HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 23, 1982 Regular Meeting56r
A Regular Meeting of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors was held
on June 23, 1982, at 7:00 P.M., in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, 9
Court Square, Winchester, Virginia.
PRESENT S. Roger Koontz, Chairman; Will L. Owings, Vice- Chairman;
William H. Baker; Rhoda W. Maddox; David L. Smith and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION
The invocation was delivered by the Reverend Ed Harrison of the Round
Hill Methodist Church.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Mr. Stiles requested time under "County Officials ".
Mr. White stated that he had a couple of handouts under the Finance
Committee at the end of the meeting that needed Board action.
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker the
agenda was approved as amended by the following recorded vote: Aye - S.
Roger Koontz, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox, Will L. Owings and Kenneth
Y. Stiles. Mr. Smith had not arrived at this time.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Stiles stated that in the minutes of May 12, 1982, Page 1, the
Chairman read the rules that would be followed with reference to the Budget
hearing and he felt these rules should be made part of the minutes. He
stated that on Page 9 of the May 12, 1982 minutes, the second paragraph, he
refers to a proposed worksession by the Chairman for discussion of the solid
waste proposal and he asked what the status of this worksession was.
Mr. White stated that this would be discussed later on in the meeting
under the Code and Engineering Committee Report.
Mr. Stiles referred to the minutes of May 26, 1982, Page 18, and to the
bid package that was referred to in the Code and Engineering Committee
Report. He asked when this would be completed.
Mr. Owings stated that he could not answer this as this was not avail-
able at the last Code and Engineering Committee meeting.
Mr. White stated that this needed to be resolved at tonight's meeting,
that there was a difference of understanding relative to the request for a
proposal to have the basic engineering assumptions verified first before bid
packages were sent out.
568
Mr. Stiles stated that the Committee directed the staff to prepare a
bid package and he did not see how this could have been misunderstood.
Mr. White stated that the bid package was in shape but not ready to go.
Mr. Owings stated that there was misunderstanding between the Committee
and the staff to what the Committee was asking for. He stated that the
Committee thought they were going to have a comparison between an actual bid
and the figures they were given, but as of this date the bids have not gone
out.
Mr. White stated that it was the staffs' position to proceed along
these lines but he wanted to be sure that the numbers being used were
accurate.
Mr. Stiles stated that on Page 21, of the May 26, 1982 minutes, with
reference to the delinquent tax resolution, he would request that the
remarks he made with reference to this be made part of the minutes. He
stated, "that he was in favor of the resolution as long as it was understood
that as far as he was personally concerned that it was not meant to reflect
in a negative way, the way any of these Officers were performing their
jobs ". He stated that in the minutes of May 26, 1982, Page 22, the last
paragraph, it refers to year end transfers and he wanted to know if this
information was provided in the Finance package that was being presented
tonight.
Mr. White stated that yes it was.
Mr. Stiles stated that on Page 24, of the May 26, 1982 minutes, the
word "mislead" and "lead" is mispelled.
Mr. Smith stated that on Page 17, of the May 26, 1982 minutes, the
fourth paragraph and a statement made by Mr. White with reference to the
draft that he had prepared on revisions to the compensatory time policies.
He stated that it was his understanding that Mr. White had a draft on his
desk at that time with all the compensatory time of each department and that
this would be prepared, finalized and sent to the Personnel Committee. Mr.
Smith asked Mr. White when the request was made of the Personnel Office with
reference to the figures on the compensatory time.
Mr. White replied that it was after the last Board meeting.
Mr. Smith asked if this information would be made available to the
Personnel Committee for their next meeting.
Mr. White replied that yes it would.
b69
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and
passed unanimously, the minutes of the Regular Meetings of May 12 and May
26, 1982 and Special Meeting with the City of Winchester of June 9, 1982
were approved as amended.
STEVE CULBERT APPOINTED TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOL
BOARD FROM SHAWNEE DISTRICT - APPROVED
Mr. Culbert appeared before the Board.
Mr. Stiles asked Mr. Culbert what his point of view was with reference
to County employees and collective bargaining.
Mr. Culbert stated that collective bargaining in his mind smacks of
unionism and he had mixed emotions about it, that he would much rather see
it phrased as local associations with the idea in mind of furthering the
best interest of those involved. He further stated that he did not deal
with collective bargaining in his personal life being in an area that is
practically union free, we don't hear too much about it in this area. He
stated that you hear more of associations being used as opposed to collec-
tive bargaining.
Mr. Stiles asked Mr. Culbert if he was aware of the fact that the
education association is defined as a union by Federal Courts and the
Internal Revenue Service and that their primary goal is public employee
collective bargaining in Virginia.
