HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 10 2008 Regular Meeting127
A Regular Meeting of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors was held on
Wednesday, December 10, 2008, at 7:15 P.M., in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room,
County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia.
PRESENT
Chairman Richard C. Shickle; Vice-Chairman Gene E. Fisher; Charles S. DeHaven, Jr.;
Gary W. Dove; Bill M. F,wing; Philip A. Lemieux; and Gary A. Lofton.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Shickle called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION
Reverend Daniel Hess, Harvesters of Hope, delivered the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice-Chairman Fisher led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA -APPROVED
County Administrator John R. Riley, Jr., advised there were no changes to the proposed
agenda..
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Supervisor Dove, the Board
approved the agenda as presented.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
CONSENT AGENDA -APPROVED
Administrator Riley offered the following items for the Board's consideration under the
consent agenda:
- Joint Finance Committee Report -Tab H;
- HR Committee Report -Tab I;
- Koad Resolutions -The Guards, Section I & II; Raven Pointe Subdivision, Section 6;
and Route 1000 Arbor Court -Tab T.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Vice-Chairman Fisher, the Board
approved the consent agenda.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
128
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Lwing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
CITIZEN CCIMMENTS
Sortis Pappas, Gainesboro District, appeared before the Board regarding the proposed --
PATH line. He stated that his property was affected by the proposed line and he was interested
in knowing:
- Why was original route changed?
- If power too the east is critical, why was a power plant near Alexandria shut down?
He went on to say the power from this proposed line would go to Maryland and Frederick
County would get rio benefits, but would pay the cost through lower property values. He
concluded by saying we should not have to bear this burden.
Julia Moss, Gainesboro District, appeared before the Board regarding the proposed
PATH linc. She read the following statement:
"With the southern and of our county being ripped and scarred by TRAIL may I inquire as to
why the northern part of the county must be as well?
The entire state of West Virginia benefits tremendously from their coal and energy industry.
Here are some facts from West Virginia's Office of Miner's Health, Safety, and Training:
The West Virginia coal industry provides WV with 40, 000 direct jobs. "faxes paid by the coal
industry and by utility companies that make electricity using WV coal account for two-thirds of
business taxes paid in West Virginia. The coal industry pays approx. $70 million in property
taxes to WV annually. 1'he Coal Severance 7'ax adds approx. $214 million to WV and even non-
coal producing counties receive Coal Severance Tax funds. The coal industry payroll is nearly
$2 billion per year. Coal is responsible for more than $3.5 billion annually in gross state
product of West Virginia.
Berkeley and Morgan counties bosh passed resolutions against PATH. Allegheny spokesman
Todd Meyers and Allen Staggers have both stated that input from county commissions and
citizens protesting were reasons the route has been relocated out oj' Berkeley and Morgan
counties (and therej'ore across Frederick County, Virginia).
Additionally, West Virginia has been quite adept in extracting perks' for themselves when it
comes to dealing with Allegheny Power. For example, according to the Charleston Gazette, in
order to approve the TRAIL project, West Virginia property owners who ware affected by that
project will receive a credit on their first 12, 000 kilowatts of power they use each year (that is
roughly equivalent to what the average homeowner uses annually). No such deal for Virginia
property owners. Also, Allegheny promised to move a transmissions operations center to West
Virginia, and to save customers (in WV) more than $40 million in industry rate reductions, low-
income assistance, and conservation plans, and deferments oj'rate hikes to fund the transmission
line construction. And for Virginia?????
If the state of West Virginia wants the income and jobs,from the coal industry then they can live
with the power linos that come with that state's industry. The other residents oj' West Virginia
have no right to force the PATH lines info Virginia at all. What will be left of our county if it is
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
129
parceled up for the profit of others? "
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS
Supervisor llove stated he was glad to sec the Board consider a resolution regarding the
proposed PATH line.
MINUTES-APPROVED
Upon a motion by Supervisor Dove, seconded by Supervisor Lofton, the Board approved
the minutes from the November 12, 2008 regular meeting.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Ayc
Upon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Vice-Chairman Fisher, the Board
approved the minutes from November 19, 2008 budget worksession.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
COUNTY OFFICIALS
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
APPOINTMENT OF LEEANNA PYLES AND GAIL MILLER AS FREDERICK
COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES TO THE REGION 2 PREPAREDNESS
ADVISOKY COMMITTEE FOR INTEROPEKABILITY (REGION 2 RPAC 1)
APPROVED
Upon a motion by Supervisor Dove, seconded by Vice-Chairman Fisher, the Board
appointed LeeArma Pyles as Frederick County's primary member and Gail Miller as the alternate
to the Region 2 Preparedness Advisory Committee for Interoperability (Region 2 RPAC-1).
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Ayc
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
130
APPOINTMENT OF GARY E. LONGERBEAM AS BACK CREEK DISTRICT
REPRESENTATIVE TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION -
APPROVED
Supervisor Lofton began by commending Robert S. Hartman for his service on the Parks
and Recreation Commission and stated Mr. IIartman did not wish to be reappointed.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lofton, seconded by Supervisor Ewing, the Board
appointed Gary E. Longerbeam as the Back Creek representative to the Parks and Recreation
Commission. This is a four year appointment, said term to commence January 17, 2009 and
expire January 17, 2013.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofl:on Aye
REAPPOINTMENT OF RHODA W. KRIZ AS MEMBER-AT-LARGE TO THE
HISTORIC RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD -APPROVED
Upon a motion by Supervisor Dove, seconded by Supervisor DelIaven, the Board
reappointed Rhoda W. Kriz as Member-At-Large to the Historic Resources Advisory Board.
This is a four year appointment, said term to commence January 12, 2009 and expire January 12,
2013.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Ayc
Gary A. Lofton Aye
REAPPOINTMENT OF JOHN R. RILF.Y, JR. AS A FREDERICK COUNTY
REPRESENTATIVE TO THE NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY
REGIONAL COMMISSION -APPROVED
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Supervisor Dove, the Board
reappointed John R.. Riley, Jr. as a Frederick County representative to the Northern Shenandoah
Valley Regional Commission, said term to commence January 11, 2009 and expire January 11,
2012.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12!10/08
131
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
RECOGNITION OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT RECEIVING AWARD FOR
DISTINGUISHED BUDGET PRESENTATION FROM THE GOVERNMENT
- FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (GFOA)
Administrator Riley advised this was the 25~h consecutive year Frederick County has
received this award and he commended Finance Director Cheryl Shiffler and her staff for this
accomplishment.
The Board also congratulated Director Shiffler and her staff on receiving this award.
REQUEST FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE FOR REFUND
APPROVED
Administrator Riley advised this was a request from the Commissioner of the Revenue to
authorize the 'treasurer to refund L & H Trucking, Inc. the amount of $2,681.49 for overpayment
of personal property taxes after apportionment and proration due to the sale of vehicles. He went
on to say the County Attorney has reviewed the request and the refund is appropriate.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved the refund request.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
RESOLUTION (#031-OS) RE• CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED "PATH" 765
KILOVOLT TRANSMISSION LINE -APPROVED
Administrator Riley read a draft resolution regarding the construction of the proposed
"PATH" 765-kilovolt transmission line prepared by staff for the Board's consideration.
Supervisor llove stated the proposed line comes through his district. He went on to say if
we continue to allow these lines to be run through the county then the power company will do it
at will. He liked the proposed resolution, but felt the wording should be stronger. He then
offered changes to the proposed resolution.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Dove, seconded by Supervisor Lemieux, the Board
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting or 12/10/08
132
approved the resolution opposing construction of the proposed "PATH" 765-kilovolt.
transmission line in Frederick County.
WHEREAS, in September 2007 PJM directed construction of $1.8 billion in electric
rran~mission upgrades in the PJM region; and
WHEREAS, said upgrades include a 250 mile,
from a substation in southwestern Wand; and inia tc
Maryland located near Frederick, Mary
765-kilovolt transmission line extending
a proposed substation in Kemptown,
line is proposed to pass through northern Frederick
WHEREAS, this Board and its constituents have concerns relative to the impact and
benefit of this proposal on Frederick County; and
WHEREAS, this Board and its constituents oppose locating the proposed "PATH" 765-
kilovolt transmission sine through Frederick County to serve areas to the east.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors strongly encourages Allegheny Power and all of those entities involved in the
location and construction of this 765-kilovolt transmission line to perform their due diligence in
this project and make known the need and justification to Frederick County; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that should the need for the improvement be justified,
the Frederick County Board of Supervisors strongly encourages Allegheny Power to implement
improvements to the local electrical distribution system so that planned land uses within the
County would benefit from this significant high-voltage transmission line construction project.
WHEREAS, said transmission
County scarring our rural area; and
ADOPTED this 10`" day of December, 2008.
Chairman Shickle stated he was concerned with two lines coming through Frederick
County and the perceived benefits were not apparent to him. He went on to say we get nothing
but the impact of the lines.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove AYe
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
LW ~ULV il.Vlr fhV JG-VO AV ia.v ~.~---- ~ - --
FOR FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY -APPROVED W1T
CONDITIONS
Administrator Riley read the following resolution for the Board's consideration:
WHEREAS, the National Guard has been an important part of the Winchester/Frederick
County Community; and
WHEREAS, the National Guard's existing facility along Millwood Avenue could no
longer accommodate the personnel and equipment needed to outfit the local guard unit; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Military Affairs desired to construct a new National
Guard Armory in the area; and
Minute Buok Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/]0108
133
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, Department of Military
Affairs, and various elected officials worked in partnership to ensure the National Guard Armory
would locate within the boundaries of Frederick County; and
WHEREAS, water and sanitary sewer connections are needed for the construction of the
new National Guard Armory facility located on Coverstone Drive; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) can provide said
connections to the National Guard facility at a cost of $140,639.00; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors hereby reduces the principal of the outstanding loan between the County and the
Frederick County Sanitation Authority by $140,639.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority shall waive
the water and sanitary sewer connection fees associated with the construction of the new
National Guard Armory and shall provide water and sanitary sewer service to the site.
ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2008.
Chairman Shickle wondered why two meters were needed for this project.
Administrator Riley responded that stafCcould look into that issue.
Supervisor DeHaven asked what budgeted in the project for connection fees.
Administrator Riley responded he was told $10,000.
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Vice-Chairman Fisher, the Board
approved the reduction in loan principal in the minimum amount necessary to complete the job
and for the $10,000 budget for this project to be used towards the total cost.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
COMMITTEE REPORTS
FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT -APPROVED
The Finance Committee met in the First Floor Conference Room at 107 North Kent
Street on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 8:00 a.m. Member Richie Wilkins was absent.
Items 3, 6, and 9 were approved under consent agenda.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved items 3, 6, and 9 under the consent agenda.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of l2/10/O8
134
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewin€; Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
1. The Coutlty Attorney will present his review of the County's real property tax
exemption program. See attached information, p. 1-9. The committee recommends forwarding
this item to the Code & Ordinance Committee.
2. The County Administrator requests a General Fund budget transfer in the amount of
$29,400. This amount represents funds needed for the renewal of the county's e-Civis Grants
Network service and is requested to be transferred from the operational contingency line item.
See attached memo, 'p. 10-11. The committee recommends approval. -Approved.
Upon a motion by Supervisor F,wing, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved the above request by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Nay
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
3. The Superintendent of Parks requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in
the amount of $3,027_04. This amount represents an insurance reimbursement and is requested
to be appropriated to the Repair and Maintenance -Vehicle line item. No local funds required.
See attached memo, p. 12-14. -Approved Under Consent Agenda.
4. The Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation requests a General Fund supplemental
appropriation in the amount of $12,000. This amount is for the installation of two aerators in
Sherando Park lake and is requested from the Proffer Fund. See attached memo, p. 15-17. The
committee recommends postponement of this item until alternate funding sources have been
investigated. The committee also recommends the proffer policy be reviewed to clarify the use
of proffer funds for items not on the CIP.
5. The Conservation Easement Authority requests a General Fund supplemental
appropriation in the amount of $265,000. This amount represents a carry forward of funds
earmarked for the VDACS Office of Farmland Preservation's Purchase of llevelopment Rights
program. See attached memo, p. 18-19. 'fhe committee recommends approval of the carry
forward and for the funds to be restricted. Expenditures are required to come before the
committee. -Approved
Upon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved the above request by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
6. The Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center requests a NRADC supplemental
appropriation in the amount of $770. This amount represents a reimbursement from 1CE and is
requested to be appropriated to Professional Services. No local funds required. See attached
memo, p. 20. -Approved Under Consent Agenda.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
135
7. The NRADC Superintendent requests a NRADC supplemental appropriation in the
amount of $65.000. This amount represents funding for replacement of the Jail Automated
Building Maintenance System and is requested to be appropriated from Unreserved Fund
Balance. See attached memo, p. 21. The committee recommends approval. -Approved.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved the above request by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
--- Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
8. The Director of the Winchester Regional Airport requests an Airport Capital Fund
supplemental appropriation in the amount of $1 837 500. This amount represents a carry
forward for various capital projects that were not completed in FY 2008. See attached memo, p.
22. The committee recommends approval. -Approved.
iJpon a motion by Supervisor Ewing, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved the above request by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
_ Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
9. The Finance Committee requests a General Fund supplemental appropriation in the
amount of $2.950. This amount represents adjustments to salaries to reflect the amounts being
paid for Lord Fairfax Soil & Water Conservation District employees. No local funds required. -
Approved Under Consent Agenda.
***Information Only***
1. The Finance Director provides a fund balance report.
There was a joint budget worksession with the Board of Supervisors immediately following
the Finance Committee meeting.
JOINT FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT -APPROVED UNDER CONSENT
AGENDA
The Joint Finance Committee met on Wednesday, November 19, 2006 at 10:00 A.M., in
the Board of Supervisors Meeting Room, County Administration Building, 107 North Kent
Street, Winchester, Virginia. Present were Chairman Richard Shickle, Frederick County
representative; Bill M. Ewing, Frederick County representative; Charley Gaynor, City of
Winchester representative; and Jeffrey Beuttner, City of Winchester representative. Others
present were: Supervisor Philip A. Lemieux; Brannon Godfrey, City Manager; John R. Riley,
Jr., County Administrator; Mary Blowe, Finance Director, City of Winchester; Cheryl Shiffler,
Finance Director, Frederick County; and Natalie Wills, Director of the Frederick-Winchester
Convention and Visitors Bureau.
Chairman Shickle called the meeting to order.
***For Information Only***
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
136
Natalie Wills presented justification for increased funding based on the activity of the
visitors' center, increases revenues generated by lodging tax, and the current funding formula
outlined by the Memorandum of Understanding. Ms. Willis stated at a minimum the visitors'
center needs an increase of $68,000 (i.e. $34,000 from each locality) to maintain some marketing
activity; ideally the marketing budget should be funded closest to the level of the existing MOU,
which would be an increase of $128,000 or $64,000 for each locality. Without these increases
Ms. Wills indicated that the visitors' center would not be able to remain open seven (7) days a
week.
Mr. Lemieux indicated that since he was the liaison to the Convention and Visitors'
Bureau from the Board of Supervisors it was important to emphasize the role the CVB plays in
the local economy; however, he did understand that based upon the current state of the economy
it may not be feasible to provide and increase at this time.
Chairman Shickle complimented the CVB on the job they had done, but stated now was
not the time to be granting an increase. He did however encourage them to come back before the
committee to make known their requests and the progress that they were making.
The Committee directed the City Manager and the County Administrator to look at the
current MOU and to recommend changes in the structure of the document that more accurately
reflect current funding.
On a motion made by Mr. Gaynor, seconded by Mr. Ewing, the Committee voted not to
increase funding to the Convention and Visitors' Bureau at this time.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
HR COMMITTEE REPORT -APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA
The HR Committee met on Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. with the following
people present: Bill F,wing, Philip Farley, and John R. Riley, Jr. Gary Lofton was not present.
The following information was shared with the committee:
***For Information Only***
Our current Parks and Recreation Director is anticipating retirement; therefore, Jason
Robertson, Assistant Director, will be appointed Interim Director for a period of time. Should
Jason perform duties at the expectations of the County Administrator, Mr. Robertson will be
appointed Director of the department at that time.
Committee went into closed session pursuant to Virginia Code §2.2-3711; subsection A
(1) to interview prospective Fire Chief candidates for employment.
No other business was discussed.
Thank you.
LANDFILL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE REPORT -APPROVED
The Landfill Oversight Committee met on Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 8:00 a.m.
All committee members were present. The following items were discussed:
***Item Requiring Action***
1. Review of Proposed Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Budget -Approved Reduction In
Municipal Tipping Fee From $24 to $12 Per Ton Retroactive to July 1, 2008.
Prior to discussing the fiscal Year 2009/2010 budget, the staff presented a proposal to
reduce the current municipal tipping fee from $24 to $12 per ton retroactive to July 1, 2008. This
action would result in a rebate to the three (3) jurisdictions for the first six (6) months of the
current Fiscal Year 2008/2009. The reduced tipping fee of $12 per ton would be extended
through the proposed Fiscal Year 2009/2010 budget. Staff indicated that this reduction can be
tolerated because of the current landfill reserve amount (approximately $32,500,000) and the
anticipated additional revenue resulting from the gas/electric generation project.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
137
After discussing this reduction at length, a motion was made by Tim Coyne and seconded
by Stan Crockett to endorse the municipal tipping fee reduction from $24 to $12 per ton
retroactive to July 1, 2008. All committee members except Gary Dove voted to approve the
motion.
Staff presented the proposed Fiscal Year 2009/2010 budget for information only. In
addition to the proposed reduction in the municipal tipping fee, the budget will include a five (5)
dollar per ton rebate proportionately distributed to each jurisdiction. 1t is intended that this
rebate be applied to recycling and/or other solid waste applications within the three (3)
jurisdictions. The proposed budget includes a reduction of four (4) staff positions because of the
anticipated continuing reduction in waste flow. Also, capital projects have been limited to
improvements to the landfill entrance and an excavation contract in advance of the next CDD
cell ($850,000).
Upon a motion by Supervisor Dove, seconded by Supervisor Lemieux, the Board
approved the reduction in the tipping fee through Fiscal Year 2009/2010.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Nay
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
***Items Not Requiring Action***
1. Proposed Land Exchange at Landfill Entrance
T'he staff presented a proposal to exchange landfill property for an approximate 0.4 acre
parcel owned by the Odd Fellows Organization located east and adjacent to the landfill entrance
road. The proposed landfill property is located immediately east of an additional Odd Fellows
property and will be approximately equal to the 0.4 acre parcel. The acquisition of the parcel
adjacent to the entrance will allow the staff to greatly improve the site distance and safety at the
intersection with Sulphur Spring Road. The committee unanimously approved this proposal.
2. Update on Projects
a. Leachate Force Main: The design of the new leachate force main has been
completed and advertised for bid. Bids will be received on December 16, 2008.
Permanent easements have been obtained on all affected properties except two (2)
small parcels adjacent to the landfill entrance. F,fforts are currently being made to
obtain temporary easements from the new owner of these properties (Odd Fellow
Organization). Aland exchange and boundary line adjustments will ultimately be
employed to resolve this remaining issue.
b. Greenhouse Uas: The greenhouse gas contract has been executed by all parties.
