse2ex+2sr VICINITY MAP ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE LEND. 6 SCALE:1"=1000' SHEET OF 37 SITE PLAN VALID FOR(5)FIVE YEARS FROM DATE OF APPROVAL DWG#1303 GENERAL PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES VDOT GENERAL NOTES LEGEND Pohadd-., VI All.11db 111.1—-1-11�.1. v I. d F.g,I Idd. h1d, -1d dd.1 1-1 1 11 F d- ld-.n Ile b T.I.I.IbIld,IIET) _dd Id Vg" ==I'd IZ I-n-d An, ldn-, dm e F I I., 11.lo-d I I I T1.n1m Rbv,01:,`,6=%`,2,Mn10 Zld,�,11" FRE_`,R 11,Admln.I.l.n I GE holl bb held hl -.1hn,11 dd .Ilh� F�-lpo-�nld-,n.�,llb�o,p,�-b,IlI Ime deb,ondl,mbo .l honnhhd n on,..b Ih.1. Esha be d Im.ddld� Tp., lh�F.)F. ---- .pd'hm.d=G .h non,':P. V, n_ hd=yd&,� FA E IThZp.on,-1�=Zppp-.� pa pp_0 _te,III-1hpd,IdIld-,lhldnIdld, .1 IhdI,og-Ion,l Ch-b I.,pod.0 n..,d-o 1,ho�b'hl'ddd 1.=�p.�,��bl h;be.pp.-d --P,,--d.�n-.1v�.T'-,'�,�.P�l�l��n��n-I �h Ih, Ala-1.......Ih,___'I W hm.1 A`= VEITT"Ih RGEIRE-EUTTER V d -.'-b I,—Innd.1hIl�', "'I"'I"bd Y I...d pm,. .1-Ih�n Ihe PREIAll G Th.ddvddp.h`.nhd1=p y_ =d .f. .1 the ==f.b.nng m.d- b�Vf` hp-b p-I nl.n TRAdIAMER TOE%7CZ 3 Ab a,ld-d.11 pl.n. .11 dppl-b1b d m.n.m -h-n I-I R Th.- Id,".d1,=h-,�p�m,dl pd,I., p.bl�, do. =h,11`TI:p',= fl.bpe,. -nl,.I.n Ahph,-.1-flh. b. .11 Im- I.. lh�-lb-he.p.n.ldby .11, Idl m,I--nf1IIle P.-d-nl,.I.n V-T pp-f .TE1EPdEREIIRE R.h, =.hph=._.'.b �dhpdve,., PREITFhEF.RE IIRE I�Wam n=.m,,,,IT- fd_-1d b.,n lh�11-ane Ideldl..n..l _,m TdId V5 E.gn .11,fd1d e,.11,.nb nd nl.l bolly f 1-m.,b. d-.dd pldn GE a.1,Ihe Eng-d, f.,CdnId1-hbd-1. -h,-1. FE a nl,Id _hd C'� VEET A,11 d.pdn-In,,,.d 111IdId hv..,11 be Ih. bf Ihd RGER WFH IIET T,Ih.I.nl-.,F.b-nl--, I-I,I.nl.m,ld-. T =p.,.v.,dhdl b. nh,.dV,VII pdhddn,dI 1,lnlln.pd1d,.1Ibdhd. dd PIAEDW71 IET pb_ '1h. I'd f Edpdd.dnI I T.n.phh-VEET)lb If T,1. VE.T Ldd E-e "T '=W" u.Id.1.1d.,p-d.-.11 b� dddd T ddvedpd-bdId.,dn.d..p-ldl,,g _,h_dn=n�1 E b...n -Rb.,,.V,, P. IngIn-,dndl., flh� D P" TAT= Ib=E I Me=d -h-I-nf.,,.,I.u h.uE d......I Ed n Eln::,dbdnd T bndddd dnd E'd d :,d P,.vvl�l n.1 b,Ih,b,.,nl,ndp.n 'mbn"T.n.pdhd1dn,VE1)FudMR.1I f=d degnare�sePon z ane 11 A�p,,h,,,.,h�lbh.,,pp--dL,I-p,Pl.n.h.Ilb..---d.p--�l,lh.-In',��,1.�-.11.1��n VgET dh _ �IE h.u.ob-nmany rep�raa ar,egos, - A n; -pp�nd d,d 1.Ihd nd-I dl,m dd.d, Thd p.11 Id M,dmuld 6- VI IF—,-Eenld,�1141)1-1. VE, =E1`ETR`1EXEE`T 7 A,=et.=..I.-h-d d-b-n denlIbd dhn.'=P.d glo-le bh-n n d.mdl.,nd-n.,m 1.VEET 1-hd-1 d.d, phd f Ihd nddd1al.n nd dmdvdI f lh� PRELECTRlEE , nll.b.�.n.�l,�n..P.�l. 1. nl.-,11.lb.p.n.bld Id,-Int.hIng a Vp-ted d===71.)In d-11..1h E.ETIR p h. =h-111,n,p nd-nddhIng p-.1.,11n.wn t..du,ng-ndth-.n.nd Ihe e-h I" I In 111 f EmsInd=1,1-11 F p.p.l..dd by PR-IIIIE LU g-dd-e:dbd.u,n,,dn1n no---ddle,dnd I�All 11 bd Idn-d.ng lb Ebb..,11.1,..Id I.I.I._ 'I P.,_halIhZVm,.=_dh_,h IhdZlv d.umng=h,.n.d=,,1., -7"WATM'Rb1EW',,E` z PE%==ER PERM El III hd p=l he NG FIRE :T LU u V!' Z:thun=n hd;,�=-gl Il V I A IF PRMT1 I TEE 11 be Tdp.n.b1b hh,-In,.11 1-Ihd app-,bl ARTM1417 EM RE E CL 'M P�Rblb.u.bdnId1nl.u..f.1pId d=. andth-mplh l-,u,-m,nl nd all Ata-nd L-1 11 b.lId Id, 'Well FIdd-,dl -n..,,-dllhdn A In-d.thlh.dd,A.dlmu.dflhm Alul-uuf-nll-.n�h�llb��mm��.le�b.�hlll��.11-�.n.flhe�n,�n-,.ndV�IWI�.h'�=gnl��I Pl IED.1,1�---METER =IhbeV�,n,l,p,lm,nlnf.E-,,nmllTlhu�a',IEI)-Ih.Inled-..A,-,Cd,pIf b-le,m Ined T,1.enRnd pp.-d T,VE.T PRII E R hall.1.Id-p-ddl,Ih.I.11 ,d, I �af�lbeh, nl.ndb Idl mo,be p=den7=ndth1.n Id h.,,.bd.1 "nd-mpd-d In h.-nddl I IIl.f I In-Ih.1 All III b., P.P.111RE h d DIT y hhdE.nIdh. 1118 5T1 flhe I 'he d Ilbb Md"Il ==NT 7ull db Laphd E Ih b �. e Il.1m .. ,dbdfd',ngdVdn. ..dlh,-,bylhe,..,hnIenRnee,dd.nle1bdlIbeped.1. - �h .1 VD1 nd Ihal IbIng hall be_n-,ddn-.1h Mon P`g m'VFMP)I'---n n."d n I.._u Id,%The,holl 3 P,ndp.I be-Ilduhhh1,h III pbn.le-d-d InI.b-b-AlfZ., PMPED CERREIIIE 1.h-pon.bl f.,-n ng:m.In.,n,ng n'I�o F=�fp..,j=Phvdn,n Pdn I FWPPP)_pphdvdI-f pld n:hdIldIh. hlb d,dnI I lh�..p.n.lbble.-nl.Ined In Ihd Vn,d E...n dnd,mdn!h_1ddI p.p.,P,.,,. All-d-,111 b-��ub,.d�m.le,�.l.ndb-llll,nul,llyll.,.�-�,1,.nh...h.Ilb.-mpo-d,na-�,n--Ih EIIAINGEENREPLINE pl Fdre' d'nd.e_ppuensIEdpmdht sh.�=pd. hdn 4ph.I I , -�,�,elp.,I--�- h hI III E I.d b� V, LI III n.1.1 v1' Fd`-ldmbeyn'lhe I,- V15 VIIT I.n&,dlD.nd Mndn..hd1I-.1.11hEl unl`nd1,dped b,VE1 F-IRE ,,d 4 E bd, d V1 6==.pl., b.-Mu-d b,lh.l.nl-.,.n.11 plp-&nlIpl.n... IENCELIRE f4f_ dd P_nd F.,p�pe.ul-Is.m,n,mumd.n�p�p��n-l�l.n.-.h.-.f A M1�11 VSMP =dl T,u-th F.d.,.k Ed—Plnn,ngl,bdnd h-I d- MAT =.hhneZP d..bn)Th.-1.Iflhd em nlmdnl11 bd.-.d Ith m,n,mum 6 Ind.I.I.-n lh�p1-111bd..=.., :T=d�=1mppd f:pneul.d R_PhERE PEOE6Tu P. Pub Addl.ndl 11ng m,y yl�hhb VEdIT IndPdIm I EnIl Ia.lh� bf lh�R d-h Eng-I , =,e.n._ n=,md=b� =� ldt7fl nsp..1.n IVD OT). p-bb lb F,dbe,1 I county p dvIh n-.1 Ing -dm b.nkm.n.hall-beg.11 nhd,hlm,dhdmlh.nbIhd.m V17 Th-n-1.1-d-, = nd.,VloTM. INDICATESTIENJIffiER011P PARA NGSPocEs m fln Ih. 1 4 he,h' V,d PlI he1 PARI.IRE-R ghl- sdp..f I I Thd n' 1. d'hm.'h==.h'11 bd II fd p.n.ny dth-.11 huhdd dt.,gl p-mdnlIng. Ihd dl 7 On q.Idd F.I.and ond.,1. dd bbb d Zp.'.' .Ipon.-w IhVEMdn td D=T=nI1h'nT.11 m..,,.l p,dIld 11,-1 df PP PARdING hdp -h 1. d.l..,nd.,.nh 1.Ih. T I.d bb .�h re A Ajg:,udn.d.._m pa,e,=md. fFl,'undd ......=P.�u�=,�hldn�d -1 bb P-d. Ih.11 I Ih.d. bu-lhen.h The f.und.ldh d.lnIhn hall b.n--.d E I 1hn.,IbbIfIled lh hand-mp.-d.17 'hd� I P, VEhhELFA PER pl.. n g_ fd, VDET L.M F;:.hd1I b�pld Ddn.,, be PM IRI ERTRANCE h hdghI1 d-g-b, E,gdd,ulh,Ih.-u-df. pa.lb bu,.,ng Addd b, 7 b,n-du,n, d.nd, �h='.n.hIldn _ -nl.l III,In oon-h.1ldn 114 fldhe VDIET pd'm' All w 7 Id v dudl p-ml. bb hu-hold 1.ng f- ndng an.d,dd-dd Idd-In,Ih.I,gn VD1 d.,I,unl.- VDCT11-dI NIDERTEIER 0 -p...bu,l pd,.,, TfTn .'dl 1, 1 E L If Ihd-nl.-,d.e. FE.,-1-1 Ihen Ihe-n-,um-d1l d..Ih.pp.lunl, phnI du,n,d Ihe-n1h1ldn dnd d1n, Z:ll DRAIR STII-TERI sTGRM b -1hm. f"II'..p-bd'- by En,,n-, Ib, '.=h tebtsIbd-p-I Id bd1I be.-thed lb VD.T EE dIng ull h 3 �bull'�'llwM�.,.,u,�re,,,��fman..,Ihllap,,.d��n.Pd.--nEn,nl, d1h. I I TI deM,=I'llp III nd IM-71 A-11I .1 A�,hd1I-n.h,.p.-m-.=h' IlheVDOT RIP,.Epe.1-Idd. d'onde=dnl.hd I.I �Ib`all =h".1".pn IIE Il lbe lunddlI.n.hh,p,ul-.Ih,_.I dd I_ ,u,,.. dnIld, 4 A dd n_hdd 1,Ef Rd-hd bull, .1=II- � dsh.11 be PR EL-IER 35' F,4 ul,l,, Idu,n,Ild ony.b,-f.,unu-I naldd ld II Th.-n.,.dlI-p.1fndl 11--E ,nun, P, hd phd,�n I I. "ed Ih, :,7 n.I,n., = mudl b.11dd I,EE 0Tdb,.p,vdIp,d,tdp1ddngpl,1unddl.nde.gn1I.mpb.1h Z he P,.P.,=,F,_ .7 ,nl.l .7 EnFn g,.ny .h I T.P: un n b b=. mentd VD1 R-nd F,l Fddnddhd PI-I Wh-yd.,,,,.,.1-bb un-ldbl,lundbld, 1. n. d P,=I nTOPOGRAdg d,.Il 7-Y n I T.ph,h n INd pll hIll,-n nd- lh�VA I-CII-1-2 and 1.., .1=ndd Fu.,d I.�h.bd �d w d=,VIIT PROJECT INFORMATION f_h.0 d b P_7 I'da-M 11haldn--d "VDI�l�,g.d�, Id .4 A,hdflhd-p1d-sho1plhI Par We;tf= 28 3 Th. F ",S_ Z EE d1ICdnI. I'd-hedn,`fu' "I Idl...and hLf, En_ hn,Ihe-pld h:` dl�..Ihn�ap�=,p.nn. p T 1.nddhd bb d gee pl.nd bp,,VloT wa I'd hd Id P.jd,dF,R,A. w ,h l,n.. y g 16 Th, nfIlb b-n-,T,me.n.-b-th, fbu=�_..n I.- ITI co d.e,m,ne 1.1,, d Ild dbundal.n Thd bonlhall ubm,l f boddhdd T� 2 � (-I.) PW -Il��'l,�,.�1.1�lnlnun I 1�,1111d Ih.....fp1p-1 ..pnp" d_ mare dn I.h.-mm.,.M.,If d. III III, VD d "va Plh,"It l2)-b,,d_lut- - Ed e n- 11 .-.- Eb- R d_ en=dde7I b-d phpdbed Ihe IN.1-s.f bddd,ng IIIII bb..lb), 9 h.eI�Id pnIm Fdle I.n F.I FREDERICK COUNTY INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT NOTES Ihe--un-ldbe lund- Ihb lu nddd f.,I.III-'I yn'.d.'l: `ddb,: -.,-Ch-h ansnoodaw .b d f-m Ihb ppd-ulh.It,ddnPdbng _d Ma-n-pIh.-1. _M,l-1.-1."'T,F -7 T - elbp=. Pubbst I I-nl,-Ied,nddn-1h the 1 Ibe Mete Il y.=GP�gd - hGqe 5. a,,=Inh�,p1,TvM df.---1 bylh.VD.T E-Inde, dlt.n I- h' Ad . = A111 =M E �dnpdm b'. 1.Ihe-Ing TTE1 In 11 d.1 ddl.n f Ih.V,,W11 Adl5U 1 Wh_gl -I.n IT..11 In--d--dn..mul I.p-ld hoIf I—n ,, Th,V11T En-d,.h.11 b.d n le-I 14 d - . ld MOT I1h 1,b.d,dl.-f P-11.s--: gn rp;d' IV-bbA-th.,,1d.,1dlnd.h1dl 1,..111 d.ml th JI22 f I.III- EdI., RIl FREDERICK WATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES 10 AIlI1I11 Rdd 3- ThIpI......hl. H",-p '114 ly d 1e see eml I F.d.l.x-tn.-.,a,dse-,s.nla-s-,�ll.t,oreere..,Ie.at-I.&I Ree2.The bdItd11 dlI dheld th Fhddd1 Wdtd,-ndd..nd pdd1.tdd.In-1.thd b.. .�hl I. s,_I-- EhulIh 41 b.- -t P_IId F.jdbP H.,�. bb th..t, Engne behe.dbep.nsb1;,�,bdd :�,7 nte.....Y.0 b h�pn dd_ FREDERICK WATER PROJECT INFORMATION 3 Ih,pd-w,n,lw,lll-.w.dl,-mpl-n-w�thd..�npl.-Thd-n.,.-1bpeIb. 4 11-nt,,I,,,h,-n-ln,w-, 1nn-,hngm.nh..b,-hdd,III Ig th. Pd`"'I ,.desPn-ult d -p ddw,de., WATER ANE RITAW EWER E I A 11 p., 11 Tet 1,It d nd d I,d-,sl I I be pel-l-d dnd phvd,b-p-te,by dth-A d,u�t,1 u.I Add_t_ f.,_d z by Ih.,hot n, -D'm. bell AARITAW _IR732 Fddd.=,.dlIf=.rl T%n.d. tdho dmdkb the t.pde s '=7" An Appl-t,.n.,-t IF11 ba-b-d nd thd,n,t,.l Id pa�dbh,thd lapama -t. RE ..E;&.FR A E..d-t.-.te,nd-w- l,ne. be--ld-th F-lb,Wd., b1t. IdId,dd_ NOTES 7 1d1.&,,,1�td,,,dsm n".t., u,..rb.nd.=. tdrth_h2d,h. 1p.,.tvh�- .,.fth.d,.�l�,.�,��th��td Any-nIdth, htng rellre en msv nett It th _y bell The=n =b., b..w1h be pdd,Ignbd th th.d.I., I t11 Eng eFdp,1fb,mdd ppRhb1.n1pdo.n n d. 'd dddn '�III`�m`A`- RE 2 2The=nd '1Z1g=- bb bd,bhdlI Id I—2d III— Tt. I d Th. b.w III W th-AJnnn,I,—dbdPn,bnd,tdn. b.., df1I E.Ihw.,l.,.111-nd d m n mum dnd d Pb RIDE) bytb Pdnn,ng DIn E11,419.1thd A .mp.nent..fthe me.,b..I1,.hd11 phdpdI Jn.- Ab M- E. Iled I Ethl hl et.'�h1fZtfmf T, hod'I pI,1.M.Id dl�_ll '_KV'j F:_th )hl I 1I a Fhdd- Fl ,s 1 11 dI. Pd,1 F ------- I—AFTM-EAl I.f, d.t1d.n..p.p:�bdtl tg,=l Ell I I.1=1 FIRE MARSHALS NOTE 1,1.11 12 8_35)A In.(2dtI,.,k1,�dI) =r PI" (EP d h� � P.d, LOS _1 121 Ad19.n �h�d` d. R b Th.=tt�.dlbp-.11 ShThe-glnddl hnII,ndthld.nt.I11dn,_ pdo.bb.n.1 Zd.nd hm.tustsf.'= F--knt,pl�,t.p:-dm1p%1ndt',u.' FI.J..11dnd.,ndPd I.,I—th� td)the In fthd cath F-dl-t -n 13--1H,11.1h- h =1p.ed'.."It h.,uM.,,lIe d,,tn."u'll,17 b=III h.uld b.pld-d n dt.b1b ub,Ell Adl ZZeda.gbn- lren d.pane Fre d W,n d. 2bI P -s:t. n Ap t.n A.I"III II Ed--1.11.1 I.p-h u-.that h.-n.b-n pp.-d T, p.1.11,All III m.-Ill I _t A`uEt= m b Iddu I 1-h-k-I- I PI q. 1. A.Pe H b S-ed(2 E,11-6 DAT Zp.leld b.p-In md.mum 10-n.,d.-1.A11111 bdah pe dt d I -d n ghbund h.uld b.phbp.,� =lIn=m b�P=FIll pl TRIP GENERATION DATA F dhddd. Rl ddI,AR11 A 36 1 .,.1 RE ID A I hh,ned mul d- phe-nt.n dId,I— Thd Pdd 51�12%,11 111.3 RE "t Els, IsE d 1IRIP RATE T VPD dbvy s AI tud.�gb�ellllT.,�14.7bAn, dm1,_�_n't.b,�.f.,.,ht-.1 h.I R/, P t, I. area d I— d._ s de _d by the= I M AITM-DI.) pb" h Rd- Id. segs atas2,-=$6325d 4 t-hng PmPdPh I—Iddd,n A 3 Pd Eqh,p $1dAb- 5 thdn I I thdn III-n h,h.111 hd,uId 11b,1ddb,1ry An.l,,. 2. F.I.,AJht H.,-Ah F, I-n,t 2111 11 F, , th 1.)=dn and,m.ddhal dp,-1 6 All III enb.��mpbd,n, d-sIng..Inlmnl-h 11 b=pdvpe'tn.n d n. 0Lol All lghb�.111 ma In 161.1111 -.,.k .Fre nee caner melarand ream man tle.m.b ntd-hdh.,th th. OEPQ ch- 8.- 11- 0 Fvdeoc' dte hqu-sa1EE1= t �d All.