The URL can be used to link to this page

057-10Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: February 3, 2010 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: February 24, 2010 ❑APPROVED ❑DENIED RESOLUTION 2010 -2011 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CIP) WHEREAS, the Frederick County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed 2010 -2011 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for Frederick County on February 3, -- 2010; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Planning Commission recommended approval of this plan at their regular meeting on February 3, 2010 and determined that the projects contained in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) conform to the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this plan during their regular meeting on February 24, 2010; and, WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors supports the priorities for capital expenditures contained in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) and has determined that the projects contained in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) conform. to the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as follows: The Frederick County Board of Supervisors hereby approves the 2010 -2011 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for. Frederick County, Virginia as an element of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. PDRes #06 -10 Passed this 24th day of February, 2010 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Gary W. Dove Gene E. Fisher Christopher E. Collins PDRes #06 -10 BOS Res. ��057 -10 Aye Gary A. Lofton. Aye Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Aye A COPY ATTEST l�� ',� .J �.,� ` Jo��I�. Riley, Jr. Frederick County Administrator CQ[J1�T'F� of F�Ei�ERICJ De�a�-tme�t �t' P1aeT�«�� t�� -��€��E�;��` 540/565 -5v5i Fl�X: 540!565 -63Q5 TQ: Boazd of Supervisors FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Director DATE: ..February 16, 2010 y�� I2E: Public Hearing: 2010 -2011 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP} The 2010 -2011 Capital Improvements PIan (CIP} is scheduled for a Board of Supervisors Public Hearing on February 24, 2010. Endorse�zaea�t of the CIP by the Board would be ._ appropriate_ at this tiane. The CIP was endorsed by the Frederick County Planning Commission on February 3, 2010 following a Pub1_ic Hearing. -The Planning Commission found the CIP to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Previously, the CIP was considered at the following meetings: • Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) — December 14; 2009 The CPPC agreed that the CIP requests ,were i.n conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and forwarded the draft document aut of the Executive Committee for Planning Commission discussion. • Planning Commission — January b, 2010 The Planning Commission considered the CIP as a discussion item and the consensus of the Commission was that the projects proposed within the CIP were in conformance wish the Comprehensive Policy Plan. • Board of Supervisors — January 13, 2010 The Board considered the CIP as a discussion item and directed Staff to schedule public hearings for the 2010 -20 i 1 CIP. Board of Supervisors.. - - Public Hearing_ 2010- 201I.CIP - . February 16, 2010.:_- Page 2 a Planning Commissions = February 3,`2010 _ _ The Planning Commission considered the CIP as a public hearing and endorsed the CIP and found it in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan - This year's CIP once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects. This endeavor was further -. reinforced through the effort of the Pazks and. Recreation Department and their identification of their- comprehensively - planned parks including community, neighborhood, and district parks. � - It should be rioted that several CIP projects -have been adjusted in recognition of current growth trends and to be generally reflective of the current economic climate_ In addition, Staff has made an effort to further refine the Fire and Rescue components of the CIP by reorganizing this element consistent with the County's finance policy_. Please find attached with this agenda item: a draft, copy of the proposed 2010 -2011 CIP, which includes four maps illustrating the known locations of the CIP requests and a summary of all of the project requests: If adopted, the CIP and included maps will ultimately become a component of the Comprehensive Policy Plan; satisfying the review - requirement of Section 15.2 -2232 of the Code of .Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed unless said ,facility is a "feature shown" within a jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. The CIP is presented as a public hearing. The Board of Supervisors should be ready to endorse the 2010 -2011 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) at this ii.me. Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this information. Attachments . �� l' .� l � ` 1 MILL ELEMENTAdtYSCHOOL OVEMENTS ]PLAN 2010 -2011 Fiscal Year Adopted by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors February 24, 2010 Recommended by the Frederick County Planning Commission February 3. 2� 1(1 �'�3LE �F �OI��`�1`�TS INTRODUCTION......------••----------------------•------.. ..............---- •-- •--- - - - - -- 1 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS .....................:.. . . . . . . . ........................ 2 Frederick County Public Schools .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..... . ............ . . . ..... . ... . . .. . 2 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department . .. . . . . .. . ... . . . ..: . . . .... . .2 Handley Regional Library ------------------------- ------------------------- - - - - -- 3 Transportation Committee ........................... ............................... 3 Winchester Regional Airport .............. ............................... . . . . ...... 3 County Administration ................................ ..............................4 Fire& Rescue ........... ............................... . . . ............... . . . . .........4 2010 -2011 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP ............................... . ............ . ..... 7 2010 -2011 COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP......... _. 9 2010 -2011 COUNTY PARKS AND REC. CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP... _ . _ _ .....11 2010 -2011 TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS MAP .. . ..:..... . .... . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . ..... 13 201.0 -2011 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLE ..... . ........ . ........ . 15 CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS ......................... . . . . ............................... 21 PROJECT FUNDING ............... ............................... .....................21 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ................................. ......................... ...... 23 Frederick County Public Schools ...................... .............................23 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department ............................27 Handley Regional Library .............................. .............................33 Transportation Committee .............................. .............................�5 Winchester Regional Airport ........................ ............................... 39 County Administration ................... ............................... . ........... 