HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 12, 1979178
A Regular Meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Frederick, Virginia, was held on the 12th day of September, 1979, in
the Board of Supervisors' Meeting Room, 9 Court Square, Winchester,
Virginia.
PRESENT: S. Roger Koontz, Chairman; Thomas B. Rosenberger,
Vice Chairman; Dr. Raymond L. Fish; Will L. Owings; R. Thomas Malcolm;
and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
ABSENT: None
CALL TO ORDER
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
INVOCATION
The invocation was delivered by the Reverend David Knight of the
Christ Episcopal Church.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Upon motion made by Will L. Owings and seconded by R. Thomas
Malcolm,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Frederick, Virginia, does herein approve the minutes of the Regular
Meeting held on August 22, 1979 and the Special Meeting held on August
31, 1979, as submitted.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote:
Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Thomas.B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish,
Will L. Owings, R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION - $403,261 - CONSTRUCTION OF NEW
SENIOR HIGH SCHHOL - APPROVED
Mr. Rosenberger stated that the final cost of the new high school
has been determined and there would be no additional estimates or guess
work. He stated that he felt the study of the cost factor of this
school has been as great as any public building in Frederick County.
Mr. Renalds then presented the following cost breakdown as submitted
by the School Board and the Contractor:
JAMES WOOD HIGH SCHOOL - APPLE PIE RIDGE CAMPUS
General Conditions and Supervision
Excavation and Site Work
Concrete Work
Structural Steel and Miscellaneous Metals
Masonry Work including Architectural Concrete,
Wall Insulation, etc.
Roofing, Waterproofing & Roof Insulation
Carpentry and Millwork
Hollow Metal, Hardware, Special Doors, Windows
and Glass
Painting and Caulking
Floor Covering and Floor Finishes
Ceiling Finishes
Elevator
Plumbing
Heating, Ventilating & Air Conditioning
Construction at Cost
5% Overhead & Profit (2% Overhead & 3% Gross Profit)
Bond
*Guaranteed Maximum Cost For Construction
*Architect $ Engineering Fee
Equipment Cost
TOTAL
*This Guaranteed Maximum Cost for Construction
is based on plans and other criteria:lthAt':wvll
provide for a complete structure in accordance
with plans and specifications as well as primary
roads, a secondary access road, and student
parking.
$ 313,815
930,443
514,665
491,544
863,126
423,238
393,805
142,922
120,200
259,188
124,185
17,545
390,157
1,290,562
$7,179,884
358,994
35,656
$7,574,534
378,727
750.000
$8,703,261
n
L J
I
•
•
11
179
Mr. Rosenberger stated that the Finance Committee is satisfied that
this final figure will provide the County with.a new, complete high school
and that it was the unamimous decision of the Finance Committee to approve
' the requested supplemental appropriation in the amount of $403,261.
Mr. Stiles stated that when the Board met with the School Board in
February, the additional funding needed was $423,000. He asked what
facilities would be included in the new figure of $403,261. Mr. Shockey
stated that the figure was less because there was more fill and cut then
had been anticipated and they were able to grade a large area to the north
to provide adequate recreational facilities for the physical education
• 1 classes; that this did not include the football stadium, track or tennis
courts but would provide an area for a baseball field.
Mr. Owings asked what the expected date of completion was and Mr.
Shockey replied that they are aiming for September of 1980.
Upon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger and seconded by Dr. Raymond
L. Fish,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that a
supplemental appropriation in the amount of $403,261 is hereby approved
• for the construction of the new senior high school, said funds to be
transferred from the General Revenue Fund to the School Debt & Construction
Fund when needed to complete the project.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote:
Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will
L. Owings, R. Thomas Malcolm and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
RESOLUTION - $1,500,000 SCHOOL BOND ISSUE - APPROVED
Dr. Melton Wright, School Superintendent, appeared before the Board
and stated that the same format, procedure and documents must be submitted
for the upcoming bond issue as have been done in the past. He stated that
0 11 the State Treasurer has indicated that he expects the interest rate will
L. Fish,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY,
VIRGINIA:
1. It is hereby determined to be necessary and expedient for
come in in
the general
area of
the
previous issue.
contracting a debt
in the amount of
One Million
Upon
motion made
by Thomas
B.
Rosenberger and
seconded by Dr.
Raymond
L. Fish,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY,
VIRGINIA:
1. It is hereby determined to be necessary and expedient for
Dollars ($1,500,000), issuing its school bonds therefore and selling
the same to the Virginia Public School Authority, a state agency prescribed
by the General Assembly pursuant to Article VII, Section 10(b) of the
Constitution of Virginia.
