Loading...
August 27, 1980 Regular Meeting29 Mr. Malcolm asked if the Planning Commission was in favor of the 30 day lag proposal and Mr. Riley replied that they were. Upon motion made by R. Thomas Malcolm and seconded by William H. Baker, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the thirty (30) day time- table for matters acted upon by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Will L. Owings, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox and R. Thomas Malcolm. UPON MOTION DULY MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DO NOW ADJOURN. i P. oaiM of upervjs- rs erk, Board of Supervisors A Regular Meeting of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors was held on August 27, 1980, in the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, 9 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia. PRESENT: S. Roger Koontz, Chairman; Will L. Owings, Vice- Chairman; William H. Baker; Rhoda W. Maddox; R. Thomas Malcolm; and Kenneth Y. Stiles. CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order. INVOCATION The invocation was delivered by Reverend Michael Parker of the First Baptist Church. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The following corrections to the minutes were noted: June 10, 1980 - Page 1 - Mr. Stiles should be shown as being present at this meeting. June 11, 1980 - Page 13 - The first line should be corrected to read, "Mr. Stiles advised that the Planning Commission had not heard any opposition from the neighbors ". June 11, 1980 - Page 19 - mr. Stiles requested that it be noted that a copy of the transfers of unexpended funds for Fiscal Year 1980 for the School Board is on file in the office 30 of the County Administrator. The Board concurred. June 25, 1980 - Page 10 - Mr. Stiles requested that the total amount of the 1980 -1981 Highway Budget for Frederick County be set forth as well as the amount of the reduction. The Board concurred. June 25, 1980 - Page 16 - The date of the work session should be corrected to read July 2nd instead of July 1st. Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and passed unanimously, the minutes of the following meetings were approved with the corrections set forth above; June 10, 1980, June 11, 1.980, June 25, 1980, July 2, 1980 and July 9, 1980. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Upon motion made by R. Thomas Malcolm, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles and. passed unanimously, the Agenda was adopted with the fol- lowing additional items: 1. Request from Chapter 10 Board 2. Discussion regarding part of the reorganization plan of the County Administrator. 3. Recreation Department, i.e. swimming pool 4. Reprot - ASAP S. Report - Capital Facilities Committee 6. Discussion Re: Trick or Treat regulations 7. Discussion regarding an appointment 8. Discussion regarding a possible ordinance on rodent control APPOINTMENT OF ROBERT HODGSON TO BOARD OF BUILDING APPEALS Upon motion made by R. Thomas Malcolm, seconded by Will L. Owings and passed unanimously, Mr. Robert Hodgson, a resident of Shawnee Magisterial District, was appointed to the Board of Building Appeals for a term of five (5) years, said term to commence on Aug- ust 12, 1980 and terminate on August 12, 1985. Mr. Baker requested that the recommendation for appointment of Mr. Fred Showalter be carried forward to the next meeting. The Board concurred. RESIGNATION OF V L. CONNER FROM SCHOOL BOARD - ACCEPTED Mr. Baker presented a letter of resignation from Mrs. Virginia L. Conner as a member of the School Board from Back Creek District as follows: 31 August 27, 1980 Mr. William Baker, Supervisor Back Creek District Frederick County Board of Supervisors 9 Court Square Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Baker: It is with sincere regret that I must tender my resignation from the Frederick County School Board effective October 1, 1980. I very much appreciate the confidence shown in me last July 1 and while my tenure has been short, the experience has been very gratifying and I have learned a great deal. I do feel that we have an excellent school system and with more parent, teacher and community concern and support, it can only get better. Fhen we return from Saudi Arabia in approximately 20 months, we will again offer our support and commitment to the commun- ity and the Frederick County school system. Very truly yours, /s /Virginia L. Conner (Mrs. Thomas R. Conner) 2326 Peach Orchard Lane Winchester, Virginia 22601 cc. Frederick County Board of Supervisors Mr. S. Roger Koontz, Chairman Mr. Will L. Owings, Vice Chairman Mrs. Rhoda W. Maddox Mr. Kenneth Y. Stiles Mr. R. Thomas Malcolm cc. Frederick County School Board Mr. John T. Solenberger, Chairman cc. Dr. Melton Wright, Division Superintendent Frederick County Public Schools Mr. Baker stated that he felt Mrs. Conner had performed very well and had been an asset to the School Board. He added that Mrs. Conner was not aware of her husband's promotion and transfer to Saudi Arabia at the time of appointment to the School Board. Upon motion made by William H. Baker, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles, and passed unanimously, the Board agreed to permit Mr. Baker to present a nomination to fill the unexpired term of Mrs. Conner on the School Board at the September 10, 1980 meeting with action to be taken on said