Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
March 14 2018 Board_Agenda_Packet
AGENDA CLOSED SESSION & REGULAR MEETING FREDERICK CO. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 2018* 6:00 and 7:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 6:00 P.M. – Closed Session: The Board of Supervisors will convene in closed session pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 A (7) and (8)of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, for Consultation with Legal Counsel and Briefing by Staff Members Pertaining to a Litigation Matter, Stonewall Industrial Investors, LLC v. Frederick County, Virginia, currently pending in the Frederick County Circuit Court, Where Such Consultation or Briefing in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect the Negotiating or Litigating Posture of the Public Body, and for Consultation with Legal Counsel Employed or Retained by a Public Body Regarding the Matter, Requiring the Provision of Legal Advice by Such Counsel. 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting Call To Order Invocation Pledge of Allegiance Adoption of Agenda Attachment Consent Agenda ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Minutes Budget Work Session of February 28, 2018 Regular Meeting of February 28, 2018 Committee Reports ------------------------------------------------- B Parks and Recreation Commission -------------------------------------------------------------- C Public WorksCommittee ------------------------------------------------------------ D Transportation Committee -------------- E Proclamation of Local Government Education Week: April 1-7, 2018 ------------ F Proclamation of National Telecommunicators’ Week: April 8-14, 2018 ------------------------- G Resolution Honoring Employee of the Month Travis Mitchell Consent Agenda - continued ------------------------ H Closing of County Offices for Annual Apple Blossom Festival Resolution to Request that the Comprehensive Plan and Programs Committee (CPPC) Consideran Amendment to the 2035 Comprehensive Plan Outside of the Annual Amendment Process for St. Paul’s on the ---------------------------------------- I Hill Episcopal Church Located on Senseny Road Citizen Comments Board of Supervisors Comments County Officials Presentation of Resolution of Appreciation to Joseph G. Dove Presentation of Employee of the Month Resolution to Travis R. Mitchell -------------------------------------------------------------------- J Committee Appointments Handley Regional Library Board 2 applications received One unexpired 4-year term ending 11/30/21, Social Services Board - Red Bud District Representative One unexpired 4-year term ending 06/30/20 Board of Building Appeals No applicationsreceived One unexpired 5-year term ending 11/10/2018, Frederick Water Board of Directors 4-year term of Christopher Collins ends 04/15/18 Parks and Recreation Commission – Red Bud District Representative 4-year term of Christopher Fordney ends4/28/18 Committee Business Public Works Committee 1.Adoption of Revised Charter for the Shawneeland Sanitary District Advisory Committee The committee recommends approvalof the revised Charter. (3¤¤ 4 ¡ U#U ¥®± ££¨³¨® « ¨¥®±¬ ³¨®) Committee Business – continued 2.Adoption of Proposed Vehicle Replacement Program The committee recommends approvalof the use of the proposed model. (3¤¤ 4 ¡ U#U ¥®± ££¨³¨® « ¨¥®±¬ ³¨®) 3.Disposition of the old Frederick County Middle School The committee recommends approval of advertising and receiving bids on the property. (3¤¤ 4 ¡ U#U ¥®± ££¨³¨® « ¨¥®±¬ ³¨®) Transportation Committee 1.Revenue Sharing Agreement-Northern Y (see attached): An agreement governing revenue sharing funds and match for the Tevis Extension from the roundabout north and east to Route 522. Staff is seeking a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors on whether to execute the agreement and authorize Staff to proceed to approximately 30% design and the associated updated cost estimate. It is noted that regardless of the amount of the cost estimate, Staff will bring the agreement back before the Committee and Board of Supervisors. Staff recommends approving the agreement to allow 30% design. (3¤¤ 4 ¡ U$U ¥®± ££¨³¨® « ¨¥®±¬ ³¨®) 2.SmartScale Applications Recommendation The following is the list recommended by the Committee for projects that Frederick County should apply for through the SmartScale application process and the MPO projects to be promoted at the Regional Commission level: •Exit 317 and Redbud RoadFrederick County •Route 11 North (lane widening)Frederick County •Route 522 Costello Drive left turnsFrederick County •Route 11 South-Stars or Route 11 ShawneeFrederick County •Exit 313 BridgeMPO/RC •Exit 307MPO/RC •Greater I-81 include Exit 317 NB on-rampMPO/RC (3¤¤ 4 ¡ U$U ¥®± ££¨³¨® « ¨¥®±¬ ³¨®) Public Hearings(Non Planning Issues) Twelve Month Outdoor Festival Permit Request: -------------------------------------------- K Trumpet Vine Farm(DeMarchi Spears) Pursuant to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 86, Festivals; Section 86-3, Permit Required; Application; Issuance or Denial; Fee; Paragraph D, Twelve Month Permits.All Events to be Held on the Grounds of Trumpet Vine Farm, 266 Vaucluse Road, Stephens City, Virginia, Back Creek Magisterial District. Property Owned by DeMarchi Spears. Outdoor Festival Permit Request: ----------------------------------------------------------------- L Tyler Wakeman – Peak Leaf Music & BrewersFestival Pursuant to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 86, Festivals; Section 86-3, Permit Required; Application; Issuance or Denial; Fee, for an Outdoor Festival Permit. Festival to be Held on Saturday-Sunday, October 20 and October 21, 2018, from 9:00 A.M. October 20, 2018 Until 12:00 P.M. October 21, 2018 on the Grounds of 7180 Valley Pike, Middletown, Virginia, Back Creek Magisterial District. Property Owned by Wakeland Manor, Inc. Outdoor Festival Permit Request: ----------------------------------------------------------------- M Grove’s Winchester Harley-Davidson–Battle of theBands & Vintage Bikes. Pursuant to the Frederick CountyCode, Chapter 86, Festivals; Section 86-3, Permit Required; Application; Issuance or Denial; Fee, for an Outdoor Festival Permit. Festival to be Held on Saturday, May 19, 2018, from 10:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., (Rain Date to be Held on Saturday, June 9, 2018, from 10:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.), on the Grounds of Grove’s Winchester Harley-Davidson, 140 Independence Drive, Winchester, Virginia, Shawnee Magisterial District. Property Owned by Jobalie, LLC. Outdoor Festival Permit Request: ----------------------------------------------------------------- N Grove’s Winchester Harley-Davidson – Rhett Rotten’s Wall of Death. Pursuant to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 86, Festivals; Section 86-3, PermitRequired; Application; Issuance or Denial; Fee, for an Outdoor Festival Permit. Festival to be Held on Saturday and Sunday, June 16 and June 17, 2018, from 9:30 A.M. to 3:30P.M. Each Day, on the Grounds of Grove’s Winchester Harley- Davidson, 140 Independence Drive, Winchester, Virginia, Shawnee Magisterial District. PropertyOwned by Jobalie, LLC. Proposed School Bond Financings by the Board of Supervisors---------------------- O of the County of Frederick, Virginia. Notice is Hereby Given that the Board of Supervisors (The "Board") of the County of Frederick, Virginia (the "County") will Hold a Public Hearing in Accordance with Section 15.2-2606 of the Code Of Virginiaof 1950, as Amended, on the Issuance of General Obligation School Bonds (the "Bonds") of the County in an Aggregate Principal Amount Not to Exceed $27,000,000 to Finance Certain Capital Projects for Public th School Purposes, Consisting Primarily of the Construction and Equipping of the 12 Elementary School Located at Snowden Bridge. A Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of the Bonds will be Considered by the Board of Supervisors at Its Meeting on Wednesday, March 14, 2018. All Interested Parties are Invited to Attend and Present Oral or Written Comments. Planning Commission Business Public Hearings Rezoning #05-17 for O-N Minerals (Chemstone)----------------------------------------------- P d/b/a Carmeuse Lime & Stone Submitted by Lawson and Silek, PLC., to Amend the Proffers for this Property; Rezoning 394.2 Acres from the EM (Extractive Manufacturing) District with Proffer to the EM (Extractive Manufacturing) District with Revised Proffers. The Properties are Situated Generally West of the Town of Middletown. Specifically, the Middle Marsh Property is Located East of Belle View Lane (Route 758), and West and Adjacent to Hites Road (Route 625) and is Further Traversed by Chapel Road (Route 627). The Northern Reserve is Bounded to the South by Cedar Creek and is West and Adjacent to Meadow Mills Road (Route 624). The Properties are Identified with Property Identification Numbers 83-A-109 and 90-A-23 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Conditional Use Permit #09-17:Gregory A. Bishop------------------------------------------ Q (Shenandoah Mobile, LLC)Commercial Telecommunication Facility Submitted to Construct a Wireless Commercial Telecommunication Monopole Towerwith Supporting Equipment in a Fenced Compound. The Property is Locatedat 219 Round Hill Road, Winchester, Virginia and is Identified with PropertyIdentification Number 52-A-254 in the Back Creek MagisterialDistrict. Proposed Springdale Road Truck Restriction Proposal-------------------------------- R – to Close Route 649 to Trucksfrom Route 11 to Route 651. The Proposed Alternative Route is Route 651 and Route 11. This Restriction Will Apply to Commercial Vehicles Exceeding 30 Feet in Length. 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)----------------------------------------------------- S The CIP is a Prioritized List of Capital Projects Requested by Various County Departments and Agencies. The Plan is Created as an Informational Component ofthe 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Board Liaison Reports Citizen Comments Board of Supervisors Comments Adjourn Frederick County Board of Supervisors Budget Work Session * February 14, 2018Page 1 of 3 Page 1 of 3 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Budget Work Session * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Budget Work Session * February 14, 2018Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Budget Work Session * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Budget Work Session * February 14, 2018Page 3 of 3 Page 3 of 3 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Budget Work Session * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 1 of 11 CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL Page 1 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 2 of 11 CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION HONORING THE LIFE OF DAVID "DAVE" W. GANSE WHEREAS, David Dave W. Ganse was born in 1954 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, to Marjorie A. Ganse and the late Robert G. Ganse, and WHEREAS, Dave graduated from James Wood High School as a member of the Class obefore attending Virginia Tech, and WHEREAS, Dave was a respected architect in the Winchester and Frederick County community and established his own firm, David W. Ganse, AIA Architect, which h 2017, and WHEREAS, Dave was inducted into the James Wood Hall of Fame in 2012 for hool prowess in football, wrestling and track, and was also an avid guitarist throughout his life and WHEREAS, Dave unselfishly gave back to his community by offering to share his time and expertise serving as a member of the Frederick County Board of Building Appeals from Nov January 2018 and the Frederick County Public Works Committee fro and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Board ovisors extends its sincerest thanks and appreciation for David Ganse and honors his contribution to the community. ADOPTED this 28th day of February 2018. + + ++ + + + + + ++ + CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION HONORING THE LIFE OF JAMES THOMAS JIM WILSON WHEREAS, James Thomas Jim Wilson was born on July 30, 1933 in the late Raymond Thomas Wilson, Sr. and Virginia Dora Hughes Wilson, and WHEREAS, Jim served in the U. S. Army, was a lifetime member 33 Fairview United Methodist Church in Stephens City, and WHEREAS, Jimwas the original owner and operator of Valley Redi-Mix in Stephens City, Virginia, and WHEREAS, Jim unselfishly gave back to his community by offering to share his time and expertise serving as a member of the Frederick County Public Works Committ December 2017 and the Frederick County Landfill Oversight Commit April 2006, and WHEREAS, Jim provided valuable insight when the Committees discu and recycling issues and offered the businessmans perspective, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Board o sincerest thanks and appreciation for James Wilson and honors hi contribution to the community. ADOPTED this 28th day of February 2018. + + ++ + + + + + ++ + CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL + + ++ + + + + + ++ + Page 2 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 3 of 11 Page 3 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 4 of 11 Page 4 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 5 of 11 Submitted for Establishment of a Landscaping Contracting Business in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The Property is Located at 639 Reliance Road, Middletown, Virginia and is Identified with Property Identification Number 91-A-77 in the Opequon Magisterial District. Page 5 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 6 of 11 Page 6 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 7 of 11 + + ++ + + + + + ++ + Page 7 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 8 of 11 Page 8 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 9 of 11 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Finance Committee DATE: February 21, 2018 SUBJECT: Finance Committee & Budget Work Session Report and Recommendations A Finance Committee meeting was held in the First Floor Conference Room at 107 North Kent Street Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 3:45 p.m. All members were present. () Items 1, 2, and 3 were approved under consent agenda. A budget work session followed at 4:00 p.m. FINANCE COMMITTEE 1.() The Sheriff requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $1,000. This amount represents a DARE donation. No local funds required 3. 2.() The Sheriff requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $5,051.12. This amount represents an auto claim reimbursement. No local fu memo, p. 4. 3.() The Deputy County Administrator requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of $6,996. This amount represents a property claim reimbursement for water damage at Millwood Fire Station. No local funds required. See 5. 4.The VJCCCA requests a General Fund budget transfer in the amount of $25,000 from salaries to client services. No local funds required. See attached memo, p. 6. The committee recommends approval. BUDGET WORK SESSION 1.Discussions were held on the FY 2019 budget. The Frederick County Public Schools Superintendent presented the schools proposed FY2019 budget. Page 9 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 10 of 11 INFORMATION ONLY 1.The Deputy County Administrator provides information regarding the Triennial Applications for Real Property Tax Exemptions. See attached information, p. 7 52. 2.The Finance Director provides a Fund 10 Transfer Report for January 2018. See attached, p. 53. 3.The Finance Director provides financial statements ending January. See attached, p.54 64. 4.The Finance Director provides an FY 2018 Fund Balance Report ending February 15, 2018. See attached, p. 65. 