Mr. Koontz stated that he doubted this.
Mr. Stiles stated that he could verify this statement.
Mr. Koontz stated that this is not true in Virginia, that it may very
well be a local association or National Education Association, but that it
would not be true in the State of Virginia.
Upon motion made by David L. Smith, seconded by William H. Baker,
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the appointment of Steve Culbert as
representative from Shawnee Magisterial District to the Frederick County
School Board, said term to commence June 30, 1982 and terminate on June 30,
1986.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
Rhoda W. Maddox, William H. Baker, Will L. Owings, David L. Smith and
Kenneth Y. Stiles. Abstain - S. Roger Koontz.
RICHARD HARDISON REAPPOINTED TO THE SOCIAL SERVICES
BOARD - APPROVED
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, that Richard Hardison be reappointed to the Social
Services Board, said term to commence on June 30, 1982 and terminate on June
30, 1986.
RESOLUTIONS HONORING 8 VALEDICTORIANS FROM JAMES WOOD
GRADUATING CLASS O 1982 - APPROVED
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and
passed unanimously, that the following resolution honoring the 8 Valedictor-
ians of the James Wood graduating class of 1982 be approved and presented to
the following graduates:
WHEREAS,
was a senior at James Wood High School and;
WHEREAS, she /he recently graduated, achieving the honor of being one of
eight Valedictorians in his /her class, and;
WHEREAS, this achievement has brought honor and credit to himself/ -
herself, his /her school and to his /her Community;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors hereby expresses its congratulations to for his/
her outstanding achievement;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a true copy of this resolution be
delivered to
RESOLVED this 23 day of June, 1982.
/s/ S. Roger Koontz
S. Roger Koontz, Chairman
/s/ Will L. Owings
Will L. Owings
/s/ William H. Baker
William H. Baker
/s/ Rhoda W. Maddox
Rhoda W. Maddox
/s/ David L. Smith
David L. Smith
/s/ Kenneth Y. Stiles
Kenneth Y. Stiles
The above resolution was presented to the following:
Pamela Ann Bitto, Janice Elaine Groff, Tami Lee Heyman, James Vernon
Hutton, III, John Julius Koegl, Jeannette Aimee' Sorrell, Daniel James
Sterrick and Daniel Allen Thorn.
Mr. Baker stated that he felt this was a tremendous tribute to the
educational system of Frederick County and he felt they were to be
commended, that they have turned out 8 Valedictorians, to his knowledge the
first time in the history of the County and as far as he knew in the history
of the State. He stated that this was exceptional performance on the part
of the School system and the kids.
Mrs. Maddox stated that the words of Mr. Baker were her sentiments also
and that everyone could see that education was alive and well in Frederick
County.
COUNTY OFFICIALS
571
Mr. Stiles referred to the letter from the Area Agency on Aging that
had been given to the Board prior to tonight's Board meeting. He stated
that he was very much concerned about this situation and he felt a meeting
tonight with the County representatives on this matter would have been
useful prior to their meeting on June 25, 1982. He further stated that it
was his understanding that there was more than one problem that needed to be
dealt with.
Mr. Koontz stated that legal counsel is involved and that there is a
problem with anyone discussing this matter before the Board at this time.
Mr. Stiles stated that Mr. Toht had requested that the County funding
be increased some 600% this year over last year and quite frankly there is a
question of credibility involved.
Mr. Koontz stated that it was his understanding at this point that the
State was involved.
Mr. Owings stated that he felt it was inappropriate for the Board to
take any position until we receive a full report on this matter.
Mr. Stiles stated that he would like to request that the County
representatives on the Area Agency on Aging meet with the Board at their
August 11 meeting.
Mr. Stiles stated that on June 10, Jim Doran, Ned Cheely and Mr. Brown,
of the Recreation Commission, and himself met at the Clearbrook Park with
Mr. Harvey Strawsnyder, of Foundation Engineering, to pursue possible
alternatives for getting a return of swimming at the Clearbrook Park in one
way or another. He further stated that he had a copy of Mr. Strawsnyder's
inspection report and he would like to request that the County Admini-
strator's Office make a copy of this report and forward it to each Board
member for their review.
Mr. Baker stated that he would like to refer back to the Area Agency on
Aging. He stated that he did not hear any comments made as to other Board
members' concerns about the point Mr. Stiles made concerning this. He
further stated that he would like to personally express himself that he did
have a very great concern, that he felt the Board did have to recognize the
confidentiality of the meeting that is being held by Dr. Brown and Mrs. Roe,
but he also felt that the Board should be privileged to have someone from
the Agency to appear before the Board to give the input that comes out of
the meeting.