nomination at the September 24, 1980 meeting. DR. JACK MCALLISTER ADDRESSES BOARD RE: KIDS ARE OUR CONCERN Dr. Jack McAllister appeared before the Board and presented a brief report regarding the Kids Are Our Concern Program. He read a position paper expressing concern regarding the sale of drug para- phernalia in the community and urging the Board to pass an ordinance 32 banning the sale of these items in the County. The Chairman stated that he agreed with this movement and re- quested the group to meet with the Law Enforcement Committee to dis- cuss proposed legislation to be introduced at the next session of the General Assembly. Dr. McAllister agreed with this request. Mr. Stiles stated that he was concerned regarding the enforcemen and constitutionality of such an ordinance. The Chairman thanked Dr. McAllister for his presentation. REQUEST FOR INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ROAD - FORT COLLIER INDUSTRIAL ESTATES - APPROVED Mr. John Riley presented the request for industrial access road for Fort Collier Industrial Estates. There was no public comment. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by R. Thomas Malcolm, WHEREAS, A request has been made for the construction and main- tenance of an industrial access road by Fort Collier Industrial Es- tates to serve Harris Intertype and Northwestern Workshop, said road to begin at State Route 1322 and extend in a southeasterly direction for approximately 1800 feet to a point on the property line; and, WHEREAS, The property is bounded on the east, west and south by property of Fort Collier Industrial Estates and on the north by the Frederick County School Board; and, WHEREAS, The State Highway Commission, pursuant to the provis- ions of Section 33.1 -221 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, may construct industrial access roads; and, WHEREAS, The State Highway Commission has indicated its will ness to construct and maintain the said industrial access road pro- vided the right -of -way is made available and all adjustments have been made for utilities; and, WHEREAS, Fort Collier Industrial Estates owns the right -of -way to be used for construction of said road to serve Harris Intertype and Northwestern Workshop; and, WHEREAS, Fort Collier Industrial Estates will provide the nec- essary right -of -way for road construction and be responsible for pay- ment for any utility adjustments associated with construction of said road; and, 33 WHEREAS, Upon completion of said road it will be added to the secondary highway system; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick, Virginia hereby approves the construc- tion of an industrial access road as described, provided that the project is completed pursuant to the provisions of Section 33.1 -221 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and further provided that the land on which the industrial access road is to be con- structed shall be provided with no cost to the Commonwealth of Virginia and that the necessary adjustment for utilities is made without cost to the Commonwealth of Virginia. The above resolution was passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION POLICY RE: SPOT ZONING DISCUSSED Mr. Riley presented a policy statement regarding spot zoning which had been recommended by the Planning Commission. He stated that the Planning Commission felt this would give them some sort of criteria to measure zoning applications which come before them. He noted that this policy would not deny anyone the right to apply for rezoning. Mr. Stiles stated that there had been violent disagreement at the Planning Commission meeting regarding. this policy. He noted that he, as well as others, felt this would result in a reduction of the number of rezoning applications inasmuch as applicants who do not meet the criteria will only proceed if they can afford a good lawyer. He added that he felt the effect of this policy would be to have zoning decisions made more and more at the staff level rather than at the Board level. Mr. Stiles stated that he felt the ultimate effect of Item #5 of the policy would be to give the Comprehensive Plan the effect of an ordinance and there would be no leeway at all. He added that he felt a policy was needed but the Board and Planning Commission should have substantial discretion in its application so that each rezoning request can be judged on its own merit. Mr. Stiles stated that this policy contradicts the information given to the residents at the public meetings on downzoning when they were told they could request their property be rezoned if they were not satisfied with the zoning set forth in the downzoning plan. 34 Mr. Riley stated that the comprehensive plan is a flexible document which would change from year to year whereas the zoning ordinance is a fairly rigid document. He added that he felt appli- cants would be appreciative of the fact that they will. have criteria on which to base their applications. There followed a lengthy discussion regarding the possible leg problems involved if the policy was not followed consistently. Commonwealth's Attorney Ambrogi advised that this is just a policy and the Planning Commission is a recommending body with the Board having the final decision. Mr. Stiles stated that he felt both bodies should be giving people basically the same direction; that he felt this