January_27_2016_Board_Agenda_Packet
AGENDA
JOINT BUDGET WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING
FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2016
5:30 P.M., 7:00 P.M.
BOARD ROOM, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
107 NORTH KENT STREET, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
5:30 P.M. Joint Budget Work Session with Frederick County School Board
7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - Call To Order
Invocation
Pledge of Allegiance
Adoption of Agenda:
Pursuant to established procedures, the Board should adopt the A
the meeting.
Consent Agenda:
(Tentative Agenda Items for Consent are Tabs: D, E, and F)
Citizen Comments (Agenda Items Only, That Are Not Subject To Public Hearing.)
Board of Supervisors Comments
Minutes: (See Attached)A
----------------------------------------------------------------
1.Closed Session and Regular Meeting of January 13, 2016.
County Officials:
(See Attached)B
1.Committee Appointments. -------------------------------------------
(See Attached)C
2.Request from Commissioner of the Revenue for Refund. --
(See Attached)D
3.Approval of Employment Contract for County Attorney. -----
AGENDA
JOINT BUDGET WORK SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING
FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2016
PAGE 2
(See Attached)E
4. Resolution Declaring a Local Emergency. ----------------------
Committee Reports:
(See Attached)F
1. Parks and Recreation Commission. ------------------------------
(See Attached)G
2. Finance Committee. ---------------------------------------------------
Planning Commission Business:
Public Hearing:
1. Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe CenterSubmitted by Pennoni Associates,
to Rezone 58.30+/- Acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to
B2 (General Business) District and 72.47+/- Acres from B2 (General
Business) District to RP (Residential Performance) District within the
Crosspointe Center Development, Rezoning #13-03, and to Amend the
Proffers Associated with Rezoning #13-03. The Properties are Located
East and Adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and Adjacent to Tasker
Road and Hillandale Lane. The Properties are Identified with Property
Identification Numbers 75-A-89, 75-A-89A, 75-A-91, 75-A-92, 75-A-95,
75-A-96 and a Portion of 75-A-90 and 75-A-94 in the Shawnee
(See Attached)H
Magisterial District. ----------------------------------------------------
Other Planning Items:
1. Discussion 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP).
(See Attached)I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Board Liaison Reports (If Any)
Citizen Comments
Board of Supervisors Comments
Adjourn
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Finance Department
Cheryl B. Shiffler
Director
540/665-5610
Fax: 540/667-0370
E-mail: cshiffle@fcva.us
TO:Board of Supervisors
FROM:Finance Committee
DATE:January20, 2016
SUBJECT:Finance Committee,Audit Committee, and Budget Work Session
Report & Recommendations
A Finance Committee meeting washeldin the First Floor Conference Room at 107 North Kent
Street onWednesday,January 20, 2016 at 8:00 a.m.There wasan Audit Committee meeting
immediately following. Directly after, a Budget Work Session washeld.All members were
present.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
1.The Finance Director requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the
amount of $1,141.72.This amount represents unspent FY15 VJCCCA funds to be
returned to the State. See attached letter, p.3.The committee recommends approval.
2.The Registrar requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the amount of
$1,194.91.This amount represents a reimbursement for expenses related to relocating
the Russells prescinct polling place for the November 3, 2015 election due to the
incomplete construction of the Round Hill Fire Department.No local funds required.
See attached information, p.4– 5.The committee recommends approval.
3.The Sheriff requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation inthe amount of
$15,375.18.This amount represents reimbursement for two auto claims. See attached
memo, p.6– 7.The committee recommends approval.
107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601
1
Finance Committee, Audit Committee, and Budget Work SessionAgendas
January 20, 2016
Page|2
AUDIT COMMITTEE – no action required
1.Per the request of the committee during the last review of the Finance Committee
Charter, Chris Banta from Brown, Edwards & Company, LLP will be present to discuss
the internal auditprocess. The last internal audit is included for information, p. 8– 21.
The committee heard an overview of the audit process from Mr. Banta.
BUDGET WORK SESSION – no action required
1.Information is provided for discussionon the FY2017budget. See attached
information, p.22–1.The committee heard anoverviewfrom the County
Administratorofthe information provided.
INFORMATION ONLY
1.The FinanceDirector provides aFund 10 Transfer Reportfor December2015.See
attached, p.1.
2.TheFinanceDirector provides an FY 2016Fund Balance Report ending January14,2016.
See attached, p.17.
3.The FinanceDirector provides financial statementsfor themonth ending
December31,2015. See attached, p.17–18.
Respectfully submitted,
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Judith McCann-Slaughter, Chairman
Charles DeHaven
Gary Lofton
Bill Ewing
By
Angela Rudolph
___________________________
Cheryl B. Shiffler, Finance Director
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1/20/2016
Budget Worksession January 20, 2016
Tab A Overall Summary of General Fund Revenues and
Expenditures (will be updated at meeting with
school numbers) & Budget Calendar
Tab B Summary Table of All Appropriated Funds Lists
FY 2016 Original Budget and FY 2017 Proposed
Budget
Tab CSummary of General Fund Departments including
Totals and Percent Changes Lists FY 2016
Original Budget and FY 2017 Proposed Budget and
Percent Changes from FY 2016 to FY 2017
Tab DGeneral Fund Revenue Detail Report Details all
General Fund Revenue by line item with far right
column detailing FY 2017 Proposed Revenue
Tab E General Fund Budget Summary Detail Lists
increases, decreases, and significant changes
between FY 2016 Original Budget and FY 2017
Proposed Budget
Tab F General Fund Expenditure Detail Report Details
General Fund Expenditures by department by line
item with far right column detailing FY 2017
Proposed Expenditures
Tab G Capital Request Summary Lists all capital
requests for the General Fund; also includes
capital requests for all other funds
Tab H New Position Requests Lists all new positions
requested for FY 2017 for all appropriated funds
Tab I Outside Agency Funding Requests Summary
Tab JBudget Scenarios A-
Tab K School Budget Info will be provided at budget
worksession
22
1/20/2016
FY 17 Proprosed Budget
General Fund and School Funds
TotalSchool FundsGeneral FundTAB
Total General Fund Revenues156,133,714D
Requested General Fund Expenditures(A)184,327,280B,C,E,F
Shortage-28,193,56616,516,47911,677,087
Capital 10,455,6275,188,4515,267,176G,K
New Positions5,389,3922,700,0002,689,392H,K
Other Operating12,348,5478,628,0283,720,519E,F,K
28,193,56616,516,47911,677,087
ASSUMPTIONS
Salary increases budgeted at 4.1%
Contingency budgeted at 500,000
(A) Includes School Transfers
NO USE OF FUND BALANCE TO BALANCE BUDGET
TotalTAB
Total General Fund Revenues156,133,714D
Fund Balance Funding7,300,000
Requested General Fund Expenditures(A)184,327,280B,C,E,F
Shortage-20,893,566
Capital 10,455,627G,K
New Positions5,389,392H,K
Other Operating5,048,547E,F,K
20,893,566
Total Increased Expenditures29,513,636
Total Increased Revenues-8,620,070
20,893,566
ASSUMPTIONS
Salary increases budgeted at 4.1%
Contingency budgeted at 500,000
(A) Includes School Transfers
7.3 Million used from Fund Balance
23
1/20/2016
FY 16-17 Budget Revenue Projections and Expenditure Requests Com
FY 15-16 Adoped Budget
FY 15-16FY 16-17Increase
AdoptedProjected/Requested
Revenue$ 147,513,644$ 156,133,714$ 8,620,070
Requested expenditure$ 154,813,644$ 184,327,280$ 29,513,636
Over(short)$ (7,300,000)$ (28,193,566)$ (20,893,566)
Ues of Fund Balance $ 7,300,000 $ (7,300,000)
Over(short)$ - $ (28,193,566)$ (28,193,566)
24
1/20/2016
Budget Calendar
FY 2016-2017
MonthAction
October21, 2015Budget memo fromFinance Committee Chairman presented
to Finance Committee
October 29, 2015Budget materials sent to all departments and outside agencies
November 30, 2015Budget requests from departments and outside agencies due
back to Finance Department
December 14, 2015 –January 8, Requested Departmental meetings with County
2016Administrator’s Budget Committee
January 20, 2016Finance Committee/Budget Worksession;Possible Budget
Scenario discussion 8:00 a.m.
January 27, 2016Joint budget meeting with School Board and Board of
Supervisors; School Board presents School Board budget to
Board of Supervisors/Possible Budget Worksession 5:30 p.m.
February 3, 2016Budget Worksession –Board of Supervisors 8:00 a.m.
February 10, 2016Budget Worksession –Board of Supervisors 6:00 p.m.
February 16, 2016School Board budget public hearing
February 17, 2016Finance Committee/Board of Supervisors Budget
Worksession 8:00 a.m.
February 24, 2016Budget Worksession –Board of Supervisors 6:00 p.m.
March 2, 2016FinalBoard of Supervisors Budget Worksession before
budget advertisement 8:00 a.m.;
March 7, 2016Budget Advertisement to Winchester Star for publishing
March 14, 2016Public Hearing Advertisement in newspaper
March 23, 2016FY 2016–2017Budget/Tax RatesPublic Hearing
April 13, 2016FY 2016–2017Budget Adoption
May-July, 2016Preparation of Adopted Budget Document and submission of
budget for award
April 13-27, 2016Prepare and InsertTax Bills
April 29, 2016Tax Bills mailed
July 1, 2016Implementation of Fiscal Year 2016–2017
Dates are subjectto change
25
1/20/2016
FY 2016-2017 BUDGET TOTALS - ALL FUNDS
2015-20162016-2017
OriginalProposed
Fund #FundBudgetBudgetDifference% Change
10General Fund154,813,644184,327,28029,513,63619.06%
11NRADC20,063,86020,934,968871,1084.34%
12Landfill6,086,5206,990,921904,40114.86%
13Division of Court Services620,639642,17021,5313.47%
16Shawneeland811,026932,885121,85915.03%
17Airport2,283,2281,784,040(499,188)-21.86%
29Lake Holiday800,570779,998(20,572)-2.57%
30EMS Revenue Recovery1,501,0001,770,148269,14817.93%
31EDA573,198617,51044,3127.73%
26
1/20/2016
FY 2016-2017 NEW POSITION REQUESTS - GENERAL FUND
Dept
CodeDepartmentNew Position Plus FringesAmount
1202County Attorney Assistant County Attorney 65,800
FICA5,034
VRS6,981
Health/Dental10,500
Life783
Worker's Compensation59
Disability400
1 Position Total Cost89,557
1203Human Resources HR Specialist 32,300
HR Assistant 29,500
FICA4,728
VRS6,557
Health/Dental21,000
Life735
Worker's Compensation62
Disability360
2 Positions Total Cost95,242
2201Commonwealth Attorney Asst. Commonwealth Attorney 70,000
FICA5,355
VRS7,427
Health/Dental10,500
Life833
Worker's Compensation63
Disability420
1 Position Total Cost94,598
3102Sheriff Deputy I - Patrol 12 x $36,800 441,600
Deputy I - ACO 2 x $36,800 73,600
Deputy I - SRO 3 x $36,800 110,400
Crime Prevention Specialist 36,800
1 Deputy position salaryFICA50,674
+ fringes = 55,215VRS70,281
Health/Dental189,000
Life7,883
Worker's Compensation13,645
18 Positions Total Cost993,883
3505Fire and Rescue Firefighter - 21 x $36,800 772,800
Training Officer 36,800
165
1/20/2016
Dept
CodeDepartmentNew Position Plus FringesAmount
Training Officer 36,800
1 Firefighter positionFICA64,750
salary + fringes = 56,308VRS89,803
Health/Dental241,500
Life10,072
Worker's Compensation42,574
23 Positions Total Cost1,295,099
7104Recreation Centers Program Coordinator 37,300
FICA2,853
VRS3,958
Health/Dental10,500
Life444
Worker's Compensation936
Disability220
1 Position Total Cost56,211
8101Planning Planner 45,200
FICA3,458
VRS4,796
Health/Dental10,500
Life538
Worker's Compensation45
Disability265
1 Position Total Cost64,802
47 General Fund Positions Total Cost2,689,392
166
1/20/2016
FY 2016-2017 NEW POSITION REQUESTS - OTHER FUNDS
Fund
CodeFundNew Position Plus FringesAmount
11NRADC Correctional Officer - 3 x 36,800 110,400
FICA8,446
VRS11,713
Health/Dental31,500
Life1,314
Worker's Compensation2,274
3 Positions Total Cost165,647
16Shawneeland Laborer 26,000
FICA1,989
VRS2,759
Health/Dental10,500
Life309
Worker's Compensation1,256
Disability160
1 Position Total Cost42,973
31EDA Research Manager 57,000
FICA4,361
VRS6,048
Health/Dental10,500
Life678
Worker's Compensation57
Disability350
1 Position Total Cost78,994
167
1/20/2016
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
FY 2016-2017
2015-20162016-2017MOU/Regional
ApprovedBudget$%Funding
BudgetRequestDifferenceDifferenceFormula
Organization
Big Brothers Big Sisters NEW REQUEST$0$5,000$5,000100%
Discovery Museum NEW REQUEST$0$35,382$35,382100%
Bluemont Concert Series NEW REQUEST$0$8,000$8,000100%
Blue Ridge Legal Services NEW REQUEST$0$5,547$5,547100%
CLEAN, Inc.$10,000$15,000$5,00050%
Our Health, Inc.$20,000$25,000$5,00025%
NW Works, Inc.$25,000$26,500$1,5006%
Access Independence, Inc.$11,000$12,000$1,0009%
NSV Substance Abuse Coalition$60,000$60,000$00%
Tourism Program - City of Winchester$100,500$150,500$50,00050%
Courthouse Museum$25,000$25,000$00%
Lord Fairfax EMS Council, Inc.$16,000$17,600$1,60010%
Health Department$301,000$393,867$92,86731%
Northwestern Community Services$318,000$343,440$25,4408%
Shenandoah Area Agency on Aging$60,000$66,000$6,00010%
The Laurel Center$6,000$8,000$2,00033%
Lord Fairfax Community College$56,000$78,819$22,81941%
The Handley Library$862,665$942,357$79,6929%
Shenandoah Apple Blossom Festival$3,800$5,000$1,20032%
NSV Regional Commission$45,301$45,915$6141%
Lord Fairfax SWCD$7,000$11,250$4,25061%
Total$1,927,266$2,280,177$352,911
168
1/20/2016
170
43053004000000 2,500.00
FILING FEES-PROFFERS12023002000000 (100.00)
12025413000000 100.00
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORDEFICIT IN TRAVEL12015506000000 2,000.00
12243002000000 (2,000.00)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORDEFICIT PRINTING AND BINDING12015204000000 (300.00)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 12013006000000 300.00
LITTER CONTROL GRANTREPLACEMENT BASE FOR ROAD42055204000000 (100.00)
LITTER CONTROL GRANT 42055407000000 100.00
COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEYSOFTWARE UNLIMITED MAINTENANCE22015401000000 (2,550.00)
COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY22013005000000 2,550.00
ounyoreerc,
CtfFdikVA
ReportonUnreservedFundBalance
January14,2016
UnreservedFundBalance,BeginningofYear,July1,201542,344,282
PriorYearFunding&CarryforwardAmounts
C/FRoseHillPark
(168,000)
C/FSherandoParkmasterplan
(22,780)
C/FDARE(400)
C/FAbbottGrant
(33,854)
C/FFireCompanyCapital
(274,086)
ReserveEsummonsfunds
(38,816)
C/FFireProgramfunds
(29,521)
ReserveP&RPlayFundfund
(6,932)
s
Schoolencumbrances
(581,267)
C/FForefeitedasset
(58,035)
s
C/FSchoolCapitaltoSchoolOperating
(314,747)
C/FSchoolOperating
(123,737)
C/FF&Rvehicleequipmen
(40,000)
t
C/FF&Runiforms
(64,000)
(1,756,175)
OtherFunding/Adjustments
Parksreturnedunusedproffe(710)
r
CORrefundBrookfieldStephensonVillag(20,539)
e
CORrefundAllyFinancial(5,405)
CORrefundFordMotorCredit(2,930)
CORrefundOpalOil(4,070)
Treasurerdrivethroughrepai(30,000)
r
CircuitClerkdeputyclerkposition(10,913)
Airportcapital(63,818)
Gainesborositeretainag5,960
e
CORrefunddisabledveteran(3,689)
CORrefundGreenwayEngineerin(12,753)
g
CORrefundNavitusEngineerin(42,560)
g
CORrefundCitizensAssetFinanc(5,736)
e
CORrefundCarrierEnterprise(144,392)
s
ArmelElementaryrenovationdesign(200,000)
NSVRCcontribution(1,216)
PPEArefundadministrationbuildin(47,897)
g
CORrefundDaimlerTrust(8,679)
CORrefundAquaLakeHolidayUtilitie(2,759)
s
CORrefundProbuildCOLLC(13,282)
CORrefundLawrenceFabrications(6,533)
CORrefundWashingtonGas(89,697)
CORrefundCarrierEnterprise(106,516)
s
CORrefundBrittLouisNemeth(3,019)
CORrefundAdmiralSecurityService(2,815)
s
CORrefundShenandoahGa(17,706)
s
CORrefundGlassAmerica(2,834)
CORrefundCrownCork&Seal(352,334)
3/2016PresidentialPrimaryElection(38,614)
(1,235,457)
FundBalance,January14,2016 39,352,650
172
December 31, 2015
ASSETSFY16FY15Increase
12/31/1512/31/14(Decrease)
*A
Cash and Cash Equivalents45,516,491.3345,388,357.96128,133.37
Petty Cash1,555.001,555.000.00
Receivables:
Taxes, Commonwealth,Reimb.P/P2,734,603.513,637,250.65(902,647.14)
Streetlights1,669.361,746.18(76.82)
Miscellaneous Charges43,947.1835,710.238,236.95
Due from Fred. Co. San. Auth.734,939.23734,939.230.00
Prepaid Postage(586.52)3,026.77(3,613.29)
GL controls (est.rev / est. exp)(13,230,142.86)(8,506,695.30)(4,723,447.56)(1) Attached
TOTAL ASSETS35,802,476.2341,295,890.72(5,493,414.49)
LIABILITIES
Performance Bonds Payable446,671.73399,421.0547,250.68
Taxes Collected in Advance139,641.57134,437.595,203.98
Deferred Revenue2,780,519.053,675,021.06(894,502.01)*B
TOTAL LIABILITIES3,366,832.354,208,879.70(842,047.35)
EQUITY
Fund Balance
Reserved:
Encumbrance General Fund445,170.59447,768.74(2,598.15)(2) Attached
Conservation Easement4,779.854,779.850.00
*C
Peg Grant137,071.7566,131.0570,940.70
Prepaid Items949.63949.630.00
Advances734,939.23734,939.230.00
Employee Benefits93,120.8293,120.820.00
Courthouse Fees269,039.57222,145.7646,893.81*D
Historical Markers17,330.7617,295.2535.51
Animal Shelter335,530.02335,530.020.00
Proffers2,042,419.804,023,780.67(1,981,360.87)(3) Attached
Economic Development Incentive0.00550,000.00(550,000.00)
Parks Reserve6,932.250.006,932.25
E-Summons Funds38,816.250.0038,816.25
VDOT Revenue Sharing436,270.00436,270.000.00
Undesignated Adjusted Fund Balance27,873,273.3630,154,300.00(2,281,026.64)(4) Attached
TOTAL EQUITY32,435,643.8837,087,011.02(4,651,367.14)
TOTAL LIAB. & EQUITY35,802,476.2341,295,890.72(5,493,414.49)
NOTES:
Cash increase includes an increase in revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balance(refer to the comparative
statement of revenues,expenditures and decrease in fund balance.