572
Mr. Koontz stated that both of the members had been contacted and that
they would be present at the next meeting.
Mr. Smith inquired as to the reoptimization study that was being
conducted for the Frederick - Winchester Service Authority.
Mr. White stated that there had been a delay in the date of the finali-
zation of the optimization study because of a change by the State.
Mr. Smith stated that it concerned him that when an update was
scheduled to be presented to the Board on a particular matter that the
County Administrator or Department Head should report to the Board why there
has been a delay. He asked if a report would be forthcoming at the August
11 meeting.
Mr. White stated that yes there would.
Mr. Smith asked Mr. White what the progress was of the report on
compensatory time for County employees.
Mr. White stated that he had asked Mrs. Kelican to take care of this.
Mr. Smith asked Mr. White when Mrs. Kelican was directed to do this
report.
Mr. White replied shortly after the Boards' last meeting.
Mr. Smith stated that several weeks ago the organizing of a Fire and
Rescue Committee within the County had been discussed and he would like for
a letter to go out from the County to each Fire Department and Rescue
Company in the County to get their input on this.
Mr. Koontz stated that he had been contacted by various members of the
Fire Companies and that they do want to have input into this. He stated
that all of this would be going to the Personnel Committee before coming to
the Board.
Mr. Stiles inquired as to the status of the citizen member being placed
on the Personnel Committee and that he did have a citizen that was
interested in serving.
Mr. Koontz requested that the Board members submit to him in writing
their nomination for a citizen member on the Personnel Committee.
ZMAP #006 -82 - MCDONALD'S CORPORATION - OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT - APPROVED
Mr. Horne presented this rezoning request stating that the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval.
573
Mr. Doug Swift, representing McDonald's Corporation, appeared before
the Board and showed them on a plat where the proposed McDonald's would be
located with reference to the present Texaco Station and Route 277.
Mr. Koontz asked about the Texaco sign and if it would be removed.
Mr. Randy Boone, representing McDonald's Corporation, stated that this
was on the lease property and the terms on the contract stated that it will
be removed.
Mr. Koontz stated that there was concern about truckers coming off
Route 81 as there has been a problem on Route 11 North even though they are
parking illegally.
Mr. Boone stated that two acres would be developed at this site as this
is all Texaco would lease to them and he felt the truckers would not get off
81 because of the ingress and egress problem.
Mr. Baker asked if "No Parking" signs had been erected by the Highway
Department on Route 11 North.
Mr. Koontz replied yes, but that they are continually knocked down.
Mr. Stiles stated that the staff recommendations coming to the Board
are not the same as the ones presented to the Planning Commission. He
further stated that the idea of one way traffic in this area was discussed
at the Planning Commission meeting and Mr. Boone was not in favor of this
idea for understandable reasons. He further stated that the Planning
Commission had concerns not only for this section of 277 but for this whole
stretch of area on 277.
Mr. Owings stated that this particular intersection has been of great
concern to him for some time. He further stated that he had been in contact
with the Virginia Department of Highways and Transporation and that they had
assured him that everything is okay.
Upon motion made by Will L. Owings, seconded by William H. Baker and
passed unanimously, that Zoning Map Amendment Petition Number 006 -82 of
McDonald's Corporation, 3015 Williams Drive, Fairfax, Virginia, consisting
of 2.3500 acres, now zoned B -1 (Business- Limited) to be rezoned B -2
(Business - General) be approved. This property is designated as Parcel
Number 149 on Tax Map No. 85(A) in the Opequon Magisterial District.
AN ORDINANCE ENACTING ARTICLE X OF CHAPTER NINE OF THE
CODE OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, TO LEVY
A COUNTY LICENSE TAX ON TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH HEAT
LIGHT, WATER AND POWER COMPANIES PURSUANT TO THE PRO-
I RGI NI A. 1950, AS AMENDED -
574
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Will L. Owings and
passed unanimously, the following Utility Tax Ordinance was approved as
presented:
Sec. 9 -36 General
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick,
Virginia, that for each and every year, beginning on the 1st day of January
and ending on the following 31st day of December, until otherwise amended or
repealed, there is hereby levied upon each and every telephone, telegraph,
heat, light, water or power company doing business in the County of
Frederick, Virginia, for the privilege of doing business within the County
of Frederick, a license tax equal to one -half of one per centum (1 %) of the
gross receipts accruing to such company from such business in the County of
Frederick and the following shall be applicable to such tax:
Sec. 9 -37 Definitions
The following words and phrases when used in this ordinance shall, for
the purpose of this ordinance, have the following respective meaning, except
when the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
(a) Telephone or telegraph companies. Those corporations subject to
the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 12, Title 58, Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended.