42 Fire and Rescue .......................................... .............................44 �IVTI2OI��CT��1� Section 15.2 -2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP} consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must -also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform. to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed wish considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Policy PIan_ The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is projected. Transportation projects are included in the CIP for a fourth year. The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. The 2010 -2011 CIP once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects. This effort was further reinforced through the effort of the Parks and Recreation Department and their identification of their comprehensively planned parks including community, neighborhood, and district parks. _ l PR D�I� �' T RFC�1V�1��1`�7DA'I'��]�S Frederick County 1?ublEC Schools The Public Schools top priority remains a new. transportation facility_ Frederick County .. Public Schools .recently `completed the site. acquisition of .approximately 50 acres � on . Route 522` South.. for the development of a new. transportation. facility for the public school system. The site will house administration, driver training areas, driver and staff meeting areas, mechanical service and repair bays, inspection bay, wash bay, and fueling .,bays: - - _ . In an effort to maintain educational facilities that � will handle the growing student population, the construction of two new elementary schools is recommended within the . UDA (Urban Development Area). However, the timeframe for these facilities has been extended out several years. A new high school and both a replacement and new middle ': school have also been requested in anticipation of the .future demand of a growing student population. A number of school renovations and relocations are proposed, several of which are aimed at accommodating an all day Kindergarten program. The Elementary School renovations .have been updated to reflect the phased. construction of these improvements projects. It should be recognized that the all day kindergarten program has been delayed for- several years in light of_ the current fiscal climate. The CIP has been ,- reflected accordingly. - This year's CIP continues to include a request to renovate_ and expand the current administration building on Amherst Street. - Parks &Recreation The indoor aquatic facility continues to be proposed as the top priority of the Pazks and Recreation Depaztment for the fifth year in a row. This item is followed by necessary upgrades to the baseball field lighting at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. All of the remaining projects identified by the Parks and Recreation Department have been moved out to the later years of the CIP, in recognition of the current economic climate. The Parks and Recreation Department has proposed to acquire land in both the eastern and western portions of the county for the development of future regional park system. Bosh land acquisitions call for 150 -200 acres of land to accommodate the recreational needs of the growing population. The -effort of the Parks and Recreation Department and their identification of their comprehensively planned pazks including community, neighborhood, and district pazks, further emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning prof ects. softball complex; picnic area with a shelter, and an access road with parking and trails. �1�he soccer complex higher priority �i.s in recognzt?on of a partnership opportunity with a co- sponsored organization, BRZ'SA_ The projects planned- far the Clearbrook Park - include, upgrade of baseball lighting, upgrading pool amenities, a new open play area, a tennis /basketball complex, and shelter with an area for stage seating: The upgrade of pool amenities at the swimming pools at both parks will include the addition of water slides and a spray ground. Ha�adley Regional Library The Handley Regional Library continues to recommend four projects, consistent with their 2009 -2010 request. The library's top priority is a parking lot expansion as well as improvements to sidewalk access at the Bowman Library. The parking lot expansion would accommodate 121 more parking than what is currently available. The library wishes to extend the sidewalks to serve residents traveling from the east to Lakeside Drive. The three remaining projects request that funding be provided for new library branches throughout the county which include the areas of Gainesboro, Senseny /Greenwood Road, and Route 522 South, with the latter two being located within the UDA (Urban Development Area). 'I'ransportatior� Committee This is the fourth year the Transportation Committee is providing project requests for the CIP. Virginia State Code allows for transportation projects to be included within a locality's CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from developers and revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does not take away funding for generalized road improvements. The Transportation Committee has requested funding for twelve projects. The twelve requests include projects that entail widening of major roads; key extensions of roads that help provide better networks, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and the addition of turn lanes at current unsafe intersections. The relocation of the Senseny Road bicycle and pedestrian improvements and the Eastern Road Plan are the most recent additions to the CIP. The inclusion of an item for Eastern Road Plan Improvements once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects which are aimed at mitigating potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Winchester Regional Airport The Airport component of the CIP was modified last yeaz to be more consistent with the capital planning requirements of the Virginia Department of Aviation. The number of projects that are included in this CIP is similar to that of previous years, several requests represent different phases of construction of these capital improvements. 3 The most significant request of i:he ulinchester Airport in this year's CIP is a request to address the rehabilitation .and upgrade of Runway .14/42_ In:' addition, the .design -and construction of a relocated Taxi way Connector is another significant project. This year's - CIP includes several projects that provide for the acquisition of additional parcels along .. Bufflick Road which are required, to meet, noise abateme_ nt requirements and -will facilitate'the proposed expansion of the airport facility. Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal. and slate governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding. County Administration - Modifications to two of the County's refuse convenience. sites. continue to be a Public Works priority. The first request is than the current. Gainesboro facility .be moved. A. fenced, accessible two -acre site will be constructed along North Frederick Pike in close proximity to the existing site on Old Gainesboro Road. This project will require several months to complete and include fencing, earthwork, a retaining wall, electric, lighting, paving and landscaping. The other request., is for the expansion relocation of the Gore Refuse Site to allow for a trash compactor, which .will reduce operational costs, by compacting trash before it reaches the landfill_ Last year, an item was added to enhance the connection between the C1P and proffered - contributions made to mitigate- the impacts of development ,projects is an item that addresses general government capital expenditures chat may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold. This is similar to the approach previously taken for Fire and Rescue Capital Equipment. The structure of the County Administration section of the CIP has been modified and no longer includes Fire and Rescue. Fire and Rescue has it's own section which is as follows. Fire and Rescue The top project for the Fire and Rescue component remains the creation of Fire &Rescue Station #22 in the vicinity of Route 277, with the ability to provide an annex facility for other county related offices. The collaboration of this project with other community users and a land use planning effort was a key element of the Route 277 Land Use Plan. Fire and Rescue has also included a project which provides for the capital apparatus needs of this facility. project will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial and educational institutions located within the region. Fire card Reseate ValaQnteer C�hYpaFxy �`apitcal.��a€iprazerat Requests Previously, a project consisting of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment that may. fall below the guidelines established by the Finance Committee. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficiat-m ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County's capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. The individual Fire and Rescue Companies have identified their own Capital Requests which have been added to the CIP in no particular order. Most of the Capital requests meet the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee. Those requests that do not meet this guideline have been noted and therefore relate to the Fire &Rescue Capital Equipment project category. 5 2010 - 2011 Capital Improvements Specific or Approximate Locations County Administration 1 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation 2 Gore Convenience Site Expansion 3 Annex Facility /Fire 8 Rescue Station 4 Round Hill Fire Station Relocation 5 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation 6 Fire 8 Rescue Station 23 Airport Library 1 Bowman Library - Parking Lot and Sidewalk Addition 2 Northern Frederick County Library Branch 3 Library Branch - Senseny &Greenwood 4 Library Branch - Rt 522 South N W �ClE ��11 S �Jote Created by Frederick County Department of Planning 8 Development Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests submitted by various county departments. 