Loading...
January 20, 1982 Special Meeting46f A Special Meeting of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors was held on January 20, 1982, at 7:00 P.M., in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, 9 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia. PRESENT S. Roger Koontz, Chairman; Will L. Owings, Vice - Chairman; William H. Baker; Rhoda W. Maddox; David L. Smith and Kenneth Y. Stiles. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order. INVOCATION Due to the absence of a minister there was a moment of silence. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Stiles stated that he would like to request an Executive Session at the end of the meeting to discuss personnel and legal matters. Mr. Stiles further stated that he had two questions with reference to the minutes of December 9, 1981. Mr. Koontz stated that he had an additional resolution for the Boards' approval. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the agenda was adopted as amended. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Stiles inquired as to whether or not the Parks and Recreation Commission had met with reference to the Commission reconsidering a different type of building to be erected at Sherando Park that would be used as a restroom and concession stand as referenced in the minutes on Page 9. Mr. Baker stated that due to inclement weather the meeting had been postponed until 26 January. Mr. Stiles further asked about the recommendations of the Code and Engineering Committee, re: the reorganization in the Department of Public Services, Inspections and Planning and clarification of the assignment of duties under the organization regarding zoning, code enforcement and conditional use permit matters, and that the Engineering and Code Enforcement Committee report in this regard to the Board sharing their findings with the Planning Commission. Mr. Owings stated that the Code and Engineering Committee had not met. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the minutes of 9 December 1981 were approved as submitted. MR. TOHT ADDRESSES BOARD RE: FIFTH ANNUAL BUDGET REPORT - SHENANDOAH AREA AGENCY ON AGING Mr. Toht reviewed the annual report of the Area Agency on Aging, more specifically the section that deals with Frederick County. He addressed the increases and decreases in services provided to the County residents through the Area Agency on Aging. Mr. Stiles asked Mr. Toht how many full time employees the Agency had. Mr. Toht replied nine. Mr. Stiles asked Mr. Toht if he had been able to determine how the Federal cuts would effect his budget. Mr. Toht replied that his budget was expected to stay the same. Mrs. Maddox asked about the role of the Area Agency on Aging in the schools. Mr. Toht stated that at the present time some tutoring was being offered but that more volunteers were needed. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR REGINALD KING OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION - e nnn nvrn Mr. White read the following resolution of appreciation for Mr. King: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO REGINALD KING WHEREAS, Reginald King served as an employee of the Virginia Department of Highways from July 1, 1946 to December 31, 1981 serving as Assistant Resident Engineer for Frederick County since 1961, and WHEREAS, He possessed the highest devotion to duty as an employee of the Highway Department, and ably served the needs of Frederick County, and was relied upon by the Board of Supervisors, and WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors wishes to express its appreciation to Mr. King for his years of conscientious service to the citizens of Frederick County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County does hereby express its sincere appreciation to Reginald King; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a true copy of this resolution be presen to Mr. King. RESOLVED the 13th day of January, 1982. /s/ S. Roger Koontz S. Roger Koontz, Chairman /s/ Will L. Owings Will L. Owings, Vice - Chairman /s/ William H. Baker William H. Baker /s/ Rhoda W. Maddox Rhoda W. Maddox /s/ David L. Smith David L. Smith /s/ Kenneth Y. Stiles Kenneth Y. Stiles /s/ R . Thomas Malcolm R. Thomas Malcolm ATTEST: /s/ James M. White Clerk, Board of Supervisors 464 Mr. Stiles requested that Mr. R. Thomas Malcolm's name be added to the resolution, inasmuch as he had worked with, and had the highest regard for Mr. King for the past six years. Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the above resolution, with the addition of R. Thomas Malcolm's name, was approved as read. The Board directed that this executed resolution be delivered to Mr. King. RESOLUTION HONORING ARNOLD W. "BUCK" RYAN - APPROVED Upon motion made by Rhoda W. Maddox, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the following resolution honoring Arnold "Buck" Ryan was approved: MEMORIAL RESOLUTION IN HONOR OF ARNOLD W. "BUCK" RYAN WHEREAS, Arnold W. "Buck" Ryan was a nationally respected Fiddle Player, having won the National Fiddle Championship three times; and WHEREAS, "Buck" Ryan was also a long time resident of Frederick County where he was respected and warmly regarded by his friends and neighbors; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ryan departed this life 7 January 1982, and the Board wishes to honor his passing; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Board of Supervisors hereby enact this Resolution in honor of the memory of "Buck" Ryan and the qualities which he represented in the community; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That a true copy of this resolution be presented to the family of Mr. Ryan. /s/ S. Roger Koontz S. Roger Koontz, Chairman /s/ Will L. Owings Will L. Owings, Vice - Chairman /s/ William H. Baker William H. Baker Attest: /s/ James M. White Clerk, Board of Supervisors /s/ Rhoda W. Maddox Rhoda W. Maddox /s/ David L. Smith David L. Smith /s/ Kenneth Y. Stiles Kenneth Y. Stiles CUP #017 -81 - PRESTON R. WHITACRE - BACK CREEK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - DENIED Mr. Horne presented the request of Mr. Whitacre for a conditional use permit for a public garage and stated that the Planning Commission unani- mously recommended approval with conditions. Mr. Whitacre was not present. Mr. Erin Mitchell, who lives on Route 803, appeared before the Board stating that he was opposed to this conditional use permit inasmuch as this area is primarily a residential area, and further that he felt a public 465 garage would halt- an effect their property value in that it would be depreciated. He further stated that.he felt the.parking restrictions as recommended the Planning Commission were vague and needed to be more specific. Mr. Melvin Omps appeared before the Board and stated that he owned property adjoining Mr. Whitacre's property and even though he was not living in the house at the present time, that he had purchased this property as an investment, as he did plan on retiring there and he did not want to retire in a business district. Mrs. Lucille Patton appeared before the Board in opposition to this conditional use permit stating that she is also an adjoining property owner and she is afraid Mr. Whitacre will start a junk yard, and even though she had been told a fence would be erected around this property she did not want that either. Mr. Larry Patton, son of Mrs. Lucille Patton, appeared before the Board in opposition to this conditional use permit stating he was afraid the same thing would happen with this garage that happened to Burcham's Garage in the City of Winchester. r Mr. Stiles stated that noone appeared at the Planning Commission meet- `.. ing in opposition to this conditional use permit. He further stated that if this conditional use permit is approved and the neighbors feel that Mr. Whitacre is starting a junk yard all it would take is one phone call to the Planning Office, and if it was determined by the staff that in fact he was starting a junk yard, the conditional use permit would be revoked at that time. He further stated that outdoor storage and the use of two lots instead of one was not brought up at the Planning Commission meeting, that this permit gives Mr. Whitacre the right to work in the existing building and that is all. Mr. Baker stated that from what the people that are here tonight have said they are afraid this will become a junk yard and the fact that this is a residential area he could see why they are concerned about having a garage of this nature in an area where there are children residing. Mr. Stiles asked since Mr. Whitacre is not here tonight should this be tabled until the next Board meeting. Mr. Baker stated that he did not feel that this should be tabled. Mr. Owings stated that Mr. Whitacre had been notified just as the adjoining property owners had and this should be decided upon tonight. 466 Upon motion made by William H. Baker and seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox, the conditional use permit #017 -81 of Preston R. Whitacre, Route 4, Box 110, Winchester, Virginia, requesting a permit for a public garage is hereby denied. This property is designated as Parcel No. (3) (4) on Tax Map No. 53 B in the Back Creek Magisterial District. The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - S. Roger Koontz, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox, Will L. Owings. Nay - David L. Smith and Kenneth Y. Stiles. Mr. Stiles stated that he felt restrictions could be added to meet the needs of the neighbors. CUP #018 -81 - ELMER H. LAUCK - GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED Mr. Horne presented this conditional use permit request and stated that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with conditions. Mr. Stiles stated that he had received a call from a concerned neighbor with reference to the right -of -way. Mr. Horne addressed this. Mr. Stiles stated that he had received a call with reference to working hours on Sunday as there is a church located nearby. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by William H. Baker, that the condition be added to the conditional use permit #018 -81 of Elmer Lauck stating that there be no outside Sunday work. The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Will L. Owings, Kenneth Y. Stiles, William H. Baker and David L. Smith. Nay - Rhoda W. Maddox. Mr. Owings stated that this concerned him inasmuch as the Board had just denied a similar request in the same type of zoning even though the neighbors stated that they would be agreeable to the request with conditions and now the Board amends the conditions of this request and approves it. Upon motion made by Rhoda W. Maddox, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles an� passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve conditional use permit #018 -81 of Elmer H. Lauck, Route 2, Box 323, Winchester, Virginia, requesting a permit for a public garage. This property is designated as Parcel No. 150 on Tax Map No. 30 -(A) in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. CUP #019 -81 - CRAIG D. AND SERI K. KERN - GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED 467 Mr. Horne presented this conditional use permit request and stated that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with conditions. There was no opposition. Upon motion made by Rhoda W. Maddox, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the conditional use permit #019 -81 of Craig D. and Seri Kern, P. O. Box 3196, Winchester, Virginia, requesting a permit for a kennel /pet grooming shop is hereby approved. This property is designated as Parcel No. 231 on Tax Map No. 42 -(A) in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. ZMAP #009 -81 - SHOCKEY REALTY COMPANY - HARRY W. AIKENS - WALTER AIKENS - FORT COLLIER FARMS INCORPORATED - STONE - WALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED Mr. Horne presented this rezoning request and stated that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. Mr. Ben Butler, Attorney, addressed the Board concerning this rezoning request. Mr. Robert Fuller appeared before the Board stating that he lives next to Fort Collier Farms and inquired as to how large the building would be that they planned to erect. Mr. Horne stated that he was not sure, but that it would have to be a 150 feet from Mr. Fuller's property line. Mr. Stiles stated that it would be no more than 30 feet wide because of the size of the parcels. Mr. Fuller stated that he was not in favor of this rezoning. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the zoning map amendment petition no. 009 -81 of Shockey Realty Co., P. O. Box 2530, Winchester, Virginia; Harry W. Aikens and Walter Aikens; Martinsburg Pike, Winchester, Virginia; and Fort Collier Farms, Inc., c/o Eds Coleman, 20 South Cameron Street, Winchester, Virginia, con- sisting of 2.21 acres. Fort Collier Farms, Inc., and Harry W. Aikens and Walter Aikens now zoned R -3 (Residential - General) to be rezoned M -1 (Industrial - Limited) and Shockey Realty now zoned B -2 (Business - General) to be rezoned M -1 (industrial-Limited) is hereby approved. These parcels appear on Tax Map No. 54 in the Stonewall Magisterial District and parcel numbers are as follows: Aikens - 0021, 0022A, 0023, 0024; Fort Collier - 0022; Shockey Realty - 0043. 466 ZMAP #010 -81 - GARY A. AND REBECCA H. DOLPHIN - STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - APPROVED Mr. Horne presented this rezoning request and stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the amended rezoning application to rezone only that portion of Parcel 6 that was rezoned B -2 prior to October, 1980. The Planning Commission finds that a business use was existing on this property prior to October, 1980, therefore the property should not have been rezoned at that time. Mr. Robert Mitchell, Attorney, appeared before the Board representing Mr. and Mrs. Dolphin. Mr. Mitchell stated that the Dolphins had been con- ducting a leather business within their home for a number of years and because of the growing business they had decided to expand. When they applied for their building permit they were informed they had been down zoned in 1980 and that this was not permitted in the present zoning. Mr. Mitchell stated that due to the fact that this was an existing business at the time of the comprehensive rezoning of 1980 that it should not have been down zoned and that Mr. and Mrs. Dolphin should be granted this rezoning request. Mr. Koontz asked if the Planning Commission did not feel this was spot zoning. Mr. Stiles stated that this was bounced around and that some of the members did feel it does tend to violate the spot zoning regulations. Mr. Owings stated that at the time of the rezoning, due to the tremend- ous amounts of rezoning, the Board did state that they would try to correct any errors that had been done. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the zoning map amendment petition no. 010 -81 of Gary A. and Rebecca H. Dolphin, Route 7, Box 102, Winchester, Virginia, consisting of 2.843 acres, now zoned R -3 (Residential - General) to be rezoned B -2 (Business - General) is hereby approved. This appears on Tax Map No. 55B, Parcel 6 in the Stonewall Magisterial District. JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - APPROVED Mr. Horne stated that this proposal is the result of a number of meet- ings by the working group at which time concept of the Joint Economic Development Commission was considered and specific proposals were prepared as to budgets, compositions, goals and strategies. He further stated that it is felt that through the representation of both jurisdictions on the membership of the Commission that all responsible parties in each jurisdic- tion will be aware of the activities of the Commission and will have the opportunity to monitor the activities of the Commission and its staff. Mr. Koontz asked where the governing bodies fit into this picture. Mr. Stiles stated that the Commission would be answerable to the Board of Supervisors and the City Council and further that this Commission would let interested firms know exactly what was available to them in Frederick County and the City of Winchester. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does hereby endorse the following resolution for the establishment of the Joint Economic Development Commission: CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY CREATING THE WINCHESTER - FREDERICK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIO BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Winchester and the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, in separate meetings assembled, that: I. Creation There is hereby created the Winchester- Frederick County Economic Development Commission. 2. Purpose The Winchester- Frederick County Economic Development Commission is established for the purpose of fostering an efficient and cooperative effort towards establishing economic development goals, and strategies to meet those goals, for the Winchester - Frederick County area. 3. Composition, Appointment, Term The Winchester- Frederick County Economic Development Commission shall consist of seven members as follows: one member of Common Council, appointed by Council; one member of the City Planning Commission, appointed by the Commission; a member of the Winchester Industrial Development Authority, appointed by the Authority; one member of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, appointed by the Supervisors; one member of the County Planning Commission to be appointed by the Commission; a member of the Frederick County Industrial Development Authority, appointed by the Authority; and a representative of an industry in the Winchester - Frederick County area, to be appointed by the other six members of the Commis- sion. For the initial appointments the representatives from the respective governing bodies shall serve three year terms, the representatives from the respective Planning Commissions shall serve two year terms, all other representatives shall serve one year terms; thereafter, all members shall serve for a term of three years or until their successors take office. The following will be available to provide staff support to the Commission: 470 Winchester City Manager Frederick County Administrator Winchester Planning Director Frederick County Director of Planning & Community Development Representative of Winchester- Frederick County Chamber of Commerce Representative of Winchester Downtown Development Board 4. Vacancies Vacancies on the Winchester- Frederick County Economic Development Commission occurring otherwise than through the expiration of a term shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term. 5. Compensa All members of the Winchester- Frederick County Economic Development Commission shall serve without compensation. 6. Organization, Officers, Quorum The members of the Winchester- Frederick County Economic Development Commission shall, as soon as possible after their appointment, meet and organize. The Commission shall elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretary and such other officers as it may deem necessary. A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum. 7. Reports and Budgets At least once each quarter the Commission shall make a full written report to the Winchester Common Council and the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, showing the activities of the Commission for the previous quarter. Once each year the Commission shall submit a report of its goals and proposed activities for the coming year. The Commission shall also annually submit a budget to the Council and Board. JUDICIAL CENTER COMMITTEE REPORT Mr. White stated that the Judicial Center Committee met on 21 December 1981 and that they had received the final schematic and design development drawings for the Judicial Center. The Committee noted that all users of the space had approved the drawings as prepared. Mr. White further stated that the Committee will be proceeding with the development of the materials and finished schedule with the architect as development of the construction drawings proceeds. The architect is currently developing unit cost information that the Committee will be examining in the development of the finished schedules. He further stated that it is anticipated that construction documents will be completed in April with bidding to proceed in May and June and the start of construction expected in July, 1982. Mr. White further stated that it had been recommended by the Committee that Mr. Thomas Malcolm be requested to stay on the Judicial Center Committee, representing Frederick County, at least until the start of construction. 