(b) Water or heat, light and power companies. Those corporations
subject to the provisions of Article 10, Chapter 12, Title 58, Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
(c) Gross receipts. Gross earnings and receipts derived from business
within the County of Frederick, Virginia, as reportable pursuant to Section
58 -581., Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for telephone and telegraph
companies and pursuant to Section 58 -603, Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, for water or heat, light and power companies, and taxable under the
provisions of Section 58- 266.1, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
(d) Year. Calendar year.
(e) Penalty. An amount added to the tax due for failure to pay the
same when due. The rate of such penalty shall be the same as provided in
Section 58 -587, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for telephone and
telegraph companies and as provided in Section 58 -614, Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, for water or heat, light and power companies.
(f) Interest. Simple interest on the amount of tax due plus penalty
from the first day following the day such tax was due until paid. The rate
575
of such interest shall be the same as the rate provided in Section 58 -964,
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Sec. 9 -38 Reports to be Filed
Each company liable for this tax shall report to the Commissioner of
Revenue of the County of Frederick, Virginia, annually, on or before the
15th day of April its gross receipts derived from the County of Frederick
for the preceding year. The report of any such company shall be signed and
sworn to by the President or duly authorized officer of such company.
Sec. 9 -39 Basis of Tax
The tax imposed hereunder shall be based upon the gross receipts for
the preceding year, assessed on the 1st day of January of each year but due
and payable to the Treasurer of Frederick County, Virginia, on or before the
15th day of April following the date on which the taxes are assessed.
Sec. 9 -40 Failure to Pay
Any company failing to pay such taxes to the County Treasurer within
the time herein prescribed shall incur a penalty and interest thereon which
shall be added to the amount of taxes due and be collected as provided for
by law.
Sec. 9 -41 Failure to File
A failure to file the report as required herein or the filing of a
false report shall upon conviction subject such company to a fine of not
more than Twenty -Five Dollars ($25.00), but each such failure, refusal,
neglect or violation and each days continuance thereof shall constitute a
separate offense.
Sec. 9 -42 Effective Date
This ordinance shall be effective on July 1, 1982. The report due and
tax payable on or before April 15, 1983, shall be for gross receipts for the
period July 1, 1982 through December 31, 1982. Reports due and taxes
payable on or before April 15 for each year thereafter shall be for gross
receipts for the entire preceding year.
REQUEST FROM FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL ESTATES FOR SECTION
OF BROOKE ROAD TO BE ACCEPTED INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM -
APPROVED
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the following was approved:
WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of Highways and Trans-
portation and the Department of Planning and Development have reviewed the
request by Fort Collier Industrial Estates and recommend the inclusion of
576
approximately .51 miles of Brooke Road extended from its intersection with
Brooke Road to the Fort Collier property line, in the Stonewall Magisterial
District, into the secondary road system pursuant to the provisions of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and,
WHEREAS, This Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right -of -way of sixty (60) feet with necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
BE IT RESOLVED, That this Board does approve the request
for inclusion into the secondary road system contingent upon the posting of
a proper and acceptable bond with the Virginia Department of Highways and
Transportation.
REQUEST FROM J. P. DARLINGTON FOR PORTION OF BAKER LANE
TO BE ACCEPTED INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM APPROVED
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the following resolution was approved:
WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of Highways and Trans-
portation and the Department of Planning and Development have reviewed the
request by J. P. Darlington and recommend the inclusion of approximately .38
miles of Baker Lane extended from its intersection with Brooke Road to the
Arcadia Mobile Home Park, in the Stonewall Magisterial District, into the
secondary road system pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended; and,
WHEREAS, This Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right -of -way of sixty (60) feet with necessary
easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
BE IT RESOLVED, That this Board does approve the request for inclusion
into the secondary road system contingent upon the posting of a proper and
acceptable bond with the Virginia Department of Highways and Transporta-
tion.
ED TEMPORARY CLOSING OF ROUTE 692 - APPROVED
Mr. Horne stated that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transpor-
tation was requesting that Route 692 between Route 671 and the West Virginia
line be closed temporarily for approximately one week to construct the new
pipe overflow.
Upon motion made by Rhoda W. Maddox, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and
passed unanimously, the request for the temporary closing of Route 692 was
approved.
