HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 10, 1992 Regular Meeting
635
A regular meeting of the Frederick County Board of Super-
visors was held on June 10, 1992, at 7:15 p.m., in the Board of
Supervisors' Meeting Room, Frederick County Courthouse, Loudoun
street Mall, Winchester, Virginia.
PRESENT: Chairman Richard G. Dick; Vice-Chairman W.
Harrington Smith, Jr.; James L. Longerbeam; Robert M. Sager;
Beverly J. Sherwood; and Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. Mr. Riley was
not present at the start of the meeting due to sons' graduation.
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION
Mr. Dick delivered the invocation in absence of the
scheduled minister.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by W.
Harrington Smith, Jr., the agenda was adopted as presented.
The above motion was passed by the following recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr., Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Owens, Assistant County Administrator, suggested the
following tabs be approved under the consent agenda:
1. Tab C - Memorandum Re: Contract for Audit services;
2. Tab I - Memorandum Re: Road and Drainage Improvements -
Apple Ridge SUbdivision;
3. Tab J - Memorandum Re: Gore School Day Care;
4. Tab M - Request from Charles Robinson for Outdoor
Festival Permit - Request to advertise for
public hearing;
5. Tab N - Handley Library Agreement;
6. Tab 0 - Correspondence from Council on Child Day Care
and Early Childhood Programs RE: Grant Award;
7. Tab S - Parks & Recreation Commission Report;
8. Approval of proposal of Robinson, Farmer, Cox &
Associates to conduct county audit. (hand out at meet-
ing. )
636
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by Robert
M. Sager the above tabs were approved under the consent agenda
by the following recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
w. Harrington smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
E. EDWARD NUCKOLS. III. APPOINTED TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY
SCHOOL BOARD FROM OPEOUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by W.
Harrington smith, and passed by the following recorded vote, Mr.
E. Edward Nuckols, III, was appointed to the Frederick County
School Board from Opequon District for a four year term, said
term to commence on June 30, 1992, and terminate on June 30,
1996. Mr. Nuckols was present.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
w. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
CHARLES R. ROTT. REAPPOINTED TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOL
BOARD FROM STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., seconded by
James L. Longerbeam, and passed by the following recorded vote
Mr. Charles R. Hott was reappointed to the Frederick County
School Board from Stonewall District for a four year term, said
term to commence on June 30, 1992, and terminate on June 30,
1996. Mr. Hott was present.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
ELLIE ADAMS APPOINTED TO THE LORD FAIRFAX REALTH DISTRICT
SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD
Upon motion made by Beverly J. Sherwood, seconded by Robert
M. Sager, Mrs. Ellie Adams was appointed to the Lord Fairfax
Health District Services Advisory Board for a four year term,
said term to commence on June 10, 1992 and terminate on June 10
1996.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
637
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
PATRICIA STILES APPOINTED TO THE SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD FROM
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Mr. Orndoff explained that due to redistricting Mr. Russell
could no longer represent Stonewall District. He wished to
thank Mr. Russell for his years of service and would like to
place the name of Mrs. Patricia (Trish) stiles in nomination for
this appointment. Mr. Smith seconded this motion. Mrs. stiles
term will commence on July 1, 1992 and terminate on June 30,
1996.
The above motion was approved by the following recorded
vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
Mr. smith stated that even though there is plenty of time
he will check with Dr. Rosner about his continued service on the
Shenandoah Area Agency on Aging.
PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
Upon motion made by W. Harrington smith, Jr., seconded by
Beverly J. Sherwood, and passed by the following recorded
vote,the public hearing date of July 8, 1992 is hereby set for:
1. Annual review of Conditional Use permits.
2. An ordinance to revise all portions of Chapter 8,
Erosion and Sedimentation, of the Frederick County
Code.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr., Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
AGENDA ADOPTED AS AMENDED
Mr. Dick stated that he just realized Mr. Owen had items
that needed to be added to the agenda, and this should have been
included when the agenda was adopted at the beginning of the
meeting.
638
Mr. Owen stated that he had an item dealing with EMS as
well as the central dispatch agreement which the city of
winchester which has been in the works for a number of months,
which also includes the issue of tariff funds for central
dispatch and is ready to go the the Code and Ordinance Committee
for their review.
Mr. Owen further noted that under Committee Reports item
number four, Mr. Riley would like to speak to the Airport
Agreement at such time as he arrives at the meeting.
Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by W.
Harrington smith and passed by the following recorded vote the
agenda was adopted as amended:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington smith - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles w. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES CENTRAL DISPATCH AGREEMENT AND
TARIFF FUNDING OF SAME REFERRED TO COUNTY CODE AND ORDI-
NANCE COMMITTEE
Upon motion made Robert M. Sager seconded by James L.
Longerbeam and approved by the following recorded vote the EMS
agreement and funding of same is hereby referred to the county
Code and Ordinance Committee for their review and recommenda-
tion:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
w. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS\PUBLIC HEARING
REZONING APPLICATION #003-91 OF MARSHALL D. WILLIAMS TO
REZONE 3.1 ACRES FROM RA (RURAL AREAS ) TO M-2 (GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL) FOR WASTE AND TRASH COLLECTION AND RECYCLING -
SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - DENIED
Mr. Watkins, Planning Director, appeared before the Board
to present this request and noted that the staff and Planning
Commission had recommended denial.