12/10/09 Z 2010 - 2011 Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan i 4 6 3 S e. 0 12.500 25,000 50,000 75,000 0 2 4 Feet $ 12 Miles dExisting Elementary Schools Existing High Schools lExisting Middle Schools Future School Bus Facility ONew School Location Alternatives � � � Urban Development Area SWSA Replacement FCMS Note: Created by Frederick County Department of Planning &Development Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests submitted by Frederick Ccunty School Board 12/10/09 2010 - 2011 Fi�ede�ick County Capital Improvements Plan � New School Locations �� [ ji' '� r,��i �� 1 �� E ,, Elem School K...�'A�{y `� � #5 Middle School Elem School``-�.��,�,��'� =w �� Hi�School School Locations N WE Are Most S Appropriate o , 2 4 Miles Within the UDA 91 Existing County Parks District Park ® Neighborhood Park Purposed Parks Q District ,a�,. Community Neighborhood �� UDA * Please see attached Spreadsheet. 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 I I I I I I I +vie' Created by Frederick County Department of Planning &Development Map represenLS the Capital Improvment Requests submitted by The Dept of P_aiks &Recreation 12/10/09 2010 - 2011 Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan New Parks � Rec Locations ... �`r+ ,.�,� �� R .•�,,�l,_� .� °r` �'� ;;,, �� _ .�:�: . ' /a+. "' �4�� 1� + / a �� '� � r �= sa �; ,. t� �� .a;� r 111 13 County Total Project Department Priorit Count Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs 2011- 2012- 2013- 2014 - Projects 2010 -2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Public Schools New Transportation Facility 19,000,000 2,100,000 $21,100,000 $21,100,000 Replacement Frederick County Middle School 1,700,000 13,500,000 16,500,000 2,292,000 $33,992,000 $33,992,000 Fourth High School 6,000,000 1,500,000 21,000,00(1 23,500,000 3,250,000 $55,250,000 $55,250,000 Robert E. Aylor Middle School Addition and Renovation 7,975,000 7,725,000 3,375,000 2,925,000 $22,000,000 $22,000,000 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary. Phase 2 Renovation TBD TBD James Wood High School Renov. TBD TBD Bass Hoover E�mentary Addition and Renovation �� TBD Fifth Middle School 1,200,000 1,200,000 $33,992,000 D $33,992,000 FCPS Office Expansion Ph 1 & 2 500,000. $14,510,000 $14,510,000 Elementary School #12 2,400,000 $23,200,000 D $23,200,000 Elementary School #13 $23,200,000 D $23,200,000 $227,244,000 Parks &Recreation Indoor Aquatic Facility 15,163,000 $15 +163,000 $15,163,000 Clearbrook 8� Sherando Baseball Field Lighting 1,252,498 $1,252,498 $1,252,498 Park land Western Fred. Ca 3,367,728 $3',367,728 $3,367,728 Park Land Eastern Fred. Co. 4,490,510 $4,490,510 $4,490,510 Clearbrook &.Sherando Water SlidetSpray Ground. 1,251,208 $1,251,208 31,251,208 Sherando Soccer /Multi Use Fields 1,121,998 $1,121,998 $1,121,998 Sherando Access Road wh'arki[iglTrails 1,540,626 $1,54(1,626 $1,540,626 Sherando Maintenance Compound 374,310 $374,310 $374,310 Clearbrook Open Ptay Areas 478,565 $478,565, $478.565 Sherando LakelTrailslParking- 2Fields 1,360,610 $1,360,610 $1,360,610 Sherando Skateboard Park 513,089 .$513,089 $513,089 Sherando Softball Complex 671,062 $671,062 $671,062 Glearbnwk TennisBasketball Complex 526,355 $526,355 $526,355 Sherando Picnic Areas 804,243 $804,243 $804,243 Clearbrook Shelter Stage 508,402 $508,402 $508,402 Multi- Generational Center 8,802,605 $8,802,605 $8,802,605 Community Parks (5) 1,347,153 $1,347,153 $1,347,153 Neighborhood Parks (3) 336,788 $336,788 $336,788 District Parks (Northeast and Southwest) 7.858,238 .$7,858,238 $7,858,238 $51,768,988 County Total Project Qepartment Priority Count Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs 2011- 2012- 2013- 2014 - Projects 2010 -2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Regional Library Bowman Parking Lot/Sidewalk 258,028 $258,028 $258,028 Gainesboro Branch 202,516 1,989,180 $2,191,696 $2,191,696 Senseny /Greenwood Branch N/A N/A Route 522 Branch N/A N/A $2,449,724 Transportation Route 37 Engineering &Construction , .300,000,000 3300,000,000' E $300;000,000 I -81 Exit 307 Relocation $60,000,000 E $60,000,000 Warrior Drive Extension...... $23,200,000 E $23,2,000 Channing Drive Extension $20,600,000 E $20,600,000 Widening of Route 11 North 347,&!(1,000 E 54 ?,800,000 Brucetown /Hopewell Realign. $3,000,000 E $3,000,000 SensenyRoad Widening 522,840,000 E $22,800,000 East Tevis Street Extension $2,600,000 E $2,600,000 Inverdee Way $10,200,000 E $10,200,0 Fox Drive $250,000 E $250,000 Rennaisance Drive 52,000,000 E $2,000,000 Senseny Road Pike & Ped 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,550,000 $2,000,000 E $2,000,000 Revenue Sharing 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 $3,000,000 E $3,000,000 Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD $497,450,000 Winchester Airport Rehab R/W14/32, Upgrade Airfield C 10,000,000 5200,0 A,B $10,000,000 Land Acquisition, Parcel 50 225,000 $4,500 A,B $225,000 Land Acquisition, Parcels 51, 52 295,400 55.900... A 8 3295,000 Design TNV Reloc Sec 1 200,000 $4,000 A,B $200,000 Land Acquisit�n, Parcel 54 315,7 $6,316 A,B 5315,790 Construct T/W Reloc Sec 1 3,684,210 $73,684 A,D $3,684,210 Land Acquisition, Parcel 67 263,158 `$10,52t3 A,B 5263,158 Land Acquisition, Parcels 64,65 526,316 $5,263 A,B $526,316 $15,509,474 County Administration Relocation of Gainesboro Sfte 3,000 449,625 $452,625 $452,625 Relocation /Expansion Gore Site 12,000 425,150 $437,150 $437,150 General Government Capital Expe 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 $1,889,775 v County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs 2011- 2012- 2013- 2014 - Projects 2010 -2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Fire Sr Rescue Fire &Rescue Station #22 (277) 400,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 Fire &Rescue Station #22 (277) Apparatus 100,000 700,000 $800,000 $800,000 Station #15 (Round Hi1Q Relocation 494,000 3,787,696 $4,281,696 $4,281,696 Station #13 (Clearbrook) Relocation 33,000 I 213,000 4,275,000 $4,521,000 $4,521,000 Station..# 23 (Crosspointe) New Facility 550,000. 1,250,000 1,000,000 52,800,000 $2.800,040 Regional Training Center 75,000 1,250,000 10,000,000 6,500,000 $1,075,000 D $29,075,000 $44;877,696 Fire &Rescue Company Capital Requests Fire 8r Rescue Capital Equipment 200,000 200,000 200000 200,000 200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 See Fire &Rescue Company Requests ( <$100K) Technical Rescue Equipment for Stephens City Fire & Rescus $105,000 G $105,000 Ambulance Replacement Project for Greenwood Vol. Fire 8� Rescue Co. $150,000 C $150,000 PumperlT'ankerforMiddletown Vol. Fire &.Rescue Co. $552,000 C $552,000 Ambulance for Middletown Vol. Fire &Rescue Co. $200,000 C $200,000 North Mtn: Fire 8r Rescue Station Modification $315,064 C $315,064 $2,322,064 Total $848,511,721 * Fire &Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests ( <$100K) Groundwater Reduction Project for Greenwood Vol. Fire &Rescue Co. S50,000 C .� T_._, ate„ ,,,,,, A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation B= Partial funding from FAA C= Partial funding from private donations D= Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years E= Partial funding anticipated through development &revenue sources N+ NIA= Not Available TBD= To be Determined V tat W.i V,V VV T�� CJrP TAI�L� C�I�IT)✓l�dT J��SCRIPT.I��TS The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital improvement .projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Depaa�tment Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contributiog- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five -year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the .fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. 1Votes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs- The -cost for each project, including county allocations and other funding sources. PR�.3>�CT F�JI�DI1�dG The projects included in the 2010 -2011 Capital hmprovements PIan have a total project cost to the county of $843,511,721 primarily over the next five years. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the county. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the- federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. • The inclusion. of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. �'t-e�eric� �€�uat� J�u�li� �ehool� P�-��cf P'ri€�rif-� �isti I�RIOTY Transpot-tQtion Facility ➢escription: This project involves the .construction and .development of a izew transportation facility for the public school system. The site will house administration, driver training areas, driver and staff meeting areas, rnechariical service and repair bays, inspection bay, wash bay, and fueling bays. Capital Cost: $21,100,000 - Justification: The current transportation site has outgrown the current facilities and there is not sufFicient area to expand those facilities. The increase in student membership, coupled with stringent laws and regulations that govern the operation and maintenance of school transportation vehicles, requires a much Iarger and upgraded. transportation facility. Construction Schedule: Construction will take 24 months. PRIORITY 2 I2eplacemeast of Frederick County lYliddle School _ ➢escription: The replacement of Frederick County Middle School will have a program capacity of 8�0 students and serve grades 6 -8. The project location has been requested in the westen� portion of Frederick County between Route 50 West and Route 522 North ui the area of Hayfield Road. It will contain approximately 166,000 square feet of floor area and be located on approximately 35 acres. Capital Cost: $33,992,000 Justif cation: With the need for renovations at the current school to major mechanical systems, items dealing with ADA compliance, increasing membership, location of the facility, concern for best building configuration for the delivery of instruction. Construction Schedule: Construction will take 42 months. PRIORITY 3 Fourth High School Description: This project consists of the development of a fourth high school serving grades 9 -12 with a program capacity of 1,250 students. The project location has yet to be determined, but will have a floor area of approximately 242,000 square feet and. is to be located on approximately 80 acres of land. Capital Cost: $55,250,000 Justification: This project will address continued grov�rth in student enrollment in the school division over the next five years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase at all levels. Student enrollment in the high schools. by the fall of 2013. is projected to be 4,250. Construction Scheduler Construction will take 48 months PR>[OR�TY 4 Roberi E. Aylor 1Vli€ldle School Rehov�tion Description: This project involves renovations of the current facility: Major_ areas to be included in the projecf are additional. classroom space and storage. space; - a complete replacement of fire alarm and communication systems; plus roof replacement; upgrade of electrical and plumbing; and complete replacement ofinechanical- systems_ Other areas to be addressed are security, repaving, and the installation of an emergency system_ Capital Cost: $22,000,000 Justification: Robert E. Aylor Middle School is soon � to ' be 37 years. of age 'and renovations are- needed to a number of different areas to ensure � economic and efficient operation of the school for years to come. ` Construction Schedule: 48 Months PRIORITY 5 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovations .Description: Currently, the building serves grades K -5. The building is in good condition; however, several major azeas need to be addressed_ These items will be _ addressed in two phases. The first phase, kindergarten renovation, was completed this summer. In the second phase, a renovation of the remaining facility will be completed. Seveial of the major issues to be addressed in this renovation include open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy .conservation, security, and- upgrades of fire .alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. - Capital Cost: $TBD Justification: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is over 30 years old and renovation is needed to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operations of the school for years to come. � . - Construction Schedule: 36 Months PRIORITY 6* James Wood High School Renovation bass ��c�ave�- elementary Sehc�a[ l�e�avatFO�s Desei-iption: Currently, Bass - Hoover serves grades K -5. The. building is in good condition, but several major issues need to be addressed. Renovation of the remaining facility will be completed. Several of the major issues to be addressed in this renovation include open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy conservation, security, and upbrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems_ A building addition will be needed to maintain program capacity. Capital Cost: $TBD Justification: These renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure economic and efficient operation of the schools far years to come and to accommodate a full day kindergarten program. Construction Schedule: 42 Months -July 2015 PRIORITY 8 Fifth Middle School I)escriptian: This project consists of the development of a iiew middle school serving grades 6 -8 with a capacity of 850 students. The project location has yet to be determined but will have a floor area of approximately 166,000 square feet and will be located on approximately 35 acres of land_ Capital Cost: $33,992,000 Justification: This project will address continued growth in student enrollment in the school division over the next seven years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase at all levels. A projection using cohort migration shows enrollment in the middle schools by the fall of 2015 to be 3,460. Based. on this projection, it will be necessary to construct the fifth middle school in Frederick County to open in that time frame. Construction Schedule: Construction will take 48 months. PRIORITY 9 Frederick County Administratnje Office E�cpansian Description: The facility contains 20,592 square feet, which does not include the 5,000 square foot Annex that has recently been constructed or the seven modular units that have been added to help address the need for additional space. The expansion will address the need for office and meeting space, will take advantage of advances in technology, and will provide. mechanical, plumbing and electrical wiring to code. Capital Cost: $14,510,000 Justification: The administrative offices will serve 110 current siaff housed in the present Frederick County Public Schools Administration building. Construction Schedule: 24 Months Pf��YT 5t' l a . . Eiement�ry Sehool #12 IJescription_ This is a single -story elementary school with a floor area of approximately 100;000 square feet located on 15 acres. The facility will be designed to accommodate a shident membership of 75.0_ The outdoor facilities will include three pods of grade -level appropriate playground equipment,. one asphalt. play area,- one softball field, and a . physical education f eld. This facility will meet or- ,exceed all Virginia Department of _ . . Education's new construction requirements for K -S. elementary schools. - .. Capital Cost: $23,200,000 - Justification: This project will address continued growth in student enrollment in the_ school division -over the next six years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase �at all levels.. A projection using cohort: migration shows enrollment in the.. ,. elementary schools by the- fall of 2014 to` be 6,627.. Based on .this projection, . implementation of full -day kindergarten, and renovations at Apple Pie Ridge and Bass- _ Hoover Elementary Schools, it will be necessary to construct the 12�' elementary school in Frederick County to open in that time frame. Construction Schedule: Construction will take 42 months. PRIQ)EZITY 11 Elementary School #13 I3escription: This is a single -story elementary school with a floor area of approximately 100,000 square feet located on 15 acres. The facility will be designed to accommodate a student membership of 750. The outdoor facilities will include three pods of grade -level appropriate playground equipment, one asphalt play area,_ one softball field, and a physical education field. This facility will meet or exceed all Virginia Department of Education new construction requirements for K -5 elementary schools. Capital Cost: $23,200,000 - Justification: Significant residential growth in Frederick County is expected to resume once the economy recovers, with the result that school enrollment is expected to exceed program capacity in FY 2019 -20. " Construction Schedule: Construction will take 42 months. :. �: -: . -. . .. _ 26 . ��-� � ��ere�Igo� ��arf��i Pro�cet �ri�ri� Lisp P>�1��TY >i Indoor aquatic Facility Dese�Flrtion: Tlus facility would house a leisure and competitive lap s�v�iinming pool with an office, storage and locker rooms. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the County and would utilize approximately 8 -12 acres. u1ith parking. Capital Cost: $15,163,000 - JustifZCation: There are no indoor public pools in Frederick County. By constructing the indoor pool, it would pernut the department to meet citizen programming demands, provide an instructional facility, as well as provide the area with a facility that would attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer year round recreational prograi�ning for the residents of Frederick County and provide a facility for competitive scholastic programs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10 -11. PRIORITY 2 Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade Description: This project involves upgrading fine lighting at both Clearhrook and ._ Sherando Parks Baseball Facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the existing fixtures and wooden poles and their replacement with fixtures that meet Little League International Standards on all little league fields. Capital Cost: $1,252,448 Justification: This project will provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park service area which includes all county residents. Park visitation at the two district parks exceeds 425,000 annually and is growing. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10 -11 PRIORITY 3 Park Land — Western Frederick County Description: Parkland acquisition in the western portion of the county. Capital Cast: $3,367,728 Justification: Anew 154 -200 acre regional park would be utilized by the entire county population. This project would reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the rn ;n;mum standard for the Frederick County service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. The location of this project would provide parkland to create more accessible recreational facilifies to residents in western Frederick County.. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15 . _ 27 1. .�. �'�rk I,�md - ��stern Frederick Cor�nty PRIORITY 6 Soccer Coanpleg- Sherando Park Description: This project includes the development of one soccer field (artificial grass); access paths; restrooms; concession; one picnic shelter; a plaza.; landscaping; and lighting (one field). Capital Cost: $1,11,998 Justification: This facility will serve the entire county population and will be utilized by the Frederick County School System. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15. PRIORITY 7 Access_ Road v��ith Parking and Trails- Sherando Park Description: This project involves the development of an entrance and 1,800 linear feet .��ssti� cation: This facility will provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park se��ic� �,�u and il;e entire lre�erck �:OLniy col��nu�i�� -�. The deveiol��r <�nt of tl�;s facility will reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational — areas and the number required to meet the minimum standards established for the service area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15_ pz�� a Maintenance Compound and ��ce — Sherando Park Description: This project involves the construction of a 1,200 square -foot office and a 4,000 square - foot storage shed for operation at Sherando Park. Capital Cost: $374,310 Justification: This facility. will enable the County to maintain equipment and facilities in amore responsible and effective manner_ The additional responsibility to maintain the outdoor facilities at Sherando High School, Robinson Learning Center, Annel Elementary, Orchard View .Elementary, Bass Hoover Elementary, Middletown Elementary, R.E. Aylor Middle, Admiral Byrd Middle, and Evendale Elementary, increases the need for more storage, maintenance, and office space_ Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15. t�nT�nrm�� n �pem Play Area — Cflearizrook Description: This project includes development of a picnic shelter; six horseshoe pits; a volleyball court; croquet turf; shuffleboard; parking; refurbishing the existing concession stand; landscaping (14 shade trees); peripheral work; and renovations to existing shelters, restrooms, access paths, and parking areas on the south side of the lake. Capital Cost: $478,565 Justification: These facilities will provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park Service Area which will lessen the disparity between the number of passive recreational areas needed to meet the minimum standards for this service area. Clearbrook Park offers the best location for this development. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15. PRIORITY 10 Lake, Parking, and Trail Development RRth two Multi- purpose Fields .Iazstifieati��: This facility,wilI provide recreational opportunities for the Sheraido =Park service. area and .the entire 1'rederiek County cainmunity_ . The .development of this facility- will reduce_ the,. needs gap- beta %eeri the number of e�stin passive recreational `- areas and the number required to meet the" minimum standards established for the service . area. -- Constrnctian Schedule:. Completion in FY 14 -15_ P1210RITY 1l- Skateboard Park - Sberando Park Description:. This project recommends the development. of a .skateboard bowl; a half pipe; an open skate area; vehicle parking; an access road; fencing; and landscaping.. , :: ; _ Capital Cost: $S 13,089 � - - Justification: This facility will enable the County io provide a recreational facility that has been identified • iri the County .Comprehensive.:. Plan for` ,recreational facility dewelopmei�t. _ Construction Schedule; Completion in FY 14 -15_ PRIORITY 12 _ Softball Complex- Sherando Park Description: This project includes two softball fields; an access road; parking spaces; and landscaping - Capital Cost: $671,062 Justification: Tliis facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire county population, as -well as the Frederick County School System Presently, there are ten softball and baseball fields within the county's regional park system.. Eight of the existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball, as well as adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become increasingly difficult to facilitate these programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate the existing demand for youth baseball and adult softball programs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15. PRIORITY 13 TennisBasketball Complex- Clearbrook Park Description: This project includes the development of four tennis courts; Iwo basketball courts; a shelter; access paths; parking; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $526,355 Justification: These facilities will be available to all county residents. Currently, there are no tennis courts or basketball courts in the Clearbrook Park Service Area. Clearbrook T'- �- -- --�_v --� �- -- -- • - -son nnn -- -=`- -- --- .-- n- ...ti -_,.r _.. FL.,s F ,.;t;f;e� ��e �evaea - PficnBC Area- Sherando Park Descriptiors: This project includes a restroomJconcession area; four picnic shelters; playground area; access paths; parking; and landscaping_ Capital Cost: $804,243 Justification: These facilities would be used by the residents of Sherando Park service area_ This area of .the county is growing and is def dent in passive recreational opportunities. This development is needed to reduce the gap between the number of existing facilities and the minimum standards for the .Sherando _Park .service area and southeastern Frederick .County. . Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15. PR)iO�ITY 15 Shelter /Stage Seating- Clearbrook Park Description: This project includes the development of a shelter with a performance stage; refurbishing existing restrooms and access paths; and renovations to the lake_ Capital Cost: $508,402 Justification: This facility would be used by the entire county population. Presently, there are no facilities to acconunodate cultural programs within the county's park system_ -- This project is needed to provide a facility for cultural activities. Construction Sclaedrale: Completion in FY 14 -I5. PR�(��T�' A6 li�ulti- Generational Comanunity Ce�ater Description: The project involves building a 44,000 square foot facility that would contain an indoor track and at least two basketball courts. The court area would be designed to be used by indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton. The area could also be used for special events. Additionally, the project would house a fitness center, multi- purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Capital Cost: $8,802,605 Justification: This facility would give the Parks and Recreation Department the ability to offer year round recreational programming to the residents of Frederick County. The department can no longer meet the programming and facility needs of the County residents. Constriction Schedule: FY 14 -15. P}2�O��TY 17 Comanunity Perks (3) )!Description: Acquisition.of Parkland; 60 acres . - . Capital Cosf: $1,347,153 .Tustification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existirg parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area; as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. The project meets policy recomr�nendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, insuring that adequate and : _ appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided.: Construction Schedule: FY 14 -1�. � - . Capital Cost: $336,788 Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and -the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan_ The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, insuring that adequate and appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided_ Construction Schedule: FY 14 -15. PRIORITY 19 Iiistrict Parks (Northeast and Southwest) I3escription: Acquisition of Parkland; 200 acres Capital Cost: $7,858,238 Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the nLn?.mum standard for our service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities, insuring that adequate and appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided_ Construction Schedule: FY 14 -15. �ndle� �€��1 ��a� �t°��c� �r��-�� sf . PRI`GR�TY l�ow�nan Libra>iy Parking Lot and Side��alk Extension Description: This proposal is to expand the parking lot on the Lakeside Drive side of the library from 1.01 to 221 parking spaces, and to provide a sidev4�alk that will extend approximately 400 to 500 feet beyond the sidewalk that now borders the parking lot to connect to .the sidewalk on Lakeside Drive. capital cost: $25s,a2s Justification:. The .parking lot expansion is needed to relieve overcrowding and to accommodate library patrons. The sidewalk is necessary to provide safe access for pedestrians to the library. Planning consideration for alternative modes of transportation such as bicycle connectivity should also be considered_ Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10 -11 PRIORITY 2 Northern Frederick Cortnty — Gainesboro I,ibz-ary I3�-ancln Description: Construction of a 7,000 to .10,000 sq_ ft. branch library. Initial parking should be for at least SO velucles_ The proposed location would be on Rt_ 522 in the Gainesboro district, but this could change depending on patterns of library use in the next 3 to 4 years and on whether donated land could be located. The acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres would be in fiscal year 2008/2009'. There is discussion as a possible reuse of the old Gainesboro School as a library branch, but this is a decision to be made by the Board of Supervisors after fiu-ther study. Capital Cost: $2,191,696 Justif cation: Now that the Bowman Library is completed, the residents of Gainesboro district comprise the largest population group that is the most distance from a library within the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programm?ng for patrons from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends vahen school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 11/12 PRIORITY 3 Frederick County Library Branch — Senseny /Greenwood Description: Construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. branch library with expansion possible to 15,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for up to 100 vehicles.. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first -step of - the project would be the acquisition of the. land of 5 to 8 a.eres. 33 _. _ . ,: Capital C ©st: N/A .: .lustifecatic�f�: � Iibrai-y in this area would meet the needs, of Fredezick County citizens by reducing traffic into Winchester=. Parenfs and other library users will use the library more often if they do not have to come downtown to Handley Library. This area also lacks a community center; a library.: with a meeting room. could help. fill .this need. The Library will provide materials and programming. for pairons .from toddlers- to senior citizens_ It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will. be a prime .source for :homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed_ .The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room, of 425.square feet in which area groups can meet. � - _ Construction Schedule: TBD . PRIORITY 4 Frederick County Library Branch- Route 522 Sottth Description: Construction of a 7,000 sq. ft_ branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet_ Initial parking should be for up to 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The f rst step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acres. Capital Cost: N/A .Iustiiication: This population group is not close to a library in the regional system. This area also lacks a community center that a .library with meeting room could help fill this need. The Library will provide materials and programming for patrons from toddlers to _ senior citizens. It will provide recreational and. educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access for word processing and other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Coustra�ction Schedule: TBD . . 34 _; - - - '�r�r€��o�-�� Coitl�e P�-��ect ��i�t•�� L,��f PRIORI'1'�' I Izlanninb, Enbineering, Right oi< Way and Constriction Word for R€�ute �7 Deseri�ti ®n: This project would be to continue «pork on the Eastern Route 37 extension_ IVlore specifically, to update the Environmental lrnpact Statement to the point of a new Record of Decision acid to update the I992 design plans to address the cun-ent alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange vnprovenients. In addition, this allows for advanced engineering, right of way purchase and construction. Capital Cost: $300,000,000 + - Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion. of a trancportation unprovement that would beneft the entire county and surrounding localities. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 2 Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $60,000,000 .. Justif5catioa�: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in ma�iy areas of the County and address coining development to the surrounding areas_ `- Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 3 Warrior Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4 -lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277. where Warrior Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with I -81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $23,200,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 4 Charming Drive Extension Jn�tii"iea�io�i: This project has beenidentified in the Eastern: Road Plan, anct will address congestion in .Eastern Free�erick County_ and address development to the suz�roundin� areas_ Construction Seheclule: TBD - _ PRIORITY S Wideninb of Route 11 Nort12 to the'�Vest'Virgiuia State Line Description: Improve Route 1 I to; a divided. 4 and 6- lane.. facility, as detailed in. the Eastern Raad Plan. - �. Capital Cost: $47,800,000 - Justifcation: This is a regional transportation improvement that will ,address _congestion over a large area of the County -and address development to .the surrounding azea. This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and improving the flow of traffic..:.. ; Comstr�action Schedule: TBD Brucetowri 12oad/Ilopewell Road Aligrfinent and Intersection Imiprovements Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11 _ Improvements to this intersection will address comprehensive planned development's traffic generation in the area_ - Capital Cost: $3,000,000 Justification: This is a transpor`�ation improvement that will have signif cant impact on the Route 11 corridor. The location is identified by.joint planning efforts between the county and VDOT. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 7 Senseny Road Widening Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4 -lane divided roadway. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the implementation of Route 37, Charming Drive, and development in the area. Capital Cost: $22,800,000 . Justification; This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD . . . -. . _ .: . , .. 36 . �, :; .. - ,. ;> .. ,:. - - PRIORITY S fast '1'evis Stg-eet Extension Description: Construct a 4 -lane divided roadway begiruung at Route 522 and going «pest approximately 0.2 miles to connect to the road network being constructed by the Russell 150 development_ Capital Cost:- $2,600,000 .l�astif�eatio�a: This is a regional transportation improven7ent that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address development to the surrounding area. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the county, VDOT, and the developer. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 9 Inverlee Way Description: Construct a 4 -lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south to Route 50 East. This project is being plaiu�ed in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and surrounding development_ Capital Cost: $10,200,000 .Iustifeation: This is a regional transportation improvement. that will address congestion and provide an additional needed link between Senseny Raad and Route 50 East_ Censtra�ction Schedule: TBD �'RIORITY 10 J4 ox D rive Description: Add additional fuming lanes) to Fox Drive where it intersects with Route 522 North. Capital Cost: $250,000 Justif cation: Tlus is a transportation improvement that v��ill address congestion at this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 11 Renaissance Drive p1�.IC��Ii'1,�' LZ Revenue Sharing Descriplioh: Plan to prepare for fture revenue sharing applications. Capital Cost: $3,000,000 Justif cation: This project is intended to prepare the county -for future revenue sharirig applications that may or may not include developer contributions. Constrtaetion Schedule: N/A Senseny Road )bicycle and Pedestrian Iinproveaments Description: This project .will: construct bicycle and :pedestrian. improvements .along Senseny Road -from Greenwood Road to the I -81 crossover_ Capital Cost: $2,000,000 Justification: This project will improve pedestrian safety along a corridor surrounded by residential development and centered upon the Senseny Road Elementary School_.,, Construction Schedule: N/A � _ _ PRIORITY 14 - �" )Frederick County Eastern Road Plan Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation . improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan, Eastern Road Plan that are not noted individually above. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This project prepares the county for future development by addressing the projects needed to support that development in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. � - Construction Schedule: N/A �Yi��hesf�� .��i��a� �ir-��rt �r��et �r��-i �,ist PRIT�R�T�' � Rehab R/� ��/32, IJp�rade Airfield Lightinb I�esigh Description: Design of Runway ReIiab and Lighting Upgrade_ - Capital Cost: $10;000,000 Local Cost: $200,000 �fl➢S$IfiCatHOPil: This design project involves the rehabilitation of runway 14 -32 to renew the life of the existing pavement. Also included is an upgrade to the runway lighting comprised of new high intensity runway lights and the installation of a new four box PAPI, which provides a greater accuracy far pilots on final approach to the runway. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10 -11 PRIORITY 2 Land Acquisition — Bufllick Road — Parcei 50 Description: Acquisition of parcel located along Bufflick Road. Property is included in the 20 Year Master Plan. Capital Cost: $225,000 Local Cost: $4,500 Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of — the residential parcels are located inside the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non - compatible with airport operations. Construction Sclredr�le: Completion in FY 1 I -12 PRIQRITY 3 Land Acquisition — BufiIick Road — Parcels 51, & 52 Description: The �uinchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcels 51 and 52 on Bufflick Road. These pazcels are critical because a portion of each is located within the airport primary surface, and the structures on the property are located closest to the runway. Capital Cost: $295,000 Local Cost: $5,900 Justification: Parcels 51 and 52 lie within the runway's primary surface at the Winchester Regional Airport Structures on the property aze also located closed to the runway. The airport has completed all preliminary efforts (i.e. appraisal, surveys, EDDA, etc.) and has made its initial offer along with negotiations and will act to complete this transaction to ultimately improve safety conditions at the airport. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 11 -12 '- . 39 PRIORITY 4 Taxiway A Relocatian = Pinase I & J`I �csign PRIORITY 5 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 54 Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority .proposes to acquire an -- additional parcel on Bufflick Road identified on the Airport property map as Parcel 54. This parcel is critical because a portion is located within the airport primary surface, ,and the structure on the property is located closest to the runway. Capital Cost: $315,790 Local Cost: $6,316 Justification: The additional parcel on Bufflick Road lies within the runway's primary surface at the Winchester Regional Airport. Structures on the property are also located close to the runway. The airport has completed all preliminary efforts (i.e. appraisal, sur`Teys, EDDA, etc.} and has made its initial offer along with negotiations and will act to complete this transaction to ultimately improve safety conditions at the airport Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 12 -13 PRIORITY 6 Taxiway ARelocation — Phase I & II Construction terminal building midfield. Phase II will continue from the terminal building to the approach end cirvl�� %�y � =!. Capital Cas €: $3;6o °4,210 Local Cost:. $73,684. Justification: The relocation of Taxiway A is necessary to increase the Airport's ability to accoininodate larger aircraft. This pro }ect also will improve the serviceability of the Airport iri regards to ground traffic. Corastrractioxr �chedeale: Completion in FY 12 -13 Pl<tI ®itJi7,Y 7 Land Acquisition — Fu:�fliek Road — Parcel 67 I?escription: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire this parcel on Bufflick Road .identified on the Airport property map as Parcel 67. This parcel is critical because a portion of each is located within the airport primary surface, and the structures on the property are located closest to the runway_ Capital Cost: $263,158 Local Cost: $10,526 Justi�aeatioa: This parcel on Bufflick Road lies within the runway's primary surface at the Winchester Regional Airport. Structures on the. property are also located closed to the runway. The airport has completed all preliminary efforts (i.e. appraisal, surveys, EDDA, etc_} and has made its initial offer along with negotiations and will act to complete this transaction to ultimately improve safety conditions at the airport_. Corzstrs�etior� Sclredaale: Completion in FY I3 -14 PRiDRI'i'X S Land Acquisition — Bui=flick Road — Parcels 64 and 65 Ji?escription: The �TJinchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire two additional parcels on Bufflick Road identified on the Airport property map as Parcels 64 and 65. These parcels are critical because a portion of each is located within the airport primary surface, and the structures on the property are located closest to the runway. Capital Cost: $526,316 Local Cost: $5,263 Justification: The two additional parcels on Bufflick Road lie within the runway's primary surface at the Winchester Regional Airport. Structures on the properly are also located closed to the runway. The airport has completed all preliminary efforts (i.e. appraisal, surveys, EDDA, etc.) and has made its initial offer along wish negotiations and v��ill act to complete this transaction to ultimately improve safety conditions at the airport. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 14 -15 C�u�ty �d��is1:= r��o�i ��-��ee� Pri��-�ty List PRI��ITY 1 Gainesboro Conveaaie�aee -.Site Relocation I�escriptiotz: The relocation of the Gainesboro citizens' convenience site t© property: located within.the Gainesboro community is planned for`the 09 /I O f seal year_ Remaining _design work will be completed during the cuiTent fiscal. year_ A fenced, accessible two - acre site will be constructed along North Frederick Pike. in -close proximity to the existing site on Old Gainesboro Road.. This project will require several months to complete and include fencing, earthwork, a retaining wall; electric, lighting; paving and landscaping: Capital Cost: $452,625 Justification: Approximately 4,000 residents are served by the Gainesboro facility. The refuse site serves a wide geographic area from Gainesboro westward to the Cross Junction, Whitacre and Reynolds Store communities `' � . Construction Schedule.Start in FY IO -11 Gore Refuse Site Relocation/Exgansion Ileseriptian: The project'euill expand refuse collection capacity at Gore by installing a surplus trash compactor: With the relocation of the Gainesboro site and purchase of new equipment, there will be an available compactor. Installation of a compactor at Gore will drive down collection costs at the site where trash is now collected in 10 8 -yard boxes. In order to accomplish this, and account for improved traffic flow and the construction of necessary concrete walls, the site will be expanded onto an adjoining parcel already owned by the county. Capital Cost: $437,150 Justification: This project would also provide much - needed capacity during heavy flow times such as weekends and holidays. All 10 containers now on site fill to capacity during Saturday afternoons and during the Sunday shift when up to 189 vehicles visit the facility. A 40 -yard roll -off is placed at the site during the Christmas holidays to provide for increased trash generation. An upgraded site would meet the future solid waste demands of a growing community_ Construction Schedule: Start in FY 11 -12 PRIORITY 3 General Government Gapatal Expenditures «gas determined that the- inclusion of such a project v�auld be beneficial iri ensuring flzat L�11S S1�7i1lTicaii`l CSpital eXI "�eI�SE I5 IdPIlfJt�cj ?i7 tl ")e CC }U12tj`'S C:zpll:al p��IlI�IT,�T 21iC1. 1?ud; %et process. This project is far the benefit of the County Crovenunental Entities participating in the CIF but does not include individual �Tolunteer Fire and Rescue Companies_ ��pi�a.� C�s'r: �I,000,000 _ .