577
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Mr. Horne stated that in the quarterly report for the Department of
Planning and Development, it was noted by the staff that the Planning
Commission Subcommittee on Capital Improvements had completed the system for
evaluation for capital improvement requests by County departments. The
Subcommittee is now awaiting action by the Board of Supervisors on a series
of fiscal and financial policies which will generate the projections for the
amount of funds available for capital improvements over the life of the
plan.
The full Planning Commission, at the meeting on June 2, instructed the
staff to draft a memorandum to the Board of Supervisors urging the inactment
of these fiscal and financial policies. Without an indication from the
Board of Supervisors as to the available funds for capital improvements, the
Subcommittee and Planning Commission will be unable to realistically set
priorities for capital improvements over the next six years. The
Subcommittee would have no basis for knowing which projects were possible
and during which years it could be funded.
The Subcommittee is awaiting the action by the Board of Supervisors and
when the Board has set fiscal and financial guidelines under which the
Subcommittee can operate, they will be immediately setting up final
interviews with County departments and agencies to rate and set priorities
for capital improvements for the life of the Capital Improvements Plan. The
Planning Commission would again like to urge that the Board of Supervisors
take action at the earliest possible date on this important matter.
Mr. Koontz asked if the Subcommittee was going to go to the Planning
Commission first before talking about finances.
Mr. Horne replied that not before the Committee talks about finances
He stated that before any proposal comes before the Board for projects it
will go to the Planning Commission for their review and endorsement.
Mr. Stiles stated that the Subcommittee has reviewed everyone's request
and that they can't make any recommendations until they know how much money
is available.
Mr. Koontz stated that they didn't want to tell them how much money is
available until they give us a list of the projects.
Mr. Stiles further stated that his perception was that when the
Subcommittee makes its recommendations to the Planning Commission, the
Planning Commission and the Board are going to hear a lot of complaints
578
stating that the various departments cannot live with the recommendations
that they have presented.
Mr. White stated that he had written a memo to Mr. Horne addressing the
Capital Improvements Program and inasmuch as the Finance Committee had not
been able to meet, he was providing a copy of this memo to the Board tonight
for their review.
Mr. Stiles stated that he could not vote on a matter as important as
this on such short notice and that he felt the Board should have a
recommendation from the Finance Committee.
Mr. White stated that he was not asking the Board for any action on
this at tonight's meeting.
Mr. Stiles stated that he disagreed with this as he felt the Committee
had to know how much money would be available and that Mr. White was asking
the Board to make a recommendation with the most critical factor still up in
the air.
Mr. Koontz stated that the Board could not take any action on this
matter at tonight's meeting.
CODE AND ENGINEERING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. Owings, Chairman, presented the following Code and Engineering
Committee Report:
Parking
The Committee reviewed an informal proposal regarding the possibility
of the County subsidizing parking spaces in the new parking garage for
employees and blue tags. The consensus was that no subsidizing be under-
taken at all. The proposal was referred to the Finance Committee for
consideration.
Mr. Stiles asked whose idea this was.
Mr. Owings stated that he was not sure, that he understood a survey had
been sent out from the County Administrator's Office and that the Committee
was given the results without him knowing anything about it.
Mr. White stated that the City had requested the number of County
employees interested in parking in the garage. Various questions concerning
this arose from the employees and thus the reason for the questionnaire.
Mr. Smith requested that a copy of the questionnaire be given him when
the Board retired into Executive Session later on in the meeting.
579
Mr. Baker requested that the last sentence of the above be deleted,
that being, (The proposal was referred to the Finance Committee for
consideration) .
Upon motion made by Will L. Owings, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and
passed unanimously, the above was approved as submitted.
Department of Inspections
The Committee reviewed the following information provided by the County
Building Official:
As of June 16, 1982, 103 backlogged permits have been cleared and
finalized. An additional 31 have been addressed and are still open, either
due to the project not being completed or personal contact has not yet been
made with the permit holder. The Committee noted with pleasure the satis-
factory progress. Cooperation from individual citizens has been excellent.
One Inspector is assigned full -time to the project with daily assistance
provided by the Field Inspectors as their inspection load permits.
Mr. Stiles stated that he had the same reservations on this as
discussed before.
The Building Permit Guide is being revised but cannot be completed
until after July 16 when the 1981 BOCA Code becomes law.
The first quarterly newsletter to builders, contractors, and home-
owners, etc., is being reviewed in house. It will be provided to the
Committee for review and approval prior to distribution.
The Committee noted that the 46th Annual Virginia Chapter meeting of
the International Association of Electrical Inspectors was hosted by
Frederick County on June 13 through 15 at the Lee Jackson. Attendance was
good with representatives from throughout Virginia and neighboring States,
such as Tennessee, Georgia, Massachusettes, Delaware, New Jersey, Illinois
and Maryland.