-hal __Tdumddt�...1. (Sl -EET 2 - 31 .1 F., DWG# 19-03 1800092014 COUNTYof FREDERICK PROFFER STAq'Eh6NT PROPPER STATEMENT Dgtmhnm[ofPlmving aM pwel r� '3 WGSLEY HOU6MG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ST.PAUL'S OT THEHILL o opmmt m� ST.PAUL'S ON'HIN H1LL RED DUD MAOL9SRIAL DISTRICT 540/665-5651 RED ROD—GIS AL DISTIUCT. B o 4971 Acres Fu:540/665-6395 aia jj 4.971 SIGNATURE PAGE 3 Srymntrr 14,2018 Remninm RZ d02-18 APPLIUTT: Recd*d(inner Flonnie Nlmic WiHI—Lokia Tao Voight,and I.m O'Malley WF.SI.EV HOi1S1NODPVEI.OPMEN3'CORPORATION OP NORTHERNYIRGRUA w i—wyav IngeS Tmdeu oPSCPnnpson-We-Hill Eplsopal OM1urch 1031 WIadY I£I�I W^enBMc WwcRmler,VA336M Applicmt Wulcy Elousiv6 Developmerrt CoryomNm ofNorthem Virginia By'. �" AEPANDVG YOE-Ig 6t.PanPSMtnelXe Z Fepo 4971 sacs Iecated a[1527 S——,—1 N—,54A- Name:�)� 10 C(e+/ /'M�.r� 128 Till,��fX.PGr 6.I.r '�l' 'I Dw Nn.wyme L W Zonivg: RP(Resi&.tid Performance)b RP P,.ff—d Thu IG w.Sephmba 12fi Ole'Iha abovebm W ®FrNuiek Covnry Boyd o[supervises zt Way —1110 W Iect Nvme:- St.Paul's nn thellill � applirmim was approvedmrzmce 4.971H- w WC7 ItP(RuidmtleL Pm(ommu)Avtnct to RP(RodJmdal Pnfotmmrcz U 1 m Sm[e of�,i/I✓(�(ri/��t!l, mem m them�y_IerslW a 1527 SmsmY Rued in We rzaibutl Magisterial U'svictcaod's ii W llak: ` Avgmt 8,2018 —Yof YCf.l.l�'I/}l�!. �davnR�bY Pmpety tdmtifirvim�vwvbu54A-128. ,8� Pwmmt n Ve.Cade Am.Q 15.2-2296,et ew_and Q 165-102.06 oftbe Eredxick 'ILO pmHer sakmrnt origimlly detd August 8,pie that wva epprovN as a part of Wis teeming V GOun 2.lmiv ONimuce,ll[e undersi d Nmeb ffers that the develo d use Subscribed mrd mvomtobeforeme tins g tlaY of 3'C 2018 in my eppliratwn an migm to the above refamcad pmpeny and h bw regamless of o ty g gee 1 Pmevtm Cowry and Stat,aforesaid,by the aforenamal - Ercloeeduacmy of Ne Wopled pro(fvnet®cvt(e your ncmds.INnuumm wnaaWP ofm Property,comisOv6 of approximstely 4.971 ones,lomeed s[1527 Sensem Roed, princi §I65.10106E,me Comas wtm..ey wdt preumtM wHnm PmXa m me FrmeriGr eoultpcare o[ciremtconrt Wimhmtm,Vuginia,ih Pred,ick Connh,shall Fein svbstarAA mNormanec with tlro for recordation filloxhng conA¢®s.MiNe avem Nis mmningis graaledhs applied fr bytes AppNexnt, Nslnese proffers sM1ell supacmda mdrepLxeiniNeirmtlroty sll otnuprop§rsmaJe pram Plesse do cat Reshete to omtau Nis oXiu if yin have anygaastiona mBmdmg Ne appmval o[Au nemm.IvlM oven-leis vezonivg ie vo[grmtedm.Plied id Ore APNicmb R[an those - �Zo�Zo 7L> memlvgappdwdm. protf,'s shall be d—mindmwn-S—I bo null d anvod My C.rwmssiov Fxp cs. RnmW MY Norm Re Number. 7�i' y- 0E R E¢� cuncntowner el _Olt `4pphram've ref�remed neem shall nGnd thin it,meamv6 the Y glen don ,f� l fume namers and successors mmtacst �t r 1 �, 1. DEVELOPMCNT AND USE OF THE PROPERTY �a Mvuua Direcm 1.1. Development nn the -Iffi 1 H be limited l)a CnvrGy and b Rovsing 6¢, ar m� CWhd for Older Pmeom as that term is dtlived iv 42 USC§360'1(6)(2)and ro8vla0oas issued thoasuvd r mdm applicable ante lawmloml oadinm c,mid pmvrdadf tmettna[ 100%of tha Musing mtcd of sold such[M1at at le.a one ruitlmt ec Rlmm P.Dong Redbad D'umtt Ba Mau Knblcen M.DawmnmW Chdflapho- ofiq Radbud Distract PUnnng Commiwimen m eine nArnaeetaon at least age ss or ov,. me Andvmn,Rsal edea z �M.Mhy.ca�natRm W Willi ams tbumy TryAvomwEPi R Ruchtim a [SigoanrmmfollowingpeEeJ srec'v of R. Hill Pyivnpal Pmi'smiMHiCMrvh,1521 5enseny Ra.,Winchmm,VA w 2 32603 G. F o W a a U 107Nortb Kmi6trret,Swtc202•Wia —,Vuginla 22601-SUoo q Q Q J F � az o aU COUNTV.£FREDERICK WinchP��er� (°�n a W < er ncpemvmt o£Plwdng and nevelaprnmt Paga2 puS..services LP6UIf,(6-. �p� w 5401615-5651 MN.Evm Wyatt R.Zomm DetumimXov-Pmkb�g Requumvmte '�' Z Qw Fax:54N 6656395 Imaery24 2019 _ W a U r� CERTIFlED MAIL and IIAN0.DFt IVERED fmime gromde Por the appeal,how the appolmt is m eggiamai Petty,mY othu �,ane x�,i ( 1 W c J Q yon mo wmt m —H and a 5P50o0 RLng fee ovice the..pini epZpnli,—u emeptyN.it win M scbedvled fr pd,ne Mining and decisive before Ae _ awv _ fK a. Iummy24,2019 Please do vo[nuitate to covmm mer<gvding any quueene you may have m(540)665- August 6,2018 5651. Evan Wyatt,pireraurof LalW Planning Sincerely. 153—EvgivemMg,lm. WuadYlRll Lave M,.Evan Wyatt Winchestu,VA 22602 Greenway Etkgineering Wndy ggMk R n161La RE W3--rVA 22 2 ZoAng Admiviavator Property ldenpficvOov Number(PEV):54-A-128 HE'. Water antl Sewer Service-Ta ap Parce16 -128 Zoning Disfrim:RP(ReMmdal Perfmmmre) MRGdw Dear Evdn: Dur Evm: u. Fl M Williams Trvvme EmlaafBt Pauls EN%vPil Lurch, Sis letter ism mspovseb ypm ammapoMmea dated Jmmnry 4,20]9,to theZ ivg ISTI Sammy—da wMLMa�,VA 22603 In tespbnse i.your certesp.ndence datetlA s11,2018,This le8er conhrmsihe following: Admivuuabr raryudng a zordng tlemmdwpon in to pahivg requirmtmta tma fume 1.The Cltyof Winchester Public Illee h hie r-IIY pfoylded,and mntin...to envteE aM affordable ew,ly reidaAil multi-fmoay dmmrrc located w Xu above- pr.vitle publicwaterand se est he SI.Paul's.n the Hill Ep—,l reEmmmd property.(Knawnm Bt Pml's ontM Hnl) Clu hpr.pettyl.cat.— 278....ny din Frederick County. The FrMoiGr Cmnty Zmivg OAinmm Smnov 165-2112.01(OMioavce)sek the 2.The Cltyof Wlnchest.,P is Utilitleshase8l'ng water antl sewer infraslmcture. ilh deq t p t Ih p p d P I tth t tl parl'ng-�,:mmmd fm commuciil nam fh' Predmck comtr.The Dorking h had n fa ly -d f b g th si t d eve regair®rmm far a CnurrL n 1 spine pa 3 Sect 165-002 091 of the OrAvmm u tl d 19 500 g 11 p d, M1u a Parking requmanmt of 2 apace pe f M Id f By R.—tN BWdtttgs. 3.Th C'ty f W' t—Alk UI I' 'll 9 th bl 1 P P rty with Ilse tmal pmkivgreyuiremmtafrbmlr us 'lib 845aXon 16520201A(4)ofNe pbl Wet tl 111,11 th,r-11,agency sponsbleforihe Site OrAvnncc allovn Ne Z"ng Admrw eke adrysimmh n pmkivg Planappl at' process Wth Frederck County. Tr A mgwemmta Ym v mvveptual pim of the Popm'tY with a tocol of 99 pmkio8 $ /L :.R '- spaces.This nmobm.of fp parNvg apmerwin M Glowed Fm 8tia site m a mivimum.You ns.r n $ oa r. eq. will needb providemexearted mvmmtg'ng parking p fm edditionG mkivg if SIB anyque . .sed adtlitional lnrormatlon,please wMac eatrytime, y^,a$LpsC.Zptu SSS444'kkR d needed m thisptopmty edam shplm aDProvai. Sincerely, y, 1�yo'» f You have Me right b eppeil this dGamivelion weiWn wdY(30)days of tM date of Mis DATE'.04/20/2020 letter m ecmMmce with Sectim 15 2-2311 ofthCode of 3o e Sia decision shoe beavd meJryealable-fit is nos appealed wHinirty(30)d,ays.Slmnid ynu A.ose a appeal,Xte aPPUI mart be fila)web the Zoning AdmmiaNafor and the Bmrd of errY N/A Toeing Appeals(SZA)w accordance wiW A11iGe X 6ocdm Ifi51001.02 0[the Pu Seevioes Director Fredmid Covvty Zonivg ONinance.Sie pmvisim require Ne mlrmisaon of m ALE. appncerim£cob writlm atGavmtaevingf nine tlecisiev being appealM,deteof DESIGNED EY RL1t/]tA6 :.awVa»6mnn�..ia.s FILE N0. 838'1W 4.9 yRJN w-,:tten 107 Nodfi Kmt 9imn,Suite 202•Winahesmr,Vhginia 2260-OW ^r.mr: 1 w c a :wwaco.. r air. s DWGg3 19-03 NOiE HE 50'MATURE WOOOIANO FULL ScaEEry TOa aE310ENtwL J I 1 1 SEVAaAiiOry eu!lEa.inE vaOVERTYOWNER I3 NOT ALLOWEoiO CLEAR ini3vEGEiaiION. I -- I 1 II II II — I R>laN N3 L 3 3 1 II_ Ex—A. �> �EX NATER UNE \ � P I , I Wz w Wu i' xz 54lgUGWC1,I 1LpIP f1fiDS C7 L IFEIYibCM�L1]WM1284�HL1Y B11lA IS CITY"ITARY A4INHC(E // i_ __ W AJT Pfl UJ1 _ Z WF V 421 EA UY:SINLLF-FANNY p \ L USF:SfI.tlCL Fv MNyHCLE H/NV OUT=6]t.A3 ——————— Ex ary�NTIA � EX TCP-a19.a6 \ L EX e'INV IN= EX GAS UNE .5 ———— — !EF ' / PRESERVE AREA CE EE MA1'IEI ?5'RIPAR4W �\ X l�C�-�C _ a� EX IT CIXT PE \I (PER NE' B-!5 J _ _-_ EK EA1 171" 'N32 MAOeCLE EX.UT/UIY PCIS /_——EX a/SAArIARf A41NFo(E VOC aU!!EF NV IN R W/GI/✓ED WIRE j� /N UEU IT CATf ASNWLVERCS E% 8'IV OUT aB 85 / / —IX, CTE,{'V �L \\ o E%8/NV 01/l 6]C,85 I/ / 9 LNV C82— -- — _ — \ GO VNFE EX.I//lUl1'POLE _ CVERN(AV W 'RCP RT✓LINE �— \` POLE 1A ITSITI EX Urrmr PCLE 35 111�aN v W/—EC WrRES _ \ \ VL v e 326 -10 IAI Pc s6r smNr, El 24� \\ \ I p� I� /CO Nm e " Arvas P wrRE _ EX.B"C CF WNC ES ER SAN SLN— - �T 50 FPLW =� RCAM __ — � — +f ➢ �_ Ili �' (� m_Q A..R EX.TFEELINE / EX.NgCO CX ASPh4LTQ1 Q Y ING \ WA LEX 'OUT'682'N' a / _ f \ I W �� 9BN \\/ /// TC IXNSY1��xRAEAC0V11� - l \ I /I \ �. X 11 115 /, EX.�N& E r EMc i iA 1 / c' W 6.U. / ` PN 54 A r28 /CX.TC P. EISAVE _'S N / ! e N / RICK NUS J AAvIN �I �CurEC enREs i HWlIyaCRI1,1%A1SHFCH PECESiAL / 6 Z QO C \ k' Ge 2a5 PC 4r6 Q a \ T EX AS / \ ND OC EMLYISI/RE 5 W I FF 6 £.OVCRNUD 41171 ARP Q Z III Q a EA PHaC] j K N E'� (I\EpgVEFS�� I B! 6 Pl I i'� 4911 ACFE /TRANX4CFMEF r'`� roMPLEX O co AT 6UlN \ �� / x.EP 9 \ \ /� X 0IE C�4Y2L✓� I A'III EA-A' ATVE i L RN6 P 1 k ,IFI / ESE IX. NPP SN WAS o� V •��o �\ IXA I� �. �. EANo� \�E ax \ PIIS! EX,2 3m X63 �2e SC +� a 7 ILI EXi NCS cm� emLmmc f n m EA I ' � E a \ 1 °Ix Wo 0696T6 wi EC wREs n FFL IP U x 50 A 111—`"P C�� GHRF EELOPpxN /j L, v _11'11EA' S9_ 'EX-AST-1 PARRINC SETRAPx 1 d EX 3C��P AC E (YS P/L !NE PCDESTALS N 5�FKi yGyG _ IX PRCP=R APARTMENT iIX l¢fivE _ � � � �PLS � 11 AIEIIDESSEEUE ER 25 } ((( CS � buli£kE ANDP_ ITEA INE OVIEX INET No 90003]]6 R�e gel ML Si"''RESVC WL E:CCNC PAD I PEC6lALS Ey SICK __I �o•�'f 11,WSAEAJb5I \ ( W/HVAC r/NI S tl R kCPCRTr LINe SEPARAIICN BUEf£REM ,0 ER _ —OVIASEb v GARr _ MEN-r N \ euEEEq.wC - f CMP I IXME aY C C!£ANCU] 1 r- \ \\, T L "'7 N RIETiNNG SC ICN'A6' - 0 IX TCWM/ , $ U COMPLIX 0 \lx` ` 5 sbo NuaaF3n '� LX a,"NI Cu! sae aC P N N eaTfr a c Ex.SAw Ce 3C4 v F �+ \ ��S c"G3 A �\ EX.TC ao Es I o FC Es I SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION M � A\� i` f ss� � � � � IX Ns--b1/11/111b CF�E.8690 67\111\\\\\\\ \ \\ M2 lf1IXtlJIX1) APCMPLEX ��-M.51-A-ITIF E� 6 CS P/L x v9\\ �IfAyE BI \ I I BM1G�'E LWD M11/SI 1.Boundarysurvey was performed by: ALE.] 20 WW9 PU 53P P 9 P Oated 09/]6/2011 SC E NV W1 / \ \ \ ]M 51 A iTJB I USE AIU[]ffAMRY po e / %er" DESIGNED BY'.FLK/KA9 ____I P rfo P e FILE N0. Z0.VE:FP \ \'A. rp EX CITPN INE \ USF]UMApU.ffS 9_ ly a93 C/WIVE UIIUIY PCLE \ SCALE.I 30 mopog pNTFR PMIS Pl P paten. 0/]9/20]T MEET 63o7W ' v v RDWGya19-03 q�amP LEGEND \ E��s 6} w1-lI POB WNB I.56,BUD.C 9 ws-irmx ans[i ROuWG1RFlE 505 E< f<-nxsrxB nooU.— � sox m aol 3 j v l _ Exr Haar EIEMiwx FREDERICK COUNTY `3 v roe-vmn a eEcrexnc SCNOOL!fl) pr IRF S ——e,r-—FASIIIG D]xIBNR Zw --- r' NJz jxz S _�'' _ - — - "_ J �' 40 \q �xoD.azSw5B ",;; -" w �� .. 11--11 i 1 - _ \'� �HRIsT EPISCOPAL CHURCH �' –» \� — J FRED (RICK PARISH 10 255 P 416 `; 4.9N ACMES / J A 'r :U tr ox o o o PAGE BROOKE fnK—U 62 \\d\Y'�\\ 1`Yr\��\ k 1 I Ir I/r f I rr= \ rt[u�s \ - LAND TRUST d 1x1 o CL ds\\'ts�yq� Io-r..n. W w`S2 [w.U `tAt LL1111 IR F�4 a II \�\\L�"/ avyo..� .rv. 0F a � \ �� `\� �l1✓I1 J��IJ _--�- ------- _ — �F x —'- dam' �ry z Z �a \\ s�sx omNsx� 31' W m \. S35 W 685. \/� \ \ GENERAL NOTES: 0. w ISA PAGE-BROOKE 1'r' 1U `P�\ \ \1 \ 1 -`. -s _— --—_- __J LAND TRUST \ oUNMEHT axes Pnae.,e'Im aF-SUEPIscaraBcxuxau.MEMMCK WISH, � z $\ \\ \ ,`Rr\r SUMMIT COMWNIIV w BANK MTHE 0O=$r.RVx.Bnm1m,T TwarN1TI�REceNxaueNlr:wN,aNr,Ee N ?$„ ¢ �k\\\\\�\�\Y\\ eOwINB.Y1BT.ariwrEvn'ruwnire+�r,EROA,Eo.xivx+,m,rusnoexc[v,lws: FREDFRIGKCOUNiTVIRpNRVIRCIwa W p°gsa '� \ nPuraxD suRvevarD®eoox zespaopmslsilE cuRReNrowrvERs ncqusmgN e1wNDIEAP svacE _j 'i - cwrMsem+eunr o,merrennereR sd.ere.mmvr m G t'E o >,FTMB✓EciO.ol, ormOE m�,oPO>°ONwOEwsonlaRPaNY opwRIl AgRa,ELY rn�rE. mFrmems "°"`�-""rne0�s Dare sEPFEm�Rxxore .s,osxmnD.ParrEENo.rlap s,sFFSEDRrB {LSr, x- 1Nro Nbr«ar xr�msPr«sRoar and mm,re F � � ,� aOwRarESY wer,Tp. 'x1 PalExm.INsrFFI1IE„TPxr��sOR REOIRDE1rNPORxwn �n seb;�"r,„a,x��mnmrewlmm��n�M®� Z RA Zoning Requirements: 8)lM VVIRaxwsTarerwx 0EMMENr MOORDEDINceEDBIOxxepa 01wE ar.Bm StaeRol%.wmmelo oma..wm�mlanamn:.ic.n�w&r onium Q m wgxroF Srare R,E.11,SENSENV P�.amoP.r.mrn<i a pnE erovm as TxE wR�av veer urea FainP F�«mre�nrNwm:ale nam ure pM�l,ne«no�s+�v f eo-�eeE`clmaaorlror�+earesse�re. 9Ees�[Nrooro„� OFWa EMRREcor IIIIEEoeoa+Sa EW P wm�i�m am rvmm,reseme l�neeammmvmn wPeemoYz ram No. pnmse sNo HERON.PnxreommuNry Bemrs;s•s0arw. mremapn wn pi�r®I u:ear mrumure snNlm�eiminaeMmepnmey ux NewienPmPnrg�w m,mmxc: ,NBOrTOPtnv III av TONORr1Nw Fov.Px contPary racoROEo mane a maworeremeo�me wnneM rgnlwa,Ilnemse,eaM Rowew. ,e,R•'1�£`� ayaNre Perai sUe acMEIv INeuFFlarRnClEm pnvsI—MIR ECIRDF➢IrsOPPwneN io nNNE eentetlmnnq xim sale mimM 3`lJJ s.nro«lem�mm +�+)sue.Ecrro urlrmRlrartopvavrocxEsapFaxEarmPor«ucrEresNarve OanvarxopwRDlrvw Rone�m+eimeed.Irw ^mmsegmmv SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: .y ( mml,Omm �� S u FLNJnL 1^cUC N(� more men Beaw,00 fwt CIPDFD IN DEEq B01xxi5 Pale vi.INwFnGEMPNY51Gc0RRECORDED INPoRNaRIDNro eesmneeinnee lens provww anFmMonin BrYw�i pLceM�Sal".