Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
July 8 2020 Board_Agenda_Packet
7 f AGENDA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2020 5:00 PM and 7:00 PM BOARD MEETING ROOM 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 5:00 PM - Closed Session The Board will enter a closed session pursuant to Virginia Code Sec. 2.2-3711(A)(3) for discussion of the disposition of publicly held real property, 441 Linden Drive, in the City of Winchester, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the public body and pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711(A)(1), for personnel matters, specifically the continuation of the annual evaluations of the County Administrator and the County Attorney. 1. Call to Order 2. Invocation 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Adoption of Agenda 5. Citizen Comments — For agenda items that are not the subject of a Public Hearing 6. Consent Agenda Roll Call Vote Required 6.A. Minutes of Closed Session and Regular Meeting of June 10, 2020 BOS07-08-20Minutes10June2020.pdf 6.13. Transportation Committee Report of June 29, 2020 B0S07-08-20TCReport29June2020.pdf 6.C. Request from the Commissioner of the Revenue for Refunds and Supplemental Appropriations 1. Toyota Lease Trust— $6,627.22 2. Undisclosed Taxpayer— Disabled Veteran's Relief—$5,263.87 BOS07-08-20Refund Requests.pdf 1 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 2 July 8, 2020 Consent Agenda, continued 6.D. Approval to Amend Rules of Procedure in reference to the Agenda Deadline for Regular Meetings of the Board of Supervisors BOS07-08-20MemoRulesUpdate.pdf 6.E. Letter of Support for Economic Development District Designation by the U.S. Economic Development Administration (U.S. Department of Commerce) BOS07-08-20NSVRC_EDD_Designation.pdf 6.F. Resolution of Support for Frederick County and Regional SmartScale Applications BOS07-08-20SmartscaleApplicationsSupportResolution.pdf 7. Board of Supervisors Comments 8. County Officials 8.A. Tourism Update - Justin R. Kerns, Executive Director, Winchester- Frederick County Convention & Visitors Bureau 8.B. Committee Appointments Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) 2-year term of Private Provider Representative expired 6/30/20 See Attached CPMT Recommendation of David S. Alley Board of Building Code Appeals 5-year term of Whit L. Wagner expires 08/12/20 Mr. Wagner is eligible and willing for reappointment BoardCom m itteeAppts(070820Bd Mtg).pdf 2 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 3 July 8, 2020 County Officials, continued 8.C. Discussion: Proposed Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission BOS07-08-20MemoJointMeetingWithPlan ningCommission.pdf 8.D. Discussion: Proposed Joint Meeting with the School Board BOS07-08-20MemoJointMeetingWithSchoolBoard.pdf 9. Committee Business - None 10. Public Hearings (Non Planning Issues) - None 11 . Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings 11.A. Rezoning #01-20 for RCS Investments, LLC. Submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc. to Rezone 12.61+1- Acres from the M1 (Light Industrial) District to the M2 (Industrial General) District with Proffers. The Property is Located at 220 Imboden Drive (Route 1327) at the Terminus of Cul-De-Sac and is Identified by Property Identification Number 54-7-7A in the Stonewall Magisterial District. BOS07-08-20REZO1-20RCSInvestments.pdf 11.B. Conditional Use Permit #02-20 for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) Submitted to Construct a Commercial Telecommunication Facility Consisting of a 199-Foot Monopole Telecommunication Facility. The Property is Located at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia and is Identified with Property Identification Number 26-A-29 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. BOS07-08-20CUP02-20NewCingularWirelessATT.pdf BOS07-08-20CUP02-20NEPASurvey.pdf 3 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Page 4 July 8, 2020 Planning Commission Business - Public Hearings, continued 11.C. Conditional Use Permit #03-20 for Foxglove Solar LLC Submitted to Construct a 668.5-Acre (370-Acres Disturbed Area) Utility Scale Solar Power Generating Facility. The Properties are Generally Located Along Marlboro Road, Hites Road, Klines Mill Road, Clark Road and Vaucluse Road and are Identified with Property Identification Numbers 73-A-21, 84-A-29, 84-A-39, 84- A-40, 84-A-40A and 84-A-50 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. BOS07-08-20StaffReportCU P03-20FoxgloveSolar.pdf 03-20 Location Maps.pdf 03-20 Application red.pdf 03-20 Agency Comments red.pdf 03-20 Decommissioning Plan rev 062420.pdf 03-20 Exhibit A - Protected Species Review.pdf 03-20 Exhibit B - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.pdf 03-20 Exhibit C - DCR Ltr dated September 22, 2018.pdf 03-20 Exhibit D - Phase I Historical Resources.pdf 03-20 Impact Analysis Statement.pdf 03-20 Power of Attorney red.pdf 03-20 Tax Verification.pdf 03-20 Viewshed Analysis.pdf 03-20 Visual Simulation.pdf 03-20 CUP Site Plan rev 061920.pdf 12. Planning Commission Business - Other Planning Business - None 13. Board Liaison Reports 14. Citizen Comments 15. Board of Supervisors Comments 16. Adjourn 4 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Minutes of Closed Session and Regular Meeting of June 10, 2020 Attachments: BOS07-08-20Minutes 10June2020.pdf 5 MINUTES CLOSED SESION AND REGULAR MEETING FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2020 5:00 and 7:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ATTENDEES Board of Supervisors: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman; Robert W. Wells, Vice Chairman; Blaine P. Dunn; Shawn L. Graber; J. Douglas McCarthy; Gene E. Fisher; and Judith McCann-Slaughter; were present. Staff present: Kris C. Tierney, County Administrator; Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney; Karen Vacchio, Public Information Officer; Scott Varner, Director of Information Technology; Andrew Farrar, IT Program Coordinator; Mike Ruddy, Director of Planning; Tyler Klein, Senior Planner; Joe Wilder, Director of Public Works; Steve Majchzrak, Assistant Fire Chief; and Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION Vice Chairman Wells moved that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County enter a closed session pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711(A)(19) and 2.2-3711(A)(8), for discussion of plans to protect public safety as it relates to specific cybersecurity threats or vulnerabilities and briefings by staff members and legal counsel concerning actions taken to respond to such matters or a related threat to public safety, discussion of information subject to the exclusion in subdivision 2 of Section 2.2-3705.2, where discussion in an open meeting would jeopardize the safety of any person or County information technology systems, and for consultation with legal counsel regarding a legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel, all specifically regarding recent activity involving County information technology systems; pursuant Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 1 6 to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711(A)(8),for consultation with legal counsel regarding a legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel, specifically regarding a dispute with a vendor regarding the procurement of a specialized motor vehicle designed for use for public safety purposes; and pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711(A)(1),for personnel matters, specifically the annual evaluations of the County Administrator and the County Attorney. Supervisor Slaughter seconded the motion which carried on a voice vote. At 6:41 p.m., the Board members being assembled within the designated meeting place in the presence of members of the public and the media desiring to attend, the meeting was reconvened on motion of Vice Chairman Wells, seconded by Supervisor Dunn and carrying on a voice vote. Vice Chairman Wells moved that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County certify that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting to which this certification applies, and (ii) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered by the Board. Supervisor Dunn seconded the motion which carried as follows on a recorded vote: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye RECESS At 6:43 p.m., Chairman DeHaven recessed adjourned the meeting until the 7:00 p.m. regular meeting time. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Supervisor McCarthy delivered the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chairman Wells led the Pledge of Allegiance. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 2 7 ADOPTION OF AGENDA—APPROVED Upon motion of Supervisor Slaughter, seconded by Supervisor McCarthy, the agenda was adopted as presented on a voice vote. CITIZENS COMMENTS - None ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA—APPROVED Supervisor Graber requested the removal from the Consent Agenda of the item titled Extension of Local Emergency for Covid-19 Pandemic. Upon motion of Supervisor Slaughter, seconded by Supervisor Graber, the consent agenda was adopted as revised on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye - Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 27, 2020 -CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL - Public Works Committee Report of May 26, 2020 - CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL,Appendix 1 - Parks and Recreation Commission Report of May 26, 2020- CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL, Appendix 2 -Request by 26th Court Services Unit of the Department of Juvenile Justice for Transfer of Funds -CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL -Road Resolution For Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways -Snowden Bridge Section 4-CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL WHEREAS,the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3,fully incorporated herein by reference,are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County;and WHEREAS,the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation;and WHEREAS,the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on June 9, 1993,for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition;and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described in the attached Form AM-4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.2-705,Code of Virginia,and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way,as described, and any necessary easements for cuts,fills and drainage;and Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10,2020 3 8 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. -Road Resolution For Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways-Snowden Bridge Section 7-CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL WHEREAS,the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3,fully incorporated herein by reference,are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County;and WHEREAS,the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation;and WHEREAS,the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on June 9, 1993,for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition;and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described in the attached Form AM-4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.2-705,Code of Virginia,and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way,as described, and any necessary easements for cuts,fills and drainage;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. -Road Resolution For Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways— Belleview Farm -CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL WHEREAS,the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3,fully incorporated herein by reference,are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County;and WHEREAS,the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation;and WHEREAS,the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on June 9, 1993,for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition;and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described in the attached Form AM-4.3 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.2-705,Code of Virginia,and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way,as described, and any necessary easements for cuts,fills and drainage;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + EXTENSION OF DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY FOR COVID -19 PANDEMIC— DENIED At the request of Supervisor Graber, the Extension of Declaration of Local Emergency for Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10,2020 4 9 Covid-19 Pandemic was removed from the Consent Agenda. Supervisor Graber moved that the Board not extend the declaration of emergency for the Covid-19 pandemic saying it was overreach to extend the local emergency through the end of the year as proposed and that it was time for things to return to normal. Supervisor Dunn seconded the motion adding that the declaration was causing more problems than it was worth. Supervisor Fisher inquired if not having a local emergency in effect would limit the County's ability to receive funding assistance. County Administrator Tierney noted the local declaration does not impose any limitation on business and only keeps the County eligible to receive state reimbursement. He noted the federal Coronavirus Relief Act Funds are available for expenses through the end of the year which is why staff proposed the same time period for extending the declaration of local emergency. Supervisor Graber said the declaration gives the County Administrator the ability to make decisions bypassing the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor McCarthy and Mr. Tierney discussed the Coronavirus relief funds already received and the possibility of traditional emergency funding as another option. Supervisor McCarthy said he supported the motion and that if the need arose, a new local emergency could be declared. The motion carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher No Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. No Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye + + + + + + + + + + + + + + BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS — Supervisor McCarthy paraphrased a writing of C.S. Lewis in reference to the pandemic. Supervisor Slaughter noted an upcoming road improvement project at Old Charles Town Road and Martinsburg Pike. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 5 10 COUNTY OFFICIALS: DAWN C. ROBBINS REAPPOINTED AS PARENT REPRESENTATIVE ON THE COMMUNITY POLICY AND MANAGEMENT TEAM—APPROVED Supervisor Slaughter moved to reappoint Dawn C. Robbins as the Parent Representative on the Community Policy and Management Team for a two-year term. The motion, seconded by Supervisor McCarthy, carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye DEVELOPMENT IMPACT MODEL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS—APPROVED Supervisor Fisher moved to appoint the following to one-year terms on the Development Impact Model Oversight Committee: Kris C. Tierney-County Administration Representative Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. -Board of Supervisors Representative Judith McCann-Slaughter-Board of Supervisors and EDA Representative Christopher Mohn -Planning Commission Representative John Jewell -Planning Commission Representative Stephen Pettler-Top of Virginia Building Assoc. Rep. Rob Frogale -Top of Virginia Building Assoc. Rep. Frank E. Wright(appointed as the School Board's Representative in Jan. 2020) The motion, seconded by Supervisor Graber, carried on a voice vote. GARY OATES APPOINTED AND JAMES R. WILKINS, III, RE-APPOINTED TO THE FREDERICK-WINCHESTER SERVICE AUTHORITY—APPROVED Supervisor McCarthy moved to appoint Gary Oates and to reappoint James R. Wilkins, III, Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 6 11 each to a three-year term beginning 8/31/20. The motion, seconded by Supervisor Dunn, carried on a voice vote. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FY 20-21 BUDGET- DENIED Supervisor Dunn cited concerns about expected County revenues in light of the pandemic and moved to withhold $4.8 million from the adopted FY 20-21 budget until the Board has determined expected revenues are available. He said the reduction would give the County and the Schools each the same funding as the current year and could be increased once revenues are assured. Supervisor McCarthy seconded the motion saying it makes sense to hold off spending for now. Vice Chairman Wells said the reduction does not have to be done now and can be done later if necessary. Supervisor Gaber said it is wise to give staff direction on the budget because certain things are on hold until revenues are known. Supervisor Dunn said the action needs to happen now because in July the Schools are allotted their budgeted funds and if there is a revenue shortfall, only the County will bear the loss. The motion failed on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher No Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells No J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. No Judith McCann-Slaughter No PROPOSED JOINT MEETING WITH FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD-APPROVED Supervisor Dunn discussed a possible joint meeting with the School Board in July, August or early September to discuss areas of mutual interest including budgets, means to raise revenue to address a growing population in Frederick County, and/or other issues of concern to members of either the Board of Supervisors or the School Board. He moved to invite the School Board to attend a joint meeting. The motion seconded by Supervisor Graber, carried on a voice vote. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 7 12 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + COMMITTEE BUSINESS SHAWNEELAND SANITARY DISTRICT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-APPROVED Supervisor Graber moved for adoption of the proposed budget identified as scenario 2A and appropriation of the funds. Supervisor McCarthy seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Shawnee and Sanitary District Fund 1,146,023 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PUBLIC HEARINGS (NON PLANNING ISSUES) ORDINANCE REGARDING CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS OF FREDERICK COUNTY GOVERNMENT —APPROVED County Attorney Williams discussed the proposed extension of the emergency ordinance enacted on April 8, 2020 which provided for the temporary reduction in the number of meetings held and for remote participation by members of Boards, Committees, and Commissions. Chairman DeHaven opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairman DeHaven closed the public hearing. Supervisor Dunn moved for approval of the Ordinance Regarding Continuity of Operations of Frederick County Government. Supervisor Slaughter seconded the motion. The Board and staff discussed the ordinance and its relationship to the declaration of local Frederick County BoUrd of Supervisors Regithir Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 8 13 emergency. The motion carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber No Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye + + + + + + + + + + + + + + PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS—PUBLIC HEARINGS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 165 ZONING, ARTICLE II SUPPLEMENTARY USE REGULATIONS; PARKING; BUFFERS; AND REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES; PART 204 ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES, 4165-204.19. TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES, COMMERCIAL.—APPROVED Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reviewed the proposed amendment to Chapter 165 — Zoning Ordinance and to the Development Review Fee Schedule to reduce the fee for a Conditional Use Permit for commercial telecommunication facilities. He said the Planning Commission generally supported fees covering actual review, processing and advertising costs incurred by the County for conditional use permit applications. Chairman DeHaven opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairman DeHaven closed the public hearing. The Board and Mr. Klein discussed application costs and their relationship to tower heights and also discussed decommissioning or removal once a tower is no longer in use. Supervisor McCarthy moved to adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 165, Zoning,Article II, Supplementary Use Regulations; Parking; Buffers; And Regulations For Specific Uses, Part 204 — Additional Regulations For Specific Uses, §165-204.19. Telecommunication Facilities, Commercial, to set the application fee for a standard process project at $750. Supervisor Graber seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W. Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 9 14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 165 ZONING ARTICLE II SUPPLEMENTARY USE REGULATIONS;PARKING;BUFFERS;AND REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES PART 204—ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES §165-204.19.TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES,COMMERCIAL WHEREAS, an ordinance to amend Chapter 165, Zoning and to revise the Development Review Fee Schedule to reduce the fee for a Conditional Use Permit for commercial telecommunication facilities. WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Committee (DRRC) reviewed the proposed changes at their February 27,2020 regular meeting and generally agreed with the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission discussed the proposed changes at their regularly scheduled meeting on May 6,2020 and generally agreed with the proposed changes; and WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors discussed the proposed changes at their regularly scheduled meeting on May 27,2020 and agreed with the proposed changes; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance amendment on June 3,2020 and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance amendment on June 10, 2020; and WHEREAS,the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of this ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety,welfare,and in good zoning practice; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 Zoning and the Development Review Fees Schedule, is amended for applications for a conditional use permit(CUP)for commercial telecommunication facilities is$750. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 165 ZONING, ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISION; AMENDMENTS; AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS; PART 101 GENERAL PROVISIONS, §165-101.08 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES; ENFORCEMENT. —APPROVED Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reviewed the proposed ordinance revisions to maximize the penalties for zoning violations noting the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment. Vice Chairman Wells spoke in support of raising the fees. The Board and staff discussed the existing violations and the effect of a fee increase. Chairman DeHaven opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairman DeHaven closed the public hearing. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 10 15 Supervisor McCarthy moved to adopt the ordinance amending Chapter 165,Zoning,Article I, General Provisions; Amendments; And Conditional Use Permits, §165-101.08 Violations And Penalties; Enforcement. Vice Chairman Wells seconded the motion which carried on a recorded vote as follows: Blaine P. Dunn Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Shawn L. Graber Aye Robert W.Wells Aye J. Douglas McCarthy Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Judith McCann-Slaughter Aye AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 165 ZONING ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS;AMENDMENT;AND CONDITIONAL USE PERRM[ITS §165-101.08 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES;ENFORCEMENT WHEREAS,an ordinance to amend Chapter 165,Zoning and to revise the current ordinance,to maximize the penalties for zoning violations. WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Committee (DRRC) reviewed the proposed changes at their February 27,2020 regular meeting and generally agreed with the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission discussed the proposed changes at their regularly scheduled meeting on May 6,2020 and generally agreed with the proposed changes; and WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors discussed the proposed changes at their regularly scheduled meeting on May 27,2020 and agreed with the proposed changes; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance amendment on June 3,2020 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance amendment on June 10, 2020; and WHEREAS,the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of this ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety,welfare, and in good zoning practice; and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 Zoning is amended maximizing fines in such a way to create a disincentive for violations, enabling fines up to the $1,000, $1,500, and then repeated$2,000 fines for the subsequent 10-day periods as enabled to localities by the Code of Virginia§15.2-2286. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + BOARD LIAISON REPORTS - None CITIZEN COMMENTS Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 11 16 Eli `Nick' Lauderdale, Gainesboro District, spoke in reference to his road being scheduled for paving this fiscal year. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS Supervisor Dunn noted the protests occurring across the country saying that locally the protest was civil. Supervisor Dunn referenced the Governor of Virginia saying the pandemic lockdown needs to stop and asked the Governor to reconsider his position. Supervisor McCarthy recognized Father's Day. ADJOURN On motion of Vice Chairman Wells, seconded by Supervisor McCarthy, the meeting was adjourned at 8:03 p.m. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Minutes *June 10, 2020 12 17 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Transportation Committee Report of June 29, 2020 Attachments: BOS07-08-20TCReport29June2020.pdf 18 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT to the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Monday,June 29, 2020 8:30 a.m. 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA ATTENDEES: Committee Members Present: Judith McCann-Slaughter, Chairman (Voting), Charles DeHaven, Jr. (Voting) Gary Oates (Voting), James Racey (Voting) and Cordell Watts (Voting). Committee Members Absent Mark Davis(Liaison Middletown) and Lewis Boyer(Liaison Stephens City). Staff Present: Assistant Director-Transportation John Bishop, and Kathy Smith, Secretary. ITEMS REQUIRING ACTION BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: 2-SmartScale Resolution and Discussion: A draft Resolution was prepared by Staff for adoption by the Board of Supervisors in support of County and MPO SmartScale applications. The Committee reviewed and supported the Resolution that is a required element of each Smartscale application. Upon a motion by, Charles DeHaven, Jr. and seconded by, Gary Oates the Committee recommended to forward the Resolution of support for Frederick County and Regional SmartScale Application to the Board of Supervisors for recommendation of approval. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION ONLY: 1-Route 11 North Exit 317 Area Study: VDOT Staff gave a brief overview to the Committee on the Route 11 North area study as it nears completion. The MetroQuest survey had a very remarkable outcome with 1,700 visitors and 1,000 participates,which was a great outcome. The survey was able to give VDOT the assessment of what the citizens experience daily in commuting in that area at different times and improvements in the area for safety. The next step is that on August 3, 2020 an Operations and Safety report will be prepared. Staff gave a visual view of the Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) example that is in the Haymarket area that is projected for this area. A key feature of the DDI is the eliminating the need to stop which keeps the traffic flowing. The graphics will available to show how the DDI will work indifferent scenarios of the area. The Committee will be updated as more information comes available. 19 3-Interstate, Primary and Secondary Road Plans Discussion: Staff gave an overview of the Interstate, Primary and Secondary Road Improvement Plans. Usually, this time of year is when the updated drafts are being adopted, however, due to the need for VDOT to update revenue projections,the updates are currently on hold. However, Staff discussed the update in preparation for when the updated revenue projections are available. After much discussion, the Committee will be presented with updated Interstate and Primary Road Improvement Plans at the next meeting. The Secondary Road Improvement Plan will be updated as soon as VDOT releases updated revenue projections. VDOT confirmed that projects scheduled for fiscal year 21 are still expected to go ahead as scheduled. VDOT also noted that Sulphur Springs Road improvements will be undergoing final inspection shortly. 4-County Projects Updates: Crossover Boulevard aka Tevis Street Extension/Airport Road/1- 81 Bridge: The Bridge deck final pour has been completed and the work on the intersection of Route 522 and Airport Road is commencing. The contract completion date remains September 2021. Renaissance Drive:The Roadway design has been completed through 90% and Staff has received CSX comments to proceed to 100%design. The County consultants are also proceeding with preparation of right-of-way documents. 5-Other: 20 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Request from the Commissioner of the Revenue for Refunds and Supplemental Appropriations Attachments: BOS07-08-20RefundRequests.pdf 21 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Roderick B.Williams County Attorney _ 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail rwillia@fcva.us MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Board of Supervisors CC: Kris Tierney, County Administrator FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney DATE: June 30, 2020 RE: Commissioner of Revenue Refund Requests Attached, for the Board's review, are requests to authorize the Treasurer to credit the following entities: 1. Toyota Lease Trust—$6,627.22 2. Undisclosed Taxpayer—Disabled Veteran's Relief—$5,263.87 Attachments 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 22 COUNTY OF FREDERICK P r Roderick B.Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 ,`ecl+w Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail rwillia@fcva.us MEMORANDUM TO: Seth T. Thatcher, Commissioner of the Revenue Frederick County Board of Supervisors CC: Kris Tierney, County Administrator FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney DATE: June 26, 2020 RE: Refund—Toyota Lease Trust I am in receipt of the Commissioner's request, dated June 16, 2020, to authorize the Treasurer to refund Toyota Lease Trust the amount of$6,627.22, for personal property taxes in 2019 and the first half of 2020 and vehicle license fees for 2020. This refund resulted from normal proration of vehicle taxes where vehicles financed by this company were either sold or moved from this locality. The Commissioner verified that documentation and details for this refund meet all requirements. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 58.1-3981(A) of the Code of Virginia(1950, as amended), I hereby note my consent to the proposed action. The Board of Supervisors will also need to act on the request for approval of a supplemental appropriation, as indicated in the Commissioner's memorandum. Attachment 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 23 ,f reberick wuntp, 'Virginia OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE °. 107 North Kent Street P.O.Box 552 FF*Pxtr Winchester VA 22601 Winchester VA 22604-0552 seth.thatcher(cDfcva.us www.fcva.us/cor SETH T.THATCHER Phone: 540-665-5681 COMMISSIONER Fax: 540-667-6487 June 16, 2020 TO: Rod Williams, County Attorney Cheryl Shiffler, Finance Director Frederick County Board of Supervisors Kris Tierney, County Administrator FROM: Seth T. Thatcher, Commissioner of the Revenue RE: Exoneration - Toyota Lease Trust Please approve a refund of$6,627.22 for exoneration of vehicle personal property taxes for 2019 and 2020 and vehicle license fees for 2020 in the name of Toyota Lease Trust. Vehicles of the various individuals leased through Toyota were either sold or moved out during this period and are the result of normal proration. To comply with the requirements for the Treasurer to issue this refund, Board action is required. The Commissioner's staff has verified all required data, and the paperwork is in the care of the Commissioner of the Revenue. Please also approve a supplemental appropriation for the Finance Director on this request. Exoneration is $6,627.22. 24 Customer Name: TOYOTA LEASE TRUST Customer Transactions: 19 Lf) ----------------------------------------------------------- Options: 2=Edit 4=Delete 5-View Ont Dept Trans Ticket No. Tax Amount Penalty/Tnt Amount Paid PP2019 1 01317080123 $429.30- $.00 $429.30- PP2019 2 01317080124 $515.16- $.00 $515.16- PP2019 3 01317080213. $286.03- $.00 $286.03- J I PP2019 4 01317080214 $343.24- $.00 $343.24- PP2020 5 00637920005 $280.97- $.00 $280.97- PP2020 6 00637920006 $337.16- $.00 $337.16- PP2020 7 00637920019, $271.00- $.00 $271.00- PF2020 8 00637920020 $270.99- $.00 $270.99- PP2020 9 00637920037 $495.12- $.00 $495.12- PP2020 10 00637920038 $495.11- $.00 $495.11- PP2020 11 00637920059 $90.01- $.DO $90.01- PP2020 12 00637920060 $180.01- $.00 $180.01- Multiple Pages Total Paid : $6,627.22 F3=Exit F14=Show Map# F15=Show Balance F18-Sort-Entered F21=CmdLine F20=Attach Cashier: Total Transactions: 949 Customer Name: TOYOTA LEASE TRUST Customer Transactions: 19 Options: 2=Edit 4-Delete 5=View ¢� Dent Trans Ticket No. Tax Amount Penalty/Int Amount Paid PP2020 13 00637920109 $307.15- $.00 $307.15- PP2020 14 00637920110 $307.15- $.00 $307.15- PP2020 15 00637920277 $881.66- $.00 $881.66- PP2020 16 00637920278 $1,062.16- $.00 $1,062.16- VL2020 17 04763490001 $25.00- $.00 $25.00- jj VL2020 18 04763930001 $25.00- $.00 $25.00- VL2020 19 04764770001 $25.00- $.00 $25.00- Multiple Pages Total Paid $6,627r.22 F3=Exit F14=Show Map# F15=Show Balance = ot-E ntered F21=CmdLine F20=Attach COUNTY OF FREDERICK P r Roderick B.Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 ,`ecl+w Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail rwillia@fcva.us MEMORANDUM TO: Seth T. Thatcher, Commissioner of the Revenue Frederick County Board of Supervisors CC: Kris Tierney, County Administrator FROM: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney DATE: June 26, 2020 RE: Refund—Undisclosed Taxpayer—Disabled Veteran's Relief I am in receipt of the Commissioner's request, dated June 16, 2020, to authorize the Treasurer to refund a taxpayer the amount of$5,263.87 from 2016 through 2020 for real estate taxes,based on proper filing of proof of 100%permanent and total disability directly due to military service, as required under the Virginia Code change as a result of the Constitutional amendment that took effect for 2011. This refund applies to the Veteran's principal residence. Taxpayer's name cannot be made public because of applicable legal requirements as to privacy, but is known to the Commissioner and the Treasurer on a confidential basis. The Commissioner verified that documentation and details for this refund meet all requirements. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 58.1-3981(A) of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), I hereby note my consent to the proposed action. The Board of Supervisors will also need to act on the request for approval of a supplemental appropriation, as indicated in the Commissioner's memorandum. Attachment 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 26 ,f reberick wuntp, 'Virginia OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE °. 107 North Kent Street P.O.Box 552 FF*Pxtr Winchester VA 22601 Winchester VA 22604-0552 seth.thatcher(@fcva.us www.fcva.us/cor SETH T.THATCHER Phone: 540-665-5681 COMMISSIONER Fax: 540-667-6487 June 16, 2020 TO: Rod Williams, County Attorney Cheryl Shiffler, Finance Director Frederick County Board of Supervisors Kris Tierney, County Administrator FROM: Seth T. Thatcher, Commissioner of the Revenue RE: Exoneration (Name withheld -Veteran's Exemption - CONFIDENTIAL) Please approve a refund of$5,263.87 for exoneration of real estate taxes from 2016 through 2020 for a 100% permanently and totally service-connected disabled veteran. This refund applies to the Veteran's principle residence and is supported by the Veterans Administration official documentation that has been provided to us. To comply with the requirements for the Treasurer to issue this refund, Board action is required. The Commissioner's staff has verified all required data, and the paperwork is in the care of the Commissioner of the Revenue. Please also approve a supplemental appropriation for the Finance Director on this request. Exoneration is $5,263.87. 27 Cashier: Total Transactions: 98 co Customer Name: N Customer Transactions: 8 Options: 2=Edit 4=Delete 5=View - �G .0 Trans Ticket No. Tax Amnuni• Penalty/Tnt Amount vain RE2016 1 00362090002 $575.10- $.00 $575.10- _ RE2017 2 00158380001 $631.20- $.00 $631.20- /96 ,/� RE2017 3 00150380002 $631.20- $.00 $631.20- / T RE2018 4 00158840001 $641.72- $.00 $641.72- _ RE2018 5 00158840002 $641.72- $.00 $641.72- av, RE2019 6 00159810001 $714.31- $.00 $714.31- �[ _ RE2019 7 00159810002 $714.31- $.00 $714.317 RE2020 8 00161040001 $714.31- $.00 $714.31- Total Paid $5,263.87 F3=Exit F19=Show Map# F15-Show Balance F18=Sort-Entered F21=CmdLine F20=Attach Need Bood n I'oUQ 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Approval to Amend Rules of Procedure in reference to the Agenda Deadline for Regular Meetings of the Board of Supervisors Attachments: B0S07-08-20MemoRu 1 esU pdate.pdf 29 7 COUNTY of FREDERICK ® Office of the County Administrator ygGl\'f Tel: 540.665.6382 Fax: 540.667.0370 MEMORANDUM To: The Board of Supervisors From: Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk Date: July 2, 2020 Re: Agenda Material Deadline ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Following the Board's recent re-adoption of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct, Chairman DeHaven noted that the due date for agenda items is stated as noon on Thursday in the week immediately prior to Board meeting. He has asked that the deadline be changed to one day earlier, noon on Wednesday, to allow sufficient time for his review of the agenda with senior administrative staff prior to its publication. The proposed change is indicated below: RULES OF PROCEDURE AND CONDUCT FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ARTICLE IV—AGENDA Section 4-1. Preparation The Clerk shall prepare an agenda for each meeting of the Board of Supervisors, conforming to the order of business specified in Section 5-1 under Order of Business. Supporting information for every item to be placed on the regular meeting agenda shall be received in the Office of the County Administrator before noon on the ThuFsda Wednesday that falls in the week immediately prior to the regularly scheduled Board meeting. Agendas for special meetings shall be prepared as far in advance as the circumstances necessitating the special meeting allow. The clerk shall include on the agenda all matters for which a written request and supporting information have been received in advance of the deadline herein established. 107 North Kent Street•Winchester, Virginia 22601 30 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Letter of Support for Economic Development District Designation by the U.S. Economic Development Administration (U.S. Department of Commerce) Attachments: BOS07-08-20NSVRC_EDD_Desig nation.pdf 31 COUNTY of FREDERICK wrt Jay E. Tibbs Deputy County Administrator 540/665-6382 Fax: 540/667-0370 E-mail:jtibbs@fcva.us TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Jay E. Tibbs,Deputy County Administrator DATE: July 2,20202 RE: Letter of Support for NSRVC Economic Development District Designation From 2018-2019 Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission (NSVRC) staff worked with a consultant and a strategy team of nearly 50 public,private, and non-profit stakeholders to develop the region's first Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS), and in 2020 that economic development planning document was approved by the U.S. Economic Development Administration. Many of the objectives defined within the five-year plan are currently underway. As a result of having an approved Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy, the NSVRC can now pursue and Economic Development District (EDD) designation. Of the 21 planning districts in Virginia, 11 of them are EDDs. The intentions of this effort are two-fold: ensure that the Northern Shenandoah Valley can maximize federal investment in economic development projects and that the Regional Commission can provide sustained regional economic development support. Regional Commission staff is seeking a letter of support from the Board for their application to pursue an Economic Development District designation. Regional Commission staff will be present at the July 8,2020 meeting should the Board have any questions regarding this request. Attachment 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 32 COUNTY of FREDERICK 04 Kris C. Tierney County Administrator 540/665-6382 Fax: 540/667-0370 E-mail: ktierney@fcva.us July 9, 2020 Mr. Brandon Davis, Executive Director Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission 400 Kendrick Lane, Suite E Front Royal, VA 22630 Dear Mr. Davis: Please accept this letter as evidence of support on behalf of Frederick County for the Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission's designation as an Economic Development District (EDD) by the U.S. Economic Development Administration. The Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission is a critical partner in the region by spearheading many regional planning initiatives, promoting regional economic development, and providing technical assistance to localities. The Regional Commission, working with the regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy Committee, developed the first region-wide CEDS in 2018-2019, ensured its approval by the EDA in 2020, and will continue to maintain the document going forward. Designation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission as an EDD will help strengthen the capacity of the region as communities pursue projects to promote our regional economy. Additionally, the designation of the Regional Commission as an EDD will enhance the region's efforts for ongoing, long-range economic development planning. It is for this reason that Frederick County supports the Commission's request for designation as an Economic Development District by the U.S. Economic Development Administration. Sincerely, Kris C. Tierney County Administrator 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 33 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Resolution of Support for Frederick County and Regional SmartScale Applications Attachments: BOS07-08-20SmartscaleApplicationsSupportResolution.pdf 34 4�GK CO RESOLUTION # RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FREDERICK COUNTY w BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR FREDERICK COUNTY AND REGIONAL SMARTSCALE 1738 APPLICATIONS Action: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: July 8, 2020 WHEREAS, this resolution supports the following Frederick County and Regional SmartScale Applications within Frederick County for the following projects: Frederick County Applications 1. Exit 317 NB Ramp Realignment to Redbud Rd Location 2. Route 11 —Shawnee Improvement 3. Route 11 Corridor and Old Charlestown Road Roundabout 4. Route 7 STARS Improvements Win-Fred MPO Applications 5. Exit 317 Interchange Improvement Project 6. Valley Pike/ Shawnee Drive Intersection Improvements 7. Route 11/Old Charlestown Roundabout 8. Route 7 STARS Access Management Projects WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (hereafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT) has adopted procedures for evaluating and scoring projects consistent with SmartScale requirements; and, WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has requested applications to be submitted by localities to be consider for inclusion in the DEPARTMENT'S Six-Year Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2022 through 2027; and WHEREAS, projects will be evaluated for inclusion in the Six-Year Improvement Program through screening and scoring process to be undertaken by the DEPARTMENT; and WHEREAS, each of the listed projects play important roles in the County's Long Range Transportation Plan and near term traffic safety concerns; and WHEREAS, the County of Frederick is an eligible entity to apply for transportation funding under House Bill 2; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors is supportive of each of these applications for inclusion into the Six-Year Improvement Program fiscal years 2022 through 2027. 35 ADOPTED, this 8th day of July 2020. This resolution was approved by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Shawn Graber Gene E.Fisher Judith McCann-Slaughter Blaine P. Dunn A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney, Frederick County Administrator PDRes 921-20 36 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Tourism Update - Justin R. Kerns, Executive Director, Winchester-Frederick County Convention & Visitors Bureau Attachments: 37 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Committee Appointments Attachments: BoardCommitteeAppts(070820BdMtg).pdf 38 .r COUNTY of FREDERICK Office of the County Administrator tigGl\'f 173_ Tel: 540.665.6382 Fax: 540.667.0370 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk DATE: July 1 , 2020 RE: Committee Appointments Listed below are the vacancies/appointments due through August 2020. As a reminder, in order that everyone have ample time to review applications, and so they can be included in the agenda, please remember to submit applications prior to Friday agenda preparation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. MARCH 2020 Conservation Easement Authority (CEA) Ron Clevenger— Frederick County Representative 1028 Welltown Road Winchester, VA 22603 Home: (540)323-0630 Term Expires: 03/23/20 Three-year term (Mr. Clevenger does not wish to serve another term.) (The Conservation Easement Authority was established in August 2005. The Authority consists of seven citizen members, one member from the Board of Supervisors and one member from the Planning Commission. Members should be knowledgeable in one or more of the following fields: conservation, biology, real estate and/or rural land appraisal, accounting, farming, or forestry. Members serve a three-year term and are eligible for reappointment.) JUNE 2020 Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) Dana Bowman, M.A. — Private Provider Representative 39 Memorandum — Board of Supervisors July 1, 2020 Page 2 Chief Operating Officer Children's Services of Virginia, Inc. P. O. Box 2867 Winchester, VA 22604 Term Expires: 06/30/20 Two-year term (See Attached CPMT Chairman Recommendation of David S. Alley. Dana Bowman is stepping down when her term expires.) Social Services Board Ryan C. Shaw — Red Bud District Representative 110 Foxglove Drive Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: 877-4978 Term Expires: 06/30/20 Four-year term (Mr. Shaw has moved from the Red Bud District.) (The Social Services Board is comprised of seven members, one member from each magisterial district and one member at large. Members serve a four-year term and are limited to two consecutive terms.) Winchester-Frederick County Tourism Board Joint Appointment with the City of Winchester Karen B. Helm — Non-Profit Sector Representative 311 Fairmont Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 Phone: (540)327-2467 Term Expires: 06/30/20 Three-year term James E. Richard, Jr. — Private Sector Representative Richard's Fruit Market 6410 Middle Road Middletown, VA 22645 Phone: (540)869-1455 Term Expires: 06/30/20 Three-year term Andy Gyurisin — Private Sector Representative 40 Memorandum — Board of Supervisors July 1, 2020 Page 3 177 Kernstown Commons Blvd. Winchester, VA 22602 Office: (540)667-1322, Ext. 111 Term Expired: 06/30/19 Three-year term (The Executive Tourism Director advised the Tourism Board unanimously recommends to the Board of Supervisors and City Council the appointment of Laura Kerr, Julie Shaffer and Josh Huff. Per the Tourism Director, the candidates will be instructed to next go through the City's online board application process as soon as possible. Tourism Director and Board look forward to having them all join as they would bring a variety of backgrounds and great amount of experience and energy to the Board. The Tourism Board was formed by Joint Resolution of the Board of Supervisors and the City Council in April 2001.) Winchester Regional Airport Paul G. Anderson, Jr. — Frederick County Representative 1009 Germany Road Stephens City, VA 22655 Phone: (540)869-2182 Term expires: 06/30/20 Four-year term JULY 2020 No appointments due in July. AUGUST 2020 Board of Building Code Appeals Whit L. Wagner— Frederick County Representative 251 Tyler Drive Clearbrook, VA 22624 Home: (540)662-9711 Term Expires: 08/12/20 Five-year term (Whit Wagner is willing to continue serving.) (FYI - There are five members on the Board of Building Code Appeals. Members serve a five-year term and are eligible for reappointment. Members should, to the extent possible, represent different occupational or professional fields relating to the construction industry. At least one member should be an experienced builder, one member should be a registered 41 Memorandum — Board of Supervisors July 1, 2020 Page 4 design professional, and at least one member should be an experienced property manager. Employees or officials of the locality shall not serve as members of the Board of Building Code Appeals.) Conservation Easement Authority Judith McCann-Slaughter— Board of Supervisors Representative Term Expires: 08/24/20 Three-year term Diane Kearns — County Representative P. O. Box 2368 Winchester, VA 22604 Phone: (540)667-3390 Term Expires: 08/24/20 Three-year term (The Conservation Easement Authority was established in August 2005. The Authority consists of seven citizen members, one member from the Board of Supervisors and one member from the Planning Commission. Members should be knowledgeable in one or more of the following fields: conservation, biology, real estate and/or rural land appraisal, accounting, farming, or forestry. Members serve a three-year term and are eligible for reappointment.) VACANCIES/OTHER Board of Equalization Luther O. Stiles — Frederick County Representative 114 Lane Street Stephens City, VA 22655 Home: (540)869-2504 Term: 01/01/17 - 12/31/19 Three-year term (Mr. Stiles does not wish to serve another term.) Vacancy— Frederick County Representative Term Expired 12/31/18 Three-year term (The Board of Equalization is composed of five members. Members must be free holders in the county. In October 2010, the Board of Supervisors appointed the Board 42 Memorandum — Board of Supervisors July 1, 2020 Page 5 of Equalization as a "permanent"board for subsequent reassessments. The original five members were appointed for the following terms: one member for a one-year term, one member for a two-year term, and three members for a three-year term. Going forward, all future appointments shall be for a three-year term. Recommendation for appointment/reappointment are made by the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Judge of the Frederick County Circuit Court for final appointment.) AWP/tjp Attachment UATJP\committeeappointments\MmosLettrs\Board Comm itteeAppts(07082020Bd Mtg).docx 43 Frederick County, Virginia Children's Services Act 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor Winchester,VA 22601 Office: (540) 722-8395 1739 FAX: (540) 678-0682 r,2�2829 p7 6/29I2020 CEIVED1. 00213 01 � T4 I fedf+rick County I Mr. Kris Tierney ptnr - 'ce 1bFrederick County Administrator EA 'i� 107 N. Kent Street �1���1 �;� Winchester,VA 22601 -�ft7 RE:CPMT Private Provider Representative Appointment Dear Mr.Tierney, As Chairman of the Frederick County Community Planning and Management Team(CPMT), I am pleased to inform you that at our meeting of June 22, 2020,the CPMT nominated Mr. David Alley, by unanimous vote,to fill the vacancy of Private Provider Representative. The Private Provider representative is a mandated position on the CPMT.The State Code provides for both private provider representative and parent representative to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors.Appointments occur during the May Board of Supervisor's Meeting and are for a two-year term with members being eligible for reappointment. Interim appointments will finish out the prior term and renew on the current schedule. Traditionally,the Board of Supervisors has considered input on new appointments to the CPMT from the seated members. Mr.Alley is a Case Management Administrator with over 10 years of experience in a management position with Grafton, but over 22 years overall with the organization. He obtained his Master of Science in Organizational Leadership in 2006. Using his strong communication skills, he strives to maintain a collaborative approach, resolve problems,and improve stakeholder satisfaction. In Mr.Alley's own words, "I bring a comprehensive set of skills that I believe will be valuable. In my Case Management Administrator role, I honed my abilities in problem solving and communication, providing a firm foundation for this role. My collaborative nature, child centered focus,and compassion have afforded me excellent decision-making skills along with the ability to make mindful fiscal decisions." Mr. David Alley's history of experience makes him a strong candidate for the position of Private Provider Representative on the Frederick County CPMT.The CPMT appreciates your consideration of Mr.Alley for appointment.The nomination information that was submitted for him is enclosed for your review. Sincerely, On behalf of Peter Roussos Pete usso CPMT Chairman 261h District Juvenile Court Services Unit Probation Manager 44 DAVID S. ALLEY Winchester, VA 2260154 • June 15, 2020 Jackie Jury, MS,LPC CSA Coordinator-Frederick County 540-722-8395 jjury@fcva.us RE: Private Provider CPMT Frederick County, VA Dear Ms. Jury, As an experienced Case Management Administrator, with Grafton Integrated HealthNetwork, I believe I have the knowledge and skills to be a valuable member of the Frederick County Community Policy and Management Team. I bring a comprehensive set of skills that I believe will be valuable. In my Case Management Administrator role, I honed my abilities in problem solving and communication, providing a firm foundation for this role. My collaborative nature, child centered focus, and compassion have afforded me excellent decision-making skills along with the ability to make mindful fiscal decisions. I am excited to contribute my talents and proficiency in leadership toward your team efforts. I look forward to being part of a team that recognizes the parent- child dyad when considering community based options for those children who are at risk. Thank you for your time and consideration of my interest in this position. Sincerely, David S. Alley 45 INFORMATIONAL DATA SHEET FOR FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS District Supervisor, would like to nominate you to serve on the_Community Policy and Management Team_. As a brief personal introduction to the other Board members,please fill out the information requested below for their review prior to filling the appointment. (Please Print Clearly. Thank You.) Name: David Alley Home Phone: Address: 105 Richards Avenue Office Phone: Winchester, VA 22601 Fax: Employer: Grafton IHN Email: Occupation: Case Management Administrator Civic/Community Activities: Former Winchester American Red Cross volunteer supporting Disaster Relief and CPR/First Aid, United Way Day of Caring, DisAbilty Law's Safety Coalition for the State of Virginia. Will You Be Able To Attend This Committee's Regularly Scheduled Meeting On: 1:00-3-002m , 4th Monday of each month YeS; X No: Do You Foresee Any Possible Conflicts Of Interest Which Might Arise By Your Serving On This Committee? Yes: I No: X Explain: Additional Information Or Comments You Would Like To Provide (If you need more space, please use the reverse side or include additional sheets): I have spent many years in the behavioral health field and saw the power of supporting and including families and communities with children's service planning. I have participated in community FAPTs across the state of Virginia and embrace the philosophy of family strengths and improving parent compacity in meeting their child's needs. I would like to be considered for the provider representative of Frederick County CPMT. I feel my knowledge I have gained working with communities and resources throughout the state would prove to be an asset in planning cost effective, child centered,family focus programs. Applicant-'s Signature: Date: 6/12/2020 Nominating Supervisor's Comments: (06109106) 46 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Discussion: Proposed Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission Attachments: BOS07-08-20MemoJointMeetingWithPlan ningCommission.pdf 47 .p COUNTY of FREDERICK Office of the County Administrator "a Tel: 540.665.6382 Fax: 540.667.0370 MEMORANDUM To: The Board of Supervisors From: Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk Date: July 2, 2020 Re: Date and Topics for a Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Planning Director Mike Ruddy provided a memo (attached) regarding the proposed dates and possible additional topics for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission that suggested the following: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. Supervisor Wells stated his preference for September 16 for this meeting, but Supervisor Graber is unavailable on that date. During the Board's discussion,it is hoped that the Board can find a date that is agreeable for all the Board members. 107 North Kent Street•Winchester,Virginia 22601 48 r ' COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 5401665-5651 Fax: 5401665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Board of Supervisors Kris Tierney, County Administrator FROM: Mike Ruddy, AICP— Director of Planning and Development RE: Board of Supervisors/Planning Commission Joint Work Session — Planning Items for discussion DATE: June 18, 2020 The Board of Supervisors has requested that a joint work session will be held with the Planning Commission to discuss various planning topics. The Board of Supervisors further requested that the members provide input to staff and the Planning Commission on the topics they would like to discuss. Staff has included an outline of several topics that may be of interest to the Board, some of which have been expressed in previous comments and discussion. It is requested that Board members respond to the attached email survey with your priority order for the topics. Please include any additional topics you would like to see discussed during the work session. Staff would propose holding the work session in conjunction with the one Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPPA) request received as part of this year's annual process, CPPA #01-20, Woodside Business Park, Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) inclusion. The following dates are proposed for the joint work session: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room. Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room. Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room. Alternately, the Board of Supervisors may suggest a suitable alternative date and place. 49 The following items are proposed for discussion: Planning project items: • Special Event Centers and Conditional Use Permits (CUP's), Rural Area uses in general • Update of Northeast Land Use Plan • Housing related initiatives • Other topics of interest to the Board of Supervisors. With regards to any other topics of interest to the Board of Supervisors, it is requested that you provide a topic title and include brief description for the benefit of other Board members. Summary of items. Special Event Centers and Conditional Use Permits (CUP's). Supervisor Dunn introduced this topic at the May 27, 2020 Board of Supervisors meeting. This discussion led to the request for a broader work session. Concern was expressed about the impact of special events in the rural areas and the compatibility of special events facilities with agricultural uses. This topic may include a further look at rural area uses in general. Update of the Northeast Land Use— Land Use and SWSA Limit Examination. An evaluation of this area plan may be timely given the frequent requests for adjustments to the Comprehensive Plan and changes in land use that have occurred over the last decade, such as, large-scale industrial development, growth in Snowden Bridge, new community facilities, and historic preservation efforts. Housing Initiatives. Recent interest in workforce and affordable housing projects indicates that the County may wish to examine how we provide for these housing types. A stated goal in the Comprehensive Plan is to encourage innovative housing choices that also accommodate a full range of affordability. Consideration of flexible and incentivized approaches, such as reevaluating accessory dwelling unit allowances and development bonuses, may be part of the discussion. I look forward to your feedback on the topics you would like to discuss. Please contact me if you have any questions. MTR/CEP/ Attachments S:\Committees\CPPC\Agendas\Worksession\2020 BOSPCCPPC Worksession.dou 50 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Discussion: Proposed Joint Meeting with the School Board Attachments: BOS07-08-20MemoJointMeetingWithSchoolBoard.pdf 51 .p COUNTY of FREDERICK Office of the County Administrator "a Tel: 540.665.6382 Fax: 540.667.0370 MEMORANDUM To: The Board of Supervisors From: Ann W. Phillips, Deputy Clerk Date: July 2, 2020 Re: Date for a Joint Meeting with the School Board ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ In response to the Board's invitation to the School Board for a joint meeting, Superintendent Sovine sent the attached response indicating the School Board's preference for a joint meeting in November. Following receipt of Dr. Sovine's letter, Supervisor Dunn sent an email (attached) about the possibility of moving the proposed joint meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board to a much earlier date. He proposed the following dates: Wednesday,Ly 8, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Supervisor Fisher and Supervisor Graber were unavailable on July 8. If it is the desire of the Board, staff will contact the School Board about meeting on August 12. 107 North Kent Street•Winchester,Virginia 22601 52 From: Blaine P. Dunn <bdunn@fcva.us> Sent:Thursday,June 25, 2020 2:14:52 PM To:Chuck Dehaven <cdehaven@crosslink.net>; Robert Wells<rwells@fcva.us>; Shawn Graber <shawn.graber@fcva.us>;Judy McCann-Slaughter<Islaughter@fcva.us>;J Douglas McCarthy <dmccarthv@fcva.us>; Gene Fisher<gene.fisher@fcva.us>;Jay Foreman <foremani@fcpssb.net> Cc: Kris Tierney<ktiernev@fcva.us> Subject: BOS School Board Joint Meeting Date Dear Board members, I discussed with Jay Foreman the possibility of moving the proposed joint meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board to a much earlier date. He was amenable to an earlier date as well. The reason to hold a meeting on an earlier date is so that both boards can digest whatever thoughts, proposals, or solutions are generated at the meeting and before the School Board has its strategy session in October. Also, if we collectively need to propose legislative solutions to our discussions,that will give us time to convey those ideas to our local delegation before the General Assembly begins putting together a legislative agenda which occurs in the fall.That also will give us time to implement ideas as both boards begin working on next year's annual budget. Since I requested this meeting, let me suggest we meet at 9 AM on July 8 or 9 AM on August 12. 1 would like us to allow 3 hours although we may not need that much time. However,that would give us all time to talk through issues without a meeting deadline immediately afterwards (at least for BOS members). Kris Tierney could see if these dates work for the BOS and Jay Foreman can see if these dates work for the School Board. Thank you for your consideration. Blaine Blaine P. Dunn Frederick County Board of Supervisors Red Bud District 115 Bedford Drive Winchester, VA 22602 540-665-8006 53 ItFrederick county Public Schools Superintendent of Schools sovined@tcpskl2.net MEMORANDUM [ w Mr. Kris C. Tiemey,, ounty Administrator From: Dr. David T. Sovine, Superintendent of Frederick County Public Schools Re: Joint Board Meeting Invitation Date: June 22, 2020 At its meeting on Tuesday, June 16, the School Board members discussed their interest in reengaging with the Board of Supervisors in a joint meeting in the fall of 2020. Specifically, our School Board reached agreement on targeting a date during the week of November 16-20. I would suggest the two Board chairmen, Mr. DeHaven and Mr. Foreman, discuss specific date, time, and other details for the joint meeting, Please let me know if you have any questions. cc: Mr. Chuck DeHaven, Chairman, Frederick County Board of Supervisors Mr. Jay Foreman, Chairman, Frederick County School Board Ms. Ann Phillips, Deputy Clerk, Frederick County Board of Supervisors Mr. Steve Edwards, Clerk, Frederick County School Board 1415 Amherst Street www,fredenck k12 va-us 540-662-3889 ext 88102 P Q Box 3508 Winchester.Virginia 22604-2546 54 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Rezoning #01-20 for RCS Investments, LLC- Attachments: BOS07-08-20REZ01-20RCS I nvestments.pdf 55 REZONING APPLICATION 401-20 Cod RCS Investments, LLC qw �� Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors w Prepared: June 25 2020 w ' 0 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director ]938 Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 06/03/20 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 07/08/20 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 12.61+/- acres from the Ml (Light Industrial)District to the M2 (Industrial General) District with proffers. The subject property is part of the Baker Lane Industrial Park which was subdivided in 1985. LOCATION: The subject property is located at 220 Imboden Drive(Route 1327) at the terminus of the cul-de-sac. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 07/08/20 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is an application to rezone 12.61+/- acres from the MI (Light Industrial) District to the M2 (Industrial General) District with proffers. The subject property is part of the Baker Lane Industrial Park. The site is located within the limits of the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan identifies the property with an industrial land use designation, therefore,the existing M 1 Zoning as well as the requested M2 Zoning are consistent with the goals of the Plan. The Planning Commission did not identify any concerns with the request and recommended approval of the application at their June 3, 2020 meeting. The proffers associated with this rezoning request are as follows: Proffer Statement-Dated March 16, 2020: A. Land Use and Property Development 1. The Owner proffers to limit the land uses on the Property to the following: • All uses allowed in the M-1 Light Industrial District • Recycling Operations (No SIC Code) 2. The owner proffers to prohibit outdoor storage of material utilized in Recycling Operations on the Property. 3. The Owner proffers to prohibit waste transfer stations in conjunction with Recycling Operations on the Property. B. Monetary Contributions The owner proffers to provide a monetary contribution of $0.10 per building square foot for County Fire and Rescue services. Followinz the required public hearinz, a decision rezardinz this rezonin,-application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors.l 56 Rezoning #01-20 RCS Investments June 25, 2020 Page 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by Staff where relevant throughout this Staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 06/03/20 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 07/08/20 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 12.61+/- acres from the M 1 (Light Industrial)District to the M2 (Industrial General) District with proffers. The subject property is part of the Baker Lane Industrial Park which was subdivided in 1985. LOCATION: The subj ect property is located at 220 Imboden Drive(Route 1327)at terminus of cul-de- sac. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 54-7-7A PROPERTY ZONING: M1 (Light Industrial) District PRESENT USE: IndustrialNacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING& PRESENT USE: North: MH-1 (Mobile Home Community) District Use: Residential M1 (Light Industrial) District Use: Industrial South: RP (Residential Performance) District Use: Residential M1 (Light Industrial) District Use: Industrial East: Interstate 81 Use: N/A West: Ml (Light Industrial) District Use: Industrial 57 Rezoning #01-20 RCS Investments June 25, 2020 Page 3 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept.of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 1327 (Imboden Drive). The route is the VDOT roadway,which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. The existing entrance is adequate for the proposed use. Frederick Water: Please see letter from Eric R.Lawrence,AICP,Executive Director dated February 5, 2020. Frederick-Winchester Service Authority: FWSA defers comments to Frederick Water. Frederick County Department of Public Works: Please see letter from Gloria M. Pufnburger, Solid Waste Manager dated April 20, 2020. Frederick County Department of Inspections: No comments at this time. Frederick County Fire Marshall: Plan approved. Winchester Regional Airport: No comment. County of Frederick Attorney: I have reviewed the proposed proffer statement you submitted for the above proposed rezoning and find that, subject to one comment, the proposed proffer statement is legally sufficient and in proper form to serve as a proffer statement.The one comment is that,because approved proffer statements are recorded in the land records, they must meet recoding standards. Relative to the proposed proffer statement, the Clerk's Office will not record the cover page with the aerial picture. This in turn means that the page numbers on the remainder will need to be removed or restart at"1" , as the "T' on the first page will create confusion. Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) identified the subject property as being zoned M2. The property was downzoned from the M2 District to the R-3 District in 1980 with the Comprehensive Rezoning of Frederick County. The property was rezoned to the Ml District with rezoning #06-84 which was approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 11, 1984. 2) Comprehensive Plan The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County. The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the Community's guide for making decisions regarding development,preservation,public facilities and other key 58 Rezoning #01-20 RCS Investments June 25, 2020 Page 4 components of Community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. The Area Plans,Appendix I of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan, are the primary implementation tool and will be instrumental to the future planning efforts of the County. Land Use The 2035 Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan provide guidance on the future development of the property. The property is located within the SWSA. The 2035 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property with an industrial land use designation. In general, the proposed M2 Zoning is consistent with the land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. 3) Proffer Statement—Dated March 16, 2020: A. Land Use and Property Development 1. The Owner proffers to limit the land uses on the Property to the following: • All uses allowed in the M-1 Light Industrial District • Recycling Operations (No SIC Code) 2. The owner proffers to prohibit outdoor storage of material utilized in Recycling Operations on the Property. 3. The Owner proffers to prohibit waste transfer stations in conjunction with Recycling Operations on the Property. B. Monetary Contributions The owner proffers to provide a monetary contribution of $0.10 per building square foot for County Fire and Rescue services PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FROM THE 06/03/20 MEETING: To rezone 12.61+/-acres from the MI (Light Industrial)District to the M2(Industrial General)District with proffers. The subject property is part of the Baker Lane Industrial Park which was subdivided in 1985. Chairman Kenney inquired is this outside storage of raw materials. Staff explained that any product brought in for recycling purposes would be stored within the structure. Chairman Kenney further inquired if the existing containers are permitted; Staff stated that containers are part of the M-1 and permitted. Mr.Evan Wyatt of Greenway Engineering,Inc.,representing the Applicant provided a brief overview of the intent of the application. He provided photos offering a visual of the operation. Commissioner Morrison stated this is a necessary process,however,if items recycling items do wind up outside of the facility,if there is anything in the process or proffers to ensure things will be cleaned up promptly. Mr. Wyatt explained, the operation would be responsible and if something were to end up outside, they have the manpower to clean it up. 59 Rezoning #01-20 RCS Investments June 25, 2020 Page 5 Chairman Kenney called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Kenney closed the public comment portion of the hearing. There were no public comments during the public hearing and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning application. A motion was made, seconded, and unanimously passed to recommend approval of the Rezoning #01-20 for RCS Investments. Followinz the required public hearing-, a decision re-arding-this rezonin,-application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. 60 I , 135 IMBODEN DR .� li I 159 IMBIDE N DR I - i I 183 IMBODEN DR I 'I L 130 3ODEN DR 1 . 160 1 BODEN DR 178 54 7 7A IMBODEN DR 81 i 1,72 s IMBODEN DR .. I 200 I � I 882 709 I BAKER LN - !I BANBURY 100 I TER SU3TON C-i I BANBURY iER lel 216 2 701 SUTfwN Ci i REGENCY REGE +67 �3,�� I LAKES DR LAKE 603�� C-i SU3TON�BANBURY UTTON, `03 , �.IER ��� BANBURY TER 213 SU3TON`Gi 2 1 S�ON C-i it I �f BANBURW— )02 SULT'ON Ci 2 � S TT Ci :i SU7TON�G 3 ��ON Ci r � 7TON C-i 214 SUTTON Ci����15- s 20 / t„� SUTTON *17 SU3TON�C��SUTfON Cl 15 101 BURN D. 210�� 02 BURY BRAEBURN DR Y03 SU3TON Ci r TION CT_J12 BRBURN DR SUTTON �����201 ��31� � ��✓ I��N!I �*E . 9 81 102 BRAEB`URrN_�DR BRAEB N DR SUTTON C-i j BRAE*BURN DRQ ���15 10� 112 BRAE_BURNDDR BRAEBURN DR 3DAEBURN BRAEBURN R BRAEBURN DR O•f�p��,�'•���L 1 D M �313� BANBURY TER BARRINGTON LN BRAEBURN DR�� ', 314 BRAEBURN DR 403 ArAWAr/`�y ... . I�MRUR DR 41,/BRAEBURN DR �I j '�� JJJJ 519 � .o ,'•� '• ' � 11 ���� — BRAEBURN DR • BR�BUrRN DRr�, 81 ORAEBURN_N UR_�52^if �p ® � • - -- -- �iii�.q REZ # 01 20: RCS Investments, LLC Rezoning from MI to M2 Location Map EN DR I ...__ e III �� I r • I I 159 IMBODENDR IMBODENr,DR wy, III a �I 130 r - s 30D- R- 100, m 160 IMBODEN DR 178 IMBODEN DR S' Lei Fly .1172 ,'�' I wj IMBODEN DR 200 _ IMBODEMDR BAKER LN 709 - BANBURY 100 j* TER SUTTON Ci: 101 _ 701 - SUTTON Ci 3. rg BANBURY TER 4 REGENGY REGE 611 103 LAKES DR `'LAKE 603 BANBURY SUTTON CT. 203 , 111 SUTTON Ci .I BANBURY TER TER SUTTON Ci .213 r 601 �. - -.201.. - SUTTON CT BANBURY TER 102 SUTTON Ci- • _ - -' - ` 215 SUTTON Ci 114" SUTTON Ci - •t• 'SUTTON Ci 202 :. a 313 108 301'- SUTTON Ci SUTTON Ci•= SUTTON Ci �SUTTON Ci-, 315" � - • 200 ' 214 L,- SUTTON Ci 107 SUTTON Ci+ ,SUTTON Ci ' 15 101 BRAEBURN DR 210 302 BURY BRAEBURN DR Y03 SUTTON Ci SUTTON Ci BRAEBURN DR ;SUTTON Ci •7 201 213 314 �' #102 81 BRAEBURN�DR BRAEBURN DR SUTTON Ci 1 � BRAEBU315 RNIDR� 1 BRAEBUR �'�URN DR x,303 BRAEBURN DR BRAEBURNpDR 313 r ``�`�"','• BANBURY TER BARRINGiON N BRAEBURN DR 411 BRAEBURN DR BARRINGTON LN 403 507 NBURYTER 301 BRAEBURN DR„A13 BRAEBURN DR • ,��� ,•r �� ,ai i� •: 3 .'•� X315 - 519 .:.4 �♦ 114 BARRINGTON LN AI `BRAEBURN DR BRAEBURN DR tURY TER �STRATFORD�DR � ,509 211 ,�30 ��� °� BRAEBURN DR-- BARRINGTON-LNy. IN LN 314 521 REZ # 01 - 20: RCS Investments, LLC PIN: 54 - 7 - 7A Rezoning from M1 to M2 Long Range Land Use Map 00 GeV ars iMeoO��OR RE Z#01-20 . .. Film Application Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area Long Range Land Use 0 Residential No'Z'* Neighborhood Village ? Urban Center - Mobile Home Community +' * 0 Business 0 Highway Commercial e Mixed-Use Mixed Use Commercial/Office ® Mixed Use Industrial/Office w . Industrial ® Warehouse Heavy Industrial e�y 0 Extractive Mining o C� Commercial Rec IniI" Rural Community Center ° e ® Fire&Rescue 0 Sensitive Natural Areas , Institutional e e - Planned Unit Development O . Park e e Recreation +Q School Employment 0 Airport Support Area . MB0 O B2/B3 �• �Q3 Q �F�F\� O Residential,4 u/a High-Density Residential,6 u/a �n °°- tea sod O High-Density Residential,12-16 u/a e rl„ ORural Area �� • Winchester Interstate Buffer Landfill Support Area N Natural Resources&Recreation \ 0 Environmental&Recreational Resources \ WE S C 7 Frederick County Planning&Development _ 107 N Kent St Winchester,VA 22601 540-665-5651 63 0 150 300 600 Feet Map Created:April 24,2020 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 Tax Parcel 54-7-7A RCS INVESTMENTS, LLC REZONING TAX PARCEL 54-7-7A PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ# M-1, Light Industrial District to M-2, Industrial General District PROPERTY: Tax Parcel 54-7-7A (here-in after the "Property") MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall Magisterial District RECORD OWNER: RCS Investments, LLC APPLICANT: RCS Investments, LLC (here-in after "Owner") PROJECT NAME: RCS Investments, LLC Rezoning ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 16, 2020 REVISION DATE: TSD Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 12.61 - Property from the M-1, Light Industrial District to the M-2, Industrial General District with proffers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein,except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon the Owner and any legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property is identified as Tax Map Parcel 54-7-7A, owned by RCS Investments,LLC recorded as Instrument No. 200002798 and is further identified by the attached Boundary Line Adjustment Plat prepared by GreyWolfe, Inc., dated November 19, 2019 that is included as part of the Proffer Statement. File#2131 R 1 64 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 Tax Parcel 54-7-7A PROFFER STATEMENT A) Land Use and Property Development 1. The Owner proffers to Iimit the land uses on the Property to the following: ➢ All uses allowed in the M-1 Light Industrial District ➢ Recycling Operations (No SIC Code) 2. The Owner proffers to prohibit the outdoor storage of materials utilized in Recycling Operations on the Property. 3. The Owner proffers to prohibit waste transfer stations in conjunction with Recycling Operations on the Property. B) Monetary Contributions The owner proffers to provide a monetary contribution of$0.10 per developed building square foot for County Fire and Rescue services. The monetary contribution shall be made payable to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the certificate of occupancy permit for new structural development on the Property. OWNER SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE File#2131 R 2 65 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 Tax Parcel 54-7-7A Owner Sijznature The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: By; RCS Investments, LLC Date Ross Grant Hewitt, Managing Manager Commonwealth of Virginia, City/Cou of mde,ri To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 0 day of 4hri 20_�I)_by EfA6 NaWl!J0 VO C My Commission Expires 6e - r { Q Notary Public DEANNA D ALEXANDER NOTARY PUBLIC REG.#7135427 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA r MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 30,2020 By: aha PInvestments, LLC V Date od'ie Ann Hewitt, Managing Manager Commonwealth of Virginia, City/Co=y of Rr du To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Qday of 20 by__-� 1 A In -- Vl)tA+:� - - - k`(�f I M.P, P A 0 0 1 My Commission Expires "` ,(��. :�L) QDRD Notary Public DEANNA a ALEXANDER NOTARY PUBLIC REG.#7135427 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT.30,2020 File#2131R 3 66 FREDERICK WATER 315 Tasker Road PH(540)868-1061 Eric R.Lawrence Stephens City,Virginia 22655 Fax(540)868-1429 Executive Director www.FrederickWater.com February 5, 2020 Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 RE: Rezoning Application Comment RCS Investments, Inc. Tax Map Numbers: 54-7-7A 12.61 +/- acres Dear Mr. Wyatt: Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments on the RCS Investments industrial commercial rezoning application package, dated January 21, 2020. Frederick Water (FW) offers comments limited to the anticipated impact/effect upon FW's public water and sanitary sewer system and the demands thereon. The project parcel is in the sewer and water service area (SWSA). The parcel is currently served by FW, and the rezoning and proposed recycling use does not anticipate significant increases in water and sewer use. Therefore, the proposed use does not appear to impact FW's water and sewer service. Any proposed construction on the property must avoid the existing water and sewer easements on the property. Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments. Sincerely, s Eric R. Lawrence Executive Director Water At Your Service 67 cs,4l�K CpL� 4 COUNTY of FREDERICK w d' Department of Public Works ® 540/665-5643 �,`�,"• FAX: 540/678-0682 ,735 April 20,2020 Mr.Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester,Virginia 22602 RE:Proposed Rezoning for RCS Investments,LLC Property Identification Number(PIN): 54-7-7A—Imboden Drive Dear Evan: After careful review of the above request of the above request and proposed proffer statement dated January 21,2020,with the intent to develop a recycling operation,I submit the following: ■ Transportation:Facility is anticipated to generate 10-12 new vehicle trips per week. In the event that the Frederick County utilizes this facility for the marketing of its materials(cardboard,metal cans,plastic bottles and jugs),approximately 20 inbound vehicle trips would be made each week.This is in addition to trips by other localities,such as the City of Winchester,which would add another six inbound vehicle trips per week for its co-mingled materials and cardboard. ■ Solid Waste Disposal:Recycling Operations Facility is anticipated to generate approximately 10-12 new vehicle trips per week. This statement may only refer to the vehicle trips made by the applicant for its current needs.However,if it is the applicant's desire to bring in outside customers,logically,this number will be considerable higher. Although it is most desirable to receive and process clean materials,some residue is unavoidable.Based on industry standards,up to ten percent of all material received at the proposed facility will be culled out as unrecyclable and deposited at the regional landfill.Therefore,impacts to the local landfill and associated waste is a percentage of materials processed. The department would recommend that contractual agreements be put into place by the owner and those utilizing the facility to reject loads that consistently exhibit contamination levels exceeding ten percent. ■ Other Potential Impacts:Maintaining a high standard of quality as it pertains to materials received for processing will curtail processing costs on the part of the applicant and limit impacts to the Frederick County Regional Landfill. The department supports the operation of an economically viable recycling facility with indoor storage which will mitigate any impact to surrounding properties while potentially serving the needs of area localities and businesses with a local, reliable and sustainable market for recyclables collected across the region. Sincerely Gloria M.Puffinburger Solid Waste Manager cc: Joe Wilder,director file 68 To be completed by Planning Staff: Fee Amount Paid $ Anticipated PC Hearing bate Zoning Amendment Number 430 — Q0 Date Received Anticipated BOS Hearing Date i 0-10 REZONING APPLICATION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT 1. Property Owner(s) (please attach additional page(s)if more than two owners): Name: RCS Investments, LLC Specific Contact Person if Other than Above: Ross Hewitt & Jodie Hewitt Address: PO Box 3183 Winchester, VA 22604 Telephone: (540) 662-2005 Email: .rhewitt@rcswaste.com Name: Specific Contact Person if Other than Above: Address: Telephone: Email: 2. Other Applicant Party(such as a contract purchaser) (please attach additional page(s) if necessary): Name: N/A Specific Contact Person if Other than Above: A Address: Telephone: Email: 3. Law firm,engineering firm, or other person, if any, serving as the primary contact person for this application: Firm Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc Specific Contact Person at Firm: Evan Wyatt Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Email: ewyatt@greenwayeng.com Please note that, if a law firm, engineering firm, or other person, other than the owner of the property, will be acting on behalf of the owner and/or executing papers on behalf of the owner in connection with the rezoning, the owner will need to execute a power of attorney form granting the firm or person such authority. Page 12 C) rl- 4. Project Name(if any): RCS Investments, LLC Rezoning 5. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number(s): 54-7-7A b. Total acreage of the parcel(s): 12.61 +/- Acres c. Total acreage of parcel(s)to be rezoned(if other than whole parcel(s) is being rezoned): 12.61 +/- Acres d. Current zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: M1 Light Industrial District 12.61+1- Acres e. Proposed zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: M2 Industrial General District 12.61+1- Acres f Magisterial District(s): Stonewall District g. Location-the property is located at(give street address(es) if assigned or otherwise exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection,using road names and route numbers): 220 Imboden Drive (Route 1327) at terminus of cul-de-sac h. Adjoining Properties: Parcel ID Number Use Zonij!g See Attached Adjoining Map& Owner Table Exhibits Please attach additional page(s) if necessary. Property identification numbers, magisterial districts, and deed book and page numbers/ instrument numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester,VA 22601. Page 13 ti 6. Disclosure of real parties in interest. Virginia Code § 15.2-2289 provides that localities may by ordinance require any applicant for a zoning amendment to make complete disclosure of the equitable ownership of the real estate to be affected including, in the case of corporate ownership,the name of stockholders. officers, and directors, and in any case the names and addresses of all real parties of interest. Frederick County has, by County Code § 165-101.09, adopted such an ordinance. For each business entity that is an owner or contract purchaser of the property, please list the name and address of each person owning an interest in, or who is an officer or director of, any entity that is an owner or contract purchaser of the property (you need not indicate the amount or extent of the ownership interest). Please note that this requirement does not apply to a corporation whose stock is traded on a national or local stock exchange and having more than 500 shareholders. RCS Investments, LLC: Ross Grant Hewitt&Jodie Ann Hewitt, Managing Members Please attach additional page(s)if necessary. 7. Checklist. Please check that the following items have been included with this application: Location Map Plat Depicting Metes/Bounds of Proposed Zoning Impact Analysis Statement Proffer Statement(if any) Agency Comments Fee Copies of Deed(s)to Property(ies) Tax Payment Verification Digital copies (pdf s) of all submitted items Page 14 ti 7. Signature(s): I(we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I(we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I(we)understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I(we)hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my(our)knowledge. Owner: 41 Date If signing on behalf of an entity,please state name of entity and your title: Owner: (�2//1'1114-��-, Date-941-10 X20 Wigni n"g on behalf of an entity,please state name of entity and your title: Other Applicant Party(if any): L"n I- 4� � -,_' Date 4/ZG/7-4.-t 0 If signing on behalf of an entity,please state name of entity and your title: If additional signature lines are necessary, such as if more than two persons are owners, please use additional copies of this page. Page 15 co ti Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www1cya.us 77 Department of Planning&Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: RCS Investments, LLC Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. PO Box 3183 Winchester,VA 22604 (540)662-2005 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s) of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 54-7-7A do hereby make, constitute,and appoint: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Name of Attomey-In-Fact 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540)662-4185 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to application with Frederick County,Virginia for the folio for the above identified property: Q Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit wig Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) n Variance or Zoning Appeal further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or odify it. Signature Title(if signing on behalf of an entity) ✓ State of \J k'.V tlli A io,- ,County/City of Fred£'f 1cK- To wit: 1, >(Jnnk A- (— , a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person who signed the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this O?L) day ofAQf�( 20u I wt'& ioM My Commission Expires: Notary PublicANA D ALEXANDER Registration Number 115LI NOTARY PUBLIC REG.#7135427 C01k9?10WVFALTH OF VIRGINIA -014VIISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 30,2020 ti COG Special Limited Power of Attorney o County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www-,v.fcva.us Department of Planning& Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: RCS Investments, LLC Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. PO Box 3183 Winchester,VA 22604 (540)662-2005 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s) of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 54-7-7A do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Name of Attorney-In-Fact 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540)662-4185 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to application with Frederick County,Virginia for the followin ,for the above identified property: n./ Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) E] Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modif it. Signature JG, d Title(if s' mg on behalf of an enti State of 1 11 County/City of _ ,To wit: I,7j>=Q OL '1) A 1e��r , a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that the person who signed the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this-QO —day of Apr t ,2Q0 &�D(Iffi(A— ,��XCA Ai My Commission Expires t)f dp.?() Notary Public w Registration Number: 1 �A D ALEXANDER "W a`ARY PUBLIC _'i I iedetick {one Frederick County Virginia L,,,A7 mi. Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Lvlous 2019 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticket-9 RE2019 i 32515000L__j Frequency 2 Supplement# 0 Name(RCS INVESTMENTS LLC Map# 54 7 7A Account# 8028393 Name 2 1 Bill Date 0411&201 9 Acreage 9,800 Address';230 MILLER RD I Due Date[1 210512 0 1 9 Improvements $t,t41,500.00 WINCHESTER VA 7 Desc BAKER LANE IND PRK L7A Land Value $674,500,00 I —1 9.80 ACRES Land Use $0.00 Zip`22602 2630 Minerals $0.00 Penalty Paid $D.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Last Transaction Date 1111412019 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty Interest Balance Due $5.538,80 ($5,538.80) $000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Transaction I-listory Date Type Transaction# Amount Balance 1216/2019 Charge 0 $5,538.80 $5,538.80 11/13/2019 Principal Paid 19955 ($5,538.80) $0,00 Previcus 75 RCS INVESTMENTS, LLC REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT ff7` l�.. r Tax Parcel 54-7-7A Stonewall Magisterial District Frederick County, Virginia March 16, 2020 Current Owner: RCS Investments, LLC Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester,VA 22602 540-662-4185 76 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning RCS INVESTMENTS, LLC REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by the proffered rezoning of a 12.61±-acre subject property owned by RCS Investments, LLC identified as Tax Map Parcel 54-7-7A. The subject property is located on the northeast side of Imboden Drive (Route 1327) and adjacent to Interstate 81. The 12.61± acre subject property is currently zoned M-1 Light Industrial District and the Owner proposes to rezone the subject property to M-2 Industrial General District with proffers to allow for the construction of a new building that is projected to be 30,000 square feet in area that will allow for internal storage and processing of collected clean, reusable recycled materials. The Frederick County Zoning Administrator issued a Zoning Determination Letter dated December 5, 2019 advising that Recycling Operation land uses are permitted within the M-2 Industrial General District only and the subject property would be required to be rezoned for the proposed land use. Basic information Location: Fronting on the northeast side of Imboden Drive (Route 1327) adjacent to Interstate 81 Magisterial District: Stonewall District Property ID Numbers: 54-7-7A Current Zoning: M-1, Light Industrial District Current Use: Office; Transportation Services; Transportation Fleet Parking and Container Storage Proposed Zoning: M-2, Industrial General District Proposed Use: M-1 District permitted land use and Recycling Operations Total Rezoning Area: 12.61±-acres with proffers File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 2 77 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Urban Development Area The Urban Development Area (UDA) defines the general area in which residential, commercial, industrial and institutional land use development is encouraged in the County. The 12.61± acre subject property is currently located within the UDA; therefore, expansion of the UDA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of the subject property is not required for this rezoning application. Sewer and Water Service Area The Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) is generally consistent with the UDA, but also extends outside of the UDA to accommodate areas of the County in which commercial and industrial land use development is only desired. The 12.61± acre subject property is currently located within the SWSA; therefore, expansion of the SWSA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of the subject property is not required for this rezoning application. Comprehensive Plan Conformity The RCS Investments, LLC 12.61± acre subject property is a component of the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan (NFLUP) which is a large area plan within the County's Comprehensive Policy Plan. The subject property is located within the southern area of the land use plan and is identified as industrial land use based on its current zoning and development condition. Adjoining properties are identified as industrial and residential land use and are developed as office, warehouse and manufacturing; a townhouse subdivision and a mobile home park. The 12.61±-acre subject property is zoned MI Light Industrial District and the Owner has proffered to limit land uses to those permitted in the MI District and Recycling Operations that prohibit waste transfer stations and prohibit the outdoor storage of recycled materials used in the Recycling Operations. Therefore, the proposed industrial rezoning of the subject property would be in conformity with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and would be compatible with adjoining properties. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The 12.61±-acre subject property is located on the northeast side of Imboden Drive (Route 1327) and is adjacent to Interstate 81. Imboden Drive is a two-lane state-maintained road which serves as access to the subject property and other developed industrial properties. Greenway Engineering met with the County Transportation Director to discuss the proposed rezoning and proffered land use restrictions and it was determined that the existing transportation network was sufficient to accommodate the future development of the subject property. Greenway Engineering prepared a traffic impact analysis waiver request dated File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 3 78 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning December 19, 2019 which was approved by the County Transportation Director on January 21, 2020. Flood Plains The 12.61±-acre subject property does not contain areas of floodplain as demonstrated on FEMA NFIP Map #51069CO209D, Effective Date September 2, 2009; as well as information from the Frederick County GIS Database. Wetlands The 12.61±-acre subject property does not contain wetland areas as demonstrated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map and information from the Frederick County GIS Database. Soil Types The 12.61±-acre subject property contains three soil types as demonstrated by the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia and the Frederick County GIS Database. The following soil types are present on site: 1B Berks Channery Silt Loams 2-7% slope 9B Clearbrook Channery Silt Loams 2-7% slope 4 1 C & 4 1 E Weikert-Berks Channery Silt Loams 7-65% slope None of the soil types on the subject property are identified as prime agricultural soils. The Berks Channery Silt Loam is the predominant soil type on the subject property and is considered moderate soils for the construction of small commercial buildings based on slope and wetness properties. This soil type is conducive for industrial development as evident by existing structural development on the subject property and adjacent to the subject property. Other Environmental Features The 12.61±-acre subject property does not contain areas of steep slope, lakes or ponds or natural stormwater retention areas as defined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. There are no known environmental features present that create development constraints for the subject property. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Adjoining property zoning and present use: North: MH-1 Mobile Home District Use: Mobile Home Park South: RP Residential Performance District Use: Townhouse Subdivision File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 4 79 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning East: No Zoning Designation Use: Interstate 81 West: M-1, Light Industrial District Use: Office; Warehousing and Manufacturing TRANSPORTATION The 12.61±-acre subject property is located on the northeast side of Imboden Drive (Route 1327) and is adjacent to Interstate 81. The proposed rezoning from the M-1 Light Industrial District to the M-2 Industrial General District is intended to allow for the construction of a new building that is projected to be 30,000 square feet in area that will allow for internal storage and processing of collected clean, reusable recycled materials. These recycled materials will be unloaded, baled and warehoused internally to the proposed Recycling Operations Facility for distribution. The Owner's Proffer Statement limits the land uses on the subject property to allowed land uses within the M-1 District and to Recycling Operations. Additionally, the Owner's Proffer Statement prohibits waste transfer stations in conjunction with the Recycling Operations and prohibits the outdoor storage of materials utilized in Recycling Operations. RCS Investments, LLC currently utilizes 220 Imboden Drive for the parking of their vehicle fleet including trucks used in their collection operations; as well as for the storage of empty collection containers. The development of the proposed 30,000 square feet Recycling Operations Facility is anticipated to generate approximately 10-12 new vehicle trips per week from the subject property in conjunction with the distribution portion of the business operation. These additional vehicle trips will utilize Imboden Drive, Baker Lane and Fort Collier Road to access primary arterial roads and Interstate 81. This transportation network involves existing public road systems that can accommodate distribution traffic. Additionally, the distribution vehicle trips will occur during business operation hours which will not necessarily occur during the AM/PM Peak Hour traffic periods. Greenway Engineering met with the Frederick County Transportation Planning Director to discuss the proposed rezoning application and the additional traffic generation projections for the proposed 30,000 square feet Recycling Operations Facility. The Frederick County Transportation Planning Director determined that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) would not be required and provided a TIA waiver for the proposed rezoning application on January 21, 2020 based on the following considerations: ➢ The Owner's Proffer Statement will restrict the property to land uses currently permitted in the M-1 District and to a Recycling Operations Facility with restrictions as a condition of rezoning to the M-2 District. ➢ The location of Tax Map Parcel 54-7-7A creates a constraint which will significantly limit the potential to expand of the proposed facility. ➢ The projected increase in vehicle trips associated with the distribution portion of the proposed facility is insignificant and will result in some new vehicle trips occurring during off-peak hours. File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 5 80 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning ➢ The existing transportation network has been demonstrated to adequately accommodate distribution traffic. The Owner's Proffer Statement provides for land use limitations and restrictions that will adequately mitigate transportation impacts associated with this rezoning proposal for the 12.61±-acre subject property. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The 12.61±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public sewer based on County Policy. Frederick Water is the provider of public sewer service and owns and maintains the public sewer infrastructure within this area of the County. Frederick Water has existing sewer infrastructure in place that serves the various land uses within proximity of the subject property and has an existing sewer easement on the subject property for a gravity main collection system. The gravity main collection system directs sewer effluent to the Opequon Wastewater Treatment Facility (OWTF) which has a total capacity of 12.6 MGD, of which 5.475 MGD is allocated to Frederick Water. RCS Investments, LLC desires to construct a 30,000 square-foot Recycling Operation that will allow for internal storage and processing of clean, reusable recycled materials that will baled and warehoused for distribution. The proposed facility will not be a sewer intensive land use; however, Greenway Engineering has utilized standard industrial land use calculations for the sewer demand projections specific to this rezoning application. Q = 75 gallons/day per 1,000 square feet industrial Q = 75 GPD x 30 (30,000 sq.ft./1,000 sq.ft.) Q =2,250 GPD TOTAL: Q = 2,250 GPD projected sewer demand The Opequon Wastewater Treatment Facility has a total capacity of 12.6 MGD, of which 5.475 MGD is allocated to Frederick Water. Frederick Water currently averages approximately 2.63 MGD of the allocated capacity and has approximately 2.845 MGD of allocated capacity available for future development projects. The projected 2,250 GPD for the 12.61±-acre rezoning represents 0.08% of available treatment capacity; therefore, the proposed rezoning can be sufficiently accommodated by public sewer service through a system with adequate conveyance, capacity and treatment. WATER SUPPLY The subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area(SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public water based on County Policy. Frederick Water is the provider of public water service and owns and maintains the public water File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 6 81 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning infrastructure within this area of the County. Frederick Water has an existing 8-inch water line located along Imboden Drive that serves the 12.61±-acre subject property. RCS Investments, LLC desires to construct a 30,000 square-foot Recycling Operation that will allow for internal storage and processing of clean, reusable recycled materials that will baled and warehoused for distribution. The proposed facility will not be a water intensive land use; however, Greenway Engineering has utilized standard industrial land use calculations for the water demand projections specific to this rezoning application. Q = 75 gallons/day per 1,000 square feet industrial Q = 75 GPD x 30 (30,000 sq.ft./1,000 sq.ft.) Q =2,250 GPD TOTAL: Q = 2,250 GPD projected sewer demand Frederick Water obtains potable water from local quarries which are treated at the Diehl Filtration Plant (3.2 MGD) and the Anderson Filtration Plant (4.0 MGD). Additionally, Frederick Water is implementing the Opequon Water Supply Plan (OWSP) that will provide an additional 8.0 MGD of potable water during the initial construction phase which in currently underway. Frederick Water has sufficient water capacity to serve the subject property based on current and future demands. Additionally, Frederick Water has existing infrastructure that provides adequate transmission of potable water with adequate water pressure for land use and fire demands. Therefore, the proposed rezoning can be sufficiently accommodated by public water service with adequate conveyance and pressure. SITE DRAINAGE The topographic relief on the 12.61±-acre subject property generally follows a west-to- southwest pattern which directs drainage towards the rear of the property. A stormwater management system was previously developed which directs stormwater through an existing 20-foot drainage easement from Imboden Drive along the southwestern boundary of the subject property towards a stream channel within the Huntington Meadows Subdivision. This stream channel directs stormwater under Interstate 81 towards Berryville Pike (U.S. Route 7) and flows to the Opequon Creek. Development of the projected 30,000 square-foot Recycling Operation Facility will increase impervious area on the 12.61±-acre subject property; therefore, stormwater quality and quantity will be evaluated, and appropriate measures will be implemented on-site to mitigate stormwater impacts. The Owner will work with the Department of Public Works during the Site Development Plan process to identify stormwater volumes from the proposed development of the subject property to ensure that there are no detrimental impacts to the regional stormwater management channel and to adjoining properties. All stormwater management plans and erosion and sedimentation control plans associated with the development of the subject property will be required to be designed in conformance with all File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 7 82 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning applicable state and local regulations; therefore, site drainage and stormwater management impacts to adjoining properties and the community will be mitigated. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL The impact on solid waste disposal facilities associated with the development of the proposed industrial land use on the 12.61±-acre portion of the subject property proposed for rezoning can be projected from an average annual commercial consumption of 5.4 cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of structural area (Civil Engineering Reference Manual, 4th edition). It is anticipated that the buildout of the Recycling Operation Facility will yield 30,000 square feet of new land use; therefore, solid waste disposal impacts are based on the following projections that provide the increase in average annual solid waste volume for the proposed rezoning: AAV= 5.4 cu. yd. per 1,000 sq. ft. industrial AAV= 5.4 cu. yd. X 30 (30,000 sq.ft./1,000 sq. ft.) AAV= 162 cu. yd. at build-out, or 113.4 tons/yr. at build-out The Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill has a current remaining capacity of 13,100,000 cubic yards of air space. The projected commercial development will generate approximately 113.4 tons of solid waste annually on average. This represents a 0.056% increase in the annual solid waste received by the Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill, which currently averages 200,000 tons per year. Solid waste produced by the industrial development will be disposed at the Regional Landfill by a commercial waste hauler; therefore, the County will receive tipping fees associated with this land use to mitigate this impact. The Regional Landfill has adequate capacity to accommodate the solid waste impacts associated with this rezoning proposal. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey identifies the Third Battle of Winchester Property (#34-456) within proximity of the 12.61±-acre subject property proposed for rezoning. The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey identifies the Third Battle of Winchester Property as already on the state and national register of historic places and approximately 447 acres of this property has been purchased by the Civil War Preservation Trust. This property is located on the east side of Interstate 81 and adjoins land that is developed as residential, commercial and institutional land use. The National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley identifies the 12.61±-acre subject property proposed for rezoning as being located within the defined Opequon (Third Winchester) core battlefield area. The National Park Service Study further identifies the subject property and all developed properties on the west side of Interstate 81 as areas of lost integrity resulting from intensive urban development in this portion of the County and the City of Winchester. File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 8 83 Greenway Engineering March 16,2020 RCS Investments,LLC Rezoning The development of additional industrial land use on the 12.61±-acre subject property proposed for rezoning is consistent with other properties in this area of the County. The Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan (NFLUP) does not identify the subject property as historic or as developmentally sensitive area. The proposed rezoning of the property will not create negative impacts associated with historic properties and historic resources. OTHER POTENTIAL IMPACTS The development of the 12.61±-acre portion of the subject property proposed for rezoning will a allow for the development of a 30,000 square-foot Recycling Operation for internal storage and processing of clean, reusable recycled materials that will baled and warehoused for distribution. This proposal will provide new economic development opportunities for Frederick County and will assist Frederick County in reducing impacts to the Regional Landfill. It is recognized that the development of industrial land use has the potential to increase service demands on fire and rescue services; therefore, the Owner's Proffer Statement provides a monetary contribution of $0.10 per developed building square foot to the County to provide additional revenues that are specifically directed to fire and rescue services. There are no other identified potential impacts above those discussed in this Impact Analysis Statement that would be detrimental to surrounding properties or to the County from the rezoning and development of the 12.61±-acre subject property. File#2131R/Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 9 84 W ORDINANCE w + 17311 Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: June 3, 2020 Public Hearing Held, Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: July 8, 2020 Pending ORDINANCE REZONING#01-20 RCS INVESTMENTS, LLC WHEREAS,REZONING#01-20 RCS INVESTMENTS,LLC., was submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 12.61+/- acres from the M1 (Light Industrial) District to the M2 (Industrial General)District with proffers with a final revision date March 16,2020. The subject property is located at 220 Imboden Drive (Route 1327)at the terminus of the cul-de-sac. The property is located in the Stonewall Magisterial District and is identified by Property Identification Number 54-7-7A; and WHEREAS,the Frederick County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Rezoning on June 3, 2020 and recommended approval of this Rezoning; and WHEREAS,the Frederick County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this Rezoning during their regular meeting on July 8, 2020; and WHEREAS,the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this Rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety,welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors,that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to rezone 12.61+/- acres from the M1 (Light Industrial) District to the M2 (Industrial General) District with proffers dated March 16, 2020. The conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the Applicant and the Property Owner are attached This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 8t' day of July 2020 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Gene E.Fisher Judith McCann-Slaughter Blaine P. Dunn A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator PDRes 421-20 85 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Conditional Use Permit #02-20 for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) Attachments: BOS07-08-20CU P02-20NewCingularWirelessATT.pdf BOS07-08-20CU P02-20N EPASu rvey.pdf 86 cod CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #02-20 Aw �� New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors w " Prepared: June 29, 2020 Staff Contact: Mark Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 06/03/20 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 07/08/20 Pending PROPOSAL: To construct a 199-foot tall monopole telecommunication facility with accessory structures. LOCATION: The subject property is located at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 07/08/20 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a commercial telecommunication facility consisting of a 199-foot monopole telecommunication facility and accessory structures. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this application at their June 3rd meeting and recommended approval. Should the Board of Supervisors find this application to be appropriate, the Planning Commission recommended that the following conditions be attached to the CUP: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the Applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Following this public hearing, a decision regarding this Conditional Use Permit application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. 87 CUP # 02 - 20: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC PIN: 26 - A - 29 Cell Tower Zoning Map I m � m >.;. �� •' � . cuP#o2-zo j WA rm VI y C ' Hr; lF � A'1r 3 �.