��s�i�c��a>�: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to ge>ieral governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of .cash proffers accepted on behalf of the governmental entities. C'oas�raac��>� Sehe€i!ule: N/A u dire. & �ese�� I"r�ieef Priority List PRIORITY' 1 Fire &� Rescue St�ti ®n' #22' /Annex Facilities (Roue 277) - Description: Construct a two bay Fire and Rescue Station -with satellite Sfieriff's .ogee. and County office space -.for treasure, commissioner of the revenue, and BOS office with meeting room, The station will. be located in the area of Fairfax -Pike east of White Oak ' Road to provide service for the -heavy growth -area east of .Stephens City. An approximate three -acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. -The fire station .will be approximately a 10,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and ambulance.:- . This facility is specifically identified in the Route 277 Triangle. and Urban Center Land Use Plan approved in 2008. .Capital Cost: $3,400,000 Justification: The development of satellite offices .along. major transportation. networks and in areas of dense population will provide ease of access for citizens and.will improve services to the county. The County continues to experience a significant rate of growth; therefore, it is important to provide services .within_ these areas instead of requiring ' citizens to confront. congestion, limited parking, and accessibility in the City - of _. Winchester. This facility would facilitate the implement the Route.. 277. Triangle and Urban Center Land Use Plan approved in 2008. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10 -11 - PRIORITY 2 Fire &Rescue Station #2B /Apparatus (Route 277} Description: Purchase one- (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22. Capital Cost: $800,000 Justification: This fre and rescue apparatus wi'1 be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East in the Stephens City area of Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Federal KKK- A -1822E specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance. This fire and rescue apparatus is needed due to the fact that the Fire and Rescue Department currently owns one (1) pumper and one (1) ladder truck that are twenty (20) plus years of age and akeady assigned to other functions. The currently owned fire and rescue apparatus would not endure the demands placed on it while being assigned to a high call volume station. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10 -11 F'R�ORI! TY 3 iEou�d 1f 111 ��sr�: �s�ci 1-�csc�e Statlar� (��s) Relc�caElon - Description: This project includes the relocation and building of a 22;000 square foot facility to acconlrnodate ten or mare pieces of .emergency equipment and to House living and sleeping areas for staff. A community center of approximately 10,000. square feet, with a capacity of 400 people, is also planned; it «could be used for fundraising events and other activities_ The project would need a parcel of three to fve acres_ Capital Cost: $4,281,696 .�usti� cation: The existing facility serving the Round Hill -area is 50+ years old and not large enough to accommodate the equipment needed to serve the commercial growth in the Round Hill community. This community includes approximately 9,000 households, two schools, and the Winchester Medical Center. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY � Clearbrook Fire Statioa� ( #13) Relocation Description: At the present time the Clear Brook Vol. Fire &Rescue has outgrown the existing building with the equipment on hand, the call volume, the staffing of 24 hour personnel and the traff c at the existing Iocati.on_ We are proposing a new facility to be located on Rt_ 11 either North or South of Brucetown Road: The building is to be six (6) drive through bays, administration, eating and sleeping facilities along with a dining hall_ The estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 28,000 square feet. This upgrade of the facility will help to provide the needed space for Fire and EMS services for the communuty of Clear Brook. Capital Cost: $4,521,000 .Iustifieation: This project calls for Fire Station #13 to be relocated to an area that has a much safer exit/entrance way. This project will also accommodate the growth in Northeastern Frederick County. The Rt. 11 site also allows for possible growth, if required. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 5 Fire &Rescue Station #23 /New Facility (Crosspointe} Description: This project consists of a 10,000 square foot fire station to acconunodate 4 pieces of emergency equipment, and to house living and sleeping areas for staff. This project could also include satellite offices for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office, Treasurers Office, and Commissioner of Revenue as well as a meeting room for County Supervisor meetings with their constituents with an additional 2000 square feet of building area. A two and %acre parcel should be sufficient for building, parking .and amenities for approximately 20 to 30 persons. The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end ofcurrent Rt_i7 South,�an area of proposed high density residentr.al� �- developn�enf, and. corr�mercial development_ C�pitai Cyst: $2,800,000 _ .fust�c�iiotz: The- proposed Iocation at the South end of Roiite 37 provides for quick and easy access to'Interstate 81 North and South at the 310 Exit. Access and response on Rt 37 will be greatly enhanced from I$1 to Route 50. West in the Northbound Lane. Currently Stephens City and Round Hill Volunteer Fire. and Rescue Company' S serve the area_ This location also provides easy access fo Rt_ 11 and the Kernstown area along with access to Middle Road and Subdivisions of Brookneil, Stonebrook, and Jacksons Woods. These subdivisions have large single family homes in an area of Frederick County outside of the UDA. -Water supplies are scarce in these_ areas and a rapid response from_: this proposed facility will likely reduce property damage from fire and response times for Medical Emergencies. Major collector roads_ such as Tasker Road and Warrior Drive along with the proposed extension of Rt. 37 and new roadways in the development will provide quick access to additional homes and businesses in areas including Front Royal , Pike, Papermill Road..These roadway construction efforts will provide for an increased level of quality emergency service to the citizens in this entire area_ . Construction Schedule_ To be determined_ I'RRI_O�RITY 6 Fire � I2escu� Ji2egianal Training Center I}escription: Construct a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially consisting of an administrative building,; multi -story burn building, multi -story training tower, _ vehicle driving range, shooting range;. -and numerous other training props.. This project will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions located in Clarke County, Frederick County, Shenandoah County, Warren County, Winchester City, State Agencies, Federal Agencies, and potentially jurisdictions within the State of West Virginia. Capital Cost: $29,075,000 .lustification: This project will serve the rapidly growing Northern Shenandoah Valley. One of the main requirements for this project is the aging facilities currently being utilized by Winchester and Frederick County as well as Shenandoah County and the lack of facilities in the other jurisdictions. The need for modern facilities and props to train _ emergency responders and industrial personnel .for response to incidents is becoming more apparent everyday with the increased diversified population, increased number and type of residential complexes; increased number and type of commercial complexes, . increased industrial complexes, increased training requirements of emergency services personnel., and mandated requirements for governments throughout the region. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY l 1 -12 Fire &Rescue Company Capital Proiect Requests Capital Equipment Fire &Rescue — Vehicles &Equipment Description: This new project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County's capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire and rescue companies. Construction Schedule: N/A The following requests have been added to the CIP in no particular order: Individual Fire &Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests. Stephens City Vol. Fire &Rescue Company Technical Rescue Equipment Acquisition Project Cost: $105,000 Greenwood Vol. Fire &Rescue Company Ambulance Replacement Project Project Cost: $150,000 Middletown Vol. Fire &Rescue Company Pumper /Tanker Acquisition Project Cost: $552,000 Ambulance Replacement Project Cost: $200,000 North Mountain Vol. Fire &Rescue Company North Mountain Fire &Rescue Station Modification Project Cost: $315,064 Please see below for the individual requests <$IOOK: Greenwood Vol. Fire &Rescue Company Groundwater Reduction Project Project Cost: $50,000 47