The improvements required by the contract have been installed resulting in a
substantial increase in gas production from approximately 200 efm to
approximately 900 efm. Effective combustion of these gasses generates
approximately $20 per hour of revenue for destroyed CO2 equivalents.
c. Electric Generation: The staff anticipates completing the plans for the gas to
electric on or before January 1, 2009. It is anticipated that the two (2), one (1)
megawatt generators will be generating electricity from landfill gas within
eighteen months after awarding a construction contract. Staff is currently
reviewing contracts for the future sale of the electricity generated from this gas.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
138
d. New Scalehouse: The design plans for the new Scalehouse and dual scales have
been completed. It is anticipated that this contract will be advertised during the
first week in December 2008.
3. Use of Riley Farm
"fhe Landfill Manager, Mr. Steve Frye, presented a plan to contract with a local farmer to
plant a portion of the Riley farm in a row crop for two or three years with the ultimate goal of
establishing a long term reliably hay crop. This action would reduce the staff's maintenance of
the property in the form of periodic mowing and control of nuisance weeds. The land proposed
for farming does not include future clay borrow areas.
4. Debris Management Plan
The landfill staff has requested a proposal from our landfill consultant, SCS F,ngineers, to
prepare a debris management plan to encompass the landfill's service area. The completion of
this plan will require the cooperation of the three (3) municipalities served by the landfill.
Specifically, each municipality will be required to locate sites that can be used to temporarily
store debris resulting from a region wide catastrophic event such as a flood, hurricane, or
tornado. The prcpa~-ation of this plan will also include a hauling contract that can be executed in
the event of an emergency.
5. Stone Hauling
The landfill staff has established a practice of initiating a contract to purchase and haul
stone for use as a leaehate collection media well in advance of landfill cell development. This
practice has allowed us to realize lower development costs as well as minimize construction
delays. We currently have enough stone stockpiled onsite to accommodate the next
construction/demolition debris (CDD) cell development. We do not anticipate developing the
next municipal solid waste cell for at least five (5) years. ITowever, because of the current
downturn in the economy and the lower fuel prices, the staff recommends that we consider
soliciting bids in the current budget year to furnish leachate collection stone in the amount of
60,000 tons. Even though this project is not included in the current budget, we believe that a
substantial savings could be realized. Funding for this purc(ase has been considered in the
landfill's reserve account. The committee unanimously approved this approach with the
stipulation that the bid results be reviewed by them prior to awarding a contract.
CODE AND ORDINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT -APPROVED
The Code & Ordinance Committee met on Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 10:30 A.M.,
in the First Floor Conference Room, Board of Supervisors Meeting Room, County
Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. Present were chairman of
the committee Supervisor Philip A. Lemieux, Supervisor Gary A. Lofton, Stephen G. Butler and
Michael L. Bryan. Also present County Administrator John R. Kiley, Jr.; Deputy County
Administrator lay E. Tibbs; Treasurer C. William Orndoff, Jr.; Ellen Murphy, Commissioner of
the Revenue; Major Rob Eckman, Sheriffs Department; and Roderick Williams, County
Attorney.
The committee submits the following:
***Items Requiring Board Action***
1. Proposed Amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 158, Vehicles and
Traffic, Article I, General Provisions; Addition of new Section 158-3.1, Use of
Photo-Monitoring Systems to Enforce Traffic Signals; Penalty; to Allow the Use
of a Photo-Red Enforcement System.
The Committee discussed a proposed amendment to Chapter 158, Vehicles and 'T'raffic,
Frederick County Code. This proposed amendment would enable the County to implement and
utilize aPhoto-Red Enforcement System at a future date. Upon a motion by Mr. Lofton,
seconded by Mr.:Bryan, the Committee unanimously recommended approval of the proposed
amendment and forwarded this item to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing. (See
Attachment.)
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
139
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lemieux, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board sent
this item forward for public hearing.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Nay
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Nay
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Nay
2. Proposed Amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 158, Vehicles and
Traffic, Article I, General Provisions; Section 158-1, State Uniform Traffic Code
Adopted; to Modify this Section to Correspond More Closely with the Section
Titles in Title 46Z of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended.
The Committee discussed proposed amendments to Chapter 158, Vehicles and Traffic,
Frederick County Code. The proposed amendment permits the Sheriff's Department to cite
certain moving violations as a county offense. Upon a motion by Mr. Bryan, seconded by Mr.
Butler, the Committee unanimously recommended approval of the proposed amendment and
forwarded this item to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing. (See Attachment.)
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lemieux, seconded by Supervisor Lofton, the Board sent
this item forward for public hearing.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
3. Proposed Amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155, Taxation,
Article III, Senior Citizens and Disabled Persons Exemption; to Amend this
Section to Correspond More Closely with the Code of Virginia Article 2,
Chapter 32 of Title 58.1.
The Committee discussed proposed amendments to Chapter 155, Taxation, Frederick
County Code. The proposed amendments would bring this chapter into conformance with the
State Code, allows relief to be extended on a pro rata basis to eligible multiple co-owners of a
property, and includes provision for tax deferral in lieu of or in addition to the exemption. Upon
a motion by Mr. Bryan, seconded by Mr. Butler, the Committee unanimously recommended
approval of the proposed amendment and forwarded this item to the Board of Supervisors for
public hearing. (See Attachment.)
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lemieux, seconded by Supervisor Ewing, the Board sent
this item forward for public hearing.
"fhe above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
140
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
4. Proposed Amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 155, Taxation,
Article XV, Assessment and Equalization of Real Estate; Board of Equalization;
Appeals; to Modify this Section to Create a New Article XV to Allow for
Biennial Reassessment of Real Estate in the County.
The Committee discussed proposed amendments to Chapter 155, Taxation, Frederick
County Code. The proposed amendments would provide for a biennial reassessment of all real
estate in the County and the appointment of the Board of Equalization. Upon a motion by Mr.
Lofton, seconded by Mr. Bryan, the Committee unanimously recommended approval of the
proposed amendment and forwarded this item to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing.
(See Attachment.)
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lemieux, seconded by Supervisor Lofton, the Board sent
this item forward for public hearing.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
5. Proposed Amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 158, Vehicles and
Traffic, Article III, County Vehicle Licenses; to Modify this Section to
Discontinue the Issuance of the County Motor Vehicle License Decal.
The Committee discussed proposed amendments to Chapter 158, Vehicles and 'Traffic,
Frederick County Code. The proposed amendments would eliminate county vehicle license
decals. The annual fee for County vehicle license would remain the same. Upon a motion by
Mr. Bryan, seconded by Mr. Lofton, the Committee unanimously recommended approval of the
proposed amendment and forwarded this item to the Board of Supervisors for public hearing.
(See Attachment.)
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lemieux, seconded by Supervisor Lofton, the Board sent
this item forward for public hearing.
The about motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Ayc
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT -APPROVED
The Transportation Committee met on November 24, 2008 at 8:30 a.m.
Members Present
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
Members Absent
141
Chuck DeHaven (voting)
Dave Burleson (voting)
James Racey (voting)
Phil Lemieux (voting)
George Kriz (liaison PC)
Gary Oates (liaison PC)
Lewis Boyer (liaison Stephens City)
Mark Davis (liaison Middletown)
***Items Requiring Action***
1. I-81 Corridor Coalition
Frederick County has recently been approached to join the I-81 corridor coalition. "Phis
coalition is an attempt to mirror the I-95 coalition in terms of a multistate initiative to bring
federal attention to the needs of the corridor. The primary purpose of the coalition is to
coordinate the solutions developed by the six states along the corridor and to protect the interests
of the localities along the corridor. Staff noted that the organizing meeting of the coalition
determined that the coalition would not be lobbying for additional funding for the roadway.
Staff also noted that, while disagreeing with the principle, the coalition has potential to benefit
the communities along the I-8l corridor.
The Committee discussed the coalition and had some questions regarding VDOT staffing
of the effort. Staff noted that the State DOT's along the corridor have committed staff to the
effort and it would not require additional staffing at the local level. Staff also agreed to follow
up with VDOT to determine the individual who will be working with the coalition and to verify
that additional workload would not be placed upon our local VDOT partners.
The Committee unanimously recommended that the Board approve Frederick County's
participation in the I-81 Corridor Coalition, pending acceptable responses to the questions noted
above.
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Supervisor Lemieux, the Board
approved joining the I-81 Corridor Coalition.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
*** Items Not Requiring Action***
1. Agenda Format
The Committee resolved to go to a paperless agenda and asked that staff communicate
that to all the recipients of the Transportation Committee agenda, along with the offer of a paper
copy to all of those who may have difficulty receiving the agenda electronically.
2. Transportation Component -Development Impact Model
Staff presented preliminary outputs from the new transportation component of the
Development Impact Model (attached).
Discussion among the Committee covered how this model component would relate to the
impacts being discussed in the rural areas of the County. Staff noted that the only impact fee that
the County is currently enabled for in the rural areas is transportation, and that the legislation
dictating how those fees are calculated is very specific. Staff also noted that the legislature has
asked that localities not proceed with that impact fee while Richmond continues to work on the
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting oT 12/10/08
142
program.
Committee members also noted that aper-trip fee might be more accurate and that they
would like to get input from the Development Impact Model Oversight Committee before
forwarding a recommendation to the Board.
3. Route 522 Realignment Review
The Committee reviewed potential modifications to the Route 522 realignment area brought
forth by Greenway Engineering. It was noted that the outcome of the pending rezoning of the
Governor's Hill development could significantly impact the benefits of any alterations. It was
also noted that much additional study would be needed of the traffic.
4. T1A Standards
Staff distributed an updated draft of the proposed County TIA Standards (attached).
Committee members noted that this was by far the best draft to date and asked staff to continue
meeting with the private sector on the standards and to add the issue to the Planning Commission
retreat agenda to allow for discussion by the PC and Board before sending it forward.