Mr. Smith explained that he had visited this site, and
given the amount of rain this area has had in the last two years
and the reports submitted concerning the flood plain area, that
he did not see how this rezoning request could possibly work.
639
Mrs. Sherwood stated that it was her understanding that
this is a non-conforming use, which means he can continue to do
what he is currently doing without a rezoning or a conditional
use permit, without anything from the county government, he can
continue his established business.
Mr. Watkins replied, that is correct.
Mr. Marshall Williams appeared before the Board and gave a
background summary of his operation and explained why he was
asking for this rezoning.
Mrs. Sherwood asked Mr. Williams if he was requesting of
the Board that his application be amended to M-1.
Mr. Williams replied that if this is where he should be
then that is what he is asking for, he is not sure what is the
best for him and he is asking the Board for direction.
Mr. Longerbeam asked Mr. Watkins since this is a non-con-
forming use, Mr. Williams cannot expand 50% of the property that
he bought.
Mr. Watkins replied that was the Planning staff's original
determination, and charges were brought against Mr. Williams
that he was illegally expanding a non-conforming use. A jury
trial was held and they found Mr. williams not guilty on the
charge of illegally expanding a non-conforming use.
Mr. Longerbeam explained that the way he understood this,
Mr. Williams can do exactly what he has been doing, will be
taxed at a much lower rate than he would if he were either M-1
or M-2, and it is not in his best interest for this Board to
grant him this request.
Mr. smith asked Mr. Williams what his intentions were with
regard to the fence as the post have been up about a year.
Mr. Williams replied that he will put the fence up.
No one appeared before the Board either in favor of or
opposing this request.
Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr. seconded by
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. that Rezoning Application #003-91 of
Marshall D. Williams to Rezone 3.1 Acres from RA (Rural Areas)
64U
to M-2 (General Industrial) for Waste and Trash Collection and
Recycling be denied.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
1992 REVISIONS TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SIGNIFICANT REVISIONS INCLUDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY
AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. A MAP CHANGE IS INCLUDED FOR A
BUSINESS CORRIDOR ALONG ROUTE 11 SOUTH
Mr. Kris Tierney, Assistant Planning Director appeared
before the Board to present the comprehensive plan.
Mr. Dick requested that each proposal be voted on separate-
ly rather than the complete package, as has been the policy in
previous years.
SUMMARY OF 1992 SWDA/UDA EXPANSION REOUESTS
1) Ralph Gregory, Route 11 South - This request was for an
area along Route 11 South that lies just outside the Urban
Development Area consisting of roughly 250 acres. Mr.
Gregory requested that either the Urban Development Area be
expanded or the Route 11 South Business corridor be expand-
ed to include this property.
The main issue discussed with regard to this request was
how to extend water and sewer without opening this area up
to residential development. The Subcommittee felt if sewer
and water were extended, the lines serving the area must be
dedicated to the County. The Subcommittee's recommendation
is that the Sewer and Water Service Area be expanded to
include this area. The area would be an extension of the
Route 11 South Business corridor. The Subcommittee has
also added language to the Comprehensive Plan that would
require that any sewer and water line six inches or large
be dedicated to the County. (This language would apply to
extensions anywhere in the County, not just to the area
along Route 11).
2) Louise Brim, Route 11 South - This request was for sewer
and water in an area encompassed by the Gregory request.
Mrs. Brim's request was for three specific parcels along
Route 11 South near the Shackleford Farm (now Marathon
Bank, etc.) and the Mountain View Church of Christ. The
Subcommittee has recommended the extension of the Sewer and
Water Service Area in response to the Gregory request;
therefore, Mrs. Brim's request is in affect also being
approved.
Mr. Gregory appeared before the Board at this time on
behalf of this request noting that he has lived in this area for
over fifty years and he feels this is a reasonable request and
that this area should be rezoned business. He presented pictures
to the Board of the property in question, which also showed the
adjoining properties.
641
Mr. smith inquired about the private water line that was
discussed earlier.
Mr. Gregory explained that the water line belonged to him,
or the partnership of which he was a member, as they had paid
for the line.
Mr. Longerbeam stated that his understanding was that if
this line is extended that the extension becomes a part of the
Sanitation Authority, and will not be private as the first part
is.
Mr. Gregory, replied, that was correct.
Mr. Steve Gyurisin, appeared before the Board of behalf of
the Town of Stephens city Planning Commission, and requested
that the Board delay their decision on the extension of water
and sewer in this area, as the Planning Commission does have
concerns with this as currently proposed. He further noted that
this would definitely have an impact on traffic, roads, as well
as the historic area of main street. He requested that a joint
meeting be scheduled between the county Planning Commission and
the stephens city Planning Commission before any plans are
changed.