Deferred revenue includes taxes receivable,street lights,misc.charges,dog tags, and motor vehicle registration fees.
Upgrade board room audio visual and broadcasting equipment in the previous year $178,122 from Comcast provided
PEG funds.
Previously ADA Fees.
DEPARTMENTAmount
Animal Shelter 4,910.07 Replace Heat Exchange on Two Units
Fire & Rescue 1,381.20 Uniforms
2,558.29 Bailout System Supplies(Ropes, Harnesses, Etc.)
32,844.52 Vehicle Tools & Equip.(Includes Light Bars, Custom Cabinets, etc
14,450.00 HT Face Pieces(95)
Fire Company Capital 4,002.94 Accountability Machine
9,475.00 Sequel Software (4) Users & Website Interface
400.00Rose Hill Park Engineering Service
19,922.30 Special Events T-Shirts
18,477.70 Playground Equipment Replacement Parts
Public Safety 10,273.08 Repair & Maintenance of Radio Equipment
Reassessment 2,980.00 (2) Surface PRO 3 with Covers
12,430.00 (15) Body Armour
4,773.65 Uniforms
30,095.52 (12) Tactical Vests & (24) Hard Armor Plates
3,136.32 Dare T-Shirts
6,240.00 (2) Python III Dual Antenna Radar Package w/Accessories
260,260.00 (10) 2016 Police Interceptors
6,560.00 (20) Body Cameras
445,170.59
Designated
Other
SCHOOLSPARKSFIRE & RESCUEProjectsTOTAL
54,706.90435,280.16491,139.401,061,293.34 2,042,419.80
Designated Other Projects Detail
218,936.34
1,000.00
108,000.0012/11/14 Board Action designated $50,000 for final debt payment
101,206.00on the Huntsberry property.
10,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
162,375.00
41,776.00
12,000.00
26,000.00
BPG Properties/Rt.11 Corridor 330,000.00
1,061,293.34
Other Proffers @12/31/15
(4) Fund Balance Adjusted -
Ending Balance @12/31/15 39,746,432.01
68,983,235.89
(31,868,251.84)
(48,988,142.70)
27,873,273.36
FY16FY15YTD
REVENUES:
12/31/1512/31/14Actual
AppropriatedActualActualVariance
(1)
General Property Taxes100,608,073.0042,969,653.9640,867,986.012,101,667.95
(2)
Other local taxes31,899,849.0010,102,589.989,703,101.22399,488.76
(3)
Permits & Privilege fees1,663,682.001,258,279.45868,308.10389,971.35
Revenue from use of money
(4)
and property160,420.13105,836.24129,832.47(23,996.23)
Charges for Services2,478,226.001,364,380.431,198,987.61165,392.82
Miscellaneous569,580.87185,040.40312,051.28(127,010.88)
Recovered Costs1,318,702.58786,155.461,100,235.91(314,080.45)(5)
(5)
1,163,151.78588,237.12574,914.66
Intergovernmental:
(6)
Commonwealth8,900,008.0011,002,197.7411,268,998.01(266,800.27)
(7)
Federal39,000.0045,950.4520,357.0025,593.45
TOTAL REVENUES147,637,541.5868,983,235.8966,058,094.732,925,141.16
EXPENDITURES:
General Administration 10,498,436.434,682,712.514,065,054.95617,657.56
Judicial Administration2,434,843.521,114,903.071,009,481.81105,421.26
Public Safety32,687,004.5216,733,491.8715,240,421.641,493,070.23
Public Works4,948,422.682,043,852.281,768,328.75275,523.53
Health and Welfare8,177,956.003,653,306.003,381,365.74271,940.26
56,000.0028,000.0028,000.000.00
Parks, Recreation, Culture6,340,979.242,949,379.602,727,204.36222,175.24
Community Development1,997,260.95662,606.511,518,477.85(855,871.34)
(8)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES67,140,903.3431,868,251.8429,738,335.102,129,916.74
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES ( USES):
(9)
Operating transfers from / to 94,171,951.6948,988,142.7042,586,315.756,401,826.95
Excess (deficiency)of revenues & other
sources over expenditures
& other uses(13,675,313.45)(11,873,158.65)(6,266,556.12)5,606,602.53
Fund Balance per General Ledger
39,746,432.0136,420,856.123,325,575.89
Fund Balance Adjusted to reflect
27,873,273.3630,154,300.00(2,281,026.64)
Income Statement 12/31/15
`
Penalties and Interest 436,530 453,292 (16,761)
Credit Card Chgs./Delinq.Advertising (9,422) (5,951) (3,471)
Adm.Fees For Liens&Distress 178,128 177,888 240
42,969,654 40,867,986 2,101,668
(2) Other Local Taxes
Local Sales and Use Tax 4,318,674.65 4,147,202.52 171,472.13
Communications Sales Tax 437,357.34 452,404.61 (15,047.27)
Utility Taxes 1,097,756.06 1,099,957.69 (2,201.63)
Business Licenses 930,555.31 944,216.34 (13,661.03)
Auto Rental Tax 55,498.37 48,807.50 6,690.87
Motor Vehicle Licenses Fees 379,788.67 372,646.22 7,142.45
Recordation Taxes 781,606.93 598,515.54 183,091.39
1,859,103.17 1,822,956.52 36,146.65
Lodging Tax 222,910.97 196,462.06 26,448.91
Street Lights 15,197.70 15,912.32 (714.62)
Star Fort Fees 4,140.81 4,019.90 120.91
10,102,589.98 9,703,101.22 399,488.76
(3)Permits&Privileges
Dog Licenses 18,185.00 21,436.00 (3,251.00)
Land Use Application Fees 9,575.00 7,400.00 2,175.00
Transfer Fees 1,656.00 1,400.17 255.83
Development Review Fees 334,366.14 247,572.72 86,793.42
Building Permits 651,099.38 441,371.06 209,728.32
2% State Fees 11,634.21 9,945.65 1,688.56
Electrical Permits 59,501.00 39,185.00 20,316.00
Plumbing Permits 11,895.00 6,830.00 5,065.00
Mechanical Permits 74,368.00 32,117.50 42,250.50
Sign Permits 2,526.72 1,470.00 1,056.72
Permits for Commercial Burning 50.00 250.00 (200.00)
Explosive Storage Permits - 200.00 (200.00)
Blasting Permits 210.00 105.00 105.00
Land Disturbance Permits 81,763.00 58,125.00 23,638.00
Septic Haulers Permit 300.00 - 300.00
Sewage Installation License 1,150.00 600.00 550.00
Transfer Development Rights - 300.00 (300. 00)
1,258,279.45 868,308.10 389,971.35
(4) Revenue from use of
79,097.13 79,836.53 (739.40)
26,739.11 49,995.94 (23,256.83)
105,836.24 129,832.47 (23,996.23)
Recovered Cost Fire Companies 38,672.90 16,758.26 21,914.64
Reimbursement Circuit Court 6,959.45 5,886.38 1,073.07
Reimb.Public Works/Planning Clean Up 2,496.25 290.00 2,206.25
Clarke County Container Fees 32,620.45 19,327.62 13,292.83
City of Winchester Container Fees 29,589.25 18,950.93 10,638.32
Refuse Disposal Fees 46,069.92 29,326.42 16,743.50
38,791.96 35,047.08 3,744.88
Fire & Rescue Merchandise(Resale) 1,050.00 - 1,050.00
Container Fees Bowman Library 875.28 576.14 299.14
Litter-Thon/Keep VA Beautiful Grant 500.00 - 500.00
Restitution Victim Witness 3,466.00 4,634.05 (1,168.05)
Reimb.of Expenses Gen.District Court 12,395.26 14,816.96 (2,421.70)
34,066.48 32,706.04 1,360.44
Sign Deposits Planning 100.00 (50.00) 150.00
Reimbursement-Construction Projects - 385,799.69 (385,799.69)
*1
Reimbursement Elections - 4,049.21 (4,049.21)
Westminster Canterbury Lieu of Tax 12,456.00 24,450.10 (11,994.10)
Grounds Maint.Frederick Co. Schools 129,382.99 119,489.97 9,893.02
Comcast PEG Grant 35,732.25 35,344.80 387.45
Fire School Programs 9,424.25 11,375.00 (1,950.75)
Clerks Reimbursement to County 5,838.05 4,291.62 1,546.43
Sheriff Reimbursement 1,537.59 7,520.35 (5,982.76)
Subtotal Recovered Costs 786,155.46 1,100,235.91 (314,080.45)
483,090.46 449.50 482,640.96
*2
16,891.55 - 16,891.55
Proffer Redbud Run 32,270.00 19,362.00 12,908.00
Proffer Canter Estates 44,967.67 4,087.97 40,879.70
Proffer Village at Harvest Ridge 12,312.00 7,695.00 4,617.00
Proffer Southern Hills 19,640.00 - 19,640.00
Proffer Snowden Bridge 342,398.10 305,152.65 37,245.45
Proffer Meadows Edge Racey Tract 181,296.00 241,728.00 (60,432.00)
29,286.00 9,762.00 19,524.00
Proffer Westbury Commons 1,000.00 - 1,000.00
Subtotal Proffers 1,163,151.78 588,237.12 574,914.66
1,949,307.24 1,688,473.03 260,834.21
*1 Reimbursement for the Round Hill Fire and Rescue Station and Event Center design.
*2 Blackburn Commerce Center Rezoning/Transportation Improvement $452,745.46
(6) Commonwealth Revenue12/31/201512/31/2014
FY16FY15Increase/Decrease
Motor Vehicle Carriers Tax 37,721.45 36,948.73 772.72
Mobile Home Titling Tax 58,618.97 60,131.19 (1,512.22)
Recordation Taxes 180,462.40 167,636.80 12,825.60
P/P State Reimbursement 6,526,528.26 6,526,528.18 0.08
Shared Expenses Comm.Atty. 199,732.86 180,551.89 19,180.97
Shared Expenses Sheriff 1,013,227.77 991,025.87 22,201.90
Shared Expenses Comm.of Rev. 89,916.62 88,257.65 1,658.97
Shared Expenses Treasurer 67,609.76 66,637.95 971.81
Shared Expenses Clerk 166,958.63 158,302.50 8,656.13
Public Assistance Grants 2,201,803.37 2,053,656.27 148,147.10*1
Litter Control Grants 15,687.00 15,515.00 172.00
Other Revenue from the Commonwealth - 189,576.00 (189,576.00)
Emergency Services Fire Program 214,535.00 239,007.00 (24,472.00)
DMV Grant Funding 8,880.11 19,276.02 (10,395.91)
State Grant Emergency Services 14,838.80 62,786.60 (47,947.80)
DCJS & Sheriff (State Grants) - 124,932.44 (124,932.44)*2
JJC Grant Juvenile Justice 64,180.00 64,180.00 -
Rent/Lease Payments 83,579.22 147,851.22 (64,272.00)
Spay/Neuter Assistance -State 171.00 395.20 (224.20)
Wireless 911 Grant 27,930.69 31,374.43 (3,443.74)
State Forfeited Asset Funds 27,673.83 16,346.19 11,327.64
Victim Witness - 25,805.00 (25,805.00)
F/R OEMS Reimb. 2,142.00 2,275.88 (133.88)
Total 11,002,197.74 11,268,998.01 (266,800.27)
*1 Increase for special needs
*2 Abbott Grant FY15 $99,064.88
County ofFrederick
GeneralFund
December 31, 2015
(7) Federal Revenue FY16FY15Increase/Decrease
Federal Forfeited Assets 11,538.45 - 11,538.45
Housing Illegal Aliens-Federal 12,581.00 12,449.00 132.00
Federal Funds-Sheriff 8,983.00 5,509.00 3,474.00
Emergency Services Grant 12,848.00 2,399.00 10,449.00
Total 45,950.45 20,357.00 25,593.45
(8) Expenditures
General Administration
Expenditures increased$2,129,916.74.increased $617,657.56andreflects a
Public Safety
$402,670.54increase of Commissioner of the Revenue taxrefunds year to date.The
increaseof $1,493,070.23 includes the contribution for the local share for the Jail through the third
Public Works
quarter($1,275,824.50) that was a January entry in the previous year. increased
$275,523.53and includes the County share of the Courthouse Complex maintenance increase of
$170,481.64. Additionally, Engineering purchased a 2015 Chevrolet Colorado truck ($26,632), Refuse a
30 yard recycling can and compactor ($17,475) and Maintenance Administration a 2015 Ford F150
Parks, Recreation, and Culture
truck ($27,963). increased $222,175.24 and includes vehicle
purchases of (2) 2015 Chevrolet Silverado trucks ($24,375) each and (2)2015Toro Z-turn riding
Community Development
mowers($13,057) each.Thedecrease inreflects the $875,000 in FY15
transfer to the Economic Development Authority for EDA Incentives.The Transfers increased
$6,401,826.95.See chart below:
(9) Transfers increased $6,401,826.95 FY16FY15Increase/Decrease
Transfer to School Operating36,743,038.3132,892,257.05 3,850,781.26*1
Transfer to Debt Service Schools7,313,075.507,313,075.50 -
Transfer to School Construction3,200,000.00 - 3,200,000.00
Transfer to Debt Service County1,281,234.72698,798.40 582,436.32*2
Transfer to School Operating Capital314,746.72542,593.92 (227,847.20)
Transfer to Capital Projects Fund0.001,000,000.00 (1,000,000.00)*3
Operational Transfers 136,047.45 139,590.88 (3,543.43)*4
Total48,988,142.7042,586,315.75 6,401,826.95
*1 Increase in FY15 School Operating Transfer.
*2 FY16 payments include the Bowman Library, Roundhill, Millwood
and the Animal Shelter.
*3 Proffer for Round Hill Fire and Rescue Event Center Site Plan
*4 Timing of insurance charge outs.
179
County of Frederick
FUND 11 NORTHWESTERN REGIONAL ADULT DETENTION CENTER
December 31, 2015
ASSETSFY2016FY2015Increase
12/31/1512/31/14(Decrease)
*1
7,791,202.665,973,556.711,817,645.95
GL controls(est.rev/est.exp)(758,250.33)(486,482.85)(271,767.48)
TOTAL ASSETS7,032,952.335,487,073.861,545,878.47
LIABILITIES
Accrued Operating Reserve Costs2,258,904.002,115,099.00143,805.00
TOTAL LIABILITIES2,258,904.002,115,099.00143,805.00
EQUITY
Fund Balance
Reserved
Encumbrances19,902.0194,346.02(74,444.01)
Undesignated
Fund Balance4,754,146.323,277,628.841,476,517.48*2
TOTAL EQUITY4,774,048.333,371,974.861,402,073.47
TOTAL LIABILITY & EQUITY7,032,952.335,487,073.861,545,878.47
NOTES:
Cash increased $1,817,645.95. Refer to the following page for comparative statement of revenues,
expenditures and changes in fund balance.
Fund balance increased $1,476,517.48. The beginning balance for FY16 was $3,209,470.54 and includes
adjusting entries, budget controls FY16($725,046.00), and the year to date revenue less expenditures of
$2,269,721.78.
Current Unrecorded Accounts Receivable-FY2016
Prisoner Billing:29,068.04
.