2. It is hereby determined to be in the best interest of Frederick
County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority to
' purchase the bonds at a rate of interest which will produce a differential
of not more than 1 /10 if 1% over the net interest cost to the Authority
on the bonds which it will sell to provide the necessary funds to purchase
the County's bonds, provided that the offer of the Virginia Public
School Authority shall not be finally accepted and the bonds shall not
Frederick County to
finance capital
projects for
public schools by
•
contracting a debt
in the amount of
One Million
Five Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($1,500,000), issuing its school bonds therefore and selling
the same to the Virginia Public School Authority, a state agency prescribed
by the General Assembly pursuant to Article VII, Section 10(b) of the
Constitution of Virginia.
2. It is hereby determined to be in the best interest of Frederick
County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority to
' purchase the bonds at a rate of interest which will produce a differential
of not more than 1 /10 if 1% over the net interest cost to the Authority
on the bonds which it will sell to provide the necessary funds to purchase
the County's bonds, provided that the offer of the Virginia Public
School Authority shall not be finally accepted and the bonds shall not
180
be awarded [until; the Board of 'Supervisors shall have �approved� ]the rate ,
of interest, as finally determined, which the bonds are to bear.
3. The bonds shall be dated June 15, 1979, shall be designated
"School Bonds, Series of 1979B," shall mature in numerical order in
installments of $75,000 on December 15 in each of the years 1980 to 1999,
inclusive, without option of prior redemption and shall bear interest payable
semiannually on June 15 and December 15 at such rate as may be determined
prior to their sale.
4. At the request of the Virginia Public School Authortiy the bonds
shall be issued initially as fully registered bonds without coupons, with
one bond being issued for each maturity, numbered R -1 to R -20, inclusive.
Principal and interest on the bonds shall be payable in lawfull money of
the United States of America at ;.the:principailoff ice of .'United .Vi!rginia
Bank, Richmond, Virginia. The bonds shall be countersigned by its Clerk
and its seal shall be affixed thereto.
5. The fully registered bonds shall be in substantially the following
form:
No. R-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FREDERICK COUNTY
(FORM OF REGISTERED BOND)
School Bond, Series of 1979B
$75,000
Frederick County, Virginia, for value received, hereby acknowledges
itself indebted and promises to pay to the order of
VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
upon presentation and surrender hereof the principal sum of SEVENTY -FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000) on December 15, 19 , and to pay to the Virginia
Public School Authority interest from the date hereof to maturity at the
rate of - per cent ( %) per year, payable
semiannually on June 15 and December 15. Both principal of and interest
on this bond are payable in lawful money of the United States. of America
at the principal office of United Virginia Bank, Richmond, Virginia.
This bond is one of an issue of $1,500,000 School Bonds, Series of
1979B, of like date and tenor, except as to number and maturity, and is
issued pursuant to the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, including Article VII, Section 10(b) of the Constitution and
the Public Finance Act, as amended, to provide funds for financing capital
projects for public schools.
9his bond may be exchanged without cost at the principal office at
United Virginia Bank, Richmond, Virginia, for an equal.aggregate principal
amount of coupon bonds without privilege of registration, of the denomination
of $5,000 each, of the same maturity, bearing interest at the same rate and
having attached thereto coupons representative all unpaid interest due
or to become due thereon.
The full faith and credit of Frederick County are hereby irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of and interest on this bond.
•
•
•
•
181
All acts, conditions-and things required by the Constitution and
statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed
precedent to and in the issuance of this bond have happened, exist and have
been performed, and the issue of bonds of which this bond is one, together
with all other indebtedness of Frederick County., is within every debt
and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County,
•
Virginia, has.caused this bond to be signed by its Chairman, to be
countersigned by its Clerk, its seal to be affixed hereto, and this bond
to be dated June 15, 1979.
COUNTERSIGNED:
----------------------- - - - - -( SEAL ) ----- ------ ------------- - - - - --
Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors
of Frederick County, of Frederick County,
Virginia Virginia
6. Fully registered bonds without coupons may be exchanged at
•
•
I�
•
the expense of the County at the principal office of United Virginia
Bank, Richmond, Virginia, for an equal aggregate principal amount of
coupon bonds without privilege of registration, of the denomination
of $5,000 each, appropriately numbered, of the same maturities,
hearing interest at the same rate and having attached thereto coupons
representing all unpaid interest due or to become due thereon. Upon
request of the Virginia Public School Authority, the County shall execute
and deliver as soon as practicable coupon bonds in exchange for fully
registered bonds. All fully registered bonds surrendered in any such
exchange shall be cancelled.