Mr. Smith stated that this has been in the "works" for
sometime and he questioned why Stephens city is just making
their concerns known at this time.
Mr. Linden Fravel, Jr. member of the stephen City Town
Council as well as the Planning commission, addressed the Board
to explain why the Town Council is concerned that if this
request is approved for the extension of water lines it will
have a definite impact on the Town of Stephens city. The Council
was also concerned that they had not been included in any
meetings conducted by the county when this was being discussed.
He too requested that this be tabled until the two groups could
meet and discuss it further.
Mr. Mike Kehoe, Town Manager, explained to the Board that
the Council has been requesting a meeting with the Board for the
past two years to discuss this matter, but nothing was ever
scheduled. He further explained that he, along with Town
642.
council, feel there are a lot of unanswered questions concerning
this request and feels they are entitled to some answers before
this request is voted on by the Board.
Mr. smith asked Mr. Kehoe how far north of stephens City is
council concerned with.
Mr. Kehoe replied up to the southern property line of Mr.
Gregory.
Mr. Riley arrived at this time.
Mr. Sager asked if number 2 of this plan is predicated on
number I.
Mr. watkins, replied yes, number 2 is included in number 1.
Mr. Stephen Chadwell appeared before the Board stating that
he had a major investment in approximately 120 acres that would
be between stephens city and the proposed corridor. would
Mr. Watkins explained that Mr. Chadwell is included in the
new, proposed business area.
Mrs. Louise Brim, addressed the Board stating that they
owned nine pieces of property along this corridor, and have
plans to restore what they can, but without public water and
sewer this would not be possible.
Mr. Bill Hastreiter, resident of 4910 Valley Pike, present-
ed a petition to the Board signed by residents adjacent to this
undeveloped property on Route 11 South, north of stephens City.
He stated they are opposed to the development of the business
corridor at this point and time for a number of reasons.
Ms. Connie Robinson, neighbor of Mr. Hastreiter, is con-
cerned as she is not sure of Mr. Gregory's plans for this
property. She is concerned about the increase in traffic on
Route 11 and the fact that this will also open this area to
growth.
Mrs. Hastreiter stated that she had not planned on speak-
ing, but after hearing from others felt she should express her
concerns and felt that her neighbors were not aware of what was
about to happen to their neighborhood and asked that this be
tabled until a later date.
643
Mr. Dick explained that there have been pUblic meetings to
bring this to the general publics' attention and that all of
these meetings have been duly advertised.
Mr. Gregory explained that this was not a new proposal as
it was proposed three previous times by him to the Planning
Department three different years, so this is not something new,
and he was surprised to see all this opposition tonight when
this has been going for this length of time. He requested that
it be voted on at tonight's meeting, as it has already been
delayed for three years.
Mr. Sager asked Mr. Watkins exactly what Mr. Bill Bushman
of the highway department had recommended with regard to Mr.
Gregory's request concerning the "no passing" lanes on Route 11
South.
Mr. watkins explained that under current conditions this
would not be warranted, however all of this would change due to
development that would occur. A full impact traffic study would
be required, if this is approved.
Mr. Sager stated at this time that he does have a conflict
of interest since number land 2 are combined.
Mr. Tierney explained the area that was requested by number
2 is included within the larger area that involves number 1, and
these are the only two that overlap.
Mr. Longerbeam stated that he would like to see the lang-
uage amended, and at this time he would move for approval, with
some modification. He stated that there would be a long time
from tonight's action until the first rezoning. Between now and
the time for the first rezoning. The first rezoning, if neces-
sary, could be delayed, to include the necessary meetings
between Stephens City and the County Planning commission, and
the Board members if necessary, to work out an orderly transi-
tion area between properties, this would allow stephens city
some input. Mr. smith seconded this motion.
Mr. Sager explained that he was abstaining due to the fact
that his church is mentioned in this request.
644
Mrs. Sherwood explained if rezoning requests corne in,
adjoining townships would be asked for comment, just as we do
for the city, that is procedure. She further noted with the
comprehensive plan it is an asserted effort of the Planning
Commission to go public by taking it out into the community. She
did however feel that the public meetings during this past year
focused more on the Route 37 project.
The above motion was approved by the fallowing recorded
vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington smith, Jr., Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Abstained
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
3) Ryland Carper, Route 723 - This request involved
approximately 210 acres located off of Route 723 near Route
50 East. The Subcommittee feels that the inclusion of this
land in the Urban Development Area at this time is not
appropriate due to the fact that it would open up thousands
of acres in Eastern Frederick County for development.
Mr. Watkins pointed out that the Planning Commission voted
to approve the first two items, but did not vote either to
approve or deny the five remaining requests.
No one appeared before the Board concerning this request.
Upon motion made by W. Harrington smith, Jr., seconded by
Robert M. Sager, the request of Ryland Carper was denied by the
following recorded vote:
RiChard G. DiCk - Aye
W. Harrington smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
4) Signal station Associates, Round Hill - This request was
for the county to grant one of two requests:
a. Extension of sewer from Merriman's Lane up to Abrams
Drainage-way to serve the entire Round Hill Community
Center. This would involve approximately 1000 acres.
b. Establishment of a community sanitary system to serve
the Round Hill Community.