5. Other
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION (#033-081 CONCERNING THE
EXTENSION OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE HELD BY
COMCAST OF CALIFORNIA/MARYLAND/PENNSYLVANIA/ViRGINIA/-
WEST VIRGINIA LLC FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERMITTING THE COUNTY
AND THE FRANCHISEE TO COMPLETE RENEWAL DISCUSSIONS -
COMCAST'S CURRENT CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
WITH THE COUNTY EXPIRES ON DECEMBER 19 2008. THE COUNTY IS
CURRENTLY NEGOTIATING A RENEWED FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
WITH COMCAST BUT THOSE NEGOTIATIONS WILL NOT BE COMPLETE
PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE CURRENT AGREEMENT. THE
PROPOSED RESOLUTION WOULD EXTEND THE CURRENT FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT FOR AN INTERIM PERIOD TO ALLOW THE COUNTY AND
COMCAST TO COMPLETE THEIR NEGOTIATIONS. -APPROVED
Assistant County Administrator Kris Tierney appeared before the Board regarding this
item. He advised staff has been working with the law firm of Miller and Van Eaton to negotiate
a new franchise agreement with Comcast. He went on to say while negotiations are nearly
complete; it has become apparent a finalized agreement will not be in place prior to the
expiration of the term of the current agreement. 'fhe proposed resolution would extend the
termination date for a period of four (4) months, from December 19, 2008 through April 19,
2009. He concluded by saying Comcast has agreed to this extension.
Supervisor Lofton asked if the negotiations could be brought to conclusion by April 19,
2009.
Assistant Administrator Tierney responded that he hoped so. He went on to say Comcast
has been slow to respond to various issues, but he was confident negotiations could be wrapped
up in four months.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
143
Supervisor DeHaven asked that Mr. Tierney share his concerns with Comcast on the need
for two way communications. He went on to say it should not take this long to complete the
agreement.
Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing.
There were no public comments.
Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing.
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Supervisor Fisher, the Board
approved the resolution.
WHEREAS, on December 20, 1993, Frederick County, Virginia (the `'County"), granted
a cable television franchise (the "Franchise") to Central Virginia Cable, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the Franchise is now held by Comcast of
California/Maryland/Pennsylvania/Virginia/West Virginia, LLC (the "Franchisee"); and
WHEREAS, the Franchise expires on December 19, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Franchisee have been engaged in discussions
concerning the renewal of the Franchise and those discussions are nearly complete; and
WHEREAS, the County wishes to extend the term of the Franchise to allow time for the
parties to complete negotiations; and
WHEREAS, the Franchisee has consented to the proposed extension of the Franchise;
and
WHEREAS, the County and the Franchisee both desire to reserve their respective rights
under state and federal law, including, without limitation, 47 U.S.C. § 546.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the term of the Franchise is hereby
extended until April 19, 2009.
This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. F,wing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Ayc
Gary A. Lofton Aye
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PUBLIC HF,ARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #10-08 FOR ADAM
ARKFELD, FOR A COTTAGE OCCUPATION - MOTELBED & BREAKFAST
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 250 SISTER CHIPMUNK LANE AND IS
IDENTIFIED WITH PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBF,R 34-A-98 IN THE
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. -APPROVED
Zoning Administrator Mark Cheran appeared before the Board regarding this item. IIe
Minu[e Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
144
advised the property is located at 250 Sister Chipmunk Lane in the Stonewall Magisterial District
and is zoned RA (Rura.l Areas) District. This is an application for a bed and breakfast. This use
is allowed in the RA District with an approved conditional use permit. The proposed bed and
breakfast will have three (3) bedrooms and will take place on the 58 acre parcel. The nearest
structure from this proposed use is 150 feet away. There will be no employees other than those
residing on-site. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the following
conditions:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. Any proposed business sign shall conform to the cottage occupation sign
requirements and not exceed four-square feet in size.
3. No more than three bedrooms and six guests allowed with this bed and breakfast use.
4. No other on-site activities will be associated with this bed and breakfast.
5. Any expansion or modifications will require a new conditional use permit.
6. Allowance for aone-time Chamber of Commerce Social on site in the Spring of
2009.
Supervisor DeHaven asked if condition number 4 eliminates other uses on the site.
Lvning Administrator Cheran responded yes.
Supervisor Lofton asked if the road maintenance agreement had been signed by
everyone.
Adam Arkfeld, applicant, responded no. He said there was one signature left; however,
that individual has been given the opportunity to respond but has not done so.
Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing.
There were no public comments.
Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing.
Supervisor DeHaven began by saying he had a problem with rural subdivisions being
constructed with covenants which do not apply uniformly to all lots. He "reluctantly" moved to
approve Conditional Use Permit #10-08, but would not be hesitant to pull the permit if there
were complaints.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Lofton.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Ayc
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
145
PUBLIC HEARNG -ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -CHAPTER 165 ZONING
ARTICLE X, BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT X165 82 DISTRICT USE
REGULATIONS; 5165-83 DIMENSIONAL AND INTENSITY REQUIREMENTS
CHAPTER 165 ZONING ARTICLE IV SUPPLEMENTARY USE
REGULATIONS, &165-27 OFF-STREET PARKING• &165 29 MOTOR VEHICLE
- ACCESS; 5165-31 PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES 165 37
BUFFER AND SCREENING REOUIREMENTS• 165 47 LANDFILLS
JUNKYARDS TRASH DISPOSAL AND INOPERABLE VEHICLES• CHAPTER
165, ZONING, ARTICLE XVIII, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN X165 133
WHEN REpUIRED• AND &165-141 CONTENTS OF PRELIMINARY MASTFR
DEVELOPMENT PLANS. REVISION TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW ZONING DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT
THE MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL/OFFICE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN AND REVISIONS TO ADD NEW
SECONDARY USE, STANDARDS - APPROVED
Senior Planner Candice Perkins appeared before the Board regarding this item. She
advised that staff has becn working on a new zoning district intended to implement the new
Route 277 Land Use Plan. This district would implement the mixed-use industrial/office land
use classification of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. This new district will not affect any of the
existing commercial and industrial districts in the county. In addition, design and development
standards will be introduced with this new ordinance. She concluded by saying the Planning
Commission recommended approval.
Supervisor DeHaven applauded the work the committee and staff have done on this
proposal. He asked if there have been discussions regarding secondary residential uses.
Senior Planner Perkins responded those uses were not permitted in the district.
Supervisor DeHaven stated he was supportive of the concept that people should be able
to live close to where they work.
Chairman Shickle asked if the Board would see tweaks to this proposal as text or
ordinance amendments.
Senior Planner Perkins responded changes would come in the form of 'Coning Ordinance
text amendments.
Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing.
There were no public comments.
Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing.
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Vice-Chairman Fisher, the Board
approved the revisions to the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, an ordinance to amend Chapter 165, Zoning, Article X, Business and
Industrial District, § 165-82 District use regulations; § 165-83 Dimensional and intensity
requirements; Chapter 165, 7_oning Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, §165-26
Accessory Uses; § 165-27 Off-street parking; § 165-29 Motor vehicle access; § 165-31 Protection
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
146
of environmental features; §165-37 Buffer and screening requirements; §165-47 Landfills,
junkyards, trash disposal and inoperable vehicles; Chapter 165, Zoning, Article XVIII, Master
Development Plan, §165-133 When required; and §165-141 Contents of preliminary master
development plans, was considered by the Planning Commission and the Development Review
and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) during their regularly scheduled meetings; and
WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS)
recommended approval of this amendment on August 28, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on November 5, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on December 10, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the adoption of this
ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in good zoning
practice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1'1 ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors that Chapter 165, Zoning, Article X, Business and Industrial District, §165-82
District use regulations; §165-83 Dimensional and intensity requirements; Chapter 165, Zoning
Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, § 165-26 Accessory Uses; § 165-27 Off-street
parking; § 165-29 Motor vehicle access; § 165-31 Protection of environmental features; § 165-37
Buffer and screening requirements; § 165-47 Landfills, junkyards, trash disposal and inoperable
vehicles; Chapter 165, Zoning, Article XVIII, Master Development Plan, §165-133 When
required; and §165-141 Contents of preliminary master development plans are amended. This
amendment is amended as described on the attachments.
§ 165-26. Secoudary or Accessory uses.
When permitted secondary or accessory uses that are normally or typically found in association _u
with the allowed primary use shall be allowed on the same parcel or lot as the primary use.
Secondary uses shall meet the requirements of this section as well as any particular standard
imposed on such use.
A. Agricultural accessory uses. The selling or processing of agricultural products
produced on the premises shall be considered to be accessory to an agricultural use.
On bona fide, operating farms, temporary or permanent housing for workers actively
working on the farm shall be an allowed accessory use.
B. Accessory dwellings. One accessory dwelling shall be allowed with any single-family
dwelling as long as the following conditions are met:
(1) The floor area of the accessory dwelling shall be no more than 25% of the gross
floor area of the primary residential structure on the lot.
(2) In the RP Residential Performance, MHl Mobile Home Community and R4
Residential Planned Community Districts, accessory dwellings shall only be
allowed if they are attached to the primary residential structure.
(3) In no case shall a mobile home be allowed as an accessory dwelling in the RP
Residential Performance District. R4 Residential Planned Community District
and RS Residential Kecreational Community District. [Amended 6-9-1993]
C. Dwellings in a business. One accessory dwelling shall be allowed with any business or
industrial use only so long as it is occupied by the owner of the business or industry, an
employee or a watchman.
D. Child day-care services. Child day-care services and facilities shall be allowed in the M1
Light Industrial District as an accessory use to any allowed use or group of allowed uses
in an industrial park. [Added 8-8-1990]
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Kegular Meeting of 12/10/08
147
E. In no case shall a mobile home or temporary trailer be allowed as an accessory use,
unless it is used for temporary or permanent housing on a bona fide, operating farm.