� ..� .��• .N,HW ESTERN N. NpRT xo 50 PIKE HAMPSHIRE COUNTY QV ° 111L1:7 � V'• • ���y WA/f x. AZI ��� F 50 N Application � �\ Parcels \ WE SS C Frederick County Planning&Development _ 107 N Kent St Winchester,VA 22601 pp 540-665-5651 V Q 0 175 350 700 Feet Map Created:April 1,2020 0) 00 aftt RF Justification Site Name: FROG EYE SIRBAUGH Address: 141 Fairview Road,, Gore VA 22637 (Frederick County) The main objective of this site is to add and enhance AT&T coverage along Route 50, SR-707, SR-610, SR-703, SR-259 and the surrounding areas in Gore VA. The addition of this site will improve coverage including in-building coverage in the commercial and residential areas along Fairview Road, Fletcher Road and Maple Hills Drive. Currently, this area has weak AT&T coverage. The Proposed site will also ensure overlap coverage, hancloffs and off-load traffic among existing AT&T Sites Cross Junction and Wild Acres, Commuters and residents will experience better quality of voice and data services from AT&T with the addition of Coldbrook site. AT&T is proposing for 190' Rad Center for this site to meet its coverage and capacity needs. Prepared by: Gaurav Behl RF Engineer Approved by: Sandeep Gupta RF Design Manager AT&T Mobility 7150 Standard Drive Hanover, MD Tel: 410-712-7817 Fax: 410-712-7784 C) 07 Statement of Compliance and Justification for AT&T's Proposed 199' Monopole Telecommunication Facility at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 Applicants: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (d/b/a AT&T Mobility) 7150 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076 Rocon, LLC 9 101 Chesapeake Ave Sparrows Point, MD 21219 Representatives: Gregory E. Rapisarda and Douglas A. Sampson Saul Ewing Amstein&Lehr, LLP 500 East Pratt Street, Suite 900 Baltimore, MD 21202-3171 (410) 332-8661 Greg.Rapisardagsaul.com Douglas.Sampsongsaul.com AT&T Site 4124 "Frog Eye Sirbaugh" FA# 10138153 Property Owner: Hott Emma J. Etals Tax Map/Parcel: 26-A-29 Instrument#: 180012690 Property Address: 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 Zoning Designation: RA(Rural Area) Magisterial District: Gainesboro Jurisdiction: Frederick County, Virginia Acreage: 14.37 acres Pursuant to Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia and Chapter 23 and Sections 165-103 and 165-204.19 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance ("Zoning Code"), New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility ("AT&T"), by and through its agent/counsel, Saul Ewing Amstein & Lehr, LLP, and Rocon, LLC hereby request a determination that the proposed wireless telecommunication application described herein is in substantial compliance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan and is authorized for a conditional use. We appreciate your time and consideration in review of this application for a Conditional Use Permit. The following document and attached Exhibits provide a justification for AT&T's proposal, and a brief explanation as to how and why this proposal conforms with the Zoning Code. This information, as well as additional and clarifying evidence to be presented at an upcoming public hearing, provide the foundation for approving AT&T's 36297050.6 04/06/2020 1 rn application for a Conditional Use Permit. The following Exhibits are attached to this Justification Statement: EXHIBITS Exhibit I RF Justification Statement Exhibit 2 AT&T Wireless Broadband Usage During COVID-19 Crisis Exhibit 3 AT&T FirstNet Information Sheets Exhibit 4 Maps of AT&T Search Area Exhibit 5 Site Plan in 8.5"x 11" Exhibit 6 Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stable, and Olfunke O. Fagbami, Cell Phone Towers Do Not Affect Property Values, American Bar Association Probate&Property(May/June 2016) Exhibit 7 Engineering Certification Letter Exhibit 8 RF Emissions Compliance Letter Exhibit 9 Affidavit of Tower Removal Exhibit 10 FCC NEPA Survey Exhibit 11 County Agency Comment Sheets I. AT&T'S GOALS AND NEED FOR IMPROVED WIRELESS SERVICES AT&T is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to provide wireless telecommunications services in Frederick County, Virginia. Pursuant to Zoning Code § 165-401.03, a telecommunications tower is permitted in the RA District with a conditional use. AT&T needs the proposed telecommunications tower to provide and improve the delivery of emergency and non-emergency wireless and broadband services to residents in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed telecommunications facility will add and improve AT&T's wireless broadband services near the Virginia/West Virginia border along Route 50 (Northwestern Turnpike), SR-707, SR-610, SR-703, SR-259, and in the surrounding Gore, Virginia community. e RF Justification Statement attached as Exhibit 1}. The proposed facility will include in-building coverage in the commercial and residential areas along Fairview Road,Fletcher Road, and Maple Hills Drive. (!Yee Ex. 1). The proposed facility will ensure adequate overlapping coverage between and among AT&T's existing facilities to the east. Ultimately, the proposed facility will allow residents and commuters to experience better quality, improved broadband access, and diminished dropped calls. The necessity of accessible and reliable wireless broadband services has never been more clear. According to the FCC, more than half of the families in the United States have only cellular phones, with no "landline" in their home. More than 80% of 9- 1-1 calls are made from mobile phones. During the COVID-19 crisis, wireless and broadband services became essential for millions of Americans who were forced to stay home. Adequate coverage allowed people to telework, participate in teleconferences, attend virtual school lessons, visit remotely with a doctor or therapist, attend online worship services, and keep in touch with family members and friends. 36297050,6 04/06/2020 2 C14 0') Over the first three weeks of the COVID-19 crisis, AT&T saw a significant increase in voice calling, instant messaging, text messages, and video services. (&e AT&T Wireless Broadband Usage During COVID-19 Crisis attached as Exhibit 2). The use of audio-conferencing solutions and large-scale webcast events each tripled, as business and schools adapted to the need for remote communications. (,See Ex. 2). The usage of audio, web, and video conferencing tools increased by five times. (,See Ex. 2). Having sufficient and reliable wireless broadband coverage has never been more important. 11. FIRST RESPONDER NETWORK AUTHORITY("FIRSTNET") The proposed site will enhance and expand the First Responder Network Authority ("FirstNet") in Frederick County. FirstNet is a nationwide high-speed broadband communications platform dedicated solely to America's first responders and emergency personnel. Following the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, the United States Congress established FirstNet to provide reliable public safety networks across the country and dedicated bandwidth for use by first responders. (Lee AT&T First Net Information Sheets attached as Exhibit 3}. The goal was to prevent the pervasive communications failures that occurred during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The federal government entered into an exclusive contract with AT&T to provide FirstNet services, and FirstNet is only available where AT&T has sufficient wireless coverage. On July 11, 2017, the Commonwealth of Virginia became the first state to opt into the FirstNet National Safety Broadband Network. Every U.S. state and territory has since opted in. The full importance and efficacy of FirstNet has been revealed by the recent COVID-19 crisis. During the nationwide emergency, FirstNet is ensuring that first responders have adequate communications free of commercial congestion. More than 11,000 agencies, including FEMA and the U.S. Coast Guard are using more than 1.2 million FirstNet connections during the COVID-19 crisis. (See Ex. 3). FirstNet offers dedicated deployable assets to FirstNet subscribers to boost coverage where its needed, such as in remote areas or at field hospitals (See Ex. 3). FirstNet is being extensively utilized by the U.S. Navy hospital ships operating in New York and Los Angeles. 111. THE PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY When AT&T has a need for coverage, it first seeks to co-locate antennas onto or within an existing structure. In accordance with Zoning Code § 165-204.19(A), AT&T has provided maps depicting the search area used in siting the proposed commercial telecommunications facility. (See Map of AT&T Search Area attached as Exhibit 4). AT&T's closest existing telecommunications facilities are located 7.5 miles to the west (in West Virginia), 5.4 miles to the northeast and 4.6 miles to the southeast. (See Ex. 4 at 1). There were no existing telecommunications facilities or structures over 75 feet which might be viable for co-location opportunities within AT&T's search ring. 362970%6 04106/2020 3 M In order to meet the AT&T's coverage goals, AT&T conducted a search ring with a radius of approximately one mile. It was determined AT&T must place the proposed telecommunications facility within the search ring to fill the existing coverage gaps and optimize AT&T's coverage. Therefore, all existing structures outside of the mile radius search ring were ruled out. AT&T conducted a search for existing structures within the search ring for possible co-location opportunities. (See Ex. 4). The area is mostly rural farm land with few businesses, and AT&T did not identify any building or structure over 75 feet in height. Therefore, there were no viable co-location opportunities within the search area. Additionally, AT&T conducted an "Antenna Structure Registration" search through the Federal Communication Commission and determined there were no existing commercial telecommunication towers within the one-mile search ring. The closest nearby telecommunications facility is owned by Shentel Communications, which is located 1.2 miles from the proposed site. That tower is already at capacity with no space for additional telecommunications equipment. The tower is only 105 feet tall. Even if AT&T was able to locate its equipment at 105 feet,AT&T's engineers have determined it would not meet AT&T's existing coverage needs. With no viable co-location opportunity, AT&T determined, and its investigation confirmed, that a new tower was required. AT&T determined that property at 141 Fairview Road in Gore, Virginia 22637 (the "Property") was viable from a technical perspective (i.e. radio frequency), a zoning perspective (i.e. permitted use in the RA district and compliant with all regulations), and from a land owner perspective (i.e. a land owner willing to lease space to AT&T). The proposed telecommunications facility consists of a 199' monopole within a 50' x 50' (2,500 sq. feet) equipment compound surrounded by a 6' chain link fence, topped with 12 inches of barbed wire as an anti-climbing device (the "Facility"). (See Site Plan attached as Exhibit 5). The 199' tower consists of a 193' monopole topped by a 6' lightning rod (the "Proposed Tower"). The Proposed Tower will allow AT&T to locate its antennas at a RAD center of 188' and it will allow at least three future carriers to locate antennas at 178 , 168' and 158' respectively. The height of the monopole will eliminate AT&T's current network deficiencies and provide the maximum utility for other commercial carriers to co-locate their equipment to fill existing coverage gaps in their own networks. The Facility will operate automatically and will not require any personnel or hours of attendance. It will operate twenty-four (24) hours a day, three hundred and sixty-five days a year. Maintenance personnel will visit the site occasionally for repairs or modifications to the Facility. The Facility will comply with all relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code and other relevant regulations. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Facility will not change the character of development in the area, will not affect the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties, and is in accordance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. The Zoning Code permits telecommunications 36247050.6 0410612020 4 facilities in the RA (Rural Area) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit. See Zoning Code § 165-401.03. The properties immediately adjacent and surrounding the Property are all zoned RA. The Property is over 14 acres in size, allowing the Facility to be located in the center of the Property, well away from adjacent properties and existing roadways. The proposed site is ideal, because its location and the lack of natural barriers will fill AT&T's existing coverage gap with a single tower, and will likely also fill existing coverage gaps for other wireless providers. The Property is located in a rural area, that is surrounded by trees and rolling hills. As such, the proposed site will be screened by the existing landscape, and be made compatible with the setting, color, lighting, and topography of the area. Additionally, the Facility will be built within the existing tree line, and will be surrounded on all sides by mature trees, further limiting the visual impact on the surrounding area. (&e Ex. 5 at CD. AT&T's Proposed Tower will not hinder any further development on adjacent properties or impair the value of the surrounding land. Substantial evidence shows that cell towers do not affect property values. e Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stable, and Olfunke O. Fagbami, Cell Phone Towers Do Not Affect Property Values, American Bar Association Probate & PropeLfty, at 10-15 (May/June 2016), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 6).1 A number of studies and court cases have demonstrated that "cell towers have no appreciable effect on property values. . ." Id. at 15. In the study, AT&T examined property sales two years before and two years after a tower was erected. The overwhelming data demonstrated that the existence of the tower had no effect on the value of property sales, even where the tower was visible. Id. at 13-14. Many studies have demonstrated that proximity to a cell tower makes no measureable difference in property values.2 A study in Richmond, Virginia examined six towers and 140 properties, and concluded that "there was no consistent market evidence suggesting any negative impact upon improved residential properties exposed to such facilities . . .,,3A similar study of eleven separate cell phone tower sites in Virginia and Maryland compared properties where a tower was visible and properties where a tower was not I Excerpt:pages 3-9& 16-64 removed for convenience. 2 How Does the Proximity to a Cell Tower Impact Home Values?, Valbridge Property Advisors (Sept. 14, 2018), https://www.valbridge.com/news-article/647/how-does-the-proximity-to-a-cell-tower- impact-home-values. Thome Consultants,Inc.,Monopole Impact Study on Residential Lots in the Vicinity of the Bullis School Potomac, Montgomery County, Maryland(May 2, 2001), at 3. (Examining 111 transactions and determining that the proximity to a cell site had no effect on sales prices of homes or residential lots). Appraisal-Associates, Inc., Impact of a Telecommunications Tower upon Values of Residential Properties(Aug. 2005) ("The data demonstrates that residences in close proximity to a towers (less than one quarter mile or 2,000 feet in the case of the vast majority of the sales studied) did not incur a measurable diminution in value after development of the tower,"). 3 Allen G. Dorm Jr.,NMI, SAR&Joseph W. Smith 111, The Impact of Communications Towers on Residential property Values, Right of Way, Mar./Apr. 1999, https://www.irwaonline.org/eweb/upload/0399b.pdf 36297050.6 04/06/2020 5 LO visible. The study found that homes appreciated at approximately the same rate, whether or not the tower was visible.4 The Facility will have no effect on the environment of Frederick County. Given the mature trees and rolling topography, its visual impact will be minimal. The tower will be unmanned, and will not generate any noise, light, or fumes. Because the Facility will be unmanned, there will be no need for any additional facilities or amenities to be included. There is an access roadway on the Property that will allow safe and adequate access to the Facility. The proposed access way will be 20 feet wide with an approved turn around for emergency vehicles. (See Ex. 5, Site Plan at C1). AT&T's structural engineer has certified that the Facility will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. (See Engineering Certification Letter attached as Exhibit 7). V. COMPLIANCE WITH FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING CODE § 165-103.01. Consideration; approval or disapproval. A. Certain uses in each zoning district are listed as being allowed with a conditional use permit. Because of their particular nature, such uses must be separately considered to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the County and to avoid adverse impacts on surrounding properties. • AT&T Response: The Facility will not impact the health, safety, or welfare of residents in Frederick County, Virginia. The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") heavily regulates the strength of radio frequency ("RF") waves produced by telecommunications towers. The Facility will comply with all FCC regulations. (See RF Emissions Compliance Letter attached as Exhibit 8). The proposed tower will produce less than two percent of the levels allowed by the FCC. The Facility will pose no risk to the public and will not impact the health, safety, or welfare of residents of surrounding properties. B. The Board of Supervisors shall approve or disapprove, as a legislative function with recommendation from the Planning Commission, requests for conditional use permits. • AT&T Response: AT&T looks forward to public hearings with both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to clarify any information in this application. § 165-204.19 Telecommunications facilities, commercial. No commercial telecommunications facility shall be sited, constructed, or operated except pursuant to a conditional use permit issued through the process defined in Part 103 of Article 1 of this chapter. Commercial telecommunications facilities that locate on existing structures and towers shall be exempt from the conditional use permit requirement. The issuance of a conditional use permit for the siting, construction, and 4 Thorn Consultants,Inc.,Monopole, Lattice and Water Towers Studies,(2010). 36297050.6 04/0612020 6 CD (3) operation of a commercial telecommunications facility is permitted within the zoning districts specified in this chapter, provided that, pursuant to § 15.2-2232A of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the general location or approximate location, character, and extent of such facilities are substantially in accord with the adopted Comprehensive Plan or part thereof and that adjoining properties, surrounding residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are not negatively impacted. A. Information required as part of the conditional use permit application and that the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors may consider in acting on the application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Information regarding the need for the facility, including but not necessarily limited to usage statistics, operational data, and maps and reports showing current and anticipated radio frequency propagation. • AT&T Response: AT&T has submitted an RF Justification statement describing the area where there is presently deficient wireless service. (&e Ex. 1). Given recent changes in the Virginia Code (Va. Code § 15.2-2316.4), County Staff requested that AT&T not submit any radio frequency propagation maps. However, there is a dearth of telecommunications facilities near the property and a severe lack of wireless coverage, which AT&T is attempting to address. (2) A map depicting the search area used in siting the proposed commercial communications facility. • AT&T Response: AT&T has submitted its map depicting the search area used in siting the proposed Facility. (See Ex. 4, Map of AT&T Search Area). (3) Identification of all service providers and commercial telecommunications facility infrastructure within a search area. The applicant shall provide confirmation that attempts to co-locate on existing structures or towers have been made and, if such attempts were unsuccessful,the reasons so. • AT&T Response: AT&T's search ring was approximately a mile radius. There is no existing telecommunications infrastructure within AT&T's search ring. The closest telecommunications tower is 1.2 miles from the Property, a 105' tower built by SBA Towers and currently owned and operated by Shentel Communications. The tower is already at capacity for wireless infrastructure. Even if there was available space,AT&T's RF engineers have determined that the tower is of insufficient height (likely RAD center at 80') to address AT&T's existing coverage gap. AT&T was unable to locate any other structures over 75 feet within the search area for co-location opportunities. (See Ex. 4 Map of AT&T Search Area). 36297050,6 04/06/2020 7 ti (4) Documentation issued by the Federal Communications Commission indicating that the proposed commercial telecommunications facility is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commissions established ANSMEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation. • AT&T Response: A radio frequency engineer has certified AT&T's compliance with all Federal Communications Commission ANSI/EEE Standards. (See Ex. 8, RF Emissions Compliance Letter). (5) An affidavit signed by the landowner and by the owner of the facility stating that they are aware that either or both of them may be held responsible for the removal of the commercial telecommunications facility as stated in § 165-204.19B(7). • AT&T Response: AT&T and the landowner agree that they each may be held responsible for the removal of the commercial telecommunications facility. (&e Affidavit of Tower Removal attached as Exhibit 9). B. If the Board of Supervisors grants a conditional use permit under this section, the following standards shall then apply to any property in which a commercial telecommunications facility is sited, in order to promote orderly development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties, residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value: (1) The Board of Supervisors may reduce the required setback distance for commercial telecommunications facilities as required by § 165- 201.03B(8) of this chapter if it can be demonstrated that the location is of equal or lesser impact. When a reduced setback is requested for a distance less than the height of the tower, a certified Virginia engineer shall provide verification to the Board of Supervisors that the tower is designed, and will be constructed, in a manner that if the tower collapses for any reason the collapsed tower will be contained in an area around the tower with a radius equal to or lesser than the setback, measured from the center line of the base of the tower. In no case shall the setback distance be reduced to less than 1/2 the distance of the tower height. Commercial telecommunications facilities affixed to existing structures shall be exempt from setback requirements, provided that they are located no closer to the adjoining property line than the existing structure. • AT&T Response: AT&T's Proposed Tower will have setback distances of 225' to the north, 450' to the east, 239' to the south, and 170' to the west. (See Ex. 5 Site Plans At CI). Therefore, AT&T is requesting one reduced setback of approximately 30 feet from 200 feet to 170 feet to the west. AT&T chose the location on the Property due to existing mature trees and forest on the Property. By reducing the setback to the west, AT&T was able to locate the Facility in the 36297050.6 04/06/2020 8 00 middle of these mature trees maximizing screening from surrounding properties and roads. If the tower was moved 30 feet to the east to meet the required setback, the screening by existing trees would be greatly reduced increasing the potential visual impact. AT&T's engineer confirmed that, in the unlikely event of a tower collapse, the tower will fall within a radius of 100 feet, well short of any existing property line. (Lee Ex. 7, Engineering Certification Letter ). Therefore, the reduction in setback will not create a hazard to any surrounding property or structure. (2) Monopole-type construction shall be required for new commercial telecommunications towers. The Board of Supervisors may allow lattice- type construction for new telecommunications towers when existing or planned residential areas will not be impacted and when the site is not adjacent to identified historical resources. • AT&T Response: The Proposed Tower will be a monopole-type construction. (Lee Ex. 5, Site Plans, at C2). (3) Advertising shall be prohibited on commercial telecommunications facilities except for signage providing ownership identification and emergency information. No more than two signs shall be permitted. Such signs shall be limited to 1.5 square feet in area and shall be posted no higher than 10 feet above grade. • AT&T Response: There will be no signs or advertising on the Facility other than permitted by this paragraph. (4) When lighting is required on commercial telecommunications facility towers, dual lighting shall be utilized which provides daytime white strobe lighting and nighttime red pulsating lighting unless otherwise mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Federal Communications Commission. Strobe lighting shall be shielded from ground view to mitigate illumination to neighboring properties. Equipment buildings and other accessory structures operated in conjunction with commercial telecommunications facility towers shall utilize infrared lighting and motion-detector lighting to prevent continuous illumination. • AT&T Response: The Proposed Tower will not have any lighting unless required by the FAA or as provided as a condition of approval by the Board of Supervisors. Generally, the FAA does not require any lighting or illumination for towers under 200 feet in height. If lighting is required, that lighting will be in accordance with FAA regulations and this paragraph. (5) Commercial telecommunications facilities shall be constructed with materials of a galvanized finish or painted a non-contrasting blue or gray 36297050.6 04/06/2020 9 rn rn unless otherwise mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Federal Communications Commission. • AT&T Response: The Proposed Tower will be of a galvanized, gray finish. (See Ex. 5 Site Plans at C 1 & C2). (6) Commercial telecommunications facilities shall be adequately enclosed to prevent access by persons other than employees of the service provider. Appropriate landscaping and opaque screening shall be provided to ensure that equipment buildings and other accessory structures are not visible from adjoining properties, roads or other rights-of-way. • AT&T Response: All associated equipment at the Facility will be enclosed within a 50' x 50' compound area surrounded by a 6' tall chain link fence with anti-climbing devices. The Facility will be screened by a significant number of existing mature trees. AT&T will also add landscaping and native trees and shrubs around the Facility to aid in screening. The Proposed Tower will be of a galvanized, gray finish. Other buildings and accessory structures will not be visible from adjoining properties, roadways, or other rights-of-way. (See Ex. 5, Site Plans at C1 &C2). (7) Any antenna or tower that is not operated for a continuous period of 12 months shall be considered abandoned, and the owner of such tower shall remove same within 90 days of receipt of notice from the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. Removal includes the removal of the tower, all tower and fence footers, underground cables and support buildings. If there are two or more users of a single tower, then this provision shall not become effective until all users cease using the tower. If the tower is not removed within the ninety-day period, the County will remove the facility and a lien may be placed to recover expenses. • AT&T Response: AT&T and the Property owner acknowledge this provision and affirmatively state that if the Proposed Tower is not used for a continuous period of 12 months it will be removed along with all associated equipment and fencing. (See Ex. 9 Affidavit of Tower Removal). C. "Existing structure or tower," for purposes of this section, shall mean any man- made object having an ascertainable stationary location on or in land or water, whether or not it is affixed to the ground, which object is at least 50% of the height of the proposed commercial telecommunications facility. • AT&T Response: AT&T acknowledges this definition. 36297050.6 04/06/2420 10 C) C) V1. HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AT&T contracted with a third party environmental engineering consultant to analyze the Property, the Facility, and the surrounding areas and complete the required FCC environmental compliance report identifying the impact on environmental resources, prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ("NEPA"). A copy of the final NEPA report by ACER Associates, LLC, dated August 12, 2019, is attached as Exhibit 10. The NEPA report determined no relevant environmental or historical effects. Specifically, there was a finding of no historical properties in the area. (Lee Ex. 10, Attachment 7 at 76). Additionally, the location "does not contain an archaeological site" and the project "will have no effect on archaeological resources..." (Lee Ex. 10, Attachment 7 at 83). Acer received a response from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurring with its findings. (See Ex. 10, Section E at 109). The NEPA report further indicates that there will be no effect on dedicated wilderness areas or designated wildlife preserves, and "the project 'is not likely to impact any wilderness areas or wildlife preserves."' (Lee Ex. 10, Section G at 1441. Acer further concluded the project is "'not likely to adversely affect any threatened or endangered species."' (Lee Ex. 10, Section H at 146-47). V11. REVIEW BY PERTINENT COUNTY AGENCIES Pursuant to Code § 165-102.02, and the conditional use requirements set forth by the Frederick County Office of Planning and Development, AT&T submitted its application materials to various agencies for review. The agency comment sheets are attached hereto as Exhibit 11. The Virginia Department of Transportation stated that the proposed Facility will "have little measureable impact on Route 733 (Fairview Road). . ." The VDOT stated that the "new entrance will need to meet VDOT standards for the proposed use." AT&T will comply with all VDOT standards. The Frederick County Fire Marshal disapproved of the plan due to inadequate fire lane access and the need for an approved turn around for fire department vehicles for a lane greater than 150' in length. AT&T amended its site plans for the proposed Facility to satisfy these requirements. (&e Ex. 5, Site Plan at Cj). Pursuant to the Frederick County Fire Prevention and Protection code § 90-4B(2), the proposed access way was expanded from 10' wide to 20' wide. (Lee Ex. 5, Site Plan at C 0. Pursuant to the 2015 Statewide Fire Prevention Code, Appendix D, AT&T has added an approved turn-around for any fire department vehicles. (Lee Ex. 5, Site Plan at C1). The Frederick County Inspections Department stated that the Facility must comply with the Virginia Building Code and the tower must be designed in accordance with the provisions of the TIA-222. AT&T will comply with all applicable building codes and other requirements, including those cited by the Inspections Department. 36297050.6 04/06/2020 11 T- C) The Winchester-Frederick County Health Department had no comments because the Facility is unmanned. Frederick Water said that the parcel is outside of the Severe Water Service Area, and had no comments. The City of Winchester declined to submit a comment sheet because the parcel is located outside of the Winchester city limits. The Winchester Regional Airport had no comments. The Historic Resource Advisory Board stated that "the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the application by the HRAB." V111. CONCLUSION AT&T respectfully requests that Frederick County grant the requested Conditional Use Permit. If you need further information, please contact our zoning attorney Douglas Sampson at 410-332-8661 or douglas.sampsongsaul.com. 36297050,6 04/06/2020 12 O � Jf `T Air . R 4� a i 0 e� SITE ACQUISITION REQUEST FORM ISSUED DATE 5/31/2018 MENS APPROIVAL16ATE ISSUED BY Gaurav Beni TRIDENT APPROVAL DATE APPROVED BY Sandeep Gupta 07EFORMANICE 114ANAGER Andres Gomez SITE Acouisn&COMPANY Smartlink DESIGN MANAGER Sandeep Gupta SITE ITE ID(COMMON ID) 4124 DESIGN ENGINEER Gaurav Behl 'S SEARCH RING 10 4124 SEARCH RING NAME FROG EYE SIRBAUGH Zm" " REGION North-East LOCATION COMMON NAME MARKET ARKET�CLUiSTEF�_ E91 I PHASE 2 M MARKET Washington DC/Maryland CITY _ GORE .SUB-MARKET COUNTY _____ Frederick POLYGON CLUSTER �SITE PRIORITY 1-High CASPR PROJECT it —FREQUENCY BAND 850/1900/700/AWS FIXED ASSET# 10138153 TECHNOLOGY LTE SELECT OBJECTIVE B-COV PASTE/INSERT SEARCH RING MAP HERE A*W LOCATION SHORT DESCRIPT-1-ON- I Route 50 and SR 733 SEARCH RING PARAMETERS LATITUDE(N)(DD-MM 39-17-4 LATITUDE DECIMAL(N) 39.284485 LONGITUDE(W)(DD&7MM.SS;.S) 78-23-5 LONGITUDE DECIMAL(VV) -78.384773 GROUND ELEVATION AMSL(FEET) 1120 SEARCH RING RADIUS(miles) O7 REQUIRED HEIGHT-MAX AGL(FEET). 180 OVERALL TOTAL HEIGHT-MAX Tuis'll_ I(FEET) 1320 REQUIRED HEIGHT-MIN AGL(FEET) 200 OVERALL TOTAL HEIGHT-MIN AMISL OVERALL (FEET) T) 1300 COVERAGE OBJECTIVE To extend coverage in Freerick County along Route 50,SR 733,707,610 and 703 POSSIBLE CANDIDATES Wthere,an available Crwwn or ATC candidate within 11,5 times the radius of the center of the search ring? H yes,Include In Passible candidate I Possible candidate 2 0� ;---iiiT risible candidate 3 iiible—candidate 4 PossiblyPPP_--�; c-^d'd aI a 5 Please submit candidates within the red polygon shown above C:) W INFINIGY9 FROM ZERO TO INFINIGY the solutions are endless 6865 Deerpoth Road,Suite 152, Elkridge,MID 21075 1O/1/19 RE: AT&T Site Name: Frog Eve AT&T RA#: i6��8�53 Site Address: 141 Fairview Road Gore,VA22637 ToWhom |tMay Concern, This letter is written to address the proposed AT&T cell site installation located at 141 Fairview Road, Gore,VA22637. The proposed cell site structure will be ordered by AT&T to be designed to adhere to TIA-222-G-2005 Structural Standards for antenna supporting structures and antennas. In addition,the structure will adhere to the International Building Code 2012 as amended and adopted by the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building code and all other local, state, and federal codes and requirements. Infinigy will confirm the order as requiring these codes to be met with final structure design and code adherence by tower manufacturer. The proposed tower structure which is proposed to measure 193'above ground level to top of steel and 199'above ground level tothe lightning rod tip height. The tower will bedesigned with acritical design point located atthe midpoint qfthe tower, 1UO'above grade level. This would heaccomplished by ensuring anappropriate overdea/gnwithin the base 1OU'ofthe tower. This critical design point effectively increases the structural integrity of the design, and shall a tower failure occur,the critical design point would eb the point at which the tower would fail,thus reducing the fall zone in half,or 1OO'. Should you have any questions on the above, please do not hesitate to reach out to me directly at(518) 69O-O79O. Respectfully Submitted, lAc No 53459 Joe Johnston, PE all |nfin|gyil K� K ��U�UU^��'���� ���� �—��~���.� � �� cz 4�1 9U 000 SITE NAME G >—a- Y—hw.bel FROG EYE SIRBAUGH (D I canl �4a • E og FA SITE NUMBER ww Lu 10138153 Z., SITE ID at&t - uj 4124 Z SITE ADDRESS 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD GORE VA 22637 PROJECT SITE INFORMATIONLOCATION MAP SHEET INDEX Tv FROG EYE SIRBAUGIJ SITE ID, 4124 DESCRIPTION Ti TITLE TPAGE EA SITE A 10138153 —N, To-iEs- 21E ADDREM, 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD N2 NOTES Lie.No.04MO534!9 GORE VA 22637 a STE PLAN 03/04/2020 1URISNOTEN, FREDERICK C2 COMPOUND PLAN AND ELEVATION • MAGI RIAL DI�7Ri T' GAINESBORO C3 BE SCHEDULE AND NOTES ZONING: RA PIN#1 26 A 29 C4 ANTENNA AND RRH MOUNTING DETAILS INSTRUMENT k -RFPUUMBING DIAGRAM— ME 18 OD12690 PROPERTY AREd 14.371 ACRES C6 EQUIPMENT DETAILS as Marano —M PROJECT SITE CT EQUIPMENT DETAILS wcw n• SITE COORDINATES, F N X 17'04.45' 'IAD 83) WG SAIRRAUGH CS GENSET DETAILS C9 DC9 WRING DIAGRAM ONW 78'23'05.06' NAD 83) GROUND ELEVATION- 1100.5±FEET AMSL (NAVO 88) C10 CIVIL DETAILS Cii FENCE DETAILS IZ QE U121EST APP URTENAN CE: 199'-0'±(LIGHTNING ROD) (AGL) El ELECTRICAL DETAILS PARCEL 2EM HOTT EMMA J ETALS E2 DO POWER OfTAILS n ox 141 FAIRAWE ROAD CORE,VA 22637 E3 FINN WRING DIAGRAM APPLICANT AT&T MOBILITY E4 UTILITY PLAN FROG EYE SIRBAUG 7150 STANDARD DRIVE E5 GROUNDING PLAN SITE ID:4124 HANOVER,NO 21076 E6 GROUNDING DETAILS FA#10138153 2— NORTH L CODE COMPLIANCE ED HE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE 2 ALL WORK AND MATER SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UOMNG OWES AS ADOPTED WITH ANY LOCAL AMENDMENTS BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES: PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION 2015 VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE(VUSBC) F- APPROVALS 1 -- • 2014 NATIONX ELECTRICAL CODE(NFPA 70) ENECT MANAGEMENT, SMARTLIN • 2115 MECHANICAL COD APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE&—RESUBMrr INTERNATIONAL AN E 1362 M K,LLC 20 PLUMBING CODE --QW-N-EF-RU'— DATE u ❑0 ❑ ELLON ROAD 2015 IN HANOVER,M)21076 1, NAL FUEL GAS CODE 20,NATIONAL E PROTECTION ASSOCIATION APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE&RESUBMrr ENGINEER- INFINIGY SOLUTIONS • 2015 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 1101 SITE ADD 0 13 13 Q> 6865 DEERPATH ROAD STE 152 • AMERICAN INSWE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS(AtSC) DATE M UNDERWRITER LABORATORIES APPROVED ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS. APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE&RESUBMIT ELKRIDGE, D 21075 ANSI E"S222 REV.G CON STRM11ON DATE 0 0 (518)690-0790 TA 607 TME PAGE AEPLICANT: AT&T MOBILITY INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS 81 APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE&RESUBMIT NING 7150 STANDARD DRIVE IEEE C2 LA OXTE_ 00 jM EDITION) rl 0 _I 275 HANOVER,MIT 21076 ANSI T1,31 I APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE&RESUBMIT F ENGINEER DATE Ej Tl 9N SITE WORK NOTES: GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED SOIL COMPACTION NOTES: 0 1,CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES PRIOR 1. EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED 70 REMOVE VEGETATION&TOPSOIL EXPOSE ABBREVIATIONS TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 4. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL UNDISTURBED NATURAL SUBGRADE AND PLACE CRUSHED STONE AS REQUIRED. AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, 2, COMPACTION CERTIFICATION:AN INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY A ACL ABOVE GRADE LEVEL �'^m 2.ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC,AND OTHER TIMES,ES ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE. BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION _TL WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK,SHALL EXECUTION PROTECTED AT ALL R HAL 5, DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT i0 SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO (E) EXISTING £ ANq WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXTROF THE WORK,SHALL SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 3. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION,THE �j�'(C p w BE RELOCATED A$DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR.EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD UNDISTURBED SOIL"WE SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH"COMPACTION (P) PROPOSED L E2 a 8E USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING EQUIPMENT',LISTED BELOW,TO Ai LEAST 95%MODIFIED PROCTOR MA%IMUM MIN MINIMUM (,1,) w uj AROUNO OR NEAR UTILITIES.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,APPURTENANCES,AND LABOR NECESSARY TO DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 METHOD C, N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE L�z TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW.THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INOICATEO ON THE DRAWINGS. TO 0.)FALL PROTECTION 8)CONFINED SPACE C)ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) 4. COMPACTED SUB BASE SHALL BE UNIFORM&LEVELED,PROVIDE 6"MINIMUM REF REFERENCE G� TRENCHING&EXCAVATION.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL MATERIALS IN CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL COMPACTED IN S'C 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND TS ABOVE COMPACTED z U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SAFETY Am BE PROVIDED AND ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS TRAINING. ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SOIL.GRAVEL SHALL BE NATURAL OR CRUSHED WITH 100%PASSING i"SIEVE. � SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. BE RADIO FREQUENCY Lu 3.ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECTB. IF THE EQUIPMENT 5. MINIMUM SOIL BEARING 2000 PSF OR AS NOTED, T.B,D. TO BE DETERMINED HE SPECIFICATIONS. SPECIFIED ENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS,THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE T.B.R, TO BE RESOLVED 4-4 �N : TYP TYPICAL a:o 4.IF NECESSARY,RUBBISH,STUMPS,DEBRIS,STICKS,STONES AND OTHER INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR. COMPACTION EQUIPMENTL - REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT,POWER HAND OPERATED DOUBLE DRUM,VIBRATORY ROLLER,VIBRATORY PLATE COMPACTOR OR REQ REQUIRED AND T1 CABLES.GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, JUMPING JACK COMPACTOR. EGR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING �V 5.ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC AND OTHER GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN o UTILITIES,WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK,SHALL BE FIELD APPROVAL BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDCTION FOR ANY Q REMOVED AND/OR CAPPED,PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT DEVIATION FOR SHOWN ROUTES FOR ANY UTILITY. AND AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE .i POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS,PAVEMENTS, MOB MASTER GROUND BUS Ow H Q /r SUBJECT i0 THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, CURBS,LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES.ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE EG EQUIPMENT GROUND ■ REPAIRED AT SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. ■ 6.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING SUBSTITUTIONS OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS REQUIRE THE APPROVAL BOW BARE COPPER WIRE ■ CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EXCEEDING THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. y IDENTIFIED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING AND ASSURING THAT SEDIMENT SAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS OEVISI ~ AND EROSION CONTROL IS PROPERLY MAIN +TAINED. ire.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP GEN GENERATOR SEPH R JOHNS MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM16 7.THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITY.ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE IGR INTERIOR GROUND RING(HALO)0,�,4 THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION, R85 RADIO BASE STATION ♦ iC.N0.040205345 8.THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER 70 FLOW AWAY 12.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN A CLEAR CONDITION ON A �O .�lO4I202OJw FROM THE EQUIPMENT,TOWER AREAS AND INTO NATURAL DRAINAGE WAYS. DAILY RASIS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: SYMBOLS " IL73.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF G U FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHAH A PLACED ON FROZEN SPECIFICATIONS UNDER"GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301,ACI 318, S G SOLID GROUND BUS BAR GROUND.FROZEN MATERLALS,SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY CONSTRUCTION OF AT&T SITES.' ACI 336,ASTM A184,ASTM A165 AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION sm osAu/r2 FILL OR EMBANKMENT. SPECIFICATION FOR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. S N SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR sre ovmho 14. WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT m/xm 10.THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH WITH ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE LOCAL 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI 9 SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION,THE PERMIT SHALL HAVE PRIMARY AT 28 DAYS,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. s<e o:poh> AUTHORITY. p 2-POLE THERMAL-MAGNETIC IT.THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK ANDN3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615.GRADE 60.DEFORMED CIRCUIT BREAKER was�asn> NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER,EQUIPMENT OR SHALL BE GRADED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A TO A UNIFORM SLOPE,AND STABILIZED TO PREVEVENTT EROSION AS SPECIFIED 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL SINGLE-POLE THERMAL-MAGNETIC • IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES" BE CLASS"B'AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD,ONO. CIRCUIT BREAKER Darlgnaa_m� 12.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR � CHEMICAL GROUND ROD cnenrea: ..4 CONSTRUCTION, EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,IF REQUIRED DURING 1, ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: 0 GROUND ROD r�ukcr N�rem.. CONSTRUCTION,SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST EDITION OF AISG ess.o02 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH........3 IN, E�3 DISCONNECT SWITCH CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: Pf_Irene 2. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER ASTM A123, jf J 6 AND LARGER ...2 IN. ® METER FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 5 AND SMALLER&WWF.........1 1/2 IN. 3. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL TO MEET ASTM A36 SPECIFICATIONS. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION SITE ID:4124 CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: FA#10138153 GENERAL NOTES 4. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70O ELECTRODES AND ■ COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AUG.SURFACES D R WELDED E SHALL SLAB AND WALL......................3/4 IN. 1oI IEWRCAD 01 SEAMS AND COIUMNS...............i 1/2 IN. - -- GROUNDING WIRE ,ORE'.vp_25I> BE CLEANED AND PREPARED PER AW,STANDARD PRACTICE WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN,PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER Prepares Fa �- 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC"MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION'.PAINTED 5.. A CHAMFER OF 3/4'SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF OEFlNITXIR SHALL APPLY: SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP, CONCRETE,ONO,IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4, ENGINEER-INFINICY CONTRACTOR-GENERAL CONTRACTOR(CONSTRUCTION) 5. DAMAGED GALVANIZED SURFACES TO BE REPAIRED PER ASTM A7% 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR,SHALL BE PER OWNER-AT&T MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE.THE ANCHOR BOLT, SHALo^o OEM-ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 6. BOLTED CONNECTIONS L BE ASTM A325 BEARING DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR TYPE(3/4"0)CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.NO RESAR SHALL BE 2. PRIOR iC THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS,THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.BOLTS AND HARDWARE SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN _ SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING GALVANIZED PER ASTM A153.ALL HOLES IN STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE CONCRETE.SPECIAL INSPECTKkiS.REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES,SHALL BE W■ q CONDITIONS AND E CONFIRM THAT THE WORK AN BE ACCOMPLISHED AISC STANDARD SIZE(BOLT A.X.7)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ILr- AW g- AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS,ANY DISCREPANCY LOADS x�LL FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CONTRACTOR. ,p .- 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT jy+a ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE$,REGULATIONS,AND ORDINANCES.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS,ORDINANCES.RULES,REGULATIONS,AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING,THE prevxrg ilrye PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. NOTES Daring Mirpar -_ -� N1 LN GENERAL ELECTRICAL AND GROUNDING NOTES: E.SYSTEM GROUNDING PPRT i-OFNFRAI 1. ALL GROUNDING COMPONENTS SHALL BE TINNED AND CROUNDNC CONDUCTOR$HALL BE k2 AWG BARE, J 1.1 GENERAL CONDITIONS: SOLID,TINNED,COPPER.ABOVE GRADE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSULATED WE E NOTED. 3. CABLES SHALL BE NEATLY TRAINED,WITHOUT INTERLACNG,ANO BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH IN Alt. J m 2. GROUNDING BUSES SHALL BE BARE,RUINED.ANNEALED COPPER BARS OF RECTANGULAR CROSS a W A. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EXISTING SITE WNOID9NS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID.ANY QUESTIONS ARISING SECTION. BOXES&EQUIPMENT TO PERMIT MAKING A NEAT ARRANGEMENT.CABLES SHALL BE SECURED IN A _ DURING THE BID PERIOD IN REGARDS TO THE CONTRACTORS FUNCTIONS.THE SCOPE OF WORK,OR ANY OTHER STANDARD BUS BARS MOB,SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSOAI.LEO BY tHE CONTRACTOR.THEY$BALI. MANNER TO AVOID TENSION ON CONDUC70R$OR TERMINALS.CONDUCTORS SHALL BE PROTECTED ISSUE RELATED ip THIS PROJECT SHALL BE BROUGHT UP DURING THE BIO PERIOD WITH THE PROJECT MANAGER NOT BE FABRICATED OR MODIFIED IN THE FIELD.ALL GROUNDING BUSES SHALL BE IDENT6TED WITH FROM MECHANICAL INJURY AND MOISTURE.SHARP BENDS OVER CONDUIT BUSHINGS IS PROHIBITED. F g FOR CLARIFICATION,NOT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED, MINIMUM 3/4"LETTERS BY WAY OF STENCILING OR DESIGNATION PLATE. DAMAGED CABLES SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED A7 THE CONUtACTOR'S EXPENSE. a 8. THE CONTRACTOR SFIAI.L OBTAIN PERMITS.LICENSES,MAKE ALL DEPOSITS.AND PAY ALL FEES REQUIRED FOR THE 3. CONNECTORS SHALL BE NIGH-CONDUCTIVITY,HEAVY DUTY,LISTED AND LABELED AS GROUNDING p CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR THE WORK UNBER THIS SECTION. CONNECTORS FOR THE MATERIALS USED.USE TWO-HOLE COMPRESSION LUGS WITH HEAT SHRINK FOR 4. ALL POWER WIRING SHALL BE COLOR CODED AS FOLLOWS: C. DRAWINGS SHOW THE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF ALL SYSTEMS ANO COMPONENTS COVERED UNDER THIS MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS.INTERIOR CONNECTION$USE TWO-HOLE COMPRESSION LUGS WITH INSPECTION SECTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.DRAWING SHALL NOT BE SCALED TO DETERMINE WINDOW AND CLEAR HEAT SHRINK. DESCRIPEIQN 2p8/2401jZQ_VQI,T-SYSTEFyS, IW g DIMENSIONS. 4. EXOTHERMIC WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED M KIT FORM AND SELECTED FOR THE SPECIFIC PHASE A BLACK 1.2 LAWS,REGULATIONS,ORDINANCES,STATUTES AND CODES, TYPES,SIZES,AND COMBINATIONS OF CONDUCTORS AND OTHER ITEMS TO BE CONNECTED. PHASE B RED 1 1 Z o 5. GROUND RODS SHALL BE ERICO#615800,COPPER-CIAO STEEL WITH HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL CORE PHASE C BLUE lig A. ALL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. AND NEUTRAL WHITE w AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL LAWS.REGULATIONS.ORDINANCES.STATUTES AND OWES.CONDUIT BENDS SHAD-BE ELECIROLYpC-GRADE COPPER OUTER SHEATH,MOLTEN WELDED TO CORE,SJBx10'-0'.ALL GROUNDING GROUNDING CREEK Z THE RADIUS BEND FOR THE TRADE SIE OF CONOUT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF NEC. RODS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH INSPECTION SLEEVES 1.3 REFERENCES: NDU` 6 5 ECIFICARONS AND INSTALL AN NEC.GME EQUIPMENTDCROUNDNGLCONDUCTOR$SH'.O BE BONOEOWITH AiHALLTU ACTION (.I.( A. THE PUBLICATIONS LISTED BELOW ARE PART OF THIS SPECIFICATION.EACH PUBLICATION SHALL BE THE LATEST TO BOXES,PULLBOXES,DISCONNECT SWITCHES.STARTERS,AND EQUIPMENT CABINETS. REVISION AND ADDENDUM IN EFFECT ON THE DATE.THIS SPECIFICATION IS ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS C OTHER MATERIALS: `� OTHERWISE NOTED.EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY THE REQUIREMENT SPECIFIED HEREIN OR THE DETAILS OF THE w DRAWINGS,WORK INCLUDED IN THIS SPEC PC SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THESE 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OTHER MATERIALS,THOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY OESCRIDED.WHICH '�'m PUBLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETELY OPERATIONAL SYSTEM AND PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE WORK. o 2. PROVIDE PULL BOXES AND JUNCTION BOXES WHERE SHOWN OR REQUIRED BY NEC. C.DISCONNECT SWITCHES: o I.ANSI/EEE(AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE) 2.ASTM(AMERICAN SGUEtY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS) G.PANELS AND LOAD CENTERS: 1. INSTALL DISCONNECT SWITCHES LEVEL AND PLUMB.CONNECT TO WIRING SYSTEM AND uywi 3.ICE (NATIONAL CABLE ENGINEERS AC UCIANON) 1. ALL PANEL DIRECTORIES SHALL BE TYPEWRITTEN. GROUNDING SYSTEM AS INDICATED. 'V .♦ 4.NEMA(NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION) D.GROUNDING. 5.NEPA(NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIHEALTH ADMIION)NISTRATION) PART 3-IXyCLITAIN 6.OSHA(OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION) 1. ALL METALLIC PARTS OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WHICH DO NOT CARRY CURRENT SHA-L BE 7.UL(UNDERWRITERS tA80RAi0RiFS INCA 3.1 GENERAL: GROUNDED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER,AT&T isk 8.Ai& GROUNDING AND BONDING STPNOAROS GROUNDING AND BONDING STANDARDS,AND THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. �y 1.4 SCOPE OF WARN: A. ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH i'HE MANUFACTURER'S 2. PROVIDE ELECTRICAL GROVNDINC ANO 89NONG SYSTEM INDICATED WITH ASSEMBLY OF RECOMMENDATIONS. MATERIALS,INCLUDING GROUNDING ELECTRODES.BONDING JUMPERS AND ADDITIONAL B. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE TIGHTLY COVERED AND PROTECTED AGAINST DIRT OR WATER,AND AGAINST CHEMICAL ACCESWRIES AS REQUIRED FORA COMPLETE INSTALLATION. 4A j A. WORN UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL CONSIST TI FURNISHING ALL LABOR,MATERIAL,AND MIMIATED BE-ES OR MECHANICAL INJURY DARING INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION PERIODS, 3. ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTOR$SHALL PROVIDE A STRAIGHT DOWNWARD PATH 70 GROUND WITH .0 S R.JOINS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION AND BE OPERATIONAL.. 4p B. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE PROPERLY TESTED,ADJUSTED.AND ALIGNED BY THE 3.2 LABOR AND WORKMANSHIP: GRADUAL BEND AS REWIRED.GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE LOOPED OR SHARPLY '�'r"O F�'♦ CONTRACTOR. STRAIGHTEST ATUTE THHSNDING POSSIBLE TO CONNECTIONS MINIMIZEJTRANSIIENTROUGHING VOLTAGGEGRISESRD D IN THE SHORTEST AND + 'e.No.44Q2053459 C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATING.DRAINING,TRENCHES,BACKFILLING.AND REMOVAL A ALL LABOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED FOR THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 4. BUILDINGS AND/DR NEW TOWERS GREATER THAN]5 FEET IN HEIGHT AND WHERE THE MAIN + ! OF EXCESS ONO. SHALL BE INSTALLED BY EXPERIENCED WIREMEN,IN A NEAT AND WORKMAN-LIKE MANNER. GROUNDING CONDNOLEN,ARE REQUIRED TO BE ROUTED 70 GRADE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ♦Q D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE OWNER WITH CERTIFICATES Of A FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL B. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AIJUSiEp.ALIGNED AND TESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS ROUTE TWO GROUNDING CONDUCTORS FROM THE ROOFTOP,TOWERS,AND WATER TOWERS S . 03144!2020 i FROM TINE INSPECTION AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. REQUIRED TO PRODUCE THE MLBEQ PERFORMANCE. GROUND RING.TO THE EXISTIN GROUNDING SYSTEM,THE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL r 1 E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE 0.COMPLETE SEL OF A$-BUILT ORAWNGS,DOCUMENT ALL WIRING EQUIPMENT C. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY CLEAN ALL EXPOSED EQUIPMENT, NOT BE SMALLER THAN 2T AWG COPPER.ROOFTOP GROUND RING SHALL BE BONDED LO THE M CONDITIONS,AND CHANGES WHILE COMPLETING THIS CONTACT.THE AS--BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED 0.T REMOVE ALL IMIL5 AND ANY DEBRIS,CRATING OR CARTONS AND LEAVE THE INSTALLAUQN FINISHED AND EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM,THE BUILDING STEEL COLUMNS.LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM. COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. READY FOR OPERATION. AND BUILDING MAIN WATER UNE FERROUS OR NONFERROUS METAL PIPING ONLY) PART 2-PRODJCTc 3 3 COORDINATION: 5. TIGHTEN FOU AND BLINDING CONNECTORS,INCLUDING SCREW$AND BOLTS,IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS PUBLISHED TORQUE TIGHTENING VALUES FOR CONNECTORS ve o4ryUu 2.1 GENERAL: A, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL ITEMS WITH THE ANO BOLTS.WHERE MANUFACTURER'S TORQUING REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE,TIGHTEN are or/osm OWNER-FURNISHED EQUIPMENT DELIVERY SCHEDULE TO PREVENT UNNECESSARY DELAYS IN THE TOTAL CONNECTIONS TO COMPLY WITH TIGHTENING TORQUE VALUES SPECIFlED IN UL TO ASSURE em/xho A. ALL MATERW.S AND EQUIPMENT SHAD,BE UL LISTED,NEW,AND FREE FROM DEFECTS. WORK. PERMANENT ANp EFF-ECHE CRQUNDINC' an�o/nAe B. ALL ITEMS OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION AS 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF CROUNONC 71E-IN-POINTS TO THE EXISTING mAeM SUITABLE FOR THE USE INTENDED. 3.4 INSTALLATION: GROUNDING SYSTEM.ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE ues wmN C. ALL EQUIPMENT SHELL BEAR AHE ONDERWRfiERS lAB0A70RIES(ABEL OF APPROVAi.,ANp SHALL CONFORM TO EXOTHERMIC WELD PROCESS AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S A IM"AA REQUIREMENT OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. A, CONDUIT: INSTRUCTIONS. ens ox/zeAv D. ALL WFRCURRENT DEVICES SHALL HAVE AN INTERRUPTING CURRENT RAYING THAT SHALL BE GREATER THAN THE 7. ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR TIGHTNESS.EXOTHERMIC WELDED SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT 10 WHICH THEY ARE SUBJECTED,10,000 AIC MINIMUM.VERIFY AVAILABLE SHORT 1, ALL ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONDUIT AS SPECIFIED.NO CONDUIT OR TUBING OF CONNECTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR HAVING JURISDICTION BEFORE BEING CIRCUIT CURRENT DOES NOT EXCEED THE RATING OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE LESS PERMANENTLY CONCEALED. 110.24 NEC OR THE MOST CURRENT ADOPTED CODE PER THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION. THAN 3/4 INCH TRADE SIZE, 8. PPPUY CORRCSIONT-RESISTANCE FINISH TO FIELD CONNECTIONS AND PLACES WHERE FACTORY oeelgeetl.,�. 2. PROVIDE RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL CONDUITS FOR ALL RISERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EMT MAY DE APPLIED MOTE ECTVE COATINGS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED.USE KOPR-SHIELD ANTI-OXIDATION 2.2 MATERIALS AND EOUIPMEM: INSTALLED FOR EXTERIOR CONDUITS WHERE NOT SUBILET TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE, COMPOUND ON ALL COMPRESSION GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. Ce"` A SEPARATE,CONTINUOUS,INSULATED EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL.8E INSTALLED - A, CONDUD` 3. INSTALL SAN AL PVC CONDUIT WITH A MINIMUM COVER C ER UNDER ROADWAYS,EARNING LOTS, IN ALL FEEDER AND BRANCH CIRCUITS. T STREETS,AND ALLEY$.CONDUIT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 18 IN ALL OTHER NON-TRAFFIC 10.BONG ALL IN GROUNDING BUSHINGS WITH A BARE 6 AWG GROUNDING CONDUCTOR TO <ea_oo2 1. RIGID METAL CONDUIT(RMC)SHALL BE HOT-GIPPED GA.VANIED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE INCLUOMG ENDS AND APPLICATIONS(REFER TO 2008 NEC,TABLE 300.5). A GROUND BUS, woa slna THREADS AND ENAMEL D OR tACOUEREO IN IN ADDITION TO CpLb'ANRINC. 4. VSE GALVANIZED FLEXIBLE STEEL CONOUIT WHERE DIRECT CONNECTION TO EQUIPMENT WITH MOVEMENT, 11.DIRECT BURIED GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A NOMINAL DEPTH OF 36" 2. CONDUIT C FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUP RTSSHAS BE UL LISTED, VIBRATION,OR FOR EASE OF MANTENANCE.USE UOUID TIGHT,ftE%IBLE METAL CONDUIT FOR OUTDOOR MINIMUM BELOW GRADE.OR 6'BELOW THE MOST UNE,USE THE GREATER OF THE 7W0 FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 3, CONDUIT COMPS,STRAPS AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE STEEL OR MALL"ABLE IRON ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE APPLICATIONS.INSTALL GALVANIZED FLEXIBLE STEEL CONDUIT A7 ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION Ttl DISTANCES. COMPRESSION AND CONCRETE TIGHT ttP0 GROUNDING BUSHINGS WITH INSULATED THROATS SHALL BE EQUIPMENT MOUNTED ON SUPPORT 70 ALLOW FOR EC AND CONTRACTION. 12.ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTORS EMBEDDED IN OR PENETRATING CONCRETE SHALL BE INSTALLED INSTALLED ON ALL CONDUIT TERMINATIONS 5. A RUN OF CONDUIT BETWEEN BOXES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT CONTAIN MORE THAN THE EOUNALENT IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT, SITE ID:4124 4. NONMETAIIC CONDUIT AND FITTNCS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC OR SCHEDULE 80 PVC WHERE SPECIFIED. OF 13. THE INSTALLATION OF CHEMICAL ELECTROLYTIC GROUNDING SYSTEM N STRICT ACCORDANCE FA#10138153 D 124 INSTALL USING SOLVENT-CEMENT-TYPE JOINTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. THREE QUARTER-BENDS.CONDUIT RENO SHALL BE MADE WITH THE UL LISTED BENDER OR FACTORY 90 WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS REMOVE SEALING TAPE FROM LEACHING AND BREATHER DEGREE ELBOWS MAY BE USED. HOLES.INSTALL PROTECTNE BOX FLUSH WITH GRADE. 141 FARAEWROA B. CONDUCTORS AND CABLE: 6. FIELD FABRICATED CONDUITS SHALL BE CUT SQUARE WITH A CONDUIT CUTTING TOOL AND REAMED TO id.DRIVE GROIINO RDD$UNDL TOPS AAE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 36'DEPTH OR 6'BELOW �E VA:2537 PROVIDE A SMOOTH INSIDE SURFACE. FROST UNE.USING THE GREATER OF THE TWO DISTANCES. 1. CONDUCTORS AND CABLE SHALL BE FLAME-RETARDANT,MOISTURE AND HEAT RESISTANT THERMOPLASTIC. 7. PROVIDE INSULATED GROUNDING BUSHING FpR ALL CONDUITS. 75.IF COAX DN THE ICE E GRE I$MORE THAN 6 FT,FROM THE GROUND BAR AT THE BASE OF P-d FeF SINGLE CONDUCTOR,COPPER,TYPE iHHN/THWN-2,600 VOLT,SIZE AS INDICATED,/12 AWG SHALL BE THE 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPoN$IBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL CONDUii$DURING CONSTRUCTION,TEMPORARY THE tpWER.A SECOND GROUND BAR WILL BE NEEDED AT THE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE,TO MINIMUM SIE CONDUCTOR USED. OPENINGS IN THE CONDUIT SYSTEM SHALL BE PLUGGED OR CAPPED TO PREVENT ENTRANCE OF 2, MOISTURE GROUND THE COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS AND IN-LINE ARRESTORS S10 AWG AND SMALLER CONDUCTOR SHALL BE$DUD Dk STRANDED.AND�B AWC AND LARGER CONDUCTORS OR FOREIGN MATTER.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY CONDUITS CONTAINING FOREIGN MATERIALS i6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR,AND/OR REPLACE,EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM COMPONENTS SHAtt BE STRANDED. THAT CANNOT BE REMOVED. DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 3. SOLOERLESS,COMPRESSION-TYPE CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED FOR TERMINATION OF ALL STRANDED 9. ALL CONDUITS SHALL BE SWABBED CLEAN BY PULUNC AN APPROPRIATE SIZE MANDREL THROUGH THE CONDUCTORS. CONDUIT BEFORE INSTALLATION OF CONDl7GTOR5 OR GABLES CONDUIT SHA.L BE FREE OF DIRT AND 3.5 ACCEPTANCE TESTING a^$ 4. STRAIN-RELIEF$UPPOR75 GRIP$SHAU,BE HUBBELL KEU.EMS OR REPROVED EQUAL.CABLES SHALL BE DEBRIS. f1� SUPPORTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC ANO CABLE MANUFACTURE'R'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 10, INSTALL PULL STRING$N ALL CLEAN EMPTY CONDUITS.IDENTIFY PURI STRINGS pi EACH END. A. CERTIFIED PERSONNEL USING CERTIFIED EQUIPMENT SHALL PERFORM REQUIRED TESTS AND pR E, 5. ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE TAGGED AT BOTH ENDS WITH THE CONDUCTOR,AT ALL PULL BOXES,J-BOXES, 11. INSTALL 2"HIGHLY VISIBLE AND DETECTABLE TAPE 12"ABOVE ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND SUBMIT y EQUIPMENT AND CABINETS AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH APpROVEp PLASTIC TAGS(ACTION CRAFT,BRADY,OR CONDUCTORS. WRIREN TEST REPORTS UPON COMPLETION. v" APPROVED EDUAL). 12. CORIOLITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE AGAINST COLLECTION OF TRAPPED B. WHEN MATERIAL.ANOJOR WORKMANSHIP I$FOUND NOT TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFIED CONDENSATION. REQUIREMENT$,THE NON-COMPLYING ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT SITE AND G. DISCONNECT SWITCHES: 13. PROVIDE CORE DRILLING AS NECESSARY FOR PENETRATIONS TO ALLOW FOR RACEWAYS AND CABLES TO REPLACED WITH ITEMS COMPLYING WITH THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS PROMPTLY AFTER RECEIPT 1.DISCONNECT SWITCHES SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY,DEAD-FRONT,QUICK-MAKE.OUICN-BREAK.EXTERNALLY OPERABLE, BE ROUTED THROUGH THE BUILDING,W NOT PENETRATE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SLEEVES AND/OR OF NOTICE FOR NON-COMPUANCE. /yam HANDLE LOCKABLE AND INTERLOCK WFTH COVER IN CLOSED POSITION,MARC0.S INDICATED,UL LABELED PENETRAUONS IN FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE EFFECTNELY SEALED WITH FIRE RATED MATERIAL C. LEST PROCEDURES: //_O FURNISHED IN NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE,SQUARE-D OR ENGINEERED OVEO EQVA1. WHICH SHALL MINYAN THE FIRE RATING OF THE WALL OR STRUCTURE.FlRE STOPS AT FLOOR \`V/i/// PENETRATIONS SHALL PREVENT PASSAGE OF WATER,SMOKE,FIRE,AND FUMES.ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE I Al FEEDERS SHALL HAVE INSULATION TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION,BEFORE CONNECTION TO D. CHEMICAL ELECTROLYTIC GROUNDING SYSTEM: UL APPROVED FOR THIS PURPOSE. DEVICES.THE CONDUCTORS SHALL TEST FREE FROM SHORT CIRCUITS AND GROUNDS,TESTING Dmw+ng TMe I. INSTALL CHEMICAL GROUNDING AS REQUIRED.THE SYSTEM$HAL BE ELECTROLYTIC MAINTENANCE FREE B. CONDUCTORS AND CABLE: $HALL BE FOR ONE MINUTE USING 1000V DG PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FOR ALL TEST RESULTS. ELECTRODE CONSISTING OF RODS W1TN A MINIMUM 82 AWG CV EXOTHERMALLY WELDED PIGTAIL, 2. PRIOR TO ENERGIZING CIRCUITRY,TEST WIRING DEVICES FOR ELECTRICAL CONTINUITY MO MOTES PROTECTIVE BOXES,AND BACKFILL MATERVG_MANUfAGTURER SHALL BE LYNCOLE MIT GROUNDING ROD i. SPLICES SHALL BE MADE ONLY AT OUTLETS,SLACK BOXES,OR ACCESSIBLE RACEWAY CONDULEiS PROPER POLARITY CONNECTINS. TYPES K2-(')CS OR Kt1-(')CS(r)LENGTH AS REQUIRED. APPROVED FOR TBI$PURPOSE. 3. MEASURE AND RECORD VOLTAGES BEEN PHASES AND BETWEEN PHASE CONDUCTORS AND 2. GROUND ACCESS BOX SHALL BE A POLYPlASRC BOX FOR NON-TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS.INCLUDING BOLT 2. PULLING LUBRICANTS SHALL BE UL APPROVED.CONTRACTOR SHALL USE NYLON OR HEMP ROPE FOR NEUTRALS.SUBMIT A REPORT OF MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VOLTAGES DOWN FLUSH COVER WTH BREATHER'HOLES,"I MODEL'XB-22.ALL DISCONNECT SWITCHES AND PULLING CONDUCTOR OR CABLES INTO THE CONDUIT. 4. PERFORM GROUNDING TEST i0 MEASURE GROUNDING RESISTANCE OF GROUNDING SYSTEM Omvfny Number CONFROWNG DEVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ENGRAVED WAIICAL NAMEPLATES INDICATING EQUIPMENT USING THE IEEE STANDARD 3-POINT FALL-OF-POTENTIAL'METHOD.PROVIDE PLOTTED TEST CONTROLLED,BRANCH CIRCUITS ID'ORDERING,AND THE ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE. VA_UES AND LOCATION SKETCH.NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF MEASURED VALUE I$ N2 3. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE LYNGONITE AND LYNCOLE GROUNDING GRAVEL. OVER 5 OHMS. 9U GENERAL SITE NOTES WWW AT&T tfR"V 1201240V A COMPLETE BONDAR, �OF THE GER PARCEL HAS NET 6*-O'x 6-8• RAN PEDEFRA.O SY INPIEDY SOLUTIONS. ND—BOI S7M WC(ACO PMO)aV WAS RBTAXER WARS KEDS, SLOORD, I SITE INFORNATTE, ENTHIED EA.A FSELI*11TIONTAIN ,WETR EPUR TBAFY -W PAD AS NECESSARYBEFORE COF—IR, MEE PEDESTALS ON C4V0f 1 11—SELPTI—PN-1R1 1ANE0=41 A111 M12- 3 THE IRSANYSED DIMBINERB ONE,AN N'RE N.,OF 5-o AT&T G&VmwR ANE Ism. W/190 Wov TAW EXISTLNG-QILITY POLE z 4. THE REQUIRE DEROLOPIANIF M NNANNED AND THEREFORE DOES NOT A MEANS BE BATERU BERBER XI 'Up" AB UNESD,—WORK.PREBOBED IN COALNETION WITH N15 (=I%)6 PAD N PRS 12'-6'='LEASE AREA DEVELOPMENT EITHER N.— HE.11 EDRID Lu PRIXFOSED D1111-1 XSED NOT HOL DE D— LU STORAGE OR ANY FOUR WASTE 1111FTAELEI. (250 SAE LEASE AREA) z RUMEE SHORN ON PUN ARE TAKEN FROM NINE.RECORDS AND HELD LOCATION OF YIDELE SURFACE FEATURES. THE EXISTENCE.EXTENT AND EMT HORIZONTAL AND VERDONF UDCARRIND OF NURSE BAR NOT BEEN VERIFIED.ANY LORIR z -7 NERFtI'MNON TNS WEAK EIS S[F REST IT DIED NUTTY IT Lu LEAST 48 HOURS PRIDE TO CORNENCINI WORK. P.PA. Ell.DO/w 9. RAN N,--,B AT&TI4EVELONE IF WILL OCCUR IN ZONE OF WNTRAL -f Maim LAMMM4 TYPICAL OF(1!I)L MAIL • FLREDHA2ARD. APPROVAL ftMM j"SIDWIMN CWMAWN _j��(2) TE LEGEND com"Its ,R, 4 (FM POMP j7nk)(BY omm) 4 n SITE PROBE UNE T. /A STREET OR ROAD —FROpm 20'GRAM AI-1 TREE/SHRUB DAVK+J20,LOW(BY ovm) TREE LINE 0 1A S UTILITY POLE PROV50 G&VAN'2ED FOW 'J'\1 MONOPaE TOMER(BY 07hr?S) (SVEC#41) 11�I EXISTING UTILITY POLE MR. 41,1;) JVSV�W R. Am'"�m"""m A (m SrAoy OpEn) -,vt ic.W 040205345 • FRaVSW 10!WfI 03/04/2020 &RMAROW AArA 'A AF PRmw A MIER FALL De A 'IT AANAA N- -INIT A,111 7 I,-IA -E.A A, I/A FROG EYE SIRBALIGH SITE ID;4124 EXISTING TREELINE(TYP) FA#10138153 'QUO or-�, A,1-1- NS ""AAIWW1.d�FW— 'Dc 7 7A 6 71 12 p! ' EXISTINGTING PROPERTY LINE(Pll) SO � EXISTING BULOING(TYR) SCALE GRAPHIC 1 SIT PLAN 100, 50, 0 50, 100, SITE PUN = NORTH CI SCALE:AS NOTED L SCALE (11x17): 1" = loo'-o" .—N,N-1— SCALE (2204): 1" = 50'-0" cl 6U 000 z�f TOPWOPOSED LWnWMG ROD Z W g s OIAILF67pfr) _ -z W EL£YA7RM!t799r-0 Aa PROPOSED 1ALRS UGHTAWG ROD o u, TaP OF PROPOSED MaVOM,KE ) zz� *ELEVARaV.ttet78J'-0 AG'—L PROPOSED W TOP OF PROPOSED AT.T.7UMS ATRT ANSrAUNIENNA ARRAY W/ -9r—77xAl:t192r0 A(X- (t2)AN7ENNA5(6 mSTAtt,6 FL7RRE) Jv€0�PROPOSED ATRT AM7ENMAS .. (t5)RRHs(9 flV5'TALt,6 tDXW) 4-0 Y— (J)OC9s(J MSTAtt) �! EZEVA77GY ti88'-0'ACL �W FUTURE CARRIER RAO CENTER I� FUTURE CARRIER ANTEENA ARRAY Y ELEVATION: }1]8'-D"ACL ----— L'--j CC�(iM OF 3) PROPOSED 50x.50 FENCED COMPOL MO FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER n (2500 SF.)(BY ODWRS) -t$—-—_ PROPO$Ep lANDSCAPoNG,TYPICAL CM"(15j. FmA Ci! �.Si s �.tis L ti s ,ti f ELEVATION: 1e APPROVAL PENONC.1196SOICRAN CO4RWAnOM. w w X—X—X— —X y�FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER _ I 7 A x pF e f r Y ELEVATION; ±158'-0"AOLLI = r FUNRE r FUTURE, FUTURE w f r Ar 2'.2D I I7FA6� ( 12•.25' I AC Y• LEASE AREA (LEASE ARE0.( LEASE AREA PROPOSED Aar(j)6Y PROPOSED CAVAN/2ED fIN/SY MOYOR7CA d j � �+, (248 S.F.) (192 SY) `¢s, (300 S.F. I ( PVC COTS W/ TOLWR(BY Ows)WW/ •w R.� i F f x I ( x w s PROPOSED(J)24PR FABER CABLES PROPOSED(J)ATaT 24PR RBER CAerEs�► •NO.046205345 '•► PROPOSED 04LVAIM FbWgl 19X 125' I �-——J PROPOSED(a)s/C OC CABLES PRU OSLO(9)AtitT 6/C OC POMER �� �Is MOVOP"MI ER(BY ODM) L——J cAelEs RGKI7ED msm POLE D 03/04/2020 c.Si s x ( yO Amr 120/240V•10,200A PRC W/ t PROPOSED GABLE w ——J GEN PUFG(1NIEORAL m WC) rz s a COWR'00a0iSE'To BE AVSTAUED I ---""""�� ; y PROPOW A T VERRV I20/240V OR 6-1 6=8T sR4 a w�ne SIM WC(WO jZ00B0)ON evn m t w C w SIM PEDESTALS OW OL'R4WEIE PAD roiane PRLRO$ED HANOMOE (NEC 120J24)AMD PROPOSED s engine J Arer j"DIEM GVWMr0R .w.s mrane (BY DAMS) h W/190 GALLON W mrs mksnv (CENERAC/NEO 20270 OFF >u+ a"m,: PROPOSED PAD MLCMt7fD d<T--EaT (�f PROFYJ$Ea 72 8'CpVQ7E,E.PAD IRAIWOR R'R(BY OWS)- -x x�L X m PROPOSED 12=6170'LEASE AREA PRaPOSE'D(2)4'OOWDIRIS �; (250 SF.LEASE AREA) (FAA POW7O J75't) Z'e PROPOSED Ater 12'-6170•LEASE AREA (eY 0T mss) (250 se LEASE AREA) PROPOSED 1201240V,t4 6 GANG AT&T ORS ANTENNA . a_ MEIER STAUO(SHENAAWM VALLEY (ATTACFRD ro WC) Pmre�rtro �PROPOSEDCOOP)(ByOK 14 2004on"RS)WAW � PROPOSED 12'ACCESS GA IF(BY OnfERS) FROG EYE SIRBAUGH METER AMO M.GB SITE 1D:4724 PROPOSED 2'VG CaYDW'T (FOR Ater 2DO4 Pomp,.ro't) FAQ#�0�138153 vaRvlevu NonD PROPOSED 2'UGCO4DLA'r (FA?Aar TELCO,45't) wren ver -- m 7II m 7D7D Exnmw WALL OF R:t.G ogNM PRCROSED 6'CHAm L96!FENCE W/1'BARBED WRE a GREEN E e WTE SEA 75(BYOTHERS) GRADE LEVEL CL EVATION:8-0`AAOL Drevxrp Title 98APHIC SCALE• COMPOUND 20' 1o' 0 10' 20' PLAN AND /I \CQMPQlND el 6N ��1��1�i 2 Al N ELEVATION NORTH 22 SCALE:AS NOTED SCALE (11 X1 7); 1" = 20-0" C2 PT TO SCALE N SCALE N / N SCALE (22x34): 1" = 1o'-0" C2 CARL YST M&RF SYST M DESIGN PLAN NOT J i. SECTOR ORIENTATION/AZIMUTH WILL VARY FROM REGION TO RECON AMC IS SITE SPECIFIC.REFER TO SEPARATE RF REPORT FOR EACH SITE TO DETERMINE THE ANTENNA i h t LOCATION AND FUNCTION OF EACH TOWER SECTOR FACE. (�•/)f(!�v,o 2. THE STANDARD 15 BASED ON EIGHT COLORED 2 0£ TAPES-RED,BLUE,GREEN,YELLOW,BROWN,ORANGE, PROPOSED ANTENNA SCHEDULE AND RF SYSTEM DESIGN PLAN (REDS DATED 02/22/2019, V2019_1.0) WHITE.AND SLATE(GREY).THESE TAPES SHOULD BE z uof j Q8 READILY AVAILABLE TO THE ELECTRICIAN OR CONTRACTOR A a SECTOR ANTEONNNA ANTENNA MAKE/MODEL RAD CTR. W rc J POSITION FT AGL AZIMUTH M-TILT RRH MAKE/MODEL E-TILT FEEDLWE FEEDUNE LENGTH JUMPER LENGTH ON SITE. Z o AI FUTURE - _ _ _ 3. USING COLOR BANDS ON THE CABLES,MARK ALL RF fie' w CABLE BY SECTOR AND CABLE NUMBER AS SHOWN ON z w CDVAlS'CLWE' ROMA AfRSCA1E DUAL RRH lT4R Bf2/14 320W At6.BA GTE 70x 2 'CABLE MARKING COLOR CONVENTION TABLE z W 2 AWNBt-BSC-R4 188-D, 60' 0 t2't A NOW AfR=gX OVAL RRH 4T4R 825/66 520W ANN LTE 1900&AMS 25 N 24M OBER OPRC CABLE. 123' 4, COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3"WIDE AT TOP AND #3 cauuSCIWE 188,_01 &0 ROMA AfNCA 85 AN45CALE RRH 4T44 85 i60W ANCA LTE BSO&850 SG 2 (3)6117(BANG DC CABLES 1403' AR1XH-BSC-R4 12'1 MIDDLE OF TOWER AND 2"WIDE At THE BOTTOM.ALL FUTURE WCC AFH _ JUMPERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. #4 FUTURE - J2'3 - - FUTURE 7000 RRH _ 5. ALL COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3M-35 AND SHALL -� RS FUTURE - - _ _ BE INSTALLED USING A MINIMUM OF(3)WRAPS OF TAPE � 4 188=0' f80' 0 LTE 7q?2'STA NRSCALE DUALXT ARN 4TAR 812114 W AJWA AND SHALL BE NEATLY TRIMMED ANO SMOOTHED OUT SO #6 723 AS TO AVOID UNRAVELING. z u' B NGW%A AIRSCALE OVAL RRH 4T4N 825/66.STOW ANABB LTE 1900&AMS,25 N 24PR EVER GWBC CABLE 123 6. ALL COLOR BANDS INSTALLED AT OR NEAR THE GROUND ~} GCW.MSCA�E ROMA ANCA 95 AJRSCAJE RRH STIR 85 160W ANMt LTE 850&830 SF.2 ISS 6/17 JBAMS DC CABLES ifp.t t13 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/4`WIDE. #7 NNNH-65C-Rf 'e8=o' rte' o ♦(JR�sjy FUTURE AVE RAX f2i 7. ALL COLOR CODES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO'■I,, B FUTURE - - - FUTURE 700D RRH _ ALIGN NEATLY WITH ONE ANOTHER FROM SIDE-TO-SIIt,O #9 FUTURE COYNSCWJ1881-0*E NWA ANSCALE OVAL RRH 4T4R 8!2/14 SYOW ANABA LIEM 2 61O MYW-6517-R4 0 fT2 C NWA AWSC41E DUAL RRH 4W 8T5/6B 32OW ARM 17E 1900&AMS 2s (J)24m N78ER CPRC CAME J1't iU 10 ISH R 10 GYWXSCHNS # #11 p°E 188-, N016A ANCA 85 AAQSCALE RM!4T4N 8S 16OW AWA Llf 850&8S0 S4:T (3J 61t;pA%V DC CA&ES J403 — NNNBf-65C—R4 0 O r2t + FUTURE WC5 RRH No.0402053439 • X72 FUTURE - - - F07URf 700D RRH 123 I Q Q3104J2020 GPS - OP5 CABLE IDENTIFICATION NOTES- � t !)1( COAX 1, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING ��J33 - WITH THE MASTER COLOR CODE DOCUMENT. & 2.SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS vma+na IDENTIFICATION TM(1..1/2'IN DIAMETER WITH 1/4' as masav STAMPED LETTERS AND NUMBERS ONE AT THE eaTx7ro ANTENNA PORT CONNECTION NEAR THE END OF THE 7am+aT:sna JUMPER AND ONE ON EACH END OF THE JUMPER m7uns SERVING THE RADIO EQUIPMENT.EACH TAG WILL DE ars vNnn9 STAMPED WITH'ATT"AND THE ANTENNA PORT 1oln+hr IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FYIMPLE BELOW.TAGS SHALL i "'"a macro BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF LN RESISTANT MRE OR CABLE-TY. pravm,_PS�L vexlgnetl� ATT SAMPLE ANTENNA 1'1 REFER TO AT&T ANTENNA P,*P T.� COLOR @NUMBERING FROG EYE SIRBAUGH SCHEME DATED 5j17/2005. REV.2/2/2005 SITE ID:4124 FA 11 10138153 141 FAIRVIEWROAD GJRE,VA 2-7 P.PaPtl Fo• }c A7 E wOw Yd GAMMA, 3' C' OR Z ALPHA, 1,A,OR X ABz RF CABLES RFT CABLES TCA ES NRA LE B AIO 405 REO'D AS REO'R Cl — iRF SCHEDULE BETA, 2,B,OR Y RF CABLES AND NOTES B+THRU B10 AS REO'D ANTENNA SECTOR AND 9;.pNomear CABLE DEFINITION C3 #12 .. _ FIRSJNET ANJEAMA PMA AREA U 81 (NO RRIM 70 RE k"JED WJBRQ(TIP) 00_w PROPOSED AT&T AN70WA S" �(TYP OF?PER SECIOP.6 TOTAL) S TRI HANG RAIL KIT FOR i0 FORTRESS MOUNT,SITE PRO 7 MODEL p: SS TRI K70 m 4�'DA did �zOs 7 P`AT'46o f) Z w n Tl c LLZo� l s3 PROPOSED ANSCALE 825166 RRH AAD - PROPOSED A6?SL'ALE BI W PROPOSED MP PER SSW W l k�r ANTEMIIED TO r_.. 44 FUTURE AT&T ANTENNA FUTURE OF 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL) we a fU7URE 700 RRH MOUNTEDB Amn / BEHIND ANTENNA _ o (TYP OF 7 PER SECTOR,3 TOTAL) o s ,.." Ag 48 A7 46 45 I FORTES S TRI-PLATFORM MOUNT WITH WALKWAYS,SITE PRO I MODEL f.F3P-IOW �X PROPOSED LOW PROFU PLATFTMM W/ 1 Q • WW PLA IFOPM ( R 16&&00) +u U J R J(J i • >i PROPOSED DL'9(rm or 31 •r� No.0402053459 • 2 ANTENNA PLATFORM DETAIL •'P C4 SCALE:AS NOTED GRAPH SCALE: �p 03/04/2020 6 3' 0 3' k i ANT NNA ORIENTATION NORTH C4 SCALE:NTS SCALE (11X17): 1" = 6-0" SCALE (2204): 1" = 3'-0" �bm NOTES. a-a whaA> AT&T TOWER PIM NOTICE T. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA DOWNTILT BRACKET WITH THE DOWTION TILTSCHEDULE DOLE DIN THE ANTENNA CABLE punnv CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE PROPOSED 2-7/B"X 120' 2. REPS MUST BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA AS,;6R.$ SOM..40 AA;WMAi P7PEs PROPOSED 2-J/6•X 720'LC WHEN SUPPORTING RF COAX ADPERS,MR,RET OR OC CABLES LOCATED AT THE PLATFORM LEVEL w 3. DO NOT INSTALL OOWNTILT BRACKETS ON FIRSiNET A&IOq, JSYSI SLAf. fnPES PROPOSED 2-7/6'X110" AA/OR AITERNA RAD CENTER,UBUZE OTv-2 W RATED 1/4•WE NALGN CABLE RES(PER ANTENNAS. PROPOSED FJP-NRKrO HAND RAIL AIT LC AT O'LL 35M SUPPORT FORT) za.e $CAL.40 MOIJNRNC PIPES ENSURE THERE S NO RUSTN6 METAL ON MOURCING PPE WHERE CABLE HWCER AND ADFTER ARE cxetl�q._ TO 8E ARACNE0.USE A WIRE 89191 OR NYRE WHEEL.A DRIL TO REMOVE NIY RVBTRIG METAL CLEAN 1HE MOIMDNO SURFACE(INLUWAS REMOVAL CF LRIYJR C09i05KKI)N1iN A SCDLTI BRITS Prprecl Number. PML PART ANY EXPOSED META.WHERE THERE WAS RI1ST OR CJLYINQMG HAS BEEN OANAGED PROPOSED AMID" WITH ._.= PMN,(COLD-MV),USE IR BETWEEN PIPE MOUN}INC HWpA'ARE 48smz (CLAMPS ORSTANESS-STEEL BANDING)AND MOUNIMG PIPE IF COLD-MV PAW WAS MMKD. ore.Tke�. PROPOSED 85 RRH ENSURE THE RW HAS DRIED BEFOREAPPLYING NO-OX.DD NOT USE NOSE CLAMPS TO SECURE AAO PROPOSED&V RRH CABLE xAxaRs OR LANCER ADPRE IS M LIGH 95c PLA zDNEs. FROG EYE SIRBAUGH ON PROPOSED SW14E'L LIOWAr ALL ORGIES TES SHOJID BE FLUSH CUT TO PRET I MGMRrr FROM EXPOSED SHARP MG • DD NOT ATTACH EAASB TAGS 70 RF CABLES FOR CABLE AENDFMADON (sw PRO I IRRDAASAA) R91e MMOT BE LOCATED DIRECTLY 801IND ANTENN4 THEY AAE BENANO. SiTE 10:4124 FA ii 10138153 141 FAWIAw ROAD 60RE,V:3637 ANTENNA-OE7AJERL7AlE AMENNW CFJVJERLWE w]U— pared Far PROPOSED 81211814 RRH AND PROPfEp 825/66 RRN PROPOSED F,P-IOW'mow2'-6'MIN PROPOSED AN7EASV1 OrV PROPOSED STgYEi ARALRVr �� o o m (SPE PRO I/MCOSM) E rc�w$ PROPOSED fx'9 or) W OrevAng TTM ANTENNA AND NOTES, POS QN 12/16/JR4 OC9 MO IMIN-QETAJ POSITION 13/!7/111 GRAPHIC SCALE RRH MOUNTING 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA DOWNHILL 4' 2 O 2 _4' DETAILS BRACKET WITH 7HE DOWNHILL SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA /�� AARCNIAIA/DbLI/Ilf^fr lull IAITIAI/` (1CFAll I _ DmNiny Number ALPHA SECTOR BETA SECTOR �-w 6CC_Plprep_P20LFN7PA1A3 P30CWprep_P40prep_FO_NoDC_A c __--•••. _ rep P 7PA1 _ OC p P_ P p_ _ ............. ; ._............... Pip 20LFN A3 P3 W re P40 re FO NoDC_B Lu LEmmZ13 7777i"' ••,, Lu 5 W Lu i Jg-t Z-i Z. s + •0 ,C.. i +� EPHL ♦U qi L c.No.0402053459 + %0 03/04/2020 LSI t J I_«�lM L�J J Lal L= U 1=1 l_a«.1�' M F] rensa� - '°'"' mm :onn. av•n. GAMMA SECTOR Asn. 6CC_Plprep_P20LFN7PAIA3 P30CWprep_P40prep_FO_NoDC_C ° --aa— �tl.�m_ 12 } iFROG EYE SIRBALIGH s SITE ID:4124 _.._..._.� FA#10138153 141 FNRNEW R04D F=ir--1H�Hf WW WRE.Vk?3B3'i _ c � = i = •� m E n W Dmrxng Tnle RF PLUMBING DIAGRAM $ �� j vng xureee: WIC COMPONENTS PART AT&T NUMBER NEQ4 DESCRIPTION J J ----T2017026 20060 AT&T 6'-8 1/4'x6'-8 7/4"STEEL WC V 120/24OV,200A,10,3 SOURCE MAINS;ASCO SERIES m AA-G-122OD42-100R-CL-R TBD 300-G PLUS MTS:STRIKESORB;42 POSITION SQUARE D PANElB0AR0;NEMA3R ENCLOSURE;ICGC RIGHT;65kA _Z�a NETSURF ON SERIES-SIDE A D POWER SYSTEM SIZED M � _ 6'-8 1/4- SECURITY W n 582727000203 NE0.20068®7000AMP ON-48VDC SDE AND SWA ON+24VDC SIDE ��SNB 6'-8 1 4 W/3 FACTORY INSTALLED AND WIRED BATTERY TRAYS. HVAC UNIT (FOR DPS ANTENNA) tFL LKIiTS (,E,J rc EY88 (YYP OF 2 FRONT �Z w PTS 3703-WIC WOF NEO.19678 RACK COMMBAY-WIC-WTHOUT FIBER PANEL AND REAR) PTS3704-WC-WF NEO.19679 RACK COMMBAY-NTC-WITH FIBER PANEL Z m DIRECT AIR COOLING(DAC)SYSTEM.DUAL-481DC AN7A� LE.I AF000735 BL0.70558 POWERED FRESH AIR COOLING KIT WITH HVAC CONTROL LOCKABLE ENTRY DOOR W/ NCTION ��, FOR LOW VOLTAGE(24 VAC)CONTROLLED HVAC UNIT DC FRESH AN COOLING SYSTEM ECUA12ACA036S-A5-100 N/A 1 TON WALL MCONTED HVAC W/CONTROLLER, (2)DCiz SURGE SUPPRESSORS SUPPLY,RETURN GRILLS,AND REMOTE SENSOR MOUNTED TO FACE OF W.I.C. - o I � pdg (3)6"PJC CONDUITS n 3)6"WC CONOthiS (PLUMBED THROUGH (PLUMBED PAD) GH CONCRETE PAD) CONCRBE ♦� xIW �{ IT LEFT Et£YATXNV STEEL PEDESTALS(ORDERED EM OVATION RIGHT EIZIADON : B'VERTN SEPaRATEL� GRAPHIC SCALP 6' 3' 0 3' ~ • 1 WIC AI J RJAHNS y� CB SCALE:AS NOTED SCALE (11 x17): 1" = 6' }(, ic.No.040205345 • • SCALE (2204): 1" = 3'- o 03/04/2020 i LED LIGHT FIXTURE r t (LOCATED'N CEILING.TYR OF 4) SMOKE DETECTOR (LOCATED IN CEILING) a:asrm mrs rz FACE OF o2nre EXISTING TOWER I BACKER ROB AND SILICON.CAULK nasw[`ew "�wnzna MAT(TOP AND SIDES OF COVER unm a.e"� moans u ` PLATE TO I OF WALL) �'� TOWER(TYP) 14 GA SHEET 5 CHAMFER EDGE METAL ENCLOSURE- BROOM FINISH W/3/ Pl 3/8"x2"x3"LONG.PROVIDE 14 GA 3'x3'REMOVABLE CO - (0 , 4" 3 VER.CENTER HOLE FOR(i)3/8'DIA.STAINLESS BOLT OPENING ABOUT TANK PENETRATIONS it EA PULE SPACE PLATES®i'6 MAX O.C.ALONG VERTICAL SIDES OF COVER azeam 'g ROVIDE A 1 BREAK ON Pm,r M EXISTING TONER PORTHOLE P 587 suRFACEs of COVER IN CONTACT FROG EYE SIRBAUGH i/4'STAINLESS SELF TAPPING SCREWS _ NSTH TOWER FOR BACKER R00 • 3 _^ a DI'-0"O.C.MAX AROUND OPENING AND SILICON SEALANT BEARING 1 _ '—_ - SITE ID:4124 L3x3x1/4 FOR SHEET METAL FA#10138153 COVER SUPPORT, 00 NOT 141—1-ROA ATTACH COVER TO SUPPORT,ONE —Ev:2sa7 �• -116®16"O.C. ANGLE FOR EACH SIDE OF BOX Prtparce For. FINISH GRADE (EACH WAY,TOP AND BOTTOM) 3/4'CHAMFER(TYP) 3/8"DIA EXPANSION "• to ANCHORS 3"MIN y 8O EMBED(3 EACH ANGLE) / 2-q4 A DUNG ANTENNA COAX c �`.� { �•� PROPOSED CONCREIE PVC NING(TYR) " f/ SLAB ON GRADE 24 PORTPONT CABLEENTRY \S \ � ld WALL (ROXTEC 24.24 EZ ENTRY. ♦T f 's,. � 'P!d �STONE OR ^ m WALLS AND ENTRY DOOR TED GRANULAR FILL TYR OF 5) 6 MIN CRUSHED STONE OR 7/2 COMPRESSIBLE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. NULAR FILL GEOTEXTIIE FABRIC(MIRAFI 500X) _M -"( o _ FILLER(TYP) x WIC FOUNDATION NOTES ' t MIN //)�AVV�� 2 WI Y T M I Y� 1. REMOVE ALL LOOSE INORGANIC OR UNSUITABLE SOIL TO 3 N T A T ff (( .I r,q ° EXISDNCe TOWER FOUNDATION C8 SCALE:AS NOTED �i-_�! 5' (MAY VARY) C8 SCALE:AS NOTED UNDISTURBED BEARING STRATA W/ALLOWABLE SOIL _I BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 ASF. I, MM :• 0*�re Title GRAPHIC S LE: 2. CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 4000 PSL MIN. �RAPHSCALE: jf EQUIPMENT 3. SLAB SHALL BE LEVEL}7/4'. 6 3' d 3' 6' ,44®72"O.C.EACH WAY 4 2 O 2 4 4. THE'UNDISTURBED SOIL'BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO (4)B"DIA PVC DETAILS 1 m AT LEAST 55MPROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY PER m ASTM D 15577 METHOD c. ��CONDUIT STUB-UP DETAIL SCALE (11x17): 1" = 4°-0" 5. PRELIMINARY PAD DESIGN;SUITABILITY OF FLOATING PAD TO SCALE (11x17): 1" = 6'-0" vaWneN�mwr BE DETERMINED AFTER GEOTECHNICAL ANAI,Y$15. SCALE -- NOT TO SCALE SCALE (22x34): 1" = 2'-d" (22x34): 1" = 3'-0" c6 t7 MATCH EXISTING SURFACE 11 TH DISTURBED By EXCAVATION (x) NOTES: COMPACT IN 6'LIFTS UNDISTURBED EARTH I ALCATEL-WCENT/NOKA VA AT&T SUPPLIES REMOTE RADIO HEAD (RRH) SRR AND RRH MOUNTING 8p%CKEj. .1� CD Ran SHALL SUPPLY UNISTRUT (D UB AND INSTALL RRH.AND ALL MOU G E INCLUDING ALU/NOKlA SERI HARDWARE D' WALL MOUNTING BRACKET IF NECESSARY, ALU/NOKIA MAKES CABLE TERMINATIONS. 6'AL METAL CORE,UNDERGROUND WARNING TAPE PRINTED WITH uj z 2 DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS ARE FOR RSH WO WITHOUT MOUNTING BRACKET 'CAUTION BURIED UTILITY LINES" SIZE AND WEIGHT TABLE 6'0 PVC CONDUIT 7-z REP MODEL (TYP.OF 3) w ALU HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT EALRH 2�40-'7AT 1— IG 4D 4x30-4R �IR U 2 52�91 USE ALP B25 HER 4040-�R WASHED SAND AL R _21 2�11 97--7 IT 52B LOS 5 .12 D'�8 7* — +0 31.5 LOS TS ALU RRH 425-WCS-NR -31 COMPACTED IN A-1_11- AL E3EEA RRH4,45-4R 11 K rl 1.8"x7.2" — C3 86 52S LES 0 1 NOKIA 4R 812 14 320W AHURA_26�1"l LBS !14' 99 NOW40A 4T4B FIRS 6,32OW AHF19 NO T LIS — B 5 88.18 LOS OKA 4T4R LIS I HOW AH si,_�_ - 13.7, Al- -SE� OR NOKIA 4.1. 16.83".12.48'x6.3` 39.02 UBS 2*GALV.STEEL CONDUIT SIDE FRON REAR FOR ELECTRIC GROUNDING 4' 4' CLEARANCE TABLE Bono —CLEARANCE_REQ'D R—OW — %Ik R IN ALL ACCESS NOTES %0 k I P� Is SET REAR 470 WITH SUPPLIED AMMUN�11W�BRACKETS QLM_MKQ0PE MODEL NO. NNHH-65C—R4 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LONG RADIUS BENDS.(24"RADIUS MIN.OR a LEFT 4'FOR AIR )w RIGHr a'FOR All FLOW GREATER AS REQUIRED TO SNAKE CABLE CONDUIT THROUGH CONDUIT) a __RADOME MATERIAL: FIBERGLASS,DIV RESISTANT TOP 11 FLOW RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY 2 ALL PIPE TRENCHES TO BE HAND EXCAVATED AND BACKFILLED TO ENSURE P.70Hm1w t;* BOTTOM =1_10LI DIMENSIONS,H~: OIND.R+SOONER 96Vx79,6',7.8' THAT EXISTING CONDUIT AND PIPING ARE NOT DISTURBED.CONTRACTOR TO -W WEIGHT,W/O MOUNTING KIT 99.2 UBS MAKE ALL PVC JOINTS WATERTIGHT.M$T PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 0 No.002053459 CONNECTORz (a)--lo M L, -\UNDERGROUND CONDUIT DLJ, %oj03/04/2020 3 7 SCALE:NTS a C7 SCALE:NTS 2\ANTENAI ' —w1l 2 AWG THW OR TW STRANDED Y-1 GROUND LEAD ATTACHED TO PIPE WITH EXOTHERMIC WELD TO SECTOR CND BAR PIPE(2'TO 4"GO AS PER STRUCTURAL AND(OR MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS)PECIPICAPONS) PROPOSED USE ROUND MEMBER ADAPTER A$REQUIRED TO SECURE JUMPERS PIPE MOUNTING BRACKET 72"} ProFw Tues. (PT#ANDREW-31670-2 OR FINISHED GRADE FROG EYE SIRBAUGH Fl APPROVED EQUAL) 7 g 7PRI N PANEL ANTENNA MOUNTING BRACKET FURNISHED I!. WARNING TAPE(I TYR.) SITE ID;4124 WITH ANTENNA —COMPACTED BACK FILL FA#10138153 i TO 95%MODIFIED R., ",PAIRAE— IET MOTORPROCTOR DENSITY VA 2x631 PER ASTM D 1557 NQTES UNDISTURBED _y I,ANTENNA ORIENTATION 15 BASED ON TRUE NORTH BEARING, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. —COMPACTED SAND c AZIMUTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, = �-'�2� NOT INSTALL DOWNTILT BRACKET ON RRSTNET ANTENNAS. CABLE MANAGEMENT BRACKET C NTRAGTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING IN THE FIELD POWER CONDUIT 4.SUB PVC SCHEDULE-40 0 zd WITH REPRESENTATIVE. L 2,CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO FINAL RE CONFIGURATIONS SHEET FOR ANTENNA A 3.DO AT&T DWG 5.INSTALL SURGE ARRESTORS ON MAIN COAXIAL CABLES.GROUND TO RAY SIZE AS GROWN IN NEAREST GROUND BAR -CAP MODEL NO, DC9-48-60-24-8C—EV PVC CONDUIT E 6.SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS IDENTIFICATION TAG(I VKUVIUtS HELP CONNECTIONS FOR UP TO 24 PAIR FIBER SIZE SCHEDULE-40 1/2'IN DIAMETER)WITH 1/4"STAMPED LETTERS AND NUMBERS.ONE (LC-LC SINGLE MODE)AND AS SHOWN ON DWG AT THE ANTENNA PORT CONNECTION NEAR THE END CIE THE JUMPER PROTECTION FOR NINE(9)INDIVIDUAL-48VDC CIRCUITS(#12 TO#4 AWG) AND ONE ON EACH END OF THE JUMPER SERVING THE RADIO CEO 9-CEO.21427 S EQUIPMENT.EACH TAG WILLBE STAMPED WITH AT&T AND THE ANTENNA LES PORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER.I.E. nR Ti. FADE SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF W RESISTANT MRC OR CABLE-Ty. EQUIPMENT DETAILS --\ANTENNA Mg -1 N-1 4 MOUNTING DETAIL 5\RAYCAP — 7j SCALE NIS _M EIDER/DC DEMARQ DOME DETAIL --\COMPOUND -i7J SCALE:NT, / 6 TRENCHING DETAIL \57j SCALE:NIS C7 421 18.6'] J DED —j G4[98-) 122 0 89 17 4E'6'�"250 1(6 6") [4,92 7'] [3.5`] RECOMMENDED ELECTRICAL FLUB-OPS {SEE OCTA, LED NEW @ TOP NEW) 80 [3.2'] R462 [R18.2"] Ra4i 111 INSIDE NO...NNG DOOR (,12.4`] (a4+) DESCRIPTION BASE (i PLACE) LATCHING ES) � IW a ` (2 PLACES) O 0 A � i19C i)AC LOAD LEAD CONDUIT AREA, AIR FILTER 6 AIR FUEL FUEL " i 6+ LLL_Z w RESTRICTION[Np[CAipR SUPPLY RETVRN \ 90. [2' ] 2)1(20/340 VAC FROM UTILITY A [1]"} LOW VOL (BY OTHERS)CBOX p (GLAND PLATE INCLUDED) Z E B) 77 WPRIMARY CTION 384 [30.6"ENING [15.1(+] TANK) 1)TRANSFER SWITCH/ FUEL VENTS I) .� PRIMARTAGE STO AREA P COMMUNICAHONSCANDU2�WIRE L SEE NOTE 16) WITH OTE 6 NllSLNDS BE PUN INB TEL LEVEL RAM {N ) START O CONDUrz wr>H AQ v4awc.SEE E l + AREA 11TALP ) (SEE NOTE 8) FUEL FILL VIEW LOW VOLTAGE �x STUB-UP AREA o (NOTE 8) ...`. T-� - SEE NOSE 16) -P rm vl (298,] a3 [t.'"] ,A ENGINE BLOCK HEATER TANK STUB-UP (NATE 21 AREA(NOTE 6) i 437 X 945(W%H) 880 X Das(W X H) 2407 [94.8"] 965 38" OVERALL LENGTH �ra [17.2 X 37.2] [36.5 X 31.27 [ J DISCHARGE ♦ I� �, OVERALL WIOLD AIR INTAKE TYP EACH SDE ( ) 0 SOLI-ON PANEL BOLI-ON PANEL NOTES 9 ffi 11 ♦ AND REAR(NOTE 10) + [ fV J JL JoBm + CONTROL PANEL tc.No.0402053459 x.: E (NOTE 11 ;YF0 03/04/2020 LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER i CONNECTION 90% (NOTE 81 +/ 551 MAIN LTNE CIRCUIT {, DISCHARGE [Et 1+I BREAKER(MLCB) DUCT y,s a)pTny (NOTE 15) wm PxmnP 2310 (91"] HIGH VOLTAGE wm tt/N/p r p[wtto nwxaaxP OVERALLCNI BOX-. °° ure.az w+a,Ansna HEIGHT NOTES ATE$4 9&2> ws aynAw _. [53.5'] mweo m m_v[w as mAre>•> ° MLCB M+wMrre«rem L 1 LOT BE 5 UBLD : x FU1168 [46.1 802 235 [29`] 894 [3&2'1 1� Dealo rntl� " CAPACIN BOTRTOM O O CA tTY fief [31.6'] TANK HEIGHT Pro-ch.— CLEARING CONNECTION BOX L 499002 PralettTitle LIFTING BRACKETS M17.46(0.69'] 914 [36+] 40%60 SLO OUNTING HOLES NOUNnNG HOLE 1(B [0.T"] COCLFNT FROG EYE SIRSAUGH 8 PLACES [ ) TYR 26.2 3 RIGHT SIDF 41FW OVERFLOW (a PLACES) 570 ) 950 37.4' (}L NIT)IN SITE ID:4124 4SO [226"] 110 (43'] TANK WIDTH (SHOWN WITH DOORS REMOVED] FUEL 1268 (49.9» iYP SEPARATOR OIL FILTER FA#10138153 M CENTER OF GRAVITY FAR EW BATTERY IIIFAERVViEAVt�AD 2692 [106`] (IN BO%j TANK LENGTH FFT SIDF YTFW Pared FP 1�CCONTROL PANEL INCLUDES BATTERY CHARGER WITH THREE PRONG CORE r 2. MON 12WAC ENGINE BLOCK HEATER WITH THREE PRENG CORD c 3. 12 VOLT NEGATIVE GROUND SYSTEM .� GENERAL)70/2a0V 10 TW KW OIE PFNFRATOR W/i A nN F TANK A GENERATOR MUST BE GROt1NOM 06 o o MEL NO $DOTS NEQ B 20230) 5. CENTER OF GRAMtt @ WEIGHT MAY SHIFT SLIGHTLY DUE TO UNIT OPDONS o W 6. STUB-UPS:BASE TANK REQUIRES ALL SND-UPS TO BE IN THE FEAR OF TANK SIDI AREA 7. HIGH VOLTAGE STUB-UP AREA INCLUDES THE AC LOAD LEAD CONNECTION TO THE MAIN ONE CIRCUIT BREAKER,THE NEUTRAL CONNECTION,AND AU%IVARY 120/2W CONNECTION p WEIGHT DATA FINC UDS MPtt FID TANKI 8. CONNECTION POINTS FOR CONTROL WIREO.BOTTOM OF LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION BOX HAS KNOCKOUTS FOR 1/2'AND 3/4'CONDUIT THINGS 9. MUST ALLOW FREE FLOW OF DISCHARGE AIR AND EXHAUST.SEE SPEC SHEET FOR MINIMUM AN FLOW AND M0.%IMVM RESTRICTION RpVIREMENiS �r GENERATOR:1409KG(3106 1857 10MUST ALLOW FREE FLOW OF INTAKE AIR.SEE SPEC SHEET FOR MINIMUM AIR FLOW AND MAXIMUM RECURSION REpUIREMENi$ ♦A GENERATOR WITH WOODEN SNIPPING SKIDS:14)aKG(3350(b .SJ 12 GENERATOR MUST BE INSTALLED SUCH iWni FRESH COOUNG AR IS AVAILABLE AND THAT DISCHARGE AIR FROM THE RADIATOR IS Not RECIRCULATED YY// 12. 11(IS TXE RESPONSIBIOtt OF TIE INSTAL(ATION iECXNICMN TO ENSURE THAI THE GENERATOR INSTALLATION COMPILES WITH ALL APPLICABLE COVES,STANDARDS,AND IS!� 13.190 GALLON USME CAPACITY RASETANK IS INCLUDED WITH GENERATOR 14.UNIT IS SHIPPED WITH FUEL SUPPLY ANO RETURN LINES DISCONNECTED AND PLUGGED BETWEEN ENGINE ANp FUEL TANK,THIS HAS BEEN DONE TO FACILITATE I PRESSURE TES NNO OF THE LANK IN THE FIRM FOR INFORMATION REGARDING CONNECTING THE FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN ONES PRIOR TO START UP,SEE THE FUEL DmWinB TIM TANK FIELD ES,NG PROCEDURE(OE5082)SUPPLIES IN THE TANK LOOSE VENTS KIT,WHICH IS SHIPPED WITH THIS GENERATOR. 15.SEE GENERAL DRAWING W3850 FOR DISCHARGE DUCT REMOVAL.REMOVAL OF DUCT WILL PROVIOE ACCESS TO MUFFLER FOR SEMICING GENSET 15.ADDITIONAL 2'FEMALE NPT POI-PLUGGED OR EQUIPPED WITH TOP-MOUNT SWITCHES DEPENDING ON UNIT OPTIONS. /-\ IESEI GENERATOR DFTAI L DETAILS \_28 SCALE:NTS =`® pnwirg NumWe CS DC9 FIBER CONNECTIONS DQ DC POWER CONNECTIONS Cho J J i FIBER PORT RRH CONNECTION a ••`:• 2 1 812/700 2 +.. - .�c ..ac«:..,aaz:. .z,- .s = t1 - 2 2 PCSl825/7900 2 +.cis ..«v.::.,.E Y s.a-c....zc..rz.�..fx..s•.a_.rrsc.. 4 .Zg t t z z 3 nWs/essl2roo 02 — s�=.,m,�j { wcs/ FUTUa W Wa 1 +- 2 4 WCS/830/2300 2 -.� �-�+.. —02 5 FIRSTNETl614/700 2 z... ..r� x�__Ios 0.x-,...r6 � z W ___<2 8 85/850-LTE 2 .++ y • ' �' °" 2 7 B5/850-SG 2>-_ : - J BS 850 i &5f kOF TURF 2 8 FUTURE F - n� 1 _ 2 9 FUTURE d 2 II«• 2 10 FUTURE 2> T CT, a�� ♦, <2) it FUTURE 2 I �,�, FI�TUR.E 1 4 z � i Y FSR[ F.cz. 2 12 FUTURE Y EG Y r .szec,�,., NEG 6 •z�s K,� .. K � FUTURE 2 d O POS rr X ^'�'' POS C -...•z-r O 14 FUTURE 2 I 7} F , Ir"-- 2 15 FUTURE 2 '1 FIRFTNET/B144/7700 AND r .No.04MOS345 �e+s^ 2 16 FUTURE z ,) 811/700 FUTURE ; Z O 03104!2020 ....zz.a_�_ .:SJ NEG C+ ..z_.`.s.. F,._,v ...:.yn.. NEC© -...�:=u..� f� 1► '«+= 2 17 FUTURE C i r. 2 _...z i-`TJ POS G1t _ .:-..� �.r.,...-:.:«.ETU POS C. 2 78 FUTURE 2 PH '-O CJS ewAuna X am no 2 19 FUTURE 2 , AWS/88812100 ANO N em mm h PCSl825J1900 mnona 2 20 FUTURE 2 � a:s ou•no �� F � f • - +�NEG�fs c:N nzre 02 21 FUTURE 2 -'�0 Ffl POS Ci•. t 2 22 FUTURE 2 223 ceslcYea:_A .S_. FUTURE 2 w Y ` �b«Hwnser r i a CONNECT SHIELD 4esmz T -_ 2 24 FUTURE 2 �� 11� DRAIN WIRE 4 '— CABLE GND WIRE P1a1x T. Iy1 + TO GROUND BAR u, l GROUND i _� K BAR a d GROUND (NOTE z)(nP) FROG EYE 51RBAUGH _p_ BAR SITE ID:4124 FIBER FIBER DC POWER INPU7 OUTPUT INPUT DC POWER OUTPUT FA#10138153 �.i-24PR FIBER CABLE 2PR SINGLE MODE FIRER, M - - '"'--#2 GREEN,STRANDED 141 FNAIA WROAD �t�','�..�� OUTDOOR RATED,FOR j (1yy b/C DC TRUNK INSUTATEp COPPER CONDUCTOR �E.va_uai FINAL RRH CONNECTION _� (f �(3 CABLES MAX OR (ROUTED TO NEAREST BUSSBAR) Puree Foy (TIP PER RRH) i R AS QTY ON PLANS)f v_ i 2!G OC POWER GABLE, r m_..! OUTDOOR RATED,FOR b NOTES: FINAL RRH CONNECTION 1. TRUNK GLAND KITS: (TYP PER RRH) : o e o • TRUNK GLAND KIT A:OVAL GASKET FOR)i4 AND YBAWG TRUNK(CEO.21428) • TRUNK GLAND KIT 8:OVAL GASKET FOR(2)#4 AWG TRUNKS(CEO.21429) � �� NJ • TRUNK GLAND KIT C:OVAL GASKET FOR(2),#8 AWG TRUNKS(CEQ.21434) 2. WHEN SHIELDED CABLE IS USED CONNECT CABLE SHIELD DRAIN WIRE AND GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR, m LL 3. FIRST SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND(OR FIRST INSTALLED)RRH ON ALPHA SECTOR.IN E THE EVENT THE ALARM CABLE CANNOT BE CONNECTED TO ALPHA IT PHYSICAL SECTOR ON AN EXCEPTION BASIS. WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO ALARM 70 THE CLOSEST /yam 4. 2N0 SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED 70 THE LOWEST BAND(OR FIRST INSTALLED)RRH ON BETA SECTOR. /Jp'1► 4. 3RD SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND(OR FIRST INSTALLED)RRH ON GAMMA SECTOR. 5. AN RRH WILL NEVER HAVE MORE THAN ONE SQUID ALARMED ON IT, Aesop rnM 8. SQUID ALARMS ARE NOT TO BE DAISY CHAINED. Oz =LC CONNECTOR DC9 WIRING DIAGRAM O=STRIKESORB PROTEC ION f 1 \RAYCAP DC9 FIBER/DC DEMARC DOM DETAIL MODULE BY RAYCAP C9 SCALE:NTS NH—, C9 LLL oa J �a �zog c �_ r- 20° w<g ww tzo°1zo° LL Z tao°tao° wo WIND Z WIN, —w CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR TREES ON 4:7 OR STEEPER ` k; WIND WIND SLOPES,PLACE 2 GUYS UPSLOPE, o ONE DOWNSLOPE: OTHERWISE GUYING PATTERN PLACE FOR PREVAILING WIND, FOR DECIDUOUS TREE GUYING PATTERN 3/4'CRUSHED STONE Y \ LIMITS CRUSHED P(ANTIN __EVER 2ELN E) ASiM C33 SIZE N0.u]- STONE SURFACE ---_ FOR 2� NZ GRADE ro DRAIN ��� �`� PLANTING � � o �;=��j( GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY i*Sz FROM TOWER YARD EVERGREEN TREE xIII R' DECIDUOUS TREE tOr PRUNE ONLY DEAD OR DAMAGED: WOOD.DO NOT PRUNE 41, f FLUSH TO BRANCH.LEAVE y, MARAFI 500X GROUND STABILIZATION FABRIC PLACED SLIGHT STUB. �U JOS EPH R JOHNWN' ON COMPACTED'.GRADE STANDARD WATERPROOF TREE WRAP 12 GA.GALV.STEEL GUY WIRES (DECIDUOUS TREES ONLY)TO ATTACH TO 2a"MIN.STEEL r U.No_046Z0534S9 10 SECTION THROUGH COMPOUND 2Np BRANCH –POST OR REHAB STAKE,3'T 03!0412020 -- N07 TO SCALE TREE.DO NOT PULL TAUT. + IL 3"OR WIDER NYLON WEBBING W/METAL GROMMETS FLEX–PIPE BARK PROTECTOR 12 GA.GALV.STEEL WIRE, -AP,. DO NOT PULL TAUT. SET ROOTBALL 2"-4"ABOVE FINAL sm-A— A GRADE,REMOVE ENTIRE WIRE BASKET BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF FOOTBALL a AeAc AND ANY TWINE OR WIRE. o �rs wVR 6'LONG STAKES,2"x 2"OR 2 1/2" wr.re DIAM.WOOD,OR STEEL T–POSTS, WHITE PVC AROUND WIRE TO MARK m.,-pp ---- TWO PER TREE(DECIDUOUS TREES) AND PREVENT PEOPLE FROM NOTES TRIPPING OVER WIRE. oreurnw: –USE OF SWALES AND/OR DRAINAGE DITCHES FOR PROPER SPECIFIED BACKFILL Osee°_y WATER RUNOFF AS NEEDED. 4"DEPTH WOOD CHIP MULCH COMPACTED SUBGRADE r°ku rvumi».. –AGGREGATE IS BASED ON STANDARD AASHTO. 12• 6"HIGH SAUCER AROUND PLANT –PIPE SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 4-LONGER THEN ACCESS 2 TO 1 SLOPE MAINTAIN TO BOTTOM OF 24"MIN,STEEL T–POST OR&4 REBAR I"01Btl'T"K 4 ROAD WIDTH ON EACH SIDE FOR PROPER SHOULDERING. DITCHUNE/FLOWUNE AND ON OPPOSITE 6" SLOPE MATCH EXISTING SLOPE. DITCHES / \\ STAKE,FLUSH W/GRADE,THREE SHALL HAVE A 1' '/ / \ PER TREE(EVERGREEN TREES) FROG EYE SIRBAUGH –ALl GROSSORAINS SHALL 8E INSTALLED ON A 45'ANGLE (FOOT)FLAT BOTTOM WITH \\ / / RIP RAP INSTALLED IN HEAVY EROSION AREA. /\ / \ \ WITH THE FALL.OF THE GRADE. \\/\\ /�// //, SITE 10:4124 FA#10138153 141FAIR4IEWROAD SLOPE 1/4 PER FOOT ICAL} RE VA? 3] SLOPE 1/4'PER FOOT12` IN,(i/ i/ Rreparae Eer� M 2 I ROOTBALL�� 2:1 SLOPE ROOTBALL ROOTBALL x DIA. DIA. c I I. )I 1_—I I i- I DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN H=7_11 ( I I "I!I III=� TREE PLANTING AND GUYING DETAIL ' (-1 ( "I I(— I E —1 I -I I -I I I III= i I! = I I— — I( (GUY AND STAKE DECIDUOUS TREES 2rr AND LARGER CALIPER 6'AGGREGATE BASE couRSE `-COMPACTED SUBGRADE, AND CONIFEROUS TREES OVER 4' HT.) MIN.OF S"OF ROAD BASE COURSE#610 COMPACTED SELECT FREE FROM TOPSOIL m q w TOTAL=9"THICK. FILL WHERE REQUIRED AND ORGANICS NOT TO SCALE E 4a CLASS 4 GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL"MIRAFI–SOO (OR EQUAL) 2 \DRIVEWAY SECTION — CROWNED 3\TREE STAKING AND GUYING DETAIL -- N07 TO SCAT-E NOT TO SCALE Dawes ime CIVIL DETAILS oaweR N„neer CIO 2•MESH 9 GALV.W/ COLORED SLATS(TYPJ HEAVY PRESSED STEEL BARBED 6,-0, 6'-0" 1U'-0'(MAX) V WIRE OUT RIGGER ARM— 00 J N 1-1/4-TOP A ,/-3 STRANDS OF 4-POINT w INTERMEDIATE RAIL- ( BARBED'MRS 3'CORNER POST Fr z 4^tA,�x LU<8 2"z 2"-9 CA.FENCE `j�`' 3/75"x 3/4"STRETCHER o FABRIC k BAR AT CORNER AND GATE in lJ 2'INTERMEDIAS POSTS POST Z DIAGONAL.ROD w/STEEL W TURNBUCKLE GA.TENSION WIRE, - �� CONTINUOUS I'f'ROWN FOR DRAINAGE •V �'t�ij� .l �`i•`.T�l`c: `h 5,`i i�`�'i rl X� ��,, �`by<7 a�•C.1 ta'i A� TA �<' `"^F*�Y,1•I r Kv 0-0 �r DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION O.♦ f t•L`f\` !n:T•.i I• f Ap z ��Y �u ♦C ;EM I JOEIM N ;♦ HEAVY-pUTY GALV LOCKABLE, ♦'� 4 6"MIN 3/4"CRUSHED STONE NO GAP BETWEEN FINISH DOUBLE GATE LATCH WITH OU ID EXTENDED ONE FOOL CONTRACTOR FURNISHED LOCK GRADE AND FENCE FABRIC L a No.0-0d2T2053459 OUTSIDE OF FENCING) MIRAFI 500%GEOTECH q I"GAP BETWEEN FINISH GRADE FABRIC,OR APPROVED EQUAL f 031041ZOn0 i NOTE: --'---- 3/8"CIA TRUSS ROD WITH AND BOTTOM GATE RAIL UNDER ROCK j / G i.ALTERNATE FOOTINGS FOR ALL FENCE POSTS IN ROCK:IF ROCK IS TURNBUCKLE AT GATE ONLY 6"DIAM,BY 18°PEEP CONC.FOOTING �y ENCOUNTERED AT GRADE,OR AT A DEPTH SHALLOWER THAN 3'-6", WITH 1-1/4"PIPE SLEEVE,6"L POST IN — THE COREHOLE AND FALL WTH CONCRETE ILL AN 8'DIA POLE 18" TOR GROUO THE T. ROCK RIS BELOW DOUBLE SWING ACCESS GATE DETAIL FINISH GRADE,COAT BACKFILLED SECTION OF POST WITH COAL TAR, ere w/wra AND BACKFILL WITH WELL.-DRAINING GRAVEL. -- SCALE:N.T.S. am wnsao e tt/xn 2.ATTACH EACH 1WITH 3 NON-LIFT-OFF TYPE,MALLEABLE IRON OR wv sonsAv FORGING.PIN-TYPE1 HINGES.ASSEMBLIES SHALL ALLOW FOR 180'OF a mneAe GATE TRAVEL,(THREE POINT HINGE) ms wnxnv e w.ne 2"MESH 9 GALV.W/ wn oxnsYm COLORED SLATS(TYP,) BARBED WRE A-yq_ d� } mptt umGu.4W PrgeU TMs. �—TOP BRAGS RAIL FROG EYE SIRBAUGH SITE ID:4124 Vii---STRETCHER BAR FA#10138153 191 aA1RUfEW ROAp oae,vA:zsai /-DIAGONAL ROD w/ Prepared s« g STEEL TURNBUCKLE FTS BOi70M c TENSION WRE FINISH GRADE •}�•vry 1 MAX CLEARANCE FROM L •- LT FENCE TO GRADE pnvnn9 nk FENCE 41�CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL DETAILS -- SCALE:N.L.S. orew�p N,mee� C11 PROPOSED UTILITY RAO"RO W1 J#6 oo GANG PROPOSED 120/240Y, VALLEY aV F Z., W7EGW 2004 GEN ALUG -7 LLJ Wa PRIDPOSED AT&T LL W Ar&r PILO V-8 1/4• ZOE W1 MIS AND ATS Sim mc z FUNCWN AND (Tom 12090) LLJ OWEGAVIL PANEL U&r MART OF STEEL#V) PANELAT&r 4-w! VOLTS,1 /240 11—P,34NIRE,200A IN BREAKER RATING X 200 L2 _9K_R EiW--%7A 12GO400 DESCRIPTION DEB®RIPMON VA_Wc_jK_R__POEN L1_ 708N E RECTIFIER I— C30 IER RECTIF 7w—C —3 NC 0 UTURERE—ClIF 145D 145D 4 30 _NE—0 21&22 1450 6 —No— IS RECTIFIER RECTIFIER 384 6 0 �URJR_ 1450 0 7 --14-50 —8 30 Ne 0 238.24 IL —SPACE 1450 C 30 10 S —SPACE 1. RECTIFIER 588 9 50 1450 C it 1450 12 S SPACE ♦ _T4_50 1-4 —6 RECTIFIER 7&8 1450 0 13 3D 1450 19 S 16 —SPACE o♦ex JOHNS _WC 17 0 8 3 4 5 6 FUTURE RECTICIFER 0 —SPACE P.JOHNSW t;4 9,10 —— SPACE .6 0 -C Is _0 20 —6 4P FUTURE RECEFFER 0 RE'— 2-1 —0 — 2-2 —8 —SPACE �.'$li-No.0402053459 11&12 —0 _NC 30 2-3 —_TM_ 2-4 —IZ_TWo 00 03/04/2020 0 NO 25 19M m 2D FUTURE RECFFFER SD — NC 1820 WAC PROPOSED JOHW 13814 0 NO 27 WO 2-6 -WOT $DO LIGHTS WWM am CuAm FUTURE R7ECITIFER 0 NO — 2-9 7-50 — 3-0 NC TS- .-61ENERATOR HEATER W ON 1190 GkLON MrA'NK IS&Ie —0 0 So 31 — 7-50 3-2 -75-D CFN BATTCHARGER (GENVW/AIM00) 51D 3-4 _N FUTURE RECTIFIFER o 33 _ir_ _ 0 PP BATTERY HEATE Q 35 17818 750 -121 NO 250 PP GFCI 500 BATTERY OAS OFCI FurruPiF RECITIFEA 0 NO 3-7 SIM 18820 —0 NC 30 3-9 SIM 40 SIM 197—TER — Y HEATER I ti SPACE S A, "wo- 500 BATTERY HEATER 2 PHASE TC0FAIq?TA7 8370 --972-0 CURRENT PER PHASE(AX 831 PANEL TOTAL(VAX_19M D EW OA$)LS T T T T T-%T T PANEL PAr IKVA' .L 2 VANW�L.A�DA PINW T& FROG EYE SIRBAUGH GCIF NQTF-. SITE ID:4124 SCRIPPtON� I. MULTIPLE KEY CHART CALLOUIS REPRESENT MULTIPLE INSTALLATIONS OF 1. WIC PRE-PLUMBED FOR AD POWER AND DO FA#10138153 CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS. POWER CONNECTIONS,SEE MANUFACTURER 1d1.R V'-R.AD 2'CANOW W/J13,0+1140 mm mm no pac) 2. WIC PRE-PLUMBED FOR AD POWER AND DO POWER CONNECTIONS,SEE DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT LAYOUT,SMOKE GORE, 2-CONW W/sm/MLVRM(FROM Mm DENIM To M) MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR CONDUCTORS,RACEWAYS,LIGHT LAYOUT, DETECTOR LAYOUT,AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. areP,ree v«: J 2'CMOEU_iiljploP11217 —(RM GENERATOR TO PILO) SMOKE DETECTOR LAYOUT,AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. 4 1'CONOW W1 4110+21W(fRw PILO 70 QEWMMN WATER&813, INSTALL(12)12V,180AH BATTERIES(MARATHON MlVIBOFT,NEO 77ZEWRY #15171)CONFIGURED IN(3)BATTERY STRINGS 0-48VDC NOMINAL FOR s 1,CoAmu W/A" TOR COX"R G&MMR)R CONIRM) APPROX.4.25 HRS BATTERY BACKUP TIME c 4. TNATE/INSTALL(8)-48VDC 2000W RECTIFIERS(EMERSON ESURE) r-ALAtIN CABLfS AND NYLON KILL aw(RR Gm Abt%6) (NEO#11111)11 P.11 PLANT FOR N+l :E 5. CONDUITTYPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: • UNDERGROUND CONDUITS:SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT,SCH.80 BENEATHn ROAD/PARKING LOT. A: "R • EXTERIOR ABOVE GROUND CONDUITS:RED • INTERIOR CONDUITS:IMC E 0U) Drewry ELECTRICAL ea:�OJIUTY DIAGRAM — DETAILS \_!IO/SCALE:NIS 2 \PANEL SCHEDULE \_!I/SCALE:NIS El OU v V zg Z Lu w dg Lazo z(D --w 4-0 POSITION BREAKER DISTRIBUTION -48V BREAKER DISTRIBUTION sy1 POSITION -48V POSITION BREAKER DISTRIBUTION -4BV R; RATING ROW 27 dUS RATING ROW fit BUS RATING ROW#3 BUS \ gg o ♦�R * 1 700 OF FUSE PANEL#2-A 1 25 850{ARCA)G 1 tOD FIF FUSE PANEL#i-A `hh d�i�M 2 - 2 75 850{ANCA)8 2 O 3 100 FIF FUSE PANEL#2-B 3 25 850(AHCA)A 3 100 FIE FUSE PANEL#1-8 VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 2"OR LESS FROM N .y ' X„� 4 d 50 PCS/AWS(AHFlB)G 4 (SEE NOTE 1)— 2" CONNECTOR END • 5 _ WIRS SHALL BE 5 5 b'� 1 APPLIED TO- VOLTAGEE NTIFICATION BOTH ENDS DFEAII NEW DC * EPHRJO I; 6 6 50 PCS/AWS(AHFlB)B 6 - POWER WIRING USING UL224 VW-1 FLAME _ CLEAR HEAT SHRINK TUBING RETARDANT UL LISTED THIN WALL HEAT : L .No.0402053454 7 7 7 SHRINK TUBING OF APPROPRIATE COLOR, O 03104!2420 "� 8 - 2'OR LESS FROM f24V OC=RED MARKINGS ALTERNATIVELY IT SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE i0 re, 8 50 PCS/AWS(AHFlB)A B - CONNECTOR ENO 2' -48V DC=BLUE MARKINGS APPLY VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS i 9 - 9 _ _ OC RETURN=NO MARKINGS TO DC WIRING WITH APPROPRIATELY + 9 COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE THAT SHALL BE Of 70 - iD 50 700/FN(AHLBA}G 70 - 7 7 APPLIED IN TWO HALF-LAPPED LAYERS 11 SAWG ANO AR RDC POY1 WITH THE FINAL TWO WRAP$APPLIED FULLY a – 11 _ _ e wksM 1212 50 700/FN(AHLBA)B- 12 OVERLAPPING WITHOUT TENSION.WHENEVER _ POSSIBLE THE ELECTRICAL TAPE VOLTAGE sw mixAe 13 - 13 - t3 _ VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 1"OR LESS FROM IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS SHALL BE FULLY B;y nasnc to - (SEE NOTE 1) 1' CONNECTOR END COVERED WITH CLEAR UL224 VW-1 FLAME mneme I4 50 700/FN{AHLBA)A 14 - RETARDANT UL LISTED THIN WALL HEAT m¢wpz/,e 15 75 - 15 - ---_ SHRINENT TUBING TOO PEVENT 77 UNWINDING OR SIAD we sne Ib 20 16 - 15 _ °-CLEAR HEAT SHRINK TURING DESIGNATIONS. a 17 - _ 2. AT&TA7&T COMPLIANT THIN WALL CLEAR OR 18 20 T7 1"DR LESS FROM f24V DC=RED MARKINGS COLORIZED HEAT SHRINK IS AVAILABLE FOR paslyr,aa..�_ SIAD 18 _ 18 - CONNECTOR END I* -48V OC=BLUE MARKINGS ALL DC POWER WIRING SIZES FROM cnadatl�q+_ 79 19 DC RETURN NO MARKINGS HURNOY(HSGFR&HS-FR)AND THOMAS —"----- 19 _ &BETTS(CPO SERIES).OTHER 20 20 TRANSPORT NO20 - 20 _ 1OAWG AND SOUR DC POWER rpgL MANUFACTURER HEAT SHRINK SHALL BEACCEPTABLE ONLY IF IN FULL COMPLIANCE ralaa rnN. 27 21 21 _ WITH SPECIFICATION PROVIDED ABOVE. 22 20 DAC FAN 22 _ 22 _ 3. DESIGNATION TAGS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO FROG EYE SIRBAUGH BOTH CABLE ENDS AS SPECIFIED IN AT&T 23 5 HVAC CONTROLLER 23 - 23 - DOCUMENT ATT-TP-76300,SECTION L. SITE ID:4124 24 - 24 40 FSM4 za _ FA#10138153 25 - 25 40 FSM4 25 _ fbI PAIRYiFw ROAo 26 – 26 40 _.A28 _ OORE,11Pmperetl For'. 27 4027 FSM4 27 _ v i c t 'o P17ry E mgw nrnw„B Tme DC POWER DETAILS �C POWER BREAKER H D II v �C POWER WIRIN InFn1rlFlraTl E2 SCALE'NTS N D AI wnB Numaer \_L2j SCALE.NTS E2 0 0 0 ALPHA SECTOR CL L UUE-/-AAU-.- z Q. -OR `KN/.WA W I, LLi V__AAHKI .1 ITT. z 1. —1 Z z #6 ANG DO Lu POKER CABLE (TYP OF 3 PER BETA SECTOR 4-f SECTOR.9 rWY TO BETA-AN -cs/AW,ASK --I-- FLU,—-A.. A FA NH, UC-I- _AF 9 is uA/ 0 4 —.2 NOKw NX, (,AM) W_ AWG POWERS AWG to J R.JOHNS (TYP=R=PER SECTOR) ** 5* "A. (NOTE 2) 'Or 4e-No.040205345 GAMMA SECTOR TAX 03/04/2020 UE`NUHW AIR,,OAAA-A 7M/EN M L1E 850/880 SG /s Y i0 UE-/A.M CNWA AH_ I.ASAIII..AR. rxrro T.C4 OLD— AUMALUAN I.- A/ POOR —U, H"Awa " q I-p OF N" C%DUOTFX TOTAL) aw UEAAA. ONA, -AW. MAUT 409OLE FRON FROG EYE SIRBAI IGH SITE ID:4124 TO FA#10138153 ON LTK ROAD IE4.:-1 PEePanB For HVKH) A D, ma E M--M--M--M--m-,--17 -El- M- c E5 1, rn 1, LABEL THEEDC POWER CABLES AT BOTH ENDS OF EMERY WIRE AND IN ANY PULL BOX 11 USED, LABEL SHALL BE Qa> DURABLE, ELF ADHESK,WRAPPED LONGITUDINALLY ALONG THE CABLE AND STATE THE SECTOR.FREQUENCY BAND AND PC -I.E.-19Y IM SEE LABETAL FOR CABLE SIZES AND MAXIMUM LENGTH. 3 [)ravm9 Title : SEE DETAILS ETA:US FOR OCR INTERNAL WIRING, RRH DC ,L THE WE WIRE OF EACH MULTI-CONDUCTOR CONNECTED CABINET GROUND DR41N WIRE WHEN A SHIELDED CABLE 15 USED.SHALL BE 5 SEA"TO THE EQUIPMENT . WIRING BLOCK ASSIGNMENT DETAIL FOR AUR.CABLE CONNECTIONS. SOLUTE POWER AND FIBER`LNPERSFLEI CONDUIT FROM DC9 TO SLACK BOXES 70 BRIT,. DIAGRAM 1'\RRH DC WIRING DIAGRAM E: SECURE ECUR P \-E3—/SCALE:NTS E DO OWED CABLES WITH HOSE MMPS AND FIBER TRUNK CABLES WITH VELCRO WADAP TIE ONLY. zz� ,Q-TES* 1. LABEL GEN PLUG W1 PHENOLIC NAMEPLATE-AT&T 120/24OV.T�,20OA- 2 CONDUIT TYPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. 00-j BELOW GRADE CONDUITS:SCH,10 PVC CONDUIT,SCH.80 BENEATH -j V ROAD/PARKING LOT. CL EXTERIOR ABOVE GRADE CONDUITS'RAS INTERIOR GONDUrrS:IMC CONDUIT x KE� DESCRIPTION Lu 9 �(FNM f 2�COW W1�41310�1140:AAM—TO POC) �� ui 4V LLZoW 2 2'—W1 W MUSMM(PRM 7UM-DEME M—.C) JI 2'CaWW W1#J1tT+Ij2G(PRM MMIUR To PW) z 4 E`CONDIAT W/4/10�2jW(fiRvow PRC To GENERATOR WATER&84TTMY O—ARCM) w W 6 1 .�BMo fZ4 AARP 040MI&S N407&jn.0MN IAMFTf6R GEN—NAW) 4-4 LEE 41 PROPOSEB 6'CHAW LM FENCE W1 I'MRSED W(8Y OnAM) *%j x X x x x (ERs Efts Efts ff4s R SF)(BY OTNcawrourm III W, ,Kull 2500 ERS) E- PROPOSED CA8111 CORER TOCHOUSE' 053459 0 X I FUTURE FUTURE F EMIT-1 f TO BE ANS OWR FROPOSED • E 12',Il' 12'=25' COWT STUB VP 0 MYNER Olt ,�12',W SE'AREA L ASE AREA llA�1.1 SIREA IRL JORM 0 192 S.F.) r -4 MBENCROAyD PIC OWDSTIS W1 (24 S.F.) PROPOSED AMY(J)6 PROPOSED(3)24PR FWR CA&Z AWPOSED(9)611C DC C48LES I C.N..0402053459 PROPOSED M004DRDLE 195'-0' L AT&T 1201124014 to,2MA IRILC wl *Vo 063/04/2020 (BY Dom) L MY PLUG(INIETIM TO WC) PRIVI'M NANIXIaE f u PROPOSED AT&T GOVIEFAITAR COADDITS (a r 07MMn) MUTED SMTH PLA"M To PILa to wpm MWM A Mr wwry t2ol24ov PROPOSED PAD MOMTEDstEa WC(A00(20060)ON IRANSFWA(M(8Y ODIERS) SIM PMIXS 0111 CMWIE PAD PRaVSM(2)#-CMM7S (WO 0024)AMID Ma-MM (FOR POOR,J7V) AT&T J"DEM MMAIR ma-mm(1)4-Cawr wl Igo"tav rAw (FLV MC0,MME) x x x (BY omn) Fk70POSED 12x16' PAD UAaR-—!B,— IN PROPOSED 12WM'LEASE AREA PRW050 1201240v to 6 GANG (250 SR LEASE AREA) MEYER STACK(SlIMAND0,40i VALLEY PROPOSED A Mr 12'-6'='LEASE AREA aEcmx COOP)(BY oms)W/ (250 SK LEASE AREA) P—CT—� PROPOSED 120,'2 V 10,2M AMY MEZER AM AIC, AT&T CPS AN 7E)WA FROG EYE SIRBAUGH (Armaow m MC) PROPOM 2*Do CaWT SITE ID:4124 (FOR A MY 200A PONEII,40*,*) PROPM 12 ACCESS GALE Aar 0THq?S) PRWOMV 2•UG CaWT FA#10138153 ❑ PROPOSED 10 CRAM ACCESS DMW1;DRE. 41 FAIR (TW A mr MCIZ 45'.*) (BY 01HERS) �R E.1H 2'—r$7 c — t 0 E S D.—T. GRAPHIC SCALE: UTILITY 0 10' 20' PLAN — 20' 10, wwll. 1 COMPOUND PLAN NORTH \14/SCALE:AS NOTED i SCALE (11x17): 1" = 20'-0" P-1 N—, SCALE (22x34): 1" = lo'-O" E4 cz� 000 CL L TYPICAL SECTOR z PROPOSED fatr CORNER Posm TOED.2ROUNVED Z Lu 10 PROPOSED OMM SYSMW(BY OTHERS) Eli Z Z'7m-E AWPM 6'CHAW LIMIT FENCE x x X—xx x x x x X W1 I'BARBED ONE(BY OPIERS) Lu X F—————- c PROPOSED 12 INSUIATED FU GROUND WIRE FUTURE (SEE (TwyP X TORE FUTURE I I NOTE 5) 12'.20, 12',61 2'x25 LEASE AREA LEASE AREA LEASE AREA PROPOSED 06 INSULATED (240 S F.) 192 S.F�) (300&F.) (AT SECTOR) TED 4 W(A=R) COPPER CONDUCTOR G x x 4.MONOPOLE 195'-0' I ED INS ULAIREEN EITRANIED COPPER x SED MONOPOLE GROVAV CONDUCTOR(ROUTED(BY Om (AT LE D s) W/ L -i LEVEL) To PROPOSED CABLES ————— I PROPOSED (ATTACHED TO RNIEN EACH AT&T ANTENNA SECTOR) s x ON ffimblm?S"m To mnw Tom VXSEPH I Jo L RING AT 2 tOC4RM) 12/0 GREEN,STRANDED INSULATED COPPER x PROPOSED C461E CONDUCTOR(ROUTED "'d No.OM053455 I . COMER 700")Sr TO BE WSMUM W1 PROPOSED CABLES PROPOSED PROPOSED AT&T .0 03/04/2020 OWN PROPOSED(5)6-0 CONDUIT TO AT&T MOM LEVEL) AT&T 3"DIESEL 6'STE 61-8* S tP 0 IVOID? I GENERATOR STEEL WIC BOND PROPOSED GROUND REMIT 70 row---emx--1 (SEE NOTE 8) a mum smet COMPOUND WIND MNG(TYP OF 2 LOCA DONS) A earls rmc Btww(PART or*To) w (WM 70 ROWER RING x mmw(Pmr OF rx) MORN w/12 GVED", (BOND M GROUND RIMS sm"Im. W1 12 MEM SnWaa x IRR"Em COPPER M mmulm COPPER WIRE) PROPOSED HANDVDL� PROPOSED AT&T IERnV 120124OV BVIS10I 12 (a Y ORM) e'-a ... .... cm-dA x STEEL ON(AEC 12XM)ON jo�4.. pl�WjW=��- STEEL FEX$rALS ON commir PAD 1)AAD, FROVIOSED PROPOSED DIE I M GROUND (SEE NO Q?AVMrOR It 0 0 'NOTE 190(MELON OINK TOWER GROUND ROD �W GROUND RING (SEE 7)(rYP) D —S (WMW1%j20=2M)VON FROG EYE SIRBAUGH x x X Mpo= 6 4 RE RAC PRO Bo x x x IN PROPOSED t2-$'JM*LEASE AREA POSED STEEL COM OEN/WIC PLATFORM SITE ID:4124 (250 SF.LEASE AREA) (BOND TO PROPOSED GROUND RING - AT(2)LOCATHRIS) FA#10138153 PX%12T.A%ra 141FA-E—I) PROPOSED MOM ROD LURED GROUND WRE, P".120124OV.716 GANG prevarae Por. MKI NSPIECAN NEU A NOING PLAN. MEIER SrAa((SHENANMW VALLEY PROPOSED 12 XW MOM CONDUCIOR NOTES: uErmic coop)(BY OINEM)W/ (OR PER MAW SPECS)(rtP) I. PROVIDE#ZAWG GROUNDING CONDUCTOR U.O.N. c PROPOSED 120 M,j PROVIDE BONDING AND GROUNDING CONDUCTORS WITH GRE=�Hpqj INSULATION,U.O.N. MEIER AM BIVII,14 200A AT&TA mr PROPM GROUND ROD") KE GRI 3: ADD#2/0 GREEN INSULATED CONDUCTOR BETWEEN CM E; PSTRUT/COVER. 4 BUSSSEMRS ARE To BE TINNED UNTIED ON INSULATORS,U.O.N. :E GROUND INTEGRATED COP H.PER MANU.SPECS. 6. ANTENNAS,5 HAS.DP.X%E'Z G MOUNTED NoCADMOUDING AT SECTOR LEVEL 7. GROUND RODS SMALL BE 5/8'M'LIC COPPER CLAD STEEL,ROD DRIVEN VERTICALLY SPACING TO BE MIN.6 SEPARATION WITH 16'SEPARATION PREFERRED WHERE POSSIBLE. a. STEEIL WIC PRE-EQUIPPED FROM MANUFACTURER WITH(2)BUSSBARS qDND EACH BUS W STRINDED,INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR TO WITH(1)EACH 12 GREEN, 1 TYPICAL SECTOR GROUND RING AND TO TOM FIND PER GROUNDING RM. SYMBOL GROUNOING SHOWN BELOWE(3)SECTIONS TO BE INSTALLED AND GROUNDED. DPT. rADWELD TYPE CONNECTION GROUNDING COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTIONkN'TS�IN PLAN GROUNDING WIRE NORTH (DTA'E NL2 3ROUNDING DIAGRAM __/SCALE:NTS ES i7Z FIAT WASHEp�ON All fc O INSULATORNO OVFRLAPP�NG p�RMI NOTE. ;/6 AND FROM ANTENNA/RRH/F1l.TER GROUND KIT ALL GROUND LUGS SHALL .�.���q C h 4`x1/4'SOLID HAVE CLEAR HEAT SHRINK 00 J 6 AND STRANDED Cu WIRE WITH GREEN, W COPPER BAR SLEEVE.MARKING TAPE SHALL O HXN,THWN INSULATION OR BLACK '/--' MARKED AS REQUIRED BY NEC 2 O NOT BE APPLIED OVER HEAT (REPAID A TOP OF PIPE MAST SHRINK. (REPAIR DAMAGED GALVANIZED a 0 ° SURFACES PER ASTM A780) (---- R OLIN EO #2 AND GREEN,STRANDED Z NGTH ( E O COPPER CONDUCTOR GROUND BAR ON LE i 3 (FROM CABLE GROUND __ _ Z n WALL,FLOOR OR BAR AT PLATFORM) f�W w Q w ON ANTENNA ANTENNA LOWER /_ EACH GROUND CONDUCT R T RMINATING ON ANY GRD ND FlM HAV SECTOR GROUND BAR DETZAIL Z AN IDENTIFICATION TAG ATTACH 0 Ai A N ND THAT WI ID NTIFY ITc DETAIL 6 SCALE:N75 Z w ORIGIN_ ANp DfCTiNATiON E CONNECTION FOR: W V O O O O O O GAS CABLE SHIELp COAXIAL CAB #2 AND GREEN INSULATED URLE SURGE SUPPRESSORS STRANDED COPPER WIRE Q O Q Q Q O Q O O CABLE ENTRY PORTS(HATCH PLATES) RECTIFIER FRAMES (INTERIOR GROUND RING) T&B CO."TY-RAP",CAT. 24V&48V DC POWER RETURN BAR GENERATOR FRAME WORK TC376 STAND-OFF BRACKET PIPE MAST(TYR) TELCO GROUND BAR MASTER GROUND BAR i&B CO.'C-TAP"CAT. OR EGO.2'-0'ON T DETAIL NOTES: Q 15473D CRIMP TYPE CENTER MAX.SPACING #2 AND GREEN,STRANDED I ANGLE SHOWN TO ILLUSTRATE WELD PARALLEL TAP OR EOUIV, INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR I Q 5 AT THE LOWEST POINT ON THE BAR (CADWLLD TO PIPE MAST)(TV) , r o EXOTHERMIC WELD(WELDING L. TWO-HOLE,LONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUG WITH 2 AND STRANDED COPPER �) RRx RRx PROHIBITED ON ROOFTOPS) CONDUCTOR AND GREEN THOU INSULATION TO GROUND BAR.ROUTE CONDUCTOR DIRECTION OF BOND TO AS APPLICABLE TO BURIED GROUND CONDUCTOR OR MASTER GROUND BAR AND TURN TO SHORTEST $6 AND GREEN INSULATED *r 2 AND SOLID BARE TINNED CONNECT WITH TWO-HOLE LUG TO'P"SECTION. DISTANCE TO STRANDED COPPER WIRE T11 0 COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 2, USE PERMANENT MARKER TO LABEL THE WHOLE BAR AS»P"WITH i"HIGH DISTANET (UNIT BOND) I, EXOTHERMIC WE-D 70 BURIED GROUND LETTERS. HATCHPLATET&R CO.