The Subcommittee felt that it would be premature to extend
water and sewer west of Route 37 at this time. The Subcom-
mittee has not ruled out the possibility of the Round Hill
Community eventually going to an alternative sewage dispos-
al method. The Subcommittee recommends waiting until the
results of the investigation (currently underway) of
possible alternatives for waste water treatment in Rural
Community Centers is completed. This study is scheduled to
6~
be completed in October of this year. There was no public
input.
The Board concurred with the committee recommendation.
5) James Marlow, Route 661, 662, 838 - This request was for an
extension of the Urban Development Area to include approxi-
mately 350 acres bordering on Route 661, 662, 838 and the
B&O Railroad near the I-81 and Route 11 North intersection.
Mr. Marlow wishes to rezone this land for industrial use.
The Subcommittee felt that the issues of access and impacts
on the Stephenson's Farm Battlefield need to be addressed
prior to inclusion with the Urban Development Area. It is
believed that Mr. Marlow is in the process of preparing an
impact statement. There was no public input.
The Board concurred with the committee recommendation.
6) Residents of 522 South/Shenandoah Mobile Home Park - This
request was considered together since they are in the same
geographic area. The Subcommittee was concerned about the
large amount of agricultural land in the area. The exten-
sion of sewer and water would open approximately 1728 acres
up for development. consequently, the Subcommittee recom-
mended denial. This request was later modified to approxi-
mately 687 acres as opposed to the original 1728. Of this
acreage, approximately 330 would be open to development.
There are approximately 200 houses within the area and the
SUbcommittee is concerned about the potential of a failing
septic system problem I The applicants and the county have
been in contact with the Health Department and they have
agreed to conduct a survey of the septic problems. Depend-
ing on the outcome, the Subcommittee may consider extending
the Urban Development Area. One issue that the Subcommit-
tee is looking into is the question of whether we can
extend sewer and water for the existing home, but not allow
new construction to tap on.
Mr. Smith referred to the last two sentences, and asked if
the county runs water and sewer lines do we always have to have
it tied to zoning. These people, some two hundred houses,
desperately need water and sewer.
Mr. Tierney stated the county has a lot in its favor if
they turn down a request, if the area is outside the urban
development area, that is sort of rule number one.
Mr. Smith asked, who would make this determination.
Mr. Tierney replied, it is a legal question that was
discussed by the subcommittee at one of their meetings.
Mr. Ambrogi replied that the courts would be the ones to
decide.
Mr. Smith explained that his constituents are always
telling him, here comes new development, they have no problem
getting water and sewer, we have been here for years and cannot
get it, and they rightfully want to know why. I don't have an
answer.
6,46
Mr. Watkins explained that water is already approved,in
effect it is programmed by the Sanitation Authority to extend
water to this area.
Mrs. Sherwood stated that she concurred with what Mr.
Longerbeam was saying earlier. She explained that what makes
this particular request the exception is that the Planning
Commission and the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee have looked
at this area and have said, this will possibly go in at some
future time. It was felt that this is a very large tract of
land and they were not ready to add that much all at one time.
There was no public input.
Mr. smith moved at this time that this be continued to be
actively pursued.
Mr. Riley stated that his understanding was that the Board
would like for the Planning Commission to take another look at
this and bring it back to the Board as soon as possible.
Mrs. Sherwood seconded Mr. Smith's motion.
The above motion for this request to be looked into further
by staff and back to the Board was approved by the following
recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
7) Billy Joe Tisinger, Realigned Route 642 - This request was
present on behalf of Fred L. Glaize, Jasbo, Inc., Oakcrest
Builders, Inc. and Wrights Run Limited Partnership. The
proposal is that the Urban Development Area be expanded to
include approximately 200 acres of land north of the
realigned Route 642 and bounded by Route 522 on the east
and old Route 642 on the west and north sides. It would be
the intent of this group to immediately rezone and proffer
$150,000 toward the realignment of Route 642.
Although it is anticipated that the Urban Development Area
will be expanded to include this area at some point in '
time, the Subcommittee is concerned that the timing is not
right to open up more land for residential development.
However, the Subcommittee did not rule out the possibility
of industrial zoning in this area. At this point, it is
uncertain whether the landowners intend to propose an
expansion of the sewer and water service area to accommo-
date industrial zoning of the area.
Mr. Billy Joe Tisinger, appeared before the Board to answer
any questions they might have, and explained to them that he did
ot feel this would be premature a year from now.
647
There was no further public input.
Mr. Sager moved, and Mr. smith seconded, to accept the
recommendation of the Planning Commission at this time. The
above motion was approved by the following recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
AN AMENDMENT TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE. CHAPTER 21.
ZONING: ARTICLE IX. BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING
DISTRICT: SECTION 9-1-4. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M-1). TO INCLUDE
HUMAN SERVICE CENTERS AS AN ALLOWED USE - TABLED AND
REFERRED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT & COURTS COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW
AND RECOMMENDATION
Mr. Watkins presented this request stating that the Plan-
ning Commission did recommend approval of the amendment, however
they did make amendments to the conditions.