�o°ii rrmwsswcnnn wrlo fff IWs �ro:- - a®ealwrel nno F«aemlDwna,e sa.e«e�mrem oEE NNsrbs pw��TTOixl=Mn PWWrcRBSTERnroslsNwo HR SeoWw RE=RMIIN Ev�nr+enm,n.Fl.a.nd<venN,.w,a,.w.«.Mm. ,�,L ary .3"oEC-L,w e«nnm,r rn.mePe«am®,em..erra, nmm,m //7 rre�am,elewrorea.IDmnmmnremms�:oo„�a Eal nERDrv. o,emlmre�n om�uRe� ,:=°�4 ve Immrcemmww«mmeNwp.mre amn.re rt.oveimemw�i�•13m,.m mTemn Nmnrem m.n.N worx Fa ;e.R+,.n.a,e,nnm,e xvsmnWaNe eo ARxer 18.1011. _ DATE:14/20/202 FaamwanxcwoR BUILDINewxsrnlcnoNOR w:D.,,apswlvw s" 1.e. RTI me elle eewD UBEDM 1$111 w SM Du,R COMP wumes.NOOmen w/v/rl DESIGNED BY'.Rix/I{AS Novi-rwxu lDeNnFleurnwxcix[PERGrnNNICE OFixle euavev. FILE N0, S DWGgs 19p-03 a°LASI —v � lA 99 R'OPpSEA ARE ANU INFRASTRUCTURE. x R a m 8 I I I I LEGEND IIII GAS ANO ELECTRIC DEMOLITION 1111111111 iI I i STORM SEWERAND SANITARY SEWER PIPE DEMOLITION I—I Ex Sp10d. I 11 /// 3i PAVEMENT ANO BUILDING DEMOLITION Ex wnrER uNE I _, I \\ II Qz _ fy/ \ I W�I u ----_- _EB[SIC-r?C-56 og Z 1 1 / TAr.sl-A-r19 // epr s6 w.aw c. aao� W I —— lM1CttRlCX Ed 4 SCHOW.6'0100 U.do SMtllARY LNmKKE OB 1�P0�A11 1�\, I 1 D:.8•MYW-6)1.95 / _ ' /�''// / USF:SWd.F-EAWL--_- I USE:SCIpOL EX.diY GI6Y)MT NW1KK( A—EA B'MY OU!-611.9) �_��LX.GIS LWf I \ J5' PRR-fAREA OF 50 T,GW/RFLb, ` -_ �' EX.B•WV Wl=6XA15 —— 60flER _ i' ND FO[(SCFENL(Nf _-'- d PIXE ----__ EX diY SHMlARY NW1pLE FE';t-A"(SEPAFArIONfX.Uml-q-I.S45) -__ EX.!Cf>=6IBJ1 W/Cl/!ED XiFES — _ 611 �'Wtl[U OFY'AZECORY rvPE C EX.B•WYW\ I I LX.GIS NILK 1 V N 671.W EX.BEX. BBIIV OV 6M.85 _ sAN sev / // �E 8•INt 6Xx-Bx�� FX.046RHEA0 BAK EX UIBIM1 FIXE — 1 EX,OYERx!/01Y'. _. xiUaEIAiN / 6�EX PROFERn(INl � \\11 1 1 11U— a uml ME ��'� — � � ��Y_S_ _ „_— _ �_`�� - _EKB�SEY \ \ yd�y�I'' %GUIED WWEJ _ 9�.(vvVyIE/6�'(Y� LB I J\ XA'SaR.S£W. - e = cEnAOI OINSE \ II 1� f9A�'l. J16 p -1y - z� WA �-�-- - l7�• _S-AIRAWYr-?3-^'BO i� -616- _ _ __ DEAD Ex.saN SEA --- --- g�'' WB >Lwe Wm C0F _ °=�°� xa-_-_ �x�dm a�mxc 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111NNIL v� -_ Ir tram%_ - -'4 =6Ber DE.A.EL Iffl — i sREAu -.\\\ 1 / i � / ` I _ \ \ \♦ I I 1 -__ \ F EMs _ --` J \ NEcs sA N. EBB' \� 1\ \\ ` \ I I 0. a4 / j-/ sZZ z LK `{ E ENO IX. 6-eenvDr o EE II ___�� \ o U A NLF TXYI A.AIE AN DEN, cvNNrm� / °i;H, Z OF 11.D1 \ X(nL/FV POSE \ \\ \\ / IICHRISa(RSClMLI MUM1CH PfOE1TAL9 / O/,:m ,q 8 \ EaT \a .'i _ \\ \ \ \\\\ \ I I CfihCN MRl9W /(X-LEPMM'E Q �Q co pDnoIX.l ww/fwrEp enREs v v / of Brom \ \ I- \ 185 Ak Aie \ l7 / w pw F(CrP.) UNING kFEQVER/.'UO \\ \\ \\ �6grA .971 AAdkSP -�( dEC!- I EX. W 1 f'/! IN SFORMER �RJ I/ AP REN! I I C] '.'LA � cpuxcx a xvAcuxiTs 1 pEMOEN/6LECT11Vrl \ // NEIERC\ �EFODATE X \ AND U as Rral Ex �EK t MC i wwmx eTOIX UNR II 1 �a1ts \\ I 2 1 _\16coNcaE / `gjEz U25TOav w/c✓vE w �NE \ l / � HVA NO 6W ESI / --j a ppI \ \ T 1 R II -- \� � �m f�r K M SGN EM It}VIII IIIIIIIMh EXl @UII AaN�H� _ N R / ' uricRr cEncIXcnLiv 0` L\ ry rA'i9Ci1K cA PUDE NE ds oLEiYP. �Ia• E�X 2JlF1YIJNE rR �\ \ 1 ,p IIIIIHIHHHH1HHkHNNIHIHIpI1HHIHHINIIH� X. 66ss1F III \ ,^y-/ 15 ACIIK � WAW(IK J� — UN /- -,urz$,MW 8' PRO/Rr(INC ; r�M !LA — I ALAY1uP F E . 't ANu s SHARED w f / w l CROEMNO 77LY/pN / 'A' SC1NF�fvfXO� / 1 / W/NYAC UMl3 -1.,.. I EX ELECT I z �V A VV! 1 I CLMMSILWE050' ce PROPCRY"r'CIR� dM1 / � fiyl' "�6?,w,o V o / ]R USfaeMEB�—T— V v Ex. APARIMENi fi I EX I / C\ SCCmW \\ EX 69 iJ CONP Ex L Ex ALAR—T l GfiW011! \ \ \,� SIR�1Y'0019IXtl))lb �. ` I fX.B WVTONI.WWKS I a E SNi f91— i u, liq\ 1 5'Sl�kn).tVKtlYI !\ " f�.S-M'N.Wl•=$ m o� r J _-___ / CEA I NAT" ` ( AA` \ EX.roNNWpKS I AV I ! v�vI I r. 1x DATe -A/DV-- 'Y ArAa.F ru.sf-A-ia)r 1 A •x68890 d5 P/L / !�:a l•I \3�1..,`�Z i,lIXW.MW II \\ I dMWYEX FACF- F VIRUS! ---_� // AL➢.] 00 Ex. T 69019 v III EX.IS•CWP '� \\ 1\ i11p� I� PACE�%tlOXE WIO]fiYIST .,— Y \\\\\ / DESIGNED BY Rix/— /EX G&Ffl�F V f I L14 9J0 FG B]0 -——— A ENM fF 1 I A zaVE 8P 1 NO, ex6siXo 63— /Ex QiRiu �! 1\xp �'pldnla•E __- use ronM,nu56s 1 3a o ED xeeT or sT `I(xlptE/wn Y I/ \\1151 EX.hmur r E k \\ 11 5 scALE:f"=3c' S EET I 19-03 OF31 EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROLLEGENDEND FOR PHASE I EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY !1 NO. KEY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MM coNs,n`cnorNraANCE RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER =�v Soz cE NAME: PILTRE.- CERTIFICATION y: _ i? =g sM —xr,xr.xr,SNARTFENCE DATE: ccs EIBLDISTURBER cFs COMPOST FILTER SOCK IS PARTYRESPONSIBLE FOR eV)pioet�Ve �s. S.or STORM GRAN INLET PROTEENON CARRYING OUT THE LAND DISTURBING DpR oA``L ACTIVITY AS SET FORTH IN THE PLANS. v> Soe O CULVERT INLET PROTECTION DODaz 3.os GG A TEMPORARY DIVERSION DIKETS sHu PRoTEcrEo wlTH soIL ---— �1 oQ�TC; z STABLIATION o-zLe 3.15 TOSD m TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN 2 aorvMErvTALSMAaTEENFE OR "LTELTEo ONE Z 3.1S O .11ETPROTECTIOn aEOEacKcouNL,vu ——— Law w 3.a LE p sTEKTEa socKs�aEe s¢E UNLESS NOTED Seo w RocK CHECK DAMS OTHERwiSE EiLTERSOCKSSHALLSE—EOONLEVEL w W c7 O '�'�' CONTOua AID ENDS PULED UPS-OPE TO PREVENT RUNOFF .Z OLIMITSOFCLFARING FADING GES(Gw.Y COLOR)PER COMPOST EiLTER SOCKS W 3.32 POS PERMANENT SEEDING J (C�n3aS)ARE INITIALDNIDESTOTHE SOCKS DUaNGSTE CLEARING DRAINAGE DIVIDES TH—AREAS OPERATIONS RETAINNS G—D GINGOF THE IN ON STA AND .A "LL =ON1 BE— THE N—AREAS 1ILL BE ,THE D'ANAGE KE -GISNRSArvvCE� DI asDEiO o SDTO THE SEDIMENT CASN(DRANAGE 35'RIPgRIAN� EP OA MINIMUM.ANY DISTUR AREASTOeE�E�GEG, Divi DE cvnN GDLOR).TE RSAREAN SUFFERARE STREAM ANG BUFFEF --- MULCHEDANDTACKEGIMMEDw CRITICAL AREASTO PaOTEET \ 1 Ex.WETLAND.GTaEAM AND — yU u� — a PAa N "'E,_E G PER LINE CHNEALAREASTOPROTEC�— — — 1� ANRARY G93a AC qEL 35 R/PAFAN I I 1 _ S ---- 5—_ = — SF / ,) 5 ROP RETA NTNG U X -IN OBxF _ _ q " i �� I cFs as ITO IRS 17 , ,i- DAm2e AC I I In-I� ` ®s r l v] ED L1 _ Es� To�cEs p,s�� croro(sEE 0 TO c TOCFsaS cA eu ) I�, 0. z a D 3 NG / o�aBp, PRO ^N 1 6 E �NDTE�EE 1 NOTE E � `�ND /APE DIVERG ON �� — -- — '/) � ` � w PRO �� / �' 3 �I i w co LE ,AG �� ;. aADM� W �GCK O GEOERlit A ` ` \ I A .� IRDGN �' prPEREll MPDS RYLINING I OP� EE OAGRNG 3N _ OR--e E �� ------ ---- P z — LLI o J�-Rl LINING NAIR -- AP DEo)uALR IL I F 141 I I I II 5 C A \ Ex. �EDIGNED RY H ,AB 69UFHLE N0. 630 FW DT 1 SCALE:1-W EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER NO. KEY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION NAME A.CERTIFICATION : 9� AS ao2 O TEMpopAav cw.vEL S,�s O m TEMpowwv SLOPE Dw.IN DATE: --" CONSTRUEnory ErrtRANCE >>ffi=° F"TPENCE S.+S op ourtETpROTEcrION THE RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER 3� SMF -xr.xxra- azo co IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR suaRr FENCE v —�—�—ROCK CHECK w.Ms CARRYING OUT THE LAND DISTURBING 3: OYIS COMPOST FILTER SOCK O LIMITSocCLEARINOa ORADINo ACTIVITY AS SET FORTH IN THE PLANS. 30 STORM DEAN INLET IRDTETION PERMANENT SEEDING oa o CULVERT INLET 1—EET.N -- DRAINAGEDNIDES a� 300 DOD y D TEMPORARY DNERSION DIKE KRITTALAFFA-DISTDE—CEIGCRRICALAREAS—E SIAL IR—T TEDwITHEDIL MULoA MIwuDM.ANY DISTIRSED AREAS TO BE SEEDED. .s,Ec-z�L S CHEDANDTACKEDIMMEDATELY. A�SMARTFENCEOR OTHEa wiTH vaaiArvCEaERI ' Z W E LIKED IN LIEU OFONE Wz ArvE UMFEFDC CW w Wu z Lid Iii f S w MATCH LINE SHEET 7 �F €g w z IF,� 0 0 X44 Ol + - EA�DEK w w g� w — — — — — — / SENSENY ROAD-A ROUTE 657 — a `S`"\ i mar ewxg rosmn sxm-.uwry z � o Vo o CL ao W„ 6g71 u rj- . � 'AT w EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL PHASE I VIEWLEI ro ro Z �W SEAL "=ST C W I CD W Dp b Eli w y MATCH LINE SHEET 9 �'�� - ��w LJ G�x �� -� --- --- } iP � _ ---- _ w w IF w ; i _ F TDA m D, 1 aaam k R�. �c ccnry Rn4 mar aures rosrsn — —/ 0400,1 -- --- —�--- -` --- ° ° 0 _ - x D zBER ': ,�-1 i --,b DATE.04/20/2020 EROSION&SED IMENi CONTROL PHASE II VIEW =S0 15 p S0 0S DE9IDNED BY.Ex/EAN 11. FOR PHASE I & II EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY !! s�E"=� "D 638'" s DWGW 19F-03 EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER NAME A. NO. KEY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATION : 9� AS 302 O TEMPORrav cw.vEL 3,�5 O m TEMpowwv sLopE Dw.IN DATE: -E CONSTRucnoN ENTRANCE >>ffi=° F",PENCE 3.+3 oP .11PTPRCTEEDI THE RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER 3� SMF -xr.xxra- azo co IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR suaRr FENCE v —�—�—ROCK CHECK w.Ms CARRYING OUT THE LAND DISTURBING 3: OS COMPOST FILTER SOCK LCO LIMITSOFCLFARINGS.—ING ACTIVITY AS SET FORTH IN THE PLANS. 307 IOP STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 332 PS PERMANENT SEEDING oa o CDLVERTINLET PRGTET.N -- DRAINAGEDNIDES a� 300 DOD y NOTES D TEMPORARY DNERSION DIKE KRI>T TU ARES_DISTURSANVCEINCRwICALAREAS TO SE SIAL PROTECTEDwITHSOIL MUToA M111—ANY DlsruRSED AREAS TO SE SEEDED. ,s(EC-2)L S CHEDANDTACKED MMEDwTELY, AL SMART FENCE OR LTREALTEREUKEDwuSOFONE Wz ANOTIERWITIVARIANCEFROMFREDERIC CWNTY. w W �W ---------- MATCH - ----MATCH LINE SHEETS 7&9 ,e/ WII a EE �' W ory } ` ` , U I 4-It I / ` = WI FILT� a o F ` coMPosr R®.. DOCK —RSO. 4 2 Q Al _ Q I lip D P aF 0 ao .z =_°'z -°'z e e Y . . . e o .mow- - i-A - --- - E. IIS„ --• a `` e e _ w- w w CFS ry o � �u R d L� OP Z Q Q c Is ImwmmFs,Posrtn srtm= ' — i °o — Po/L cou�vir — 6 a oa o x �F \ W .rI L�0 1 -_� �\ r�Ll� e -- W eA ., =g =� Az A ' EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL PHASE I&II VIEW f�o eo yti dt nA1•e:oa/zo/zoz w 15 0 3p W DESIGNED BY'.Fix/— FOR PHASE I & II EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY !! s�E"-� s F'ENG A 63OF DWGg1D 13 ER°s°NSEOMENT°°NTR°L LEGEND ge FOR PHASE II EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ONLY !! °alA�, eavA�re=I NO. KEY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION g?m8 oN'TRLGT0 e N E RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER w a v 3- —x x x—BILTFENCE NAME: CERTIFICATION 9M4RT FENCE DAiE IFI—COMPOST H-ER BGCK THE RESPONSIBLE LAND DISTURBER eBvKio"T c0 �s. .m IP ST—ow.IN INu:T aRGTc-cTIGN IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR Dpo�"E CARRYING OUT THE LAND DISTURBING v> 3m qP CULVEET INLET PROTECTON ACTIVITY AS SET FORTH IN THE PLANS. 1 3.05 ' TEMPORARY DNERBION DIRE 8.18 TOso m TEMP.—I.-PED-IN ,.sLOPBE311 DGREATERSHALLBEPROTECTEDWITH BOIL By SUDS LT E�B��1EN)VIRDNMENTALEMARTPENGEGR W Bae oR our�TPROTe-eTION mord are MaLBa eeeP m 5e L v m EDINUE SONE W z RocK CHECK wMs ,ii1pe5bo"� ANOTHER WITH VARIANCE FROM FREOERICKCavNrv.UO � Wz LcOG LIMI—CLEABIN—R-1- W 3.82 O PERMANENTBEEDING DRAIN-ITrtEA9TD BE�BEGEDE — KE, E iTOa MINiMum ANv o�BTw ELv D LAND BtREAM D BUG IPgR41N� / _ MUL HEo DTA KEDIMMED E WEAN BUFFER ARES CCRITICALAREABTGPROTECT -`, D,STREAM ANo —� RPAR�BUF RAE L Ex WETLAN, IFS LDL s._ mw ST CIL I ST LBB _< cr ST PQM -(21Ps CL lip 211 i IP iiii, W �B�N .i z O �) BEDBAFFLM NT PsDD DY P a LTA �PA A ` oLL - _ _ 1 TD,o10, IPsA� ae2 — EN 30 MP f — � �� 9. -.�� DA-,e Ac. T y _ ME f1 To— E, /OWNNOMES DATE. a/�o/�oza 7A �� oa 11- sU c.nm m� cP L (P A -1 ^- Aro Lcx C.Fry DESIGNED BY FLK/AAS 15 30 BO FILE N0. 698 D� �3B 1-1 , —3D NEET DB2 L BDWGW 19-03 mxyE01-m D." ....... Atw sur ..It bb 11.111,, .1111..I, AZ- g gi8 " " phb-1t`Abnn 1.fl to III, .11 w p b d.lG l.-t,bID) Z W. I D-1Ib.nt.1.dup..-- p -Y II 1111 t I.Y.I d- It I—gad-,th-1. =='T'="1=1 It-I I l P... Pt-M.,-pp'y'=1y I,Ah-h-T1 mt. 1, (2) pnntl 15-1-11 All....III be--.. 1,b 1ma ac c maa rem is bnadrsand butts =1 I TM,=, I- d-t-h-.11 IM pll b.1b,. l I III =T 717 A.1- I-I Ih I.