7. Principal and interest on the coupon bonds shall be payable
in lawful money of the United States of America at the principal office
of United Virginia Bank, Richmond, Virginia. The bonds shall be signed
by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors, shall be countersigned by its Clerk and its seal shall be
affixed thereto or a facsimile thereof printed thereon. The coupons
attached to the bonds shall be authenticated by the facsimile signature
of the Chairman and Clerk.
8. The coupon bonds and the coupons attached thereto shall be in
substantially the following form:
(FORM OF COUPON BOND)
No-.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
FREDERICK COUNTY
School Bond, Series of 1979B
$5,000
Frederick County, Virginia, for value received, hereby acknowledges
itself indebted and promises to pay tb bearer upon presentation and
surrender hereof the principal sum of
182
FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000)
on December 15, 19 and to pay interest thereon from the date hereof
to maturity at the rate of per cent ( %) per year,
payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15 upon presentation and
surrender of the attached coupons as they become due. Both principal of
and interest on this bond are payable in lawful money of the United States
of America, at the principal office of United Virginia Bank, lZichmond,
Virginia.
The bond is one of an issue of $1,500,000 School Bonds, Series of
1979B, of like date and tenor, except as to number and maturity, and is
issued pursuant to the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, including Article VII, Section 10(b) of the Constitution and
the Public Finance Act, as amended, to provide funds for financing capital
projects for public schools.
The full faith and credit of Frederick County are hereby irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of and interest on this bond.
All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and
statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed
precedent to and in the issuance of this bond have happened, exist and have
been performed, and the issue of bonds of which this bond is one, together
with all other indebtedness of Frederick County, is within every debt and
other limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth
of Virginia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County,
Virginia, has caused this bond to be signed by the manual or facsimile
signature of its Chairman, to be countersigned by its Clerk, its seal to
be affixed hereto or a facsimile thereof printed hereon, the attached
interest coupons to be authenticated by the facsimile signature of its
Chairman and Clerk, and this bond to be dated June 15, 1979.
COUNTERSIGNED
Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors
of Frederick County, of Frederick County,
Virginia Virginia
9. The full faith and credit of Frederick County are hereby irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of and interest on the bonds. There
shall be levied and collected annually on all taxable property in the County
and ad valorem tax over and above all other taxes authorized or limited by
law sufficient to pay such principal and interest as the same respectively
become due and payable.
10. After the bonds have been awarded, the Chairman and the Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors are hereby authorized and directed to take
all proper steps to have the bonds prepared and executed in accordance with
their terms and to deliver.the bonds to the Treasurer of Virginia on behalf
of the Virginia Public School Authority upon payment therefor.
11. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized and
directed to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be delivered
forthwith to the Clerk of the County School Board of Frederick County. The
bonds hereby authorized shall not be issued until the County School Board
1
J
•
•
J
•
183
J
n
U
r
•
shall have adopted an appropriate resolution consenting to the issuance
of the bonds.
12. Such officers of Frederick County as may be requested are
hereby authorized and2 directedLto ;execute__an__appropriate certificate setting
forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the bonds issued .
pursuant hereto in order to show that such expected use and investment will
not violate the provisions of Section 103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954, as amended, and regulations issued pursuant thereto, applicable
to "arbitrage bonds." Such certificate shall be in such form as may be
requested by bond counsel for the County.
13. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized and
directed to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be filed forthwith
with the Circuit Court of Frederick County and within ten days thereafter
to cause to be published once in a newspaper having general circulation in
the County a notice setting forth (1) in brief and general terms the
purpose for which the bonds are to be issued and (2) the amount of such
bonds.
14. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
15. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote:
Aye - S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will
L. Owings, R. Thomas Malcolm and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
RIDGEFIELD SUBDIVISION, SECTION II - OPEOUON DISTRICT - APPROVED
Mr. John Riley presented the plat of Ridgefield Subdivision, Section
is
II stating that it included 53 lots in the Opequon Magisterial District
and that all.approvals have been received. He advised that he had received
this date some recommendations from the Highway Department setting forth
some erosion control which he felt could be handled administratively through
the staff.
Mr. Harry F. Stimpson, Jr. and his attorney, Mr. William A. Johnston
appeared before the Board and stated that they could see no problems with
the recommendations from the Highway Department.
Mr. Koontz asked if this property had been included in the survey con-
ducted by the Sanitation Authority regardingL: theccapacity :
Mr. Stimpson advised that it had been and he had signed a contract in 1974
for 165 connections; that Section I contained 49 lots and this section will
contain 53 lots.