Compensation Board Reimbursement 12/15467,206.40
496,274.44
County of Frederick
Comparative Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balance
12/31/15
FUND 11 NORTHWESTERN REGIONAL ADULT DETENTION CENTER
FY2016FY2015
REVENUES:
12/31/1512/31/14YTD Actual
AppropriatedActualActualVariance
Credit Card Probation-75.8773.152.72
Interest3,228.423,519.59(291.17)
Supervision Fees41,696.0018,446.0019,429.00(983.00)
Drug Testing Fees5,000.00-455.00(455.00)
Work Release Fees355,828.00158,472.36136,552.0021,920.36
Federal Bureau Of Prisons0.00275.001,825.48(1,550.48)
Local Contributions6,495,106.004,871,329.504,504,039.89367,289.61
Miscellaneous15,000.002,068.833,950.19(1,881.36)
Phone Commissions345,000.00112,026.8495,913.5316,113.31
Food & Staff Reimbursement130,000.0030,740.4145,840.21(15,099.80)
Elec.Monitoring Part.Fees90,000.0046,732.1235,824.8610,907.26
Share of Jail Cost Commonwealth1,097,197.00374,043.68295,394.6578,649.03
Medical & Health Reimb.68,000.0037,031.5629,177.977,853.59
Shared Expenses CFW Jail5,090,140.002,197,479.002,198,821.33(1,342.33)
State Grants250,263.0073,340.9476,425.00(3,084.06)
Local Offender Probation252,286.0068,238.0067,190.001,048.00
Transfer From General Fund5,103,298.003,827,473.502,461,093.121,366,380.38
TOTAL REVENUES
19,338,814.0011,821,002.039,975,524.971,845,477.06
EXPENDITURES:
20,116,966.349,551,280.258,869,914.04681,366.21
Excess(Deficiency)of revenues over
expenditures2,269,721.781,105,610.931,164,110.85
FUND BALANCE PER GENERAL LEDGER
2,484,424.542,172,017.91312,406.63
Fund Balance Adjusted To Reflect
4,754,146.323,277,628.841,476,517.48
Income Statement 12/31/15
181
665,525.52567,387.1798,138.35*1
Accounts Receivable Other0.000.000.00
Allow.Uncollectible Fees(84,000.00)(84,000.00)0.00
44,899,611.0743,682,208.641,217,402.43
Accumulated Depreciation(26,818,616.30)(25,115,864.21)(1,702,752.09)
GL controls(est.rev/est.exp)(731,470.00)(3,337,276.64)2,605,806.64
TOTAL ASSETS51,098,935.6747,049,160.864,049,774.81
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable - -
Accrued VAC.Pay and Comp TimePay191,362.47178,911.2412,451.23
Accrued Remediation Costs12,233,415.9311,938,535.78294,880.15*2
Retainage Payable0.009,244.62(9,244.62)
Deferred Revenue Misc.Charges0.000.000.00
TOTAL LIABILITIES12,424,778.4012,126,691.64298,086.76
EQUITY
Encumbrances0.00143,112.58(143,112.58)*3
Land Acquisition1,048,000.001,048,000.000.00
New Development Costs3,812,000.003,812,000.000.00
Environmental Project Costs1,948,442.001,948,442.000.00
3,050,000.003,050,000.000.00
28,815,715.2724,920,914.643,894,800.63*4
.
TOTAL EQUITY38,674,157.2734,922,469.223,751,688.05
TOTAL LIABILITY AND EQUITY51,098,935.6747,049,160.864,049,774.81
Landfill fees increased $98,138.35 and is due to an increase in tipping fee rates. Landfill fees at 12/15 were
$478,298.64 compared to $397,587.47 at 12/14 for an increase of $80,720.17. Delinquent fees at 12/15 were
$182,872.32 compared to $165,923.71 at 12/14 for an increase of $16,948.61.
Remediation increased $294,880.15 and includes $265,000.00 for post closure and $29,880.15 interest.
There was not an encumbrance balance at 12/31/15.
Fund Balance increased $3,894,800.63. The beginning balance was $27,730,771.72 and includes adjusting entries,
budget controls for FY16($75,138) and year to date revenue less expenditures of $1,160,081.55.
FUND 12 LANDFILLFY16FY15YTD
REVENUES12/31/1512/31/2014Actual
AppropriatedActualActualVariance
Interest Charge0.002,094.731,952.96141.77
Interest on Bank Deposits60,000.0022,629.9225,774.18(3,144.26)
Salvage and Surplus0.0041,433.7570,005.80(28,572.05)
Sanitary Landfill Fees5,080,500.002,686,059.822,321,112.54364,947.28
Charges to County0.00203,013.44167,794.6235,218.82
Charges to Winchester0.0059,209.4647,652.9211,556.54
Tire Recycling120,000.0039,866.3884,952.71(45,086.33)
Reg.Recycling Electronics60,000.0022,843.0019,465.013,377.99
Greenhouse Gas Credit Sales0.003,668.28(3,668.28)
Miscellaneous60,000.00161.00174.00(13.00)
Wheel Recycling120,000.000.0010,491.47(10,491.47)
Renewable Energy Credits116,262.0073,374.0469,954.503,419.54
Landfill Gas To Electricity394,620.00187,237.97238,723.67(51,485.70)
Waste Oil Recycling1,920.537,506.19(5,585.66)
State Reimbursement Tire Operation0.000.000.000.00
TOTAL REVENUES6,011,382.003,339,844.043,069,228.85270,615.19
Operating Expenditures5,391,520.001,432,335.741,461,483.22(29,147.48)
Capital Expenditures1,351,332.00747,426.751,267,006.13(519,579.38)
TOTAL Expenditures 6,742,852.002,179,762.492,728,489.35(548,726.86)
Excess(defiency)of revenue over
expenditures1,160,081.55340,739.50819,342.05
Fund Balance Per General Ledger27,655,633.7224,580,175.143,075,458.58
FUND BALANCE ADJUSTED 28,815,715.2724,920,914.643,894,800.63
REZONING APPLICATION #12-15
CROSSPOINTE CENTER
Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors
Prepared: January 8, 2016
Staff Contacts: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Director
John Bishop, AICP, Deputy Director - Transportation
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission:
01/06/16 Recommended Approval
Board of Supervisors:
01/27/16 Pending
PROPOSAL:
To rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General
Business) District and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP (Residential
Performance) District within the Crosspointe Center development, Rezoning #13-03, and to amend the
proffers associated with Rezoning #13-03.
Please see the enclosed plat of rezoning which identifies the location of the modified zoning areas
within the property.
LOCATION:
The property is located east and adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and adjacent to
Tasker Road and Hillandale Lane.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE
01/27/16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING:
The commercial and residential zoning proposed for this property with the rezoning and proffer
amendment is consistent with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The original
rezoning for Crosspointe Center, Rezoning #13-03, was
use plan. This current request, Rezoning #12-15, remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a
land use perspective.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request and also, as noted in the meeting
summary, discussed this item thoroughly. Those items discussed included: the transportation
components of the request, details of the continued approach to address community facility impacts of
the residential development through the commercial credit, the Planning that
the land identified for Government Services should be dedicated rather than reserved, and the potential
to mix the type of residential units. Ultimately, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
this request.
The Applicant has provided a revised proffer statement dated January 4, 2016 that includes minor
adjustments to address the legal comments provided by the County Attorney.
With regards to the impacts associated with this request, it has been demonstrated that transportation
improvements will be in place to support this additional development. VDOT has expressed their
approval of the revised proffers that ensure the improvements will be secured.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 2
While the reorganization of the land uses within the development could lead to additional traffic
generation compared to what is currently approved, the resulting difference is not enough to trigger a
Chapter 527 evaluation. This application retains a three phase development and associated
transportation improvement program, similar to the current proffers. However, the new proposal moves
much more of the transportation impacts into Phase One. That is offset by an agreement to complete a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) upon the completion of 370,000 square feet of commercial and accelerate
transportation improvements or make modifications if needed. Ultimately, the project will be
responsible for extending Tasker Road, construction of a portion of Warrior Drive, Future Route 37,
bridges over Tasker Road, and demolition of the temporary ramps to Tasker Road being constructed by
VDOT.
Staff has continued to point out in the report that the original proffer which provided for the dedication
of area for Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation of area for
government services. The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
The items identified throughout the Staff Report, and those issues discussed by the Planning
Commission should be evaluated by the Board of Supervisors prior to a decision on this rezoning
request.
Following the required public hearing, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the
Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately
address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 3
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this
application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues
concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission:
01/06/16 Recommended Approval
Board of Supervisors:
01/27/16 Pending
PROPOSAL:
To rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General
Business) District and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP (Residential
Performance) District within the Crosspointe Center development, Rezoning #13-03, and to amend the
proffers associated with Rezoning #13-03.
Please see the enclosed plat of rezoning which identifies the location of the modified zoning areas
within the property.
LOCATION:
The property is located east and adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and adjacent to
Tasker Road and Hillandale Lane.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
: Shawnee
PROPERTY ID NUMBERS
: 75-A-89, 75-A-89A, 75-A-91, 75-A-92, 75-A-95, 75-A-96, and a
portion 75-A-90 and 75-A-94.
PROPERTY ZONING:
B2 (General Business) District and RP (Residential Performance) District
PRESENT USE:
Vacant
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant
M1 (Light Industrial) Washington Gas
South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential (Lakeside/Village at Artrip)
B2 (General Business) Private School/FCSA
East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant/Agricultural
West: B2 (General Business) Use: Commercial
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 4
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation:
Please see attached email from Jeff Lineberry dated December 11,
2015 and most recently from Matthew Smith dated December 21, 2015.
Frederick County Fire Marshal:
Plans approved.
Public Works Department:
Please see attached letter from Harvey Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E., Director of
Public Works dated August 17, 2015.
Frederick County Sanitation Authority:
Please see attached letter from Uwe E. Weindel, PE,
Engineer-Director dated August 14, 2015.
Frederick County Parks & Recreation:
The proposed proffer does not appear to meet the monetary
contributions necessary to satisfy the Parks and Recreation impacts of this development. Parks and
Recreation recommends adjusting the monetary contributions proffer to meet the current impact model
standards.
Winchester Regional Airport:
The proposed Proffer Amendment for Crosspointe Center review has
been completed. While the site is within the airspace of the Winchester Regional Airport the proposed
proffer amendment will not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport.
Frederick County Public School:
Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Crosspointe
Center proffer amendment application submitted to us on August 12, 2015. We offer the following
comment:
1.The change from 200 age-restricted units to 200 possibly age restricted units is noted. This
could have an impact on FCPS of as many as 80 additional students. Eighty students would
increase our costs $927,000 annually and necessitate a one-time capital cost of $3,306,000.
Frederick County Attorney:
Please see attached letter from Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney,
Final legal review of the proffer statement dated December 15, 2015 was
dated September 24, 2015.
provided prior to the 1/6/16 Planning Commission meeting. The Applicant provided a revised proffer
statement dated January 4, 2016 that addressed the comments made by the County Attorney.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 5
Planning & Zoning:
1)Site History
Rezoning #13-03, Crosspointe Center, was approved by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors on February 11, 2004. This application was to rezone 574 acres from RA (Rural
Areas) and B2 (General Business) to RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business).
More specifically, the rezoning approved 175.62 acres from RA to B2, 381.8 acres from RA to
RP, and 16.95 acres from B2 without proffers to B2 with proffers. The proffers that were
approved with this rezoning request are unique to the properties contained in the Crosspointe
Center rezoning application (Rezoning #13-03).
The current rezoning request (Rezoning #12-15) seeks to modify the proffers associated
with the original rezoning and adjust the general locations of the RP and B2 areas of
zoning.
2)Comprehensive Policy Plan
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County.
Land Use.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan provides guidance
on the future development of the property. The property is located within the UDA and SWSA.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property with an Urban Center land use
designation. This land use designation supports commercial and residential development. The
Urban Center designation is envisioned to be a more intensive, walkable urban area with a
larger commercial core, higher densities, and designed around some form of public space or
focal point, located in close proximity to major transportation infrastructure.
In general, the proposed commercial and residential zoning for this property is consistent
with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan.
It is recognized that the
future land use would support a greater mixing and intensity of land uses, supported by a robust
pported in the
current zoning and approved proffers for the property. The original rezoning, Crosspointe
Center, Rezoning #13-
current request remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a land use perspective.
Transportation.
important is the Route 37 extension, followed by Warrior Drive and Tasker Road. Each of
these roads are critical to the Co Implementation of these
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 6
major roads is essential to accommodating local and regional traffic at acceptable level of
service (LOS) conditions throughout the study area.
The original rezoning addressed these key transportation components through the approved
proffer statement. It is important to evaluate this current request in light of agreements that have
been made since the approval of the original rezoning (Three-Party Agreement with VDOT and
Frederick County), and the need to ensure the transportation commitments made to address the
needs of the local and regional traffic are maintained and improved upon.
Currently, VDOT is constructing improvements to the Interstate 81 Exit 310 Interchange.
Referred to as Phase One improvements, construction includes the relocation of Tasker and
Hillandale Roads to accommodate exit ramp improvements for the interchange. These
improvements will enable the future extension of Route 37 east of its current terminus through
the Crosspointe property as a limited access, grade separated, roadway, pursuant to the Three-
Party Agreement.
With regards to transportation, the rezoning and proffer amendment seeks to clarify the
remaining road improvements within the property required for the completion of the project.
The rezoning and proffer amendment continues to promote a three phased approach to
implementing the transportation network that is generally consistent with the original rezoning.
However, the request increases the amount of commercial land use that may be developed and
increases the amount of development that may be included in the first phase. To offset this
increase in the first phase, the Applicant
above 370,000 square feet (the original parameters of Phase One) and the completion or
advancement of improvements identified by the TIA and the proffers.
In addition to adjusting the transportation commitments required for the completion of the
project, the rezoning and proffer amendment modifies the locations of the commercial and
residential land bays and increases the maximum commercial floor area from 960,000 square
feet to 1,088,000 square feet.
3) Potential Impacts
The Impact Analysis prepared for this rezoning application addresses the impacts associated
with, among other things, the increased intensity of the project, the relocation of the various
commercial and residential land bays, and the proposed modification of the developer obligated
transportation improvements.
The amount of commercial land use that may be developed on the property has increased by
128,000 square feet, from 960,000 to 1,088,000 square feet. In addition, the location of the
commercial land uses has been adjusted to predominately the western portion of the property.
This provides greater visibility from the Interstate 81 right-of-way.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 7
An additional 240,000 square feet and an additional 322 residential units are proposed in Phase
One. This represents a larger amount of development in Phase One than the current zoning.
Consequently, Phase Two and Phase Three have been reduced in scope.
The revised land use proffer addressing residential development would enable an additional 200
non-age restricted housing units to be developed on the property. This has the potential of
introducing additional impacts on the County should the age restricted units not be constructed
in favor of non-age restricted units.
The value of the proffers aimed at mitigating the impacts associated with the development of
this property are the same as the original proffer statement for this project which was approved
in 2004. It should be recognized that the Development Impact Model projects a much higher
amount in 2015. As proposed, the residential land use changes may allow an additional 200
residential units that are not age restricted, thus potentially creating additional impacts on
schools.
will offset the impacts to capital facilities caused by the residential development. It is
recognized that the Applicant may still utilize age restricted units within the project.
It has been demonstrated that transportation improvements will be in place to support
this additional development. Coordination with VDOT and the County in achieving
agreement on the transportation approach has been very important. It has ensured that
the proposed land uses and land use phasing, with the improvements made by VDOT in
fulfillment of the Three-Party Agreement, are coordinated and acceptable.
The cap of
370,000 square feet of commercial land uses triggering additional TIA and improvements, if
warranted, is consistent with the current rezoning and provides a mechanism for addressing the
impacts to the satisfaction of VDOT.
Site Access and Transportation.
The current proffer statement directly ties the amount of development, the phasing of the land
uses, to road improvements. Previously, the Applicant demonstrated that the transportation
improvements would be completed with the appropriate amount of development. The proposed
proffer statement continues to tie the land use to the needed transportation improvements. The
addition of a proffer tying the increased development in the first phase to a TIA, with the
guarantee that additional transportation improvements would be provided to support this
development, maintains a level of consistency with the original proffers and ensures the
development remains tied to the road improvements. This addresses the question of what is
stopping the next phase of development from not touching or necessitating the necessary
transportation improvements. The application therefore links the land use to the transportation
improvements to a greater extent.
Environment.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 8
The application continues to provide for a comprehensive trail network linking the development
land bays with historic park areas and stream corridors within the site and adjacent
developments. The Stream Preservation Buffer Areas have been identified as in the approved
rezoning and GDP. Particular attention has been paid to the stream buffer area and potential trail
connectivity along the Opequon Creek. This linear feature is supported in the Senseny/Eastern
Frederick Area Plan.
Historical.
The area identified as Historic Park in the western part of the property, north of future Route 37
has been modified and is smaller than in the original five acres identified in the original GDP.
This historic preservation parcel immediately surrounds the Hillandale House. The change was
necessitated by the additional right-of-way VDOT required for the completion of the Interstate
81, Exit 310 Interchange. The proffer has been further modified to allow for the adaptive reuse
of the structure which may include a commercial type use.
The other commitments made in the original rezoning from a historical perspective, the
preservation of Camp Russell and the Carysbrook Redoubt, remain consistent.
Community Facilities.
The application addresses the potential impact to community facilities by maintaining the
proffer values of the original rezoning for Fire and Rescue, Schools, Parks, Libraries, Sheriff,
and Administration.
It is important for Staff to point out that the original proffer which provided for the
dedication of area for Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation
of area for government services. The difference between dedication and reservation is
significant.
The area for government services is nine acres in size and would be located within
the Phase One commercial area. The reservation is for a period of five years. No value has been
attributed to the acreage and the cost to the County has not been determined. Previously, the
dedication was at no cost to the County, it was for three years with an additional two year
extension. Further, in lieu of the dedication, the Applicant would pay to the County $200,000.
The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
has
consistently recognized the need for a new fire and rescue station (#22) in the immediate
vicinity of the Crosspointe Center project.
4) Proffer Statement
Original Date of Proffers August 27, 2003 (Revised and Approved January
23, 2004). Revised proffers dated August 7, 2015, December 15, 2015, and most recently,
January 4, 2015.
Final legal review of the proffer statement dated December 15, 2015 was provided prior to the
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 9
1/6/16 Planning Commission meeting. The Applicant provided a revised proffer statement
dated January 4, 2016 that addressed the comments made by the County Attorney.
In general, the proffer statement;
provides for the phased development of land use and transportation with provisions that the
project shall be developed in three phases;
includes a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) that illustrates the phased development;
provides for development related items such as architecture, signage, and landscaping, a
pedestrian trail system and recreation areas, environmental and cultural resource preservation;
provides for community facility impacts by continuing to proffer amounts consistent with the
original rezoning; and
As pointed out in the report, it should
proposes an area of reservation for government services.
be determined if the change from dedication to reservation of this area is acceptable.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 01/06/16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
The commercial and residential zoning proposed for this property with the rezoning and proffer
amendment is consistent with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The original
rezoning for Crosspointe Center, Rezoning #13-
use plan. This current request, Rezoning #12-15, remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a
land use perspective.