- rosonnm (I)P,,d P -1 by th,�& It -b"MI.I, L.1 P-n t, IatvPdnep az fy thl I,- it Itt PIW II.,bl- mob da 1. --t I Phly I t, -1-ty 1,-111, lhe E- - 1,,m I, ,y MI p=Ph I-II-1-tt-I, Ihsmrm ty bb IL 1. n meaa t, .'PIGI W h-ppl-b- -k fl- Th=lb d be b'b th-e.-h.-d--1-d-.-the 1-m nd-Thelbe.m.nd...ndneaa,a G p.p=I,t-t,b-dl -1n, -n-t :�. " UJ z kEfOM ;XbtZ I., 61 ui (2)IM-IndlDon-,e1.1Ol.I z a® ro mem comm Hambmx. A_tbb be (3) pt-tyIM11-tyme t411h b,domb,bb III -1y d.nll th- p -.§&LLjLjLUoIjLLjLj=ofG.A,t M .11 be, I, Z", b Auer dam reseemdas payes. a her Ju b be It.see' emem ectanrelt ormm §12. I.Ad Id thl, I-II.I.hy =dT.��7It- lh-h.1(1 tm b.n by Ill-Phlil,1 d (4)Pd.. q thy Mnn., T�,ment,s.b.,�..d.��u,.dt�.�,.,,%%t.,el.�n,oMd,s�d.l, .-o'AI It.M'nPl, @2�.=�fdl III V-P Il to d, E,21141 of III to dm I1, the,.1 .1 In I MlI bb lfth.,--bbl pond to. 1NP),Ibbt --pl,pb d1 Id .0-.-by men a see tdns my Oe evdemeof perm'sson to mars thsmPmveme =G fA our wIM she Su1 I—Ile, 7 �l 11111 dma ntl l .1 hydro be o care 1 .1t,,, th. 1I. b.ren d b D1 A =7111 nbtf.I.Ilo,fill�io, ppp�Ift��.VrtnlESCPf.pl.nb,m.,,..`.it inv TI m or rem re. re.ro�ible fo�peffomibgtne itmid¢rere¢. A Wh=.,'fibn,.�1 d.,-, pIon..It sw 2 In-I p-,d. 1PM1pbl �-,=,.bb,n,.,-,M--.I-,-mh(Pe,,-.-.t.bd-lond- Ids , 1S All."sewer ld¢tsmatare niaeeopereole dbI1 4 Ptb1-dnt.Id I IS =teml-bl,dm�m=ed��s 11 bels d--n 1111)dlIh thb Ion.to d-I bbsn d- y .yn..b p, Tema W 7 1- M 11 -d,-t. I,I I I.,I I Idml reloa3lam mall otm or grs cm 10 Obt-l'sw g99 re 12�..n-,k,n 1.p11 111 kPn pm-11 P= n,,t,,ds, d n.;b .......th' t are d 13.W=71.f hperod y 2olas th,.==,l I b1b,If-bb,thl--.-th,A �45=t`,=,nt.M,,Ibe 1==,dzt=aZ.,.dtuh1d th,n t1 I E. CL < nd 2t=1.m gbIb ed': I6s.n M-d-lb1 m-su-th t-p,-1.1thb 14h All pplPt. l t 11 Itt)11--lbd the b,I re, t1 III IaU th_ nbd=t"11,='ed- 11,ItIl I 1,111 b bull,thep- t,1 15 ...... 41E IM d�Ib Giro I,e-u.�bn I,t. ..IM emrenmem one nt bas M red -Idulb 11 th,I.III— naas-Zd' I)d CO 2 &bb'.4)'=Plon3I11II2bfth6H 3 In.,,.t�,ul��.d.,,,.Iu.1l,m�ne,t.th�t�l,�...fl2l�,e,l�D�u..�t b, see mrougn en aPProvee bD --t- 2t. be, Z 4 Peitnere IZmysaneram �I:Llsl=l I I Effbdng.p.l...111 Il III d th.. ""Z11"' co b 1�� -tg' seven hn-(-n(7)bb Pdb.t,1N1.nnIo',pr,h,l 114)d- I MuIha1=%,d1, d Mb- =tl b.' tfo �,p,,Iy b.In ord.,to C. T1 thot Msbn Il lh s1t d D-1h L G'. P111 I..nnp,Pb1,n-In.th.pl., t.nd.t,-glhlbN A mon berms,d Ib 2 A d- f W-.P'.:`l 11 ed wlm. d.. �dntll 17 he�tIf. I.11 1. 11111 th. thd -d o,III 1,1 d bt� III'..p.,f sed mad hy .1,, E: AbESE1EG0E1TPTFENIEMFl1TPP ,S,-d Ll Z=s17 I. hb,,u,II.-Il-ln,t 9B It Ifrom III-by. It-tl-lull tmt,, 11 I AIF E- the_ erger em d-b- h-11 2 Fn 1m,I F te, I t I 11=1 t-1 111 dA.Y1nnb: Mnn.t P111 I I �Il 3. =I b Th,s.11 t -11. tId reseed uness ISCPht,.Trapped see mem aim �� yP b,l,��p.ntf.R�..,�.n.Ms�,m.�lon. 1tt P "M=. _dI,oIbm.P -rat X,=df"m I-1b,nn nt. -. .I.p =f doraean that .Ith th,ll Pe.. em on prolene;II ===s.pm'= m-ml. Z=.pttm fl. SOILS MA SESSEDY PLACE Ed,LL DATE:04/20/202 DESIGNED BY'.Rix/SAS FILE N0. DWGW 19-03 CONSTRUCTIONOF A SILT FENCE STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (WITH WIRE SUPPORT) T.N.d smE ELEvnrioN � "IIC611— j IIII 1 �," �� IIII �� II /IIII ?III Super Silt Fence 061 ePLANp VIEWp I Wz i w Wu i T jx w III od��,l� —SECILQhL VIEW [^[„S o.°, °..,••[„[x SIIPEE.ET FENCE SECTION B wwga°u�`u. re..wum m.w ROCK CHECK DAM 2 ACRES OR LESS OF DRAINAGE AREA. ENCU.- 74M Ae°p,onDm:N/llMls U fov,ioivul" W (DOWNSTREAM VIEW) 6 wr E, Q Q ccaas "RC0P1 SOPER SILT FENCE CLas Mary M1emer of Gedev,lle Cl�avowr Nneb wire!=brie mceF!clam C] z—la Aeaas OF DRAINAGE AREA mem,,°nu°a.n,=u E _,. lmq°,macoco-el,caa„da- Z x n T° cma e soul—ae ae 1-°f o-1,—3� Z o n{�s�n��n{Isrn�<u`. .°OAa ey W m ns Bal a�k�_�R,<r =rte°�II��a M1<w e«� _<,{. �1�k<��{={ is o m" Q (DD NSTREAN YEW > ani<m<mr, a,�,w<laa< , »s °°=�°lM1eeonm a ,M1I=.N°aar�°laefm°=,M1°alarm°e<a° w1alo.,! T ,.sa�l,ak L<�m ola,<Dow<oa,.iNamE a sum,sla t<aa,M1=I{<o°ro,°,°,b<kll°.Mgn°,,,aa°�: cug i aia cyan rnyael �4.�Mf lbs! 10-t0'/o 10:1-5:1 r20p kn I,SODfe 2pd3% 5'.t-)',I IOp lcce 1,00D&G SOYo+ 2.1+ Sp fm PSO fmr I)Fwitl,H,<le1<s, inn a D<vamam,ai on Roel antl aridge Sand°r&krc�"I,ki link SPACING BETWEEN CHECK DAMS z>cwm ° TEMPORARY DIVERSION DIKE = ) - ,�«a«r, ,<rM1<.=, ° .�. p m Na b-err<M<__ _ __ _ l_ — — o-.°kM1 splbfi°! ,> ;�nuc-w� ! o.� "o ) ASTMT rMWM1 aD,lal o S9 w . TR9 CKING E,k e a 7 m vooT awaana eaasr s,=�mrmva.l lss3 `.Muyl.°a�pam,e .xrnr.°.g T au,a,.o-u,o° DATE:04/z0/z0 R a I„w aa,l cm.,°an,°n Eerv,w ALe. N/A DESIGNED BY'.—/KAS FILE N0. s DWGW 191-03 q amA GRAVEL CURB INLET SEDIMENT SILT FENCE CULVERT INLET PIPE OUTLET CONDITIONS FILTER PROTECTION ^ ^ MuwxTMne s> ' J Pwx Nmw ANN°' �siu��ox.wm°O°imac d SINGLE INSTALLATION SECTION ?z �xJ ��<� W u jxz — OPTIONAL STONE COMBINATION + °max°x � PYRAMID INSTALLATION SECTION 0 -L NTS z 3. FILTREXX®RUNOFF DIVERSION SECTIONS ACCEPTABLE TEMPORAPI SEEDING PLANT MATERIALS 'BUICK REFERENCE FOP ALL REGIONS' < WQ e xea ss Frog° ed10�s151n° �zs abs a J a z p 1-FeN is L2 a a 111-11 11 F1,11, 11 w F� o Ixo Nurse Croo Asx INs W Q 311 Oe co w Deb.IS- P 30 A,-III °° Z o Q cD x Gox°�e<m "er"xx ero=�on Q ° ° RF pl— DEFE:NM/2D/2 SMILE N,E DESIGNED BY Rix/DES FILE N0. S DWG 119E-03 SEDIMENT BASIN SCHEMATIC RECOMMENDED DEWATERING EXAMPLE PLAN VIEWS OF __ Bz oN ELEVATIONS SYSTEM FOR SEDIMENT BAFFLE LOCATIONS IN ,L LLQ s BASINS SEDIMENT BASINS gam roex.mmr cm ��-.e�o\r\�a`ySeA °,r P:rP \i/ ❑❑❑❑�I� _ SS ELy6e0Az 35 v�I wn noskr orvrs Xr»,IL s„L \ ,.r a,a. ra.° i Mary _ OLIE(o)ocuvo 3~ # °N .ew �\ BLOCKOeENING_ I aE�sgo Rim RwGE II = Sv;NtMS°Eo ILS SHEIE °y CV DESIGN ELEVATIONS WITH oau \\~ -1 _ DaiFlcE=slsso I �\ sin NGLm30.w Cu.Yo9.1 Z�z III III EMERGENCY SPILLWAYNIE sa»r r.,aw wT..1G Nrs1 A R rvG ' W aFIe _ Er W H uj ELGCKGPNING DC w sealer ma acaannta.a nrw.rrann an nrr mr GG RE NSLOP 4 <�i<�i<�i<�i<�i� -at 6 TW-0M EGA nra.,rra° N, Far a. .r r,.r.°,°...°ar i�i iG G W a.na ma an-LL marLY win Aarn aaa, cora roma ra.rmr a ra.rrarr�.° <- � �`;��x�%x vL/lvL/ll< AII,maw n,n. E m M INIIIE ,vvNivivivN � p61 DESIGN ELEVATIONS WITHOUT FOR Euovgrvevr EMERGENCY SPILLWAY (wsm runs z�m.cwr) a us i imo..c owuxa � - - z CLAv WI TOPS TH 6' OILCAP -_ SWM BASIN PRINCIPAL RISER i. MODIFIED FOR SEDIMENT BASIN SEDIMENT BASIN CONVERSION TO BWM BASIN NOTES: 1. PE RUCTURE IN COLOR I-Y ANOTEMP.-EBS ENT NP, N'TALL IT N' PAL 4 MEASURES TO REMAN INT L IPTREAM AREAS ARE PRMArvErvicv SrAe LZEo SqS SHOWN AE WE. U MPGRARLv Ep OCK wEigry ONiryo I R DEVICE oOI RCE PIS ArvNSTALTIE L IEMPogTE ORARv EwRirvG OFFICE ANODE-- I I a 6 I'E APQ - EGRAOSEEEAT'EL eoimM ttlS ET'. REMOVEo win SwMEASi RIN'.DEVICE Arvo GROUT OEwgTEENG OEFICESCLOSEo(urvOLE 90 PENINGISE G J 6,Z LL EMGVE TEMPGE,RY eL-ONGL P as SEE SHEET 23 FORM EASIN OETAILB. O r FO z cox Wr^ a 1992 3.14 1992 3.14 1992 3.14 1992 3.14 -INGRAAY SEDIMENT BA&N1 De61GN DATA 6HEET Ii. Total-WE baaiv volume at uest of riser•= 1165.03 m.ydl.4 16. WiN emmgemy spillway. p 1�la•D.% 1 12 W 1 Q elevation 61h.1.(Prom Storage-ElevatwnQwe) (^ tea, (wiN or without an emergenry spiLLwaY) Assumed available head(h)= NIA fl.N II Q2) 23. Depth of water at pdndpal IBM—crest(Y)_ b. c J C] W Project`' seny Place •Minimum=134 m.Ydfi'/acre of Loral&IIiuege area. h= treat N Emcrgcvry IS-,Pievadov - trot of Riser Blevadov Slope of upsveam fear of embankment(Z)_ :1. CK flaw!`1 Ieradov NMheact 9. Diameter of dewmeong"I"'= 4 WttM1ou emQ Slope of pdnapal spillway barrel(90_ % genry spMlwey: 10. Diameterofflexibletubirig= 6 in.(diame,erofdewa[elingoMice length of bmrel In saturated zone(")= N. Total area drainwg to basin: 6,16 acres. plus-h.). Amumed available head(b)= SJN h(Defog Q") N. Numbu o[mllaca rcgwrcd dlmeiuions h= Design High Weur Elerehon- bast of Aisa EkvaOov Prel'minary D-gn Plena nns 1 (from Plate 31412) R s 17. Riserdiama[ee NJ=48248I,A-M1ead(h)=0.14 0.Q2 win fimragr: u. aac of Rtaer= 6lsz conal 13esaa ele�acom (Prom Place 9.140_)-1-Oil used (1.82 R Q100 662.2 1. Mimmum requ'ved volume=R]w.yds.x Tocol DI A..(acres). Tap of Dam= 6132.2 25. Top of Dam= tjyli g:AvoiJ ori&ca Flow aovtlidays 6pt1,92 100YR W S.F. 67 w.ydsx�.y{y acres= 412.12 a.yds Design High Wator= 600.01 100VR Design High Warer= 18. EmrG lc4agth(I)= 48 R Y f(1 Bmmgenry Spillway Creel= 2. Av fable badn volume= 4{1Q�w.da at elevation 616.59.(From Dpnream Toa of nam= ' storage-elevation vvrve) Head(H)on harrei through embankment= ]21 N. Pr ndpal SpfRway Cres,- 61Y'2 Teng Oy hl 1,1 weir to 662.5 on 3. Rxas G Ocn.yds.m--iv zcqufPetl volume•. y@�pe Cham PWte 3.1 7) - princiyel risar Dewatering Orifice Irwen= o amrnponding to require)vnWme=Innen of,M1e dewatering 12. 1 o°v oSM f Fluw L 19. Basel tiemeter JIGPermanem eanei reen orNar.aho Effemive WIJ,h Ke Claa,wu[eleva[ton= 6751 (Pram Plau 3.14-B[mnaere pipej or Plau 3.14-A[corrugated pipet). 4. -Moble vohlme III,-d req IPed If>2 baffles are rw[requueJ e�luuvb pstrcam i' ElevaLLou o[ll Toc o[Dam �, 33 cu.Yda.: D"m.ds. If<2 barites are re 20. Tresh cock mtl mtl vorux devwe ur F r(dared 0onmv o` a re J)e_ 2..., y qu red Area E11 / 5. El fi-corresponding d vel- 6]a.1 S-11 Dmmetu= NIA orches Permanent Trash Rack[o be usW. uF L Elm (Prom Storage Elco .Curve) U. Qt = 16.21 cf (Pram Chap[er 5) Herght- NA coshes _ a s (Amin Table 3,14.). '3 OEC 2yw P" fi. (`,tea I- en of Ne dewaudvg orIDce,o e4 am lend==R. 14. Qyq /9 ds (Prom Chapur s)1 WVR q Cor Frederick County "rr.«x+C^"' Emerrenc Sbi tom PIIOmYaI Sn 1 ev nuim ry enrage: 21. Requirctl sPillwaY UPadry Qe=mro-QP 42,19ds. TO. o4/zo/zozJ U. With emagenry spJlwaY.reyuiraJ apfLLwaY eepaciry Op=O>.= 1_6.21 cfs. ]. Minimum required rolume=fi]cu.YJs.x Tuml Drainage Area(acres). (riur arW benelj 22. f3otrom wid,h(b) fi;the slope of the exit ebe I (a) = ALE. N/A NIA R./brat;mtl the mhdmum IangW of[he wit cbampl(x) _67 y&. 6.16 saes= 412.12 cu.Yds. Cr-- spillway required sPillwaY mpacfry Qv=Qy=4t/.!e(a NIA D. (ricer and barrel) (Fkom Table 3.14L). Combined rise emergency spillway designed N Cess- DESIGNED BY'.Rix/KA6 100VR O fun FmdPl ck Caun) 100YR Marv.rated In Hyd-d. FILE N0, III-112 IA-113 111-114 111-"1 s DWGg3191-03 HIS-1111 11 11110 I=DESGNc _-- ITna30rvEeE0R00MANOmTWO SEOROOMUNITS FORA TOTALOF63UNITS.63 U.0.UNITS.--- — � 9 6. 1111 FOR III IIIIS PROoC 1111 S�aE55 wiTn eaCCEss SEn svocGsS OwILE6sPA1cwEJsu'S"XIsnz H C—A-CELEF RPRROJECT WHICH I ,IR�LONf Np03P ; �N m P H All ARIIDDIICES THE REMAINING295PACE5 3 TRACT. 9.GA LSAGE COUECOOrvo O¶RES�oOENrwL urvESLOCaTEOT�TERry"'I'72iESUILDING I f v 0HC FP x"%MAcTO 11 ROss sRLOPE)EO wlin AccESSISLE ROuiES IUFF u.O.FOMPUANT ACCESSIBLE RAMPs(Saa%M1N%RUNNINGSLOPE, ,,.ONE SETOE EnERIOR STNRS IS rvOT LOCa-WLFHU THE ACCESS SLE ROUTER. NY ROA DOURING 13.110111101111 101111 TOCI.TOrvRIFTOUN�RUI T�FILI_iuR—FT0IIIDFILL SCREEN FOR RESIDENTIALSSEPARATION BUFFER THE I �� ` % INIF DDlrosp s >- 11A ro HEFULDND-FA F1Fo�E1a1101FACLIEE 3z R TWE ss ROOM AND COMMUNITY ROOM SHALL REMAII RECREAT ON SPACES ury LESS AN a¢mz EDUTERrvaTIVE IS PROVIDo o. ZW 1.SH-1. , W z t f �SflkOL NIM1D '` LOr SQ 04 wze'rS I C MLOS w W u zax ro x j � � uY:sMYac-r r W T R F\\ =t N sof a ccs>rPE c� S"E 1 ,t �EX.ENOMNCE y _ IN LIEU — —a IRA 'E IP LIQ -- -- I N K, PRO ESPN 6a °.A� g ,a FICATIO /(11 NG E591 1. RETAIry NG WAIL W RS) uY tt / EE%S� -- 9rr 4]F L GESS EEMT, — � ,I o I \ 50'BR 1 � S rNP I U ie \/ 12B� STAIRS ER) —tea ORV SEry ORRE �WL(63 UD UNITS) ` _ \ ' RCCMss M ACCESSBLESPACETYP. -CCE TYP EE NOTE6—SLOPE c. ry 'S EE IOT a, ELOPE 2r,ALL DIRE or� I 6 CL lFUTWREN C'KuacH II HcoMMUN Tv ivoALLOREcr RENS �'✓ RRAM1l I tt U apw sF� RooM _ �,ar r>,eixmcx \ :4FFF oe xs Pc 41 w x 6 s PBq q� IV v EP "in�'y a y�y ..?5 MA-11 / S11 a4 1 \\ COMPLEX VJ LK cON � ,iso y .per k 1 1 x A\1' 9' �yte '� TL ,v r zse RTo IIT. FUruRE PRAYERt RNTH R 5 ... x'ACON: —FuiuRE c 6 e° m ,e PLt?FA ? yryP 1 ouMPSTERP 4, C6,1B rrP Ri_— 5 GSR EX N 0 /;l In C✓ �� , I� tt R L R _ GG R tt G d5 Pi ` gq 1 5'HKNMYi 9E/&4Vf APA PUM O E L E CCMP!?. E 2 5/LIREO 50 BV TROL`" sTarvOsv r N I 11 FE L EE HEEra6 EEn'rNc sccr6oNE� (SEE )rvE cENERATDR uREETO—E \ I a3cE» EE SHE Paal ao(,3x1 IEE' R�`° DAL ) SCREEN STaTaOry PUMP S SH rvG EENCE COOP.saw TOOTH EX' EX L RS(rOPROVDEI APARMENT APAROIOVT SCfiBfTNVG []KW M (SEE OEfAl.) I OVERUND RELIEF), 51 CGMp.EX L'(1VREX x� � EX ttINNHONE3 FQPENwGE�S—ETNL E 01 \� Ex.raxnwouEs EX. 13 c u \I I cRnc T YO'Xg260) �1 \ ANMftCXr MOE,BPoLNE UWD rAY15r KEY t 648.