-TY-RAP-CAT. N6 AND GREEN,STRANDED LIBER A POWER INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR DEMARC DOME LNG AND GROUND RAR 3. FOR GROUND BAR LOCATED OUTDOORS,ON-GRADE ONLY,EXOTHERMICALLY WELD TY25M CABLE TIE Oft EOUN, AND HEAT SHRINK ALL LUGS A 2 AWG BARE TINNED COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND BAR AND GS! EXOTHERMICALLY WEIR TO BURIED GROUND CONDUCTOR. INTERIOR CROtINO RING WA UPPORT AND UNIT DON O (OR PER MANU.SPECS)(tYP) ♦ '� �: 4. APPLY NO-OX OR EQUIVALENT TO MATING SURFACE OF LUG AND WIPE CLEAN -#2 AND GREEN COPPER INSTALLATION OF GROUND WIRE EXCESS COMPOUND. STRANDED WIRE 0 0 ♦G RJOHN CIGBE(GROUND BAR ! ;IN3SULATOR (INTERIOR GROUND RING) t TO CABLE GROUND 8AR DETAIL 2 PP NTA/SECTOR GROUND BAR DETAI BARE COPPER (MOUNTED NEAR/BELOW SECTOR) NoM *�Q ic.No.04=5345 (T!P OF i PER SECTOR,3 TOTAL) SEE RF CHART'LA03/04/2020 E6 SCALE:NTS SQALE.NTS RRH QUANTITIES.C#2 AWG GREEN,STRANDED INSULATED .....COPPER CONDUCTOR ROUTED i0 NEWTON INSTRUMENT COMPANY,INF GROUND BAR AT COAX TRANSITIONBUTNER,N.C. COPPER CRIMP CONNECTOR 7p N0. REO. PART NO. DESCRIPTION T&8#54740 OR APPROVED Ro EQUAL r 4xsxm>>�im.na+o mmlwRo t✓ 1 7/4'x4"x3D" PRE DRILLED CND.BAR �' CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRE +nv: -60$6 ;ALL VITG.BRK7. �INTERIdR GROUND RINGSPLICE DETAIL �5�TO GROUNDING BARD TAIL n Q 2 3061-4 INSULATORS Ee SCALE:NTS E6 DETAIL a wn+n> Q 4 5012-I SCALE:NTS •Ey ox/xs• 5/6"-11x7»H.H.G.S. Q 4 3QiS'8 oe (,_pyp� S/8 IOCKWASHER oenpneA� DOUBLE CRIMP Cbeakatl.�W� CONNECTW GRADE INSPECTION HANG HOLE W/ m I ufnha` � EACH GROUND PEDESTRIAN RATED COVER <s&0p2 A.'J CON 1.TOR —�T (ERICO T4168 OR EQUIV, 10'0FOR GROUND RODS, (A7 GRADE) HAVE AN FOR 0 HEMRODS)REOUN. FROG EYE SIRBAUGIQENTIFICATION TAG EXOTHERMIC WELD Q FND THAT Wim GRADE SITE ID:4124 .� GROUND RING LOOP® FA#10138153 ta1FAIRwif.N[RoADERMIC WELD EACH IN$PECTgiJ PORT GOREVA1Nat-. P�gr•k For yS.EQTION'I'—EQI ATFD CROUN030N4 7RING GROUND 12 SECTION'P'-SURGE PROTECTORS AND RCN SOLID, `Y • CABLE ENTRY PORTS(HATCH PLATES)(#2) ALL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FRAMES, TINNED CONCRETE OR PVCc • GENERATOR FRAMEWORK(IF AVAILABLE) ISOLATED GROUND BAR-IGO(#2) g2CLEAN SAND FILL o TELCO GROUND BAR(p2) DETAIL NOTES • COMMERCIAL POWER COMMON NEUTRAL/GROUND BOND(#2) 1.EXOTHERMICALLY WELD#2 AND BARE TINNED GROUND ROD COPPER E N�v • +24V POWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR(#2) SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND BAR. CLAD STEEL ROD m g IS • -45V POWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR(#2) ROUTE CONDUCTOR TO BURIED GROUND RING W/MIN.5/8'0x8*-0" E - • COAk SUPPRESSION AND PROVIDE PARALLEL EXOTHERMIC WELD. LONG SECTION"IO -SI RTAB ORRERC • INTERIOR GROUND RING(#2) 2.USE PERMANENT MARKER TO DRAW THE • EXTERNAL EARTH GROUND FIELD(BURIED ONES BETWEEN EACH SECTION AND LABEL GROUND RING GROUND RING)(,12) EACH SECTION('P',"A','I")WITH i'HIGH SIZED PER GROUND RING vn•a ritl• • METALLIC COLD WATER PIPE(IF AVAILABLE) LETTERS. (MIN.12 BCW) BUIL 3.APPLY NO-OX OR EQUIVALENT TO MATING CABLE TO ROD CADWELD GROUND ROD GGROUNDING • BUILDING STEEL(IF AVAILABLE)(i2} SURFACE OF LUG AND WIPE CLEAN EXCESS COMPOUND. DETAILS 6 CELL REFERENCE GROUND BAR DETAIL 7 GROUND ROD DETAIL 8 INSPECTION WELL DETAIL OmMng"�N` —`— E6 SCALE:NTS E6 SCALE:NTS E6 SCALE:NT$ ES LO N ambar,org/r ay/June 2016 Vol.30 No.3 R 11 A Publication of the Rea!Prolierty,Trust atul Cstate Lm Section AOM American Bar Anociation, r Cett Phone Towers . , 11 Not Affect PropertU Ualues r ,f ■ t1► i■ CD N r -Pwww.ambar.org/r. li May/June 2016 Vol.30 No.3 — - 1 A Publication of the Real Pro ,Treat l"state UW Section "can Bar Association FEA t ttES 10 Cell Phone Towers Do Not Affect Property Values {tar the Case of Three Board Hearings and One Temporary Tower} By Richard A.Forsten,Wendie C.Stabler,and Olufunke 0. Fagbami .22 - 22 Estate Planning for the Chronically Ill, Aging,and Otherwise Vulnerable or Isolated Client --.— By Martin M.Shen art 35 By the Way,What About the Post-Closing Credit Enhancement? ar a By Frederick L.Klein and Devin I-Shepherd r 41 Bipartisan Budget Act Significantly Changes Social Security Retirement Benefit Options p.44 By Steven A.Brand,David G.Freitag,Ron R. Rc binsori, and Bruce A.Tannahill 44 Reappraisal of Ground Lease Rentals By Jerome D.Whalen 53 Explaining Estate Funding with Hands-on Examples By Paige K.BenYaacov p,53 a: PROBA F& PRA)t*tarrr■?&YIW 2016 1 I- CN ARA PUBUSHING % /tN `Ik%AI4r It' Ni6 V'n' Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice Art 044 or k"druvA -XI'Vaia Manager,Produdion Servim� DEPARTIMFNTS .3 Letters to the Editor 1 f fl'i ,Ftp I '('ite Operations i"Al 4 Section News % Advertising Sales and 8 Uniform Laws Update 1r .! rrtrtrrr. i 16 Xit-, 16 Keeping Current—Property e>4'ivin jr, (d azerman AAAA ells 30 Keeping Current—Probate t, fps ditt$is in!I=ttivn, 51 Technology—Property '�Cl N.ciSinvi Ahjv�"ft K tAW f_Mita„co, it,N-fol:4-75irs "v art. MiNc-Afli—V 64 The Last Word f -ha!A�Sittvraigvt 13112)9M-6115, Van Der�jtcc Cover :panic AZirtvh I lim Marr Di*pa rtmeats Witar REAL TRUST& r Mi PROPERTY 1 ESTATEAW Lht:Sent to thv� ; :- propri-try FAilorial Policy: t>ItntihilIt is jr-signed tit a'sist f:%vvcr11 orate_ tiring in the Areas of real estate,wills,trusts,and estates,in,- providing arlides and tififorial utalwr written in a rrajabir anif informaliv, -tyle The articles,other editorial content,And advertisements Are intend to give up-to-elate,praclit4l intonnation that will aid law- lilarrhlA MaY Juax. a 4-5t,Sepernt",'Lictober.mid Asa vers to giving their chents accurate,prompt,and efficient service, )w wrican Say A vx7ats zr StIction,4 Real Protterty.Trust And E. Law EdIttiow,ac�verhwng.%*.crq*.n. uiatmn offices'.321 1-j cu'k%ret, The materials cuntAined herein represent the opinions of the C:hicaguil,Q*54-7;98 authors and editors And should not be construed to be those of either the American Bat Association or the Section of Real Property, T1`price of an annual for nic"brts 4 the Se ettici of Real phl*eft.I most aod 'Brost and Estate Law unless adopted pursuant to the bylaws of the Estatir"Atur tszt)is includ'-d in their dur'ate-r,rim deductible dicrt+una N"V wxwbcr Association.Nothing contained herein is to be considered the ten- of the ABA in"beecoam a rneirk"Ir-of tf,. -1 Real[It,yj wity.Trust and fistaw Law dering of legal or ethical advice for specific cases and readers are ky Nenihng annua! of$71)and an a; ddre'rml to its flection:A2 mer;*cr- responsible fur obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. I;Np is a pirred,aue to,,ectron mernbc-, 1-1.Asti autitutioryIrKiteligible tem These materials and any forms And agreements herein are intended ABA m2n,_'vT%tup may,.4ttiscribe ip Pnt;�. '�75 M, year,$&50 per Year for for educational and informational purposes only. •uttonsaddravwd oulside thr L:Tt.-. i fug,�' Saigir copits are$7 Phu$195 kw PMdW And-"umdh%RrIv, -6,Im w back isiors stiouid be 1 2016 American Bar Association All rights reservai.No part or addrmwd to,ABA we Center,Amin 721 N,Clark-Stat'R.flikago, this,publication may be reproduced,stored tit a retrieval systurn,or l.fat transmitted tit anv form or by ativ means,electrottic,mechanical,phr. tocopying.recording.or OtherwisL,without the prior written permis- dr'Pi 1, of cion of the publisher Contact ARA Copyrights St Contracts,at rejormt.fitout or via tax at(317j 498- WAR for permimunt,Printeci in the U.Sak. It iTI;II 2 PRON V#'F& PROPFRIN ro MAYMMI 2016 .1 00 N r e [ ,I Phos t Affect P (Or the Case of Three Board Hearings and One Temporary Tower P ,w lot ' M �x I f. ' 1 _ Ar fr �r By Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stabler, andOlufunke i Fagbarni �a M N 111 phone use has exploded. neighbors,invariably argue that a and analyses available on the valuation Ten years ago,the illonc did new tower will adversely affect prop- question,all of which generally indi- not exist.Smartphones did not erty values(specifically theirs),so the cite that cell towers have little or no exist. The iPad did not exist.Black- pending tower application should be effect on the value of nearby proper- berries were cutting edge.Them-was rejected. ties.Following this general review,the no twitter,no Instagram,not Pinter- Appraisers argue to the contrary article examines the case of ATfvTT1_ est.Raccixtok was still nascent,and Cell towers,they point out,are much Siuswx Courtly Ittmird of Adjustment,No. MySpace was still popular.Today,peri- like other modem infi-astructurie('tele- S14A-04-01 MJB,-7015 Wt.1975620 ple regularly access the Internet over phone poles,utility lines,streetlights, (Del.Super.Ct.Apr:30,2015),in which their smariphones,and tablets.They and so on).Although cell towers may AT&T was able to demonstrate that its tweet,they post,they swpchat. initially be noticed,they quickly facie proposed tower would have no effect In just an eight-year pLTitid,from into the background and have no on value because,during the pendency 2tW to 2014,AT&T saw it I 00,OOD"/. appreciable effect on value--just as of the lengthy appeals process con- increase in mobile data traffic on its telephone poles,utility lines,street- cerning the originally-approved tower, wireless network---not a 100%increase, lights,acrd the other infrastructure Nl'&f had erected a temporary tower, not a 1,0001%increase,but a 100,011r/. of modern life do rt(-,)t afftx:t value. which was shown to have no effect(,)it increase.See Randall Stephenson, Although this conclusion may seem value.Put another way,unlike most cell Chairintin's LVer,AT&T 2014 Annual counterintuitive to many,and certainly tonver applications in which opponents Report(Feb.10,2015),wwwatt.com/ those opposing a new tower will vehe- argue that studies from other areas an-, lnvestor/ATT_Annual/.1014/lettt,r_to_ athe proposed mently disagree,it is borrie out by the not indicative of the effect investors.h1ml.National mobile data statistilt-,and studies, tower will have on their properties, traffic is estimated to increaswanother Recently,in Sussex County,Dela- Nl'&f was able to conclusively dem- sixfold from 2015 to 2020,at a corn- ware,a unique set of circumstances onstrate that the proposed tower in the pound annual growth rate of 42%,See made it Possible to review the effect of proposed location would have no effect Cisco,VNI Mobile Forectist ffighli ,ghts, a proposed tower on the property val- on nearby property values.Finally,this 207.5-2020,%rww.cisc(i.com/a&sc-ts/sol/ ues of surrounding properties Nfow the article conclude:with some other les- .qp/vni/forec.ist-hightighL-,-Mt)bile/ final approval was granted.Specifically, sons from the AT6rT case. index.htmi(last visited Feb.2,1,2016)- after an approval for a proptxwd tower People have responded to this tech- was go anted,it was clialhoniged.While Generally Speaking,Cell nology.And they like it.A IoL the challenge was pending,a tempo- Ta wmrs Do Not Affect But one thing people do not seem to nary tower%vas erect o in the location Property Vallie like is cell towers—the infrastructure proposed for the permanent tower.The (-wnertllv speaking,most studies of necessary to make the network work. challenged approval was reversed and the issue conclude that proximity tee Despite pundits who predicted that a new hearing ordered.Because the cell tower has no significant effect on technology would reduce the num.- county bras a Policy of allowing 7on- property values.For example.a 2(01 ber of towers,the need for additional ing cede violations to remain in place Study by Thom Consultants,which towers and network capacity is greater while the property owner seeks a vari- examined 85 transactions involving than ever,as the network capacity to at ice or undertakes other remedial homes and 26 transactions involving transmit data has been far outstripped action(in this case,the new hearing vacant lots,concluded that"proximity by the ever-growing demands of a process),the county allowed the tem- to the cell site did not affect sale price-, population abandoning its landlines porary tower to remain. of homes or residential lots within the in favor of the convenience of smart- ()ver the course of the next two Potomac study area."See'lliome Con- phones and mobile data access. years,while the challenges to the tower sultants,Inc.,Mo nolittle 1i11mct 51111111 on Inmost jurisdictions,proposed new played out before the Sussex County Residential Rml Estate PriaNfor Homos cell towers must undergo some sort of Board of Adjustment and the Delaware and Rt-4dential tell in Hit,Vit,initll of public application process involving a courts,the temporary tower remained, the Bullis Sclitiol,Potoinfic,Mitiquin- public hearing.Given the chance,those allowing the tower applicant to ana- ery Courttit,A&rylatid(May 2,2001),at in the area will oppose any proposed lyze property values before and after 3.4he AV]study,in turn,referenced a new tower.While the Federal Telecom- the temporary tower was constructed 1998 study in the Richmond,Virginia, munications Act of 1996,47 U.S.C. and to measure its effiv- t on local prop- area that examined six towers and 140 §332(7)(B)(iv),prohibits jurisdictions erty values as compared to the market properties,and that also concluded from denying cell tower applications as a whole.In fact,as further clescnbed -there was no consistent market evi- on the basis of alleged ill-health effects, herein,and consistent with the broader Bence suggesting any negative impact literature(in the subject,the actual data upon improved residential properties Richard A.Forsten and Wendie C.Stabler for the site in question confirmed no exposed to such facilities in the areas are partners,and Olufunke 0.Fagbami is effect on value. included in the study"S ee Allen G. an associate,in the Wilmington,Delaware, This article is divided into three Dorin Jr.,MAI,SRA&Joseph W.Smith office of Saul Ewing I.I.P. parts.First,it reviews various studies Ill,71te litiliviet t!f Civittintiticaiions'rorpyys Pluiltxrr& Pitorj:Iri i,a MAY11K 2016 11 C) CV) on Residential pTjwrfy Vphins,Right A 2005 survey conducted by studied the effm its,proposed tower of Way,Mar./Apr.190Q,at 17,avail., researcher-,in Now Zealand found an wou!'d have on properties in the imme- able at ht",�://wwiv.irvvt�onfine.org/ interesting bias.Although the study diateerea,but how to study an un-built eweb/upload/099b.pdf A 2004 study concluded that proximity to a tower tower was not explained.Indeed,this of homes in Orange County,FloT- did seem to affect value,it also found is the conundrum facing many appli- ida,found a minimal effect of 2%)on that those in the"control group,"who cations--wliflie studies and data based value-SeeSandy Bond,I.Lviyi<g GIS to did not live near z tower,expressed a on other towers indicate no significant Maisure the Intpuel ffDistllncr to Cell great deal more concern over the effect effect tin value,opponents claim that Pluine Wmvrs an House Pricoiii Florida, of a tower on property value than those such studies involving other areas and Appraisal J.,Fall 20(17.A 2013 study who lived near i tower.See Sandy other towersshouldnot apply to their from Chatham County,North Can)- Bond&Ko-Kang Wang,The hnimcl particular properties. lina,concluded that"the proposed ty'Cell Phone 1,4aws on I louse Price in In 2013,though,AT&T would find tower will not adversely affect prop- Rcsidential Neighk)rlhvib,Appraisal I., itself in the unique and unanticipated erty values in the general vicinity of Summer 2(05,at Z1,6,262-65.Specifi- I position of dernonstrating that its pro the tower,-and a study from that same cally,almost halt of the control group posed tower would have no effect on year in Holly Springs,North Carolina, expressed concern about the effect on value based on actual market data from concluded that for an existing tower, value,while only 1.3%of those living the actual geographic area surrounding "then-does not appear to be any sig- near a tower expressed Concern,and the actual proposed tower.Thus,,the nificant or consistent change in value more than 6M,were not worried about challenge of disproving a negative had from the properties located[closer the effect on value.Id.5e researchers just become much easier. to or farther from the tower]...con- thvorivt�d that this difference between eluding;that the tower does not affect those who did not live near a tower AT&T v.Sussex Countir. the value of the properties as distance versus those who did may be because One Cell Tower,Three increases from[the]tower."See David those living near a tower did not want Hearings'Niv Eflfv-tet Oil Value A.Smith,lid 1wet Ali alysis qf to PnilhNed to express fear--,about property value "t-case that would become AT44T relIT01111flialications Tait er on the Val- decline that would then,in fact,lead it Su.. Court v Board rfAdpislinail die's of Phiperties in the Gait'ral Vkhiitjl to lower property values.Id.An expla- begin in the early 2()00s,when New of the Torver Ux-ated on Pqythress Road, nation just as likely,if not more so,is Cingular Wireless I'CS_ (which would Chathant Count.11,North Carolina(Sep* posited by researchers whose studies later be acquired by AT&T)first iden- 10,2013),at 1,available at u-wwcha- find no general effect on value--that is, tifivol the need for a new cell tower as thamnc.org/ that because cell towers are perceived part of its network in the general vicin- Rezonin&%:LibdivisionC.ise--/2013/ as part of today's modern infra- ity of Bethany Beach,Sussex County, 9-16-13-BOC/Meacham-ct4l-Lot/PFI- structure,they simply fade into the Delaware.After several years of fit-, Commt-,nts/impact'y,,20Analysi.-, background and are not noticed.I'llose and starts,Cingular finally found a %20SK01 1715.pdf;Tom J.Keith& living near towers do not express Con- suitable site with a willing property Associates,Inc-,Inipart(f C41 Tower cern,or do not perceive the cell towers owner—the rear of a combirlation on Surrounding Properho-,,available at as having a negative effect can property Arby's Restaurant/BP Gas Station http://d39pcpjksqix5i.cloudfmnt.net/ values,because the towers have simply parking lot.The property was located media/rc-resea rch/cel 1-tower-study faded into the background as part of on the east side of Route 1,the major pdf(last visited Feb.23,2016).Finally, the existing landscape. north/south artery senting;the Dela- a 2005 study from New Castle County, Despite the general consensus ware beaches from Fenwick Island at Delaware,looked at eight tower sites that cell towers,do not adversely the Maryland line to Rehoboth Beach and similarly concluded that"the mar- affect property values,courts have to the north.A late night drive-thru for ket demonstrates,no ascertainable sometimes allowed boards and admin- the Arby's was located on the back side diminution of value to surrounding istrative bodies to ignore studies from of the building(the same side as the neighborhoods due to the installation other jurisdictions and locations,on the proposed tower)and a water retention or presence of a nearby communica- apparent theory that such studies fail pond was located at the very rear of the tions tower."See Appraisal-Associates, to take local factors into account.For property.lb the immediate south of the lnc.,hitiNict of a Tricconnnunications example,in ChWular Penn.ylmoiia,LLC property was a furniture store and to 'rorwr ufxw Valt((N-of Regidentkd Prop- v Sussex Couni)y Awrif tfAdiuslnteni, the immediate north,a small undevel- ertie.5(Aug.2005),at 93,"The data No.05A-12-003-RFS,2(XJ7 WL 152548 aped parcel.lb the cast and a portion demonstrates that residences in close (Del.Super.Ct.Jan.19,2007),at*8,the of the southern boundary was a small proximity to a tower(less than one Delaware Superior Court justified the (46-unit)condominium community quarter mile or 20V feet in the case of boards refusal to consider two out- called"Sea Pines."To the south of the vast majority of the sales studied) of-state analyses because they"were Sea Pines were a Holiday Inn Express did not incur a measurable diminu- not substantially similar to the pro- and a seafood restaurant,and to the tion in value after development of the posed area in question."The court then east of Sea Pines was the much larger, tower."Id.at 92. suggested that Cingular could have and considerably taller,Sea Colony 12 P11oh vil'& Pltoerimi m MAY/Jt!z 2016 CO Condominiums,consisting of multiple effect on value, nine-story buildings.See:Figurt,1. one would think Under theSussex County Zoning that the top sales Coale,if a cell tower"is to be erected prices would within.5ffl feet of any residentially not be achieved zoned lot,"as was the case here,aspe- in the comn-tu- cial use exception is required from the nity immediately Board of Adjustment.Sussex County surrounding the Cbdv§115-194.2(A).In addition to tower. meeting certain technical requirements AT&T's other regarding height,setback,and fight- appraiser tracked ing,among other-.,the applicant must the movement also demonstrate that the special use of prices in the exception will not"substantially affect '-,-a Pines corn- adversely the uses of the adjacent and munity and the neighboring property:"SussexCounty larger beach com- Code§115-210, munity for two Cingular submitted its original cell years before and tower application in September 2W). Figure 1. through two Neighbors opposed the tower,but the year-,after the board granted the request by a 3-2 vote. evaluating the application;the board installation of the temporary tower. Opponents.of the project then appealed found only that the proposed tower His analysis demonstrated that as the to the Delaware Superior Court;while would"adversely affect"neighbor- larger real estate market moved up and the appeal was Pending,Cingular,with ing properties,not"substantially affect down,so did the Sea Pines community the permission of the county,installed adversely"as required by the Sussex in approximately the same way.See. a temporary cell tower.After the tem- County Code.See New Cir; War Wire- Figure 2 on page 14.In testifying befoi c porary tower was crected and while tt G PCS n Bit of Adjustnicid,65 A.3d the Sussex County Board of Adjust- the appeal was pending,it was discov- 607,611-12(Del.2013).The matter meat,the appraiser explained: cared that the county had posted notice then returned to the board for a third of the hearing on the wrong property hearing,some four years after the first In this high density mixed use (the undeveloped adjacent parcel to the hearing,and the stage was now set area,there's a lot of influences north).Thus,the superior court held with a temporary tower having been surrounding this project already. that,even though posting of a property in place for over three years,one could So People,when they're making is not required under county rules,and look at the movement of property val- a purchase decision in Sea Pines all other notices(for example,newspa- ucs in the vicinity of the temporary and other areas its this resort mar- per and mailings)had b m—n property tower both before and after the tower ket,there are many thing,-,that given,if the county was going to post was constructed and compare those impact your decision,your view-, on a property,it needed to post on the movements to the movement of prop- your access.And a cell tower correct property,and a new hearing erty values in the wider market;or,put Pole,a single monopole,really was ordered.S(v. Stvi Phtt%-Vill.Condo, another way,one could determine with is an expected thing in today's Aqs'n of Owners,(.,.Bit ofAdjustnient,No. relative certainty what effect,if any,a world.As we showed,one side of SIOA-01-M TI IG,2010 WL 825W2 tower at the propcosed location might this property is lined with power (Del.Super.Ct.OLL 28,2010). have. lines that have been there forever. So,Cingular(now a part of AT&T) People need power.They're an went back to the board for a new The TenWorary Tower Has Hip accepted part of the landscape. heating.This time,mare opponents Effect on Propeft Vahm Apparently,people have been showed up and the board voted 3-2 AT&T had two appraisers look at the making purchase decisions in Sea to deny the request;in doing so,the market effects of the temporary tower. Pines for many years in the pres- board noted in its written decision The first appraiser looked at sales of ence of those lines and the other that"it was impossible for the Board two-bedroom nonwater-view condo- uses like gas pumps and the to disregard the large number of indi- minium units(that is,units comparable convenience store,and we just viduals opposing the tower."This time to the condominium units adjoining didn't see anv evidence of this Cingular appealed,first to the supe- the cell tower site).He found a total one particular structure(having] rior court,which affirmed the board, of 36 sales,of which the top two sales, a unique influence on property and then to the Delaware Supreme and six of the top 10 scales,were in the value Court.The supreme court reversed Sea Pines Condominium community the board's decision because the immediately adjoining the cell tower Opponents of the project testified at the board applied the wrong standard in site.If the tower were going to have an hearing before the board as well.They PROMIT& 1`110111•rnl'w MAY/Juw 2016 13 N co offered no appraisal or other direct evi- ISuperior Court,which,by statute,has that the superior court coui'd receive deuce of any effect on value.In tao, the power to reverse,affirm,or modify additional evidence as part of the appeal stamc of their testimony actually bol- a decision of the board.See F)e;.Code process.I' 1.Code Ann.tit 9,§§'1314fe'l steed AT&T.%case when two residents Ann.tit.9,§§1314(f),4918(t),6418(f); 4918(c),6918(c).IN-only reason for the testified that they had experienced noW,.Code Ann.tit.22,§328(c).Signifi- court to receive additional evidence problems in fully renting their umLs cantIN,unlike other Fk-laware statutes would be for the court it)make find- during the rental season after the tem- ings on its own and resolve the porary tower was instAW---or,put Average Saks Price matt v r once and for all,rather another than remand a proceeding back -m-n- to the board for another did not affect the ability of unit t hear- ers to rent their units.Moreover,no ing and,potentiaJiv,another unit owners complained of having to appeal.I lomeowners should not lower rents to secure tenants or of any be faced with year,-,of litigation other adverse economic effect.0me of over whether they can build an XWT's appraisers also did a study of 0=9 additional two feet into a setback, rental rates and found that Sea Pines's But,despite the lack of the rental rates were consistent with the power to remand,when revers- local market and that there,was no ing a box-ord decisiondenying effet-t on rental rates ase ociated with a a permit or variance request, the temporary tower courts have a]most always said In sum,then,the case of the So.%- that reversal does not constitute rex County temporary tower confirms a grant of the permit or vara- what studies have shown for vears ance--rather,the court requires that cell towers have becomepart of the applicant to go back to the the suburban landscape and have no board and reapply for the per- appreciable effect on value.Like tele- mit or variance with a new phone poles,power lines,strectlights, hearing and an entirely new pro- anti the other infrastructure of modern Figure 2. cess.In other words,reviewing life,call towers fade into the back- courts have done the functional ground and draw no more attention regarding appeals from other boards equivalent of a remand,even though than other infrastructure. and administrative bodies,there is no the courts do not call what they're doing power to"remand"a decision back to a"remand." Some Other Lessons firorn the board of adjustment.(For examples The superior courts 2015 decision is the AT&T Case of statutes,in which remand is specifi- significant,then,because the court did AT&rs experience in this case provides cally listed as a remedy,see,e.g.,Del. noel reverse the board and then require two further lessons.First,a land use Code Ann.tit.7,§6612(b);W+Code A J,&_I,to go back to the board and re- applicant needs to be absolutely cer- Ann.fiL 7,§6214(b),Del.Code Ann.tit. apply(for what would have been the twin that all procedures are followed 9,§&312(c);Del.Ccide Ann.lit.14, fourth time)for a special use excep- properly;and,for better or worse,this §1414;Del.Code Ann.tit 18,t' i 328(h); tion for the cell tower.Rather,the court means confirming that the local gov- and Del.Code Ann.tit.19,§1350(b).) specifically recognized that it did not ernmental body has given the prr)per And this lack of remand is most likely have the power to remand and there- notices e-notices and made the proper mailings not an accident, fore modified the board's decision by and postings.But for the county's inad- Most matters before a board of ordering the special exception granted, vertent error in posting notice of the adjustment involve homeowners seek- Specifically,the court explained: hearing on the wrong property in 20X)9, ing minor dimensional variances AT&T could have avoided four years for things such as--a,reened porches At this stage,Apo lant JA1'&rJ of additional litigation.One need not or additions to their homes.judicial has been before the Board and he heavy-handed in confirming that review,of course,can be a time-con- the Court three times regard- things are done properly,but confirma- surning and expensive process.Rather ing this pn*vL The first time,the tion should be obtained. than remands and multiple hearings, Board's approval was reversed More importantly,the Wdware the Delaware Genera I Assembly gave on procedural grounds.The see- Superior Court's 2015 opinion,fol- the superior court the ability todecide and time,the Board applied the lowing the third hearing by the board, the matter(reverse,affirm,or modify) wrong standard and denied the marks something of a watershed toy as part of its decision on appeal,rather application,resulting in the deci- Delaware courts in the way they deal than remand back to the board for far- sion ultimately being reversed by with decisions by boards of adjust- ther proceedings.Indeed,although the Supreme Court.Because the ment.Under Delaware law,appeals most appeals are on the record,the statute provides no authority to from the board go to the Delaware General Assembly further provided remand,Appellant has had to file 14 ftilnill..& Paom:irry P MAY/laE 2016 CO CY) a new application each time.While it-Certainly the statute states that a are supported b),empirical data,and, courts typically reverse rather than court may"affirm,reverse,or mod- although it may seem counterintui- modify decisions of the Board of ifv,"although one would think that tive,the results ultimately make sense Adjustment Review,thea.statute granting a previously-denied appiica- As one appraiser in the.ITS rT caw I]clearly provides the Court with tion is the very epitome of a"reversal," observed,"a cell tower vole,a single the power to modify when appro- not a"modifica tion.""Modifica- monopole,really is an expected th"rig priate.This is such an instance.. . tion"would seem to be reserved for in today's world--_people have been `Me statute in tfie instant case only those situations in which,perhaps,the -making purchase decisions J I for many allows the court to affirm,reverse; board imposed conditions on a vagi- veau-sin the presence of th ow. ,lines and or modify.In the absence of the ince and the court modified those the other uses like gas pumps and the option to remand,the Court finds condihom-or lessened or increased the convenience store,and we just didn't Appellant's argument that the dimensional component of a granted see any evidence of this one particular decision be modified to grant the variance but otherwise left the grant in structure[having)a unique influ&nce permit especially compelling.-_ place.Regardless,though,the AT&T on property%,,tine." For the foregoing reasons,the deci- court's decision is good news for prep- The AT&T case is especially inter- cion ofthe Sussex Courity Board erty cm,nets and other applicant-,who esting and uniquely helpful because of Adjustment is A4ODIFtFDmd receive denials from a board--the it allowed the cell lower applicant to ATI*&Vs Application for a.V. e- court has explicitly recognized that it demonstrate that there would be no cial user exception to construct a Lacks the power of remand and acted effect on value for the very location pe-rmanent I 00-foot telecommuni- according ,ly�.Perhaps future applicants at issue.Property values in the vicin- cations tower on fthel Property is will now be spared the cycle of hear- ity(if the temporary tower moved in GRANIFt). ing,judicial review,new,hearing,more the same way as property values in judicial review,and so on. the larger market,iNot only is this con- ATr:,,'F,2015 W1,1975629 at*14-15.Thus, el union consistent with the generel the court granted AT&T the special use Conclusilim literature and studies in this area,but exception it needed to construct a per- Studies have long shown that cell Xl'&I'was actually able to dennonstrate manent tower.When opponents did towers have no appreciable effect on that its proposed tower in its proposed not appeal the superior court decision, property values,but opponents of tow- location would not affect property Vol- A71*71's odyssey was finally over. ers,and some;boards that consider or-,in the immediate area.11 The court stated that it was modify- these applications,refuse to believe ing the board'-decision,not reversing these studic-i.Nevertheless,the resu Its V Jur Money gets YO . tn,, the finish line i'Aiikwv. FELIS;N TRUSTAND ESTATE HTIGATION Ilk LAW FINANCE 61OUP PAYS YOUR BILLS WHEN YOUR CLIENT'S FUNDS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED. et LES stepped in to assist its when we needed them most Many o;fiers believed in the case,tilt few had the wisdo,ritomvestirit, Only one had the resources to fund it in tiara finish tine,"' Onia,Writ. 1 1.4 14 Law Finance Group Plu)"Vfu& Pitolfam m MAY/Ju,,qc 2016 15 It Submittal Deadline PIC Meeting BOS Meeting LQ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FRE DERICK COVNTY,IVIRGLNNIA 1. Applicant(check one): Property OwnerOther_ NAME: New Cingular Wireless PCS..LLC("AT&T"} ADDRESS: 7150 Standard Drive,Hanover Md TELEPHONE: 4105703714 2. Please list all owners,occupants, or parties in interest of the property: Holt Emma.J Etals 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) 141 Fairview Rd,Gore Virginia 22637 4. The property has a road frontage of feet and a depth of feet and consists of 14-37 .acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Hott Emma J.Etals as evidenced by deed from LAWRENCE HAHN (previous owner) recorded in deed book no. 338 -on page 451 as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court,County of Frederick. 6. Property Identification Number(P.I.N.)26 A 29 Magisterial District Current Zoning RA LO c� 7. Adjoining Property: USE ZONING North Residential RA East Residential RA South Residential RA West Residential RA 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept.before completing): Conditional Use 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: AT&T is proposing to build a 199'mono pole cell phone tower with 250 square foot compound on the ground to hold equipment. There will also be a 12'access gate and a 10'wide gravel access road 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, Or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front Of(across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this a lication: Name and Property Identification Number Address NameSherri Mills f - 1 00119 Fairview Rd Gore VA Property#8030011 Name Bryan S Hahn 08836 northwestern pike Gore VA [NameKaren roperty#8035771 c9& , 4 -541 /3 Mailing Address S Hahn - 1 8962 Northwestern Pike Gore VA operty#8004867 Mailing Address NameKaren S Hahn 8962 Northwestern Pike Gore VA Property#8004868 Mailing Address Name Deborah Paskel 08938 Northwestern Pike Gore VA Property#8004869 NameKaren S Hahn t�. ` 8962 Northwestern Pike Gore VA Property#8004870 -2 Mailing Address Name Bruce W Ledford 26-tl-1 r' 39350 Edmonds LN Clements MD Property#8004849 Mailing Address 6 Name and Property Identification Number Address Name William A Hefner 261 Fairview Rd Gore VA Property#8004836 1 Mailing Address Name Charles R Wenger 26-*-1- 914 PO box 4 Gore VA Property#8004850 Mailing Address Name Brian Mcqovern 214 Fairview Rd Gore VA Property#8044283 Name Timothy R Rose Z —111 -19114 236 Fairview Rd Gore VA Property#8044282 Name Sandra Filppu PO box 39 Gore VA Property#8044281 Mailing address Name Renee Aneta Swisher 8986 Northwestern Pike Gore VA Property#8004879 1 1 NameG&R Rental Properties LLC 1585 Old Tractor Ln Capon Bridge WV Property#8004875 1 Mailing Address Name Gary Carpenter 1585 Old Tractor Ln Capon Bridge WV Property#8004848 Mailing address Name Gary Carpenter 585 Old Tractor Ln Capon Bridge WV Property#8004837 Mailing address NameCharles Wenger PO Box 4 Property#8004854 Mailing Address Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# 7 rl- 00 IL Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. 00 M 1 2. additional comments,if any: I(we),the undersigned,do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County,Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7)days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. �9 Joseph PrietoSiature of Applicant 7xle:2RZ0 d3 3t F3 Ct;t-0-rJ4'�. Douglas A. Sampson, Esquire Digitally signed by Douglas A.Sampson.Esquire Signature of Owner ' Date:2020.03.31 14:05:33-04'00' Owners'Mailing Address Owner's Authorized Agent, 500 E. Pratt Street,Baltimore, MD 21202 Owners'Telephone No. 10-332-8661 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTI2ATOIt: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: i E 3 M r AFFIDAVIT OF LANDOWNER AND COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY OPERATOR Hatt Emma J. Etals, owner of 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility submit this affidavit pursuant to Frederick County Code § 165-201.19B(7): 1. Hott Emma J. Etals and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility are aware that either or both may be held responsible for the removal of the proposed commercial telecommunication facility located at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637. HOTT EMMA J. ETALS AND NEW LINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM under penalties of perjury and upon personal knowledge that the content of the foregoing paper is true. Date Hott Emma J. Etals Date New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility 36317408.1 12(12119 C) I ticY e°G Special Limited Power of Attorney c County of Frederick, Virginia I Frederick Planning Website: www,feva.us •Int Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 � Phone (540)665-5651 facsimile (540)665-6395 i Know All 1V en By These Presents That: Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the progeny owner/opplicunt is on entity,the name oi'the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the properly or are applicants an execut M tower nratiomey flout each o ner will be nee ed. / � ! Y! ( 71-- t �.�..1"'{.t.i:.i t�..[� (4ole �� ��lJ�'� � Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: i90ve'lc<S A, Name of Attorneytn-Fact Mailing Address of Altorney-In-Fact Teieplume Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my bell alf with respect to applition w th Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Master Development Plan{prelim,or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-In-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modify it. , f i-n- ,�� L Si ature C = tI Title(if signing on behalf of an entity) I State of Ita�1IV� __ �I County/City of ,j. ) a ,To wit: a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that the person who signed th foregoing instrument personally appeare4 before me and Ws acknowledged the m b saefore me inA)l AY i 'urisdiction aforesaid this day of ' -� ' ,20 j, M —00' , ry Pubilc It istradon b a6 i Notary public-State7Aug land Harford Co My Commission Expire ,2023 r i Page 2 CUP 902-20 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) June 29, 2020 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 06/03/20 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 07/08/20 Pending LOCATION: This property is located at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 26-A-29 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING& PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant PROPOSED USE: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to enable the construction of a 199-foot Monopole-Type Commercial Telecommunications Facility. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 733, (Fairview Road), the VDOT facility providing access to the property. A location has been identified for a low-volume commercial entrance on Route 733. The new entrance will need to meet VDOT standards for the proposed use. Should the use ever expand in the future, the entrance will need to be reviewed, to determine if additional improvements may be required. Frederick County Inspections: The Tower foundation and related building and/or structures shall comply with the Virginia Building Code. Tower shall be designed in accordance with the provisions of the TIA-222 and shall be of noncombustible material. Towers shall be located such that guy wires and other accessories shall not cross or encroach upon any street or other public spaces, or over above-ground electric utility 141 Page 3 CUP 902-20 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) June 29, 2020 lines without written consent. Access to the tower sites shall be limited as required by applicable OSHA, FCC, and EPA. Section 102.3 Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (USBC) addresses the exempts equipment, related wiring, and structures supporting the related wiring installed by a provider of publicly regulated utility service or a franchised cable television operator and electrical equipment and related wiring used for radio, broadcast or cable television, telecommunications or information service transmission. The exemption shall apply only if under applicable federal and state law the ownership and control of the equipment and wiring is by the service provider or its affiliates. Such exempt equipment and wiring shall be located on either public rights-of-way or private property for which the service provider has rights of occupancy and entry; however, the structures, including their service equipment, housing, or supporting such exempt equipment and wiring shall be subject to the USBC. The installation of equipment and wiring exempted by this section shall not create an unsafe condition prohibited by the USBC. The replacement of or retro fitting of existing fiber distribution boxes falls under this exception as well. Please note that the exemption of permitting does not apply to building structures erected or remodeled on these sites. The tower, foundation and any other related buildings/structures require permits. Winchester-Frederick County Health Department: The office has no objections provided the facility will be "unmanned" as mentioned in the statement of Compliance and Justification. Frederick County Fire Marshall: Plans disapproved by Frederick County Fire Marshal, Adam Hounshell. The Fire Marshal comments will be addressed by the Applicant at time of site plan approval. Winchester Regional Airport: No comment. Frederick Water: Parcel is outside of the Sewer Water Service Area (SWSA). Frederick Water has no comments. Planning and Zoning: The 2035 Comprehensive Plan of Frederick County provides guidance when considering any land use action. This proposed 199-foot monopole-type commercial telecommunication facility is located on a 14+/- acre property that is zoned RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area of the County to remain rural and is not part of any current land use study. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for commercial telecommunication facilities in the RA Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The properties immediately adjacent to this proposed CUP are currently zoned RA Zoning District. The zoning ordinance requires that all proposed telecommunication facilities be subject to additional performance standards in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties, residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value. 142 Page 4 CUP#02-20 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) June 29, 2020 Furthermore, the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires an Applicant to provide confirmation that an attempt was made to collocate on an existing telecommunication facility, and possible collocation structures. The Applicant has provided an inventory of existing telecommunication facilities, and no other telecommunication facility or possible collocation opportunity structures exist in this area. Should this facility be approved this commercial telecommunication facility will be positioned to provide the existing and future land uses in this area of the County with telecommunication needs. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FOR THE 06/03/20 MEETING: Mark Cheran, Zoning Administrator (Staff) reported this is a request to construct a 199-foot monopole commercial telecommunication facility with accessory structures located at 141 Fairview Road in Gore VA and consists of 14 acres that are zoned RA (Rural Areas); the site is in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Staff noted that the Comprehensive Plan identifies this area of the County to remain rural and is not part of any current land use study. Staff provided an overview of the conditions that are proposed with the permit. Chairman Kenney inquired what is considered a personal wireless service provider. Staff explained that it is considered resources such as Cingular, AT&T, and T-Mobile. Mr. Doug Sampson, legal counsel for AT&T came forward and provided an overview of the need of this service in Frederick County. He noted, the need has never been higher; with people working from home and students being taught at home. He highlighted that this is a First Net sight; what that means is First Net is a congressionally authorized public safety network, which provide emergency broadband to emergency provider and emergency personnel. Mr. Sampson stated the application materials are accurate and comprehensive and fairly show what the project is. He noted, they show compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Frederick County. Commissioner Triplett asked if this would give good coverage to other Back Creek valley area. Mr. Sampson explained, it will be in and around the Gore, Virginia area and the Virginia, West Virginia border, specifically along Route 50 and Route 259 as part of the coverage area. He stated the request for the 199-ft. tower is to maximize the coverage area. Commissioner Morrison inquired if this is a self-collapsing monopole. Mr. Sampson replied, these towers are designed to have a fall radius, and designed to telescope within themselves. Chairman Kenney called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Kenney closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Upon motion made by Commissioner Triplett and seconded by Commissioner Dawson the Commission recommended approval of the permit with the conditions presented by staff. 143 Page 5 CUP 902-20 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (AT&T) June 29, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 07/08/20 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a commercial telecommunication facility consisting of a 199-foot monopole telecommunication facility and accessory structures. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this application at their June 3rd meeting and recommended approval. Should the Board of Supervisors find this application to be appropriate, the Planning Commission recommended that the following conditions be attached to the CUP: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the Applicant or property owner within twelve (12 months of abandonment of operation. 5. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12)months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Following this public hearing, a decision regarding this Conditional Use Permit application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. 144 • 1 SURVEYRoCON WIRELESS ANTENNA SITE VA-WVA MARKET 00, 11FROc; EYE" FA# 101381S3 141 Fairview • • d Gore, • County, August 12, 2019 Prepared for: ROCON . - R LLC. ASSOCIATES,LLE 9 101 Chesapeake Avenue Sparrows Point, 08091 Project • • 20190947 � TM RACER ASSOCIATES,LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS A. NEPA Package Checklist/Guideline B. Owned NEPA Checklist C. NEPA Environmental Effects Checklist Source Information Form D. FCC Form 620 E. E-106 SHPO Concurrence E-mail F. Final Tribal Consultation Summary G. Wilderness Areas and Wildlife Preserves H. Threatened & Endangered Species 1. Floodplain Map J. Wetland Map K. National Scenic Trails, National Historic Trails, National Scenic Byways, and National Wild and Scenic Rivers Summary Document Security Disclaimer At the request of the client, this Portable Document Format (PDF) file was delivered without edit or alteration protection security. No warranty expressed or implied, is made in ensuring this document was not altered or otherwise edited from its original,delivered state. 1012 Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 08091 Tel.(856)809-1202 Fax.(856)809-1203 r- 4"'4AGER ASSOCIATES,LLC Section A NEPA Package Checklist/Guideline 1012 Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 08091 Tel.(856)809-1202 Fax.(856)809-1203 00 NEPA Package Checklist/Guideline Site: Frog Eye Approximate Structure Height: 201' Site antenna(s)are to be: Top mounted Side Mounted X *Categorize all compliance/audit sites according to their pre-build status. A. If your site has been previously reviewed and is in compha.nce,no NEPA approval memo is needed for the following changes: 1. ERP reduction,antenna change outs that do not increase the gain,orientation change,lighting change, removal of non-operating antennas,address changes. B. Only RF review is required on the NEPA Checklist when: 2. Minor modification which will affect the RF(Adding a BTS,larger gain/size antenna) 3. Major or minor modifications to an Antenna Farm(previously determined by EPA Group) 4. Temporary/Special events sites(COWS)(temporary crane testing does not require RF review) C. Only age verification of the building is required and RF review when: 5. All facilities are completely located within a building including antennas. Historic viewshed issues cannot apply for antennas wholly contained in a building. D. For LEASED structures the requirements specified on the Limited/Short Form,in either box 2A,B,C;or 3A,B,C or 4A,B,C,is the criteria established to determine when only Historical and RF verification is required: 6. No additional Historical NEPA review will be required for minor modifications covered under the specifics of the FCC's Programmatic Agreement(PA)(See the Programmatic Agreement) 7. The minor modifications include: structure height increases that are less than 10%;or addition of platforms that would not protrude beyond 20% and additional excavation outside the current tower site is not involved.(See NEPA Short Form) 8. Additional Historic NEPA review will be required for major modifications or substantial changes to structures not covered by the PA. (i.e.tower height increase of 10%or more). 9. Major or minor modifications to a structure considered to be part of an existing Antenna Farm (previously determined by FCC Group) 10. Additional Historic NEPA review will be required for any existing man-made structure such as buildings, water tanks, billboards, flag pole, etc. (man-made=any structure not originally designed to carry telecommunications antennas)when:the building is over 45 years or older;is a historic location or within a historic district,or is eligible for listing.(See Programmatic Agreement) Other available resources that can be used to show no impact to historical. Database search/Photos/Site plot on a map Site Visit/qualified consultant Previous SHPO"No Effect"or"No Adverse Effect"finding Current SHPO"No Effect"or"No Adverse Effect"finding(required for all major modifications) Age of the building E. For Owned structures:the Owned NEPA Review Form should be used for: 11. A minor modification,including structure height increases that are less than 10%;or addition of platforms that would not protrude beyond 20%and additional excavation not involved outside the current tower site, and modifications for a site previously in compliance. 12. Full NEPA Documentation is required for new tower construction 13. Full NEPA Documentation is required to modify an existing owned site without a previous full NEPA review on file(Audit) Current research to document"No Effect" FEMA Wetlands Critical Habitat Wilderness USF&W(federal) State DNR Historical/Native American Eligibility(local check) Native American Religious Sites(new builds only) DOES THIS SITE NEED AN EA? NO Revised 6/12/03 ACERASSOCIATES,LLC Section B Owned NEPA Checklist 1012 Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 08091 Tel.(856)809-1202 Fax.(856)809-1203 C) uz AACERASSOCIATES,LLC OWNED NEPA REVIEW PROIECT INFORMATION: Site Name: Frog Eye Type of Structure: Monopole FCC Market: VA-WVA Site Address: 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Frederick County,VA 22637 TYPE OF ACTION: Z New Tower Construction Temporary Facility(COW etc.) M Audit/Compliance Modification PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ROCON LLC proposes to construct a telecommunications facilij�f at 141 Fairview Road in Gore, Frederick CounV,Virginia. The scope of work for this project has been summarized below: • Construct a 195 foot monopole within a 50 foot by 50 foot fenced tower compound, • Install six (6) antennas (2 per sector) at centerline heights of 190 feet and tip heights of approximately 194 feet: • Install nine (9) remote radio heads (RRH) Q per sector) on proposed antenna frame per the enclosed construction documents: • Install six foot lighting protection to the top of monopole with an overall tower height of 201 feet: • Install a 6.7 foot by 6.7 foot walk-in cabinet on a proposed pre-fab platform and diesel -generator on a proposed 10 foot by 18 foot concrete l2ad, a cable bridge, a handhole, and a utilij�t backboard within the tower compound; • Install a pad mounted transformer adjacent to the proposed equipment compound; • Route approximately 380 linear feet of under-ground telco and power conduits from the tower compound to an existing utility pole located along the north side of the prODOsed access drive extending off Fairview Road:and • Construct a 10 foot wide gravel access road off of Fairview Road. U. Will the facility belocated inunofficially designated wilderness area? [47 CFR |.|3O7(a)(|)] Fl Yeo [D No 2, Will the facility belocated inanofficially designated wildlife preserve? [47CFR |.|]07(u)(Z)] M Yes Z No 3. Will the facility: (i) affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats;or(ii) likely jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species;or is it likely to result |V|2Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 0809| ACER ASSOCIATES,LLC in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973? [47 CFR 1.1307 (a)(3)] F� Yes Z No 4. Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places? [47 CFR 1.1307 (a)(4)] E]Yes Z No S. Will the facility affect an Indian religious site? (47 CFR 1.1307(a)(5)]TCNS#: 185754 F1 Yes Z No M N/A If so, describe the source of the information. 6. Will the facility be located in a"floodplain"? [47 CFR 1.1307(a)(6)] [:]Yes Z No 7. Will the construction of the facility involve significant change in surface features(e.g.wetland fill, deforestation or water diversion)?(47 CFR 1.1307(a)(7)] F-1 Yes Z No 8. Will the facility be equipped with high intensity white lights which are to be located in a residential neighborhood,as defined by the local zoning law? [47 CFR 1.1307(a)(8)] F1 Yes Z No Additional Checklist Items: Will the facility affect any National Scenic Trails, National Historic Trails, National Scenic Byways,or National Wild and Scenic Rivers? F1 Yes Z No The undersigned has completed this Checklist as part of an environmental impacts analysis for the possible development of a tract of land and certifies that the answers contained herein are truthful and accurate to the best of the undersigned's knowledge after reasonable investigation. Consulting Firm: Market Representative: 8/12/19 ker Associates, LLC Date Date 1012 Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 08091 Tel.(856)809-1202 Fax.(856)809-1203 N IA. Cellular Sites—providing Cellular Radiotelephone Services within the meaning of 47 CFR Part 22,Subpart H,do either of the following apply(See A&B below): [47 CFR 1.1307(b)] E]Yes [—]No - A. non-building-mounted antennas: height above ground level to lowest point of antenna less than I Omtrs.(3 0 ft.); and the total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP*;or B. for building-mounted antennas: the total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP.* 1B. PCS Sites 1) providing Broadband PCS services within the meaning of 47 CFR Part 24,Subpart E,do either of the following apply (See A&C below): [47 CFR 1.1307(b)] DYes EjNo 2) providing Narrowband PCS services within the meaning of 47 CFR Part 24, Subpart D,do either of the following apply (See B&C below): [47 CFR 1.1307(b)] E]Yes FjNo A. for non-building-mounted antennas: height above ground level to lowest point of antenna less than I Omtrs.(30 ft);and the total power of all channels is greater than 2,000 watts ERP*; or B. for non-building-mounted antennas: height above ground level to lowest point of antenna less than I Omtrs.(30 ft.);and the total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP*;or C. for building-mounted antennas: the total power of all channels is greater than 2,000 watts ERP.* IC. Microwave Sites—Complies with exposure limits identified in Table I of 1.13 10 when the equipment is in close proximity of the public. F] Yes F1 No [_1 N/A 1D. Paging and Radiotelephone Service Sites within the meaning of 47 CFR Part 90,does either of the following apply (See A&B below): [47 CFR 1.1307(b)]: n Yes n No A. for non-building-mounted antennas:height above ground level to lowest point of antenna less than 10 mtrs.(30 ft),and total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP*;or B. for building-mounted antennas: the total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP.* 1E. Providing 700 services-providing Wireless Communications Services within the meaning of 47 CFR Part 27,do either of the following apply(Select A or B below): [47 CFR 1.1307(b)]n Yes Ej No A.non-building-mounted antennas:height above ground level to lowest point of antenna less than I Omtrs. (30 ft.);and the total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP*,or B. for building-mounted antennas:the total power of all channels is greater than 1,000 watts ERP.* *In the section above,the term "total power of all channels"means the sum of all co-located simultaneously operating transmitters owned and operated by a single licensee. For facilities using sectored antennas,this rule is applied separately for each sector. REQUIRES SIGNATURE OF RF ENGINEER OR NETWORK DEPLOYMENT MANAGER The undersigned certifies that this site will be modified/constructed in compliance with the RF exposure regulations mandated by the FCC with regard to the general public. The FCC and Cingular guidelines regarding Maximum Permissible Exposure will not be exceeded as a result of activating this site. Signature of RE Engineer/Network Deployment Mgr Date M LO ' 1 `��ICCER ASSOCIATES,LLC Section C NEPA Environmental Effects Checklist Source Information Form 1012 Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 08091 Tel.(856)809-1202 Fax.(856)809-1203 It LO *, ACERASSOCIATES,LLC NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CHECKLIST SOURCE INFORMATION FORM Site Name: Frog Eye Dace 8/12/19 Initials: |3H |. Will the facility be located in an officially designated wilderness area? Suunoa U.S.G.S. Topographic Map. "Wilderness Areas and Wildlife Refuges," Wilderness Areas Ghouefi|es and simplified Wildlife Refuge Boundaries [computer files]. Arlington, V/\.: Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service and National Park Service. 2. Will the facility be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? Source: U.S.G.S. Topographic Map. "Wilderness Areas and Wildlife Refuges," Wilderness Areas [shapeh|em] and simplified VVi|d|iya Refuge Boundaries [computer files]. Arlington, VA.: Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Sen/ice, Forest Service and National Park Service' ]. \0/i|| the facility: (i) affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or (ii) likely jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species; or is it likely no result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitaco, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973? Source: Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Virginia Department ofGame and Inland Fisheries United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US F&WS) Virginia Field Office 4. \0/i|| the facility affect districts, mites, bui|dings, structures or objects, significant in American hiotmry, architecture, unchao|ugy, engineering or culture, that are |is¢ed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places? Source: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 8/[}HRJ Virginia Cultural Resource Information System A/-CR|S\ database SHPO Concurrence inaccordance with Section V||.B.| of the 2004 NPA |V|2Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey O809| Tel.(856)VO9-|2O2 Fax.(8S6)n09-|ZO3 U') LO AACERASSOCIATES,LLC 5. Will the facility affect an Indian religious site? Source: Electronic Notification through the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) Direct Tribal Consultation in accordance with the FCC's 2018 Infrastructure Second Report and Order, released March 30, 2018, effective July 2. 20|8 G. Will the facility be located in a "Uoodp|uin^? Source: "Flood Hazard Zones ." Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Laver (hJFHi] Web Map Service [WMSService]. Jessup, Maryland: FEMA Map Service Cen¢cr, August 2008. Using: ArcVievv GIS [GIS Software]. Version 9.3.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. |999-2DU9. 7. Will the construction of the facility involve significant change in surface features (e.g. wetland fill, deforestation orwater diversion)? Source: "National VVedundu Inventory," United States Fish & VVi|d|iha Service Web Map Service |VYMS Service]. Madiuon, VV|: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Department of the Interior. Various Dates (Start Date: |99O-0|-O|). "35URGO Soil Survey Area," NRCS Soil Data Mart Data Access Web Map Service [/9MS 3ervice]. Auburn, AL: No1imnu| resources Conservation Service. 8. Will the facility be equipped with high intensity white lights to be located on an antenna tower or supporting structures located in a residential neighborhuod, as defined by the local zoning |uvv? Source: ROCON [LC 9. Will the facility affect any National Scenic Trails, National Historic Trails, National Scenic Byways, nrNational Wild and Scenic Rivers? Source: U3 Department of the Interior - National Park Service, National Trails System Maps, htzp:/A^m^mv.nAu.gov/nts/ United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, America's Byways, http://wvvvv.fhwa.docgmv/bvvvuys/ "Continental United Stateu'", Nu1iwnm| Pork Service, National VViN and Scenic Rivers System [shape0|es]. Burbank, WA: U3GS National Atlas and the Interagency Wild and Scenic River Coordinating Council. |O|2Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey mV09| Tel.(8S6)8n9-|202 Fax.(o56)V09'|203 (.0 LO 4".4ACERASSOCIATES,LLC Section D FCC Form 620 1012 Industrial Drive,West Berlin,New Jersey 08091 Tel.(856)809-1202 Fax.(856)809-1203 ti FCC Form 620 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB New Tower("NT")Submission Packet 3060-1039 Notification Date: 7AM EST 0611212019 See instructions for File Number: 0008686638 public burden estimates General Information 1) (Select only one) ( NE NE-New UA-Update of Application WD-Withdrawal of Application 2)If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal,enter the file number of the pending application currently on file. File Number: Applicant Information 3)FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0023421365 4)Name: ROCON LLC Contact Name 5)First Name: William 6)MI: E 7)Last Name: Rothman 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Principal Contact Information 10)P.O.Box: And 11)Street Address: 9101 Chesapeake Avenue /Or 1 12)City: Sparrows Point 13)State: MD 14)Zip Code: 21219 15)Telephone Number: (443)804-8007 1 16)Fax Number: 17)E-mail Address: velpoe@atlanticbb.net Consultant Information 18)FCC Registration Number(FRN): 0028471308 19)Name: ACER Associates,LLC Principal Investigator 20)First Name: E.Quent 21)MI: 22)Last Name:Winterhoff J23)Suffix: 24)Title:Archaeologist Principal Investigator Contact Information 25)P.O.Box: I And 26)Street Address: 1012 Industrial Drive/Or I 27)City: West Berlin 28)State: NJ T 29)Zip Code: 08091 30)Telephone Number: (856)809-1202 —1 31)Fax Number: (856)809-1203 32)E-mail Address: scofthorn@acerassociates.com I of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 00 Professional Qualification 33)Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards? (X }Yes { }No 34)Areas of Professional Qualification: ( X } Archaeologist ( } Architectural Historian ( ) Historian { ) Architect { } Other(Specify) Additional Staff 35}Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( )yes {X )No If"YES,"complete the following: 36)First Name: 37)MI: 38) Last Name: 9)Suffix: 40)Title: 41)Areas of Professional Qualification: { } Archaeologist ( } Architectural Historian { ) Historian ( ) Architect ( } Other(Specify) 2 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 0') LO Site Information Tower Construction Notification System 1)TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Site Information 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: )Yes X No 3)Site Name: Frog Eye 4)Site Address: 141 Fairview Road 5)Detailed Description of Project: Frog Eye-new tower site build 6)City: Gore 7)State:VA 8)Zip Code: 22637 9)County/Borough/Parish: FREDERICK 10)Nearest Crossroads: Northwestern Pike and Fairview ROad 11)NAD 83 Latitude(DD-MM-SS.S): 39-17-04.4 X )ffor( )S 12)NAD 83 Longitude(DD-MM-SS.S): 078-23-06.1 )Eor( X )W Tower Information 13)Tower height above ground level(include top-mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 61.3 Feet X Meters 14)Tower Type(Select One): Guyed lattice tower Self-supporting lattice X ) Monopole ) Other(Describe): Project Status 15)Current Project Status(Select One): X Construction has not yet commenced Construction has commenced,but is not completed Construction commenced on: Construction has been completed Construction commenced on: Construction completed on: 3 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 C:) Determination of Effect 14)Direct Effects(Select One): X ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects(APE) ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 15)Visual Effects(Select One): X ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects(APE) ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 4 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visualX )yes No effects? 7 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 186754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes1NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians Contact Name 5)First Name: Edith 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Leoso 8)Suffix: 9)Title: THPO Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/15/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Catawba Indian Nation Contact Name 5)First Name: Dr.Wenonah 6)MI: G 7)Last Name: Haire 8)Suffix: 9)Title: THPO and Executive Director Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/16/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 5 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual X )Yes No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes"NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Cherokee Nation Contact Name 5)First Name: Gwen 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Terrapin 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/16/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Chickahorniny Indian Tribe Contact Name 5)First Name: Stephen 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Adkins 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Chief Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05115/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 6 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 M Tribal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APES for direct and visual ( X )yes ( )No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Contact Name 5)First Name: Montana&Associates 6)MI: 7)Last Name: LLC T8)Suffix: 9)Title: Attorney Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/1512019 11)Date Replied 05/23/2019 ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( X ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Cultural Heritage Partners Contact Name 5)First Name: Ellen 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Chapman 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Program Manager Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/1512019 11}Date Replied ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest { ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 7 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual X )yes No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Delaware Nation Contact Name 5)First Name: Kim 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Penrod T)Suffix: 9)Title: Cultural Resources Director Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/1612019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Contact Name 5)First Name: Kelly 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Nelson 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Cell Tower Coordinator Dates&Response -1 05/16/2019 10)Date Contacted 11)Date Replied 05/20/2019 ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest X ) Replied/Other 8 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 LO Tribal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual X )yes No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe Contact Name 5)First Name: Garrie 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Kills a Hundred 8)Suffix: 9)Title: THPO Officer Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/16/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Monacan Nation Contact Name 5)First Name: Dean 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Branham 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Dept of Cultural Preservation Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/16/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 9 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 TribalINI-10 Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APES for direct and visual X )Yes No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 16 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)TribeINHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Nansemond Indian Tribe Contact Name 5)First Name: Lee 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Lockamy 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Chief Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/1512019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Prairie Island Indian Community Contact Name 5)First Name: Noah 6)MI: C 7)Last Name: White 8)Suffix: III 9)Title: THPO Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 05/15/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) RepliedlOther 10 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 ti Tri bal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual X )yes No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs! 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Shawnee Tribe Contact Name 5)First Name: Kim 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Jumper 8)Suffix: 9)Title: THPO Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 0511612019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe Contact Name 5)First Name: W.Frank 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Adams 8)Suffix: 9)Title: Chief Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 06/15/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other of 19 FCC Fomi 620 May 2014 00 (D Tri bal/NHO Involvement 1)Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHOs)been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual X )yes No effects? 2a)Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 185754 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 15 2b)Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe]NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3)Tribe/NHO FRN: 4)Tribe/NHO Name: Tuscarora Nation Contact Name 5)First Name: Bryan 6)MI: 7)Last Name: Printup Suffix: 9)Title: TCNS Rep Dates&Response 10)Date Contacted 06/15/2019 11)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 12 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 rn Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tri beINHO Information 1)FCC Registration Number(FRN): 2)Name: Contact Name 3)First Name: 4)MI: 5)Last Name: 6)Suffix: 7)Title: Contact Information 8)P.O.Box: And 9)Street Address: /Or 10)City: 11)State: 12)Zip Code: 13)Telephone Number: 14)Fax Number: 15)E-mail Address: 16)Preferred means of communication: E-mail Letter Both Dates&Response 17)Date Contacted 18)Date Replied ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest Replied/Have Interest Replied/Other 13 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 CD ti Historic Properties Properties Identified 1)Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? )Yes ( X )No 2)Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected,or sites that are of cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? )yes ( X )No 3)Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? )yes ( X )No L— If"Yes",you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Historic Property 4)Property Name: 5)SHPO Site Number: Property Address 6)Street Address: 7)City: 8)State: 79)Zip Code: 10)County/Borough/Parish: Status&Eligibility 11)Is this property listed on the National Register? )yes ( )No Source: 12)Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? )yes ( )No Source: 13)Is this property a National Historic Landmark? }yes ( )No 14)Direct Effects(Select One): ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15)Visual Effects(Select One): ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 14 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 ti Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1)FCC Registration Number(FRN): 2)Name: Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board Contact Name 3)First Name: Maral 4)MI: 5)Last Name: Kallblan 6)Suffix: 7)Title: Architectural Historian Contact Information FAndT 8)P.O.Box: Jor 9)Street Address: 107 North Kent Street lo)city: Winchester 1 11)State: VA 12)Zip Code: 22601 13)Telephone Number: (540)665-5600 14)Fax Number: 15)E-mail Address: 16)Preferred means of communication: )E-mail X Letter Both Dates&Response 17)Date Contacted 0510912019 18)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest Replied/Other Additional Information 19)Information on local government's role or interest(optional): 15 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 CN ti Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1)FCC Registration Number(FRN): 2)Name: Frederick County Planning Commission Contact Name 3)First Name: Kevin 4)MI: W 1 5)Last Name: Kenney 6)Suffix: 7)Title: Chairman Contact Information St 8)P.O.Box: ]:�Ereet Address: 107 North Kent Street lo)city: Winchester I 11)State: VA 12)Zip Code: 22601 13)Telephone Number: (540)666-5600 14)Fax Number: 15)E-mail Address: 16)Preferred means of communication: )E-mail X Letter Both Dates&Response 17)Date Contacted 05109120119 18)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Additional Information 19)Information on local government's role or interest(optional): 16 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 co ti Other Consulting Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted 1)Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? X )yes Consulting Party 2)FCC Registration Number(FRN): 3)Name: Winchester-Frederick County Historical Society Contact Name 4)First Name: Not 5)MI: 6)Last Name: Available 7)Suffix: 8)Title: Contact Information 9)P.O.Box: 10 10)FAn d Street Address: 1340 South Pleasant Valley Road /Or 11)City: Winchester 1 12)State: VA 13)Zip Code: 22607 14)Telephone Number: (540)662-6550 15)Fax Number: 16)E-mail Address: 17)Preferred means of communication: )E-mail X Letter Both Dates&Response 18)Date Contacted 05109/2019 19)Date Replied X ) No Reply ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other Additional Information 20)Information on other consulting parties'role or interest(optional): 17 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 ti Designation of SHPOITHPO 1)Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(THPO)based on the location of the tower. SHPO/THPO [Name: Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2)You may also designate up to three additional SHPOs/THPOs if the APEs include multiple states. If the APEs include other countries,enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency. SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: Certification I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true,correct,and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name:J.Scott MI: Last Name:Horn Signature: J.Scott Horn --Tate: 06/1112019 FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT(U.S. Code,Title 18,Section 1001)AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT(U.S.Code,Title 47,Section 312(a)(1)),AND/OR FORFEITURE(U.S.Code,Title 47,Section 503). 18 of 19 FCC Form 620 May 2014 r` Aftachmnents � Type Description Date Entered Resumes/Vitae 06R11/2019 Photographs 06/11/2019 Map Documents 0V11/2019 Additional Site Information 06/11/2019 Area ofPotential Effects 06/11/2019 Tdba|/NHO |nvo|vement 0011/2010 Historic Properties for Direct Effects 06/11/2019 for Direct Historic Properties for Visual Effects 0V11/2019 for Visual Area ofPotential Effects 06/11/2019 Local Government Involvement 06/11/2018 Public Involvement 0011/2019 Other 06/11/2019 /vu/1y FCC Form azo May 2014 Q0 r` NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3OSO-1O30 ATTACHMENT I. R'sum'syVITAE E. QUENT WINTERHOFF, PHD, RPA Senior Principal Scientist EXPERIENCE: Dr. VVin¢erhoff has more than o dozen years of project management experience in cultural resource services including phase | archaeological surveym, architectural viavvmhed analyses, phase || site evm|uationo, and phase ||| mitigations. At Apogee, Dr. VYinterho#ru responsibilities include project oversight, proposal vvriting, agency consultation, and completing technical and regulatory reports. EDUCATION: University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, Doctor ofPhilosophy inAnthropology University of Oregon, Eugene. OR. Master of Science in Anthropology Ohio University, Athens, OH, Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology (cum laude) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Register ofProfessional Archaeologists Society for American Archaeology PRIOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE: 2015-Prmsenc Senior Principal Scientist Investigator, Apogee Environmental && Archaeological, |nc, Pittsburgh, PA 2011-2015 Principal Investigator, Apogee Environmental &kArchaeological Inc., Whitesburg, KY& Charleston WV 2010 Principal Investigator,Janus Research, Tampa, FL 2010 Staff Archaeologist, Florida History, LLC, Tampa, FL 2009 Laboratory Supervisor, ASPAArchaeological Program, PagoPago, AS 2008 Archaeological Technician, Environment and Archaeology, LLC, Florence, KY 2000 Principal Investigator, Environment and Archaeology, LLC, Florence, KY 2003-2006 Project Leader/Field Director, University of Oregon, y1uoeunn of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, OR 2006 Instructor, University of Oregon, Pacific Island Archaeological Field School, Tutuila, AS 2001 Field Director. University of Oregon, Pacific |m|ond Archaeological Field School, Tutuila, AS Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number 20190847 FCC Form 62O May 2019 r^ r- NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OGO-1O3S 1997-2000 Archaeological Technician. Environment and /\rchaeo|ogy, LLC. Florence, KY 1998 Lab Technician, The Obsidian Hydration Laboratory, Ohio University, Athens, OH 1998 Curator, The Department ufClassics, Ohio University, Athens, OH 1998 Lab Technician, Ohio University Archaeological Laboratory, Athens, OH 1998 Assistant Field Director, OUArchaeological Field School, Athens, OH 1996-/997 Archaeological Technician, Archaeological & Historical Consu|tants, State College, PA 1996 Undergraduate Participant, OU Archaeological Field School, Athens, OH SUPERVISORY EXPERVENCE & RESEARCH: Archaeological Survey(180 weeks totaLt) 2010+ Principal Investigator: Apogee Environmental J&Archaeological, Inc. 2010 Principal Investigator:Janus Research, Tampa, FL 2008 Principal Investigator: Environment and Archaeo|ngy, [LC. Florence, KY 2003-2006 Project Leader/Field Director: UO. Museum of Natural and Cultural Himtory, Eugene, OR Excavations (84 weeks total) 2009 Laboratory Supervisor: ASPAArchaeological Program, PaeuPxrm. A3 2008 Principal Investigator: Environment and Archaem|ogy, LLC, Florence, KY 2003-2006 Project Leader/Field Director: UO. Museum of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, OR 2006 Instructor: University of Oregon, Pacific Island Archaeological Field School, Tutuila, AS 2005 Field Director: Prehistoric Basalt Tool Production in American Samoa and its Role in Exchange Networks in Fiji-West Polynesia: NSF award number 0533926 (2005) 2001 Field Director: University of Oregon, Pacific |m|und Archaeological Ha|d School, Tutuila, AS Laboratory Cataloging &Analysis (60 weeks total) 2010* Principal Investigator: Apogee Environmental &Archaeological, Inc., Whitesburg, KY 2009 Laboratory Supervisor:/\SPAArchaeological Pro0ronm, Pamo Pngu, AS 2009 Principal Investigator: Environment and Archaeology, LLC, Florence, KY 2003-2008 Project Leader/Field Director: UO. Museum ofNatural and Cultural History, Eugene, OR 2006 Instructor: University nfOregon, Pacific |m|und Archaeological Field School, Tutuila, AS 2005 Field Director Prehistoric Basalt Tool Production in American Samoa and its Role inExchange Networks inFiji-West Polynesia: NSF award number O53]928 Applicant's Name: ROCUNLLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 30100947 FCC Form G2U May 2019 oo r` NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3OM0-1U3Q 2001 Field Director: University ofOregon, Pacific Island Axchueo|Archaeological Tutuila, AS - Part-Time Graduate Instructor: Department of Anthropology, University mfOregon, Eugene, OR Midwestern Prehistoric Archaeology(144 weeks toWl 2010+ Principal Investigator: Apogee Environmental &Archaeological, Inc., Whitesburg, KY 2008 Principal Investigator: Environment and Archaeology, LLC, Florence, KT Midwestern Historic Archaeology(107 weeks total) 2011+ Principal Investigator: Apogee Environmental &Archaeological, Inc., Whitesburg, KY 2008 Principal Investigator: Environment and Archaeology, LLC, Florence, KT Historic Archaeology(24 weeks total) ZO| |* Principal Investigator: Apogee Environmental &Archaeological, Inc., Whitesburg, KY 2010 Principal Investigator:Janus Research, Tampa, FL 2003-2006 Project Leader/Field Director: UO. Museum of Natural and Cultural History, Eugene, OR NONSUPERVUSORY EXPERIENCE & RESEARCH; Archaeological Survey(74 weeks total) 1997-2000; 2008 Archaeological Technician: Environment and Archaeology LLC, Florence, KY 1996-1997 Archaeological Technician: Archaeological fkHistorical Conmu|tants, State CmUege, P/\ Excavations(45 weeks total) 2010 Staff Archaeologist (26vveek« : Florida History, LLC, Tampa, FL 1997-2000; 2000 Archaeological Technician: Environment&Archaeology LLC, Florence, KY 1996-1997 Archaeological Technician: Archaeological & Historical Consultants, State CmUege, F\4 Lalborato!jt Cataloging&Analysis(26 weeks total) 2010 Staff Archaeologist: F|wridoHimtmry, LLC. Tanopa, FL 1997-I000 Lab Technician: Environment and Archaeology LLC, Florence, KY 1998 Lab Technician: The Obsidian Hydration Laboratory, Ohio University, Athens, OH 1998 Curator The Department of Classics, Ohio University, Athens, OH 1998 Lab Technician: Ohio University Archaeological Laboratory, Athens, OH Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form S2O May 2019 m r` NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 308O-103S Midwestern Prehistoric Archaeology(89 weeks total) 199/-2000; 2008 Archaeological Technician: Environment and Archaeology LLC, Florence, KY 1998 Assistant Field Director: Ohio University Archaeological Field School, Athens, OH 1996 Undergraduate Participant: Ohio University Archaeological Field School, Athens, OH Midwestern Historic Archaeology(6 weeks total) 1997-2000; 2008 Archaeological Technician: Environment&Archaeology LLC, Florence, KY Historic Archaeology(8 weeks total) 1997-2000; 2008 Archaeological Technician: Environment &kArchaeology LLC, Florence, NY 1996-1997 Archaeological Technician: Archaeological & Historical Consultants, State College, PA ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD SCHOOLS 2006 Instructor: University of Oregon, Pacific Island Archaeological Field �choqSchool,/\ Tutuila, AS 2001 Field Director: University of Oregon, Pacific Island Archaeological Field School, Tutuila, AS 1998 Assistant Field Director: Ohio University Archaeological Field School, Athens, OH 1996 Undergraduate Participant: Ohio University Archaeological Field School, Athens, OH ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS & CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS VVinterhnf[ E, Ayres, VV.S, Wozniak, |.A, and E. Lash (200 Intra-Island Source Variability on Tutuila, American Samoa and Prehistoric Basalt Adze Exchange in Western Polynesia-Island Melanesia.Archaeology in Oceania 42:65-7|. VVincerhwf[ E, and D. RiXtrup (2DO6) /\Tale ofTwo Quarries: Investigating Prehistoric Basalt Adze Production onTutuila Island, American Samoa.Journal oFSamoan Studies 2:G7-94. VVinnerhof[ E2005) Material Choice and Travel Time inAncient Polynesia: /\n Experimental Perspective on Basalt Adze Exchange. RopmNu/ /uurno/ |9(2) 9|-99. yVinterhmff, E` and P.Johnson Material Manifestations of Landscape Control in Prehistoric 3arnpu. 2009 74th Society of American Archoeolopy Annual Meeting- Poster Presentation, Atlanta, GA. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCDNLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2U May 2019 C) Co NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3UGO-1838 Winterhof[ E., and P.Johnson Social Relations atBasalt Adze Production Sites onTutuila, American Samoa: /\ Chemical Characterization Study into Intra-Island Distribution. 2008 73rd Society of American Archaeology Annual Meeting, Vmncmuver, BC. VVinmerhof[ E To'i: Production Analysis of Samoan Basalt Adzes. 2007 72nd Society A of Archaeology ' Annual Meeting, Austin TX \A/ncerhof[ E. Have Adze, Will Travel: Understanding Prehistoric Inter-island Interaction by Examining Intra-Island Basalt Adze Source Variability. 2007 VII International Conference on Easter Island and the Pacific Vim6xSvveden. VVinterhoff, E, Ayres, and D. Rigtrup Recent Insights igto Prehistoric Stone Tool Production within Tutuila, American Samoa. /8th Amnon/ Prehistoric Association Conference, Mani|a. Phi|ippinea. \0'interhof[ E. Rivers Run Through It: Fishing, Hunting and Obsidian Acquisition in the Mid-Columbia Valley. 2006 Northwest Anthropological Conference, Seattle, WA. Henrikson. L, VVintarhmf[ E, and M. Long Phantom Associations: An Experimental Perspective on Vertical Displacement ofLithic Assemblages inCave Deposits. 2O053»th Chacmool Archaeological Association Conference: Tools oFthe Trade, University ofCalgary, Canada. VVincerhot[ E. Assessing Raw-Material Utility for Adze Tools: an Experimental Point of View on Ancient Polynesian Exchange. 2005 38th Chacmool Archaeological Association Conference: Tools oFthe Trade, University ofCalgary, Canada. VVinterhof[ E, Ayres, VY.S, Wozniak, .A.. and E. Lash A Short Step in a Long Distance Interaction Sphere: Quarry Activities in West Tutuila, American Samoa. 2U0] /O/ozAmerican Anthropological Association Annual Meeting. Poster Presentation, Chicago. |L. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: HOCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20180947 FCC Form G2U May 2019 T1- co _oo NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OSO-1U39 J. SCOTT HORN, PG CHNINI President As a principal of Acer Amuoduces. LLC. [1r. Horn has extensive experience working on Section 108 Review and Historic Preservation construction projects. Since 1998' Mr. Horn has acted as a project manager and principal investigator for over 4,000 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Section 106 Historic Reviews conducted for telecommunications sites in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware. Mr. Horn is responsible for the preparation and review of Section 106 Review reports for telecommunication sites in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, De|avvara, Maryland, Virginia, \A/esc Virginia and New York. Reports include Form 620n and Form 62|m in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreements for telecommunication sites, visual impact aosexmnnents, phoozuirnu|utiono, mitigation mfadverse effects and memorandum of agreements. Mr. Horn also has extensive experience working on Historic Preservation construction projects in o project management role. These projects have included such notable historic structures as The Bellevue Stratford Hotel, Independence Hm|| National Park, 30m Street Station, City Ha||, Suburban Scncion, Roman Catholic High School, and The Fidelity Building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; The Camden County Courthouse and the former First National Bank located at 2"« and Market Street in Camden, New Jersey; The Carnegie Library in Atlantic City, New Jersey; and uresidence located at | | RennsenAvenue inNew Brunswick, New Jersey. Mr. Horn has prepared National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental effect surveys and Environmental Impact Assessments (BAs) for over 2.000 telecommunications sites in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and New York. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Acer Associates, LLC, West Berlin, NJ, 2003-Pnssen¢ Adler Gaumdance. Inc. Barrington, NJ, 1998-2003 The Krv6onGroup, |nc, Cherry Hill, NJ, 1994-1998 Hill International, |nc, Willingboro, NJ, 1989-1994 Kase|aan & D'Ange|uAssociates, Haddon Heights, h8 1984-1089 Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2O May 2019 r4 co NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 5OGO'103Q CULTURAI-XHUSTORVCALRESOURCE EVALUATION: w Conducts Surveys and Evaluations of Historic Structures in accordance with Sections 106 and | |Oofthe National Historic Preservation Act. w Preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reports, and National Historical Preservation Act's (NHpA) Section 106 Ravi*vvu, and submission of these reports tuthe appropriate State Historic Preservation office (DHP[}). • Conducts reviews of architectural and archaeological resource information at state historic preservation offices (SHPOs), state museums and libraries, and local historic societies. • Prepares and reviews assessments of adverse effects pursuant to 36 CFR 800. • Research and preparation of historical and architectural and architectural documentation in support ofbuilding restoration. ~ Oversees architectural field surveys and archival research to determine significance and eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). ~ Conducts site investigation and preparation of cultural resource survey forms for potentially eligible properties. * Reviews applications for yJRHP determination of eligibility (DOE) in accordance with the Secretary ofInterior's Standards and Guidelines. • Familiar with avariety ofresearch tools including the National Register Information System (NR|S), historic topographical maps, historic Sanborn mnapn, deed records, County Soil Surveys, State and Local Historical Maps and informant interviews. • Prepares photographic documentation and simulation for determination of effects and/or mitigation. m Researches HAB8/HAERdocumentation. * Conducts Balloon Tests and Photo Simulations for determination/resolution of potential adverse visual effects. EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATIONS: B.S. CSeq|o@y` 1983 University mfDelaware, Newark, DE Professional Geologist, P.G, Delaware, |.D. #S4-000|Q75 Professional Geologist, P.G, Pennsylvania, I.D.# PG062896 Professional Geologist, P.G, Tennessee, |.D. #OOOO43|9 Professional Geologist, P.G, Virginia, I.D. #28O| 001820 Licensed Site Remediation Professional, New Jersey |.D.# 575606 Certified Hazardous Materials Manugar (CHMM) Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2O May 2019 nn co NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3O8O-1O38 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS: American Conference ufGovernmental Industrial Hygienists (ACG|H) American Industrial Hygiene Association N\|HAJ Institute of Hazardous Materials Management (IHMy1) Alliance of Hazardous y1u1aria|m Professionals N\HMP\ Geologic Society of America (GSA) American Council for Accredited Certifications (ACAC) Society for Architectural Historians (SAH) Nu1iunu| Trust for Historic Preservation American Concrete Institute k4C|\ American Institute of Professional Geologists A\|PG\ Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20150947 FCC Form G2U May 2019 It Co NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 ATTACHMENT 2. PHOTOGRAPHS All photographs were taken by ACER on March 5, 2019. The camera used during the site reconnaissance had an 8 mm focal length of lens. a. Photographs taken from the tower site showing views in all directions. b. Photographs of all listed and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects (APE), if any. C. Photographs in the direction of the tower site from listed and/or eligible properties that are visible from the project area, if any. d. Aerial photograph(s) of the APE for Visual Effects. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form 620 May 2019 s >�•��, is ;1 �� �. 7OLM : �� •- _ �'�`�r,�..� : M fill� v- R•, a„Z R.` ip TO •' ems?, .! -.--+•+'� ems�.: '_� a - •. . yrs n. �, �.• 5 r � E• „`�'r'�'lr AM fr'''y s� . •- Ood_ & , '�r_ Rl 1 g`. Iw �= r-►: 4 ;saw _ 1 F .art :� t �► . yam. , a7 a7 ." 1b$ ?�''� ilf� ' �T "sad •. f i p. r, Frog Eye s � f ra . Ale w N SITE LOCATION 112 MILE RADIUS AERIAL LOCATION MAP ( ) "Imagery,"World_Imagery[ArcGIS Map Service]. Redlands,CA: ACER ASSOCIATES, LLC Environmental Systems Research Institute,Inc. 1012 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE WEST BERLIN,NEW JERSEY 08091 Tel (856)809-12021 Fax(856) 809-1203 M Co NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 ATTACHMENT 3. MAPS Attached are one or more 7.5-minute quad USGS topographical maps identifying: a. The APES for Direct and Visual Effects. b. The location of the proposed site and any new access roads or other easements including excavations. C. The locations of each property are listed in Attachment 8. d. Keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form 620 May 2019 0 rn 200 t f v e r Af .01 t�61� r , 77 qw, AP All "a¢ Frog Eye {� l tlo 4A Y'p JJJ ' � k }�� '`,q� 'Ria !s�• r r.:fF ,-`ti.1� � � � .f ��� f �,.,;... tt. i .was• •♦ ...! '! -.. --ti _,�y.�r♦ ilf @p ei.,F i f y r-. �' .gym•- ...R.. N SITE LOCATION USGS TOPOGIFIAPHIC MAP 112 MILE RADIUS Quadrangle Capon Bridge! le P g "USGSTopographic Map,"US_Topo_Maps[ArcGIS Map Service]. Redlands,CA i ACER ASSOCIATES LLC Environmental Systems Research Inst ,Inc. Using:ArcView GIS[GIS Software]. 1012 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE Version 9.3.1. Redlands,CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute,Inc.,1999-2009 j WEST BERLIN,NEW JERSEY 08091 Tel (856)809-1202 1 Fax(856)809-1203 ■ V. afs Aiken#1s�rt T;),'4 Ce SS rfex eatus'e�m The Data V!,i 2er,p1?ase Welcome,tisaoo a�acerassactates.oam# rra clear your ttiratirsr=t'I,Lache. v�elcom'.m , rul tin C`tihurai Resuuree 111formatiun System sub-'Y'd your r.�, to t;eips Improve v-cnts ~ Map � Fiffiff. __ Map Layers t3,jukrTwlkb Map Manager Labeling I lull, t41 Fairview Road,Dote Search o DHR Daus w Historic ResourcesVGINMOStReceritAertals + A;chiteclure Resources 1 0 � fi,it;M'p{.tore t3a€-'.5 I le ndV,1 ai Histoor.CisLict Prole 'r Arihao-.PlC;gitBi Resowce.s ; an Archaeology Labels i Archaeology Phase t Survey j +' DHR Easements s *� ASPP Civil War Battlefield Bounda Reference Data (I I 'J USGS GIS Place Hames + Roads ae2 II Sfreln';5 iPii=Oi i (' e+ County Boondfaries a _ congresslanal pist.'ICt Virgineg HaUSe DtrVlCt Jurisdx.r,cnal9oondary i Zip Cade Boundary Hydinkgtc Unit::Udc.Pcunda ?oac Quad Grin; ov,ns 3-48 . g 4.TF1 a• ga I I rr 191 r� m NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3OSO4U39 ATTACHMENT 4. ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION Fixed Asset#: 10138153 Tax Parcel UD; 26/\ I9 Project Overview: ROCON LLC proposes to construct u telecommunications facility at 14/ Fairview Road in Gore. Frederick County, Virginia. The scope of work for this project has been summarized below: * Construct a |95foot monopole within a50foot 6v5Dfoot fenced tower compound; * |nmza|| six /6\ antennas /2 per sector) at centerline heights of |9Ofeet and tip heights of approximately 194 feet; m Install nine (9) remote radio heads (RRH) (3 per sector) on proposed antenna frame per the enclosed construction documents; w |noto|| mix foot lighting protection to the top of monopole with an overall tower height of 201 feet; w Install a 6.7 foot by 8.7 foot walk-in cabinet on a proposed pre-fab platform and diesel generator on apropmsad 10 foot by |8foot concrete pad, acub|e bridge, ahandhu|e. and autility backboard within the tower compound; • Install a pad mounted transformer adjacent to the proposed equipment compound; • Route approximately 380 linear feet of underground telco and power conduits from the tower compound to an existing utility pole located along the north side of the proposed access drive extending off Fairview Road; and ~ Construct |Dfoot wide gravel access road off nfFairview Road. The above scope of work was interpreted from the March 22. 2019 construction documents prepared by |nfinigy Engineering, PLLC. /\copy of the construction documents is attached. Applicant's Name: RUCONLLC Project Name: ROCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 30190947 FCC Form H20 May 2019 SHEET INDEX PROJECT SITE INFORMATI( 70- DESCRIPTION 00 —T1 TLE PAGE 2IE-BAML BON PARITY ROD FROG EYE SIPEAUGH Ni SITE ID 4724 Sft�wwool 0 N2 NOTES Cl (D h cl SITE PLAN t&t EA SITE 9. 10138153 cil- C2 COMPOUND PLAN AND ELEVATION SITE ADDRESS 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD -7 uj CORE,VA 226374 C3 RF SCHEDULE AND NOTES —W FREDERICK z C4 BE PLUMBING DIAGRAM MAGISTERIAL L DISTR-I.QL GAINESBOR0 0 C5 EQUIPMENT DETAILS SITE NAME ZQNINC RA -7 z Lu C6 EQUIPMENT DETAILS PIN# 26 A 29 C7 GUSSET DETAILS — BDN PARITY NSB FROG EYE SIRBAUGH INaIRUMENT A 1B 0072690 OR DC9 WRING DIAGRAM PROPERTY SITE ID - 4,37±ACRES 4-4 CS ANTENNA AND RRH MOUNTING DETAILS SITE COORDINATES R El ELECTRICAL DETAILS 4124 LAI)TUDE, N 39'17'04.35* (HAD 83) E2 GO POWER DETAILS 78O5 ' (HAD E3 RRH WRING DIAGRAM FA SITE NUMBER =VATIQN. 1100.513 2'FEET Q6AMSL (NAVD83)88) LT' E4 UTILITY PLAN TOP-GE-HIGHEST APP Q9FAAKL 201'-0'±(LIGHTNING ROD) (AGL) —E5 GROUNDING PLAN — 10138153 PARCEL—OWNER HOTT EMMA,ETALS E6 GROUNDING DETAILS SITE ADDRESS 141 FAIRVIWE ROAD GORE,VA 22637 — 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD APPUGANT AT&T MORALITY — GORE,VA 22637 7150 STANDARD DRIVE STRUCTURE TYPE HANOVER,MD 21076 — MONOPOLE APPROVALS AT&T CONSTRUCTION: AT&T BE. DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION FROM 7150 STANDARD DRIVE AT&T COMPUANCE: AT&T REAL ESTATE: C� SMARTLINK.LLC START OUT GOING SOUTHWEST ON STANDARD DRIVE TOWARD PARKWAY DRIVE. 1362 MELTON ROAD STANDARD DRIVE BECOMES PARK CIRCLE DRIVE,TURN LEFT ONTO COCA COLA DRIVE.MERGE ONTO MD-100 WEST TOWARD ELUCOTT CITY,MO-100 WEST HANOVER,MD 21076 BECOMES COLUMBIA PIKE/US-29 NORTH.MERGE ONTO 1-70 WEST MA EXIT SCOPE OF WORK TOWARD FREDERICK.MERG 25B CLIENT REP.CONTACT, JOSEPH PRIETO LEESBU TOWN ONTO US-340 WEST VIA EXIT 52 TOWARD JOSEPH.PRIETOOSMARTUNI(LLC.COM RG/CHARLES (PASSING THROUGH VIRGRWA,THEM CROSSING INTO ;�P-T11 WEST VIRGINIA).MERGE ONTO US-340 SOUTH TOWARD LEESBURG/BERRYMLLE 010-2-MRING. GROUND SOUPING ONT'D TOWER SCORING • INSTALL POWER AND TELCO CONDUCTS 21 AQ91JISITION SMAR INK.LLC BON PARITY NSB m INSTALL ICE BRIDGE INSTALL(1)3 SECTOR PLATFORM (CROSSING INTO VIRGINIA).MERGE ONTO VA-7 WEST TOWARD WINCHESTER.MERGE STALL EQUIPMENT PAD ROUTE NEW FIBER AND DO TRUNKS INSTALL(6)ANTENNAS ON SECTOR PLATFORM 1362 TMLELL N ROAD FROG EYE SIRBAUGH ONTO 1-81 NORTH TOWARD MAR IINSBURG.TAKE THE US-11 EXIT,EXIT 317, INSTALL STEEL AID COMBO PLATFORM(NEQ 020324) FROM WIC To CABLE PORT ON HANOVER,MD 21076 TOWARD VANCHESTER/STEPHENSON/VA-37/US-522 NORTH/LS-�U WEST.KEEP NSTALL STEEL WIC(WED#20060)ON PLATFORM MONO INSTALL(9)RRI-H ON SECTOR PLATFORM SITE IDO 4124 LEFT To TAKE RAMP TOWARD WNCHESTER/RTS522 NORTH AND RT WEST. INSTALL MkW AC DIESEL GENERATOR W/190 GALLON POLE VIA ICE BRIDGE INSTALL(3)DC%ON SECTOR PLATFORM SITE ACQUISITION CONTACT JOSEPH PRIETO FA#10138153 TURN LEFT ONTO MAR11NSBURG PIKE/LS-11 SOUTH.STAY STRAIGHT TO GO ONTO TANK BNEQ#20230)ON PLATFORM 140EWVlHJ 6'0 VA-37 SOUTH TAKE THE US-50 EXIT TOWARD ROMNEY/WNCHESTER.TURN RIGHT 2ELL GOOFING JOSEPH PRIETOOSMARTUNKLI-C.COM 2R?7 ONTO NORTHWESTERN PIKE/US-50 WEST.TURN RIGHT ONTO FAIRVIEW ROAD/ INSTALL(3)24PR FIBER CABLES INFAIIGY SOLUPONS -- VA-733.SITE WILL BE ON THE LEFT. INSTALL 19)6/C#6AWG DO CABLES p—d- 6665 DEERPATH ROAD SUITE 1-2 LOCATION MAP GENERAL NOTES ELKRIDGE,ME 21075 -y CODE COMPLIANCE C ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND'INSTALLEDIN ACCORDANCE ENGINEER CONTACT- MATT UVERETTE :e �.�.�R- HANDICAP ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT REQUIRED. MUVERETTEONFINIGYCOM WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED WITH ANY 301-928-8789 12 FACILITY 11 11MAIN11 AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. LOCAL AMENDMENTS By THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES: a 2 J FACILITY HAS NO PLUMBING OR REFRIGERANTS. 2015 4 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE BE ENGINEER AT&T 0 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 7150 STANDARD DRIVE NATION E INIS FACILITY SHALL MEET OR EXCEED ALL FAA AND FCC REGULATORY 2012 AL 1�11 PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 101 HANOVER,MD 21076 REQUIREMENTS NATIONAL AL F RE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 1 • LOCAL BUILDING CODES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE EQUIPMENT,ANTENNAS/RRH AND CABLES • STffUTl 01 STEEL CONSTRUCTION • ALL NEW MATERIAL SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED By CONTRACTOR CITY/COUNTY ORINNANC Sfi AMERICAN SPECIFICATIONS(AISC) FURNISHED By OWNER AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. UNDERWRITERSLABORATORIES APPROVED ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS. • ANSI EIA/TLA222 REV.G THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT • TA 607 ON STORMWATER DRAINAGE, INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS 61 TITLE PAGE FEE 12(LATEST EDITION) T.LL Z NoSANITARY SEWER,POTABLE WATER,OR TRASH DISPOSAL SERVICE I TELCOR"A GR 1275 REQUIRED • ANSI T1.311 NORTH CallbOorydjII. 5;-A N.— NO COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED Tl 193 SITE WORK NOTES: GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED SOIL COMPACTION NOTES: 000 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES PRIOR I. EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO REMOVE VEGETATION&TOPSOIL EXPOSE ABBREVIATIONS _jw 4. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL UNDISTURBED NATURAL SUBGRADE AND PLACE CRUSHED STONE AS REQUIRED. h TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, 2.ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC,AND OTHER UTILITIES AGE ABOVE GRACE LEVEL ~ ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 2. COMPACTION CER IFICALFON:AN INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY A a QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE. BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION F WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK,SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, (E) EXISTING Z z 5. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED 70 _ AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORN,SHALL SHOW OUTLINE ONLY. 3. 'U DI ALTERNATIVE TO INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION,THE (p) PROPOSED BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED RY CONTRACTOR.EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD "UNDISTURBED SOIL"BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH"COMPACTION I,I,( rc BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING EQUIPMENT',LISTED BELOW,TO AT LEAST 959 MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM Ijf w AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT,APPURTENANCES,AND LABOR NECESSARY TO DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 METHOD C. N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE Z TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW.THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. �j TO A)FALL PROTECTION 8)CONFINED SPACE C)ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) 4. COMPACTED SUB BASE SHALL BE UNIFORM&LEVELED.PROVIDE 6"MINIMUM REF REFERENCE / (� TRENCHING&EXCAVATION.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL COMPACTED IN 3`LIFTS ABOVE COMPACTED U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE N0-ED LL��Z BE PROVIDED SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT„L AWARENESS TRAINING. ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SOIL.GRAVEL SHALL BE NATURN.OR CRUSHED WITH 1009 PASSING i"SIEVE ��z SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. RF RADIO FREQUENCY uj 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE 3.ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT 5. MINIMUM SOIL BEARING 2000 PSE OR AS NOTED. T.B.O. TO BE DETERMINED SPECIFICATIONS. DRAWINGS,THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE T.B.R. TO BE RESOLVED 4-0 • TYP TYPICAL 4.IF NECESSARY,RUBBISH,STUMPS,DEBRIS,STICKS,STONES AND OTHER INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR, COMPACTION EQUIPMENT .0 � REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY_ 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT,POWER HAND OPERATED DOUBLE DRUM,VIBR0.70RY ROLLER,VIBRATORY PLATE COMPACTOR OR REO REQUIRED /� s AND T1 CABLES,GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, JUMPING JACK COMPACTOR. PER EQUIPMENT GROUND RING 'V 5.ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER,WATER,GAS,ELECTRIC AND OTHER GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN UTIIJTIES,WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK.SHALL BE FIELD APPROVAL BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION FOR ANY AND AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE DEVIATION FOR SHOWN ROUTES FOR ANY UTILITY. REMOVED AND/WI CAPPED,PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT MGB MASTER GROUND BUS P POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHAH PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS,PAVEMENTS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. CURBS,LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES.ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE EG EQUIPMENT GROUND REPAIRED AT SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 6.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING SUBSTITUTIONS OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS REQUIRE THE APPROVAL BCW BARE COPPER WIRE CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EXCEEDING THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. IDENTIFIED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING AND ASSURING THAT SEDIMENT SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEVICE AND EROSION CONTROL IS PROPERLY MAINTAINED. 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM GEN GENERATOR ' 7.THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITY.ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE IGR INTERIOR GROUND RING(HALO) THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. OWNER'S NO LOCATION. RBS RADIO BASE STATION 8,THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN A CLEAR CONDITION ON A /� FROM THE EQUIPMENT,TOWER AREAS AND INTO NATURAL DRAINAGE WAYS. DAILY BASIS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: 13.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF SY�g�l.5 uw1xoAAnou= 9.NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN SPECIFICATIONS UNDER"GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR 1, ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301,ACI 318, F771 SOLIROUND BUS BAR GROUND.FROZEN MATERIALS,SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY CONSTRUCTION OF AT&T SITES. 5 0.C1 336,ASTM A784,ASTM A185 AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FILL OR EMBANKMENT. SOLID GE I4. WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT SPECIFICATION FOR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. D NUTRAL EUS BAR 10.THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH WITHANY REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE LOCAL 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI �SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. AUTHOISE. RITY HAVING JURISDICTION,THE PERMIT SHALL HAVE PRIMARY AT 2S DAYS,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UQC 2-POLE THERMAL-MAGNETIC sm/zzA> 11.THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND 3, REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615,GRADE 60,DEFORMED u u CIRCUIT BREAKER NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER,EQUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY,SHALL BE GRADED 185 WELDw,�i«na UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A ED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL AN THERMAL-MAGNETIC IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. UNIFORM SLOPE,AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED BE CLASS"B"AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD,UNIT. CIRCUIT BREAKER Drewi.�yg_� IN STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: B 12.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR CHEMICAL GROUND R00 jaaN mt�r: CONSTRUCTION, EROSION CONTROL MEASURES,IF REQUIRED DURING i. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: O GROUND ROD vro CONSTRUCTION,SHALL E IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESEDITION OF ALSO ayA.ppz FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONCRETE CAST AGAINST ._... IN. DISCONNECT SWITCH Pmjac(Taa CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH .. W ER:OR WEATHBDN PARITY NSB 2. ALLFAB STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER jjjj6 AND LARGER........_ METER FABRICATION PER ASTM A723. #5 AND SMALLER&WOVE,.......�1 1/2 IN. v FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 3. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL TO MEET ASTM A36 SPECIFICATIONS. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT � CAOWEL.D TYPE CONNECTION SITE ID:4124 CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: ■ COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION FA#10138153 GENERAL NOTES 4. ALL WELDING L C O PERFORMED USING E70O ELECTRODES AND SLhB AND WALL .. .. ..........3,4 IN. Tat FAIftVIEW ROAD WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC.SURFACES D R WELDED E SHALL BEAMS AND COLUMNS... i/2 IN. GROUNDING WIRE GORE,-�A 116a> BE CLEANED AND S ARL PER AND STANDARD PRACTICE.WHERE Prep re F -- 1 SIZES ARE NON SHOWN,PROVI5. A CHAMFER OF 3,4'SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF FILLET DE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING TABLE J2.4 IN THE ABC'MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION" PAINTED DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: ENGINEER-INFINIGY SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP, CONCRETE,UNG,IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. INC CONTRACTOR-GENERAL CONTRACTOR(CONSTRUCTION) 5. DAMAGED GALVANIZED SURFACES TO BE REPAIRED PER ASTMA780. 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR,SHALL BE PER OWNER-AT&T MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE.THE ANCHOR BOLT, M1 •J w S$ OEM-ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 6. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE(3,4"b) DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR "m' CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS NO REBAR SHALL BE N PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS,THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR OTHERWISE.BOLTS AND HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED PER ASTM CUT WUHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING A753.ALL HOLES IN STRUCTURAL STEEL t0 BE AIDE STANDARD SIZE CONCRETE.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS,REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES,SHALL BE CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED (BOLT 01BI UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.ANY DISCREPANCY LOADS. FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CONTRACTOR. 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES,REGULATIONS,AND ORDINANCES.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS,ORDINANCES,RULES,REGULATIONS,AND w+�a Tae LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. NOTES Ni V. 194 GENERAL ELECTRICAL AND GROUNDING NOTES: E.SYSTEM GROUNDING: 1. ALL GROUNDING COMPONENTS SHALL BE TINNED AND GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL BE#2 AING WE cX) 1.1 GENERAL CONDITIONS: YLIG,TINNED,COPPER.ABOVE GRADE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSUICATED WHERE NOTED. 2. GROUNDING BUSES SHALL BE BARE,TINNED,ANNEALED COPPER BARS OF RECTANGULAR CROSS 3. CABLES SHALL BE NEATLY TRAINED.WITHOUT INTERILACINGOAND BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH IN ALL PAT BY BOXES A,.EQUIPMENT TO PERMIT MAKING A NEAT ARRA > A CON RACTOR STUALL INSPECT THE EXISTING SITE CONSIDERS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID.A SECCON NG D QUESTIONS ARISIENG NT.CABLES SHALL BE SECURED IN A IN THE BID PERIOD IN REGARDS TO THE CONTRACTORS FUNCTIONS,THE SCOPE OF WORK,OR ANY OTH SHALL RON ISS , BE R STANDARD BUS BARS NOR,SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR.THEY MAN ER TO AVOID TENSION ON CONDUCTORS OR TERMINALS.CONDUCTORS SHALL BE PROTECTED UE RELATED TO THIS PROJECT SHALL BROUGHT UP DURING THE BID PERIOD WITH THE PROJECT MANAGER �UT.Bl FA��BICATED UP MODIFIED IN TTE FI-L ALL C-UNI ROCKS 1—.1 IDENTIFIED ART M MECHANICAL INJURY AND MOISTURE SHARP BENDS OVER CONDUIT BUSHINGS IS PROHIBIEEO d ITS HIS UB L SAN R CLARIFICATION,NOT AUER THE COMPACT HAS BEEN AWARDED , BUSES BY WAY OF STENCILING OR DESIGNATION PLATE. AGED CABLES SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. B 'T THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERMITS,LICENSES.MAKE ALL DEPOSITS,AND PAY ALL FEES REQUIRED FOR THE 3. CONNECT RS SHALL BE TGH-ONDUCII ,HEAVY DUTY,LISTED AND LABELED AS GROUNDING z R C CONSTRUCTION K C FOR C V"' ALL BAIR PERFORMANCE FOR THE WOR UNDER THIS SECRONL ONNESTOR' [HE MATERIALS USED.USE TWO-HOLE COMPRESSION LUGS WITH HEAT SHRINK FOR 4. POWER WIRING SHALL BE COLOR CODED AS FOLLOWS C, D NGS SIT THE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS.INTERIOR CONNECTIONS USE TMO-HOLE COMPRESSION LUGS WITH INSPECTION SECTION,THEOW SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS COVERED UNDER THIS DIMENSIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL GAME ONE DRAWING SHALL NOT BE SCALED TO DETERMINE WINDOW AND CLEAR HEAT SHRINK DESCRIPTION LLI'z 12 EXOTHERMIC WELDED CONNECTIONS STALL BE PROVIDED IN KIT FORM AND SELECTED FOR THE SPECIFIC PHASE BLACK LAWS, A REGULATIONS,ORDINANCES,STATUTES AND CODES. 