The "Quality of Services" questionnaire was discussed, including the
cost of mailing. The Committee recommended that a copy without postage be
provided to every new permit holder for the next six months. The consensus
was that a questionnaire without postage would most probably result in
responses from the extremes, i.e., those very pleased or those not pleased.
Mr. Stiles stated that the Board had discussed for some time having
the Building Inspectors do some zoning inspection field work. He stated
that he would like to recommend in the strongest possible way, given current
circumstances, that this be delayed and that any zoning inspection field
work continue to be done by the Planning and Zoning staff.
Mr. Horne stated that the Board had adopted a work program for the
Planning Office and the Inspections Department. The transfer of limited
responsibilities for routine zoning inspections out of the Planning Depart-
ment into the Inspections Department was an intricate part of the work
program which not only has an effect on the routine zoning administration,
but that it has a dramatic effect on the ability to do long range planning.
He stated that the Deputy Director is currently spending the majority of his
time on day to day concerns and that he felt that if this action is taken,
it will have a dramatic impact on the timetable of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Stiles stated that given the problems we have had and are continu-
ing to have with the Inspections Department, that the worst thing they could
do would be to expand their field of operation.
Discussion followed as to whether this should go to the Planning
Commission for their consideration.
Mr. Stiles requested that this be delayed until the Planning Commission
had had a chance to review it and that a full report would be given to the
Board at the August 11 meeting. Mr. Stiles asked why the Design Review
Specialist had been doing inspections.
Mr. Harriman stated that he did not know the reason for this but that
this was no longer being done.
Solid Waste Management
The Landfill fund projected deficit was discussed. The deficit was due
to repair costs exceeding the amount projected at the beginning of fiscal
1982. A memorandum from the Finance Director was discussed indicating that
a supplemental appropriation of $35,000 must be requested. If this request
is approved, a second request must be made to advance the $35,000 from the
general operating fund. It was also noted that a transfer of an additional
$10,000 would be necessary in order to cover cash flow deficiencies.
Figures representing actual repair cost for FY82 and anticipated repair cost
for FY83 were discussed. The Committee recommended that the supplemental
appropriation and advance of $35,000 be granted and passed to the Finance
Committee for further action.
Mr. Stiles stated that he felt this repayment should be budgeted as
part of the money that comes from the rate that is paid by the users.
581
Mr. Harriman stated that if we maintain the present equipment and a
projected fee of $6.50 across the board, that you would be seeing an operat-
ing deficit of $40,000 above and beyond the $55,000. He stated that the
budget he had prepared originally was the one that had projected lease
purchasing three new pieces of equipment and with that agreement the County
would see a profit at the end of next year above and beyond the pay back of
$55,000.
Mr. Stiles stated that he did not understand this. He stated that he
is estimating $130,000 for repairs for next year and that he was saying that
if we do that we will lose $40,000 and if we go back into the lease purchase
we will not make money, but the monthly payments for lease purchase for each
of these three pieces of equipment is $144,000, which puts us $14,000
further in the hole.
Mr. Harriman stated that the sale of equipment is included in this
figure.
Mr. Stiles stated what is not considered is that if any maintenance and
repair is needed on the new equipment that will be purchased.
Mr. Harriman stated yes, that within that is $16,000 that addresses the
contractors whomever they may be to provide maintenance and
repair. He stated that with all the companies he had talked with a
guarantee to a level of $15,000 for each piece of equipment over a five year
period and anything in excess of $15,000, they will assume part of that.
Mr. Stiles asked if this included the undercarriage, if it is torn up.
Mr. Harriman stated that the undercarriage is one item in the lease
purchase agreement that most companies won't address.
Mr. Stiles stated that that is correct because the undercarriage will
not last three years.
Mr. Harriman stated that part of the maintenance program is adjusting
the tension on the undercoverage on the tracks.
Mr. Stiles stated that there is a substantial amount of equipment
failure at the Landfill and to simply assume that we are going to get new
toys to play with, that there will not be any failure, I don't buy it.
Mr. Smith asked Mr. Harriman how he arrived at the $35,000 figure.
Mr. Harriman stated that among other things were bills outstanding,
ones that the County owes, anticipated bills that he expected to get prior
to the end of the fiscal year, etc.
Mr. Smith asked why Mr. Eddie Wright was not in attendance at this
meeting in order that this might be discussed with him.
Mr. Harriman stated that he had told Mr. Wright that it was not
necessary for him to be in attendance.
Mr. Stiles stated that any time the Board is discussing a situation
that pertains to a particular department, the employee of that department
was to be present at the meeting.