471 Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein accept the Judicial Center Committee report and recommendations as presented by Mr. White and further that Mr. Thomas Malcolm remain on the Committee, representing Frederick County, at least until the start of construction. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND COURTS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Mrs. Maddox, Chairman, presented the Law Enforcement and Courts report and recommendations. The Law and Courts Committee met on 7 January 82 with Mrs. Maddox and Mr. Stiles present. Mr. Coverstone was absent. The Committee makes the following report and recommendations: Proposal for the Establishment of Work Release Centers The Committee reviewed a proposal submitted by the Division of Court Services for the establishment of work release centers. The proposal was quite lengthy and thoroughly developed. The Committee unanimously recommends the proposal to the Board for endorsement and to authorize the Division of Court Service's staff to proceed with the additional steps necessary for implementation. Upon motion made by Rhoda W. Maddox, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the proposal for the establishment of the work release center was approved. Classification for Civil Process Servers The Committee reviewed a memo from the Administrative Assistant for Personnel proposing that salary range classifications for Civil Process Deputies be established as shown in the memo. The Committee recommends approval of the classifications as proposed. The Committee also recommends that the classification procedures established to implement this proposal stipulate the Deputies which work regularly as Deputy Sheriffs would be classified and paid as Deputy Sheriffs rather than Civil Process Deputies. Mr. Stiles stated that after talking with Mrs. Kelican concerning this matter and from what he understood of their conversation and the information in this memo was not the same, therefore he would like to table this to be reviewed again by the Committee. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the above recommendation was tabled for further review. AMENDMENT TO TAX RELIEF FOR THE ELDERLY ORDINANCE, SECTIONS 472 9 -12 (C)(D), 9 -13 (A) AND 9 -14. THE AMENDMENTS GENERALLY INCREASE ELIGIBILITY LIMITS ON INCOME FROM $9,000 TO $12,000 AND ON NET WORTH FROM $20,000 to $30,000 - APPROVED Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the following amendment to the Tax Relief for the Elderly was approved: Article M. Real Estate Tax Relief for Certain Elderly Persons. For state law as to authority of county to adopt this article, see Code of Va., 58- 760.1. Sec. 9 -11. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: Affidavit. The real estate tax exemption affidavit. Dwelling. The full -time residence of the person or persons claiming exemption. Exemption. Exemption from the county real estate tax according to the provisions of this article. Taxable year. The calendar year, from January 1 until December 31, for which exemption is claimed. (12- 12 -73, 1.) Sec. 9 -12. Eligibility for exemption. Exemption from real estate tax shall be subject to the following provisions: (a) The head of the household occupying the dwelling and owning title or partial title thereto shall have reached the age of sixty -five prior to the taxable year for which the exemption is claimed. (b) The title or partial title to the real estate for which exemption is claimed shall be owned on January 1 of the taxable year by the person or persons claiming such exemption. (c) The total combined income during the immediately preceding calendar year from all sources of the owners of the dwelling living therein and of the owners' relatives living in the dwelling does not exceed twelve thousand dollars provided that the first three thousand dollars of income of each relative, other than the spouse, of the owner, who is living in the dwelling shall not be included in such total. (d) The net combined financial worth including equitable interest, as of the thirty -first day of December of the immediately preceding calendar year, of the owners, and of the spouse of any owner, excluding the value of the dwelling, and the land, not exceeding one acre, does not exceed thirty thousand dollars (e) The fact that persons who are otherwise qualified for tax exemption pursuant to this article are residing in hospitals, nursing homes, convalescent homes or other facilities for physical or mental care for extended periods of time shall not be construed to mean that the real estate for which tax exemption is sought does not continue to be the sole