-5 (Lr P/L% \ 1� L L I zalF er so m m M SB1 I T.51-A-IPIB \ _---_ sssros DATE:04/20/2020 ZO:8P �EX.G911f2—. MOE-&WLW(�U 5! UY:MLLFIIAYp.Y csJ P fNr'�MfL ZOMF:FP ` — xvirvc SCALE1'-30' EX.MM Ae� �? l I —EX.q2H Lplf USE:rOMHIWSFS -692)0tt ✓// \ f wN DESIGNED EY.RLK/AAS �.�yLE N0. 6337W 11 3 30 wv ar — xeeT 3 or 3Y EDWG 419-03 1 tL � C RUElER R4Vv� 7( PROP 11 FREDERICK p —G6R IDT I� w-Fte R�`MT.I MATCH LINE SHEETS 14&17 0°fR"�°w' — _ _ e PaoE zp s.r.s,-n-rav EX,oc°n ro�EaM E MT suuwr cwwwxn ewx v `' frif➢ETnCt rou,n SCMXY.EdKO 1 r°RA L I AEPRui mu couuoN swREU sa euElER owso No M x 3 ee ae,a+ar /z s, anro sreEEmNo srcnoN a' zoxF er TEM zave xv P a�w ../f s lnwNuaa" LI use saroa s,Wzero ca-.csu D83264`511... - roN C66 TOCGSR(rvP) PRDP.ASPHALT l"'TAPER WA E-- E ED E PAVEMENTw .DEN NG 'Al—x U/,(,/ GWF... 4 GP. gP. '/Ur ro ,r � r ruwaurvE N� ,P HE --•� r r Ram/ssA r .. PaOP.GR NE,. z Ex Raw oEiursnEEr G,) x ovERurrvP sN�du x cws vA)vE snouroE ` P EX.ROW vP y = _ ) �EX.019CHZJNE'- - - - PROP.w- , _ _ S p - RioP.EG P P. a G„ " 0 wAf F0 7 W 9 he an Sava $ L W SE�EN� J W z - - Ex z>F- w FLA 657) W u PROP.WPI T'P Ex, RANCE -- ,/AO WRE�Ex. ! EXK CNIRANCW EO 35MPNX �W ry cVEF CX CN/RANCE fX.0/ - MEETS _ _ PROP GRAVEL _ SNv ry SE.TLER AT C CR \a.m 1 R°ICl 5 L TRANCE - rL r M roti(/- �, W AVEMENT EX ROW m 1 nTAPER _ _ - - '20UTU N~NETAP r Z TURN UNE - r/lpnm/i' 15 MN -PARNff APP\Ac IX NATROP 2V TEMPORARv ER 11,w4�€R RM ESM, F 1� TENIP _ �� FMRANC! STORM ESMT o. �ORAO NS ESM'. NCE�� SITE I UTILITY VIEW yz' ' tim ti PROP 11 PREPARICI ' ON 1 .( jk 1, m wAIFR ESMT MATCH LINE SHEET 16 °�a" ) �( m �•�/jm k r� ru.-A-I- -42 I a I— ce ae,Rc,ar..r.s,-n-ran ... a k wuwr roawwxn ewx rxEixma rown scneee msco �_,� a .waikx =�` � � l� wsm xa roroonoa r 12TRAIr NGREss, / J; __ �. cuaeTRANSTON CG pTocG AL GE.D IONE`pp EGRESS IF— k USE` USF:SfIXML Xis— ,yy C EORADED El—LINE \ 1�� ___ ___ ___ _ ___ ___ • _._I #" x� �b b? OP. oaa ., TMP 0. U a -_ �_- - ♦-�a -_- - - - -� a jf -� ,o- °Z` ._ r •� � - I I� k�:PR EF. gig\ - x --- — — -- -->_ 1 W �o -- --> - 1- - x a fENSENr�° o ARPELLJ E U RES) �a Lu _ N R° �R X12 3D D 30A - --m———� --r-- p sG NOEEMT. SCPLE:1 =3Q SENSENY ROAD-GS7 URBAN COLLECTOR SYSTEM SENSENY ROAD-VDOT ANTICIPATED FUTURE U4D GRADING VIEW E ER® R E (LEFT TURN TYP SECTION) TYP.SECTION(NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) M 2 RD c,s a m 9 9 9 1 9 1 e e e S e � 44' -_ - ,��-- IxGA psEss m 44' 1-4111 sslrt 29 30' 30' xGaE-P." "HEAL �m.03 6' f0'TRAIL a 14' f0' 2' 12'THRU 12'LEFT TURN 12'THRU 8 a 3' f0'TRAIL 6 8' 2' 12'THRU 13'THRU MEDIAN KE PE PFr •° - sx0'J/oE S SURFACE 6' 1 6' .200% �5 yMEs 00 2SN SON Cc CG9 s .. eso BASE WP2(TVP) OVERLAY. .n o G.m o ✓. L. a.pp 4ov°° i SUBBASE EXISTING UD-0UNDERDRAIN / e tis AGGREGATE G TRAVELWAVI HE _� UD-0UNDERDRAIN rTO SLUE PlIP AEssow TAKES NToncc uNTTnEE ss AS ASANr PATES svvooi. NOT TO SLUE w - �Ezls G s ea N TSECTIONGfw+Oaw E/Ev-sasTs RAOIEE*AT PRIORTDc FEE EcEDN PPRDVEN R'VERT SENSENY ROAD-GS7 URBAN COLLECTOR SYSTEM SITE ENTRANCElIR sENE�RiACE IRI ExPAN ANG (RIGHT TURN TYP SECTION) (TYP SECTION) RET. saroroic R r L .EeRCP X NNEss _ 61' p 20' E 20' FIN S3 C 2pte xi. I- 12s p 30' 30' 18' 2' To Tlis To rnE 1ALPILrvE� �� d m EslrF g w 12'PAINTED m 0 SURFACE 'ACT ROADS ARE �E DATE.04/20/2020 2 f0'TRAIL 6'`^ ITURN 12'THRU ISLAND 12'THRU 8' - -EFF ooD INS V 6' 2' CGe v'� �:. LAsonos MON F)R J/ CG9 LLEEFITECREEISENVR ecA),re:G eo SURFACE zap% za0% z 2W% UD-0 SUBBASE e.YOl ,�;� - UNDERDRAIN NOT TO SLUE LIMITS OF DESIGNED BY reix/xns ero '' Y ourE ssMsnAss BE 00 0 0 0 era a.w o.a o�so v.m i.m rw0 rr50 PI( .W..171,11",VERL ' CAVATONNTRE LE No. 638W PAVEMEMOEGGN CGfi BASE WP-2(TVP) OVERLAY EMENr DESIGN SIpwN SPRELM NnRv,ENA/PAVEUE LA,TTINsaEORAND P ENTRANCE ROAD PROFILE r AIT. LORI SUBBASE EXISTING GESGNwusE SasEOON ACrue/EE/s csR TESTS. MATCH NO CP RESCURED FEET ) o s'r 6S SM25.0 TRAVELWAV s Tis AccRECATE PER WPI �. SCALE:�'- e'nsAGGaEGAre NOTTOSOALE -FEET 19re 03 sEA%.CR0SS CF 2F — orZIIIII III 10IFF—I IN III iFI —111— uARiESSTHAN1S%F -- -= 11ANINGR—L.0FR TaNGwALL. N A 11 f99YR W3E=691.fT CG6 3'v$$' SEPARATION BUFFER.10-N 11111 IF—1-FILL SOREEN—RESIDENIFA, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOT—1i0 cLEAa THIS vEGETATbN. ^� x uNOEaGF." 'TT ANO UNOERGROUNOPPNG. DE FEATURES BEFORE NS,ALLING _F" 7�7FL—LINE 0 ELN NE SAW-TOOTH CUae =693.72 OPENINGS(5) 1, 1 S I 7-A Da 1 I i< i,99va PEAU Eiow W ` 1 (HYDR R.foan f.66AC o.5a DUCE s95 iAT5"Ze ___ -_______ ' 7W 1�1 f1 y II I I (HYDR0C0D,000.26 WA3 USED T0PR0DUCE WEia c06nPu -- ---__-_ W OVERLAND RELIEF WEIR FOR STORM STRUCTURE 70'.�A /--- J W z 2 ®I Noiro uE W c7 i- TITF 5F 1 1 t �� ''] xw•Kxw 1 1 1 . - -- ewrtx __ _ sFa�RN Woa rEsoE NOyeurEER Mu `i\\ yl\ i ss•mrN,wx _ - � - �--��I�-___-nna=i_b�Psn —_�-�s]a�43.. ..+e i`=-�=-=---�-�=�-��_ 1 -- ---e6_ i" 'B:.� M• '/i i � ��"fWh1506 � —A4=PMW6 -B d5.a3 8wxifl<__ � -z-S C _.. `� Eye �m \�\ -- N 4 Sw�655E= w o%ocmP� cuR32 �' ae•°- �ea � � ems- �� %` i I�� R I 1 it � 1 ��.,,'a�e°` i 6 .�z -_ � m_� E- Ji RI W^�^A 91 14 ss v6ti- Sit � m1 n s x ; x n v x . nom - 9 _ „ .,,' s, s3m I Y J QA F-J, \t RS x x 566 X t, Y g.I Rnx�nou }, '`xo w_. 95`c5 95+„ 95P> - oe ell x/ -� / 95n, YYY _ . Ix 9 696h r NE • R`\ �1W ti O GRnO NG ESMT fr1 aAl X\ I1�i / %— 5+ bM-wEir' in fief 1fa 1 ' r 5w E W. RCOTOR'ro H I, � � v x� R� ran SS",To Si�R ES 9 All RELoDaTEa3 � ��SOMN --- I a E - - ---- - oeII— wcit /] pY31'i �s m o�9d' =1 `, • -___ter KEY "'w,,.«.,,• �I� oII A U _____ �nTe: a/zo/zoz NGE 1 1 ] 1 API R*I I 1 I II 1 \ �� 11 DE9IGNE BY AS iv II I P I WI \ \ 11 FILE NOD 633RW/x 30 15 0 �\ I1 30 80 I = "\\ I �.�. 1 sxeer f3 OF S2 =30 \ r muo2 \�4 I I r 1 A - _ , s�noE- DWG/J 19-03 NCED..snuL BE B Fuc sDR35.aooF LEADER coNNEcrION ro \ N OF cOMPANYPLArvs,TnE ENGwEER Musr BE 3. BASED uvorvA DOMEsrIcwATER I-— _ —— I F�� A �1 EIT11"10FRPMElEais PROPOSEDFOa TnE cnuacn BAst!D UPON 5t WSPU,SEE OFTAIL-B.SHEET IN. \- "°' � B.a�cOa TnOOUGH!ro BE,T'PER AvnI1ABLE RECORDS, I 3 a nE Fx SE rvG wASa a NET CONFIRM THE SIZE AND PRpR TO I \, �3r BRARY G RARING GAREMEIS AND OR ANYE I I RAUE STALLING UNDVAU LTG 541100. B.WS�e� COOB G 1ZTOFFPPTzTBN'IO T_T"OrvFsERGROUND cT win EN,-NO GABS LI NE.A MINIMUM 1V I a` SNe MAV BEULOweDTOAVOiD corvFucTA55 wu WSPECTORTO DETERMINE OF Wh STUB AND llSHINGA SEMBLYLOGATOrv�SEDDPDN soFIELD GNDITGNS — 10-BALLVALVETOBELOCASDONPROPERTYUNE. ()NNERSHIPENDSATBALLVALVE. - \ I m\ PO' PE Fy % 4u A PE Z I w W u iz W '\\ CX.ONsa6rAFWw MMBILYE a..B'BV XI=671.95 1 a..B'BN WT=671.93 (X B`.1 W-6ffi 7 ss'BPISHM� PRESERVE ARG OF 50 M1UN OR ou Ex e`mv r-6M IS axrrx waocL.wc ruu scwEEN FoaRE EX ABNVLOIRK„ EX.CNY SIM)Mf MMXKK( EX UMIn PIXE LX ON.S FM M4XNLE fR 5/OEM44 SEPARm10N BUFF \� _,(PER Mh 6EC0N85 BYJ565J EX.2W-61&.V LX!G^-6)G 15 /NG LIEU GE GEEGGRv ivPE T' 1 EX.B'AYV A9 67146 ��XifilS CITY EX B`IV XI-6)1.93 0 SUFFER \ EX.GAS MLVE ��\ B'ASV AV 6)106 - iNV W!-6)T 8T \y \ �B`AYV W] 61485 _ � E_T�.. (X OYE6HE10 WMC " EX.UMUV RkE - -_I\ EX E»EM1rAD OSE ES E. P R lNE -PROP.Cm _ - SAN.SEw 2 0 U M MHY JEX.UMIn POE 36 RWA4(44' - - MT �- fx b .Y 1 j /`.A W/L111CD MM1YS fiUflER � � � � 0 Y� Vim( ---3D_ mss- _ \ ,.1 \..Il/PD•SAN SEM.. 7 t411 _- R - --- MItY =- Swml E 0 IFOI TY2' 9H LB PO 561 II S - SWM RISER E E-e REPAa CR. !AD]F !.'. �,.- PROP. Ex AIM.sEu,. n M99.ErJ '� rn1 "B'ON( )ER SA4'SEM MH U rc S—ERMT RE GE , T1`GMP OP„ O \ � aFROI 12 F I FLITAF H lot 36 MPAMNS v \\� e 9RGM BLfF£N _y-,`DSS $ e e' D ER U D DSA P) I %/%) \9CFNCEH9 .] PRE "N�E- 3 as, ; PR�P.s° CL SEW.I \ /1DETEMIED z U x EST Es,c P ED BUILDING BOry nu S RES DEMWL(63 UD UNITS) D525 p5 TRASH y OMR/cE R P.s DNG coMMUNr X20 ROOM I tt tt cxmsr ERS00.91L auba S / Z on a Dse nxMMCX nous~ � s n P'y 2B J L19 P65 Pr 116 / W N \INC CST til 4 Ea 530 6_ 0520 ZONE: U\\yl �iG< \ \�SR 3 9P PROP. n RESTR �F RE PRO T � 9 / E EN{ •// APPS EX co a, X DP \ O \ WATERS SPRMKLER FDC SERVICE SEW. (SEE S) M L 2<5'BEND c b t' 0.9 _ ARMOR,T \ 1.OYI �CE. 0. DE Fn_ V Fx RYPI .try 10i l\ 681 � SERVICE 1 Y2\ , E• a ,225° 115 WATER VA EX , \ \� BEND _ P 107 I 4� - RE MET EX 0 _ T t D 11 o - c\ R FUTURE BAYER LLgtgQyyRR NTH BFRESERVICE ti'ACIM I` BAOUATIC PPS _ X.U.o / A` PROR."F_ v T SAN.Po CE - 6WFEF 0 Imo_ BENC / 6 v LE __p-c MBLY,SEE F0.5TERA`DAMER 2a WI SMT Gy � � PEOE / BEE ! LO O�1 , �'CH 5 E 5DPfOCSiAL Pt` PI., PRO.FH -.- ::i2FEASMLSWETTAPI U ICX L VA ' :.�. 5'M6Npl6 P _ APAIENI BLE. e'FsvbvvCb�+_-r.'_A OP R P ] � � EX EX AYV XI E / O o BALL VALVE tta BE VACATE EW r - EX RLEF1xk:E CCMIPLEX i EX XMIEN P) \ e AOW nP cnnrvGEs COMMON SW1RE0 50'BUTTER P vATE II-MlE T t P 05 LfSINS r -- //A M(2R EBMT.T'L4\+ c lNS NO.PFOPEFn(6Nf 'SEE DEI 5 Mn •o M LTXM.MO ® '.5£I LE fiEO/ _ I ,� � /a VALVEVATE TO Fw OSCREENING SECIIG \ I .=E _- PROP.2U EX pIVW! f - _FR. E I S 6B1T9 \ EX. X EX SIN fM $ STATD LWiHIXCvi AftY I APMlMEV] APARIMEVr /# MGNOU! 1 b (SEE DEALS) EX l0M169 IS \ COMPLEX EX SWM EX B'XIV -.7.11 X.rOnMHCMES r _J COWiEX EX.SIN 3M I ® \ 1 \o \ I III __ "Wr�r+'••4 q^_E� j\= FY COVER la \ I EX.]OXNHOMES I DATE:04/20/2020' T GST 11 ELOCAS AS rvECESSAa EX.]ONNHOIIES WXWiE P"EX.6AlEM a /Y v10 _ `\ \ EX. MEi£R m REL.. EE covER m NM1OE FLMP i _ E.WV pl \ l�'t I a •��F� \ \ --�- APARIAIENT 9CAL➢.] UO � basso � �,� SNEES \ � cauwEx EX VW! 690T9 EK 15'CMP T` 30 ,5 o x LE No. saB2w V w F1 EX.AYv IFEFER.IF \ MEET 1 OF UT -693.7!1 EX wATEFwL SCALE:T NY uaxlroL SDWG# 19-03 I ALL 1110 ESDOWNSPOOT HALL BE OOFLFw PER O"'TECSEREFERErvcED.SHALL BE 5'PVC$DR35.ROOF LEADER CONNECn Ory roOF ESTRurvis Ory ExISTING WATER Mary PER cuRRENT FEOUIREMREDER eR wAENTS ER REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO \ \ \ 'OE'COMM" POSSIBLE CnMPANV PLANS.THE ERGI'ER MusT BE Esou0.ces ON-SITE TOaccOMPusH TASKS PER FREDERICK WATER uasPECToxs °"w E ED SHEET 11 S 111 PIR THE'ATER METER"' DENT AL BI LAND RSEDDPONADOMESTICWATEaRDETAL oRvroTHE FREDERICKWAERINSPEGroRFIREWATCN,NIGN SEE _> o RIOK WATER INSPECTOR FREDERICKcoUNTV FIRE MARSw.LL,AND ALL 's.N - METER IS PROPOSED FOR THE cnu RASED UPON sl-E1U.SEE DETAIL-E,SHEETJa. AFFECTEDCl-OloaEuni�Faer`l'D INADVANCE.AIDMAEPREPa ATIONs REDDIREDsv ALLPAm ES. n.SIMBOL 1EISGWATERLINE TOUCOrvFa BE"HE SPERANDFRIOR TOCORPS. ssc `ro I '3FLL PRIORTOSTRES—ONST COUOTIOCA'DNO5EA0.EASEMPORARV GRADING EASEME,TS AND OR ANV USAGE NWp, S HE Hu7 \ I x S.pONTRACTOR PIPLy IRDIN4TE ALL FINAL GRP.DE FEATURES BEFOREINSTALLING UNDERGROUNDVAULTs ND 11DERGROUND W iwizz e 0 ' I1 , ex / I Ex OIS PRovtRn'uME i IJ II SF.RcxZ n AN ATOE ~ i.M 51-A-IPIE IN.51 n-121 ,y34� 2/�I�>•Ily�• ).M.51 A-1]A h '/` ! P a` Q S $LVIIIN CWMAWIY BlM/f iRYA51£F Y!M 9T1 PoOISIJ C q Q .KWE w.SMWSIXI H W r.N.51-w-laac W amu oLsr.wMmr msm. oeamJJn us:oas sTCNr " W �a mxe Na .TEE e L.A sGv Rk MSlR.M1tl.10YKtlJPoI a MY GK CLNIfR ¢ V '^ IAY.'fiESKfNML CK Z0 E'BI W O O 2: � of J • I &�.' � It Wyw �` a k Z a' C 'W .` ,r 1L c Q J 3 a it ax d 2 < mew a� Wil DP PRDP PRI vE cn o E xo W ,, 1 o Z \ (} - +x wIL-NTr> _ W -•_�,.� t� I,� \� ..2b PROP.COUI \\ _>= U _>- , _,� p• �-- - - - I els> , — I - -__ � W �a WAR -- ,1 z ENDc4P ---� CRT w - -- ¢' — — - g QD,e�TRANTS z Z E— PEOP UTE 657 aE o QN Wk (Wpb m Ryp,l AA'L$PoSIEO SIfED-15MMPROP � — — — — — — A✓PoX OG EX.