This matter will be discussed later in the meeting under the Finance
Committee recommendations.
Mr. Stiles stated that he would still like to know what the Boards'
pleasure was as far as to how this money would be repaid.
Mr. Harriman stated that the repayment should come from fees. He
further stated that he was not sure the Board could get the fee high enough
and quickly enough to cover this expenditure and still cover the operating
expenses.
Mr. Owings stated that the fee should have been increased prior to this
year which was not done and it has gradually built up to the point where
this action must be taken at this time.
It is recommended that the Landfill fee for FY83 (effective July 1,
1982) be increased to $7.00 /ton for all users except Winchester and
Frederick County. The Winchester and Frederick County fee is to remain at
$6.00 /ton. It was also recommended that this fee structure be reviewed in
six months. The increase in fee is required to support the FY83 budget as
approved. (This will be done under the Finance Committee recommendations.)
The Committee reviewed the RFP and endorses the proposed collection
system. The responses are due prior to Wednesday, June 23, 1982.
Mr. Owings stated that there had been a misunderstanding concerning
this. He stated that the Code and Engineering Committee felt that prior to
any evaluation that the solid waste would be put out to bid and the
Committee would receive the bids and at that time an evaluation would be
asked for which was the most cost effective way for the County to go, but
prior to any other action being taken letters were sent to five consulting
firms and he had not seen the results from any of these letters. He further
stated that he did not anticipate the Board taking any action on this
tonight. Mr. Owings further stated that as far as he was concerned the
system that was proposed by the Public Services Department should have been
reviewed and a decision made by the Board as to whether or not this is the
way the County wants to go and if so then the Board would decide if the
system would be put out to bid or if it would be done in- house.
Mr. Harriman stated that he felt there was a misunderstanding and the
last time it was discussed by the Board he was under the impression that
some of the numbers being discussed did not please some of the Board
members.
Mr. Stiles asked how much these bids had come in for.
Mr. Harriman stated that he had received replies from three and one had
called this date to say that he would not be bidding and one was to be
delivered to his office tomorrow morning. He stated that the highest bid
was for $4,000 and the lowest was $2,500.
Mr. Stiles stated that he did not feel the County had any business
being in the trash hauling business and further that the County had tried
this before and had decided against it because of the headaches and he could
not vote to pay a firm any amount of money to do an analysis to tell the
Board whether or not they should do something when he was not in favor of it
to start with. He stated that he felt a poll should be taken of the Board
and see what the feelings are before we proceed with this project. He
further stated that if this is to be put to bid on the system that is being
proposed that we also ask any commercial operators if they want to bid it
and if they are interested in submitting a bid on an alternative operation
the County can then evaluate which one they think is the best proposal for
the amount of money. He further stated that he is not interested in obtain-
ing the services of any consultants on this matter.
Mrs. Maddox stated that the Committee felt the Board was not pleased
with the figures that the staff had given and therefore felt this should be
done by a consultant.
Mr. Koontz stated that he did not feel this could be voted on at
tonight's meeting.
Mr. Stiles stated that he felt the Board needed a worksession in order
to discuss this further.
Mr. Koontz stated that he would get with Mr. Harriman and set up a
worksession with the Board in order to discuss this matter.
FINANCE REPORT
Mr. Baker presented the following memo from Jim Boyd:
5 81_ �.
Since the Finance Committee was unable to meet prior to the Board of
Supervisors' meeting to be held on June 23, 1982, the following items should
be presented directly to the Board for their consideration on the 23rd of
June.
Code and Engineering Committee Recommendations
Supplemental Appropriation
The Frederick - Winchester Landfill Fund will require a supplemental
appropriation in the amount of $35,000.00 in order that the Fund may meet
its obligation to June 30, 1982.
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and
passed unanimously, the above was approved.
Advance to the Frederick - Winchester Landfill Fund
The Landfill Fund will require an advance from the General Operating
Fund in the amount of $35,000.00 prior to June 30, 1982, in order that the
Fund may meet its obligations. This advance along with the $20,000 advance
from the fiscal year 1980 -81 is scheduled for repayment during the next
fiscal year, contingent upon sale of old equipment and lease purchase of new
equipment.
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, that the above be amended to read:
The Landfill Fund will require an advance from the General Operating
Fund in the amount of $35,000.00, prior to June 30, 1982, in order that the
Fund may meet its obligations. This advance along with the $20,000.00
advance from the fiscal year 1980 -81 is scheduled for repayment during the
next fiscal year and that the payback be incorporated over the next two
year's Landfill rate.
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the above was approved.
