Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 09, 2000 Regular Meeting 016 A Regular Meeting of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors was held on Wednesday, August 9, 2000, at 5:00 P.M., in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. PRESENT Chairman Richard C. Shickle; Vice Chairman Charles W. Orndoff, Sr.; W. Harrington Smith, Jr.; Robert M. Sager; Margaret B. Douglas; and Sidney A. Reyes. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Shickle called the meeting to order. He asked that the Personnel Committee Report be heard following the closed session. WINCHESTER FREDERICK COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PRESIDENT CHARLIE WEISS PRESENTATIONRE: FORWARD WINCHESTER FREDERICK INITIATIVE President Weiss presented to the board the chamber's four-year growth initiatives. A nine minute video tape was played for the board. The four-year development efforts will focus on five specific action areas: 1) Workforce Development to concentrate on resources that will increase the availability of skilled and trainable labor for area employers; 2) Education and Leadership Development to implement strategies to provide the best possible education for area young people and identify and develop new and emerging leaders for the community; 3) Community and Governmental Affairs to work closer and more effectively with all levels of government for positive development; 4) Business Development to assist in continued economic prosperity for area business and industry; and 5) New Chamber Building where all of these critical initiatives can be implemented on behalf of the overall community. To accomplish this goal, the chamber requested an investment from the board of supervisors of $1 00,000 over a four-year period. Forward Winchester Frederick Tri-Chair Jerry Kerr appeared before the board to answer questions. The board questioned the city's participation in this project and was advised that the city has agreed to support this effort if a block grant is pursued and depending on where the facility will be located. A new facility is estimated at approximately $840,000 to $1,500,000. Another option being studied by the chamber is expansion of the existing facility. REOUEST FROM PRESIDENT KATHERINE S. WHITESELL. FORT COLLIER CIVIL WAR CENTER. INC.. FOR FREDERICK COUNTY TO SERVE AS FISCAL AGENT FOR ALL STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED FOR THE FORT COLLIER PROJECT - APPROVED Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 17 Ms. Whitesell addressed the board requesting Frederick County to serve as fiscal agent for the above mentioned grant. This grant of $166,000 will help the center purchase Fort Collier constructed in 1861 as part of the defense in Winchester. The acquisition of the ten-acre tract is $500,000. As of today, $153,000 in donations and pledges have been received and the remaining $334,000 will be raised through additional private donations and grants. The grants pursued will help the organization purchase the land and once the land is purchased, the county will no longer be involved with the project. Some concern was addressed by the county administrator regarding staff's time in processing these grants. Only two departments are capable of administering the grants, the planning and development office staff and the assistant county administrator. With the turnover situation in planning, limited time will be available and he asked for the board's patience in handling this responsibility if the board approved this request. Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., this request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT The Finance Committee met in the First Floor Conference Room at 107 North Kent Street on July 19,2000 at 8:00 a.m. The agenda items were as follows: 1. The County Administrator Seeks Direction on the ReceiDt of an Additional $1,000.00 for the Local Government Challene:e Grant - ADD roved See attached memo, p.I-2. The committee recommends approval for a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of$2,000.00. This would require $1,000.00 in additional local funds. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Robert M. Sager, the above request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 018 2. The County Administrator Seeks Direction from the Committee on How to Proceed with Re~ard to the CorresDondence from Our Auditors, Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates - Action Deleted with Acknowledllment that V ACO will Assist Localities With the ImDlementation of House Bill 279 and Senate Bill 163 See attached letter, p.3-4. The committee recommends accepting Robinson, Farmer Cox Associates request to provide necessary amended ordinances. 3. The Director of Social Services Requests a General Fund Supplemental ADDroDriation in the Amount of $800.00 - Denied These funds were received in FY2000 from the sale of a vehicle and need to be carried forward into FY2001 in order to purchase a vehicle and are requested to be placed in line item 5307- 7005-000-000 Motor Vehicles and Equipment. No additional local funds are required. See attached memo, p.5. The committee denies approval and recommends establishing a policy that all funds from surplus sales revert to the General Operating Fund. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Sidney A. Reyes, the above request was denied by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 4. The Sheriff Requests a FY2000 General Fund SUDDlemental ADurouriation in the Amount of $863.91- Auuroved These funds were received in FY2000 and represents reimbursement on a claim involving one of the department's cruisers and are requested to be placed in line item 3102- 3004-000-002 Repair and Maintenance Vehicle. No additional local funds are required. See attached memo, p.6. The committee recommends approval. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Robert M. Sager, the above request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 5. The Sheriff Requests General Fund SUUDlemental Apurouriation in the Amount of $13,587.39- Denied These funds represent proceeds from the Sheriff's sale and are requested to be placed in line item 3102-5409-000-000 Police Supplies for FY2001. No local funds are required. See attached memo, p.7-8. The committee denies approval and recommends establishing a policy that all funds from surplus sales revert to the General Operating Fund. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Sidney A. Reyes, the above request was denied by the following recorded vote: Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 19 Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 6. The Director of Fire and Rescue Requests a FY2000 General Fund Supplemental Appropriation in the Amount of $561.85 - Approved These funds were received in FY2000 and represent an insurance reimbursement for the testing ofladder repairs and are requested to be placed in line item 3505-3004-000-002 Repair and Maintenance-Vehicle. No additional local funds are needed. See attached memo, p.9-11. The committee recommends approval. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Robert M. Sager, the above request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 7. The Director of Fire and Rescue ReQuests a General Fund Supplemental Appropriation in the Amount of $1,225.00 - Denied These funds were received in FY2000 for the sale of a vehicle and are requested to be carried forward into FY2001 and placed in line item 3505-5413-000-000 Other Operating Supplies for the purchase of public education materials. No additional local funds are needed. See attached memo, p.l2. The committee denies approval and recommends establishing a policy that all funds from surplus sales revert to the General Operating Fund. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Sidney A. Reyes, the above request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 8. The Director of Public Works ReQuests a General Fund Supplemental Appropriation in the Amount of $50.000 - Approved These funds were received in FY2000 and need to be carried forward in FY200 1 to assist in improving drainage channels downstream of the Orchardale Subdivision and are requested to be placed in line item 4201-7900-000-001 Storm Drain Improvements. No additional local funds are needed. See attached memo p.13-14. The committee recommends approval. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., the above request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 02 Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 9. The Re~ional Jail Requests a Rel:ional Jail Supplemental Avpropriation in the Amount of $94.545.00 - Approved These funds were budgeted and not received in FY2000 but need to be carried forward in FY2001 and are requested to be placed in line item 11-3301-7003-000-000 Communications Equipment. This request represents grant funds and no additional local funds are needed. See attached memo p.15. The committee recommends approval. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., the above request was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 10. Durin!: the Exit Interview Followin!: the Preliminary Audit. Policv Chanl!es Were Recommended bv the Auditors for School Operatin~ Fund Carrvover Balances and Fixed Assets - Tabled See attached pages 16-17. The committee recommends maintaining the current policy to return the School funds to the General Operating Fund. The committee also recommends postponing a decision on Fixed Assets pending additional information. The following items were submitted for the board's information only. 1. Dr. Marilyn Beck. President of Lord Fairfax Community Collel!e Provided Information for Fundinl! of the Community Cultural Center See attached memo, p.1S. 2. Monthly Financial Statements for the Month Endin~ May 31.2000 Are Included See attached memo, p.19-30. BOARD RETIRED INTO CLOSED SESSION Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., the board retired into Closed Session in accordance with the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Section 2.1-344, Subsection A, (1) and (5) to discuss personnel and economic development- industrial prospect. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 21 W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye BOARD WITHDREW FROM CLOSED SESSION Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., the board withdrew from Closed Session. The motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye BOARD RECONVENED INTO REGULAR SESSION Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Sidney A. Reyes, the board reconvened into regular session and certified nothing other than what was noted as reason for going into Closed Session was discussed. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LAUREN G. CARRIER'S EVALUATION - CERTIFIED Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Robert M. Sager, the Assistant County Administrator Lauren G. Carrier's evaluation was certified by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye INVOCATION The invocation was delivered by Reverend Carl Moore with Maranatha Fellowship. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 022 The Personnel Committee met on Wednesday, August 2, 2000, with the following members present: Margaret B. Douglas, chairman; Sidney A. Reyes, vice-chairman; Philip C.G. Farley; Verne E. Collins; Robin Damico; John R. Riley, Jr.; Lauren G. Carrier; and Ann K. Kelican. 1. ReQuest from Sheriff and Fire and Rescue Director for Salary Adjustment and Staff Restructure - Approved Sheriff Bob Williamson and Fire and Rescue Director Gary DuBrueler appeared before the committee and requested a salary adjustment in the amount of$5,000 each for the duties they will perform in the co-management of the Communications Center and restructure of the departmental staff. No additional county funds are needed to implement this request. The committee recommends approval of this request. (See Attachment A) Upon motion made by Margaret B. Douglas, seconded by Robert M. Sager, the above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Nay Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Nay Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 2. ReQuest from Planninl: Director Kris Tierney for Salarv Adiustments and Reclassifications - Approved with Amendment Planning Director Kris Tierney appeared before the committee and presented a proposal for salary adjustments and reclassification of the Planning Department staff. The committee recommends approval ofthe salary adjustments requested for the Director, Deputy Director, Zoning Administrator, and Mapping and Graphics Manager as set forth in the attached proposal. The committee requested that salary comparisons for the planner positions, the GIS System Analyst, and the Cartographic Design Technician be presented at the next committee meeting for consideration. (See Attachment B). Supervisor Reyes moved to approve the recommendation of the committee and further authorized the county administrator to hire a zoning administrator with a salary above the fourth step. Margaret B. Douglas seconded the motion and was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye 3. Employee of the Month The committee selected Carol I. Huff ofthe Planning Department as Employee ofthe Month for August 2000. (See Attachment C). Mrs. Huffwas unable to attend the meeting and the board received a memorandum from her expressing her thanks and appreciation. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 23 County Administrator Riley advised the board that staff received notice from Karen Unger- Fricke and Ellie Unger to withdraw their request for exception from the Subdivision Ordinance for the Unger Farm Subdivision and no action was required by the board (presented as Tab R on agenda). Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., the agenda was adopted, as presented, by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye CONSENT AGENDA County Administrator Riley suggested the following tabs for approval under consent agenda: 1. Proclamation Re: Frederick County Day of Remembrance - Tab H; 2. Correspondence and Resolution Re: Changes in the Primary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 522, Project 0522-034-118, C501 - Tab K; 3. Correspondence and Resolution Re: Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 739, Project 0739-034-109, C501 - Tab L; 4. Resolution Re: Request for Installation of "Watch for Children" Sign - Hites Street - Tab M; 5. Withdrawal of Request for Exception from the Subdivision Ordinance for the Unger Farm Subdivision - Tab R; and 6. Road Name Change Request - From Teets Court to Bryce Court - Tab S. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., the consent agenda was approved as noted above by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye CITIZEN COMMENTS No one appeared before the board. MINUTES OF JULY 12. 2000 - APPROVED AS AMENDED Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded by Robert M. Sager, the minutes ofthe Regular Meeting of July 12, 2000, were approved with one correction on page 12. Supervisor Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 024 Orndorff made the motion to approve Conditional Use Permit #09-00. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye COUNTY OFFICIALS SANITATION AUTHORITY REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS BOARD RE: WATER STATUS UPDATE Frederick County Sanitation Authority Chairman James Anderson appeared before the board and introduced the evening's presentation regarding the Water Supply Plan in Frederick County. The plan addressed various areas of concern regarding the effects of the drought, overview of the long range water supply plan, the USGS study, review ofprojected water demand and treatment and transmission facilities to meet demands, review of ground water source availability and development, and review of the water contract negotiations with the City of Winchester. Frederick County Sanitation Authority Engineer/Director Wellington H. Jones appeared before the board. In summary, he advised the board that from a vegetation perspective the drought is over but the effects of the drought on the ground water will not be specific until next spring because significant recharge of groundwater occurs during the late fall to early spring. Indicators he uses show that the drought is less severe at this time. The voluntary water conservation measures were called for in the early spring in preparation for a repeat ofthe summer of 1999, which was not the case this year. He made it perfectly clear to the board that new development was not a concern to the authority as this only represented around two percent or 60 thousand gallons per day in water demands. The peak water demands from existing customers are always a concern during hot and dry weather conditions. As a result of the favorable weather conditions this summer, the peak demands have been met by the authority and it is perceived that there will be no need to impose water restrictions should the current conditions prevail. The Clearbrook, Stephens City, and Bartonsville quarries will provide the most reliable source of water for the county and due to the economic development ofthese resources rates will not have to be increased. The USGS proposed study will help address questions regarding the quantity of water available for use, the effects of increased pumpage on groundwater levels and instream flows, the relation between karst features Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 'I 25 and the hydrology and geochemistry ofthe surface and ground-water flow systems, and the quality of the ground-water supply and its vulnerability to current and potential future of sources of contamination. The study will take three and one-half years beginning in October 2000 and a final report will be produced in FY 2004. Messrs. David Nelms and George Harlow, hydro geologists with the Water Resources Division, Geological Survey in Richmond, will present their proposal at the board meeting scheduled for September 27. The authority has asked the board's cooperation and support for funding this survey and the geological survey will fund up to 50 percent of the study. Gilbert W. Clifford and Associates Vice President and Senior Environmental Consultant Earl Sutherland, P.E., appeared before the board and addressed the projected water demands and treatment facilities to meet those demands. By 2001, the authority will have treatment and transmission capacity to meet maximum day demands of 4.6 MGD; 2003, 10 MGD of treatment capacity to meet 5.1 MGD maximum day demands; and by 2025, an average daily demand of about 8 MGD. At present, water is purchased from the city in order to meet water demands as county water sources are less than county water demands, however, with the completion ofthe Bartonsville Wells, the Stephens City South Quarry, the Frey Quarry, and the Frey Quarry Expansion, the authority will be able to sustain its maximum needs with the completion of these systems. Science Applications International Corporation Technical Services Manager Michael D. Haufler, P.G. ofthe Westminster, Maryland office appeared before the