— Isl I 6`h CWN CK ___• _r • T __ AAN)LE RECOBOB Iy E IRFEE� ... Evwa —�J -3FM pOGAnON PE � N qm -- T ��__ 1 1 / -- ,}-� �NDMLI LLF HOCNMIV �10.M R LINM PIpR51WN '•� r 2 N M1 I ,`. \. rt X MLL LB 11J PG iJb AY51R.N0.O.tttlP5159 m \ q \R, zm.w �✓ TT7 $ lYX1E:M1P W I B INSIR.ND.O600W145 fif9LfMNL USE' L USE:NESNA'NW l Its �W 1, 'PB,I rare SMALEL P.NflfANO M \ C FIS \ >i.M.SlE-)-1B \ �7.M.51E-)-TS INSIR.N0.150010/19 \� fP 512 Po ( FATI RR/zD/zona —_—_-____ \ SCALE 1 30 DE910EED BY.FLK/KAS 30 15 0 B. 63 HEET 0.1 TAOFN R 31 SCALE:r'=x' DWG// 19-03 ---------- Ho - Ho / i I LIN—SGHTSTATION i aWa NTERSEcrpN cHTD . -R�� •- �•-r slGHrolsrmICE -/-.. �t _ � - -- I.♦ I 3:LL s sr I • SENscNY ROAD-VA R(WE 6S7 _ a en - �- f waE OH spHr�nror� a Wo -,. woivsrn.r Joao- -rravcs.�� a oa _ r = sr SIOHTSrnTpN a r ` _ _I�, -G I OE S \ IE I I Wc7 ss l\ PLAN VIEW rpTEs. 1-1 1 -so 1"=50' 21"rHE EuaN,Ea_01sHT isis zso 11 .as Roo1coE MVH. o sr�TUNE ess ` 1-11NE a w > ess raa - ss roa R hE w Q n ppmpa�eH�=�aa�ar�r,e�norsarnHR�r�I d RalorRn�e z � 6z as RHv-Peat Hoer voumle lasso Geslgn HwM vaume cqurralenl - - - _ Ew-� o C] - br RIPMNms ei'� a.m a.sa awa z.w fwa ,.sa ,.m a.so a.aa aso a.w o.00 o.sa ,.m t.50 two 2.so a.W �.5a a.m a.w w � Q U =or pasmasapems atom.Hares mpn,Pfry nyry wms>ao,�o INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILE LEFT TURN LANE(RIGHT) INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILE LEFT TURN LANE(LEFT) E' coa plaveo rgmnras=PRymnms-sg SCALE SCALE Z on - - H:1"=50' H:V 50' V:1`5' P w' =Nep—t ffRFOr..gwr,e p khour V:1'=5' � w� o=ve cercem mvanun me ceex avenin ornrnv Q vine na ave or ll�rorH xovnn samao e w Ween ngn,wm foams are warrerAxt,ses agars-3t nr nesgn agena' Iedwnsim orro.Inmme,nge aam,dea Housing ^eIoo�e,r ii be lD'ceADT Tna a veannoa I'r' Ear(%-r-4Re HIaHtvat) - aes�ao�f�ol How s aTW sac z1s3 035 331 _, c d u - e<,+vne- ms - eal ae=�sf ??'-z azo 800- as �f o c I c l ,aarsaHf-h- Haav can g p-) Hoe,fo,Ho a euaav,nm veau oy,m,d,e,m sse r Z 706- /00 _ vRovosEo IyDoi Road Data W BW �_ eHwE eomnerla Enoenremnnea on onmsensenreoatl RTE enjbetween Bounaarraven,e a,a,aemooa lane) o voor zflrT tram[awnc,esxersen on of rte sn 0 Sao _ NT r --- /I ! - 11D PMeH e g speee 3a ,00- - --- P- s z $ Q Sao _ ' - es saaHHo paaHMp, - H,ador o esa arcama�a a o,Fano. p2oa --- oa�w,vnnWT .a - o INt .ITurn Lana Requlre>i. o��vr,v v�,k Hoy, seta n�,k MP, - 1ao ®� ,•.sem eas R >bY�L -P" --.- NEunRanNTIEa..e .:. - _-. ' -0.w owa o.sa ,wa ,.so Awa rss a.os a.sa aws Ilr.ad,anP3rf,omYhoTroad ad,rl,ageF-e1I 0 ti 0 aoo 400 ey00 B00 1000 INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE PROFILE RIGHT TURN LANE(LEFT) VA ADVANCING VOLUME(VPH) SCALE Deg£:g</zo/zoza H:1"=50' V,V=5 _T.,wa,a',�a, Yss nSC - FIGURE 3-6 �. 1111 me1H11 11,ta11, DesmNeD ev reix/rens 6 6 3i51rAp,enl,zE(Pag -ea) FJLE N0. a s2WG//s19�03 SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND TYPICAL PAVEMENTSECTION#1 o>xvR xTxeR DFeAe a OMR«x sstR°:,o"ox s Aff�s © w�EPA�LLE<<xEssPAffoe.tE.AP�. as ; ass LOarT MAINEDRIVE ISLE .2�. 8 PARKING aa+ sp a xess0.)TxassxOwxox PIT 'I BYAz R P A.Mnxua,ox ux e0.tMTexTTa TH[MaxW ax uxvroMTRnErt O0 5)aw O svAe[,L[xom As sxawx ox PIN sE �� M eaxTao,Dewees. TRAxssomnTox aano AxD O srowx, PIN AR«xos,a wnioTxu�s�xoixnsrtsxowx ax O �sxsPaeeoix�Aras nxo,e. c.P.TosE�D A.. 0 gw,xPncrEo ra oErvsm LL as DGe sPetrtAT oxs. xes W [a� Oj TRnxotsv[tosTRPe(onoxA,) p'Ecorvrtrvr / 3i oRo sT oRo x.oFT�sPOTaTox ooNo �s NE° °aAtaasA.oE.z .A sw.xx„z o.oa Easy arvaFxEa IL sxeeTx� �aEtoxs<aucae.xaMExt.Psx�A.Eo�Exs (oP � O �/ / �\ � woo Taxs,AxnTa coMxvw.xsTAxonRos RereRexceD 1' twrwA.eo.uexuxe nRRow. ""G' PROPOSED SIGN KEY MAP xAs'�P,eMexTTaTeM�� D�ResaR o ��PA ,aTawa ® , a Rrv�sze 81111—xe oxcoMx�TRAErt 1.. awwe TIRNuxea=, are as'N �PaeeDPAxeMxTMR«xss ,Re�MReTe,veRR TeD —/ PLC ATeD,�eA�w " ""`' ° 1 , W x.xueuxTLex srx�PnuEMrxTMnR«xcsuxRe ELONGATED TURN LANE ARROW DETAIL ELONGATED TURN LANE ARROW DETAILElTURN LANE ARROW DETAIL / W MnTwet N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. R IPNG r_1 _ -- TaRes�xss,uLRe RAeeozraan PAeearaRe Ta Lend x�eD�earsax TYPE B WHITE MARKING TYPE B WHITE MARKING TYPE B WHITE MARKING PER DETac(T'P) asMx Moux.wMxeMxrs,aueea RIT" rT Pex me Mvreu Resueumeo '— I '/. ) / .I RIA T—T GG R11111 11 nPPRovu PR ORTa neRt.axM.stxs. 11 1 a�xozsvrzox.axsuuTxEe,D Txewex . „TxeaP— N� uRe1e ) J EDS 91 �Eo� --_ . I TDTEE sENNRDADPQ1_1TSENTDNTDMAT xExEnNGPAYEM 11EE TbN �PoR r DREEALDND«ETN EENEEN RDAD a zD ) / i1 a z mn "c sDE aaTypj Cn ET w co WPEEP sEPa�I� �ox�xfr ®Nr._ I —� Yr I PI,YR. g m——� DATB:oa/zo/zoza __ DESIGNED BY'. /PAS N_SIN—y�'� —/�� I FILO]N0. —657 wim P�u spEw=3SM%I \ HEST ] 699—Dv sDWGyx 19-03 F,di& —,VA FE z \ � ( u� _ ry rvaE c MCS \ / 2U12 Fretlerick County F{re Prevent'on Code 1012 LLI izz v, "IZ A \v' // \I i� \ �mxurss \� ——J �.w.,... „\�1�: a l-o �.;II'o ,.��«,�aa.��.N eeo<�N.w�.,.�.�_.w.,..<.,,«<„<. '� IJ,J ¢a � I\ \I4, \ \ ✓ J�,i � \(� ��\ �� a�.�.,.®�,�..�o,,..,.,,,,�„m,.,,e,, .�.,�,,,ea .�,m.,<.,n,....,a�....w.�,.,.,.,.A.em,m.„.m�..,..._M 1,z 40 20 0 0 80 'THIS VIEW FOR FIRE LANE MARKINGS&SIGNAGE ONLY 5CALEL 40 A-1....AP.—--.1 ............ ................ sc- 20 OF 37 BMP LEGEND IS I------------------------------------- ------ LU z Wu Fq F[ply L IM 00 ..0 0 _j CL Z LEVEL 1 DRY POND Cf) (EXTENDED DETENTION) I Z ------- B",L 40P —————————— ———— 41� 40P % DATE 04/20/-0 El 1;71 IZE",EIT.I�EIIYT�ll IIITI�l 1111.1Yrzoao 30 DE-NED BY 1� 15 1� 10 DWG/ 19-01 A rc STUDY "-' i� '�J Tc �� STUDY P off _ '.POINT#1 �'� ��y�', DA=1.48 Ac FLOW � _—_�=_=POINT#1 Q� CN 81 Z� FLOWLu TC A� A 1— �� ' '� FLOW �� — r�� > - �'�� '' *�F i� w Wz PATH �, � `�— 1 3 / r - _ --r t- —%� _ , b.98 w �DA=1.68 PATH J SDA=1.64AC 1 > :,r-�� DAa2.29L'AC f r DA=1.39 AC CN 83 = � r 1 1 e CN 7 �— �P CN=86 1 r /; i v C� CN=,94 l I l i A%'�'i i 1 v ,/ TC l i �r FLOW ' ��-�/ r r / .-� r. i ' TC f PATH ��, DA=1.85 AC �+r /� DA=48.93 AC FLOW DA=2.06 AC \ CN=82 ' ' 6i ! i CN-84 \PAT H ` CN=86 r l ' _ - � _ SDA=O.QO,�C / � // ✓ �� " � y ,� SDA=p.�6AC/ r y i :r �� i�d <s I ACN9.14AC � i �� CN- B l� . �S v �� i...�� ! �1 �� CN f7 �\ / / b 1 TC FLOW �� > /�� / L I� TCPLO�(1✓ goo o 100 zoo Lu / ►' PATH i I - 1 1 / / 1 PATH � U �a , A SCALE: 1"=100 J .QO � LCL d'z � T �� /� J 1111 � E� iia i� ra A < 1 r z - l sruov Lu r i t ? / r 1 ' "°" aoigr m m Z Q Q �� \ `i �� --1 � .'� v PPV iAA� `•- �r�� r ,^�i ?� OFFSIT SWM DRAINAGE \ DIVIDE MAP 1"=300' 7 PfkE-DEVELOPNT SOS MEWM �> PT-DrzSWM WM �' 1ao 0 1ao zoo -- Al \ � / ')`P�-� ,,J soa o 300 Sao DRAINAGE DIVIDE MAP ----- DRAINAGE DIVIDE MAP ` — SCALE: 1"=100' 1n=1 SCALE: 1"=300' SM D SWM LEGEND ,r'"'�"� � SCNANIEL All FLOW110.E0I wEBE MET ev TIE va011SE001v 1—FOB i,E xomv �.3-o�C-Yn+n ,pj iuov voiN.1. 113 on.w.cso oEseE.s "*, �f mN SCALE AS NOTED 1 1 ,ww,.Eo ar su,w oEvcE iuxcox.vaucovcss DESIGNED BY Rix/KAS N0. —DWG/ 19-03 TOP 1152z" ttP TRAEHRACKBY PL.pTIC.-U CH., v d _ OVED EQUAL m IF VA . � RG❑Ea�oR T> 3 „ w CONCRETE ORPSLE� TOISCHISE1101:11:1111 a o $ " ❑❑❑❑❑❑ ELEv=6]az6 s,oO YR ws ELEv 6eo.D1– ELEv=6]az6 3 dLL SWM OAI M P E DETAL ER SDETR[SH RACK NOT '3F s 10 VR WS ELEV 67901' SHOWN PoR CLARItt °o°o �wE zo _NT WEwEL E,] ELEV cnBz <oo z � �__ s,rR Qz I AFT.11A x_ (Ruwci olrvisj rs �INv.6r6m ,rscH ao Pec IPEI EVERSE LL `r WRIER OMMALRMY TORiI E D OIIARI WEH,OE9RI M ORIFICE DETIAEETH*SHEET) NV.Sr5.00 - ) ' Z W an<mwa:un arry nE un:c mx:. VDOT EW l ccxsnE owa s ro E xerxux Wmx r:E rxme INJ.a'i]a. a L nwrx a n..xn.r ro,noxwnr.xnwixxr xz«. TYPICAL SWM DPM sNORMAL POOL WS ELEv 6r6ar Wz a00a MT PS CONCRETE z.6' o axrto m rrt n:w.w xoWo m mlwa cwt.wx a \ PREETRUCTPBASEIND w LU RISER STRUCTURE 1v OOT)- illff�� mgwo mww r:ux nu:e I �� SWM,SQUARE rvS UE a'xa' ELEV=6r220 ,^W V Swl�+,sa AXEJFEAryoo;a° ---- ----J \$ OFI.0 x • �j�j� q{oP.NSI ORADE CONCRETE FILL __ �L,—w.w DYANcv 6]zsn � i.��/,❑��V�ji�'l �� ORSUCYANcv L-L XaEs DETN METAL RATE MID SDE VIEW WITH D RACK �� METAL RATE OETAL R QUALITY ORIFICE _ TCIAY LINER WITH 6" c. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (SWM)DETAILS TUBE TOPSOIL CAP DEBRIS RACK.MET&PLATE,WATER QLAUTY ORIFICE.CONCRETE CRADLE tFCN SWM ORNNACE Sm1.Uto1U_E5 SWM RISER PIPES AND SWM OM51 m. (wsEOAssuMES ApL OPEN NCS eELow THEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN *ar rxxewrt.Tw STARTING wsE IS AT T,E TOP OF THE RISER PRINCIPAL RISER SECTION PRINCIPAL RISER FRONT VIEW Anti-Flotation Desiqn-Riser Buoyancy Cbeck NTS SWM Pond 1-PrimaN Riser 1.'PLIT.of Water Displaced 5.001 5.00 R. T.10ft = 11.50 tuft. STEEL LATE 2.WelgMof Water Displaced 1]750 cqR x 62A0 Ibrcu.M1= 110]6.00 Ibs M00.EBAV98 O BOLTEDTOEW-, 3a'PIPE 3.Volume of Concrete CRO POOL Concrete filled base 5.00 fl. 5.00 R. 2.60 R.. = 65.00 cu.ft. - � Wall -fl.x DOD sq 440 R. = 3960 cu.ft. 211 4.91 sq fl. 0.50 R. _ -2 46 n. U Pp 12' D]9 sq fl. 0508 - -040 tuft a Lu � a6 m nus we r2.3'x 1.5' 2.DD fl.x D.E]R O.SO R = -0,8]cu.ft. O o 5 - TOP TRASH RACK NOT yj 7 TtlVolume mnusgpenngs 101:D8 cvfl. F�wC BIgWNPoRCLARtt if 4.WeigMat"'cl 10108 coR x 15000 Ibrcofl_= 15162 DO Ibs ^, BENCH((FOR SAFETY FL OPO `Il Q%- S.SetelyF—Min.125 151620D Ibs l 11O7D.Ibs = 13]Safely FaclOr PURPOSES) J 6 Fz CfAv uNER rvoTEs - AQUATIC BENCH DETAIL F a,ED IMUM THICKrvE55 CF2a INCHES AND Ae ECAST RCP a45 PSI RETEANO Ta WNx 0.6TH Q � SXOu10 eOMPLY wIi,TIE SPECIFICATIONS PROvpEO Iry TABLE BO]-3. e. oa finer sn VD-E. vDOTEW-1 ERSTRUCTURE(VOOT)- aLIMINIMUM6-,z INCXESTHION)s,DDLO BE M,SQUARE INSIDE W. x zpL CYEO D ERIEACTEDroFORESEE ON.wRH AN APPRDPRATE SEED =mr,r� BOLTEoio wl W ,a RE iaEREa,ovEscH.,a C4 3.ASVrvT,ETCLrvERwiHAMrvOMUMT,CKNESS OF 6aM LOR OTIERLN SOLUTIONS TRASHRACK C]C] 'SEDO"NONSPROV OED 1TPIPE IASTC�LUTpNSEMI 11 PIP OR APPROVED QUALHE VERFY NG THE L N ER MATER AL S PERFORMANCE - —T, TRAS CK co �EE o1-1—T, VDOT EW-1ESTEEL PLATE BOLTED TO EWt V 0 a r^ oa'DIA AMETEK LOw FLOwO C] ' Low ORF CE DETUL THIS W FICE SEE Y EJ E❑ (LOw RILOw)� FORCO CRETE SLAS ORIFICE GRFTE GHFEr)wF - $ g G PLASTIC NR*NS IMP / x CON.AFROS TRASH RACK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN 2 PROP GRI Ex.GRADE _ PRINCIPAL RISER PLAN VIEW LOW FLOW ORIFICE DETAIL NTS eas; ass ass ws Nrs 1 TOPGF BERM ,za' PorvD ACCE S PROP GRADE_ =K'LED FILL- ELEv.=66z z" BENCH(a%r:�ax.) -' EMBAry KMENTTo _ NO ES: CLAY / OP OF BERM 6B5❑6❑ 1 CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY WITH a0' ,ROVE WSES001 / sso T RECOMMENDATIONS FROM GEOTECHNICAL / �Y./Y./Y./Y./Y� gp/Y./Y./Y REPORT. zo ❑�� Ev=6eaw CP sw'sE ,ovawsE 6]s0, j " ND LEVEL,DESIGN ( ES q sP LLw °❑Po �. .� TERTy Ts)�m1 uLo j�) ,vROILwSE 6n.6z 6�5. ACCESS �5 z TROLw LL BE PuacHASE ER)Tv�Y�_ GF OFFSITE SroRMrvATER CREDITS. Np. /I'L 11 j BENCH(4%MAR) B.THE,BO YEAR wnTER suRFACE ELEVATION IWSE)ASSUMES UL aro RPww D lcDrvc R—TS2F) 6s5"AT FDREaTc� �e ARLSORE NGSBELow THETDEDFTCONs.auc,oNi�Ec❑v FOREBAY SPILLWAY a'AQDATIc w EE Dao)SD L MATERALS)TOBE DR q x RADLE ENC, I BENCH LIP) rW z aaaj NCAL ENG NEER 1`1�1t w 1z j EER TEs PERMANENTSwM EMBANKMENT EBAry EDF R PE��zzLo _ _ ars v,aea.oLSrvE oDEEs OTCROSSTHETOE OF TME EMBANKMENT y C2b� THEREFORE NO DESINAE "EM _p DO—ETeR RAM rvMUM OF2 ARODNDEPE N AR EAS DF B D NE CRANED sops SHALL HAVE STHONE E RIR LESH N ,ZDY1Y m` BACKF LL. 9.CLAY COREa'MrvIMUMwIoiH STARTING ATTHE tovRwSEArvO THUrP 04/20/2020 UP N TION OFT HE RE DO _ � we ❑ SINCETHEPONDEMBANKMENTSLOCATEDwT,NALLcOT SCALE -30 DESI NED BY Rix/KAS SES sc ,a ,c.so „w0 I,.w ,2.ao r2.s0 ,s.ao e.sc rc.0o ,0.w „ „wso ,1.W FILE N0. SWM POND -OUTFALL STRUCTURE PROFILE'A-A' SWM POND -CROSS SECTION'B-B' s DWG/ 19-03 ' PRGP29�TY / SAN.SEW. �rvA e lYU) e�eANo� �O S No EN � CLEANOUT SENO wvE B'S4N. 1 Alv FM OSEW uiER4L JJ _ SZw uj STAT, A xZ W PLAN VIEW V 1"=50' 1\ III 1 ` I PRGP ,� III j , I w — ------------- — Pil— _I s �� _ESNNT e N IVt I11 EGRCE—.1 F \ \ 1LL \\ Ru eul eas v 5 scH SsLU � III II ' �OB 32B PC SB4 Nu�4� z0 w EwiHN � , I !