5.Frederick County has received the Distinguished Budget Presentati 2018 budget from the Government Finance Officers Association of st (GFOA) for the 31 consecutive year. See the attached award letter, p. 66 67. Respectfully submitted, FINANCE COMMITTEE Judith McCann-Slaughter, Chairman Charles DeHaven Gary Lofton Angela Rudolph Jeffrey Boppe By ___________________________ Cheryl B. Shiffler, Finance Director Page 10 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018Page 11 of 11 Page 11 of 11 Frederick County Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting * February 14, 2018 Attachment1 Attachment2 TO: Public Works Committee FROM: Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator SUBJECT: Vehicle Replacement Policy/Model DATE: February 21, 2018 Staff was tasked with developing a methodology for evaluating veAttached please find a summary of the model inputs/points system which are used as part of this model. The methodology is based upon the American Public Works Association guidelines but have been modified to be more reflective of Frederick Countys vehicle fleet. Staff will be present at the meeting to go over the model/inputs. Following staffs presentation, if the Committee is comfortable with the proposed model, staff is seeking a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to approve the use of the model for evaluating requests for replacement vehicles. Attachment Attachment3 -DRAFT- FREDERICK COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOLSUMMARY REPORT February 26, 2018 The Frederick County Middle School is a parcel in the City of Winchester, Virginia, designated as PIN 130-01-1, with an address of 441 Linden Drive, and contains by current field survey 22.7960 acres. Frederick County acquired the property by deed dated September 10, 1965 and recorded in Deed Book 316 at Page 62 in the Frederick County Clerk's Office. The subject property is a portion of the land that was annexed into the City of Winchester in the late 1970's, and the property currently has city zoning of Low Density Residential (LR). Attached is a copy of the City of Winchester Zoning Ordinance relating to the LR district. The subject property has significant frontage along Linden Drive, a 60-foot wide right of way with a city maintained roadway. The adjacent property to the west is owned by the Winchester Medical Center and this property is zoned MC (Medical Center). A portion of the Winchester Medical Center land on the north side of the subject property is zoned HS (Health Services) to allow for the Shenandoah University Pharmacy School. In August 2017, an 8-acre parcel was conveyed to Shenandoah University for the pharmacy school building, which includes direct access ways. The Frederick County Middle School completed a boundary line adjustment with the adjacent medical center land that conveyed 0.5766 acres to the medical center, which is a portion of the land in the rear of the school property. Attached is a survey map with an aerial overlay that shows the current boundaries of the middle school property and the adjacent land. The middle school is accessed by Caroline Street, which intersects Fox Drive to the east, and Linden Drive, which accesses Amherst Street to the south. The original survey for the school property provided for an extension of Caroline Street that was never built. This right of way area of Caroline Street was vacated by the City of Winchester and conveyed to the Winchester Medical Center in 2009. Recently, an emergency access strip was conveyed to Shenandoah University for the pharmacy school. The middle school property is served by public water from an 8-inch water main located in the intersection of Linden Drive and Caroline Street. Sanitary sewer isalso provided by the City of Winchester through an 8-inch gravity line on the north side of the property, which flows to the city sewer system along Caroline Street. The school property has a direct natural gas service line that crosses the property behind the school for connection at the mechanical room area. Power is provided to the school from an overhead power line that extends across the northerly portion of the property to a power pole that drops the electric service to underground and extends to the meter connection behind the school building. Additionally, the school has a steam heating system and an aboveground 2,500-gallon fuel oil tank for the system boiler. The attached survey map delineates these utility lines that serve and surround the school property. Other easements that burden the property are also shown on the survey exhibit, which includes an overhead electric transmission main with an 80-foot easement that crosses the westerly side of the property. The property is improved with the school building that was built in the mid-1960's and an asphalt parking lot and separate asphalt entrance and student drop-off area directly in front of the school building. The school property is also improved with a cinder quarter-mile track and anathletic field. Additional athletic open space areas surround the rear portion of the school and these areas are maintained in grass. The original school building is supported by eight additional temporary mobile classrooms that are positioned directly behind the school, and have walkway access and electric service. The Frederick County Middle School property falls within the northwest geographic area of the City of Winchester Comprehensive Plan. This area of the comprehensive plan also includes the medical center and the residential properties east to Route 522. Attached with this report is the comprehensive plan information for the northwest geographic area. The comprehensive plan would suggest that the future use of the middle school property would be to link the site to Route 37 via connection to the Winchester Medical Center private roadway network, which would also make the site attractive for mixed-use zoning. Non-residential uses would need to be buffered to the single-family homes being constructed along the east side of Linden Drive. The comprehensive plan indicates that the proximity to the regional medical center and Shenandoah University's Pharmacy School makes this site very marketable, and could be considered a key parcel for the mixed-use transition area. Summary of Existing Features Address: 441 Linden Drive, Winchester, Virginia PIN:130-01-1 Area:22.7960 Acres Zoning: LR (Low Density Residential) Land Acquired: September 10, 1965 Deed Book 316, Page 62 (Frederick County) School Built: 1966 Building: Two-Story (64,000 square feet) Additional: Eight Mobile Classrooms of 24' x 38' (900 square feet each; 7,200 square feet total) Public Sewer and Water: City of Winchester (8" water line; 8" gravity sanitary sewer) Parking Lot: Asphalt (166 spaces total) Overhead Electric Line to Underground Service Natural Gas Service (4" line) Heating Oil Tank: 2,500 gallons (not in use) Steam Heating System Direct Access to Linden Drive, City of Winchester Public Street Athletic Fields: 0.25-mile cinder track and football field Score Board with Electric Service Field Irrigation System Two Additional Open Area Athletic Field Areas WINCHESTERMEDICAL CENTER ZONED MC (MEDICAL CENTER) 80' ELEC. ESMT FREDERICK COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL ZONED HS SHENANDOAH (HEALTH SERVICES) UNIVERSITY PHARMACY SCHOOL ZONED LR (LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) 22.796 AC. ZONED LR (LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) Attachment4 SURVEY OF GLASS RECYCLNG IN FREDERICK & SURROUNDING AREAS FEB. 2018 Jurisdiction !¢¢¤¯³² Recycle Reuse Status Impact Glass/Residents Yes Yes Purchased Six mo. Delay Goal is to capture & ¨±¥ · glass crusher on set-up and residue from single- to pull glass not receiving stream recycling residue from loads from process; provide three outside area aggregate for internal processing to date; road uses at landfill; facilities for tipping fee to reuse at Frederick and pay through landfill; would be avoided costs and tip remainder $35/T, fees marketed by delivered recycling facilities Yes No Crushed and On-going; DEQ Reduces cost of & ´°´¨¤± mixed w/some approved use; buying soil soil and counts as concrete to PRM; will construct plant grass privacy berms and trees at landfill Yes Yes Private single- ,®´£®´ stream and county drop- offs; six processing facilities in region accept glass Yes No Used as daily On-going for 5 Provides beneficial 0 ¦¤ cover at yrs; approved use of glass & landfill by DEQ as contributes to PRM or PRM DEQ diversion rate Yes Yes Six processing 0±¨¢¤ facilities in 7¨««¨ ¬ region accept glass from county drop- offs and private single- stream; Manassas facility landfills glass SURVEY OF GLASS RECYCLNG IN FREDERICK & SURROUNDING AREAS FEB. 2018 Yes No Used as daily On-going for When mixed with clay; 3§¤ £® § cover at at least 3 yrs; aids soil mix; landfill approved by contributes to DEQ DEQ as PRM diversion totals Yes No Hauled to Used as daily Provides beneficial 7 ±±¤ Page County cover use of glass & Landfill approved by contributes to PRM or DEQ as PRM DEQ diversion rate Yes Yes Hauled to On-going Single stream 7¨¢§¤²³¤± local search for processors in processor as alternative Hagerstown/Manassas dual-stream markets since Will not process glass; material 1/17; no No glass rebate at contract with Southern; pays Southern $16/T tip fee for glass, Scrap, local cans, plastics processor Yes Yes Hauled to Started Rebate received for "¤±ª¤«¤¸ 76 cullet hauling glass clear offsets hauling processor in when costs; costly to haul PA from 3 Zuckerman green/brown drop-offs; closed curbside glass recycling ended 9/17 No No Discussion of ( ¬¯²§¨±¤ curbside in 76 Romney by private hauler; no glass included Yes Yes Hauled to Rebate for clear glass *¤¥¥¤±²® 76 cullet processor in PA No No Program Due to -®±¦ 76 ended 12/17 increased hauling costs GLASS REYCYCLING/REUSE ALTERNATIVES IN FREDERICK COUNTY FEB. 2018 - ±ª¤³ ,®¢ ³¨® 5²¤ #®²³ ³® #® )¬¯ ¢³ Frederick County Glass bottles; $72/T plus Material 3®´³§¤± cullet unknown cost recycled; Scrap processor in of retrieving contributes to PA any unsold recycling rate; material (per 500 T/yr; contract); additional $36,000 per $42,000/yr in year tip fee to hauling costs processor; no to move glass rebate from drop-offs to recycler I-95 Complex Crushing $36,040/yr to Not yet Fairfax operation; haul, can operational Crushing roads, rental and and open to aggregate at tipping fee to outside glass; landfill Fairfax; material reimburse reused in Local landfill construction; for logistics contributes to recycling rate; requires staging, loading and equipment by local landfill Hagerstown & Hagerstown Hagerstown Contract with - ³¤±¨ «² Manassas stopped will accept our Southern to 2¤¢®µ¤±¸ processing materials, but process; Facilities glass 9/17; no glass additional Manassas hauling costs; accepts in co-tipping fees mingled loads but landfills glass Pennsylvania Two cullet $48,220/yr to Cullet sold to #´««¤³ processors haul, can make new Processors rental. No tip bottles, fee; no rebate; construction reimburse and industrial local landfill uses; for logistics contributes to recycling rate GLASS REYCYCLING/REUSE ALTERNATIVES IN FREDERICK COUNTY FEB. 2018 Shenandoah County Grind to create $56,000/yr for Operation still 3 £ "« ²³¨¦ sand blasting hauling and stockpiling material trailer rental; glass for undetermined eventual tipping fee operation; material reuse; contributes to PRM or diversion rate Frederick County Embankments, Glass must VDOT earthwork, meet state base, crushed specs; for pipe contractors backfill made aware of its availability for reuse; approved by DEQ as PRM; contributes to diversion rate; requires stockpiling Regional Landfill Crush loads of Loss of Material !«³¤± ³¨µ¤ glass with efficiency in considered $ ¨«¸ #®µ¤± existing how metal beneficial use equipment; cans collected; by DEQ as mix with soils $172 per pull PRM; as daily cover due to contributes to in operations dropping part of cans/glass diversion rate load at Southern (cans) and remainder (glass) at landfill; otherwise, purchase 11 30-yd containers at $99,000; reimburse landfill for logistics Attachment5 Attachment6 RECYCLING REPORT - FY 17/18 ALSTEEL MONTHGLASSPLASTCANSCANSPAPEROCCSHOES/TEXELECSCRAPTOTAL JUL 34,0603,4107,33076,06089,5406,56085,340289,600591,900 AUG 37,8204,3707,770100,38095,14040,420269,640555,540 SEP 35,8202,2054,17569,48083,5974,86037,520333,060570,717 OCT 33,6203,7608,87078,34082,24039,960242,741489,531 NOV 36,1203,7059,31582,84077,6207,80038,980232,809489,189 DEC 35,8602,7106,75081,060104,00038,460181,040449,880 JAN 51,5203,5458,515100,82097,5506,16043,760155,156467,026 FEB 0 MAR 0 APR 0 MAY 0 JUN 0 TOTAL 0264,82023,70552,725588,980629,68725,380324,4401,704,0463,613,783 FY 16-17 372,600430,43541,00289,9761,082,7371,009,15337,220495,5002,687,2416,245,864 FY 15-16 919,540428,30052,07797,2521,275,060974,49348,820480,4002,376,3446,652,286 FY 14-15 895,600407,70340,06097,5151,272,660893,38049,440532,2831,890,7296,079,370 FY 13-14 904,780417,09039,39999,1771,281,105902,70137,800611,5801,639,2255,932,937 FY 12-13 913,530410,33845,086102,8751,508,029878,45039,700502,6801,321,9385,722,626 FY 11-12 865,380398,32043,88499,8461,492,826840,71737,920484,6001,432,6785,696,171 FY 10-11 949,185378,45242,12098,4741,404,806824,87341,700467,9201,220,1075,427,637 FY 09-10 1,123,671370,38642,84496,6661,235,624671,66921,160435,6801,348,3985,346,098 FY 08-09 762,810322,92823,47355,2461,708,302564,95728,780404,7601,097,1514,968,407 FY 07-08 794,932284,22015,78340,5441,971,883545,6920498,1101,172,8805,324,044 FY 06-07 600,464200,72011,83429,2851,684,711441,3210382,574550,0703,900,979 FY 05-06 558,367190,61112,47828,5261,523,162381,469204,2202,898,833 FY 04-05 549,527193,22411,41527,5251,552,111273,70725,0802,632,589 FY 03-04 541,896174,25611,43731,1121,443,461156,870336,2302,695,262 FY 02-03 413,627146,7709,84023,1481,381,19562,840171,6802,209,100 FY 01-02 450,280181,04010,56525,5531,401,20654,06158,1402,180,845 FY 00-01 436,615198,51910,36724,9881,759,7319,6202,439,840 FY 99-00 422,447177,26010,17722,8471,686,58744,1802,363,498 FY 98-99 402,192184,4059,56422,9051,411,95048,8102,079,826 FY 97-98 485,294136,11013,30729,7751,830,0002,494,486 FY 96-97 373,106211,10523,58446,6251,690,0002,344,420 FY 95-96 511,978167,48628,44144,9951,553,0602,305,960 TO DATE 14,247,8216,009,678548,7371,234,85533,150,2068,547,406342,5406,225,03417,634,72187,941,078 Attachment7 FREDERICK COUNTY ESTHER BOYD ANIMAL SHELTER FY 2017-2018 DOG REPORT ON HAND ATRECEIVEDBROUGHT INBITEBORN ATDIED ATESCAPED/CARRIED OVER MONTHFIRST OF MONTHAT KENNELBY ACOCASESKENNELADOPTEDRECLAIMEDDISPOSEDKENNELSTOLENNEXT MONTH JULY50284740383980044 AUG44255120434470028 SEP28213810243231028 OCT28364320393030037 NOV37353310282820048 DEC48242430442610028 JAN28263210262710033 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL 2631952681402422262510246 In the month of January - 87 dogs in and out of kennel. 