Mr. Orndoff asked if this would fit in B-2.
Mr. Watkins replied, that this was discussed and if there
is an alternative, that would be the logical alternative.
Mr. Sager asked Mr. Watkins to define pre-release.
Mr. Watkins replied, that pre-release would be offenders
serving time under a conviction from a court of law.
Mr. Sager asked if he would still be serving time as a
convicted felon.
Mr. Watkins, replied that is correct.
Mr. Smith stated that in his research of this request he
noted that Delegate Alson Smith, Judge David Whitacre, and Mike
Fling of J&D Court refers to this as a halfway house, however
the individuals running it specified emphatically it is not a
halfway house.
Mr. Sager explained that a halfway house is a place where
people who have been released from court custody are directed to
go in order to provide a service, whether it be ANA or whatever
the case may be. They are not inmates, they have already served
their sentence.
Mr. Steve Gyurisin, representing Plans and Project appeared
before the Board to explain what Thin Line Inc. was requesting.
He stated that the primary use of the facility is an office type
648
use, which is permitted both in the B-2 and the M-l Zone. He
further explained that Thin Line was present at this time to
address the residential aspect of the rezoning.
Mr. Sager asked if convicted individuals, who are serving a
sentence would be housed in this facility.
Mr. Gyurisin replied that he would refer that question to
the executive director.
Mr. Mark Puckett, Director of Thin Line Incorporated,
appeared before the Board at which time he answered Mr. Sagers'
question stating that yes, individuals would be directly paroled
to their institution.
Mr. Sager asked why would an individual be directed to Thin
Line's program rather than the Regional Jail who has the same
capability.
Mr. Puckett replied that Mr. Hodge had no problem with what
Thin Line wanted to do.
Mr. Riley and Mr. Sager both rebutted this statement in
saying that Mr. Hodge made no recommendation on this matter.
Mr. Sager asked who would be referring these individuals to
Thin Line.
Mr. puckett replied, Department of Corrections, District
II, Probation and Parole.
Mr. Sager asked if this had been addressed to them.
Mr. Puckett replied yes.
Mr. Sager asked if there was a contract to these offices.
Mr. Puckett replied no, but there is a proposal open for
us.
Mr. Sager asked who was going to be responsible for these
inmates when they walk away from this facility. What type of
security arrangements have you made.
Mr. Puckett replied, that Thin Line would be responsible
for any inmate that is housed at their facility.
Mr. Gyurisin asked that this' be tabled until some of these
particulars are worked out.
Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by
Beverly J. Sherwood, and passed by the following recorded vote
649
the request of Thin Line, Inc. is hereby tabled and referred to
the Law Enforcement and Courts Committee for their review and
recommendation.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
Mr. Longerbeam requested that Mr. Ambrogi look at this
ordinance amendment.
End of Planning Commission PUblic Hearings.
Other Planning Items:
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FREETON - APPROVED
Mr. Tierney presented this request noting that the Planning
Commission recommended approval with conditions.
Mr. Chuck Maddox, of G. W. Clifford & Associates, appeared
before the Board to answer any questions they might have.
Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by W.
Harrington Smith, Jr. Master Development Plan #004-92 - Freeton
was approved as presented by the following recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
WINCHESTER AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (WATS) - APPROVED
Mr. Watkins presented this information to the Board stating
that the Virginia Department of Transportation has been working
for the past several years on an overall transportation study
concerning Winchester and Eastern Frederick County. WATS is
intended to provide the basis for major road planning in the
area. This study is in its final stages, and it is important
that our local governments be involved in this process, and they
are requesting county input at various points, and one of those
points have been reached. At this time Mr. Watkins presented
slides to better explain to the Board about the interchanges.
Mr. Watkins stated that the following recommendations for the
interchanges are general in nature, and more specific studies
and designs will have to be done before improvements are made.
650
He further stated that the staff would propose that the Board
endorse the following statements to be forwarded to the Virginia
Department of Transportation:
I. The proposed improvements to the Interstate 8i/Route
17-50/Route 522 corridor are probably needed to improve
safety. The County supports proposals made by the City
of Winchester to improve intersection configurations to
the east of this interchange.
2. In response to the Interstate 8i/Route II/Route 37
North corridor proposals, four lanes should be provided
on Route II North from Brooke Road to the ramp to Route
37. Additional lanes should be added in each direction
on the ramps to Route 37 and on Route 37 to 1-81. A
new off ramp should be provided from eastbound 37 to
Route II. The crossover to Crown Cork and Seal should
be studied to determine if it can be more effectively
designed to serve Crown Cork and Seal and Amoco Foam.
The most effective design for the crossover to best
meet traffic needs should be implemented. Additional
signification should be provided for the 1-81 ramps.