board to address the ground water source availability and development. He reported that there is a lot of ground water in the valley because ofthe geology. It is estimated that 50 MGD is available. The USGS study will help quantify the resources. The goal is to develop beyond the 8 MGD estimated and the quarries are the county's primary source. Currently, the water is supplemented by wells and Mr. Haufler explained in detail how they identify these wells. Reservoirs are not an option at this time as the federal and state regulations are very stringent and would be very costly for Frederick County. Since ground water is abundant in this area and easily tapped, wells are the most economical source of water. Concerns were addressed regarding the Frye Quarry and finding it dry, however, during a mining operation it has to be dry to excavate and is kept bottomed out. Mr. Anderson appeared before the board again to address the water contract negotiations with the city as the current contract expires December 31,2000. Several options were negotiated to include changing the service area for the city. Since no consensus was reached with this option, the Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 U26 service area discussions have been eliminated. Currently, the authority is negotiating a long term contract of20-30 years and the cost for water is being developed. Several areas are being reviewed to help keep county cost down. This includes the installation of water meters and water being provided from the city to the Stephens City area. He asked for the board's cooperation in supporting the authority's needs from the city and the need for developers to provide proffer well sites to the Sanitation Authority. PROCLAMATION (#001-00) RE: FREDERICK COUNTY DAY OF REMEMBRANCE - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA WHEREAS, the First Annual Parents of Murdered Children for the family and friends of those lost to violence, Frederick County Day of Remembrance will be commemorated on September 25, 2000; and WHEREAS, Parents of Murdered Children helps survivors deal with acute grief in a safe, non-judgmental environment and helps them through the maze ofthe criminal justice system; and WHEREAS, the annual Day of Remembrance honors the memories of all children and adults lost to murder, allowing their silent voices to be heard and insights into the personal pain and loss of their families and friends; and WHEREAS, the annual Day of Remembrance provides an opportunity for the community to share in remembering those lives lost senselessly to violence; NOW, THEREFORE, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, does hereby proclaim September 25, 2000, as *FREDERICK COUNTY DAY OF REMEMBRANCE* Adopted this 9th day of August, 2000. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS JOHN D. POWELL APPOINTED TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERM OF PAUL SPAIN Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by Sidney A. Reyes, John D. Powell was appointed to serve as the Opequon District representative on the Frederick County Parks and Recreation Commission. This appointment will fill the unexpired term of Paul Spain who resigned from the commission, said term to expire January 24,2004. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye GARY DOVE APPOINTED TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY INDUSTRIAL Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 27 DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO FILL UNEXPIRED TERM OF DON LENTZ Upon motion made by Sidney A. Reyes, seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sf., Gary Dove was appointed to serve as the Gainesboro District representative on the Frederick County Industrial Development Authority. This appointment will fill the unexpired term of Don Lentz who resigned from the authority, said term to expire November 10,2001. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jf. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye ROBERT M. SAGER REAPPOINTED TO THE CLARKE-FREDERICK- WINCHESTER REGIONAL JAIL BOARD Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Sidney A. Reyes, Robert M. Sager was reappointed to the Clarke-Frederick-Winchester Regional Jail Board, as the Frederick County Representative, for a four year term. This term will commence October 13,2000, and expire on October 13, 2004. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sf. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye The board requested county staff to contact Robert S. Hodgson to determine if he is interested in being reappointed to the Board of Building Appeals. In addition, some confusion was expressed regarding the non-district representatives and whose responsibility it was to appoint someone in these positions. Staff was asked to clarify the board's responsibility of these appointments. SCHOOL BOARD'S REOUEST TO FUND SIX YEAR CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CIP) WITH VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY BONDS WITHOUT GOING TO REFERENDUM - DENIED Upon motion made by Sidney A. Reyes, seconded by Robert M. Sager, to approve the school board's first choice of financing the Capital Improvements Plan with the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bonds without a referendum was denied by the following recorded vote: Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 028 Richard C. Shickle - Nay Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Nay W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Nay Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ASKS THE SCHOOL BOARD TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REFERENDUM FOR THIS NOVEMBER ELECTION FOR VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY BONDS TO FUND THE $60.000.000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOLS- APPROVED Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., to request the school board to consider resolutions of approval for VPSA bonds by referendum in the November 2000 election for the school's first two projects totaling $60,000,000 in the Capital Improvements Plan. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye CORRESPONDENCE AND RESOLUTION (#003-00) RE: CHANGES IN THE PRIMARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 522. PROJECT 0522-034-118. C501 - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA WHEREAS, Route 522 from 0.13 miles north of Route 127 to 0.99 miles north of Route 127 has been altered as shown on the plans for Project 0522-034-118, C501; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided this board with a sketch dated 31 May 2000 depicting required changes in the Primary System of State Highways, which sketch entitled "Changes in the Primary and Secondary Systems Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 522, Project: 0522-034-118, C501," which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a new road now serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified to be abandoned and those portions to be abandoned no longer serve a public need. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby request that the Virginia Department of Transportation abandon from the Primary System of State Highways the portion of Route 522 identified as Section 1 on the aforementioned sketch, pursuant to 33.1-148 of the Code a/Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. ADOPTED this 9th day of August 2000. CORRESPONDENCE AND RESOLUTION (#004-00) RE: CHANGES IN THE SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 739. PROJECT 0739-034-109. C501 - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 29 AGENDA WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided this board with a sketch dated June 19,2000 depicting required changes in the Secondary System of State Highways, which sketch entitled "Changes in the Primary and Secondary Systems Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 739, Project: 0739-034-1 09, C50 1 ," which is hereby incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a new road now serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified to be abandoned and those portions to be abandoned no longer serve a public need. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby abandon from the Secondary System of Highways the portion of Route 739 identified as Section 1 ofthe aforementioned sketch, pursuant to 33.1-155 ofthe Code a/Virginia, 1950, as amended; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation add to the Secondary System of Highways the portion identified as Section 2 of Route 739, on the aforementioned sketch, pursuant to 33.1-229 of the Code a/Virginia, 1950, as amended; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a certified copy ofthis resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. ADOPTED this 9th day of August 2000. RESOLUTION (#005-00) RE: REOUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF "WATCH FOR CHILDREN" SIGN - HITES STREET - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA WHEREAS, the 1997 Session of the Virginia Assembly amended the Code of Virginia adding Section 33.1-210.2 relating to the installation and maintenance of "signs alerting motorists that children may be at play nearby," and WHEREAS, this act provides for the adoption of a resolution by the governing body of any county requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to install and maintain this type of sign, and WHEREAS, the source of funding for the installation of this sign shall come out of the secondary system construction allocation to the affected county. The costs of maintaining such sign shall be paid out of the secondary system maintenance allocation to the affected county; and WHEREAS, Hites Street, Route 1281, is located in a residential area and is within the secondary road system and is a viable candidate for a "Watch for Children" sign, and BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors does hereby request that the Department of Transportation install a "Watch for Children" sign in accordance with the provisions of Section 33.1-210.2 of the Code of Virginia. BE IT FURTHERRESOL VED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer ofthe Virginia Department of Transportation. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE. CHAPTER 7. ELECTIONS: ARTICLE II. ELECTION PRECINCTS: SECTION 7-7. PRECINCTS AND RESPECTIVE POLLING PLACES ENUMERATED: PARAGRAPH A. BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: TO CHANGE THE KERNS TOWN PRECINCT POLLING PLACE FROM THE TRI- COUNTY VIRGINIA O.I.C. TO THE ORCHARD VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. THE PROPOSED RELOCATION WILL BE EFFECTIVE FOR THE NOVEMBER 7. 2000 ELECTION - APPROVED Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 03 County Administrator Riley presented this code amendment. There was no public input. Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by Margaret B. Douglas, the following code amendment was approved: BE IT ORDAINED, that Chapter 7, Elections; Article II, Election Precincts; Section 7-7, Precincts and Respective Polling Places Enumerated; Paragraph A., Back Creek Magisterial District; Kernstown Precinct Polling Place, be amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 7 ELECTIONS 97-7. Precincts and Respective Polling Places Enumerated The precincts for each magisterial district and the polling places for each precinct shall be as set forth below: A. Back Creek Magisterial District. Precincts Polling Places Cedar Creek Precinct Gore Precinct Kernstown Precinct Middletown Elementary School Gore Fire Hall Russells Precinct Tli COuut.Y "(/;15;11;(1. a.I.e. Orchard View Elementary School North Mountain Volunteer Fire Hall The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #10-00 FOR STORAGE SOLUTIONS SUBMITTED BY TRIAD ENGINEERING. INC. FOR AN OFF- PREMISE BUSINESS SIGN. THE SIGN WILL BE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TASKER ROAD (ROUTE 642) AND RAINVILLE ROAD AT THE EASTGATE COMMERCE CENTER. THIS PROPERTY IS IDENTIFIED WITH PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 76-A-53 IN THE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED At this time Supervisor Sager excused himself from any discussions on this matter due to a conflict of interest. Planning and Development Planner II Amy Lohr presented this item. The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting on July 5, 2000, recommended approval ofthis CUP with the following conditions: Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 31 I. All review agency comments must be complied with at all times. 2. A sign permit must be obtained from the Building Inspections Department for the off- premIse SIgn. 3. Should the business cease to operate at the location advertised by the sign, the off- premise sign must be removed within 30 days. 4. Upon the sale of Parcel 76-A-53 and/or upon the construction of a permanent sign, CUP #10-00 will be void. There was no public input. Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., CUP #10-00 was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Abstained Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Aye PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING #03-00 OF OLD GORE SCHOOL TO REZONE 1.215 ACRES OF A 3.292 ACRE TRACT FROM B2 (BUSINESS GENERAL) TO RA (RURAL AREAS). THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 251 GORE ROAD AND IS IDENTIFIED WITH PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 28-A-52 IN THE BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED Planning and Development Deputy Director Evan Wyatt presented this rezoning request. The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting on July 5, 2000, unanimously recommended approval of this rezoning request. The applicant/owner Mr. Michael B. Morgan appeared before the board and advised that the facility will be used for a mental retardation class of about 6-1 0 people and that there would be little traffic and the program would be well supervised. He also stated that the drainfield and plumbing was okay and that he had spent well over $20,000 on the facility for improvements. Since Frederick County leased out a day care there at one time, he did not see how this class would be a problem at this facility. The following person appeared before the board in opposition ofthis request: Derek Heishman. Back Creek District, expressed his concern that the facility would not be very secure to hold such a program, was too close to the road, an increase in traffic would occur, the condition of the facility was inadequate, and the septic system was inadequate which would affect nearby wells. Upon motion made by Margaret B. Douglas, seconded by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., rezoning Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 032 application #03-00 was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Nay Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Nay PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE. CHAPTER 165. ZONING. AMENDING ARTICLE VIII. R5 (RESIDENTIAL RECREATION COMMUNITY) DISTRICT: ARTICLE VI. RP (RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE) DISTRICT. SECTION 165-65.F. SINGLE FAMILY SMALL LOT HOUSING: AND ARTICLE IV. SUPPLEMENTARY USE REGULATIONS. SECTION 165-31.B(6)' PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES-STEEP SLOPES. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS WOULD MODIFY THE EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW INCREASED FLEXIBILITY IN THE DESIGN OF A RESIDENTIAL RECREATION COMMUNITY BY PROVIDING APPROPRIATE DESIGN STANDARDS. ALTERNATE DIMENSIONAL REOUlREMENTS.AND ALTERNATE MEANS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - APPROVED Zoning Administrator Michael Ruddy presented this code amendment. The Planning Commission, at their meeting on July 19, 2000, unanimously endorsed this code amendment and recommended approval to the board. The following citizens appeared before the board concerning this code amendment: Michael Wilson. President ofthe Winchester Chapter ofthe Izaak Walton Leal!ue and Vice President of the Lakeside Development Homeowner's Association. In representing these two organizations, they are opposed to this code amendment. These organizations represent a significant portion of the county population and they felt the amendments eviscerated the environmental protection standards. He also addressed concern with the development and the homeowner's association enforcing the restrictions. Sam Lehman. Back Creek District, is opposed to the code amendment. He is not in favor ofthe change in slopes :from 15% to 25% and feels amendments should be policed by the county not the homeowners association, and not to allow extreme high density lots on small parts ofland. The higher the density the more problems you have and also expressed concern with the large open spaces in the R5 subdivisions. Wayne Miller. Gainesboro District and Planninl! Commission Member, is in favor of the code amendment and feels these changes are in the best interest of Frederick County. He feels a lot of misinformation has been given to the public. He specifically addressed the paid advertisement by the Izzak Walton League of America dated Friday, August 4. Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 33 Mrs. Mary Lou Koontz. Gainesboro District, is in favor of the code amendment. Believes an age restricted community will benefit and is needed in the community, it will not require new schools, and will bring more people in to shop and eat. Lisa LaCivita. Onequon District, is opposed to the code amendment. Feels the environmental protection regulations are less restrictive and is concerned with the alteration ofthe steep slopes and design alternatives. Pat Gochenour. Shawnee District and Vice President of Citizens for a Oualitv Community (COC), is opposed to the code amendment. Feels there are too many unanswered questions regarding the environmental issues and water and the amendments will only benefit a few at the expense of many. Kenny Stiles. Stonewall District, is not sure of the code amendment as there is some confusion with some of the issues. He does not feel the 25 percent foot slope change is a good idea and suggested the board go out and look at the areas. He is in favor of the age restrictions but concerned with how it will be enforced especially in asking the homeowners association to enforce a zoning ordinance and especially concerned with county staff checking on the ages of residents. Charles Maddox. Vice President. G. W. Clifford and Associates. Enl:ineer for the Shenandoah Project, feels it is a good policy to allow an age restricted community and is done all over the country. The amendments were well thought out and a lot of time and work went into the revlslOns. Vickie West. Orl!anizer of Save the Water, is opposed to the code amendment. Concerned that the amendments will affect wildlife and the water and is also concerned with the change of slopes. Kathy Whitesell. Back Creek District, is opposed to the code amendment. Feels the board members needed to take more time to study the amendments and that this was an opportunity to convey a message