3 dogs transferred to rescue. Attachment8 FREDERICK COUNTY ESTHER BOYD ANIMAL SHELTER FY 2017-2018 CAT REPORT ON HAND ATRECEIVEDBROUGHT INBITEBORN ATDIED ATESCAPED/CARRIED TO MONTHFIRST OF MONTHAT KENNELBY ACOCASESKENNELADOPTEDRECLAIMEDDISPOSEDKENNELSTOLENNEXT MONTH JULY10113523262821430094 AUG94183242843115020115 SEP115171281024415221132 OCT132153141026316720102 NOV10210214002867510108 DEC10869700537610063 JAN63463010391431056 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL 7158591407142412479181670 In the month of January - 140 cats in and out of shelter. MEMORANDUM Route 11 South-StarsFrederick County Exit 317 and Redbud RoadFrederick County Exit 317Northbound on ramp Frederick County Route 522Costello Drive-left turnFrederick County Route 37 (Lenoir Drive slip ramps)Frederick County Route 11 North (4lane widening)Frederick County Exit 307 ImprovementsFrederick County Exit 317 and Redbud RoadFrederick County Exit 317Northbound on rampFrederick County Route 522Costello Driveleft turnsFrederick County Route 11 South-StarsFrederick County Exit 313 BridgeMPO Exit 307MPO Greater I-81MPO Route 11 South-Shawnee areaWinchester Route 37 (Lenoir Drive slip ramps) Route 11 North (4lane widening) Route 7 Inverlee Way Route 277 (Sherando Park Entrance) Exit 317 and Redbud RoadFrederick County Route 11 North (lanewidening)Frederick County Route 522Costello Driveleft turns Frederick County Route 11 South-StarsorRoute 11 Shawnee Frederick County Exit 313 BridgeMPO/RC Exit 307MPO/RC Greater I-81include Exit 317 NB on-rampMPO/RC Note: If the City does notapply for Route 11 South-Shawnee area, the County would apply for this project and move Route 11 South-Stars to the MPO/Regional Commission list. Code of Virginia APRIL 1-7, 2017 AS LOCAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATION WEEK WHEREAS, since the colonial period, the Commonwealth of Virginia has clos institutions of local government; and WHEREAS, local governments throughout the Commonwealth provide valuable s citizens of the communities they serve; and WHEREAS, citizen services such as, law enforcement, public health and saf opportunities, and educating local children, are most often deli WHEREAS, in recognition of the work performed by local governments, the Vnia General Assembly, on February 29, 2012, designated the first week in Apr Education Week in Virginia; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, that April 1-7, 2017 is hereby designated as Local Government Education Week; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia will promote civic education and engagement in an effor their local government, strengthen the sense of community, and e local government managers. day of March, 2018. ADOPTED this 14 th _________________________________ Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Employee of the Month Resolution Awarded to: Travis R. Mitchell WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors recognizes that the County's employees are a most important resource; and, WHEREAS, on September 9, 1992, the Board of Supervisors approved a resolution which established the Employee of the Month award and candidates for the award may be nominated by any County employee; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisorsupon recommendation by the Human Resources Committeeselects one employee from those nominated; and, WHEREAS,Travis R. Mitchell who serves as a Deputy with the Frederick County Sheriff’s Department wasnominated for Employee of the Month; and, WHEREAS, early in 2017, Deputy Travis Mitchell who is assigned as aSchool Resource Officer at Frederick County Middle School and the Director of Bright Futures began exploringthe idea ofa “Lunch Buddy” program. The goal was to create a mentoring program with elementary students to develop stronger relations between the community and law enforcement, all while providing students with a positive role model. The program requires a Deputy to have lunch with students 1 or 2 times a month. Deputy Mitchellbegan a trialrun in three elementary schools with great success.Atthe end of the 2017 school year, the program was expanded to all eleven elementary schools in Frederick County. Deputy Mitchell has recruited and mentored fellow officers as well as officers from Middletown and Stephens City Police Departments. Deputy Mitchell continues to monitor the involvement of officers and has created an on-line tracking system to effectively monitor participation. So far during this school year, over 20 officers have participated in the program with positive results. It is Deputy Mitchell’s proactive approachand leadership that has made this program successful; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors day of March 2018, thatTravis R. Mitchellis hereby recognized as the Frederick this 14 th County Employee of the Month forMarch2018; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends gratitude toTravis R. Mitchell for hisoutstanding performance and dedicated service and wishes him continued success in future endeavors; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Travis R. Mitchell is hereby entitled to allof the rights and privileges associated with hisaward. County of Frederick, VA Board of Supervisors ___________________________________ Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY of FREDERICK Jay E. Tibbs Deputy County Administrator 540/665-5666 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: jtibbs@fcva.us TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy County Administrator VPSA Bond Issuance for 12 Elementary aka Snowden Bridge th SUBJECT: Elementary School DATE: March 8, 2018 Attached please find a resolution authorizing the issuance of bo elementary school along th with supporting documentation from Frederick County Public Schools. The resolution authorizes the issuance of General Obligation School Bonds in an amount not to . As you might recall, the Board of Supervisors previously appropriated $27,000 speaking with bond counsel regarding the higher number, staff was which equates to approximately 5%, is to allow for fluctuation in the bond market so the county can secure the funding needed to do the project. this resolution, that amount is $27,000,000. Bond counsel has confirmed that the total borrowing for this project can only go up to $27,000,000. At the conclusion of the public hearing on this matter, staff and the schools are the authorization resolution. Should you have any questions or need additional information, pl Attachments RESOLUTION ______________________________________________ Action: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:March 14, 2018 APPROVED DENIED ______________________________________________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $28,350,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THECOUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA,TO BE SOLD TO THEVIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDINGFOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF. WHEREAS , the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Frederick, Virginia (the "County"), has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow an amount not to exceed $28,350,000 and to issue one or moregeneral obligation school bonds (as more specifically defined below, each a "Local School Bond") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for public school purposes, consisting primarily of the construction and equipping of an elementary school in Snowden Bridge (collectively, the "Project"); WHEREAS , the County helda public hearing, duly noticed, on March 14, 2018, on the issuance of the Local School Bonds in accordance with the requirements of Section 15.2-2606, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code"); WHEREAS , the School Board of the County has, by resolution, requested the Board to authorize the issuance of the Local School Bonds and consented to the issuance of the Local School Bonds; WHEREAS , Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") has offered to purchase a Local School Bond along with the local school bonds of certain other localities with a portion of the proceeds of certain bonds to be issued by VPSA in the springof 2018 or a future bond sale(the "VPSA Bonds"); WHEREAS, the Bond Sale Agreements (as defined below) shall indicate that $27,000,000 is the amount of proceeds requested (the "Proceeds Requested") from VPSA(in the aggregate)in connection with the sale of the Local School Bonds; -1- WHEREAS, VPSA's objective is to pay the County a purchase price for the Local School Bond which, in VPSA's judgment, reflects eachLocal School Bond's market value (the "VPSA Purchase Price Objective"), taking into consideration of such factors as the amortization schedule the County has requested for thespecificLocal School Bond relative to the amortization schedules requested by other localities, the purchase price to be received by VPSA from the sale of the VPSA Bonds and other market conditions relating to the sale of the VPSA Bonds; and WHEREAS, such factors may result in a Local School Bond having a purchase price other than par and consequently (i) the County may have to issue one or moreLocal School Bonds in a principal amount that is greater than or less than the Proceeds Requested in order to receive an amount of proceeds that is substantially equal to the Proceeds Requested, or (ii) if the maximum authorized principal amount of the Local School Bonds set forth in section 1 below does not exceed theaggregate Proceeds Requested by at least the amount of any discount, the purchase price to be paid to the County, given the VPSA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, will be less than the Proceeds Requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA : 1.Authorization of Local School Bond and Use of Proceeds . The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell its general obligation school bonds, on more than one occasion,in an aggregate principal amount of no more not to exceed $28,350,000 (each a "Local School Bond") for the purpose of financing the Project. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of one or moreLocal School Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2.Sale of the Local School Bond . The sale of eachLocal School Bond, within the parameters set forth in paragraph 4 of this Resolution, to VPSA is authorized. Given the VPSA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, the County acknowledges that the limitation on the maximum aggregate principal amount ofall Local School Bonds issued under this Resolution set forth in paragraph 1 of this Resolution restricts VPSA's ability to generate the Proceeds Requested, however, eachLocal School Bond may be sold for apurchase price not lower than 95% of the Proceeds Requested. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator, or either of them (each a "Delegate") and such other officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to enter into an agreement with VPSA providing for the sale of eachLocal School Bond to VPSA (each a "Bond Sale Agreement"). The Bond Sale Agreements shall be in substantially the form required by VPSAasitmay be approved by the County officer executing the Bond Sale Agreement. 3.Details of the Local School Bond .EachLocal School Bond shall be dated a date designated by VPSA; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bond, Series 20___";(or such other designation as the County Administrator may approve) shall bear interest from its dated date payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts acceptable to a Delegate (the "Principal Installments"), subject to the provisions of paragraph 4 of this Resolution.The Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Payment Dates are subject to changeat the request of VPSA. -2- 4.Interest Rates and Principal Installments .Each Delegate is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on each Local School Bond established by VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be five one-hundredths of one percent (0.05%) over the interest rate to be paid by VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the VPSA Bonds, a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Local School Bond, and provided further that the true interest cost of each Local School Bond does not exceed five and fifty one-hundredths percent (5.50%) per annum. The Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Installments are subject to change at the request of VPSA. Each Delegate is hereby authorized and directed to accept changes in the Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Installments at the request of VPSA based on the final term to maturity of the VPSA Bonds, requirements imposed on VPSA by the nationally-recognized rating agencies and the final principal amount of such Local School Bond; provided, however, that the principal amount of all Local School Bonds shall not exceed the amount authorized by this Resolutionand the final maturity of each Local School Bond shall not exceed 31years from the date of the issuance and delivery of such Local School Bond. The execution and delivery of each Local School Bond as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence the approval and acceptance of all of the details of such Local School Bond by the Delegate as authorized by this Resolution. 5.Form of the Local School Bond .Each Local School Bond shall be initially in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as ExhibitA. 6.Payment; Paying Agent and Bond Registrar . The following provisions shall apply to each Local School Bond: (a)For as long as VPSA is the registered owner of each Local School Bond, all payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on a Local School Bond shall be made in immediately available funds to VPSA at, or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption,or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next succeeding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. (b)All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on such Local School Bond. (c)The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to engage a financial institution to serve as Bond Registrar in accordance with VPSA's requirements.The County may, in its sole discretion, replace at any time the Bond Registrar with another qualified bank or trust company as successor Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for any LocalSchool Bond. The County shall give prompt notice to VPSA of the appointment of any successor Bond Registrar and Paying Agent. 7.Prepayment or Redemption .With respect to any Local School Bond sold to VPSA in the spring 2018 sale, the Principal Installments of the Local School Bond held by VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2028, and the definitive bond for which the Local School Bond held by VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2028, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Local -3- School Bond held by VPSA coming due on or after July 15, 2029, and the definitive bond(s) for which the Local School Bond held by VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or after July 15, 2029, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July15, 2028, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Local School Bond to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2028 through July 14, 2029 101% July 15, 2030through July 14, 2031 100½ July 15, 2032 and thereafter100 Provided, however, that the Principal Installments of the Local School Bond shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of VPSA or other registered owner of the Local School Bond. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to VPSA or other registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If VPSA refunds the VPSA Bonds in the future and such refunding causes the Local School Bond to be deemed refunded, the prepayment or redemption of the Local School Bond will be subject to VPSA approval and subject to similar prepayment or redemption provisions as set forth above that correspondto the call period of the VPSA bonds issued in part to refund the Local School Bond. With respect to any Local School Bond sold to VPSA in a subsequent sale, the Principal Installments of such Local School Bondwill be subject to similar prepayment or redemptions provisions as may be set forth by VPSA at the time of such sale. 8.Execution of the Local School Bond . The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver each Local School Bond and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9.Pledge of Full Faith and Credit . For the prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and the interest on each Local School Bond as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any portion of such Local School Bond shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual advaloremtax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and the interest on such Local School Bond as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes -4- authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10.Use of Proceeds Certificate and Tax Compliance Agreement . The Chairman of the Board, the County Administratorand such other officer or officers of the County or the School Board as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver on behalf of the Countya Use of Proceeds Certificate and Tax Compliance Agreement (the "Tax Compliance Agreement") setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of a Local School Bond and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds from the issuance and sale of eachLocal School Bond will be invested and expended as set forth in such Tax Compliance Agreement and that the County shall comply with the other covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so thatinterest on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. 