5 TYPES,SIZES,AND COMBINATIONS OF CONDUCTORS AND OTHER ITEMS TO BE CONNECTED. PHAS B RED Lu al AN GROUND COOK SHALL BE RICO#615800,COPPER-CIAD STEEL WITH HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL CORE PHASE C BLUE z IN A, ALL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICA GO NEUTRAL WHITE AND APPLICABLE LOCAL LAWS,REGULATIONS.ORDINANCES,STATUTES AND CODES.CONDUIT BE D ALLKLS BENDS U 6E RELECTROLYTIC-GRAEOE COPPER DUTY STEAM MOLTEN WELDED TO CORE. ALL GROUNDING GROUNDING GREEN THE'A' BEND FOR THE TRADE SIZE OF CONDUIT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF NES" ODS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH INSPECTION'SLEEVES, z 1.3 REFERENCES. INSTALL AN EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR IN ALL CONDORS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AT&T uj SPEC FICATIONS ME NEC,THE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BONDED AT ALL JUNCTION A. THE PUBLICATIONS LISTED BELOW ARE PART OF THIS SPECIFICATION.EACH PUBLOATION SHALL BE THE LATEST BOXES,PULLEROXES,DISCONNECT SWITCHES,STARTERS,AND COUIPMEW CABINETS. REVISION AND ADDENDUM IN EFFECT ON THE DATE.THIS SPECIFICAMON IS ISSUED FOR CONSTRUcnON UNLESS F.OTHER MATERIALS: OTHERWISE NOTED EXCEPT AS MODFIED BY THE REQUIREMENT SPECIFIED 4-f k HERE N OR THE DETAILS OF THE DRAWINGS,ACT iNCLUDED IN THIS'SPECIFICATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE APIPPLICABLE PROVISION OF THESE 1, THE CONTRACTOR HALL PROVIDE OTHER MATERIALS,THOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED,WHICH p S UBLEACONS ARE REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETELY OPERATIONAL SYSTEM AND PROPER INSTALICATC, OF THE WORK. 44 2, PROVIDE PULL BOXES AND JUNCTION BOXES WHERE SHOWN OR REQUIRED By NEC C.DISCONNECT SWITCHES: I ANI(AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSITTLIE) �TA 2 ASTM(AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS) G.PANELS AND LOAD CENTERS: 1, INSTALL DISCONNECT SWITCHES LEVEL AND PLUMB.CONNECT TO WIRING SYSTEM AND 3 ICE(INSULATED(ABLE ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION) GROUNDING SYSTEM AS INDICATED. 4.NEAR,(NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTUREWS ASSOCLAIIQN) 1. ALL PANEL DIRECTORIES SHALL BE TYPEWRITTEN. A NI 1 5.NFPA(NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION) C GROUNDING; A, 6.OSHA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINCEIRAEON) P&ET_jEXEQQl_0N 7 UL N ORWRITERS LA80RATORIES NI 1, ALL METALLIC PARTS OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WHICH DO NOT CARRY CUP,ENT SHALL BE 8 AT&I -blu R 3 1 GENERAL: GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS 0 T BUILDING MANUFACTURER,AT&T BONDING AND BONDING STANDARDS CROON INC MD BONDING STANDARDS,AND THE RATIO F HE IA SCOPE OF WORK: A, ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTAHED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTHREWS 2, P ME ELECTRICAL CODE. BESIDE ELCCTRII GROUNDING AND BONDING SYSTEM INDICATED WITH ASSEMBLY OF RECOMMENDATIONS MATERIALS,INCLUDING GROUNDING ELECTRODES,BONDING JUMPERS AND ADDITIONAL ED IPMEN1 SHALL BE YGMILY COVERED AND PROTECTED AGAINST DIRT OR WATER.AND AGAINST CHEMICAL 3� ACC DEBTOR AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE INSTALLATION. WORK U DER THIS SECTION SHALL CONSIST OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR,MATERIAL,ME ASSOCIATED SERVICES ORUMECIFI INJURY DURING INSTALLATION MY CONSHOUCHAN SENIOR ALL' N IS D U REQUIRED TO COMPLETE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION AN BE OPERATIONAL, ME NOING CONDUCTORS SHALL PROVIDE A STRAIGHT DOWNWARD PATH TO GROUND WITH R ALL ELECTRICAL E(PIPMENT UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE PROPERLY TESTED,ADJUSTED,ARE ALIGNED BY THE 32 LABOR.0 WORKMANSHIP RADICAL BEND AS REQUIRED.GROUNDING CDNDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE LOOPED OR SHARPLY 'OHLBACTOR SEW.HOME GROUNDING CONNECTIONS AND CONDUCTORS 10 GROUND IN THE SHORTEST AND STRAIGHTEST PATHS POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE TRANSIENT VOLTAGE RII THE CONTRACTOR SPI BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATING,GEARING,TRENCHES,RACKFILLING,AND REMOVAL A. ALL LABOR FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS AND EOUIPMENT FURNISHED FOR THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM D/O OF EXCESS DIRT, 4 BUILDINGS AN A NEW TOWERS GREATER THAN 75 FEE IN HOW AND WHERE THE MAN T SHALL BE INSTALLED By EXPERIENCED MAKERS IN A NEAT AND WORKMAN-LIKE MANNER. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ROUTED TO GRADE,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL C THE CON RACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE OMER WITH CERTIFICATES OF A FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ADJUSTEbkIGNED AND TESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS TWO GROUNDING CONDUCTORS FROM THE ROOFTOP,TOWERS,MY WATER TOWERS M M THE INSPEC71ON AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, EOU ROUTE E ` C UPOIRED TO PRODUCE THE INTENDED PERFOR CE GROUND RING,To THE EX ONDITIONS,AND CHANGES WHILE COMPLETING THIS CONTRACT THE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHVLJ_ING 0 1 m N JSFIIHNG GROUNDING SYSTEM,THE UP URGING CONDUCTORS SHALL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A COMPLETE SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS,DOCUMENT ALL WIN R C E U P ENT COMPLETION OF WORK,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY CLEAN Ali EXPOSED EQUIPMENT, NOT BE SMALLER IBM 2 0 AWC COPPER.ROOFTOP GROUNDORING SHALL BE BONDED TO THE GO BE SUBMITTED AT REMOVEIFALL LABELS AND ANY DEBRIS,CRATING OR CARTONS AND LEAVE THE INSTALLATION FINISHED AND EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM,THE BUILDING STEEL COLUMNS,LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM, MRSETION OF THE PROJECT READY OR OPERATION. AND BUILDING MAIN WATER ONE(FERROUS OR NONFERROUS METAL PK. ARVE,pD. S PING EA� 3S COORDINATION 5, TIGHTEN GROUNDING AND BONDING CONNECTORS,INCLUDING CREWSPAND BONLT`y�IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S PUBUSHED TORQUE TIGHTENING VALUES FOR CONNECTORS 2.1 GENERAL. A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INSTYRI-RION OF HECIRICAL TINS WITH THE AND BOLTS.WHERE MANUFACTURER'S TORQUING REOUIREMENTS ME NOT AVAILABLE,TIGHTEN OWNER-FURNISHED EQUIPMENT SALARY SCHEDULE TO PREVENT UNNECESSARY DELAYS IN THE TOTAL 0Tt ROD EFFECTIVE GROUNDING A k MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UL TESTED,NEW,AND FREE FROM DEFECTS, CONNECTONS 70 COMPLY WITH TIGHTENING TORQUE VALUES SPECIFIED IN UL TO ASSURE ALLL ITEMS OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION WORK. PERMANEN 6. CON OR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF GROUNDING TIE-IN-POINTS 10 THE EXISTING SO[TABLE FOR THE USE INTENDED. AS 14 INSTALLATION: PROTRACT UNDING SYSTE.ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE ALL EQUIPMENT STOOL BEAR THE UNDERWRI ERB LABORAPARIES LABEL OF APPROVAL,AND SHALL CONFORM 10 EXOTHERMIC WELOMPROCESS AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER S RE 0 A QUIREMENT OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. A. CONDUIT. INSTRUCTIONS RE OVERCURRENT DEVICES SHALL HAVE AN INTERRUPTING CURRENT RATING THAT SHALL BE GREATER THAN THE 7. ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR CONGRESS,EXOTHERMIC WELDED SHORT CIRCUIT C URRENT To WHICH THEY ME SUBJECTED,10,000 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONDUIT AS SPECIFIED.NO CONDUIT OR PUBING OF SO Cl B AIC MINIMUM VERIFY AVAILABLE SHORT C NNECTIONS SOREL BE APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR TRANG JURISDICTION BEFORE BEING ,,RCULT CURRENT DOES NOT EXCEE THE RATING OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WRIT ARTICLE LESS ORMANENT CONCEALED. 3- 014 NEC OR THE M07 CURRENT ADOPTED CODE PER THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION, PAR Y4 INCH IRADE SIZE. S. APPLY CORLY011ON-RESISTANCE FINISH TO FIELD CONNECTIONS AND PLACES WHERE FACTORY NAA,l 2,2 MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT: 2. PROVO RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL CONI FOR ALL RISERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EMT MAY BE APPLIED PROTECTIVE COATINGS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED USE KOPR-SHIELD ANTI-OXIDATION INSTALLED TO EXTERIOR CONDUITS WHERE NOT SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE COMPOUND ON ALL COMPRESSION GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. ..... S 9, A SEPARATE,CONTINUOUS,INSULATED EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL BE INSTALLED A. CONDUIT. 3, INSTALL CH.60 PAC CONDUIT WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 24'UNDER ROADWAYS,PARKING LOTS, M N��Nl STREETS,AND ALLEYS.CONDUIT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 18'IN ALL OTHER NON-TRAFFIC 10 IN ALL FEED AND BRANCH CIRCUITS. APPLICATION BOND ALL INSULATED GROUNDING BUSHINGS WITH A BARE 6 AWC GROUNDING CONDUCTOR TO * R111D METAL CONDUIT RMC)SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE INCLUDING ENDS AND 4. US S(REFER TO 2008 NEC,TABLE 300.5) A GROUND BUS, THREAD'AND ENAI B Go I-ACQUERED INSIDE IN ADDITION TO GALVANIZING E GALVANIZED FLEX BLE STEEL CONDUIT WHERE DIRECT CONNECTOR TO EQUIPPED �7 I. * LIQUIDIGHT FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT SHALL BE UL LISTED. VIBRATION,0 T WITH MOVEMENT, ll�DIRECT BURIED GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A NOMINAL DEATH OF 36" R FBI WE OF MAINTENANCE.USE LIQUID TIGHT,FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT FOR OUTDOOR 3 CONOTT CLAMPS,STRAPS AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE STEEL OR MALLEABLE FOR.ALL FIFTH APPLICATIONS INSTALL GALVANIZED FLEXIBLE STEEL CONDUIT AT ALL MINOR BE CONNECTION TO MINIMUM BELOW GRADE,OR 6'BELOW THE FROST LINE,USE THE GREATER OF THE TWO RION PARITY HER CON Go,SHALL BE EQUIPMENT NO DISTANCES FROG EYE SIREAUGH IN PRI AND CONCRETE TIGHT TYPE.GROUNDING BUSHINGS WITH INSULATED THROATS SHALL BE COUNTED ON SUPPORT TO ALLOW FOR EXPANSIO AND CONTRACTION. 12,ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTORS EMBEDDED IN OR PENETRATING CONCRETE SHALL BE INSTALLED 4. ASTALLED ON ALL CONDUIT TERMINATIONS. 5 A RUN OF FIRED BETWEEN BOXES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT CONTAIN MORE TOM THE EQUIVALENT E I ONMETALUC CONDUIT AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PROC OR SCHEDULE 80 PER WHERE SPECIFIED. OF QUAR 13 IN SCHEDUL 11 No BOND ff. SITE ID:4124 THE INSTALLAT NI USING SOLVENT-CEMENT-TYPE JOINTS AS RECOMMENDED By THE MANUFACTURER. THREE TER-BENDS.CONDUIT BEND SHALL BE MADE ART THE UL LISTED BENDER OR FACTORY go "UFA ION OF CHEMICAL ELECTROLYTIC GROUNDING SYSTEM IN STRICT ACCORDANCE DEGREE ELBOWS MAY BE USEQ WITH ITURER'S INSTRUCTIONS,REMOVE SEALING TAPE ROM LEACHING AND BR FA#10138153 B. CONDUCTORS AND WEE- 6, FIELD FABRICATED CONDUITS SHALL BE CUT SQUARE WITH A CONDUIT CUTTING TOOL MIT REAMED TO HOLES.IN STALL FATHER 141 FARVIEVI PROTECTIVE BOX FLUSH WITH GRADE, G U,VAAXV7 PROVIDE A SMOOTH INSIDE SURFACE. 14�DRIVE GROUND ROSS UNTIL TOR ME A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 36"DEPTH OR 6"BELOW 1� CONDUCTORS AND CABLE STALL BE TER E-REFFIRDMI,POSTURE AND HEAT RESISTANT HERMOPLAMIC. 7 PRO BE INSULATED GROUNDING BUSHING FOR ALL CONDUITS. FROST LINE,US GIG THE OR ER OF THE TWO DISTANCES ED 8 C P-d SINGLE CONTRACTOR,COME S TYP THHN/THI 600 VOLT,SIZE AS INDICATED,#12 AWG SHALL BE THE ONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL CONDUITS DURING CONSTRUCTION 15.IF COAX ON TO ICE BRIDGE IS MORE THAN 6 R FROM THE GROUND EM AT THE BASE OF S V SYSTEM SHALL BE PLUGGED OR CAPPED TO PREVENT ENTRANCE OF THE TON R�A SECOND GROUND HAN WILL BE NEEDED AT THE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE,TO MINIMUM S'CONDUCTOR U ED. OPENINGS IN THE CONDUIT TEMPORARY 2. QAWG AND SMALLER CONDUCTOR SHALL BE SOLID OR STRANDED AND#8 AWG AND LARGER CONDUCTORS MOISTURE GROUND RUE COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS AND IN-LINE ARRESTORS HAEL HE SMANDEQ OR FOREIGN MATTER.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY CONDUITS CONTAINING FOREIGN MATERIALS is,CONTRANOTOR G L REPAIR, D/O REPLACE,EXISTING ROUND ING SYSTEM COMPONENTS 3, S THAT CANNOT BE REMOVED. DAMAGED DURIN" FISTRUCHON AIR ME G I COLDERLESS,COMPRESSION-TME CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED FOR TERMINATION OF ALL STRANDED A L CONDUITS SHALL BE SWAPPED CLEAN BY PUI_UNG AN APPROPRIATE SIZE MANDREL THROUGH THE 3.5 ACCEPTANCE TESTI T CONTRACTORS EXPENSE HINDU TORS. CL A. STRAIN-RELIEF SUPPORTS GRIPS SHALL BE HUBBELL SELLERS OR APPROVED EQUAL,CABLES SHALL BE D JOBS IT BEFORE INSTALLATION OF CONDUCTORS OR CABLES.CONDUIT SHALL BE FREE OF DIRT AND 5 SUPPORTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC AND CABLE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, SEEMS ALL 10. METZ PULL STRINGS IN ALL CLEAN EMPTY'CONDSO.IDENTIFY PULL STRINGS AT EACH END, A. DEBT]IED PERSONNEL USING CERTIFIED EQUIPMENT SHALL PERFORM REQUIRED TE95 AND CONDUCTORS SHALL BE TA60ED AT BOTH ENDS OF THE CONDUCTOR,AT ALL PULL BOXES,J-BOXES, SLUMS EQUIPMENT AND CABINETS AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH APPROVED PLASTIC TAGS(ACTION CRAFT,BRADY,OR 11. INSTALL 2'HIGHLY VISIBLE AND DETECTABLE TAPE 12'ABOVE ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND AN IT ,P GO DOCTORS. GLEN TEST REPORTS UPON COMPLETION. C 8 WHEN MATERIAL AND/OR WORKMANSHIP IS FOUND NOT TO COMPLY WITH THE SPECRIED 0 ROVED EQUAL). 12, CREDITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE AGAINST COLLECTION OF TRAPPED FILE E COND NSATION. C. DISCONNECT SWITCHES. 13, P REQUIREME THEKNON-COM LYING ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED MOM THE PROJECT SITE AND ROODE CORE DRILLING AS NECESSARY FOR PENETRATIONS TO&LOW FOR RACEWAYS AND CABLES TO REPLACED WIG�HE S COMPLYING WITH THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS PROMPTLY AFTER RECEIPT I�DISCONNEC BE OF NOTICE FOR NON-COMPLANCE. T SWILCHES STAFF BE HEAVY OUTY,DEAD-FROATT,QUICK-MAKE,CUT K-BR EXTERNALLY OPERABLE, ROUTED THROUGH THE BUILDING.DO NOT PENETRATE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SLEEVES AND/OR C. TEST PROCEDURES; JD I HANDLE ED KAHLE A INTERLOCK WITH COVER IN CLOSED POSIT I EAK' 'IN NEW' ION,RATING AS NDICATED,OF LABELED RENE DNS IN FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY SEALED WITH FIRE RATED FURNISHED SIR ENCLOSURE,SQUARE-D OR ENGINEERED APPROVED EQUAL, WHICIERRE A IN THE FIRE RATING OF THE WALL OR STRUCTURE,FIRE GORE AT F MATERIAL D� CHEMICAL ELECTROLYTIC OCCURRING SYSTEM: RATIONS SHATA PREVENT SAGE OF WATER,SMOKE,FIRE, 0 HEART SIT HL RAIN LL COOK 1 ALL FEEDERS SHALL HAVE INSULA ON TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION.BEFORE CO CEDS,ON T NO UL APPROVED FOR LEIS PURPOPSAS. AND FUMES.ALL MATO RE SHALL BE DEVICES THE CONDUCTORS SITHELTEST FREE MOM SHORT CIRCUITS ARC GRO ONECT TESCO SHALL BE FOR ONE MINUTE USING IO00V Do.PRORDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FOR kL 1. INSTALL CHEMICAL GROUNDING AS REQUIRED.THE SYSTEM SHALL BE ELECTROLYTIC MAINTENANCE FREE 8, CONDUCTORS AND CABLE: TEST RES LOS CLECOEODE CONSISTING OF RODS WITH A MINIMUM 12 AND CU EXOTHERMALLY WELDED PIGTAIL, 2 PRIOR TO EFIFIRAZI.Ng CIRCUITRY,TEST WIRING DPVCR FOR ELECTRICAL CONTINUITY AND ROTECTAN BOXES,MD BACKFAL MATMV�RAPID ACCORDS SHALL BE LYKOLE MIT GROUNDING ROD I� SHUCKS SHALL BE MADE ONLY AT OUTLETS,SLACK BOXES,OR ACCESSIBLE RACEWAY CONDULETS ROPE NNECTIONS NOTES 2 TYPES`2 1' OR AGE(A)CS -)LENGTH AS R QUIRED. 'PH VED FOR THIS PURPOSE. 3, MEASLY POLACTITY DOOR AC�CS RE AND RECORD VOLTAGES BETWEEN PHASES AND BETWEEN PHASE CONDUCTORS AND M SS BOX SHALL B�A POLYPLASIIC BOX FIRIXNOR�TlRfIC A�P�lo 2 PULLING UBRICANG SHALL BE OF APPROVED.CONHRAClOR SHALL USE NYLON OR HEMP ROPE FOR NEUTOLS,SUBMIT A REPORT OF MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VOLTAGES DOW N FLUSH COVER WITH"BREATHER"HOLES,ALL MOM G �_V LL DO' Ll.,AUIGRGI�'INCLUDING BOLT 4 GO T CHES AND PULLING CONDUCTOR OR CABLES IWO THE CONDUff. P RFORM GROUNDING TEST 0 MEASURE GROUNDING RESISTANCE OF GROUNDING SYSTEM T�.A, GONE ROLLING DEVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH ENGRAVED HUMICOID NAMEPLATES INDICATING EOUIPMENT US C -PENT'FAUL-OF-P ENTAL"METHOD.PROVIDE PLOTTED TEST WROLLED,BRANCH CIRCUITS IS NUMBERING,AND IN THE IEEE STANDARD 3 3 BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE LYNCOM11 AND LYNC THE ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE. VALUE AND LOCATION SKETCH.ROM THE ENGLOTER IMMEDIATELY IF MEASURED VALUE IS OLE GROUNDING GRAVEL. OVER 5 OHMS N2 195 GENERAL SITE NOTES A 1HAP TTE BOUNDARY SURVEY HE THE HOST PMC&HAS NOT J I BEEN PERFORMED BY IN M.1 SPOODONS,BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAROBTAINED FROM DEEDS,NIS DATA AND PIANS OF R "- ECORD. SNE w 2 INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A MEN INVESTIGATION PERFORMED BY INUNIGY SOLU11Q45.CONTRACTOR TO HE.VERIFY DIMENSIONS AS NECESSM BEFOflE CONSiRI1C1roN ,R q S. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE SIGNS OF PROPOSED A7dT VERRV 120/$ADV V EXISTING UTILITY POLE NONBHEING. Z z- < THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNMANNED AND THEREFORE GOES 6'-8 1/i�'6'-B 1/4" \ DID z s. NOTPONDOSSALWREQUIRE ANEDWS G 11 WAFER SUPPLY CMUNNWrnon WUN THIS W `d STEII NEC(NED/12DO60)DN \ DEVELOPMENT'MD.TURN THAT WHICH IS SHOWN. d rc \PROPOSED PRE-FAB PLA JFLRV 6. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE OUTDOOR L�Z w (NEO%24,),AND PROPOSED STo-E DR ANY W D WASTE RECEP M, AT&T 30RW DIESEL DENERAW \ T. U,ME3 SHOWN ON PUN ME WEN FROM OWNERS RECORDS 'n y� W/190 GALLON TANK AND NEN LOCATION OF VD BLE SURFACE FEATURES. THE V EXISTENCE,OLUNT AND EXACT HOWEDMAL ARE VERTICAL. 3 PROPO(CaESED 120230)ET \ LOCATIONS OF WORN ON HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIES,ANY CONTRACTOR Z PRDPOSED 77X16'CONCRf7E PAD PERFORNING WORN ON THIS SITE MUST VENTAGE MISS OWN AT W 1N PROPOSED 12'-6 X20'LEASE AREA LEAST.HOUR PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. "" 9. PER FEMA FIRM 01ID69—NE,EFE.O9/S"SNDS,THE PROPOSED (2w Sf.LEASE AREA) kt D LOPMENT WILL OCCUR IN ZONE `,M OF MINIMAL ' �.� FLOOD HPZMD. PROPOSED 50'x50'FENCEO COMPOM (250 S.F.)(Be OVER. SITE LEGEND62 — / SITE PROPERTY LINE _ STREET OR ROAD ti T^ J I TREE/SHRUB f PROPOSED 10 CRAVEt AOXSS DRIVE , / (BY 07NERS) TREE LINE / UTILITY POLE / PROPOSED 195 Afa"Q E(BY OTHERS) PROPOSED(2)M"C'QVDURS EXISTING UTILITY POLE(SVEC 941) PRO POKER 4'C(BY 07NERS)� PROPOSED(t)IX CRVBY O (FOR 7EZLY/,,380'1)(8Y D7NER5) Sore oa:y� m._ 1 — oQq NNN�re ro Al PW� TTM s SDN PARITY NSB EXISTING TREPHINE(TYP) FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 4 -�. " SITE ID:4124 v FA#10138153 \ / 1 ER Vnnv3�° \ .,^ E111111 PROPERTY UNE(TYP) Di \ \ / E ffZ EXISTING BUILDING(TYP) fbe�1 GRAPHIC SCALE: 43�—SITSIT PLAN loo, 50' 0 50' 100' SITE PLAN M rem( NORTH Ci SCALE:AS NOTED SCALE (11x17): 1" = 100'-0" SCALE (22x34): 1" = 50'-0" N Cl 196 00 Q_ z LLI Lu 70P Of PROPOSED LICHTNIN47 ROO *L.01,,�,147Z31 PROPOSED 6'LICH TWO ROD z OF PROPOSED 0;-;; (BY DINERS) Lu WOW_*195'-0'at ,$,.MPOFPROPOSED AT&TANISVNAS PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNA ARRAY W1 VA17N_*194--O ALI 4-0 (12)ANTENNAS(6 INSTALL,6 FUTURE) j'j;R lz (IS)DRRHs(J(9h INSTALL,6 FUTURE) A, (3) M YSIACC) *Uy A _VUICEl CARRIER FAR 1. ±180'-Q'ACL (TYR OF 3) PROPOSED 6'aWN LINK FENCE IID ,�FUTURE CARRIER ANTEENA ARRAY W1 I'lIARRED W(BY DINERS) -0$,LVT-URE CARRIER RAD CENTER __ ELEVATION:±170'0"AOL X x x x— PROPOSED x66YFENMO COMMAND IT——_1 (2500 SF.)(BYFCRE CARRIER RLD CENTER F F -1 BY OTHERS) ELEVATION: AOL __ FUTURE IUTCRI FUTURE x 2'.20' 12',16' IU,�25, LEASE AREA LEASE AREA LEASE AREA (240 SY) (192 S.F.) (300 S F PROPOSED AT&T ICE SMOG!"W/ PROPOSED MONOPOLE(By DRIERS)W1 PROPOSED(3)2MR FIBER CABLES PROPOSED MONO-ME 195'-0' 25' L— PROPOSED(9)61C DC CABLES PROPOSED(3)AT&T 24PR FIBER CABLES =S(9)AT&T 61C DC POWER CABLES �L (BY 07HERS) L— V POLE PROPOSED HANONGI L —AT&T 12012,WV,10,200A PILO W1 (BY OTHERS) I QW PLUG(IN7EGRAL 1`0 WC1 PROPOSED PAD k"7ED x PROPOSED AT&T 6fRI7V M440V TRANSFORMER(BY OTTERS) STEEL 114'X 6'-8 114- STEEL WC(NEQ 00324)ON PROPOSED(2)4-CWM#75 PROPOSED PRE-FA&FLA 7TORM AND FAW (FOR POHER,37511) GDVM70R W1 190 GALLON PROPOSED AT&T JOKW DIESEL (BY OTHERS) (aNDUVALED 1202JO)ON X PROPOSED 10)(18'C0I PAD IN PROPOSED t1'-65020'LEASE AREA (250 SF LEASE AREA) PROPOSED 120124OV,10 6 GANG AN VZ, METER ST ACK(SN&VAADO:,VALLEY PROPOSED AT&T 12'-6X20'LEASE AREA hoz ELECTRIC COOP)(BY ON')W1 PROPOSED 120 40 20CM AT&T (250 SF LEASE AREA) M C�2 METER AND 8 (ATTACHED I&T CPS AN IMA REIN PARITY NSB (A TWINED 10 WC) FROG EYE SIRBAUGH PROPOSED 2*DO CONDUIT (FOR AT&T ZOOA POOER,40',*) PROPOSED 12'ACCESS CARE(BY OTHERS) SITE ID:4124 PROPOSED 2'OG 00"T PROPOSED 10'GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE FA#10138153 (FOR AT&T 7aCO,45'.+) (BY CI I��FNRA ROAD 'B"Po6'CHAIN LM FVVCF W/I. 'VD BARBED WRE(By OTHERS) -1 fl o lzf E ELEVATION:0'-0"AOL LEVEL ME GRAPHIC SCALE COMPOUND 20' 10' 0 10, 20' PLAN AND COMPOUND PLAN ELEVATION 41:�ELEVATIQN NORTH \_22 SCALE:AS NOTED SCALE (11x17): I" = 20'-0" 2j NOT TO SCALE �ZN_ � SCALE (2204): 1" = 10'-0" C2 197 o CABLE SYSTEM&RF SYSTEM DESIGN P N NOT[$_ J 1. SECTOR ORIENTATION/AZIMUTH WILL VARY FROM REGION a`� TO REGION AND IS SITE SPECIFIC.REFER TO SEPARATE RF REPORT FOR EACH SITE TO DETERMIIJF THE ANTENNA LOCATION AND FUNCTION OF EACH TOWER SECTOR FACE 2. THE STANDARD IS BASED ON EIGHT COLORED Z o TAPES-RED,BLUE,GREEN,YELLOW,BROWN,ORANGE, w PROPOSED ANTENNA SCHEDULE AND RF SYSTEM DESIGN PLAN (REDS DATED 02/22/2019, V2019_1.0) WHITE,AND SLATE(GREY).THESE TAPES SHOULD BE Z W as READILY AVAILABLE TO THE ELECTRICIAN OR CONTRACTOR AN RAD CTR. AZIMUTH M-TILT RRH MAKE MODEL ON SITE. LL�Z o SECTOR POSITION ANTENNA MAKE]MOp0. FT.A / -TILT FEEDUNE FEEDLINE LENGTH JUMPER LENGTH #1 FUTURE - - _ _ 3. USING COLOR BANDS ON THE CABLES,MARK ALL RF �Z CABLE BY SECTOR AND CABLE NUMBER AS SHOWN ON COMMSCOP£ NORIA AIRSCALE DUAL RRH 4T4R B!2/t4 320W AHLBA LTE-70a.2 "CABLE MARKING COLOR CONVENTION TA3LE". W 2 NNHH-650-R4 1�1 0 IZ't A NOATA AIRSCALE 11 RRH 411125166 J20W AHM LTE 1300 R AWS:25 (1)24PR FIBER OF RC CABLE !2't 4. COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3"WIDE AT TOP AND COMMSCOPE NOK/A ANCA BS ALRSCALE RRH 474R 85 16OW ANCA LTE 850&'850 5C•2 (3)61C JSAWS OC CABLES !'fit MIpOLE OF TOWER AND 2"WIDE AT THE BOTTOM.ALL $3 190' 80' 0 J2t JUMPERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. i{d AYJt87-85C-R4 _-----__..__.__._..__... _ FUTURE WCS RRH - 12'f - #4 n,FUFURF - - - FUTURE 700D RRH _ 5. ALL COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3M-35 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED USING A MINIMUM OF(3)WRAPS OF TAPE i BS FUTURE - - - (v �� AND SHALL BE NEATLY TRIMMED AND SMOOTHED OUT SO CGumscQ£ NWA AIRSCALE DUAL RRH 4F4 812/14 32OW AIRBA LIF 700:2 AS TO AVOID UNRAVELING. NCA7A32-OW z w H6 NNNH-65C-R4 90 80 0mom --RRH - __- _ .__ Zt \\ B 47}R 825/66 320W AL#7B LTE J900&AWS 25 (1)24PR F78ER SRC CABLE 12'1 6. ALL COLOR BANDS INSTALLED AT OR NEAR THE GROUND Mj T 00NMSCopE rte, 1�. 0 NO10A ARCA 85 A(RSCALE RRH 4DAR 85 16OW ARCA LTE 650 R 650 SO`2 (3)6/C/6AMG DC CARES 1401 121 SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/4"WIDE. ! ,� NNHN-65C-R4 FUTURE WET RRH - � 12'1 7. ALI.COLOR COPES SHALL 8E INSTALLED SO AS TO FUTURE ' �8 R1RE - FUTURE 700D RRH ALIGN NEATLY WITH ONE ANOTHER FROM SIDE-TO-SIDE. 9 FELTURE - 10 COdINSCDPE tom, , 0 NOKIA AIRSCALE DUAL RRH 4T4R 812/14 J20W AHLBA LTE 700:2 12't C NNHH-85C-R4 NpKIA gy7SCAt£DUAL RRH}T4R 825/66.i2UW AhlF7B LTE 1800&AWS 25 Ci"AUAASCAPE NOKA ARCA 85 ATRSCALE RAH 4T4R 85 16OW AHCA LTE 850 h 85O SD'2 ((3f 6/C CA8LE5 140'1 24PR FIBER OPW CAlILE 121 #11 NNHH-65C-R4 1� 3�' 0 72'1 FUTURE WCS RRH _ 121 X12 FUTURE FUTURE 700D RRH CABLE IDENTIFICATION NOTES GPS - GPS _ _ _ _ _ (1)112'COAX 1. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING 15'1 - WITH THE MASTER COLOR CODE DOCUMENT. uojw« 'u.s 2.SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS IDENTIFICATION TAG(1-1/2"IN DIAMETER WITH 1/4" SIAMPED LETTERS AND NUMBERS ONE AT THE ANTENNA PORT CONNECTION NEAR THE END OF THE JUMPER AND ONE ON EACH END OF THE JUMPER SERVING THE RADIO EQUIPMENT.EACH TAG WILL BE STAMPED WITH"ATT"AND THE ANTENNA PORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER EXAMPLE BELOW.TAGS SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF UV RESISTANT MIRE OR CABLE-TY. gavm' PI-N A — SAMPLE ANTENNA i'i REFER TO AT&T ANTENNA COLOR&NUMBERING eE BON PARITY NSB SCHEME DATED 5/17/2005, FROG EYE SIRBAUGH REV,2/2/2005 SITE ID:4124 FA#10138153 iaNONE 1ELw- Preparetl For Al ^ EOF GAMMA, 3.C,OR Z ALPHA, 1,A,OR X _ RF CAB ftF CABS THRU a 0 LE IRU '4�C�,i•1",9 Al REQ AS RESC OEauNg Title RF SCHEDULE BETA,2,8,OR Y RF CA13LFS AND NOTES Bl THRU 810 AS REO'D ANTENNA SECTOR AND A—Number CABLE DEFINITION C3 198 ,T12 _ FRS— ANTENNA PM AREA (� #1 (NO RRHS,70 BE MOUNTED WITI(rW) J ,Rl PROPOSED AT@T ANTENNA -w C, (TOP LP 2 PER 5ECT0W,6 TOTAL) HAND RAIL KIT FOR 10'FORTRESS TRI-PLATFORM hh 50 MOUNT,SITE PRO 1 MODEL$:F3P-HRKIO y gTL (, #z ��oe. —�Z I,IF W n LL z 0 1., „ w 63 ---PROPOSED AfRSCAtE 925/66 RRN AND n z C " � PROPOSED APSCALE 812/14 lWfi MOMAIND Ttl PROPOSED 731 SNT6EZ MOUNT BEMND ANTMA •.P (TOP PER SECTOR,3 TOTAL) r W #4 FUTURE AT&T ANTENNA ;r� 9B ��(TYP OF 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL) FUTURE 700 RRH MOUNTED g % BEHIND ANTENNA M (TIP OF i PER SECTOR,3 TOTAL) I X8 #7 Efi 45 id FORTESS TRI-PLATFORM MOUNT WITN WALKWAYS,SITE PRO 1 MODEL#:F3P-70W ,R PROPOSED LOW PROFILE PLATFORM W/ ® # WORK PEA FORM : . t PROPOSED FWtSTNET'ANTENNAS 9 C + (POS70612,06&PO) !--� *Q '� R•'�® S PROPOSED TOY(Tm OF 3) L\ 2" \ANTENNA PLATFORM DETAIL #iIII o•No.0442053439 SCALE AS NOTED GRAPHIC SCALE: lo 03/04/2020 � f' rg' 3 0 3, Ar _ w �3 1 T NNA ORIENTATION NORTH CR, SCALE:INTO SCALE (11x17): 1"INDIES = 6 -0" umN.d SCALE (22x34): 1" m /p T CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA BRACKET AT&T TOWER PIM NOTICE WITH THE DOWNTILT SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA NNA CAB CABLE m As CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE. PROPOSED 2-7/6'X 120-LC cuxsxrs es m�.As 2. RRH,MUST BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA A53,4R.B,3511$!SCH.40 MOUNNN;PIPES —uxr wsw�a PROPOSED 2-7/6'X 120'LG WHEN SUPPORTING RF CO0.X JUMPERS,CPRE RET OR DC SALES LOCATED AT THE PUINTMM LEVEL " 3. 00 NOT INSTALL OOWNTILT BRACKETS ON flRSTNE7 A53 OR.8,35K5T SCK 40 MONNIM PIPES PROPOSED 2-7AX120' ANO/OR ANTENNA RAD CENTER,UNUZE Ott®2 W RATED 174,WIDE RriON CABLE 11EB(PER ANTENNAS. PROPOSED F3P-WKTO 1WI77 R42 KIT TO A53,OR.8 35XY SUPPORT PoINn SCK 40 MOUNDNO PIPES ENSURE THERE IS NO BURNS METAL ON MOUNDNG PIPE WHERE CABLE WOOL AND ADAPTER ARE TO BE ATTACHED.USE A WE&RUSH OR WE WHEEL&MM M REMWE ANY RUSTING MU& CLEW THE MOUNRNG SURFACE(INCLUDING RElW&OF MINOR CORROSION)WITH A SCOTCN BRRE irvumnee. PAD.PALM PNY EXPOSED METAL WHERE THERE WAS RUST OR GALVANIZING HAS BEEN DAMAGED PROPOSED ANTENNA WITH COLD-GALVANIZRLG PAINT(COLD-CALM.USE NO-OX BETWEEN PIPE MOUNNNG HARDWARE (CLN1P5 OR STONES`-STEEL WOW)AND MOUN INS PIPE.IF COLD-GALV PAM WAS APPLSD, PrgaclTMe. -PROPOSED 85 RRH ENSURE THE PAM HAS=BEFORE APPLNNG NO-OX.DO NOT USE HOSE QAMPS TO SECURE AND ROPOSEDf!830 MO AC UDE,E,PES SNWLD HANS6E.�IFROUTT To PRUENENTMSR%MADS,,—ES. UPosv ewNP SONES, FROG EYE SIRBAUGH (9 PRO RUDSM MOUNT DO NOT ATTACH MISS TAGS TO RF CABLE$FOR SANE IDENHFlCATNN! (SITE PAI?!1RRUOSAI) PNNb CANNOT BE LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND ANTENNA THEY ARE SERNNG. SITE ID:4124 FA#10138153 141 ONSWAEW2ROA0 ANTENNA CENTERLINE coaBv ,gNTE�CETJJERUNE eared fw'.y/ PROPOSED 6121@14 RRH PROPOSED F3P-TOW MOUNT 2'-6"MIN I ON PROPOSID SBWNEL MOTM7' •.� PROPOSED ANlE'NN4 (SBE PRD 1/RRUDSM) ON PROPOSED DC9(77P) U) ANTENNA AND 1.CO: pOS(170N #2!#6/#10 009 hd0UNT1NG DETAIL POSITION#3!87!#11 GRAPHIC SCALE: RRH MOUNTING 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA DOWNHILL 4' 2' 0 2� 4' DETAILS BRACKET WITH THE DOWNTILT SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA /-� �.�. { z \AAITCNII.IA/DC1tJ/flt`(1 11/11 IAITIAI!` 11LTAll _..__. ..__ 199 dISM 00 0 ALPHA SECTOR BETA SECTOR d 6CC P1prep_P20LFN7PA1A3_P30CWprep_P40prep_FO_NoDC A 6CC Plprep_P20LFN7PASA3 P30CWprep P40prep_FO NoDC 8 C? _ — — — KMR M i MieMN MMMMi ; ...........•••' ...••••• Z,£ 1. ' Z. .nriya'..aamr, • i t ............."" ui • maMnw,vw ' '/Rax ♦Mpwµr,ro.,Nx,x s I a xwm�xRn-;.,Ra. i E i WZw zoi --W „ w 3 i s $ i .T j 1- , GAMMA SECTOR 6CC P1 re P20LFN7PA1A3 P30CW re P40 re FO_NoDC p P_ _ p P_ P p_ _C a� , 8DN PARITY NS8 f FROG EYE SIRBAUGH FA#E101 81153 a Faat7ew sono TIT ,[� aaxF, zzear -- i G Et� n}OW� wn9 Tie RF PLUMBING i DIAGRAM mc4 200 - WIC COMPONENTS 0 PART -AT&T DE NUMBER TOC DESORPTION cko ----F2017026 20060 AT&T 6'-8 1/4"X 6'-8]/A'STEEL WC 120/24OV,200A,10,3 SOURCE MAINS;AGED SERIES AA-C-1220042-10OR-CL-R TOP 300-G PLUS MTS;STRIKESORB;42 POSITION SQUARE 0 PANELBOARD;NEMA3R ENCLOSURE;JCGC RIGHT,65kA Iz NETSURF 71 00 SERIES-48VDC DO POWER SYSTEMSIZED 582127000203 NE0.20068 @ DOOAMP ON-48 SIDE AND 500A ON+24VDC SIDE LLJ VDC W/3 FACTORY INSTALLED AND NEED BATTERY TRAYS. 1 TON WALL LL uj NEQ-19678 III IAI-",-,,ITIIUT FIBER PANEL 6--8 1/4- Z PTS 3703-WC WOF MOUNTED PMAC UNIT— SECURITY LIGHTS 7 0 M3704--WC-WF 019679 RACK COMMBAY-MC-MTH FIBER PANEL Z DIRECT AIR COOLING(DAC)SYSTEM PIPE STUB CrYP OF 2.FRONT AF000135 BLD.1055B POWERED FRESH AIR COBURG KIT WITH HVAC CONTROL AND REAR) Lu FOR LOW VOLTAGE(24 VAC)CONTROLLED HVAC UNIT ... .ml PRO W/ATS/ N/A SUPPLY, WALL MOUNTED HVAC W/CONTROLLER, FUNCTION AND 4-J! LOCKABLE ENTRY DOOR W/ GENERATOR PLUG F� RETURN GRILLS,AND REMOTE SENSOR DOFRESH AIR COOLING SYSTEM------------- Fi COMBO PLATFORM (ORDERED SEPARATELY, NOT PART OF"C) COMBO PLATFORM (ORDERED SEPARATELY, \4]�WIC DETAIL NOT pm- E5 /SCALE:N IS �A LEFT MATIONFRONT ELEVA77C41 RNTHT ELEVATION AT&T 3OKW DIESEL GENERATOR W/190 GALLON TANK LED LIGHT A RE (CENEN /NEQ#20230) (LOCATED IN CEJUNG,TYP OF 4) /4*X 6'-8 1/4* SMOKE DETECTOR STEEL WIG(NECI 20060) (LOCATED IN CODING) Fps oamnc BROOM FINISH W/3/4-CHAMFER EDGE D VWArs N Protect Title: 16, BOB PARITY NSB /A-CHANTER Qyp) FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 16' FINISH GRADE (EACHWAGO.Y,TOP AND BOTTOM) SITE ID:4124 FA#10138153 FNRUSw- IA NY— CRUSHED STONE OR Ir LA COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL GENERATOR NG KIT G OTEXT, CRUSHED FABRIC(MIRAP 500X) (TY,EA END) (DESIGN BY VERIM 6"IAN CRUSHED STONE OR ACCESS STAIRS COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL Ur OF 2) 8 (DESIGN BY MNW)—Z WC COMBO GENERATOR E —24 PORT CABLE PLATFORM GRAVITY MOUNT ENTRY PORT WIC FOUNDATION NOTES NOTES- KIT(NEO#20324' (ROXTE 24.24 EZ ENTRY, I. SEE SUPPORTING STRUCTURAL DDCLUENTATION FOR COMBO DESIGN BY MBRNV. NOTE', Typ OF REMOVE ALL LOOSE INORGANIC OR UNSUITABLE SOIL 10 SEE NOTES 2&3 FOR WALLS AND ENTRY DOOR 5 2, GENERATOR PLATFORM BY VERTIV, RM 0 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. UNDISTURBED BEARING STRATA W/ALLOWABLE SOIL SECURE COMBO GENERATOR PLATFORM TO CONCRETE PAD W/(2) PLATFORM ANCHORING) — BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 PEE mH-A—TI. Z CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 4000 PSI,MIN. HY-200A ADHESIVE ANCHOR SYSTEM. EQUIPMENT 3 SLAB SHALL BE LEVEL±1/4-, 3. MIN,THREADED ROD ENDED SHALL BE 9-IN CONCRETE PAD, 4. THE"UNDISTURBED SOIL'BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED IS DETAILS AT LEAST 5%MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY PER -- /-2\WIC LAYOUT ISOMERIC VIEWkSTM 0 1551 METHOD C 3\CONCRETE PAD DETAIL - \,CSCALE:NTS PRELIMINARY PAD DESIGN;SUITABILITY OF FLOATING PAD TO 4 5 S� \WICIGENER&LOR ON COMBO PLATEQRM ISOMETRIC VIEW BE DETERMINED AFTER GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS. CS SCALE:NTS CS SCALE:NIS cs 201 NOTES; INSTALL DRIP LOOP ON 7. WHEN USING COMPONENTS AS SHOWN IN E -j WIDTH ANTENNA CABLES AT STANDARD EEl SU MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE _I BOTTOM O CUT POST LENGTH TO SUIT BY SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS ON A >-a w NOTES: TOWER/MONOPOLE. REMOVING UNCAPPED END CONTINUOUS SINGLE SECTION OF BRIDGE BENDING RADIUS PER CHANNEL SHALL BE 6 FEET. 'n 1. ALCATEL-LUCENT/NOKIA VW AT&T SUPPLIES MANUFACTURER'S SUPPORT BRACKET 2. WHEN USING COMPONENTS FOR SPLICING V(a RRH AND RRH MOUNTING BRACKET. STANDARDS BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS,THE SPLICE REMOI E RADIO HEAD RRH) SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY UNPHRUT © OR 24'WIDE ICE BRIDGE SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE SUPPORT, �' 0 f AN 0 INSTALL RRH,AND All MOUNTING CUT ICE BRIDGE CHANNEL LENGTH TO F POSSIBLE,OR AT A MAXIMUM OF 2 HARDWARE INCLUDING ALU/NOKIA ROH FEET FROM THE SUPPORT. _ SUIT(SEE NOTES)BOND SECTIONS 3, WHEN USING COMPONENTS,SUPPORT LIJ w WALL MOUNTING BRACKET IF NECESSARY. TOGETHER WITH 6 AWG WIRE. SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS CLOSE ASLu AFF, MAKES CABLE TERMINATIONS. TRAPEZE KD ORDER ADDITIONAL POSSIBLE TO THE ENDS OF ICE BRIDGES, 1�Z W 2. DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS ARE FOR RRH _ TRAPEZE KITS A5 REQUIRED TO WITH A MAXIMUM CANTILIVER DISTANCE OF UI WITHOUT MOUNRNC BRACKET MAINTAIN MAXIMUM CABLE SPAN OF 2 FEET FROM THE SUPPORT TO THE FREE w z z 3'-0`(TYP) END OF THE ICE BRIDGE. _z SIZE AND WEIGHT TABLE __ ® 4. CUT BRIDGE CHANNEL SECTIONS SHALL W FIBER]POWER CABLE ARRANGEMENT HAVE RAW EDGES TREATED WITH A RRH MODEL HEIGHT x WIDTH x DEPTH WEIGHT © BY CONTRACTOR MATERIAL TO RESTORE THESE EDGES TO ALU RRH 2x40-O7AT 24.8"x11.5"5;" 52.9 LBS _ THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL,OR EQUNALENT, ALU 825 RRH 4x30-4R 21.2'x71.9]"x7.18" 52.9 LBS © FINISH. ALU RRH 4x25-WCS-4R 31.5"x12.0"x8.7" 31.5 LBS m 3 5. ICE BRIDGES MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITH ALU B66A RRH4x45-4R 25.6"x11.8x7.2" 52.9 LBS COMPONENTS FROM OTHER NOKIA 4T4R 812 14 320W AHLBA 26.7',12.8.7 4" 99.2 LBS - MANUFACTURERS,PROVIDED THE A�! NOKIA 4T4R 825/86 320W ANUS 26.7x12.8"xT 3" 'B LBS MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES �V NOKIA BLAB 85 1 6S AHCA 132 01.6`x6.4' 36.81 HAS 19.6 3"STANDARD PIPE OR EQUIVALENTARE FOLLOWED. NOKIA 4T0 830 16OW AHNA 16.83112.48"x6.3" 39.02 LBS 6. DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARDS FOR COMPONENT INSTALLATIONS ARE PERMITTEDtp SIDE ERONT REAR BOTTOM WITH THE RESPECTN MANUFACTURER'S CLEARANCE TABLE TI 7. DEVIATIONS FROM ICE BRIDGE J' CLEARANCE REOD FOUNDATIONS REQUIRE ENGINEERING FRONT 36"FOR INSTALLATION ACCESS ^ APPROVAL. REAR WITH SUPPLIED MOUNTING BRACKETS) COMMSCOPE MODEL NO.: NNHH-65C-R4 :r e. THE DESIGN IN BASED ON ASCE 7-05,3 RIGHT 4"FOR AIR ROW -- --- - ---- ---.__ --_--- --.__ CONCRETE PIER SECOND GUST WIND SP=ED OF 90 MPH, LEFT 4FOR AIR FEB.- RADOME MATERIAL: FIBERGLASS,UV RESISTANT (F,'=4,MUM) P51 EXPOSURE C,ELEVATION AT GRADE, RADOME COLOR LIGHT GRAY a MINIMUM} TOP 12"FOR NR FLOW _ 9. THIS DESIGN ID BASED ON(24�12 WIDE ICE 80TTOM 12'FOR CONDUIT ROUTING DIMENSIONS, MOUNTING 96.0"x19.6"x7.8" BRIDGE,A LE STD PIPE,AND(4 1 SOS ---- WEIGHT,W/0 MOUNTING NIT '39.2 LHS DIA CABLES IN 3 ROWS OF 4 AND POST CONNECTOR (8)4.3-70 FEMALESUPPORT SPACING OF O-O", 12 10. HEIGHT OF POST SHALL BE 10'-6"MAX. ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. 1 RR DETA L 11. FOR MONOPOLE OR SIMILAR D FIBER r.xo/m as ANT NNA FAIL FOR MONOPOLE ALL AT&T Dc AN. Cg SCALE:NTS C6 SCALE:NTS DE. a ICE BRIE_ AIL CABLES SHALL BE ROUTED IN 2" SCALE:NTS INNERDUCT. 2 AWG THW OR TW STRANDED ---- ----- - -. GROUND LEAD ATTACHED TO .i nn� wrs wkznv PIPE WITH EXOTHERMIC WELD -T s.wnd«cwvxrs w m/�./�v TO SECTOR END BAR PIPE(2"TO 4"OD AS PER IHI o�a :_e� Devpnea. uni. STRUCTURAL AND/OR MANUFACTURER SPEGIFICATIONS) � en Number: PROPOSED USE ROUND MEMBER z PANELADAPTER AS REQUIRED Dien role: 98 ANTENNA TO SECURE JUMPERS PIPE MOUNTING BRACKET T2ef FINISHED GRADE (PT#ANDREW-31670-2 OR �' ^ BEN PARITY NSB w FROG EYE SIRBAUGH APPROVED EQUAL) "��� SITE ID:4124 MOUNTING BRACKET FURNISHED w / -WARNING TAPE(7 TYP.) FA#10138153 WITH ANTENNA COMPACTED BACK FILLHl IRVIEWROAD TO 959 MODIFIED oaRE r.1 AFT a iH �i --- ---.--.-__- -_- _�-• n� _.-_- PROCTOR DENSITY -_-_ PER ASTM 0 1557 wrea Fov NQIES z W f5}---UNDISTURBED ^^ y 1.ANTENNA ORIENTATION RI BASED ON TRUE NORTH BEARING, Q Q Q COMPACTED SAND t`• CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,FOR n ((( o� 2 CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO FINAL RF CONFIGURATIONS SHEET FOR ANTENNA AZIMUTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CABLE MANAGEMENT BRACKET x POWER CONDUIT �q 3.DO NOT INSTALL SHALL C BRACKET ON ORFIRSTNETCODING ANTENNAS. PVC SCHEDULE-40 (.'�o"� 4.SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING IN THE FIELD SIZE AS SHOWN ON pWG WITH ATt REPRESENTATIVE. RAYCAP MODEL NQ.: DC9-48-60-24-8C-EV _� -----rLEE CONDUIT 5.INSTALL SURGE ARRESTORS ON MAIN COAXIAL CABLES.GROUND TO _ PVC SCHEDULE-4C {� NEAREST GROUND BAR. PROVIDES FIBER CONNECTIONS FOR UP TO 24 PAIR FIBER `-~ SIZE AS SHOWN ON DWG 6.SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS IDENTIFICATION TAG{i (LC-LC SINGLE MODE)AND 1/2`E DIAMETER)WITH 1/4"STAMPED R THE AND NUMBERS.ONE PROTECTION FOR NINE(9)INDIVIDUAL-48VDC CIRCUITS(#12 TO#4 AWG) AT THE ANTENNA PORT CONNECTION NEAR THE END OF THE JUMPER CEO#:CEQ.21427 AND ONE ON EACH END WILL E JUMPER SERVING THE RADIO MJGH7(W/O MOUNTI' 16.0 LBS Draw I, one EQUIPMENT.EACH TAG WILL BE STAMPED WITH AT&T AND THE ANTENNA (/ LIN PORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER.I.E. I.HT W MO Ti:26.2 LRS TAGS SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF UV RESISTANT WIRE EQUIPMENT OR CABLE-TY. �-� �-� DETAILS SNTENTSINIA MOUNTING DETAIL La �RAYCAP DC9 FIBER/DC DEMARC dOME DETAIL Lc \COMPOUND TRENCHING DETAIL RNmb, CB SCALE:NTS A C6 SCALE:NTS Cg SCALE:NTS C6 202 coo 120 69 RECOMMENDED ELECTRICALSTUB--UPS , — (SUE DETAILED NEW& OR VIEW) c x0 1.2 B462 tRIIE2 SAY, [R17.4" DESCRIPTION �N_SIOE ONLATCHING D"j LATER NO DOO] BASE UJ�l IT PLACE) (2 PLACES)R IR DETER&AIR "LIAL A C 1)AC LOAD LEAD CONDLI LIJ W REST"Mo IRA I AREA. N INDICATOR SUPPLY RETURN EU T�l " A z Ol Y/1041 1 C FROM UTILITY LOW VOLTAGE DESIGNER TRESS) CONNECTION BOX I rrn NOTE 8) (GLAND PLATE INCLUDES) z ("n ''"L..LEAD C..PIT AREA 2 /FROM'TL" `T-LAS) AN AT E RE A PRIMARY OB CONNECTION777, GL PLATE DO N)j UJI [EBG _TO BOX DOMINO DID,1 TANK 1)TRANSFER C-P/ E PC C H ON U :Nl A:�.:NNG CONDUITS ON PRIMARY HIGH VOLTAGE C 4VUTAC E FRED VENTS THE UP COMMUNICATION OGNOUITS STUB-UP AREA WITH AREA C.....'CAR X�ANDRE (SEE NOTE 6 GLAND PLATE 0 B START MUI I EF JSOT BE RUN IN R Ire 'J CONDUIT WTO AN WRING ED ' 11 1 SEE STUB-UP (NOTE 7) EJ LEVEL CRE AREA DETAIL (DUE NOTE 6) FUEL FILL— — LOW MULTAGE MEW STUB-UP AREA m A Ir (NOTE 8) IN SEE NOTE 16) STUB-UP AREA DETAIL VIEW 2%5 j (' 11.8-1 ENGINE BLOCK HEATER TRl'l'Cl ,NOTE ID AREA(NOTE 1) 1 B-] 437 X X 945(W X IT) RE.A WAS(W.DO 965 (36] G'VERALL LENGTH p"2 E 21 I-E, 372 DISCHARGE RGL r_ON'EA SECT- PANEL OVERALL WIDTH AIR INTAKE TEP—H IDE IN TIES 9 11) /AND READ(NOTE 10) CONTROL PANEL L_ IRATE I, LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION... (NOTE 8, A F 1551 MAIN LINE CIRCUIT DISCHARGE 1 BREAKER DUCT (NOTE 15) 2310 (91") HIGH VOLTAGE OVERALL ........ON EPA - EIGHT GU.,FE A K 77 wryAro F-M, AW 1358 S, .tam PM AT LCO 0 LOW�LTACE GP_. SIR OR F 'iRe [46-] 2 [29-1 eq. [3,.TO Gh—E lp ACITY R DRIFT CLEARANCE BOTTOM CONNECTION BOX -4 LIFTING T _017,5[019-1 RON PARITY NSB 2.361, (A PLACED) (4 PLACES) 0 ART) SITE ID:4124 DEEP,X "Y_ H TYP 76 2 [3C] O"IDIALOW L [C,7-] FROG EYE SIRB UGH ID RIMI.11�"0 GU�N AT HOLES ."T 'HEJ_E! F A LAi- TANK 950 [37.4") Worth OIL DRAIN [224'f' — [4.3"] CSROWN WITH DOORS RESSISID FUEL C TYR TYP SEPARATOR FA#10138153 pBR"]-- — 1268 [49 11, 117�:Ril� ARATO C�AFILTER %ENM__ TYR CENTER 0,0 1 - PAT GAP,MAA.1 26 9 2 IUoF-j PARITY (IN...Y TANK LON.AT pre Far LLEFT SIDE VIEW =j NOTES 1. CONTROL PANEL INCLUDES BATTERY CHARGER W O IN THREE PRONG 2 NORRY 120�ENTIRE BLOCK HUNTS WITH THREE PRONG CORD 3. 12 WALL NEGAIRE GROUND SYSTEM GENERAL 720 z240V i0 W30KW 01 EL G N BATOR W!790 GALL LGN FU TANK a. GENERATOR MUST BE GROUNDED CE MODEL-NII-Q-030(NEO#20230) 6 S WER OF CRIME`&WEIGHT MAY SHIFT EURIALY DUE TO UNIT FIBERS TUS-UPS BASE TANK REQUIRES ITT SNB-UPS TO BE IN THE REAR OF TANK STUB-UP AREA A,Fi, 7, HIGH"'T"'STUB-UP AREA INCLUDES THE AD LOAD DFAC CONNECTION TO THE MAIN LINE GREAT EIMER,THE NEUTRAL CONNECTION,AND AUXILIARY 120/2MOV CONNECTION 0K ALKEE_DATA D_UNC LADES EMPtt TFL TA KI 8 DO NED.3N STINTS FOR CONTROL MWEE,8070.OF LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION FOX HAS KNOCKOUTS FOR 1/2-ISO 3/4-CONDUIT FITTINGS GENERATOR:140 AD(310 CBS) D� MUST ALLOW FREE FOR OFF DISCHARGE AS.0 EXHAUST.SEE SPEC SHORT FOR MINIMUM AD FLOW.0 MRAMI.RESTRICTION ROUIREMENTS 10 MU FLOW C IN IN GE ST ALLOW OR w TAKE MR.SEE SPEC SHE FOR NNASDM AS FLOW AND MAXIMUM RUTRICTION REQUIREMENTS A, SENATOR WHE WOODEN SHIPPING SKIDS:1474KC(325)CBS) ll.GENERATOR MUST BE INSTALLED SUCH FLAT FRESH COOLING AIR IS AVAILABLE AND THAT DISCHARGE AIR FROM THE WATER IS NOT RECIRCULATED 12 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION TEEMORN TO ENSURE THAT THE GENERATORINSTALLATIONCOMPLICE WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOODS,STANDARDS,AND RECULARIPIS 13. USEABLE GALLON USLE CAPACTG RAEFTANK IS INCLUDED WHO GENERATOR UNIT IS SHIPPED WITH FUEL CHIPET AND RETURN JNFG DISCONNECTED AND PLUGGED BETWEEN ENGINE AND F"O_FARE HIS HAS SEEN HDRE DO TACONITE PRESSURE TESTING OF THE TANK IN THE CELD,FAIR INFORMATION REGARDING CONNECTING THE FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES PRIOR TO START UP,SEE THE NIL ON—1. LANE HELD ILSHNG PROCEDURE(DEEG82)SUPPLIED IN THE M,LOOSE AEGIS AT,WHILE B SHIPPED WHY THIS GENERATOR DRAWING GCC`EO OPS DISCHARGE DUCT SENEGAL REMOVAL OF FORT WILLPROOSP ACCESS TO MUFFLER FOR SERMONS. GENSE 15T 16 GET PENE WASHOGAL 2'ROME NET POSTS-PUGGED OR'QUIPPED WITH TOP-MOUNT SWITCHES DEPENDING ON UNIT OPTIONS. -\DIESEL GENERATOR DETAIL DETAILS \,.27/SCALE NTS C7 203 DC9 FIBER CONNECTIONS DC9 DC POWER CONNECTIONS \0 J FIBER PORI RRH CONNECTION /—a w V o s --02 2 PCS/825/1900 2> �� � '" - Z 2 3 AWS/866/2100 2WCSB30/2300 FUTURE LLJ 2 4 WCS/830/2300 2 - -. _ HE �� Z o m NEG C FOTO-�J�/�J - 2 5 FIRSTNE7/874/700 2 �`�I-_ o-L.l — Z N W y 2 6 85/850-LTE cN� Bti gs0 L1E&SC 7 i 85/850-5G 2 � FUTURE 2 8 FUTURE _ Y Q 0 2 9 FUTURE � o 2 10 FUTURE 2 2 11 FUTURE 2 U RE RE 2 12 FUIURE 2 - O-NEG C .. .��p�C-I MFUTURE Pi 700 FUTURE r� NE� t _ «...,� m n 2 77 FUTURE 1 16 218 FUTURE 2> 2 19 FUTURE2 AWSj866/2100 AND [lam PCS/8251900 2 20 FUTURE 2, �� € e rwsxu xus wny�v ,• ^*7, NEG C. ". a swrux cwao,rs m wnanv `[—� .. n isam mxw ars azns/m 2 27 FUTURE 2 2 22 FUTURE 2 iY x, luau 2 23 FUTURE 2 amlv�'.I Numter'. { CONNECT SHIELD snot 2 24 FUTURE - DRAI IN WINE IE 2 CABLE GND WIRE `OI as S TO GROUND BAR BDN PARITY NSB q GROUND GROUND (NOTE 2)(TYP FROG EYE SIRBAUGH FlBER OUTP DC POWER „ DC POWER SITE ID'4124 —_ INP ..__.—.. —..._._ ____ e DT NP —� __. -- —._ _ FA#10138153 �.__�__ ____ __ OUTPUT 24PR FIBER CABLE 2PR SINGLE MODE FIBER �' 6/C DC TRUNK #2 GREEN,STRANDED w 141 RE VAD'p OUTDOOR RATED,FOR F ^ _ INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR _ FINAL RRH CONNECTION (3 CABLES MAX ON - (ROUTED TO NEAREST BUSSBAR} rere For (THE PER RRH) AS QTY ON PLANS) (1_ DC POWER CABLE. OUTDOOR RATED,"" c NOTES: FINAL RRH CONNECTION (LYP PER RRH) o m 1. TRUNK GLAND KOS: N N • TRUNK GLAND KIT A.OVAL GASKET FOR#4 AND#6AW1 TRUNK(CEO.21428) • TRUNK GLAND KIT 8:OVAL GASKET FOR(2)#4 AWG TRUNKS(CEO.21429) e • TRUNK GLAND KR C:OVAL CASKET FOR(2),#8 AWG TRUNKS(CEO.2i 04) 2. WHEN SHIELDED CABLE IS USED CONNECT CABLE SHIELD DRAIN WIRE AND GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR. 3. FIRST SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND(OR FIRST INSTALLED)RRH ON ALPHA SECTOR.IN t� THE EVENT THE ALARM CABLE GANNOI BE CONNECTED TO ALPHA IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO ALARM TO THE CLOSEST v, PHYSICAL SECTOR ON AN EXCEPTION BASIS. 4. 2ND SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND(OR FIRST INSTALLED)RRH ON BETA SECTOR. /( 4. 3RD SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND(OR FIRST INSTALLED)RRH DN GAMMA SECTOR 5, AN RRH WILL NEVER HAVE MORE THAN ONE SQUID ALARMED ON IT. oa�s tl 6. SQUID ALARMS ARE NOT TO BE DAISV CHAINED. DC9 WIRING V=LC CONNECTOR �� pip p� �� DIAGRAM O-STRIKESORB PROTECTION i R YCAP- Cl A R DC NEMAR QQ b=_E�� wns www 1 MODULE BY RAYCAP C8 SCALE:NTS C$ 204 FIRSIWT AABENNA PIA1 AREA (� (NO RR b TO GE MOUNIED NODW)(OP) \��J N PROPOSED AT&T NINTf161A --2-7/8"O.D.z 120'LG /�' w (TBP Of 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL) SCH.40 PIPE MAST #72 #1 (TYP OF 5 BILK SECTOR,15 TOTAL) c s Z o i #2 Sp7' FUTUR01�£B 85 RRRH MOUNTED TO W q v' rG PROPOSED SWYEL AIOUMT 8EA7ND ANIEAWA (T}P PER SECTO4,3 TOTAL) LU u�Z a PROPOSED AARSCALE 825/66 RRH AAD 7 33F' 1 h D PROPOSED AIRSCALE 812/14 RRB MIXJNTED fiJ L Z . +' 85 PROPOSED S=TD BEh7MD AMEATEA W ¢, (TTP PER SECTOR,3 TOTAL) �. #3 —FU7URE AT&7 ANTENNA - ,J} (TYP OF 2 PER SECTOR,6 TOTAL) RA o i t FUTURE 700 RED MOUNTED o #4 BEHIND ANTENNA z 7 i`I A� Li (TYP OF 7 PER SECTOR,3 TOTAL) w #8 #7 #5 #6 ry PROPOSED LOW PRO91E PLATFORM W/ WORK PLA IFOPM PROPOSED FasmraMEAW4s SITE PRO 1 MODEL NO.: F3P-12—WLL (POSYDUNS/2 J6&JIG) 12'3 SIDED PLATFORM W/HANGING WALKWAY PROPOSED DC9(TBP OF J) AT&T CEO#BLD.10634 1 ANT N A ORIENTATION -2csSCAL � ' ---- NORTH E NTs [ \ANTENNA PLATFORM DkfAIL C9 SCALE:NTS NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA AT&T TOWER PIM NOTICE a WNTILT BRACKET WITH THE OOWMT SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA CABLE CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE. _ wn+n+ RRH,2.DON MUST BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA. WEEN SUPPOR7MG RE COAX R,WAS,OTY Al UR OC 1/,FS IDE NYLON Ai THE PLATFORM LEAST ans 3.DO NOT INSTALL COWNTILT BRACKET'ON FIRSTNEf AND/OR APOINT) RAD CENTER,MIL4E Ott=2 IN RATED 14 WIDE NriON CABLE 11E5 PER a.m� ANTENNAS. SUPPORT polET} / ( ENSURE THERE IB NO RUSHER METAL OR MOUNTER PIPE WHERE CABLE RANGER AND AGAPTER ARE "..... �- TO BE ATTACHED.USE A WIRE BRUSH OR WIRE MEL R GRILL OVE TO REMANY RUKING METAL PROPOSED 2-7/8'S 120'IG 40 MDiM7NG PIPES PROPOSED 2-7/6'X 120'LC CLEAN THE MOUNBNG SURFACE(INCLUDWG REOVAL OF MINOR CORROSION)WITH A SCOTCH BMTE EIOa Number. A57 OR,B,35X$7 S '08, OR.8,JS/(ST SCR.40 MOUNTING PEES PAD.PALM ANY EXPOSED METAL WHEED THERE WAS RUST GALVANIZING RTS BEEN TRANSITPROPOSED 2-7/8 X 720'LC WITH COLD-GN.VANIZING PAINT UCU-GAL1�.USE NO-O%BETWEEN PIPE AKKINIING HARDWAIS 453,.W.A 35KSI SCH,40 MOUMM0 PIPES (C-PS Oft 9ANIESS-STEEL RANGING)ANO MOUNTING PIPE.IF COLD-GALA PNM WAS MPUEO, Pm)ect Titla. ENSURE THE PAINT HAS DRIED ESTATE APPLYNIG NR-OX.X NOT USE HOSE PLANES TO SECURE BDN PARITY NSB CABLE RANGERS OR HANGER ADPFIERS IN RICH RISK PIM ZONES. ALL CABLES HES SHOULD BE FLUSH CUT TO PREVEM IHIURY FROM EXPOSED SHARP EDGES. FROG EYE SIRBAUGH PROPOSED AN/ENNA PROPOSED ANTENMq DO NOT ARACH BRASS TAGS TO ED CABLES FOR CABLE RAH, CANNOT BE LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND ANTENNA THEY ARE SEINING. SITE ID:4124 FA#10138153 ,A,FrNRVIEwROAo PROPOSED M-KL MOUNT PROPOSED DC9(IIP) coRE,vA ns3> Pana Fo� ANTENNA CEA7ERiME 7U AMZENNA CEMERt#4E R) MA7CN MOUM CfMERL1NE MATCH MOIAVT CENTE'RL1NE -J �oN PROPOSED 812/814 RRH PROPOSED B5 RRH AND PROPOSE'0 815/66 RRH AMO FUTURE MRS RRN (s PROPOSED RIASS MOtM7 E ON PROPOSED SWAEL MOUNT (SDE PRD 1 IRM) �} ESTE PRO i jRRUOSM) M� Z. DreWng Title ANTENNA AND 1���Wllll PLAATFORM xGRX PLATFORM woR PSD RRH MOUNTING (NTEORAE 70 rip-ow (MEDIAL TO FJP-KL) (wirm TO Fp-wu) �-- DETAILS EMEDQU#2/#6/#10 MIDDLE PIPE POSITION 13/#7/#11 L \ANTENNA/RRN/DC9 MOUNTING DETAIL �^9N.— C9 SCALE:NTS C9 205 PROPOSED URETY SA PROPOSED 7201290K 10 6 GANG Ak V STACK(SBENAWDOm vALLEy accnuc COW)(BY O#O?S) W1 M7.D1.201'D 401,�.1,1. O 0 z INTEGRAL 20%4 GIN PLUG cc LLI z 0 ui PROP05ED AT&T V-8 1/4-X 6'-8 1/4� z FT&-Tl AT&T PRC W1 MTS AND A IS S TEEL INC Lu FLWWN AND (NEO 120060) #4EGR4L PANE"AT&T' O 0 1 (PART OF SIM W) PANE 4-4 MAIN BREAKER iRfING�AY,_200 120+2AOV DERR)PTION VA_—WRC RKR_-FrO—SN_Ll L2 _P'0_6N_6KN`WC_qAFE_3_CRPTQN I 14W 2 E RECINFER I&2 30 N a 11HUR 14501 C 1480 21822 0 RECIEFIER3&4 NC FUTURE RECTIFIER — 14601 0 7 --1-460 2387A Sy. M1 RECTIFIER 6&8 -il.--,—C- 30 44W 10 IS SPACE 1450, r 19 1460 12 -6 SPACE RECIRIDE R 7&8 145D C 30 13 1450 14 IS ----SPACE 1450 C is 1450 16 S SPACE J 4 5 6 FUTURE RECTIFIER a NO 30 17 0 UI 8 —SPACE 9&10 0 NO 19 0 20 S SPACE REE -.0 IN ...... FUTURE 'ITFUR 1, 21 0 22—S ------ SPACE 30 2-3 1920 _24 0 NO 1920 FUTURERECIFFIFER 030 2 HI :NO 25 G20 28 NO 1920 53&14 _�5___�C_—59-—LIGHTS PROPOSED JOkW 0 �NC 27 500 21 DAM GENERATOR FUTURE RECTIFIER 0 NO 30 30 20 NO 750- GENERATOR HEATER (OEMEW19"120230) o-T-NE. 31 750 32 _26-_NC REN 8ATT UPWR5ER__ :w7 15 18 PROPOSED XU60NMAW & FUTURE RECTIFER-_ FP_ 556 BATTERY HEATER SO 33 SOFT 34 17818 p NO 3S 250 36 SO C 250 PP GFCI FUTURE ff.ITEE� . 'IC 37 500 38 20 NO 5W BATTERY CAB GFCI 19 820 o NO 3019 500 40 26 NC SGO BATTERY HEATER I SPACE S 47 5W 42 20 INC] 500 1 BATTERY HEATER 2 PHASE TOTALS(VA). CURRENT PER PHASE(A). PANE[TOTAL(VAr HANtktOtf T T T T T T T GITT ILV�A) ❑ P BON PARITY SEE NQm FROG EYE SIRBAUGH G�EDU SITE IDD 4124 AND CONDUCTORS. 1. WIC PRE-PLUMBED FOR AC POWER AND DC FA#10138153 KEY DESCRIPTION 1. MULTIPLE KEY CHART CALLOUTS REPRESENT MULTIPLE INSTALLATIONS OF POWER CONNECTIONS.SEE MANUFACTURER P1 FAIRVE.RUME 1 2'C=W W1#J10+114G(FROM MM 7v paC) CONDUIT 0 2� WIC PRE-PLUMBED FOR AC POWER AND DO POWER CONNECTIONS,SEE DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT LAYOUT,SMOKE ..KE,VA 1-1 DETECTOR LAYOUT,AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. 2 2-CONDUIT W1 SWI PULLSTRIM MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR CONDUCTORS,RACEWAYS,LIGHT LAYOUT, crepa�ea For. 1 2'COAOV7 W1 Mj1o+jj2C('F-RO-'W' SMOKE DETECTOR LAYOUT,AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT MMTOR 70 PFW) 1 INSTALL(12)12V,I&OAH BATTERIES(MARATHON MIV180FI,NEQ _y 4 184TTERY #15171)CONFIGURED IN(3)BATTERY STRINGS 9-48VDC NOMINAL FOR e- APPROX.4.25 MRS BATTERY BACKUP TIME 4. ACTIVATE/INSTALL(8)-48VDC 20DOW RECTIFIERS(EMERSON ESURE) P,JR(AW),24 CABLES AND'PEOM PMEE OWC __W(EUR OSIf A(AZ )j (NEQ#15930)IN POWER PLANT FOR N I CONDUIT TYPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: • UNDERGROUND CONDUITS.SEN.40 PVC CONDOR,SOL 80 BENEATH R GAD/PARKNG LOT. EXTERIOR ABOVE GROUND CONDUITS:ROE • INTERIOR CONDUITS:INC ELECTRICAL UTTY DETAILS Et SCLI DIAGRAM ALE.NTS --\PANEL SCHEDULE 2 !l/SCALE KID D-9 NL El 206 cj �—a w �og z w LL_z o zz W POSITION BREAKER DISTRIBUTION -48V BREAKER DISTRIBUTION _48V POSITION BREAKER DISTRIBUTION _48V ` a� RATING ROW#1 BUS RATING ROW#2 BUS POSITION RATING ROW#3 BUS PI g s1 7 100 FTF FUSE PANEL#2-A 1 25 850(ARCA)G 7 700 FIF FUSE PANEL#i-A .! 2 - 2 25 850(ARCA)8 2 - 3 700 FIT FUSE PANEL#2-B 3 25 850(AHCA)A 3 700 FIF FUSE PANEL#I-B VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 2'OR LESS FROM NOTES. 4 - 4 50 PCS/AWS(ANFIB)G 4 _ (SEE NOTE 1) 2" _ CONNECTOR END i. VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION WIRES SHALL BE 5 - 5 50 PCS/AWS(AHF18)B 5 - /� APPLIED TO BOTH ENDS OF ALL NEW DC 6P WEE WING USINGVW-1 FLAME 6 - 50 PCS/AWS(AHRB)A 6 - CLEAR HEAT SHRINK TUBING RETARDANiRUL LISTED THIN 4WALL HEAT 7 - 7 50 700/FN(AHLBA)G 7 - �' +24V DC=RED MARKINGS SHRINK TUBING OF APPROPRIATE COLOR. 2"OR LESS FROM 9 8 50 700,/FN(AHLBA)B 8 - CONNECTOR END 2' -48V DC BLUE MARKINGS APH YNVOLTAGE IDENTIFICI IT SHALL ATION MARKINGS MARKINGS BLE TO 9 - 9 50 700/FN(AHLBA)A g _ DC RETURN=NO MARKINGS TO DC WIRING WITH APPROPRIATELY 70 - 10 - 10 - APPLIED PNORIHALFCAL TLAPPED LAYERS APE THAT SHALL BE __u+ojw' .n�us BAWG ANO LARGER OC POWER CABLE R. 11 - 11 - 1 i _ WITH THE FINAL TWO WRAPS APPLIED FULLY _ _ OVERLAPPING WITHOUT TENSION,WHENEVER 12 12 12 - POSSIBLE THE ELECTRICAL TAPE VOLTAGE 13 - 13 _ 13 VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 1°OR LESS FROM IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS SHALL BE FULLY _ (SEE=+ - O " END COVERED WITH CLEAR 01224 l^X-1 FLAME 14 14 - 14 - RETARDANT UL LISTED THIN WALL HEAT mizxAn 15 - 75 - 15 - MOVEMENT OFSHRINK GTO THE ELECTRICAL VENT NTAPE OR __ n ovnsl+n i6 20 SIAD 10 - 16 - HRINK TUBING 2 DESI NCATION ANT THIN WAIL CLEAR OR pN REO MARKINGS COLORIZED HEAT SHRINK IS AVAILABLE FOR 17 - 17 ._ 17 - �e i"OR LESS FROM N 18 20 SIAD 18 - 18 CONNECTOR END BLUE MARKINGS ALL DC POWER WIRING SIZES FROM_ NO MARKINGS BURNDY(NSC-FR&119-FR)AND THOMAS rolsa Numeer: 19 19 79 - &BETTS(CPO SERIES).OTHER MANUFACTURER HEAT SHRINK SHALL BE 20 20 TRANSPORT NID 20 - 2p _ )gAWG AND SMALLER DC POW R GABL ACCEPTABLE ONLY IF IN FULL COMPLIANCE PP,.f. 21 21 - 21 - WITH SPECIFICATION PROVIDED ABOVE. 22 20 DAC FAN 2222 - 3. DESIGNATION TAGS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO BMN PARITY NSB BOTH CABLE ENDS AS SPECIFIED IN AT&T FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 23 5 HVAC CONTROLLER 23 - 23 _ DOCUMENT ATT-TP-76300,SECTION I, SITE ID:4124 24 — 24 40 FSM4 24 — FA#10138153 25 -- 25 40 FSM4 25 - 141 FAIRVIEW ROPD 26 - 26 40 FSM426 __ .VA—1P�epereE For'. 27 - 27 b0 FSM41 27 _ E�m orermcrn. DC POWER �- DETAILS 1 \DC POWER BREAKER SCHEDULE L 2 \DC POWER WIRING IDENTIFICATION DETAIL E2 SCALE.NTS E2 SCALE-NTS ne n�ren®r Ea 207 oo ALPH�TOR A— 7OU/M Pow E P -y- T- T cr PARE/B.. aso/BwPC 8 9 Z LL J. —zi z(D z R-C 06 AWS DC uj POWERINKS OF 3 PER BETA 4a I— F.'a,"N"Ma—DE"C" PEF-PROM I.." E. ED a 44 .2 US- -I-- a./—. E 9X 7 OBTRIDEPUR DOME NI CSE IND.A STOP) A=MED :_1 E AWG FEWER CABLES (TYP PER BRIT PER SECTOR) FWAB WTX (NOTE 2) GAMMA a/. TE_HWA ED FOURPORUE I—DO "A'DONIERN-MAD—B 'a" MBM MUDEM ,E`E`-XD Ez� LIVE PLN/N. ITE �z =:Ed j i LIN EPTAND AM REM DAWMA 1—M —A A—a. E-N W/,— K A-'ERTS ctb 2 mXD MOO, AN,w(A) L BUOUDE-DUAL) PRE NNAMESGIc BRP - Nrvm r. w FlBFF Peoleci PUMP TDIN PARITY NSB iaialwl - B FROG EYE SIRBAUGH T. MD SITE ID:4124 TO FA#10138153 141FAI-- W E,.AN tiE Jas x VAA-7 AMD NO P-1 For MAPS a XZ A, —y TO AND RAW E 1llll�� llllllll ail-.A OvL LABEL THE DC POWER CABLES IT FORT ENDS OF EVERY WINE AND IN ANY PULL BOX 11 USED. LABS1 ETTIAT BE DURABLE SELF ADHESIVE WRAPPED IONETRUNINALI NO THE CABLE ABU STATE THE SECTOR,FREQUENCY HANG AND a,INAT Pam PLANT pow.�IS T.. 2. SEE DETAIL 11 SI L FOR CABLE AND MAXIMUM LENGTH. RRH DC 3. SEE DUMB FOR XB INTERNAL M—"B"S 4, THE RARE WIDE OF EACH MULD-CONDUCTOR CABLE AND BRAIN WIRE WHEN A SHIELDED CABLE Is USED,SH,DL BE CONNECTED TO THE EQUIPMENT CABINET GROUND ■BAR, WIRING 5 SEC ALARM BLOCK ASSIGNMENT RETAIL FOR FLATS.CABLE CONNECTIONS. 1'\RRH DC WIRING DIAGRAM 6. ROUTE POWER AND FIBER JUMPERS IN la'FLE)(CONDUPT FROM DCS TO SI-ACK BOXES TO TRUE DIAGRAM \.E�j SCALL NITS 7. SECURE TO POWER CABLES WITH HOSE CLAMPS AND FIBER TRUNK CABLES WITH VEBRO WRAP TIES ONLY, DFO-Pq—N—b-1 E3 208 NOTES 1. LABEL GEN PLUG W/PHENOLIC NAMEPLATE-AT&T 120/24OV,3,1,,20DA" 00 2 CONDUIT TYPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. BELOW GRADE CONDUITS:SCH.40 PVC CONDUIT,SCH,30 BENEATH ROAD/PARKING LOT EXTERIOR ABOVE GRADE CONDUITS:RGSrn g INTERIOR CONDUITS:IMC CONDUIT_59HEDU uj KEY DESCRIPTION uJ rc 1 2•COAOW W1 3131,a+f14.-(n?OM ME7ER rD Przc) L.7,_z 2 2 fOalWff W1 5W�111W�(,Wllc, 111,,; -7 J 2 CONDUIT W1 3/3/0+r{20(FROM alMMR TO 111) z 4 • &84 W _5 6 4-o! 111.6'CNANJLnTx IMIX W1 P 8ARVED MRLI(BY OTHERS) X X x x X PROPOSED 50'60'RNCEO COMPOUND F _7 (2500 SHF)(BY OMRS) FF x Fl��111� FUTURE FU TURE ,2. 12'.16' I 12*x25' _1111 A'REI, ILEIIE AREA LEASE AREA PROPOSED AT&T/0,1 BRIDGE W1 (240 S, (192 Sl) (300 SY.) FROI(3)24PR FIBER CABLES X PROPOSED(9)61C DC CABLES PROPOSED MONORGE 195'-0' L— _j AT&T 1201240V to,200A PRO W1 (BY OTHERS) L— _J iXW PLUG(INZE.RAL TO WC) PROPOSED AT&T ormEtATOR CONOUgs PROPOSED HAAVHOff — (BY 01HERV (R(ROUTEDRaTH TAPLATFORM to Par [3 4 3 E67 LT x PROPOSED AT&T wRiLy 12q,24ov 6'-8 114-X 6'-8 114'STEEL WC(NEO 420060)OR PROPOSED PAD MOUNTEDPROPOSED PRE-FAB PLA 7FORM(NEO 120324)AND7RANISFORMI(BY OMRS) PROPOSED A A*T JOKW DAM PROPOSED(2)4'COMITS GENERATOR W1 190 GAUDY TANK (FOR POPER.3763) (DEWACIACO 4=30)OV PROPOSED(1)4-COADIATTc.T--pE. PROPOSED 10'XI8'COYCREM PAD (FOR 7aCO J80-1) x x IN PROPOSED 12'-6'X20'LEASE AREA OTHERS)O�wi) (250 SF.LEASE AREA) PROPOSED 1201'24OV.10 6 GANG METER STAG((SqEhAAOa4N VALLEY PROPOSED AT&T 12'-61X20LEASC AREA ELECTRIC COOP)(BY OTHERS)W1 (250 IF.LEASE AREA) PROPOSED 1201240Y,10,2024 AT&T METER AND MCR AT&T OPS ANIMA BON PARITY NSB (ArrACOM TO WC) FROG EYE SIRRAUGH ❑PROPOSED 2'DO COAR#r PROPOSED/2'ACCESS CA T(BY OTHERS) SITE ID:4124 (FOR AT&T 2044 POWN,40'1) FA#10138153 PROPOSED 2'UG COI PROPOSED 10 GRAWL ACCESS DWWrao1.K-— (FOR A r&r ra CIE 45'1) (BY OTHERS) URE VA 22637 .GRAPHIC SCALE: UTILITY 20' 10' 0 10, 20, PLAN / 1--\COMPOUND PLAN NORTH \_j4/SCALE:AS NOTED SCALE (1107): 1" = 20'-0" owning N.— SCALE (2204): 1" = lo'-O" E4 209 TYPICAL SECTOR z (D gg z uJ aE ZED PROPOSED 6'CHAIN LEAK IMCE z 0 z r—X X X X X X X X X x W1 PRARBEO WRE(BY OTHERS) P W x PROPOSED#2 INSULATED I I F 7 GROUND WIRE FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE (SEE NOTE 5) jyi fR 12 1 2'�20` 2'x16' 2'.25' 4a N x LEASE AREA LEASE AREA PROPOSED#6 INSULATED -l"'S"A" M RUSS RUSS (240 S.F,) 192 SF) (300 SR) COPPER CONDUCTOR----— — (AT SECTOR) of - A (BY OTHERS) GREEN,STRANDED PROPOSED MONOPOLE 1.95'-0• ))�iv1011l tV INSULATED COPPER FROpaw movopoSE GROUND --p.m#3 CONDUCTOR(ROUTED (BY OTHERS) (AT CABLE TRANSITION W/PROPOSED CABLES L—————- RING MAUPOSED BUSSBAR(ATTACHED 70 EGOIST` AT AT&T SECTOR LEVEL) TO EACH AT&T ANTENNA SECTOR) x P ON NSULATORS ROW TO 011577AC TOWN I #2/0 GREEN,STRANDED L—————- d� RAMC AT 2=00NS) �INSULATED COPPER PROPOSED AT&T ICE BRIDGE(GROUND CONDUCTOR(ROUTED ALL ICE BRIDGE WIT CHAWVLJS AND POSTS) T PROPOSED CABLES PROPOSED To PROPOSED AT&T AT&T MOUNT LEVEL) AT&T 3OkW DIESEL 6'8 1/4'X W-8 i1/4'GENERATOR STEEL WIC m.axiom BOND PROPOSED GROUND RING (SEE NOTE 8) COMPOUND GRIND RING(T)P OF 2 LOCA770015) wsw(PART OF WIC) x BUS w(PART OF JI WDER A (BOND TO TOPS RING (BOND TO GROUND PUMG W1 12 G.,1I.D., W1 12[WEEN SWAM, 77 INSULATED COPPER WIRE) 7 AWM70 COPPER WRIF) V PROPOSED HAAOHOUF PROPOSED AT&T WRIT 1201240V 6'8 114'X 6'-8 114- STEEL WC(NEO A70050) (BY OTHERS) ON PROPOSED PRE-FAB ALAITOW(NEO R_ J20324)AND PROPOSED AT&T JOKIV DESF. assaoi CENERARDY W1 190 r4LLON TAW PROPOSED NOTE 1(TYR) (GENERACIN62 P02210)ON 11111111 TOWER 74G.ROUND ROD (Typ� I.NO (TIP PROPOSED IOIX18'CONCRETE PAD GROUND RING (SEE NOTE 7) BDN PAR"TIES G #4 PROPOSED I2'-6*X2O'LEASE AREA FROG EYE SIRBAUGH x x x x x x (250 SF LEASE AREA) PROPOSED STEEL COMBO GEN/WIC PLATFORM SITE ID:4124 ((BOND TO PROPOSED GROUND RING AT(2)LOCATIONS) FA#10138153 1411——— pP,,CsEv PROPOSED#2 AWG BCW BURIED GROUND 1.2.1 �x CACUM ROD RING.REFER TO SITE GROUNDING PLAN. \--IRIII.120124OV,10 6 GANG W1 INSPECTION IKEU P.—d For. METER STACK(SHISMANDOAH_UEY PROPOSED 12 BOW GRDUVD CONOWROR MOM* _y ELECTRIC COOP)(BY OTHERS)W1 (OR PER AAWA SPECS)(TEP) 1. PROVIDE#2AWG GROUNDING CONDUCTOR,U.O.N. PROPOSED 1201240 10,200A AT&T Z PROVIDE BONDING AND GROUNDING CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN TYPE THWIN INSULATION,U.O.N. PROPOSED GROUND ROD(ftp) 1 ADD#2/0 GREEN INSULATED CONDUCTOR BETWEEN CABLE TRAY AND GRIPSTRUT/COVER. METER AND M.C.R. t AN BUSSEARS ARE TO BE TINNED COPPER BARS(%'.2*.12*)MOUNTEDON INSULATORS,U.C.N. A S' GROUND INTEGRATED ANTENNAS,DO SURGE DEVICES,AND RI PERMANU,SPECS, 10 ., E'To 6. NO CADWELDING AT SE CTOR LEVEL 7. GROUND RODS SRALL BE 5/8-0.8 LO COPPER CLAD STEEL ROD DRIVEN VERTICALLY.SPACING TO BE MIK 6' SEPARATIONPREFERRED WHERE POSSIBLE 14 E WITH 16'SEPARATION v B. STEEL WIC PRE-EQUIPPED FROM MANUFACTURER WITH(2)BUSSBARS.BOND EACH BUSSBAR WITH(1)EACH 12 GREEN, STRANDED,INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND RING AND TO TOWER RING PER GROUNDING PLAN, 9. TYPICAL SECTOR GROUNDING SHOWN BELOW,(3)SECTORS TO BE INSTALLED AND GROUNDED, SYMBOLS aT;n CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION GROUNDING m COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION PLAN 1 GR PLAN 0 — GROUNDING ARE NORTH \ --\GROUNDIN SCALE.NTS 2 Q DIAGRAM \,5Sj SCALE.NTS ES 210 Q} INSULATOR FLAT WASHERS NOTE STRANDED Cu WIRE WITH GREEN, SOLID #6 RAG FROM ANTENNA/RRH/FILTER GROUND KIT ALL GROUND LUGS SHALL oo AW HAVE CLEAR HEAT SHRINK HA 6 E S 50AVW,`TEWN INSULATION OR BUCK COPPER BAR SLEEVE.MARKING TAPE SHALL MARKED AS REQUIRED BY NEC--- 2 0 NOT BE APPLIED OVER HEAT CADWELD 0 TOP OF PIPE MAST SHRINK. (REPAIR DAMAGED GALVANIZED TO SURFACES PER ASTM A780) QUIRED #2 PING GREEN,STRANDED z C BETH AS RI GTH 0 0 (OPPER CONDUCTOR FROM I __OQ AT GROUND GROUND BAR ON BAR PLATFORM) uj - WALL.NFLOOR OR i—ADW ANTENNA ON ANTENNA TOWER z 1. 11 GROUND.CONDUCTOR 11 1 :1 INAT11 I ON ANYGROUND BAR SHALL HAVE 3 XKXSECTOR GROUND BAR DETAIL AN IDENTIFICATION L,AiTA HFI]AT EACH ND THAT Wil I IDPNTIFY O- ORIGIN AND DESTINATION. \!6/SCALE:NIS z Lu C 'D oc) 00 C) 0) C #CONNECTION ECK 2 AWC ATOAXIAL CABLE SHIELD COAXIAL CABLE SURGE SUPPRESSORS STRANDED GREEN COPPERINSMULOREED O F)(c)) 0 p OABLE ENTRY PORTS(HATCH PLATES) RECTIFIER FRAMES (INTERIOR GROUND RING) TAB Y-RA'",CAT. +0 24V&48V DO POWER RETURN BAR GENERATOR FRAME WORK TC376 CO.STAND-OFF BRACKET PIPE MAST(TYP) TELCO GROUND BAR MASTER GROUND BAR T&B CO."C-TAP"CAT. OR EQUIV.2'-0"ON P, J54730 CRIMP TYPE CENTER MAX. ACING #2 ABC GREEN,STRANDED ANGLE SHOWN TO ILLUSTRATE WELD DETAIL NOTES 0 PARALLEL TAP OR EQUIV. INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR ——— AT LOWEST POINT ON THE BAR (CADWELD TO PIPE MAST)(TYP)- EX 1. TWO-HOLE,LONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUG WITH 2 ARNO STRANDED COPPER EXOTHERMIC WELD(WELDING ROOFTOPS) P ON TURN TO SHORTEST PROHIBITED CONDUCTOR AND GREEN THW INSULATION TO GROUND BAR.ROUTE CONDUCTOR DIRECTION OF BOND TO AS APPLICABLE TO BURIED GROUND CONDUCTOR OR MASTER GROUND BAR AND #6 AWG GREEN INSULATED CONNECT WITH TWO 0 STRANDED COPPER WIRE 2 PAID SOLID BARE TINNED -HOLE LUG TO F'SECTION. DISTANCE TO Vzj COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 2, USE PERMANENT MARKER TO LABEL THE WHOLE BAR AS'P"WITH I'HIGH HATCHPLATE (UNIT BOND) #6 AWG GREEN,STRANDED ocs EXOTHERMIC WELD TO BURIED GROUND LETTERS. TAB 'TY-PAP"CAT. INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR HKBR R FOR TY25M CABLE BE OR EOUIV 'U TBRARC LOWE RING AND GROUND BAR 3, 0 GROUND BAR LOCATED OUTDOORS.ON-GRADE ONLY,EXOTHERMICALLY WELD AND HEAT SHRINK ALL LUGS A 2 AWG BARE TINNED COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND BAR AND EXOTHERMICALLY WELD TO BURIED GROUND CONDUCTOR. INTERIOR GROUND RING WALL SUPPORT AD WIT (OR PER MANU.SPECS)OTYP) 4. APPLY NO-OX OR EQUIVALENT TO MATING SURFACE OF LUG AND WIPE CLEAN #2 AWG GREEN COPPER INSTALLATION OF GROUND EXCESS COMPOUND. STRANDED WIRE CORE(GROUND BAR 0 0 (;)INS BAR T - Y6 MIN. (INTERIOR GROUND RING) (MOUNTED NEAR'BELOW SECTOR) TO CABLE GROUND L 2 UIPPLEMENIA )G'MAX� f NOTE SCALE.NTS s SECTOR GROUND BAR DETAIL BARE COPPER (TYR OF I PER'SECTOR,3 TOTAQ- SEE RF CHART FOR Ir` IIIIIIIIIC'SCALE-NTS V, #2 AWG GREEN,STRANDED INSULATED I PRO QUANTITIES. ''- I�All wand T�37'ITA TAP CAT OR""V 'I ON A TYPE CENTER_X llAOGG OR EQU, BONDTO TO GREEN HSCLAFF. A #A IRTE STRANDED OFFER RE OURN END) TX.CO.Go _",. AT TY"M A OF COPPER CONDUCTOR ROUTED TO hirojae"w T+un NEWTON INSTRUMENT COMPANY,INC. GROUND BAR AT COAX TRANSITION BUTNER,N C INSULATOR COPPER CRIMP CONNECTOR NO REQ. T NO DESCRIPTION R _ T&B#54740 OR APPROVED _ P_ EGUO 1 1/4%4'�30' RE DRILLED GND.BAR __XXINTERIOR GROUND RING SPIED CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRE A-6056 WALL MTN NRXT 4 LQ ozrssns 2 X\ 7 _�061-A INSULATORS -NTS _L6j SCALE:NTS 4i�TL6 GROUNDING BAR DETAIL SCALE 4 4__3015-8 DOUBLE CRIMP GRADE- INSPECTION HAND HOLE W/ CONNECTION Irvumeac INTERIOR 2 3 EACH GROUND PEDESTRIAN RATED COVER A-2 GROUND RIN CONDUCTOR (ERIC0 T416B OR EQUIV. 1QX P=========� TERMINATING QNL ANY FOR GROUND RODS, (AT GRADE) TlR202_BAR_aLA UIV ERIC0 T416BH OR BERN PARITY KISS 2 HAVE AN FOR CHEMRODS) FROG EYE SIRBAUGH o 1 0 0 5 4 DE EXOTHERMIC WELD SITE D:4124 A=A NED AT EACH GRADE 10138153 A END THAI WIT I FA#1 GROU 141FARVIEWROA XOTHFRIAIC WELD ANDJEaCHNATION EACH INSPECTION PORTVA 22631 -13 13' IDLNPFY ff�ORIGIN NO RING LOOP 0 SECTION'I"-ISOLATED GRO ND ZON RING GROUND#2 SECTION"P"-SURGE PROLE TORS PRIG BCW SOLID, • CABLE ENTRY PORTS(HATCH PLATES)(#2) ALL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FRAMES. TINNED CONCRETE OR PVC • GENERATOR FRAMEWORK(IF AVAIIABLE) ISOLATED GROUND BAR-ROD�#2) E (#2) CLEAN SAND FILL Ei a Y • TELCO GROUND BAR(#2) DETAIL NOTES • COMMERCIAL POWER COMMON NEUTRAL/GROUND BOND&2) 1. WELD#2 AWN BARE TINNED rGROUND 101 COPPER • +24V POWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR UIV) S LID COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND BAR. CLAD STEEL ROD • -48V P ROUTE CONDUCTOR TO BURIED GROUND RING W/MIN.5/8`A,RC-O* E COAX GOWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR 012) D OPPRESSION AN PROVIDE PARALLEL EXOTHERMIC WELD. LONG SECTION"A"-SURGE ABSORB R5 • 2,USE PERMANENT MARKER TO DRAW THE • INTERIOR GROUND RING HOG) EXTERNAL EARTH GROUND FIELD(BURIED LINES BETWEEN EACH SECTION AND LABEL GROUND RING 0 GROUND"NI)(12) EACH SECTION(`P".'A% YC)WITH I"HIGH SIZED PER GROUND RING GOT. • METALLIC'OLD WATER PIPE(IF AVAILABLE) LETTERS (MIN.#2 HOW) (#2) 3 APPLY NO-OX OR EQUIVALENT TO MATING CABLE TO ROD XCADWELDGROUND ROD GROUNDING • BUILDING STEEL(IF AVAILABLE)(#2) SURFACE OF LUG AND WIPE CLEAN EXCESS COMPOUND. DETAILS --\GROUND R 8-\INSPECTION WE 6 `XCELL REFERENCE GROUND BAR DETAIL 7 OD DETAIL WELL DETAIL �l SCALE:NTS \X.E6 SCALE:NTS NS_�6 SCALE NTS E6 211 CN T1_ CN NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 ATTACHMENT S. AREAS OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS a. APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS The APE for direct effects includes areas of earth disturbance associated with the proposed tower, associated equipment compound, and access and utility easements. b. APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS The APE for visual effects associated with this project was a three-fourths (3/4) mile radius from the proposed tower site as specified by Section VI.C.4.b of the "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties For Certain Undertakings Approved By The Federal Communications Commission" if the proposed tower is more than 200 but no more than 400 feet in overall height. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form 620 May 2019 nn r� NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 30SO-1U3S ATTACHMENT 6. TRIBAL AND NHO INVOLVEMENT On May 13. 2019. Acer Associates, LLC (ACER) on behalf of ROCON LLC posted a notification on the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (7CNS) — Notification |D 185754. /\ Notice of Organizations email (NOO) dated May |7. 2O|9from the FCC notified ACERthat the information had been sent cu identified Tribal Nations by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Any necessary follow upcorrespondence will becompleted via the preferred methods listed on the attached NO{J for each Tribe. Copies of the TCNS documentation have been attached. Applicant's Nome: R0C<]N LLC Project Name: ROCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2O May 2019 C%4 From: towernotifyinfogfec.gov Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 3:04 PM To: mattdepalma@acerassociates.com Subject: Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #6287748 Dear Matthew J DePalma, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System.Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 05/13/2019 Notification ID: 185754 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Acer Associate Consultant Name: Street Address: 1012 Industrial Drive City: West Berlin State:NEW JERSEY Zip Code: 08091 Phone: 856-809-1202 Email: mattdepalmagacerassociates.com Structure Type: MTOWER- Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 17 min 4.4 see N Longitude: 78 deg 23 min 5.1 see W Location Description: 141 Fairview Road City: Gore State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK Detailed Description of Project: Frog Eye -new tower site build Ground Elevation: 335.4 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 61.3 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 396.7 meters above mean sea level Proposed Tower Structure Info-Email ID#6287748.txt[6/9/2019 7:42:20 PM] From: towemotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:02 AM To: mattdepalma@acerassociates.com Cc: tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION-Email ID #6289299 Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS,which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally-recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"),Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts,the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission(NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt,the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time,you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IVY.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. Attorney Montana&Associates LLC - Crow Creek Sioux Tribe -N12923 N Prairie Rd Osseo, WI - CCSTFCCTCNS@outlook.com - 605-881-1227(ext: 1) - electronic mail 2. THPO Officer Garrie Kills a Hundred - Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe - 603 W. Broad Avenue (PO Box: 283) Flandreau, SD-garrie.killsahundred@FSST.org- 605-997-3891 (ext: 1240) - electronic mail and regular mail NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S).txt[6/9/2019 7:42:27 PMJ CD T1_ (N 3. Cultural Resources Director Kim Penrod - Delaware Nation- 31064 State Highway 281 (PO Box: 825)Anadarko, OK-kpenrodgdelawarenation.com-405-247-2448 - electronic mail and regular mail 4. TCNS Rep Bryan Printup- Tuscarora Nation- 5226 Walmore Rd Via: Lewiston,NY- bprintup@hetforg- 716-264-6011 (ext: 103) -electronic mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TCNS,the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 5. THPO Noah C White III -Prairie Island Indian Community - 5636 Sturgeon Lake Road Welch, NM-celltowergpiic.org- 651-385-4175 - electronic mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Prairie Island Indian Community within 30 days after notification through TCNS,the Prairie Island Indian Community has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Prairie Island Indian Community in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 6. THPO Edith Leoso -Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians - (PO Box: 39) Odanah, WI -thpo@badriver-nsn.gov; THPOAsstgbadriver-nsn.gov - 715-682-7123 - electronic mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians has no interest in participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 7. Gwen Terrapin- Cherokee Nation - (PO Box: 948) Tahlequah, OK- historicpreservation@cherokee.org; gwen-terrapin@cherokee.org- 918-772-4165 -electronic mail Exclusions: Please email all review documents for FCC Form 620/621 (i.e. archeologist report,photos, NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S).txt[6/9/2019 7:42:27 PM] ti SHPO response, etc.)to historicpreservation4cherokee.org or gwen-terrapin@cherokee.org. You may also mail a cover letter and a CD or flash drive containing the review documents and FCC forms to: Cherokee Nation: Attn: Gwen Terrapin, PO Box 948, Tahlequah, OK 74465. Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to email or call 918.772.4165. Wado, Cherokee Nation 8. Cell Tower Coordinator Kelly Nelson-Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma- 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK-celltower@estoo.net- 918-666-2435 (ext: 186 1) -regular mail Exclusions: DO NOT EMAIL DOCUMENTATION; it will be deleted without being opened. Submit one printed color copy by US postal mail or other parcel carrier of all documentation to: Eastern Shawnee Tribe Attn: Cell Tower Program 70500 E. 128 Rd. Wyandotte, OK 74370 Provide a 1-page cover letter with the following information: a. TONS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type e. Project coordinates f. Contact information The Eastern Shawnee Procedures document is available and highly recommended for guidance; send an email to celltower4estoo.net requesting our most current copy. 9. THPO Kim Jumper- Shawnee Tribe -29 South 69A Highway Miami, OK- kimjumper@shawnee-tribe.com - 918-542-2441 -regular mail 10. THPO and Executive Director Dr. Wenonah G Haire - Catawba Indian Nation- 1536 Tom Steven Road CIN-THPO Rock Hill, SC -wenonahh@ccpperafts.com- 803-328-2427 (ext: 224) -regular mail Exclusions: Please do not email documentation; it will be deleted without being opened. Mail one printed color copy of all documentation to address: Dr. Wenonah G. Haire Tribal Historic Preservation Office 1536 Tom Steven Road NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S).txt[6/9/2019 7:42:27 PM] 00 T1- CN Rock Hill, SC 29730 Please submit by US Postal mail or other parcel carrier complete information for all telecommunication projects: 1. Please provide I page cover letter with following information a. TCNS Number b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project Type e.Project coordinates f. Contact information 2. We also request photographs of project area,previous land use history and copy of SHPO Letter. If you have any questions about our process or timeline of project notifications you can email Caitlin Rogers at Caitlinhgccpperafts.com 11. Program Manager Ellen Chapman- Cultural Heritage Partners - 1811 East Grace St Suite A Richmond, VA- ellengculturalheritagepartners.com; rapn8nggmail.com - 434-327-6663 -electronic mail 12. Dept of Cultural Preservation Dean Branham - Monacan Nation- (PO Box: 1136)Madison Heights, VA -Mnation538gaol.com-434-946-0389 -electronic mail 13. Chief Stephen Adkins - Chickahominy Indian Tribe- 7240 Adkins Road Charles City, VA - stephenradkins@aol.com - 804-829-5548 -electronic mail 14. Chief W. Frank Adams -The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe - (PO Box: 184)King William, VA - wfrankadams@verizon.net- 804-690-1694 - electronic mail 15. Chief Lee Lockamy -Nansemond Indian Tribe - 5005 Mosey Way Virginia Beach, VA - Samflyiingeagle48@yahoo.com - 757-407-4825 - electronic mail The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction,you must provide the NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S).txt[6/9/2019 7:42:27 PM] CN SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct(or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands),with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. 16. Environmental Review Coordinator Renee GledhillEarley-NC State Historic Preservation Office -4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC - renee.gledhill-earleygncmail.net- 919-733-4763 - electronic mail 17. Deputy SHPO David Brook-Historic Preservation Office -4610 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC - david.brookgncmail.net- 919-807-7283 - electronic mail 18. Manager- Office of Review& Compliance Ethel R Eaton PhD -Department of Historic Resources - 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA-ethel.eatongdhr.virginia.gov- 804-367-2323 - electronic mail 19. Deputy SHPO Susan M Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture &History, Historic Preservation Office - 1900 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston, WV- susan.piercegwvculture.org - 304- 558-0240 -electronic mail and regular mail 20. Deputy SHPO Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture&History, Historic Preservation Office - 1901 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston, WV- susan.piercegwvculture.org- electronic mail 21. Director Julie Langan -Virginia Department of Historic Resources-2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA - VASHPO—FCCgdhr.virginia.gov- 804-367-2323 -electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion,you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre-construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S).txt[6/9/2019 7:42:27 PM] C) C\1 opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid,please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 05/13/2019 Notification ID: 185754 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name:Acer Associate Consultant Name: Street Address: 1012 Industrial Drive City: West Berlin State:NEW JERSEY Zip Code: 08091 Phone: 856-809-1202 Email: mattdepalma@acerassociates.com Structure Type: MTOWER-Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 17 min 4.4 sec N Longitude: 78 deg 23 min 5.1 sec W Location Description: 141 Fairview Road City: Gore State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK Detailed Description of Project: Frog Eye - new tower site build Ground Elevation: 335.4 meters Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 61.3 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 396.7 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice,please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/available-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at(877)480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday(except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S).txt[6/9/2019 7:42:27 PM] T1- C14 (N NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 ATTACHMENT 7. HISTORIC PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE APE FOR DIRECT EFFECTS a. Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects Acer Associates, LLC conducted a search of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V-CRIS) database for sites located within the APE which are listed and/or eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. A review of these sources revealed no (0) listed or eligible to be listed historic properties were located within the APE radius for direct effects. b. Properties Not Listed in Attachment 9a, that the Applicant Considers to be Eligible For Listing in the National Register as a Result of the Applicant's Research No (0) additional historic properties were identified within the APE for direct effects. C. Techniques and Methodology Used to Identify Historic Properties within the APE for Direct Effects For identification of historic structures, Acer Associates, LLC conducted a search of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V-CRIS) database for sites located within the APE which were listed and/or eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. For identification of potential archaeological resources, ACER conducted a Phase I archaeological investigation. The techniques and methodology used are detailed in the following Phase I archaeological investigation report. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form 620 May 2019 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved tyOMB 3OGO-1038 Phase UArchaeological Survey Introduction This report presents the findings of Phase | archaeological investigation for the proposed BDN Parity NSB Frog Ere 0rbaugh cell tower and gravel access nuud construction project (Site |D4|24; F/\ |O|38|53) located inGaineubormDistrict, Frederick County. Virginia. -Thioreport was prepared by Apogee, Inc. for AT&T under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (ux amended) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The location ofthe proposed facility im accessed via Fairview Road (State Route 733), Frederick County, Virginia (Figure |) at N/\C} 83 N 39" 17' 04.35". \oJ 78" 23' 05.06^. A 195-fonc high monopole tower will be constructed within a 50-fomt by 50-foot lease area and within afencad compound (Figure 2). Access will be via a newly constructed 10-foot wide gravel occnoo road from Fairview Road (Figure 3). The tower site is currently located within avvooded bench while the majority of the access road is located within a fuUovv agricultural field (Figure 4). Scope of Work Background research and file searches were undertaken via the interactive map on the Virginia State Historic Preservation Office Cultural Resources Information System website. Additional secondary research was undertaken via historic topographic quadrangles and atlases. Research focused on identifying hoovvn and potential archaeological resources that might exist within 0.75 miles of the project area. Archaeological field testing in the form of shovel tests and pedestrian survey were recommended. Cultural Context This literature review summarizes the prehistory and history of Virginia and Frederick County. It provides details on the six major time periods documented by [JHR; Early Hunters, Dispersed Foragers, Sedentary Foragers, Farmers, European Contact and Historic Period. Early Hunters Poleoindion Period (oy /5000 to 8000 8.C] This period marks the end of the glacial in the late Pleistocene Period and the transition into the Holocene Period in Virginia (Custer 1990A. Due cmthe cool temperatures, the Pa|eoindian Period is marked by u mmobi|e, hunting and gathering adaptation, known primarily as big game Applicant's Nome: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROC[>N LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form S20 May 2019 co NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 300U-1O39 hunturs ofnow-extinct nneoufzuno. The Pa|eoindian tool kit is heavily defined by chipped stone fluted points of local material, which focused on procurement and processing of rnegafaunu (Custer 1990). During this almost mix thousand years long period, there is a consistent settlement practice of small familial bunds to||mvving alongside game movements. /\ very snna|| number ofPa|emindian sites have been encountered in modern day Virginia. One consideration for the area is the use of overhangs as shelter as well on temporary camps (Custer 1998A. Early Archaic (8OODtw6ODO&[] The Early Archaic period rnurhs a shift in the types of |ithic points that were produced as well axudrastic shift in environment. The once cool temperatures receded, and were replaced by vvurnm and dry climate. The melting glaciers eroded much of the Appalachian area, significantly altering the places of habitation. The hunting lifestyle shifted to include gathering of fruit and nucs, and the extinction ufrnegnfaunu led to the hunting ofsmaller game, for which a smaller toolkit became necessary (Custer 1990A Middle Archaic Period (6D00to25ODRC] As populations responded tothe dramatic changes oothe plant and animal communities of the early Ho|ocene, mnnu|| mobile groups developed umore diversified subsistence strategy. Asa result, the Archaic tool kit also diversifies. More plant processing tools are encountered, including grinding scones, mortars and pestles. Another shift includes increase in group mize, but the locational pattern stays relatively the same. There are u limited number of Archaic sites |mco¢ad inVirginia (Custer 1990. Eg|off and Woodward 1992). Seclenta!�� Foragers Late Archaic, Early and Middle Woodland Period(25O08`Ctog0UA.D] The Woodland Period correlates to a pronounced warm and dry period in the regiun, where this climatic alteration with increasing sea levels create extensive brackish marshes along the coast. In addition tmthe dramatic climatic changes. Woodland settlements become larger and start to congregate along major river flmndp|ainm and estuarieo, and the construction of homes correlates with o sedentary life-style. With an overall tendency of increases in population denuitiax, there is an increased efficient utilization of horticulture. The Woodland tool kit continues to utilize chipped stone tools and plant processing tools like in the Archaic, but now ocuns to incorporate non-local |ithic raw materials that indicate larger interaction spheres. Due Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form S2O May 2019 It NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OBO4O3Q to increased success in food production and incorporation of storage conudners, such as cararnics, there is corresponding proliferation in social develop and the beginnings of ranked societies around 1200 B.C. In southwestern Yirginia, this period is the most common type of archaeological sites encountered. The Late Archaic and Early and Middle Woodland Periods often correspond with the appearance of agricultural practices and large-scale villages this increased density u||ovved for larger base camps and seasonal camps, which lent for more hsnioning nflarge groups versus additional proliferation of social complexity. This period may be characterized by rock shelter and small camp sites (Egloff and Woodward 1992, VP 2018) Farmers Late Woodland 64.D. 900 to /600 The Late Woodland period is characterized by large villages with incredibly organized sudu[ economic and political structurem, as such, the material culture expanded immensely to include avvide variety of pottery, Uthic and bone tools, even jewelry made from shell and copper. Burial practices became more e|mborate, and different areas began developing distinct identities. In southwestern Virginia the main cultures were a mix of local tribes and the Mississippian culture. Farming became a main source of food, with the three main crops being beanu, corn, and squash. Site types for this period include large oett|annencs, burial mounds, and camps (E*|off and Woodward 1992). Historic Period This section summarizes the history of Frederick County, Virginia. Frederick County is located in north-western Virginia within the Shenandoah Valley between the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Allegheny Mountains. Its land area is 416 square rni|es, and its estimated 2010 population was 78,305. Frederick County was h»rrnad in 1743 with Winchester established as the county meat. The county was created from portions of Orange County and was named after Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales and eldest son of King George || of Great Britain. Early Settlement Rapid settlement of Frederick County can be traced back to the mid-|8th century with the rapid decline of Native American populations in the area. By the 1790u. population |avdm had reached upwards of 19.500 citizens. Early settlement was primarily Englishmen who entered the area from the Piedmont region h»||ovvcd closely by Germans and Scotch-Irish settlers who traveled south from Pennsylvania. The settlement pattern of the late 18th and early 19th century was typified by mnna|| family farms. Wheat and cattle production were central to the economy ofFrederick County during this time (pCVA 2019n). Applicant's Name: R[>CDNLLC Project Name: R000NLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2U May 2019 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OSO-1O3g Nineteenth Century By the time of the Civil War, the county had shrunk to 18. 500 residents. As the Shenandoah Valley was to become known as the breadbasket of the Confederacy, residents' loyalties were firmly aligned with the South throughout the war. Located within the northern portion of the Shenandoah Valley, citizens of Frederick County supplied southern armies with soldiers, horses, food, and livestock. Several Civil War battles occurred within the valley due to its proximity to Washington D.C. and other nearby strategic locations. Over the course of the vvur, the town of Winchester changed hands from Union to Confederate and back again more than 70 times. The Shenandoah Valley was left desolate after3heridan's troops burned all their resources in 1864 /FCVA2019p\. Twentieth Century The population steadily declined inthe early 2nacentury. In |890. there were 17,900 people within the county, but through the 1920s the population decreased to 12.400 people. It was the post-World War || boom that really uovv a spike in population growth; 17'537 in 1950. 59.209 in 2000. and 78.280 in 2010. As the population continues to grow, industries such as Kraft Foods, Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and FEMA thrive (PCVA 2019b). Results Previous Research /\ review of the Virginia Cultural Resource Information 5vmtenn via the Virginia State Preservation Office website identified two (2) previous archaeological studies, one (|) archaeological site, and eleven (| |) historic resources within a 0.75-mni|e radius of the project area (Table |). No resources were located within oradjacent nothe current project area. Table /: Previously recorded cultural resources located within a0.75-rni|e radius of0Dhj Parity NSB Frog Eye 0rbaueh. Resource No. Cultural Period Name/Site Type NRHP Evaluation 034-1515 Historic: 1899 Fairview Lutheran Church Not Evaluated 034-1516 Historic:c. 1800 B.F.White House Not Evaluated 034-0170 Historic:c. 1845 George Parrish House The Primary Resource is no longer extant. 034-0171 Historic:c. 1790 1'.Imith House Not Evaluated C Historic:c. 1870 -louse Not Evaluated Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190847 FCC Form G28 May 2019 NT SUBMISSION PACKET FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OSO-1O3Q Resource No. Cultural Period Name/Site Type NRHP Evaluation 034-0483 Historic:c. 1880 J.R.Lewis Farm Not Evaluated 034-5091 Historic:c. 1950 Garage Not Eligible 034-5092 Historic:c. 1930 House Not Eligible 034-5093 Historic:c. 1930 House Not Eligible 034-5094 Historic:c. 1930 House Not Eligible 034-5095 Historic:c. 1840 House Not Eligible 44FK0696 Prehistoric:Paleo-Indian;Early,Middle,and Lithic Scatter Potentially Eligible Late Archaic;Early,Middle,and Late Woodland Environmental Setting The general area falls within the Middle Section, Valley and Ridge physiographic province of the Appalachian Mountain Region of western Virginia. The Valley and Ridge Province iscomposed of Early Paleozoic sedimentary rocks forming synclines and anticlines that run southwest to northeast between the Appalachian Plateau Province tnthe west and the Blue Ridge Province to the east (NPS 2018). The project area specifically lies atop the [hemnung Formation/ Foreknobs Formation, a Devonian aged sedimentary bedrock primarily composed of ahu|e. mudstone, and sandstone with minor components of conglomerates (USGS 2019; VDMR 1993\ The project area is situated approximately 200 ft to the east of Nixon Run. which Uovvx southeast and meets the southern branch of Isaacs Creek another 0.70 rni|em south of the project area. Isaacs Creek flows into Bach Creek approximately 8 miles to the east of the project area northeast ofthe City ofGaineubnro. Since the last glacial rnaxirnurn episode of the Pleistocene Epoch and the arrival of humans in North America, there have been significant oscillations in regional climate that have affected the occupation and settlement patterns of prehistoric peoples. During the last glacial nnazinnurn, mixed conifer/northern hardwood h»ramt was prevalent throughout much of the continent. This forest type contained henn|ochs, pines, mAruces, hro, oahs, bircheo, e|nnu, ashem, inunvvuod, maples and beeches (Grayson and Meltzer 2003). Hovvevar, as temperatures warmed and glaciers retreated during the Late P|aixo/cene, there was n general change from boreal forest ¢mvvardo mixed conifer/northern hardwood 6zraot (Anderson 2001). During the Terminal Pleistocene around 10.900 B.C., arupid shift towards glacial conditions occurred throughout the northern hemisphere. This abrupt cooling event, called the Younger Dryas Cold Epioode, quickly heralded the extinction of mega-fauna in the Americas (Anderson 2001). The Early Applicant's Name: ROCDNLLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190847 FCC Form 62U May 2019 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OOO-1O3S Holocene Climatic Epinode, starting at approximately 9.300 B.C., began m period of rapid warming with the proliferation of nnexic deciduous woodlands in North America (Anderson 2O0|). The mid-Holocene interval, also referred toumthe Hy9sitherrna| Climatic Episode, began around 7,000 B.C. This period brought about conditions that were generally dryer and warmer than present day. This drier weather resulted in more prairie vegetation and greater local climatic variability (Anderson 2001). During the Hypsithmrmna| Climatic Epimode, prairie grasses and vegetation including xeric oak and hickory mpedau typified the local floral assemblage (Grayson and Meltzer 2003\ The Lute Holocene Climatic Epimode, beginning at approximately 3.800 B.C., heralded u climate similar to our present-day condition with modern deciduous forests (Anderson 2O0|\. According to the United States Department mfAgriculture (USDA) Web Soil Survey, is one /|\ dominant soil type identified within the project area: \A/e|kerc-Berks uhannary silt |oamns (4|C) located on slopes ranging from eight A0 to 15 percent \A/e|krn-Berks channery silt |marnu have nmpotential tmcontain deeply buried deposits (USDA 2O|9o. Archival Research and Historic Site Potential /\ review of three /3\ historic USGS topographic quadrangle maps was completed prior to fieldwork in an attempt to identify any potential historic properties located within the direct APE. According to the Winchester, \&»y (1894) USGS 30-rninuce topographic quadrangle, Capon Bridge, WV (1937) 15-nninute topographic quodrang|a, and the Capon Bridge, \8/Y /1965\ 7.5-minute topographic quadrang|e, there are no historic buildings or mining features directly impacted by the BDN Parity NSB Frog Eye 0rbaugh project; hovvevar, both the 1937 and 1965 Capon, WV topographic quadrangles show u property adjacent co the project area (Figure 5). Aerial photographs show this property was changed dramatically in 2005. Field Research Proposed archaeological field testing for this project consisted of series of shovel tests across the lease area and access road, as well as a pedestrian visual inspection of the lease area and access road (Figures 8through 13). Proposed shovel tests were to be dug across the 50-ft by 504t lease area and along the |O-ft by 630-ft gravel access road area at 50-fopc intervals. A shovel test was also placed within the tower center location. Tests were dug in mtrati#raAhic layers and all soil was screened through 'A inch mesh hardware cloth. Excavation continued into sterile subsoil. The project area along the majority of the proposed gravel access road was located within a ta||ovv agricultural 0*|d while the remainder of the project area was located within mixed deciduous woodlands. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: ROCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2O May 2019 00 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3OG0-103S Disturbances noted within the project boundaries consisted of two CU ug�cu|tunu| ditches; however, theme ditches did not impact the proposed shovel testing. Slope greater than 15 percent was noted within the project area impacted the proposed shovel testing. A total of ten /|CA shovel tests were excavated within the boundaries of the project area. There were two (2) typical shovel test soil profiles. One consisted of 17 to 19 cm of brown (10YR 4/2) silt |mann with cobbles over yellowish brown /|O`yR 5/8U day loam subsoil with cobbles (Figure |4). Some profiles terminated inarock impasse. The second typical soil profile consisted of |U to 00 cm of grey brown /|OTR 5CH silt day loam over a rock impasse. No cultural material was recovered. A pedestrian visual inspection of the lease area and access road. No cultural material was recovered and nmcultural surface features were discovered. No artifacts were recovered from any of the shovel tests or pedestrian survey. No cultural features were identified. The negative results from the shovel texts confirms that this location does not possess an archaeological site. Conclusion Archaeological field testing confirmed that this location does not contain an archaeological site. It is concluded that this project will have no affect on archaeological resources and no additional archaeological work ixrecommended. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: RDCONLLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form 620 May 2019 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3O8O-103S References Cited Anderson, David G. 2001 Climate and Culture Change in Prehistoric and Early Historic Eastern North America. Archaeology ofEastern North America 29: |43-| |86. Custer,Jay 1990 "Early and Middle Archaic Cultures of Virginia: Culture Change and Cnntinuity" In Early and Middle Archaic Research in Virginia /\ Synthesis edited byTheodoreR. Reinhart and Mary Ellen N. Hodges. Archaeological Society of Virginia: Richmond. 22: |-4/. Eglmff, K. and Woodward, D. 1992 First People: The Early Indians of Virginia. Virginia Department of Historic Resources: Richmond. Frederick County Virginia 2019u History pfFrederic County. Electronic document, . accessed May 2019. 2019b Economic Development Authority. Electronic document, https://www.fcva.us/departments/economic-development-authority , accessed May 2019. Grayson, Donald K, and David J. Meltzer 2003 /\ Requiem for North American Overkill. journal ofArchaeological Science3O:5G5-593. National Park Service I018 Valley and Ridge Province. Series: Physiographic Provinces. Electronic document, https://www.nps.gov/articles/valleyandridgeprovince.htm, accessed October 2018. United States Department pfAgriculture 2019 Web Soil Survey. Electronic Docunmenc, http://vabmmi|aurvey.nrcm.usda. eov/apm/WebDoi|Survey.aopx. acceysad May 2019. United States Geologic Survey 2019 Virginia Geologic Map Data Electronic document, . accessed May 2019. Applicant's Name: HOCON LLC Project Name: ROCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20190947 FCC Form G2O May 2019 co NT SUBMISSION PACKET _ FCC FORM 620 Approved byOMB 3UGO-1O3A Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2019 Virginia Cultural Resource Information System. Electronic document, htzpx:/Aorim.dhr.virginia`gov/vcrio/. accessed May 2019. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources 1993 Geologic Mop of Virginia. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources. Virginia Places 2018 \A/uod|und Indians in Virginia. Electronic Document. ht¢p:/A^o^wv.virginiap|aceo.qrfnativaamnerican/vvmmd|andindiann.htnn[ accessed October 2018. Applicant's Name: ROCON LLC Project Name: RDCON LLC Frog Eye Project Number: 20180947 FCC Form G2O May 2019 'r ` r Board of Supervisors Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: July 8, 2020 ��Gt• Agenda Section: County Officials Title: Conditional Use Permit #03-20 for Foxglove Solar LLC Attachments: BOS07-08-20StaffReportCU P03-20FoxgloveSol ar.pdf 03-20 Location Maps.pdf 03-20 Application red.pdf 03-20 Agency Comments red.pdf 03-20 Decommissioning Plan rev 062420.pdf 03-20 Exhibit A- Protected Species Review.pdf 03-20 Exhibit B - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.pdf 03-20 Exhibit C- DCR Ltr dated September 22, 2018.pdf 03-20 Exhibit D - Phase I Historical Resources.pdf 03-20 Impact Analysis Statement.pdf 03-20 Power of Attorney red.pdf 03-20 Tax Verification.pdf 03-20 Viewshed Analysis.pdf 03-20 Visual Simulation.pdf 03-20 CUP Site Plan rev 061920.pdf 231 cod CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #03-20 Foxglove Solar,LLC q Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: June 24,2020 Staff Contact: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 06/03/20 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 07/08/20 Pending EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to enable construction of a 370-acres utility-scale solar power generating facility (disturbed area) located on property totaling approximately 668.5-acres. Should the Board of Supervisors find this use for a utility-scale solar power generating facility to be appropriate, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the permit with conditions 1-6 as outlined below. Staff would note that following the Planning Commission recommendation on June 3rd, the Applicant made minor revisions to the application proposal to better address Commissioner and public comments received at the meeting. The amended conditions being proposed are listed following the conditions viewed by the Commission. Planninz Commission recommended conditions: 1. All review agency comments provided during the review of this application shall be complied with at all times. 2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and subject to approval by Frederick County prior to the establishment of the use. The site plan shall address additional regulations for specific uses outlined in §165-204.26 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and be in general conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, dated April 17, 2020. 3. Buffers and screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project in general conformance with quantity of the proposed plantings depicted on Sheet 5 of the Preliminary Site Plan, `Landscaping/Vegetative Screening Detail, " included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, dated April 17, 2020. Buffers and screening shall fulfill the landscape screening requirements of §165-203.02(B)(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. 232 Page 2 CUP 903-20-Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 4. Prior to site plan approval, the owner shall enter into a written agreement with Frederick County to decommission solar energy equipment, facilities, or devices pursuant to the terms and conditions of §152-2241.2(B) of the Code of Virginia. The written agreement shall be updated every five (5) years and in general conformance with the Decommissioning Plan, included with the CUP application, prepared by Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley & Walsh, revised April 21, 2020. 5. Batteries, for the purposes of mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred to the grid, are prohibited as part of this CUP. 6. Any expansion or modification of this land use will require the approval of a new CUP. The following conditions reflect the changes drafted by the Applicant following the June 3rd Planning Commission meeting (proposed chanzes are shown in bold underline italics): 1. All review agency comments provided during the review of this application shall be complied with at all times. 2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and subject to approval by Frederick County prior to the establishment of the use. The site plan shall address additional regulations for specific uses outlined in §165-204.26 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and be in general conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. 3. Buffers and screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project in general conformance with quantity of the proposed plantings depicted on Sheet 5 of the Preliminary Site Plan, `Landscaping/Fegetative Screening Detail, " included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. Buffers and screening shall fulfill the landscape screening requirements of §165-203.02(B)(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. The landscape buffer plandn'-s shall be maintained in good health for the life of the proiect, up to 35 years. Landscapin'- and buffering shall be installed along the property boundary on the east side of Hites Road (Route 635), alonz the property boundary adioining PINS 84-1-1, 84-3-2, 84-1-3, 84-1- 4, 84-1-5, 84-A-33, and 84-A-35, and alonz the property boundary on the north side of Mines Mill Road (Route 633), within three (3) months of the commencement of construction on the properties identified with PINS 84-A-50 and 84-A-29. An extension of this time limit may be zranted by the County upon the recommendation of a licensed landscape architect or horticulturalist to ensure the planting occurs during optimal seasonal conditions in order to improve the survivability of the required plantin-s, 233 Page 3 CUP 403-20-Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 upon submission to the County of a letter from such licensed landscape architect or horticulturalist, specifyinz the appropriate time frame for plantinz prior to the start of construction, to accompanV the site plan application proiect file. 4. Prior to site plan approval, the owner shall enter into a written agreement with Frederick County to decommission solar energy equipment, facilities, or devices pursuant to the terms and conditions of §15.2-2241.2(B) of the Code of Virginia. The written agreement shall be updated every five (5) years and in general conformance with the Decommissioning Plan, included with the CUP application, prepared by Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley & Walsh, revised April 21, 2020. 5. Batteries, for the purposes of mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred to the grid, are prohibited as part of this CUP. 6. Access to the site shall be limited to entrances from Marlboro Road (Route 631), Clark Road (Route 638), Mines Mill Road (Route 633) and Vaucluse Road (Route 638), and be in zeneral conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. Entrance to the site from Hites Road(Route 635) shall be prohibited. 7. Lav-down yards shall not be permitted to be accessed from or visible from Hites Road (Route 635) 8. Pile-drivinz of poles for solar arrays durin'-construction shall be limited to 7.00AM to 5:00PM Monday throu,-h Friday. All other construction activities are permitted 7.00AM to 7.00PM Monday throu,-h Friday and 7.00AM to 5:OOPM on Saturday. No construction activities are permitted on Sundays. 9. Any expansion or modification of this land use will require the approval of a new CUP. Following this public hearing, a decision regarding this Conditional Use Permit application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. *Any recommendation for approval should also include a statement affrminz that the proposed solar facility is in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 234 Page 4 CUP 903-20—Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 LOCATION: These properties are generally located south of Marlboro Road (Route 631), east and west of Hites Road (Route 625), north of Klines Mill Road (Route 633), north of Clark Road (Route 638) and south of Vaucluse Road (Route 638). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 84-A-40, 84-A-40A, 84-A-50, 84-A-29, 73-A-21, & 84-A-39 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Agricultural Agricultural and Forestal District(South Frederick) Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING& PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural/Residential South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural/Residential East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural/Residential/Vacant West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural/Residential PROPOSED USE: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)to enable construction of a 370-acres utility-scale solar power generating facility (disturbed area) located on property totaling approximately 668.5-acres. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for these properties appear to have little measurable impact on Route 631 (Marlboro Road), Route 625 (Hites Road), and the VDOT facilities providing access to the properties. Locations have been identified for a low-volume commercial entrance, on Route 631 and Route 625. The new entrances will need to meet VDOT standards for the proposed use. Should the use ever expand in the future, the entrances will need to be reviewed to determine if additional improvements may be required. See comment letter dated March 31, 2 02 0. Frederick County Fire Marshal: Plans approved by Fire Marshal, Frederick County. See comment letter dated March 31, 2020. 235 Page 5 CUP 903-20—Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 Frederick County Inspections: The utility scale solar power generating facilities conditional use permit for installation of solar array shall be designed per the 2015 Virginia Building Code,U-Utility Use Group. Solar panel installation not associated with publicly regulated utilities require permits. Plans submitted for permits may require the design to be sealed by a Registered Design Professional licensed in the State of Virginia. Arrays shall be designed for the applicable loads as required in Chapter 16 VBC. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 of VBC for special inspection requirements on the type of structure (soil, concrete etc.). See comment letter dated March 6, 2020. Frederick County Public Works: A comprehensive review shall be performed at the time of site plan submission. All stormwater and E & S shall be designed in accordance with County Code Chapter 143 and VA DEQ requirements. See comment letter dated March 23, 2020. Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB): The Virginia Department of Historic Resources identified many historic properties in the vicinity; three of which are located on the site: o Miller House (34-0254) o Woodbine Farm (34-5075) o Farmhouse, Route 633 (34-0429) In addition, a portion of the Cedar Creek Battlefield is located south of the properties with a small portion identified on the southernmost property,PIN#84-A-29. After reviewing the information provided, the Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) recommended approval of the CUP with the following comments: • The Applicant should not disturb any structures or ruins that are present on the properties. There are a number of barns, outbuildings, the Miller House ruins, a cemetery, and the overgrown Woodbine Farm main house. These structures should be protected from any disturbance from this project. • No solar structures should be placed on the portion of the property that is located within the limits of the Cedar Creek Battlefield. • A Phase 1 Archeological Survey will be completed as part of the permitting of this project. 236 Page 6 CUP#03-20—Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 • This survey should document the collection of historic structures on and around this development and determine if this area would qualify as a rural historic district. See comment letter dated May 22, 2020. Planning and Zoning: Utility-scale solar power generating facilities are a permitted use in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The Board of Supervisors added "utility-scale solar power generating facilities" to the Zoning Ordinance on January 8, 2020, including additional regulations for specific uses. These additional regulations further specify for utility-scale solar power generating facilities to prepare an engineered site plan and enter into a written agreement with Frederick County for facility decommissioning. The application proposes use of approximately 668.5-acres of rural area property, primarily used for agriculture, to generate 75 megawatts (MWS) or photovoltaic (solar) electricity. Approximately 370.1-acres of the subject parcels will be utilized for the installation of rows of ground-mounted photovoltaic modules, commonly known as solar panels, other necessary equipment for facility operations, access paths, fencing and landscaping. Most of the application acreage is also within the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. Ground disturbed will be replanted with native turf grass that will preserve the soil, prevent erosion, and improve water quality. The solar panels will be interconnected, and the power generated by each solar panel will be combined, converted, and the voltage increased to allow delivery of the power to the adjacent First Energy 138 kilovolt(KV)transmission line. The proximity of the project to the existing transmission line was a significant factor in the selection of these properties for the development of the facility. The application states the electricity generated by capturing sunlight will create quiet, clean, and affordable electricity for Frederick County and elsewhere in Virginia. Additionally, the project as proposed does not include any batteries for the purposes of mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred into the grid. The 2035 Comprehensive Plan envisions this area of the County to remain primarily rural in nature and for agricultural land to be preserved for future generations. The project is generally compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, with the rural character of the area, and with the adjoining agricultural and residential uses. The preservation of the underlying land maintains the ability for agricultural uses in the future. As stated in the application, the use is highly passive with limited noise, lighting, and traffic during operations. Setbacks for the solar arrays (panels) will conform to the setback requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance for principle uses in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District (§165-401.07): 60- feet (FT) front setbacks from right-of-way streets and roads, and side/rear setbacks of 50-FT from adjoining parcels 6-acres or less, 100-FT from adjoining parcels of more than 6-acres, and 237 Page 7 CUP#03-20—Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 200-FT from Agricultural and Forestal Districts (more than 6-acres) and orchards (regardless of size). The required setbacks are depicted on the Preliminary Site Plans included with the application. The Applicant has also proposed buffering and screening around the perimeter of the property to shield view of the facility from adjacent roadways, residences, and existing agritourism operations. A Visual Simulation, included with the application materials, depicts the anticipated screening as viewed from adjacent roadways at various intervals. Finally, a draft Decommissioning Plan included with the application materials, satisfies requirements contained in §165-204.26 of the Zoning Ordinance, ensuring that in the event the facility is no longer in operation, the land will be returned to the pre-development condition with all solar infrastructure removed, ensuring future viability of the land to resume agricultural operations. Further, proposed condition of approval #4 ensures that Frederick County would maintain a bond that is updated every five (5)years keeping it up to date. In addition to requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance, the Applicant is concurrently pursuing a "Permit-by-Rule" (PBR) through the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The PBR is a state-level administrative review and approval process for the siting of solar energy facilities in the Commonwealth, including environmental and cultural review and study. One component of the state required PBR review is local jurisdiction "approval" of solar project siting; this CUP application, if approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, would satisfy that requirement enabling completion of a PBR process for this project. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 06/03/20 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to enable construction of a 370-acres utility-scale solar power generating facility (disturbed area) located on property totaling approximately 668.5-acres. Should the Planning Commission find this use for a utility-scale solar power generating facility to be appropriate, Staff would suggest the following Conditions of Approval: 1. All review agency comments provided during the review of this application shall be complied with at all times. 2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and subject to approval by Frederick County prior to the establishment of the use. The site plan shall address additional regulations for specific uses outlined in §165-204.26 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and be in general conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, dated April 17, 2020. 238 Page 8 CUP#03-20—Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 3. Buffers and screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project in general conformance with quantity of the proposed plantings depicted on Sheet 5 of the Preliminary Site Plan, "Landscaping/Vegetative Screening Detail, " included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, dated April 17, 2020. Buffers and screening shall fulfill the landscape screening requirements of §165-203.02(B)(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. 4. Prior to site plan approval, the owner shall enter into a written agreement with Frederick County to decommission solar energy equipment, facilities, or devices pursuant to the terms and conditions of §15.2-2241.2(B) of the Code of Virginia. The written agreement shall be updated every five (5) years and in general conformance with the Decommissioning Plan, included with the CUP application, prepared by Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley & Walsh, revised April 21, 2020. 5. Batteries, for the purposes of mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred to the grid, are prohibited as part of this CUP. 6. Any expansion or modification of this land use will require the approval of a new CUP. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FOR THE 06/03/20 MEETING: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 3rd. Following a staff presentation, the Applicant provided an overview/summary of the project and answered Planning Commissioner questions regarding leaching of toxic chemicals, noting there is no ability for leaching from the solar panels. Additionally, the Applicant clarified points regarding site access, noting that the proposed location on the Preliminary Site Plans submitted with the application were conceptual, and construction and project entrances would be reviewed and approved by County staff and VDOT during the more formal site planning process if their application were to be approved. Fourteen (14) members of the public spoke on the proposed application. Two (2) speakers voiced support for the project, including the property owners, who expressed their desire to continue to own their property and use it for "agricultural" while also diversifying their source of income. Twelve (12) members of the public spoke in opposition to the proposed project citing the following concerns: reduction in property values, disturbance of viewshed/rural landscape, impact to local wildlife habitat and water quality, construction traffic, noise and dust, construction/project access (specifically from Hites Road), potential impact to environment and toxic leaching of chemicals, fencing, setbacks and that the proposed landscaping may not create a sufficient buffer. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the merits and concerns of the 239 Page 9 CUP 903-20—Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 application. Commissioner Oates stated that during the Planning Commission discussion of the ordinance amendment to add "utility-scale solar power generating facilitates" there was support among the Planning Commission to allow solar farms "by-right" similar to other utilities, and that if this application were not approved there were far more impac�l uses that could go on the property such as noxious agricultural uses, or up to 135 residential homes (subdivision). Commissioner Oates concluded stating this was a "win-win" for the County, as there are no capital impacts of such a facility and it also generates significant tax revenue beyond what currently exists for those properties. Commissioners Thomas and Morrison expressed concern with the proposed entrances, especially during construction, and hoped that the Applicant would address their concerns and concerns raised during the public hearing be addressed during the site plan. The Planning Commission voted 11-0-1-1 (Commissioner Mohn — Absent; Commissioner Marston — Abstaining) to recommend approval of the proposed CUP by the Board of Supervisors. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE 07/08/20 MEETING: This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to enable construction of a 370-acres utility-scale solar power generating facility (disturbed area) located on property totaling approximately 668.5-acres. Since the Planning Commission meeting on June 3rd, the Applicant has made a few minor revisions to their application to better address concerns raised by adjoining property owners and comments made by the Planning Commission. These changes include: • Increasing the setback along the property frontage along Hites Road from 60-FT to 75- FT. Staff notes that when including the width of the right-of-way it effectively creates a 100-FT setback from the residential properties across Hites Road to the west. This change is reflected on the revised Preliminary Site Plans revised June 19, 2020 (Sheets 2 & 4); • A commitment to maintain the landscape buffer for a period of 35-years (or the life of the project), and to install all landscaping along Hites Road and Klines Mill Road within 3- months of the start of construction. This change is reflected in the amended Conditions of Approval (#3)below; • Restricting site access (including for construction) to Marlboro Road, Vaucluse Road, Clark Road and/or Klines Mill Road and torp ohibit access to the site from Hites Road. Restricting siting of a lay-down yard from accessing and view from Hites Road. These changes are reflected in the amended Conditions of Approval (96 & 7)below; • Limiting hours of construction for pile-driving of poles for solar arrays. This change is 240 Page 10 CUP 903-20-Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 reflected in the amended Conditions of Approval 4 (8); and • If feasible, to install woven wire fence instead of chain link fence. This change is reflected in notes contained in the Preliminary Site Plans revised June 19, 2020 (Sheets 2, 3, 4, & 5 under"Legend"). Should the Board of Supervisors find this use for a utility-scale solar power generating facility to be appropriate, the following (amended) Conditions of Approval are recommended (additional language reflecting changes are highlighted in bold, italics and underline): 1. All review agency comments provided during the review of this application shall be complied with at all times. 2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and subject to approval by Frederick County prior to the establishment of the use. The site plan shall address additional regulations for specific uses outlined in §165-204.26 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and be in general conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. 3. Buffers and screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project in general conformance with quantity of the proposed plantings depicted on Sheet 5 of the Preliminary Site Plan, `Landscaping/Fegetative Screening Detail, " included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. Buffers and screening shall fulfill the landscape screening requirements of §165-203.02(B)(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. The landscape buffer plantings shall be maintained in eood health for the life of the proiect, up to 35 years. Landscaping and buffering shall be installed along the property boundary on the east side of Hites Road (Route 635), along the property boundary adioining PINS 84-1-1, 84-3-2, 84-1-3, 84-1- 4, 84-1-5, 84-A-33, and 84-A-35, and alonz the property boundary on the north side of Mines Mill Road (Route 633), within three (3) months of the commencement of construction on the properties identified with PINS 84-A-50 and 84-A-29. An extension of this time limit may be granted by the County upon the recommendation of a licensed landscape architect or horticulturalist to ensure the plantinz occurs during optimal seasonal conditions in order to improve the survivability of the required Alantin'-s, upon submission to the County of a letter from such licensed landscape architect or horticulturalist, specifying the appropriate time frame for plantinz prior to the start of construction, to accompany the site plan application proiect file. 4. Prior to site plan approval, the owner shall enter into a written agreement with Frederick County to decommission solar energy equipment, facilities, or devices pursuant to the terms and conditions of §152-2241.2(B) of the Code of Virginia. The written agreement shall be updated every five (5) years and in general conformance with the Decommissioning Plan, included with the CUP application, prepared by Walsh, Colucci, 241 Page 11 CUP 403-20-Foxglove Solar, LLC June 24, 2020 Lubeley & Walsh, revised April 21, 2020. 5. Batteries, for the purposes of mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred to the grid, are prohibited as part of this CUP. 6. Access to the site shall be limited to entrances from Marlboro Road(Route 631), Clark Road (Route 638), Mines Mill Road (Route 633) and Vaucluse Road (Route 638), and be in meneral conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. Entrance to the site from Hites Road(Route 635) shall be prohibiter. 7. Lav-down yards shall not be permitted to be accessed from or visible from Hites Road (Route 635). 8. Pile-drivin,- of poles for solar arrays durin'-construction shall be limited to 7.00AM to 5:00PM Monday throu,-h Friday. All other construction activities are permitted 7.00AM to 7.00PM Monday throu,-h Friday and 7.00AM to 5:OOPM on Saturday. No construction activities are permitted on Sundays. 9. Any expansion or modification of this land use will require the approval of a new CUP. Following this public hearing, a decision regarding this Conditional Use Permit application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. Any recommendation for approval should also include a statement affirminz that the proposed solar facility is in substantial accord with the Comprehensive Plan. 242 I ♦ ; . ♦ I , ; I ♦ I , ♦ ; I ♦ , Esq:,. :T+;`. MARL6 VRV RU L • MARLBOOW RO RD HILL DR 7 142 6124 15121326 INEZ LN &['* MIDDLE RD 1677 MARLBORCYRD .210 14 MARLBORO RD 2.13 MARLBORO RINEZD �, � 242 INEZ LN• NCKAHOE LN - 1651 4 ' INEZILN MARLBORO RD 1567 239 6286 MARLBORO RD. MARLBORO RD • .....LN MI6 MLN IDD RD 1631 � 1541 1381 � CORA`• � 6342 6312 MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD 969 MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RD �'—�+► 186 ' ' MARLB,ORQ 6319' 182 22 105 MID,DrLE RD I I HITES RD HITES RD LE�RD 6419 CLARK RD�® 363 131,6 1213 MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RD 73 A 21 POMME CIR HITEB�RD MARLBORO RD 1.94 ARK RD 127 160�� 6 1211 MARLBORO RD CLARK RD CHANTERELLE Ci HITES,RD MARLBORO RD 02 0 191. -'?LA'RK RD CLARK RD . �.► �►•.,1-3.+1 , 20 190 CHANTERELLE Ci CHANTEREL�L-E21 i � 200 CHAMERELLEC-i _. .;� CHAMERELLEC-i 20 tK RD • 85 HITES RD 615 • CLARK RD HITES RD HITES RD HITES RD 846 609 138 365 STROD • CLARK RD 594 GEM DR 1,97 N LN CARSON LN MCLEOD �� HITES.RD C-ARSO 514 v !20 CLARK RD RK RD 697 gl 1 1 ! 756 CLARK RD '" HITES RD 7HITESRD 365 660 84.A40A' - 716 722 FAMILY DR CLARK RDo _ HITES RD. HITES RD 846 �: 700 HITESRD 8 ,-, VAUCLUSE RD 306 .A` ""_•.,.� 08 BUFFALOI / HITES RD MARSH RD • •84 A 40 (' (' 320 308 CLARK RD 84 A;39 .698 CONESTOGA LN 'FFALO '4 _ • VAUCLUSE RD ,RSH RD 370 1,91 ^ 888. 696y BUFFALOBUFFALO 986 HITES RD VAUCLUSE RD MARSH RD 245 MARSH RD 201 CLARK RD /alyr� L 84 A 50 13 BUFFALO BUFFALO 1080 1 181 \'�1�.1.� STROSNIDER LN 388 418 MARSH RD MARSH`RC) CLARK RD CLARK RD 84 A 50 VAUCLUSE RD ,BUFFALO 996 MARSH RD FF LO 181 1.:38 1160 HITES RD ,� •.�! BUFFALO CLARK RD 1 h530 , BUFFALO _ CLARK RD I020VAUCLUSERD MARSH RD 528 � MARSH RD ,4 HITES+RD - 10381053 51 619 360 2SH RD' 281 HITES RD HITES RD VAUCLUSE-RD'" - VCLUSE RD H2NEWELL ti'DR NEWELL D'R 111V 266 161 284 NEWELHITES RD �,. - VAUCLUSE RD 160 NEWELbDR L DR 451 1162 WELL DR 260 WESTERNVIEW DR HITES RD HITES 180 RD L NEL �� �� ♦ I•" - �� IEWELL DR WE447 � 190 443 WESTERNVIEW DR Ow, �7� NEWELL DR WESTERN VIEW DR a:� 84.A 29 '� ` �+. �$ti•t;`Ilri�� ,�", IFALO ®276 746`.. 21 .,��, �RSHRD �-.-, 1282 KLINES,.. IN VAUC" •� $'1` ��b WESTERN VIEW DR 3qy WESTERNVIEW DR � ♦ ' 1115 379 WESTERN VIEW DR 210 HITES RD 1273 MILL RDS KLINES SPRIt'� CHAPEL RD MILL RD HITES RD 734 I . ,.., �� �' •. `�, . WESTERN VIEW DR WESTERNVIEW DR :v1 _ !: 325 KLINES MILL RD WESTERN,, 1341 O 1 .120 .HITES RD 725 �,���,. �'•� ... . IEW DR MILL RD KLIN j ��. ►��r a WESTERNVVIIEW DR - KLINES 621 MILL ♦♦�i ♦ ��81'�" 461_ D WESTERN VIEW DR/ 1 'MILL RD �57Z1" `•I •,��`�i.G�„'��'��gt i �{{�� MAKLOUKU KU 1736 OAK' • •• ARLBORO RD. HILL DRX42 _ 6124 1512 1326 IN LN -. MIDDLE RD 677 ORO RD MARLBORO RD •210 MARLB '14 213 /" MARLBORO RD 242241INEZ 11 LN INEZ TUCKAHOE LN r ? 1651 VNEZ LN -1687`MARLBORO RD 1567 f 239 6286MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD' s INEZ LN MIDDLE RD • , • 6342 6312 • :,r: _ .1631 1541. 1381 MARLBORO RD; MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD 969 MIDDLERD MIDDLE RD 186 - - MARLBORO 6319 HITES RD 182 22 105 MIDDLE RD _ � I I TES RD AA LEIRD 6419 CLARK R 131 298 1215 ® ' 6363 1 MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RD 73 A 21 POMME CIR HITES RD MARLBORO RD 1213 194 1 - MARLBORO RD ARK RD 127 ib0 316. 1211 CLARK RD CHANTERELLE Ci HITES'RD MARLBORO RD 0210 191 �,•- tLT.4RK RD CLAR RD , 20190 CHANTERELLE Ci 2K RD CHANTERELLE Ci � � - �2� CHANTERELLE CT CHANTERELLE 20 2K RD 685 158 HITES 615 • CLARK RD '" HITES RD 564 HITES RD HITES RD 846 609 138 365 ITES•RD CARSON LN STROD CLARK RD 594 GEM DR 197 CARSON LN MC.-LEAD � H 514.s '20 CLARKRD � RK RD 704 685- 697 756 HITES RD HITES RD CLARK RD_ 365 660 - 84 A 40A 716 HITES RD 722 FAMILY DR CLA- = HITES RD HITESSRD 846 I -` 700 3 '06HITES RD 808 'VAUCLUSE RD ` , BUFFALO. I I HITES RD +. a MARSH�RD' �'-�862 �1411� /�^4 A 40 �hWa CLARK RD84 A;39 698 CONESTOGA LN 'FFALO • VAUCLUSE RD ,RSH RD 370 191 �• 888. 696 BUFFALO BUFF FALO 986 HITES RD VAUCLUSE RD MARSH RD MARSH RD CLARK RD 84 A 50 245 201 ���•�� ���i 134 BUFFALO BUFFALO 1080 :11181 - STROSNIDER LN VAUCLUSE RD CLARK RD CLARWRD X18 MARSH RD MARSHLRD9961BUFFA84 A 50 j MARSH FFA 181 1138<:. 1160 HITES(RD BUFFALO BUFLO CLARK RD 1020530 �-- FACLARK RD / MARSH RD / 9?gVAUCLUSE RD + MARSH RD ..HITES=RD ! ' TALO •. ""..�� 1038 1053 f r 619 360 81 2SH RD HITES RD HITES RD ✓VAUCLUSE RD. VAUCLUSE-RD.... . 2 NEWELL DR NEWELr' � ' 266 R NEWELL DR 1111,,, 161 284 VAUCLUSE RD WELL DR WELbD260�WESTERNVIEW DR HITES RD, HITES RD _�� •��� i;�..°���� HITES RD IEWE L NE... 447 �' I I �• �. � �a O �� 190 443 WESTERNVIEW DR � `,.� , . - ,,,_ �i �►,� 733 NEWELL DR \ 84 A 29 • �� (iJ� �•.or � '`i WESTERNVIEW DR �:. . �'- IFFALO Imo""—" _ 746 » .� "21 ���.",- 411 ®�27�6 w KLINES ''� 566 �D.,'•��y�j► .RSH RD WESTERNVIEW DR 3q2 WESTERNVIEWIDR 1282 3 VAUC=A '✓:• HITES RD MILL RDS �KLINES�� gpRH 1115 379 WESTERNVIEW DR 210 CHAPEL RD WESTERNVIEW DR HITES RD 734 1 , `MILL=RD �y STERN, 325 KLINES MILL WESTERNVIEW DR 520 • '� ' \�� �. 24l 120 1341 HITES RD 725 KLINES.. WESTERNVIEW DR '•r., `V WESTERNVIEWDR � KLINES 621• MILL •, )r MILL RD 1461 MIL4RD �57T `I��7/ ,1��.2 r��fi���•�` 4�GK f CO�� w ORDINANCE w yta��i 1730 7111 Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: June 3, 2020 Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: July 8, 2020 Pending ORDINANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #03-20 FOXGLOVE SOLAR, LLC TO CONSTRUCT A UTILITY-SCALE SOLAR POWER GENERATING FACILITY WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit#03-20 for Foxglove Solar, LLC.,was submitted to construct a utility-scale solar power generating facility. The properties are located adjacent to Marlboro Road (Route 361), Hites Road (Route 625), Klines Mill Road (Route 633), Clark Road (Route 638) and Vaucluse Road (Route 638) and are identified with Property Identification Numbers 84-A-40, 84-A-40A, 84-A-50, 84-A-29, 73-A-21 & 84-A-39 in the Back Creek Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit on June 3, 2020 and recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit during their regular meeting on July 8, 2020; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this expansion to a Conditional Use Permit to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the zoning map to reflect that Conditional Use Permit Application 903-20 for utility-scale solar power generating facility is permitted on the parcels identified by Property PDRes 420-20 1 245 Identification Numbers 84-A-40, 84-A-40A, 84-A-50, 84-A-29, 73-A-21, and 84-A-39 with the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments provided during the review of this application shall be complied with at all times. 2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and subject to approval by Frederick County prior to the establishment of the use. The site plan shall address additional regulations for specific uses outlined in §165-204.26 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and be in general conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. 3. Buffers and screening shall be provided around the perimeter of the project in general conformance with quantity of the proposed plantings depicted on Sheet 5 of the Preliminary Site Plan, "Landscaping/Vegetative Screening Detail," included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group,revised June 19, 2020. Buffers and screening shall fulfill the landscape screening requirements of §165-203.02(B)(1) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. The landscape buffer plantings shall be maintained in good health for the life of the project, up to 35 years. Landscaping and buffering shall be installed along the property boundary on the east side of Hites Road (Route 635), along the property boundary adjoining PINS 84-1-1, 84-3-2, 84-1-3, 84-1-4, 84-1-5, 84-A-33, and 84-A-35, and along the property boundary on the north side of Klines Mill Road (Route 633), within three (3) months of the commencement of construction on the properties identified with PINS 84-A-50 and 84-A-29. An extension of this time limit may be granted by the County upon the recommendation of a licensed landscape architect or horticulturalist to ensure the planting occurs during optimal seasonal conditions in order to improve the survivability of the required plantings, upon submission to the County of a letter from such licensed landscape architect or horticulturalist, specifying the appropriate time frame for planting prior to the start of construction, to accompany the site plan application project file. 4. Prior to site plan approval, the owner shall enter into a written agreement with Frederick County to decommission solar energy equipment, facilities, or devices pursuant to the terms and conditions of §152-2241.2(B) of the Code of Virginia. The written agreement shall be updated every five (5) years and in general conformance with the Decommissioning Plan, included with the CUP application, prepared by Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley & Walsh, revised April 21, 2020. 5. Batteries, for the purposes of mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred to the grid, are prohibited as part of this CUP. 6. Access to the site shall be limited to entrances from Marlboro Road (Route 631), Clark Road (Route 638), Klines Mill Road (Route 633) and Vaucluse Road PDRes 420-20 2 246 (Route 638), and be in general conformance with the Preliminary Site Plans, included with the CUP application, prepared by Timmons Group, revised June 19, 2020. Entrance to the site from Hites Road (Route 635) shall be prohibited. 7. Lay-down yards shall not be permitted to be accessed from or visible from Hites Road (Route 635) 8. Pile-driving of poles for solar arrays during construction shall be limited to 7:OOAM to 5:OOPM Monday through Friday. All other construction activities are permitted 7:OOAM to 7:OOPM Monday through Friday and 7:OOAM to 5:OOPM on Saturday. No construction activities are permitted on Sundays. 9. Any expansion or modification of this land use will require the approval of a new CUP. Passed this 8th day of July 2020 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Shawn L. Graber J. Douglas McCarthy Robert W. Wells Gene E. Fisher Judith McCann-Slaughter Blaine P. Dunn A COPY ATTEST Kris C. Tierney Frederick County Administrator PDRes 420-20 3 247 I ♦ ; . ♦ I , ; I ♦ I , ♦ ; I ♦ , Esq:,. :T+;`. MARL6 VRV RU L • MARLBOOW RO RD HILL DR 7 142 6124 15121326 INEZ LN &['* MIDDLE RD 1677 MARLBORCYRD .210 14 MARLBORO RD 2.13 MARLBORO RINEZD �, � 242 INEZ LN• NCKAHOE LN - 1651 4 ' INEZILN MARLBORO RD 1567 239 6286 MARLBORO RD. MARLBORO RD • .....LN MI6 MLN IDD RD 1631 � 1541 1381 � CORA`• � 6342 6312 MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD 969 MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RD �'—�+► 186 ' ' MARLB,ORQ 6319' 182 22 105 MID,DrLE RD I I HITES RD HITES RD LE�RD 6419 CLARK RD�® 363 131,6 1213 MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RD 73 A 21 POMME CIR HITEB�RD MARLBORO RD 1.94 ARK RD 127 160�� 6 1211 MARLBORO RD CLARK RD CHANTERELLE Ci HITES,RD MARLBORO RD 02 0 191. -'?LA'RK RD CLARK RD . �.► �►•.,1-3.+1 , 20 190 CHANTERELLE Ci CHANTEREL�L-E21 i � 200 CHAMERELLEC-i _. .;� CHAMERELLEC-i 20 tK RD • 85 HITES RD 615 • CLARK RD HITES RD HITES RD HITES RD 846 609 138 365 STROD • CLARK RD 594 GEM DR 1,97 N LN CARSON LN MCLEOD �� HITES.RD C-ARSO 514 v !20 CLARK RD RK RD 697 gl 1 1 ! 756 CLARK RD '" HITES RD 7HITESRD 365 660 84.A40A' - 716 722 FAMILY DR CLARK RDo _ HITES RD. HITES RD 846 �: 700 HITESRD 8 ,-, VAUCLUSE RD 306 .A` ""_•.,.� 08 BUFFALOI / HITES RD MARSH RD • •84 A 40 (' (' 320 308 CLARK RD 84 A;39 .698 CONESTOGA LN 'FFALO '4 _ • VAUCLUSE RD ,RSH RD 370 1,91 ^ 888. 696y BUFFALOBUFFALO 986 HITES RD VAUCLUSE RD MARSH RD 245 MARSH RD 201 CLARK RD /alyr� L 84 A 50 13 BUFFALO BUFFALO 1080 1 181 \'�1�.1.� STROSNIDER LN 388 418 MARSH RD MARSH`RC) CLARK RD CLARK RD 84 A 50 VAUCLUSE RD ,BUFFALO 996 MARSH RD FF LO 181 1.:38 1160 HITES RD ,� •.�! BUFFALO CLARK RD 1 h530 , BUFFALO _ CLARK RD I020VAUCLUSERD MARSH RD 528 � MARSH RD ,4 HITES+RD - 10381053 51 619 360 2SH RD' 281 HITES RD HITES RD VAUCLUSE-RD'" - VCLUSE RD H2NEWELL ti'DR NEWELL D'R 111V 266 161 284 NEWELHITES RD �,. - VAUCLUSE RD 160 NEWELbDR L DR 451 1162 WELL DR 260 WESTERNVIEW DR HITES RD HITES 180 RD L NEL �� �� ♦ I•" - �� IEWELL DR WE447 � 190 443 WESTERNVIEW DR Ow, �7� NEWELL DR WESTERN VIEW DR a:� 84.A 29 '� ` �+. �$ti•t;`Ilri�� ,�", IFALO ®276 746`.. 21 .,��, �RSHRD �-.-, 1282 KLINES,.. IN VAUC" •� $'1` ��b WESTERN VIEW DR 3qy WESTERNVIEW DR � ♦ ' 1115 379 WESTERN VIEW DR 210 HITES RD 1273 MILL RDS KLINES SPRIt'� CHAPEL RD MILL RD HITES RD 734 I . ,.., �� �' •. `�, . WESTERN VIEW DR WESTERNVIEW DR :v1 _ !: 325 KLINES MILL RD WESTERN,, 1341 O 1 .120 .HITES RD 725 �,���,. �'•� ... . IEW DR MILL RD KLIN j ��. ►��r a WESTERNVVIIEW DR - KLINES 621 MILL ♦♦�i ♦ ��81'�" 461_ D WESTERN VIEW DR/ 1 'MILL RD �57Z1" `•I •,��`�i.G�„'��'��gt i �{{�� MAKLOUKU KU 1736 OAK' • •• ARLBORO RD. HILL DRX42 _ 6124 1512 1326 IN LN -. MIDDLE RD 677 ORO RD MARLBORO RD •210 MARLB '14 213 /" MARLBORO RD 242241INEZ 11 LN INEZ TUCKAHOE LN r ? 1651 VNEZ LN -1687`MARLBORO RD 1567 f 239 6286MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD' s INEZ LN MIDDLE RD • , • 6342 6312 • :,r: _ .1631 1541. 1381 MARLBORO RD; MARLBORO RD MARLBORO RD 969 MIDDLERD MIDDLE RD 186 - - MARLBORO 6319 HITES RD 182 22 105 MIDDLE RD _ � I I TES RD AA LEIRD 6419 CLARK R 131 298 1215 ® ' 6363 1 MIDDLE RD MIDDLE RD 73 A 21 POMME CIR HITES RD MARLBORO RD 1213 194 1 - MARLBORO RD ARK RD 127 ib0 316. 1211 CLARK RD CHANTERELLE Ci HITES'RD MARLBORO RD 0210 191 �,•- tLT.4RK RD CLAR RD , 20190 CHANTERELLE Ci 2K RD CHANTERELLE Ci � � - �2� CHANTERELLE CT CHANTERELLE 20 2K RD 685 158 HITES 615 • CLARK RD '" HITES RD 564 HITES RD HITES RD 846 609 138 365 ITES•RD CARSON LN STROD CLARK RD 594 GEM DR 197 CARSON LN MC.-LEAD � H 514.s '20 CLARKRD � RK RD 704 685- 697 756 HITES RD HITES RD CLARK RD_ 365 660 - 84 A 40A 716 HITES RD 722 FAMILY DR CLA- = HITES RD HITESSRD 846 I -` 700 3 '06HITES RD 808 'VAUCLUSE RD ` , BUFFALO. I I HITES RD +. a MARSH�RD' �'-�862 �1411� /�^4 A 40 �hWa CLARK RD84 A;39 698 CONESTOGA LN 'FFALO • VAUCLUSE RD ,RSH RD 370 191 �• 888. 696 BUFFALO BUFF FALO 986 HITES RD VAUCLUSE RD MARSH RD MARSH RD CLARK RD 84 A 50 245 201 ���•�� ���i 134 BUFFALO BUFFALO 1080 :11181 - STROSNIDER LN VAUCLUSE RD CLARK RD CLARWRD X18 MARSH RD MARSHLRD9961BUFFA84 A 50 j MARSH FFA 181 1138<:. 1160 HITES(RD BUFFALO BUFLO CLARK RD 1020530 �-- FACLARK RD / MARSH RD / 9?gVAUCLUSE RD + MARSH RD ..HITES=RD ! ' TALO •. ""..�� 1038 1053 f r 619 360 81 2SH RD HITES RD HITES RD ✓VAUCLUSE RD. VAUCLUSE-RD.... . 2 NEWELL DR NEWELr' � ' 266 R NEWELL DR 1111,,, 161 284 VAUCLUSE RD WELL DR WELbD260�WESTERNVIEW DR HITES RD, HITES RD _�� •��� i;�..°���� HITES RD IEWE L NE... 447 �' I I �• �. � �a O �� 190 443 WESTERNVIEW DR � `,.� , . - ,,,_ �i �►,� 733 NEWELL DR \ 84 A 29 • �� (iJ� �•.or � '`i WESTERNVIEW DR �:. . �'- IFFALO Imo""—" _ 746 » .� "21 ���.",- 411 ®�27�6 w KLINES ''� 566 �D.,'•��y�j► .RSH RD WESTERNVIEW DR 3q2 WESTERNVIEWIDR 1282 3 VAUC=A '✓:• HITES RD MILL RDS �KLINES�� gpRH 1115 379 WESTERNVIEW DR 210 CHAPEL RD WESTERNVIEW DR HITES RD 734 1 , `MILL=RD �y STERN, 325 KLINES MILL WESTERNVIEW DR 520 • '� ' \�� �. 24l 120 1341 HITES RD 725 KLINES.. WESTERNVIEW DR '•r., `V WESTERNVIEWDR � KLINES 621• MILL •, )r MILL RD 1461 MIL4RD �57T `I��7/ ,1��.2 r��fi���•�` Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY,VIRGINIA 1. Applicant(-check orim Property Owner � Other NAME: Foxglove Solar,LLC ADDRESS- 337 Log Canoe Circle,Stevensville,MD 21666 TELEPHONE: 410-604-3603 2. Please list all owners,occupants,or parties in interest of the property: Woodbine Farms,Inc. Alined L.and Betty V.Snapp, Alfred L.Snapp and Son,Inc. Levi J.and Keighley C.Gore 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) Please see the attached Addendum for the following additional information for Items 3,4,5,and 6. l 4. The property has a road frontage of feet and a depth of feet and consists of acres.(Please be exact) , 5. The property is owned by as evidenced by deed from (previous owner)'recorded in deed book no. _ on page as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. Property Identification Number(P.I.N.) Magisterial District Back creek Current Zoning RA__ 5 250 7. Adjoining Property: See attached Adjacent Property Owner Map USE ZONING North East _ South West 8. The type of use proposed is(consult with the Planning Dept.before completing): Utility Scale Solar Power Generating Facilities 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: In addition to solar panels,there will be collection and distribution lines,and a substation consisting of converters and transformers. This is visibly depicted on the attached conceptual pian. 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of(across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: Name and Property Identification Number Address Name SEE ATTACHED LIST Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# 6 251 Name and Property Identification Number Address Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# Name Property# 7 252 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. Please see"Preliminary Site Plan,"prepared by Timmons Group, dated April 17,2020 8 253 12. Additional comments, if any: Please see Impact Analysis Statement dated March 4,2020 I(we),the undersigned,do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County,Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7)days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Develo meant Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature ofApplicar� Signature of Owner Owners'Mailing Add4s� Owners'Telephone No. TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: 9 254 ADDENDUM A Woodbine Farms,TM 73-A-21; approximately 821 feet of frontage on Marlboro Road;271 acres 307/588 pg Woodbine Farms,TM 84-A-50, 829 Vaucluse Road; approximately 5960 feet of frontage on Vaucluse Road and 2900 feet of frontage on Hites Rd.; 197 acres 307/588 pg Woodbine Farms,TM 84-A-29, 718 Klines Mill Road;approximately 770 feet of frontage on Klines Mill Road; 106.46 acres 386/511 pg Alfred L. Snapp and Son, Inc.,TM 84-A-40,943 Clark Road;approximately 2277 feet of frontage on Clark Road, 69.30 acres 749/656 pg Alfred L. and Betty V. Snapp,TM 84-A-40A, 883 Clark Road; approximately 1164 feet of frontage on Clark Road,46 acres 734/941pg Levi J. and Keighley C. Gore,TM 84-A-39, 856 Hites Road; approximately 323 feet of frontage on Hites Road, 1.93 acres 0/Opg Total deeded acreage=691.69acres (P095721 LDOCX/2 Addendum A to CUP application 011121 000001) 255 Foxglove Solar CUP Application Form Owner Signature Page I(we),the undersigned,do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County,Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7)days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your properly where the proposed use will be conducted. Tax Man:84-A-50,84-A-29&73-A-21 Woodbine Farms,Inc. a Virginia corporation By: _ ' HarrKon M.Brumback,President q Owners mailing address: 510 Barley Lane,Winchester,VA 22602 256 Foxglove Solar CLIP Application Form Owner Signature Page I(we),the undersigned,do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County,Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7)days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Tax Mac 84»A40 Alfred L.Snapp&Son,Inc. a Virginia corporation By. Name: Alfred L. Snapp,President Owners mailing address: 883 Clark Road, Stephens City,VA 22655 257 Foxglove Solar CUP Application Form Owner Signature Page I(we),the undersigned,do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County,Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7)days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Tax Map A-40A Alfred.L.Suapp Jr. Betty V.Snappy Owners mailing address: 883 Clark Road,Stephens City,VA 22655 258 Foxglove Solar CUP Application Form Owner Signature Page I(we),the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County,Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing.Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Tax Mat)84-A-39 ,Xe ghley C.G6 Owners mailing address: 856 Hites Road Stephens City,VA 22655 259 Foxglove Solar CUP Application Form Applicant Signature Page I(we),the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven(7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors"public hearing. This application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission,Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect the property where the proposed use will be conducted. Foxglove Solar,LLC a Virginia limited liability comppy By: ` -t.Franklin DePew,Manag r- Applicant mailing address: 337 Log Canoe Circle, Stevensville,MD 21666 260 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Department Frederick County Inspections Department 107 North Kent Street,2"d Floor Attn: Building Official Winchester,Virginia 22601 107 North Kent Street,2nd Floor (540)665-5650 Winchester,Virginia Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,please attach two (2)copies of your application form,location map and all other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Foxglove solar,u.c - - Telephone: 410-604-3603 Mailing Address: 337 Log canoe circle,Stevensville,MD 21666 RECEIVED MAR 0 5 2020 Frederick County Name of development and/or description of the request: Public works& inspections Foxglove Solar Project-Utility Scale Solar Power Generating Facilities Location of Property: Hites view Road(668.5 acres as shown on the preliminary site pian) Building Official's Comments: Building Official's Signature&Date: 3/ 112,I)20 _ Notice to Inspections Department-Please Return This Form to the Applicant 12 261 Conditional Use Permit for installation of solar arrays shall be designed per the 2015 Virginia Building Code,U-Utility Use Group. Solar panel installation not associated with publicly regulated utilities require permits. Plans submitted for permits may require the design to be sealed by a Registered Design Professional licensed in the State of Virginia. Arrays shall be designed for the applicable loads as required in Chap 16 VBC. Please note the requirements in Chapter 17 of VBC for special inspection requirements on the type of stricture. (Soils,concrete etc..). S:iSite Plan comments120151CUP Solar Arrays.doc 262 CitP Comments Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Dept. of Public Works Frederick County Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering Attn: Director of Engineering 107 North Kent Street 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Suite 200 (540)665-5643 Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement,impact analysis,and any other pertinent information, Applicant's Name: Foxglove Solar,LLC Telephone: 410-604-3603 Mailing Address: 337 Log Canoe Circle,Stevensville, MD 21666 Location of property: Foxglove Solar Project-UDRY Scale Solar Power Generaling Facilities Located on Hites View Road(868.5 acres as shown on the preliminary site Flan Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: CUP Acreage: Department of Public Works Comments: t Grvn ►°L lF 4 n r is a "of Gam✓ 51,-I1 411 i- , C ok--� r VA Public Works Signature&Date: 3- 23- 20 Notice to Dept.of Public Works-Please Return This Form to the Applicant 22 263 Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office Of the Fire Marshal cK / 1080 Coverstone Drive o,.. G Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: 540-665-6350 Fax: 540-678-4739 1E fmo@fcva.us Plan Review Conditional Use Status: Approved Business Name Foxglove Solar, LLC Foxglove Solar Hites Rd Stephens City,Virginia 22655 Phone:410-604-3603 Printed Date: 03/31/2020 InformationGeneral Received Date: 03/06/2020 Occupancy Type: Review Begin Date: 03/12/2020 Property Use: i Review End Date: 03/12/2020 Activity Number: 103BJ022 Hours: 1.0000 Review Cause: New Construction Activity Details Project Name Solar Power Facility Comments: Access roads shall be 20 feet of drivable surface in width for fire department/EMS service access. Identifying"zones"or naming access roads within the site would greatly assist in Fire department services. . t Adam Hounshell Lieutenant/Assistant Fire Marshal Page 1 of 1 264 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS r lop Virginia Department of Transportation Mahand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Transportation Attn:Resident Engineer Attn: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike 2275 Northwestern Pike Edinburg,Virginia 22824 Winchester,Virginia 22603 The local office of the Transportation Department is located at 2275 Northwestern Pike in Winchester if you prefer to hand deliver this form. Applicant: It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,please attach two(2)copies of your application form,location map and all other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Foxglove solar,LLc Telephone: 410-604-3603 Mailing Address: 337 Log Canoe Circle,Stevensville,MD 21666 Name of development and/or description of the request: Foxglove Solar Project-Utility Scale soler Power Generating Facilities Location of Property: Hites View Road(666.5 acres as shown on the preliminary site plan) Virginia Department of Transportation Comments: I he application Mir a conditiona use permit Tor these P1 uperties appear to have Itt e measurable impact on Route 631 (Marlboro Road) and Route 625 (Hites Road), the VDOT ace es prove mg access to the grope les. Locations have been I ent e r a low-volume commercial entrance,on Route 631 and Route 625. The new entrances will need to meet VDOT standards Tor the pruposea use. Should the use ever expanin t e future,the entrances will need to be reviewed to determine if additional improvements may be required. VDOT Signature&Date: _ r � Notice to VDOT-Please Return Form to Applicant 10 265 DECOMMISSIONING PLAN (Frederick County) Revised June 24,2020 L Introduction This plan for decommissioning (the "Plan") is for the Foxglove Solar Project(the "Project") located in Frederick, County, Virginia (the "County"), and shall be binding on each successor and assignee (the "Facility Owner"). The purpose of the Plan is to ensure the Project is properly removed at the end of the Project's useful life, or earlier if abandoned in whole or in part, and that the Project site is restored to pre-existing conditions. Pursuant to this Plan, a Decommissioning Cost Estimate will be provided for County review prior to the site plan approval and updated every five (5)years during the Project Life. II. Decommissioning The expected life of the Project is the period during which the facility can produce electrical energy generation (the"Project Life"). At the end of the Project Life, or earlier in the event of abandonment of all or a portion of the Project, the Facility Owner shall decommission the Project or a portion thereof, as set forth below. The decommissioning process for the Project is generally expected to occur as follows ("Decommissioning"):1 I. The following items shall be removed, dissembled(if applicable),packaged and shipped for re-sale or to a salvage/recycling facility or other processing facility where possible, or to a landfill for disposal. a. PV Module b. Racking System c. Mounting Posts d. Electrical wiring/cabling e. Inverters/transformers/connector station f. Fencing g. Concrete Foundations h. Gravel from Access Drive(s) 2. Dispose of any components in a landfill that cannot be salvaged/recycled, re-sold or re- used. 3. Stabilize any exposed soil where equipment was removed, consistent with County and other applicable erosion and sediment control standards. 4. Maintain and replant turf-grass throughout the site, as necessary, unless required otherwise by the landowner. 5. The Project site or portion thereof shall be restored to its pre-development condition. 1 It is expected, but not required, that most components of the Project will be salvageable, recyclable,re-usable or re-salable. 266 6. The Project does not generate any hazardous materials. In the unlikely event, and to the extent that, any hazardous materials, as defined by federal, state and/or local laws, are present due to the Project, as part of Decommissioning the Facility Owner shall dispose of all such materials in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations governing such materials and the disposal of the same. III. Decommissioning Process Decommissioning generally proceeds in reverse order of installation of the Project: 1. The facility is disconnected from the utility power grid. 2. Solar arrays are disconnected, collected, and either shipped to another project, salvaged, or submitted to a collection and recycling program. 3. Electrical interconnection and distribution cables are removed and recycled off-site by an approved recycler. 4. Array support H-beams and racking are removed and recycled off-site by an approved metals recycler. 5. Electrical and electronic devices, including transformers and inverters are removed and recycled off-site by and approved recycler. 6. Concrete pads (if used for the inverter blocks) are removed and recycled off-site by a concrete recycler. 7. Fencing is removed and recycled off-site by an approved recycler. 8. Any interior Project roads,typically constructed of 4" aggregate base, can either remain onsite should the landowner choose to retain them, or be removed and the gravel repurposed either on-or off-site. 9. Unless agreed otherwise by the landowner, the Project site is returned to its condition prior to installation of the Project, in accordance with applicable land use regulations in effect at the time of Decommissioning. IV. Decommissioning Cost Estimate The Facility Owner shall provide an estimate of the cost to decommission the Project (the "Decommissioning Cost Estimate") prepared by a Virginia Licensed Engineer prior to site plan approval for installation of the Project, which shall include the following: (a) The gross estimated cost to perform Decommissioning as set forth in Section 11 above ("Gross Cost"); (b) An administrative and inflation factor of 10%of the Gross Cost(the"Admin Factor"); (c) The estimated resale and salvage values associated with the Project equipment ("Salvage Value"); and (d) A reduction in the Salvage Value by 10% such that only 90% of the Salvage Value can be used as a credit against the Gross Cost and Admin Factor. The Salvage Value multiplied by 90%is the"Salvage Credit." 2 267 Thus, the Decommissioning Cost Estimate formula is: Gross Cost+Admin Factor—Salvage Credit=the Decommissioning Cost Estimate. The Facility Owner shall provide an updated Decommissioning Cost Estimate on every 5th year anniversary of the date when the Project first began to continuously deliver electric energy to the electric grid for commercial sales (the "Commercial Operation Date") during the Project Life,which shall account for inflation, cost and value changes, and advances in decommissioning technologies and approaches. If the Project lies on property owned by more than one person, entity or group (multiple owners), the Decommissioning Cost Estimate shall include a table allocating the Decommissioning Cost Estimate across the Project site,based on the percentage of generating capacity in megawatts(MW)attributable to each separately owned part of the property (the "Cost Allocation"). V. Timing for Decommissioning Upon the earlier of. (i) Completion of the Project Life; or (ii) Abandonment of the Project or any portion thereof, the Facility Owner shall promptly arrange for and be responsible for the full Decommissioning of the Project. If the Project or any portion thereof has ceased operations and is not maintained for a continuous period of longer than one(1)year and decommissioning is required before the end of the Project Life, the County may provide written notice of suspected abandonment to the Facility Owner. Upon receipt,the Facility Owner shall have a sixty (60) day period in which to refute the claim,remedy any problem, commence Decommissioning, or show why more than sixty (60) days is reasonably necessary to remedy the problem. If at the end of the sixty (60) day period the parties are unable to resolve amicably any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Decommissioning Plan, then such dispute shall be resolved by an action filed in the Circuit Court of Frederick County,Virginia. VI. Partial Decommissioning If Decommissioning is triggered for a portion,but not the entire Project,prior to the end of the Project Life, the Facility Owner shall commence and complete Decommissioning, in accordance with the Decommissioning Plan, for the applicable portion of the Project. If a portion of the Project is Decommissioned, the remaining portion of the Project would continue to be subject to this Decommissioning Plan. VII. Completion of Decommissioning Decommissioning will be complete when the County Construction Official or County Engineer, or another party appointed by the County, determines that Decommissioning has been completed in accordance with this Decommissioning Plan by issuance of a letter to the Facility Owner. VIII. Default by the Facility Owner If the Facility Owner is in default of its obligation to commence or complete Decommissioning, and such default remains uncured for more than sixty (60) days (as explained in Section V above), each landowner shall have the right to commence Decommissioning activities within the area it owns. 3 268 Nothing herein shall limit other rights or remedies that may be available to the County to enforce the obligations of the Facility Owner, including the County's zoning powers. IX. Notice under this Decommissioning Plan Foxglove Solar, LLC Department of Planning & Development c/o Urban Grid Solar Projects, LLC County of Frederick, Virginia 337 Log Canoe Circle 107 North Kent Street Stevensville, MD 21666 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attn: Decommissioning Notice Attn: Planning Director X. Financial Security Financial security shall be in an amount equal to the Decommissioning Cost Estimate (as determined by a Virginia licensed Engineer in Section III) (the "Decommissioning Security"). When the Decommissioning Cost Estimate is redone during the Project Life,the Facility Owner shall adjust the amount of the Decommissioning Security to match the updated Decommissioning Cost Estimate. If the Facility is not developed by a public utility company or an independent power producer with an investment grade credit rating with Moody's or Standard and Poor's (a "Qualified Company"), prior to commencement of commercial operations the Facility Owner shall provide financial security for the removal of the Facility. If the Facility is at any time neither owned nor operated by an entity that is a Qualified Company, then at such time either the owner or the operator shall provide such financial security. If such financial security is required to run to the benefit of the County, such security shall also run to the benefit of the landowner. The Facility Owner will only be required to provide one instrument or obligation equal to the Decommissioning Security to satisfy its obligations to both the County and the landowner. The Decommissioning Security may be provided in one of the following forms: (i) a surety bond, (ii) a letter of credit from a financial institution, (iii) a parent guaranty, or (iv) such other financial instrument as is commonly used in business to secure monetary obligations, so long as such instrument is irrevocable unless replaced with cash or other form of security reasonably acceptable to the parties that benefit from such security. 4 269 PREPARED FOR: Urban Grid Foxglove Solar Protected Species Review August 2018 { + ' `y • lar. q , t •• • _ Com_ J A F i +' na Prepared By: TIMMONS GROUP .0000•0 YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. • • 0 1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300 Richmond,Virginia 23225 Phone: 804.200.6500 Fax: 804.560.1648 www.Timmons.com Timmons Group Project No. 41147 270 FOXGLOVE SOLAR-PROTECTED SPECIES REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Background Information ................................................................... 1 2 Protected Species Analysis............................................................................................ 2 3 Conclusions.................................................................................................................. 5 Attachments Attachment 1 -USFWS IPaC Search Documents Attachment 2-VDGIF IPA Search Documents and Maps Attachment 3 -VDGIF WERMS Map Attachment 4- CCB Eagles Nest Locator Map &USFWS Bald Eagle Concentration Areas Map Attachment 5 -VDGIF Northern Long Eared Bat Search Map Attachment 6-DCR-DNH Database Search Documents Attachment 7-DCR Project Review Comments (will send this attachment when received) 1 Introduction and Background Information Timmons Group has completed a preliminary desktop evaluation to identify known occurrences and habitat of state and federally protected species at the Foxglove Solar site (Site), including federally and stated threatened and endangered (T&E) species. This updated review includes the additional study limit update that occurred in August 2018. This evaluation satisfies the Permit by Rule regulation requirements related to the analysis of wildlife as outlined in 9VAC 15-60-40 A.1 and 2. This evaluation included queries of the following databases: • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation search (IPaC)-provides a list of unofficial federal T&E species within the project limits • USFWS Bald Eagle Concentration Areas mapping tool • The Center for Conservation Biology (CCB)Eagles Nest Locator • The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Services (VaFWIS), Initial Project Assessment (IPA) - includes a search within the project limits and areas within a two (2)mile radius of the project limits, per VDGIF's IPA recommendations Urban Grid Timmons Group:PN 41147 Foxglov Solar—Protected Species Review August 2018 Page 1 271 • VDGIF Wildlife Environmental Review Map Service (WERMS) — An ArcGIS based mapping tool which contains maps, features, and geodata services on critical wildlife resources including both federal and state protected species. • VDGIF Northern Long-eared Bat (NLEB) mapping tool — provides locations of known hibernaculum and roost trees for these protected species in Virginia • Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation-Department of Natural Heritage (DCR-DNH) watershed search - database for threatened or endangered species known to occur anywhere in the Cedar Creek-Meadow Brook Subwatershed(HUC 02070006 PS75) Project specific comments were also solicited from DCR through their Project Review process to assess the potential impacts of the project on natural heritage resources, including protected plant and insect species. All database results and correspondence are provided in the attached enclosures. Please note that the database search results presented in this report are considered valid for a period of up to 6 months. After this time, the searches are considered out of date and need to be re- evaluated. 2 Protected Species Analysis Based upon the results of the database findings, five (6)protected species have known occurrence and/or the potential to exist within the vicinity of the Site. These species include two (2) federally endangered/state endangered species(FESE), one(1)federally threatened/state threatened(FTST) species, two (2) state endangered species, and one (1) state threatened (ST) species. Details for each of these species,including habitat requirements and potential project impacts are summarized in Table 1: Protected Species Occurrences. Other Notable Species A search of known Bald Eagle nest locations/concentration areas utilizing the William and Mary Center for Conservation Biology (CCB) website and USFWS Bald Eagle Concentration Areas mapping tool indicate there are no known Bald Eagle nests or concentration areas located within 2 miles of the project boundary. Therefore, the Project will not likely affect this protected species and additional agency coordination is not anticipated. In addition, project specific comments received from the Department of Conservation and Recreation(DCR)may mention other protected species. A request for a 30-day turn around Project Review Comments was submitted on 8/24/2018. Those comments will be provided in an addendum report, once received from DCR. Urban Grid Timmons Group:PN 41237 Foxglove Solar—Protected Species Review August 2018 Page 2 272 Table 1: Protected Species Occurrences. Common Species/ ME Agency Name Scientific Name Habitat Descri tion Status* Search Conclusions/Recommendations USFWS suggests this species could potentially be affected by activities at Mammal-Hibernating Bat/ this location. However,based on DGIF's review,this species has not Over-winter hibernates in been observed within the project boundaries or within the 2-mile buffer mountain caves. In summer around the site. Agency coordination will likely be required if state or Indiana Bat Myotis sodalist they are found along riparian FESE USFWS federal permits are needed,or if project related tree clearing is proposed. woodlands. Typically nests Potential TOYR:No significant tree removal at project site from Apr 15 — under loose bark of large snags. Sep 15;No significant tree removal within 5 miles of hibernacula from Apr 1 -Nov 15 Based upon a review of available information(Digital Atlas of VA and Vascular Plant/ USDA Plant Atlas),Harperella has never been document or identified in Harperella nodosum Typically found in seasonally FESE USFWS Fredrick County. Therefore,we do not expect to find this species on Site. nodosum inundated and frequently However,agency coordination will likely be required if state or federal flooded rock outcrops. permits are needed. Mammal-Hibernating Bat/ Based upon a review of available information there are no known Over-winter hibernates in maternity roosts or hibernacula located within or near the Northern Long- Myotis mountain caves. Typically FTST USFWS Project. Therefore,the Project will not likely be affected by this species ear Bat(NLEB) septentrionalis roosts underneath bark,or in as outlined in the USFWS NLEB Final 4(d)Rule. However, agency cavities of both live trees and coordination may be required regarding project related tree clearing_. snags DGIF DGIF and the DCR subwatershed search both indicate this species may be Appalachian Fontigens Freshwater Snail/ DCR-DNH affected by activities occurring on this Site. Confirmed observations of Previously identified in cave SE ershed search this species have been noted in several stream reaches both onsite and Springsnail bottimeri streams and in small springs swithin the 2-mile buffer. Agency coordination will likely be required if search federal or state permits are needed. Although there have been two confirmed observations within the 2-mile Roost/dwell in caves,trees, buffer surrounding the site,there were no observations onsite and there are Little Brown Myotis lucifugus rocks,buildings,under bridges, SE DGIF no known maternity roosts or hibernacula located within or near the site, Bat in mines and tunnels mainly in based upon review of available database information. Therefore,the forested regions. project will not likely be affected by this species,but agency coordination will be required to confirm. Urban Grid Timmons Group:PN 41147 Foxglove Solar—Protected Species Review August 2018 Page 3 273 Table 1: Protected Species Occurrences. DGIF and the DCR subwatershed search both indicate this species may be affected by activities occurring on this Site. Confirmed observations of Reptile/ DGIF this species have been noted in several stream reaches both onsite and Glyptemys Aquatic turtle living in and DCR-DNH within the 2-mile buffer. Agency coordination will likely be required if Wood Turtle insculpta around perennial streams, ST Subwatershed federal or state permits are needed. roaming in riparian woodlands search Potential TOYR: For instream work: Oct 1—March 31;For work within 900 feet of stream(zone of concern): April 1—Sept 30. Maintain undisturbed naturally vegetated buffer of at least 300 feet on stream. *F=Federally, S=State, T=Threatened, E=Endangered. $VDGIF= Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, DCR = Department of Conservation and Recreation-Department of Natural Heritage,USFWS=US Fish and Wildlife Service Urban Grid Timmons Group:PN 41147 Foxglove Solar—Protected Species Review August 2018 Page 4 274 3 Conclusions Based upon the results of this evaluation, official agency comment and/or coordination regarding protected species will be required if federal and/or state permits are needed for the development of this Site. Protected species of concern for this site are the Indiana Bat (*otis sodalist), Appalachian Springsnail (Fontigens bottimeri), and the Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta). USFWS, DGIF, and DCR-DNH databases indicate that these state and federally endangered species may occur within the vicinity of the project area or that potential habitat may exist onsite. A search using VDGIF NLEB mapping tools show no known maternity roosts or hibernacula located within or near the project boundaries. Therefore, the Project will not likely affect any known NLEB areas. However, under the NLEB final 4(d) rule, the USFWS reserves the right to request additional studies or information during consultation with federal permitting agencies. In addition, project specific comments received from the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) may mention species not covered in this desktop analysis. A request for a 30-day turnaround Project Review Comments was submitted on 8/24/2018. Those comments will be included in an addendum to this report once received. In order to obtain clearances and/or required mitigation for protected species within the project site, official agencies coordination will be necessary. Coordination will need to include the VDGIF, and USFWS. Currently, these federal and state agencies are unable to provide project evaluation/coordination until a project is reviewed through an interagency coordination process. Specific events trigger this coordination process include: • Permit applications o Joint"dredge-and-fill" permits o VPDES and VWPP permits (VDEQ) o Small Renewable Energy Facility permits-by-rule (PBRs) • FERC license application and SCC applications • Environmental documents o Environmental Impact Reports or Statements o Environmental Assessments o Other NEPA documents o Coastal Consistency Determinations o Section 7 (Endangered Species Act) reviews for selected state and federal agency projects only • Proposed state or federal legislation or regulations • Federal land and wildlife management plans for parks, refuges, forests, and DOD lands • Miscellaneous projects such as Landowner Incentive Program projects; projects proposed on or adjacent to VDGIF Wildlife Management Areas, boat ramps, public fishing lakes, or hatcheries; gypsy moth spray blocks, etc. • VDOT projects and locality administered transportation projects Urban Grid Timmons Group:PN 41147 Foxglove Solar—Protected Species Review August 2018 Page 5 275 • VDCR Recreation Grant Project Reviews: Land and Water Conservation Fund projects & Recreation Trails Program projects Prior to formal agency review, surveys for the presence/absence of these protected species can be completed to further understand if these species are present on the site and to help in determining how they may or may not impact site development. Timmons Group can provide survey services upon request. Urban Grid Timmons Group:PN 41147 Foxglove Solar—Protected Species Review August 2018 Page 6 276 ATTACHMENT I USFWS IPaC SEARCH DOCUMENTS 277 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location IPaC U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s)with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. LocationXle Frederick County, Virginia -0 01?�I- 4 ,.4 Local office Virginia Ecological Services Field Office t. (804) 693-6694 18 (804) 693-9032 6669 Short Lane Gloucester, VA 23061-4410 http://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/ https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB6I/resources 278 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts. The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project-specific information is often required. �X:4 Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly. For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing the following: 1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE. 2. Click DEFINE PROJECT. 3. Log in (if directed to do so). 4. Provide a name and description for your project. 5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries`). Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more information. 2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location: Mammals NAME STATUS https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB61/resources 279 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species.Your location is outside the critical habitat. httpL.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5949 Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045 Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739 Critical habitats Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves. THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATIONr Migratory birds_ Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described be ow. 1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. Additional information can be found using the following links: • Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/ birds-of-conservation-concern.php • Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/ conservation-measures.php • Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB61/resources 280 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your . project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON IFA BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED .........................................................�............................................... FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST,THE _..................................................................................................... IRD MAY BREED IN YOUR .................................................................................. CT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN .............. ........................................................................................ THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE. CP ........................................................................................ "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT THE BLRD.DOES.NOT LIKELY 0 BREED I.N YOUR ROJECT AREA.)...................................................... Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds May 20 to Jul 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31 This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC)throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. Probability of Presence Summary https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB61/resources 281 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence ( ) Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high. How is the probability of presence score calculated?The calculation is done in three steps: 1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25. 2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2. iF I X 3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score. To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. Breeding Season ( ) Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area. Survey Effort ( ) Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys. To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar. No Data ( ) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Survey Timeframe Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse. probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB61/resources 282 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bobolink g '�` I F� '�`■ BCC Ran ewide (CON)(This is a Bird ................................................ of Conservation ....................................... Concern(BCC) .................................. throughout its range .................................................. n the continental ........................................... USA and Alaska.) ......................................... Prairie Warbler —� ---- ---- --- IIII IIII IIII ---- ---+ ---- ---- ---- BCC Rangewide ..................................... (CON)(This is a Bird ................................................ of Conservation ....................................... Concern(BCC) throughout its range ..................................... in the continental ........................................... USA and Aiaska.) ......................................... Red-headed ---+ ---- ---- ---- -III IIII IIII IIII I -4I— ---- ---- -- Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON)(This is a Bird ................................................ of Conservation ...................................... Concern(BCC) ....................... throughout its range in the ...............continental ............................ USA and Alaska.) Wood Thrush 'C' C Rangewide COs a ( N)(This iBird of Conservation C ...................................... oncern(BCC) .................................. throughout its range .... .i.n. the .....continental ....... ............................ USA and Alaska.) Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds. Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area.When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area,view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site. What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location. The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN).The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development. Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area.To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E-bird Explore Data Tool. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB61/resources 283 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location? The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network(AKN).This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets . Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available.To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them,go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link. How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area? To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,wintering, migrating or year-round),you may refer to the following resources:The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there),the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area,there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If"Breeds elsewhere" is indicated,then the bird likely does not breed in your project area. What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? 40AN Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern: 1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA(including Hawaii,the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands); 2. "BCC- BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions(BCRs) in the continental USA; and 3. "Non-BCC-Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements(for eagles) or(for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing). Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular,to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics. Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal.The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately,you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage. Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring. What if I have eagles on my list? If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles,you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB61/resources 284 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern.To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ"What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the"probability of presence"of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s)that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the"no data" indicator(a red horizontal bar).A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high,then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and,therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species.This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding(which means nests might be present).The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed.To learn more about conservation measures,visit the FAQ"Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds"at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page. ON Facilities Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries ' REFUGE AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME C -0 Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory Impacts to and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. This location overlaps the following wetlands: FRESHWATER POND PUBHh RIVERINE RSUBH R4SBC A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB6l/resources 285 8/23/2018 IPaC: Explore Location Data limitations The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location,type and size of these resources.The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.Wetlands are identified based on vegetation,visible hydrology and geography.A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery,thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis. The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems. Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work.There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site. Data exclusions Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands.These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities(coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth,go undetected by aerial imagery. _ i Data precautions AMIN. % \\,\ Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory.There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory,to define the limits of proprietaryjurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities. 0. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/WKDQEVRQBRFG5FTVYVA6KNDB6I/resources 286 ATTACHMENT 2 VDGIF IPA SEARCH DOCUMENTS AND MAPS 287 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map aFWIS-Department +Aa H+e of Game and Inland Fisheries --- ---- 4' hack ���� � Refresh Browser 39.07443-78.27333 M3p Pan M Map In Zoom oUt Screen Small Size 'Big is the Search Point Click Scale Size Submit Cancel ? s - Search Point r �" O. Change to"clicked"map point _ *. r. e {l Q Fixed at 39.07443 r -78.27333 F > Show Position Rings OYes * No 1 mile and 1/4 mile at the r Search Point a A, _ �'.r , Show Search Area OO Yes O No 2 Search distance miles buffer `A �t7 Search Point is at a y map center K .•. Base Map Choices BW Aerial Photography v '} A y Map Overlay Choices F Current List:TEWaters, AEANests,BECAR,TierII, ' Search z Map Overlay Legend rr �-'a:r • �� T SL E Waters L ,r Federal !State 3,0 2 mile radius Search Area r r Bald Eagle4` Concentration Areas and Roosts Bald Eagle nests 660 and 330 foot °=� •v `i management zones ,• # ,•. , r Datas Observation Site 2 Mile WAP Tier I+II N 1 a 1 2 3 4l9lamahrs I a 1 2 3 4 Mlles Point of Search 39.07443-78.27333 Map Location 39.07443-78.27333 Select Coordinate System: O Degrees,Minutes,Seconds Latitude-Longitude OO Decimal Degrees Latitude-Longitude O Meters UTM NAD83 East North Zone O Meters UTM NAD27 East North Zone Base Map source:Black&White USGS Aerial Photography(see Microsoft terraserver-usa.com for details) https://vafwis.dgif.virginia.gov/fwis/maps/zMapFormJava.asp?v=082315 288 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map Map projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD 1983 with left 727878 and top 4336577.Pixel size is 16 meters.Coordinates displayed are decimal Degrees North and West.Map is currently displayed as 1000 columns by 1000 rows for a total of 1000000 pixles.The map display represents 16000 meters east to west by 16000 meters north to south for a total of 256.0 square kilometers.The map display represents 52502 feet east to west by 52502 feet north to south for a total of 98.8 square miles. Topographic maps and Black and white aerial photography for year 1990+- are from the United States Department of the Interior,United States Geological Survey. Color aerial photography aquired 2002 is from Virginia Base Mapping Program,Virginia Geographic Information Network. Shaded topographic maps are from TOPO!©2006 National Geographic http://www.national.geograpWc.com/topo All other map products are from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. map assembled 2018-08-23 15:46:11 (qa/qc March 21,2016 12:20-tn=926537 dist-3218 I) $poi=39.0920000-78.2738200 I DGIF I Credits I Disclaimer I Contact skirl.dressler(a&f.virginia.gov IPlease view ou privacy_policy, ©1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries https://vafwis.dgif.virginia.gov/fwis/maps/zMapFormJava.asp?v=082315 289 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map 7 Species Observations here Bat,little brown ` (050020)observed -- hack Refresh Browser Pa e_ 39,05,31.2-78,16,25.7 Map Pan Map In Z.00m OUt Screen Small SiZe _I Big is the Search Point Click Scale Size — Show Position Rings O Yes t! No 1 mile and 1/4 mile at the k h Search Point a t Show Search Area , OO Yes O No , 2 Search distance miles buffer Display Search Point is at center J of at map center r Base Map Choices ' BW Aerial Photography ti Map Overlay Choices Current List:Search,SppObs �— K c ! r '' 741 Map Overlay Legend 2 mile radius Search Area Data observation Site AL . Sx r f �i•�,1. 1. a � 77 1- N 1 a 1 2 3 4l9lamahrs 1 a 1 2 3 4 Mlles Point of Search 39,05,31.2-78,16,25.7 Map Location 39,04,27.9-78,16,24.0 Select Coordinate System: 03 Degrees,Minutes,Seconds Latitude-Longitude O Decimal Degrees Latitude-Longitude O Meters UTM NAD83 East North Zone O Meters UTM NAD27 East North Zone Base Map source:Black&White USGS Aerial Photography(see Microsoft terraserver-usa.com for details) htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/ma s/zMa FormJava.as ?autoscale=14&coord=LL&dis Ia _onlY=1&dist=3218&dp=& ap=&In=timmons&o oi=&overla... 290 — 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map Map projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD 1983 with left 727878 and top 4336577.Pixel size is 16 meters.Coordinates displayed are Degrees,Minutes,Seconds North and West.Map is currently displayed as 1000 columns by 1000 rows for a total of 1000000 pixles.The map display represents 16000 meters east to west by 16000 meters north to south for a total of 256.0 square kilometers. The map display represents 52502 feet east to west by 52502 feet north to south for a total of 98.8 square miles. Topographic maps and Black and white aerial photography for year 1990+- are from the United States Department of the Interior,United States Geological Survey. Color aerial photography aquired 2002 is from Virginia Base Mapping Program,Virginia Geographic Information Network. Shaded topographic maps are from TOPO!©2006 National Geographic http://www.national.geograpWc.com/topo All other map products are from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. map assembled 2018-08-23 15:53:35 (qa/qc March 21,2016 12:20-tn-926537.1 dist-3218 I $poi=39.0920000-78.2738199 I DGIF I Credits I Disclaimer I Contact shirl.dressler@dgif.virginia.gov IPlease view ou privacy-policy ©1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/ma s/zMa FormJava.as ?autoscale=14&coord=LL&dis Ia _onlY=1&dist=3218&dp=& ap=&In=timmons&o oi=&overla... 291 -- 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report r Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries 8/23/2018 3:55:23 PM Fish and Wildlife Information Service VaFWIS Search Report Compiled on 8/23/2018, 3:55:23 PM Help Known or likely to occur within a 2 mile buffer around line beginning 39.0920000 -78.2738199 in 069 Frederick County, VA where (050020) Bat, little brown observed. View Map of Site Location Species Observations where Bat, little brown (050020) observed (7 records,7 observations with Threatened or Endangered species) View Map of All Query Results Species Observations where Bat,little brown(050020)observed N Species obsID class Date Observer Different Highest Highest View Observed Map Species TE Tier 230931 SppObs May 26 Sanders: Danielle Ireton, 2 SE I Yes 2008 JjJason Collins 230932 SppObs May 24 Sanders: K. Voochees, Chris 2 SE I Yes 2008 IlSanders May 18 Sanders: Clayton Lutz Jen 230937 SppObs 2008 Hicks 2 SE I Yes 230939 SppObs May 18 Sanders: D. Ireton, C. 2 SE I Yes 2008 IlSanders May 171 Sanders: Mike Schneider, 230935 SppObs 2008 Chelsea Albertson 1 SE I Yes May 17 Sanders: Clay Lutz Jen 230936 SppObs 2008 Hicks. 5 SE I Yes EgEppObs] May 15 Sanders: Mike Schneider, 1 SE I Yes 2008 Chelsea Albertson Displayed 7 Species Observations where Bat, little brown (050020) observed *FE=Federal Endangered-, FT=Federal Threatened-, SE=State Endangered-, ST=State Threatened-, FP=Federal Proposed, FC=Federal Candidate-, CC=Collection Concern **I=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier I-Critical Conservation Need, II=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier II-Very High Conservation Need, III=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier III-High Conservation Need, IV=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier IV-Moderate Conservation Need Virginia Widlife Action Plan Conservation Opportunity Ranking: a-On the ground management strategies/actions exist and can be feasibly implemented.-, b-On the ground actions or research needs have been identified but cannot feasibly be implemented at this time., c-No on the ground actions or research needs have been identified or all identified conservation opportunities have been exhausted. https://vafwis.dgif.virginia.gov/fwis/NewPages/VaFWI S_re ort_search.asp?pf=1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&commonName=Bat,+little+brown&co... 292 - 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report Compiled on 8/23/2018,3:55:23 PM I926537.1 report—BOVA searchType=L dist—3218 poi=39.0920000-78.2738199 audit no.926537 8/23/2018 3:55:23 PM Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service © 1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/fwis/NewPa es/VaFWIS_re ort_search.asp?pf=1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&commonName=Bat,+little+brown&co... 293 -- 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map Threatened and Endangered Waters `# here Turtle,wood - (030062)observed I-LEI I Refresh Browser Pa e Map Map In Zanm oUt Screen Small SIZe l gIg 39,05,31.2-78,16,25.7 Click Scale Size is the Search Point ? Show Position Rings Yes O No 1 mile and 1/4 mile at the r Yy r % 7 Search Point Show Search Area Yes O No ¢rx r 2 Search distance miles Wt, buffer +. 9 Display Search Point is 4 f at center of at map center tf �. Base Map Choices f BW Aerial Photography v a, Map Overlay Choices Current List:Search, TEWaters ' x, Map Overlay Legend T&E Waters Fe ed ral state 2 mile radius r t Search Area f � r A"F rsy �r �`'; µms. +-. ;r _. .- y •�; 1 � r - - � t s N 1 a 1 2 3 4 K9lome%m 1 a 1 2 3 4 M1165 Point of Search 39,05,31.2-78,16,25.7 Map Location 39,04,27.9-78,16,24.0 Select Coordinate System: 03 Degrees,Minutes,Seconds Latitude-Longitude O Decimal Degrees Latitude-Longitude O Meters UTM NAD83 East North Zone O Meters UTM NAD27 East North Zone Base Map source:Black&White USGS Aerial Photography(see Microsoft terraserver-usa.com for details) htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/ma s/zMa FormJava.as ?autoscale=14&coord=LL&dis Ia _onlY=1&dist=3218&dp=& ap=&In=timmons&o oi=&overla... 294 — 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map Map projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD 1983 with left 727878 and top 4336577.Pixel size is 16 meters.Coordinates displayed are Degrees,Minutes,Seconds North and West.Map is currently displayed as 1000 columns by 1000 rows for a total of 1000000 pixles.The map display represents 16000 meters east to west by 16000 meters north to south for a total of 256.0 square kilometers. The map display represents 52502 feet east to west by 52502 feet north to south for a total of 98.8 square miles. Topographic maps and Black and white aerial photography for year 1990+- are from the United States Department of the Interior,United States Geological Survey. Color aerial photography aquired 2002 is from Virginia Base Mapping Program,Virginia Geographic Information Network. Shaded topographic maps are from TOPO!©2006 National Geographic http://www.national.geograpWc.com/topo All other map products are from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. map assembled 2018-08-23 15:59:26 (qa/qc March 21,2016 12:20-tn-926537.1 dist-3218 I $poi=39.0920000-78.2738199 I DGIF I Credits I Disclaimer I Contact shirl.dressler@dgif.virginia.gov IPlease view ou privacy-policy ©1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/ma s/zMa FormJava.as ?autoscale=14&coord=LL&dis Ia _onlY=1&dist=3218&dp=& ap=&In=timmons&o oi=&overla... 295 -- 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries 8/23/2018 4:00:58 PM Fish and Wildlife Information Service VaFWIS Search Report Compiled on 8/23/2018,4:00:58 PM Help Known or likely to occur within a 2 mile buffer around line beginning 39.0920000 -78.2738199 in 069 Frederick County, VA where (030062) Turtle,wood observed. View Map of Site Location Threatened and Endangered Waters where Turtle,wood (030062) observed (15 Reaches) View Map of All Threatened and Endangered Waters T&E Waters Species Stream Name HighestView BOVA Code, Status, Tier��, Map TE Common & Scientific Name Meadow Brook En�oold Glyptemys (012679 ) ST F30062ETIa insculpta Yes Meadow Brook(02941 En�oold Glyptemys ST 030062 ST Ia insculpta Yes FEE Z Meadow Brook(02967 STFEEE Turtle, Glyptemys Yes ), wood insculpta Meadow Brook En�ood Glyptemys (030257 ) ST 030062 ST Ia insculpta Yes Meadow Brook ST F30062 Turtle Glyptemys (031659 ) ST Ia woody insculpta Yes Meadow Brook Turtle Glyptemys (031663 ) ST 030062 ST Ia vc ood insculpta Yes Meadow Brook Turtle Glyptemys (035797 ), ST 030062 ST Ia wood insculpta Yes Meadow Brook Turtle, Glyptemys (038085 ) ST 030062 ST Ia wood insculpta Yes Meadow Brook En�ood Glyptemys (0395267 ) ST 030062 ST Ia insculpta Yes Meadow Brook F7n�ood rtle Glyptemys (041248 ) ST FO62 ST Ia insculpta Yes Meadow Brook(07077 ST F----7F----7F--71 IYes 2 htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/fwis/NewPa es/VaFWIS_re ort_search.as ? f-1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&commonName=Turtle,+wood&comm... - 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report ). 030062 ST Ia Turtle, Glyptemys wood insculpta Meadow Brook(07670 Turtle Glyptemys ST 030062 ST Ia vc cod insculpta yes Meadow Brook(08676 Turtle Glyptemys ST 030062 ST Ia vc cod insculpta yes Meadow Brook(08781 ELALood ,:] Glyptemys ST F06]2 [EFainsculpta yes To view All 15 Threatened and Endangered Waters records View 15 *FE=Federal Endangered; FT=Federal Threatened; SE=State Endangered; ST=State Threatened; FP=Federal Proposed; FC=Federal Candidate; CC=Collection Concern **I=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier I-Critical Conservation Need; II=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier II-Very High Conservation Need; III=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier III-High Conservation Need; IV=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier IV-Moderate Conservation Need Virginia Widlife Action Plan Conservation Opportunity Ranking: a-On the ground management strategies/actions exist and can be feasibly implemented.; b-On the ground actions or research needs have been identified but cannot feasibly be implemented at this time.; c-No on the ground actions or research needs have been identified or all identified conservation opportunities have been exhausted. Species Observations where Turtle,wood (030062) observed (I records, 1 observation with Threatened or Endangered species) View Map of All Query Results Species Observations where Turtle,wood(03006 2)observed N Species View obsID class Date Observed Observer Different Highest Highest Ma Species TES Tier�� p DR. CARL ERNST (PRINCIPLE Apr 13 PERMITTEE) THOMAS AKRE 64628 SppObs 2000 (COLLECTOR), DEPT. 1 ST I Yes BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES GMU Displayed 1 Species Observations where Turtle, wood (030062) observed Habitat Predicted for Aquatic WAP Tier I& H Species where Turtle,wood (030062) observed (8 Reaches) View Map Combined Reaches from Below of Habitat Predicted for WAP Tier I&II Aquatic Species Tier Species Stream Name Highest View BOVA Code, Status, Tier", Map TE Common & Scientific Name Fawcett Run (20700061)( ST Glyptemys yes 030062 ST E Turtle, wood insculpta F60201]F SEIF IIc I I Springsnail �[Fontigens 297 htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/fwis/NewPa es/VaFWIS re ort_search.as f-1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&commonName=Turtle,+wood&comm... - p 9� 9� 9 9 _ p p�p- p -- 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report L IL- — Appalachian 11bottimeri Meadow Brook EmTLo :1 Glyptemys (20700061) ST 030062 STIa insculpta yes Middle Marsh Brook ST E062:H]Ej::] Glyptemys yes (20700061) vc ooinsculpta Turtle tributary (20700061) ST 030062 ST Ia v�,00d insculpta Glyptemys yes Turtle tributary (20700071) ST 030062 ST Ia Glyptemys Yes wood insculpta Turtle, tributary (20700072) ST 030062 ST Ia Glyptemysv�,00d insculpta yes Turt Watson Run (20700061) ST 030062H E i II ::] insculpta Glyptemys yes Habitat Predicted for Terrestrial WAP Tier I& II Species where Turtle,wood (030062) observed N/A Compiled on 8/23/2018,4:00:58 PM I926537.1 report—BOVA searchType=L dist—3218 poi=39.0920000-78.2738199 audit no.926537 8/23/2018 4:00:58 PM Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service © 1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/fwis/NewPa es/VaFWIS_re ort_search.asp?pf-1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&commonName=Turtle,+wood&comm... 298 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map Threatened and Endangered Waters `# here Springsnail, - ppalachian(060201) back1 Refresh Browser Pa e observed Map Map In Zoom OUt Screen Small 5128 gl Click Scale Size -9 39,05,31.2-78,16,25.7 - ? r is the Search Point _ r+; rd� fir Y ,. r w� J ' ► Show Position Rings 1 t r l�rw1 O Yes (�, No 1 mile and 1/4 mile at the Search Point " ► x �' ' Show Search Area OO Yes O No 5 2 Search distance miles buffer Display Search Point is �� Nall r � at center Jof at map center Base Map Choices BW Aerial Photography v r' s Map Overlay Choices . Current List:Search, TE Waters Map Overlay Legend T&E Waters K F® ad rale ; l state rte. t 2 mile radius Search Area �`'; µms. +-. ;r _. .- y •�; 1 � r - - z_ t � t s N 1 a 1 2 3 4 K9lome%m 1 a 1 2 3 4 M1165 Point of Search 39,05,31.2-78,16,25.7 Map Location 39,04,27.9-78,16,24.0 Select Coordinate System: 03 Degrees,Minutes,Seconds Latitude-Longitude O Decimal Degrees Latitude-Longitude O Meters UTM NAD83 East North Zone O Meters UTM NAD27 East North Zone Base Map source:Black&White USGS Aerial Photography(see Microsoft terraserver-usa.com for details) htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/ma s/zMa FormJava.as ?autoscale=14&coord=LL&dis Ia _onlY=1&dist=3218&dp=& ap=&In=timmons&o oi=&overla... 299 - 8/23/2018 VaFWIS Map Map projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD 1983 with left 727878 and top 4336577.Pixel size is 16 meters.Coordinates displayed are Degrees,Minutes,Seconds North and West.Map is currently displayed as 1000 columns by 1000 rows for a total of 1000000 pixles.The map display represents 16000 meters east to west by 16000 meters north to south for a total of 256.0 square kilometers. The map display represents 52502 feet east to west by 52502 feet north to south for a total of 98.8 square miles. Topographic maps and Black and white aerial photography for year 1990+- are from the United States Department of the Interior,United States Geological Survey. Color aerial photography aquired 2002 is from Virginia Base Mapping Program,Virginia Geographic Information Network. Shaded topographic maps are from TOPO!©2006 National Geographic http://www.national.geograpWc.com/topo All other map products are from the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. map assembled 2018-08-23 15:57:25 (qa/qc March 21,2016 12:20-tn-926537.1 dist-3218 I $poi=39.0920000-78.2738199 I DGIF I Credits I Disclaimer I Contact shirl.dressler@dgif.virginia.gov IPlease view ou privacy-policy ©1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/ma s/zMa FormJava.as ?autoscale=14&coord=LL&dis Ia _onlY=1&dist=3218&dp=& ap=&In=timmons&o oi=&overla... 300 -- 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report rs . Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries 8/23/2018 3:58:57 PM Fish and Wildlife Information Service VaFWIS Search Report Compiled on 8/23/2018, 3:58:57 PM Help Known or likely to occur within a 2 mile buffer around line beginning 39.0920000 -78.2738199 in 069 Frederick County, VA where (060201) Springsnail,Appalachian observed. View Map of Site Location Threatened and Endangered Waters where Springsnail,Appalachian (060201) observed (14 Reaches) View Map of All Threatened and Endangered Waters _ T&E Waters Species Stream Name Highest View BOVA Code, Status, Tier��, Map TE Common & Scientific Name Buffalo Marsh Run SE 060201 [E]EP-Dalachian Springsnail Fontigens (028363 ) Abottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh RunSpringsnail Fontigens (030206 ) SE 060201 SE IIc Appalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh RunSpringsnail Yes Fontigens(031697 ), SE FEEEc Appalachian bottimeri Buffalo Marsh RunSpringsnail Fontigens (031734 ) SE 060201H]EAppalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh RunSpringsnail Yes Fontigens(031908 ) SE FEEE Appalachian bottimeri Buffalo Marsh Run Springsnail Fontigens (032717 ) SE 060201 SE IIc Appalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh Run Springsnail Fontigens (032866 ), SE 060201 SE IIc Appalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh Run Springsnail Fontigens (035385 ) SE 060201 SE 11c Appalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh Run Springsnail Fontigens (035477 ) SE FEElc Appalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh Run Springsnail Fontigens (035577 ) SE 060201FSE IIc Appalachian bottimeri Yes Buffalo Marsh Run SE I —T--F-1Yes 301 htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/fwis/NewPa es/VaFWIS_re ort_search.as ? f-1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&commonName=S rin snail,+Appalac... - 8/23/2018 VAFWIS Seach Report (038035 ). 060201 SE IIc Springsnail, Fontigens I-J� Appalachian bottimeri Buffalo Marsh Run Springsnail Fontigens (041054 ) SE 060201 SE IIc Appalachian bottimeri yes Buffalo Marsh RunSpringsnail Fontigens (041055 ) SE 060201FEE Appalachian bottimeri yes To view All 14 Threatened and Endangered Waters records View 14 *FE=Federal Endangered; FT=Federal Threatened; SE=State Endangered; ST=State Threatened; FP=Federal Proposed, FC=Federal Candidate; CC=Collection Concern **I=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier I-Critical Conservation Need, II=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier II-Very High Conservation Need, III=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier III-High Conservation Need, IV=VA Wildlife Action Plan-Tier IV-Moderate Conservation Need Virginia Widlife Action Plan Conservation Opportunity Ranking: a-On the ground management strategies/actions exist and can be feasibly implemented.; b-On the ground actions or research needs have been identified but cannot feasibly be implemented at this time., c-No on the ground actions or research needs have been identified or all identified conservation opportunities have been exhausted. Species Observations where Springsnail,Appalachian (060201) observed N/A Habitat Predicted for Aquatic WAP Tier I& 11 Species where Springsnail,Appalachian (060201) observed (1 Reach) View Map Combined Reaches from Below of Habitat Predicted for WAP Tier I&II Aquatic Species Tier Species Stream Name � View Map. Highest TE BOVA Code, Status , Tier , Common & Scientific Name Habitat Predicted for Terrestrial WAP Tier I& II Species where Springsnail,Appalachian (060201) observed N/A Compiled on 8/23/2018,3:58:57 PM I926537.1 report—BOVA searehType=L dist—3218 poi=39.0920000-78.2738199 audit no.926537 8/23/2018 3:58:57 PM Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service © 1998-2018 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries htt s://vafwis.d if.vir inia. ov/fwis/NewPa es/VaFWIS_re ort_search.asp?pf-1&Title=VaFWIS+Re ort+Search&common Name=S rin snail,+Appalac... 302 -- ATTACHMENT 3 VDGIF WERMS MAP 303 1 -Ail U Jgm l 40 p fp Bat - 1 brown w r O g r � Bat,Iii,I a 1bt+¢ aZ brow v r _ y. 7 a' � > � tt ILL! z $at,little „J 4 -- /�brown t Z 'r" o LU Species Observed within 2 Milesyy LU S ecies Name Federal Status State Status _ t y htl t J/ _ Batlittle, brown Non-Threatened State Endangered y� �'`a+ Bat,big brown Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Bat,eastern red Non-Threatened Non-Endangered 4��`� ` NN Bat,hoar Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Bluebird,eastern Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Bullfrog,American Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Dace,blacknose Non-ThreatenedNon-Endangered _ - e Dace,pearl Non-Threatened Non-Endangered r 4' WER a „a9 ryr,omV�N. Darter,fantail Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Frog,pickerel Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Salamander,cave Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Thrasher,brown Non-Threatened Non-Endangered Watersnake,northern Non-Threatened Non-Endan ered ._a°, Wren,house Non-Threatened Non-Endangered .' .` Ca 06 Legend / Bat,little o brown -` • r _ _ d REVISIONS Project Study Limits-557.4 Acres �- _+ ra+s O l 2 Mile Protect Buffer NLEB Roost Trees Not Present Threatened/Endangered Waters WILDLIFE Trout Streams •�l��" -tx. Bat,little - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAP Anadromous Fish Use Not Present .i �,- brown -Bald Eagle Concentration Areas and Roosts-Not Present '" - _ O 3 { -Colonial Water Birds Not Present Bat H bernacula Not Present Federal Threatened/State Endangered Observation Area Species Observed-Federal Status,State Status O Non-Threatened Non-Endangered 'r �+ 0 1800800 '3600 • Non-Threatened,State Endangered .x.' _ -- a r t H 043zs999 Ur wiin y Fmdrwco y S�mmo,S 304 ATTACHMENT 4 CCB EAGLES NEST LOCATOR MAP AND USFWS BALD EAGLE CONCENTRATION AREAS MAP 305 NLEB LcicEd crs and PccEL Tress ctvlfi�the P41 Baltimore vi k.shanr Columbia antaom Approximate Project Location AnnaPOI15 Hale nal Frost Washington NOWhal W Forest0 yn. IF,,-,I NIA Dale CAy As Hand Flalmr.nbui Charleston t v P redericksbutg? calfullia siauN C-11 —.% '�'j ff Chadofl esvifle L�3A e Chesapeake Bay f,J ff. J'v r4k.nI fired �J v I I,r�I N I A Richmond NI A LynrliYurg ,. F. --3 R-an,p Owe]Boone N -f P.d b;T P F • 1 M1ioirn,tarn HAMPIan LO-F Norfalh VITgInI3 Lead, Danville Jahn H Xe" — — — — — — —— — - Chffrc4,,- Hy; — Lake lnhn-n CM Hoilw. S.M Sdt.. Greaa5bwc L 11111.1m 9211'x718 4(XCB R\11 1:2311,162 KLM K-um 0-fo-ped N&ar RDCEt(arm-ur H�bta) 0 20 40 8Drrh 1\LMHb11111J11-f5-SM1aJiF11 0 35 � 140km N=HbffrMJLrn1-ff Me R-ffEr Est,FERE C- ml FAQ LEM EPA NIM VA DeGaim&I da-d FA' — Es,FERE Carm FAQ USGS EPA NF 306 ATTACHMENT 5 VDGIF NORTHERN LONG EARED BAT SEARCH MAP 307 8/23/2018 ArcGIS-USFWS Bald Eagle Concentration Areas-Virginia USFWS Bald Eagle Concentration Areas - Virginia Foxglove Solar Site Eagle Concentration ' , Areas Cr fDecember 15 to li March 15 I ,f May 15 to August 31 � and December 15 to March 15 s VV"ghts R%L0 USFWS Northeast Region States 41 lu Mi.dd to-mi0. 1 rd3 lrPg \ BW 6 G room* 1la6tl-.4c;al fk This map depicts designated Bald Eagle Concentration Areas in the State of Virginia. The Intent of this map is to provide information to the public about shoreline areas that ar ... VITA, West Virginia GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, NGA, EPA, USDA, NPS https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html 308 What We om Gi\Q to CC13 The CENTER for AI)V Lis CONSERVATION .. •. BIOLOGY ■■ MAPPING i i ► Help FAQ Layer,, gp f Le9.tl OCirenEr-IM3p rmlriburors,(adI abbulior 1 Bald Eagle II 3 cme J x'1,4 us A.. war, xrA„knlm KT VA EagIF Nest Locator + i rmombd ft . _ ''J vA9 t Mcs-.recent data CCB has - _._ 'o ,:... on talc eacle nest 3n° II In Virginia.Data is Wgely from IrAr III annual ae-lal Flight; ._ t9 - • PurcpllrMe D]ndnflBC in winter and �-� • spring of all tributares cf 4121 ,5 m k - the icmerChesapeake ■ Approximate `�'r�°' ,_�,= • 0 Day ando[herpr°miren. „ Project Location .a bodies of maI Repored grcundsurvey data is V U- C 0 also Ih Iuded • Mcre infous xs M VA Eagle Nest Brffers us aan ,ap�f..i + us 4, Eagle R.eosts 1w ss us sz: p r VVV 259 Eagle Rcust Polygors ` 0 Eagle Roost Buffers . _30 /C6.12 mi Eagle Roosts by , . . " ,.� u3 so Tonquad �c0 Chesapeake Say Herons • J0, r - • °'"I 4 2013 Colonial Waterbirds 2017 • 0 Colonial Waterbirds 2008 Colonial Waterbirds 2302 if , , Finat ecpal h } Osprey • +� + d{ ` 16f .YnmsPo y0.r 0spreyWatch Nests • . !ms n Chesapeake Say Osprey • us 3u0 , • • • / r Nests I995-1995Nlghtprs . �'... 4 Nlght!ar Survey 1I - f. � n4 • Toggle Lece9dc 'JA Eagle Vest La Zr Eagle Roost Buffers Layers: Va Eagle Nest Locator Map Center (longitude, latitude): (-78.2449722290039, 39.079974145329246) Report Generated On: 08/24/2018 309 ATTACHMENT 6 DCR-DNH SUBWATERSHED SEARCH DOCUMENTS 310 Natural Heritage Resources Your Criteria Global Conservation Status Rank: Select All State Conservation Status Rank: Select All Federal Legal Status: Select All State Legal Status: Select All County: Frederick Watershed (8 digit HUC): 02070006 - No. Fork Shenandoah River Subwatershed (12 digit HUC): PS75 - Cedar Creek-Meadow Brook Search Run: 8/23/2018 15:41:32 PM Result Summary Total Species returned: 4 Total Communities returned: 0 Click scientific names below to go to NatureServe report. Click column headings for an explanation of species and community ranks. 311 Common Scientific Global State Federal Legal State Legal Statewide Virginia Name/Natural Name Conservation Conservation Status Status Occurrences Coastal Zone Community Status Rank Status Rank Frederick North Fork Shenandoah Cedar Creek-Meadow Brook COLEOPTERA (BEETLES) Hupps Hill Pseudanophth G1 S1 SOC None 2 N Cave Beetle almus parvicollis GASTROPODA (SNAILS) Appalachian Fontigens G2G3 S2S3 SOC LE 6 N Springsnail bottimeri REPTILES Wood Turtle Glyptemys G3 S2 None LT 47 N insculpta VASCULAR PLANTS Canby's Paxistima G2 S2 SOC None 35 N Mountain-lover canbyi Note: On-line queries provide basic information from DCR's databases at the time of the request. They are NOT to be substituted for a project review or for on-site surveys required for environmental assessments of specific project areas. For Additional Information on locations of Natural Heritage Resources please submit an information request. To Contribute information on locations of natural heritage resources, please fill out and submit a rare species sighting form. 312 ATTACHMENT 7 DCR PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS 313 Rochelle Altholz Matthew J. Strickler (' Deputy Director of Secretary of Natural Resources a Administration and Finance Clyde E.Cristman Russell W.Baxter Director "Ar" Deputy Director of Dam Safety&Floodplain Management and Soil&Water COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Conservation Thomas L. Smith DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION Deputy Director of Operations September 22, 2018 Marjorie Siwy Timmons Group 1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300 Richmond,VA 23225 Re: 41147, Foxglove Solar-Two Project Sites Dear Ms. Siwy: The Department of Conservation and Recreation's Division of Natural Heritage(DCR)has searched its Biotics Data System for occurrences of natural heritage resources from the area outlined on the submitted map.Natural heritage resources are defined as the habitat of rare,threatened,or endangered plant and animal species,unique or exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic formations. This project is situated on karst-forming carbonate rock and can be characterized by sinkholes, caves, disappearing streams, and large springs. The Virginia DCR karst staff screened this project against the Virginia Speleological Survey(VSS) database and the Virginia DMME sinkhole coverage for documented sensitive karst features and caves. The Ogdens Conservation Site is located within two miles of the project sites. Conservation sites are tools for representing key areas of the landscape that warrant further review for possible conservation action because of the natural heritage resources and habitat they support. Conservation sites are polygons built around one or more rare plant, animal, or natural community designed to include the element and,where possible, its associated habitat, and buffer or other adjacent land thought necessary for the element's conservation. Conservation sites are given a biodiversity significance ranking based on the rarity, quality, and number of element occurrences they contain; on a scale of 1-5, 1 being most significant. Ogdens Conservation Site has been given a biodiversity significance ranking of B 1,which represents a site of outstanding significance. The natural heritage resources of concern at this site are: Pseudanophthalmus parvicollis Hupps Hill Cave beetle G1/Sl/NL/NL Fontigens bottimeri Appalachian springsnail G2G3/S2S3/NL/LE Stygobromus biggersi Bigger's Cave amphipod G2G4/S 1 S2/NL/NL Significant cave G3/SNR/NL/NL The more northwestern of the two sites will directly negatively impact Ogdens Cave and the Ogdens Conservation Site. All surface runoff from this site will feed into Buffalo Marsh Run and eventually make its way into Ogdens Cave.Water that makes its way into the groundwater below this site is likely to recharge at Blue Spring. This spring also feeds into Ogdens Cave. Ogdens cave is home to the Appalachian Springsnail,which is a state listed species, and coordination with DGIF about this endangered snail is recommended. The cave is also home to the Hupps Hill Cave Beetle. This cave beetle is one of the rarest in the state. It is only known from two 600 East Main Street,24u'Floor I Richmond,Virginia 23219 1 804-786-6124 State Parks•Soil and Water Conservation•Outdoor Recreation Planning Natural Heritage•Dam Safety and Floodplain Management•Land Conservation 314 locations. One of these locations is Ogdens Cave. Recent work with this species by DCR, Division of Natural Heritage's Karst Program indicates that the beetle may be completely extirpated from the other site leaving Ogdens Cave as its only know location. The Karst Program recently conducted a study on 17 rare cave beetles in Virginia for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Based on the data from this study it is extremely likely that DCR will recommend to US Fish and Wildlife that they consider listing this species and we are currently in discussion with the USFWS about this topic. Ogdens Cave also contains Bigger's Cave Amphipod. Based on the resources that may be impacted at Ogdens Cave by the development of a solar energy project at the northwestern site,this location is not recommended. Impacts could be severe for the resources that inhabit this cave and the groundwater they depend on. The project site to the southeast also could impact Ogdens Cave but not as severely. Most of the water from this site would be captured by the watersheds to the southeast of the Ogdens watershed. Most of the southeastern site should overlay the recharge zone for Vaucluse Spring directly to the east of the site. DCR recommends strict adherence to proper standard erosion and sediment control measures including best management practices to ensure drainage from the project site does not enter any caves or sinkholes that are nearby. While no sinkholes are shown on the DMME sinkhole coverage used for this review for these sites, it is possible that sinkholes that are not delineated may be encountered on the sites. If sinkholes do occur within the project area they should be avoided to help reduce any potential impact from the development of a solar farm at this location. Most of the water on these two sites will make its way into a very fragile groundwater system. Contamination in this area could have dramatically detrimental consequences to the species that depend on it. If herbicides and or pesticides are to be used on the site for maintenance the potential impact to groundwater resources should be taken into account in the selection process.No known caves are within the two project footprints provided for this review. If karst features such as sinkholes, caves,disappearing streams, and large springs are encountered during the project,please coordinate with Wil Orndorff(540-230-5960,Wil.OrndorffAdcr.virginia.gov)to document and minimize adverse impacts. Discharge of runoff to sinkholes or sinking streams, filling of sinkholes, and alteration of cave entrances can lead to surface collapse, flooding, erosion and sedimentation,groundwater contamination, and degradation of subterranean habitat for natural heritage resources. If the project involves filling or "improvement"of sinkholes or cave openings, DCR would like detailed location information and copies of the design specifications. In cases where sinkhole improvement is for storm water discharge, copies of VDOT Form EQ-120 will suffice. In addition, Buffalo Marsh Run,which has been designated by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) as a"Threatened and Endangered Species Water"is and adjacent to the project area. The species associated with the Buffalo Marsh Run T&E Water is the Appalachian springsnail. Due to the legal status of the Appalachian springsnail,DCR recommends coordination with Virginia's regulatory authority for the management and protection of this species,the VDGIF,to ensure compliance with the Virginia Endangered Species Act(VA ST §§ 29.1-563 —570). DCR also recommends the development of an invasive species management plan for the project and the planting of native pollinator plants in the buffer areas of the planned facility which bloom throughout the spring and summer. Please note, Ogdens Cave Natural Area Preserve is located approximately 2.1 miles southwest of the southeast project site. For more information, please contact Tyler Urgo, DCR Shenandoah Valley Region Steward at (540) 332-9226 or tyler.urgokdcr.virginia.gov. Under a Memorandum of Agreement established between the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (VDACS) and the DCR, DCR represents VDACS in comments regarding potential impacts on state- listed threatened and endangered plant and insect species. The current activity will not affect any documented state-listed plants or insects. 315 New and updated information is continually added to Biotics. Please re-submit a completed order form and project map for an update on this natural heritage information if the scope of the project changes and/or six months has passed before it is utilized. A fee of$250.00 has been assessed for the service of providing this information. Please find attached an invoice for that amount. Please return one copy of the invoice along with your remittance made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia, DCR Finance,600 East Main Street, 24t'Floor,Richmond,VA 23219. Payment is due within thirty days of the invoice date. Late payment may result in the suspension of project review service for future projects. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) maintains a database of wildlife locations, including threatened and endangered species,trout streams, and anadromous fish waters that may contain information not documented in this letter. Their database may be accessed from http://vafivis.org/iRvis/or contact Ernie Aschenbach at 804-367-2733 or Ernie.Aschenbachkdgif.virginia.gov. According to the information currently in our files, Meadow Brook and Middle Marsh Brook,which have been designated by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (VDGIF) as "Threatened and Endangered Species Waters"for the Wood turtle are within 2 miles of the project area. Therefore, DCR recommends coordination with Virginia's regulatory authority for the management and protection of this species,the VDGIF,to ensure compliance with the Virginia Endangered Species Act(VA ST §§ 29.1-563 —570). Should you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at 804-371-2708. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, r S. Rene Hypes Project Review Coordinator Cc: Ernie Aschenbach,VDGIF Wil Omdorff, DCR-Karst Tyler Urgo, DCR- Shenandoah Valley Region Steward 316 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FOXGLOVE SOLAR APPROXIMATELY 406 ACRES FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA PREPARED FOR: FOXGLOVE SOLAR, LLC PREPARED BY: TIMMONS GROUP 5410 TRINITY ROAD, SUITE 102 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607 Inspection Date: August 21 , 2018 Report Publication Date: August 28, 2018 #. CIVIL ENGINEERING I ENVIRONMENTAL I SURVEYING I GIS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES T I M M O N S GROUP www.timmons.com 317 YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 3 1.2 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT 3 1.3 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 3 1.4 METHODOLOGY USED 3 1.5 USER RELIANCE 4 2.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY AND VICINITY DESCRIPTION 5 2.1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.2 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 5 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF SITE STRUCTURES 5 2.4 SITE UTILITIES 5 2.5 CURRENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES 5 3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING 6 3.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 6 3.2 REGIONAL HYDROGEOLOGY 6 3.3 TOPOGRAPHY 6 3.4 SOILS 6 3.5 FLOODPLAIN 6 3.6 WETLANDS 6 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 7 4.1 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND/OR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 7 4.2 STORAGE TANKS 7 4.3 POLY-CHLORINATED BIPHENYLS(PCBS) 7 4.4 HEATING AND COOLING 7 4.5 STAINED SOIL/PAVEMENT AND/OR STRESSED VEGETATION 7 4.7 ODORS 7 4.8 DRAINS AND/OR SUMPS 7 4.9 RAILROAD TRACKS 7 4.10 MONITORING WELLS 7 4.11 DISCARDED/SOLID WASTE MATERIAL 8 4.12 ADJOINING PROPERTIES 8 5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 9 5.1 FEDERAL DATABASE REVIEW 9 5.2 STATE DATABASE REVIEW 9 5.3 SUPPLEMENTARY DATABASE REVIEW 9 5.4 UNPLOTTABLE SUMMARY 10 6.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 11 6.1 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 11 6.2 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 11 6.3 HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS 11 6.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH 11 6.5 PREVIOUS REPORTS 11 7.0 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 12 318 8.0 INTERVIEWS 13 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 14 9.1 FINDINGS 14 9.2 DATA GAPS 14 9.3 OPINIONS AND ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS 14 9.4 RECOMMENDATIONS 14 10.0 REFERENCES 15 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 SITE MAPS APPENDIX 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION APPENDIX 3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX 4 ERIS DATABASE REPORT APPENDIX 6 ERIS HISTORICAL AERIAL REPORT APPENDIX 6 ERIS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RESEARCH RESULTS APPENDIX 7 THE ERIS ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH REPORT APPENDIX 8 ASTM STANDARD E 2247-16 USER QUESTIONNAIRE APPENDIX 9 ASTM STANDARD E 2247-16 PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONNAIRE 319 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in§312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess the nature, history, and setting of a property. We have developed and performed the "all appropriate inquiries" in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Chase Farnsworth IV, CES John T. Russell, AIPG CPG Environmental Scientist II Senior nvironmental Project Manager Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 1 320 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of Foxglove Solar, LLC (hereafter"the User"), and in accordance with 40 CFR Part 312 and ASTM Standard E 2247-16 (Standard Practice for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process for Forestland or Rural Property), Timmons Group conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of two (2) noncontiguous areas totaling approximately 406 acres located on Hites Road and Marlboro Road in Frederick County, Virginia (hereafter the "Subject Property" or"Site"). Based on our understanding,the Site is being evaluated for the construction of a solar farm. The assessment was performed to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) on the Subject Property or adjoining properties based on a review of reasonably available environmental resource information and/or site observations. The assessment was also performed to allow the User to qualify for any landowner liability protections, including the Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser liability protection, available under federal and state law. RECs are defined by ASTM standards as "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products into structures or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water on the property." Site Description The Subject Property is comprised of two (2) noncontiguous areas totaling approximately 406 acres located on Hites Road and Marlboro Road in Frederick County,Virginia. The Site primarily consists of cattle grazing land and agricultural land including orchards with some forested areas. Environmental Conditions on the Subject Property The results of the Phase I ESA did not identify any RECs in connection with the Subject Property, as defined by ASTM Standard E 2247-16. Environmental Conditions on Adjoining Properties The Subject Property is bordered to the north by Marlboro Road, private residences/farms, and agricultural land;to the east by agricultural land, private residences/farms, and Main Street (Route 11); to the south by agricultural land, private residences, forested areas, Clark Road, and Klines Mill Road; and to the west by agricultural land, private residences, forested areas, and Middle Road (Route 628). As a result of site inspection and a review of resource data, RECs were not identified for the adjoining properties as defined by ASTM Standard E 2247-16. Data Gaps No data gaps were encountered during the completion of the Phase I ESA. Conclusions and Recommended Response Actions Timmons Group conducted a Phase I ESA of two (2) noncontiguous areas totaling approximately 406 acres located on Hites Road and Marlboro Road in Frederick County, Virginia. No RECs were identified in connection with the Subject Property or adjoining properties; therefore, Timmons Group recommends no further assessment to satisfy due diligence requirements per ASTM Standard E 2247-16. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 2 321 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with 40 CFR Part 312 and ASTM Standard E 2247-16. The assessment was performed to identify RECs based on a review of reasonably available environmental resource information and/or site observations that reveal evidence of a release or the threat of release of hazardous substances or petroleum products on or in the vicinity of the Site. The assessment was also performed to allow the Users to qualify for any landowner liability protections, including the Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser liability protection, available under federal and state law. RECs are defined by ASTM as "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products into structures or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water on the property." The term includes "hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws." The term is not intended to include "de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate government agencies." The purpose of this report is to provide the User with a Phase I ESA of two (2) noncontiguous areas totaling approximately 406 acres located on Hites Road and Marlboro Road in Frederick County, Virginia. The scope of work for preparing this assessment included: • reviewing reasonably available federal and state environmental regulatory records, • site reconnaissance, • interviews, • reviewing and evaluating reasonably available historical maps and data regarding the Subject Property and immediate vicinity, and • data evaluation and the completion of an ASTM Standard E 2247-16 Phase I ESA. 1.2 Limitations and Exceptions of the Assessment This report was prepared solely for the use of the User, their affiliated entities, affiliates, successors and/or assigns in accordance with the agreed upon scope of services. The conclusions provided in this report are based only on the information contained in this document. Additional information with respect to this Site or nearby sites, which was not available at the time this assessment was prepared, could modify the conclusions stated herein. This report has been prepared in accordance with ASTM Standard E 2247-16; no other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of the agreement between the User and Timmons Group, as discussed below. Timmons Group was retained to complete a Phase I ESA to evaluate the presence of RECs and/or areas of potential environmental concern, either on-site or on the adjoining properties that could affect the environmental integrity of the Subject Property. Furthermore,this Phase I ESA is only valid up to 180 days prior to the date of acquisition. No estimates, plans or specifications, soil and/or groundwater testing, asbestos inspection, lead-based paint inspection, geotechnical or remedial recommendations or activities other than described herein were included under the scope of services. 1.3 Special Terms and Conditions No special terms or conditions were applied to the completion of this Phase I ESA. 1.4 Methodology Used This Phase I ESA was completed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E 2247-16. Timmons Group reviewed reasonably available federal and state environmental regulatory records, historical maps and data regarding the Subject Property and immediate vicinity. The User (i.e., Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 3 322 the party for whom this Phase I ESA was prepared), current landowner and government officials were contacted, as necessary, to obtain additional information pertaining to the Subject Property. Site reconnaissance was conducted by Timmons Group on August 21, 2018, to determine if any RECs and/or areas of potential environmental concern were present on the Subject Property. 1.5 User Reliance This Phase I ESA (the "Report") was prepared exclusively for the User, their entities, affiliates successors and/or assigns, and reliance is accordingly extended to designated third parties. All limitations and conditions associated with the Report therefore remain in effect and transfer along with this authorization of reliance. Reliance is subject to the scope of work and the terms and conditions under which the Report was prepared for the User. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 4 323 2.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY AND VICINITY DESCRIPTION 2.1 General Site Description The Subject Property is comprised of two (2) noncontiguous areas totaling approximately 406 acres located on Hites Road and Marlboro Road in Frederick County,Virginia (Appendix 1). Property details are included in Appendix 2. 2.2 Current Use of the Subject Property The Subject Property primarily consists of cattle grazing land and agricultural land including orchards with some forested areas. 2.3 Description of Site Structures While no structures are present in the western area of the Site, the eastern portion of the property includes a farm with two (2) barns and a dilapidated house off Vaucluse Road. Furthermore, two (2) small houses and three (3) large barns are present off Klines Mill Road. The barns are wood-frame with metal roofs while the houses are single-story built slab-on-grade with shingled roofs. 