� PL N50 , 0 �,,,5 . AA �8 5 � PIAN VI�W 0 SCALE , =so AA SCALE:, =so Z b9 SANITARY SEWER EGRCE LATERAL,x X U 9.59 , w taw „ .59 ta.90 is w taw9 a � w a 8 R .. Baa >95 ,os sea $•Ex cw.GE T.]1- O F, co o - OP.E cOE PROP.RiP RAb a' P P N Ex — Ex __--- N m .GRADE RaUE d � ®PPE CA� EEE=as5.5scFF� EEE=53e.sa- _ - ---- &� / caoe SUE - al P;o°PRM &3 wA & / / Soa2fi 555 wo xIN 2a 3 w 555 _ ®y0s°I G wso AS, Sao, cRGWNSs N,.�soaz5ze NIW ores of CONNECT � � I `� X26 � 415 R RGW 3 w w w .w 12.59 w w R y 5T 3,R E am 5 w9 w9 �/- RYSEWER 51, els _ 5R 25 _ wwy ._5 615 yoYnL .a. 5 04/20/2020 fibs UE $$ r$ "'u� SCALE'.AS SHOWN g� as 8 ass$ 8 DeslcNcoerHN/NAS A 8O - 8 �F� 0 8 R - 8 ffio NOTES. '" E E E d d z o od o_ z—TRACTORTOTEST PIT EXISTING UTILITIES ANO RELOCATE AS NECESSARY. Fae No. s ALLRESTRANMJOETSTOE%TEN020'MOCUT 50 01AC 9.00 9.50 taW t9. SANITARY SEWER »Sp ,2.W 12.54 t2.w 9.59 to'w SANITARY SEWER LATERAL-CHURCH 12+w ,2.59 9.50 SCALE: =50' SDWG 24 OF Cv w Ex STRV-Ex STR"L"t N L9-�3 t W WET WEin) Z: z Z, zw Lu z ui Igz T.ll��111111, T Kle BLAPE 3er,..s XGV I XGVH BARNES' 7 ❑ 4 7-x -wis" kll�4-� Il Lu 7 IOND-696.20 roNmm EAW IL 78 GPM @ 120-TDH Lu CO Lli L11 I IIA ... . . _T T." co INST.1-NI.HATCH IN a FLATTOP DUPLEX,PAC�GE, saws z BAF-2020 c.mw S—RCOM—TONS 2�PMW==--�-d &.1� L IjI. FvnP 111--d 1-11,a,a1Wbe a mm yy w able of proNtlkq the plarp rale et rite toll deepn need Hebd H Il,e II by Ih. -d� NO� overload n d p—Th�- t -LM--RT—MU-- Sao dHwt be provdetl ---------w.rm - '.mg TO resp eaa ==:z hoWowx d--k..— 'M-'=N'TO 7. r. �by� ndLtle 11-to Ih, I ==IN -.-y -d I.,-I- 1. =OAML-=A I EIL:7 req b la There an ow. F1 p ury K—f, p aPtcee Qide rak HW be Jame® N_171 A 9CA1.E:A9 SHOWN �1.A'hldr 11:1)-P:tl 11 d. ..1- 18 A-l�d -N——Ir TO sueE -pkettg MRcetlon pr«adiree Geeporede pareale telePM1ole 2 CCNIRACTC6 SHALL S,IFf'LY SHOE UxAw1NCW OF 11E STANDBY FOhER SYSTEM DESIGNED BY R1.K/]tA5 mmb k-*,aphy�J lhe m 0--�-p— 8leaLeOxisOLSExeLFILE NO, 63- DWGW 19-03 A. 3�oA$ LU u m= » mo w r \ ea 1 &f 8°a�M ssa Mp ws $ 8$ 8 �5 `=AB$ $8 8 $Si R m t'g8m .PB a e _ ffi "' w$ es .g$ 3 ess w wmm w w w w w w wq wa wg wa w a w AIR w w w^ w wm^ w wq #5 # # �sw a s www ww sw wwSw #q js w w w a� a _ o s i� a a a a a zEzz STR 100-STR 114 STR 102-STR 102A STR 103-STR 103A STR 1041-STR 104B 50 25 C 5A W SCALE , -SD' -E U a6 a CL Qz w x W cf)SA W PA �a e s e°5 woeoa� con+ .DOsr, nnnxwura Dav e°o e°o u, eso ens HCL e°s eso E— QPQx Ec—oE FlLL - eao eao ea° eas eao G_ —\ \ �-MIAoE FILL s �.No oeLe ssv, - _ _ $ —M D saa on AsrM ossa F 3 3 n 3�D.0-bW ar8w$ w2 8699 FS � � DiA.T E04/20/-0 a/=/—r 0ww w $ ,77 8 _I'l ,°s ,,w -0 ,,.o °.so °sao .a.w ,°.w .s. ,e° A STR 106-STR 106B STR 109-STR 109F STR 111-111A STR 101-STR 205 C 5D D-.—F1 F./— SCALE , —5C F]LE N0. s DWG# 19F-03 VIE LLI LLI z .1 o jx VZ --p-T -1 M P—T. IITIPIR 7� 7 AD A'M 11wdw� KH K §4 "o .5, .1 ll.m ,°.m 1.. 11- 11- 1— 1— 11- 11 1— 1— STR 108-STR 115 STR 202-STR 202A STR 1-STR 6 STR 4-STR 4A STR 7-STR EX2 EZ-STW11" 9 1� 25 o A lll� aEc "2RRl�'.' SCALE:1 10 AT I�'T'0 T. �Zl'.A aE ""'IIAT 01111 1111 T11 111 11-1 'T W z."""'ToR"A'T""IIIIRIIAIITI- -TS—S-T—vi.—__T__R_r AT_ CL Qz Z W cl) N Z oQ wJ) PA IR01— mss EMEE 1zi —E PA W .1 _E .1 W oIDc 7 A No WSVS— IU oL8 -o 11.1 STR -STR 8A STR 113 STR 116 CULVERT CULVERT 22-23 SCA,, H 1- 5Q 25 50 100 DESIGNED 11 SCALE 1 -50 FILE NG. A. »A�^s - ]A6 1110. aEsraniKr�aNrs lT'P.)� - >oa ess -- ens Q / xz w 00o p S nnn4ossa 0 ,� e,0 0 0.0 10.00 ».00 1:.00 1— 1— 0,00 WATERLINE"A"(FREDERICK WATER) WATERLINE"B"(CITY) W U 50 25 0 10 V > RELOCATE A9 NECE9S4RV. SCALE., =5D' CL z a z x a W Qu w cf) �a —� 6ZQ W co PRO— esa �� es= opo 171 o�noE P e,s .a mme,a e,s 11171 a— a� .10 1— na Iowa ,— e,. 11- 111. a.. �a WATERLINE"C"(FREDERICK WATER) WATERLINE"D"(FREDERICK WATER) DESIGNED 6N.—Zrens E N0. —LE.1 —so �DWGy 19-03 H)DRAI LIC(;R AHL LINE CAL(LILA I IONS slo 1SE"FELPIPECALCULATI Ns o oP ca norz ua row ¢r op me Pie pTI- T. T I IT 1 1 . Qz T Y-H a N 11-0 E., IE I .11 1. Ill 171Z. M, ui 171 111 mk-_� .21 A "I H m to !! ! I I A I a w a; as go-w m IS 2 H m "Z' ol) III 1. 11-1 111 01 111 011 11121 1111 1. 1. 11 1. 12 117 1. 2 11� 011 - "I 1.4l 'ITT 41. inns a lol 11 IC _6 III .1 Z"4141114* 2- ITI 11 111 111 11 11 2- -1 1. l" m T. TIo 11 ol 1, 1. IST Il" IITII 111 12. 111 171 211 111 IST I. a at 1. 71 0. U al ii-A it A 1-4 To�1211�1 122 111 111 - 11 12 a I'l 07 -- I_ W2�wm Is 19 Es if m u 19 m 12 2 111, .12 2 -11 Wo I., o" 00, .1 111 11 4 28 011 011 101 1. 11,60 ll, W-A A it TKa-A Th 111 211 1. Ill .11 1 121 11 .11 11 .21T oll "I" o'I Wit �a 2 9'. z oQ o 2- 11" 12- Ill 12111 1 Iz m m on IT w STORNT FTC%LCUF%TTONS IT ll 1 1, L L� T` WP z 1 171 11 01 Ill 011 o 11 TE o- loo 52�5 'l 1 19 1. ig a m m to 12 1. oll 4. 01 1. T. T41 1. U4 I- 1112 0 0.1 Hl 1. 1. 211 W-0 2 H -1. 111 - 0 �g is E ?E US in 12 V 11. 12 12 V I Ill C11 I/1�1 Nl� 111. 10, I 17, 2 m I I 1 11 11 0- ��2 .-I __�e_i� III oll 4 1411 1- -121 - ' 011 im 11 11 11 11 11 - oll CA o/a rv/l 11 11 01DATE:04/20/20 oll oll _011 1. 1. cm 11 112 1 1. ."1 "1 o. 1. .11 .11 o//A o -1. ITI'A I. lo, _CTIT a. ITT a, III "I IA 0I ALE.NTS 10, L 1'. -2 Ill T.4 Eli FM N0. m,v 100WP z DESIGNED BY'.RLK/KAS 0�2 ol. .9 11 DWGW 19-03 m _ q�amg RET:NHcwALLwMAHD = ' m.-- 5 s sncxr,u Qz 9] S Ek =5B9W • \ 1 Auj , w Iq a_DD .0 gasp - r r LY IX 7a NEG Tw 5�.5D o�Rc,a .," TArvrvGWAL� BW 5a5a3 i e DcSo I�} \ I DNaorGNDRaN �w _� WINArvDEAL ao - - I � Z'- `gyp 2 Nu-55a.5o "'V W=5e5 a3 I ° ° o D ��YII ESInS � 1 I W s9- I .s — \ S I TYPICAL va0v0sED BU LD rvO ^= � CAL SECTION v ,0701Y SE111EREES5N9S5I.5T5A'L 153 UD UNITS) STATIONS 10+00-10+90 hG+53) T N. n a, os V L NT6 1 lI ,5 30 60 j—GNer GT1EIS1 W U W G4 o Q a r c sDEOEw a J F EGDNDADGNDa N � a a �, w o a Z �x TYPICAL SECTION 2 z pWpp�q (r, STATIONS 10+90-13+11 'Z co W NTS F 1111 IAEALLET STGE_ED 5 a W W a Low siDE orwuL sciiaro�1 eao 3 3 a _ 3 5 1 ETGRA 1E d 1— RI-EETAINING WALL vo+w 14- 14.m ,s.ro 11- 1s.00 EOEDU EALGT I AN-UNIAT LDwsioE 1111 NTNG WALL /EouNw N—N 50 0 D° wALL�EB�33DaEOE,EAMrvEOBY�3ArvrvB�ALLOESBNEA ALE 55, E1 TYPICAL SECTION 3 M1'DyL Eq STATIONS 11+13-15+23.45 J �-U. 13 NTS NOTES: 1. RETAINING WALL TYPICAL SECTION IS JUST TO SHOW PROXIMITY TO RETAINING WALL,HORIZONTAL AND 04/20/2020 VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN STORM AND SANITARY. 2. RETAINING WALL SECTION IS NOTBASED ONANYACTUAL DESIGNOFAWALL.RETAINING WALL DESIGN WILL BE BY ALE.A9 NOTED OTHERS. DESIGNED BY'.ELK/EAS F]LE N0. s DWGg919F-03 ONS-SCO'EIN S, �wao-1 �a „_sa a .I, qua N $`vah0l" F END VE. END SECTION DIENSIONS END SECTION MENO R SECTION'A SECTION A-A _ w W u jxw -1 CEIL ar prt,rte FLARED END SECTION o ' ,z^-as•• ARDDWEDWAL FOR PIPE CULVERTS 4v . CUL%w OTPOTECTON rr soy coxcssreHisxrs ccu�ex - rico i » . �. AJE a.oma, ak",4 .,,..,�.,m...a.,.� ,A,�...• as.a..�aem..a W aan�ma w..W.�am. �. r�M�lr,w ,:.,..,•,..�,..,.._�, �:t➢o„,..,�,�.ws. J a. �� .«.€�I:k °p..�aa,�b.. =�:1 i�r�.�.' � w,•.a.a.a, ,�„ � re,.. Q � wo ELL lt.I.I.E • awe .,�na„^..�«o -- z L �_ _ e. �x vws Y.�,., MCH I .,..n...�..� .,ax aaa � W 6U W �,s'w.wem rnwass nrt unnaa v �Lm p`::`>. '� C] .. .a�a..a.,,.,aa....a..a...aa a.,.aa.,.saa... w.„�.,,...•..�„ a L____ I �.,.•.,. sna w ,. .�. CK a� INSTALLATION OF PIPE CULVERTS&STORM SEWERS ,m„ CAST IN PLACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT `tea \DOTWW�v PRECAST STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DRAINAGE GENERPL NOTES a. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE �«a :�°�,^„a .,paw a, - STRUCTURE o m� TDI -TE NO n—_ fiLim �� of000l00000® 1�'I ol�o®om00000 I� ,.� P •”� �.Y—J C�� of-t,a vc 1L' JV w a KK 00000000000000 93 avu r+orx ouxonr ow a "a3 ,wir'I&9,'Nam ,� `R0 € �mu0� a•u,. DATE 04/20/2020 DER r fl NOT- 1-1—ION 111.CD x O w INSTALL dF PIPE CULVERTS AND STORM SEWERS F "".m DE—NED BY � »"""""""`"^""" ""° rare TC NT o r s /xns CIRC.PIPGRATE L E BEDDING AND BACKFILL-METHOD"A” r STAND DDROPINLET y... STANDARD PRECAST TOP UNITS t O” "`NOPP° SDWG�/o19�-03 �,aRo,�a��EsrANOAreos jj NE ERPL NO ES ixwrz'd na N w..t 4 W - n \ \ == ==z $v LL IXS.NVc.a Nr .NLroww, xoM Zw w Lu uJ MI n Q Il ME x kLEo aN«Awus oLTxL EEIEC—LE ASPHALT PAIE VEMENT WIDENING CG 12 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE CG-12 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE rLF,_T,E_,ETax TPw cxoss-s T ...m gym.W.,...x •. /W/J� U 4d � J az W co n�w ELP�<Tax "La -B& w _ a RFLAREO- 6.SEC TION �°�, COMBINATION V CURB AND GUTTER STANDARD V CURB CFO'$ 1111IR 1111—K �. I—zl w�onxr�'wT •,,. �.mE>wE tPr�ro ieFossoE 1 f� ., �T,k� t , N PEFEUFnreo - - .-,x.u...°:.........., DATE oa.ww un wow m: --. «««.s.m:axouowxi,u o,.,.,s,aaernox ,w..,.........onww,»�.•6.0 : ,.EV'4.iP.' ` °,40_ - F , -•,••.•••. ALE. N/A uma.rr..o •P'�.. .w.u. ax va. nm.cnw STANDARD CROSSDRNN EFS FCR 2 1 SLOPE 5ie.C.PD C �RET PIE Fr;E :L �s 'L-,['Loe "°""` s�cNEo sv relE/xns S-A4DAR7 CONGh ETE ST N.a s DWG/ 19F-03 T,E D-E.NOTE1 PERF—TEDT0UM—,P� E ....... M Q PaVID—DER SECTION WRB AED WTTEA SECTION 1L. TTEI OECT- ,F,, . .. ... TE' �CTD�1. EEOTI.. ULV�'�TG— ui LU u cez m vl� 'mrAj %w. I mm mul�w= DEDTNN D I STANDARD PAVEMENT EDGEDRAN STANDARD PAVEMENT EDGEDRAIN METHOD OF 'TH"T"F T-TREATMENT 11221—IT1=1 bats baro ll� Vfllrnlll�nul ........... �zt �2V71'�I'l i il 1�i Es 711� UJ DrIll I.R 1IL— DE-L LOCAT-OF EDGE —j- AT LN,, ... ._O., 11-1 INITEll ------------- ul > G. 71,— �T L D—O"" —FED OE-L DOTTED .... L E_BST _E7LA _L.E_E, ........AT ..��T�r Lis -1 E .1— IAND ll�l.—I�T T TYPI II 1NALI T ITE111-11 11-1 1 Ell 011 11 1 �l INDETNa SA Z AT CROSSWALN—TH ........ ... M, ECiIONs DATE.04/20/202 1111 NOT1 Ql DESIGNED BY ELK/KAS E—.— DWGW 19-03 REINFORCNG J.- Of F�M OECGON IA V. v ui maww^v -TION z m_ uj� A W.IX.1' M� w -- ce N.E OET- 'j mrL,, 77 "'I'L W`N U81D —1.7 -NON E—ION S�7ANDA%I:CURB�.DROP 1.1-1.T LMSTAN�DARD CURB DROP�IONLET STANDARD CURB DROP INLET g. qlT.I OF G---1. ITI -B Lb&j M M, -AL A N: RIM -Nnr- % L_O UJ 47-71271&A PLON VIEL OETNL A IITTVoA TO' SE ON B IIN L -9 --7 NOT.—.1 uJ p- pprap- �7 ANT11 SE111 11 -TOM MA 02"MM" DD 7 I'mom MA U Ta G —N N-1 N ao MEDIAN DROP INLET STANDARD STANDARD ,M.E.Dl�VDROP INLET STANDARD PRECAST TOP UNITS- [M P, m 11 10 1 IE -R-1—T-A- DA. DESIGNED BY-/KAS DWGW 19-03 dmq PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) CROSS SECTION#1 REMOVED N 3~ NA GREEN SI5BN DITCH UNING (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) Ur OW Z aM_ oePr Fns zrRW css - Fns 3W BIR STORM EVENT sa CFS O.aa• - ,ovR STORM�EVEErvi oo cF5 oar - -.••^° _NNEL SLOPE 6T603:a CH NEL SLOPE 61% Z w COMBINATION 6' REVERSE CURB & CUTTERYo GRASS CHANNEL SECTION#1 GRASS'CHANNEL SECTION#2 GRASS CHANNEL SECTION#3 , Wz No*TO sclE NOTTO.BLE NOTTO.BLE uj u w PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 5 6 CROSS SECTION#4 REMOVED (DESIGN BY OTHERS) GREEN NDITCH LINI &' ( NG (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) K FLOW VE-11 KFLOW VELOCItt 2YRIIIMIINTCFS 0.76 FPS 6BCFSFPS BTCFS - - O.OT BBCF9 0.33' CIwNNELTSLOPE23% C NNEL SLOPE Iz//e BELIEF WE BncK DE_. GRASS CHANNEL SECTION#4 GRASS CHANNEL SECTION#5 GRASS CHANNEL SECTION#6 _ BACKOF No*TOsclE NONOTTO.BLENo*ro.lE F W U ERCURB PROVIDE EROSON U a¢ 'F O 11 iL4I d"3900 PSIVDOT A3 CONCREf PROTECTIONPERP ,.; EOFRP I'- IDTHV 6x6 WWM Q O� `l eo cnv E sEEsnec NIN '� J ¢z ¢ LL a DEPRESBION SLOPE 4% O } F O T 3•ttP. W�j_ TEDWcTEOro ssi WF rwTED,\ 1E c w a•suesasEl sTONEI o n / �CURBOPENING T'R(TVP3 'CONCRETETOBENRENTRNNED.NRTOSE6%1,5.SLUMPDiOBES"1,M�„D) NT YlLE'R - W tea, SAW-TOOTH CURB OPENINGS MODIFIED _ CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3O1CONCRETE SCUPPER Q MTs. N.Ts. x NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN WITH PEDESTRIAN GRATE °Ax�o�xs°.oE. ------------DRAIN BASIN INLINE DRAIN FR9A1°c*P1i0N41fHB"4no.o. y h 1z.wo.