Lyon motion made by Will L. Owings and seconded by Kenneth Y. Stiles,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederi
Virginia, does herein approve Ridgefield Subdivision, Section II, containing
53 lots located off Route 277 in the Opequon Magisterial District.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
18,4
SITE PLAN - C. EDWARD SHIRLEY - STONEWALL DISTRICT - APP
Mr. John Riley presented the site plan of C. Edward Shirley and
stated that all approvals had been received and the Planning Commission
unanimously recommended approval of said plan. He advised that regarding
the request of the Highway Department, the Planning Commission felt it
was too much of an economic burden to put in a standard commercial entrance
for that particular site and recommended gravel and the smoothing down of
the dirt pile at this location.
Dr. Fish asked if the construction of the new building proposed on the
site plan would permit Mr. Shirley to remove the spare parts located on his
property and Mr. Shirley replied that it would and everything would then
be under cover.
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by Thomas B. Rosen-
berger,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick;
Virginia, does herein approve Site Plan No. 010 -79 of C. Edward Shirley for
the construction of a new building for working on equipment on his property
located northwest on U. S. Highway 11, about 3.5 miles north of Winchester,
Virginia, in the Stonewall Magisterial District, with the stipulation that
the entrance to the property be graveled and the dirt pile at this location
smoothed down as recommended by the Planning Commission.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
SITE PLAN NO. 018 -79 - BULBS INTERNATIONAL - STONEWALL DISTRICT -
rnnn�s,v n
Mr. Riley presented the site.plan of Bulbs International and stated
that the changes as recommended by the reviewing agencies had been made
as requested.
There followed a brief discussion regarding the contract between Mr. Arty
Judd the applicant, and Mr. Thomas Gilpin, the owner of the property wherein
Mr. Judd had contracted to buy the entire five acre tract but would develop
only 2 1/2 acres with the stipulation that if said tract can be subdivided
into two 2 1/2 acre tracts within the next seven years, Mr. Gilpin would
have the right to purchase the remaining 2 1/2 acres. Mr. Judd advised that
he had discussed this contract with his attorney and is satisfied with the
provisions set forth therein.
Mr. Stiles expressed concern with this arrangment and stated that it
appeared that this was a scheme to avoid the planning and subdivision
ordinances. He stated that he felt the proper procedure would be for the
individuals to apply for subdivision of the property and then submit a site
plan for each parcel.
Mr. Malcolm asked if the Planning Commission was satisfied with the
legal posture of this situation and Mr. Riley replied that they were inasmuch
as it is a five acre tract.
•
U
E
•
I
185
Mr. Stiles then asked when the Sanitation Authority would be able to
I
provide services to this area and whether or not the developer would be
required to hook onto said service. Mr. James Diehl, Chairman of the
Frederick County Sanitation Authority, stated that the target date for
services in this area is next spring and'they would be required to hook
onto the service. Mr. Judd stated that he0desired to hook onto the
service and this had been discussed.
The submission of a more detailed master plan for this park was dis-
•
cussed as well as the deed covenants set forth for the park. Mr. Gilpin
stated that they would be happy to try to refine the plan but did not want
to be so restrictive as to prevent a large industry from locating in the
park.
Mr. Malcolm stated that he felt it should be noted that the Board has
•
requested a.more detailed master plan and that this plan should be filed
so that problems might be avoided in the future regarding the overall
development of this park.
Mr. Thomas B. Rosenberger asked if the residential area shown on the
prior plat had been removed and Mr. Tyson Gilpin stated that this had been
discussed but.it has not yet been determined which type development would
be most feasible for this area.
Mr. Stiles stated that a`.large part .'of. -this ;area is .very 'wet. -He then
•
•
asked Mr. Judd how much traffic would be generated by his proposed business
and Mr. Judd stated that there would be very little traffic inasmuch as their
deliveries are made by UPS daily and.there would be only two or three
employees. He then explained the business and the products he would be
dealing with stating that they would be primarily replacement parts such
as lamps,.horns, etc. for motorcycles.
Mr. Stiles expressed concern regarding the potential traffic hazard
which would be created at the intersection of Welltown Pike and Route 11 wh
all 500 acres in this area are developed. He stated that eventually Well -
town Pike may have to be widened to provide access. He asked if the
developers were prepared to do this and Mr. Gilpin replied that they would
certainly 'try to apply for industrial access funds and that it was his
understanding that they would be responsible for the roadways from their
property to the state road and then it became the state's responsibility.
He added that he had discussed this matter with Mr. King and had been
advised that they are in the process of..getting a traffic count on this
road at the present time; that the 1979 count for Welltown Pike was 1900
cars per day whereas the count to Mr. Stine's property was 3200 cars per
day.
Mr. Stiles stated that he would move to approve this site plan but
he did not like the procedure which was being followed in this development;
that he felt it should be subdivided first and then site plans submitted.