dwelling of such persons during such extended periods of other residence so long as much real estate is not used by or leased to others for consideration. (12- 12 -73, 2.) Sec. 9 -13. Claiming of an exemption. (a) Application for exemption shall be made annually between February 1 and May 1 of each taxable year for which the exemption is claimed. The person or persons claiming such an exemption must make application on the 473 forms supplied by the county. The application must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue. (b) The affidavit shall set forth, in a manner prescribed by the Commissioner of Revenue, the names of the related person(s) occupying the dwelling for which exemption is claimed, their gross combined income, and the total combined net worth of the owners and spouses. (c) If after audit and investigation, the Commissioner of Revenue determines that the person or persons are qualified for exemption, he shall so certify to the Treasurer of the County who shall deduct the amount of the exemption from the claimant's real estate tax liability. (d) If any person applies for exemption but is determined to be ineligible by the Commissioner of the Revenue, such a person will be notified in writing by the Commissioner of Revenue. (12- 12 -73, 3.) Sec. 9 -14. Amount of exemption. For eligible claimants, the amount of exemption from real estate tax for any taxable year shall be as follows: T( In COMBINED NET WORTH Up to 5,001 10,001 15,001 1 20,001 25,001 Combined 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,00( to $ 000 I 100 98 94 I 88 I -- 80 70 001 -6,000 1 95 1 93 1 - _ 89 1 83 1 75 1 65 0 1 85 1 83 1 79 1 73 1 65 1 55 $ P,001-10 1 70 68 64 58 50 40 1 4 ,001-12,000 1 50 4 8 38 30 20 Sec. 9 -15. Change in status. Any change in respect to total combined income, net combined financial worth, ownership of the dwelling exempted, or other factors, which occur during the taxable year for which the affidavit is filed, and which has the effect of exceeding or violating the limitations and conditions of this article, shall nullify any exemption for the then current taxable year, and the taxable year immediately following. (12- 12 -73, 5.) Sec. 9 -16. Claimant Death. If an eligible claimant should die during the year, the exempted taxes will be prorated to the day of death and the remaining year's taxes will be paid by the new owner providing the new owner is not also exempt by the provisions found in this article. (12- 12 -73, 6.) Sec. 9 -17. Administration of article. The exemption from real estate tax for elderly persons shall be administered by the Commissioner of Revenue according to the provisions of this article. The Commissioner of Revenue is hereby authorized to prescribe, adopt and enforce such rules and regulations in conformance with the provisions of this article, including the right to require answers under oath, as maybe reasonably necessary to determine eligibility for exemption. The Commissioner of Revenue may also require the production of certified tax returns to establish total combined income or net combined financial worth. (12- 12 -73, 7.) ORGANIZATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Election of Vice- Chairman Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and passed unanimously, Mr. Will L. Owings was elected Vice- Chairman of the Boa- rd of Supervisors for 1982. Adoption of Rules of Order Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox andl passed unanimously, the Board adopted Robert's Rules of Order as the rules and procedures to be followed by the Board of Supervisors. Appointment of Parliamentarian Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and' passed unanimously, Mr. James M. White, County Administrator, was appointed Parliamentarian for the Board of Supervisors. Establishment of Time and Place of Meeting Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month were established as the meeting dates for the Board of Supervisors, said meetings to be held in the Board Meeting Room at 7:00 P.M. Committee Appointments - Stonewall District Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the following committee appointments from Stonewall District for 1982: Animal Care Committee - Esther Boyd Stream Standards Committee - Charles E. Boyd Transportation Safety Commission - J. Patrick Russell Extension Advisory Committee - George Cather Committee Appointments - Shawnee District Upon motion made by David L. Smith, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the following committee appointments from Shawnee District for 1982: Animal Care Committee - Gary VanMeter Stream Standards Committee - Ynez Hetland Transportation Safety Commission - Jim Racey Extension Advisory Committee - Gwen Lunsford Committee Appointments - Opequon District Upon motion made by Will L. Owings, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the following committee appointments from Opequon District for 1982: Animal Care Committee - Sandra Brown 475 Stream Standards Committee - Douglas Legge Transportation Safety Commission - Neil Stallings Extension