„GV�LNE s<x Toaoo�aaa,rwouEn .Davol-� o anTnio-n®roo /NF r a, Bx wxxE ax=PT I / R as yea Jim ro.«Es.w°Ea eoxomP <J oexreeeowc / zaDW ENT °ucEocm,au,woa„.ow,.r xaaacEwxx,>sm�., Yn3 rw.eoeconvncreowawmrwanc�wlmasWm S'-, n,. N�'+•i” RumacwanaeruN�Toau�.�a..ccemw,c.= es.ssa°ir<riuEDwxx wwners _ ”. rug - - �..iaxwouunw e. w m (� DESIGNED BY Rix/]tA5 HANDICAPPED PARKING Bu,6 ®w Neel^' Eon ETT„aw„E Ny101aeY T..o. %7 s EET 2DWGg19F-03 U �W 1"X4"X4W SLATS,2-FINISH NAIL AT n TOP ANO BOTTOM 3�r�$ T'X4.BEAMS,TOE NAIL TO P06T a' far NO � 4 4"X4"%8'POSTS 7!7 Q —U z I 1 ZW W v w Wu jx z COMPACTED G- ==ill=iii= NOTES: 1.PRESERVATIVE STAIN ON ALL WOOD. COLOR TO MATCH THAT OF BLDG. 2.FINISHED 61DE OF FENCE SHALL FACE ADJOINING PROI IF APPLICABLE. WOOD FENCE DETAIL OR APPROVED EQUAL, FOR BUFFER SCREENING(FENCE 6') NOT TO SCALE E-RETRE41Eo soaRo oN soARo w000 GnreoRAPPRovEn EpuL F —X1—TEE T11 FILL. W U IW 0 COICRETEEPoOtiuGm v '� M Q O ouMPSIERGU F a a C] U Z x W aU T—LWA FEMEM m �w Exv.aoiMrw. � o Q m� W =u 11 INc Q "i�µ�uy��iu��-w- canvncr®suscnnnE �=iii - rw rxnk PouPAo CONCRETEPAo 16-0no W.M.ONCOMPAc,Ell'AGGREGAressnsE oW S-ANI FOOLING TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL WITH BOARD ON BOARD CONSTRUCTION NTS 3 LOEe-2o�' ,f DATE:04/20/202 DESIGNED BY:RLK/]tA6 6 DWG 19F-03 WINCHESTER PUBLIC SERVICES NOTES JJl A# 041 LU LLI u TI 1',I I _R "ITT "IT"I'll I I T;�Tlll �Cll 9 JJ az L. co co 11-11 IIS I T11-11- T11 1-- 3 IF �T-E 1.21 III.E T�TI I lIF'�I -E C1/112C 1 11-,3EE, _10`�' L-1 II-E 11/11 IIL 11/1- 3 _'l ILI I 1�1- ,, F �11' 13_1 ss- T"IT F1 =n%,"m �3�o�t-vw Ir - ,az�_, Ti ii�ii n TE 04/20/2020 SCALEL l/, DESIGNED BY: RFK/KAS I-DE 1111L-,1/11121 L LIIL I DWG# 19-03 q�amg xwpoene"uee"°m�""m — Y^ I..� f-T 3r ° I W yJz w W mereRlrvsTu-uEDN FIREEN 1-11 GATE—VE Lu F > w o z U reM www X a LU CK nmuceR 4 •�p'�l�o Q � Ll C] TE,cxoss,w a IS o RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR REDUCER, RESTRAINED JOINTS FOP TEE,GROSS, HORIZONTAL BEND GATE VALVE DEAD END -CAL OFFSET �3-LoeC-leio DATE.'OW./z ALE. N/A DESIGNED BY RLK/KAS s DWGg419T-03 v�dNB --°"off \ - Q C7 �LuW 12 w r OND VA EVAULT WATER NAiN GASSEA., GRAVITY SEWER CLEANOUT BE o owu,Anwsro ew.wau revuva w aanumac 3'MIN. r-:+ F _ W U F 7 eweruo u W Q q W LK 7 x oris ac v snxooao e.m CxJ Wz 6 a ea...vuw x¢ifw�n rrn a fY, VJ '�'W ncav000 w _L v .z.. n w W � coW � T m — ooxone,Ernm�Lp u „v.itl..oii wxaa�a..xax : K �e�s. Eswa xsnras..wosvw. m•eamree�nurn �>s.waavvE s..wosvwN eF� TT �angatl O..Caw 52. tl 2Acw YPraaw6 N,RaeSea,Ewan FroveO eaf ai. w ��"''°L@ wal,PaM Aooar NCNrew N�nat FIRE SERVICE AND DOMESTIC SERVICE VAULT DETAIL r^ 11 El 11 1 s WATER METER A .ENB ARE MEM M_ METE'll�,VALT11—RREYE-1�SSEMRIESTO eE PER FwSPEaRIUTIONs. VENf1ON VAuITTO BE MINMUMY,�aSYL-e. i 3 u..orre-zow 4?r DATE a4izoiz0e SCALELE/A DESIGNED BY nLxixn s DW(/# 19F--03 THIS SHEET FOR LANSCAPING ONLY A. oil -77 �— _ ---- - - E P Zw LLJ _ / \ Wz ---- --- / 2Ls�� 4Arr 44 /ER s I It I M r r t 5 Bu to 21m i — i a SH r---_ a � wo awahaetS A) F—b-1 30 To HLh leecl�,�me r e Z ,uc cre L 4 n lawahee<1A now row mem, I x y m F. `ary a r---- o co a LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE NOTEspm we NOTES: z z me,wtnmeoprrem a m areae moo re o ngom oomieooby owmr. wain ahrpb ai:mamwow®a mo- mamwom nt spheeple. '� Z nQ scopeoFWwopK me ea ANu s in m f ge D b w a P s.Remo mil ce n�oeem protm oe o o - Tmlweamp ntrwmrahan rovieeallmateeala,laborwewpromwtmmmplerealllamwaw epeecBJ3) G Dain yre ew �wamn pee atmae�receonortma�teaemm�abator m pore .TplmemeMofo-e��hownoott,�p�o��ylleho�` epi=h�t�malofi°�'to�„heowmrrmemrvmmeepht 3o W a naa ahomoo me plum araapwieoatmm. eppee pla nal bee wmnrm root balKew of omlom weeba.Theremtreea,mrammet°pmpmk Eb,b mFreeemk 11 Pmwlre Dewrm,wL �. moa wk a PIe¢ momrmwmFr oN Id—p.wt sulrsti b c q oremipwt Ler.Iwane anmetmrorenvwrwk the poor moo- ee c pots a e poem n w a ewmv batmwew treerewream mop non pi�n;e eg�k�s Pa«ee�o`g"ee be �iP a��tvzom °tl ,stem em.For p rook Row trees ore repa�aore the prowm o-omree Wmsemm�v the am wren e.mrs ofrh; Rope�k�n�eoeieoat o�. � warm Amamw stamam ror Nprsery snick c.co�n' p^ kanau ep same mer w pmmeacarworvTvpeB speer mRtl,Patmo wrmee.emptloom�imein Free R. w lANul.Plein metenelmmtbe - doing o�mmame g,6sz6a62(D)(a)weo mistlog utuny(molmry sewer)wmuma(erc.me co��ire+�oee�'re%s��e ry eae�m 5hii,7��ea ab�ove�me root Afieoreeoirefemeie beide provisos sore me ev>episeE only twnen eppi;Zpeosw°xels eprtreslemeertetrep�een mpmtWrs."l^mtee 9 p slreu woos pe om weu ewtnbpteb th pp ut Ne bop ry 1 ntmtlre rowxromes ceptoiNe a Ity coxnin. wmereewewiT,Horms III by L.H.-I re(gimlire)am manse rows Shen be o-eameio ABB BOTANIC NAME COMMONNAME QUANTITY SIZE ItSBSTIFUmTIONS:P wpe ra roaplenerebseparerotm roosb hem urxangll sacral 11int 1bd Tod=fIpre Orme plwcS.PhIn,pr—r.for au�o—r-S.,trees SsI—I,this PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS guises by tre mw aw arohimn.Tin m-a,,mw:r�., Deer b-tn —tb Lina wewapearobitwt mrtas'mrmmieereowThe lamscaw cwtrenor win very the lemwa mrnairer.growo pmrnssmple be grog nam wamree eauv pool may ore plwme,the sous 11 ,r.l,�,.merrm xr,I,i,.Srr�x arahawrifrmreara kwwneiawam orimwtrmiammapwiestmtmnbambarirrrzee roraw kept mm,n witn me wpi�alem of oosiochof ramfan per week. A. ronhmeonsmrell recammemebsubstitrushael11 b--abase diewp p pmpce rerm Plenring owreew. The cm res o E�Aarohalmo-wsn snan be m�ereemraap matenelfrom eryire otn an m "+ o.NmY ywim tin smte one lomUews wrlelningm tin trens�rtof meterlels. I.gvle+xe,r xyrxxlw SU BSTRUTIONS:POST-BID / Trpeassmlhe pereein en upr gh ieon wiN tin rmt Imceree by mulrn em kept me6t.Trees it Istm lnrwtmeliminem pmt-be substtu[iem.However In Ne eventtmttmmntrec enol one shrugs smut ml be leflonsiR unpentee fvrmare tmn2o-hours witmuteeegmte weterte SNgTEMTO vaaP msbewmepoavei see en eppro eeresu[setrnionmmtbeepprovee by tin owrees m imure root survrvel. rnul,aecuenulw'smarape' represenmAve am tin Freeerick County Pronning Depenmenr NSPECTION rySFT COM1P CT5D SAUCE VIRLITIES AND UNDESO RES m spblwtro mpwAonem approval by tin owwrorowwr5 re rmeotative et me u .,s.rra, dawrrw z.rxa De Tmees res wemr ceere comrenor oabveoce of gr�wxana b' re ry eomwrogwry 'b, z.xe PROPOSED SHRUB PLANTINGSa amo- Panmmm iecrab ev me owoara PACTED TGPSUL ,� w+ I.11 be reswmbaror c.smte wbrs m ee to me amscewarchtw woo regws. W p repwms. vmstewmreware 11 \ r� / scaRFV PTsoES MIM 6) xey� ma NTNG PRO U S O CO G ES&SHRUBS wmxmns \��\�� Eh by �/ ;/� //� S j � . EALCULATIONS N ret R. m Y neem mapaotsare Y °-tMe \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ -$3 t16w s r pts�bwmaere v � m, ve ap emre„-Ommpoh.Keepmpmc ev m�eo-pokofo e.+„xuwexne //�/�/�/�/�/�/�/�/� otlenem ( 1 u13)m):1 pe, p s renew mmmaeam pmrer orere ebtm as tbwammtmwbomremmmep,rerm Notrem p wcm ry �.xom xxm+ 2.BALL DIA.MN Pe, r 1 n 3SR) maeaa,.6,oc� ams DATE:/ /0 S NO ,tree ODO sfR. T. ry' A) sex mennmscommenGn asmm mafd� ffff�I � sw �u NOTES tinea pl be meteeem of 2.Bamreme' em emw 'ogmecaoewt tec pseearemet wstb"n IWWWIr1lllull -11 � WW '—ill ROOTSPRFADTO BENACOOROANOEw Stree he' of Ne meelfiee rose ALE.- 30 ren Boa %ease ar more since em mint be cretee-1bane see ememmen5 w om ILII AN STANDARDS FOR NURSERYSTOCK'TMIT tree forevery o0f SC 2swee ee eeeewmntm men eeeer nweroe back or a tore mmmrresm be morparem0 nro so eteraro of g2 m.per,6gp s.l.(2 IIII—EEE Ill f .PRu15 ALL MMAGED DISEASED OR WEAK LIMBS S ROOTS. 2. ) Y�(6 u)6treesiroce.F eespovieee DESIGNED DY'.FLK/KAS /,o �). 'I III IIEII JCCLEA PRUiNE ALL WMAGED ROOT ENDS m ntssm mof mesem w f2J m. r,OW s.f.(t666 m.wrec.). III IIEIIE +owuusuroar,vraa d NOTAL ROOTS tO DRYOIrt IU NG NSTALLATpNPRODE33. OTAL TIFFS REOURED.dg rypeas a m,T,worifi sue uness omerw gp tab. 5Seee mis .1 Kentucky J,w em 331.Sencee sp pp'ee et me li oawr<uuwo+auswmx � SSOAK ROOTS HWATEROVERN GHTBEFORE PLANTING. TOTAL TREES PROvoED:56 FILE NO, m ofW20 ub�.per w.or similar Brown olerent ink. 6361W shau mappoeb mall seeeeb arwsattm rareor JSoo lbs.wwream ammrm wim TREE PLANTING-VERTICAL STAKES TYPICAL PLANTING DETAIL-SHRUBE,__ �eeT a or aT 6u«k.orammamee awmmappuae ata rete orwggalmm perw.. rerarowemsrnS rn s519-03 26v,wol be seines wramem). DWC� C ss Autobahn Series A732 _d�LigMi.D Is E LGHTURFlcl2l12516oqlvl LILI 1 1.1 1 11. ' avec :L.IHT, I, A" ... II—IF2� 3. IFU UU 2 MIN U �I 2 " " II D', �2 F�� mpoIl-E -11111111HTINGITATIT111 W............. -A z CO-1 ui B-lua .&NEE -AEo — WRETE LIN IL F-URE1 MILIT-21PILISITIOLT-1- ce L z 2 FULL CUOFFWA I-ISANO FILL CUTOFF FLIFA F IFFSARF P-05Fo TYPICAL 2F LIGHT POLE DETAIL Norro lE &o Do do do do do do do do do ad ZONED:RP do do do 6o &.o do do 1 ad do do USE. NGLE FAM 11 I...... &o ao do do 4o ao 6. ....... do Ko ad ZONED:RP ao do 6o do 6o 6L. o oo do do do do 6o do 6o do do o do do do a o 6L. do 7- AMW USE:SCHOOL do do go do oLo do do ao oo ad do do E `�Lllll-L�Sao do.oo ad oo 6, ad do do do do do do a. do do al do Fo a. a, a. ad do ol 62 &4 64 oo do do UJ 6o a. ad &I I �--or CK T ol o do do do 6o 2 1 do do do do do do go a. do a. do a. 02 ao 6o do do .1 1ao do 6o do @ 2 of o o Do 60 do do do 6. do do F L� ii , , I do go do > a5 gj ad 6. do al do do 7, /do z 14� 1 14 ,1 'F �j 12 2 do do �,l Lu I o2 �j go o. 'd o ito 6 a 1 '4 10 P—SED IUILUING do go 4,0 �o do z do Oo 4 FTDRY SE-FLIE S'D'E'NTUL(63 UD UNITS) X �A I o DF g2 L. 65 , 'Ll I I & OF do Lu 1. to �,A @ 2 60 cf) do do &3 5' o I 13' do do a FFE &7 I do I' Ox 8 1 lo I I �j Nl� 6F go .6 &2 go a1 , 4 EX. a0 2 6 do 26 �ZoEol &8 do do B @ 13' do go Da ao 5.g o 1 �8, '. o, a, 'o 6F�2 go ad do o. do 'o to 4L3 , - 6 lo, So ol I �o a a. do o do oo a g a./ ad 1.6 a. 6o do �A �A oo x. 24 2 f.ao 8 dF OA @325'1 6. 1 -6.o- .6 go oo ol I do 1 , 1-N.-- �4 zu) do go �A 6 —1- USE:MULTI-FAM 6, 30 ° '(t' '2 IF I - IF 6 do 4 j no, 5o �J .1 1 13 go 1 4 - -, / do ad 3A 13, a 12, LIF_'D �3 go FE '6 .6 4o a ad' 36 0.1 do 6. a. � �2 D, 42 go �A .0 a41, do I aq� 1�6, d. Id a, 6 2il Y.� 4L4 �7 g' �4 go 93 oo 6 6o � o 8 �F o6 lo 4 17 13 'd'\ ap,I � 6L2 �4 , 1L _ �o 14'. 60 do o3k, IF�.3 g4 YF , , i 0 a, k2, 96 4 YL2 I do 16 7 g, do I _; -- �o do F. tF 1. d7 7dq o ao do lo tA do 5 40 iLo, a, 6o 6. ao d4 A!�,'1 6 �� - do 7 0 do do do a4 a, D� 77-77,77 773 do x Ex dil-W.1do do 6, 62 62 6, _JIL do o.o o i �Ex o do FZ,�Tl d2 d, l9k� do 6, __7-- 3 do o do do a a. do cls alof al 61 al do do F d-F do-_--!do 6 d, do 61 di al doi. do TKPWE_7M�O_-- al do ZONED:Bl 'o 'o do APARWFVT olo ao o do do do do EX 6o 10 o, 6 1 do I .I\ ZONED:RP do a i USE: do Do El.�616 1�, do calp 6p do i do _F� do do oo do USE:SINGLE FAM ATT o ad an a. A 7 \ . I - a. do ,dao 4 o vo do La- do FIl.1 Fo do -do' ao ao do o0 o ao do DF-L.L Fl F./.AF \�o Ex. 1, 00 EX.JD.� do do do do do oo )v- do do do 6o 1. � o 6� do do I do do — aLI 6L —do a, — 6o do Ex. X do Do a. 30 15 1 30 6D FILE LF), 63- do do \ ad-—— —do do do A WN, do 6o a\ do do aq do do 11 1 -1� do 61 do I , do do do do 6o 6o 1 do ad do do 9. do DWG# 19-03 A. »A�^s vA& w W L z x i — fes — - PRG PRGP-EG �_ PR.� RIGHTTURN IN RIGHTTURNOUT W z U a6 F Q Q ( az � as a Z U a Wa w a Z oQ W m� cf) Q - x Ej 4 �— xa os_,x_exzx � PROP.EGA j�FAf V q �P DATE.o</zo/zoo LEFT TURN IN AR(P)is THEDE3IGN VEHICLE—WILLErvTER AxO EXIiiHIS SITE WITH KEY AL,F 1 sU FRE.'_'.TH NGERCAR3. LEFT TURN OUT AUOOlURNSMULATTOry iLATFLE EE—E Wi TLAOOOMMOOATE THE(LARGER VEHICLE. vExlcLE CElrtEx uxE DESIGNED ElL./— FILE N0. vExic�Eemvcxvao 30 AF SCALE,1'=30SDWG# 19-03 C