3. In response to the Interstate 81/Route 277/Route
II/Route 647 corridor proposals, a new bridge connect-
ing Route 647 to the Town of Stephens City will have
unacceptable impacts on the Town. Making Route 647 one
way north could also have unacceptable impacts on Route
641. The County supports additional lanes on Route 277
and suggests that a right turn lane and signalization
is needed on Route 647. Means to provide additional
distance between the eastern 1-81 ramps and the Route
647 and Route 1012 intersections with Route 277 should
be studied.
Mr. Longerbeam asked if Route 37 North is going to be tied
at all into the proposal for the new Route 37.
Mr. Watkins replied, yes that is part of the long range
planning.
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by W.
Harrington Smith, Jr. and passed by the following recorded vote,
the above recommendations for WATS were approved as presented:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
End of Planning Commission Business.
ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS - APPLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION -
APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA
A memorandum from Harvey E. strawsnyder, Director of
Engineering informed the Board that a pre-construction meeting
as been held on June 4, 1992, to review the proposed improve-
ents to the Apple Ridge Subdivision. As a consequence of this
eeting a contract has been award to Superior Paving Corporation
651
for the subject project in the amount of $72,750.00. The
project is scheduled to start on or before June 15, 1992, with a
completion date of August 13, 1992.
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by Robert
M. Sager, the above memorandum referencing Apple Ridge Subdivi-
sion road and drainage improvements was approved by the follow-
ing recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
MEMORANDUM - GORE SCHOOL DAY CARE - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT
AGENDA
Memorandum stating that two proposals had been received for
day care services at Gore School. The committee recommends a
lease with Lee Davis.
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by Robert
M. Sager, the Gore School Day Care Memorandum was approved under
consent agenda by the following recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
.r
SHAWNEELAND CORRESPONDENCE - RE: AGREEMENT WITH PHIL GREEN
- TABLED
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by W.
Harrington smith, Jr., any action on this Shawnee land
correspondence was tabled as approved by the following recorded
vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
MEMORANDUM RE: APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR STREETLIGHTING IN
FREDERICKTOWNE AND GREENE ACRES - APPROVED
Mr. Riley explained this situation to the Board and noted
that $16,500 was needed in order to pay Potomac Edison for these
streetlights. He further explained that the county has been
working with Potomac Edison to try and work out some way that
652
these citizens can be billed directly by Potomac Edison for the
lights, but as of this date this has not been achieved. He
asked the Board to approve this amount in order that these
lights would not be turned off come July l. He further explain-
ed that he was working on having special legislation introduced
in the General Assembly at its next session that would devise a
plan in order that the citizens receiving the service would be
the ones paying for the service.
Mr. Sager moved at this time to appropriate the necessary
funds and Mr. Longerbeam seconded the motion.
Mr. Longerbeam stated that he felt a solution needed to be
worked out, if it be a Homeowners Association or whatever in
order that these citizens could keep their streetlights.
Mr. Sager stated that he had talked with most of the people
in Fredericktowne, and they are willing to do whatever is
necessary to keep these lights on.
Mr. Dick stated that in January this item was on the
agenda, and at that time it was unanimously recommended by the
Finance Committee that Frederick County not get into the light-
ing business and pay these bills. He feels for the citizens
that are affected by this, however there are a lot of dusk to
dawn lights throughout Frederick County and there are ways in
which these can be taken care of. He further stated that he
thought enough time had been given to work this out, and there-
fore would be voting against this appropriation of funds.
Richard G. Dick - Nay
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
REQUEST FROM CHARLES ROBINSON ON BEHALF OF JAYCEES FOR
OUTDOOR FESTIVAL PERMIT - TO BE ADVERTISED FOR PUBLIC
HEARING - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA
HANDLEY LIBRARY AGREEMENT TABLED UNTIL JULY 8. 1992 BOARD
MEETING - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA
COUNCIL ON CHILD DAY CARE AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS
GRANT AWARD - APPROVED UNDER CONSENT AGENDA
The county has been notified by the Council on Child Day
Care and Early Childhood Programs that our proposal for a
School-Age Child Care Planning Grant was selected to receive an
653
award of $1,800,00 for the period June 15, 1992 through Septem-
ber 30, 1992.
PUBLIC HEARING
AN AMENDMENT TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE. CHAPTER 5.
ANIMALS AND FOWL: ARTICLE IV. DOGS: BY THE ADDITION OF
SECTION 4-1-3.1. THIS AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW FOR THE
ADOPTION OF A BARKING DOG ORDINANCE.
Ms. Barbara Tuey, Gainesboro District, appeared before the
Board endorsing this ordinance amendment, stating that she feels
this county really needs an ordinance against barking dogs.
Mr. Jim Lettermen, Gainesboro District, explained that he
has encountered the same problems as Ms. Tuey, with dogs barking
from 6:15 P.M. to 7 A.M. the following morning, and he whole-
heartedly supported this amendment.
A Shawnee District resident stated that he was in favor of
this ordinance amendment, however, he would also like to see the
Board do something about a noise ordinance.
Mr. smith advised him that this is being worked on in
committee, and should be forthcoming in the very near future.