to the developers that it is our way or no way. Scott Grel:ory. Back Creek District, is concerned with how the development will affect the schools and water. How many schools will need to be built for the 20 percent that is not age restricted. Donnie Gladden. Opequon District, is opposed to the code amendment. He feels these amendments represents a step backwards instead of forward. He has some concerns with the Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 034 community maintaining there own roads and he feels it is time to elect the Planning Commission members instead of being appointed by the board. He also feels an amendment is not required for an age restricted community. Audrev Brown. has a residence in Stephens City, is opposed to this code amendment. Feels such an age restricted community development will not benefit the area and the environment needs to be protected. Rhoda Karusaitis. OueQuon District, is opposed to this code amendment. She is very concerned about the environmental impact this development will have on the area. Dela Bates. Opequon District, is opposed to this code amendment. Concerned that the development will not be able to find many people to live in that area. Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., the following code amendment was approved as presented: ARTICLE VIII R5 Residential Recreation Community District 9 165-73. Intent. The intention of the Residential Recreational Community District is to provide for a carefully planned recreational community which takes advantage of unique natural features and settings. Such communities shall be planned in a fashion that will protect and preserve natural and historic resources and features and that will protect and enhance the natural scenic value of the area to be developed and surrounding areas. The Residential Recreational Community District provides for a mixture of housing types and use within a carefully planned setting. Special emphasis is placed on recreational and open space uses. Business and service uses are allowed to meet the needs of residential recreational communities. 9 165-74. Master development plan. All land to be contained within the Residential Recreational Community District shall be included within an approved master development plan. The layout, phasing, density and intensity of development is determined through the adoption of the master development plan by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. Special care is taken in the approval of the master development plan to ensure that the uses on the land are arranged to provide for compatibility of uses, to provide environmental protection and to avoid adverse impacts on surrounding properties and facilities. Innovative design is encouraged. Special care is taken in the approval of R5 developments to ensure that necessary facilities, roads and improvements are available or provided to support the R5 development. Residential recreational community developments shall only be approved in conformance with the policies in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. 9 165 - 7 5. Rezoning procedure. In order to have land rezoned to the R5 District, a master development plan, meeting all requirements of Article XVII of this chapter, shall be submitted with the rezoning application. The rezoning shall be reviewed and approved following the rezoning procedures described by this chapter, including procedures for impact analysis and conditional zoning. In adopting the rezoning, the master development plan submitted will . be accepted as Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 35 a condition proffered for the rezoning. The master plan review procedures described by Article XVI~ must also be completed concurrently with or following the consideration of the rezoning. A. Impact analysis. Impact analysis, as required by this chapter, shall be used to evaluate all potential impacts, including impacts on surrounding lands, the environment and on public facilities and services. B. Land dedication. Land shall be dedicated in residential recreational community developments fo~ roads and" facilities necessary to serve the development as described by the Comprehensive Plan, the Capital Improvements Program and adopted road improvement programs. C. Addition ofland. The Board of Supervisors may approve the addition ofland to an approved recreational residential community through the procedures set forth in this chapter for the original approval of a residential recreational community development. 9 165-76. Permitted uses. The following uses are allowed in the R5 Residential Recreational Community District: A. All uses allowed in the RP Residential Performance District. . D. Indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. E. Preserves and conservation areas. F. Restaurants. G. Hotels and lodges. H. Boat clubs and service areas. 1. Service stations. J. Private campgrounds. K. Heliports or air strips. I I- I . I c L. Tele~lsloll and ladlo statIons and towers. Minute Book Number 27 Board of Snpervisors Meeting of 08109/00 03 ~ 165-77. Design requirements. A. Minimum size. No residential recreational community master development plan norrezoning to the Residential Recreational Community District shall be approved for less than 500 contiguous acres. B. Dimensional requirements. A. Areas shall be specifically designated for each different use on the master development plan. Within those areas, the uses shall meet the applicable dimensional requirements set forth for those uses in the RP, Bl and B2. B. I . I I II I Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 37 4. Existin lots. the Zoning Administrator may allow reduced yard setback distances on existing lots of record currently zoned R5 ... The Zoning Administrator may also allow reduced yard setback distances on lots contained in previously approved master plans for R5 residential recreational communities. C. Residential density. The gross density for residences in the residential recreational community development shall not exceed 2.3 units per acr . ... d <illl D. E. F. Open space. A minimum of thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross area of any proposed development shall be designated as common open space. This open space shall be for purposes of environmental protection and for the common use of residents of the development. No more than 50% of the required open space shall