[Added 6-9-1993]
F. Secondary Uses in the BI, B2 and 83Districts. The square footage or area occupied
by secondary uses cumulatively shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the gross
floor area of the related principal use. In the B3 District no more than fifteen (1 S)
percent of the gross floor area of the principal use may be used for accessory retail
sales and in no case shall the accessory retailing component exceed 2,000 square feet
The square footage devoted to accessory retail sales shall be included in calculating
the 25 percent limit on secondary uses.
G. Secondary Uses in the OM, MI and M2 Districts. The square footage or area
occupied by secondary uses cumulatively shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent
of the gross floor area of the related principal use. Retail as an accessory use
shall not be permitted in the OM Park, MI or M2 Districts.
ARTICLE X
Business and Industrial Zoning Districts
§ 165-82. District use Regulations.
D. Office-Manufacturing (OM) Park District. The intent of this district is to implement the
mixed use industriaUoffzce land use classification of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The
OM Park District is designed to provide areas for research and development centers,
office parks, and minimal impact industrial and assembly uses. Uses are allowed which
do not create noise, smoke, dust or other hazards. This district shall be located in a
campus like atmosphere near major transportation facilities.
Permitted Uses Standard Industrial
Classification
(SIC)
Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing 25
Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing 2g3
Industrial and Commercial Machinery 35
And Computer Equipment Manufacturing
Electronics and other Electrical Equipment 36
And Components Manufacturing
Excluding uses in italics:
Storage batteries 3691
Primary batteries 3692
Aircraft and Parts Manufacturing 372
Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing 3g
Publishing Industries 27
Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastics Manufacturing 30
Excluding uses in italics:
Tires and Inner Tubes 3011
Fabricated Metal Products 34
Employment Services 736
Computer Programming, Data Processing, and 737
Other Computer Related Services
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
148
Legal Services 81
Engineering, Accounting, Research 87
Management, and Related Services
Medical Laboratories 8071
Public Administration 91-97
Business signs --~
Signs allowed in §165-30B --"""-"
Freestanding building entrance signs -~~'
Multi-tenant complex signs ~"--'"
Electronic Message signs _--"--
Secondary or Accessory Uses.
The following uses shall be permitted by rig ht in the OM Park District, but only in conjunction
with, and secondary to, a permitted principal use in accordance with section 165-26.
Secondary Uses Standard Industrial
Classification
(SIC)
Insurance Carriers and Services 63-64
Commercial Banks 602
Eating and Drinking Places
Except the following:
Restaurants with drive-through uses ----'--
Food Services Contractors 5821
Caterers 5821
Mobile Food Services ----~-
Drinking Places 5813
Office Machinery and Equipment 7359
Rental and Leasing
Physical Fitness Facilities for employees 7991
Child Day Care Sen~ices 8351
Office Machine Repair and Maintenance 7629
Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services 721
Except the following:
Linen supply 7213
Dry Cleaning Plants 58
7216
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
149
Industrial launderers
Design Requirements.
7278
A. Minimum Size. No OM Park District rezoning shall be approved for less than ten (IO)
contiguous acres.
(1) There shall be no minimum lot size.
(2) There shall be no minimum lot width or depth.
B. Development Standards. The following standards shall apply in the OMPark District.
(I) This district shall be planned and developed with a harmonious coordination of
uses, architectural styles, landscaping, parking, signs and outdoor lighting.
(2) This district shall be developed with a campus like atmosphere and near major
transportation facilities.
(3) Any building shall be faced on all sides facing road right-of-ways with durable,
attractive, high quality materials, comparable to clay brick, stone, wood,
architectural concrete masonry unit (e.g., regal stone, split face, precision, ground
face) or precast concrete panels.
(4) Loading docks or loading entrances shall be blocked from view from public streets,
by utilizing board-on-board fencing, masonry walls, or evergreen tree plantings.
(S) Outdoor storage shall be prohibited.
(6) All OM Park districts shall have access to a state road
1~-.-E. M1-Light Industrial District. The intent of this district is to provide for a variety of
light manufacturing, commercial office and heavy commercial uses in well-planned
industrial settings. Uses are allowed which do not create noise, smoke, dust or other
hazards. Uses are allowed which do not adversely affect nearby residential or
business areas. Such industrial areas shall be provided with sale and sufficient
access.
£LF. M2 Industrial General District. The intent of this district is to provide for a wide
variety of manufacturing, commercial office and heavy commercial uses, including
those which may not be compatible with nearby residential and business areas.
Performance controls are used to control potential nuisances, especially in relation to
zoning district boundaries. Such industrial areas shall be provided with safe and
sufficient access.
§165-83. Dimensional and intensity requirements.
A. The following table describes the dimensional and intensity requirements for the
business and industrial Districts:
District
Requirement Bl B2 B3 OM M1 M2
Front yard setback on 50 50 50 SO 75 75
Primary or arterial highways
(feet)
Front yard setback on 35 35 35 35 75 75
Collector or minor streets
(feet)
Side yard setbacks (feet) -- -- 15 15 25 25
Rear yard setbacks (feet) -- -- 15 IS 25 25
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
150
Floor area to lvt area ratio .03 1.0 1.0 L0 1.0 1.0
(FAR)
Minimum landscaped area 35 15 25 15 25 15
(percentage of lot area)
Maximum height (feet) 35 35 35 60 60 60
ARTICLE IV
Supplementary Use Regulations
§ 165-27. Off-street parking; parking lots.
E. Parking lots. Parking spaces shared by more than one dwelling or use, required for any
use in the business or industrial zoning district or required for any institutional,
commercial or industrial use in any zoning district shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) Surface materials. In the RP Residential Performance District, the R4 Residential
Planned Community District, the RS Residential Recreational Community District,
the MH1 Mobile Home Community District, the B1 Neighborhood Business
District, the B2 Business General District, the B3 Industrial Transition District, the
OM Office-Manufacturing Park District, the M1 Light Industrial District, the M2
Industrial General District and the MS Medical Support District, parking lots shall
be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete or similar materials. Such surface
materials shall provide a durable, dust- and gravel-free, hard surface. The Zoning
Administrator may allow for the use of other hard-surface materials for parcels
located outside of the Sewer and Water Service Area if the site plan provides for
effective stormwater management and efficient maintenance. In such cases,
parking lots shall be paved with a minimum of double prime-and-seal treatment or
an equivalent surface. [Amended 9-12-2001]
(3) Curbs and gutters. Concrete curbing and gutters shall be installed around the
perimeter of all parking lots in the RP Residential Performance District, the R4
Residential Planned Community District, the RS Residential Recreational
Community District, the MH1 Mobile Home Community District, the B1
Neighborhood Business District, the B2 Business General District, the B3
Industrial Transition District, the OM Office-Manufacturing Park District, the
M1 Light Industrial District, the M2 Industrial General District and the Ms
Medical Support District. The curbing shall be a minimum of six inches in height.
All parking lots shall be included within an approved stormwater management
plan. "fhe Zoning Administrator may allow for the use of concrete bumpers
instead of curbing for parcels located outside of the Sewer and Water Service Area
if the site plan provides for effective stormwater management and efficient
maintenance. [Amended 9-12-2001]
(4) Raised islands. Raised islands shall be installed at the ends of all parking bays
abutting an aisle or driveway in the RP Residential Performance District the R4
Residential Planned Community District, the RS Residential Recreational
Community District, the MH1 Mobile Home Community District, the B1
Neighborhood Business District, the B2 Business General District, the B3
Industrial Transition District, the OM Office-Manufacturing Park District, the
M1 Light Industrial District, the M2 Industrial General District and the MS
Medical Support District. The raised islands shall be bordered by concrete or
rolled asphalt curb. All islands shall be at least nine feet wide and shall extend the
length of the parking space or bay. The islands shall be landscaped with grass,
shrubs, or other vegetative materials. The Zoning Administrator may waive the
requirement for raised islands for parcels located outside of the Sewer and Water
Service Area when curb and gutter is not proposed. [Amended 9-12-2001)
(] 1) Landscaping. Parking lots in the RP Residential Performance District, the R4
Residential Planned Community District, the RS Residential Recreational
Community District, the MH1 Mobile Home Community District, the B1
Neighborhood Business District, the B2 Business General District, the B3
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/l0/08
15
Industrial Transition District, the OM Office-Manufacturing Park District, the
Ml Light Industrial District, the M2 Industrial General District and the M2
Medical Support District shall be landscaped to reduce the visual impact of glare
and headlights on adjoining properties and rights-of--way. Parking lots shall be
adequately shaded to reduce reflected heat. Landscaping shall also be provided to
reduce the visual expansiveness of parking lots. Landscaping shall be provided in
such parking lots as follows: [Amended 9-12-2001; 4-23-2003]
§ 165-29. Motor vehicle access.
A. New driveways.
(2) In order to provide safe and convenient access and to provide efficient travel on
arterial highways, a minimum spacing shall be provided between new driveways
and entrances onto collector roads and onto primary and arterial highways, in the
following zoning districts:
B 1 Neighborhood Business
B2 Business General
B3 Industrial Transition
OM Office-Manufacturing Park
M1 Light Industrial
M2 Industrial General
§ 165-31. Protection of environmental features. [Amended 12-11-1991; 8-9-2000; 7-11-
2001; 4-23-2003]
1n order to protect those areas of a parcel which have environmental characteristics that make
them unsuitable for development, certain portions of a development shall remain undisturbed or
be protected. It is the intention of this section that the disturbance of such areas by the
development process be limited. It is also the intention of this section that the large portions of
___ the areas with such environmental characteristics be placed in open space, environmental
easements, the portion of the parcel left undivided or other areas where they will remain
undisturbed. It is intended that the environmental conditions on a property be reviewed as the
first step in the planning process before lots or dwellings are located.