Mr. Rosenberger seconded the motion stating that he had asked Mr. King to
put this road into the six year plan and Mr. King had advised that he did
not think it was necessary.
■ i
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by Thomas B. Rosen-
berger,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick,
Virginia, does herein approve Site Plan No. 018 -79 of Bulbs International to
construct an office and storage building 85' x 60' with 9 parking spaces,
landscaping and access to the site from Lenoir Drive on their property locat
on Lenoir Drive in the Stonewall Magisterial District.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
FINANCE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Mr. Rosenberger presented the Finance Committee recommendations and the
following action was taken:
TE OFF OF OVERPAYMENT OF SALES TAXES TO STEPHENS CITY AND MIDDLETOWN -
A!l[ILT
Upon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger and seconded by Dr. Raymond
L. Fish,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that
whereas.Local Sales Tax transmittals to the towns of Middletown and Stephens
City have been made according to distribution formulas which had not been
updated as required; and,
WHEREAS, This resulted in overpayments to the above referenced towns
in the amount of $7,859.45 to Stephens City and $3,281.64 to Middletown; and,
WHEREAS,the distribution formulas have been corrected as of January 1,
1978,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisor
that the County does herein absolve the towns of Middletown and Stephens City
from repaying the proceeds of Local Sales Tax distributed to-them in error by
the County of Frederick as set forth above.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
- $2,250 BUILDING RENTAL FEE
Upon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger and seconded by Kenneth Y.
Stiles,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that a
building rental fee for housing the Commonwealth Attorney's office is
hereby approved in the amount of $250.00 per month effective October 1, 1979;
and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,.That a transfer from the Reserve for Contingenci
account is hereby authorized in the amount of $2,250.00.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
FROM CONTINGENCIES TO ADJUST TWO SALARIES IN
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND THE ADDITION OF ONE POSITION EACH TO THE
•
•
•
r
FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT - APPROVED
187
•
E
n
LJ
u
Upon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger and seconded by Dr. Raymond
L. Fish,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that
the following appropriation transfers from the Reserve for Contingencies
account are hereby authorized in order to adjust the salaries of two
positions within the Sheriff's Department, retroactive to July 1, 1979,
and to add one position each to the Finance Department and Data Processing
Department:
01- 01DO -110E
Compensation of Account Clerk II
$ 6,301.00
01- 01DO -221A
Schools and Training
115.00
01- 01DO -319A
Office Supplies
24.00
01- 01DO -403A
Furniture and Fixtures
685.00
01- 01D0 -405A
Office Equipment
375.00
01- 01FO -110F
Compensation of Programmer
6,622.00
06- 06AO -11OJ
Compensation of Sergeant
427.00
06 -06AO -1105
Compensation of Sergeant
413.00
TOTAL $14,962.00
Mr. James Boyd advised that the two positions requested by the Finance
Department and the Data Processing Department were necessary inasmuch as the
entire accounting system had to be revamped according to state mandate and
the present staff in these departments is not adequate to accomplish this
requirement.
SALARY ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR - APPROVED
Mr. Rosenberger stated that the Finance Committee recommended a salary
adjustment for the assistant registrar and that at such time as the condit
of the General Registrar is known this matter would be reevaluated.
Leon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger and seconded by Dr. Raymond
L. Fish,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that the
salary of the Assistant Registrar is hereby authorized at $32.00 per day
effective October 1, 1979; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the County Administrator is hereby
authorized to make the necessary appropriation transfers within the 1979-
1980 budget of the Board of Elections to effect the above rate.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
APPOINTMENTS TO THE REGIONAL LIBRARY BOARD - DISCUSSED
The Board discussed the appointments to the Regional Library Board and
agreed that nominations to the Board should be given to the Board's Library
Committee members,.Mr. Rosenberger and Dr. Fish, for consideration and recom
mendation to the Board. The Board also agreed that the terms of the members
of the Regional Library Board should be staggered. Mr. Koontz stated that
he hoped these appointments could be made in October.
TION PE MEMBERSHIP ON THE
- DENIED
RTSY. k
Dr. Fish stated that the resolution permitting expansion of the Fred-
erick County School Board to seven members had been under consideration for
ff i PROLO
some time by the Board and he felt it was very important and would have
far - reaching ramifications. He stated that he felt it was possibly one of
the most important things this Board could do during their term of office.
Dr. Fish stated that he felt this expansion would give the people of the
County a greater voice in the school system which he felt was needed; it
would improve the relationship between the School Board and the Board
of Supervisors; that it would give the School Board a better opportunity
to express themselves and to gain some further credibility in the County
and with the Board. He added that he felt it was imperative that this
resolution be passed for these reasons. Dr. Fish then requested that the
Chairman and Mr. Malcolm abstain from voting on this issue as they did on
the appointment of the school board member in the recent past due to the
possible questions of bias they might have in this matter.