be within tlK followill& environmental areas. lakes and ponds, wetlands or steep slopes. The D~."Gto. ofrlannlll&, npuu '''''U111111"udat;uu of tl." Planning Commission may allow a larger amount of steep slopes to utilized where the develo er can demo viable Ian for the use ofthesy a . II G. Recreational facilities. One recreational unit or equivalent recreational facilities shall be provided for each 30 dwelling units. The facilities shall be in a configuration and location that is easily accessible to the dwelling units that they are designed to serve. The design and amount offacilities shall be approved by the Planning Commission in con' u . n with the Director of Plannin and the De artment of Parks and Recreation. H. Buffers and screening. Buffers and screening shall be provided between various uses and housing types as if the uses were located in the RP, B 1 or B2 Zoning District according to the uses allowed in those districts. Buffers and screening shall be provided accordingly as specified in 9 165-37 ofthis chapter. Road efficiency buffers shall be provided according to the requirements of that section. In addition, along the perimeter boundary ofthe Residential Recreational Community District, buffers and screens shall be provided in relation to adjoining properties' . lanned c' ted in the RP Bl and B2 Zoning Districts. Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 U38 1. Sewer and water facilities. All residential recreational community developments shall be served by public sewer and water facilities owned by or dedicated to a public authority. 1. Road access. All residential recreational community developments shall have direct access to an arterial or collector road or to roads improved to arterial or collector standards. K. .. The residential recreational community development shall be provided with a complete system of public streets dedicated to the Virginia Department of Transportation. The road system shall conform with the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan and with road improvement plans adopted by the county. . . ~ Planning Commission may allow the extension of existing private roads if no other means of access is available. L. All public and private streets ,oads w ithlll tho:, de, v dopmo:,llt shall be provided with curb and gutter. Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 39 M. _rcdcstdanaccess.A_systemofpede t 'anan access, in the form ofPavedMlul 1-',,,,,J interior walkways shall be provide,q. .t?. allow walking between eve use structure or recreational facility. Such 1111 walk~aY5 shall be connected with . 0 he residential recreational communit develo m N. Stormwater management. The requirements of Section 165-32 ofthis chapter shall apply to the total residential recreational community development. O. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be in conformance with an overall landscaping plan or unifying concept for the development. P. Phasing. If a Residential Recreational Community District is proposed to be developed in phases, O~C-i a pc-liod oftinlc, common open space shall be provided wit. each phase in proportion to the fraction of the total area of the development in each phase. Recreational facilities shall be provided with each phase in proportion to the fraction ofthe total dwelling units in each phase. Essential street entrances to the planned residential communit shall be vided wi phases ofthe development Q. Property owners' association. A single property owners' association shall be provided for all phases of a recreational community development according to the requirements of Section 165-34 ofthis chapter. I S. Other regulations. The residential recreational community development shall conform with all regulations ofthis chapter and the Frederick County Code unless specifically exempted by this Article. - ARTICLE VI RP Residential Performance District Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 U40 165-65 F. (1) Sin Ie-family small lot. Single-family sma~. '. residence on an individual lot. ~ The intent of this housing type is to provide an alternative to conventional single-family lots that can be tailored to the unique needs of specialized populations such as those ofthe older person. Dimensional requirements shall be as follows: (a) Minimum lot size: ~ square feet. (b) Off-street parking spaces: 2. ( c) Setback from state road: 25 feet. (d) Setback from private road: 20 feet. (e) Rear yard: 15 feet. F. Side yard: Zero lot line option may be used with this housing type. If chosen, the minimum side yard shall be 10 feet for that yard opposite the zero lot line side. If not chose the mini side d be five feet. I I (2) A minimum of20 landscape plantings shall be provided on each individual lot. At least 1/4 of the landscape plantings shall be trees, with the remainder being shrubs. The trees shall be a minimum of two inches in caliper at time of planting, and the shrubs shall be a minimum three-gallon container at time of planting. (3) Maximum building heights shall not exceed ze 35 feet in height. (4) Detached accessory buildings shall not be permitted. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle - Aye Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Nay Robert M. Sager - Aye Margaret B. Douglas - Aye Sidney A. Reyes - Nay Supervisor Reyes stated he was opposed to approving this amendment due to the public input presented at this meeting. Since the majority who spoke were opposed to approving this amendment, he voted for what the people wanted. REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION FROM THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE FOR THE UNGER FARM SUBDIVISION - WITHDRAWN ROAD NAME CHANGEREOUEST-FROMTEETS COURT TO BRYCE COURT- APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA This road is located in Gore, Virginia. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS There were no additional comments at this time. Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00 1 ADJOURN UPON MOTION MADE BY CHARLES W. ORNDOFF, SR., SECONDED BY SUPERVISOR SIDNEY A. REYES, THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD, THE MEETING WAS HEREBY ADJOURNED (TIME: 10:10 P.M.). \2J~ L-~~ Richard C. Shickle Chairman, Board of Supervisors Minutes Prepared By: tU/ C/~~.-/ Ca~anner Administrative Assistant Minute Book Number 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting of 08/09/00