A. The requirements of this section shall apply to land in the following zoning districts:
RP Residential Performance District
R4 Residential Planned Community District
RS Residential Recreational Community District
MHl Mobile Home Community District
B1 Neighborhood Business District
B2 Business General District
B3 Industrial 'T'ransition District
OM Office-Manufacturiug Park District
M1 Light Industrial District
M2 Industrial General District
HE Higher Education District
RA Rural Areas District
MS Medical Support District
§ 165-37. Buffer and screening requirements. [Amended 6-13-1990]
D. Zoning district buffers. Buffers shall be placed on land to be developed when it adjoins
land in certain zoning districts.
(1) Buffers shall be provided on the land to be developed according to the
categories in the following tables:
(b) Buffer categories to be provided on land to be developed according to the
zoning of the adjoining land: [Amended 9-12-2001]
Minute Book Number 34
Board or Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
1521'
------ Zonin of Ad'oinin Land
B3 OM Ml M2 EM
MS
Zoning of RP R4 RS MHl Bl B2
Land to
be
llevelo ed A A A A A A A A
RP - - - A A A A A A A A
R4 - - -
- - A A A A A A A A
C
RS
MHl - -
C C C B B B B B p A
A A A A A B
Bl B B B B
B _
_ A A A A A
- B
B2 B B B
C C C C _ - - - -
B B C
C
B3
OM C C C C - - -
B B - - C
M] C C C L
C B B B B B _ _
B C
M2
EM C C C
C C C C B B B B _ -
B B B C
B C
-
MS C C C B B
§ 165.47. Landfills, junkyards, tras h disposal and inoperable vehicles.
C, Inoperable motor vehicles.
hi cles shall not be stored outside of a completely e nclosed
(1) Inoperable motor ve
building in the following zoning districts: [Amended 10-27-2004]
~ Residential Performance
Residential Planned Community
R4
RS Residential Recreational Community
MHl Mobil Home Community
HE Higher Education
MS Medical Support
gl Business Neighborhood
B2 Business General
B3 lndustrial Transition
OM Office-Manufacturing Park
M1 lndustrial Light
M2 Industrial General
EM Extractive Manufacturing
§165-83. Dimensional and intens ity requirements.
The following table desc ribes the dimensional and intensity requirements for the
A. business and industrial
Districts:
District
_Reguirement B1 B2 B3 OM Ml M2
Front yard setback on 50 50 50 50 75 75
Primary or arterial highways
(feet)
Front yard setback on
35
35
35
35
75
75
Collector or minor streets
(feet)
Side yard setbacks (feet)
--
-- 15 IS 25
25 25
25
Rear yard setbacks (feet) -- --
0
1 15
0
1 IS
1.0
1.0
1.0
Floor area to lot area ratio .03 . .
(FAR)
Minimum landscaped area
35
15
25
1 S
25
15
(percentage of lot area)
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
153
Maximum height (feet) 35 35 35 60 60 60
ARTICLE XVIII
Master Development Plan
§ 165-133. When required.
A. A preliminary Master Development Plan (MDP) and a final MDP shall be submitted to
the Director of Planning and Development for Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors approval prior to any subdivision or development of property in any of the
following zoning districts: [Amended 10-27-2004]
RP Residential Performance District
R4 Residential Planned Community District
R5 Residential Recreational Community District
MII1 Mobil Home Community llistrict
HE I3igh Education District
MS Medical Support District
B1 Neighborhood Business District
B2 Business General District
B3 Industrial Transition District
OM Office-Manufacturing Park District
M1 Industrial Light District
M2 lndustrial General District
EM Extractive Manufacturing District
§ 165-141. Contents of preliminary master development plans.
C. Contents of a preliminary master development plan in the M1 Light Industrial District,
the M2 lndustrial General District, the EM Extractive Manufacturing District, the HE
Higher Education District, the B 1 Neighborhood Business District, the B2 Business
General District, the B3 lndustrial Transition District or the OM Office-Manufacturing
Park District. The preliminary MDP shall contain a conceptual plan, showing the
location and functional relationship between streets and land uses, including the
following:
This ordinance shall be in effect on the day of adoption.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DcHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -CHAPTER 165 ZONING
ARTICLE IV SUPPLEMENTARY USE REGULATIONS X165 37 BUFFER AND
SCREENING REQUIREMENTS REVISIONS TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY
ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO BUFFER AND SCREENING
REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAYS
APPROVED
Senior Planner Candice Perkins appeared before the Board regarding this item. She
advised this was an amendment to the zoning district buffer requirements for property adjacent to
a railroad right-of--way. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this proposal and
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
154
recommended approval.
Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing.
There were no public comments.
Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing.
Upon a motion by Vice-Chairman Fisher, seconded by Supervisor Dove, the Board
approved the proposed zoning ordinance amendment.
WHEREAS, an ordinance to amend Chapter 165, "Coning, Article 1V, Supplementary
Use Regulations, Subsection 37, Buffer and screening requirements, was considered by the
Planning Commission and the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS)
during their regularly scheduled meetings; and
WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS)
recommended approval of this amendment on August 28, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on November 5, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on December 10, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the adoption of this
ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in good zoning
practice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors that Chapter 165, Zoning, Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, Subsection ___
37, Buffer and screening requirements, is amended. This amendment is amended as described
on the attachment.
§ 165-37D. Buffer and Screening Requirements.
X165-37D
(ll) Whenever land is to be developed in the Bl, B2, B3, OM, Ml, or M2 Zoning Districts
that his adjacent to a railroad right-of--way that has property zoned Bl, B2, B3, OM,
MI, or M2 on the opposite side, Zoning District Buffers shall not be required. In the
event that residential uses are located on the opposite side of the railroad right-of--way,
a Zoning District Buffer as required by §I65-37D shall be provided. In the event that a
Zoning District Buffer is required, the width of the railroad right-of way may be
counted towards the required Zoning District Buffer distance.
This ordinance shall be effect on the day of adoption.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. Del-Iaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Ayc
Gary A. Lofton Aye
PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -CHAPTER 165, ZONING,
ARTICLE XVII IA INTERSTATE AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT &165-130
QUALIFYING CRITERIA AND &165-131 DISTRICT REGULATIONS.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
155
REVISIONS TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO
REMOVE GENERAL MERCHANDISE APPAREL STORES AND
AUTOMOTIVE DEALERS FROM THE QUALIFYING USES APPROVED
Senior Planner Candice Perkins appeared before the Board regarding this item. She
explained the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance permits property owners to erect larger signs
along highways if they are within the Interstate Overlay District. Interstate Overlay signs range
in maximum size from 30 square feet to 500 square feet depending on the number of users. The
intent and purpose of interstate overlay signs is to inform the traveling public as to the location
of hotels, gasoline stations and restaurants. Currently, the Interstate Overlay District also allows
for general merchandise, apparel stores, and automotive dealers to be located on the signs as
well. She went on to say staff is proposing an ordinance revision to the Interstate Overlay
District regulations to remove general merchandise, apparel stores, and automotive dealers from
qualifying uses. She concluded by saying the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
item and recommended approval.
Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing.
There were no citizen comments.
Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lofton, seconded by Supervisor DeHaven, the Board
approved this ordinance amendment.
WHEREAS, an ordinance to amend Chapter 165, Zoning, Article XVII, IA Interstate
Area Overlay District, Subsection 130, Qualifying criteria and Subsection 131, District
regulations, was considered by the Planning Commission and the Development Review and
Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) during their regularly scheduled meetings; and
WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS)
recommended approval of this amendment on June 26, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on November 5, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on December 10, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the adoption of this
ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in good zoning
practice.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors that Chapter 165, Zoning, Article XVII, IA Interstate Area Overlay District,
Subsection 130, Qualifying criteria and Subsection 131, District regulations, is amended. This
amendment is amended as described on the attachment.
ARTICLE XVII
IA Interstate Area Overlay District
[Added 5-10-1995; amended 8-13-1997]
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
156
§ 165-127. Intent.
The IA Interstate Area Overlay District is intended to provide commercial businesses
within an identified area the ability to utilize business signs that are in excess of the limits
specified in § 165-30 of this chapter. This flexibility is provided to inform the traveling public of
business service opportunities at specific interstate interchange areas. "1'he standards within this
article are designed to allow for additional visibility for commercial businesses while minimizing
negative impacts to view sheds, the traveling public and residential properties that are adjacent to
or within the proximity of the overlay district. Established boundaries are based on reasonable
sight distances and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and are intended to designate
each interstate interchange area and provide guidance for considering the addition of subsequent
properties.
§ 165-128. District boundaries.
Properties that are included within the Interstate Area Overlay District shall be delineated
on the Official Zoning Map for Frederick County. This map shall be maintained and updated by
the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development.
§ 165-129. Establishment of district.
A. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors may apply the Interstate Area
OverlayDistrict to properties within the proximity of interstate interchange areas upon
concluding that:
(1) The property is in conformance with the idealized interchange development pattern
recommendation of the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan.
(2) The placement of a sign meeting the requirements of this section will not have an
adverse impact on adjoining properties whose primary use is residential.
(3) 'The property has met the requirements of Article 11 of this chapter, as well as the
requirements of § 15.2-2286 of the Code of Virginia 1950, as amended. [Amended
11-12-2003)
B. The Interstate Area Overlay District shall be in addition to and shall overlay all other
zoning districts where it is applied so that any parcel of land within the Interstate Area
Overlay District shall also be within one or more zoning districts as specified within this
chapter. 'The effect shall be the creation of regulations and requirements of both the
underlying zoning district(s) and the lnterstate Area Overlay District.
§ 165-130. Qualifying criteria.
A. On property that is delineated on the Official Zoning Map as being part of the Interstate
Area Overlay District, the following uses shall be authorized to erect a commercial
business sign that complies with the requirements of § 165-131 of this article. Such
commercial business signs complying with the requirements of § 165-131 of this article
shall hereinafter be referred to as interstate overlay signs.