Ms. Rosenberger stated that he too felt this was a most important reso-
lution and would be good for the County; that he felt it would put the people
in closer contact with the Board of Supervisors and the School Board. He
added that he felt the County was large enough now to require seven members
on the School Board.
Mr. Owings.stated that he agreed with Dr. Fish that this was one of the
most important decisions the Board would make and since it is that important
and the matter as to whether or not two members of the Board may vote is in
litigation, he felt nothing should be done until this particular question
has been determined by the Court. Mr. Owings added that he was not satisfied
that 1/3 of the members of the Board could not participate in a matter of such
importance.
Dr. Fish stated that Mr. Owings had assured him he would vote for this if
it were held up and Mr. Owings stated that the matter of whether or not two
members could vote on the issue was not in litigation at that time; that he
felt the matter should not be brought up until such time as the matter is
settled.
Dr. Fish stated that it seemed to him that because of all this con
it would be all the more important to get the matter settled and if the Board
does not make a decision while they have the opportunity. He added that he
felt they were failing to exercise their opportunity to improve the situation
and would be remiss in their job.
Mr. Owings replied that he could not vote on this issue when it has not
been determined whether or not 1/3 of the Board is eligible to vote.
Mr. Stiles stated that he was very;suppor.tive of`.this.res6lution
talked to a great many people about it and the overwhelming majority are in
favor of this course of action as a means of increasing communications and
participation between the School Board, the public and the Board of Super-
visors. He stated that in the matter of whether or not Mr. Malcolm and Mr.
Koontz may vote on this issue, every officiallle gal .opinion -- .receiued , tstated : t
that they may not vote. He added that both of these members knew of this
situation before they ran for office and are in possession of both opinions
received, one in 1975 and the other last spring. Mr. Stiles stated that it
•
•
•
•
n
IJ
•
n
LJ
r1
LJ
may take two to three years to resolve this matter in Court. He added that
he felt this situation was comparable to the expansion of the Board of
Supervisors when the Chairman at Large was added and he felt this had
worked out very well in his opinion and to not do the same thing in this
case is to say that it would not serve the County well to have an at Large
Chairman.
Dr. Fish stated that the reason he ran for the Board of Supervisors
was because he felt the average taxpayer in Frederick County did not have
much voice in this government, particularly the running of the school
system. He stated that many people feel intimidated about going to the
School Board with problems and he felt this was one way to relieve this
feeling.
Mr. Malcolm stated that he felt this whole matter'.had" political : ramifi-
cations and it would appear obvious that this is to take advantage of the
situation that surrounds the current court case. He suggested that the
matter be delayed until after the election in November if everyone is
really interested in accountability. He stated that he felt it was para-
mount to establish that at the time of the last appointment to the School
Board seven names were submitted but only one was publicly discussed.
Mr. Malcolm pointed out that should the matter be voted upon, it
would be the vote of four people and not six and would not provide for
much countywide representation when you consider the appointment which
has just been made and the one which will soon be made.
Mr. Malcolm stated that he questioned the wisdom of the full Board
knowingly and willfully excluding 1/3 of its membership in something of this
importance. He stated that he was not sure it would be wide to have more
appointed school board members than elected governing body members. He
stated that he and Mr. Koontz were aware of the opinions received when they
ran for office, but he would point out that they were just that, opinions,
and one changed in a very short period of time and that the matter would
have to be resolved through the legal process. He stated that throughout
the state only 458 of the school systems have at large members or are
larger than the elected governing body. He added that he hoped that the
Board would want to find out where we stand legally on this question and not
rush to take advantage of the situation because at this time 1/3 of the
membership of the Board is being held in abeyance.
Mr. Stiles replied that 1/3 of the membership is holding itself in
abeyance and as far as the school board membership being larger than the
governing body, this is the case with the Planning Commission so perhaps
the membership on that body should be reduced. He added that insofar as
only 458 of the school systems having this method, it has only been six
or seven.years that this method was possible and the trend is clearly in
this direction. Mr. Stiles stated that as far as the people in Mr. Malcolm'
district being disadvantaged, the referendum was passed 2 to 1 in his
district regarding appointment of the school board. He stated that there
1<
190
is no conflict in any of the opinions received.
Mr. Rosenberger stated that he felt the Board should vote for what
is best for the children and not on politics in this issue and that his
vote would be motivated only by his concern for what is best for the school
system and the people in the County.