With regards to the impacts associated with this request, it has been demonstrated that transportation
improvements will be in place to support this additional development. VDOT has expressed their
approval of the revised proffers that ensure the improvements will be secured.
While the reorganization of the land uses within the development could lead to additional traffic
generation compared to what is currently approved, the resulting difference is not enough to trigger a
Chapter 527 evaluation. This application retains a three phase development and associated
transportation improvement program similar to the current proffers. However, the new proposal moves
much more of the transportation impacts into Phase One. That is offset by an agreement to complete a
traffic impact analysis (TIA) upon the completion of 370,000 square feet of commercial and accelerate
transportation improvements or make modifications if needed. Ultimately, the project will be
responsible for extending Tasker Road, construction of a portion of Warrior Drive, Future Route 37,
bridges over Tasker Road, and demolition of the temporary ramps to Tasker Road being constructed by
VDOT.
Staff has pointed out in the report that the original proffer which provided for the dedication of area for
Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation of area for government services.
The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 10
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FROM THE 01/06/16 MEETING:
Deputy Director, Michael T. Ruddy and Deputy Director of Transportation, John A. Bishop, presented
the staff report to the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Thomas inquired is it a comparable value of having VDOT do the work at Exit 310 to
what the developer has offered for going to a limited access for Route 37 and the bridges. Mr. Bishop
noted it appears to be comparable. Commissioner Thomas noted it does not appear we will be getting
much of Warrior Drive completed. Mr. Bishop highlighted we will actually be getting a significant
portion of this road completed.
Mr. Ruddy presented the additional impacts associated with this request: recognizes the DIM
(Development Impact Model) values and the Applicans approach; consistent with the original
rezoning; commercial revenue more than offsets the residential units especially with the additional
commercial square footage allowances; 200 residential units with age restricted condition has been
removed.
Mr. Ruddy reported the original proffer statement included a proffer which provided for the dedication
of an area for Government Services. This proffer has been modified from a dedication of nine acres to
Government Services to a reservation of an area within a specific location for Government Services.
Mr. Ruddy concluded an additional review document from the County Attorney is available for review
if needed.
Commissioner Oates inquired about the reservation for Government Services and will the County be
obligated to pay. Mr. Ruddy explained the reservation area is located in Phase One; the details are yet
to be determined and would put the County in the position to negotiate.
Commissioner Marston inquired if the nine acres ended up being five acres because of the right-of-way
for the Exit 310 ramps. Mr. Ruddy explained that is a slightly different component because there are
two historical sites one being around the Hillendale House which was reduced from five aces to three
acres for the right-of-way that was needed.
Commissioner Thomas noted in 2003/2004 the impact model was much different and if the current
proposed rezoning were ran under the current model would the monetary contributions being provided
be similar or be adequate with the current model. Mr. Ruddy explained it would most likely be a little
different but would estimate the commercial contribution would still turn out to be a positive, however
it is important to recognize we do not run the DIM when we compare the residential to the commercial.
He
an amount per unit, and then the Applicant has to demonstrate why their project would provide that
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 11
offset. Commissioner Thomas noted originally the housing types were a little more specific and now it
appears to be a little more wide open and does that cause Staff any concern. Mr. Ruddy responded it
does not cause concern and the flexibility in the housing types is appropriate.
Mr. John Foote representing the Applicant came forward and began by noting VDOT has come
through with the funds for the Exit 310 interchange and this undertaking by VDOT has taken the initial
burden off the Applicant of the upfront costs associated with the development. Mr. Foote continued
this presented an opportunity due to the layout of the property to increase the amount of commercial
development that would be permissible. Mr. Foote noted the changes to this rezoning versus the
previous rezoning are relatively small. He elaborated that some commercial has been moved from the
back of the project to the front and the Applicant has eliminated the mandatory assisted living/age
restricted housing and made it a market option. Mr. Foote addressed the traffic impacts and he noted a
specific item to observe is the 370,000 square foot completion agreement and there will be a re-study at
that point to see if the triggers are functioning or not and how they can be improved. Mr. Foote
continued with this agreement VDOT determined it was satisfied and this will be what protects the
road connection and also protects the Exit 310 interchange.
Commissioner Oates inquired as to why the switch from dedication to reservation? Mr. Foote
explained the dedication provision in the previous rezoning proffers was time restricted and expired at
the five year limitation. He noted the other reason the Applicant has gone with a reservation versus the
dedication has to do with what VDOT requested of the A
design of the Exit 310 interchange which has taken a substantially larger amount of right-of-way off
this project than what was originally anticipated. He noted the concern was that the Applicant was not
recovering that value in some way, therefore rather than making an absolute dedication they chose the
reservation route because they need to recapture some of the lost land value.
Commissioner Thomas inquired if mixed housing is planned or when will that be determined. Mr.
Foote responded no, the market will determine this and nothing has been decided at this point.
Commissioner Oates noted he is concerned with the reservation and believes it needs further
discussion. Commissioner Thomas agreed with Commissioner Oates and he would like to have more
specifics on housing. Commissioner Manuel supports this proposal and feels the commercial versus
residential is a positive factor. Commissioner Mohn commented he is generally comfortable with this
rezoning; he recognized the reasoning behind the change from dedication to reservation and is
comfortable with giving flexibility to the residential component. Commissioner Mohn asked his
fellow Commissioners what type of housing they would prefer. Commissioner Thomas commented he
would like to see a mix and would like a commitment on this from the developer. Commissioner
Dunlap commented based on the presented documents he is in favor of this project and he is not
concerned with the dedication versus reservation. Commissioner Unger commented the market will
dictate what type of housing will be needed in this area and he is in support of this rezoning.
A motion was made, seconded, and passed unanimously to recommend approval of this rezoning.
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 12
Abstain: Kenney
Absent: Crockett
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE
01/27/16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING:
The commercial and residential zoning proposed for this property with the rezoning and proffer
amendment is consistent with the current land use supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The original
rezoning for Crosspointe Center, Rezoning #13-
use plan. This current request, Rezoning #12-15, remains consistent with the approved rezoning from a
land use perspective.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request and also, as noted in the meeting
summary, discussed this item thoroughly. Those items discussed included: the transportation
components of the request, details of the continued approach to address community facility impacts of
the residential development through the commercial credit, the Planning
the land identified for Government Services should be dedicated rather than reserved, and the potential
to mix the type of residential units. Ultimately, the Planning Commission recommended approval of
this request.
The Applicant has provided a revised proffer statement dated January 4, 2016 that includes minor
adjustments to address the legal comments provided by the County Attorney.
With regards to the impacts associated with this request, it has been demonstrated that transportation
improvements will be in place to support this additional development. VDOT has expressed their
approval of the revised proffers that ensure the improvements will be secured.
While the reorganization of the land uses within the development could lead to additional traffic
generation compared to what is currently approved, the resulting difference is not enough to trigger a
Chapter 527 evaluation. This application retains a three phase development and associated
transportation improvement program, similar to the current proffers. However, the new proposal moves
much more of the transportation impacts into Phase One. That is offset by an agreement to complete a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) upon the completion of 370,000 square feet of commercial and accelerate
transportation improvements or make modifications if needed. Ultimately, the project will be
responsible for extending Tasker Road, construction of a portion of Warrior Drive, Future Route 37,
bridges over Tasker Road, and demolition of the temporary ramps to Tasker Road being constructed by
VDOT.
Staff has continued to point out in the report that the original proffer which provided for the dedication
of area for Government Services has been modified to provide for the reservation of area for
Rezoning #12-15 Crosspointe Center
January 19, 2016
Page 13
government services. The County should determine if such a modified approach is acceptable.
The items identified throughout the Staff Report, and those issues discussed by the Planning
Commission should be evaluated by the Board of Supervisors prior to a decision on this rezoning
request.
Following the required public hearing, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the
Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately
address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors.
3425245 Winchester 130
CALDWELL LN
CALDWELL LN
324
CAPITOL LN
HARRISON LN
125332
REZ # 12 - 15 VALLEY
CALDWELL LN
237
3464
APPLECALDWELL LN
PIKE332
CALDWELL LN
329
170
VALLEY
VALLEY RD
CALDWELL LN
123
CALDWELL LN
PIKEHARRISON LN
Crosspointe Center
HARRISON LN
3463
165
221
3500
VALLEY
HARRISON LN
PASTURE LN
VALLEY
148
PIKE
PINs:
PIKE
PASTURE LN
200
285
180
3540PASTURE LN
75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,
CALDWELL LN
HOOD
VALLEY
296
WAY
204PIKE
75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,
PASTURE LN
FROGALE CT
3578
portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94
VALLEY
404
3583
PIKE
296
HILLANDALE LN
Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,
VALLEY
PASTURE LN
PIKE
161
72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer
3632
COMMONWEALTH CT
COPP TRACTS
104
VALLEY
FAY ST
Subdivision
Amendment
PIKE
201
332
106
COMMONWEALTH CT
CALDWELL LN
FAY ST
3661
3790
221
350
VALLEY
01
PAPERMILL RD
COMMONWEALTH CT
KING LN
HILLANDALE LN
PIKE
11
75 A 94
190
3790
KING LN
COMMONWEALTH CT75 A 91
PAPERMILL RD
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
251
75 A 92
COMMONWEALTH CT
REZ 12-15
COMMONWEALTH
BUSINESS CENTER
Subdivision
01
37
§
¨¦
81
121
KERNSTOWN
COMMONS
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
75 A 90
75 A 94
KERNSTOWN
187
COMMONS
KERNSTOWN
COMMONS
3951
75 A 89A
VALLEY
REZ 12-15
PIKE
CROSSPOINTE
CENTER
Subdivision
REZ 12-15
130
CARRIEBROOKE DR
75 A 89
315
TASKER RD
REZ 12-15
TASKER RD
REZ 12-15
176
PICKET LN
75 A 95
1726
266
369FRONT
PICKET LN
ROYAL PIKE
TASKER RD
75 A 96
216
THE TOWNES
244
PICKET LN
AT TASKER PICKET LN
Subdivision
345
TASKER RD
220
214
LAKERIDGE DR
163
LAKERIDGE DR
RUTHERFORD LN 01
106
522
LAKERIDGE CT
VILLAGES
323
01
218
37
CHINKAPIN DR
AT ARTRIP
330
106
SOMERSET DR
PARADISE CT
107208
227
315
Subdivision
CHINKAPIN DR
SUGAR
LAKERIDGE DRFALABELLA DR
PARADISE CT
SOMERSET DR
CHINKAPIN DR
CREEK CT
PARADISE CT
102
122
114303
103
LIPIZZANER CT
WOODRIDGE CT
102TIMBERLAKECHINKAPIN DR
JADE CT
127
101
TER
LEGACY CT
126
BELL HAVEN
MYSTIC CT
104
CALEDON CT
CIR
102
§
CASCADE CIR¨¦
105
81
MYSTIC CT
CANAAN CT115
01
1285
217 11
LIPIZZANER CT
104
MACEDONIA
106
143
126106102
108101
SURREY
LAKEVIEW CTCH RD
REZ # 12 - 15
Note:
Crosspointe Center
Frederick County Dept of
Planning & Development
I
PINs:
107 N Kent St
75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,
Suite 202
75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,
Winchester, VA 22601
Applications
portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94
540 - 665 - 5651
Parcels
Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,
Map Created: December 16, 2015
72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer
Sewer and Water Service Area
Staff: mruddy
Amendment
Building Footprints
06501,3002,600Feet
3425245 Winchester 130
CALDWELL LN
CALDWELL LN
324
CAPITOL LN
HARRISON LN
125332
REZ # 12 - 15 VALLEY
CALDWELL LN
237
3464
APPLECALDWELL LN
PIKE332
CALDWELL LN
329
170
VALLEY
VALLEY RD
CALDWELL LN
123
CALDWELL LN
PIKEHARRISON LN
Crosspointe Center
HARRISON LN
3463
165
221
3500
VALLEY
HARRISON LN
PASTURE LN
VALLEY
148
PIKE
PINs:
PIKE
PASTURE LN
200
285
180
3540PASTURE LN
75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,
CALDWELL LN
HOOD
VALLEY
296
WAY
204PIKE
75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,
PASTURE LN
FROGALE CT
3578
portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94
VALLEY
404
3583
PIKE
296
HILLANDALE LN
Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,
VALLEY
PASTURE LN
PIKE
161
72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer
3632
COMMONWEALTH CT
COPP TRACTS
104
VALLEY
FAY ST
Subdivision
Amendment
PIKE
201
332
106
COMMONWEALTH CT
CALDWELL LN
FAY ST
3661
3790
221
350
VALLEY
01
PAPERMILL RD
COMMONWEALTH CT
KING LN
HILLANDALE LN
PIKE
11
75 A 94
190
3790
KING LN
COMMONWEALTH CT75 A 91
PAPERMILL RD
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
251
75 A 92
COMMONWEALTH CT
REZ 12-15
COMMONWEALTH
BUSINESS CENTER
Subdivision
01
37
§
¨¦
81
121
KERNSTOWN
COMMONS
REZ 12-15
REZ 12-15
75 A 90
75 A 94
KERNSTOWN
187
COMMONS
KERNSTOWN
COMMONS
3951
75 A 89A
VALLEY
REZ 12-15
PIKE
CROSSPOINTE
CENTER
Subdivision
REZ 12-15
130
CARRIEBROOKE DR
75 A 89
315
TASKER RD
REZ 12-15
TASKER RD
REZ 12-15
176
PICKET LN
75 A 95
1726
266
369FRONT
PICKET LN
ROYAL PIKE
TASKER RD
75 A 96
216
THE TOWNES
244
PICKET LN
AT TASKER PICKET LN
Subdivision
345
TASKER RD
220
214
LAKERIDGE DR
163
LAKERIDGE DR
RUTHERFORD LN 01
106
522
Applications
LAKERIDGE CT
VILLAGES
323
01
218
Parcels
37
CHINKAPIN DR
AT ARTRIP
330
106
SOMERSET DR
PARADISE CT
107208
Sewer and Water Service Area 227
315
Subdivision
CHINKAPIN DR
SUGAR
LAKERIDGE DRFALABELLA DR
PARADISE CT
SOMERSET DR
CHINKAPIN DR
CREEK CT
Building Footprints
PARADISE CT
102
122
114303
103
B1 (Business, Neighborhood District)
LIPIZZANER CT
WOODRIDGE CT
102TIMBERLAKECHINKAPIN DR
JADE CT
127
101
B2 (Business, General Distrist)
TER
LEGACY CT
126
BELL HAVEN
MYSTIC CT
104
CALEDON CT
CIR
B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District)
102
§
CASCADE CIR¨¦
105
81
MYSTIC CT
EM (Extractive Manufacturing District)
CANAAN CT115
01
1285
217 11
LIPIZZANER CT
HE (Higher Education District)
104
MACEDONIA
106
143
126106102
108101
SURREY
LAKEVIEW CTCH RD
M1 (Industrial, Light District)
REZ # 12 - 15
Note:
M2 (Industrial, General District)
Crosspointe Center
Frederick County Dept of
MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)
Planning & Development
I
PINs:
MS (Medical Support District)
107 N Kent St
75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,
Suite 202
OM (Office - Manufacturing Park)
75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,
Winchester, VA 22601
R4 (Residential Planned Community District)
portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94
540 - 665 - 5651
R5 (Residential Recreational Community District)
Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,
Map Created: December 16, 2015
72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer
RA (Rural Area District)
Staff: mruddy
Amendment
RP (Residential Performance District)
06501,3002,600Feet
131125VALLEY170HARRISON LN
DAWSON DRCALDWELL LN
CALDWELL LN
FROGALE CT
3463
221
148
PIKE
REZ # 12 - 15
HARRISON LN
APPLE
3526
131
VALLEY
PASTURE LN
PASTURE LN
VALLEY RD
VALLEY
DAWSON DRPIKE
285
200
PIKE
CALDWELL LN
PASTURE LN
Crosspointe Center
3578
180
296
VALLEY
130
3583HOOD
404PASTURE LN
296
PIKE
FROGALE CTWAY
VALLEY
PINs:
HILLANDALE LN
PASTURE LN
PIKE
3595
01
332
204
VALLEY
75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,
CALDWELL LN
FROGALE CT
37
139
PIKE
104
COMMONWEALTH CT185
75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96, 3632
FAY ST3790
COMMONWEALTH CT
175
VALLEY
PAPERMILL RD
121124
COMMONWEALTH CT
350
portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94
PIKE
106
DEVELOPMENT LNFAY ST
221
HILLANDALE LN
3688
75 A 94
128KING LN
COMMONWEALTH CT
Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,
190
VALLEY
FAY ST3790
103
75 A 91
COMMONWEALTH CT
REZ 12-15
PIKE
PAPERMILL RD
FAY ST
72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer
REZ 12-15
25175 A 92
01
REZ 12-15
COMMONWEALTH CT
Amendment
11
100
DEVELOPMENT LN
01
121
37
553
KERNSTOWN
SHADY
COMMONS
ELM RD3862
141
180
REZ 12-15
VALLEY
REZ 12-15
KERNSTOWN
PROSPERITY DR
PIKE
3880
COMMONS
222
PROSPERITY DR
VALLEY
170
75 A 94
KERNSTOWN
PIKE
PROSPERITY DR
220
75 A 90
COMMONS
PROSPERITY DR
161
187
PROSPERITY DR
240
KERNSTOWN
125
PROSPERITY DR
COMMONS
PROSPERITY DR
251
3951
PROSPERITY DR
3951
VALLEY
§75 A 89A
¨¦
4046
VALLEY PIKE
REZ 12-15
PIKE 81
VALLEY
PIKE
4017
4050
130
VALLEY
VALLEY
4118
REZ 12-15
PIKECARRIEBROOKE DR
PIKE
VALLEY
315
PIKE
4118
200
75 A 89
TASKER RD
VALLEY
SULKY DR
4110
PIKE
REZ 12-15
211
358
REZ 12-15
VALLEY
176
SULKY
TASKER RD
PIKE
75 A 95
PICKET LN
266
41841726
DRIVE
369
Applications
PICKET LN
VALLEYFRONT
111
TASKER RD
75 A 96
PIKEROYAL PIKE
216
MUSKET DR Parcels
143
244
142
PICKET LN
SCHRAMM
Sewer and Water Service Area
PICKET LN
136
MUSKET DR
LOOP
MUSKET DR
345
Building Footprints
239
120
TASKER RD
4227
SCHRAMM
220
Long Range Land Use
SUMMER
4273
VALLEY
LOOP
LAKERIDGE DR
163
225
LAKE DR
VALLEY
PIKE
Residential
RUTHERFORD LN
LAKERIDGE DR
PIKE
107
232
521
Neighborhood Village
324
SUMMER
SOMERSET DR
TASKER RD
133
Urban Center
330
CHINKAPIN DR
208
LAKE DR
107
PARADISE CT
223
CHINKAPIN DR
FALABELLA DR
120
LAKERIDGE DR
127
126
Mobile Home Community
SOMERSET DR
119
GOLDEN
PARADISE CT
NATURE DR
CASCADE
Business
FALABELLA DR
118
POND CIR319
110
106
112
CIR103
FALABELLA DR
WOODRIDGE CT
115
HACKBERRY DR
103
Highway Commercial
PARADISE CT
LIPIZZANER CT
TIMBERLAKE
FAIR
BELL
GOLDEN
126
106TER114CAMARUGE CT
109
LAWN CT
Mixed-Use
HAVEN CIR
POND CIR
107
183
CALEDON CT
TIMBERLAKELIPIZZANER CT
HONEY
114
Mixed Use Commercial/Office
LAKEVIEW CT
204
EQUESTRIAN DR
111
TER
CREEK CIR
100119
111
FAIR
CAMELLIA CT
212CLEARWATER CT
Mixed Use Industrial/Office TIMBERLAKELIPIZZANER CT
SOMERSET DR
LAWN CT
SURREY
TER
230
107CAMARUGE CT
Industrial
117
1285
386
CLUB LN
134
HACKBERRY DR
ROSEDALE DR