Standard Industrial
Classification
Qualifying Uses (SIC)
~1--„cv~rci3a,1 d-,mac-c¢ro'~-crppctre~ St9reS c2 .....] c~
~ *~•~~ a°~~°-° °~a gasoline service stations ~5-5541
Eating and drinking establishments 58
Hotel and lodging establishments 70
B. Qualifying uses specified under § 165-130A that arc authorized on property through the
issuance of a conditional use permit in the RA Rural Areas District may be entitled to
erect an interstate overlay sign that is of a greater height and size than is permitted in the
underlying zoning district, provided that the property has met the requirements of Article
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
157
III of this chapter, the business sign complies with the requirements of § 165-131 of this
article and the qualifying use is located on property that is delineated on the Official
Zoning Map as being part of the Interstate Area Overlay District.
165-131. District regulations.
A. Permitted signs. Permitted signs shall be as follows:
(1) (Interstate overlay signs.
I I (2) Signs permitted in the underlying zoning district(s).
B. Prohibited signs. Prohibited signs shall be as follows:
(1) Off-premise business signs.
(2) Signs prohibited in the underlying zoning district(s).
C. Number of freestanding commercial business signs. On any parcel within the Interstate
Area Overlay District, one interstate overlay sign that complies with the requirements set
forth in this article may be erected.
D. Setback requirements.
(1) All portions of an interstate overlay sign shall bed set back a minimum of 10 feet
from any lot line or property boundary line and shall meet all other applicable setback
requirements.
(2) When any interstate overlay sign exceeds the height requirement of the underlying
zoning district(s) and is located on property that adjoins or is across aright-of--way
from property that is in the RP Residential Performance District, the HE IIigher
_ Education District or any property which has a residence as its primary use, the
setback shall be the normal setback plus one foot for every foot over the maximum
height of the underlying zoning district(s).
(3) The Planning Commission may waive any portion of the setback described in § 165-
131D(2) if it can be demonstrated that the setback requirement cannot be met due to
the irregular size or shape of the parcel.
E. Spacing requirements. The spacing requirements between an interstate overlay sign and
signs in the underlying zoning district(s) shall comply with the requirements in § 165-30F
of this chapter and shall meet all other applicable spacing requirements.
F. Maximum size.
(1) No interstate overlay sign shall exceed a total of 300 square feet in area.
(2) When more than one qualifying use is located on a single parcel within the Interstate
Area Overlay District, a single support structure may be erected which contains one
or more signs, the total combined square footage of which shall not exceed 500
square feet in area.
___. G. Illumination. Neither the direct nor reflected light from any illuminated interstate overlay
sign shall create an increase in the ambient foot-candle at the property line, create glare
into or upon other structures or create glare onto a public thoroughfare so as to create a
traffic hazard for operators of motor vehicles.
H. Maintenance and permits.
(1) All signs that are erected in the Interstate Area Overlay District shall meet the
maintenance and permit requirements as s ecified in ~ t ~~~~~ ~..a ~ ~ ~c ~nr
p ~ o ~:~-.~~-.~~ §165-
30Kand § 165-30L of this chapter.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
158
(2) If required, appropriate easements shall be secured by a property owner that desires to
erect an interstate overlay sign prior to the issuance of a sign permit in order to ensure
that required maintenance can be performed.
Permitted heights.
(1) All interstate overlay signs shall be located a minimum of 25 feet in height above the
base of the sign support structure.
(2) The maximum height for interstate overlay signs shall be determined by the nearest
interstate exit number and shall be based on an elevation above mean sea level as set
below:
Exit Number
302 (Middletown and Rt. 11 South)
307 (Stephens City and Rt. 277)
310 (Kernstown and Rt. 37)
313 (Kt. 50/ 17 and Rt. 522)
315 (Rt. 7 and Berryville Avenue)
317 (Rt. 11 North and Rt. 37)
321 (Clearbrook and Rt. 11 North)
323 (Whitehall and Rt. l 1 North)
Maximum Business
Sign Height
(feet above mean sea level)
760
800
805
805
750
815
700
710
This ordinance shall be in effect on the day of adoption.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Ayc
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCES AMENDMENT -CHAPTER 165, ZONING,
ARTICLE VI RP RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE DISTRICT, §165-59
PERMITTFD USES &165-61 NUMBER OF USES RESTRICTED, &165-62 GROSS
_DENSITY, &165 62 1 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING &165-65 DIMENSIONAL
REQUIREMENTS; ARTICLE IV SUPPLEMENTARY USF. REGULATIONS,
&165 37 BUFFER AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS; ARTICLE. XXII
DEFINI"PIONS &165-156 DEFINITIONS AND WORD USAGE; AND CHAPTI/R
144 SUBDIVISION OF LANll ARTICLE V DESIGN STANDARDS, §144-24
LOT REQUIREMENTS REVISIONS TO THE FREllERICK COUNTY
ORDINANCES TO ENABLE AGE-RESTRICTED MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
IN THE RP (RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE) DISTRICT. -APPROVED
Senior Planner Candice Perkins appeared before the Board regarding this item. She
advised this proposed amendment was initiated to accommodate a new housing type in proffered
age-restricted communities. The requested changes are based on a desire to incorporate elevators
in a cost effective manner by permitting taller buildings, with more units per building, and a
higher density than allowed in the garden apartment housing type. The principle change to the
ordinance would be the introduction of a new housing type in the RP District called age-
restricted multi-family housing. The proposal calls for the new housing type to be permitted
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
159
only with proffered age-restricted housing. Shc concluded by saying the Planning Commission
held a public hearing and recommended approval.
Supervisor Lemieux asked if the only way to get a peaked roof on the buildings in this
type of development would be for the developer to request a waiver.
Senior Planner Perkins responded yes.
Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing.
Patrick Sowers, Patton Harris Rust & Associates, appeared before the Board regarding
this request. He appreciated the efforts of staff and the committee. He went on to say he had
two concerns. First, he felt the parking standards were over parked. Second, the set back
requirement of 2 feet for every 1 foot over 40 feet was a disincentive for peaked roofs.
Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing.
Upon a motion by Supervisor Lemieux, seconded by Supervisor Dove, the Board
approved this ordinance amendment.
WHEREAS, an ordinance to amend Chapter 165, 7,oning, Article VI RP Residential
Performance District, §165-59 Permitted uses, §165-61 Number of uses restricted, §165-62
Gross density, § 165-62.1 Multifamily housing, § 165-65 Dimensional requirements; Article IV
Supplementary iJse Regulations, § 165-37 Buffer and screening requirements; Article XXII
Definitions, §165-156 Definitions and word usage; and, Chapter 144, Subdivision of Land,
__ Article V Design Standards, § 144-24 Lot requirements, § 165-82 District use regulations; § 165-
83 Dimensional and intensity requirements, was considered by the Planning Commission and the
Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) during their regularly scheduled
meetings; and
WHEREAS, the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS)
recommended approval of this amendment on June 26, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on November 5, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption
on December 10, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the adoption of this
ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in good zoning
practice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors that Chapter 165, Zoning, Article VI RP Residential Performance District, § 165-59
Permitted uses, § 165-61 Number of uses restricted, § 165-62 Gross density, § 165-62.1
Multifamily housing, §165-65 Dimensional requirements; Article IV Supplementary Use
Regulations, § 165-37 Buffer and screening requirements; Article XXII Definitions, § 165-156
Definitions and word usage; and, Chapter 144, Subdivision of Land, Article V Design Standards,
§ 144-24 Lot requirements are amended. This amendment is amended as described on the
attachments.
ARTICLE VI
RP Residential Performance District
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
160
§165-59. Permitted uses.
A. All uses shall be developed in accordance with an approved master development plan
unless otherwise waived under Article XVIII of this chapter.
B. Structures are to be erected or land used for one or more of the following uses:
(1) Any of the following residential structures: single-family detached traditional
rural, single-family detached traditional, single-family detached urban, single-
family detached cluster, single-family detached zero lot line, single-family small
lot, duplex, multiplex, atrium house, weak-link townhouse, townhouse, ~ garden
apartment or age-restricted multifamily housing. Amended 10-27-1999]
(2) Schools and churches.
(3) Fire stations and companies and rescue squads.
(4) Group homes.
(5) Home occupations.
(6) Utilities necessary to serve residential uses, including poles, lines, distribution
transformers, pipes and meters.
(7) Accessory uses and structures. Accessory structures attached to the main
structure shall be considered part of the main structure. Mobile homes and
trailers, as defined, shall not be considered as accessory structures or buildings.
(8) Required or bonus recreational facilities and public parks, playgrounds and
recreational facilities.
(9) Business signs to advertise the sale or rent of the premises upon which they are
erected, church bulletin boards and identification signs, signs for non-profit
service clubs and charitable associations (off-site signs not to exceed eight square
feet) and directional signs.
(10) Temporary model homes used for sale of properties in a residential development.
(I 1) Libraries. [Added 6-8-1994]
(12) Adult-care residences and assisted-living care facilities. [Added 8-24-2004]
§165-b1. Number of uses restricted.
More than one principal structure or use and its customary accessory structures or uses are
permitted in the 1Z1' Kesidential Performance District for duplexes, multiplexes, atrium houses,
weak-link townhouses, alb garden apartments and age-restricted multifamily housing.
§165-62. Gross density. [Amended 5-11-1994]
A gross density shall be established for each proposed development, including all land contained
within a single master development plan, according to the characteristics of the land, the capacity
of public facilities and roads and the nature of surrounding uses. Because of these
characteristics, some developments may not be allowed to employ the maximum density allowed
by these regulations. "1 he following density requirements shall apply to all parcels as they exist
at the time of the adoption of this section:
A. Subsequent divisions of land shall not increase the allowed density on parcels of land.
B. In no case shall the gross density of any development within an approved master
development plan exceed 19 20 dwellings per acre for age-restricted multifamily
housing or IO dwelling units per acre for any other housing types.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
161
C. In no case shall the gross density of any development within an approved master
development plan which contains more than 10 acres and less than 100 acres exceed 5.5
dwellings per acre.