2.4 Site Utilities Overhead electric service is locally available to areas of the Subject Property. High-tension powerlines transect both properties on the Site. 2.5 Current Use of Adjoining Properties The Subject Property consists of two (2) areas, separated by: Hites Road, agricultural land, private residences, and some forestland. The table below details the properties that generally adjoin the Site. Adjoining Properties North: Marlboro Road, private residences/farms, and agricultural land East: Agricultural land, private residences/farms, and Main Street South: Agricultural land, private residences, forested areas, Clark Road, and Klines Mill Road West: Agricultural land, private residences, forested areas, and Middle Road Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 5 324 3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING 3.1 Regional Geology The Subject Property is located in the Valley and Ridge Physiographic Province. In general,the Valley and Ridge Province is underlain by sedimentary rocks that crop out in long, narrow belts or northeast trending ridges and valleys. Lithologically, the rocks are predominantly clastics and carbonates, and include sandstone, conglomerate, shale, siltstone, dolomite, and limestone (Seaber et al., 1988). The topography of this region is characterized by a sequence of ridges and valleys that are controlled by the structure and the weathering characteristics of the different Iithologies. The ridges generally are underlain by folded/faulted resistant rocks such as sandstone, cherty limestone, dolomite, and conglomerate; the valleys are generally underlain by nonresistant rocks, such as limestone, shale and dolomite; the flanks generally are underlain by siltstone, shale or other rocks of intermediate resistance. Altitudes are commonly in the range of 200 to 500 meters above sea level, and local topographic relief seldom exceeds 200 meters (Seaber et al., 1988). With reference to the above,the 1993 Geologic Map of Virginia identifies the project site as being underlain by the Beekmantown Group (map label Ob) which is described as: dolomite, limestone, and chert. 3.2 Regional Hydrogeology The 2016 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Middletown, Virginia, 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map was reviewed to extrapolate groundwater characteristics in the area of the Subject Property based on topographical expressions (Appendix 1). Depending on location across the Subject Property, groundwater is anticipated to flow to either the east toward Meadow Brook or to the west toward Buffalo Marsh Run. 3.3 Topography According to the 2016/2013 USGS Middletown, Virginia, 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Maps and visual observations, the topography of the Site is undulating with elevations ranging from approximately 760 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to approximately 860 feet above MSL (Appendix 1). 3.4 Soils The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey was utilized to detail the underlying soil units on the Subject Property. Mapping in Appendix 1 displays the soil layers of the Site (Appendix 1). 3.5 Floodplain The Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) was accessed and reviewed to determine if the Subject Property is located within a floodplain. Mapping in Appendix 1 displays the flood areas on and near the Site. 3.6 Wetlands The National Wetland Inventory map for the Subject Property was utilized to determine if wetland areas are present on the Subject Property. Mapping in Appendix 1 displays the wetland areas on the Site. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 6 325 4.0 SITE RECONNAISANCE Chase Farnsworth IV of Timmons Group completed site reconnaissance on August 21, 2018, which included observing the Site boundaries and property interior to document existing conditions and identify RECs and/or areas of potential environmental concern associated with the Subject Property and/or adjoining properties. Photographs documenting the site inspection are included as Appendix 3. 4.1 Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products No hazardous substances and/or petroleum products were observed on the Subject Property. 4.2 Storage Tanks No storage tanks were identified on the Subject Property. 4.3 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs) Several pole-mounted electrical transformers are located in areas of the Subject Property that are not labeled with non-PCB placards. However, communication with Dominion Virginia Power has resulted in the conveyance that all company-owned transformers throughout the state, regardless of labeling, have been retrofitted with non-PCB dielectric fluid. Furthermore, the potential effected area from failure is expectedly minimal. Accordingly, the transformers do not represent RECs. 4.4 Heating and Cooling The residential structures on the Site are suspected to utilize propane and/or electricity for heating and cooling purposes; neither of which represent RECs. 4.5 Stained Soil/Pavement and/or Stressed Vegetation Stained soil/pavement and/or stressed vegetation were not observed on the Subject Property. 4.6 Pits, Ponds and/or Lagoons/Pools of Liquids A freshwater pond is present on the Subject Property which is utilized for watering the on-site cattle; the pond does not represent a REC. 4.7 Odors Strong, pungent, or noxious odors were not detected on the Subject Property. 4.8 Drains and/or Sumps Drains and/or sumps were not identified on the Subject Property. 4.9 Railroad Tracks Railroad tracks do not cross the Subject Property. 4.10 Wells Several wells are present on the Site for agricultural and residential purposes. Based on the proposed usage of the Site, the wells do not represent RECs. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 7 326 4.11 Discarded/Solid Waste Material Moderate volumes of miscellaneous solid waste materials are present on the Site and primarily consist of farm materials and/or equipment, empty ASTs and 55-gallon drums, tires, bottles, cans, paper goods, and Styrofoam. Although some of the materials may have specific nonhazardous disposal requirements, the extent of the on-site material is considered a de minimis condition,which does not represent a potential risk to the Subject Property and is not considered a REC. 4.12 Adjoining Properties As a result of site reconnaissance and a review of resource data, the following environmental conditions were noted for the adjoining properties: • Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products No hazardous substances and/or petroleum products were observed on the adjoining properties. • Storage Tanks No storage tanks were observed on the adjoining properties. • Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Several electrical transformers are located along the peripheral roadways. Per previous consultation with Dominion Power, all public utility transformers have been retrofitted with non-PCB dielectric fluid. Given the construction details in tandem with the area of potential effect from potential failure, the transformers do not represent RECs. • Stained Soil/Pavement and/or Stressed Vegetation No evidence of stained soil/pavement and/or stressed vegetation was observed on the adjoining properties. • Pits, Ponds and/or Lagoons/Pools of Liquid Several small agricultural ponds are present in the vicinity to the Site which do not represent RECs. • Odors Strong, pungent, or noxious odors were not found nor suspected to be emanating from the adjoining properties. • Drains and/or Sumps No drains or sumps were observed on the adjoining properties. • Railroad Tracks Railroad tracks were not observed on the adjoining properties. • Wells Groundwater supply wells are present on the adjoining properties. However, based on usage and/or distance in conjunction with proposed usage of the Subject Property, the wells do not represent RECs. • Discarded/Solid Waste Material Minimal to moderate volumes of miscellaneous solid waste materials are present on the adjoining properties and primarily consist of farm-use equipment, trucks,tractors,tires, and some miscellaneous debris. Although some of the materials may have specific nonhazardous disposal requirements, the extent of the material is considered a de minimis condition, which does not represent a potential risk to the Subject Property and is not considered a REC. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 8 327 5.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW Timmons Group retained Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) to complete a computer regulatory database search to identify current and/or past uses of the Subject Property, and surrounding properties,that may have contributed to a release, or presents the material threat of a release, of hazardous materials or petroleum products, that has or may have environmentally impacted the Subject Property (Appendix 4). Timmons Group investigated the ASTM-required databases below along with the additional proprietary databases maintained by ERIS. Federal Databases Search Radius Government Publication Date NPL(National Priority List) 1 mile 07/03/2018 SEMS(Superfund Enterprise Management System) 0.5 mile 06/08/2018 SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System 0.5 mile 06/08/2018 Archive) RCRA CORRACTS (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1 mile 04/12/2018 —Corrective Action Report) RCRA-TSD(Treatment, Storage and Disposal) 0.5 mile 04/12/2018 RCRA-LQG/SQG (Large/Small Quantity Generators) 0.25 mile 04/12/2018 RCRA-CESQG (Certified Exempt Small Quantity Generators) 0.25 mile 04/12/2018 Federal Engineering Controls 0.5 mile 01/20/2016 Federal Institutional Controls 0.5 mile 01/20/2016 ERNS (Emergency Response Notification System) Subject Property Only 02/08/2017 Federal Brownfields 0.5 mile 02/20/2018 State Databases Search Radius Government Publication Date SWF/LF(Solid Waste Landfills) 0.5 mile 10/03/2017 LST(Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks) 0.5 mile 04/18/2018 UST(Underground Storage Tanks) 0.25 mile 04/18/2018 AST(Aboveground Storage Tanks) 0.25 mile 04/18/2018 VRP(Voluntary Remediation Program) 0.5 mile 04/19/2018 5.1 Federal Database Review According to the ERIS Database Report, the Subject Property and adjoining properties are not listed on any of the reviewed federal databases (Appendix 4). 5.2 State Database Review According to the ERIS Database Report, the Subject Property is not listed on any of the reviewed state databases (Appendix 4). However, one (1) UST and one (1) AST listing are identified for an adjoining property. Regardless, based on topographic gradient, the listings do not represent RECs. 5.3 Supplementary Database Review According to the ERIS Database Report,the Subject Property and adjoining properties are not listed on the reviewed supplementary environmental databases (Appendix 4). Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 9 328 5.4 Unplottable Summary The ERIS Database Report did not identify any unplottable sites on or near the Subject Property(Appendix 4). Unplottable sites are facilities with inadequate address information to map correctly. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 10 329 6.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 6.1 Ownership Information Ownership information for the Subject Property is detailed in Appendix 2. 6.2 Aerial Photographs Historical aerial photographs were obtained from ERIS with Google Earth historical imagery also being utilized for further analysis of the Subject Property (Appendix 5). The Site has historically consisted of agricultural land, an orchard, and forested areas along with a couple of residences and farm buildings. No visible RECs were identified by the historical aerial imagery. The adjoining properties mainly consist of agricultural land,forested areas, and private residences or farms. No RECs were identified via historical imagery for the adjoining properties. 6.3 Historical Topographic Maps Historical topographic maps were obtained from ERIS (Appendix 6). The Site has historically consisted of agricultural land and forested areas along with several residences and farm structures. No visible RECs were identified by the historical aerial imagery. The adjoining properties mainly consist of forested areas, agricultural land, and private residences or farms. No RECs were identified via historical imagery for the adjoining properties. 6.4 Environmental Lien Search Per the ERIS, no environmental liens or activity and use limitations were identified for the Subject Property (Appendix 7). 6.5 Previous Reports Timmons Group was not provided with nor has any knowledge of any previous reports completed for the Subject Property. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 11 330 7.0 USER'S RESPONSIBILITIES In order to qualify for Landowner Liability Protections under CERCLA, the User must provide certain information to the environmental professional pursuant to Section 6 of ASTM Standard E 2247-16 User Questionnaire. Failure to provide this information could result in the determination that the "all appropriate inquiry" is not complete and, therefore, the forfeiture of CERCLA protection. The ASTM Standard E 2247-16 User Questionnaire was provided by Jessica Berger of Urban Grid (Appendix 8), and the information recited in it is incorporated herein by reference. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 12 331 8.0 INTERVIEWS The ASTM Standard E 2247-16 Current Property Owner Questionnaire for the Subject Property was completed by Mr. Harman Brumback. Mr. Brumback did not detail any information that compromises the environmental integrity of the Site (Appendix 9). Based on the history of the Subject Property as agricultural land and cattle grazing land in tandem with the results of the site reconnaissance and the regulatory database research, additional interviews with local officials were not pursued. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 13 332 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 9.1 Findings Timmons Group has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 2247-16 of two (2) noncontiguous areas totaling approximately 406 acres located on Hites Road and Marlboro Road in Frederick County,Virginia,the Subject Property. Based on our understanding, the Site is being evaluated for the construction of a solar farm. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of this report. This assessment has revealed no RECs in connection to the Subject Property and adjoining properties. 9.2 Data Gaps No data gaps were encountered during the completion of the Phase I ESA. 9.3 Opinions and Additional Investigation Following a review of reasonably accessible state and federal environmental regulatory records, standard historical resources, site reconnaissance, and interviews, Timmons Group recommends no further investigation of the Subject Property to satisfy due diligence requirements as required by ASTM Standard E 2247-16. 9.4 Recommendations Timmons Group did not identify any RECs in connection with the Subject Property or adjoining properties and, therefore, recommends no further assessment to satisfy due diligence requirements per ASTM Standard E 2247-16. Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 14 333 10.0 REFERENCES • ASTM E 2247-16 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. • Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Mines Minerals and Energy, 1993. Geologic Map of Virginia, 1:500,000 scale. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., March 1, 2018. Foxglove. Database Report. Report ID: 20180227028. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., August 9, 2018. Foxglove 2. Database Report. Report ID: 20180808184. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., February 27, 2018. Foxglove. Historical Aerial Report. Report ID: 20180227028. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., August 9, 2018. Foxglove 2. Historical Aerial Report. Report ID: 20180808184. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., March 2, 2018. Foxglove. The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report. Report ID: 20180227028. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., August 10, 2018. Foxglove 2. The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report. Report ID: 20180808184. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., February 27, 2018. Foxglove. Topographic Map Research Results. Report ID: 20180227028. • Environmental Risk Information Services Inc., August 9, 2018. Foxglove 2. Topographic Map Research Results. Report ID: 20180808184. • Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018. National Flood Hazard Layer, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Frederick County, Virginia. • Legrand, H.E., 1988. Region 21, Piedmont and Blue Ridge,in Back,W., Rosenshein,J.S.,and Seaber, P.R., eds., Hydrogeology: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America,The Geology of North America, v. 0-2. • USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, 2018. Web Soil Survey 3.0, National Cooperative Soil Survey, Frederick County, Virginia. • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, 2018. Frederick County, Virginia. • U.S. Geological Survey, 2016. 7.5 Minute Series, Middletown, Virginia, Topographic Quadrangle Map, 1:24000 scale. • U.S. Geological Survey, 2013. 7.5 Minute Series, Middletown, Virginia, Topographic Quadrangle Map, 1:24000 scale. Foxglove Solar-Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 15 334 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Site Maps Appendix 2 Property Information Appendix 3 Site Reconnaissance Photographs Appendix 4 ERIS Database Report Appendix 5 ERIS Historical Aerial Report Appendix 6 ERIS Topographic Map Research Results Appendix 7 The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report Appendix 8 ASTM Standard E 2247-16 User Questionnaire Appendix 9 ASTM Standard E 2247-16 Property Owner Questionnaire Foxglove Solar—Phase I ESA Project No. 41147 Page 16 335 APPENDIX 1 Site Maps 336 Path:Y:\804\99999-Urban Grid\41147-Foxglove-Fredrick County\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\41147-VIC.mxd pPp 'ti —� � 1�``,��S� r� •� �\..�f __ � {f it�� � �� �,i��i "`;� � °/ � ����;,'.. ,�, , 17 Al 4 �O `���r )V 1� � f� � �i �y �� �f`� / �`i � � (• 4 �� �f Vii•7 �l .. - ;J'� �•� � ���J,�+ _�- ,�=`''•r -ls. r p��y,�'" • T�!?.,a � {'�'--1./; t'k JJ1 ��r.�''.` � -. ,"`-.- � �L ��}\�ai. ,� Ll�lll �, \/ lye ���1 � ��, _ley r.�' � f• �'`:,^�i � !,4^`��. j ,�... �{ O 77 Ile j` UL °'` Site Limits el 7 i /16 x y ;alJt � A. 433 Site limits are approximate. � l1 ._ J 1 f � Topographic imagery from USGS. %� I4. �- } =`=t ��.. ,} . 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 FOXGLOVE SOLAR SITE TIMMONS GROOF • ` � � FREDERICK COUNTY,VIRGINIA FIGURE 1:VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.. � TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER: 41147 U.S.G.S.QUADRANGLE(S): MIDDLETOWN PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 557.4 ACRES DATE(S): 2016 LATITUDE: 39.084214 WATERSHED(S): NORTH FORK SHENANDOAH LONGITUDE: -78.279810 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S): 02070006 These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,inclusive,but not 337 limited to construction,bidding,and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP. 14D 14C irc 40B 32C 14B 1fiC 17C 148 1]E irc d e YM a� O 14D O tiJ 14D 0 s' �8 � Y a�� Yf q 5C d Rd_ Q . �.p N W 14C irc Y�Y 14D �• N § Z=r 6 m ea 148 M\dp10 I' O= � \�x Y 14B $ irc o w..nw° a CVS ,V 17E ♦ .... r Ir Y�Y 32C 21 Na 14D 1. q' 111 W 17E aha q pe 1rD d rs e\ Z oqm rocky,11 - 11Eaodlm - 0 Q 121 —11 1-111.111111-o° `Y 1]E. y > U n11 lfiC / J LL' - _2 2M e X o - - 14C O W Sm irc LL D_ 14B ,t `i• 14D LL f Y Legend 29 ••• Project Study Limits-557.4 Acres 14Bt ,�r —•National Hydrography Dataset YY Y 14B National Wetlands Inventory Y Hydric Soil Rating J Hydric-Not Present JJJ 14D NOTES Non-Hydric a�O Fie 48 B N. aYoa'I ; fC sV opal lyam9mPnRo A� - ON—IN. 4� 17E 14C 31B 1]C 17C �� 32B fiC EVISIONS fiC 32B fi ]C 32C ]C Y� 32B Y Y Y Y 1 r ENVIRONMENTAL 14C �� r 32C ]C INVENTORY MAP ��14D x ., 31B W fiC y w cam v l4D 32C 7CY 32B 3�B ']C0 SCALE(FEET1 0350 fiC 00 fiC 32C 32B `" era t]E - - ��10F 2� 14C 28 32C -40-47 g _ aGl6\Common Shared Ex11IbILSW114]EIMmx 338 ��♦ 32B fiC 31B 32C 4D i ]C fiC CL w �e Hh 4 32C 32B y O v 8 fic X /� - OC 0 s V n _ yY • O= ar 32B �� 32B . m y h � E„a 32C 31 •5, �_ x .,u Y fiC z�d1�4 ` 32B Naounn svmeol Naounn came ]C a 32B d cer - h 14C 14D q oqm rocky,] S `` J Z d rorky.�s Y s d Y ]C fiC Jh 0 Q 12c —1-1111-12101pelle-10 121 10a,110 11 :311. J L� _J 1 `/ C) K 22- - 0 of loam,2 10 1 mr Pzeo ✓ 32C fiC .�.:f O W> 32C LL D_ 31B LL 32B fiC 1 1]E Legend •••�Protect Study Limits-557.4 Acres r' 32C ]C —•National Hydrography Dataset National Wetlands Inventory 11 ; fiC fiC' Hydric Soil RatingY My ]C 32C Hydric-Not Present `Y NOTES Non-Hydric YY er�an aoa wuaiaa w m aarum eeVa — tl08�a�e'I'h%orat \ ]C — \ pai�,,,agan 110mVGIN 1]E 34 321 fiC +�a 32B 14C ” - 31B I r 32C 333���'1, � l„y ✓J' t� f� B 32C ` �r fiC ENVIRONMENTAL ]C INVENTORY MAP Fy fiC IC 6C 32B ✓re�P Yf, 4C 32C 32C ao 34 ..1 0 SCALE(FEET) ~14B 14B 32B fiC 0 350 ]00 .fiC -40-47 Fo,g _Sol�nGIS\Commo,Sha,adE,h,b,�u1147EIMm,d 339 APPENDIX 2 Property Information 340 8/8/2018 Property Record Card Property Identification Cad Frederick County Property Information (Map#: 73 A 21) Owner: Legal Description(s): WOODBINE FARMS INC 271.00 ACRES Owner Address: 510 BARLEY IN FMP-2015 WINCHESTER, VA 22602 2710 Zoned: RA Total Land Area: 271.00 Acres Prior Assessment: *Land Use Value* $900,300 $85,600 Magisterial District: Property Address: BACK CREEK 911 Address Not on File Deed Bk/Pg: 307 / 588 Remarks: POWERLINE Assessment Values (Map#: 73 A 21) Building 1: Land Value: $901,100 Other Improvements: Total Value: $901,100 Acreage Description (Map#: 73 A 21) Size In Acres: 271.00 Description: Lump Sum or Per Acre: Per Acre https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/2211720180808143036.htm 341 8/8/2018 Property Record Card Unit Value: 3,500 Adjustment Percentage: -0.05 Utility Value: Acreage Value: $901,075 Size In Acres: Description: Lump Sum or Per Acre: Lump Sum Unit Value: Adjustment Percentage: 0.00 Utility Value: Acreage Value: Size In Acres: Description: Lump Sum or Per Acre: Lump Sum Unit Value: 332,215 Adjustment Percentage: 0.00 Utility Value: Acreage Value: $332,215 Area: 0 Unit: Rate: 0.00 Value: Total Value: $901,075 Other Improvements (Map#: 73 A 21) TOTAL VALUE: Sales Information (Map#: 73 A 21) Sales Date: 0/0/0 Sales Price: Instrument: Deed Bk/Pg: 307 / 588 Grantor: Not On File # of Parcels: Transaction History (Map#: 73 A 21) Building Information (Map#: 73 A 21) https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/2211720180808143036.htm 342 8/8/2018 Property Record Card Building 1: EXTERIOR INFORMATION Year Built: 0 Occupancy Type: VACANT LAND Condition: None Foundation: None Exterior Walls: None Roofing: None Roof Type: None Garage: Number of Cars: None Built-In No. Cars: None Carport: None INTERIOR INFORMATION Story Height: 0.00 Number or Rooms: None Number or Bedrooms: None Number or Full Baths: None Number or Half Baths: None Building Sq. Feet: Basement Sq. Feet: Fin. Basement Sq. Feet: None Heating: A/C: SITE INFORMATION Zoning Type: RA Terrain Type: ON Character: ROLLING/SLOPING Right of Way: PUBLIC Easements: PAVED Water: NONE Sewer: NONE Electric: NO Gas: NO Fuel Type: None Utility Value: 0 Fireplace: None Stk Fireplace: None Flues: None Metal Flues: None Stacked Flues: None Inop. Flue/FP: None https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/2211720180808143036.htm 343 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Property Identification Card Frederick County Property Information (Map#: 84 A 29) Owner: Legal Description(s): WOODBINE FARMS INC 106.46 ACRES Owner Addr ess: 510 BARLEY LN FMP-2015 WINCHESTER, VA 22602 2710 Zoned: RA Total Land Ar ea: 106.46 Acres Prior Assessment: *Land Use Value* $604,500 $144,463 Magisterial District: Property Addr ess: BACK CREEK 718 KLINES MILL RD Deed Bk/Pg: 386/511 Remarks: 2 MH'S CLMD ON PP GOOD RD FRTG Assessment Values (Map#: 84 A 29) Building 1: $40- Land Value: $577,100 Other Impr ovements: $33,240 Total Value: $610,300 Acreage Description (Map#: 84 A 29) Size In Acr es: 1.00 Description: Homesite Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: 8,500 Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: 60,000 Acreage Value: $68,500 Size In Acr es: 1.00 Description: Homesite Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: 8,500 Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 https://taxes.co.frede rick.va.us/applications/Pro pe rtyCa rds/2484520180220145600.htm 344 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Utility Value: 30,000 Acreage Value: $38,500 Size In Acr es: Description: Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: 8,500 Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: 30,000 Acreage Value: $38,500 Size In Acr es: 104.46 Description: Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Per Acre Unit Value: Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: 4,500 Acreage Value: $470,070 Area: 0 Unit: Rate: 0.00 Value: Total Value: $577,070 Other Improvements (Map#: 84 A 29) Description: BARN Total Squar e Feet: 2,240 Impr ovement Value: $8,960 Description: POLE SHED Total Squar e Feet: 3,840 Impr ovement Value: $13,440 Description: GARAGE-FRAME Total Squar e Feet: N/A Impr ovement Value: $500 Description: FENCE-CHAIN LINK Total Squar e Feet: N/A Impr ovement Value: No Value Description: LEAN-TO Total Squar e Feet: 1,536 Impr ovement Value: $3,840 Description: SHEDS Total Squar e Feet: N/A Impr ovement Value: $1,000 Description: SWMH Total Squar e Feet: 672 Impr ovement Value: No Value Description: SWMH Total Squar e Feet: 1,056 Impr ovement Value: No Value Description: ATTCH TO MH'S https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/248452018022014560O.htm 345 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Total Squar e Feet: N/A Impr ovement Value: $5,500 TOTAL VALUE: $33,240 Sales Information (Map#: 84 A 29) Sales Date: 0/0/0 Sales Price: $70,000 Instrument: Deed Bk/Pg: 386/511 Grantor: Not On File #of Parcels: Transaction History (Map#: 84 A 29) Building Information (Map#: 84 A 29) Building 1: EXTERIOR INFORMA TION Year Built: 0 Occupancy T ype: VAC-W/MOB HOM Condition: None Foundation: None Exterior W alls: None Roofing: None Roof Type: None Garage: Number of Cars: None Built-In No. Cars: None Carport: None INTERIOR INFORMA TION Story Height: 0.00 Number or Rooms: None Number or Bedr ooms: None Number or Full Baths: None Number or Half Baths: None Building Sq.Feet: Basement Sq. Feet: Fin.Basement Sq. Feet: None Heating: NONE A/C: NONE SITE INFORMA TION Zoning Type: RA Terrain T ype: ON Character: ROLLING/SLOPING Right of Way: PUBLIC Easements: PAVED Water: WELL Sewer: SEPTIC Electric: YES Gas: NO Fuel Type: None Utility Value: 17000 Fireplace: None https://taxes.co.frede rick.va.us/applications/Pro pe rtyCa rds/2484520180220145600.htm 346 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Stk Fir eplace: None Flues: None Metal Flues: None Stacked Flues: None Inop.Flue/FP: None https://taxes.co.frede rick.va.us/applications/Pro pe rtyCa rds/248452018022014560O.htm 347 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Property Identification Card Frederick County Property Information (Map#: 84 A 50) Owner: Legal Description(s): WOODBINE FARMS INC 197.00 ACRES Owner Addr ess: 510 BARLEY LN FMP-2015 WINCHESTER, VA 22602 2710 Zoned: RA Total Land Ar ea: 197.00 Acres Prior Assessment: *Land Use Value* $902,500 $140,875 Magisterial District: Property Addr ess: BACK CREEK 829 VAUCLUSE RD Deed Bk/Pg: 307/588 Remarks: DWL IS BOARDED UP 5/16 T Assessment Values (Map#: 84 A 50) Building 1: $24,340 Land Value: $872,100 Other Impr ovements: $14,060 Total Value: $910,500 Acreage Description (Map#: 84 A 50) Size In Acr es: 1.00 Description: Homesite Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: 8,500 Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: 60,000 Acreage Value: $68,500 Size In Acr es: 196.00 Description: Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Per Acre Unit Value: Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: 4,100 https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/2487120180220145450.htm 348 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Acreage Value: $803,600 Size In Acr es: Description: Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: Acreage Value: Size In Acr es: Description: Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: 60,705 Acreage Value: $60,705 Size In Acr es: Description: Lump Sum or Per Acr e: Lump Sum Unit Value: Adjustment Per centage: 0.00 Utility Value: Acreage Value: Area: 0 Unit: Rate: 0.00 Value: Total Value: $872,100 Other Improvements (Map#: 84 A 50) Description: BARN Total Squar e Feet: 3,960 Impr ovement Value: $9,900 Description: POLE SHED Total Squar e Feet: 4,160 Impr ovement Value: $4,160 TOTAL VALUE: $14,060 Sales Information (Map#: 84 A 50) Sales Date: 0/0/0 Sales Price: Instrument: Deed Bk/Pg: 307/588 Grantor: Not On File #of Parcels: Transaction History (Map#: 84 A 50) https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/248712018022014545O.htm 349 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Building Information (Map#: 84 A 50) Building 1: EXTERIOR INFORMA TION Year Built: 1900 Occupancy T ype: DWELLING Condition: POOR Foundation: ROCK Exterior W alls: VINYL Roofing: METAL Roof Type: GABLE Garage: NONE Number of Cars: None Built-In No. Cars: None Carport: NONE INTERIOR INFORMA TION Story Height: 2.00 Number or Rooms: 6 Number or Bedr ooms: 3 Number or Full Baths: 1 Number or Half Baths: None Building Sq.Feet: 1652 Basement Sq. Feet: None Fin.Basement Sq. Feet: None Interior W alls: PLASTER Floors: WOOD Heating: BASEBOARD A/C: NO SITE INFORMA TION Zoning Type: RA Terrain T ype: ON Character: ROLLING/SLOPING Right of Way: PUBLIC Easements: PAVED Water: WELL Sewer: SEPTIC Electric: YES Gas: NO Fuel Type: ELECTRIC Utility Value: 8500 Fireplace: None Stk Fir eplace: None Flues: 1 Metal Flues: None Stacked Flues: None Inop.Flue/FP: None https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/PropertyCards/248712018022014545O.htm 350 2/20/2018 Property Record Card Building 1 Sketch 15.9 + + 15 23 17.9 ---------------------------------- 4 +4 13.9 6 :B +_________________________300__________________________++ 15.9 15.9 :A +C____6______________24____30_______________+___________+ 7.9 7.9 https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/Property Cards/248712018022014545O.htm 351 APPENDIX 3 Site Reconnaissance Photographs 352 M LO M Phase I ESA— Foxglove 4 Southeastern view from the northern boundary of Southern view from the northern area of the the western property of the Site western property of the Site r Western view from the northern area of the western Southeastern view from the northern boundary of property of the Site the eastern property of the Site f Northern view from the northern boundary of the Old house near the northern boundary of the eastern property of the Site eastern property of the Site •10,0'0 0 • TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. v7 c� Phase I ESA— Foxglove i Barn in the northern area of the eastern property of Barn in the northern area of the eastern property of the Site the Site Western view from the northern area of the eastern Southern view from the northern area of the eastern property of the Site property of the Site Pond used by cattle in the north-central area of the Eastern view from the western boundary of the eastern property of the Site eastern property of the Site •oose0 0 • TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. v7 c� Phase I ESA— Foxglove { I Northern view from the southern boundary of the Northern view of a house and barns near the eastern property of the Site southern boundary of the eastern property of the Site 4 i r Barn and apples crates near the southern boundary Barn near the southern boundary of the eastern of the eastern property of the Site property of the Site ;i T — a �" �^'� s ;"'# '�� '� � ��.m,� Wit• r Water tank along the barn in the previous photo Empty ASTs in the barn in the previous photo *loose0 0 • TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. v7 co Phase I ESA— Foxglove I z s At br t r Empty drums in the barn in the previous photo Barn near the southern boundary of the eastern property of the Site Northern view from the southern area of the eastern property of the Site •oose0 0 • TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. APPENDIX 4 ERIS Database Report 357 E R S %%000 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES DA I A AS R1= P0 Project Property: Foxglove 2 Marlboro Road Environmental Risk Back Creek VA Information Services Project No: 41147 A division of Glacier Media Inc. P: 1.586.517.5204 Report Type: Database Report E: info@erisinfo.com Order No: 20180808184 www.erisinfo.com Requested by: Timmons Group, Inc. Date Completed: August 9, 2018 358 Table of Contents Tableof Contents...........................................................................................2 ExecutiveSummary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary- Project Property...................................................................................7 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................8 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.........................................................................................................9 Map...............................................................................................................10 Aerial.............................................................................................................13 TopographicMap..........................................................................................14 DetailReport.................................................................................................15 UnplottableSummary...................................................................................16 UnplottableReport........................................................................................17 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................18 Definitions.....................................................................................................26 Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s)may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties,and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments.The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice.Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions,or inaccuracies in such information and data,whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise,and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s)are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s)(the "Data")is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s)and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 359 Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property: Foxglove 2 Marlboro Road Back Creek VA Project No: 41147 Coordinates: Latitude: 39.081094 Longitude: -78.280389 UTM Northing: 4,329,296.91 UTM Easting: 735,245.12 UTM Zone: UTM Zone 17S Elevation: 829 FT Order Information: Order No: 20180808184 Date Requested: August 8, 2018 Requested by: Timmons Group, Inc. Report Type: Database Report Historicals/Pro ducts: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 360 Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Project Within .125mi to 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni Standard Environmental Records Federal NPL Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED NPL Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELETED NPL Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 SEMS Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 ODI Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 SEMS ARCHIVE Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 IODI Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS NFRAP Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS LIENS Y PO 0 - - - 0 RCRA CORRACTS Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA TSD Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA LQG Y .25 0 0 0 - 0 RCRA SQG Y .25 0 0 0 0 RCRA CESQG Y .25 0 0 0 0 RCRA NON GEN Y .25 0 0 0 - 0 FED ENG Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 FED INST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Y PO 0 0 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Y PO 0 0 ERNS Y PO 0 0 FED BROWNFIELDS Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 FEMA UST Y .25 0 0 0 0 SEMS LIEN Y PO 0 - - - - 0 SUPERFUND ROD Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 State SWF/LF Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 361 Database Searched Search Project Within .125mi to 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni LST Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED LST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 UST Y .25 0 0 0 0 AST Y .25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED TANK Y .25 0 0 0 0 INST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 VRP Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 BROWNFIELDS Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 Tribal INDIAN LUST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 INDIAN UST Y .25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED ILST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED IUST Y .25 0 0 0 0 County No County standard environmental record sources available for this State. Additional Environmental Records Federal FINDS/FRS Y PO 0 0 TRIS Y PO 0 - 0 HMIRS Y .125 0 0 0 NCDL Y PO 0 - 0 TSCA Y .125 0 0 0 HIST TSCA Y .125 0 0 0 FTTS ADMIN Y PO 0 0 FTTSINSP Y PO 0 0 PRP Y PO 0 0 SCRD DRYCLEANER Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 ICIS Y PO 0 - - 0 FED DRYCLEANERS Y .25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED FED DRY Y .25 0 0 0 0 FUDS Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLTS Y PO 0 0 HIST MLTS Y PO 0 0 MINES Y .25 0 0 0 0 ALT FUELS Y .25 0 0 0 0 SSTS Y .25 0 0 0 0 PCB Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 State SPILLS Y .125 0 0 0 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 362 Database Searched Search Project Within .125mi to 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni PC SPILLS Y .125 0 0 - 0 DRYCLEANERS Y .25 0 0 0 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 *PO-Property Only *'Property and adjoining properties'database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 363 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number No records found in the selected databases for the project property. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 364 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number No records found in the selected databases for the surrounding properties. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 365 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source No records found in the selected databases for the project property or surrounding properties. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 366 78°18'30"W 78018'W 78°17'30"W 78017'W 78°16'30"W 78016'W 78°15'30"W ♦ z Z / N m m II N I N I 41 ♦AP � I �♦ �N N z ♦ II NN o 1 m I I / II NN NN •� / I ♦ ;/ 1I NNN N 1 N N • IfA / I / NN N • O / / • / I I 1 ,r • • • • N / / ♦ z • ♦ ♦ m • N N ♦ • / / • NN N • N • ♦ / / ♦ I AV 1N ♦ NN I a / N m N [_J III N, .� ♦I • ♦ Miles 1:26200 0 0.4 m m m w m Map : 1 Mile Radius Order No: 20180808184 E=m R I S Address: Marlboro Road, Back Creek,VA EWRORMENT Lm%K Ik ro5 AT!Q'5ERVIOE5 Project Property Rails Q State Boundary ® FWS Special Designation Areas Buffer Outline Major Highways National Priority List Sites State Brownfield Sites Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Major Highways Ramps National Wetland State Brownfield Areas Eris Sites with Same ElevationMajor Roads Indian Reserve Land State Superfund Areas:Dept.of Defense Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major Roads Ramps ® Historic Fill State Superfund Areas:NPL 0 Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation Secondary Roads ® 100 Year Flood Zone ® WOARF Areas County Boundary Secondary Roads Ramps 500 Year Flood Zone Federal Lands:Dept.of Defense (owned/administered areas) Local Roads and Ramps 367 Source: ©2016 ESRI © ERIS Information 78017'30"W 78017'W 78016'30"W 78016'W I I � z � / o Z � � / II 0 N I 1 I N N N / 1 1 ♦ N N / N • �� ♦ u " u . 1 q, u . 1 �. 1 m `� `� ♦ / 1 to t'S � Z Miles �a 1:17400 0.25/ 5 0 0.25 m Map : 0.5 Mile Radius Order No: 20180808184 E=m R I S Address: Marlboro Road, Back Creek,VA EWRO emcnrLm%K inrow T!Q 5cawcc5 Project Property Rails Q State Boundary ® FWS Special Designation Areas Buffer Outline Major Highways National Priority List Sites State Brownfield Sites Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Major Highways Ramps National Wetland State Brownfield Areas Eris Sites with Same ElevationMajor Roads Indian Reserve Land State Superfund Areas:Dept.of Defense Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major Roads Ramps ® Historic Fill State Superfund Areas:NPL 0 Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation Secondary Roads ® 100 Year Flood Zone ® WOARF Areas _ County Boundary Secondary Roads Ramps ® 500 Year Flood Zone Federal Lands:Dept.of Defense (owned/administered areas) Local Roads and Ramps Source: ©2016 ESRI © ERIS Information368 78017'30"W 78017'W 78°16'30"W 78016'W z 0 Marlh„_ Z r C n _ N m on I ♦ � Ql m Took ,r� ♦� ah oc, � �h I II e� 4♦ I I ♦ • I ♦ ♦ • z ♦ ♦ � • � on z � � • 1 °' / 1 I � 1 , 1 1 1 • 1 1 • 1 1 1 4r# 8 . o Z ♦ a a % • %% %4%, 4r# ♦ • 8 i ♦, ♦� / ♦ ♦ sc, 44, 44, I Miles 1:12900 0 0.2 Map : 0.25 Mile Radius Order No: 20180808184 E=m R I S Address: Marlboro Road, Back Creek,VA EWROMMCNT LRSM ik ro6 AT!Q� 5cwcC5 Project Property Rails Q State Boundary ® FWS Special Designation Areas Buffer Outline Major Highways National Priority List Sites State Brownfield Sites Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Major Highways Ramps National Wetland State Brownfield Areas Eris Sites with Same ElevationMajor Roads Indian Reserve Land State Superfund Areas:Dept.of Defense Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major Roads Ramps ® Historic Fill State Superfund Areas:NPL O Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation Secondary Roads ® 100 Year Flood Zone ® WOARF Areas County Boundary Secondary Roads Ramps 500 Year Flood ZoneFederal Lands:Dept.of Defense (owned/administered areas) Local Roads and Ramps 369 Source: ©2016 ESRI © ERIS Information 78017'W 78016'30"W -4 _ ��•', t,., Mir . +' .rr « Z m 1 4 , � 1 A •N.` f i alit' N, j, "Miles 1:7900 0.1 0.051. 0 r ;;;;Op 1 Sourc : E ri, Di i IGl b ,G �Ey , E r G r p i , CNES/Air u - 1101 DS, USDA, USES,AeroGI U ID, IGN,F nd It hi—elGIS 1U,erCommu51 y Aerial (2015) Order No: 20180808184 R I S %%000Address: Marlboro Road Back Creek VA E � � ENVIRONMENTAL RISKINFORMATION SCRVItCS Source: ESRI World Imagery © ERIS Information In 370 78018'W 78017'30"W 78°17'W 78016'30"W 78016'W 78015'30"W ! i/ �i -. /ir ,��l��Il ✓ ����l��I- l i�lf '� l �� �1\ �'Cj re Ir /%�� i Z V ISI �-` �1 ,I I! r;+( �.ti i � �\�:�'�-'� V\. �� ! �- llr• - !! `� -ti � � � f m �_- � r ! 1 � -� I � r ���� -, / ,-. f r�,_✓I�� �i II_� !I V4.C9- � - �tl�l fir' �, fi rJj/V � /�'+ t rl� ! �bS L ! r i r Ridings RidglK, 3 r` 00 I I'" 114 / � ✓/r, I ll.� � � - �-" '�3 r;1 �.//, �' � 1 - o I ,y 1 ti;� ' �, rte, � %'%� �✓- �� �+ �, — �� � ; , =� �,, r 1tilMIDDLERO ��':� ` -. r r- '..ter. \\ � IJ � __/r i � III �. +r � ( � ✓ � - i I �� + l�lf Irl���i�r ✓ �� � � r � 1 I � � �'/ � I �_- �� C11 l V , _, � �`— ,, ✓,, � �, _Y ���.�� / � rel �i� �� Ir + �� �� � f ��4 , � _ r 1 _� 4,: .I,� � ✓!� T-�`�,� I i i �✓ � _ �� -�� rte. �! / - - i�� + '� �I��� J m Miles FJ , ; srfR70 1.24000 -� m m 0.35 0.175 0 0.35 Topographic Map (2016) Order No- 20180808184 Address: Marlboro Road, Back Creek, VA E " S Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA r".a':�,'"�, p' " '-'�"TI„N �F•.I,:�- © ERIS Information In 371 Source: USGS Topographic Map Detail Report Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) No records found in the selected databases for the project property or surrounding properties. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 372 Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Address City Zip ERIS ID Name No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 373 Unplottable Report No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 374 Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services(ERIS)can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List: NPL National Priorities List(Superfund)-NPL: EPA's(United States Environmental Protection Agency)list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program.The NPL,which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System.A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date:Jul 3,2018 National Priority List-Proposed: PROPOSED NPL Includes sites proposed(by the EPA,the state,or concerned citizens)for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date:Jul 3,2018 Deleted NPL: DELETED NPL The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date:Jul 3,2018 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: SEMS The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System(SEMS),which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool.This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List(NPL)as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites.An active site is one at which site assessment,removal,remedial, enforcement,cost recovery,or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date:Jun 8,2018 Inventory of Open Dumps,June 1985: ODI The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines"open dumps"as facilities which do not comply with EPA's"Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices"(40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date:Jun 1985 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: SEMS ARCHIVE The Superfund Enterprise Management System(SEMS)Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS.An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date:Jun 8,2018 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 375 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System- CERCLIS CERCLIS: Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)to locate, investigate,and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List(NPL)as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments;this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Oct 25,2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: IODI Public Law 103-399,The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994,enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native(AI/AN)lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas.The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands,assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites,and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,1998 CERCLIS-No Further Remedial Action Planned: CERCLIS NFRAP An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time.The Archive designation means that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List(NPL).This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that,based upon available information,the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date:Oct 25,2013 CERCLIS Liens: CERCLIS LIENS A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination("Superfund site")and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA("Superfund")lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Government Publication Date:Jan 30,2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: RCRA CORRACTS RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. At these sites,the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination,geology,and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date:Apr 12,2018 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: RCRA TSD RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Government Publication Date:Apr 12,2018 RCRA Generator List: RCRA LQG RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators(LQGs)generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date:Apr 12,2018 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA SQG RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators(SQGs)generate more than 100 kilograms,but less than 1,000 kilograms,of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date:Apr 12,2018 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 376 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA CESQG RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators(CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date:Apr 12,2018 RCRA Non-Generators: RCRA NON GEN RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date:Apr 12,2018 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: FED ENG Engineering controls(ECs)encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers(e.g.,soil capping,sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers,fences)to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Government Publication Date:Jan 20,2016 Federal Institutional Controls-ICs: FED INST Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments,such as administrative and legal controls,that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy.Although it is EPA's(United States Environmental Protection Agency)expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date:Jan 20,2016 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center.The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil,chemical,radiological,biological,and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date:1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center.The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil,chemical,radiological,biological,and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date:1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center.The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil,chemical,radiological,biological,and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Government Publication Date:Feb 8,2017 The Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)Brownfield Database: FED BROWNFIELDS Brownfields are real property,the expansion, redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance,pollutant,or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment,reduces blight,and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date:Feb 20,2018 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: FEMA UST The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,2017 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 377 LIEN on Property: SEMS LIEN The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System(SEMS)provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program. Government Publication Date:Jun 8,2018 Superfund Decision Documents: SUPERFUND ROD This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of(or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan.The decision documents include Records of Decision(ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences(ESD),along with other associated memos and files.This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA(Environmental Protection Agency). Government Publication Date:Apr 11,2018 State Solid Waste Landfills: SWF/LF The solid waste program in the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)is designed to encourage the reuse and recycling of solid waste and to regulate the disposal and treatment of solid waste,including regulated medical waste,and to ensure that hazardous waste is properly managed. Standards are designed to protect human health and the environment and driven by regulatory requirements. Government Publication Date:Oct 3,2017 Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks: LST When a release occurs from an aboveground or underground storage tank,the owner and/or operator of the tank is required to report the release to the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ).This database contains a listing of releases from tanks both above and underground. Government Publication Date:Apr 18,2018 Delisted Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks: DELISTED LST Facilities which have been removed from the list of leaking petroleum storage tanks made available by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Facilities may be removed from the lists of leaking petroleum tanks when it is determined that the release reported is not an actual release,or the released substance is not petroleum-these sites may still have endured non-petroleum hazardous substance releases. Government Publication Date:Apr 18,2018 Underground Storage Tanks: UST A listing of registered underground storage tanks.This list is maintained by The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Apr 18,2018 Aboveground Storage Tanks: AST A listing of registered aboveground storage tanks.This list is maintained by The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Apr 18,2018 Delisted Tanks: DELISTED TANK Facilities which have been removed from the list of registered aboveground and/or underground storage tanks made available by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Facilities may be removed from the lists of registered tanks when it is determined that the tank does not require registration,for example,due to capacity or contents. Government Publication Date:Apr 18,2018 Institutional Controls: INST Institutional controls are legal or contractual restrictions on property use that remain effective after remediation is completed and are used to satisfy remediation levels.This list is maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Apr 19,2018 Voluntary Remediation Program: VRP The Voluntary Remediation Program is to encourage hazardous substance cleanups that might not otherwise take place.The program is a streamlined mechanism for site owners or operators to voluntarily address contamination at sites with concurrence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Government Publication Date:Apr 19,2018 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 378 Brownfields Site Specific Assessments: BROWNFIELDS Brownfields are idled, underutilized,or abandoned industrial or commercial properties where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. Examples include factories,railyards, landfills,dry cleaners,etc.This list is maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Feb 27,2018 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks(LUSTS)on Tribal/Indian Lands: INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks(LUSTS)on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 3,which includes Virginia.There are no LUST records in Virginia at this time. Government Publication Date:May 4,2018 Underground Storage Tanks(US Ts)on Indian Lands: INDIAN UST Listing of Underground Storage Tanks(USTs)on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 3,which includes Virginia.There are no UST records in Virginia at this time. Government Publication Date:May 4,2018 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: DELISTED ILST Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Oct 14,2017 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: DELISTED IUST Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Oct 14,2017 Coun No County standard environmental record sources available for this State. Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: FINDS/FRS The US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)'s Facility Registry System(FRS)is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities,sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality,accurate,and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems,state master facility records,data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. Government Publication Date:Apr 17,2018 Toxics Release Inventory_(TRII Program: TRIS The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory(TRI)is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S.facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling,energy recovery,and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,2016 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: HMIRS US DOT-Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration(PHMSA)Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date:May 23,2018 National Clandestine Drug Labs: NCDL erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 379 The U.S. Department of Justice("the Department")provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date:Dec 21,2017 Toxic Substances Control Act: TSCA The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA)section 8(a)Inventory Update Reporting(IUR)rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting(CDR)rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing,processing,and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances)on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory(TSCA Inventory).This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes,manufacturing sites,and how the chemical substances are used.This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information(CBI). Government Publication Date:Jun 30,2017 Hist TSCA: HIST TSCA The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA)section 8(a)Inventory Update Reporting(IUR)rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting(CDR)rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles,the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals.The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing: FTTS ADMIN An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act(FIFRA)and Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA),together known as FTTS.This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA)National Compliance Database(NCDB).The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date:Jan 19,2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing: FTTS INSP An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act(FIFRA)and Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA),together known as FTTS.This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA)National Compliance Database(NCDB).The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date:Jan 19,2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List: PRP Early in the cleanup process,the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties(PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date:Oct 10,2017 State Coalition for Remediation ofDrycleaners Listing: SCRD DRYCLEANER The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners(SCRD)was established in 1998,with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date:Nov 08,2017 Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS): ICIS The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance(FE&C)and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)programs.The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities.These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement.The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits,limits,discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date:Nov 18,2016 DrvcleanerFacilities: FED DRYCLEANERS A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS).The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date:Sep 14,2016 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 380 Delisted DrycleanerFacilities: DELISTED FED DRY List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities(sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS)with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date:Sep 14,2016 Formerly Used Defense Sites: FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to,or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986,where the Department of Defense(DoD)is responsible for an environmental restoration.This list is published by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date:Nov 22,2016 Material Licensing Tracking System(MLTS): MLTS A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(NRC)licensing requirements.This list is maintained by the NRC.As of September 2016,the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date:Jun 30,2017 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System(MLTS)sites: HIST MLTS A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System(MLTS). In some cases,a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an"Agreement State".An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(NRC)authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date:Jan 31,2010 Mines Master Index File: MINES The Master Index File(MIF)contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration(MSHA)for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date:Jan 30,2018 Alternative Fueling Stations: ALT FUELS List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency&Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol(E85)stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas(Propane)stations, Ethanol(E85)stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations,and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment(EVSE).The National Renewable Energy Laboratory(NREL)obtains information about new stations from trade media,Clean Cities coordinators,a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website,and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers,original equipment manufacturers(OEMs),and industry groups. Government Publication Date:Apr 25,2018 Registered Pesticide Establishments: SSTS List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System(SSTS).The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act(FIFRA)Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides,active ingredients,or devices be registered.The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Mar 1,2018 Polychlorinated Biphenyl(PCB)Notifiers: PCB Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)activities.Any company or person storing,transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date:Nov 30,2017 State spills: SPILLS The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)Pollution Response Program(PREP),provides for responses to air,water and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. PREP staff often work to assist local emergency responders,other state agencies, federal agencies,and responsible parties,as may be needed,to manage pollution incidents.Oil spills,fish kills,and hazardous materials spills are examples of incidents that may involve the DEQ's PREP Program. Government Publication Date:May 1,2018 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 381 Pollution Complaint: PC SPILLS The database contains a listing of Pollution Complaints from 1986 to 1994 that include petroleum releases and other releases on state land and waters. This list is maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:1986-1994 Drvcleaners List: DRYCLEANERS A listing of registered drycleaners maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality. Government Publication Date:May 31,2018 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. Coun No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 382 Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including:source, information available, time coverage,and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location,starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction:The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'-Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and,within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'-This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details,see the'Detail Report'section. Map Key The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at#1. The project property will always have a map key of'1'if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number,this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets,there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation'and the orange square will dictate'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area,and are included as reference. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180808184 383 E R S %%000 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES DA I A AS R1= P0 ) 1W Project Property: Foxglove Hites Road, Middletown, Va Environmental Risk Middletown VA Information Services Project No: 41147 W03 A division of Glacier Media Inc. P: 1.586.517.5204 Report Type: Database Report E: info@erisinfo.com Order No: 20180227028 www.erisinfo.com Requested by: Timmons Group, Inc. Date Completed: March 1, 2018 384 Table of Contents Tableof Contents...........................................................................................2 ExecutiveSummary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary- Project Property...................................................................................7 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties........................................................................8 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.........................................................................................................9 Map...............................................................................................................10 Aerial.............................................................................................................13 TopographicMap..........................................................................................14 DetailReport.................................................................................................15 UnplottableSummary...................................................................................19 UnplottableReport........................................................................................20 Appendix: Database Descriptions.................................................................21 Definitions.....................................................................................................29 Notice:IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report:This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s)may not be modified or re-sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties,and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments.The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice.Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions,or inaccuracies in such information and data,whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise,and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report(s)are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s)(the "Data")is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s)and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 385 Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property: Foxglove Hites Road, Middletown, Va Middletown VA Project No: 41147 W03 Coordinates: Latitude: 39.065496 Longitude: -78.270539 UTM Northing: 4,327,591.11 UTM Easting: 736,149.37 UTM Zone: UTM Zone 17S Elevation: 822 FT Order Information: Order No: 20180227028 Date Requested: February 27, 2018 Requested by: Timmons Group, Inc. Report Type: Database Report Historicals/Pro ducts: erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 386 Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Searched Search Project Within .125mi to 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni Standard Environmental Records Federal NPL Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED NPL Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 DELETED NPL Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 SEMS Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 SEMS ARCHIVE Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS NFRAP Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 CERCLIS LIENS Y PO 0 - - - - 0 RCRA CORRACTS Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA TSD Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 RCRA LQG Y .25 0 0 0 0 RCRA SQG Y .25 0 0 0 0 RCRA CESQG Y .25 0 0 0 0 RCRA NON GEN Y .25 0 0 0 0 FED ENG Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 FED INST Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Y PO 0 - - - 0 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Y PO 0 0 ERNS Y PO 0 - - - 0 FED BROWNFIELDS Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 FEMA UST Y .25 0 0 0 - 0 SEMS LIEN Y PO 0 - - 0 State SWF/LF Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 LST Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED LST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 UST Y .25 0 0 1 1 AST Y .25 0 0 1 1 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 387 Database Searched Search Project Within .125mi to 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni DELISTED TANK Y .25 0 0 0 0 INST CONTROL Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 VRP Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 BROWNFIELDS Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 Tribal INDIAN LUST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 INDIAN UST Y .25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED ILST Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 DELISTED IUST Y .25 0 0 0 0 County No County standard environmental record sources available for this State. Additional Environmental Records Federal FINDS/FRS Y PO 0 0 TRIS Y PO 0 - 0 HMIRS Y .125 0 0 0 NCDL Y PO 0 - - - 0 ODI Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 IODI Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 TSCA Y .125 0 0 0 HIST TSCA Y .125 0 0 0 FTTS ADMIN Y PO 0 0 FTTSINSP Y PO 0 0 PRP Y PO 0 0 SCRD DRYCLEANER Y 5 0 0 0 0 0 ICIS Y PO 0 - - 0 FED DRYCLEANERS Y .25 0 0 0 0 DELISTED FED DRY Y .25 0 0 0 0 FUDS Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 MLTS Y PO 0 0 HIST MLTS Y PO 0 0 MINES Y .25 0 0 0 0 ALT FUELS Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0 SUPERFUND ROD Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 SSTS Y .25 0 0 0 - - 0 PCB Y .5 0 0 0 0 0 State SPILLS Y .125 0 0 - - 0 PC SPILLS Y .125 0 0 0 erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 388 Database Searched Search Project Within .125mi to 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.001ni DRYCLEANERS Y .25 0 0 0 0 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. Total: 0 0 2 0 0 2 *PO-Property Only *'Property and adjoining properties'database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 389 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number No records found in the selected databases for the project property. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 390 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page Key (mi/ft) (ft) Number 1 AST ALLEGHENY POWER Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd E 0.13/ -74 15 - MEADOWBROOK Stephens City VA 22655 686.25 SUBSTATION Facility ID I Facility Active?I Active ASTs I Inactive ASTs:6026240 1 Yes 11 10 Tank No I Tank Status:1A I CURR IN USE UST ALLEGHENY POWER Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd E 0.13/ -74 16-- MEADOWBROOK Stephens City VA 22655 686.25 SUBSTATION Facility ID I Facility Active I Active UST I Inactive UST:6026240 1 Yes 10 11 Tank No I Tank Status:1 1 REM FROM GRD erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 391 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard State UST-Underground Storage Tanks A search of the UST database, dated Feb 6, 2018 has found that there are 1 UST site(s)within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance(mi/ft) Map Key ALLEGHENY POWER Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd E 0.13/686.25 1 MEADOWBROOK SUBSTATION Stephens City VA 22655 Facility ID I Facility Active I Active UST I Inactive UST:6026240 1 Yes 10 1 1 Tank No I Tank Status: 1 I REM FROM GRD AST-Aboveground Storage Tanks A search of the AST database, dated Feb 6, 2018 has found that there are 1 AST site(s)within approximately 0.25 miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance(mi/ft) Map Key ALLEGHENY POWER Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd E 0.13/686.25 1 MEADOWBROOK SUBSTATION Stephens City VA 22655 Facility ID I Facility Active?I Active ASTs I Inactive ASTs:6026240 Yes 11 10 Tank No I Tank Status: 1A I CURR IN USE erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 392 78018'W 78°17'30"W 78017'W 78016'30"W 78016'W 78°15'30"W 78015'W 78014'30"W �� ♦♦ z � k ♦♦ on m I � I _ � I It I , N Z z It If I � ♦ �r 1 N / 1 ♦♦♦ ♦` ``� 1 I' / 1 �♦ � I 1 / 1 1 ♦ ♦ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / Z / I 1 U 1 : 1 v I I I �1AA Ir 1 / m / I 1 ♦ � I I / 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ I 1 / I II /j♦ ,� t� r I ItIn m 1 ' 1 / I I I • R ` • ♦ 10 FA 40u \ I ♦ � II � `a \ Z m 11009=3001= Miles _ _ _ :28300 m m0.45 0.225 0 0.45 Map : 1 Mile Radius Order No: 20180227028 E=m R I S Address: Hites Road, Middletown, Va, Middletown, VA `""R°"'"`"r"i%Kimr°�Rr'°.5cic`' ` 000 Project Property Rails Q State Boundary ® FWS Special Designation Areas Buffer Outline Major Highways National Priority List Sites State Brownfield Sites Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Major Highways Ramps National Wetland State Brownfield Areas Eris Sites with Same ElevationMajor Roads Indian Reserve Land State Superfund Areas:Dept.of Defense Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major Roads Ramps ® Historic Fill State Superfund Areas:NPL 0 Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation Secondary Roads ® 100 Year Flood Zone ® WQARF Areas County Boundary Secondary Roads Ramps 500 Year Flood Zone Federal Lands:Dept.of Defense (owned/administered areas) Local Roads and Ramps 393 Source: ©2016 ESRI © ERIS Information 78017'W 78016'30"W 78016'W 78°15'30"W 78015'W I `♦ I � 0 m • 1 f lZ / / / ♦ ♦ / f r % '� ■ r 1 f 1 1 1 • � f I 1 / • 1 I 1 Z f / z 1 � / z 1 f r 00� f m f O(1 VVa�$ I I I / I f r r 1 ♦ ■ ■ 1 • ♦ I / 1 ■ ♦ / / I z ■ ♦ I ♦ f I z ♦ ,♦ I z f I o o ♦ _ f. I - ♦ I I m 1 I40' II 11 m I 1 ♦ I � ! 1 O ■ ■ I I 1 ta�0 ■ ♦ � II II ♦ I I I �a ♦ •. I . 0 • z Miles 1:19500 0.3 0.15 0 0.3 Map : 0.5 Mile Radius Order No: 20180227028 E=m R I S Address: Hites Road, Middletown, Va, Middletown, VA `""R°"'"`"r"i%Kimro�AT!Q.5cic`' ` 000 Project Property Rails Q State Boundary ® FWS Special Designation Areas Buffer Outline Major Highways National Priority List Sites State Brownfield Sites Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Major Highways Ramps National Wetland State Brownfield Areas Eris Sites with Same ElevationMajor Roads Indian Reserve Land State Superfund Areas:Dept.of Defense Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major Roads Ramps ® Historic Fill State Superfund Areas:NPL 0 Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation Secondary Roads ® 100 Year Flood Zone ® WOARF Areas County Boundary Secondary Roads Ramps 500 Year Flood Zone Federal Lands:Dept.of Defense (owned/administered areas) Local Roads and Ramps Source: ©2016 ESRI © ERIS Information394 78017'W 78016'30"W 78016'W 78015'30"W ♦ �� z 1 1 '• I , / 1 1 I ♦ � 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / / 1 1 1 1 / 1 / I / ♦ 1 z e I � 1 fA ee ♦ ♦♦ o e � ♦ 1 1 � ♦ e 1 z � � ♦ 1 0 Z 1 e ♦ by, ♦• ♦e m rsh 6f 1 , �♦ ♦♦ s • • ♦. �s I Q Miles 1:15 0 0.2 0.1 0 0.2 Ja Map : 0.25 Mile Radius Order No: 20180227028 E=m R S *IIIIoo Address: Hites Road, Middletown, Va, Middletown, VA CHWRQRMCRTAL RI:K IRfp M%+i❑v SCRyICCS Project Property Rails Q State Boundary ® FWS Special Designation Areas Buffer Outline Major Highways National Priority List Sites State Brownfield Sites Eris Sites with Higher Elevation Major Highways Ramps National Wetland State Brownfield Areas Eris Sites with Same Elevation Major Roads Indian Reserve Land State Superfund Areas:Dept.of Defense Eris Sites with Lower Elevation Major Roads Ramps ® Historic Fill State Superfund Areas:NPL 0 Eris Sites with Unknown Elevation Secondary Roads ® 100 Year Flood Zone ® WOARF Areas County Boundary Secondary Roads Ramps 500 Year Flood Zone Federal Lands:Dept.of Defense (owned/administered areas) Local Roads and Ramps 395 Source: ©2016 ESRI © ERIS Information 78016'30"W 78016'W 78015'30"W Z -VFW } �l .. ro L Ml�! L? 4 }b ♦ • I Z Z m v � • r• ti . - e i a + z 0 m m } '4 't 446 Miles a 1:9800 0.1 0.05 0 0.1 Sourc : E ri, Di i IGI b ,G Ey , E r G r p i , CNES/Air u "j., DS, USDA, USES,AeroG ID, IGN, nd he GIS U er Communi y Aerial (2015) Order No: 20180227028 R I S %%000Address: Hites Road Middletown Va Middletown VA E � � � � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SCRVItCS Source: ESRI World Imagery © ERIS Information In 396 78017'30"W 78017'VV 78016'30"W 78016'W 78015'30"W 78015'W 78014'30"W n rchar& - �� �+ ,!J ,-� IY)I rl� t iJ �� 1 �' /%f ���6'_.- _ .�' !- �] - 1 l� � r i l A� �t �, Poplar Ptidge q (I, J A (1-2 1- j OC4 C� 1l.V 17. Ej 6, _RAI R+k- VauclUse (Lilt, ( A I' 750 -�I,;o n-R u •7 21 F-' Nie de 4t� Miles 1:24000 0.35 0.175 0 0.35 A- Topographic Map (2013) Order No: 20180227028 Address: Hites Road, Middletown, Va, Middletown, VA a R CO %%000 Quadrangle(s):Stephens City,VA; Middletown,VA; ERIS Information In 397 Source: USGS Topographic Map Detail Report Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) 1 1 of 2 E 0.131 747.511 ALLEGHENY POWER AST 686.25 -74 MEADOWBROOK SUBSTATION Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd Stephens City VA 22655 Facility ID: 6026240 Region: VRO CEDS Facility ID: 200000070425 Parent Region: Valley Fa cility A c tive?: Yes Facility Addr 1: Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd Fed Regulated?: Yes Facility Addr 2: Active USTs: 0 Facility City: Stephens City Inactive USTs: 1 Facility Location: Route 11 &638 Active AS Ts: 1 County: Frederick County Inactive AS Ts: 0 State: VA Facility Type: UTILITY Latitude: 39.0605340688 Facility Name: ALLEGHENY POWER MEADOWBROOK Longitude: -78.2514980578 SUBSTATION Tank Details Tank Owner ID: 36831 Install Date: 1/18/2006 Tank No: 1A Date Closed: Tank Status: CURR IN USE Capacity: 1000 Tank Type: AST Contents: DIESEL Fed Regulated Tank: N Other Contents: Tank Materials Tank Mat Bare Steel AST: No Tank Mat Insulated Steel: No Tank Mat Concrete Coated: No Tank Mat Unknown: No Tank Mat Other. Yes Tank Mat Other Specify: Steel W/Concrete Tank Type Cathodic/CP: No Tank Type Single Wall: No Tank Type Double Wall: Yes Tank Type Lined Interior: No Tank Type Double Bottom: No Tank Type Portable/Skid: No Tank Type Fabricated/Built: No Tank Type Vault Below Grade: No Tank Type Vertical: No Tank Type Horizontal: No Tank Type Unknown: N Tank Type Other. No Tank Type Other Specify: Note: Tank Foundation Concrete Coating: No Concrete: Yes Steel/Sad/Run/Beam: No Earthen: No Ring Wall: No Unknown: No erisinfo.com Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 398 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Other: No Other Specify: Roof NA Horiz Tank: No Roof Floating: No Roof Fix Concrete: No Roof Other: Yes Roof Other Specify: Horizontal Note: Tank Containment Curbing: No Weirs/Boom: No Sorbent Material: No Culverts/Gutters: No Diversion Pool: No Retention Pond: No Dike/Berm/Wall: No Unknown: No Cont Type None: No Cont Type Other: No Tank RD GW Monitor: No Tnk RD Visual Mntr: No Tank RD Vapor Mntr: No Tnk RD Inter Mntr: No Tank RD None AST: No Tank RD Other AST: No RPB Double Bottom: No RPB Double Wall: No RPB Polyeth Jacket: No RPB Dike/Berm Exc: No RPB None: No RPB Unknown: No RPB Other: No Cont Type Other Specify: Tank RD Other Specify: RPB Other Specify: Note: Owner Tank Owner ID: 36831 No of Active AST: 1 No of Active UST: 0 No of Inactive AST: 0 No of Inactive UST: 1 Federal Regulated: Y Region: VRO Name: ALLEGHENY POWER MEADOWBROOK SUBSTATION Owner Name: The Potomac Edison Company OwnerAddress 1: 800 Cabin Hill Dr Owner Address 2: Owner City: Greensburg Owner State: PA Owner Zip 5: 15601 Owner Zip 4: 1689 Owner Type: COMMERCIAL 1 2 of 2 E 0.131 747.511 ALLEGHENY POWER UST 686.25 -74 MEADOWBROOK SUBSTATION Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd Stephens City VA 22655 Facility ID: 6026240 Region: VRO CEDS Facility ID: 200000070425 Parent Region: Valley Facility Active: Yes Facility Addr 1: Rt 638 Vaucluse Rd erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 399 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) Federally Regulated: Yes Facility Addr 2: Active UST: 0 City: Stephens City Inactive UST: 1 Facility Location: Route 11 &638 Active AST: 1 County: Frederick County Inactive AST: 0 State: VA Facility Type: UTILITY Latitude: 39.0605340688 Facility Name: ALLEGHENY POWER MEADOWBROOK Longitude: -78.2514980578 SUBSTATION Tank Details Tank Owner ID: 36831 Install Date: 7/1/1991 Tank No: 1 Date Closed: 1/17/2006 Tank Status: REM FROM GRD Capacity: 1000 Tank Type: UST Contents: EMER GENERATOR Fed Regulated Tank: Y Other Contents: Tank Materials AsphalUBare Steel: No Impressed Current: No CCP/STI-P3: Yes Polyethyl Jacket: No Composite: Yes Concrete: No Fiberglass: No Excavation Liner: No Lined Interior: No Secondary Contain: No Double Walled: Yes Repaired: No Other: No Unknown: No Other Specify: STIP3 Note: Pine Materials Piping Type: NO VALVE:SUCTION Double Walled: Yes AsphalUBare Steel: No Polyflexible: No Galvanized Steel: No Unknown: No Fiberglass: No Secondary Contain: Yes Copper: Yes Other: No Cathodic Protected: No Other Specify: Repaired: No Note: Impressed Current: Tank/Pipe Release Detection Manual Gauging: No Overfill Spec: Tank RD Tight Test: No Pipe RD MTG: No Inventory Controls: No Pipe RD ATG: Tank RD ATG: No Pipe RD GW Monitor: No Tank RD Vapor Mntr: No Pipe RD Vapor Mntr: No Tank RD GW Monitor: No Pipe IM Dbl Wall: Yes Tnk RD IM Dbl Wall: Yes Pipe IM Sec Cont: No Tnk RD IM Sec Cont: No Pipe RD ALLD: No Tank RD SIR: No Pipe RD Tight Test: No Tank RD Leak Defer: No Pipe RD SIR: No Tank RD Other: No Pipe RD Leak Defer: Tank RD Other Spec: Pipe RD Other: No Spl Device Install: Yes Pipe RD Other Spec: Overfill Dev Inst: Yes Note: Overfill Type: Owner Tank Owner ID: 36831 Owner Name: The Potomac Edison Company No of Active AST: 1 Owner Address 1: 800 Cabin Hill Dr No of Active UST: 0 Owner Address 2: No of Inactive AST: 0 Owner City: Greensburg erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 400 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Elev/Diff Site DB Records (mi/ft) (ft) No of Inactive UST: 1 Owner State: PA Federal Regulated: Y Owner Zip 5: 15601 Region: VRO Owner Zip 4: 1689 Name: ALLEGHENY POWER MEADOWBROOK Owner Type: COMMERCIAL SUBSTATION erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 401 Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Address City Zip ERIS ID Name No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 402 Unplottable Report No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 403 Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services(ERIS)can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List: NPL National Priorities List(Superfund)-NPL: EPA's(United States Environmental Protection Agency)list of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program.The NPL,which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System.A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 National Priority List-Proposed: PROPOSED NPL Includes sites proposed(by the EPA,the state,or concerned citizens)for addition to the NPL due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Deleted NPL: DELETED NPL The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: SEMS The Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System(SEMS),which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool.This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List(NPL)as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites.An active site is one at which site assessment,removal,remedial, enforcement,cost recovery,or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. Government Publication Date:Dec 11,2017 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: SEMS ARCHIVE The Superfund Enterprise Management System(SEMS)Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS.An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. Government Publication Date:Dec 11,2017 Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation and Liability Information System- CERCLIS CERCLIS: Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)to locate, investigate,and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List(NPL)as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments;this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Oct 25,2013 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 404 CERCLIS-No Further Remedial Action Planned: CERCLIS NFRAP An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time.The Archive designation means that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List(NPL).This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that,based upon available information,the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date:Oct 25,2013 CERCLIS Liens: CERCLIS LIENS A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination("Superfund site")and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA("Superfund")lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Government Publication Date:Jan 30,2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: RCRA CORRACTS RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. At these sites,the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination,geology,and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date:Oct 17,2017 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: RCRA TSD RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.This database includes Non-Corrective Action sites listed as treatment, storage and/or disposal facilities of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Government Publication Date:Oct 17,2017 RCRA Generator List: RCRA LQG RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators(LQGs)generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date:Oct 17,2017 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA SQG RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators(SQGs)generate more than 100 kilograms,but less than 1,000 kilograms,of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date:Oct 17,2017 RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA CESQG RCRA Info is the EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators(CESQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date:Oct 17,2017 RCRA Non-Generators: RCRA NON GEN RCRA Info is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS)and the Biennial Reporting System(BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste(see 40 CFR 260.10). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date:Oct 17,2017 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 405 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: FED ENG Engineering controls(ECs)encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers(e.g.,soil capping,sub-surface venting systems, mitigation barriers,fences)to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Government Publication Date:Jan 20,2016 Federal Institutional Controls-ICs: FED INST Institutional controls are non-engineered instruments,such as administrative and legal controls,that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy.Although it is EPA's(United States Environmental Protection Agency)expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. Government Publication Date:Jan 20,2016 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center.The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil,chemical,radiological,biological,and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date:1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center.The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil,chemical,radiological,biological,and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date:1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center.The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil,chemical,radiological,biological,and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Government Publication Date:Feb 8,2017 The Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)Brownfield Database: FED BROWNFIELDS Brownfields are real property,the expansion, redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance,pollutant,or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment,reduces blight,and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date:Aug 16,2017 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA UST The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,2017 LIEN on Property: SEMS LIEN The EPA Superfund Enterprise Management System(SEMS)provides LIEN information on properties under the EPA Superfund Program. Government Publication Date:Dec 11,2017 State Solid Waste Landfills: SWF/LF The solid waste program in the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)is designed to encourage the reuse and recycling of solid waste and to regulate the disposal and treatment of solid waste,including regulated medical waste,and to ensure that hazardous waste is properly managed. Standards are designed to protect human health and the environment and driven by regulatory requirements. Government Publication Date:Oct 3,2017 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 406 Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks: LST When a release occurs from an aboveground or underground storage tank,the owner and/or operator of the tank is required to report the release to the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ).This database contains a listing of releases from tanks both above and underground. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Delisted Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks: DELISTED LST Facilities which have been removed from the list of leaking petroleum storage tanks made available by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Facilities may be removed from the lists of leaking petroleum tanks when it is determined that the release reported is not an actual release,or the released substance is not petroleum-these sites may still have endured non-petroleum hazardous substance releases. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Underground Storage Tanks: UST A listing of registered underground storage tanks.This list is maintained by The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Aboveground Storage Tanks: AST A listing of registered aboveground storage tanks.This list is maintained by The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Delisted Tanks: DELISTED TANK Facilities which have been removed from the list of registered aboveground and/or underground storage tanks made available by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Facilities may be removed from the lists of registered tanks when it is determined that the tank does not require registration,for example,due to capacity or contents. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Institutional Controls: INST CONTROL Institutional controls are legal or contractual restrictions on property use that remain effective after remediation is completed and are used to satisfy remediation levels.This list is maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Jan 23,2018 Voluntary Remediation Program: VRP The Voluntary Remediation Program is to encourage hazardous substance cleanups that might not otherwise take place.The program is a streamlined mechanism for site owners or operators to voluntarily address contamination at sites with concurrence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Government Publication Date:Jan 23,2018 Brownfields Site Specific Assessments: BROWNFIELDS Brownfields are idled, underutilized,or abandoned industrial or commercial properties where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. Examples include factories,railyards, landfills,dry cleaners,etc.This list is maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:Aug 22,2017 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks(LUSTs)on Tribal/Indian Lands: INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks(LUSTs)on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 3,which includes Virginia.There are no LUST records in Virginia at this time. Government Publication Date:Feb 20,2014 Underground Storage Tanks(US Ts)on Indian Lands: INDIAN UST Listing of Underground Storage Tanks(USTs)on Tribal/Indian Lands in EPA Region 3,which includes Virginia.There are no UST records in Virginia at this time. Government Publication Date:Feb 20,2014 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: DELISTED ILST Leaking Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal LUST lists made available by the EPA. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 407 Government Publication Date:Aug 3,2017 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: DELISTED IUST Underground Storage Tank facilities which have been removed from the Regional Tribal UST lists made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Aug 3,2017 Coun No County standard environmental record sources available for this State. Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: FINDS/FRS The US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)'s Facility Registry System(FRS)is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities,sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality,accurate,and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems,state master facility records,data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. Government Publication Date:Dec 12,2017 Toxics Release Inventory(TRI)Program: TRIS The EPA's Toxics Release Inventory(TRI)is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from thousands of U.S.facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling,energy recovery,and treatment. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,2016 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: HMIRS US DOT-Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration(PHMSA)Incidents Reports Database taken from Hazmat Intelligence Portal, U.S. Department of Transportation. Government Publication Date:Sep 11,2017 National Clandestine Drug Labs: NCDL The U.S. Department of Justice("the Department")provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date:Dec 21,2017 Inventory of Open Dumps,June 1985: ODI The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA of the Act)provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines"open dumps"as facilities which do not comply with EPA's"Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices"(40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date:Jun 1985 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: IODI Public Law 103-399,The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994,enacted October 22, 1994, identified ongressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native(AI/AN)lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas.The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands,assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites,and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,1998 Toxic Substances Control Act: TSCA erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 408 The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA)section 8(a)Inventory Update Reporting(IUR)rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting(CDR)rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing,processing,and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances)on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory(TSCA Inventory).This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes,manufacturing sites,and how the chemical substances are used.This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information(CBI). Government Publication Date:Jun 30,2017 Hist TSCA: HIST TSCA The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA)section 8(a)Inventory Update Reporting(IUR)rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting(CDR)rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles,the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals.The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date:Dec 31,2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing: FTTS ADMIN An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide Act(FIFRA)and Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA),together known as FTTS.This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA)National Compliance Database(NCDB).The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date:Jan 19,2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing FTTS INSP An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act(FIFRA)and Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA),together known as FTTS.This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA)National Compliance Database(NCDB).The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date:Jan 19,2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List: PRP Early in the cleanup process,the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)conducts a search to find the potentially responsible parties(PRPs). EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. Government Publication Date:Oct 10,2017 State Coalition for Remediation ofDrycleaners Listing: SCRD DRYCLEANER The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners(SCRD)was established in 1998,with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin. Government Publication Date:Nov 08,2017 Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS): ICIS The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)is a system that provides information for the Federal Enforcement and Compliance(FE&C)and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)programs.The FE&C component supports the Environmental Protection Agency's(EPA) Civil Enforcement and Compliance program activities.These activities include Compliance Assistance, Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement.The NPDES program supports tracking of NPDES permits,limits,discharge monitoring data and other program reports. Government Publication Date:Nov 18,2016 DrycleanerFacilities: FED DRYCLEANERS A list of drycleaner facilities from the Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS).The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date:Sep 14,2016 Delisted DrycleanerFacilities: DELISTED FED DRY List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities(sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS)with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date:Sep 14,2016 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 409 Formerly Used Defense Sites: FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to,or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986,where the Department of Defense(DoD)is responsible for an environmental restoration.This list is published by the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. Government Publication Date:Nov 22,2016 Material Licensing Tracking System(MLTS): MLTS A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(NRC)licensing requirements.This list is maintained by the NRC.As of September 2016,the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date:Sep 13,2016 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System(MLTS)sites: HIST MLTS A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System(MLTS). In some cases,a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an"Agreement State".An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission(NRC)authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date:Jan 31,2010 Mines Master Index File: MINES The Master Index File(MIF)contains mine identification numbers issued by the Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration(MSHA)for mines active or opened since 1971. Note that addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself. Government Publication Date:Jul 31,2017 Alternative Fueling Stations: ALT FUELS List of alternative fueling stations made available by the US Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency&Renewable Energy. Includes Biodiesel stations, Ethanol(E85)stations, Liquefied Petroleum Gas(Propane)stations, Ethanol(E85)stations, Natural Gas stations, Hydrogen stations,and Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment(EVSE).The National Renewable Energy Laboratory(NREL)obtains information about new stations from trade media,Clean Cities coordinators,a Submit New Station form on the Station Locator website,and through collaborating with infrastructure equipment and fuel providers,original equipment manufacturers(OEMs),and industry groups. Government Publication Date:Feb 6,2018 Superfund Decision Documents: SUPERFUND ROD This database contains a listing of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of(or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan.The decision documents include Records of Decision(ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences(ESD),along with other associated memos and files.This information is maintained and made available by the US EPA(Environmental Protection Agency). Government Publication Date:Dec 11,2017 Registered Pesticide Establishments: SSTS List of active EPA-registered foreign and domestic pesticide-producing and device-producing establishments based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System(SSTS).The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act(FIFRA)Section 7 requires that facilities producing pesticides,active ingredients,or devices be registered.The list of establishments is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date:Feb 28,2017 Polychlorinated Biphenyl(PCB)Notifiers: PCB Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)activities.Any company or person storing,transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date:Jul 18,2017 State Spills: SPILLS The Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ)Pollution Response Program(PREP),provides for responses to air,water and waste pollution incidents in order to protect human health and the environment. PREP staff often work to assist local emergency responders,other state agencies, federal agencies,and responsible parties,as may be needed,to manage pollution incidents.Oil spills,fish kills,and hazardous materials spills are examples of incidents that may involve the DEQ's PREP Program. Government Publication Date:Jan 02,2018 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 410 Pollution Complaint: PC SPILLS The database contains a listing of Pollution Complaints from 1986 to 1994 that include petroleum releases and other releases on state land and waters. This list is maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ). Government Publication Date:1986-1994 Drycleaners List: DRYCLEANERS A listing of registered drycleaners maintained by the Department of Environmental Quality. Government Publication Date:Jan 16,2018 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. Coun No County additional environmental record sources available for this State. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 411 Definitions Database Descriptions:This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including:source, information available, time coverage,and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report:This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location,starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance:The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction:The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation:The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary:This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'-Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and,within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary'-Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary-Surrounding Properties'-This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details,see the'Detail Report'section. Map Key The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at#1. The project property will always have a map key of'1'if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number,this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets,there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation'and the orange square will dictate'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables:These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area,and are included as reference. erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 20180227028 412 APPENDIX 5 ERIS Historical Aerial Report 413 e R 0 *%000 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES HISTORICAL AERIAL REPORT for the site: ERIS Information Inc. Foxglove Environmental Risk Informaon Hites Road, Middletown,Va Services (ERIS) Middletown, VA A division of Glacier Media Inc. PO#: T: 1.866.517.5204 E: info@erisinfo.com Report ID: 20180227028 Completed: 2/27/2018 www.erisinfo.com Search Results Summary Date Source Scale Comment 2016 NAIP-National Agriculture Informa.on Program 1"=800' 2014 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2012 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2011 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2009 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2008 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2006 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2005 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2004 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 2003 NAIP-Naonal Agricultur e Information Program 1"=800' 1997 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=800' 1982 NHAP-Naonal High Altude Phot ography 1"=800' 1977 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=800' 1972 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=800' 1963 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=800' 414 one Inch AIM a „*' if MOVA id; ���rf!% `'{' •��"y, � J�If r,•R rY/�t,} 1,,+f� �`'�� +s r..�.1yr � ;,. it ,.�. fry{{r �� .�' � �//! �1 � it�' a• ^,�`w_ {}�'.{ e .. !:. - •� f .'fir, ,.. �. ��f r✓r .f ;�f_ � I _ e� � 1 a 7,y �` x ` � 4? lu ,^-r 47 �.'t � � !,"f `�Y'f. -,' +� kF-P{ y�,"A!�`1`.r a P 1{�f rYb ✓' ,rte ! J'T.n. h 5, „ f 1 � t S "w 4W r E -� , t wit' r • ", y ;,?�-'y�' r. s Date: 2016 Source: 1" IP to r� Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 415 one inch /� d."_��p�+� "- ' '�.�' �•*`,'�7r ;y�s��� , Imo! *6� , '""� �• * tJ��i *, ��i ` ''"1�• i {, t ";fir IV ' rrf '�"r .��;,� •. ,.i lfjt�: r/��rrr ��� �I �,/}yr 441 J1;O, ,.••: rf�:�.-,: / .. g• '�1 Prr�rtl�rul/xr{/,��1' '��rl .' 74;0� AW 44P All 7 14 r. .f� oo -Alp 'S:"�.Zlv „tea 4. a ,i Date: 2014 Source: 1" IP to t� Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENViRDNMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 416 one inch /� ' • �" F� yf.r: [c rr J. �; i s- '�" ys J•f c w / It rr Ak r� $ ✓ir /rr %1'Itt w /JJ... z f' Jkf P R � ^ 'rq r r �r .�y�,ti"4,rn .,, .�•• '.. •I> r r, x k f. F r Miff� 14--.7 •. �r+r '���+f r��l, �a�,1yv;:,. �'rr s �� er .el .,.p - r I; JJ +..�}+',, •rY 1,.,�r te. ,r_,r or s �r •77,, i' � f. � i'j •i iss r •f� ,r IN re F hp P. r 7 v r r hi ri Date: 2012 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON SERVCSG Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 417 IfP 4F '{� '►ii�� s+ ^S1`•} i 1 r W F bra .;.��► j v 1 ;�.'�` r�rr':�• � .'�,,yy spa VIA y '�g' r r!r � ire? ' . � k, r. •�(�•p t fia/J +r;•� 1/ .%11�tt `��11`� s•}�� S`-�r ,f�, , til[` -,Jf��l�� .,�• ! �i er�1 F er'c•�'`" f .#y,F• ,•.Y �' j .1 ' G l�.rf�t rll�� .. ,/,...'r+� �.r� ! �c..r .'.r � I%L V f� Affi'vr }" �fl;'.. r•rr _ fie. h ILI% rx c 1!1 + 4 i+3l+Fn.I Al 3 4L IX Ir •� �F. ry ..�+r�5�,, tr ,rte gg • �;, �' � 'r �.! ���'&''3 )�q 'It t. � ria'" ,�_. �, �i�. a.. +.{-. � Y• � f{� 1�t � r t y, � ' �iJ�. Y f."+I{. t.., •A , 1 J/r i J`/.1 �3� y. C y, k *�k'.` t Ilk. r • `'�� ! "' i�� �/ err �, ,� ���' `%.�� ���:, `'c `},� ��J�J�'';{���� � •J .f.., � +�$�rl Kkv � re'� S.eJ -'�: erYJrr fi �G�}k r r* '4�"4 e Jwv'r� •," e .. � rfifJJf:•l Yi�i�ti?� ', ag.ti'Ta 'L �r �.Y .. 41 I t%N Fit N, V. AP z. !y • 'R P.ry�+l' Date: 2011 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK i.v-DRMATiON SCkt Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 418 OqlwGPM [', r iL •' IL r r , r _ ', 'r` r / irl ` Jr, P-1 •fit + 1 A f� � A' , r/_ � � A�ir f(!7}7/R{((ff��/I rA s\,'�a`\.'•,-••,�/'f��� ���777►►► th �r �f � ��* p� Jfu}�jff��I��°t�fr f'y��� I,�.� ,� 'w ��•, -. .. �.• .Y. l may,, �'Yti^,� \\ °{M�' i y Y + � Y y r 'yam a' rr s +1fr )ry ' �� •� Y. .�+. •t I� •' �• �•`,a.`_ r' ,Y ,a�•' + r S 1 — � �l, Si7 fp A ► [ Sr f�is k N.' x S • r4''y T.�. r S`=p e e r r �E,••, e, r- .,. to p., }? a b M. ,�;i. � �Y •�•"f � i 'A '{•�� �'�� A I [ '�' i-��f���}RsS fYaiY �'s\� ��[y •1V s� 'T rT •r �'���+w�r�'• r ►{.r ,tom ye. y # f'¢x 1Yr '1�[�r. r {, r 'is9A p�1 A 61 Y t f r t : i f�`'y ]ya'• lr Y !lIfCCC • �' +'•.ted 'V !! f�i � 'j1y { '1 Y A F.r 1 '� 1r 8. d� d �ej • 'rte Al i U r !�-.f ark y.�„Wy r``.�r � `• ' '.-•�' �.�, #� .• .' r •ir,, f R'` r' �Vii.j fir �.�, i ,� �! •yr, 31� A f ,I` ♦{� .t 1 rt!,.+ r r r it r • fr•� /ti'�cr•� ���' lif� � d ct `� t4♦ �,r, t..$r �^. - � ,y'F�,,�i SAS. - fV d.. " 33o t Y C ��.�•f,1 ' .L'2y ��•• ��` Y„,r. + is 1�, � Ir i y� Y p t. Gf Date: 2009 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RI-A IN-DRMATiON GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 419 one inch /� t r'xf f� ••���0 •• r _ s �5 r P ✓ / Ori ,'., Op `,.=� 6 � .� i ,` ;�ALM• a+�� -'�#+ f yy 4 t .t .c Date: 2008 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON GERVCS_� Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 420 one inch MAIM yr,, r NP low p Ni •r j f r My IL .46 Y s + r i _ .s•ty �.`l,. !, ;L C. r kl�r �4�d - ter• :r. f' '�' • x / IF ri'- $.,, q '.i #�q� It 's "tet [[yy ,r. • ! � r�� r � i� n.i�4� i�� ', �/ ?�',�,� •.� l �r /✓f!/�A'r n 'W',fe_ v. 1 •--4 4-4 In lilt 501 •%r► + mac ;. /J( s ; Date: 2006 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 421 AV •";'1 � w d CLQ' ; �'!' . . },�.,� � ,.�- �• - - • a r. ,.I,,' u�p r �I< +l/r" � •.'6r ��/WC�.�r + 4.y� 1��iF��rYf f� �Y 1 � ti.'! � _ -: _.�� �t ` ��� .�. �� 7M k,h � � �- -v� '•'Miry �.'' ;;� .,. . ` I, s,, Af r_ 4t Date: 2005 r e h 1' R • Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to i Comments: Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 422 , one inch /'� '�* i • 7i r�4 ,'i Imo! � .,�. JL M f .. + • �" �''"',� 1 P / Ib 3Y V•J s�, � - yT i� 4. Y ♦. r �+ r It IP r C� ��• ! l :inti Y��• . � r fi', ti � ,.rr-rrT w �`�� ` TPP n'"r• w"� �. '�`���: r - _.`1- ,, r a R * R _ ' _ a s '�+`- '�5� °"S� :.'ti ti �.- �� r 5' •i�.:f!-. � a�lr�`. d ' fir * --. !- F Y r,.. ..:.✓,.,_ - ria -P•rIN M l ' ' k f � . Date: 2004 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-ORMATION GERVICSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 423 yam. J lox w �J/ 4• r" t F! ,. .�'v„fir P r I Yt ; ,r A. '' a {,. �pT ti �/,��•��%r 4 j �.�. 441 ;- "A� t N. .r II{ - ` ,� 1, _ mks_.` ;"• tp t y Y°e s P , - •ri A + 1 \ gyp. .r .'4. 4 y * < J• y f t cy FSA w 1iC r/ t.r`+ ' ' Pk i� .-����:��J.�P. y. •.' r ,x, � ��.\ r toy ���� ■ •,%� :T� J A Date: 2003 Source: 1" IP to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN—ORMATION GERVICSG Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 424 � 1 ne inch M y� _ t gni • +g -� T `7 if +� I*1_7,LER"' � �a � Y �•� "^� it Thr +~ `+ ► ..,fl. _`'�i'f}+�r t'�� y'�" �.,11.rt , g1 r r J T w• A ti.. I' y y .0 •F-.� rf la.y .'/F. �1 J T 01, fRI IF sk r � - � TFIe •�, ', hi r F 1 '. A � 'ai �'�.w .l � •e t+�, i j, 00, top f d1b+t � Date: 1997 Source: 1"GS to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: nj ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 425 • ��:'- '"-fir , '� •00 �? 41 �if"rri3Sj s"IyT,.. t Ar M ,•_,� •Lf �jfF}F.f f ,��F �Y�s3 Rt f `�: a�'" l f � p7¢• �, .r f a � ' f 1 ".r', `�.- 1. • yy Yr o • ;� ,rile - yyyy S y too-, F • al 3 _ 00- - - t' fi��%• '1'+t►f�: 8 "'fir,iyt�k `t Source:Date: 1982 ' Scale: 1" to 11 i Comments: Approx Center: ne inch' �*. .., r - i yT ,T •��w � �. ., R I P,.�,.`d: �_ ;` : �* Ilk. - ��M.yyf`,'a�fr t/ r' �'' :!'.,4a�;� #'�� "y`��1C`yl',r �+'. � Pr F. ,•,`� �,�+ y� �,�,� }, tVd r //J rg;,, s .r 'E.r "s S •�' kn X3'.�t'- ,rt .. 4Apit ► r'S. t k ,r r .r 1: Date: 1977 Source: USGS Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: N ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATION GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 427 Iia r� rf rt • 71 MP ti r � VnI 7-4 4 mow, �, M y. +ti y FtY r�„ 4 •{ '. C - Ff*` •� fe'V _ - ri 4 r A( 4, • e'.Y•1 .,r M ,� �2¢{y � , r• a.� ' _`;tai^ � ,,•� . ;; J aj rr S• Date: 1972 Source: 1"GS to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: N ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-DRMATiON GERVCSS Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 428 'one inch,+ /� �e r��`.•`t .��'r � r ' llw ■ 'A'"" S ss j 1 h rE 1 f! s wY' R :. II• yam, V t / -.t. -��F'.Pr'S•I �yY1 rF F �Y7:4�.�r f [ • 1 `tel *,..�;�, ��� :;�iY "y w f - - Fy r y J , F Date: 1963 Source: 1"GS to Scale: 1" to 800' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISA IN-ORMATION GERVICS_-, Subject:Hites Road,Middletown, Va Middletown VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.06549/-78.27053 429 e R 0 *%000 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES HISTORICAL AERIAL REPORT for the site: ERIS Information Inc. Foxglove 2 Environmental Risk Informaon Marlboro Road Services (ERIS) Back Creek,VA A division of Glacier Media Inc. PO#: T: 1.866.517.5204 E: info@erisinfo.com Report ID: 20180808184 Completed: 8/9/2018 www.erisinfo.com Search Results Summary Date Source Scale Comment 2016 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2014 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2012 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2011 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2009 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2008 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2006 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2005 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 2003 NAIP-National Agriculture Information Program 1"=700' 1997 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=700' 1990 NAPP-National Aerial Photography Program 1"=700' BEST COPY AVAILABLE 1982 NHAP-National High Altitude Photography 1"=700' 1977 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=700' BEST COPY AVAILABLE 1972 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=700' BEST COPY AVAILABLE 1963 USGS-US Geological Survey 1"=700' 1960 USAF-United States Air Force 1"=700' 1938 USDA-US Department of Agriculture 1"=700' PHOTO INDEX-BESTAVAIL 430 A one inch OV y F 3Y ion 41 Y_ _ ,� r{ , rll wo �e j ,► ,. �:. � vw D �• -�• r` { s NeIx :'�,4 ti ✓/r r� �f, //J,Vii. r Ag Awl, Date: 2016 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 431 ys4-1 fire"_ °none�na� � �' �• ,y _ ,,., . q y ' X • •�f }L � � 4 ~ ' A . t gg _7 k- �..,.� q 'r•-.. X {y�` �• p i �4f ®r 4V• * F of Oc F. J� + • , ,.. +���. a :*=♦ ,�.may, �. A - + i Date: 2014 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 432 one inch ". R 71114,7 M s ri,�. �fir:." !r > •� '�< r• r•`r A.. Y t' /1 � e !rte ,l •f ,,, " • l 7- Y'a{ '-rj' r r.. QA w. ,y..r y���,�d �t `sr 4r ��}r�. ~ +'�P,F R"�1.fiZ".. �� _-. f �'" t '7F ',. •/ w 1"Ay k b� t +j� "'F eS• e `F{ T... •%# r T %�Jf:'-S .h fr Pf '' vk'' .-. "" .t .d .v.' rr ', 7�'5YF4 �' .t" A•- A. ��-�� 4�`�Mw • ,'f' 'rx-�" t ¢ yy Wit• r � g. r.!�, _ Jp ,� _1'^ .f r•n. .,P «1aG"r7f.,�,n' 'fl f P J •�_ rr C# n�f' s. at'r+' �tti+,.s`�a4a..y„ .r �.a �. e'a'r"`'• �►"' �y .� .�1� R � ��" a�'t's.�:.��e•-.^F�.�ry. ;lt•'r4��r i.�y^4aa� �,✓tip ^°' . „rey ,J.rf(,`;�;. ;,: . t. k•-cam*, .- -�. rr "Al r C. n '� r� ,� ti a'r ` * '-.., ._�� :•.u.� s�',.' J'.,q,...;,, a'4r`�67'_7.�1 r.. 4-1 re /rfyr• ". '"fes »., yr Ai' Date: 2012 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INPORMATiON GERVICes Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 433 f/— -- —� IF ( 4'' one inch n �•' 9 x_a '^# �"3:. � ��' �� •ass' Z r p. � (1�T - 4•� <<.. 1 '� � 11 v x .R ►, i, + 7 r � •-�'� `! {9/°ri d Erb:.�`xK' w;.. ^�fyY� � t f{�g'a�}r.tri,.. 4 $. v. t+ 1.6 .Y a - + a Y f c� it w t-' j a r eI ry«• � x . � ;'� �� eR FF�:S �Ae �t*'� t �, v ^r ;YT' t.^"� Fr�r"rr•��r. s ��lyt"rte' iri �r x a ` EX.i 41�'..l,r'Q,. r 41 Cy ��r R,µ f �. yl V I� .�y' .rtes. . tgf �� d',.� Y`/ ' ✓ � � �R����:f Td ♦e '�'} F� �°* fy;: Y F• r� .,Ifi` t 'Y4��' I1. ,� Jt+Ft { �,+r.��r�- r �-�>s,T i ' ` � l �P�` F "kt.}t�i q' r' A,r .4�,v 4 d` ,t.::. ,..! i.a _ �l�lr•7rf i 1+t r-Y i �I '���''� �p`'�' � y"fir/ 54 r �I � r • �e IP t.s {• '�•'. ,� v5'.,3` r, K..a� # ,t. 9,F r ,�'"'� 'i'4`,IBR 'C l ;..tJG' � � +. f. a. ry... i�s aM-o . r � i* it I :�3., x t t, 1`Vrl- .p''�' !'