CHINKAPIN DR
MACEDONIA
SURREY
Warehouse
FAIR
113
112
128
102
CH RD
124
CLUB LN
243
LAWN CT
Heavy Industrial
AUBURN
BUTTERNUT DR
AUBURN
WILLOW107
HACKBERRY DR
113
BRANDYLION DR
92
111
HILL CT
HILL CT
OAK CIR
LAKEWOOD DR
Extractive Mining ALDIE
1285
106
CHINKAPIN
POCONO PL
126
237
BURN CT
MACEDONIAPENDERBROOK CT
BUTTERNUT DR
DR
Commercial Rec
103
107
110
POCONO PL
LAKESIDE DR
100
227
CH RD
219
AUBURN
TATTERSALL CT
WHITE
SOMERTON CT
Rural Community Center
ALDIE
LAKESIDE DR 01
101
WAKELAND DR
HILL CT
NIGHTINGALE
102
PINE CIR
BURN CTSOMERTON CT
BUTTERNUT DR 522
871
Fire & Rescue
216
VINCENT DR
NIGHTINGALE
118
329
01
105
127
TASKER RD
124WAKELAND DR
116
100
NIGHTINGALE
312HICKORY
CHELTENHAM DR
Historic
37
IVY
VINCENT DR
LANE ST
117
MIMOSA DR
108BRIGATINE DR
HILL DR
213BLUEBIRD DR
112
HILL CT
208
Institutional
106
LANE ST
302LAKESIDE DR431
WARBLER DR
110
414
VINCENT DR103
113
WAKELAND DR
MULBERRY
BLUEBIRD DR Planned Unit Development TALAMORE DR
209HICKORY
KINTYRE LN
RICHWOOD CT
102
103AYRSHIRE CT
104
100
CIR
208
NIGHTINGALE
HILL DR
ROBIN
TALAMORE DR
CRAIG DR
HICKORY
LAUREL104
Park
LAUREL
307
BRANDYLION DR
AVE
101
113
HILL DR108
HILL DR419
BRISTOW
HILL DR
RAVEN RD201
226
Recreation
KILLDEER RD
109WORTHINGTON CT
115
LANE ST
MANOR LNTALAMORE DR
1075
303
LAUREL
BLUEBIRD DR
BRANDYLION DR
KILLDEER RD
School
212213
201
TASKER RD
CHELTENHAM DR
HILL DR
412
§
¨¦
108
213
974
107
NIGHTINGALELAUREL
QUINTON
81
TALAMORE DR
Employment 405
BOWLING
KILLDEER RD
TASKER RD
01
DORNACH CT
AVEHILL DR
OAKS CIR
112
302
1187
CRAIG DR
GREEN CIR
100 11
Airport Support Area
ROBIN223
211111103101
212LAUREL106101
215208306
MACEDONIA
MOUNTAIN
B2 / B3
REZ # 12 - 15
Note:
Residential, 4 u/a
Crosspointe Center
Frederick County Dept of
High-Density Residential, 6 u/a
Planning & Development
I
PINs:
High-Density Residential, 12-16 u/a
107 N Kent St
75 - A - 89, 75 - A - 89A, 75 - A - 91,
Suite 202
Rural Area
75 - A - 92, 75 - A - 95, 75 - A - 96,
Winchester, VA 22601
Interstate Buffer
portion of 75 - A - 90 and 75 - A - 94
540 - 665 - 5651
Rezoning 58.30 acres from RP to B2,
Landfill Support Area
Map Created: December 16, 2015
72.47 acres from B2 to RP, and Proffer
Natural Resources & Recreation
Staff: mruddy
Amendment
Environmental & Recreational Resources
08501,7003,400Feet
AMENDMENT
Action:
PLANNING COMMISSION: January 6, 2016 - Recommended Approval
-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 27, 2016APPROVED DENIED
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
REZONING #12-15 CROSSPOINTE CENTER
,
WHEREAS
Rezoning #12-15, of Glaize Developments, Incorporated,
submitted by Pennoni
Associates to rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business)
District and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP (Residential Performance) District
within the Crosspointe Center Development (Rezoning #13-03), and to amend the proffers associated with
Rezoning #13-03, final revision date January 4, 2016 was considered. The properties are located east and
adjacent to I-81 Exit 310 Interchange, and adjacent to Tasker Road and Hillandale Lane. The properties are
further identified with PIN(s) 75-A-89, 75-A-89A, 75-A-91, 75-A-92, 75-A-95, 75-A-96 and a portion of
75-A-90 and 75-A-94 in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
,
WHEREAS
the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 6, 2016 and
recommended approval; and
,
WHEREAS
the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 27, 2016;
and
,
WHEREAS
the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be
in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive
Policy Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED
by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that
Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to
rezone 58.30+/- acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District
and 72.47+/- acres from B2 (General Business) District to RP (Residential Performance) District within
the Crosspointe Center Development (Rezoning #13-03), and to amend the proffers associated with
Rezoning #13-03, final revision date January 4, 2016. The conditions voluntarily proffered in writing
by the applicant and the property owner are attached.
PDRes #03-16
-2-
This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption.
Passed this 27th day of January, 2016 by the following recorded vote:
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman ____ Gary A. Lofton ____
Robert A. Hess ____ Robert W. Wells ____
Gene E. Fisher ____ Judith McCann-Slaughter ____
Blaine P. Dunn ____
A COPY ATTEST
_________________________________
Brenda G. Garton
Frederick County Administrator
PDRes #03-16
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Frederick County Board of Supervisors
FROM:
Michael T. Ruddy, AICP
Deputy Director
DATE:
January 19, 2016
RE:Discussion: 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
The 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is presented to the Board of
Supervisors for discussion, and direction to move the CIP to the Planning Commission
for a public hearing.
The Planning Commission discussed the CIP at their January 6, 2016 meeting and
forwarded it to the Board of Supervisors with no modifications and their support.
Previously, on December 14, 2015, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee
(CPPC) met with County Department and Agency representatives to discuss their
individual capital improvement project requests, including new projects and
modifications to previous requests, associated with the 2016-2017 Capital Improvements
Plan (CIP).
The role of the CPPC, and ultimately the Planning Commission, in the CIP process was
to ensure that the various departmental project requests are in conformance with the
projects was presented by Frederick County Public Schools, Parks and Recreation, and
staff. Also provided was a projected cost for each project as required by the Code of
Virginia. The CPPC discussion was typically thorough. The CPPC recommended the
following additional notation which was added to the draft CIP - Please refer to the map
identifying future school sites for additional school sites located throughout the County.
end, the first column is highlighted to emphasize projects for which funding would be
requested in the upcoming budget would be located in this column. In addition, those
projects that are long range comprehensive plan projects have been placed at the end of
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Board of Supervisors Discussion: 2016-2017 CIP
January 19, 2016
Page 2
the CIP table, outside of the 5year window of a traditional CIP. With regards to the
timing of the approval of the 2016-2017 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the CIP may
be approved by the Board of Supervisors either with the upcoming budget or in advance
of the budget as has customarily been done in the County.
Particular focus was once again placed on enhancing the connection between the CIP and
the policies of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This effort continues to be exemplified
with the collaboration between Frederick County Public Schools and the Parks and
Recreation Department with their identification of joint community facility opportunities.
The CIP includes a total of eighty-nine projects, including several new projects. Projects
have also moved off the CIP based on their initiation or completion indicating progress
include the individual Fire and Rescue Company requests as a subcomponent of the CIP.
Other components include Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional Library,
Transportation, Winchester Regional Airport, County Administration (including the
Voter Registrar), and Fire and Rescue.
It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider the proposed 2016-2017 Capital
Improvements Plan as a discussion item prior to t
hearing. This discussion will provide a valuable opportunity for the collective review of
proposed capital projects while also allowing the Board of Supervisors the ability to
determine if additional information or analysis is needed in advance of final consideration
of the CIP. It is the role of the Planning Commission to affirm that the 2016-2017 CIP is
in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Board ultimately approves the
CIP.
If adopted, the CIP and included maps will ultimately become a component of the
Comprehensive Policy Plan, which would satisfy the review requirement of Section 15.2-
2232 of the Code of Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed
Please find attached with this agenda item the Draft 2016-2017 CIP which includes: a
summary of the proposed 2016-2017 CIP in table form, and a draft copy of the proposed
2016-2017 CIP maps illustrating the known locations of the CIP requests incorporated
into the draft of the CIP. More detailed information regarding the individual department
requests is available digitally and may be forwarded to you directly if requested. The
information provide
website via the following link: www.fcva.us/plans.
Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this
information.
MTR/dw
Attachments
FREDERICKCOUNTY
VIRGINIA
CIP
APITAL MPROVEMENTS LAN
2016-2017
Fiscal Year
Adopted by the
Frederick County
Board of Supervisors
TBD, 2016
Recommended by the
Frederick County
Planning Commission
TBD, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….1
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………….2
Frederick County Public Schools…………………………………………...2
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department……………………….2
Handley Regional Library ………………………………………………..3
TransportationCommittee………………………………………………….4
Winchester Regional Airport……………………………………………….4
County Administration ……………………………………………………..5
Fire & Rescue……….. ……………………………………………………..5
2016-2017CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP…………………………………………..7
2016-2017COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP………..9
2016-2017COUNTY PARKS AND REC. CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP…………11
2016-2017TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS MAP………………..…………….13
2016-2017CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLE……………………15
CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS……………………………………………………21
PROJECT FUNDING………………………………………………………………21
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS……………………………………………………….23
Frederick County Public Schools…………………………………………...23
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department……………………….27
Handley RegionalLibrary…………………………………………………..37
Transportation Committee…………………………………………………..39
Winchester Regional Airport……………………………………………….44
County Administration……………………………………………………..51
Fire and Rescue……………..……………………………………………….55
Individual Fire & Rescue Company Requests……………………….58
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
FREDERICK COUNTY
2016-2017
INTRODUCTION
Section 15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of
plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements
Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the
ensuing five years.
The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed
or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in
preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital
expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform
to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with
considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component
of the Comprehensive Plan.Frederick County approved the 2030 Comprehensive Plan on
July 14, 2011.
The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning
document, not for requesting funding allocations.Once adopted, project priorities may
change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that
particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The
status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is
projected.
Transportation projects are includedin the CIP.The inclusionof transportation projects
to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently
undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of
state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing.
The 2016-2017CIP continues toemphasizethe connection between the CIP,
Comprehensive Plan,and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning
projects. This effort continues to be exemplified with the collaboration between Frederick
County Public Schools and the Parks and Recreation Department with their identification
of joint community facility opportunities.
1
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
Frederick County Public Schools
Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects
that have been priorities from previous years. The replacement Frederick County Middle
School has recently been initiated and thereforeno longer a part of theCIP.
Previously removed projects include the James Wood Middle School parking lot safety
enhancement project, the new transportation facility located adjacent to Armel
Elementary School, and the school renovations proposed to prepare school facilities for
an all-day Kindergarten program. It should be recognized that the all-day kindergarten
program had been delayed for several years in light of the recent fiscal climate so it was
very positive to see the all-day kindergarten program be introduced through the joint
efforts of Frederick County Public Schools and the Board of Supervisors.
th
The joint top capital improvement priority for the Schools is the 12Elementary School
and the addition to, and renovation of,Armel Elementary School. This is in recognition
of the anticipated community growth in these two general locations.
The construction of the County's fourth High School is the second priority.The new high
school has been requested to relieve overcapacity issues at the high school level and in
anticipation ofprojected student population growth.
Improvements to Robert E. Aylor Middle School is thethirdhighest priority.
Other schools included for renovation projects include Apple Pie Ridge Elementary
School, Bass Hoover Elementary School, and James Wood High School. This year’s CIP
continues to include requeststoimprovethe parking lot and construct a softball field at
Sherando High Schoolandto renovate and expand the current administration building on
Amherst Street.
Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located
throughout the County.
Parks & Recreation
Swimming improvements continue to be a focus for Parks and Recreation. The upgrade
of pool amenities at the swimming pools at both parks will include the addition of water
slides and a spray ground. Added to the scope of this project is an overall pool complex
renovation. This project is expected to increase pool attendance by 30 percent while
providing recreational opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service
areas.
2
The indoor aquatic facility continues to be proposed as a high priority of the Parks and
Recreation Department. This project has been moved up to the Department’s #3 priority
th
in recognition of Frederick County Public Schools 4High School land opportunity.
This year’s CIPcontinues to bereflective of the previouseffort to seek community input
into the parks and recreation programs and facilities. The recently completed survey has
been taken into consideration when prioritizing parks and recreation capital projects.
The majority of the recommended projects are planned for the county’s two regional
parks (Sherando & Clearbrook). However, a new project,the Snowden Bridge Park
Development has been identified in recognition of an endorsed site plan on the proffered
park and school site. This project has been separated from the Community Park Group
where it was previously considered.
The effort of the Parks and Recreation Department and their identification of their
comprehensively planned parks including community, neighborhood, and district parks,
further emphasizethe connection between the CIP, Comprehensive Plan, and potential
proffered contributions made with rezoning projects.
Projects planned for Sherando Park include: upgrade of baseball lighting, upgrade pool
amenities, a softball complex, a soccer complex, maintenance compound and office,
skateboard park, parking and multi-purpose fields with trail development, picnic area
with a shelter, and an access road with parking and trails. The projects planned for the
Clearbrook Park include, upgrade of baseball lighting, upgrading pool amenities, a new
open play area, a tennis/basketball complex, and shelter with an area for stage seating.
The Sherando Park Softball Complex has been moved up in recognition of scheduling
pressure at existing facility and the number of Community Parks has been reduced to
threein recognition of work underway at Rose Hill and separation oftheidentified
Snowden Bridge site.
A project that continues to be a highpriority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams
Creek Greenway Trail.This facility would provide recreational opportunities for
residents of this corridor along with the surrounding communitiesand was emphasized in
the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan completed during 2012. This project
will provide trails with bicycle, walking and jogging opportunities, which ranks #1 in the
2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor recreational activities.
Handley Regional Library
The Handley Regional Library continues to recommend threeprojects. As noted last year,
this marksa change from their2014-2015requestof four.The library’s top priority is a
new library branch in the Gainesboro area.
The tworemaining projects request that funding be provided for new library branches
throughout the county which include the areas of Senseny/Greenwood Roadand Route
3
522 South, both of which are anticipated to belocated within the UDA (Urban
Development Area)in locations consistent with recently approved area plans; The
Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the Southern Frederick Area Plan.
The parking lot sidewalk extensionproject, designed to promotesidewalk access at the
Bowman Library as phase 2 of the parking lot expansion projectby extending the
sidewalks to serve residents traveling from the east to Lakeside Drive, is the project that
was most recently removed from their submission.
Transportation Committee
The Transportation Committee continues to provideproject requests for the CIP.
Virginia State Code allows for transportation projects to be included within a locality's
CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from developers and
revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does not take away funding
for generalized road improvements.
The Transportation Committee continues theirrequested funding for sixteenprojects.
The sixteenrequests include projects that entail widening of major roads; key extensions
of roads that help provide better networks, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and the
addition of turn lanes at current unsafe intersections. The inclusion of theEastern Road
Plan Improvements item once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and
potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects which are aimed at
mitigating potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
The major change to the transportation projectlistin recentyearsCIPsis the
classification of the projects into funded and unfunded priorities.In this year’s CIP, the
funding contributions have been further adjusted by the Transportation Committeeto
reflect the amount allocated to each funded project. Unfunded priorities have been placed
in the Long Range Comprehensive Plan Project column.
Winchester Regional Airport
Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and
state governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the
other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding.