11.State Non-Arbitrage Program; Proceeds Agreement . The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with eachLocal School Bond. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administratorand such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of eachLocal School Bond by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, VPSA, the investment manager and the depository, substantially in the form submitted to the Board at this meeting, which form is hereby approved. 12.Continuing Disclosure Agreement . The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator and such other officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, as set forth in Appendix D to the Bond Sale Agreement, setting forth the reports and notices to be filed by the County and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and directed to make all filings required by Section 3 of the Bond Sale Agreement should the County be determined by VPSA to be a MOP (as defined in the Bond Sale Agreement). 13.Refunding. The Board hereby acknowledges that VPSA may issue refunding bonds to refund any bonds previously issued by VPSA, including the VPSA Bonds issued to purchase a Local School Bond, and that the purpose of such refunding bonds would be to enable VPSA to pass on annual debt service savings to the local issuers, including the County. Each of the Delegates is authorized to execute and deliver to VPSA such allonge to the Local School Bond, revised debt service schedule, IRS Form 8038-G or such other documents reasonably deemed necessary by VPSA and VPSA's bond counsel to be necessary to reflect and facilitate the refunding of a Local School Bond and the allocation of the annual debt service savings to the County by VPSA. The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is authorized to affix the County's seal on any such documents and attest or countersign the same. -5- 14.Filing of Resolution . The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 15.Election to Proceed under Public Finance Act . In accordance with Section 15.2- 2601 of the Virginia Code, the Board elects to issue the Local School Bond pursuant to the provisions of the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 26 of Title 15.2 of the Virginia Code. 16.Further Actions . The members of the Board and all officers, employees and agents of the County are hereby authorized to take such action as they or any one of them may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Local School Bond and otherwise in furtherance of this Resolution and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 17.Effective Date . This Resolution shall take effect immediately. * * * The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on March __, 2018, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. Members present at the meeting were: ______________________. Members absent from the meeting were: ________________. Members voting in favor of the foregoing resolution were: ______________________. Members voting against the foregoing resolution were: ____________________________. Members abstaining from voting on the foregoing resolution were: ________________. WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, this ___ day of March, 2018. Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia [SEAL] -6- Land Use Transportation and Access. See proffer 2.1 o Berms o o ST 627 REZ # 05 - 17 O-N Minerals (Chemstone) Co. PINs: ST ST 627 83 - A - 109, 90 - A - 23 759 ST 625 Rezoning from EM to EM Zoning Map ST 622 ST REZ #05-17 633 83 A 109 ST 627 ST 625 REZ #05-17 83 A 109 83 A 109 ST 627 ST ST 625 T-627 ST REZ #05-17 ST 757 842 Middletown 90 A 23 ST 624 ST 625 SHENANDOAH ST ST COUNTY 624 627 VIRGINIA ST 624 § ¨¦ 81 § ¨¦ 01 81 ST 11 ST 842 727 Applications Sewer and Water Service Area Parcels B1 (Neighborhood Business District) B2 (General Business District) B3 (Industrial Transition District) EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) § ¨¦ WARREN 81 HE (Higher Education District) COUNTY M1 (Light Industrial District) REZ # 05 - 17 Note: M2 (Industrial General District) Frederick County Dept of O-N Minerals MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) Planning & Development I MS (Medical Support District) (Chemstone) Co. 107 N Kent St Suite 202 OM (Office - Manufacturing Park) PINs: Winchester, VA 22601 R4 (Residential Planned Community District) 83 - A - 109, 90 - A - 23 540 - 665 - 5651 Rezoning from EM to EM R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) Map Created: October 18, 2017 Zoning Map RA (Rural Areas District) Staff: cperkins RP (Residential Performance District) 01,6003,2006,400Feet ST 627 REZ # 05 - 17 O-N Minerals (Chemstone) Co. PINs: ST ST 627 83 - A - 109, 90 - A - 23 759 ST 625 Rezoning from EM to EM Location Map ST 622 ST REZ #05-17 633 83 A 109 ST 627 ST 625 REZ #05-17 83 A 109 83 A 109 ST 627 ST ST 625 T-627 ST REZ #05-17 ST 757 842 Middletown 90 A 23 ST 624 ST 625 SHENANDOAH ST ST COUNTY 624 627 VIRGINIA ST 624 § ¨¦ 81 § ¨¦ 01 81 ST 11 ST 842 727 § ¨¦ WARREN 81 COUNTY REZ # 05 - 17 Note: Frederick County Dept of O-N Minerals Planning & Development I (Chemstone) Co. 107 N Kent St Suite 202 PINs: Winchester, VA 22601 83 - A - 109, 90 - A - 23 540 - 665 - 5651 Rezoning from EM to EM Applications Map Created: October 18, 2017 Location Map Sewer and Water Service Area Staff: cperkins Parcels 01,6003,2006,400Feet ST ST REZ # 05 - 17 638 622 O-N Minerals (Chemstone) Co. PINs:ST 627 ST 83 - A - 109, 90 - A - 23 ST 625 759 Rezoning from EM to EM Long Range Land Use Map ST 622 REZ #05-17 ST 633 83 A 109 ST 627 ST 625 REZ #05-17 83 A 109 83 A 109 ST 627 Applications ST ST Sewer and Water Service Area 625 T-627 ST ST REZ #05-17 Parcels 842 757 ST 90 A 23 Middletown Long Range Land Use 624 Residential SHENANDOAH ST 625 COUNTY Neighborhood Village ST VIRGINIA 624 ST Urban Center 627 Mobile Home Community ST 624 § ¨¦ Business 81 § ¨¦ 01 Highway Commercial 81 ST 11 Mixed-Use ST 842 727 Mixed Use Commercial/Office Mixed Use Industrial/Office Industrial Warehouse Heavy Industrial Extractive Mining Commercial Rec Rural Community Center Fire & Rescue Sensitive Natural Areas Institutional WARREN Planned Unit Development COUNTY VIRGINIA Park Recreation School Employment § ¨¦ 81 Airport Support Area B2 / B3 REZ # 05 - 17 Note: Residential, 4 u/a Frederick County Dept of O-N Minerals High-Density Residential, 6 u/a Planning & Development I High-Density Residential, 12-16 u/a (Chemstone) Co. 107 N Kent St Suite 202 Rural Area PINs: Winchester, VA 22601 Interstate Buffer 83 - A - 109, 90 - A - 23 540 - 665 - 5651 Rezoning from EM to EM Landfill Support Area Map Created: October 18, 2017 Long Range Land Use Map Natural Resources & Recreation Staff: cperkins Environmental & Recreational Resources 02,0004,0008,000Feet Please see attached letterfrom Serena Manuel, Executive Director dated December 7, 2017. Please see attached letter from Candice E. Perkins, AICP, Assistant Director/Staff to HRAB, dated January 22, 2018. NORTHWESTERN110 130 150 PIKE CUP # 09 - 17 CROCK WELLS 180 CROCK WELLS CROCK WELLS 190 MILL CROCK 208 MILL MILL CROCK WELLS MILL CROCK Gregory A. Bishop WELLS MILL 01 WELLS MILL 50 (Shenandoah Mobile LLC) 2275 2255 PIN: NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN PIKE PIKE 52 - A - 254 2161 101 2117 NORTHWESTERN STONEWALL DR Telecommunication Tower NORTHWESTERN PIKE 2275 2177 PIKE NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN Zoning Map 2153 2131 PIKE PIKE NORTHWESTERN NORTHWESTERN 137 PIKE PIKE ROUND 2147 HILL RD NORTHWESTERN 100 PIKE STONEWALL DR 103 111 STONEWALL DR STONEWALL DR 107 STONEWALL DR 113 STONEWALL DR 109 STONEWALL DR ST 803 104 STONEWALL DR 106 116 STONEWALL DR STONEWALL DR 108 183STONEWALL DR 112 ROUND STONEWALL DR HILL RD 2093 NORTHWESTERN PIKE CUP #09-17 52 A 254 200 WARD AVE 365 ROCK HARBOR DR 01 50 Cell Tower Round Hill Applications Parcels 165 Building Footprints WARD AVE B1 (Neighborhood Business District) B2 (General Business District) 01 B3 (Industrial Transition District) 37 EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) HE (Higher Education District) M1 (Light Industrial District) CUP # 09 - 17 Note: M2 (Industrial General District) Frederick County Dept of MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)Gregory A. Bishop Planning & Development I MS (Medical Support District) 107 N Kent St (Shenandoah Mobile LLC) Suite 202 OM (Office - Manufacturing Park) PIN: Winchester, VA 22601 R4 (Residential Planned Community District) 52 - A - 254 540 - 665 - 5651 R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) Telecommunication Tower Map Created: December 13, 2017 Zoning Map RA (Rural Areas District) Staff: mcheran RP (Residential Performance District) 0175350700Feet BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Code of Virginia Springdale Rd Restriction and Alternate Routes Alternate Route 1 ~ 2.15 miles 01 37 01 11 § ¨¦ 81 01 37 § ¨¦ 81 § ¨¦ 81 § ¨¦ 81 01 11 Alternate Routes Restricted I Map Produced by Frederick County Planning and Development Dept. 00.10.20.4Miles January 10, 2018 Frequently Asked Questions -Through Truck Restriction Program What is a through truck? 46.2-809of theCode of Virginia,Athrough truckis defined For the purposes of through truck restrictions enacted under§ as any truck or truck and trailer or semitrailer combination, except a pickup or panel truck, that travels from one pointto another and having no origin or destination along the route(s) traveled. How does the program work? The Through Truck Restriction Program allows a local governing body to request that VDOT restrict the use of through trucks on any part of aprimary or secondary highway that is under the jurisdiction of VDOT if a reasonable alternate route is provided. The program is governed by§46.2-809of the Code of Virginia. How is a request for a restriction evaluated? The local governing body must hold a public hearing and make a formal request, including the submittal of a resolution, to VDOT. VDOT evaluates requests in accordance with the Through Truck RestrictionGuidelineswhich lays out the requirements that must be met in making the request as well as criteria for evaluating the appropriateness of the proposed restriction. Thecriteria considerthe reasonableness of the alternate routingand thecompatibility of truck traffic with the type of roadway and the character of the affected area.VDOT also solicits andconsiders public comments on the proposed restriction. What is the process to request a through truck restriction? Requests for through truck restrictions are made to the local governing body,generally the Board of Supervisors(BOS). The BOS holds a public hearing for any proposed restriction it desires to consider. Following the public hearing, the BOS must make a formalrequest toVDOTfor any restriction it has determined to move forward. The request to VDOT is generally through the Residence Administrator (In Fairfax, Prince William, and Loudoun Counties the request is made to the VDOT Regional Traffic Engineer) in accordance with various requirements. From this point VDOT has 9 months to respond to the formal request. VDOT evaluates and considers the request, conducts a study, and solicits public comments on the proposed restriction. For primary routes,theCommonwealth Transportation Boardapproves or denies the request. Forsecondary routes,the Commissionerof Highways (VDOT) approves or denies the request.VDOT then notifies the local governing body of the decision. How is a through-truck restriction funded? VDOT incurs all installation and maintenance costs out of its operating budgets. Which routes are currently restricted? herefor a map of restricted routes. Click MEMORANDUM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 2018-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS I 1 APPENDIX - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS PROJECT R2 Frederick County Publ 15 Frederick County Public Schools 2 Frederick County Parks and Recreation 18 Frederick County Parks and Recreation 2 Handley Regional Library .2 Handley Regional 27 County Administra2 3 .9 Transportation 3 Winchester Regional Airport4 Fire and ..32 2018-2023 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAPS Transportation .6 2018-2023 5 Winchester Regional Airport... 43 2018-2023 Frederick County Public Schools..6 2018-2023 ..7 2018-2023 ..8 ...9 . 2018-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLES.10-13 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY FY 2018-2023 INTRODUCTION Section §15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for prep Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for thCounty for the ensuing five years. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plan intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP co the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the gener, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Once the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and provides a link between the documents and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning The inclusion of projects to the CIP is in no way an indication The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding Once adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year basedlar projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes further in the future it is projected. PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS Frederick County Public Schools Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects that have been priorities from previous years. The top capital improvement priority for the Schools is the replacement of Robert E. Aylor Middle School. Construction of the New High School is the second highest priority, followed by the Armel Elementary School addition and renovation. Other schools included for renovation and addition projects include James Wood High School and Sherando High School. Parks & Recreation The top capital improvement priority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams Creek Greenway Trail. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents of this corridor along Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan completed during 2012. Other top priorities include parking at Clearbrook Park, restroom construction at NW Sherando Park and the Indoor Aquatic Other requests include projects for Sherando Park, pool upgrades at both regional parks and new community and district parks. Handley Regional Library The Handley Regional Library recommends three projects. The new library branch in the Gainesboro area. The two remaining projects request that funding be provided for new libr throughout the County which include the areas of Route 522 South and Senseny/Greenwood Road; both of which are anticipated to be located within the UDA (Urban Development Area) in locations consistent with the approved area plans - the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the Southern Frederick Area Plan. County Administration The two requests from Public Works are for the relocation of the Albin Citizen Convenience Site and the expansi Citizen Convenience Site. The joint County Administration and School Administration Building and the future replacement of the Joint Judicial Center remain in the CIP. General Government Capital Expenditures is also included in the CIP this item enhances the connection between the CIP and proffered contributions made to mitigate the impacts of development projaddresses those general government capital expenditures that may fall below the established $100,00en for Fire and Rescue Capital Equipment (see Fire and Rescue descriptions). Fire and Rescue The top project for the Fire and Rescue is the construction of the Regional Public Safety Training Center. The construction ofFire & Rescue Station #22 in the vicinity of Route 277, with the ability to provide an annex facility for other County-related offices. Fire and Rescue has also included a project which provides for the capita Project four includes the construction of Station #23, a new facility located in the vicinity of Crosspointe that would also provide the ability for an annex facility for other County-related offices. Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests The revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established remains a component of the CIP. This capital expenditure fund is for purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and equipment that may fall below the guidelines established by the Finance Committee. It was determined th and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Resc Companies previously identified their own capital requests which capital requests meet the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee. Greenwood Fire Station has included two company capital requests. These requests include the fire station living quarte renovation and expansion and a request for a replacement ambulan Transportation Committee The Transportation Committee continues to provide project requesn projects to be included within a locality's CIP. Funding for tr come from developers and revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does The Transportation Committee has requested funding for 22 projects. The 22 requests include projects that entail Interstate 81 Exit 310 Improvements, widening of major roads; key extensions of roads that help provi lanes at current unsafe intersections. The inclusion of the Easgain emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Winchester Regional Airport Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions p The construction of a new general aviation terminal to support future airport operations and associated followed by the . A number of other projects focus on land acquisition in support airport development to meet Federal Aviation requirements for gene these improvements came from the FAA and VDA. 2018 - 2023 Capital Improvements Specific or Approximate Locations County Administration 1 Albin Convenience Site Expansion 2 Gore Convenience Site Expansion 0 1 Airport 127 Library 0 1 1 Library Branch - Gainesboro 522 2 Library Branch - Rt 522 South 3 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood Fire & Rescue 1 Regional Training Center 2 Fire & Rescue Station 22 3 Fire & Rescue Station 22 Apparatus 4 Fire & Rescue Station 23 1 0 1 2 50 3 0§ 1¨¦ 81 259 0 1 1 37 0 1 0 1 7 7 0 1 3 50 0 1 50 § ¨¦ 81 0 1 37 2 0 1 0 1 50 4 11 1 0 1 11 0 1 0 1 522 55 2, 3 V 0 1 277 05,00010,00020,000 0 1 11 Feet 1 01.252.55 0 1 522 § ¨¦ Miles 66 !01 High Schools 522 ! Middle Schools ! Elementary Schools ! Support Facilities Potential School Facility Locations Potential School Locations Purchased Land Proffered Land Potential Proffer 01 Urban Development Area 522 01 SWSA 127 0 1 Facilities Services §! 50¨¦ 81 FCMS ! GES ! 01 522 0 1 SES 50 ! IHES 12th Elementary School, ! at Snowden Bridge 0 1 01 11 259 JWHS ! ! 0 !APRES 1 37 Support Facilities West § ¨¦ 01 81 522 Middle School MHS ! ! ! ! JWMS DJHC 0 1 School Board OfficeRRES 7 ! Winchester NREP/SRS GMES ! ! Multi-Use Campus Elementary School The Willows 01 0 1 522 37 OVES ABMS ! EES ! ! Fourth High School 0 1 Villages at Artrip 50 0 1 AES 11 ! ! 0 1 Transportation Facility Stephens 55 ! City REAMS ! BHES Elementary School Middle School SHS ! 01 V 277 § ¨¦ 81 School Locations 0 1 11 Are Most MES Note: Elementary School 0124Miles ! Created by Frederick County Department of Appropriate 01 Planning & Development 522 Middletown Within the UDA Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests submitted by Frederick County School Board 11/27/17 Proposed Parks District Community Neighborhood Abrams Creek Trail Existing County Parks District Park [ k Reynolds Store Community Park [ k Neighborhood Park £ ¤ Publically Accessible Land 522 Federal State Battlefield Cross Junction Non-Profit Local Park Tuscarora Trail School Gainesboro Public Boat Launch !y § ¨¦ Urban Development Area 81 Gore Clear Brook £ ¤ Clearbrook £ ¤ 259 50 Park Stephenson £ ¤ 11 Albin WEST Snowden Bridge Park £ ¤ 37 Round Hill Shawneeland NE [ k Winchester Frederick Heights Park £ ¤ 37 Rose Hill Park £ EAST¤ 50 £ ¤ 522 £ ¤ 55 Stephens City Star Tannery Armel National Forest £ ¤ 277 Sherando V Park £ ¤ 11 Note: Created by Frederick County Department of § ¨¦ 81 Planning & Development£ ¤ 00.751.53Miles 522 Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests Middletown submitted by The Dept of Parks & Recreation 11/28/2017 2018 - 2023 Capital Improvement Plan Transportation Projects 17 Funded Priorities 0 1 11 ò ðñ 1. I-81 EXIT 310 IMPROVEMENTS 310 "" § ¨¦ 81 2. ROUTE 277 WIDENING & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 1) 3. EAST TEVIS ST EXTENSION & $+ BRIDGE OVER I-81 16 4. RENAISSANCE DR, PHASE 2 5. SULPHUR SPRINGS RD 17 IMPROVEMENT FROM ROUTE 50 01 TO LANDFILL § ¨¦ 81 522 $+ 6. FOX DR; INSTALL TURN 6 LANES ONTO ROUTE 522 13 $+ 7. ROUTE 277; RT TURN LANE 7 EXTENSION AT WARRIOR DR 9 12 $+ 0 1 8. PAPERMILL RD; RT TURN 12 11 0 1 8 37 $ + LANE EXTENSION AT ROUTE 522 9 6 17 Unfunded Priorities 9. CONTINUE ROUTE 37 PLANNING 0 1 50 & ENGINEERING WORK § ¨¦ 81 ò ðñ 307 10. I-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATION 0 1 7 "" Winchester 11. ROUTE 277 WIDENING & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 2) 12. REDBUD RD & EXIT 307 RAMP $ + 21 REALIGNMENTS 18 13. ROUTE 11 N WIDENING FROM 19 SNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD TO 15 OLD CHARLESTOWN RD 3 5 14. WARRIOR DR EXTENSION § ¨¦ TO NEW EXIT 307 81 9 01 15. CHANNING DR EXTENSION 522 0 1 TO ROUTE 50 37 0 1 16. BRUCETOWN RD/ 50 $ +$+ 8 HOPEWELL RD; ALIGNMENT 16 1 AND INTERSECTION ò 4 ðñ 310 "" 17. ROUTE 11 N OF WINCHESTER 9 WIDENING TO WV LINE V 20 0 1 18. SENSENY RD WIDENING 11 19. INVERLEE WAY; CONNECTION FROM SENSENY RD TO ROUTE 50 Stephens 00.512Miles 20. WARRIOR DR EXTENSION City § ¨¦ 81 FROM ROUTE 37 Frederick County Dept of 01 $+ 21. SENSENY RD; TURN LANES Planning & Development 522 $ + 2 21 10 107 N Kent St AT CRESTLEIGH DR 7 11 Winchester, VA 22601 01 ò ðñ www.fcva.us 277 22. EASTERN ROAD PLAN 307 22 11/28/17 "" 14 IMPROVEMENTS 0 1 11 THE CIP TABLES - CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan tables, on the following four pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects propoed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Projects Ranked by Department - The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for th County Contribution - The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the righ columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes - Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources Total Project Costs - The cost for each project, including the County allocations and other funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in Table 1 have a total projected cost to the County of $544,206,269 this figure excludes Airport request and transportation projects as these are primarily funded through ot. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. School projects are funded through a combination of loans from t Literary Fund. Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come fthe unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission actively seeks grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a co contributions, and revenue sharing. Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federate, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, Warren ,; / ¦z· L¦©Ý;;· t w;¨Ò;· Contribution Per Fiscal Year Long Range County Total Project Comprehensive Projects - Ranked by Department2018-20192019-20202020-20212023+ContributionsNotesCosts Plan Projects 9Òzm .;ä7 Cz- ; ©; © ; © ; © ; © ; © Z Department Public Schools $15,600,000$20,800,000$15,600,000$52,000,000 Robert E. Aylor Middle School$52,000,000 New High School $16,600,000$24,900,000$24,900,000$16,600,000$83,000,000$83,000,000 Armel Elementary School addition and renovation$2,000,000$3,900,000$3,900,000$9,800,000$9,800,000 James Wood High School Upgrades$1,500,000$53,500,000$55,000,000$55,000,000 Sherando High School renovations and addition $1,500,000$58,000,000$59,500,000$59,500,000 Joint Administrative Offices$14,000,000$14,000,000$14,000,000 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation$10,000,000$10,000,000$10,000,000 Bass-Hoover Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation$10,000,000$10,000,000$10,000,000 Dowell J. Howard Center Replacement$35,000,000$35,000,000$35,000,000 Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation and Addition$10,000,000$10,000,000$10,000,000 Relocation of Facilities Services$5,000,000$5,000,000$5,000,000 5th Middle School$52,000,000$52,000,000$52,000,000 13th Elementary School$34,000,000$34,000,000$34,000,000 Total $15,600,000$37,400,000$42,500,000$28,800,000$23,500,000$429,300,000$429,300,000 $0 Parks & Recreation Abrams Creek Greenway Trail$500,000$500,000$1,200,000$1,200,000$3,400,000$3,400,000 Clearbrook Clearbrook Parking$257,000$257,000$257,000 Sherando Sherando NW Restroom$275,000$275,000$275,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility$480,000$10,820,000$11,300,000$11,300,000 Sherando/Clearbrook Water Slide/Spray Ground$624,000$624,000$624,000 Sherando HS Softball Complex$176,000$1,473,000$1,649,000$1,649,000 $4,550,000 Snowden Bridge Park Development$300,000$4,250,000$4,550,000 $720,000 $720,000$720,000 Sherando HS Baseball Field Lighting Sherando Sherando Park Area 3 Development$2,150,000$2,150,000$2,150,000 $672,000 Community Center$8,395,000$9,067,000$9,067,000 Community Park $990,000$1,100,000$2,090,000$2,090,000 $831,000 Neighborhood Parks (6)$4,155,000$831,000$4,986,000 $11,803,000 District Parks (3)$3,934,000$7,869,000$11,803,000 $2,035,000 SherandoS Sherando Park Development $2,035,000$2,035,000 Fleet Trip Vehicles $307,000$307,000$307,000 SherandoSherando Park Area 1 Development $2,220,000$2,220,000$2,220,000 SherandoSherando Park Area 2 Development$2,273,000 $2,273,000$2,273,000 $6,180,000 $6,180,000$6,180,000 Indoor Ice Rink Total $2,612,000$19,913,000$3,693,000$14,629,000$0$0$25,039,000$58,074,000$65,886,000 Contribution Per Fiscal Year Long Range County Total Project Comprehensive Projects - Ranked by Department2018-20192019-20202020-20212023+ContributionsNotesCosts Plan Projects Regional Library Gainesboro Library$165,023$1,475,736$128,275$1,749,034$1,769,034 Route 522 South Library$306,765$2,736,470$3,043,235$3,043,235 Senseny/Greenwood LibraryTBDTBDTBD Total$0$165,023$1,475,736$128,275$306,765$2,736,470$4,792,269$4,812,269 County Administration Albin Convenience Site$135,000$1,224,000$1,359,000E$1,359,000 Gore Convenience Site Expansion$30,000$624,000$654,000$654,000 $1,000,000 General Government Capital Expenditures$200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$1,000,000E TBD County/School Board Administration Building TBDTBDE TBD Joint Judicial Center New FacilityTBDTBD Total$335,000$1,454,000$824,000$200,000$200,000$0$3,013,000$3,013,000 Fire & Rescue $31,175,000 Regional Training Center$75,000$100,000$1,250,000$10,000,000$9,500,000$10,250,000$31,175,000 $3,400,000 Fire Station 22$400,000$1,500,000$1,500,000$3,400,000 $1,100,000 Station 22 Apparatus$250,000$850,000$1,100,000 $3,700,000 Fire Station 23$550,000$2,150,000$1,000,000$3,700,000 Total $1,025,000$4,000,000$4,600,000$10,000,000$9,500,000$0$10,250,00039,375,000 $39,375,000 Fire & Rescue Company $1,000,000 Capital RequestsFire & Rescue Capital Equipment$200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$200,000$1,000,000E Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests Greenwood Fire Station Living Quarters Expansion610,000$610,000 210,000$210,000 including capital equipment requestsGreenwood Fire Station - Ambulance Replacement Total $19,572,000$62,932,023$53,092,736$53,757,275$33,506,765$2,736,470$534,554,269$544,206,269 Other Funding Sources:E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources TBD= To be Determined ,; © ¦©· ·z t©;-· /Lt w;¨Ò;· /·©z,Ò·z t;© Cz- ; © County/VDOT/P Long Range rivate Total Project Comprehensive Projects - Ranked by Agency2018-20192019-20202020-20212021-20222023+ContributionsNotesCosts Plan Projects 9Òzm .;ä7 Cz- ; ©; © ; © ; © ; © ; © Z Funded Priorities $54,200,000 I-81 Exit 310 Improvements$54,200,000E Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening $35,944,878 and Safety Improvements (ph 1)$35,944,878$35,944,878E Airport Road Extension, East Tevis Street Extension and $24,703,788 Bridge over 81$24,703,788$24,703,788E $5,791,500 Rennaisance Drive, Phase 2$5,791,500$5,791,500E $11,946,091 Sulpher Springs Road Improvement project$11,946,091$11,946,091E $650,996 Fox Drive$650,996$650,996E $476,644 Route 277 right turn extension Warrior Drive$476,644$476,644E $507,262 Papermill Road right turn lane extension Route 522$507,262$507,262E Unfunded Priorities $750,000,000 Route 37 Engineering & Construction$750,000,000$750,000,000E I-81 Exit 307 Relocation with 4 ln connection to Double Church and Stephens City Bypass $234,255,469 $234,255,469$234,255,469E Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening $25,428,550 and Safety Improvements (ph 2)$25,428,550$25,428,550E Redbud Road Realignment and $11,239,132 Exit 317 Ramp realignment$11,239,132$11,239,132E $28,346,120 $28,346,120$28,346,120E Widening of Route 11 North (ph 1) $47,000,000 Warrior Drive Extension (south)$47,000,000$47,000,000E $45,000,000 Channing Drive Extension$45,000,000$45,000,000E $3,800,000 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign.$3,800,000$3,800,000E $192,000,000 Widening of Route 11 North (ph2)$192,000,000$192,000,000E $67,000,000 Senseny Road Widening $67,000,000$67,000,000E $27,300,000 Inverlee Way$27,300,000$27,300,000E $33,500,000 Warrior Drive Extension (Crosspointe south)$33,500,000$33,500,000E $2,548,579 Senseny Road turn lanes/improvements Crestleigh Drive$2,548,579$2,548,579E TBD Eastern Road Plan ImprovementsTBDTBDE Total $80,021,159$0$0$0$0$0$1,467,417,850$1,601,639,009$1,601,639,009 Other Funding Sources: E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources w; z-Òz E ·© ¦©· ·z ¦©;-· · ·w; /Lt z z Þ ä ¦©;-· Þz -·zÒ; · -; E© -,z ·z E · ·; 7 E Table 3 - Winchester Reginal Airport CIP Requests Contribution Per Fiscal Year Long Range County Total Project Comprehensive 2021-20222022-2023 Projects - Ranked by Agency2018-20192019-20202020-20212023+ContributionsNotesCosts Plan Projects Ensuing Beyond Fiscal YearYear 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6+ $1,782,000$3,650,000 New General Aviation Terminal$90,400A,B $5,522,400 6,000,000 Taxiway "A" Relocation Design/Construction$300,000$3,130,000$3,140,000$3,700,000A,B $16,270,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 (Moreland)$175,000A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-33A (Beaver)$125,000A,B $125,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-40 (Rosenberger)$175,000A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-69 (Robertson)$160,000A,B $160,000 Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper)$200,000A,B $200,000 Land Parcel 64-A-64 (Hott)$160,000A,B $160,000 $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-59 (Kyle)A,B $175,000 Fuel Storage Facility Design/Build$1,000,000A,B $1,000,000 $700,000 North Side Internal Access RoadA,B $700,000 North Side Access (Coverstone)$1,300,000A,B $1,300,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-52 (Lee)$175,000A,B $175,000 Total $2,557,000$7,300,000$3,405,400$7,000,000$4,400,000$1,475,000$26,137,400 A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation B= Partial funding from FAA *Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the feder governments. The local portion may include contributions from F Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. APPENDIX PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Robert E. Aylor Middle School Replacement Description: Because of the expense of renovations necessary to the existing construction of a replacement school. The new middle school will serve students grades 6-8 and have a program capacity of 900 students. The school will be designed for collaborative educativariety of learning styles and to impart skills nec Capital Cost: $52,000,000 Justification: Robert E. Aylor Middle School is 48 years old, was constructed a department (middle school arrangement is now by grade), and 85% interior walls are load bearing. The age of the facility's infrastructure, the school's outdated arrangement, and its expen-to-move walls make replacement of the facility a fiscally sound choice. 85% of HVAC systems, 82% of plumbing components, 73% of electrical components, 52% of finishes, and 50% of site elements have reached their average useful life and should be re buildings, making it expensive to install all of the infrastruct between the roof and the drop ceiling. Construction Schedule: 54 Months PRIORITY 2 - New High School Description: The new high school project will serve students grades 9-12, have a program capacity of 1,725 students, and will address anticipated growth in high school student enrollment in the school division. The si behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school is designed for collaborativeds of a variety of learn Capital Cost: $83,000,000 Justification: This project will address expected growth in high school student several years. We project that enrollment in the high schools by the fall of 2023 will be 5,063 st is currently 3,785 students. To relieve overcrowding in the highck County to open within that time frame. Construction Schedule: Construction will take 48 months PRIORITY 3 - Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation Description: Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since that time. The school contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 590 students. A classrooms will be added to Armel ES, to accommodate the additioupdated as needed and core areas partially renovated to serve the additi Capital Cost: $9,800,000 Justification: Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, growth in through the addition of classrooms to the facility. An attendance rezoning was complet implementation of full-day kindergarten. Addressing the growth issue at Armel was studi were identified to be rezoned to another school to offset the additional growth at Lake Freder a complete and satisfactory solution. One option would have put split a neighborhood and sent some of the neighborhood to a school further away. A third issue to another school. The fourth option was adopted, but onlyes. Construction Schedule: 30 months PRIORITY 4 - James Wood High School Renovations and Addition Description: James Wood High School opened in 1980 and has served as a high s square feet and has a program capacity of 1,200 students. Currently, the building serves grades 9-12. This school will be renovated to support collaborative education, with a variety of learning s needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart Capital Cost: $55,000,000 Justification: James Wood High School is 36 years old. Renovations, additions, of areas to ensure effective, economical, and efficient operatiouilding is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovatio increased electrical service and distribution to support technol its installation, upgrade of plumbing and mechanical systems, and modification of instruction Construction Schedule: 36 Months PRIORITY 5 Sherando High School Renovations and Addition Description: Sherando High School opened in 1993. The facility contains 239,517 students serving grades 9-12. Several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation, including reorganization and addition of classroom and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborati. Because we want the facility to last another 30 years, facility infrastructure will be renewed and up. Other areas to be addressed are security, traffic safety, and gender equity in athletic facilities. Capital Cost: $59,500,000 Justification: Sherando is 24 years old and will be at least 29 years old by the time we renovate it. Renovations are needed to ensure the economical, efficient, and effective operation of the school for years to come. Modern instr of learning spaces be provided, including collaborative spaces o Transportation safety concerns exist on and around the school site at Sherando during arrival and dis a softball field on site, instead using a softball field in Sherirls sports policy of equity between boys and girls sports. Construction Schedule: 48 Months Long Range Projects: Joint Administrative Offices ($14,000,000) Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation Bass-Hoover Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation Dowell J. Howard Center Replacement Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation and Addition Relocation of Facilities Services 5th Middle School 13th Elementary School Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Abrams Creek Trail Description: 10' wide, asphalt, shared-use trail along Abrams Creek from Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is estimated the trail will have six bridge stream crossings, and will be approximatelyoned in three phases of approximately 1 mile each. Each phase will haveions in themselves. Phase 1 from Senseny Road to Woodstock Lane. Phaserom Woody's Place to Channing Drive. Capital Cost: $3,500,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for resid exiting the City of Winchester from Eastern Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Com Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20. PRIORITY 2 Clearbrook Park Parking Description: This project expands the existing pool parking lot by approximatParking lot to be asphalt paved. Capital Cost: $257,000 Justification: This parking expansion is required due to the anticipated loss on the south side of the park. The south parking is on leased land, and FCPRD has been notified that the e needs of park amenity users during peak pool use times. Currently allsed during peak pool time. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19. PRIORITY 3 Sherando Park NW Restroom Description: This restroom installation includes a restroom building and requ population utilizing the planned amenities at the NW area of Sherando Par-use trail, shelter, outdoor gym, mountain bike trails, and bicycle skills p Capital Cost: $275,000 Justification: This project is needed to serve users of the NW amenities. The nearest restroom facilit approximately 1/2 mile away. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19. PRIORITY 4 - Indoor Swimming Pool Description: The Parks and Recreation Commission has engaged in conversation with FCPS to site the facility at the 4th campus. Land on the site has been set aside for this purpose. sq.ft. building will likely house a 10 lane competitive pool, 6 lane warm water teaching pool, meeting rooms, shower and changing rooms, and facilities su above facility would meet the swimming needs of the community, i. Capital Cost: $11,300,000 Justification: There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By constructing the indoor pool, it wou department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citiz the community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. This facility would be available tprovide a facility to offer competitive scholastic programs and year-round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 5 - Water Slide and Spray Ground Description: Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherano Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of the diving boards and the installation of one 50' water slide annclude the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool. Capital Cost: $624,000 Justification: To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park an and Recreation Department operates two outdoor swimming pools atr 20 years old and were constructed with two diving boards as the main feature for recent years and users are requesting different water features. und to each pool facility will appeal to families and younger children, increasin attendance and potentially fees to comparable facilities, the Coe annually. Clearbrook and Sherando Parks, currently owned by Frederick Counhis facility. With the upgrade to the existing swimming pool facili property acquisition or infrastructure development and increase the recreational oppo Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19 PRIORITY 6 - Sherando Park North - Softball Complex Description: This project completes the development vision for the SE area of Sherando Park located expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. I use trail segment, roadway and parking. Capital Cost: $1,649,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the e recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County School System. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields within the Cas youth and adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these ields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these programs project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Departme adult softball programs. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick Co Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents that the County will not have to acquire property for this facility means that the most completed. Sherando Park also provides a location that is situaCounty and is adjacent to Sherando High School. Joint use of facilities between the park and school programs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 7 - Snowden Bridge Park Development Description: Snowden Bridge Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge development the provision of an active recreation park. The above park is to include athletic fields suitable for league and parking are part of the park concept. Capital Cost: $4,550,000 Justification: The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (forme The proffer indicates the provided land to be used for baseball eld development in anticipation of the population increase generated by the development. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 8 - Sherando Ballfields Lighting Replacement Description: Upgrade the ballfield lighting at Sherando Parks Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the 30/20 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and steel poles on (4) four fields at Sherando Park. This standard is required by Little League International on all little league fie Capital Cost: $720,000 Justification: The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfiel recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the playing surface. This will facilitate the provision of r at Sherando Park for the service areas which include all Frederiy-five years old and are affixed to poles. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 9 - Sherando Park North Area 3 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the SW area of expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are recta roadway and parking, playground, restroom, and maintenance build Capital Cost: $2,150,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County School System. With the development of N Sherando Softball Complex (CIP item #6) two rectangular play fields will be displaced. The development of area 3 not only ad addresses additional identified needs of the community. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 10 - Community Center Description: The Field House project would be approximately 44,000 square feet an accommodate a 1/16 mile track and a minimum of two basketball co by indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton with t-floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for speciaome, outdoor, craft, antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility The facility would also house a fitness center, multi-purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Capital Cost: $ 9,067,000 Justification: Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relCounty public schools to house recreation programs. This arrangement was adeq department currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating meet the programming and facility needs of the County residents. A Community Center facility will facilitate thet citizen programming demands and provide the area with a facilityould be available to all area residents and is intended to meet the n7 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. The Department and the community has benefited from the co-location of recreation and school facilities; however community size warrants a separate fas project will provide a facility the Department will be able to offer yea-round recreational programming to the residents of Frederick Cou This facility could be built in conjunction with or as an attach Stonewall District if full size gymnasiums are no longer included with new elementary schoo Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 11 - Community Park Description: The Community Park project includes the acquisition of approximay thirty-five acres. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical d Acquisition of Parkland (35 acres) Paved & Gravel Paths Playground Tot lot Shelters Lighted Basketball & Tennis Courts Open Play Fields Toilets Parking Shade Trees & Turf Capital Cost: $2,090,000 Justification: Potential acreage for parkland would be located close to populat district area. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to create more accessible recreati opportunities to the residents Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 12 Neighborhood Parks Description: The Neighborhood project includes the acquisition of six sites of approximately ten acres a development of these sites. Developed amenities will ultimatelyent would include: Acquisition of Parkland (10 acres per site) Paved Path Playground Shelter Hard Surface Courts Open Play Fields Parking Capital Cost: $4,986,000 Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and th minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the 2013 Virginia Outdoors P needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick Countor parkland would be located in the Urban Development Area or Rural Community Centers. parkland developed to create more accessible recreational facili Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 13 District Parks Description: Acquisition of Parkland: Northeastern Frederick County 150-200 acres Western Frederick County 150-200 acres Eastern Frederick County 150-200 acres Capital Cost: $11,803,000 Justification: This project would meet the recreation needs of the Frederick Co Construction Schedule: Land acquisition FY 21/22 with the remainder beyond FY 23 PRIORITY 14 S. Sherando Park Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the area of Sherando Park located south of Route 277. This vision is expressed in the 2002 Sherando Park Master Plan update. Inclking, and restroom. Capital Cost: $2,035,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the e recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County School System. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 PRIORITY 15 - Fleet Trail Vehicles Description: Bus #1 40-50 Passenger Bus Bus #2 30-40 Passenger Bus Van #1 12 Passenger Van Capital Cost: $307,000 Justification: To offer a comprehensive package of trips where the population of Frederick County could begin to rely on the Parks and Recreation Department to meet their trip needs. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 PRIORITY 16 - N Sherando Park - Area 1 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the NW area of Sherando Par vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan -use trail, mountain bike trails, pavilions, bike pump track, dog parks, roadway and parking. Capital Cost: $2,220,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the e recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County School System. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and R Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 PRIORITY 17 N Sherando Park Area 2 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the NE area ofRoute 277. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan -use trail, mountain bike trails, restrooms, pavilions, roadway and parking. Capital Cost: $2,273,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the e meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 PRIORITY 18 Indoor Ice Rink Description: The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to 10 acres to construct. This facility should be located on propered to the County. The above ice rink may be collocated with other compatible uses should opportunities arise Capital Cost: $6,180,000 Justification: There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and County residents currently must travel over one hour to use an indoor ice facility. By constructing the indoor ice rink instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residen to offer year- round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick Cot is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation ated in an area convenient to the major transportation corridors of the County. However, as an alternative, one of the two county regional parks could be used to house the facility, since these locationsd activities. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 Handley Regional Library Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Frederick County Library Branch - Gainesboro Description: Construction of a 4,000 to 5,000 sq.ft. branch library, either astandalone facility or co-located with a planned Frederick County facility (the new middle school). Initial parking sho be on school grounds on Route 522 in the Gainesboro District, but this could change depending on patterns of library whether donated land could be located or if co-located with a Frederick County project already in the early pla projected branch would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing Capital Cost: $1,749,034 Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. I-2017 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 474,664 items. 37,426 Frederick County residents h all materials checked out of the regional system. 3,018 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered - 2017. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (wh), approximately 47% of the total have library cards. This population group is not close to a library and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It w and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weeply computer access via Wi-Fi and via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, other office applications and for internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area gr Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21/22 PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Library Branch - South Library Description: Construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. branch library. Initial parking sho location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future deveion of the land of 3 to 4 acre or collocated with the new High School projected Capital Cost: $3,043,235 Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. I-2017 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 474,664 items. 37,426 Frederick County residents have libr of the regional system. 3,018 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered 16- 2017. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (whl have library cards. This population group is not close to a library center that a library with meeting room could help fill this need. The Librardlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational mmework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. T-Fi and via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, other office applil be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 PRIORITY 3 - Frederick County Library Branch - Senseny/Greenwood Description: Construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 15,000 square feet. Initial for a minimum of 65 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to bst step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. I-2017 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 474,664 items. 37,426 Frederick County residents h and averaged 63.68% of all materials checked out of the regional system. 3,018 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered - 2017. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (wh can get a library card), approximately 47% of the total have library cards. This population group is not close to a library ter that a library with meeting room could help fill this need. The Library will provide materials and programming for patrons from senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational mit will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply internet, Wi-Fi, and desktop/laptop access for word processing and other office applications for job searching,g room of 500 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 County Administration Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Albin Citizens Convenience Site Description: rty located within the Sunnyside/Albin community is projected for FY 19/20. A fenced two-acre site is proposed in close proximity to the existing site. P relocation. The project will require several months to complete ing fencing, earthwork, retaining walls, electric, equipment, lighting, paving and landscaping. Capital Cost: $1,359,000 Justification: During August of 2017, 17,006 vehicles visited the Albin facilitty outside of the landfill. This represents a five percent increasese as the site serves a geographic area extending from Sunnyside to Cedar Creeksible from Route 37 and North Frederick Pike. The total number of vehicles using the facility, an average of 6 vehicles. As trash disposal and the resulting traffic continue tent infrastructure will be unable to safely serve the public. During holidays, the site requires two attendants in ord onto Indian Hollow Road during holidays and some weekends, creating a hazard For residents living between Cedar Creek Grade and Apple Pie Ridon of the convenience site which attracts a mix of users from the subu community. A number of users are those from the more western end disposing of their trash when traveling into Wi-Canterbury, homes also frequent the facility. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 2 - Gore Citizens Convenience Site Description: The project will expand refuse capacity in the Gore community bympactor. Installation of a compactor at Gore will drive down collection costs at the site-yard boxes. In order to accomplish this, and account for improved traffic flow and the caging areas, the site will be expanded onto an adjoining parcel already owned by the County. Capital Cost: $645,000 Justification: A total of 3,056 vehicles utilized the facility during the month 151 vehicles. The project will pay for itself in lower refuse collection coststh a compactor in place, refuse will be contained in an enclosed reces, all of which can be a challenge when using open collection cans. The project will also provide much-needed capacity during heavy flow times such as weekends and hol fill to capacity during Saturdays and Sundays. Numerous times, the site has closed early on Sundays when capacity is reache- yard roll-off container is used during holidays to contain excess trash an upgraded site will meet the current and future solid waste needs of the Gore community. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21 PRIORITY 4 - General Government Capital Expenditures Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,00l Capital Expenditures. It is the intention of this capital expenditure f governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general gan the established $100,000 departmental threshold. It was determined tsuring This project is for the benefit of the County Governmental Entities participating in the CIP but do. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental fthe Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursementers accepted on behalf of the governmental entities. Construction Schedule: N/A PRIORITY 5 - County/School Board Administration Building Description: This project consists of a County/School Board Administration Bu Development Area. The Joint Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150 Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvemen benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the it services in an accessible location. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 6 - Joint Judicial Center New Facility Description: This new project consists of a new future Joint Judicial Center or in Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvemen benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and governme services in an accessible location. The need for this project hart system and the City of Winchester. Construction Schedule: TBD Fire & Rescue Project Priority List PRIORITY 1- Shenandoah Valley Regional Public Safety Training Center Description: Construct a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially c-story burn building, multi-story training tower, vehicle driving range, shooting range, and incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materialtutions located in Clarke County, Frederick County, Shenandoah County, War, and potentially jurisdictions within the State of West Virginia. The Training Center will be located in the area central to the region which is the Middletown area of Frederick County. This ar facilitate necessary access by all participating agencies and ju, as well as, be incorporated into the existing facilities of the Lord Fairfax Community College and the Rappahannock Regional Criminal Justice Academy Middletown Campus. The Training Center will require between eighty (80) to one hundred (100) acrd other training areas. The determination for the exact buildings, associated props, and training areas will be deter by the Public Safety Training Center Questionnaire that was distveloped in a phased approach based on the strategic needs of the Northern Shenandoah Valley Re capacity of the buildings, associated props, and training areas he meet the specifications of the regulatory authorities within the Commonwealth of Virgi Capital Cost: $31,175,000 Justification: personnel located throughout the Northern Shenandoah Valley and expanding into the State of W reinforce existing training programs in those respective agencierrently not available within the Northern Shenandoah Valley which causes students and instructors t region. The number of potential personnel being trained at this aining statistics provided in July 2007 by the participating agencies. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Fire & Rescue Station 22 Description: Office and County office space for Treasure, Commissioner of the Revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. The station will be l Road and Tasker Road to provide service for the heavy growth aree three-acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be a.ft. facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy the facility will determine t Capital Cost: $3,400,000 Justification: This development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated units using a mix of housing types. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 3 - Frederick County Fire and Rescue Station 22 Apparatus Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22. Capital Cost: $1,100,000 Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Resc Stephens City area of Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 sp required and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper-A-1822E specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as a This fire and rescue apparatus is needed due to the fact that thd one (1) ladder truck that are twenty (20) plus years of age and already assigned to other func rescue apparatus would not endure the demands placed on it while Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 4 - Fire and Rescue Station 23 / Annex Facilities Description: This project consists of a 10,000 square foot fire station to ac house living and sleeping areas for staff. This project could al Treasurers Office, and Commissioner of Revenue as well as a meetts with an additional 2000 square feet of building area. A two and acre parcel should be sufficient for building, parking and ameni for approximately 20 to 30 persons. The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end of curreoute 37 South, an area of proposed high density residential development, and commercial development. Capital Cost: $3,700,000 Justification: As commercial and residential developments continue to expand in increased traffic on Route 37 and I-81, the calls for emergency services increases as well. To address the needs of the growing community and to maintain efficient response times, the addition Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Project Requests Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue Vehicles & Equipment Description: This new project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $ It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for tf purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was determined that tg that ital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose oional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment will enable the regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accee companies. Construction Schedule: N/A Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital and Capital Equipment R PRIORITY 1- Greenwood Fire Station Living Quarters Expansion and Upgrade Description: The Upgrade / Expand Living Quarters project will include remodeling approximately 4,638 sq.ft. of living space. project will upgrade the bunk rooms to accommodate up to 12 indi individuals, expand the male and female bathrooms to accommodate 6 individuals each, upgrade the kitchen facilities and add a training room. Capital Cost: $610,000 Justification: Greenwood will be remodeling the day room, bunk rooms, and work Volunteers that are providing fire and rescue service. The existing space is outdated and will additional staff that will be assigned to our Station. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19 PRIORITY 2- Greenwood Fire Station Ambulance Replacement Description: Purchase a replacement ambulance that will meet the current OEMS community. Capital Cost: $210,000 Justification: With the call volume of our Station we will be replacing an ambuement ambulance will meet the current KKK 1822 ambulance standards. Construction Schedule: FY 18-19 Transportation Committee Project Priority List CÒ7;7 t©z©z·z; PRIORITY 1 - Interstate 81, Exit 310 Improvements Description: Construct improvements to Exit 310 interchange. Capital Cost: $54,200,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address coming development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 2 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1) Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Double Church Road. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive. Capital Cost: $35,944,878 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 3 -Airport Road Extension, East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over I-81 Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 522 and going west appro road network being constructed by the Russell 150 Development. Ct Airport Road from Route 522 to a roundabout intersection with the Tevis Extension on the east side of I-81. Project includes bridge over Interstate 81. Capital Cost: $24,703,788 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address development to the surrounding area. The location is as identifhe developer. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 4 - Renaissance Drive, Phase 2 Description: Construct a connector road and Railroad Crossing between Route 1 Capital Cost: $5,791,500 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestioey Drive. This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvement Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 5 - Sulphur Springs Road Intersection Improvement and Widening from Route 50 to the Landfill Description: Widen Sulphur Spring Road from the intersection with Route 50 to the regional landfill, add paved sho pedestrians and bicycles, improve the intersection at Route 50. Capital Cost: $11,956,091 Justification: This project will address capacity and safety improvements to th This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan. Construction Schedule: Entering design and right-of- way underway. PRIORITY 6 - Fox Drive Description: Add additional turning lane(s) to Fox Drive where it intersects Capital Cost: $650,996 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestio Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 7 - Route 277 Right Turn Lane Extension at Warrior Drive Description: Extend right turn lane for eastbound 277 at the intersection of Route 277 and Warrior Drive. Installation of sidewalk for pedestrian safety and installation of pedestrian pedestal. Capital Cost: $476,644 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 8- Papermill Road Right Turn Lane Extension at Route 522 Description: Extend right turn bay of Papermill Road (Route 644) where it int that is taking place. Capital Cost: $507,262 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this i Construction Schedule: TBD EÒ7;7 t©z©z·z; PRIORITY 9 - Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37 Description: This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 e Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new Record of D current alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange . In addition, this allows for advanced engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction. Capital Cost: $750,000,000 Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation improvement that would benefit the en County and surrounding localities. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 10- Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $234,255,469 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address coming development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 11 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2) Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive. Capital Cost: $25,428,550 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in th development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 12- Redbud Road Realignment and Exit 317 Ramp Realignment Description: Realign Redbud Road from its current location through development land iNorth and Snowden Bridge Boulevard and Relocate the I-81 Exit 317 NB ramp to the current location of the Redbud Road/R intersection. Capital Cost: $11,239,132 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 13 - Route 11 North Widening to 6 Lanes from Snowden Bridge Boulevard to Old Charlestown Road Description: Route 11 North of Snowden Bridge Boulevard is currently primaril-lane roadway. This project would widen that facility to a 6-lane divided roadway with turn lanes where appropriate. Capital Cost: $28,346,120 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will provide a signifi Route 11 Corridor. This project is identified in the adopted Ea Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 14- Warrior Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior Drive continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with I-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $47,000,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 15 - Channing Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where Channing Dr continuing that roadway south to intersect with Route 50 East at Capital Cost: $45,000,000 Justification: This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan, and w address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 16 - Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11. Impro Capital Cost: $3,800,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant identified by joint planning efforts between the County and VDOT Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 17- Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line Description: Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the Eastern Road Plan. Capital Cost: $192,000,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion over a large area of the County and address development to the surrounding area. This project improv and improving the flow of traffic. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 18 - Senseny Road Widening Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not dependent upon, but i the implementation of Route 37, Channing Drive, and development Capital Cost: $67,000,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 19 - Inverlee Way Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south t planned in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and sur Capital Cost: $27,300,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion and between Senseny Road and Route 50 East. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 20 - Warrior Drive Extension from Route 37 Crosspointe South to Existing Terminus Description: 4-lane roadway from the Route 37 extension in the Crosspointe Development south to the existing terminus of Warrior Drive. Capital Cost: $33,500,000 Justification: This improvement would be concurrent with a Route 37 extension aovide significant congestion relief at Exit 307 as well as Tasker Road at Exit 310 Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 21 - Senseny Road Turn lanes at the Intersection of Senseny Road and Crestleigh Drive Description: Improvements to the intersection of Senseny Road (657) and Crestleigh Drive to include turn lanes signalization. This project would add left and right turn lanes ally a full signalization of the intersection. Capital Cost: $2,548,579 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this i Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 22 - Frederick County Eastern Road Plan Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan, Eastern Road Plan that are not noted individually above. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This project prepares the County for future development by addrethat development in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Construction Schedule: N/A Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - New General Aviation Terminal Building, Site Work and Parking Lot Design and Build Description: The Winchester Regional Airport proposes construction of a new g will be constructed in a new location slightly south of the exis Capital Cost: $5,522,400 Justification: Since its opening in the early 1990s, the general aviation terminal bu had only limited interior work completed. Interior repairs are necessary due to extensive usage and some d leaking from the roof prior to its replacement in the Spring of 2006 by necessity. The 25 years in age and are nearing the end of their useful life. Thhas failed in many areas and is generally in fair to poor condition and is costly to efficient and several of the window seals have failed. In 2008, a preliminary study was completed to examine needs and renovate the existing terminal building. After review of the study new energy efficient building slightly east of the existing termThe proposed location of the project will allow enough room to build out a new transient apron during the taxiway relocation pr Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 2 Design and Construction (Multiyear) Description: The relocation of Taxiway A is part of the overall Airport upgrade to meet safety design standards for a Group aircraft. This relocation will improve the serviceability and safety of the airport in regards operations for larger jet aircraft. Due to the complex task of relocating the en Phase I will begin at the 32 approach end of the runway and continue to the tom the terminal building to the approach end of runway 14. The project will be broken down into sections with pavement conditions, demand and availability of funding from the Federal Aviation Administration. Capital Cost: $16,270,000 Justification: The relocation of Taxiway A is to meet FAA safety design standards for larger aircraft curre project also will improve the serviceability of the Airport for Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 3 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 (Moreland) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcel 64B-A-51 (Moreland) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels arelopment because of the close proximity within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virgi property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currently more than 120 a The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefiuired and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19 PRIORITY 4 Land Parcel 6B-A-33A (Beaver) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Pa-A-33A (Beaver) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels are critica within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $125,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia 15.2e, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currentlport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased safety on the airport once the parcels are acq and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19 PRIORITY 5 Land Parcel 64B-A-40 (Rosenberger) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcel 64B-A-40 (Rosenberger) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parce proximity within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virgi property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currentlWinchester Regional Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefi are acquired and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19 PRIORITY 6 Land Parcel 64-A-69 (Robertson) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Pa64-A-69 (Robertson) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels arlopment because of the close proximity within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $160,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virgi property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currently more than 120 a Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefi are acquired and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 7 Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Pa-A-60 (Cooper) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels are critical within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $200,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia 15.2e, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currentl Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased safety on the airport once the parcels are acq and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 8 Land parcel 64-A-64 (Hott) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcels 64-A-64 (Hott) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels are cr within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $160,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virgi property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currentlional Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefiuired and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 9 Land Parcel 64-A-59 (Kyle) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire PaA-59 (Kyle) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels are crose proximity within or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virgi property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currently more than 120 aircraft based at the Winc The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefiuired and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21 PRIORITY 10 Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Design and Build Description: Construct a new fuel storage facility for expansion and to meet Capital Cost: $100,000,000 Justification: encroachment into the current fuel farm site. The current site nd/or EPA regulations. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 11 North Side Internal Access Road Description: This project proposes to construct a two lane service road aroun approximately ½ to ¾ miles in l two lanes. Capital Cost: $700,000 Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development occurring By having aircraft ground operations and storage on both sides of the airfss to both sides of the airfield will be generated. The traffic will incluivities for general maintenance. The FAA encourages the construction of service roa prevent unauthorized ground vehicle access to aircraft movement nt. The service road, located on the west side of the airport (Runway 14 end) wi Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23 PRIORITY 12 North Side Public Access Road and Utilities (Coverstone) Description: This project proposes to construct a two-lane public access road for the northside future development are Capital Cost: $1,300,000 Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development occurring development site by future tenants and/or the public will have to be frd during the project. The only way to access the airport property prohibit vehicle movement through aircraft operating areas by non-airport staff that are trained to follow all federal regulations Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23 PRIORITY 13 Land Parcel 64B-A-52 (Lee) Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcel-A-52 (Lee) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. These parcels are crwithin or near the airport primary surfaces. Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virgi property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currentl0 aircraft based at the Winchester Regional Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefiuired and vertical obstructions are minimized. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective beyond FY23