� � +: t. r• � .r �'i" �; ei�yx04 �,jyc,,'S / i "y t.' r .�Y K a Y ? 3� 4 `J k'�yS •+ Y F y " '4 h, :S Sa a °.,•t.fv v� $x'�i '�Ii�' 1(; Y'.. r, !vP{+X Y ri _ lp;�r"'.f ,F Yf. v'F IN a `� k� t �1'�"�'`�s.w �e� iFt�e � 47 �i"�i :i.� � � r ,.,, r �•? } � < r P + J. ; t- 7. k Pref F µo- i m, 1 4 ¢•. `�• fir` /]`� q �fis. i r �r� F� .4 F r d 1 '�1 a a€ ��l•• .yr/! _ +k'a v'r{� t Ja n s t' j t 4,z a 4 c. �{•ly�`� � r 'I[r a �p q4 ,,``-- � � e' r.� /, '�.T { i '+.� r rL�*Ia `�,� �: .:i 7r.3d_13p F t,"{.' "��•� :7� � � wtr�rr i' I i"'�.r C'� .� � T r r r L a r = r .,1... 1r• L, Date: 2011 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: pts ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 434 rr M 10. P oni,inch �~ f fi pY • fir, If f' db- r' � I arl Y te (!X kyr I �" •� Li f tpy. tTa • wg k� �,11 �+r,�� may;els Sr ..i r r Jr � ��q• 61 14 Ar Ip 411 IM'MMMW" � t, '.r � � r �', a �.' �h a �{'{r• t'� � �irk ,I"� �T• " xIJ r'• �• y, ri �r r e 3 gm Date: 2009 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: pts ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 435 one inchAt f - J•f S '!_ KJ .ria• j,w y'` lel� � .�y�: .. i � vu • � - *fit , r- •! ' y, i pry• rt 17 lioi + / 1 on Olt or ' * to :� E r!. +' P{°a: r Dr t` y i� •Q t • � ,l�aJ f' r 1� r Y R} �� ��.. � �, 'r � Ido�� r W..:��..:•. w 1 y� :`". '�.. i • .t ,�•r I..ir.•'1 � r R. J 1p jfi � 1 f� 11 - iJ 1 r•� r Date: P 2008 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: pts ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 436 \1 t. Ap T one inch 4! ,, 1 N 1 jr lot , / 3 *A " •�' � ry # JI ell 10 av NN r• r - Y i a 7 �. r•' --P ` A- �� � �, �yrs t ` 46 ,�,, •„ .' fe 1.4 Date: 2006 Source: NAIP Scale: 1” to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 437 one inch t i� orL �- '' r -.•_.. fir; -' � � tom_# '��� [!��• •y :,►,,fir � �wi +`� � R IP A A 44 `• .�r f„ _�� �a �, Ire �' t•:"k' r r Y f Date: 2005 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: N ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 438 one inch /\ i r� r : .'f'Al- r rr Ile • ° e+ r. i(bM1 <r • r +X �{ R lip 01 A .. -� _ - .I.FI • '. R 2�'l��j�jffpp d�.+Y�¢'"1.`l/lu��i ar f. •. n Y • f 3 C r . t:.• -.. Flf� ems) iN V -I a9 r.: r* Date: 2003 Source: NAIP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 439 r f r 00 IW Jo � .04 r i At 1. r �1• .r^ f. o �rltf.i"t { P.'1' �� ff/ •►: , '+� lr' s Yj - +' _,far ye. �Lr� • � � �fff R 1.4 jY � t�. � `� � I A •11 '`f 'f !' %�"e�Jl '�A •fir•' V • I r % - Y • r _ Date: 1997 Source: USGS Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 440 one inchIN /�. .�^'� ,�._.. I • .i 00 fi / �k i � ti► R if A r'I �� w, ;r� r 1 if dog f � 10 r i s r � � 1 t Al Date: 1990 Source: NAPP Scale: BE to 700' e R Comments: EsrCOPY auaaaBLE ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 441 _ 4 one inch 1* # 14 Ag *its# Y � �1 �+ 0,or •til # � r � 1.�e T • i, t _ i e Date: 1982 Source: NHAP Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: N ENVIRONIA NTAL RISK NFORIAATiQN SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 442 one inch 7 1A ,, V x , , VJ It t` ft 41 u 114V ii, Date: 1977 Source: USGS Scale: BE to 700' e R Comments: EsrCOPY auaaaBLE � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 443 one inch w .7 till A. e ap _ h a 01 Ar r 4 y� rpt:. +r 't r.efq ti r• r+ d $t. a- '# ` y -r. e�, ; rT� '�.•>:l���a�71 ���n,-�. r '+ie { `as,,�!ll,,,u �x"_. i F� r, •: � -�-.• .. .a . 43at ? � 'gyp' - ' Jy+' r s . F ' t fit•.f} r �•A 'A�' cam:= cs.a r y � �"•i� �+L gr pryi..,•. Y is E A ys iY r I�T ° '"'+J�., � 'F � l'l i 4 �r Y r y.` s pfd ��� � ,� r a ,, f�,t p• n �k :t`t r' Y .. r^ tom' - i. ' ...-'lc.� r. �j ZVr 4t' AFF .+,��rn ��a.. � _ �`. _ �� '��`Ari •.A� �'"�'�" � .-d � � +�,r r - t, IL 2. ili a Date: 1972 Source: USGS Scale: BE to 700' e R Comments: EsrCOPY auaaaBLE � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK 1Ni`ORMAT1ON SERVicGG Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 444 r w < ..ttom�4 r p r �`.{�� � y t! , rr. �� I f '� �y • + � . 1 4 �F„„ � � r r' _+' '��2 .i - s .dr. r♦ .+� '�1.. r t5i.r ~+.t f ` + ?,r_..�1 ,,} ',i - R r ilr L ..y�. ,r'.` r•..!�P J J~ t � � 1 Scale: 1" to 00 r one inch A s Vp JK 4r e, h �Ab + .. . • re i w # i6.1N %nr- # "r• r *_ r • • t Vt • t * A r 1 .S•~- 4+3� •�•, a * ;Ar Date: 1960 Source: USAF Scale: 1" to 700' e R Comments: � ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INPORMATiGn_CRVIC'ES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 446 r one Inc ' h .h 'kWl 7 1w 44 1wow ' I' c db pow, 14 *JL 4 a. I •6 fi s IF Date: 1938 Source: USDA Scale: 1" to e R Comments: PHOTO INDEX-BESTAVAIL N ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES Subject:Marlboro Road Back Creek VA www.erisinfo.com 1 1.866.517.5204 Approx Center:39.08109/-78.28038 447 APPENDIX 6 ERIS Topographic Map Research Results 448 E R S ImooO ENVI RON MENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RESEARCH RESULTS Date: 2018-02-27 Project Property: Hites Road, Middletown, Va, Middletown, VA ERIS Order Number: 20180227028 We have searched USGS collections of current topographic maps and historical topographic maps for the project property. Below is a list of maps found for the project property and adjacent area. Maps are from 7.5 and 15 minute topographic map series, if available. Year Map Series 2013 7.5 1999 7.5 1986 7.5 1972 7.5 1966 7.5 1943 15 1937 15 1923 15 Topographic Maps included in this report are produced by the USGS and are to be used for research purposes including a phase 1 report. Maps are not to be resold as commercial property. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. (in the US) and ERIS Information Limited Partnership (in Canada), both doing business as 'ERIS', using Topographic Maps produced by the USGS. This maps contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Address: 38 Lesmill Road Unit 2, Toronto, ON M313 2T5 Phone: 1-866-517-5204 Fax: 416-447-7658 info@erisinfo.com www.erisinfo.com 449 E R S ImooO ENVI RON MENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RESEARCH RESULTS Date: 2018-08-09 Order Number: 20180808184 Site Name: Foxglove 2 Address: Marlboro Road, Back Creek, VA We have searched USGS collections of current topographic maps and historical topographic maps for the project property. Below is a list of maps found for the project property and adjacent area. Maps are from 7.5 and 15 minute topographic map series, if available. Year Map Series 2016 7.5 1999 7.5 1986 7.5 1972 7.5 1966 7.5 1943 15 1937 15 1923 15 Topographic Maps included in this report are produced by the USGS and are to be used for research purposes including a phase 1 report. Maps are not to be resold as commercial property. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. (in the US) and ERIS Information Limited Partnership (in Canada), both doing business as 'ERIS', using Topographic Maps produced by the USGS. This maps contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Address: 38 Lesmill Road Unit 2, Toronto, ON M313 2T5 Phone: 1-866-517-5204 Fax: 416-447-7658 info@erisinfo.com www.erisinfo.com 450 - ; - MARLBORO RD ,. Rinker Qrehards PoplarRidgvt 1 6 S C r�. �c2 � ? h',f'srFBR'YIE t:I I I C I o s C ,yq - HLrOES mrLL Rb S k ff Nieswanders kart r - - r t c - ry 5' Miles Order No. 20180227028 2013 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA E R Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map %%P451 �� gar- � ,' IV q Ridings7) .10 j RD k 41 � MIDDLE RD- CARR! � . � A�E�� {r i� gyp' fE,Rp 27 Miles Order No. 20180808184 2016 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ER Ste/ Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map %%o00452 J a � '.I ^ _J$f�, `f��16�r✓j � 'YJr`:�'� � �. �` ;'r�i s�`FrV C 1-! Y i �r��_, yf r"r• 1 I.,. '� r_' / 11 h k t /fir / r J. t\ ! .1 7 TT33 77 t ` v ra } =-fir 1 41 Nieswanders Fort Y r two . II t {Ru 3) ,}• -i"111�' I Miles Order No. 20180227028 1999 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA E R Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map %%r453 I-V— — � r !f � f`�{{ 1rr1.� � ! � r`.•�! fes`- ��, � �'. �''`� � if '� C �' `� _'" � +-/ (� � �� � � i�rr r•.---`J rr; �; ! � •'. J/ rrl 3 �3._- �1�[C1i Yt�3; all orJU I 1 ! 77 'j, �l .fY Il ti _ �• f � +, \ may / {` -J ^t 5 L r� +F rf ] - � a r, 1iA t r Miles Order No. 20180808184 1999 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ER Ste/ Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map E—RIR"ENT R15KINFIR—IN IERVIIEI x/454 ,;A "� - 6i - + 4 - 4.'625 .�/� c'w.. �' •-� 1 6 t _ eel, -}� V '� ��Cr•= -�j If'Y' 1 j � ;� � 7T 758 kl- I ✓7]6 l I�, I ell 1 -,h •` rJ ' f rt (.A Lr N7eswandek Fort ,S. ` - �. ra - .. r..- ,✓ 1., j.Rujns} 1 A r — 5 a4 , f •;T4G .t �. .,a;;} 77 1 Cay _ 725 h r' Midd1C'toWn Mr. Miles Order No. 20180227028 1986 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA E R Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map %%r455 -00 J-1 V9 \ r' J J�J r �csings J r I (4 '• •� - .�� J� �s 1 jy ZZr el 4 p �� woAb If SP 9 Co 60 r Miles Order No. 20180808184 1986 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ER Ste/ Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map E—RIIME"T°`R'="IIFl °T'INIER"`ES x/456 ..k sC�•,�s � �}����rT..� *•1f� ,LaP"I C F��- � � I 1.1 pt-�, Al ` � I �., ��. Imo` "� iSy �`,��"'�7"y a � ! � •� � - ,.+ �. � I ' 1 l Ye� r� '�.'k� l.frl![jl�� „� - - �S fi•�,+t ,�� �! '.{ l iw ! ■y 41. I �3 y Wr er 1 z r � K :' �if`:� ✓'•SAA• : '�ri �f".�+ P j 1 r� K 4 r i A40 ' M„i rr , Miles Order No. 20180227028 1972 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ER S `►oO Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map %%x457 t `k ,i x:i _-"fir• �h,:. _...... • f , 4 dr 07 In M,. �''� rr .� � -.'P ,'Y• �� lr,���'7.� �y.j F� I tee' < `� ti 1 i Miles Order No. 20180808184 1972 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ERS / Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map E"v'RI""ENT LRI="'"`I,M°IINIER"`ES \/458 r � � k L sj I ft;:F�'3 i PP 17% \� C/ , `� ; -j s I I soy J 7.. /, V r/ 62 hA�11[f� Nieswnders Fort a [ ndes} i f ✓i .9 r f ..t .1245 Miles Order No. 20180227028 1966 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA E R Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map °"""°""°"'"`"""°"°°` '""""' %%r459 �� � f,' rya' !�� �. '� --' , `�: _ ri✓"'� G � r J l _ f] Hill 63, ILT tA 7 �f 0 ,�' � � 9 � �```_f S Ira •�4°� � i - l �� r 0 JI r _ /�� � '•( � Cil r'{f N ,�} 'w.. I Lys' .til- �f �• r_ ~ � �t ,-• �.�T L \ _-• -7930 794' Epwnl't3i f-� •r � fi o �' _ f� Vrtuc'd'ik� �. - 1 t C � .� Miles Order No. 20180808184 1966 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ER Ste/ Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map E"v'RI"ME"T°`R'="INFIRM°T'I"=ER"`ES x/460 f-61 A a✓ 7 795 fro 04.1 ` ►t r'- 19% Icr 00 tis f ■ 'p ■ 00 yrs * /3 Miles Order No. 20180227028 1943 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA R Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map %%P461 A Coot -- �, 0 n r r tti.tf �; ,■ a � �f J 79-5 t,I> '" fr• �. 4P11 4 f� �, r7 r �� � •lt C � . Miles Order No. 20180808184 1943 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ERISA/ Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map ENVIRIN"EN—R11KIN-1M INIER"`ES \/462 - ` ( _ 7), 72 }© �. Miles Order No. 20180227028 1937 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA E R! S '%0000 Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map °"""°""°"'"`"""°"°°` '"""' x.463 EAr J I� 01 ok 79 ,.-Ir Ilk Ch IV tiL 1 Miles Order No. 20180808184 1937 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Quadrangle(s): Middletown,VA ERISA/ Source: USGS 15 Minute Topographic Map ENvIRIN"ENT LRI="'"`I,M°II"=ER"`ES \/464 APPENDIX 7 The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report 465 E R IS � 38 Lesmi4 Road,-52 2 Toronto, 6 10-235 Phone:416-510-5204 Fax:416-510-5133 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK INFORMATION SERVICES %%00 info@erisinfo.com www.erisinfo.com THE ERIS ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH REPORT MARLBORO ROAD BACK CREEK, VA ERIS Project No. 20180808184 08/10/2018 466 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN REPORT The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering and institutional controls. A network of professional,trained researchers, following established procedures,uses client supplied property information to: • Search for parcel information and/or legal description • Search for ownership information • Research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorder's' office,registries of deeds, county clerks' offices,etc. • Access a copy of the deed • Search for environmental encumbrance(s)associate with the deed • Provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s)based upon a review of keywords in the instrument(s) (title,parties involved and description) • Provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed Thank You For Your Business Please contact ERIS at 416-510-5204 with any questions or comments LIMITATION This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to insure, or a policy of title insurance. ERIS— Environmental Risk Information Services does not guarantee nor include any warranty of any kind whether expressed or implied, about the validity of all information included in this report since this information is retrieved as it is recorded from various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. ER Ste/ RoE,A %%000 467 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN REPORT The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report is intended to assist in the search for environmental liens filed in land title records. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS MARLBORO ROAD BACK CREEK,VA RESEARCH SOURCE FREDERICK,VA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEED INFORMATION Type of Instrument: DEED Grantor: HENRY H BRUMBACK,FRANKLIN H BRUMBACK, JAMES I BRUMBACK AND MARGARET B DOUGLAS Grantee: WOODBINE FARMS INC Deed Dated: 01/03/2004 Deed Recorded: 01/06/2004 Instrument: BOOK 307/PAGE 588 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 271.00 ACRES FMP-2015 Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 73-A-21 ER S � RoE,A %%000 468 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: Found X Not Found If Found Describe: OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULs) Other AULs: Found X Not Found If Found Describe: LEASES Lessor: NONE IDENTIFIED Lessee: Lease Date: Recorded Date: Instrument#: Lease Type: Comments: ER S � RoE,A %%000 469 CO N Cn 0400801$2 THIS DEED OF CONFIRMATION,made and dated this 3id day of January,2004,by and between HENRY M BCK.FRANKLIN H. BAI MMI&M JAMES I.RLUMBACK and MARGARET B.MELM, individually and as partners hating as VWIOnDBINE FARM,a Virginia general partnership,hareaftar called the Grantors,and VN04DBD M FARMS,M.,a Vir&a cmporahiau,Grantee. WHEREAS,the aforesaid individual Grantors by deed dated January 26, 1965,recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia,in Deed Boole 307,at Pap 588,conveyed several tracts or parcels of land to Woodbine FxmL%Inc.;and WHEREAS,there has arises a question whether Frank H.Brurnback, James I.Brumbadc,Henry K Bmmb &and Margaret B.Douglas as Grantors in the aforesaid deed were aging both m their individual capacities as well as partners of Woodbine Farms,a Virginia gw=W p®rbneft; WEE REAS,said four individuals clearly believed and intended to sign such deed both in their mdividuals capacities as well as partners m Woodbine Farms,a Virginia gm rd partnership(except with respect to Tract No.3 therein, which was erroncmsly mchxW m such deed and with such correction being addressed by a separate dead of correction of even date recorded immediately wOMW P. rwrrotPjMCw ,a. shMmcCc WT w..1pv.r+.w wro, 470 o N cn w prior haeto; NOW THEREFORE,WITNESSETH:That fix and in consideration of the foregoing premises and other good consideration,the Grantors hereby aclmowledge,confirm and represent that thm signatures on the deed dated January 26, 1965,recorded in the Cte&s Office of the Circuit Count of Frederick Comity,Virginia,in Deed Book 307,at Page 588,were both in their individual capacities and is their capacities a,pertness of Woodbine Farms, a Virginia general partner,and all references to the above Gra Um in such 1965 deed shag be both as individuals and as parsers in Woodbine Farms,a Virginia general pm mcaship,with such partnership being hereby confirmed as a Grantor in said deed as well. Thee sib hereinbelow are both done as individuals and as partners of Woodbine Farms,a Virginia general partnership. WITNESS the following dpalures and seals: (SEAL) Y M.BR ACK FRANILM � ��SSA►L} H.B ACK (SEAL) JAAES I.BRUMBACK -A, ..,,,cluMopc,.. 471 CD N Ln �} .67- (SEAQ.) MAR B.DOUGLAS STATE OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF IVeA?as t cw—, to-wit: The foregoing instnm ent was acknowledged before me in my City/Cou ty and State this 3 day of 'X`�'"t 2004,by HENRY M. BRUMBACK. My Cbmtnissian Expim: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF VIRGDUA, CITY/COUNTY OFto-wit: The foregoing k nm mW was acknowledged before me in my City/gunty and State this 1= day of 2004,by FRANKLIN K BRUMBACK My C, ission Fagraes: �'"( �(�-Zooms NOTARY PUBLIC ^�R�r w, swM•rso� STATE OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF to-wit; ATTONW AT.,w �W 0.�OOOdG n Ww�wT�l W1./�Ct 472 n� c,n tri Ile foregoing instrument was wJmowkdgod befara me in my City/Cou ty sad state this -5%P day of M4.by JAMES L BRLIMHACIL My Ca®missioo Evinm- "1 3 t c i NOTARY PUBLIC W, '5;(Ar So—) STATE OF VIRGINIA, CITY/COUNTY OF f*-dlv 4cv'-t c.v— to-wit: Tle foregoing instrument was admowiedged befara me is my City/County and Stare this 3V day of P NYA 'f 2004,by MARGARET B. DOUGLAS. My Ca®mission F. *W: Xm NOTARY PUBLIC l7el-o(rewc— W. �wAl�a VIRGIMA FREDERICK()D'J? l SGT. This mstrumem of rrlirtJag va produmd to me on at L• s .m • and with mrti6cate of ack—ledgemesu thereto ttrd was admitted to reaxd.T imposed by SeQ 39.1-802 of Sr1 .s and 5g.t.41 ham been ped,H aseesahle .Clerk rwsr,a�a �v-iv�aysruw ,na�rr..ecoo.ter. 473 E R S � 38 Lesmilf Road.-5204 Toronto.-. 16- 10-235 Phone:A16-510-5204 Fax:416-510-5133 ENVIRONMENTAL R15K INFORMATION SERVICE5 *%00 info[ensinfawm www.edsinfo.com THE ERIS ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH REPORT FOXGLOVE HITES RD MIDDLETOWN, VA 22655 ERIS Project No. 20180227028 MARCH 2, 2018 474 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN REPORT The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering and institutional controls. A network of professional,trained researchers, following established procedures,uses client supplied property information to: • Search for parcel information and/or legal description • Search for ownership information • Research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorder's'office,registries of deeds, county clerks'offices, etc. • Access a copy of the deed • Search for environmental encumbrance(s)associate with the deed • Provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s)based upon a review of keywords in the instrument(s) (title,parties involved and description) • Provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed Thank You For Your Business Please contact ERIS at 416-510-5204 with any questions or comments LIMITATION This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to insure, or a policy of title insurance. ERIS — Environmental Risk Information Services does not guarantee nor include any warranty of any kind whether expressed or implied, about the validity of all information included in this report since this information is retrieved as it is recorded from various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. E mR 1 5 475 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN REPORT The ERIS Environmental Lien Search Report is intended to assist in the search for environmental liens filed in land title records. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS HITES RD MIDDLETOWN,VA 22655 RESEARCH SOURCE FREDERICK COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEED INFORMATION Type of Instrument: DEED Grantor: HENRY M BRUMBACK AND GLADYS B BRUMBACK,HIS WIFE; FRANKLIN H BRUMBACK AND BETTIE G BRUMBACK,HIS WIFE; JAMES I BRUMBACK AND MARY H BRUMBACK,HIS WIFE; AND MARGARET B DOUGLAS AND JAMES M DOUGLAS,HER HUSBAND Grantee: WOODBINE FARMS INC Deed Dated: 01/26/1965 Deed Recorded: 02/12/1965 Instrument: 307/588 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 197.00 ACRES FMP-2015 Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 84-A-50 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: Found X Not Found If Found Describe: ER Ste/ 476 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN REPORT OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULs) Other AULs: Found X Not Found If Found Describe: LEASES Lessor: NONE IDENTIFIED Lessee: Lease Date: Recorded Date: Instrument#: Lease Type: Comments: ER Ste/ 477 588 .. r�r;ir�r�aif�rtf rwf rr�rr+t■it}fry . #286 • HENRY M. BRUNRA.CK, ET AL ■ TO DEE • WOODBINE FARMS INC. r*r+rr■■rrrr r#t�r♦arrrrrrrrrr#�#* aoa� 307 588 t THIS DEED,twde and dated thisq day of January, 1965, by and between Henry M. Brumback and Gladys H. Brumback, 1 his wife; Franklin H. Brumback and Bettie G. Brumback, his wife; 81 James I. Brumback and Mary H. Brumback, his wife; and Margaret B. Douglas and James H. Douglas, her husband, hereinafter called r i the Grantors and Woodbine Farms, Inc., a Virginia corporation, -e hereinaiter called the Grantee. WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the sum of f-- 9 2 ; f One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration paid the 1,4 - Grantors by the Grantee on or before the delivery of this deed, the receipt of all of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors f hereby grant, sell and convey, with general warranty of title, ' GI unto the Grantee in fee simple, the following real estate, together with all improvements and appurtenances thereto ,r N belonging and subject to all easements and legally enforceable restrictions of record affecting such realty. S TRACT No. 1: All of the following described real estate situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, to-wit: yir Pareel 1 - All that certain parcel of land, together with the improvements thereon and appurtenances ehere- ,mEo beloagittg, acquired by Henry M. Srumheck, Franklin H. Brumback, Jamca 1. $rucnbmck and Margaret E. Brumback by deed from Harman H. BrLmback and Fannie K. Dr-mback, his wife, and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the ' Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Geed Book IIS, Page 140, whereith the said parcel of land is described as follows: That certain parcel. of 1and, imprmrad by frame dwelling, 'larce barn and outbuildi�s, tontaining 197 acres, 3 roods and 18 poles, located in Opequon Kagis- aerial District, in the gouthern section of €rederick ' County, Virginia. ■ short diatattce West of vaueluaa, adjoining the lands of the John W. ace Estate on the cti east, Se:ctt Grant's l;state on the South. and a public road on the North and West. 1 478 589 I Boas 30? FAu 589 Parcel 2- All that certain parcel of land, together. with the improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging, acquired by Henry M. Brumback, et al from Harman M. Brumback and Fannie K. Brumback, his wife, by deed recorded in the Office of the Clerk { of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 225, Page 140, wherein the said property is described as follows: i All of that certain lot of land improved by dwelling and out buildings, containing 2� acres, located on the Middle Road in the County of Frederick, Virginia, near Relief. Parcel 3 - All of that certain parcel of land, together with the improvements thereon and the appurtenances there- unto belonging, acquired by Henry M. Brumback, at al from Harman M. Brumback and Fannie K. Brumback, his wife, by deed recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 225, Page 140, wherein the said property is described as follows: That certain parcel of land, containing 90 acres, lying along the North side of the Marlboro Road and East side of the Middle Road, about three miles West of Stephens City, Frederick County, Virginia. i Parcel 4 - All of that certain parcel of land, together with the improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging, acquired by Henry M. Brumback at al, from Harman M. Brunback and Fannie K. Brumback, his wife, by deed recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 225, Page 140, wherein the said property is described as follows: AL1 of that certain tract of land that contained 510 acres at the time of the death of Dudley L. Miller, less a tract of 238 acres, one rood and 28 square poles that was conveyed to C. C. Bauserman by Cecilia Miller McKay at al, by Deed dated April 24, 1929, and of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 158, at page ' 379, thus leaving a balance of 271 acres, 2 roods and 37.2, which is conveyed sway by this Deed. A reference is hereby expressly made to the afore• . mentioned deeds for a more particular description of the four i �■I (4) parcels of land herein conveyed. MALL O.AMAX TRACT No. 2: All of the following described real estate situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, to-wit: 1 � i t 479 590 6aelr 307 SALE 590 ` All of that certain tract of land situate in Shmmee Kagiaterial District of Frederick County, Virginia, about two (2) miles south of Opequon, and more particularly described by a plat and survey Of Richard U. Coad; dated April 20, 1955: a Beginning at (1) an iron pin at the SB corner of the 34.14 acre tract conveyed by Brumback to Wisecarver in 1944; thence with Glsixe N 47 deg, W 673 feet to (2) an iron pin; thence N +42 deg, E 83 ft.t❑ (3) a Walnut tree; thence with a new division line through Wisecarver's land N 411 ,deg, E. 797 feet to (4) an iron pin; thence with Lakeman S 44 deg, 1. 493 feet to (5) an iron piss corncr to Lakeman in Brum-Nack's line; thence with Brumback S 29 3/4 deg. W 878 feet to the point of beginning, containing 11.6 acres, more or less, This being the same land which was conveyed to Woodbine Farms, a partnership composed of Henry H. Brumback, Franklin H. Brumback, James 1. Brumback and Margaret Eleanor Douglas by deed from any P. Wisecarver and Lena Wisecarver, his wife, dated May 2, 1955, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick . County, Virginia, in Deed Book 236, Page 267. J TRACT No. 3: All of that certain tract of land West of ' and abutting upon the Winchester-Front Royal Road on the East, located about one and one-half miles South of Ninevah, in Warren County, Virginia, containing approximately 210 acres, more or less, known as "Sulphur a Springs" Farm, and being the same tract of land that was conveyed to Woodbine Farms, a partnership, Henry M. Brumback, Franklin H. Brumback, James I. Brumback and Margaret E. Brumback, partners, by deed from Cornelia C. Richard, widow, dated December 23, 1957, and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Warren County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1D4, Page 2. J TRACT No. 4: All of that certain tract or parcel of land containing 104 acres, more or less, together with all rights, rights of way, privileges, improvements and i appurtenances thereto belonging, lying and being situate about three miles West of Middletown, In Opequon District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being the same land that was conveyed to Henry M. Brumback, Franklin H. j Brumback, James I. "Brumback and Margaret B. Douglas, ' partners trading as Woodbine Farwa by deed dated May 21, S 1962, from Lula M. Keller, widow, Katherine C. Shumaker and J. B. Shunaker, her husband, Mary S. Magruder, widow, and Myrtle H. Mowey, widow, and recorded in the office of HALL W KO.,AKUI the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia +..�•r w- in Deed Book 282, Page 567. 1 - 3 - i a 480 591 I coat 307 rut 511 TRACT No. 5: All of those three certain tracts or — parcels of land, together with all improvements and A appurtenances thereto belonging, lying and being situate about 8 miles southwest of Winchester, in Shawnee District, Frederick County, Virginia, one containing 18 acres, 1 rood and 8 poles, more or less, another containing 26 acres, 2 roods and 39 poles, more or less, and another containing 13 acres, 1 rood and 8 poles, more or less, and being the same parcels of land identified as lots 1, 3, and 5, respectively, on the plat of the subdivision of the estate of Henry C. Claize, which is of record in the Clerk's Office Of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book No. 131, Page 83, less and excepting therefrom a small area that was conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virghia for highway construction purposes by deed dated July 31, 1957, and of record in said Clerk's Office in Deed Book No. 251, Page 164. This being the same land which was conveyed to Frank I H. Brumback, James I. Brumback, Henry M. Brumback and Margaret B. Douglas, partners trading as Woodbine Farms by deed dated September 16, 1958, from Harry M. Glaize and Maude M. Glaize, his wife,and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 254, Page 253. 4 TRACT No. 6: All of those three certain tracts of land situate in Opequon Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, approximately four (4) miles Southeast ; of Stephens City, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: Parcel 1 - All of that certain tract containing 8.02 acres, more or less, according to a survey of Richsrd U. Goode, dated February 19, 1951, LESS two (2) acres i sold by Crowell E. Conner et al to Orndorff by deed i dated July 6, 1955, and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia i ! in Deed Book 237 , at Page 232. I I i Parcel 2- All of that certain tract of land situate as aforesaid containing 11 acres, more or less, and being more particularly described by a survey of Walker McC. Bond, dated August 9, 1948, as follows: ' "Beginning at a post in the northeastern property line of said Road, a corner to the Conner Bros. II Orchard, running with said Road Line S. 55' 50'E. l ! - 385 ft. to a post corner .to the 8.05 Acre Tract of said Conner Land about to be conveyed to Speaks and Johns; thence with a line of said proposed conveyance N. 35' 38' E. - 1262.8 ft. to a post corner in a line .,,«...... .. of the David Headley Land; thence with a line of said "'N•'• """"• Headley Land N. 55' 50' W. - 377 ft. to a post corner I - 4 - I 481 592 r� I same 307 na 592 to said Conner Bros. Orchard in a line of said Headley Land; thence With a line of said Orchard Land S. 364 W. - 1263 ft. to the point of ' beginning.!' Parcel 3 - All of that certain tract of land containing 45 acres, more or less. The aforesaid Three (3) parcels of land included in TRACT No. 6 are the Same parole of land which were cpnveped to henry K. BrLmbsck, Frank H. Brumback, James I. Brumback and Margaret B. Douglas, Farmers Trading as woodbine Ferns by decd dated February 24,, 1964, from Crowell E. Conner et al, Psrtnera, Trading as Conner Erorhera and, recordsd in tht Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County,, virginia, in Dted Book 297, page 207. This conveyance is made subject to the restrictions, easements and building lines of record, if any, affecting the aforesaid realty. The Grantors covenant that they have the right to ' convey said realty to the Grantee; that the Grantee shall have quiet possession thereof, free from encumbrances; that they have done no act to encumber the same, and chat they will I execute such further assurances of title as may be requisite. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: moi-, 4�a 161i _ (SEAL) Henry q. br=back e_4 (SEAL) G$odys B. Brumback (SEAL) All iFryaanklin H. 9rumiack Bettie G. B umback +• 1='.: ,.l a, (SEAL) James 1. Brumback nacL w raruuw ' /ITd a ,r G (SEAL) _7".. ' .7".. ' .. Hary H. fftumback - 5 - 482 593 307 na S93 Margaret B. Douglas } ..tea ?,. .4 w (5FJ1L)' aures M. Douglas ' STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDER1Cx, f�to-wit: I, ^ -�,_ !C � t a Notary Public in and for the County of Frederick, in the State of Virginia, do certify that Henry M. Brumback and Gladys B. Brumback, his wife; Franklin H. Brumback and Bettie G. Brumback, his wife; James I. Brumback and Mary H. Brumback, his wife, and Margaret B. Douglas and James M. Douglas, her husband, whose naves are signed to the foregging writing bearing date on the ,16 Y�day of January, 1965, have acknowledged the same i before me in my County and State aforesaid. f Given under my hand this �day of January, 1965. My coumission expires 19 1.e Notary Pudic VmGMA MDFA'CK COIR4TY, SC.. / '} fk1 Knlry C" -Mn- Mq1 p.adyLad toma She � -I- —jay of_ . ) b d �p y ra .and w.h a.gwx r o •6por. •harps ^te , �Q'"°1p0d rm a�Ybd r HALL .gTM1[I•n qa• ` ilil.sb.,'S'.aiai. {VIII I , - 6 - q 483 APPENDIX 8 ASTM Standard E 2247-16 User Questionnaire 484 TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE (To be completed by the User as defined by ASTM E 2247-16) Property Address: 510 Barley Lane City: Winchester County: Frederick State: VA Zip: 22602 Legal Description: 84A50, 84A29, 73A21 Current Property Use: RA Occupied by Whom: Woodbine Farms Inc Phone: 540-974-0295 1. As defined by ASTM E 2247-16, a lien is a charge, security or encumbrance upon title to a property to secure the payment of a cost, damage, debt obligation or duty arising out of response actions, cleanup, or other remediation of hazardous substances or petroleum products upon a property including, but not limited to, liens imposed pursuant to CERCLA 42 USC §§ 9607(1) and 9607(r) and similar state or local laws. In accordance with ASTM E 2247-16 and 40 CFR 312, Timmons Group, through inquiry of the User, completed a lien search for the subject property. Environmental Lien Information was provided: �by the User ❑ through Timmons Group 2. Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) are legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to a site or facility: (1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. As the User, are you aware of any activity use limitations for the subject property? ❑ Yes �No If"yes", please explain in the spaces provided below: 3. The User must take into account their specialized knowledge of the subject property, the area surrounding the subject property, the conditions of adjoining properties, and any other experience relevant to the inquiry, for the purpose of identifying conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous material at the subject property. As the User of this ESA, do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? ❑ Yes � No (continued) 1 485 TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. If"yes", please describe any specialized knowledge of the subject site in the spaces provided: 4. The User must consider whether the purchase price of the subject property reasonably reflects the fair market value of the property. If the purchase price of the subject property does not reasonably reflect the fair market value of that property, the User should consider whether or not the differential in purchase price and fair market value is due to the presence of releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances. Does the purchase price of the subject property reflect the fair market value? �Yes ❑ No If"no", does the price of the subject property reflect the occurrence of a release of hazardous material? If not please explain in the spaces below: 5. It is the responsibility of the User to convey any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information regarding the subject property in identifying potential conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases. As the User, are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help an environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, as the User: a. Do you know the past use of the property? NO KNOWLEDGE b. Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? NO KNOWLEDGE c. Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? NO KNOWLEDGE d. Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? NO KNOWLEDGE (continued) 2 486 TIMMONS GROUP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. 6. It is the responsibility of the User to convey any degree of obvious information that represents the detection of a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance at, in, on or to the subject property. As the User of this ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? ❑ Yes �No If"yes", please explain in the spaces below: In addition, certain information should be collected, if available, and provided to the environmental professional selected to conduct the Phase I. This information is intended to assist the environmental professional but is not necessarily required to qualify for one of the LLPs. The information includes: • the reason why the Phase I is required, • the type of property and type of property transaction, for example, sale, purchase, exchange, and so forth, • the complete and correct address for the property(a map or other documentation showing property location and boundaries is helpful), • the scope of services desired for the Phase I (including whether any parties to the property transaction may have a required standard scope of services on whether any considerations beyond the requirements of Practice E 2247 are to be considered), • identification of all parties who will rely on the Phase I report, • identification of the site contact and how the contact can be reached, • any special terms and conditions which must be agreed upon by the environmental professional, • any other knowledge or experience with the property that may be pertinent to the environmental professional (for example, copies of any available prior environmental site assessment reports, documents, correspondence, and so forth, concerning the property and its environmental condition). Please provide any comments to the above in the space below: NA I certify that to the best of my knowledge the above statements and facts are true and correct. To the best of my knowledge no material facts have been suppressed or misstated. User: og44tz,� � -jC4-� Date: 8.7.18 61/ 3 487 APPENDIX 9 ASTM Standard E 2247-16 Property Owner Questionnaire 488 TIMMONS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE (To be completed by the current property owner as defined by ASTM E 2247-16) Property Address: "\c,l\D ro � � \��s�st �\\ ��d^�-Ss \s 1t.O%q —'d ewe \L^ City: QA� County: State: �J A Zip: ss Legal Description: " Cox t� -A a Current.Property Use: o Occupied by Whom: A\o,no �a�.s t E . Phone: 5yo - t,u-1 Lks 3 1. To the best of your knowledge has the property or any adjoining property ever been used for an industrial or manufacturing use? ❑ Yes C9 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: r To the best of your knowledge has the property or any adjoining property been used as a gasoline station, motor repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, photo developing laboratory,junkyard or landfill, or as a waste treatment, storage, disposal, processing, or recycling facility? ❑Yes lS No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any damaged or discarded automotive or industrial batteries, pesticides, paints, or other chemicals stored on or used at the property? ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 4. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any industrial drums or sacks of chemicals located at the property? ❑ Yes ISYNo ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 5. Has fill dirt been brought onto the property from any other site? ❑ Yes Co No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 6 To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any pits, ponds, or lagoons located on the site? ❑Yes 10 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 7. To the best of your knowledge, have there ever been any stained or discolored soils on the property? ❑ Yes ❑ No j4 Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 8 To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any registered or unregistered storage tanks(above or below ground level) located on the property? ❑Yes 9 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 9. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any vent pipes,fill pipes, or access ways indicating a fill pipe protruding from the ground on the property or adjacent to any structure located on the property? ❑ Yes P�No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 1 489 TIMMONS GROUP 10. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any drains,flooring, or walls located within the facility that are stained by substances other than water or are emitting foul odors? ❑ Yes [9 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 11. Has there ever been any type of well or non-public watering system located on the property? If so, have any contaminants been identified in the well or system that exceed guidelines applicable to the water system? (9 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Seo c K w e\k "r C_g4.L` If yes, please identify and explain: 12. Do you know of any past, threatened or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant of the property? ❑ Yes V No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 13. Have you or any occupant of the property been informed of the past or current existence of hazardous substances or petroleum products or environmental violations with respect to the property or any facility located on the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 14. Do you or any occupant have knowledge of any environmental site assessment of the property that indicated the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on, or contamination of the property, or recommended further assessment of the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 15 Does the property discharge waste water on or adjacent to the property other than storm water into a sanitary sewer system? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 16. To the best of your knowledge have any hazardous substances or petroleum products, unidentified waste materials, tires, automotive or industrial batteries or any other waste materials been dumped above-grade, buried and/or burned on the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 17. Is there a transformer, capacitor, or any hydraulic equipment for which there are any records indicating the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs)? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 18. Are you aware of any prior environmental site assessments (Phase I or Phase II)that have been conducted on the property for any purpose? If so, please indicate the approximate date of the assessment or investigation and provide the location of the reports. ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: I certify that to the best of my knowledge the above statements and facts are true and correct. To the best of my knowledge no material facts have been suppressed or misstated. Name ✓ a~^0--, � d"/,f,., �0 Date: 09- J 15 J02o I S Signature: VL 7 490 TIMMONS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE (To be completed by the current property owner as defined by ASTM E 2247-16) Property Address: Fi4 Icl;A rs rn, k.'CL oa City: M, County: F,-_ck�e cam:cArc State: q A Zip: 2-2-C,4-5- Legal Description: rv&,_ %;L S4-A y -A- 50 Current Property Use, Occupied by Whom: �ao�l�'n� �Q+�.,s, Za� Phone: 1. To the best of your knowledge has the property or any adjoining property ever been used for an industrial or manufacturing use? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 2. To the best of your knowledge has the property or any adjoining property been used as a gasoline station, motor repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, photo developing laboratory,junkyard or landfill, or as a waste treatment, storage, disposal, processing, or recycling facility? ❑Yes 00 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 3. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any damaged or discarded automotive or industrial batteries, pesticides, paints, or other chemicals stored on or used at the property? ❑ Yes ❑ No Dill.Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 4. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any industrial drums or sacks of chemicals located at the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 5. Has fill dirt been brought onto the property from any other site? ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 6. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any pits, ponds, or lagoons located on the site? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 7. To the best of your knowledge, have there ever been any stained or discolored soils on the property? ❑Yes ❑ No 99 Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 8. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any registered or unregistered storage tanks(above or below ground level) located on the property? ❑ Yes 19 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 9. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any vent pipes,fill pipes, or access ways indicating a fill pipe protruding from the ground on the property or adjacent to any structure located on the property? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 1 491 a TIMMONS GROUP "ROUGH URIS' 10. To the best of your knowledge have there ever been any drains,flooring, or walls located within the facility that are stained by substances other than water or are emitting foul odors? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 11 Has there ever been any type of well or non-public watering system located on the property? If so, have any contaminants been identified in the well or system that exceed guidelines applicable to the water system? ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 12 Do you know of any past,threatened or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant of the property? ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 13 Have you or any occupant of the property been informed of the past or current existence of hazardous substances or petroleum products or environmental violations with respect to the property or any facility located on the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 14 Do you or any occupant have knowledge of any environmental site assessment of the property that indicated the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on, or contamination of the property, or recommended further assessment of the property? ❑Yes EX No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 15 Does the property discharge waste water on or adjacent to the property other than storm water into a sanitary sewer system? ❑ Yes C9 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 16 To the best of your knowledge have any hazardous substances or petroleum products, unidentified waste materials, tires, automotive or industrial batteries or any other waste materials been dumped above grade, buried and/or burned on the property? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: _eeu , a 17 Is there a transformer, capacitor, or any hydraulic equipment for which there are any records indicating the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 91 Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: 18 Are you aware of any prior environmental site assessments(Phase I or Phase II)that have been conducted on the property for any purpose? If so, please indicate the approximate date of the assessment or investigation and provide the location of the reports. ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ Unknown If yes, please identify and explain: I certify that to the best of my knowledge the above statements and facts are true and correct. To the best of my knowledge no mat ial facts have been suppressed or misstated. Name: C1✓,Mc'✓� ✓� �Z �- Date: 0 I� i 8 Signature: 2 492 Rochelle Altholz Deputy Director of Sup Administration and Finance Matthew J.Strickler Secretary gfNatural Resources 4i1 r Russell W.Baxter (R1?ejnrry 1]rrr pl raj Dain.S . Clyde E.Cristman 17rte�r(plain Director Managenretrr and$oil&WOW (:r>tlscnr�rias COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Thomas L.Smith DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION Dcpuly Director of Operations September 22,2018 Marjorie Siwy Timmons Group 1001 Boulders Parkway, Suite 300 Richmond,VA 23225 Re: 41147,Foxglove Solar-Two Project Sites Dear Ms. Siwy: ation and Recreation's Division ofNatural Heritage(DCR)has searched its Biotics Data The Department of Conseryon System for occurrences of natural heritage resources endangeredarea pliant and ahrtima3speceesnuni ue or exemplary resources are defined as the habitat of rare,threatened, natural communities,and significant geologic formations. This project is situated on karst-farming carbonate rock anRd can be characterized bs project ago against the Virginia karst disappearing streams,and large springs.The Virginia Speleological Survey(VSS)database and the Virginia DMME sinkhole coverage for documented sensitive karst features and caves. ion sites are ols for The Ogdens Conservation Site is located within twanto further reviewf the rfor possible conservoject sites. ation on action becauseoof the representing key areas of the landscape that wart natural heritage resources and habitat the o include the element and,where possibleervation sites are polygons ,tsar associated d habitat,are plant, animal,or natural community designed n a and buffer or other adjacent land thought necessary for ual�tel andnnumber of element occur ences they contains on biodiversity significance ranking based an the tar y,q y a scale of 1-5, 1 being most significant.OgConservation nes gmf�cnarsite has been given a biodiversity ice. The natural heritage resources of concern at ificance ranking of B1,which represents a site of Outstanding this site are: Hu s Hill Cave beetle G1/S1/NLNL Pseudanophthalmus parvicollis pp G2G3/S2S3/NL/LE Fonagerls botrilneri Appalachian Bigger's Cave mpa ampsnaiihtpod 02G4/S1S2/NL/NL Stygobromus biggersi G3/SNR/NL/NL Significant cave dens Cave nd he dens The more northwestern ur the two sites f from this sitewill negatively ed into BuffallogMarsh Runaandteventually make its way Conservation Site.All surface runofflow this into Ogdens Cave.Water that makes its way into the edens caveats home to theter besAppalachian Spring asnail,t Blue is a Spring.This spring also feeds into Ogden g is state listed species,and coordination with Da a beetle isabout his onendangered of the rarest inithe state.It is only known from two nded. The cave is also home to the Hupps Hill Cave Beetle. 600 East Main Street,24"Floor I Richmond,Virginia 23219 1 804-786-6124 EXHIBIT State Parks•Soil and Water Consemation•outdoor Recreation Planning Natural Heritage•Dam Safety and Floodplain Management•Land C°onsers'at 493 locations.One of these locations is Ogdens Cave. Recent work with this species by DCR,Division of Natural Heritage's Karst Program indicates that the beetle may be completely extirpated from the other site leaving Ogdens Cave as its only know location,The Karst Program recently conducted a study on 17 rare cave y it is extremely likely beetles in Virginia for the US Fish and Wildlife ldl fe fie that they y consider iased on the s 1`mg this spta from ecies dand we are currently in that DCR will recommend to LIS Fish an r's Cave Amphipod. Based on the discussion with the USFWS about this topic Cave be the developmentalso aof ains Bso�eenergy project at the northwestern resources that may be impacted at Ogdensy site,this location is not recommended. Impacts could be severe for the resources that inhabit this cave and the groundwater they depend on. om this The project site to the southeast also could o pact gdens Cave but not as severely.most of the water the southeast of the Ogdens watershed.Most of the southeastern r site would be captured by the watersheds site should overlay the recharge zone for Vaucluse Spring directly to the east of the site.DCR recommends strict adherence to proper standard erosion and sediment control measures including best management practices to drainage from the project site does not enter any caves or sinkholes that are nearby. While no sinkholes are ensure the DMME sinkhole coverage used for this review for these sites,it is possible that sinkholes that are shown dr not delineated may be encountered on the sites. If sinkholes 1©ronen within f�project to st o should of avoided to help reduce any potential impact from the development the water on these two sites will make its way into a very fragile groundwater system.Contamination in this area could have dramatically detrimental consequences to the species that depend on it.If herbicides and or pesticides are to be used on the site for maintenance the potential impact to groundwater resources should be taken into account in the selection process.No known caves are within the two project footprints provided for this review. is If karst features such as sinkholes,eaves,disappearingWil.Orndorffs,and large prdc.v�rgintaoovet document and red during the project,please coordinate with Wil Orndorff(540-230-5960, minimize adverse impacts.Discharge of runoff to sinkholes or sinking streams,filling sin ols©and alte ionon of cave entrances can lead to surface collapse,flooding,erosion and sedimentation,gr oundwater and degradation of subterranean habitat for natural heritage resources.If the project involves filling or "improvement"of sinkholes or cave openings,DCR would like detailed location information and copies of the design specifications. In cases where sinkhole improvement is for storm water discharge,copies of VDOT Form EQ-120 will suffice. In addition,Buffalo Marsh Run,which has been designated by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries(VDGIF)as a"Threatened and Endangered Species Water"is and adjacent to the project area.The species associated with the Buffalo Marsh Run T&E Water is the Appalachian springsnail. Due to the legal status of the Appalachian springsnaii,DCR recommends coordination with Virginia's regulatory authority for the management and prate 1 on lSd3� his 5705 DCR also recommends the development of anGIF,to ensure compliance with the rovasi Virginia Endangered Species Act(VA ST§§29. ) species management plan for the project and the planting of native pollinator plants in the buffer areas of the planned facility which bloom throughout the spring and summer. Please note, Ogdens Cave Natural Area Preserve is located approximately 2.1 miles southwest of the southeast project site. For more information,please contact Tyler Urgo, DCR Shenandoah Valley Region Steward at(540) 332-9226 or t le�rgo(tr�dcr virginia;ov. Under a Memorandum of Agreement established between the comments regarding po irginia DepaAment ofgr al impaciculture ts on Consumer Services(VDACS)and the DCR,OCR represents VDACS in state- listed threatened and endangered plant and insect species.The current activity will not affect any documented state-listed plants or insects. 494 New and updated information is continually added to Biotics. Please re-submit a completed order form and project map for an update on this natural heritage information if the scope of the project changes and/or six months has passed before it is utilized. A fee of$250.00 has been assessed for the service of providing this information. Please find attached an invoice for that amount. Please return one copy of the invoice along with your remittance made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia, DCR Finance,500 East Main Street,20 Floor,Richmond,VA 23219. Payment is due within thirty days of the invoice date.Late payment may result in the suspension of project review service for future projects. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries(VDGIF)maintains a database of wildlife locations, including threatened and endangered species,trout streams,and anadromous fish waters that may contain information not documented in this letter.Their database may be accessed from htt //vafwis.or fwis/or contact Ernie Aschenbach at 804-367-2733 or Ernie.Aschenbachd if.vir inia. ov.According to the information currently in our files,Meadow Brook and Middle Marsh Brook,which have been designated by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries(VDGIF)as"Threatened and Endangered Species Waters"for the Wood:turtle are within 2 miles of the project area.Therefore, DCR recommends coordination with Virginia's regulatory authority for the management and protection of this species,the VDGIF,to ensure compliance with the Virginia Endangered Species Act(VA ST §§ 29.1-553—570). Should you have any questions or concerns,feel free to contact me at 804-371-2708. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely. S. Rene Hypes Project Review Coordinator Cc: Ernie Aschenbach,VDGIF Wil Orndorff, DCR-Karst Tyler Urgo, DCR-Shenandoah Valley Region Steward 495 Circa— Cultural Resource Management, L.L.C. 453 McLaws Circle, Suite 3 Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 (757) 220-5023 Assessment and Probability Analysis Foxglove Solar, LLC 557.40 Acres Frederick County, Virginia August 15, 2018 Introduction In August 2018, Circa— Cultural Resource Management, LLC (Circa) completed an assessment and probability analysis on two discontiguous tracts that total 557.40 acres of land(Figure 1). The Project Area is roughly three miles northwest of the Town of Stephens City, Virginia on a rolling upland above Buffalo Marsh Run and Meadow Brook. The northern parcel is bordered by Marlboro Road to the north and rural residential lands to the east, south, and west, and by rural residential lands and Buffalo Marsh Run to the west. The southern parcel is bordered by Vaucluse Road to the north, Hites Road to the west, Klines Road and rural residential lands to the south, and rural residential lands to the east. Carol D. Tyrer, Principal Investigator, completed the walkover. Dawn M. Muir, Architectural Historian and Historian, completed the historic research and graphics. Y ,y r /r Vaud i Figure 1. Approximate project locations, Middletown quad. 1 496 Environmental Background The primary reasons for incorporating environmental studies into archaeological projects are: to learn of possible environmental constraints or lack of constraints; to determine the presence or absence of critical resources that might have influenced site distribution, etc.; and to discover environmental factorserosion, deposition, subsidence, and historic land use patterns—that might influence the integrity of archaeological sites once they have formed. Keeping these objectives in mind, a brief environmental summary of the Project Area is provided below. The tracts are situated in the Piedmont region and are comprised of wide,flat upland ridges separated by swales with moderate to steep side slopes towards the stream channels. The northern Project Area sits on a crest with the western and northern section draining via Buffalo Marsh Run and the eastern section draining via Meadow Brook. Elevations across the northern tract range from 754 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the stream valley to 843 feet AMSL on the uplands. Presently, trees are evident along the fringes of the streams and along the edges of the fields and in areas where the ground is too rocky to cultivate. A large power line easement runs northwest to southeast across the tract. The southern Project Area sits on a crest with the southwestern section draining via Meadow Brook and the northeastern section draining via Vaucluse Springs. Elevations across the northern tract range from 740 feet AMSL in the stream valley to 822 feet AMSL on the uplands. Presently, trees are evident along the fringes of the streams and along the edges of the fields and in areas where the ground is too rocky to farm. A fruit orchard is in the northern section of the tract. A large power line easement runs northwest to southeast across the northeastern edge of the tract. Aerial photos from 1997 to the present show little change within the northern Project Area during the last 21 years. Aerial photos on the southern Project Area from 1997 to the present show where the apple trees were eventually taken down and removed. The owner indicated that the trees were cut down and the stumps were removed via heavy equipment, to clear the area for fields to grow crops. However, some development has occurred around the Project Areas during this period (Figures 2 - 5). Soils Soils maps and associated data provide an analysis of soil types within a geographic area. Despite comprehensive and detailed coverage of most areas by soils surveyors, researchers often miss microenvironments due to their small footprints. Unfortunately, resource rich microenvironments were often common sites of cultural activity. As such, this analysis of archaeological potential is a"best-guess" using the best available data. Well-drained, agriculturally- and horticulturally-productive soils proximal to transportation corridors were the best choices for historic period occupation. Secondary areas, such as those containing wet soils and acid soils, after improvement such as drainage and liming also may have also been suitable choices for historic occupation. No navigable waterways exist within the Project Area; thus, water travel is not a factor in the site probability analysis of this tract. 2 497 az d' /. h- _ 6 - ! .Q� ,`, .gin.` :�i'�� •'�� `� _! r Jr6w Google Earth Figure 2. 1997 aerial view of Project Area, from Google Earth. Google Earth Figure 3. 2007 aerial view of Project Area, from Google Earth. 3 498 �L y j, y r' 4 TL A. Google Earth N r AL AW • w s AL qw vu dp _ • Google Earth Areas of wet soils may have been attractive to Native American cultures. In these areas, edible herbaceous plant species may have been gathered and faunal species browsing these areas may have been hunted with success. Well-drained soils proximal to these resource- rich areas may have made adequate hunting and gathering campsites where the hunted and gathered resources were processed. These sites would have left an observable archaeological footprint. Little archaeological evidence would be located within the wet areas, the immediate locale of resource procurement. Areas containing gravelly soils may have been especially attractive to stone tool- manufacturing Native American cultures,but the level of attraction may have depended on the type and quality of the gravels available in these locations. Well-drained soils proximal to quarry-able, gravel-rich areas would have made adequate lithic material procurement campsites but in this case, archaeological materials may be located at both the campsites and the quarry sites. Soils Identified Within the Project Area At least 13 different soil types and soil type variants exist within the Project Area (Natural Resources Conservation Service [MRCS] 2018). These soil and soil types include Nicholson silt loam, 2% to 7% slopes; Frederick-Poplimento loams, 7% to 15% slopes; Frederick-Poplimento very rocky loams, 15% to 45% slopes; Carbo-Oaklet outcrop complex,2%to 15% slopes; Carbo-Oaklet very rocky silt loams, 2%to 15% slopes; Oaklet silt loam, 7% to 15% slopes; Frederick-Poplimento very rocky loams, 7% to 15% slopes; Oaklet silt loam, 2% to 7% slopes; Frederick-Poplimento loams, 15% to 25% slopes; Massanetta loam; Carbo silt loam, 7% to 15% slopes; Frederick-Poplimento loams, 2% to 7% slopes; and Timberville silt loam, 2%-7% slopes (Figures 6 and 7 and Table 1). Each of these types and variants are described below including references to drainage, hunting and gathering potential, and horticultural and agricultural productivity potential. Further, conclusions regarding the suitability of each for historic and Native American occupation and archaeological site probability are also explained. Table 1. Soils Identified Within the Project Area Boundaries. SoilSoil Name Acres Within Location Within Percentage Symbol the Project the Project Area Within the Area Project Area 31B Nicholson silt loam,2%-7%slopes 146.50 Southeastern 26% parcel 14C Frederick-Poplimento loams,7%-15%slopes 95.40 Northeastern 17% parcel 16D Frederick-Popl im ento very rocky loams, 15%- 79.50 Northeastern 14 45%slopes parcel 7C Carbo-Oaklet outcrop complex,2%-15%slopes 76.90 Southeastern 14% parcel 6C Carbo-Oaklet very rocky silt loams, 2%-15% 58.00 Southeastern 10% slopes parcel 32C Oaklet silt loam,7%-15%slopes 39.40 Southeast and 7% Northwest 16C Frederick-Poplimento very rocky loams, 7%-15% 21.70 Northwestern 4% slopes parcel 5 500 Soil Soil Name Acres Within Location Within Percentage Symbol the Project the Project Area Within the Area Project Area 32B Oaklet silt loam,2%-7%slopes 20.10 Northwestern 4% and Southeastern parcel 14D Frederick-Popl im ento loams, 15%-25%slopes 19.00 Northwestern 3% parcel 29 Massanetta loam 4.40 Northwestern 1% parcel 5C Carbo silt loam,7%-5%slopes 2.10 Northwestern Less than 1% parcel 14B Frederick-Popl im ento loams,2%-7%slopes 1.80 Southeastern Less than 1% parcel 40B Timberville silt loam,2%-7%slopes 1.10 Northwestern Less than 1% parcel Nicholson Series (31B) Nicholson soils are very-deep, moderately-well-drained, slowly-permeable soils formed in the mantle of loess underlain by a residuum of limestone, calcareous shale, and siltstone (MRCS 2018). These soils are located on rolling upland ridgetops and shoulder slopes. The depth to limestone, calcareous shale, or siltstone is greater than 60 inches in these soils, which ranges in acidity from mildly alkaline to strongly acid. This soil is mostly cultivated and can support corn, burley tobacco, small grains, truck and fruit crops, hay, and pasture. Some areas are used for urban-suburban development. Those areas with native vegetation can support hardwoods, mainly oaks, maples, black walnut, hickory, ash, beech, elm, hackberry, black locust, Kentucky coffee tree, eastern red cedar. Frederick Series (14C, 16D, 16C, 14D, 14B) Frederick soils are very-deep, well-drained, moderately-permeable soils formed in the residuum derived mainly from dolomitic limestone with interbeds of sandstone, siltstone, and shale, and are located on nearly level to very steep uplands (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness is more than 60 inches with a depth to bedrock greater than 72 inches for this soil, which ranges from very strongly acid to moderately acid. This soil features a surface runoff ranging from low to very high. Most of these soils have been cleared and cultivated with crops such as corn, small grain, hay,tobacco, and apple orchards. Most of the steeper areas are in pasture or forest. The native vegetation includes mostly hardwoods such as oak, hickory, maple, and yellow poplar. 6 501 Sod Map—FMCenCk Cg to Vrtpmia } IFwapkml 32C 6C 29 328 —fl 32C ID ie k nsxo .r.r,. rrom tN i �i a ,w.. rrem ..•m xr m rn�m rvu� heron � xxos�:ci7wwewbdmar�tas=ii��.s. y kU D soaa =++a mxrm.:+vc nreormr o ao.vw.tw>wv�mr rr�rnrw r..r•r�+ Nalurol Resourpea Web Sal Survey 9{162x18 Consarvauon$*'vI Nahw+al Cvpperawe$o-I Surrey Pape i of 3 Figure 6. Northern Project Area soil map, from NRCS website. 7 502 Sail Map—Frederick County,uirgiraa s (Fozgiove) r" rstpa ram W-D 1w, 31 B 332 B R f• n K r 4 r 4w 'Aaw m MW MW rawo rab wa H�5dc 1:11,100Fp1mrfonR pn•Imf{a,^all'J AeA. H 14 Fi 1+n4� 0 1�t1 300 BEO 9�1 I� Fad 970 10]7 A 3100 30Fa MVPoWbt Wa4MAMM]r 0aPC0Kw* WWWN i*OW UAM ZWW 17R WGW4 lGi qa Hatwal R""u Web sal curvy SM6+2018 i CQn atim Service National Caopwahe SaF Survey Page s of 3 Figure 7. Southern Project Area soil map, from NRCS website. 8 503 Poplimento Series (14C, 16D, 16C, 14D, 14B) Poplimento soils are very-deep, well-drained, slowly-permeable soils that formed in the residuum of a mixture of shale, limestone, siltstone, fine sandstone bedrock found in the Ridge and Valley portion of the Shenandoah Valley(MRCS 2018). These soils are located in the gently sloping to very steep uplands in the Shenandoah Valley. Solum thickness ranges from 40 inches to 70 inches with a depth to bedrock, shale, or siltstone bedrock greater than 60 inches in this very strongly through slightly acid soil. This soil features a slow to very rapid surface runoff. This soil is generally used for crops or pasture. Where cultivated, this soil can support apple orchards, peach orchards, small grains, corn, and mixed hay. The few areas with woodland consist mainly of upland oaks, hickory, yellow poplar, walnut, and ash. Carbo Series (pC 6C, SC) Carbo soil is a moderately-deep, well-drained, slowly-permeable soil formed in the material weathered from limestone bedrock located in the nearly-level to very steep uplands in the Appalachian Ridges and Valleys (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness and depth to bedrock ranges from 20 inches to 40 inches in this soil,which ranges from very strongly acid to neutral. This soil features a medium to very rapid surface runoff Areas that have been cleared are typically used for cropland or pasture and can support crops such as corn, small grain, and hay. Where forested,this soil can support northern red oak,yellow poplar, hickory, maple, black walnut, locust, eastern red cedar, and Virginia pine. Oaklet Series (7C, 6C, 32C, 32B) Oaklet soil is very-deep, well-drained, slowly-permeable soil formed in the material weathered from limestone bedrock on gently undulating to steep upland slopes in the Shenandoah Valley (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness is greater than 60 inches with a depth to limestone bedrock ranging from five feet to more than 14 feet. Soil reactions range from very strongly acid to slightly acid throughout. This soil features a slow to medium surface runoff. These soils are typically used for crops or pasture with minor acreage in woodland. Where cultivated, this soil can support corn, small grain, and hay. Where wooded this soil can support upland oaks, yellow poplar, hickory, maple, eastern red cedar, and Virginia pine. Massanetta Series (29) Massanetta soil is a very-deep, moderately-well-drained, moderately-permeable soil formed in alluvial material derived from upland soils found in the narrow flood plains normally below springs and having carbonate-charged water flowing from limestone bedrock (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness ranges from 20 inches to 40 inches while depth to bedrock is greater than 60 inches. Soil acidity ranges from slightly to moderately alkaline and effervesces with acid throughout. This soil features a slow surface runoff. Most areas of this soil are cleared and used for permanent pasture. Other areas are used for corn or native vegetation such as mixed hardwoods. Timberville Series (40B) Timberville soil consists of very-deep, well-drained, moderately-permeable soils that formed in alluvial/colluvial materials and can be found on colluvial fans, concave areas, 9 504 and heads of drainageways or low areas adjacent to upland drainageways throughout the limestone valley (MRCS 2018). Solum thickness and depth to bedrock is greater than 60 inches. Soil acidity ranges from extremely acid to slightly acid unless limed. This soil features a slow to moderate surface runoff This soil is typically cleared and used for crops or pasture. The remainder of this soil is wooded with native mixed hardwood vegetation. PREVIOUSLY-RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES Circa—performed an archival search for the Foxglove tracts using the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) online V-CRIS system on August 16, 2018 and August 21, 2018. This research was completed to determine if historic resources exist within the Project Area boundaries. The search identified no archaeological resources and five architectural resources within the Project Area boundaries. Research was also conducted to determine if resources existed within one mile of the Project Area boundaries. Twelve archaeological resources and 70 architectural resources are present within a one-mile radius of the Project Area boundaries. Table 2 lists all the resources within one-mile of the Project Area boundaries. Figures 8 - 11 show the approximate Project Area boundaries (yellow- shaded area) and resources within proximity. Any resources shaded green on Table 2 are within the Project Area. No VDHR easements are situated within the Project Areas. Five previous Phase I archaeological surveys have been conducted within one mile of the Project Area (Figures 12 and 13). The two most relevant Phase I reports include two pipeline surveys that transect parts of the northern Project Area. These surveys include a Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the VA State Line Meadow brook Substation Appalachian Trail segments of the Trans Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties and the addendum report conducted in 2008 and 2010 respectively by GAI Consultants, Inc. Three other surveys were conducted near the Project Area and these include a Phase IArchaeological Investigation of the Meadow brook Substations conducted in 1985 by Thunderbird Archaeological Associates, as well as two Phase I surveys conducted by James Madison University (JMU) Archaeological Resource Center/Laboratory. JMU conducted a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Middle Marsh Tract in Frederick County in 2011 and A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Middletown Woods Tract in Frederick County in 2012. The two surveys completed by GAI on the two tracts did not locate any archaeological resources within the project area. They did relocate the Miller cemetery and identify a standing house and barn complex on the two parcels. Table 2. Previously-Recorded Cultural Resources Within a One-Mile Radius of Project Area Boundaries. VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number Archaeological Resources 44FK0051 Native American Camp Phase I survey, None made 11/81 44FK0055 Native American Terrestrial, open air, single Phase I survey, None made Historic dwelling 11/81 10 505 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 44FK0056 Native American Artifact scatter Phase I survey, None made 11/81 44FK0057 19th century Historic artifact scatter, Phase I survey, None made chimney fall 11/81 44FK0712 20th century A lime kiln with an additional Phase I survey 1/12 None made structure noted 44FK0720 19th century Lime Kiln Phase I survey by None made 1/12 44FK0767 19th century Tabler Farm Complex, three Phase I survey 7/08 None made 20th century separate farmsteads and a springhouse 44FK0768 19th century Tabler Cemetery, five graves Phase I survey 7/08 None made 20th century present in two rows, eight internments recorded 44FK0769 18th century Tabler Farm Road, 13 feet Phase I survey 7/08 None made 19th century wide, extends from farmhouse to Marsh Brook Lane 44FK0770 19th century Merritt's Camp, encampment Phase I survey 7/08 None made of Brigadier General Wesley Merritt's First Calvary Division, Battle of Cedar Creek, 1864 44FK0772 18th century East Road, running from Dr. Phase I survey 7/08 None made 19th century Shipley's"Belle View"Farm to 20th century Hite Mille Road 44FK0778 18th century Nieswander's Cemetery, 22 Phase I survey 7/08 None made (034-5193) 19th century graves associated with the and 1/17 20th century family cemetery Architectural Resources 034-0002 18th century Cedar Creek and Belle Grove Phase I survey 2/91 Listed on the 19th century National Historic Park aka Virginia Landmark Isaac Hite Jr. House aka Register 11/8/68 Cedar Creek Battlefield and Listed on the Belle Grove aka Belle Grove National Historic Plantation, 336 Belle Grove Landmark 8/11/69 Road Route 727, resource Listed on the includes 3,713 acres that National Register of include historic landscapes, Historic Places monuments, river fords, 8/11/69 and 2/2/03 military encampments, and and 8/11/1969 plantation houses 034-0076 ca 1870 Ash House aka Deerfield Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined Acres, 6124 Middle Road, potentially eligible resource includes a house, a 6/18/09 chicken coop,a kitchen,three garages, three vehicle sheds, a barn, and a landscape wall 034-0075 ca 1870 Stickley House, 6519 Valley Phase I survey 9/08 None made Pike, resource includes a house, silo, two barns, swimming pool, and a shed 11 506 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 034-0077 ca 1800 Bauserman House, 6127 Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined Middle Road, resource potentially eligible includes house,spring house, 6/18/09 shed, privy, well house, and two archaeological sites 034-0084 ca 1790 General Carson House aka Phase I survey. VDHR determined Pleasant Green, resource 9/08 potentially eligible includes the home of General 6/18/09 James Carson, three sheds, chicken coop, hog pen, privy barn, springhouse, corncrib, and a family cemetery 034-0138 ca 1810 Inn at Vaucluse Spring aka Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined See also Vaucluse, 231 Vaucluse eligible 6/18/09 034-0220 Spring Lane, resource includes house, workshop, millhouse, two secondary dwellings,a barn,a swimming pool, two sheds, and an archaeological site 034-0139 ca 1815 Rust Hill aka Valerie Hill,1687 Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined Marlboro Road, resource potentially eligible includes house, secondary 6/18/09 dwelling, a meat house, and two sheds 034-0140 ca 1840 Baldwin-Clark House aka Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined Buffalo Marsh, resource eligible 8/16/93 includes a house, chicken house, shed, school, and a barn 034-0141 ca 1830 Waveland, Route 623, Phase I survey. None made resource includes a house, 9/08 chicken coop, shed, swimming pool, secondary dwelling, smoke house, garage, workshop and a family cemetery 034-0191 ca 1870 Vaucluse Station, Route 638, Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR not eligible resource includes a depot, 3/16/09 demolished 034-0228 ca 1900 Sager House, Route 625, Phase I survey 1/89 None made resource includes a house, two barns, and a chicken house 034-0229 ca 1900 Fishel House, Route 625, Phase I survey 1/89 None made resource includes a house and a shed 034-0230 ca 1900 House, Route 625, resource Phase I survey 1/89 None made includes a house, garage, barn and a shed 034-0231 ca 1840 House, Route 634, resource Phase I survey 1/89 None made includes a house, gatepost entry, and a garage 12 507 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 034-0232 ca 1900 Walters House, Route 625, Phase I survey 1/89 None made resource includes a house and a garage 034-0233 ca 1870 The Hank Walters House, Phase I survey 1/89 None made Route 625, resource includes one house and several sheds 034-0234 ca 1900 House, Route 625, resource Phase I survey 1/89 None made includes a house and two sheds 034-0235 ca 1880 Tenant House for Western Phase I survey 1/89 None made View Farms, Route 625, resource includes a house and a smoke house 034-0236 ca 1840 Western View Farm, Route Phase I survey 1/89 None made 625, resource includes a house, spring house, barn, and a shed 034-0237 ca 1810 Abel Tract aka Cedar Creek Phase I survey 1/89 None made Battlefield aka Rienzi Knoll aka Dinges House, 294 Rienzi Knoll Lane, resource includes 34.566 acres of battlefield, historic open space, agricultural resources and archaeological potential. 034-0238 ca 1875 Epworth United Methodist Phase I survey 1/89 None made Church aka Epworth Chapel, resource includes a church and a modern concrete block building 034-0239 ca 1870 House, Route 625, resource Phase I survey None made includes house, smoke 1/1/89 house, barn and a garage 034-0240 ca 1900 The Cooke House, Route Phase I survey None made 638, resource includes 1/1/89 house, barn, animal shelter, and two sheds 034-0241 ca 1870 House, Route 638, resource Phase I survey None made includes a house, a barn, and 1/1/89 a shed 034-0242 ca 1810 Rickard House aka Rock Hill Phase I survey None made Dairy Farm, Route 759, 1/1/89 resource includes a house, ara e, barn,shed and a silo 034-0243 ca 1880 Rickard House, Route 759, Phase I survey None made resource includes a house, 1/1/89 smoke house, corncrib, privy, barn, three sheds, and an orchard 13 508 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 034-0244 ca 1910 Brumback-Huffman House Phase I survey None made aka Win-Liz Farm,Route 759, 1/1/89 resource includes house, smokehouse, corncrib, shelter, barn, shed, and a secondary dwelling 034-0254 ca 1830 Miller House, Route 631, Phase I survey None made resource includes a house, 1/1/89 shed, smoke house, and a cemetery 034-0259 ca 1880 Cedar Cliff Presbyterian Phase I survey, VDHR determined Church aka Unitarian 8/08 not eligible 3/16/09 Universal Church aka Unity of the Shenandoah Church, 6460 Valley Pike Road, resource includes one Gothic Revival Church 034-0260 ca 1870 House at Vaucluse, 6470 Phase I survey, None made Valley Pike Road, resource 8/08 includes a house, smoke house, shed, garage, and a chicken house 034-0262 ca 1840 Mildred Kline House, 236 Phase I survey, VDHR determined Vaucluse Road, resource 8/08 not eligible 3/16/09 includes a house, a garage, shed and a barn 034-0263 ca 1880 House, 782 Hites Road, Phase I survey VDHR determined resource includes a house, 1/1/89 and 9/08 not eligible 3/16/09 shed, and two garages 034-0264 ca 1870 Shiley Farm,856 Hites Road, Phase I survey VDHR determined resource includes a house, 1/1/89 and 9/08 potentially eligible garage, privy, two sheds, a 3/16/09 barn, and a chicken house 034-0266 ca 1880 Deerfield School, Route 638, Phase I survey None made resource includes two school 1/1/89 buildings 034-0267 ca 1870 House, Route 638, resource Phase I survey None made includes a house and a shed 1/1/89 034-0268 ca 1810 Lindamood House, Route Phase I survey None made 638, resource includes a 1/1/89 house and a kitchen 034-0269 ca 1820 House, Route 638, resource Phase I survey None made includes,house,shed,smoke 1/1/89 house, barn, and a corncrib 034-0303 ca. 1861 Cedar Creek Battlefield, Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined 093-0106 Route 11 South (Frederick, potentially eligible Shenandoah and Warren 3/16/09 Counties), resource includes a battlefield, and one structure, the Heater House, currently under restoration 14 509 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 034-0428 ca 1830 Conard House, 478 Klines Phase I survey, VDHR determined Mill Road Route 633, 8/08 not eligible 6/18/09 resource includes a house, smoke house, foundation, secondary dwelling, and a shed 034-0429 ca 1800 Farmhouse, Route 633, Phase I survey, VDHR determined resource includes a house, 8/08 not eligible 3/24/94 stable, smoke house, barn, and an apple storage building 034-1018 ca 1840 B.F.Stickley House,Route 11 Phase I survey 1/91 None made South, resource includes a house, garage, chicken house, shed, and a foundation 034-1019 ca 1800 F. Estes Kline House, Route Phase I survey 1/91 None made 11 South,resource includes a house, privy, shed, barn, and a smoke house 034-1020 ca 1900 Stickley House, Route 11, Phase I survey 1/91 None made resource includes a house, chicken house, animal shelter, and a smoke house 034-1021 ca 1900 House, 6688 Valley Pike, Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined resource includes a house not eligible 3/16/09 and a garage 034-1022 ca 1890 Kiln, Route 11 South, Phase I survey. None made resource includes a brick- 9/2008 lined kiln 034-1023 ca 1880 W. H. Dinges House aka Phase I survey 9/08 None made Martha Downes House, 6773 Valley Pike Road, resource includes a house, garage, modern outbuilding, chicken house, barn, and a modern lass manufacturing building 034-1025 ca 1929 Wise-Chandell House, Route Phase I survey 9/08 None made 11, resource includes a house, garage, privy, mobile home, chicken house, and a smoke house 034-1026 ca 1900 Bayliss-Seaman House, Phase I survey 1/91 None made Route 11,resource includes a house, a chicken house, a smoke house, a stable, barn, and a garage 034-1027 ca 1940 Nixon's Motel aka Plantation Phase I survey 1/91 None made Garden Apartments, Route 11, resource includes one house 15 510 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 034-1028 ca 1873 David Dinges House aka Phase I survey 1/91 None made Sunny Side, 7114 Valley Pike, resource includes a house, corncrib, shed, garage, barn, kitchen, meat house, and a cemetery 034-1029 ca 1900 E.H. Randall House aka Phase I survey 1/91 None made Valley View Farm, Route 11 South, resource includes a house, shed, two carriage houses, privy, shed, barn, a stable, granary and a chicken house 034-1079 ca 1903 Harvey A Richard House, Phase I survey 7/89 None made Route 628, resource includes house,shed,barn,root cellar, kitchen and a garage 034-1080 ca 1830 Snapp-Fewell House, 6286 Phase I survey VDHR determined Middle Road, resource 1/1/89 and 9/08 not eligible 6/18/09 includes, house, smokehouse, chicken house, privy, and two sheds 034-1404 No date Craig-Miller House, resource Phase I survey 4/92 None made includes one house 034-1405 ca 1815 Sleepy Hollow Farm aka Phase I survey None made Tuttle-Robinson-Bauserman 1/1/89 House, Route 631, resource includes a house, barn, shed, and a pumphouse 034-1406 ca 1920 Rothgeb-Morgan House, Phase I survey None made Route 631 and Route 625, 1/1/89 resource includes a house, garage, privy, and a chicken house 034-1407 ca 1913 Fred W. Ridings House aka Phase I survey None made Ridings House, Route 625, 1/1/89 resource includes house, kitchen, barn, smoke house, well, chicken house, and a shed 034-1422 ca 1890 Judge Rice House aka Phase I survey. None made Kenner House aka Glenmore 9/08 Farm, 239 Klines Mill Road, resource includes a house, smoke house, barn and a chicken house 034-1438 ca 1870 Richards-Fauble House aka Phase I survey VDHR determined W.H. Ridings House, Route 1/1/89 not eligible 1/5/93 628, resource includes a house, a barn, shed, and a smoke house 16 511 VDHR Survey Date of resource Description of resource Survey Information Recommendation Number 034-1439 ca 1917 Luther Snap House aka Phase I survey VDHR determined Sunnyside Farm, Route 628, 1/1/89 not eligible 1/5/93 resource includes a house, privy shed, smokehouse and a barn 034-1440 ca 1830 Tewalt-Solenberger House, Phase I survey VDHR determined Route 628, resource includes 1/1/89 not eligible 1/5/93 a house, smoke house, barn, shed,corncrib, and kitchen 034-1441 ca 1890 Rogers-Solenberger House, Phase I survey VDHR determined Route 628, resource includes 1/1/89 not eligible 1/5/93 a house, shed, chicken house, barn and an orchard 034-1552 ca 1927 Bridge, Route 633, resource Phase I survey 1/95 None made includes a slab bridge crossing Meadow Brook 034-5073 ca 1900 House, 263 Vaucluse Road, Phase I survey. None made resource includes a house, 9/08 shed, and a garage 034-5074 ca 1930 House,265 Vaucluse Road Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined not eligible 3/16/09 034-5075 ca 1880 Woodbrine Farm aka Phase I survey VDHR determined Woodbine Barn, 829 1/1/89 potentially eligible Vaucluse Road, resource 6/18/09 includes a house, two sheds and a barn 034-5077 ca 1831 Harper's Ferry and Valley Phase I survey 9/08 VDHR determined Branch of the Baltimore and not eligible 3/16/09 Ohio Railroad aka Winchester and Potomac Railroad 034-5085 ca 1838 Miller Cemetery, south of Phase I survey. None made Route 631, resource includes 5/09 a family cemetery with seven marked burials and several unmarked, a stone fence delineates the cemetery 034-5192 ca 1885 Tabler Cemetery aka Tabler Phase I survey 7/08 None made See also Farm, Marsh Brook Lane, 44FK0767 and resource includes a house 44FK0768 and a family cemetery 034-5193 ca 1780 Nieswander's Cemetery, Phase I survey, None made Chapel Road, resource 7/08 includes at least 22 graves 17 512 I aritib Dept of WtofirResources N�—CR:S L end Q ma.,e�r st,a�tri ,rx , p.s,en,.ney�,�Rno�n 44 T ^'J < ` i ✓b > ` a � ni n , Title:Fostore Daie:8 21 2.018 rrrr+ti.r+r+aaw rP...v errao rry rr.,p.w.r.,..+a v.+l.+...an � - Feet� 0 A� rMtk iltriYeW qme s:n37ars•�aaAO Fare rairMarnrdnr+�istr m:� �"•�r,e�.�.,..".®.a saris>srr...�,...�rse....,,�..." Figure 8. VDHR V-CBIS map showing previously-identified resources within a one- mile radius of the northern Project Area boundaries. vzia Dept.of 1W Toru Re a rrrs N�-CMS MoodH ,. ..,�..,.^. r' H-D�t . (M-OW) � I c�z :m a 'rJ 7i Title:Foxglove Date:811tiJSD18 0 121IM40OWUM 172.3Z411' 'I FMe :4.v yra'�rdr.J 7 y.l..r4.Mr.d arrcrrae.vean rnv wfdr.rud�wLpo.remam.r�or.n ,NJ'4 wfC4rN11•`swf•F/�IH l+r�MwrNlM'+.$w..r+a�.r4d�w�d.m.d+w..-vart� Figure 9. VDHR V-CRIS map showing previously-identified resources within a one- mile radius of the southern Project Area boundaries. 18 513 %'hl*"Dept,of Historic Ryon i _ V- I4.M e.•wm Afar��pn�M.a� d Rechec�lturmcn �y,41CLntYr Ub& y�ll�t}tN1011C L11WY[�IIIP99lS OSi•+tl rch."*ZXARefeleSM . .4rLaalc�I� e V3G5 G35 Ax11f tltltlU Ce�y Hemmers 6 , x , i J 1- rN I4 Title:Fosglnre Date: ww. ,wr.ry rmtletr.��r .gt. rmrr y.e..:. Foal =lte�lb ' / w }riY1W0— a SI-1W t$W 2W9 I 1 I05 r 1'-1.50 feel ewc,4.ie•.rysrpvlx:.i�.r+sr ie�yp�.ror�wr.d...y�rr.�rr.�c.�.ra Figure 10. Detailed VDHR V-CBIS map showing previously-identified resources within close proximity to the northern Project Area boundaries. Virsinia Dept,of HI toric Resources V-CRZS�.,*,K�ewrm>Irrn sasrsr Le,end a .a aTTmre m�t�mx 0 mm.,d.0 Hi—k rr--'s Propextl+s p: �a tr USGS GIS P1_ Ce ,so,�,mnes 0 p-ssn. ty. fN 411 Iitle:Foxglove Date:S'1G'2D151 Feet o,.�p.�.,�.a�e�,ra wa•.v,��u����,.srar.�..�,.,,�e,.,,�"`'°mrk�.rsew-v �`u sm�,�,�", ;.�m��ry 118,85611'=1,5flS Feet A'axx ry'Ax:re:.rn�ewq amvfo�al nua moV'+'��re�w.v:�awrkkw„reru.,.,mm Ael.4rfvy.�+u'.�r:�ixwgnruMaoerxr meRa.Ar, Figure 11. Detailed VDHR V-CRS map showing previously-identified resources within close proximity to the southern Project Area boundaries. 19 514 In_i i+➢epi,of Hiswic Keo r V-CR:S Ltgend Dom S� Roads(20D.ODD) P—Mgh- N�, A Fide:FONOM-e Dace:812112018 swryr lddYypi.lsmprryiarrwrrar,�wwOwiwtWr+rwrrg,w+l�+ Y' Feet n4.drlwM/Y i�ina. wpnrwMww.sMi.+�MI1.x" .�riYliM#ulawrr atR'.tetLwl . 111=403500" 1:72.22C 1=403500"1:72.220 V-6010F.H '�'�^>mlE m. wa..nom' >r,.•+min.tfurmhww�r Figure 12. VDHR V-CBIS map showing location of previous Phase I surveys and VDHR easements near the northern Project Area. v1Wru peer.of Harorir Rrwurret V-CRrS Legend h]�ah a"^.�fu i SITiV Secoadary � I � r N F1 Title:Foxglove Dale:g(W2018 •,•:kms.syr.y ny.`r,reims��m.�..,e�rw+aw.e..,e.r�+t.�..n wwl+. w.ry +.ew,r.7w.rcer 0120MOMMOM" puv�r.»e"��` w...-.�....,.r.r.�.++w�..•�.�"iw..drrw.4�r.M°�..'e a.,.rr 1:7222411101ae w " a �•w.w.r,l+ ✓r.►M•.,.wrw�.nrrw.�ne...�...+eAwvaF...rw+wlwap�l�.=n...m..r+ Figure 13. VDHR V-CRIS map showing location of previous Phase I surveys and VDHR easements near the southern Project Area. 20 515 Historic Map Review A review of historic quad maps did show some development near the Miller house and cemetery within the northern Proj ect Area during the early part of the 20th century, although this development does not appear to continue through the latter half of the century(Figures 14 - 17). A review of historic quad maps did show some development near the house and barns within the northern and southern section of the southern Proj ect Area during the early part of the 20th century. These maps do show development around the Project Area. The Project Areas are shown as mostly open fields with forested areas coinciding where the rocky outcrops were noted during the field visit. � 5• IL.lu,1'C s 'w M.il Dr,dera F`ard •'` , `!.` P' r \',,,:MAF M1j Kyrr�' t j f,zzW1 vry Ilk 1kn J y ap not to scale Figure 14. Detail of 1937 Middletown quad. 21 516 / S � O f � 4 j a M 11Ut to scale S Figure 15. Detail of 1966 Middletown quad. / r; M / 0 n / y, t 4 ti '7 r Map not to scale Figure 16. Detail of 1986 Middletown quad. 22 517 Q it• �e _s f k.�, ti s'•3 t � y n e- ,r r Figure 17. Detail of 1999 Middletown quad. Results and Summary This study was conducted to provide information on the current condition of the property, as well as to assess the potential for the presence of archaeological or architectural resources within the Proj ect Area. Fieldwork was completed in August 2018 and included a pedestrian walkover of the tract to identify any obvious archaeological or architectural resources and the site potential of various landforms. Northern Tract Architectural Resources Two previously-identified architectural resources were located on the project tract and two previously-identified resources are located adjacent to the tract(Plates 1 through 14). Previously-Identified Architectural Resources Within the Project Area Site 034-0254 Site 034-0254 is the circa 1830 Miller house identified in 1989 by Maral Kalbian. She indicated that the main house was in ruinous condition with only a five-course, American- bond brick chimney remaining. She also noted a shed, a fine coarse-rubble limestone smoke/meat house, and a cemetery. She did not make any recommendation as to the site's eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and according to the VDHR V-CRIS form no further survey work has occurred at the site. 23 518 The site is inaccurately mapped in the V-CRIS system and the site is actually located to the northwest of the cemetery, on the eastern edge of a ridge crest. The structure currently consists of a western gable end brick chimney and a portion of the northern wall. The main brick structure rests on a limestone foundation with the limestone foundation evident around a cellar/basement. The chimney has three fireboxes, indicating a basement/cellar and two floors above. There is a large mound filled with brick rubble evident on the southern side of the structure. There are numerous loose bricks within the cellar/basement and strewn around the yard of the structure. In addition, there are several architectural timber beams with square joints on the ends that match the notches on the brick walls. To the northeast of the main structure is the remains of a stone foundation that probably represents an outbuilding. To the north of the main building is a fresh-water seep. Also, to the north is a road lined with limestone rubble. There is an overgrown area to the south of the main structure, where an additional structure may have stood at one time. t w � s r �g r, E ,y Plate 1. View of brick ruins, looking southwest. 24 519 .� . r• Plate of •• • south. Plate 3. View i� a ��i �l� ' "` `•' V r; of •wing the three fire places, looking southwest. 25 520 4 A ��� d•, •. `3�A3.�iii�3 s�yy.�ee4w.-�� s r. +• ur :� - AO 44W Plate - 1 ' 1✓ t•. Plate 6. View of fireplace on the second floor, looking west. i f F rye Plate 7. View of rear of brick chimney, looking east. 27 522 Af Y� Plate 8. Detail view of the stone foundation, interior of cellar, looking west. 2F. M. � r . AAr +l �ty�,+ �. r � t -.•ms's—w� '���y,s� I � !'Vlk`d 3(i kt,� . #r i, , � �j'f��A•Y bAy � +� r \ � t ►,Rt�� Plate 9. Detail view of the joints and notches in brick and the timber(notice notch in brick and matching joint on timber beam end) for the first floor of the structure, looking south. 28 523 , .� . . _ y L F .Ik .ys� ( f•`• { : r - q Z.i I}L[ t••���j�le ��- Fes= 1 770�- Ilk, �.; �f R iy A� .:... .. R .4 r f ,�f y T� s.' Plate 14. View of overgrown area where another structure may have stood, looking south. Site 034-5085 The Miller cemetery is located in an open field that currently functions as a cow pasture. The cemetery has been neglected and is overgrown. GAI noted that many of the headstones are illegible and broken, thus making it difficult to decipher the exact number of burials. There are seven marked headstones, all of which are marble, and there are also several unmarked fieldstones. A stone fence delineates the cemetery but has collapsed in places. All the surnames on the markers are Miller, with first names of Thomas S., Bettie, Cassandra, Joseph, and Mary. GAI suggested that the cemetery has no connection with significant events, themes, or trends in history. As such, they recommended the site as not eligible for listing under Criteria A. No information identifying any person interred in the cemetery as significant in local, state, or national history can be located. Therefore, they recommended this resource not eligible for National Register of Historic Places listing under Criteria B. The cemetery lacks distinctive funerary architecture and does not utilize a specific plan. For these reasons, GAI suggested that the Miller Cemetery not eligible for National Register of Historic Places listing under Criteria C. In addition, GAI noted that there were no secondary resources associated with the cemetery. GAI may have looked at the VDHR V-CRIS mapped location of Site 034-0254 and not seen the ruins during their survey efforts and the correct location of the ruins may have been outside of their area of potential effect. The cemetery is currently overgrown with vegetation (Plates 15 through 21). Portions of the stone walls have collapsed or have been pushed down by the cattle. The graves are laid out in north to south rows, with both headstones and footstones evident. It appears that the markers were purchased, as many have scroll designs along the top. 31 526 A review of the records on Ancestory.com indicate that the Miller family lived in the area most of their lives. The 1850 census shows that Thomas Cox Miller was living at the tract with his 45-year old wife Cassandra, and their sons, 20-year old Joseph Atwell, 19-year old Robert Washington, 17-year old Thomas Madison, and 15-year old Dudley L. In addition,they had a two-year old daughter Mary Ophelia who died in 1834. All the Millers are listed as born in Virginia. Both Thomas M. and Dudley L. are listed as attending school within the year. The census list all the males in the Miller household as farmers. Thomas C.is credited with$20,000.00 in real estate value. A much higher value than his neighbors, whose farms valued an average of$3,300.00. The marriage license indicates that Thomas C. and Cassandra J. McKay were married in Frederick County on January 5, 1829. Their son, Thomas Madison Miller is listed on his marriage license as a doctor and the 1860 census listed him as a physician. Thomas M. attended the Delaware College in Newark, Delaware in 1855. In 1855 to 1856, he attended the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia. In 1856 to 1857, he attended the Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In 1857, he received his M.D. degree from the Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. His thesis was titled Typhoid fever as it occurred in the Valley of Virginia. In 1860, he practiced medicine in the Magisterial District No. 8 in Frederick County, Virginia. In 1861, he is listed as a Surgeon, serving with the 51st VA Militia, Berkley County, Virginia ["not yet commissioned"]. In November 1861, he is listed as a Surgeon, serving with the 51st VA Militia, Bath, Morgan County, Virginia ["not yet commissioned, but recommended"]. On November 5, 1861, he married Margaret Celia "Maggie" Davis, in Frederick County, Virginia. Thomas M. died January 18, 1890 and is buried in the Green Hill Cemetery in Frederick County,Virginia(Plate 22). Maggie died in 1930 and is buried next to her husband (Plate 23). The 1880 census shows that Thomas C. Miller was 78 and was living at the tract with his 44-year old son Dudley L. Both Thomas C. and Dudley L. were listed as widowers, and their trades as a farmer. The census indicates that Thomas C's father was born in Pennsylvania and his mother in Virginia. The high value of the Miller farm would indicate that it was a fairly-large estate; however, the slave records did not indicate that Thomas C. owned any slaves. It could be that the farm was used to raise livestock, which would not require as many laborers. 32 527 t '�} 4 Plate 15. View of cemetery, looking southwest. �➢ f J1 i "qyj -Pl Igo ,� •�fi- e➢, iR 3' , 0 0 /,� yl a ```` Iry P 4�r �i�� f 4'. 1 ?i. Plate 16. View of cemetery, looking east. 33 528 �l�ty� VT w dt # � XjI r If { Plate 17. View of grave marker, looking west. 34 529 .a tY n r .. . r 'A Y w 1 y . r► � +��i de Virg Plate 20. View of grave marker, looking west. P A- 3^ ' r Ry$Y4 Plate 21. View of cemetery, looking east. 36 531 i` y- meati , k a _ + ��1 � ' JP Ao WIM 4i� ,s _ tz ell tie � �a- d _ ,�;. �_ •gidd r' t. 1.. v. - - -- x Pit x JAa or ALA Ik AV i A ik 1 f Plate 23. View of Maggie Miller's grave marker, Green Hill Cemetery. 38 533 Previously-Identified Architectural Resources Adjacent to the Project Area Site 034-0077 This circa 1770 house and springhouse was identified by Michael Quinn in 1973 and is located on the south side of Marlboro Road, near the junction with Middle Road just to the west of the Project Area. Mr. Quinn's research indicated that in 1973 the house was owned by Ralph Bauserman, who also owned Site 034-0076, Deerfield Acres. At the time of Mr. Quinn's survey, the house was rented. Mr. Quinn noted that the property had passed through the same ownership as Deerfield Acres, and was originally purchased by Charles Bauserman in 1918 from Charles Snapp, who acquired the property from Mr. Tevault in 1917. Mr. Quinn noted that the type of moldings in the house dated it to circa 1770. He indicated that the structure was expanded originally from a log cabin with stone chimneys at each gable end. He noted a one room addition on the west side on the structure. The original structure has vertical tongue and groove panel partitions throughout. The structure seems to have survived basically untouched and was suffering only from lack of upkeep. Mr. Quinn thought the structure was in fair condition, and under no threat except for lack of upkeep. He noted the following original architectural elements were present at the site: House: A-Door, original 37 inches wide and six foot-two inches high; B-Window, original 55-1/2 inches wide with a 26-inch sill, and CR 37 inches; C-Door, original six-foot four inches high and 34 inches wide; and D-Window of addition 28 inches by 44 1/2 inches,with 6/6 double-hung windows. In 1989, the house was resurveyed by Maral Kalbian and she noted the house and spring house as well as a barn, frame shed, and a meat house. One of the sheds is timber-frame, with vertical-board siding and a shed roof. The other shed is concrete-block with a shed roof, and Ms. Kalbian thought small enough to be a privy. Ms. Kalbian noted that a fine course-rubble limestone springhouse with wooden grills stood to the east of the main house adjacent to Buffalo Marsh Run. She believed that while the Bauserman House once functioned as a productive farm, that is was now stands vacant and abandoned. She noted that the complex no longer possessed an intact assemblage of outbuildings and did not currently reflect early 19th century farming practices of Frederick County. She recommended that the complex was not potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A as this resource no longer conveys its historic function. No evidence could be located that connects this property to any significant individuals in history. As such,this resource was recommended ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria B. The main dwelling had lost its integrity through alterations and neglect and coupled with most of its associated agricultural outbuildings no longer standing, further subtracts from its architectural significance. Ms. Kalbian recommended the complex as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria C. In 2008, GAI resurveyed the site during a Phase I survey for the Virginia State Line- Meadowbrook Substation-Appalachian Trail segments of the TrAIL Project in Frederick and Warren counties. At that time, they noted restricted access to the property and their survey was completed from the public-access road. The only extant secondary resource that was observed from the roadway was a wood-framed shed. They noted that the house 39 534 was constructed circa 1800 and consisted of a two-story frame vernacular house on a continuous-stone foundation. It appears that the dwelling is clad in wood siding and topped with a standing-seam metal side gable roof. The fenestration consists of 6/6 and 9/6 double-hung, wood sash windows, but most of the glass panes are no longer intact. A one- story gable roof addition has been appended to the east elevation. They noted that the house was vacant and in very poor condition. GAI recommended that this resource is not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; however, VDHR asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey to fully access and survey the property. GAI did not receive a response to their request for property access. However, in 2009, VDHR believed that the resource appears potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmark Register under Criteria C. In 2010, after gaining property access, GAI noted a house, spring house, well house, and remnants of the frame shed were extant. The privy, barn, and meat house structures were not observed. GAI noted that while previous surveys identify the main house as a log structure,this claim cannot be conclusively substantiated. Their field visit revealed rough-hewn weatherboard siding under exposed sections of the asbestos-shingle siding. No log framing was observed. The roof of the original section of the house is clad in corrugated metal, and three V-crimp metal covers the roof of the addition. Pictures taken from November 2008 and April 2010 showed the continued deterioration of the siding,roof, and the second floor. The spring house stands to the southeast of the main dwelling and features coursed stone construction. They noted that the gable roof on the springhouse was clad in corrugated metal but has collapsed. Only one pegged vent remained intact, while the remaining window and door apertures are now open. They noted that the timber frame shed was no longer intact. Although portions of the timber framing still stand; the wood siding and corrugated roofing material have deteriorated and lay on the ground. The second shed recorded in the 1989 survey appears to instead be a well house. The concrete-block well house is topped by a shed roof clad with standing-seam metal. It features a strap-hinge wood door on the facade. After a site visit with full property access, GAI maintained their original recommendation that the site was not potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, B, and C. No definitive evidence that the main dwelling features log construction was observed at the time of survey. The exposed corners underneath the asbestos-shingle siding do not feature notching. In addition, this resource remains unoccupied, and due to neglect, the dwelling and its associated outbuildings continue to severely decline. There is no note on the site form indicating if VDHR concurred with GIA's 2010 recommendations. The site form currently lists the site as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Circa—identified the house, springhouse, and well house during their walkover. Plates 24 through 27 show the current condition of the structures. House The house is a circa 1800, two-story, two-bay, side-gable, wood-frame house clad in painted-white wood weatherboard and resting on a rusticated stone foundation with two exterior-end rusticated stone chimneys. The roof is covered in standing seam metal and collapsed exposing the wood framing and the interior. Most of the windows have been 40 535 removed. The entrance on the facade is not visible. There is a one-story, one-bay, side- gable, wood-frame addition attached to the side (east) elevation. Springhouse The springhouse is a circa 1800, one-story, one-bay, side-gable, rusticated stone building resting on a rusticated stone foundation. The roof has been removed and a tree is growing from the center of the springhouse. The windows have been removed. The entrance on the facade is not visible. Well House The well house is a circa 1900, one-story, one-bay, shed roof, concrete-block building resting on a below-grade concrete-block foundation. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. No windows are visible on the well house. The entrance on the facade is not visible. A <f Plate 24. View of main house, springhouse, and well house at Site 034-0077, looking north. 41 536 ' - �' .� '^i �s i '�'. C�> � °� � ' � '}� `� � �N+ x � 4 �a ���b;: k � � \, _ ., _ �j4,� -_ � -- - i ��`L.. / - - - Q'�y:. � ,��1 � _ � II ' _ �� �'� ' - • • - . - 1 � 11 •• • # � � —_ i. s _,�- t,,,: ate' I��lLIL '"�i� � ¢� � � � � i s � � � *� � � �Y� �a ._ 'f +'� �� ll,�.. $py.i. /)I i t r` `,+ �. — a ' � • • � • � - 1 � 11 •• • �4 i 7, sr i Plate 27. View of springhouse and well house at Site 034-0077, looking north. Site 034-0139 This circa 1815 house was identified by Michael Quinn in 1973 and is located on the south side of Marlboro Road down a long, tree-lined, paved driveway. Mr. Quinn indicated that the main structure had flat arches over the windows and the basement windows had wood louvers. The rear ell had an enclosed porch. He noted the following secondary structures a circa 1750 central stone chimney southwest of house, which he believed may have been a slave quarters or an original house; a circa 1880 five-course American-bond brick meat house with stepped cornice; a circa 1950 wood shed; and a 1960 machine shed. In 1991, the house was resurveyed by Maral Kalbian. The VDHR V-CRIS site form contains no additional information about her survey. In 2008, GAI resurveyed the site during a Phase I survey for the Virginia State Line- Meadowbrook Substation-Appalachian Trail segments of the TrAIL Project in Frederick and Warren counties. At that time, they noted restricted access to the property and their survey was completed from the public-access road. GAI noted that the two-and-a-half- story dwelling was built circa 1815. The structure's exterior walls were laid in common- bond brick, and a standing-seam metal gable roof tops the house. The fenestration consists of 6/6, double-hung, wood, sash windows with brick lintels. A one-story porch with Tuscan columns is located on the facade, while the rear ell features an enclosed porch. The only extant secondary resource that was observed from the roadway was the stone chimney stack southwest of the main dwelling. GAI recommended that this resource is not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; however, VDHR asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey to fully access and survey the property. In 2009, after 43 538 gaining property access, GAI noted a house, chimney stack, meat house, and machine shed were extant. The shed structure was not observed. GIA indicated that the two-and-a-half- story main house was constructed on a continuous-stone foundation, with common-bond brick walls. The side-gable roof is clad with standing-seam metal, and a stepped cornice trims the roofline. Interior brick chimneys mark the gable ends. A one-story, one-bay pedimented portico supported by Tuscan columns and a wood balustrade is located on the facade. The windows have been replaced with 6/6, double-hung, vinyl, sash windows and feature brick jack arches. The two-story rear ell features an enclosed porch and a one-bay garage addition. GAI noted no changes to the remaining chimney stack have occurred since the previous survey. The meat house is located southwest of the main dwelling. It stands one-story tall on a continuous stone foundation. The exterior walls are laid in five- course common bond brick, and a standing-seam metal gable roof tops the building. A stepped cornice trims the roofline, and a recessed door marks the northeast elevation. The modern machine shed, located south of the main dwelling, have a foundation and walls constructed with concrete blocks. A side-gable roof tops the building and is clad with standing-seam metal. Two vehicle doors mark the east elevation, and four-light fixed sash windows comprise the fenestration. After a site visit with full property access, GAI maintained their original recommendation that the site was not potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, B, and C. GAI indicated that this resource did not demonstrate a clear and definitive association with any significant themes or events. GAI could not locate any information connecting the current owner or previous owners as significant individuals in local or Virginia history. The main dwelling and its associated outbuildings stand as unexceptional examples of common architectural types in the region. Additionally, the secondary residence associated with the chimney stack is no longer standing. However, in 2009, VDHR believed that the resource appears potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmark Register under Criteria A and C. The VDHR V-CRIS form currently lists the site as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places Circa— identified the house, chimney stack, meat house, and machine shop. Today, the complex is used as a winery, with a small vineyard and outdoor seating areas located around the house. Plates 28 through 36 illustrate the current conditions of the structure. Plate 37 illustrates the viewshed from the project area looking towards the complex and Plates 38 and 39 illustrate the viewshed looking from the complex towards the project area. House The house is a circa 1815, two-story, five-bay, side-gable, Georgian style, common-bond brick house resting on a rusticated stone foundation with two interior-end common-bond brick chimneys with corbelled caps and metal vent caps. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. There is a one-story, one-bay, poured-concrete porch under a front-gable supported by painted-white wood columns with a painted-white wood balustrade. Four poured-concrete steps flanked by painted-white wood railings lead from the porch to the driveway. Sash, double-hung, 6/6, wood-frame windows flanked by painted-black wood shutters are typical on the facade and elevations. The entrance on the facade is a single- leaf, wood-panel door with a transom. There are multiple additions attached to the main house. 44 539 Chimney Stack The chimney stack is a circa 1815,rusticated stone tiered chimney. The building associated with the chimney has been demolished. Meat House The meat house is a circa 1815, one-story, one-bay, front-gable, common-bond brick building resting on a rusticated stone foundation. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. No windows are visible on the meat house. The entrance on the facade is a single- leaf, vertical wood plank door. Machine Shop The machine shop is a circa 1900, one-story, two-bay, side-gable, concrete-block building resting on a poured-concrete slab-on-grade foundation. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. No windows are visible on the shop. The entrance on the facade is a single- leaf, wood-panel door with lights. There is also a wooden sliding door on the facade. r � e ;f Plate 28. View of driveway at Site 034-0139, looking north. 45 540 . .$f�•e rNy�, Yid C I _ un '+ r pP J ����. e.r V r ' •. '� Cir . 1 r.- t 1 _ �� , ] a • - . ��- � » Plate 3£ View of rear o main house at Site 034-0139, looking northeast. \����\ ^ - . } � � ■° � . . . . . . � . § >�� ■■ � . - - � � � .: Plate 32. View of rear o the main house at Site 039-0139, looking north. 4 542 . 1.1 F � y 1 •yp. �i.+t. Is..r R ��aaX.:ru °5y i Hwy ;� � � �r•r+a �...++�y�q:�T �i, 1 aft: wl::. ..+."'� •. �` ,_�.: r' J Plate 33. View of the side of the main house at Site 034-0139, looking east. IL 1ti V Plate 34. View of the chimney stack at Site 034-0139, looking west. 48 543 fp f mak f � s- Ll a� Y� y iG _ r '.� —. I �a2_;'YkL'+.�&+•.sf^!�? .M^�. � 1� Y•,:�4'w+biehe�.'c �.Y ::-, Plate 37. View from the Project Area, looking east towards the adjacent house complex at Site 034-0139. !4 Plate 38. View from the edge of the yard at Site 034-0139 towards the Project Area, looking west. 50 545 :inn' .. .�'�. A�$.+��� � 'r - '�k_ '• 'L yc e4uu � r �`ay. �� dr sri�+.�.1 r�� �a�'r'�{.$, � >to k...,`'' •,�2�'��+5 ;�. �*c"� , r 1 �ra J Plate 39. View of from the yard at Site 034-0139 looking southwest towards the Project Area and Site 034-0077. Probability Model All open, exposed areas were inspected for the presence of artifacts and signs of cultural features. Circa— did note a cemetery and the remains of a brick structure at the site. In addition, 20 judgmental shovel tests were excavated to sample the stratigraphy of the landforms. Two soil layers were noted on several of the aprons and within the more defined floodplains along Buffalo Marsh Run. A discussion with the landowner indicated that except for the existing cemetery and house foundations, he was unaware of any cultural resources on his property. He indicated that he had not plowed the northern fields and used them for raising cattle and hay production. The southern fields he cultivated every year. The 263.1-acre Project Area consists of a series of upland ridges separated by drainages and swales (Plates 40 through). The slopes are moderate to steep with large swales noted between the level uplands. The northwestern section of the Project Area consists of an upland ridge with stone outcroppings. Shovel tests revealed one soil stratum under a thick root mat on the uplands. On some of the upland tops and side slopes where the rock outcrops were noted, Stratum A consisted of a dark reddish-brown loamy clay under a thin root mat, 0.22 to 0. 