TheAirport has recently completed a major improvement of their runway. With this
project moving from the CIP, The Airport Authority is now focusing their CIP efforts on
taxiway improvements and property acquisition in support of airport development to
meet Federal Aviation requirements for general aviation facilities.The vast majority of
the funding for these improvements came from the FAA and VDA.
The construction of a new general aviation terminal to support future airport operations
and associated parking improvements is a project that has been elevatedto number one in
4
this year’sCIP.The previous number one priority for the Airport was the acquisition of
property to support airport operations. The authority continues to be successful in their
pursuitof this priority. Arelatively new project for the airport is the Fuel Storage
Facility.This project has moved up to the Airport’s third priority in this year’s CIP.
The number of projects that are included in this CIP has been consolidatedin recentyears
as the Airport Authority is further aligning the County’s CIP with the one provided to the
Virginia Department of Aviation.
County Administration
With the potential necessary relocation of the Clearbrookcitizen convenience centerin
the future, thenumber one priority isthefacility proposed as a replacement for the
currentconvenience siteat another location in the immediate vicinity to the existing
convenience site.The other requests from Public Works arefor the expansion/relocation
of both the Albin and the Gore Refuse Sitesto allow for a trash compactor, which will
reduce operational costs, by compacting trash before it reaches the landfill.
The joint County Administration and School Administration Building that was included
in last year’s amended CIP remains in this year’s project list.A new project for County
Administration this year is the Joint Judicial Center renovation and replacement project.
Thisnewproject consists of an expansion to the existing Joint Judicial Center Building as
the first phase of the project, and the potential further renovation or relocation as a second
phase. The project is to be located generally in the City of Winchester or in the County’s
Urban Development Area. The need for this project has been established through ongoing
communication with the court system and the City of Winchester.With Phase one of this
project underway, the value of this project has been reduced accordingly.
Previously, an item wasadded to enhance the connection betweenthe CIP andproffered
contributions made to mitigate the impacts of development projects. This item, General
Government Capital Expenditures, is an item that addresses those general government
capital expenditures that may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold.
This is similar to the approach previously taken for Fire and Rescue Capital Equipment.
Fire and Rescue has itsown section.
Fire and Rescue
The top project for the Fire and Rescue component remainsthe creation of Fire & Rescue
Station #22in the vicinity of Route 277, with the ability to provide an annex facility for
other County-related offices. The collaboration of this project with other community
users and a land use planning effort was a key element of the Route 277 Land Use Plan.
Fire and Rescue has also includeda project which provides for the capital apparatus
needs of this facility.
5
Fire & Rescue has once again requested the relocation of acurrent fire station in order to
operate more efficiently; Clearbrook.The Round Hill replacement project has movedoff
of the CIP based on the successful initiation of this project. Threenewerprojects for Fire
#
and Rescue are the creation of Station 23, a new facility located in the vicinity of
Crosspointe, the creation of Station #24in the vicinity of Cross Junction/Lake Holiday,
and a Fire & Rescue Regional Training Center. Such a Regional Public Safety Training
Center potentially consisting of an administrative building, multi-story burn building,
multi-story training tower, vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other
training props. This project will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous
materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions locatedwithin
the region.
Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests
Previously, a project consisting of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000for the
benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established. It is the intention of this capital
expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital
equipment fire and rescue vehiclesand equipment that may fall below the guidelines
established by the Finance Committee.It was determined that the inclusion of such a
project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in
the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the
benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
The individual Fire and Rescue Companies have identified their own capital requests
which have been added to the CIP in no particular order.Mostof the capital requests
meet the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee.However, three
projectsdomeet this guideline.Therefore, these equipment requestshave beennoted in
the table under the Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment project category.All of the requests
are from the Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company.
6
2016 - 2017
Frederick County
Capital Improvements Plan
2016 - 2017
Capital Improvements
Specific or
Approximate Locations
County Administration
1 Clearbrook Convenience Site
2 Albin Convenience Site Expansion
3 Gore Convenience Site Expansion
4 Fire & Rescue Station 22
5 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation
6 Fire & Rescue Station 23
7 Fire & Rescue Station 24
Airport
01
127
Library
01
1 Library Branch - Gainesboro
522
2 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood
3 Library Branch - Rt 522 South
7
1
1
01
3
50
5
3
01§
¨¦
81
259
01
2
37
01
01
7
7
01
2
50
01
50
4
§
¨¦
81
01
37 3
01
01
6
50
11
01
1
11
01
01
522
55
4
1
01
V
277
01
11
05,50011,00022,000
01
Feet
522
§
¨¦
01.536
66
Miles
7
8
2016 - 2017
Frederick County
Capital Improvements Plan
!
High Schools
Existing and Potential School Locations
!
Middle Schools
01
522
!
Elementary Schools
!
Support Facilities
Potential School Facility Locations
Potential School Locations
Purchased Land
Proffered Land
Potential Proffer
01
522
Urban Development Area
SWSA
01
127
01
522
0
1
Buildings & Grounds
§!
50¨¦
81
GBES
!
!
01
522
SWES
!
IHES
12th Elementary School,
!
at Snowden Bridge
0
1
Elementary School
11
01
0
1
25950
JWHS
!
APRES
!
!0
1
37
Old Transportation Facility
01
§
¨¦
522 81
FCMS
Middle School
!
MHS
Administration
!
RRES
!
!
!
0
1
JWMS
7
Dowell J. Howard
Winchester
!
Virginia
GMES
Senseny Road
!
!
Multi-Use Campus
0
1
50
Elementary School
The Willows
01
522
0
1
37
OVES
ABMS
!
EES
!
!
Fourth High School
Villages at Artrip
0
1
AES
11
!
!
0
1
New Transportation Facility
55
01
!
REAMS
522
!BHES
Stephens
Elementary School
SHS
City
01
Virginia
!
277
V
0
1
11
MTES
Elementary School
!
0124Miles
Middletown Virginia
01
522
School Locations
0
1
11
Note:
Are Most
Created by Frederick County Department of
Planning & Development
Appropriate
Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests
Within the UDA
submitted by Frederick County School Board
12/1/15
9
10
2016 - 2017
Frederick County
Existing County Parks
Capital Improvements Plan
District Park
New Parks/Rec Locations
l
Community Park
[
k
Neighborhood Park
Proposed Parks
District
Community
Neighborhood
Abrams Creek Trail
UDA
£
¤
522
NW
§
¨¦
81
Clearbrook
£
¤
£
¤
259
50
Park
£
¤
11
Snowden Bridge
Park
£
¤
37
NE
£
¤
37
Rose Hill
£
¤
Park
50
SW
EAST
£
¤
522
£
¤
55
£
¤
277
Sherando
V
Park
£
¤
11
§
¨¦
81
£
¤
522
0124Miles
Note:
Created by Frederick County Department of
Planning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests
submitted by The Dept of Parks & Recreation
12/1/2015
11
12
2016 - 2017
Frederick County
Capital Improvement Plan
01
11
Transportation Projects
11
§
¨¦
81
$
+
10
01
522
§
¨¦
81
11
4
7
01
37
$
+
14
01
522
2016 - 2017
4
Capital Improvement Plan
01
Transportation Projects
50
Funded Priorities
01
7
ò
ðñ
1, I-81 EXIT 310 IMPROVEMENTS
310
Winchester
""
2, ROUTE 277 WIDENING &
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 1)
12
§
¨¦
81
3, EAST TEVIS EXTENSION
& BRIDGE OVER I81
13
9
Unfunded Priorities
3
4, CONTINUE RT37 PLANNING
§& ENGINEERING WORK
¨¦
81
01
ò
ðñ
5, I-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATION
522 4 307
""
01
37 6, ROUTE 277 WIDENING &
01
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 2)
50
1
7, REDBUD ROAD REALIGNMENT
ò
ðñ
310
15
""
8, WARRIOR DR EXTENSION
TO NEW EXIT 307
4
9, CHANNING DR EXTENSION
TO RT50
01
11
10, BRUCETOWN RD/
$
+
§
¨¦
HOPEWELL RD; ALIGNMENT
10
81
AND INTERSECTION
Stephens
11, RT11 N OF WINC
01
City
WIDENING TO WV LINE
522
V
12, SENSENY RD WIDENING
2
5
13, INVERLEE WAY; CONNECTION
6
01
FROM RT50 TO SENSENY RD
ò
ðñ
307
277
""
00.3750.751.5Miles
8
$
+14, FOX DR; INSTALL RT TURN
14
LANE ONTO RT522
Frederick County Dept of
Planning & Development
107 N Kent St
15, RENAISSANCE DR
Winchester, VA 22601
www.CO.FREDERICK.VA.US
12/1/15 16, EASTERN ROAD PLAN
13
16
IMPROVEMENTS
14
16
18
20
THE CIP TABLE
CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS
The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital
improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the
information in this table is explained below.
Department Priority-
The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for
their requested projects.
Project Description-
The name of the capital improvement projects.
County Contribution-
The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each
project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the
five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year
columns, does not include debt service projections.
Notes-
Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular
projects.
Total Project Costs-
The cost for each project, including county allocations and other
funding sources.
PROJECT FUNDING
The projects included in the 2016-2017Capital Improvements Plan have a total project
cost to the county of $895,223,981. While the CIP isprimarily used to cover the next five
years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years.
School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the
Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund.
Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the
unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation
Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for
projects not funded by the county.
Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state,
and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from
Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of
Winchester.
The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP isin no way an
indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these
projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of
state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing.
21
22
Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List
Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located
throughout the County.
PRIORITY 1
Elementary School #12 / Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation
Description:
The 12th ES will have a floor area of approximately 100,000 square feet
and will be located inSnowden Bridge. The facility will be designed to accommodate a
student membership of 742.
Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since
that time. The school contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 590
students. As of October 31, 2015, the school has 579students. Tenclassrooms will be
added to Armel ES for the school to accommodate the additional growth at Lake
Frederick. The existing facility will be updated as needed and core areas partially
renovated to serve the additional students.
Capital Cost:
$32,400,000
Justification:
The 12th ES project will address anticipated growth in student enrollment
in the school division in general and in the Stonewall, Redbud Run, and Apple Pie Ridge
elementary school attendance zones in specific over the next several years.
Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, unexpected growth in the
attendance zone will need to be addressed through the addition of classrooms to the
facility. An attendance rezoning was completed last year as part of the implementation of
full-day kindergarten. Addressing the growth issue at Armel was studied as a part of this
rezoning. Four areas were identified to be rezoned to another school to offset the
additional growth at Lake Frederick. None of the four options provided a complete and
satisfactory solution. One option would have put Armel outside of its own attendance
zone. A second wouldhave split a neighborhood and sent some of the neighborhood to a
school further away. A third would have simply relocated the growth issue to another
school. The fourth option was adopted, but only moved ~50 students, a temporary
reprieve from growth pressures.
Construction Schedule:
For both schools, planning, design, permit approval,
appropriation, and construction should take 30 Months
PRIORITY 2
Fourth High School
Description:
The fourth high school project will serve students grades 9-12,have a
program capacity of 1,725students, and will address anticipated growth in high school
student enrollment in the school division. The site is located at the end of Justes Drive
23
behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school is designed for collaborative education,similar to
the new Frederick County MS and the renovated Aylor MS, with a variety of learning
spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in
today’s working world.
Capital Cost:
$89,500,000
Justification:
This project will address expected growth in high school student
enrollment in the school division over the next several years. We project that enrollment
in thehigh schools by the fall of 2020will be 4,253 students. High school program
capacity is currently 4,050 students. To avoid overcrowding in the high schools, we need
to construct the fourth high school in Frederick County to open in that time frame.
Construction Schedule:
Construction will take 48months
PRIORITY 3
Robert E. Aylor Middle School Addition & Renovation
Description:
Robert E. Aylor Middle School opened in 1969 as a junior high and has
served those grades since that time. The school contains 113,643 square feet and has a
program capacity of 850 students serving grades 6-8. The building is in acceptable
condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major
areas of this renovation project include the following: reorganization and addition of
classroom and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborative
education, complete replacement of fire alarm and communication systems, upgrade of
electrical and plumbing, and complete replacement of mechanical systems. Other areas to
be addressed are security, modernization of asphalted areas, and the installation of an
emergency system.
Capital Cost:
$TBD
Justification:
Robert E. Aylor Middle School is 46years old and renovations are needed
to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operation of the school for
years to come. The school was constructed as a junior high, where the school was
arranged by department. Modern instruction requires that the school be arranged by grade
and that a variety of learning spaces be provided (classroom, low intensity labs, high
intensity labs, small collaborative spaces, large collaborative spaces, etc.) to meet the
needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working
world.
Construction Schedule:
48 Months
PRIORITY 4
James Wood High School Renovation
Description:
James Wood High School opened in 1980 and has served as a high school
since that time. The school contains 234,095 square feet and has a program capacity of
1,400 students. Currently, the building serves grades 9-12. The building is in good
condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major
24
areas to be included in this renovation project are increased electrical service and
distribution to support technology, technology cabling, hardware and its installation,
upgrade of plumbing and mechanical systems, and modification of instructional areas to
support modern instructional delivery.
Capital Cost:
$TBD
Justification:
James Wood High School is 35years old. Renovations and technological
upgrades are needed to a number of areas to ensure effective, economical, and efficient
operation of the school for years to come. This school will be renovated to be more like
the 4th HS, the new Frederick County MS, and the renovated Aylor MS, with a variety of
learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills
necessary in today’s working world.
Construction Schedule:
36 Months
PRIORITY 5
Sherando High School Parking Lot and Softball Field Improvements
Description:
This project is being undertaken to address several traffic safety concerns
identified over the years at Sherando High School and to address equity issues (there is
no softball field at SHS). Two studies of the site have been conducted, and a master plan
created. Concerns exist for pedestrians, school buses, student drivers, parents, and staff.
Rearrangement of the site and the flow of traffic on the site are necessary to address these
needs.
Capital Cost:
$TBD
Justification:
This is a two-part project. For transportation safety, concerns exist on the
school site at Sherando High School during arrival and dismissal. The students, many of
their parents, and the staff necessary to serve them are exposed to these safety concerns
on a daily basis. The flow of traffic at arrival is so slow that at times vehicles on Route
277 back up past Double Church Road.
For the softball field, SHS does not have a softball field on site, instead using a softball
field in neighboring Sherando Park. This represents an equity issue between boys and
girls sports and iscontrary to FCPS’ standpoint of equity between boys and girls sports.
Construction Schedule:
30 Months
PRIORITY 6
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovations
Description:
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School opened in 1974 and has served
continuously as an elementary school since that time. The school contains 65,120 square
feet and has a program capacity of 528 students.
Currently, the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however,
several major areas need to be addressed, including open classroom space, ADA
compliance, energy conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarm, electrical,
plumbing, and mechanical systems.
25
Capital Cost:
$TBD
Justification:
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is 41years old and renovation is
needed to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operations of the
school for years to come.
Construction Schedule:
36 Months
PRIORITY 7
Bass Hoover Elementary School Phase 2 Renovations
Description:
Bass-Hoover Elementary School opened in 1975. The school contains
70,569 square feet and has a program capacity of 656 students.
Currently, the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however,
several major areas need to be addressed. Renovations will addressseveral major issues,
including open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy conservation, security, and
upgrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. A building
addition, Phase 1, has been done to maintain program capacity and prepare the building
for full-day kindergarten.
Capital Cost:
$TBD
Justification:
Bass-Hoover Elementary School is 40years old and renovation is needed
to a number of areas to ensure the effective, economical, and efficient operations of the
school for years to come.
Construction Schedule:
36Months
PRIORITY 8
School Board Administration Building
Description:
Frederick County Public Schools’ administration has been located at the
old Kline Elementary School building since 1983. Before the building was converted to
offices, it had served as Kline Elementary School since 1961. The facility contains
27,992 square feet, including the 5,000 square foot Annex and the 2,400 square foot
Finance Addition, but not including the four modular classroom units that are used for
offices, work space, and a conference room.
Capital Cost:
TBD
Justification:
The 54year old Administrative Offices building does not have enough
office and meeting space, needs technology upgrades, and improvements to the
mechanical, plumbingand electrical systems to meet modern code. Meeting space is at a
premium, as we have only 2 sizeable meeting rooms. There are also building security and
asbestos issues. Existing issues will become more pressing and new issues will appear as
the district(and therefore the staff) grows.
Construction Schedule:
30 months
26
Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
North West Sherando Park
Description:
This project involves the development of an Access Road, Parking,
Shelter, Restroom, Playground, and Open Play Field in the North West area of Sherando
Park, off Warrior Drive.Improvements to include; Entrance and access road (400 lf) off
Warrior Drive,Parking –46 paved & lighted, 50 overflow spaces,Restroom Building,
Shelter Building,Playground,400’x200’ open play field, and Electric, Sewer and Water
infrastructure
Capital Cost:
$1,107,210
Justification:
This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando
Park service area and the entire Frederick County community.This project will provide
access to new recreation amenities trails with walking and jogging opportunities.
Walking and jogging rank #1 in the 20011 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey and 2012 Parks
and Recreation Community Survey for all outdoor recreational activities. The standard
for bike/pedestrian trails, based upon the Virginia Outdoor Plan, is 1 mile/1,000
population. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in
the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.Sherando Park,
currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With
the County currently having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this
project has already been completed. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is
necessary to meet the needs of our service area.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 2
Indoor Aquatic Facility –Competitive/Training Pool
Description:
The Parks and Recreation Commission has engaged in conversation with
th
FCPS to site the facility at the 4High School campus. Land on the site has been set
aside for this purpose. The approximately 35,000 square footbuilding will likely house a
10 lane competitive pool, 6 lane warm water teaching pool, meeting rooms, shower and
changing rooms, and facilities support areas.The above facility would meet the
swimming needs of the community, including HS level swim teams.