Upon motion made by w. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by
Robert M. Sager the following ordinance amendment was approved
by the following recorded vote:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
w. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
4-1-3.1 It shall be unlawful, after written notice by the
Sheriff to the owner, custodian or person in control or
possession of a dog, for such person to suffer or allow
such dog to continue to bark, howl, yelp, whine or
otherwise make unreasonably loud noises as are plainly
audible to adjoining residents or property owners in a
residential sUbdivision so as to unreasonably annoy,
disturb, bother, or vex such residents or property
owners.
Enforcement of this section shall be by the Sheriff of
Frederick county.
A violation of this section shall be punishable by a
fine of not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for
the first offense and a fine of no more than one
hundred dollars ($100.00) for each subsequent offense.
Each such occurrence shall constitute a separate
offense.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO VACATE THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF THE
PLAT OF SECTIONS "C" AND "D" PART 2 AND SECTION liE" PART 1
OF FREDERICK HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF
654
THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY.
VIRGINIA. IN DEED BOOK 307. AT PAGE 18. ET SEQ.. CONSISTING
OF THAT CERTAIN PORTION OF REALTY LYING BETWEEN LOT 19.
SECTION C AND LOT 1. SECTION E OF SUCH SUBDIVISION. BEING
FIFTY-SIX (56) FEET IN WIDTH AND ONE HUNDRED. FIFTY (150)
FEET IN LENGTH AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC STREET. AND. BEING
THAT DEAD-END PORTION OF MILAM DRIVE LYING TO THE NORTH OF
ITS INTERSECTION WITH RIDGE ROAD PURSUANT TO SECTION
15.1-482. CODE OF VIRGINIA. APPROVED
There was no public input.
Upon motion made by W. Harrington smith, seconded by Robert
M. Sager, and passed by the fOllowing recorded vote, the above
ordinance was approved:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
MR. RILEY EXPLAINED THAT THE POLICE COMMISSION MEETINGS
HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED AND FINAL REPORT WILL BE FORTHCOMING
VERY SOON
STAFF ACTIVITY REPORT - MAY 16-31. 1992 - ACCEPTED AS
INFORMATION
COMMITTEE REPORTS:
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION REPORT - APPROVED UNDER
CONSENT AGENDA
The Parks and Recreation Commission met on May 19, 1992.
Members present were: James Robinson, Charles sandy, Carmen Rio,
Jimmie Ellington, Beverly Sherwood.
The following action was taken:
Submitted for Information only:
Request for Impact Funds from Apple RidQe Homeowners
Association
Mr. Sandy moved to table the request until the June meeting
to enable the staff to do further research regarding ADA
requirements, seconded by Mr. Rio, carried unanimously (4-0).
supplemental Request for SewaQe Disposal
Mr. Ellington moved that, after requesting that the
Frederick-Winchester Service Authority reduce their dumping fee
for waste from the Clearbrook pool site, the department request
additional funds needed to pump and haul waste from that site,
seconded by Mr. Sandy, carried unanimously (4-0). A letter has
een forwarded to the Frederick Winchester Service Authority,
655
and we are waiting for a response. No action required at this
time.
Potential Relocation of Warrior Road
Mr. Ellington moved that the Commission endorse the plan
proposed by the Planning Commission to investigate the reloca-
tion of Warrior Road through the northwest portion of Sherando
Park and to acquire suitable property adjacent to the park as
part of the conversion, seconded by Mr. Sandy, carried unani-
mously (4-0).
JOINT MEETING OF CODE AND ORDINANCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
COURrS COMMITTEES
Mr. Riley presented this report.
A joint meeting of the Code and Ordinance and Law Enforce-
ment and Courts Committees was held on June 4, 1992, 8:30 A.M.,
Present were: W. Harrington Smith, Jr.; stephens G. Butler;
George W. Johnston, III; Mindy Schryver; Robert M. Sager; James
L. Longerbeam; Larry P. Coverstone and Sheriff Robert T.
williamson.
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., B.G. Wyatt were absent.
The committee submits the following:
Discussion of Adoptina State Traffic Code for Local Law
Enforcement Purposes
The Sheriff advised the preliminary research he conducted
concluded with the following points:
- The State Compensation Board wil1 continue current levels
of funding even if the county collects the additional
revenue.
- certain criminal charges by local law enforcement would
require local funds to be spent for confinement in jail.
Currently the state pays for confinement.
The committees recommended that the code amendments be
advertised for public hearing and that the subcommittee composed
of steve Butler, George Johnston and Larry Ambrogi research
Title 46.2 to determine which sections should be deleted from
local enforcement.
Mr. Riley presented this information to the Board.
Mrs. Sherwood asked how the State Police would be involved
in this and would they still be ticketing.
Mr. Riley replied, yes, and if the charge was under state
code then the funds would go to Richmond.
656
Mr. Riley explained that they had asked the Sheriff what
kind of revenue could the county have expected since January 1,
if these funds had come back to the county. He further explain-
ed that this information has not been provided as of this date.
Mr. Dick stated that he would like to see at least one of
the four board members serving on this subcommittee.
Mr. Sager stated that he would also like to know what
impact this would have on the county as well as the state and
the Literary Fund if we decided to approve this request.