38 feet thick, overlying a reddish-brown clay subsoil. Numerous natural stones were noted within the Stratum A fill. Buffalo Marsh Run is situated just outside of the western edge of the Project Area at the base of the steep slope and then Buffalo Marsh Run runs east to west across the northern section of the Project Area, with the stream flowing to the west. The adjacent floodplains are low and wet, although there are elevated knolls noted at the margins of the upland and 51 546 lowlands. These profiles consisted of a dark reddish-brown loamy silt, 0.48 to 0.61-foot- thick Stratum A, overlying a brownish red silty clay, 0.34 to 0.41-foot-thick Stratum B. Subsoil consisted of a reddish-brown clay. The Phase I survey completed by Thunderbird recorded a Native American site on a similar landform j ust to the west of the Project Area. The slopes along the streams and the steep slopes were always forested according to the USGS maps. There is one pond and several fresh-water seeps on the property to provide water for the cattle. There are several dirt roads that provide access into the interior section of the project tract. Y r N _ { :z4W ^ M. Plate 40. View of the Project Area, looking south. 52 547 f a A10 r V a. P 4-' Plate 41. View of the rocky outcrops within the western portion of the Project Area, looking north. 011 Plate 42. View of rocky areas with the western Project Area, looking southwest. 53 548 ..s ti Plate 43. View of Buffalo Marsh Run within the Project Area, looking west. M. Plate 44. View of previously-surveyed area within the Project Area, looking southeast. 54 549 Plate 45. View of the Project Area, looking northwest. ro P ' a r y./ kk i• n Plate 46. View of the Project Area, looking south. 55 550 A Plate 47. Detail view of the Project Area soils on the uplands. Plate 48. View of cultivated fields within the southern portion of the Project Area, looking south. 56 551 Y �d ) r 1( :W. Plate 49. View of cultivated field and a fresh-water seep in the southeastern portion of the Project Area, looking south. The project tract contains areas of low, moderate, and high archaeological site probability. According to Circa—'s assessment, areas classified as low-potential are areas of moderate to steep slopes, wetlands, disturbed areas, and poor soil; moderate-potential areas are level landforms that contain somewhat well-drained soils; and high-potential areas are well-drained soils located proximal to water, a source of raw material for tool making, or a source of food, or close to a known historic site. Approximately 25.90 acres were previously surveyed by GAI. Areas of low archaeological potential within the Project Area generally include the stream corridors, steep slopes, wetlands, areas of rock outcrops, the ponded areas, and the lowlands that surround them, gravel roads, and the utility power lines. The 144.1 acres of low-potential areas are found in the settings where independent variables suggest that archaeological sites are unlikely. The low-probability areas will be walked at 50-foot intervals and shovel tested at 10% or greater. Approximately 15 acres are 10% of the low- probability areas and would require roughly 240 shovel tests to sample those areas according to the model. Moderate potential areas are defined as those which, based on landform and location, are moderately likely to contain at least some type of archaeological remains, either Native American, historic, or both. Similar landscapes within Frederick County as the Project Area have contained some landforms with level, moderately-drained, moderately- productive soils, and a moderate proximity to surface water sources that contained sites. The 68.3 acres of moderate potential are those that combine the following: relief is 57 552 less than a 15% slope, soils are well-drained or moderately-well-drained; and distance to water is greater than 400 feet and no further than 1,000 feet. Within the Proj ect Area, these potential areas consist of broad gentle slopes and uplands that are roughly 500 feet from a water source. In addition, in some areas, these are located on steeper slopes closer to a water source. These areas will be walked and judgmentally shovel tested up to 25% or greater of the area. The areas tested will be located throughout the acreage and will consist of the slightly-elevated landforms above the streams. Shovel test intervals will be at 50- and 25-foot intervals. Approximately 17.1 acres are 25%of the moderate-probability areas and would require roughly 277 shovel tests to sample those areas according to the model. High potential areas are defined as those which, based on landform and location, are very likely to contain at least some type of archaeological remains, either Native American, historic, or both. Similar settings within Frederick County as the Project Area contain some landforms with level, well-drained, productive soils, proximity to surface water sources, these are additionally viewed as having high potential for historic and Native American settlement. There were several fresh-water seeps within the project area, and although they are currently used to water the cattle, and are very muddy, these would have been excellent sources of fresh water during the Native American and historic periods. The areas around the seeps are considered high-potential areas. In addition, the landform just to the south and north of the historic Miller house could contain some sites associated with the historic complex as could the landform to the west of the historic structure and around the associated cemetery. The 24.8 acres of high potential are those that combine the following: relief is less than a 15% slope, soils are well-drained or moderately-well-drained, the nearest distance to water is 400 feet or less, and areas near known historic sites. Within the development area, the high-potential areas are noted on the center and edges of the uplands and near the drainages and the fresh-water seeps. Survey will cover 100%of these areas and will be at 50- or 25-foot intervals and would require approximately 397 shovel tests. Southern Tract Architectural Resources Three previously-identified architectural resources were located on the project tract and five previously-identified resources are located adjacent to the tract. Previously-Identified Architectural Resources Within the Project Area Site 034-0303 The Battle of Cedar Creek was fought on October 19, 1864 when the Union Army was engaged south of Middletown following their return from Harrisonburg and the burning of the Valley, when they were attacked before dawn by the Confederate Army of Tubal A. Early(Figure 18). Although outnumbered by more than two to one,the Confederates drove the Union Army to a point a mile north of Middletown. Here occurred a fateful pause. At 4 P.M. The Union Army counterattacked and with their vast superiority in numbers, completely routed the Southern Army driving them south beyond Strasburg. Early lost 58 553 some 2,900 men while Sheridan lost 5,665. This battle destroyed the Confederate presence in the Valley. To the end of the war, the Shenandoah Valley would be in Union hands. • t ["O°, SHERIDAN l3Al-'1`l.F:QF CUSTER , uwcclrr ARMY OFTFIE CEDAR CREEK, VA `'` ROVER SHENANDOAH O[-MIIEH 10, 18414 t ��WHEATON CRIXt" l'irilwur.arg KIIF4H t Ni GOR N i SECOND CORPS Of I r IJ X IdA /xx,.1 h�MkRKITT MERRITI XAA F Miff i � - XEE FR�[C�� ., RAMSEUR ralL.... WIIEATON. 4• f� i bhin RICKET-TS Alk 'I['U6I IrS EVANS�, xq¢'�4 ran 1'l l.li:\til rrr N'hsrr � �F6.ry.� Y �r 41'13:18 1'f lti VV71, iI•mbLn XER511AW / • ,+ 1f[b� Snrg94 n "� ` Imeninn F4 / �®$ MSES R 'i_. +glltivrvu Pm^+�+Iawl�la CROnh _. •r..., f41u Som WRIGHT "TT1 1 ARN1YOF"LHE �° 1 SHENANDOAH EMORY XWCORI r ' rS • rlr - f �� �; (;RQVER f•14nYSon .r '.rok +l+K I , f -• GC71if its e��"lu } •.y.'�rnmt SLCO�I! ..., `� �'�11� N'EIARTUI 5+jn ,0F H1f Fti ` A— Iz�M1n ft'o.. CROOK z VIII CORPS fflw..4 ., O PE.GRAM � • A• D r«r Hiles � w � ~� * i '........... EARLY ■ �. {/ ARMY OF THE VALLEY '� T�rywtl Ploo�rlln 5411 4 I .. Snx+nR Amrrrr.r i l;�P>,�rrd�pr7� IFrrT 1 ;erl ll.i•n,;;'•.;: Figure 18. Battle of Cedar Creek map from the Civil War Preservation Trust. Note that the project area is to the northwest and off this map. The Battlefield Today To help put the current project area into perspective, Circa— reviewed the current boundaries of the Cedar Creek Battlefield. This circa 1864 Civil War battlefield represents part of Sheridan's Shenandoah Valley campaign. The CWSAC conducted a Phase I survey of the battlefield in 1993 but did not make any recommendations regarding the National 59 554 Register of Historic Places eligibility. VDHR determined the site potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places in March 2009. In September 2009, the ABPP released their update to the CWSAC report on the nation's Civil War battlefields. The 2009 update included a study area encompassing approximately 13,995.28 acres (Figure 19). Of that acreage, approximately 12,091.95 acres were recommended as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (see yellow-outlined area on Figure 19). According to the 2009 update, approximately 1,455.12 acres within the battlefield are protected and approximately 410.38 acres are publicly accessible through the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation. The update also noted that Cedar Creek has a unique partnership arrangement. When Cedar Creek became a national park in 2002, its authorizing legislation specified key partners to the park including Belle Grove, Inc., the Cedar Creek Battlefield Foundation, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, and Shenandoah County Parks and Recreation. It went on to note that despite remarkable partnership efforts to protect this nationally-significant landscape, more than 10,000 acres remain at risk. Commercial, residential, and industrial development, including the expansion of a limestone quarry on the battlefield, the proposed widening of Interstate 81, and the proposed construction of a new 500kv transmission line, all illustrate the need for continued and strenuous protection of the Cedar Creek Battlefield. As noted on the map, the southern project area falls partially within the extreme northeastern portion of the study area partially within the area determined potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (see Figure 19). 60 555 H t: l • i rrlrw•.rwwwrinr• .... n,-_ � + 4v gar,,... -4 t i Approxmae ,. project location ' � n Figure 19. 2009 Cedar Creek Battlefield American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) map. Plates 50 and 51 show the portion of the battlefield located within the project area. 61 556 4 t {e'`.1�' �. f ,� � . .�w �zk! �°tura 1 1 1 - -h 4• <\':. �. :}lF i. a 'f,. 4' r �FyI A.r, � ., _ _l .,` , k: ' - 1 • - 1 � 1 1 •• • � �,. ,' �'�� { ' cs.- �` '�' - �i' y ,, 7' �. r... 3 -. -e�,. .' ..... ..,.. .- :� , 3 �. .: .. ,. - �/ � � 1° 5.. ' - • - 1 � 1 1 •• • Site 034-0419 In 1989, the house was surveyed by Leslie Giles. She identified a circa 1800, one-story, log house, a stable, a smoke/meat house converted to a poultry house, a large bank barn, and an apple storage shed. Ms. Giles described the bank barn clad with vertical siding, gable roof with standing seam metal covering, and three Victorian cupolas. Although she indicated that the structure was a typical evolution of a log building with frame and masonry additions over course of approximately 150 years and a beautiful barn exists in excellent condition, she made no recommendations as to the site's eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The log structure was later demolished. In 1994, VDHR indicated that the complex was not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The site form currently lists the site as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Circa— identified the barn, a pole barn, shed, and well. The main house has been demolished and a modern modular home has been erected in its place. Plates 52 through 61 shows the current conditions of the structures at the site. Barn The barn is a circa 1800, one-story, two-bay, side-gable, wood-frame bank barn clad in vertical wood siding and resting on a rusticated stone foundation. The roof is covered in standing seam metal with three cupolas. No windows are visible on the facade. The entrance on the facade is a double-leaf, sliding, vertical wood plan k door. Pole Barn The pole barn is now being used as an apple storage shed. This circa 1800 building is a one-story, seven-bay, side-gable, wood-frame pole barn resting on the ground. The roof is covered in standing seam metal supported by wood posts. The pole barn is open on all sides. There is a one-story, one-bay, shed roof, wood-frame lean-to attached to the side (west) elevation. The lean-to is open on three sides. Shed The shed is a circa 1800, one-story, one-bay, front-gable, wood-frame shed clad in vertical wood siding. Vines have started growing on the building and almost completely cover the facade making it difficult to discern any specific construction details. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. No windows are visible on the facade. The entrance on the facade is not visible. There is a one-story, one-bay, shed roof lean-to attached to the side (east) elevation. Well The well is a circa 1900, round, poured-concrete well resting slightly above grade and covered with overgrown vegetation. 63 558 k. 'A EY.•f d kf �i .. _ ! :. he �1.• �`. i'7�� .4� 1 Pte'' c A '�Ff'. ,r 3 Plate 54. View of barn with Site 034-0491, looking east. i p_ Plate 55. View of barn within Site 034-0491, looking east. 65 560 i4 ..... —per.... a _ Plate 56. View of barn within Site 034-0491, looking northwest. .4 Ire !ter 3 � m Plate 57. View of apple storage shed within Site 034-091, looking northwest. 66 561 �' s— to• ter. �yP rte£ t ` IMF, _ J { o •� i w ttf r� vim Plate 60. View of shed within Site 034-0491, looking south. jj } +a + k - p r rrsYr,° kv%ka 1 JT 11 Plate 61. View of wellwithinSite 034-0491, looking south. 68 563 Site 034-5075 In 2008, GAI surveyed the site during a Phase I survey for the Virginia State Line- Meadowbrook Substation-Appalachian Trail segments of the TrAIL Project in Frederick and Warren counties. At that time, they noted restricted access to the property and their survey was completed from the public-access road. This circa 1880, frame, vernacular dwelling with a two-story rear ell stands on a continuous-stone foundation and is covered with aluminum siding. The house is topped with a side gable roof that is clad in standing- seam metal. The fenestration consists of 2/2, double-hung, wood, sash windows, and the first-floor windows on the facade feature decorative shutters. A modern shed roof porch has been attached to the facade. The porch is built on a pier foundation and features turned- wood posts and a wood balustrade. A one-story, shed roof addition has been appended to the east elevation upon which another one-story, gable roofed addition was attached. Secondary resources included a barn, shed, and an equipment shed. The heavy-timber frame barn is clad in vertical-wood siding and has a gable roof covered with V-crimp metal and features a fore bay on the east elevation. GAI noted a wood framed shed adjacent to the main dwelling. This shed is clad in vertical-wood siding and topped with a standing- seam metal gable front roof. The window apertures remain open. GAI noted that the 1- story vehicle/equipment shed was clad with metal siding and a gable roof, with an attached open shed roof bay to the north elevation. GAI recommended that this resource was not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; however, VDHR asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey to fully access and survey the property. In 2009, after gaining property access, GAI noted that main house was the same. They further noted that the was constructed on a continuous-stone foundation. Board and batten siding had been applied to the exterior walls, and the side gable roof is clad in standing- seam metal. An earth bank leads to large sliding wood doors on the northwest elevation. Their site visit confirmed that the 1-story wood framed shed was clad in both vertical-wood and board-and-batten siding. The standing-seam metal clad gable front roof is trimmed with exposed rafter tails. The fenestration consisted of 1/1, double-hung, vinyl, sash windows. Their site visit confirmed that the one-story vehicle/equipment shed is clad with three V-crimp metal siding, and the side gable roof is covered with standing-seam metal. A total of eight open bays are located on the facade, including the shed roofed addition on the northeast elevation. After a site visit with full property access, GAI maintained their original recommendation that the site was not potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, B, and C. However, in 2009, VDHR believed that the resource appears potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmark Register under Criteria A and C,with the barn as the primary resource. The site form currently lists the site as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Circa— identified the house, barn, and shed. Plates 62 through 68 show the current condition of the structures. The house is almost completely covered in vegetation making it almost impossible to discern any specific construction details. 69 564 Barn The barn is a circa 1880, one-story, two-bay, side-gable, wood-frame barn clad in vertical wood siding. The foundation is not visible. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. No windows are visible on the facade. The entrance on the facade is a double-leaf, sliding, vertical wood plank door. Shed The shed is a circa 1880, one-story, five-bay, side-gable, wood-frame shed clad in vertical wood siding and resting on the ground. The roof is covered in standing seam metal. No windows are visible on the shed. The facade is open. E t � s�1 Plate 62. View of main house at Site 034-5075, looking southwest. 70 565 f {{ Plate 63. View of main house at Site 034-5075, looking Plate 64. View of barn and shed at Site 034-5075, looking west. 71 566 h ry IW E =t :�� .JY '�°' '� `.F r'°$'t� }tir�h ;^}�f a k!`�i ��Y w �,,yp'� �r,r•a y1s s'� Plate 65. View of bank barn at Site 034-5075, looking east. i Plate 66. View of bank barn at Site 034-5075, looking northeast. 72 567 r J Plate 67. View of shed at Site 034-5075, looking south. _ f ���, � n, ; ♦ �� -'1 21'' f��'. _ - �.�ti � sF� R..S x�, ori k Plate 68. View of shed at Site 034-5075, looking north. 73 568 Previously-Identified Architectural Resources Adjacent to the Project Area Site 034-0138 The site has a long history of survey by various architectural consultants. In 1966,the State Review Board, in 1973 Michael Quinn, in 1989 Maral Kalbian, in 1996 The Keeping Company, and in 2008 Louis Berger and Associates all reviewed the structure. Vaucluse is a 2-story, three-bay building on a raised-stone basement. It is constructed with Flemish- bond bring on the front and a five-course American-bond brick on the sides and back. It has two large interior brick chimneys. There are flat arches over all the openings. The building has louvered shutters, most of which have been used to board it up. The first-floor windows are full length and have jib doors which are paneled. The roof is hipped with a strong overhang. The eaves now have exposed rafters but appear to have originally been concealed. There are vent windows with original wooden bars in the raised basement. To the rear of the house there is a 1-and-a-1/2-story brick wing. This appears to have originally been the summer kitchen. It also appears that there was originally an open breezeway between the main house and the kitchen which has been enclosed with brick. The 1996 Preliminary Information Form (PIF) contained the following history of the site: The original owners of the property were Lord Fairfax and Yost Hite. Between 1765 and 1778, it was part of a 775-acre tract owned by Lewis Stephens,founder of the present-day Stephens City. Between 1778 and 1782, it was owned by Isaac Zane, revolutionary was patriot and owner of the Marlboro Iron Works. Between 1782 and 1785, the property was owned by Gabriel Jones, the "Vatley Lawyer," one of the first "King's Attorneys" for Frederick County. According to Garland Quarles in his book "Some Old Homes in Frederick County, Virginia", Jones was "one of the best-known and most influential citizens of the Valley of Virginia during the Colonial period of its history."Jones served in the House of Burgesses for several years and was a friend and political campaigner for George Washington. He served in the Virginia General Assembly, the Continental Congress and the Virginia Constitutional Convention. Jones apparently never had a home at Vauscluse but is thought to have had a law office there, possibly in the building of which nothing remains today but a stone fireplace chimney. Jones sold the 775 acres to his son Strother in 1785. Strother had been a captain in the revolutionary army. He built his home and named it after a spring in Vaucluse France which was the country retreat of Petrarch, a 14th Century poet of courtly love. Strother lived at Vaucluse until his death. In 74 569 1790 and was the firstperson to be buried in the.Tones family cemetery at Vaucluse. The earliest description of Vaucluse that we have is the diary of Rev. Frederick Goodwin, who came to Vaucluse in 1827 as a tutor to the Jones children (the grandchildren of Strother Jones). At that time there was no door on the south side of the house. The entrance was on the north side where a portico was "supported by large round pillars, made rough and white thus presenting the appearance like coarse sand stone."Rev. Goodwin's description of the house, other than the main entrance being on the north rather than the south, seems clearly to fit Vaucluse as it stands today. Descendants of Gabriel and Strother lived at Vaucluse until shortly after the Civil War. The story of the Civil War in the Northern Shenandoah Valley is recounted in the words of the Jones family and their relatives, the Barton, in "Defend the Valley" by Margaretta Barton Colt. Vaucluse was occupied from time to time during the war by Union troops and ultimately all of the livelitock and crops were destroyed. "Gabriel Jones (1724-1806) and Some of His Descendants", by Brown, Chappel and Myers contains a facsimile of a sales brochure for Vaucluse thought to date to the 1870's. At that time the "outbuildings for servants, &c., are also built or brick, and are ample in character." These included two tenant houses equal to ordinary farmhouses, stables, blacksmith's and carpenter's shops, a very large and comparatively new barn, and a grist mill "of capacity sufficient for the farm and neighborhood." From 1898 until 1963, the property was owned by the Rice Family of Winchester,first by John Rice and later by his son Warren. In 1963, the survivors of Warren Rice sold the property to John and Betty Chumley. The Chumleys added the building on the site of the former mill as well as all of the buildings listed above that are not associated with the Vaucluse manor house. Mr. Chumley passed away in 1984 and his widow sold 128 acres of the 234-acre parcel to the current owners in 1995. Since October 1995, the Chumley- era buildings have been used as a country inn/bed & breakfast." In 2008, GAI resurveyed the site during a Phase I survey for the Virginia State Line- Meadowbrook Substation-Appalachian Trail segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Project in Frederick and Warren counties. At that time, they noted that the house underwent a major rehabilitation in circa 1995. The house rises two stories above a 75 570 uncoursed fieldstone foundation. It is constructed of Flemish-bond brick on the south facade and five-course America-bond brick on the remaining elevations. The house is capped with a hipped roof of standing-seam metal with overhanging eaves. It has two interior brick chimneys with corbelled caps. Windows are 12/12 double-hung wood-sash with wood-paneled spandrels on first story of the side elevations (replacing what was jib doors) and 12/12 triple-hung wood-sash windows on the first story of the symmetrically- fenestrated three-bay facade. The second story has 12/8 double-hung wood-sash windows. The centered single-leaf door on the facade features an eight-light transom. All window and door openings have jack-arched brick lintels. A five-bay, 1-story porch has been added to the house since the last survey and has an uncoursed-fieldstone foundation and wood posts and a simple wood balustrade. A 1 1/2-story brick wing is located west of the house and is attached to the main block along its northeast corner. A 1-story wood-frame entrance vestibule and porch are attached to the south elevation of the addition and the east elevation of the main block. The previous surveys and GAI noted several outbuildings on the property, a Gallery, a stone chimney stack, the mill house, the Chumley Homeplace, the Cottage on the Hill, the Cabin by the Pond, a swimming pool, and two sheds. The Gallery building was most likely moved or built on the site circa 1963 by Chumley, who used the building as his first studio. The building appears to incorporate a 1 1/2-story house and a 1-story barn. The barn is connected to the west elevation of the house. Both buildings are clad in weatherboard and have side gable, wood-shingle roofs. The house has a steeply-pitched roof with overhanging, spayed eaves that incorporated a full-width front porch. An exterior-end brick chimney is located on the east elevation. The house has 6/6 wood-sash windows and gabled dormers that hold 4/4 wood-sash windows. The south elevation of the house has an off-set single-leaf door. The barn has a triangular hay hood on its west elevation. The south elevation features a multi-light bay window. To the west of the house are the ruins of an outbuilding. All that remains is a large stone chimney with an interior fireplace. This appears to date earlier than the main house. The "Mill House Studio" is sited on Vaucluse Spring. According to current owners, the building was rebuilt on the foundation of the historic Vaucluse Mill house and used as Chumley's second art studio. The building has a raised,uncoursed stone foundation. The two-story building is clad in weatherboard and has a gable roof of standing-seam metal with and ogee cornice and cornice returns. An interior brick chimney with a corbelled cap rises above the roof. Windows are 6/6 double-hung wood-sash. The Chumley Homeplace was built circa 1820 and was also moved to its current site in 1963 by John Chumley. It is a two-story building that has been clad in weatherboard siding and topped with a side gable roof.Wood shingles comprise the roofing material, and a stone chimney marks the gable end. The fenestration consists of 6/6 double- hung wood sash windows. A 1-story screened-in porch with a shed roof has been attached to the east elevation. Multiple 1-story additions have been appended to the house on the north, south, and east elevations. Built circa 2007, the "Cottage on the Hill" is a one-story wood-frame building set on a solid foundation clad in an uncoursed, rubble-stone veneer. The building is clad in weatherboard and is capped with a side gable standing-seam metal roof with a louvered ridge ventilator. A 1-story bay projects from the south elevation. Windows are 6/6 wood-sash. The facade has two single-leaf doors. Constructed circa 1850, the one story "Cabin by the Pond" was a former tobacco barn, according to the current 76 571 owners and was moved to the site. It sits on an uncoursed-stone foundation and is constructed of hewn logs. It has a side gable, standing-seam metal roof. A 1-story, wood- frame bay projects from the west elevation and is clad in weatherboard. Windows are 6/6 wood-sash. A 1-story shed porch fronts the building and shelters a single leaf door. The porch has wood posts. A circa 1990 swimming pool. The circa 1990 shed is located north of the mill. It is a one-story, wood-frame building with a concrete-block foundation. The walls are covered in what appears to be composition siding. It has a gambrel, asphalt shingle roof. A shed overhang is located on its east elevation. A circa 1990 1-story wood- frame shed is located adjacent to the pool, along its west side. It sits on a rubble-stone foundation and its exterior walls are clad in what appears to be composition siding. It has a pyramidal roof of wood shingles. GAI indicated that this property historically served as the site of a mill. However, it currently functions as a bed and breakfast. Since the property has lost the integrity of its original function, and since no evidence could be located that supports historic significance, they recommended this resource ineligible for listing under Criterion A. Although the artist John Chumley resided on this property and used it as his studio, it is not the most significant resource associated with his life. As such, the Inn at Vaucluse Spring is not recommended eligible for National Register Historic Places listing under Criterion B. The VDHR concluded that this resource is eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C in 1996. The buildings associated with this property have not lost integrity and continue to convey their architectural significance. In addition, although some of the buildings on the property have been moved from their original locations, under Criteria Consideration B, as long as these buildings are significant solely for their architectural value, they can still be considered eligible for listing on the NRNP. As such, The Inn at Vaucluse Spring is still recommended eligible for listing under Criterion C. VDHR concurred that the recommendations for listing appears to be still valid in 2009 based on data provided for this project. VDHR suggested that current Phase II data would be needed to confirm and determine whether other National Register of Historic Places criteria apply, due to the passage of time. No additional determination of eligibility made by VDHR staff in 2009. The site form currently lists the site as eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Plates 69 through 81 show the current conditions of the structures at the site. 77 572 T 0I Plate 69. View of house at Site 034-0138, looking southwest. Plate 70. View of house at Site 034-0138, looking west. 78 573 Ft ° - ,�. 2/ .... . w - y}�� \ \ - . ��\z/d�«�\ \ � &■ g� � © � Plate 7£ View of house at Site 034-0138, looking west. - � �/ �<» w �d � - < � , : ® ®7 ' � � ^ \ 7 « ■■ v\\z/ /�� � � �: Plate 7. View of house at Site 034-0138, looking west. 79 574 5 K . •#. Plate 73. View of chimney at Site 034-0138, looking west. t 4 I�- .., ._.. Plate 74. View of secondary house at Site 034-0138, looking north. 80 575 �i •� Ub t e (+vim- ♦ 2a} !Sh - 'fit .u � � 9�` ' 1n a F ; .'�� .w Ami p _M1�rt �•�`� q w5 s.. ick. a S v a � i Plate 77. View of shed by mill at Site 034-0138, looking east. --� nnri m ur riu Plate 78. View of house and swimming pool at Site 034-0138, looking north. 82 577 � �,*-• fit; �w ye K 4 Y' gg � > �•x � rip' -'�i�'� r 3 SKr � b„ ii *R - r . .,■� - may- '�'�'t .. _ AN + 1 �• c Plate 81. View of outbuilding at gallery at Site 034-0138, looking north. Site 034-0238 In 1989, the house was surveyed by Maral Kalbian. She identified a circa 1875 1-story, wood-frame church and a concrete-block shed. She made no recommendations as to the site's eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The site form currently lists the site as not evaluated for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Plates 82 through 87 show the current conditions of the structure. 84 579 r. i, es >y � e 1 � a. �e v i� - - 1 A i r R _yr Io A .f 4r AN r Plate 84. View of Site 034-0238, looking north. 86 581 r ''� :►. bra"' �`! n s �'� t ,p I•R.,� l -r. , I vl r 1 �.,..- tis --k' "r'=P ,tv., 1 ,"� •� < I e* _ Ila 10 LA- VIP- 'L r �. 4 e jai r 1� Val ii f' Lti k M h _py n d �:: Arrsli�l_' itl Plate 87. View of shed Site 034-0238, looking northeast. Site 034-0239 In 1989, the house was surveyed by Maral Kalbian. She identified a circa 1870 2-story main house, a remolded smokehouse, a frame barn, and a two-bay, concrete-block garage. She made no recommendations as to the site's eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The site form currently lists the site as not evaluated for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Plates 88 through 94 show the current conditions of the project area. 88 583 .f.+ n � t K j s Al i� r �w - ,...:.a,� trx. ' ,�i I yj�•i,y�yii��t ; .. � -"'6.:.-4 Sr�yA- t1� � r ': j� SRi1 � I � b,�` i• F' Ilk y, jt�Vu i4=p.rw JW , ;r r- xT qr— .� � v ;�� Via:` t�r•*{• a F �;lr�. 1 '•'� yl� iI � �I 1 p d } p 1 tiA,i { ,aery A E d x. r Plate 94. View of from the edge of Site 034-0239 looking east towards the Site 034-0138. Site 034-0263 In 1989,the house was surveyed by Maral Kalbian. She identified a circa 1880 3-bay main house, a circa 1940 timber-frame board-and-batten shed with a gable roof, a 1930 two-bay timber-frame garage with a gable roof, and a modern garage. She made no recommendations as to the site's eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. In 2008, GAI surveyed the site during a Phase I survey for the Virginia State Line- Meadowbrook Substation-Appalachian Trail segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Project in Frederick and Warren counties. At that time, they noted restricted access to the property and their survey was completed from the public-access road. GAI noted that the 2-story house has a side gable roof, is situated on a continuous-stone foundation with vinyl siding. The roofing material consists of standing-seam metal, and a central chimney pierces the roof at the ridgeline. The fenestration consists of 6/6 double-hung vinyl sash windows with fixed shutters. The 1-story,three-bay open porch stands on a pier foundation with lattice skirting with turned wood posts and a wood balustrade. A 2-story ell projects from the rear of the building. GAI noted a 1-story, wood framed shed stands just north of the house. It stands on a concrete block pier foundation, is clad in vertical-wood siding, and is topped with a shed roof. The roof is covered with standing-seam metal and trimmed with exposed rafter tails. Two garages stand slightly southwest of the main dwelling. A two-bay modern garage is clad in vertical-wood siding and features two rolling vehicle doors. It is topped with a gable front roof covered with standing-seam metal. Adjacent to this garage is a one-bay wood framed garage. This garage has vertical-wood siding, a gable roof, and a set of large hinged double doors. 92 587 GAI recommended that the house lacks historical significance and they could not locate any information to associate the dwelling with significant historic events at the local, state, or national levels. Therefore, they recommended the dwelling is not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A. To date, no connection between the house and the life or activities of a person important in local, national, or regional history could be identified. As such, it is recommended not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion B. The dwelling does not possess significant architectural features and does not represent the work of a master. Therefore, this resource is recommended ineligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C. In 2009, VDHR concurred with their recommendation. The site form currently lists the site as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Plates 95 through 99 show the current condition of the structures. a Ov5 •W _, , yt Plate 95. View of Site 034-0263, looking southwest. 93 588 i k L� f d J ► v t* g 3 Air i 1 �JI 'iMq P f !� f } _ ,�. 'r:.� .x., �;:• a ;.n. ,. ���• i 4 (� l✓� V � � Y p' 1/ J� low 4 r e/ A so '4� Site 034-0264 In 1991,the house was surveyed by Maral Kalbian. She identified a circa 1870 3-bay main house, a circa 1940 timber-frame, vertical-board siding, gable roof garage, a circa 1900 timber-frame, shed roof, vertical-board siding privy, a 1930 shed, a 1920 small, timber frame, vertical matchboard siding, gable roof shed, a 1910 timber-frame, vertical-board siding, gable standing-seam metal roof, square cupola with pyramidal roof cape barn, and a circa 1940 timber-frame, long and low, shed roof chicken house. She made no recommendations as to the site's eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. In 2008, GAI surveyed the site during a Phase I survey for the Virginia State Line- Meadowbrook Substation-Appalachian Trail segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Project in Frederick and Warren counties. At that time, they noted restricted access to the property and their survey was completed from the public-access road. GAI noted that the circa 1870 2-story frame vernacular dwelling was built on a continuous-stone foundation. The exterior walls are weatherboard and trimmed with corner boards and a standing-seam metal covers the side gable roof. The fenestration throughout consists of 2/2 double-hung, wood sash windows with wood window surrounds. A one-story, three-bay open porch s located on the facade. The porch is constructed on a brick-pier foundation and features Tuscan columns with a wood balustrade. The one-story, gable roofed garage is clad in vertical-wood siding and is covered with a standing-seam metal roof trimmed with exposed rafter tails. A large vehicle entrance marks the southeast elevation, but the door had been removed. GAI noted that the garage was used for storage and had begun to deteriorate. GAI noted that the privy was not observed from the public right-of-way. GAI noted that adjacent to the barn is the one-story wood framed shed that is clad in weatherboard siding. It has a gable roof with standing-seam metal and a shed roof addition on the west elevation. GAI noted that the shed was in poor condition. The tool shed is a wood-framed building that has vertical-wood siding and a gable front roof covered with rolled asphalt. A hinged wooden door provides access on the facade, and the fenestration consists of six-light fixed sash windows. GAI noted no changes appeared to have occurred since the previous survey was conducted on the barn. GAI noted that the chicken coop is set back on the property and is difficult to view from the public right-of-way. It appeared to be clad in vertical-board siding with 6/6 double-hung wood sash windows. GAI recommended that this resource did not clearly reflect the nature and extent of agricultural practices of Frederick County in the late 19th or early 20th centuries. They suggested that numerous other area farms retain more and better representative examples of agricultural outbuildings from the time period. Therefore, the Shiley Farm is recommended not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A. GAI could not connect this property to any significant individuals in local or state history. As such,this resource was recommended ineligible for listing for the National Register of Historic Places listing under Criterion B. The main house stands as a typical example of a commonly-found architectural form in the region. The domestic and agricultural outbuildings do not possess the requisite architectural significance for listing and were not constructed using any specialized techniques. Therefore, GAI recommended the Shiley Farm not eligible for listing for the National Register of Historic Places listing 96 591 under Criterion C. VDHR asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey to fully access and survey the property. In 2009, after gaining property access, GAI noted that the weatherboard siding was removed but had not yet been replaced on the main house. In addition, many of the 2/2 double-hung wood sash windows have been replaced with 1/1 double-hung vinyl sash windows. GAI also noted that there are two interior brick chimneys with corbelled caps, as well as cornice returns on the eaves. GAI confirmed that the privy is no longer extant. GAI indicated that although no changes have occurred to this shed since the previous survey. However, it should be noted that the windows have all been boarded over except for the fixed sash window in the gable end. Also, the shed roof addition is clad in vertical wood siding and features a sliding wood vehicle door. GAI noted no changes to the tool shed have occurred since the previous survey. GAI noted that the 2-story barn is constructed on a parged foundation. The exterior walls are clad with vertical-wood siding and standing- seam metal covers the side gable roof. A cupola with louvered vents and a pyramidal roof is centrally located at the roof ridgeline. An overhanging forebay marks the facade and shelters four open bays. GAI noted that the poultry house is situated west of the main dwelling. It is a 1-story, wood-framed building constructed on a poured-concrete foundation. Vertical-wood siding covers the exterior walls. A shed roof tops the poultry house and is clad in standing- seam metal. The fenestration consists of 6/6 double-hung wood sash windows. However, many of the windows no longer have glass panes, but are instead covered with chicken wire. A shed roof addition on the southwest elevation has collapsed. After a site visit with full property access, GAI maintained their original recommendation that the site was not potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A,B, and C. However,in 2009, VDHR believed that the resource appeared potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and the Virginia Landmark Register under Criteria A and C. The site form currently lists the site as potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Plates 100 through 103 show the current condition of the structures. 97 592 ?� vY .� r � w '� � 1k1I+ f R ♦f a1 ik;'�' �� o� rs A g. ar �.. .'�r� 1[c'� � .i�'� � _ �'uw'�►a ,P�i,�,': ..1. -01 M." -Olp -14 00 t r. 1A � M CEJ ff j n' uudlk �"r�l� {' .yrr• "Alf, h r• `� -wilt!-_ "91�i��w rii1 � ' ��Srs•��w 1 / IT, * 4 WRIN4 n. i Probability Model All open, exposed areas were inspected for the presence of artifacts and signs of cultural features. In addition, 22 judgmental shovel tests were excavated to sample the stratigraphy of the landforms. Two soil layers were noted on several of the aprons and within the more defined floodplains along Buffalo Marsh Run. A discussion with the landowner indicated that he was unaware of any cultural resources on his property. The Project Area consists of a series of upland ridges separated by drainages and swales (Plates 104 through). The slopes are moderate to steep with large swales noted between the level uplands. The project area was historically used as an apple orchard that has now been converted to cropland or, where rock outcroppings are present, pasture or forested lands on the steep slopes. The trees were planted roughly eight feet apart in rows roughly eight feet apart. The trees were eventually cut, and the stumps were removed via a backhoe sometime afterl997. This clearing activity created disturbance to the soil in the fields in this area. Crops are now planted in the converted apple orchards in the southern, western, and eastern sections of the project area. Mature apple orchards are planted along the western boundary and the north western boundaries of the project area. The remaining acreage is used as pasture for livestock. The northern section of the Project Area consists of an upland ridge with stone outcroppings. Shovel tests revealed one soil stratum under a thin root mat on the uplands. On some of the upland tops and side slopes where the rock outcrops were noted, Stratum A consisted of a dark reddish-brown loamy clay under a thin root mat, 0.20 to 0. 34 feet thick, overlying a reddish-brown clay subsoil. Numerous natural stones were noted within the Stratum A fill. Meadow Brooks is situated to the east of the Project Area with a tributary draining the upper northern area and a tributary draining the southern project area. The northern tributary has been dammed for a pond. The adjacent floodplains are low and wet, although there are elevated knolls noted at the margins of the upland and lowlands. These profiles consisted of a dark reddish-brown loamy silt, 0.48 to 0.61-foot-thick Stratum A, overlying a brownish red silty clay, 0.34 to 0.41-foot-thick Stratum B. Subsoil consisted of a reddish- brown clay. The Phase I survey completed by GAI did not record any archaeological resources within the project tract. The slopes along steep slopes in the northwestern section of the project area were always forested according to the USGS maps. This area had been recently clear cut of the timber. There is one pond and several fresh-water seeps on the property to provide water for the cattle. There are several dirt roads that provide access into the interior section of the project tract. The 294.3-acre project tract contains areas of low, moderate, and high archaeological site probability. According to Circa—'s assessment, areas classified as low-potential are areas of moderate to steep slopes, wetlands, disturbed areas, and poor soil; moderate-potential areas are level landforms that contain somewhat well-drained soils; and high-potential areas are well-drained soils located proximal to water, a source of raw material for tool making, or a source of food, or close to a known historic site. Approximately 20.90 acres are located within the previous surveyed areas and will not be re-surveyed. Approximately 100 595 129.8 acres were originally part of an apple orchard. The trees were cut down and the stumps removed by heavy equipment, then the area smoothed and cultivated in crops. The previous development at the site would preclude any intact archaeological resources in these areas. Areas of low archaeological potential within the Project Area generally include the stream corridors, steep slopes, wetlands, areas of rock outcrops, the ponded areas, and the lowlands that surround them, gravel roads, and the utility power lines. The 57.2 acres of low-potential areas are found in the settings where independent variables suggest that archaeological sites are unlikely. The low-probability areas will be walked at 50-foot intervals and shovel tested at 10% or greater. Approximately 5.7 acres are 10% of the low- probability areas and would require roughly 91.2 shovel tests to sample those areas according to the model. Moderate potential areas are defined as those which, based on landform and location, are moderately likely to contain at least some type of archaeological remains, either Native American, historic, or both. Similar landscapes within Frederick County as the Project Area have contained some landforms with level, moderately-drained, moderately- productive soils, and a moderate proximity to surface water sources that contained sites. The 75.5 acres of moderate potential are those that combine the following: relief is less than a 15% slope, soils are well-drained or moderately-well-drained; and distance to water is greater than 400 feet and no further than 1,000 feet. Within the Proj ect Area, these potential areas consist of broad gentle slopes and uplands that are roughly 500 feet from a water source. In addition, in some areas, these are located on steeper slopes closer to a water source. These areas will be walked and judgmentally shovel tested up to 25% or greater of the area. The areas tested will be located throughout the acreage and will consist of the slightly-elevated landforms above the streams and on the uplands. Shovel test intervals will be at 50- and 25-foot intervals. Approximately 18.8 acres are 25% of the moderate-probability areas and would require roughly 300 shovel tests to sample those areas according to the model. High potential areas are defined as those which, based on landform and location, are very likely to contain at least some type of archaeological remains, either Native American, historic, or both. Similar settings within Frederick County as the Project Area contain some landforms with level, well-drained, productive soils, proximity to surface water sources, these are additionally viewed as having high potential for historic and Native American settlement. There were several fresh-water seeps within the project area, and although they are currently used to water the cattle, and are very muddy, these would have been excellent sources of fresh water during the Native American and historic periods. The areas around the seeps are considered high-potential areas. The 10.9 acres of high potential are those that combine the following: relief is less than a 15% slope, soils are well-drained or moderately-well-drained, the nearest distance to water is 400 feet or less, and areas near known historic sites. Within the development area, the high-potential areas are noted on the center and edges of the uplands and near the drainages and the fresh-water seeps. Survey will cover 100% of these areas and will be at 50- or 25-foot intervals and would 101 596 require approximately 162 shovel tests. In addition, metal detecting will be completed on the portion of the project area within the battlefield boundaries. An architectural survey is recommended on all structures 45-years old or older within a half-mile buffer of the Project Areas. A drive through of this area indicates several 18th and 19th century structures and early-to mid-20th century structures within the half-mile buffer. 't^'SP a 77,67, .'. Plate 104. View of converted agricultural fields within the southern portion of the Project Area, looking north. 102 597 �t Plate 105. View of converted fields within the southern portion of the Project Area, looking northwest. t Plate 106. View of converted fields within the central section of the Project Area, looking northwest. 103 598 Plate 107. View of converted fields in the central section of the Project Area, looking west. Plate 108. View of the converted fields and the exisiting apple orchard in the western section of the Project Area, looking west. 104 599 i b y Y 1 •a k f'. r r .. J �/1 ,. } J A� y}"•ywC� etf�a�,''`vaP,`vria`t.; ;ie i'7 T ,U � � � 's�'•: � �P mai d- Plate 111. View of a pond within the Project Area, looking north. Plate 112. View of the fields within the Project Area, looking west. 106 601 4. a. t a Plate 113. View of rock outcrops within the field of the Project Area, looking northeast. r . r yea ,i Plate 114. View of the Project Area, looking north. 107 602 . - _ Plate 115. View of rock outcrops within the Project Area, looking north. +kx I .0 Plate 116. View of the fields within the Project Area, looking northeast. 108 603 s x ..... ..... Plate 117. View of the northwestern apple orchard with the Project Area, looking north. Plate 118. View of the fields and ponds within the Project Area, looking southwest. 109 604 Plate 119. View of floodplain along the northern tributary to Meadow Brook within the Proj ect Area, looking east. Y 3'. Plate 120. View of the flood plain at the northern tributary to Meadow Brook within the Project Area, looking south. 110 605 7' 4 Plate 121. View of the Project Area, looking east. i' Plate 122. View of recently timbered area near the northwestern corner of the Project Area, looking south. 111 606 consisted of a dark reddish-brown loamy silt, 0.48 to 0.61-foot-thick Stratum A, overlying a brownish red silty clay, 0.34 to 0.41-foot-thick Stratum B. Subsoil consisted of a reddish- brown clay. The Phase I survey completed by GAI did not record any archaeological resources within the project tract. The slopes along steep slopes in the northwestern section of the project area were always forested according to the USGS maps. This area had been recently clear cut of the timber. There is one pond and several fresh-water seeps on the property to provide water for the cattle. There are several dirt roads that provide access into the interior section of the project tract. The 294.3-acre project tract contains areas of low, moderate, and high archaeological site probability. According to Circa—'s assessment, areas classified as low-potential are areas of moderate to steep slopes, wetlands, disturbed areas, and poor soil; moderate-potential areas are level landforms that contain somewhat well-drained soils; and high-potential areas are well-drained soils located proximal to water, a source of raw material for tool making, or a source of food, or close to a known historic site. Approximately 20.90 acres are located within the previous surveyed areas and will not be re-surveyed. Approximately 129.8 acres were originally part of an apple orchard. The trees were cut down and the stumps removed by heavy equipment, then the area smoothed and cultivated in crops. The previous development at the site would preclude any intact archaeological resources in these areas. Areas of low archaeological potential within the Project Area generally include the stream corridors, steep slopes, wetlands, areas of rock outcrops, the ponded areas, and the lowlands that surround them, gravel roads, and the utility power lines. The 57.2 acres of low-potential areas are found in the settings where independent variables suggest that archaeological sites are unlikely. The low-probability areas will be walked at 50-foot intervals and shovel tested at 10% or greater. Approximately 5.7 acres are 10% of the low- probability areas and would require roughly 91.2 shovel tests to sample those areas according to the model. Moderate potential areas are defined as those which, based on landform and location, are moderately likely to contain at least some type of archaeological remains, either Native American, historic, or both. Similar landscapes within Frederick County as the Project Area have contained some landforms with level, moderately-drained, moderately- productive soils, and a moderate proximity to surface water sources that contained sites. The 75.5 acres of moderate potential are those that combine the following: relief is less than a 15% slope, soils are well-drained or moderately-well-drained; and distance to water is greater than 400 feet and no further than 1,000 feet. Within the Proj ect Area, these potential areas consist of broad gentle slopes and uplands that are roughly 500 feet from a water source. In addition, in some areas, these are located on steeper slopes closer to a water source. These areas will be walked and judgmentally shovel tested up to 25% or greater of the area. The areas tested will be located throughout the acreage and will consist of the slightly-elevated landforms above the streams and on the uplands. Shovel test intervals will be at 50- and 25-foot intervals. Approximately 18.8 acres are 25% of the moderate-probability areas and would require roughly 300 shovel tests to sample those areas according to the model. 112 607 High potential areas are defined as those which, based on landform and location, are very likely to contain at least some type of archaeological remains, either Native American, historic, or both. Similar settings within Frederick County as the Project Area contain some landforms with level, well-drained, productive soils, proximity to surface water sources, these are additionally viewed as having high potential for historic and Native American settlement. There were several fresh-water seeps within the project area, and although they are currently used to water the cattle, and are very muddy, these would have been excellent sources of fresh water during the Native American and historic periods. The areas around the seeps are considered high-potential areas. The 10.9 acres of high potential are those that combine the following: relief is less than a 15% slope, soils are well-drained or moderately-well-drained, the nearest distance to water is 400 feet or less, and areas near known historic sites. Within the development area, the high-potential areas are noted on the center and edges of the uplands and near the drainages and the fresh-water seeps. Survey will cover 100% of these areas and will be at 50- or 25-foot intervals and would require approximately 162 shovel tests. In addition, metal detecting will be completed on the portion of the project area within the battlefield boundaries. An architectural survey is recommended on all structures 45-years old or older within a half-mile buffer of the Project Areas. A drive through of this area indicates several 18th and 19th century structures and early-to mid-20th century structures within the half-mile buffer. 113 608 Attachments: Photo, Shovel Test, and Probability Maps 114 609 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT FOXGLOVE SOLAR, LLC March 4, 2020 A. Suitability of the Site. 1. Foxglove Solar, LLC, has examined numerous properties in Frederick County as potential sites for a utility scale solar facility. As can be imagined it is difficult to find sites that possess the essential characteristics required for such a facility, including proximity to transmission lines, suitable topography, access, and, perhaps above all, the ability to aggregate sufficient land to make the development of such a project financially feasible. The parcels that have been selected as a site for this project meet the requirements imposed by nature and by practical necessity. The land proposed for this development is comprised of six parcels bearing PIN #s: a portion of 73 A 21, 84 A 40, 84-A-40A, 84 A 50, 84 A 29, and 84 A 391. These are properties owned by Woodbine Farms, Inc., Alfred L. and Betty Snapp, Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. and Levi J. and Keighley C. Gore. The total area of these properties is 668.5 acres, and the total proposed land area to be developed as a utility scale solar facility is approximately 370.1 acres, (the "Project"). The Project is graphically depicted on the Preliminary Site Plan prepared by The Timmons Group and dated January 2, 2020. The Project will consist of rows of ground-mounted photovoltaic modules, commonly known as solar panels, to generate 75 MW of clean, quiet, affordable electricity for consumers in the County and elsewhere in Virginia. It will provide power when consumers need it the most, and without using any pipelines, fuel, or water, and without any air pollution, water pollution, or waste. A majority of the ground within the fence lines of the Project will contain no equipment at all, and virtually all of the ground will be planted with native turf grass that will preserve the soil, prevent erosion, and improve water quality. The solar panels will be connected by cables, and the power generated by each solar panel will be combined, converted from direct current ("DC") to alternating current("AC"), and its voltage increased to equal that of the First Energy 138 kilovolt Transmission Line to which it will be delivered to the grid by means of a project substation and new utility switch yard situated immediately adjacent to the existing Transmission Line on site. The Project will include solar panels, racking for the panels, inverters that convert DC to AC, collection lines, a project substation that gathers electricity from the inverters and increases its voltage to transmission line intensity. There are also the necessary access paths,pyranometers for measuring solar energy and other meteorological conditions, fencing, and landscaping. 1 This parcel is included in the Project solely because a connecting line from the northern fields must be run to those on the south side of Hites Road. No other facilities, panels, or component of the Project will be placed on that parcel. 1 610 The Project does not use any batteries for the mass storage of electricity that will eventually be transferred into the grid. The panel tracker systems have small batteries that allow them to turn back to the East after the sun has gone down or to turn to horizontal when there are high-wind conditions. The Project fits with the rural character of the area. It is a highly passive use, with no odor/emissions,very limited noise,lighting,2 and traffic. The solar panels will rotate with the sun, have a low visual profile (approximately 12 feet high for a brief period as they track), and will repeat this tracking in operation daily. They will be monitored remotely at an off-site facility, permitting them to be adjusted safely,for example,in high wind or hail conditions to a horizontal stow position, and workers will visit different areas of the Project only on an as-needed basis to perform maintenance and repairs and maintain vegetation. The perimeter of the Project will include setbacks from other uses. Existing vegetation will be retained within such setbacks and if additional screening is necessary landscaping will be added along public roads and where there are adjacent residences within close proximity to the Project. 2. The properties are comprised of extensive areas of mollisols in the northern portions of the Project area, with some areas of alfisols, changing principally to alfisols on the southern portions. Additional detailed soils information can be found in the Circa—report identified below with respect to cultural and historical resources, at pages 2-10. Approximately the one-half of the northern Woodbine Farms parcel (98.5 acres) that is within the Project area is wooded. The Snapp Inc. property is cleared, as is the majority of the Woodbine Farms land across Hites Road,which is primarily in active cultivation south of Vaucluse Road. All of the parcels except 84 A 29 and 8 A 39 are located in the South Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District. The Project is located immediately south of the First Energy Transmission Line crossing the Woodbine Farms property, Parcel 73 A 21. As noted, this is a critical consideration for the location of utility scale solar facilities. There is no 100 year floodplain located within the fence line of the proposed Project, though there is some identifiable at the far western edge of the northern Woodbine parcel, and no subsoil conditions have been identified that would make the installation of solar panels, or the construction of a substation, problematic. There are small areas (approximately 5.1 acres) of potentially jurisdictional wetlands, but those areas would not be disturbed as part of the Project. The areas of steep slopes (greater than 15%) are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan and comprise approximately 56.5 acres. The properties are generally flat to slightly rolling with a typical maximum elevation of 800 to 825 feet, and a lower elevation of 775 feet. 2 Such lighting as is required will be downward facing cutoff fixtures. The principal source of lighting at the Project will be that associated with the existing substation. 2 611 3. There are no site constraints that would preclude the use of the property for a utility scale solar facility. Potentially adverse impacts will be identified during the local and state permitting processes and mitigation will be worked into the Project. Attached to the application in this case are the following detailed documents that provide significant information as to the site and its potential for use as a solar facility. These include a Protected Species Review dated August 2018, prepared by the Timmons Group and incorporated herein as Exhibit A; a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated August 28, 2018, prepared by the Timmons Group and incorporated herein as Exhibit B; and a site review by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation for Project 41147, dated September 22, 2018, incorporated herein as Exhibit C. The Project as proposed is defined by the Commonwealth as a"small solar energy project" (9VAC15-60-10) subject to a Permit by Rule ("PBR") administered by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. Among many other technical requirements, in order to proceed under the PBR an applicant must "furnish[] to the department a certification by the governing body of the locality wherein the ... project will be located that the project complies with all applicable land use ordinances[.]" 9 VAC15-60-30(A)(2) 4. Once the Project has lived its useful commercial life, the land used can be returned to cultivation.3 As required by law the Applicant will commit to a decommissioning plan for removal of the equipment both above and below ground, and return of the land to substantially its original condition. The decommissioning plan will provide for security that runs to the benefit of the County as required by state statute. B. Comprehensive Plan Conformity. The County's Comprehensive Plan does not address renewable energy, or public utility services and facilities. It has been assumed, however, that public utilities are essential wherever they are required and that they are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan without individualized review. The Plan does recognize that the County supports environmentally conscious policies and their relationship to economic development: Frederick County supports green initiatives in the field of economic development. Viable development initiatives should be recognized and their implementation encouraged. Such an example is rail access and transportation which will become more valuable and expected in industrial settings due to desire to operate effectively and efficiently. Frederick County should be proactive in ensuring the resources necessary for business development are planned for in a viable way and available to support identified office and industrial users. With regards to water, wastewater treatment, and electricity, manufacturers will require adequate supply and availability, but will also be interested in 3 The County's Comprehensive Plan says that"[o]nce land is converted from agricultural use it is unlikely that it will ever be reclaimed." FCCP, p. 33. This is not true for a solar facility because of the decommissioning requirement. 3 612 quality and service reliability. There is a Finite capacity of these resources that must be managed accordingly. Frederick County 2035 Comprehensive Plan ("FCCP"),p. 33. This statement reflects the County's interest in both "green initiatives" and enhancements in the electrical grid. In this, the County joins some of the largest corporations in the United States, if not the world. By 2018, Apple had become 100%reliant on renewable power, principally solar, for all of its direct operations, with commitments from many of its suppliers to do the same. Moreover, it has adopted a policy of"additionality,"which means that rather than using its vast cash resources simply to buy up the existing sources of green energy, it has a preference for sponsoring the creation of new renewable power sources, since it wishes to put new, clean power on the grid so that is not using up all the clean energy that may be available in the market. A group of companies including Walmart, General Motors, Google, and Johnson&Johnson have formed the Renewable Energy Buyers Alliance to represent firms that purchase renewable energy and remove barriers that make it harder to shift away from carbon based fuels.4 The area for which this application is made is largely rural and has been in agricultural use for many years. The area to be used for the solar panels would be used to harvest a different crop, electrons from the sun. The Applicant recognizes that this is not agriculture as it is customarily understood,but it is the landowner's choice to remove their lands from customary agricultural uses voluntarily, so that they may generate income from this different kind of"crop." It is also true that agriculture is a significant element of both the present and future of Frederick County, and is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Thus, Frederick County agriculture will evolve in a way that is likely to be more intensive and by necessity more diverse. While this will require less acreage than traditional farming activities, activities it is expected that income from agricultural operations will increase. As such the County should focus on implementing policies that seek to prioritize the protection of these rural areas as well as streamline the process for approving the diversified land uses as described within this section. The rural economy of Frederick County plays a significant role in the life and livelihood of its inhabitants. In addition to providing food products for the region, agriculture is a revenue generator which requires very few local services. Agriculture contributes to Frederick County's extraordinary 4 It is not just companies. Iceland is powered 100% by renewable energy, Norway has achieved 98.5% sustainability, and Costa Rica 99%. 4 613 viewshed5 while providing a living to its farmers, citizens, and a place of enjoyment for its visitors. Most importantly, an active, profitable agriculture operation reduces the amount of land converted to more dense uses. Diversification of land use for the agricultural not only generate notable income and drive more tourism dollars to the County, it can also offer future protection the land from conversion to residential uses. The Applicant submits that the use of agricultural land for solar energy production is not inconsistent with other agricultural uses of the property, and that its use for such purposes recognizes the increasingly intensive and diverse agricultural changes that the County has recognized in its Comprehensive Plan. C. Agricultural and Forestal District Considerations. Portions of the properties in the Project are in the South Frederick Ag and Forestal District. Unless a way is found to recognize solar facilities as compatible with these District designations, the properties may be removed from it. The property owner may simply advise the County in writing of his or her intention to withdraw if it is done within the 2020 timeframe allowed. Land Use Valuation, which is actually a separate program under separate legal authority, remains in place until there is a non-qualifying change in use of the property. D. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties consist of large tracts of land in excess of 200 acres, down to single family homes on two acre lots in Hites View Estates. The distance to individual properties can be measured from most adjacent Project parcels but most are set off from the areas proposed for solar. With appropriate screening these property owners will have a very limited view of the solar panels once installed. After the Project is constructed, the residents of the area will hear virtually nothing, and see very little. Typical sections of landscaping can be installed where mitigation is needed, as shown on the Preliminary Site Plan. For example,modern solar panels do not produce glare. The FAA has said that solar panels may be more compatible even for airports than other solar energy generation technologies because, among several factors, a solar panel is designed to absorb sunlight (rather than reflect it), minimizing potential impacts of glare as seen from above.6 The glass used for solar panels has less reflectivity than water or window glass, and typical solar panels reflect only about 2 percent 5 The Applicant has produced a series of viewshed studies with its application that demonstrates the visibility of the solar fields from surrounding properties. 6 FAA, "Technical Guidance for Evaluating Selected Solar Technologies on Airports" (November 2010), p. 8. 5 614 of incoming sunlight.7 The Virginia DEQ recommends that counties not address glare from solar projects in their local codes because "significant glare appears unlikely with the PV technology that can be utilized in Virginia . . . ."g E. Traffic. Construction of the facility is expected to take from four to six months, except the Switching Station, of about five acres in the back of the facility,which may take nine months. The Applicant will control and mitigate any potential traffic inconvenience by implementing a comprehensive traffic control management plan,to be approved by the County. Any typical noise associated with the construction phase of the Project will be mitigated by the construction management plan mentioned above. Once construction is complete,there is essentially no traffic generated from operations. F. Sewage conveyance and treatment. There is no sewage produced from operation of a solar facility. G. Water Supply. A solar facility does not require a water supply. As a practical matter, solar panels are adequately cleaned by rainwater in this geographical region in the US. H. Drainage. An exhibit depicting the drainage flows is included with the Preliminary Site Plan. As part of the formal site plan review process, detailed preliminary erosion and sediment(E&S) control and stormwater management(SWM)plans will be prepared that identify Best Management Practices (BMPs)required to minimize the discharge of sediment into surface water bodies and sensitive areas of the Property (wetlands/streams/floodplains), meeting all required rules and regulations set forth by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). L Solid Waste Disposal Facilities. There is virtually no solid waste produced from operation of a solar facility. J. Historic Sites and Structures. 7 Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, et. al "Questions and Answers: Ground- mounted Solar Photovoltaic Systems" (June 2015),p. 22. 8 DEQ, "Model Ordinance for Smaller-Scale Solar Energy Projects in Virginia (By Right Permitting)," (December 21, 2012), p. 5. 6 615 The Applicant commissioned and has provided an Assessment and Probability Analysis for Foxglove Solar, dated August 15, 2018, to provide information on the current condition of the Project area. During the PBR process will, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources will review that Assessment and require mitigation for adverse effects to historic resources. The full study is attached to this Statement as Exhibit D. An archival search was performed to identify any previously-recorded historic and cultural resources within the Project area. This search identified no archaeological resources within the Project area boundaries. The findings indicated there were five potential architectural related areas, two of these sites are potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places ("NRHP"). These two sites are summarized below: • Site 034-0303,Cedar Creek Battlefield Study Area: In March 2009,VDHR determined this site potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP. In September 2009, the American Battlefield Protection Program ("ABPP") released its update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission ("CWSAC") report on the nation's Civil War battlefields. According to this update,the southernmost end of the Project area falls partially within the extreme northeastern portion of the Study Area for the Cedar Creek Battlefield. As it has for other battlefield sites, the Applicant will work with BVDHR to investigate this area further during the PBR process and mitigate permanent adverse effects. • Site 034-5075, Circa 1880 House and Barn: This house is a frame, vernacular dwelling standing on a continuous-stone foundation and is covered with aluminum siding. Secondary structures on the site include a barn, shed, and equipment shed,with the barn as the primary resource. The solar facility will not require removal of these structures and will not impact them. The Applicant plans to meet with the County's Historic Resources Advisory Board as part of the review process. K. Impact on Community Facilities: Education The Project will have no adverse impact on education, but can have a most positive one. In addition to revenues produced from the Project, field trips from the County's schools can be provided that will offer students and teachers an invaluable opportunity to see a material element of that future as it is in operation. Police Protection This is typically required, if at all, during the construction phase. Fire and Rescue Protection 7 616 Solar facilities are inherently safe, because they are a passive use. It is the Applicant's practice to work with first responders (both police and fire) to share information on the operation and safety practices in the event that an emergency should arise. Parks and Recreation This is not applicable. Solid Waste Disposal The Project requires a"lay down area" for construction materials during the construction phase, but all materials are removed from the site once construction is complete and properly disposed of. Any solar panels that must be replaced will be disposed of as solid waste, if they cannot be recycled. Recycling is an option because most of the materials making up a solar project are recyclable. Solar panels themselves are comprised mostly of commonly-recycled materials such as glass, aluminum, and copper. Even if solar panels themselves are not yet fully recyclable, they are not hazardous and are able to be disposed of in conventional landfills. Other Government Activities A utility scale solar facility does not impact other governmental activities. L. Other Impacts. Virginia has adopted and updated the Commonwealth's Energy Policy at Va. Code Ann. §67-102. That Policy plainly supports the development of, and the use of, renewable energy sources. The General Assembly has encouraged "[a]ll agencies and political subdivisions of the Commonwealth, in taking discretionary action with regard to energy issues, [to] recognize the elements of the Commonwealth Energy Policy and where appropriate, [to] act in a manner consistent therewith." Even further, the General Assembly has, by § 56-585.1:4 regarding the development of solar and wind generation capacity in the Commonwealth, determined that before January 1, 2024, the construction or purchase by a public utility of one or more solar generation facilities located in Virginia, having in the aggregate a rated capacity that does not exceed 5,000 megawatts, or its purchase of energy, capacity, and environmental attributes from solar facilities owned by persons other than a public utility,is in the public interest. It has therefore directed the State Corporation Commission to so find if the SCC is required to make a finding regarding whether such construction or purchase is in that public interest. In short, Virginia has made it a major state initiative to increase the percentage of energy that comes from renewable sources, specifically including solar energy. Frederick County has recognized that renewable energy is critical to America's energy future, and has taken steps to approach utility scale solar in a responsible and reasonable manner. The Project will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the surrounding area. The Project will not cause any direct, physical injury to 8 617 either property or improvements in the neighborhood. It generates no pollutants, and is designed to have no adverse effect on surrounding properties, water sources, or the environment. Solar projects produce clean energy from a non-fossil fuel renewable resource. It is often asserted that the development of a utility scale solar facility will adversely affect the values of properties nearby. Expert appraisers who have researched the effect of the construction of solar farms on nearby property values in various states have concluded that such projects lack the features that are most commonly associated with adverse effects on nearby values. Specifically,they are not associated with hazardous materials, odor,noise,traffic, or stigma. Solar projects are similar to large greenhouses, and are generally in keeping with a rural character. Claims to the contrary are generally anecdotal at best,and the Applicant is aware of no professional study that supports the proposition that such facilities depress land values, when appropriately sited and buffered. This Project provides many benefits to Frederick County. To start with, it does not deplete any water resources or require costly sanitary sewer or other utility infrastructure. It is not a permanent conversion of undeveloped land or increase demand on the County schools. The Project will generate significant increased tax revenue with little or no burden. It strengthens and adds to the capacity of the electrical grid adding to and diversifying sources of electricity. A solar facility does not require significant County services. This Project will provide jobs,tax revenue, and other economic opportunity as explained in more detail below. Tax Payments to Frederick County. Currently, this property is taxed as unimproved(the land value). When the Project is installed, that land value will increase (an estimated two to four times)based upon its use as a solar facility. The taxation on land value is paid in full to the County by the Project. In addition, because the Project will produce over 20 megawatts of AC power, it will also pay a pro-rated portion (20%) of the annual equipment tax on all installed electrical generation equipment at the County's real estate tax rate. Applicant looks to invest in the region an estimated$60,000,000 in equipment and$40,000,000 on construction and installation activities for this Project. With this investment, the additional tax revenue to Frederick County will be significant. Local Economic Opportunity. The Project will employ several hundred workers during construction. It will help local businesses be positioned to capitalize on this opportunity. We will work with Frederick County to hold an informational event where local businesses can learn more about these opportunities. Those opportunities will range from contractor positions for electrical, general labor, site work, and landscaping to an economic boom for fencing and landscape companies, equipment suppliers,lodging and food vendors, and others. These electrical, civil, site, and other contractors will be encouraged to hire local workers. The largest job opportunities will be during construction. After installation, the Project will require a limited amount of ongoing operations and maintenance work that can produce local jobs for local contractors. Investment in Frederick County. Although it is a soft economic benefit, the media coverage and"branding" associated with solar facilities can be significant. There is clearly a new renewable energy economy emerging in the Commonwealth. Many companies are looking to find communities that support renewable energy development. With this Project,Frederick County can 9 618 be one of the leaders in this area. There are both macro and micro level benefits. One of the broadest reaching benefits is the use of renewable solar energy to produce electricity without extracting valuable natural resources or dependence on foreign raw materials. This solar energy generation facility is installed at a fixed cost investment that provides a reliable stable electricity source for many years without the need for significant reinvestment. Our regional electricity generation capacity is sustainably increased with the resultant economic improvements and without harmful environmental side effects. The Applicant is part of Urban Grid Solar Projects, the utility scale development arm of Urban Grid. A Virginia company, Urban Grid is a leading developer of solar facilities in the Mid- Atlantic Region, with extensive solar project development expertise. Urban Grid delivers solar energy projects that maximize value while delivering a vital source of clean,renewable energy that will help shape the diversified electric grid of the future. Urban Grid is a privately owned renewable energy company that has been developing and installing solar facilities for seven years in Virginia, Maryland,Delaware and across the country. Urban Grid and its partners have successfully designed and have in operation 290 megawatts of solar energy projects globally and have 1400 megawatts in development in the Mid-Atlantic. They are very experienced in the development of renewable energy projects, and bring that experience and lessons learned to implement a successful Project here in Frederick County. The Project will have a significant positive impact by contributing over $136,122 of revenue to the County in year one and over $3 Million over the projected life of the facility. As noted the construction and operation of the Project will make fiscal contributions directly to the County in the form of roll-back-taxes, increased property assessments, and new machinery and tools taxes. It also will bring significant economic benefits to the County, primarily through construction jobs and construction-related spending at local businesses. 10 619 Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick,Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www.fcva.us Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Alfred L.Snapp&Son,Inc.,a Virginia corporation _ Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: if the property ownerlapplicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own die property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. 883 Clark Road,Stephens City,VA 22655 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property Identification numbers: 84-A-40 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randall Minchew,Esquire,or either of them Name of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Colucci,Lubeley&Walsh,4310 Prince William Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)680-4664 ext.5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney4n-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to appli tion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following-for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: None. This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it Is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modify it. Signature Title(if sigrlitig on behalf of an dntity) State of V Iy Q iyi i s -;County f i n hf ,To wit: t, `ni'(rx¢eriVIP- it* HOMIcei .a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that the person who signed the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the Rine before me iWbejurisdiction aforesaid this q** dayof fir _- My Commission Expires: 14VI ►11;x;12. otary Public '- `` Registration Number: 4-M0514 CATHERINE DIETZ MARSTEN NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth at Virginia Reg. #775 --— My Commission Expires December 31,2022 620 `c c Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick,Virginia a Frederick Planning Website: www.fcva.us R,t Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Woodbine Farms,Inc.,a Virginia corporation Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. j 510 Barley Lane,Winchester,VA 22802 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-A-50,84-A-29 and 73-A-21 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randall Minchewv,Esquire,or either of them Name of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Coluccl,Lubeley&Walsh,4310 Prince William Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)880-4884 ext.5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney4n-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority t would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to applon with Frederick County,Virginia for the(illosvia for the.above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision of ane 2-3 acre Conditional Use Permit Site Plan subs t a t ion) 1 o t" Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) ❑ Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorttey-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and,to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: None. This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as l otherwise resrilnd or modify it. Signature 1 Title(if signing onalf o1'an entity) r opc, A..,. State of V l V 111'n 10 -,County Cit: f Il na.I=Jfe!� ,To wit: I, r 447- ,il rAkW,a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that thPperson who signed the fbi ging instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same bifore 9 the jurisdiction aforesaid this - day of-1'4HtJaru e,20h. My Commission Expires: 12,1311 4V9,9- ry Public '" ' Registration Number. lag 42 5 4 CATHERINE ©IETZ MARSTEN NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Virginia a rieg.#7794454 - — My Commission Expires December 31,2022 621 i ti t< CO Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick,Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www.fcva.us 1 �N Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know Ali Men By These Presents That: Alfred L.Snapp,Jr. Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note. If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. 883 Clark Road,Stephens City,VA 22655 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-A-40A do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randall Minchew,Esquire,or either of them Name of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Colucd,Lubaley&Walsh,4310 Prince William Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)680-4664 ext.6114 Mailing Address of Attomey-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to appli tion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit ✓ Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: None. This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modify it. Signature Title(if signing on behalf of an etuityy State of V l o t itl I M- ,County Ci of W l vi on f fie ,To wit: I, Q!' rrlw ,a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that th person who signed the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before me in4he iurisdiction aforesaid this�_�day of AnV ,.20?o. My Commission Expires: tLI 51 1 lNtary Public Registration Number: 1"Ipiq CATHERff-`1E DIETZ MARSTEN NOTARY PUBLIC Gommoriwratth of Vit Inla Reg.47794054 My Commission Expires December 31,2022 622 4�0� coG� Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick,Virginia ' Frederick Planning Website: www.fcva.us Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Betty V.Snapp,Jr. Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. V multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney frnm each owner will be needed. 883 Clark Road,Stephens City,VA 22655 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcels)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-ANDA do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randal Mtnchew,Esquire,or either of them Name of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Coluccl,Lubeley&Walsh,4310 Prince William Pkwy.,Prints William,VA 22192 (703)680.4664 ext.5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to app li ion with Frederick County,Virginia for the followi>A for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit 91Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: None. This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modify it.le- Signature Signature Title(if signing on behal of an eniity) State of V1 V4 i n l o, _ County Ci. of, Wl nchetfcv' ,To wit: 1, + j __,a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that d erson who signed the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before n n the jurisdiction aforesaid this�"! day of J461tal 24 ! My Commission Expires: tAst 1 pivvz tart'Public Registration Number: zfyj4c>5� CATHERINE DIETZ MARSTEN NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Virginia eg.41 f 1911 Ut - My Commission Expires December 31,2022 623 .cp Special Limited Power of Attorney a� County of Frederick,Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www. eva.us M. Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know AN Men By These Presents That: Keighly C.Gore Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. 856 Hiles Road,Stephens City,Virginia 22655 ev} Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land In Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-A-39 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: , John H.Foote,esquire and J.Randall Minchew,Esquire or either of them Name of Attomey-In-Fact Walsh,Colucci,Lubelay 8 Walsh,4310 Prince Wiillam Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)6804664 ext.5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as m true and lawful attorney-in-fact fact for and in m name la Y Y Y �place,and stead,with the same F full power and authority I would have if acting personalty,to file and act on my behalf with respect to appi tion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: d None This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modify it. Signature Title(if sib on behalf of an enury) State of Y 1Ctas ,Countyt�ef � .To wit: I, ,a Notary Public in and far the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that the pbrs n who signed the foregoing i' to exit pE ally appear da befflre me and as acknowledged the sa =in t v-inr`i llettMi n�Ar�caid this day of 20 MY Commission Expires: Notary Pubi i egistration Number: 7 ZPAULA FLORENTINA BERRY NOTARY PUBLIC 7752678 0tAMQfsk16IFALTL0F__1(1flGlt MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30,2021 _ b 624 eaG Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick,Virginia Frederick Planning Website: vwww.tcvai.us IPL Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Levi J.Gore Name of Property Owner/Applicant -- Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. 856 Hites Road,Stephens City,Virginia,22656 r yfl 77 yvs yq6 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-A-39 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randall Minchew,Esquire or ekher of them Name of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Colucci,Lubeley&Walsh,4310 Prince Wiliam Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)680-4664 ext.5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to appli "'ion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision Conditional Use Permit ,/ Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: None This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modit i It. Signature Title(if I of Ii f ofan entity) State of,Vi ContAgi} To wit: I, M04.1 ?II-PPIA100 Wa Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that ,. the person who signed the foregoing ins niment personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the f sea a M re meati the_urisdiction aforesaid this 24 clay of mp'20 0 ml qic— My Commission Expir 0 Notary"Public , --- — — g'stration Number: PAULA FLORENTINA BERRY NOTARY PUBLIC 7762679 MYO MMMSION EXPIRES:aEPTEM3£R 30,2Q21 625 �c co. Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick,Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www:fcva.us Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Foxglove Solar,LLC,a Virginia Limited Uability corporation Name of Property Owner/Applicant Please note: If the property owner/applicant is an entity,the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney from each owner will be needed. 337 Log Canoe Circle,Stephenville,MD 21666 (434)953-8810 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-A-39 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randall Minc haw,Esquire,or either of them Name of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Colucci,Lubeley&Walsh,4310 Prince William Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)680.4664 ext.5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Fact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to appli °tion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Subdivision d Conditional Use Permit tr Site Plan Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This appointment shall expire one year from the day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or modifv it. Signature, Title(if signing on behalf of an entity) State of County/City of 67 u-e-e n � ,To wit: I, ,a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that the person who signed the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this 5 day dfetke-o.4-�c 2OZO My Commission Expires: It-4 -ZDz Nota Publigotary Public-Maryland Registration Number: 16 .0 Q-7 Queen Anne's County My Commission Expires November 08,2023 626 Special Limited Power of Attorney q , County of Frederick,Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www.feva.us irK Department of Planning&Development,County of Frederick,Virginia 107 North Kent Street,Winchester,Virginia 22601 Phone (540)665-5651 Facsimile (540)665-61395 Know All Men By These Presents That: Foxglove Solar,LLC,a Virginia limited liablIlly company Name of Property Owner/Applicant - — Please note: If the property ownerlapplicant is an entity.the name of the entity should appear above. If multiple persons own the property or are applicants,an executed power of attorney tirom each owner will be needed. 337 Log Canoe Circle,Stevensville,MD 21688 (434)953-8810 Mailing Address of Property Owner/Applicant Telephone Number as owner of,or applicant with respect to,the tract(s)or parcel(s)of land in Frederick County, Virginia,identified by following property identification numbers: 84-A-40,84A-40A,84-A-51),84-A-29 and MA-21 do hereby make,constitute,and appoint: John H.Foote,Esquire and J.Randall Minchew,Esquire,or either of them Nance of Attorney-In-Fact Walsh,Coiuccl,Lubeley&Walsh,4310 Prince William Pkwy.,Prince William,VA 22192 (703)680-4664 ext 5114 Mailing Address of Attorney-In-Pact Telephone Number to act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my name,place,and stead,with the same full power and authority I would have if acting personally,to file and act on my behalf with respect to appli tion with Frederick County,Virginia for the following,for the above identified property: Rezoning Q Subdivision ✓ Conditional Use Permit Site Plan PI Master Development Plan(prelim.or final) Variance or Zoning Appeal and,further,my attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions andjto make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: Worse. This appointment shall expire o4e yr,-frornAe day that it is signed,or at such sooner time as I otherwise rescind or.n-A'4=as Signature_ Title(if sighing tiff behalf of an 4 ,A.e State of V I r" 'tCounty/City of `2J11(' C 0 ,To wit: i a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid,certify that the person who signed the foregoink instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before mein the}urisdiclion aforesaid this 0% day of v C`L4 '202CL 1 _ My Commission Expires: o3/3 \3r�aZ2 itil iii Public Registration Number: `� 627 4/21/2020 Untitled Page Virginia Pay/Lookup Taxes P.C)yrneW Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Fags Pay Parking Violation Other Payrnents Shopping(-art(0) Pill OptionsChange Email Inquiry of Real Estate Map Number: 84 A 40 View Map Name: SNAPP ALFRED L & SON INC AccolmW DQW4 Ticl(vil" seq�I Due D-nic IM filed lifforination Amount (Click Below) Mle ViewBill View Back of 8024856 RE2018 37059 2 12/6/2018 2018 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Back of 8024856 RE2019 37536 1 6/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Backof8024856 RE2019 37536 2 12/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill 8024856 RE2020 37666 1 6/5/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $339.47 18024856 RE90201 37666 - 12/7/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE [$339.461 Total Due: $678.93 Return to Search https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR_PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx 628 4/21/2020 Untitled Page H-Cdcrick Home I-r e d e 17 1& our.ity V*rg*n* Pay/Lookup Taxes Flay;rient Hone Personal Property Real 'Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pit) Options Change Emall Inquiry of Real Estate Map Number: 84 A 40A View Map Name: SNAPP ALFRED L JR AccounO Depig Ticko,14 Sell# Due D-nie Delailed Information Ammint (Click Below) Due ViewBill View Back of 8032663 RE2018 37060 2 12/6/2018 2018 REAL ES $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Back of 8032663 RE2019 37537 1 6/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Back of 8032663 RE2019 37537 2 12/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill 8032663 RE2020 37667 1 6/5/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $816.18 18032663 IRE2020f 376671 2112/7/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE, .$816.18. Total Due: $1,632.36 Return to Search https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR_PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx 629 4/21/2020 Untitled Page Frede-rick County Virginia L,-,:L i17- 7-,'-,E T011 Frcdcrick Hoilw Pay/Lookup Taxes - -,�ynient Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments Shol)pingCai-t(0) Pin Options Change Email Inquiry of Real Estate Map Number: 84 A 29 View Map Name: WOODBINE FARMS INC Deklilled 1111,ormation Amount Accouni4 Dep14 Tickelt!" SoclA Due. Dntc (C."fick Below) Due ViewBill View Back of 8024844 RE2018 43767 2 12/6/2018 2018 REAL E$ $0.00 Bill ViewBi 1 View Back of 8024844 RE2019 44373 1 6/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Sack of 8024844 RE2019 44373 2 12/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill 8024844 RE2020 44558 1 6/5/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $530.70 8024844 RE2020 44558 2 12/7/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $530.70 Total Due: $1,061.40 Return to Search 630 https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR_PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx 4/21/2020 Untitled Page Frcdcricl: Home F-redc-rick County Virginia DrE A-i- rRE To)" Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags !Day nnParking Violation Other Payr Shopping(.'art.(0) Pill Options Change Email Inquiry of Real Estate Map Number: 84 A 50 _View Map Name: WOODBINE FARMS INC ,\ccokintg Depl# Ticket# Setift Due Date I)etailed Information Amomlt� (Click Below) Dile ViewBill View Back of 8024870 RE2018 43768 2 12/6/2018 2019 REAL ES $0.00 Bill Viewffiil View Back of 8024870 RE2019 44374 1 6/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill I ViewBill View Back of 8024870 RE2019, 44374 2 12/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill View 8024870 RE2020 44559 1 6/5/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $539.55 18024870 RE2020 44559 2112/7/202012020 REAL ESTATE $539.54 j Total Due: $1,079.09 Return to Search 631 https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR—PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx 4/21/2020 Untitled Page r�[i��;�i: i l ,n,� s "cd c `icy County Virginia Lira �u- 7-RL -rc')v Pay/Lookup Taxes Payr,ent Horne Personal Property Real Estate Dog -Bays Poly Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCari.(0) Pin Options Change Email Inquiry of Real Estate Map Number: 73 A 21 View Map Name: WOODBINE FARMS INC hil'ormation /1111ount accoull(4 tDQ10 Yickelg sey# ]lige Dille (C'Belk Below) Due ViewBill View Back of 8022116 RE2018 43760 2 12/6/2018 2018 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Back of 8022116 RE2019 44367 1 6/5/2019 201REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill f ViewBill View Back of 8022116 RE2019 44367 2 12/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill 8022116 RE2020 44552 1 6/5/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $261.08 8022116 RE2020 44552 2 12/7/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $261.08 Total Due: $522.16 Return to Search 632 https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR_PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx 4/21/2020 Untitled Page Frccicricl: I Ionic 'reaericK county Virginia LIFt ;17' ,t(t rov I Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Hon-)e Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Inquiry of Real Estate Map Number: 84 A 39 View Map Name: GORE LEVI J Detailed Information Amo€nit A, :Oct�fs€aa�81f I3cp�t# I'icl<ct?� 5ct1�? Due Date (Click Bdoly) Due ViewBill View Back of Bill 8024855 RE2018 14414 2 12/6/2018 2018 REAL ESTATE $0.00 ViewBill View Back of 8024855 RE2019 14485 1 6/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill View Back of 8024855 RE2019 14485 2 12/5/2019 2019 REAL ESTATE $0.00 Bill ViewBill 8024855 RE2020 14589 1 6/5/2020 2020 REAL ESTATE $728.34 8024855 IRE20201 14589 2112/7/202012020 REAL ESTATE $728.34 Total Due: 1 $1,456.68 Return to Search 633 https://fctaxes.co.frederick.va.us/Applications/TR_PayTaxes/TicketsByMap.aspx ViNiOain n1NnooXoiaaaaa� -`��` __° - g dtlf1021oaSNOWWIloll'avlosanoloXo=l 103fOad NV-10S 3nOl°JXOd s>aa LL Ile le W11-7 T—F fi e�h Po¢y, .b'3J 2r i e / y \ / +r 7.7� Kati �� J T o C S mP� i /e � x a r LL vi a � ��01ix101 VINIONIA ,A1NfO0 XOIN303Nd aa s anoa�snowwii 011 2tll0S 3A0IOWA - oN� CN N>a 103rOdd dVIOS 3A0lOX0d _ o x v I / v. J o ob E�pV ds\ J$ D Y F �_�0 I x I 7a O� yr €•• f- i • J;� t7 Legend Y Q Project Limits-566.5 Acres Q Phalc Local,— P— Prop@setl Features 0 c] J n�Fance 'O J K 1ia@rna3 Roads sei@r Pends g y Gar156'ilnt5 N W U U� Sekbachs-60'1 F00'1200' Existing Features Y w Read GeiHeAine KOLL w O Fretl@nc&COunty T@N 1'arCSIS Y- renaxSo rET.E crnarn€sn m@onrwre. utrExr rx Fwnu@itwr—s,rm fEExfpart�wnc6en aaooEfmryva�So,u�ry TW fEEs fioefrEn MNJ Bs ncPEx��FnxrM1rA YSE CF�FJPIPnRGEL WrXP.W n6 V:S',:h, aa4�[CT�a£1 sum SIIAII:ATk.N —SPAELac 0inne@nuc@EExnucwr L PHOTO�OCATtBN er6TAiCY IkIiP I TputWgauEaef sl,p.ffCT PaaaF@iv lSb%.S�CSEa fl.—ED—TOMM—DISIM—S. SGnY� e @Si 636 4F [ „4 AM s >_ I t i , .._�� ■-+mss.--s�.�;---, - �.r_ lot"t�' 637 Hites Road Existing Conditions t K�1,:S '+� ... � •� s t �, �� !a ^ a"' -�4"� ik�� ;'.. �,��x^4+3' '�i4 �a r:.�'�=„a,,..: r, z ?� r Noma R { t._ w, w .F Y Y ,•st�°�" -ted +7 �s�� ���G$��� C2+,?� ��z,7P�a,a'. 'r4 'iti ,'hn t ,"�` epi Me. 1!erw ..'y��4:roMY.Ga.ar�•�3 � � '. .' -— - J Klines Mill Rd Existing Conditions 640 'rJ x V . it } fd , 177 Kj '�r"Tz e:A•�'F> r . � -.+ "' kS' "�,-� . .,-r. e"' ,.": r �,� ,ws ,��"�' .rz-_ " s a�. r °iv YNyy, q v,T ' `�rr . tn"yy � ar `', 4fyprc" v ash '.;p. : "� .' t�`�r r4 '' r^�iSk�� ! d Fr fl'� ff °�.r •� `+ P `� 1 s � ;:� ¢,K fti,(�'✓ ���� r � �,;�x sr f'� ,?s' 'y,- �' �' rr �.x �5�r" au'�'' � e atY rw rr^•`� .¢ ! ,> a. 7 { s .q �c'� r"�x`�� A;�S"" r ;r�, 7 r.-� t° �i� 5;� rc a t E r� G t 3 f v � Vi(�d"•'i;ii+ Biu +�i'y,°' ••i ,• "!'.. r 4 !� i' AM b f}'J1k°J l� +��/� 7$ y • � �.�F i�r w�'r ' 1� ` S r� �s� i� 4 .j � r �p r� �r� ��,�U�ti°'�";v �� o M� ��'*: s�• Klines Mill Rd Year 1 641 Klines Mill Rd Year 5 642 tam 717 t � < a, ti. Vaucluse Road Existing Conditions 643 P x o I , :,.�„� � , �` . r �r , _� ��;;_ _- , ��` ,_ �, .. - - :.> � - - �. R, r. _ ,�.;- _ , ,. ,- _: -, , ; ., ,, -• ,, r - � ",” �� >�� s � — .... . �. � d Ef ,/ �, 1 � _ � _, _ u ,�.. -; n .:. — .; — _ �, . f_',y� ....:.^s .f�� s¢ s � .,i,�'� 'W,,-+s urs. � .'.d d r... z '� `c -.�s+.r�. ��" .� .x Y> k �. _ � _ :�.- � _ 's,' _ l?esz •�,m.�� � �.,�Yy,�r�1 ���'I,Fy.a, .nY'`�f°�sf?,� � ?n �f 4 ,�"�� '{+� k r ��'��' � • _.. ....: ...... sv, rt ., d .• FOXGLOVE SOLAR, LLC .� O - SOLAR ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION FACILITY =oem :.7 aQo FREDERICK COUNTY, VA mF APPROVED BY FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING sheet List Table ADMINISTRATOR ON D 20_.SITE PLAN VALID FOR FIVE(5)YEARS 2 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAIN FROM APPROVAL DATE. 3 PRELIMINARY SITE PIN INSET R PRELIMINARY SITE PIN INSET PROJECT REUMiN -NorEs F, 7 AREA FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR m JJ 0�0 tnV� z > )>Uo i 00_V, a «w 0 0 PROJECT AREA ACREAGE:668.5 ACRES LATITUDE 39.084214 VICINITY MAP LONGITUDE:-78.279810 WATERSHED:NORTH FORK SHENANDOAH SCALE: 1"=2,000' HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE:02070006 7 -21666 Ev(410)6001603 URBAN GRID TIMMONS GROUP YOU R VI SI ON ACHI EVER TH ROU GH OU AS DEVELOPER ENGINEER RE-�SONs URBAN GRID SOLAR TIMMONS GROUP 337 LOG CANOE CIRCLE 1001 BOULDERS PARKWAY SUITE 300 STEVENSVILLE, MD 21666 RICHMOND,VA 23225 COVEWSHEET PHONE: (410)604-3603 PHONE: (804)200-6446 FAX: (804)560-1016 REVISED PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS PREPARED BY TIMMONS GROUP JUNE 19, 2020 aG� 81 OF 6 646 01 �. z o z a� B VHo I f ag o � i ® HITES VIEW.--_ �\ s Legend — ESTATES Proposed Features + I I OProject Limits-668.5 Acres ®® `I I' _ F Proposed Project Entrance =� ®®j - j w U ko O J } x x Woven Wire or Chain Link Fence Z Internal Roads - 4 O Q g z -Substationw y— / OC9 0 Solar Panels ,moi i '. n • � w0 Vegetative Screening p LU —Proposed 10 Foot Vegetative Screening A + V // X K m O X—Existing 50 Foot Mature Woodland >of T / y i1 O Constraints Ti� Y_ O Setbacks-50'/60'/75'/100'/200' % - a Existing Features N / / } I Road Centerline T. �•Transmission Line \ - ----Streams x 0 Wetlands °u88 8 00000 Woodlands '\ oo�cAD Ecs Steep Slopes(Greater than 15%) ��,a � � I ,'Vv METE.121 1%Annual Flood Hazardk�0jj . j Agricultural and Forest DistrictryNU �0000000000j /MryNu ' Frederick County Tax Parcels I _ T 11/ii rii 000000000k �V s��s ry�ryl FEET FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY FROM wnrT�PARCELS Esss,So � _ ,���OOOO ryry � � OO tltl w� ,,, 8888 FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITH PARCELS GREATER \ \ /,/ Y , 088 88888888 /" 1 PROJECTAREAISAPPROXIMATE THAN 8 ACRES,75 FEET FROM A PORTION OF MILES ROAD,100 FEET Y SITE FORESTTHAN 6 CRTRICTES AN PARCD 200 FEETFRATERTOM AN6 ACRCENT ES PLAN LTURALAND \ L 000 .i PLAN NO FOR FOREST DISTRICT PARCELS GREATER THAN SACREse uu PLAN NOT FOR 3.LANDSCAPING I S 10 FEETALLAROUND EXCEPTWHERE SO FEET / �,. _ _ --o+ CONSTRUCTION OFMATURE WOODLAND IS EXISTING. - _ �X.i 4.PRIMARY ZONING DISTRICTAND USE OF EACH PARCEL ----- e x COMPRISING PROJECTAREA IS RA. h.ALL PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN THE BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL 00811 BBBBd0000u )STRICT -- s.WETLANDSARE SOURCED FROM NATONALWETLANDs i� i / 0000000������ INVENTORY IT �.STREAMS ARE SOURCED FROM NATONALHVDROGRAPHv ' i DATASET , i G.FHAZARD NDS GD ENDATA SOURCED FRCE MMNATIOROMFEMA FL s. OODLA NATONAL LAND COVER DATASET / ANDAERIALIMAGERY DIGITIZATION. + 10 STEEP SLOPES G ENERATED FROM VG IN LI DAR / SCALE(FEET) I ,,.TOTAL IN D AREA OF SU EJECT PROPERTY I S 6 fiS 5 ACRES. / - � ;;� �00�� 1z.TOTALPRoaoseDLANDAREATOBEDEVELOPED Is3Ta5ACRES. / / 00000000 0000 00 0 T 13.PROJECTLIMITS LOCATED ENTIRE—IITHIN KARSTBEDROCK. - / \\0�����+ G O 0 650op o 1,300 NO KNOWN KARST FEATURESARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. J 1 2 OF 6 .....aL,H" "I_ nRS,Com Snared ExbibiL,11147 CUP-0—SI 141 v IDENTIFIER PIN OWNER NAME ZONE GIS ACREAGE USE D o 1 13 A 21 WOO D BINE FA RMS INC RA 263.1 VACANT �� J 2 J3 A 31 WOOD8I NE FARMS INC RA 94.1 VACANT �N, f ❑m - ^ p 3 73 A 20 BAN SERMAN CHARLESC RA 239.9 VACANT m r f 't J \\ r •�� �• F d 4 94 A 1 MC DONALD ALBERTA TRUST RA 20J.6 VACANTW/MOBILE HOME / J 5 94 A 40A SNAPPALFR ED LJR RA 44.4 _WELLING \ • Z 6 94 A 40 SNAPP AL FREOL&SON INC RA 69.5 OWELLI NG Q 794 A 41 RESMILESDONALDR RA 6.1 DWELLING \\i // • 0co 9 94 A 44 RIDINGS LVERNON RESIDNALTRNST RA 50.3 _VACANT zPp / Lz 'g 9 94 A 46 KAHN LLC RA 60.3 VACANTW/MOBILE HOME ` L_ 10 94 92 22 MOUNTAIN VISTA LLC RA 2 VACANT F 11 94 9221 MOUNTAIN VISTALLC RA 2 VACANT 12 94 9220 MOUNTAI N VISTALLC RA 2.1 VACANT 0 V$e� 13 94 9219 R081NSON JASON&JENNIFER) RA 2.9 DWELLING YYY 14 94 9215 RIDGEWAV CHARLESA&IAU RAS RA 2.6 DWELLING - ❑ / / w � a 15 94 9214 MOUNTAIN VISTA LLC RA 2.5 VACANT / 16 94 9213 YOUNG 8I LLV M&BILLIEI RA 5.4 VACANT fr 17 73 A 30N CAMPBELLTROYJ RA 5.5 DWELLING 19 J3 A 30D NEWCOME PHILIPE RA 1J.J DWELLING Legend 19 7 3 A 300 ANDERSON SHIRLEY K RA 51.2 VACANT 1 20 73 A 30C CARBAUGH CLAYTON S RA 2.1 DWELLING Proposed Features i Q Project Limits-668.5 Acres ' Proposed Project Entrance 0 a ),', 0 U.1 U x=Woven Wire or Chain Link Fence f / - ! 5 Internal Roads r \ - O J O Q Substation ,� .1 � 0 Y Z D Panels % r +❑ _ N U K Vegetative Screening O W -Proposed 10 Foot Vegetative Screening / w / 1 ,' O(9 -Existing 50 Foot Mature Woodland ` > '\+ O / (�X Constraints ,1� ❑� x UE O 0 Setbacks-50'/60'/75'/100'/200' y + J`HITES VIEW ° Existing Features ❑r' x + `� A\ � EST TES �•Transmission Line -•Streams - ✓ x m. ___ _ D Wetlands �� .; WIF F D Woodlands + " I \\ Steep Slopes(Greater than 15%) +� Existing Structures 1%Annual Flood Hazard - I LE Agricultural and Forest District + Ll �� �' T ENsv��E MD c l Frederick County Tax Parcels ZZi Topographic Contours o _® - J 00 10 Foot x - 5 Foot REVISIONS 1.PROJECT AREA SAP PROXIMATE. - h. 2.SETBACK LINES ARE BO FEET FROM ADJACENT RIGHT OF VVIYS,50 J \ \ r FEET FROM ADJACENT FEET FROM ERTY OVAKRS IT ITESIH ROAD LESS100 FE Lia' -- THAN fi ACRES,75 FEET FROM A PORTION OF HITES ROAD,100 FEET r + ®.I' P FROM ADJACENT PROPERLY OWNERS WITH PARCELS GREATER THAN 6 ACRES,AND 200 FEETFROM ADJACENTAGRICULTURALAND +' PRELIMINARY SITE FOREST DISTRICT PARCELS GREATER THAN 6ACRES. LAN NOT FOR 3.LANDSCAPING I S 10 FEETALLAROUND ExCEPTwHERE 50 FEET + - CONSTRUCTION 5 MATUREELS ARE LOISEXISTI NG. 4.PRI MARY ZONING DISTRICTAND USE OF EACH PARCEL + COM PRISING PROJECTARE,IS RA. -4, .I b.ALL PARCELS ARE LOCATED IN THE BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL �T m DISTRICT 6. PETLANDSARE SOURCED FROM NATONALV,ETLANDS /PP �.,. \+ r INVENTORY 7.STREAMSARE SOURCED FROM NATONALHYDROGRAPHY +. DATASET 8.FLOOD HAZARD DATA SOURCED FROM FEMA. ' f% - 0.wERIALIMAGERY AGENERATEDFROM NATONALLANG COVER DATASET _ AND STEEP SLOPE ES GENER TE ON. " ` ��� 10. STEEP LAN AREAO SUBJECT TPRROM VG I N IT PERTYDAR. / ` / 0 n.TOTALLANDAREA OF suGJECT PROPERry Is66esACRES. r '. � - 0 � 1 � � r' �� SCALE(FEET) 12 PROJECT LOCATED EATO BE PITHIN PEDIS3EDROACRES . TOTALPT 13.PROJECT DMITS LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN KARST BEDROCK. / %� / \ „` O1--1--3511 0opE OFm E00 NO KNOWN KARST FEATURES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA. AJ j / - A40w1147 _ nclsTcommo�sna�a E;:ne1sw114Fc aLm. 649 + x ryi � 6 x > w JL w i + ❑ ❑ s o x� ag o ❑ mak" �Isa Legend ^ Proposed Featuresa _ \ =w o-6• Project Limits-668.5 Acres ❑ Proposed Project Entrance k W J s x=Woven Wire or Chain Link Fence Z Internal Roads - - � ❑ Q 0 g Substation �' 0 x - to Z w D Panels �V ( / / _ i x � O W C) o__ Vegetative Screening —Proposed 10 Foot Vegetative Screening / / r O(9 0 Existing 50 Foot Mature Woodland 1 j� 0 x t C9 X e Constraints ❑ � ❑ - t� -�,1 '�'> � ❑'s LL OLL 0 Setbacks-50'/60'/75'/100'/200' Existing Features i' �•Transmission LineOa„ZrzOLO ��� � � i \\ m� --•-•••Streams , D Wetlands I na , D Woodlands Steep Slopes(Greater than 15%) •�' 0 Existing Structures1 11 A 11 e VAML 1%Annual Flood Hazard + c s as A a, SNAwALF='O wEU N� ' � j 6 as A ao sNAwALTaEOLasoN N wEU Nv 0 TOWLOVENO�HLLl Agricultural and Forest District F as A ac aeowusoFAII e ea oweu Ne �T L'll')--' �+ a aaAso w000e NETAanns Nc aA czz.a owEUN� sTEVENsv LLE,mOnccc Frederick County Tax Parcels .+ - x- z❑° irl NA vA TwTmoelLe Home ca,m coaacoa L Topographic Contours _ --- ' VA 10 Foot ❑ SFoot o e -_ ze -_ � I I ��---- - ll as A Ta ------ ;-. ❑ - ,�� as s,aosN oeaT meNe ez VAcnNT llY NA I VA \ eo as ".....,,.n w.., A az s.aosN OEaT LOEN E,a 0 3c as A 4zo s. 1OEaT LOEN Esa A axe vIANUEL oavo n7 1.s owEU NS REVISIONS I A 11A MIIY-11 NA 11 11 11 NOTES: 1.PROJECTAREAISAPPROXIMATE. TEL = 2.SET BACK LINES ARE 60 FEET FROM ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAYS 50 11 1 A III 1111111ARLESSJR 11 11 FEET FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WTI H PARCELS LESS /' / •' THAN 6 ACRES,75 FEET FROM A PORTION OF RITES ROAD,100 FEET % { TkusTEE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITH PARCELS GREATER T' �� \. ” u E II THAN aAazEs,AND 2oo FEETFROM ADJACENTAGRIcuLTURALANO ��� l ,�- �, PRELIMINARY SITE 11 FOREST DISTRICT PARCELS GREATER THAN O ACRES. usA"F PLAN NOTFOR 3.LANDSCAPING I S 10 FEETALLAROUND EXCEPT WHERE 50 FEET CONSTRUCTION OFMATURE WOODLAND IS EXISTING. ,/ T - %/ - {I ,; \ ffff a3 4.PRIMARY ZONINGDISTRICIS RA USE OF EACH PARCEL r\ ' LAw.kxkno r � CONl MPRISING PROJECTAREA IS RA. \ �\ `�—J❑4 / KELLE,KEV s b.ALL PARCELS ARE LOCATED I N TH E BACK CREEK MAGI STERIAL DISTRICT _ �g 0.WETLANDS ARE SOURCED F ROM NAT ONAL WETLAN DS - INVENTORY. % 11 A 11 SDUJIR-N N ].STREAMS ARE SOURCED FROM NATIONAL HYDROGRAPHv DATASET G.FLOOD HAZARD DATA souRceO FROM FEMA. i T > 0.WOODLANDS GENERATED FROM NATIONAL LAND COVER DATASET '� 4 Nl AND AERIAL DIGTZAT ON. 10 STEEP SLOPES G ENERATED FROM VG I N LI DAR. 12 TOTAL LANDAREA OFD EJECTPROPERTYBE DEVELOPED E E OPER I ACRES. ; -� TEE � ss se �A 12.PROJECTOTALPT LOCATED EATO BE WITHIN PEDIS W45ACRES. ' X T A I acxaaomneeLcmu nA w.a oweu Ne �� ❑ / x sa as A a mEI—NN. aA 1 oweu Ne NO KNOWN ARSTFEATUR S ENTIRELY WITHIN WITHIN BEDROCK. \ A 'L s5 as A Sao TEE v7rtoN koeEkTx n7 owEUNr; Op o" "350""E""FmE00 NO KNOWN KARST FEATURES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT �\ T ---_ � ARll YL. EA - O �eaow„aF -gnc11-.-Shand E:h'b1S4U47 c 40F6 149 IL 4 F "" .� ;;ya-'-•-'ate � 0. ItUf a M A Legend 0 _ r Project Limits-668.5 Acres �.,.A 9+' ® Farmland of statewide importance Acres .f•. - ' • •„ _ All areas are prime farmland-27.7 Acres P s U W U -Not prime farmland-327.4 Acres a0 UZ t, 0W U - j k W O w> 00 0 J 0 0 0 TIF,WIT REVISIONS NOTES ,.YHOJCCI ARCH D DATA FROM N. _ 2.PRIME FARMLANOROM FROM NRCS SSURGO SOILS. _ ( ALEVI MAGERV FROM F REOERICKCOUNTY - *, �> owwi.o oe.warox (EA��EVIEVN. PRIME FARMLAND MAP f SCALE(FEET) 0 6511 0 1,300 —5-0-47 g _ ncls,common snared E;Oibnsw„4�vnme Fannlana mza 6fi1