D. In no case shall the gross density of any development within an approved master
development plan which contains more than 100 acres exceed four dwellings per acre.
§165-62.1. Multifamily housing. [Added 5-11-1994]
A. Developments that are less than 25 acres in size may include more than ~ 60%
multifamily housing types.
B. Developments that are more than 25 acres and less than 50 acres in size shall be
permitted to contain up to ~ 60% multifamily housing types.
C. Developments that are over 50 acres in size shall be permitted to contain up to 40°~ SO %
multifamily housing types.
§165-65. Dimensional requirements.
The following dimensional requirements shall be met by uses in the RP Residential Performance
District. The Zoning Administrator shall make the final determination as to the classification of
housing types. Unless otherwise specified, all housing types shall be served by public sewer and
water.
L. Garden apartments. "Garden apartments" are multifamily buildings where individual
dwelling units share a common outside access. They also share a common yard area,
which is the sum of the required lot areas of all dwelling units within the building.
Garden apartments shall contain six or more dwellings in a single structure. Required
open space shall not be included as minimum lot area.
(1) Maximum gross density shall be 10 units per acre.
(2) Dimensional requirements shall be as follows:
Minimum Lot
Area per
Number of Dwelling Unit Off-Street
Bedrooms (square feet) Parking Spaces
Efficiency 1,300 1.50
1 1, 700 2.00
2 2,000 2.25
3 plus 2,550 2.50
(3) Maximum site impervious surface ratio (on lot) shall be 0.50.
(4 Minimum lot size shall be one acre.
(5) Minimum yards shall be as follows:
(a) Front setback:
[ 1 ] Thirty-five feet from road right-of-way.
[2] Twenty feet from parking area or driveway.
(b) Side: 50 feet from perimeter boundary.
(c) Rear: 50 feet from perimeter boundary.
(6) Minimum on-site building spacing shall be 50 feet.
(7) Maximum number of dwelling units per building shall be 16.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/lU/OS
-162
(8) Maximum building height shall be as follows:
(a) ~e Principal building: 40 feet.
(b) Accessory buildings: 15 feet
The diagram appearing in §165-65 (L) remains unchanged.]
Q. Abe-restricted multifamily housin;?. "Age-restricted multifamily housing" are
multifamily buildings where individual dwelling units share a common outside access.
They also share a common yard area, which is the sum of the required lot areas of all
dwelling units within the building. Age-restricted multifamily housing shall only be
permitted within proffered age-restricted developments. Elevator service shall be
provided to each floor of age-restricted multifamily housing structures for use by
residents and guests.
(1) Maximum gross density shall be 20 units per acre.
(2) Dimensional requirements shall be as follows:
Minimum Lot
Area per
Number of Dwelling Unit Off-Street
Bedrooms (square feet) Parking Spaces
Efficiency 1,300 1.5
1 1, 700 1.5
2 2,000 2.0
3 plus 2,550 2.0
(3) Maximum site impervious surface ratio (on lot) shall be 0.50.
(4) Minimum lot size shall be three acres.
(5) Minimum yards shall be as follows:
(a) Front setback:
JIJ Sixty feet from road right-of-ways.
J2J Five feet from parking areas or driveways.
(b) Side: 100 feet from the perimeter boundary. An additional two feet from the
perimeter boundary shall be added for every foot that the height of the building
exceeds 40 feet when the adjacent use is single family residences.
(c) Rear: 100 feet from the perimeter boundary. An additional two feet from the
perimeter boundary shall be added for every foot that the height of the building
exceeds 40 feet when the adjacent use is single family residences.
(6) Minimum on-site building spacing shall be 50 feet
(7) Maximum number of dwelling units per building shall be 110.
(S) Maximum building height shall be as follows:
(a) : b8 feed The maximum structure height for any principal
building shall be 40 feet. The Board of Supervisors may waive the 40 foot
height limitation provided that it will not negatively impact adjacent
residential uses. In no case shall any principle building exceed 60 feet in
height.
(b) ncees~se~~buildings: 13~eet The maximum structure height for any
accessory buildings shall be IS feet.
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
163
ARTICLE IV
Supplemental Use Regulations
§165-37 Buffer and screening requirements. [Amended 6-13-1990]
C. [Amended 5-11-1994] Residential separation buffers.
(2) Perimeter apartment, e~multiplex or age-restricted multifamily housing separation
buffers.
(a) Wherever possible and practical, garden apartments, am# multiplex structures and
age-restricted multifamily housing structures shall not be placed adjacent to
other types of residential structures. if other types of residential structures must
be placed adjacent to garden apartments, er multiplex structures; or age-restricted
multifamily housing structures the following buffers are required.
Distance Buffer Required
Screening Inactive Active
Provided (Minimu m) (Maximum) Total
(feet) (feet) (feet)
Full screen 75 25 100
Landscape screen 150 50 200
No screen 350 50 400
(b) Buffers shall be placed between the garden apartment, er multiplex structures or
age-restricted multifamily housing structures and the lot line of the lots
containing the other housing types.
(c) For age-restricted multifamily housing the full screen must include all
elements of the landscape screen with the evergreen component planted at a
__ height of six feet, and also include a six foot-high wall, fence, mound or berm.
ARTICLE XXII
Definitions
§165-156. Definitions and word usage. [Amended 11-13-1991]
'
la•i~t ~nrinf •l.
a _ r F zr lo ~~r 4f1o% ..F. w,. .._:._ __ cc ___-- _ r , , ~ . .. ,. ,.
}
ACE-RESTRICTED -Housing intended for and occupied by older persons (as defined in
Chapter 36-96.7 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended). The housing must include the
publication of, and adherence to, policies and procedures which demonstrate inteut by the
owner(s) and manager(s) to provide housing for older persons.
Chapter 144 -Subdivision of Land
ARTICLE V
Design Standards
§144-24. Lot requirements.
C. Lot Access. All lots shall abut and have direct access to a public street or right-of-way
dedicated for maintenance by the Virginia Department of Transportation
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
164
(2) "~~~'~=i=p-and Single-family small lot housing, single family attaehed housing and
multifamily housing. [Amended 10-27-1999]
(a) Lots in subdivisions to be used for the following housing types, as defined by
Chapter 165, Zoning, need not abut public streets:
[1] Duplexes.
[2] Multiplexes,
[3] Atrium houses.
[4] Townhouses.
[5] Weak-link townhouses.
[6] Garden apartments.
[7] Single-family small lot housing.
(SJ Age-restricted multifamily housing
Supervisor Fisher stated part of his concern had to do with the elevation difference with
adjacent properties.
Supervisor Dove stated he would like the Development Review and Regulations
Subcommittee to look at parking. He went on to say he did not want to see a lot of unneeded
asphalt.
Supervisor Lemieux stated until the county has mass transit the parking requirement is
presently needed.
Supervisor DeHaven stated he fully supported the housing type, but he had real issues
with placing a 60 foot building 140 feet from a single family dwelling on a'/4 acre lot. ~ ~ -_.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. lleHaven, Jr. Nay
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
OTHER PLANNING ITEMS
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SNOWDEN BRIDGE, PARTS A & B -
FORWARDED TO STAFF FOR DISPOSITION
Planning Director Eric Lawrence appeared before the Board regarding this item. He
advised the applicant was seeking revisions to the previously approved Part A and approval of
part B of this master development plan. 'The applicant was proposing to convert some of the
single-family dwelling housing types to townhouse units. Another change included the addition
of a right-in/right-out entrance along Snowden Bridge Boulevard. Further the applicant is
seeking to clarify part of the recreation unit requirements. Planning Director Lawrence reminded
the Board that Part B has not yet been approved, but is proposed to include an Active Adult
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
165
Community. He concluded by saying staff was seeking authority to approve this master
development plan.
Chairman Shickle noted this was one of the hardest master development plans to read
given the size of the font, etc.
Director Lawrence apologized and stated staff was trying to provide only those pages
reflecting changes instead of the entire plan; however, in the future, staff would provide a copy
of the entire plan to the Board.
Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Supervisor Ewing, the Board
forwarded this item to staff for disposition.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard C. Shickle Aye
Gene E. Fisher Aye
Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye
Gary W. Dove Aye
Bill M. Ewing Aye
Philip A. Lemieux Aye
Gary A. Lofton Aye
ROAD RESOLUTIONS -APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA
RESOLUTION #034-08 - THF, GUARDS, SECTION I & II
WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3, fully incorporated
herein by the reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Frederick County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Rye uirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered
into an agreement on June 9, 1993, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this
request for addition; and
NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3 to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
RESOLUTION #035-08 -RAVEN POINTE SUBDIVISION, SECTION 6
WHF,RF,AS, the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3, fully incorporated
herein by the reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Frederick County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
166
advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered
into an agreement on June 9, 1993, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this
request for addition; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3 to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Reauirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, tills and drainage; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
RESOLUTION #036-08 -ROUTE 1000 ARBOR COURT.
WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3, fully incorporated
herein by the reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Frederick County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation has
advised this Board that the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered
into an agreement on June 9, 1993, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this
request for addition; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Form AM-4.3 to the
secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEll, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-
way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
BOARD LIAISON REPORTS
There were no Board liaison reports.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
There were no citizen comments.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMENTS
Supervisor Lemieux wished everyone a Merry Christmas and happy holiday season.
ADJOURN
UPON A MOTION BY SUPERVISOR EWTNG, SECONDED BY SUPERVISOR
DOVE, THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS TO COME. BEFORE THIS BOARD,
THIS MEETING IS HEREBY ADJOURNED. (8:48 P.M.)
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08
167
O o o ~~,
Richard C. Shickle o .Riley, Jr.
Chairman, Board of Supervisors erk, Board of Supervisors
Minutes Prepared By:
Jay E. ib s
Deputy Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Minute Book Number 34
Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting of 12/10/08