Capital Cost:
$11,300,000
Justification:
There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By
constructing the indoor pool, it would permit the department to meet competition needs,
instructional needs, citizen programming provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to
the community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified
in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.This facility
would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a
27
facility to offer competitive scholastic programs and year round recreational
programming for the residents of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 3
Water Slide/Spray Ground Swimming Pool Improvements –Sherando/Clearbrook
Description:
Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando
Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of the diving boards and the installation of
one 50' water slide and one 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also include
the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool.
Capital Cost:
$1,355,000
Justification:
This project is expected to increase pool attendance by 30 percent while
providing recreational opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service
areas.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 4
Abrams Creek Greenway Trail
Description:
10’ wide asphalt multi-use bicycle/pedestrian trail along Abrams Creek
from Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is estimated that the trail will have (3) three
bridges (stream crossings) and will be approximately 2.6 miles in length.
Capital Cost:
$3,198,000
Justification:
This project will provide trails with bicycle, walking and jogging
opportunities, which ranks #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor
recreational activities.This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as
identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule:
FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 5
Softball Complex-Sherando Park
Description:
Softball fields (2) -300' radius, fully fenced, backstop, four 50 person
bleachers per field, lighted concrete poles 30/20 FC, concrete deck. Access Road -500
LF. Parking -153 spaces, asphalt paved with curbed islands and drop off; line markings
and 6 security lights. Landscaping -100 shade trees; pine screen. Peripheral Work -
General seeding -1 acre; miscellaneous signage.
Capital Cost:
$672,000
Justification:
This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire
Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by
28
the Frederick County school system. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields
within the county’s regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual
purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth and adult softball programs. With
the increased usage of these fields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these
programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to
accommodate the existing demand of youth baseball and adult softball programs.This
project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick
County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 6
Snowden Bridge Park Development
Description:
Snowden Bridge Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge
development utilizes park and school land for the provision of an active recreation park.
The above park is to include four (4) regulation size soccer fields and three (3) baseball
fields suitable for little league play. Lighting, restroom and parking are part of the park
concept.
Capital Cost:
$1,961,000
Justification:
The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (formerly
Stephenson Village) rezoning proffer of 2003. The proffer indicates the provided land to
be used for baseball and soccer field development in anticipation of the population
increase generated by the development. The Parks and Recreation Commission adopted a
site plan for the property in 2015showing parkingand three (3) baseball fields.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 7
Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade
Description:
Upgrade the ball field lighting at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks
Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the 30/20 FC (footcandle)
level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and replace with 50/30 FC (footcandle) level
fixtures, lamps and steel poles on (4) four fields at Clearbrook Park and (4) four fields at
Sherando Park. This upgrade is required by Little League International on all little
league fields.
Capital Cost:
$1,300,000
Justification:
The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfield light
system be upgraded to achieve the recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the
playing surface. This will facilitate the provision of recreational opportunities at
Sherando and Clearbrook parks for the service areas which include all Frederick County
residents. The field light fixtures are over twenty-five years old and are affixed to poles,
the majority being over thirty-five years old.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18
29
PRIORITY 8
Community Parks (3)
Description:
The Community Park project includes the acquisition of three sites of
approximately thirty-five acres and the subsequent development of four sites (Rose Hill
Park land currently under lease). Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by
the specific site;however typical development would be as described by Parks and
Recreation.
Capital Cost:
$6,305,000
Justification:
To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the
amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as
recommended by the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located throughout
Frederick County. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to
create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents Frederick
County.
Construction Schedule:
FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 9
Neighborhood Parks (3)
Description:
The Neighborhood project includes the acquisition of three sites of
approximately ten acres and the subsequent development of these sites. Developed
amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site;however typical development
would be as described by Parks and Recreation:
Capital Cost:
$2,407,000
Justification:
To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the
amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as
recommended by the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the Urban
Development Area. The location of this project would provide parkland developed to
create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents of
Frederick County.
Construction Schedule:
FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 10
District Parks (4)
Description:
Acquisition of Parkland; 200 acres
30
Capital Cost:
$15,530,000
Justification:
To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the
amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as
recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan.This project is intended to meet the needs
of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in all parts of
Frederick County. The location of this project would provide parkland which could be
developed to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the
residents of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule:
FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 11
Maintenance Compound and Office –Sherando Park
Description:
This project involves the construction of a 1,200 square-foot office and a
3,200 square-foot storage shed for operation at Sherando Park.
Capital Cost:
$386,000
Justification:
This facility will enable the county to maintain its equipment and facilities
in a more responsible and effective manner. There is a need for more storage,
maintenance and office space with the additional responsibility of maintaining all outdoor
facilities at Sherando High School, Armel Elementary School, Orchard View Elementary
School, Bass-Hoover Elementary School, Middletown Elementary School, R. E. Aylor
Middle School, Admiral Byrd Middle School, Evendale Elementary School, and the
Public Safety Facility.This project should be located at Sherando Park to best serve the
target maintenance area.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 12
Multi-Generational Community Center
Description:
The Field House project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and
include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a 1/16 mile track and a minimum of
two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by indoor
soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton with the installation
of in-floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for
special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden and home, outdoor, craft,
antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities
to take place at one time. The facility would also house a fitness center, multi-purpose
rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms.
Capital Cost:
$9,067,000
Justification:
Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied
significantly on the use of thecounty public schools to house recreation programs. This
arrangement was adequate when the department first started out, however the department
31
currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating a situation where the department
can no longer meet the programming and facility needs of the county residents. A
Community Center facility will facilitate the department to meet citizen programming
demands and provide the area with a facility to attract new businesses to the community.
This facility wouldbe available to all area residents and is intended to meet the needs of
the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey.
Construction Schedule:
FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 13
Soccer Complex -Sherando Park
Description:
Soccer field -210' x 360' artificial grass surface with goals. Access paths -
1500 LF; 10' wide; asphalt paved. Restroom/concession -820 SF; masonry with concrete
roof deck; full concession hookup. Plaza -22,000 SF; 50% paved/50% planted; kiosk.
Picnic shelters (1) -24' x 24': 6 picnic tables each; concrete pad; wood frame structure;
asphalt shingles. 12 sets of bleachers. Landscaping -90 shade trees. Lighting -1 field
(210' x 360')
Capital Cost:
$1,153,000
Justification:
This facility would be used by the entire Frederick County area. In
addition to its use as a recreational facility, the soccer complex will also be used by the
Frederick County school system. To reduce the gap between the number of existing
soccer fields and the number of fields which are needed to meet the minimum standard
for our service area.This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as
identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Sherando Park, currently owned by FrederickCounty, represents the very best location
for soccer field development. The fact that the county will not have to acquire property
for this facility means that the most costly aspect of this development has already been
completed. Sherando Park also provides a location that is situated in the fastest growing
area of the county and is adjacent to the high school. With joint use of facilities between
the park and school system, the construction of additional soccer fields will benefit both
agencies.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 20-21.
PRIORITY 14
Skateboard Park -Sherando Park
Description:
This project recommends the development of a skateboard bowl; a half
pipe; an open skate area; vehicle parking; an access road; fencing; and landscaping.
Capital Cost:
$529,000
Justification:
Requested by the community to provide additional recreational facilities
for the youth of Frederick County at Sherando Park. This project is not mandated by state
or federal requirements, but it is in compliance with the adopted County Comprehensive
32
Plan for recreational facility development and completes one element of the Master
Development Plan for Sherando Park. This project is intended to meet the needs of the
community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community
Survey.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 20-21.
PRIORITY 15
Fleet Trip Vehicles
Description:
The Parks and Recreation Department needs to upgrade the current vehicle
fleet to offer a comprehensive package of trips for Frederick County citizen’s recreation
needs. These are necessary to adequately offer trip packages and provide reliable
transportation for program participants. Bus #1 –40-50 Passenger Bus, Bus #2 –30-40
Passenger Bus, Van #1 –12 Passenger Van
Capital Cost:
$307,000
Justification:
To offer a comprehensive package of trips where the population of
Frederick County could begin to rely on the Parks and Recreation Department to meet
their trip needs.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 21+.
PRIORITY16
Indoor Ice Rink
Description:
The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and
include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a single 200’ x 85’ ice rink, locker
rooms, party/meeting rooms, and concession area and would need approximately 10 acres
to construct. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the
County. The ice rink may be co-located with other compatible uses should opportunities
arise, reducing the acreage demand.
Capital Cost:
$6,180,000
Justification:
There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and county
residents currently must travel over one hour to use an indoor ice facility. By
constructing the indoor ice rink, it would permit the department to meet competition
needs, instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as well as provide a
nucleus to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to
all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offeryear
round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County.This project is
intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County
Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule:
FY Long RangeComp. Plan.
33
PRIORITY 17
Access Road with Parking and Trails-Sherando Park
Description:
This project involves the development of an entrance and 1,800 linear feet
of access roadway from Warrior Drive; a 100 space parking area; and 2.8 miles of trails.
Capital Cost:
$1,618,000
Justification:
This project will provide trails with walking and jogging opportunities.
Walking and jogging rank #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor
recreational activities. The standard for bike/pedestrian trails, based upon the Virginia
Outdoor Plan, is 1 mile/1,000 of population.This project is intended to meet the needs of
the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey.
Construction Schedule:
FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 18
Lake, Parking, and Trail Development with two multi-purpose fields
Description:
This project involves the development of a 12 acre lake; 1.5 mile trail
system around the lake; 800 linear feet of access roadway; lighted parking lot with 125
spaces; and development of two irrigated 70x120 yard multi-purpose fields.
Capital Cost:
$1,384,000
Justification:
This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando
Park service area and the entire Frederick County community by reducing the needs gap
between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number needed to meet
the minimum standards required for our service area. This project will provide trails with
walking and jogging opportunities which ranks as #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan
survey. This project will also provide multi-use playfields for adult and youth programs.
This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule:
FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 19
Picnic Area-Sherando Park
Description:
This project includes a restroom/concession area; four picnic shelters;
playground area; access paths; parking; and landscaping.
Capital Cost:
$828,000
Justification:
These facilities would be used by the Sherando Park service area. The
Commission is recommending this project be included to address deficiencies in passive
recreation opportunities at Sherando Park. This project is identified in the 2002 Sherando
Park Master Plan and is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the
2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
34
Construction Schedule:
FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 20
Open Play Area –Clearbrook
Description:
This project includes development of a picnic shelter; six horseshoe pits; a
volleyball court; croquet turf; shuffleboard; parking; refurbishing the existing concession
stand; landscaping; peripheral work; and renovations to existing shelters, restrooms,
access paths, and parking areas on the south side of the lake.
Capital Cost:
$493,000
Justification:
To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park service area.
To reduce the gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the
number which is needed to meet the minimum standards for our service area.This
project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick
County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.Clearbrook Park, currently owned by
Frederick County, offers the best location for this development. With the county already
having ownership of the property, one aspect of the cost of this project has already been
completed. This project, being located at Clearbrook Park, is necessary to meet the needs
of our service area.
Construction Schedule:
FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 21
Tennis/Basketball Complex-Clearbrook Park
Description:
This project includes the development of four tennis courts; two basketball
courts; a shelter; access paths; parking; and landscaping.
Capital Cost:
$542,000
Justification:
Because Clearbrook Park is a regional facility, these facilities will be
available to all county residents. Currently, there are no tennis or basketball courts in the
Clearbrook Park area. This project will reduce the gap between the number of existing
tennis and basketball courts and the number of courts needed to meet the minimum
standards for our service area. Development of this project willalso provide this
department with facilities for recreational programs.This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation
Community Survey. Clearbrook Park, currently owned by Frederick County, provides the
very best location for tennis and basketball court development. Since the county will not
have to acquire property for this facility, the most costly aspect of this development has
already been completed.
Construction Schedule:
FYLong Range Comp. Plan.
35
PRIORITY 22
Shelter/Stage Seating-Clearbrook Park
Description:
This project includes the development of a shelter with a performance
stage; refurbishing existing restrooms and access paths; and renovations to the lake.
CapitalCost:
$524,000
Justification:
This facility would be used by the entire county population. Presently,
there are no facilities to accommodate cultural arts programs within the county’s park
system. This project is needed to provide a facility for cultural activities. Clearbrook
Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best location for
facilitating cultural events. The County will not have to acquire property for this project
means that a significant cost has already been completed.Clearbrook Park, with its
existing park characteristics and cultural features also provides the best location for our
service area.
Construction Schedule:
FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
36
Handley Regional Library Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
NorthernFrederick County –Gainesboro Library Branch
Description:
Construction of a 4,000 to 5,000 sq.ft. branch library, either as a stand
alone facility or co-located with a planned Frederick County facility (e.g. the new middle
school). Initial parking should be for at least 50 vehicles. The proposed location would
be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro District, but this could change depending on patterns of
library use and on whether donated land could be located or if co-located with a
Frederick County project already in the early planning stage. This projected branch
would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing property and was outlined in a document
prepared by FCPS students just over a year ago.
Capital Cost:
$1,749,034
Justification:
This branchwould serve citizens living in this growing area. In 2014-
2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 462,299 items. 42,034 Frederick
County residents have library cards and averaged 63.64% of all materials checked out of
the regional system. 3,147 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for
library cards for the first time in 2013-2014.Of Frederick County residents over five
years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 47.6 % of the total have
librarycards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the
national average level of 58%. This population group is not close to a library in the
regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from
toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will
be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when
school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi and via
desktop/laptop computers for word processing, other office applications and for Internet
usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 2
Frederick County Library Branch –Senseny/Greenwood
Description:
Construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to
15,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 65 vehicles. The
proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The
first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres.
Capital Cost:
TBD
Justification:
In 2014-2015Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 462,299
items.42,034Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 63.64% of all
materials checked out of the regional system.3,147 Frederick County residents, adults
and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2013-2014.Of Frederick
County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately
37
48% of the total have library cards.This new branch would bring the level of library
usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. This population group is not close
to a library in the regional system. Thislibrary will provide materials and programming
for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational
materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and
on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply internet, Wi-Fi,
and desktop/laptop access for word processing and other office applications for job
searching, business, entertainment, etc. usage. There will be a meeting room of 425
square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 3
Frederick County Library Branch-Route 522 South
Description:
Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to
10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 35 vehicles. The
proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The
first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acresacre or co-
located with the newHigh School projected to be built in the same area.
Capital Cost:
TBD
Justification:
This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area.In 2014-
2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 462,299 items. 42,034 Frederick
County residents have library cards and averaged 63.64% of all materials checked out of
the regional system. 3,147 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for
library cards for the first time in 2013-2014.Of Frederick County residents over five
years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 48% of the total have
library cards.This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the
national average level of 58%. This population group is not close to a library in the
regional system. This area also lacks a community center that a library with meeting
room could help fill this need. The Library will provide materials and programming for
patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will providerecreational and educational
materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and
on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access
via Wi-Fi and via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, other office
applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in
which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
38
Transportation Committee Project Priority List
Funded Priorities
PRIORITY 1
Interstate 81, Exit 310 Improvements
Description:
Construct improvements to Exit 310 interchange.
Capital Cost:
$49,121,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in many areas of the County and address coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 2
Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1)
Description:
Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to
Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley
Drive.
Capital Cost:
$38,000,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 3
East Tevis Street Extensionand Bridge over I-81
Description:
Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 522 and going west
approximately 0.2 miles to connect to the road network being constructed by the Russell
150 development.Project includes bridge over Interstate 81.
Capital Cost:
$15,000,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in many areas of the County and address development to the surrounding area. The
location isas identified by joint planning efforts between the county, VDOT, and the
developer.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
39
Unfunded Priorities
PRIORITY 4
Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37
Description:
This project would be tocontinue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension.
More specifically, to update the Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new
Record of Decision and to update the 1992 design plans to address the current alignment,
.
engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvementsIn addition, this allows
for advanced engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction.
Capital Cost:
$300,000,000 +
Justification:
This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation
improvement thatwould benefit the entire county and surrounding localities.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 5
Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation
Description:
Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost:
$60,000,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in many areas of the County and address coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 6
Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2)
Description:
Construct a4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to
Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley
Drive.
Capital Cost:
$15,000,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 7
Redbud Road Realignment
Description:
Realign Redbud Road from its current location through development land
in the vicinity of Route 11 north and Snowden Bridge Boulevard.
40
Capital Cost:
$2,500,000
Justification:
This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on
Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 8
Warrior Drive Extension
Description:
Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior
Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south and west to intersect
with I-81 at thelocation of the relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost:
$23,200,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 9
Channing Drive Extension
Description:
Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where
Channing Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south to intersect
with Route 50 East at Independence Drive.
Capital Cost:
$20,600,000
Justification:
This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan, and will address
congestion in Eastern Frederick County and address development to the surrounding
areas.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 10
Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements
Description:
Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11.
Improvements to this intersection will address comprehensive planned development’s
traffic generation in the area.
Capital Cost:
$3,000,000
Justification:
This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on
the Route 11 corridor. The location is identified by joint planning efforts between the
County and VDOT.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
41
PRIORITY 11
Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line
Description:
Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the
Eastern Road Plan.
Capital Cost:
$47,800,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
over a large area of the County and address development to the surrounding area. This
project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and improving
the flow of traffic.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 12
Senseny Road Widening
Description:
Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not
dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the implementation of Route 37, Channing
Drive, and development in the area.
Capital Cost:
$22,800,000
Justification:
This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on
Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 13
Inverlee Way
Description:
Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going
south to Route 50 East. This project is being planned in conjunction with improvements
to Senseny Road and surrounding development.
Capital Cost:
$10,200,000
Justification:
This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion
and provide an additional needed link between Senseny Road and Route 50 East.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 14
Fox Drive
Description:
Add additional turning lane(s) to Fox Drive where it intersects with Route
522 North.
Capital Cost:
$250,000
42
Justification:
This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at this
intersection.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 15
RenaissanceDrive, Phase 2
Description:
Construct a connector road between Route 11 and Shady Elm Drive.
Capital Cost:
$2,000,000
Justification:
This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at key
points along Route 11 and Apple Valley Dr. This project is identified in Secondary Road
Improvements Plan.
Construction Schedule:
Phase I construction was recently completed.