Landfill Rate
The Landfill rate must be set effective June 26, 1982. The Code and
Engineering Committee has recommended a rate of $7.00 per ton for commercial
and $6.00 per ton for the City of Winchester and Frederick County. This
rate will be reviewed at the end of six months.
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and
passed unanimously, the above was unanimously approved.
Year End Transfers
58
There are several year end transfers necessary to bring accounts into
balance before the end of the fiscal year.
Transfer to:
1208 - 3002 -00
Audit Costs
$ 7,644.63
1224 - 5604 -35
Magna Carta Donation
2,500.00
2102 - 4001 -00
General District
Court Data Process-
ing Charges
543.00
2108 - 5411 -00
Books E Subscriptions
Law Library
400.00
4104 - 7010 -00
Street Lights Installa-
tion
1,602.00
5306 - 5805 -00
Property Tax Relief
for Elderly
870.24
TOTAL $13,559.87
Transfer from:
2105- 3009 -01 Braddock House
Expenses $ 2,000.00
3202 - 3009 -02 Central Dispatch 748.00
7302 - 5605 -04 Regional Library 6,000.00
9301- 5890 -00 Operational Transfers 4,811.87
TOTAL $13,559.87
(1) Audit Costs - Cost exceeded appropriations.
(2) Magna Carta Donation - This donation was not budgeted at the beginning
of the fiscal year.
(3) General District Court - Additional appropriation required due to
increase in data processing charges.
(4) Law Library - Books and subscriptions underbudgeted.
(5) Street Lights - Installation of street lights in Section III of
Fredericktowne.
(6) Property Tax Relief for Elderly - Underbudgeted.
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the above was approved.
Year End Transfers by County Administrator
Since the Board of Supervisors will not meet during the month of July
it is recommended that the County Administrator be granted authority to make
any additional appropriation transfers necessary to balance account totals
within the various funds for the fiscal year 1981 -82 with a copy of said
transfers to be forwarded to all members of the Board.
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Will L. Owings and
passed unanimously, the above was approved.
Mr. Stiles requested that he be mailed a complete listing of these
transfers during the past year.
Request from School Board
586
The School Board Finance Committee will present a resolution passed by
the School Board requesting the Board of Supervisors to make certain amend-
ments and authorizations in relationship to the 1982 fiscal year School
Budget. Mr. Lewis Costello, Mrs. Barbara Black and Mr. Don Perrault
appeared before the Board on behalf of the School Board.
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by David L. Smith,
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County School Board
requests of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors permission to amend
the 1981 -82 operation budget to include additional State, Federal and other
revenues and any other funds that have been allotted to the Frederick County
School Board for the 1981 -82 fiscal year.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said funds to be expended
will be available from Federal, State and other revenues and represent no
additional burden upon the General Revenue Fund of the County of Frederick.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Will L. Owings, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox, David L.
Smith and Kenneth Y. Stiles. Nay - None.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Frederick County School
Board requests the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to authorize that
any balance in the 1981 -82 school budget be transferred to the operational
category, with maximum of $30,000.00, of the 1982 -83 School Board budget
designating that any balance will be used first for the acquisition of two
(2) additional buses and any balance after the bus purchase will be returned
to the Construction Fund to restore the $18,000.00 that was advanced by the
Board for repair of the cooling system at Ridge Campus.
Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Will L. Owings, the
above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - S. Roger
Koontz, Will L. Owings, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox, David L. Smith
and Kenneth Y. Stiles. Nay - None.
Mr. Costello stated that the School Board had agreed to increase the
textbook fees for summer school. He further stated that he would like to
request that the Board of Superviosrs notify the School Board when they
would like for the School Board to appear before the Board with the year end
transfer figures. He further stated that Dr. Walker met with the Board of
Supervisors in Reedsville at least once a month to answer the questions of
the Board of Supervisors and he felt that he would want to do the same here.
He further stated that it was the hope of the School Board that the working
587
relationship and credibility between the Board of Supervisors and the School
Board would improve.
The Board requested that the School Board provide them with the year
end transfer figures prior to the beginning of a new School year.
BOARD RETIRES INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the Board retired into Executive Session in accordance
with Section 2.1 -344 (a)(1) to discuss Personnel matters.
OARD WITHDRAWS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from Executive Session.
BOARD RECONVENES INTO REGULAR SESSION
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and
passed unanimously, the Board reconvened into Regular Session.
UPON MOTION DULY MADE, SECONDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY,
IT IS ORDERED THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DO NOW ADJOURN.
>n�4 pc
Chai p an,, oar /�f r
S ervisors � 1 Clerk, Board of S pervisors
J J