Mr. Koontz stated that he felt this was a very good point and that
he could find nothing which states 'more is better'; that it is the quality
of the membership and not the number. He stated that he felt this matter
was motivated for other than the improvement of education and therefore
he could not support this resolution. He stated that he was extremely
disappointed to hear references made by members politicking and getting
promises. He added that he had never approached any of the Board members
to get a vote on any issue.
Mr. Rosenberger stated that the last time the Board voted on the
school proposition, the Chairman had called and asked him to second the
motion and Mr. Koontz stated that this was correct but he had never
brought any pressure upon Board members.
Dr. Fish stated that he felt the Chairman was treading on extemely
dangerous ground when he makes statements such as the one made tonight. He
added that if the Chairman felt there was any other motivation in this
matter other than the improvement of the educational system and the tax-
payers, he would challenge him to state what that motivation is.
The Chairman replied that this was his opinion and he would vote
accordingly.
Dr. Fish stated that he would respectifully suggest that what this
business of government and this Board of Supervisors is all about is fairness
to its members and fairness to the people who put them there.
Mr. Stiles stated that he totally rejected the idea that this matter was
motivated for other than concern for improving the school system in Frederick
County and anyone who felt otherwise should so state.
Mrs. Madge Wade, President of the Frederick County Education Association,
appeared before the Board and stated that the teachers in the County are
neither for or against this resolution and it appears that what is being done
in an attempt to railroad the motion in. She - s urged the Board - to;delay - this ;•
matter until after the election so that there could be accountability to the
people and the current litigation is resolved.
Dr. Fish stated that he felt the sooner it was done, the better and he
did not feel this responsibility should be pushed off onto the next Board.
i
Mr. Stiles stated that to delay decisions because of an upcoming election
I
was shirking the duties of office and all supervisors should serve their
entire four year term. He added that he felt this matter had been delayed
too long already.
Mrs. Wade stated that she i would prefer and felt a lot of other people
would also prefer, that this matter be decided by the new Board. She asked
that the Board find out how the people felt and let them decide.
•
•
•
•
i
191
Mr. Stiles stated that before he voted he would make note that the
conflict of interest act has two separate penalties, one for violating the
conflict of interest act and secondly for knowingly violating the conflict
of interest act.
Upon motion made by Dr. Raymond L. Fish and seconded by Thomas B.
Rosenberger,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of the County of Frederick,
•
•
Virginia, that the School Board be expanded to seven members by adding two
members from the county at large; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That these two at large members be appointed
to staggered terms in accordance with Section 22 -64 of the Code of Virginia,
1950 as amended.
The above resolution was denied by the following recorded vote: Aye -
Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Thomas B. Rosenberger and Kenneth Y. Stiles. Nay -
S. Roger Koontz, R. Thomas Malcolm, and Will L. Owings.
REQUEST THAT GORE TELEPHONE SERVICE AREA BE INCLUDED IN THE WINCHESTER
FREDERICK COUNTY EXCHANGE TO BE FORWARDED TO THE UNITED STATES DEPART-
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by Thomas B.
Rosenberger,
BE IT RESOLVED, By the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that
the Board does hereby request the United States Justice Department to
allow special consideration for the Gore telephone exchange area in
Frederick County, Virginia, to permit the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone
Company to expand its territory to serve the 294 telephones within this
service area in order that residents of the area might be able to have
local phone service within the confines of Frederick County; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board does request the State
F_ 1
LJ
Corporation Commission to take note of this problem and give consideration
to ordering transfers of these phones in the Gore Service area to
Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company and does further request that
any public hearings which might be held on this matter in relationship to
the Gore telephone exchange be held in the Winchester area rather than in
Richmond; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board does herein make note of the
U
fact that due to the Gore telephone exchange being excluded from the
Frederick County service area, the "911" Emergency Telephone System will
be delayed for approximately one year in the Gore service area after
implementation in the remainder of Frederick County.
The above resolution was passed by the following recorded vote: Aye-
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y. Stiles.
MONTHLY STAFF REPORT ACCEPTED
After review the monthly staff report was accepted.
INGELO FUNKHOUSER - TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT - APPROVED
NY. Renalds explained the request for temporary occupancy permit
for Mr. Angelo Funkhouser stating that this permit would be valid only un-
til such time as his application for conditional use permit can be process -I
192
ed. Mr. Malcolm stated that
way be an indication of what
use permit.
his permit be granted it would in no
will be on the conditional
Upon motion made by Kenneth Y. Stiles and seconded by Will L. Owings,
rBE:IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Frederick, Virginia, does herein grant a temporary occupancy permit to
Mr. Angelo Funkhouser to occupy his mobile home located at 112 Lee Avenue,
Winchester, Virginia, until such!time as his application for conditional
use permit can be processed.