policy was tied closely to the proposed downzoning and the proposed revisions in the comprehensive plan as well as to the revisions the Planning Commission would be looking at in the next several months concerning large lot subdivisions in the County. He added that he would never be willing to relinquish judgement on cases to a policy which he felt was ill- conceived. The majority of the Board agreed to accept the policy as infor- mation from the Planning Commission. SITE F LAN #013 -80 - APPLE TRACTOR COMPANY - BACK CREEK DISTRICT DISCUSSED Mr. Riley presented the Site Plan of Apple Tractor Company to construct an 8,400 square foot shop and office for retail sales with 19 paved parking spaces and entrance on the east side of Route 642 immediately south of Heathcraft Homes in Back Creek Magisterial Dis- trict for a farm implement dealership. He then read the reviewing agencies comments. Mr. Stiles stated that the issue here is whether or not this is a permitted use in the B -2 category; that if it is not, then the applicants must file a rezoning request for a B -3 zoning. Mr. Ambrogi advised that it is not set forth in any of the zoning categories but it fits better in the B -2 category than any other category. Mr. John Shaw, Vice President and General Manager, of Apple Tractor Company appeared before the Board and stated that they did not anticipate this problem inasmuch as they had been advised by the Planning and Development Department that this was a permitted use 35 in this category. He described the operation stating that it would be an attrac- tive facility where everything can be done inside. He added that it would not detract from the community. Mr. Stiles moved that the Board retire into Executive Session in accordance with Section 2.1 -344, Subsection (a)(6) to discuss the legal aspects of this site plan with the Commonwealth's Attor- ney. This motion was seconded by R. Thomas Malcolm and passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - Will L. Owings, R. Thomas Mal- colm and Kenneth Y. Stiles. Nay - Rhoda W. Maddox and S. Roger Koontz. Abstaining - William H. Baker. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from executive session. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from executive session. Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles, seconded by Rhoda W. Maddox and passed unanimously, the Board reconvened into Regular Session. The Chairman advised that it had been determined that legally the only question relative to this matter was whether this was a permitted use in the B -2 category. Mr. Stiles stated that on the advice of counsel, as indicated in his letter of July 23, 1980 to Planning Director Riley, he would move that the Board adopt the position that under our current ord- inance a tractor equipment sales and service is a permitted use under Section 21- 109(b) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and refer this matter back to the Planning Commission for action under the appropriate sections of the Code. This motion was seconded by Will L. Owings and passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - Kenneth Y. Stiles, R. Thomas Malcolm, Will L. Owings and Rhoda W. Maddox. Nay - S. Roger Koontz. Abstaining - William H. Baker. The Board recessed for ten minutes. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Koontz noted the following items which have been referred 36 to Committee for study and recommendation. 1. Council on Alcoholism request for financial support from the County has been referred to the Finance Committee. 2. Possible amendments to County ordinances relative to buying and selling of gold and silver has been referred to the Law Enforcement Committee. CHAPTER 10 BOARD REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO BORROW FUNDS - APPROVED Mr. White presented the request from the Chapter 10 Board to borrow funds due to a temporary cash flow shortage as a result of slow disbursement of state grant funds. He advised that the Board must authorize this transaction inasmuch as they are the fiscal agen for the Northwestern Community Services Board. He noted that this would be a revenue anticipation note and it is done in many counties Mr. Stiles expressed concern regarding the right of the Board to authorize the borrowing of money without a referendum. He was also concerned about the responsibility for payment of interest on such a loan and who would be obligated should the Chapter 10 Board default in the payment of the loan. Mr. White advised that the interest would be paid by the North- western Community Services Board and the funds would be forthcoming from the state; that he had seen the grant awards but the State had not yet disbursed the funds. Following a brief discussion, the Board agreed to set the limi of ninety (90) days and $100,000 for the line of credit for such a loan. Upon motion made by Will L. Owings and seconded by William H. Baker, WHEREAS, Frederick County serves as Fiscal Agent for the North- western Community Services Board; and, WHEREAS, The Services Board may experience temporary cash flow shortages as a result of slow disbursement of State grant funds; and, WHEREAS, The authorization of the Fiscal Agent is required to enable the Services Board to borrow money. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, as Fiscal Agent for the Northwestern Community Services Board to establish a one -time line of credit, effective August 28, 1980, with local lending institutions with limits of ninety (90) days and $100,000. 3! The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Will L. Owings, William H. Baker, Rhoda W. Maddox, R. Thomas Malcolm and Kenneth Y. Stiles. DISCUSSION - REORGANIZATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE Mr. Stiles expressed concern regarding the thirty (30) day time lag between action by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors stating that in reality it could be five weeks and some- times six weeks between actions which he felt was inexcusable. He added that he felt there was no reason why matters could not be acted upon by the Planning Commission one week and the Board the next week. Mr. White stated that it was not only difficult to get all the materials together in the short time span between the Planning Com- mission meeting and the day the Board agenda goes out, but this timetable would give people ample time to study issues, especially controversial ones, before they come to the Board for final decision He added that this would also prevent matters which had been tabled by the Planning Commission from appearing on the Board agenda. He noted that he did not think the democratic process was served by rushing things through. Mr. Stiles replied that he felt there was ample time for study inasmuch as items are advertised well in advance of action by the Board and many times extra time has been given to controversial issues. He noted that he did not think it was fair to hold up the majority of the matters coming before the Board which are not con- troversial when it is not necessary. 5 Mr. Riley stated that he was more concerned about satisfying the legal requirements on advertising and notification of adjoining property owners and he felt this lag time would provide a suitable buffer to cover this problem. Mr. Stiles stated that he would like to hear the feelings of the other Board members and have a vote on this issue. Mr. Malcolm stated that the other Board members had already discussed this mattes at a previous meeting and voted on it. SWIMMING POOLS DISCUSSED Mr. Stiles stated that it had been 1 1/2 years since the Clear - brook pool had been closed and the people had been told that another OTIR MXWJ one would be built very soon thereafter. He requested that the Board direct the Parks and Recreation Director to present several proposals for the construction of swimming pools to the Board so that the Board might determine whether it would be desireable to put these proposals to referendum for a revenue bond issue for the November election. Mr. White stated that one of the things he felt the County should consider very carefully is not getting into additional capital facilities until we know where we are going and all the sources of financing have been explored. He added that he was not opposed to having a presentation put together, but to put it on the ballot that quickly would be very illconceived in his opinion, because of the complexities involved. He advised that revenue bonds are very comple) and other alternatives should be explored; that there are many capita: facilities to be considered. Mr. White added that he felt the Board should have quality information in order to make long term fiscal decisions for the County. Mr. Stiles stated that his point was to let the people make the decision inasmuch as this matter has been drawn out over 1 1/2 years and nothing has been done. Mr. Malcolm stated that the Board has appointed people to the Capital Facilities Committee and their responsibility is to take a serious loop: at the total capital facilities needs of the County and that as soon as we are past the court project, the Committee will be exploring all avenues regarding capital improvements; that they will then be prioritized and financing discussed. Mr. Stiles stated that when the pool was closed he had committed himself to the people that we would do everything we could to get a pool back there. He added that he felt the Board had been misled. Mr. Owings stated that when the Board agreed to close the pool we were told a new pool would cost $175,000 and that subsequently the cost increased to a half million dollars and. we cannot afford it. He added that the pool had been closed in good faith. Mr. Stiles stated that he felt the Board needed to make a commit ment to try and make an honest effort to have a pool by next summer. He added that he thought capital facilities might be drawn out for another four or five years and the people are entitled to a decision as how we will proceed with this project. 