Advisory Committee - Harold Nichols Committee Appointments - Back Creek District Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the following committee appointments from Back Creek District for 1982: Animal Care Committee - Dr. Max Mandel Stream Standards Committee - Charles R. Boyd Transportation Safety Commission - David Owings Extension Advisory Committee - Ike Phillips Committee Appointments - Gainesboro District Upon motion made by Rhoda W. Maddox, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, deos herein approve the following committee appointments from Gainesboro District for 1982: Animal Care Committee - Rosemary Wanner Stream Standards Committee - Lee Lizer Transportation Safety Commission - Robert Cather Extension Advisory Committee - Appointment will be made at next meeting. Committee Assignments The Chairman presented the following Committee assignments: Will L. Owings: Engineering and Codes, Finance Committee, Transporta- tion Safety Commission, School Board (non- voting liaison), Clerk, Regional Jail William H. Baker: Finance Committee, Personnel Committee, Agricultural District Advisory Board, Parks and Recreation Commission (non- voting liaison), Treasurer, Planning District Commission Rhoda W. Maddox: Engineering and Codes, Law Enforcement and Courts Committee, Joint Judicial Center Committee, Stream Standards Committee, Extension Advisory Board (non - voting liaison) Sheriff, Division of Court Services. David L. Smith: Personnel Committee, Animal Care Committee, Industrial Development Authority (non- voting liaison), Commonwealth's Attorney, Braddock House, Welfare Committee Kenneth Y. Stiles: Law Enforcement and Courts Committee, Joint Judicial Center Committee, ASC (non - voting liaison), Planning Commission, Commissioner of the Revenue, Regional Library S. Roger Koontz: Sanitation Authority (non- voting liaison), Planning District Commission BOARD APPOINTMENT OF CITIZEN COMMITTEE MEMBERS Hugh Dailey Appointed to Finance Committee Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, Hugh Dailey was appointed to the Finance Committee, said term to commence on January 20, 1982 and terminate on December 31, 1982. 4 7 . Robert Prettyman Appointed to Engineering and Code Enforcement ommiT ee Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, Robert Prettyman was appointed to Engineering and Code Enforcement Committee, said term to commence on January 20, 1982 and terminate on December 31, 1982. _Larry Coverstone Appointed to Law Enforcement and Courts Committee Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, Larry Coverstone was appointed to Law Enforcement and Courts Committee, said term to commence January 20, 1982 and terminate on December 31, 1982. Mr. Stiles inquired about the structure of the Welfare Board. After discussion by the Board it was decided this would be discussed in executive session with Mr. Ambrogi at which time they would have access to the State Code. BOARD RETIRES INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by David L. Smith and passed unanimously, the Board retired into Executive Session in accordance with Section 2.1 -344 (a)(6), to discuss personnel and legal matters. BOARD WITHDRAWS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from Executive Session. BOARD RECONVENES INTO REGULAR SESSION Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the Board reconvened into Regular Session. ROBERT ZIEGER COURT CASE DISMISSED Mr. Ambrogi stated that he had been notified by the Circuit Court of Frederick County that the action by Leon B. Zeiger against the County had been dismissed. DECISION RENDERED IN FAVOR OF FREDERICK COUNTY RE: DOUG TOAN CASE Mr. Ambrogi stated that Judge Woltz had found in favor of the County in the suit brought about by Doug Toan stating that he was denying Mr. Toan's request. The County ordinance that deals with Building Permit fees was upheld. COUNTY WELFARE BOARD RESTRUCTURED 477 Upon motion made by Will L. Owings, seconded by William H. Baker and passed unanimously, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors does herein approve the restructuring of the Frederick County Welfare Board to be made up of 5 citizen members and 1 member of the Board of Supervisors to serve as a non - voting member. KENNETH Y. STILES TO SERVE AS VOTING MEMBER ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVED Upon motion made by William H. Baker and seconded by Will L. Owings, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein appoint Kenneth Y. Stiles to the Frederick County Planning Commission as a voting member. The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Will L. Owings, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox and David L. Smith. Abstaining - Kenneth Y. Stiles. SECOND REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - JANUARY 27, 1982 - CANCELLED Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein cancel the second Board Meeting of January. (27, 1982) UPON MOTION DULY MADE SECONDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DO NOW ADJOURN. Chairma oard of s Alerk, Board of Supervisors