The above resolution was palsed by the following recorded vote: Aye -
I
S. Roger Koontz, Thomas B. Rosenberger, Dr. Raymond L. Fish, Will L. Owings,
I
R. Thomas Malcolm, and Kenneth Y�. Stiles.
I
EVERETT EMERSON - REQUEST FOR AMENDED SITE PLAN - TABLED
Mr. Stiles stated that Mr. Everett Emerson had requested that his site
plan be amended to remove the requirement for ribbon in the fence around
his property. He stated that the other property owners had not been required
i
to meet this requirement and helfelt some of Mr. Emerson's problems had ariser
out of a misunderstanding with some of the staff members.
W. Stiles then moved to amend Mr. Emerson's site plan to remove the
requirement for ribbon in the fence around his property. This motion was
i
seconded by Mr. Rosenberger.
i
W. Malcolm moved to table this matter until such time as the request
i
is processed through proper channels. This motion was seconded by Will L.
Owings -and passed unanimously. j
Mr. Stiles requested Mr. Pangle, Public Works Director, to reply to
I
Mr. Emerson regarding this matter.
REPORT - INSPECTION OF AMOCO PLANT
Dr. Fish, Mr. Owings and Mi. Riley reported that they had toured the
Amoco Plant located in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin and had found it to be a
very clean and desirable industry. They described briefly the operation and
appearance of the plant.
DELINQUENT TAX LIST PRESENTED TO BOARD
Mrs. Dorothy Keckley, Treasurer, appeared before the Board and presented
the delinquent tax list and requested that it be returned to her as soon as
possible inasmuch as it must be filed in the Clerk's Office.
i
"911" EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM TO BE IN EFFECT BY JULY 1980
Mr. Renalds reported that the "911" Emergency Telephone System will be
in effect in the Frederick County area, other than Gore, by July 1980 and that
the Gore area would be served by July of 1981. Following a brief discussion
the Board directed that the fact that the Gore area would be one year later
receiving this service than the remainder of the County be added to the
resolution to the United States Department of Justice regarding inclusion
of this area in the C. & P. Telephone Company Service area.
11
J
•
11
193
FIRST AND SECOND READINGS
Mr. Renalds presented the following ordinances on first and second
reading:
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 017 -79 OF DENNY'S INC. ROUTE 7
BOX 81, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA, ZONED BUSINESS - GENERAL (B -2)
REQUESTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OFF PREMISE SIGN.
THIS PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED AS PROPERTY INDENTIFICATION NUMBER
55 (A) 34 AND IS IN STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
2. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE, CHAPTER 21,
ZONING, ADOPTED JULY 12, 1978, TO AMEND ARTICLE II, SECTION
21 -11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.
3. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PETITION NO. 010 -79 OF THE FREDERICK
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR RICHARD AND LEONA NICHOLSON,
ROUTE 1, BOX 184, WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA, REQUESTING THE 14
• ACRES ON BUFFLICK ROAD NOW ZONED BUSINESS - LIMITED (B -1) BE
REZONED AGRICULTURAL - GENERAL (A -2). THIS PROPERTY IS
DESIGNATED AS PROPERTY INDENTIFICATION NUMBER 64B (A) 38
AND IS LOCATED IN SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
BOARD RETIRES INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Upon motion made by R. Thomas Malcolm, seconded by Dr. Raymond L.'Fish
and passed unanimously, the Board retired into Executive Session in
accordance with Section 2.1 -344, Subsection (a) (1) of the Code of Virginia
of 1950 as amended to discuss personnel.
BOARD WITHDRAWS FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION
• Upon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger, seconded by Kenneth Y.
Stiles, and passed unanimously, the Board withdrew from Executive Session.
BOARD RECONVENES INTO REGULAR SESSION
Upon motion made by Thomas B. Rosenberger, seconded by Kenneth Y. Stilei
and passed unanimously, the Board reconvened into Regular Session.
Mr. Malcolm stated that the Board had discussed personnel in Executive
Session and anticipated appointing Mr. Stanley Pangle, Public Works Director
as interim county administrator on September 26, 1979. He stated that in
preparation we are asking Mr. Renalds to work with Mr. Pangle prior to that
time relative to his functions as interim county administrator.
• 7PPOINTMENTS TO BOARD OF ASSESSORS DISCUSSED
II W. Stiles asked what the status on the appointment of the assessors
was and Mr. Renalds, advised that he had had no further word from the
judge on this matter. Mr. Koontz stated that he would check into this
matter.
UPON MOTION DULY MADE, SECONDED, AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, IT IS
ORDERED THAT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DO NOW ADJOURN.
• 0 3 - 1 - til (��.
Chaff man, oafd of pervis rs
1
,-
upervis