PRIORITY 16
Frederick County Eastern Road Plan
Description:
This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation
improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan, Eastern Road Plan that are not noted
individually above.
Capital Cost:
$TBD
Justification:
This project prepares the County for future development by addressing the
projects needed to support that development in a manner consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Construction Schedule:
N/A
43
Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
New General Aviation Terminal Construction
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport proposes to construct a new general
aviation terminal building. The new facility will be constructed in a new location slightly
southof the existing terminal building.
Capital Cost:
$3,660,000
Justification:
Since its opening in the early 1990s, the general aviation terminal building
for the Winchester Regional Airport has had only limited interior work completed.
Interior repairs are necessary due to extensive usage and some damage from water
leaking from the roof prior to its replacement in the springof 2006 by necessity. The
heating and cooling systems are approaching 25 years in age and are nearing the end of
their useful life. The exterior of the terminal building is made from Drivet that has failed
in many areas and is generally in fair to poor condition. In addition, the windows are not
energy efficient and several of the window seals have failed. In 2008, a study was
completed to examine needs and costs to renovate the existing terminal building. After
review of the study, the WRAA determined it would be more economical to build a new
energy efficient building slightly east of the existing terminal. The proposed location of
the project will allow enough room to build out a new transient apron during the taxiway
relocation project.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 2
Northside Connector
Thisproject proposedtoconstruct anewtaxiwayconnectorandashort
Description:
partialparalleltaxiwayonthe northwest
side ofthe airfield. The connectorwouldaccess
the runwayatthe endofRunway14andthe paralleltaxiwaywouldconnecttothe
proposedapronandhangardevelopment areaonthe northside ofthe airfield.
Capital Cost:
$1,250,000
The WinchesterRegionalAirport hasandcontinuestoexperience a
Justification:
growthinbusinessusage.Overthe past
severalyears,businesseshave beenoperating
increasinglylargeraircraft.The basedaircraftaccommodationsonthe southside ofthe
airport were developedover20yearsago,beforethese largeraircraft wereevenavailable
tobusinesses.Thereforethe southside wasnot developedtoaccommodatetheselarger
aircraft.Inaddition, theairport haseffectively"built-out"the available spaceforany
aircraft hangarsonthe southside,requiring openinguplandonthe northside.These
taxiwaysarethe firststepinopeningupthe areafor future development of large
corporate hangars.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
44
PRIORITY 3
Fuel Storage Facility
Description:
Construct new fuel storage facility for expansion and to meet DEQ and
EPA requirements.
Capital Cost:
$1,000,000
Justification:
When the taxiway midfield section is relocated it will cause an
encroachment into the current fuel farm area. In addition relocation of a fuel storage
facility will allow room to add additional storage tanks in the future.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 4
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-69
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-69 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical toairport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$212,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 5
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64B-A-33A
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel
64B-A-33A on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a
portion is located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$175,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
45
PRIORITY 6
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64B-A-40
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel
64B-A-40 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a
portion is located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$175,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 7
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64B-A-51
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-51 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$235,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers ofthese aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 8
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-67
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-67 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$275,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
46
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 9
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-64
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-64 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$275,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels areacquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 10
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-60
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-60 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$275,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
ConstructionSchedule:
Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 11
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64 A 59
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64
A 59 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport developmentbecause a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$300,000
47
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 12
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-47
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-47 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$300,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 13
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-49
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-49 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$300,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safetyon the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 14
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-50
48
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-50 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$300,000
Justification:
Under the FAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 15
Land Acquisition –Bufflick Road –Parcels 64-A-52
Description:
The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel64-
A-52 on Bufflick Road. Thisparcel iscritical to airport development because a portion is
located within or near the airportprimary surfaces.
Capital Cost:
$300,000
Justification:
Under theFAA part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia
15.2, the airport is required to own fee simple property located within the primary
surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional
Airport. The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased
safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired and vertical obstructions are
minimized.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 16
Northside Service Road
Thisprojectproposestoconstructatwolane serviceroadaroundtheendof
Description:
Runway 14.Theroadwillbe
approximately1/2 to3/4 milesinlengthsothatvehicles
stay clearofnavigational aidcritical areas.Itisproposedthattheroadwillbe 2 lanes.
Capital Cost:
$400,000
The approvedairportlayoutplanshowsnewdevelopmentoccurringonthe
Justification:
northsideoftherunway.By having
aircraftgroundoperationsandstorageonbothsides
ofthe airfield(northandsouth),groundvehicle trafficrequiringaccesstobothsidesof
the airfieldwillbegenerated.The trafficwillincludefuelingtruckoperations and
personnel activitiesforgeneral maintenance.TheFAAencouragesthe constructionof
serviceroadsaround aircraftactivity areas,especially therunways,toprevent
unauthorizedgroundvehicle accesstoaircraft movementareasandtopromote asafer
operatingenvironment.The service road,locatedonthewestsideof the airport(Runway
14end)will accomplishthese goals.
49
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 17
Taxiway (A) Relocation
Description:
The relocation of Taxiway "A" is part of the overall Airport upgrade to
meet safety design standards for a Group III airport. This relocation will improve the
serviceability and safety of the airport in regards to ground operations for larger jet
aircraft. Due to the complex task of relocating the entire 5,500' taxiway, the project has
been broken down into two phases -Phase I will begin at the 32 approach end of the
runway and continue to the terminal building located midfield. Phase II will continue
from the terminal building to the approach end of runway 14. The project will be broken
down into sections within the phases based on pavement conditions, demand and
availability of funding from the Federal Aviation Administration.
Capital Cost:
$9,650,000
Justification:
The relocation of Taxiway Ais necessary to increase the Airport’s ability
to accommodate larger aircraft. This project also will improve the serviceability ofthe
Airport for larger aircraft wishing to use the airport.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 19+
50
County Administration Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
Clearbrook Convenience Site Relocation
Description:
The relocation of the Clearbrookcitizens’ convenience site to property
located within the Clearbrookcommunity is planned for the FY 16/17.The current two
acre facility is now situated on quarry land and is the beneficiary of a no-cost lease which
ends December31, 2015. The Quarry has asked that the County vacate this property by
the end of 2016.Althoughthe original lease agreement and options were extended by the
previous owner, O-N Minerals which planned to long wall mine below the surface. Due
to Carmeuse’s intention to use an open pit approach during its quarry expansion, the
convenience site will be forced to relocate to another site in the Clear Brook/Stephenson
community, likely within the next twoyears.
Capital Cost:
$377,850
Justification:
Planned quarry expansion will mandate that current facility be relocated,
preferably on county-owned land in the Clear Brook/Stephenson community.
Construction Schedule:
Start in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 2
AlbinConvenience Site Relocation
Description:
The relocation of the Albin citizens’ convenience site to property located
within the Sunnyside/Albin community is projected for FY 17/18. A fenced two-acre site
will be constructed between North Frederick Pike and Indian Hollow Road on county-
owned property in close proximity to the existing site, ideally on a portion of the former
FCPS bus garage property. The project will require several months to complete including
fencing, earthwork, retaining walls, electric, equipment, lighting, paving and landscaping.
Capital Cost:
$442,850
Justification:
During August of 2015, 160,096vehicles visited the Albin facility,
making it the single most utilized solid waste facility outside of the landfill. The site
serves a geographic area extending from Sunnyside to Cedar Creek Grade westward to
Gainesboro. It is easily accessible from Route 37 and North Frederick Pike. The total
number of vehicles using the facility, an average of 596a day, represents an increase of
eight percent over 2014figures. On Fridays and weekends this number can reach close to
700. As trash disposal and the resulting traffic continue to increase, the present
infrastructure will be unable to safely service the public. During the holidays, the site
requires two attendants in order toefficiently move traffic. However, lines still back out
onto Indian Hollow Road, creating a hazard noted several times by the Sheriff’s Office.
For residents living between Cedar Creek Grade and Apple Pie Ridge Road, curbside
pickup is costly, prompting heavy utilization of the convenience site which attracts a mix
of users from the suburbs and rural community. A number of users are those from the
more western end disposing of their trash when traveling into Winchester. Avid recyclers
51
from Westminster-Canterbury, Shenandoah University’s Pharmacy School and SU
students living in nearby townhouses also frequent the facility.
Construction Schedule:
Start in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 3
Gore Refuse Site Relocation/Expansion
Description:
The project will expand refuse capacity in the Gore community by
installing a surplus trash compactor. Installation of a compactor at Gore will drive down
collection costs at the site where trash is now collected in 10 8-yard boxes. In order to
accomplish this, and account for improved traffic flow and the constructionof compactor
and recycling staging areas, the site will be expanded onto an adjoining parcel owned by
the county.
Capital Cost:
$349,550
Justification:
A total of 3,213vehicles utilized the facility during the month of August,
2015. On a typical Saturday, usage peaks to 146vehicles.The project will pay for itself
in lower refuse collection costs through compaction of solid waste before transport. Also,
with a compactor in place, refuse will be contained in an enclosed receiver can, reducing
blowing litter and odor and vectors, all of which can be a problem when using open
collection cans.The project will also provide much-needed capacity during heavy flow
times such as weekends and holidays. All 10 containers now fill to capacity during
Saturdays and Sundays. Numerous times, the site has closed early on Sundays when
capacity is reached. A 40-yard roll-off is used during the holidays to contain excess trash,
another additional expense. An upgraded site will meet the current and future solid waste
management needs of the Gore community.
Construction Schedule:
Start in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 4
General Government Capital Expenditures
Description:
Thisproject consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000for
the benefit of General GovernmentalCapital Expenditures. It is the intention of this
capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing capital equipmentfor
governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities.
Such expenditures may be less than the established $100,000 departmental threshold.It
was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that
this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget
process. This project is for the benefit of the County Governmental Entities participating
in the CIP but does not include individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost:
$1,000,000
Justification:
The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of
purchasing capital equipmentfor governmental agencies and to allow for improvements
to general governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the
52
Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers
accepted on behalf of the governmental entities.
Construction Schedule:
N/A
PRIORITY 5
County/School Board Administration Building
Description:
Thisproject consists of a County/School Board Administration Building,
to be located generally in the County’sUrban Development Area. The Joint
Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150,000 square foot office building
that may be shared with the CountySchools Administration. The Schools’ portion may
be 50,000 square feet.
Capital Cost:
TBD
Justification:
The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to
general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick
County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and
governmentservices in an accessible location.
Construction Schedule:
TBD
PRIORITY 6
Joint Judicial Center Renovation/New Facility
Description:
Thisproject consists of an expansion to the existing Joint JudicialCenter,
to be located generally in the City of Winchester or in the County’s Urban Development
Area. This is a two-phased project; phase one includes the $4,065,000 renovation to the
existing Joint Judicial Center(in-progress, therefore $ value removed from CIP), Phase
two is the further renovation and/or reconstruction of facilities.
Capital Cost:
$20,000,000
Justification:
The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to
general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick
County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and
government services in an accessible location. The need for this project has been
established through ongoing communication with the court system and the City of
Winchester.
Construction Schedule:
FY Long Range Comp. Plan.
PRIORITY 7
New Voting Equipment/Optical Scan
Description:
Thisnewproject consists of a replacement of the current voting machines
(Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Machines). In 2015, the General Assembly
53
introduced a bill to prohibit the use of DRE Machinesand require the use of optical use
ballot scanning systems in future elections. This project is in anticipation of future
legislation.
Capital Cost:
$297,332
Justification:
The Registrar has provided replacement plans for the voting machines by
precinct in anticipation of the replacement of the voting systems.
Construction Schedule:
Start in FY 16-17
54
Fire & Rescue Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
Fire & Rescue Station #22/ Annex Facilities (Route 277)
Description:
Construct a two bay Fire and Rescue Station with satellite Sheriff’s office
andthe potential for office and meeting room space for the County and community. The
station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike, White Oak Road, and Tasker Road to
provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three-
acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be
approximately a 10,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who
would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite office and meeting room
space.This facility is specifically identified in the Route 277 Triangle and Urban Center
Land Use Plan approved in 2008.
Capital Cost:
$3,400,000
Justification:
This development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated
community with age restrictions on 80% of the homes above 55 and the other 20% above
45. The developer‘s master plan will allow for 2,130 individual dwelling units using a
mix of housing types.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 2
Fire & Rescue Station #22 / Apparatus (Route 277)
Description:
Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I
Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and
Rescue Station 22.
Capital Cost:
$905,000
Justification:
This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station
22 located on Fairfax Pike East in the Stephens City area of Frederick County. The
pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of the required
and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built
to the Federal KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped with all of the required and
necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance. This fire and
rescue apparatus is needed due to the fact that the Fire and Rescue Department currently
owns one (1) pumper and one (1) ladder truck that are twenty (20) plus years of age and
already assigned to other functions. The currently owned fire and rescue apparatus
would not endure the demands placed on it while being assigned to a high call volume.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 16-17
55
PRIORITY 3
Fire & Rescue Station #23/ New Facility(Crosspointe)
Description:
This project consists of a 10,000 square foot fire station to accommodate 4
pieces of emergency equipment, and to house living and sleeping areas for staff. This
project also has the potential for office and meeting room spacefor the County and
communitywith an additional 2,000 square feet of building area. A two and ½ acre parcel
should be sufficient for building, parking and amenities for approximately 20 to 30
persons.The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end of current Rt.37 South,
an area of proposed high density residential development, and commercial development.
Capital Cost:
$3,700,000
Justification:
The proposed location at the South end of Route 37 provides for quick and
easy access to Interstate 81 North and South at the 310 Exit. Access and response on Rt.
37 will be greatly enhanced from I81 to Route 50 West in the Northbound Lane.
Currently Stephens City and Round Hill Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companiesserve the
area. This location also provides easy access to Rt.11 and the Kernstown area along with
access to Middle Road and Subdivisions of Brookneil, Stonebrook, and Jacksons Woods.
These subdivisions have large single family homes in an area of Frederick County
outside of the UDA. Water supplies are scarce in these areas and a rapid response from
this proposed facility will likely reduce property damage from fire and response times for
Medical Emergencies. Major collector roads such as Tasker Road and Warrior Drive
along with the proposed extension of Rt. 37 and new roadways in the development will
provide quick access to additional homes and businesses in areas including Front Royal
Pike, Papermill Road. These roadway construction efforts will provide for an increased
level of quality emergencyservice to the citizens in this entire area.
Construction Schedule:
To be determined.
PRIORITY 4
Fire & Rescue Regional Training Center
Description:
Construct a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially consisting
of an administrative building, multi-story burn building, multi-story training tower,
vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other training props. This project
will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law
enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions located in Clarke County, Frederick
County, Shenandoah County, Warren County, Winchester City, State Agencies, Federal
Agencies, and potentially jurisdictions within the State of West Virginia.
Capital Cost:
$31,175,000
Justification:
This project will facilitate realistic training in today’s modern environment
for emergency services and industrial personnel located throughout the Northern
Shenandoah Valley and expanding into the State of West Virginia. This project will
reinforce existing training programs in those respective agencies and jurisdictions as well
as facilitate training that is currently not available within the Northern Shenandoah
Valley which causes students and instructors to travel into the Washington Metropolitan
56
region. The number of potential personnel being trained at this Training Center is
potentially in the thousands based upon training statistics provided in July 2007 by the
participating agencies.
Construction Schedule:
Completion in FY 20-21
PRIORITY5
Fire and Rescue Station (#24) Relocation
Description:
Construct a three (3) bay fire and rescue station with satellite County
Offices. This station is intended to be located on or near Redland Road in the area of
Lake Holiday either at a site providedby Lake Holiday or other tract in the vicinity. An
approximate three to four acre site is necessary for a 10,000 square foot facility, to house
a fire engine, and ambulance and rescue boat.
Capital Cost:
$3,750,000
Justification:
The Lake Holiday Development is scheduled to have a final build-out of
2,800 single family homes.
Construction Schedule:
To be determined
PRIORITY 6
Clear Brook Fire and Rescue Station (#13) Relocation
Description:
Anew facility is proposed to be built on propertylocated onRoute 11
either north or south of Brucetown Road. The building is to befour(4) drive-through
bays, administration, eating and sleeping facilities along with a dining hall. The
estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 28,000 square feet.
Capital Cost:
$4,396,000
Justification:
With the current facility and need for upgrade in living quarters to
accommodate the career personnel24 hours, this is of the utmost priority. The new
location on Route 11 would give better access and additional spacefor additional use on
the property. At the current time we have outgrown our facility and with the equipment
that we have to provide the service to our community for property and health protection
and with the staffing needs and fund raising operations our current facility is in need of
upgrading/updating. We have an option to swap land with the Quarry and propose to
build a new facility on that property or remain at the current location and build on our
own property to the east and remove the current building and extend the parking to the
west.
Construction Schedule:
To be determined
57
Fire & Rescue Company Capital Project Requests
Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue –Vehicles & Equipment
Description:
Thisnewproject consistsof a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000
for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services. It is the intention of this capital expenditure
fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment
fire and rescue vehiclesand equipment.It was determined that the inclusion of such a
project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in
the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the
benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost:
$1,000,000
Justification:
The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of
purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehiclesand
equipment will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with
regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire
and rescue companies.
Construction Schedule:
N/A
The following requests have been added to the CIP in no particular order:
Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests.
Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Officeand Living Quarters Project
Project Cost: $550,000
Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Company
Apparatus ventilation system project
Project Cost: $550,000
MiddletownVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Rescue Engine Replacement
Project Cost: $700,000
MiddletownVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Self-contained Breathing Apparatus
Project Cost: $200,000
MiddletownVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Building Renovation
Project Cost: $1,000,000
58
North MountainVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Building Expansion
Project Cost: $450,000
Individual Equipment Requests less than $100,000.
MiddletownVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Turn out gear
Project Cost: $396,000
MiddletownVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Hose Replacement
Project Cost: $16,000
MiddletownVol. Fire & Rescue Company
Life Pack x2
Project Cost: $67,000
59