39 Mr. Malcolm replied that he hoped the Capital Facilities Commit tee could address this project along with the jail problem, the Welfare Department problem, etc. The Chairman requested the Capital Facilities Committee to study this matter along with the other projects. I SCHOOL BOARD BUDGET DISCUSSED Mr. Stiles stated that it occurred to him that since the new school is not opening on time, a substantial part of the expenses for opening will not be incurred until it does actually open, i.e. electricity, custodial services, etc. He noted that this money was appropriated specifically with the understanding that the school would be open and the Board has the authority to appropriate money on a contingency basis to the School Board. He suggested that the Board reduce by 10% the money allotted to the school board for each month the new school is not open. The Chairman requested the Finance Committee to study this suggestion and present their recommendation back to the Board. TRICK OR TREAT REGULATIONS AND CURFEWS REFERRED TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE Mr. Owings stated that he had had several requests for some type of limitations on Trick or Treat. Mr. Stiles stated that he had received a request that a curfew be established. The Chairman referred these matters to the Law Enforcement Committee for study and recommendation. DELINQUENT TAX COLLECTIONS DISCUSSED Mr. Baker asked Mr. Ambrogi to report on the status of the delinquent tax collections and Mr. Ambrogi replied that to date notices have been mailed to three districts. He added that he had heard nothing further from the Treasurer's office regarding collec- tion from said notices. Mr. Baker requested the Commonwealth's Attorney and Treasurer to coordinate their efforts in these collections. The Chairman referred this matter to the Finance Committee for consideration. RODENT PROBLEM DISCUSSED Mr. Baker stated that it had been discovered that there was a severe rodent problem in the area of Apple Valley Road, and there 40 is no county ordinance relating to rodent control. He stated that he felt the situation demanded the attention of the Board. He sug- gested that the County Administrator pursue the effect of an ordi- nance regarding the responsibility of a person demolishing a property which might cause this problem. He added that he felt this presents a great potential for a health hazard. Mr. Owings stated that he had a problem like this two months ago behind the Aylor Junior High School. Several other supervisors noted that they too had received com- plaints regarding this same problem. Mr. White advised that there is a program through the Division of Vector Control which might be utilized. Mr. Stiles stated that he felt it would be useful to put a sec- tion in the Code stating that before a building can be demolished, the owner must take responsibility for any rodent problem which might develop therefrom. The Board concurred. ASAP ADVISORY BOARD REPORT Mr. Malcolm stated that the ASAP Advisory Board had completed their training period and is now electing their own leadership. He advised that Colonel Lynn Myers had been elected Chairman of the Board. He noted that the Board had taken a position on the detox situation and the Finance Committee should contact Mr. Palumbo re- garding this matter. REPORT CAPITAL FACILITIES COMMITTEE Mr. Malcolm reported that the Capital Facilities Committee had met and recommended that the firm of Hellmuth, Obata and Kassabaum be retained as the architectural engineering firm for the courts project. He noted that the contract will be drawn up on September 3, 1980 and the Board might want to consider a joint meeting with City Council on September 10, 1980 to consider this recommendation. The Board concurred. CORRESPONDENCE: Year End Report Re: 1979 -1980 Budget Mr. Stiles stated that he felt it needed to be made clear that the actual surplus was $549,421 and he was concerned that the esti- mates were that far off. He reviewed briefly the year end report regarding the school board budget and stated that their surplus was $183,000 and he felt this was due to phony revenue estimates and pro- 41 vided the school board with a lot of room to play with money. He stated that it further allows the superintendent to make fraudulent statements as to how much money he saved the County, whereas in actuality it was available because his revenues were substantially above his estimates. He suggested that this be considered next year during the budget considerations. Mr. Malcolm asked what the result would be if this same analogy) was applied to the County budget and Mr. White replied that the net result would be that it would be much higher; that the County esti- mates were much more out of line than the school budget. Mr. Stiles stated that he felt there was a need to build in some safety factors in order to have more accurate estimates. RESOLUTION FROM HANDICAPS UNLIMITED OF VIRGINIA, INC. ACKNOWLEDGED The Board acknowledged receipt of a resolution from Handicaps Unlimited, Inc. regarding compliance with Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act by the State of Virginia. LETTER FROM SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT RE: LATE COMPLETION OF NEW HIGH SCHOOL The Board noted receipt of a copy of a letter from Dr. Melton F. Wright, Division School Superintendent to the construction engi- neer regarding the late completion of the new high school. UPON MOTION DULY MADE, SECONDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DO NOW ADJOURN. man, B and of S�rvisors CXerk, Board of Supervisors A Regular Meeting of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors was held on September 10, 1980, at 7:00 P.M. in the Board of Super- visors` Meeting Room, 9 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia. PRESENT: S. Roger Koontz, Chairman; Will L. Owings, Vice- Chairman; William H. Baker; Rhoda W. Maddox; R. Thomas Malcolm; and Kenneth Y. Stiles. Mr. Stiles arrived late and therefore is not in- cluded in the votes on the first four issues. CALL TO ORDER