Mrs. Sherwood stated that she was not in agreement,
particularly with this concept at all, and I have expressed that
publicly. Part of this reasoning comes from the disproportioned
amount of dollars that you are seeing in communities that are
doing this. She further explained that her fear was that there
would be some thrust to putting more personnel, that should be
investigating, onto traffic control in the county.
Mr. smith stated that he disagreed with her statement. He
does not agree with the statement about the quota system.
Upon motion made by Beverly J. Sherwood, seconded by James
L. Longerbeam, and passed by the following recorded vote the
above matter was tabled for further study.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
w. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Nay
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles w. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
Establishment of Joint Judicial Center Security
The County Administrator requested that the Law Enforcement
and Courts Committee meet with the City's Public Safety Commit-
tee to discuss security of the Joint Judicial Center. Security
matters discussed concern after hours security of the building,
courtroom security and prisoner security while court is in
session.
Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by W.
arrington Smith, Jr., and passed by the following recorded vote
the above request by the County Administrator was approved:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
657
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
AIRPORT AGREEMENT
Mr. Riley made the following statement: At a recent City
Council Meeting reference was made to the airport funding, and
he would like to set the record straight. The airport 90-91
deficit was approximately $89,000. The county's half of this
amount is currently being processed and will be paid next week
during our regular bill cycle. The county needed to confer with
the fiscal agents auditor that this amount was correct before
our payment was submitted. The county's half of this is $44,500
which will be paid as I just said. The county is now fiscal
agent for the airport. When the fiscal year is ended on June
30, 1992, the county will determine what the deficit is at the
airport, and our share is budgeted to be paid and the City will
be sent a bill for their half of the 91-92 deficit, not one-
third, two thirds. In 92-93 there is a budgeted deficit based
on the budget that has been submitted by the airport. The
county's half of 92-93 has been budgeted, and we assume the City
will pay their half of the bill when it is due at the end of the
next fiscal year. That is what is stated in the agreement.
BOARD RETIRED INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Upon motion made by W. Harrington Smith, Jr., seconded by
James L. Longerbeam, and passed by the following recorded vote,
the Board retired into Executive Session in accordance with the
Code of Virqinia, 1950 as amended, section 2.1-344,(a)-1 and 6
to discuss acquisition of property and personnel.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
BOARD WITHDREW FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, Seconded by W.
Harrington Smith, Jr., and passed by the following recorded
vote, the Board withdrew from executive session:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
658
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
BOARD RECONVENED TO REGULAR SESSION
Upon motion made by Charles W. Orndoff, seconded by W.
Harrington smith, Jr., and passed by the following recorded vote
the board reconvened into regular session:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
EVALUATIONS OF STEPHEN OWEN. ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRA-
TOR. AND MIKE DIDAWICK. DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT. APPROVED AS
PRESENTED
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by
Beverly J. Sherwood, and passed by the following recorded vote,
the evaluations of Stephen Owen and Mike Didawick were approved:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
REQUEST FROM PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR. JAMES DORAN TO
FILL A VACANT ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT POSITION IN HIS
DEPARTMENT APPROVED
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by
Beverly J. Sherwood and passed by the following recorded vote
the board authorized the filling of a vacant administrative
assistant position in the Parks and Recreation Department:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
REOUEST FROM TREASURER. C. W. ORNDOFF. JR.. TO FILL VACANT
POSITION IN HIS DEPARTMENT - APPROVED
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by
Beverly J. Sherwood and passed by the following recorded vote
the board authorized the filling of the Accountant II position
in the Treasurer's office.
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
659
BOARD DISCUSSED NOTHING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION OTHER THEN
WHAT WAS STATED AS NEED FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION
Upon motion made by Robert M. Sager, seconded by James L.
Longerbeam and passed by the following recorded vote, nothing
was discussed in executive session other then what was stated as
the reason for requesting executive session:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT
Mr. Owen noted that there was still one item on the Person-
nel Committee report that needed board action.
REOUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
The Committee received a request for a supplemental appro-
priation in the amount of $2000 for part-time clerical help in
the Planning and Development Department. The workload in the
department has become backlogged due to the increased burden on
the staff to assist the public with questions and information
regarding the new address system. The Committee recommends
approval of this request.
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by
Beverly J. Sherwood and passed by the following recorded vote
the above request from the Planning Department was approved:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
BOARD APPROVES PURCHASING 4.9 ACRES FROM NEWMAN SISK NEXT
TO THE FREDERICK COUNTY LANDFILL FOR A PURCHASE PRICE OF
$55.000
Upon motion made by James L. Longerbeam, seconded by W.
Harrington Smith, Jr. and passed by the following recorded vote
the board approved the purchasing of approximately 4.9 acres
from Newman sisk in the amount of $55,000 for expansion of the
Frederick County Landfill:
Richard G. Dick - Aye
W. Harrington Smith, Jr. - Aye
James L. Longerbeam - Aye
Robert M. Sager - Aye
660
Beverly J. Sherwood - Aye
Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. - Aye
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ADJOURNED .
--
---""\