HomeMy WebLinkAbout011-20 (ConsentFilingCUPAppBartonsvilleSolarFacilityRightsOfWayInSubs BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RESOLUTION
CONSENTING TO THE FILING OFA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR A UTILITY-SCALE SOLAR POWER GENERATING FACILITY
ON RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITHIN THE
SPRINGDALE GLEN AND CARROLLTON ESTATES SUBDIVISIONS
WHEREAS, Frederick County has received a conditional use pen-nit application (the
"Application") for a utility-scale solar power generating facility (the"Solar Facility") on
approximately 957 acres, generally located along Passage Road (Route 648), Marlboro Road
(Route 631), and Springdale Road (Route 649), west of the CSX rail corridor and partially within
the limits of the Town of Stephens City; and
WHEREAS, among the parcels that the Application includes are the entirety of the
Springdale Glen (Tax Parcel Numbers 74-7-1 through 74-7-12) and Carrollton Estates (Tax
Parcel Numbers 74-5-1 through 74-5-52) Subdivisions (the"Subdivisions"), which are owned by
the Applicants for the Application; and
WHEREAS, the Subdivisions, which are presently unbuilt, also include various unbuilt
road rights-of-way(the "Rights-of-Way"), which have been dedicated to Frederick County
pursuant to applicable law; and
WHEREAS, operation of the Solar Facility would require the use of the parcels within
the Subdivisions, which parcels are owned by private party applicants, and of the Rights-of-Way,
which are owned by the County by virtue of their previous dedication, but only the private party
applicants are parties to the Application; and
WHEREAS,the Applicants for the Application also desire to include the Rights-of-Way
as part of the Application, subject to the vacation of the Subdivisions in the event of and
subsequent to the approval of the Application; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants for the Application need the consent of the Board of
Supervisors to include the Rights-of-Way in the Application, subject to the vacation of the
Subdivisions in the event of and subsequent to the approval of the Application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors consents to
the filing of the Application to include, in part, the Rights-of-Way, subject to and expressly
conditioned, however,upon the vacation of the Subdivisions, in the event the Board approves the
Application and adopts a condition as part of any such conditional use pennit, to the effect that
the conditional use permit shall not be effective unless and until the vacation of the Subdivisions
is approved and recorded.
ADOPTED this 12t' day of August, 2020.
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chainnan Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye
J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Robert W. Wells Aye
Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye
Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye
Kris e ey
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
County of Frederick, Virginia
BOS Res. #011-20
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
Roderick B. Williams
County Attorney
540/722-8383
{GfA
Fax 5401667-0370
E-mail rwillia@fcva.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney
DATE: August 4,2020
RE: Bartonsville Solar Facility—Conditional Use Permit Application—Consent for
Inclusion of Public Rights-of-Way in Encompassed Subdivisions
Attached please find a proposed resolution by which the Board would consent to the
inclusion of unbuilt but County-owned road rights-of-way within two unbuilt subdivisions as
part of a pending conditional use permit(CUP) application for a utility-scale solar power
generating facility. The resolution would have no effect on the County's proprietary interest in
the rights-of-way, as the resolution would expressly condition the Board's consent on the
vacation of the subdivisions, as the vacation, by operation of law, would cause reversion of the
ownership of the rights-of-way to the subdivision owners.
By way of background, last month, the County received a CUP application from
Bartonsville Energy Facility, LLC (and associated landowners) for a utility-scale solar power
generating facility, to be comprised of approximately 957 acres (with the rights-of-way
constituting an additional 15.22 acres, more or less), generally located along Passage Road
(Route 648),Marlboro Road(Route 631), and Springdale Road(Route 649), west of the CSX
rail corridor and partially within the limits of the Town of Stephens City. In this memorandum, I
refer to the subject facility as the"Bartonsville Solar Facility". At present,the Planning
Commission public hearing on this application is scheduled for September 2.1
The parcels that would be subject to the Bartonsville Solar Facility include 64 lots that
currently comprise two platted but unbuilt residential subdivisions, Springdale Glen and
Carrollton Estates. Because of this,the geographic scope of the Bartonsville Solar Facility
presents a unique situation. Specifically, as is typical of subdivisions, the act of creating the
subdivisions resulted in dedication of the internal subdivision street rights-of-way to the County.
Dedication of the internal subdivision street rights-of-way means that, at this time,the County
' To avoid any confusion here,I note that the Bartonsville Solar Facility is entirely unrelated to the
Foxglove Solar LLC utility-scale solar power generating facility CUP,generally located along Marlboro Road,Hites
Road,Klines Mill Road,Clark Road,and Vaucluse Road,which the Board approved on July 8.
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601
actually owns the rights-of-way. By way of further explanation, however, I note that these
subdivision streets are likewise unbuilt and that neither the County nor VDOT have expended
any public funds relative to the subject subdivision streets.
The concept plan for the Bartonsville Solar Facility expressly contemplates that the
facility will use all areas of the two subdivisions, including the rights-of-way. The applicants
represent that they will vacate the subdivisions following any approval of the CUP and prior to
site plan approval. In fact, the proposed conditions of the CUP include vacation of the
subdivisions as a requirement. State law and County Code provide that all of the owners of a
subdivision may,with the Board's consent, vacate a subdivision before the sale of any lot therein
and that, upon vacation.,the rights-of-way revert to the owners of the land within the subdivision.
Va. Code §§ 15.2-2271, 15.2-2272, and 15.2-2274; County Code § 144-14.
I have identified as a concern, however, the fact that, absent additional action, any
approval of the CUP by the Board would therefore presently only include the subdivision lots
and not the rights-of-way. Approval of the CUP without it extending to the rights-of-way would
be of only limited utility to the applicants. Therefore, as the best way to address this situation, I
have prepared the attached proposed resolution for the Board's consideration.
The attached proposed resolution, if the Board adopts it, would permit the CUP
application to proceed with respect to the subdivision lots and the encompassed rights-of-way,
but only expressly conditioned upon the vacation of the subdivisions following approval of the
CUP. By the terms of the proposed resolution, if the vacation of the subdivisions does not occur,
then the CUP would not take effect.
The attached proposed resolution, if the Board adopts it, is a common sense solution to an
awkward circumstance in which particular property owners, with the Board's consent,have a
right to vacate the subdivisions and, as a result, have the rights-of-way in those subdivisions
revert back to them. Because the applicants do not currently own the rights-of-way and do not
desire to vacate the subdivisions before the approval of the CUP,they need the Board's
permission to include the rights-of-way in the application. For understandable reasons, it does
not appear that the County should force them to lose the benefit of any subdivision by vacating
them, merely in order to be able to apply for a CUP as to which the applicants obviously have no
guarantee of approval.
Attachment